Hunt revealed on ESPN’s Sunday NFL Countdownthat the league never interviewed him regarding the incident. TMZ posted video Friday of Hunt shoving and kicking a woman in a Cleveland hotel in February.
This article will be updated to provide more information on this story as it becomes available.
Get the best sports content from the web and social in thenew B/R app. Get the app and get the game.
Report: NFL Investigating 2nd Incident in Which Hunt Punched a Man
via ProFootballTalk
Report: ‘No Chance’ Hunt Gets Claimed Off Waivers
via Bleacher Report
Hunt Admits Lying to Chiefs About Altercation
via Bleacher Report
Report: NFL Didn’t Interview Hunt During Investigation
Kiev, Ukraine – Ukraine’s President Petro Poroshenko has said Kiev is ready to hold talks with Russiain “the Normandy format” to de-escalate the conflict between the two countries in the Kerch Strait.
Poroshenko’s remark came on Sunday, a day after German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Russian President Vladimir Putin discussed the possibility of four-way talks between Ukraine, Russia, France and Germany at the G20 summit in Argentina.
The four countries form the “Normandy Four”, which was set up to resolve the conflict in eastern Ukraine involving Russian-backed rebels.
Poroshenko told the French broadcaster, France 24, that Merkel agreed to the proposal in his talks with the German leader.
“We will certainly take part in the meeting of the Normandy format at the level of political advisers, where we will raise the urgent question: the requirement for the Russian Federation to return our military, ships and open the Kerch Strait,” he said.
“We demand [from Russia]: stop violating international laws … [it] may have further consequences,” Poroshenko said.
He also said that Moscow “should withdraw its troops stationed on the Russian-Ukrainian border and remove a large number of warships from the Sea of Azov”.
Ukraine has also called on Germany and its allies to boost their naval presence in the Black Sea to deter Russia from further aggression in the region.
‘Russia has been rejecting talks’
Volodymyr Fesenko, director of the Penta Centre for Political Studies in Kiev, told Al Jazeera that Ukraine has always been in favour of negotiation.
“Russia is the one that has been rejecting it. Poroshenko tried to talk to him right after the incident in the Kerch Strait, Putin rejected it. Then, the foreign ministers of the Normandy format met in Berlin, but we are told the Russian side refused to discuss the Kerch situation,” he said.
“Now, it is clear why. Russia is blocking the talks since it is waiting for the end of the [March 31] presidential elections in Ukraine.”
He also said that without the Normandy format talks, there would be no Minsk Agreement “and at least partial implementation of those accords”.
“All serious questions have been resolved in the Normandy format only. Without mediators like Germany, there would have been no progress,” he said.
Oleksiy Haran, head of research at Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation, told Al Jazeera that Ukraine is unlikely to go for talks with Russia without a third party.
“Whenever we have bilateral talks, Russia violates it. There is no trust with Russia,” Haran said.
The rift between Russia and Ukraine intensified after Kiev ousted the Moscow-backed president, Viktor Yanukovich, in 2014.
It turned into a conflict following the Russian annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula and the seizure of Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the east by Russia-backed rebels the same year.
The conflict between the two neighbour states reached a new low last Sunday after the Russian border patrol blocked three Ukrainian military vessels from travelling from the Black Sea to the Sea of Azov through the Kerch Strait – the shared internal waters of both states according to a 2003 agreement.
On Saturday, Poroshenko, who believes Moscow wants to conquer the whole of Ukraine, said there were more than 80,000 Russian soldiers in and around his country
The Kremlin has accused the Ukrainian president of playing up the conflict with Moscow to secure electoral support in the upcoming presidential election.
Follow Al Jazeera’s Tamila Varshalomidze on Twitter: @tamila87v
The outcome from Saturday’s meeting between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping sets up a challenging time frame for China. | Nicolas Asfouri/AFP/Getty Images
The agreement doesn’t tackle tough issues; it simply delays dealing with them.
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina — They ate. They talked. They struck a temporary cease-fire to a trade war that has roiled relations for the past year.
Most of all, President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinpingpostponed the day of reckoning in U.S.-China trade relations for another three months.
Story Continued Below
That outcome from a much-anticipated dinner meeting between Trump and Xi in Buenos Aires on Saturday sets up an extremely challenging time frame for China to make the extensive structural changes that the U.S. has been demanding all year and that hard-liners in the Trump administration will undoubtedly seek during the coming talks.
“If Xi’s history is any judge, we will just see more of the same and no substantial changes,” said Scott Kennedy, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
The Chinese president has the authority to “drive a new wave of liberalization,” but may avoid taking steps that could risk threatening China’s economic order, Kennedy added.
Trump has imposed tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese goods since July after accusing Beijing of effectively subsidizing state-owned firms, forcing U.S. firms to hand over technology in order to do business there and tolerating outright intellectual property theft.
The cease-fire arrangement came with no public guarantee from China that it would address those issues.
At least one win for Trump would be if China carries through on its promise to resume buying soybeans and other farm products right away. The $110 billion in retaliatory tariffs imposed by China have hurt U.S. farmers particularly hard.
As part of the deal reached Saturday night, China agreed to buy “a very substantial amount of agricultural, energy, industrial, and other product from the United States to reduce the trade imbalance between our two countries,” White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. “China has agreed to start purchasing agricultural product from our farmers immediately.”
Other China watchers, however, said the news from the dinner amounted to the two countries kicking the can down the road. The official Chinese statement made no mention of specific products or dollar amounts it would buy.
“The obvious takeaway is we’ve gotten nowhere on conventional trade talks,” said Derek Scissors, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute who has provided advice to the administration on China policy.
For his part, Trump called the outcome of the meeting an “incredible deal.”
“China will be opening up. China will be getting rid of tariffs,” he told reporters aboard Air Force One after the meeting. “You know, China right now has major trade barriers — they’re major tariffs — and also major non-tariff barriers, which are brutal.”
The most immediate outcome from the agreement was a U.S. decision to delay tariff increases on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods that were scheduled to go into force on Jan. 1.
But to avoid those duties rising to 25 percent, from 10 percent currently, the two sides have reached agreement on an array of tough issues that have stymied them so far.
Trump has already set another 25 percent on another $50 billion of Chinese goods and threatened eventually to slap tariffs on all of China’s exports to the United States. Those totaled about $505 billion in 2017.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and other hard-liners in the administration believe China’s actions pose both an existential threat and an intentional grab at U.S. innovation in order for Beijing to dominate next-generation, high-tech sectors.
The main question many were asking was whether China would be able to commit to making any substantive changes to the U.S. complaints that justified the tariffs.
“We’re now eight months into this conflict. So why will the Chinese government move in 90 days when they didn’t [on Saturday]? What changes between now and then?” said Scott Lincicome, a trade attorney and adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute.
However, the Trump administration has shown an aversion to lengthy negotiations and has voiced particular concern about getting drawn into long, drawn-out talks with China that prove unsuccessful.
Dan DiMicco, a former trade adviser to the Trump campaign and transition official, said he doesn’t trust China to make “fundamental changes” without a stronger response from the U.S.
“They should have put the 25% tariffs in place and then negotiated….and that may still happen in 90 days. If [China does] as I believe and just stall, then we will see the final $270 billion get tariffs as well!” DiMicco, a former CEO of Nucor, one of the largest U.S. steel producers, said in an email.
One source speculated “the three Ms — Mueller, midterms and markets” may have prompted Trump to strike a deal that would restart agricultural and energy exports to China — referring to special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, the Republican loss of the House in last month’s elections and stock market losses over the past several months because of concerns stemming from the trade war.
Meanwhile, major U.S. business groups like the U.S.-China Business Council struck a hopeful tone that the 90-day cease-fire could result in a positive outcome on U.S. demands.
The group’s president, Craig Allen, applauded the decision to freeze the tariff increase but also called for a plan that would remove all the tariffs that countries have imposed on one another and make meaningful progress on the range of concerns the U.S. has raised.
Retailers were happy that Trump is not going forward with an action that would raise duties on everyday consumer items like mattresses, apparel items, paper goods and furniture. In addition, Trump’s threat to impose duties on all Chinese imports is on hold for at least another three months.
“Negotiators on both sides now have a reasonable 90-day window to achieve meaningful outcomes in key areas of concern affecting U.S. businesses, such as IP theft, forced technology transfer, and market access,” Myron Brilliant, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s head of international affairs, said in a statement.
“The hard work begins now,” he added.
Adam Behsudi reported from Washington and Andrew Restuccia reported from Air Force One. Ben White contributed reporting from New Jersey.
I don’t know what the scores should be with that last round. 10-8 for Wilder….but Fury won majority of the rounds. What do y’all think ??
George Foreman @GeorgeForeman
Wilder brought the fight all night. Fury did a great job “ShowTime”; but he didn’t Win tonight. Stop indoctrinating. We see what see
Le’Veon Bell @LeVeonBell
THAT WAS A GREAT FIGHT!!!!! ON EVERYTHING!!!
Dez Bryant @DezBryant
Joshua has to fight fury or wilder… none of Joshua other fights matter now… you have to respect both of those fighters tonight regardless of the outcome… no disrespect to Joshua but he’s the 3rd best heavyweight now until proven wrong
Julius Randle @J30_RANDLE
Idk how dude kept getting back up lol
Jeremy Lin @JLin7
Lesson of the Night: don’t judge a book by its cover. Fury’s legit. Boxing’s rigged. #WilderVsFury
I don’t know what the scores should be with that last round. 10-8 for Wilder….but Fury won majority of the rounds. What do y’all think ??
George Foreman @GeorgeForeman
Wilder brought the fight all night. Fury did a great job “ShowTime”; but he didn’t Win tonight. Stop indoctrinating. We see what see
Le’Veon Bell @LeVeonBell
THAT WAS A GREAT FIGHT!!!!! ON EVERYTHING!!!
Dez Bryant @DezBryant
Joshua has to fight fury or wilder… none of Joshua other fights matter now… you have to respect both of those fighters tonight regardless of the outcome… no disrespect to Joshua but he’s the 3rd best heavyweight now until proven wrong
Julius Randle @J30_RANDLE
Idk how dude kept getting back up lol
Jeremy Lin @JLin7
Lesson of the Night: don’t judge a book by its cover. Fury’s legit. Boxing’s rigged. #WilderVsFury
A record number of women have been elected in Bahrain’s elections in what officials say is a historic achievement that has broken the glass ceiling of representation in the country’s parliament.
By the election’s second and final round of voting on Sunday, a total of six women were voted in, doubling the number of female lawmakers in the tiny Gulf kingdom.
“The 2018 elections are historic for Bahrain,” Mohammed Al-Sayed, spokesperson for Citizens for Bahrain organisation, told Al Arabiya English news channel.
“We will certainly have more women in parliament, and this is a source of pride for all Bahrainis as we believe in equality and the important role played by Bahraini women in society and politics,” he continued.
Sawsan Kamal, Zainab Abdul Amir, Massoma Abdul Raheem and Kaltham Al Hayki joined Fawzia Zainal and Fatima Al Qatari, who were elected in the first round on November 24.
The total number of seats for Bahrain’s Council of Representatives is 40.
‘Breaking the glass ceiling’
Bahrain’s first elections in 2002 saw no women elected to parliament, despite 31 female candidates. The following election in 2006 saw only one woman elected, Lateefa al-Gaood, who retained her seat in 2010 and remained the sole woman legislator.
In the 2014 election, three women were elected to parliament.
Bahrain does not have a quota system for female representation in parliament, with many Bahrainis viewing such a scheme as running against the country’s constitution, which states equal rights for all of its citizens.
Speaking to the state-owned Bahrain Television, Ahlam Janahi from Bahrain’s Businesswomen’s Society said the latest election will be remembered for breaking the glass ceiling.
“Finally, the women of Bahrain have proven themselves that they are able to represent themselves in all facets of life and proved that as a country, we do not need a quota system in order guarantee female representation,” Janahi said.
Elections boycotted by opposition
The government said at 67 percent, the voter turnout for this year’s election was the largest in Bahrain’s history. The opposition, however, claimed the turnout did not exceed 30 percent.
The last election in 2014 had a turnout of 53 percent after when opposition groups boycotted elections in the Western-allied kingdom, home to the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet.
Activists had called for a boycott of this vote, describing it as a “farce”, amid a crackdown on dissent by the ruling Al Khalifa family since it quashed a Shia-led uprising in 2011 with the help of neighbouring Saudi Arabia.
Since then, the island state has kept a lid on dissent, closing opposition groups, barring their members from running in elections and prosecuting scores of people, many described by human rights groups as activists, in mass trials.
Chinese President Xi Jinping said he was open to approving the Qualcomm-NXP deal when the document was presented to him again, according to the White House. | Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP Photo
This story is being published for Pros as part of a content partnership with the South China Morning Post. It originally appeared on scmp.com on Dec. 2, 2018.
While a trade war truce was the biggest menu item at the 2 1/2-hour dinner between Chinese President Xi Jinping and his U.S. counterpart Donald Trump, there were other key takeaways from their historic summit in Buenos Aires.
Story Continued Below
Both nations will be relieved that the escalating trade tensions — which erupted with the imposition of tariffs on July 6 — are contained, but the United States took the opportunity to raise demands which may lead to further confrontation ahead.
It also appears Taiwan may still be a stumbling block for the two nations.
But Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi described the talks as “friendly and candid,” indicating the Chinese side was satisfied with the outcome.
“The agreements reached not only prevent the trade confrontation from further escalating, but also open up more space for win-win cooperation of both nations,” Wang said after the two leaders’ met.
Both nations agreed that no additional tariffs would be imposed on Jan. 1.
Trump agreed he would leave the existing tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese products at the 10 percent rate, rather than raising it to 25 percent.
Wang said both nations were working towards removing the existing tariffs and that negotiations would continue.
But a White House statement said both sides would immediately begin negotiations over a wide range of issues, including forced technology transfers, intellectual property protection, non-tariff barriers and cyber intrusions.
If the two sides cannot reach agreement over these within the next 90 days, the U.S. will raise tariffs to 25 percent.
What did the U.S. say about Taiwan?
According to Wang, the U.S. said it would continue to adhere to the one-China policy regarding Taiwan. But the self-ruled island was not mentioned in the White House statement.
The U.S. has in the past acknowledged the one-China position but has not recognized Beijing’s sovereignty over Taiwan.
Beijing, which regards Taiwan as its breakaway province, described the island as a core interest.
China has repeatedly demanded that the U.S. not support the island’s pro-independence forces and also cut off military exchanges with Taiwan.
The absence of a clear statement from the U.S. side on the one-China policy could indicate a future source of tension between the two powers.
China will buy more from U.S., but how much?
Wang said China would buy more U.S. products based on market demand to ease the trade imbalance with Washington.
The White House said China would purchase a not-yet agreed upon, but very substantial, amount of agricultural, energy, industrial and other products from the US. China would also buy agricultural products from U.S. farmers immediately.
More market access for U.S. firms
Wang said China would expand market access to American firms and take steps to address legitimate concerns of U.S. companies.
Xi said he was open to approving the Qualcomm-NXP deal when the document was presented to him again, according to the White House, but Wang did not mention the deal, which was previously rejected.
U.S. chip maker Qualcomm walked away from its $44 million bid for NXP Semiconductors — the biggest potential takeover in the chip industry — when it failed to secure the approval of China’s antitrust regulators.
China joins opioid war
The synthetic opioid fentanyl was one of the issues discussed between the two leaders. China said it would designate fentanyl as a controlled substance. The U.S. has previously said efforts to stem the flow of synthetic opioids from China were being stymied by China’s inadequate regulations on pharmaceutical and chemical production.
Support for North Korea meeting
China supports the upcoming meeting between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Wang said China hoped the U.S. and North Korea could be accommodative of each other’s interests, and that the U.S. would continue coordination with Beijing over North Korea.
The White House statement said Trump, Xi and Kim would work for a nuclear-free Korean peninsula.
Last week, the US mainstream media demonstrated once again that it has a Palestine problem. CNN suspended the contract of commentator and Temple University Professor Marc Lamont Hill, after he gave a speech at the United Nations in which he criticised the Israeli occupation and the abuse of Palestinian rights.
Hill based his speech very much on facts. He cited Israeli laws that discriminate against Palestinians; the use of arbitrary violence by the Israeli security apparatus; the use of torture against Palestinian detainees; the denial of due process to Palestinians by Israeli courts; the restriction on movement in the occupied territories, etc – all violations that have been well-documented and condemned by the UN and a myriad of human rights organisations.
Yet CNN, which last year adopted a new slogan – “Facts first” – did not seem to agree with these facts. After pro-Israel organisations like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) condemned the speech, the TV station was quick to sever its ties with Hill.
While CNN did not announce why it chose to do so, it is clear to many of us it caved in to pressure from pro-Israel groups. Hill was accused of being anti-Semitic for using the phrase “free Palestine from the river to the sea”, which supposedly is a “Hamas slogan” and a call for the destruction of Israel. Well, it is neither.
Throwing accusations of anti-Semitism at people criticising Israel and supporting the Palestinian right to self-determination is a convenient tool of the Zionist lobby. But calling for the freedom of Palestinians and for the recognition of their rights is not anti-Semitic; it is pro-Palestinian.
In Palestine, the Israeli authorities have brought this tactic to the extreme and have already passed a number of laws curbing freedom of speech. This means that those of us who dare criticise Israeli policy or call for resistance to Israeli occupation, even if in the form of a poem, face the risk of imprisonment.
In the United States, those who do so clearly face the risk of being fired, as in the case of Professor Hill and as in the case of many others before him– and probably many others after. The way CNN (mis)handled this situation offers us an opportunity to discuss how media organisations succumbing to Israel’s campaign of silencing critics is particularly problematic.
For a long time, mainstream media organisations in the West, like the CNN, have been hiding behind the veneer of objectivity when it comes to issues such as the Palestinian struggle.
These outlets claim to be covering these issues objectively – applying certain procedures and high standards of verification that supposedly guarantee full and balanced reporting. With that grand declaration of objectivity, they then claim to present the true picture of what is going on. But they often don’t.
The language employed by many mainstream media networks in the West when reporting on Palestine is often imprecise and misrepresents certain objective realities. CNN and its peers often talk of a “conflict” between Palestinians and Israelis, skipping the fact that the latter are – legally and objectively speaking – occupiers. They talk of “contested lands” – as if there is no illegal settler-colonialism going on in Palestine, pushing Palestinians out of their land. They would often call the Israeli army’s violence against peaceful protesters “clashes” (as if the two sides are equal) and conveniently use the passive voice in titles reporting killings of Palestinians (as if Israeli soldiers were not the ones who shoot Palestinians dead).
Claiming objectivity but then, clearly using obfuscating language and intentionally skipping certain facts is not only damaging to the media profession but also spreads disinformation. The firing of Professor Hill has exposed once again this disingenuity, the apparent political bias, and perhaps even the fear of the Israeli lobby within Western mainstream media.
It also shows that even media institutions that claim to be fighting for freedom of speech, to be delivering “facts first”, to be “speaking truth to power” can also partake in the silencing of critical voices. What is particularly disconcerting, in this case, is that CNN is not only succumbing to political pressure and Israel’s speech policing policies but also perpetuating them – even if indirectly.
CNN is clearly not ready to take on the “controversial” topic of the Palestinian question and pursue “facts first”. Instead, it has chosen to stay on the political “safe side”: report only on certain events with bias, obscuring the real dynamic of relations between oppressor and oppressed and processes and using a certain preset discourse.
Unfortunately, this “safe side” logic has also been adopted not only by media outlets but also by Western institutions – both academic and political ones – and even by governments. Just recall all those fake condemnations by political leaders in the West during Gaza’s Great March of Return, when in one day Israeli snipers shot dead more than 50 unarmed, peaceful Palestinian protesters and wounded hundreds of others, with local hospitals unable to cope. They all called on Israel to exercise “restraint” and threw in there for “balance” and “objectivity” a reference to Hamas, which killed no Israelis that day – or any other day of the march for that matter.
Those who do not stand on the “safe side” of things – people like Marc Lamont Hill – have been taking clear positions on Palestine, based on facts and critical thinking. They – like others throughout history who stood up for oppressed peoples’ rights – are vilified and viciously attacked, but they will persevere and continue to speak truth to power, objectively and factually.
Meanwhile, Western institutions (academic, media and others) will eventually have to engage in self-scrutiny because they are not only regularly succumbing to political pressures and adopting misrepresentations, but are also complicit in reproducing Israel’s policing and silencing strategies.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.
HOW BUSH IMPACTS LEGISLATING … SHUTDOWN DELAYED? … It appears completely plausible that GEORGE H.W. BUSH’S death could push off a government shutdown, at least for a bit. Remember: a slice of government is slated to shut down FRIDAY. But the growing consensus is that Congress won’t want to fight during a week of remembrance for Bush.
THE MAIN THOUGHT RIGHT NOW is a a one- or two-week stopgap funding bill, to place the deadline a bit farther from the Bush remembrance week.
TWO WEEKS makes the most sense, because it would put the funding deadline on FRIDAY,DEC. 21 — and there would be major incentive to get something done then, because Christmas is the following Tuesday. But Congress almost never does what makes sense, so they’ll probably do a one-week stopgap.
STORY OF THE DAY … NYT’S PETER BAKER, “‘I Love You, Too’: George Bush’s Final Days”: “George Bush had been fading in the last few days. He had not gotten out of bed, he had stopped eating and he was mostly sleeping. For a man who had defied death multiple times over the years, it seemed that the moment might finally be arriving.
“His longtime friend and former secretary of state, James A. Baker III, arrived at his Houston home on Friday morning to check on him. Mr. Bush suddenly grew alert, his eyes wide open. ‘Where are we going, Bake?’ he asked. ‘We’re going to heaven,’ Mr. Baker answered. ‘That’s where I want to go,’ Mr. Bush said.
“Barely 13 hours later, Mr. Bush was dead. The former president died in his home in a gated community in Houston, surrounded by several friends, members of his family, doctors and a minister. As the end neared on Friday night, his son George W. Bush, the former president, who was at his home in Dallas, was put on the speakerphone to say goodbye. He told him that he had been a ‘wonderful dad’ and that he loved him. ‘I love you, too,’ Mr. Bush told his son. Those were his last words.” NYT
— DICK CHENEY to CHUCK TODD on NBC’s “MEET THE PRESS” on which Bush was harder to debate: “Probably — well, as vice president they couldn’t fire me, so I could be a little bit more forthright in speaking. But they both — they were great guys to work for. The — I’m very proud of what I was able to do with both of them. The fact that I was asked to serve, those were remarkable years. And there were difficult times, no question about it, in both administrations. But it was a, well — the highlight of my career.”
— JAMES BAKER to GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS on ABC’S “THIS WEEK”:STEPHANOPOULOS: “That is a blessing. And I guess you also had the blessing of friendship with him for so long. Have you ever imagined how different both your lives would have been had you not met?”
BAKER: “Well, I’ve certainly imagined how different my life would have been had he not been my friend. You know, I never intended to get into politics or public service, George. And I was a lawyer in Houston, Texas. I was content to continue that.
“Then I lost my wife to cancer at the age of 38 and Barbara and George were the last people to come see her other than family before she died. And, George wanted — George came to me and said, you know, you need to take your mind off your grief, how about helping me run for the Senate here in — in Texas?
“I said, well, George, that’s great idea except for two things. Number one, I don’t know anything about politics. I was sort of apolitical. And number two, I’m a Democrat. He said, well, he said, we can — we can cure latter problem. And — and we did. I — and I — I changed parties and helped him in that Senate race. And from there on out, it was an extraordinarily warm and close friendship. And as you’ve said, I think in your introduction, I did — I did lead all of his campaigns for president.”
— COLIN POWELL to GEORGE:STEPHANOPOULOS: “He was also the last president to serve in combat. How did that shape his work as commander in chief?” POWELL: “He knew what combat was all about. He knew that combat meant the death of people, people on your side and people on the other side. And so, he wanted to avoid a war.”
— TODD PURDUM, “A president with a poet’s eye: With a pen and paper, the 41st president showed a depth greater than what his public persona suggested”: “In retirement, when Ann Devroy, the Washington Post reporter who had been among the toughest chroniclers of his administration, was dying of cancer, he wrote to her that in his White House days ‘there was a tension; perhaps an inevitable tension, that clouded things between us — never a visceral dislike, but a tension. I was the out of touch President, the wimp; you were the beltway insider who thrived on who’s up, who’s down — who will be fired, who will win.
“‘But now I am out of it, happy in my very private life, away from the arena; and you are on leave fighting a battle that far transcends the battles of the political wars. Strangely, wonderfully, I feel close to you now. I want you to win this battle. I want that same toughness that angered me and frustrated me to a fare-thee-well at times to see you through your fight…’” POLITICO
— DAVID HOFFMAN in WaPo: “George H.W. Bush valued expertise, prudence in navigating a world on fire”: “Bush placed high value on personal relationships, cultivated over many years, and worked hard at them, often frenetically. Some aides called him the ‘mad dialer’ for all his telephoning; he woke up British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the middle of the night. He relished a private word with King Hussein of Jordan on a speedboat in the Gulf of Aqaba, or with Gorbachev on a hiking trail at Camp David, or with French President François Mitterrand looking out at the sea at Walker’s Point. In a crisis, he called the White House Situation Room at 5 a.m. for updates. He didn’t like to be alone and was rarely idle.” WaPo
THE PRESIDENT is sending Air Force One to Houston to pick up Bush’s casket.
Good Sunday morning.HANUKKAH begins tonight.
CONFIDENCE! … JAKE TAPPER spoke to SEN. SHERROD BROWN (D-Ohio) on CNN’S“STATE OF THE UNION”: TAPPER: “You’ve said you’re seriously considering a run for the White House in 2020 … Do you think you are the best person to take on President Trump?” BROWN: “I don’t know.”
CHINA NEWS …
— DOUG PALMER and ANDREW RESTUCCIA in Buenos Aires: “Trump, Xi declare truce on new tariffs as trade talks continue”: “President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed Saturday to a temporary trade ceasefire to allow time for more negotiations. The move means that U.S. tariffs on $200 billion worth of goods will not rise to 25 percent on Jan. 1, from 10 percent currently.
“As part of the deal, China agreed to buy ‘a very substantial amount of agricultural, energy, industrial, and other product from the United States to reduce the trade imbalance between our two countries,’ White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. Although precise quantities still need to be worked out, China will ‘start purchasing agricultural product from our farmers immediately,’ Sanders said.
“That would be welcome news for U.S. soybean and other agricultural producers, who have borne the brunt of China’s retaliation against Trump’s tariffs.” POLITICO
ATTN. CONGRESS: PRESIDENT TRUMP aboard AF1 from Buenos Aires to D.C.: “We get rid of NAFTA. It’s been a disaster for the United States. It’s caused us tremendous amounts of unemployment and loss and company loss and everything else. That’ll be terminated. And so Congress will have a choice of the USMCA or pre-NAFTA, which worked very well. You got out, you negotiate your deals. It worked very well. Okay?”
— TRUMP SAID it would be a six-month withdrawal period.
MISSOURI SEN. ROY BLUNT (R) to CHRIS WALLACE on “FOX NEWS SUNDAY”: BLUNT: “People like me who have really been concerned about the President’s stated trade policy can take some encouragement in what happened in the last couple of days, the signing of the US Canada and Mexico agreement that’s a big step that 6 months ago or even just a few weeks ago we were concerned that we would not be making that kind of progress and on the Chinese front you are right, we need more specifics here.”
WAPO’S SEUNG MIN KIM: “In election’s wake, Trump courts Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin”: “Fresh off the midterms, President Trump is making nice with one of the Democratic senators he repeatedly hammered on the campaign trail: Sen. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia.
“Trump will host Manchin at the White House at 12:30 p.m. Monday, a spokesman for the senator confirmed Saturday. During a post-election chat, the two decided to meet for lunch, and Monday is the first day since that conversation that has worked with both their schedules.
“One particular issue Manchin plans to press with Trump, according to spokesman Jonathan Kott, is the fate of expiring pension benefits for miners. Lawmakers faced a Nov. 30 deadline to put together a proposed solution for the expiring benefits that affect not only miners but also retired truck drivers and supermarket clerks.” WaPo
THEY’VE GOT JOKES! … SEN. TED CRUZ (R-Texas) at the GRIDIRON DINNER last night: “[My first Gridiron appearance] came during what my panicky political advisors were calling a ‘crisis in likeability.’ And just one night here, that brief, shining moment of seeming less odious to you than usual – it really turned my image around. The only problem is, impressions are fleeting, and I’m afraid we might need to make this an annual event.”
— “In any event, I’m sure I’ve shaken off my 2016 nickname for good, along with any hard feelings that might have lingered from my clash with Donald Trump. Sometimes you just have to put minor squabbles behind you … you know, like whether or not your dad was the guy on the Grassy Knoll.”
— “For the next year, I’ll keep working on my relations with Mitch McConnell, with whom I’m pleased to report have seen a pretty amazing transformation. These past couple of years, some strange new influence has been at work to make Mitch stop thinking of me as the most unreasonable, uncivil, uncontrollable person he could imagine. Somehow I don’t seem so bad anymore. I just wish I knew who to thank.”
— Also next year, we Republicans will have Senator-elect Romney soon to join our ranks. And though I probably shouldn’t mention this – in the Senate we often go by friendly nicknames. Not that a guy called Mitt needed another handle, but for no particular reason he is going to be known as ‘Squi.’ One thing’s for sure – the Kavanuagh hearings gave us all plenty to think about, as I did one quiet evening by the fireplace, watching the flames consume my high school yearbooks.” His full remarks
— REP.-ELECT ABIGAIL SPANBERGER (D-Va.) also spoke at the Gridiron: “There were a lot of dirty tricks played against me and my campaign this year – including someone from James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas trying to infiltrate my campaign office with a hidden camera. That’s right folks – James O’Keefe thought it was a good idea to send an amateur spy into the campaign office of an actual spy. I don’t have a joke about this – I just want all of you to think about that before you go to bed tonight.” …
— “Maybe I mentioned I was in the CIA too much. But you can’t really tell people you’re in the CIA when you’re still in the CIA, so you gotta make up for lost time. People ask me all the time about my time in the CIA, and I think tonight is the right time to make a confession: CIA actually stands for ‘Culinary Institute of America.’
“I just felt weird about correcting people when they thought it was the other one. And I make a mean pepper steak. … Voters in my district really liked the fact that I was in the intelligence service. And I know because they’d said so in their emails and phone calls to each other.”
SPOTTED: Janet Yellen and Philippe Reines separately in first class on the 3 p.m. Acela to D.C. … Justice Elena Kagan at Le Diplomate Saturday night … John Kerry at the Friday night performance of “Springsteen on Broadway.” Pic
THE INVESTIGATIONS — “Michael Cohen, Ex-Trump Lawyer, Asks U.S. Judge for Leniency,” by NYT’s Benjamin Weiser and Maggie Haberman: “In a deeply personal memorandum that expressed Mr. Cohen’s contrition and shame, defense lawyers portrayed him as a man whose personal and professional lives had been shattered, and who had harmed himself legally while trying to protect Mr. Trump.Arguing against a prison sentence, the lawyers cited Mr. Cohen’s cooperation with the investigation by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, whose legitimacy is regularly denounced by the president. ‘In the context of this raw, full-bore attack by the most powerful person in the United States,’ the lawyers wrote,
“‘Michael, formerly a confidant and adviser to Mr. Trump, resolved to cooperate, and voluntarily took the first steps toward doing so even before he was charged.’ … Mr. Cohen consulted with White House staff members and Mr. Trump’s ‘legal counsel’ as he prepared for his false congressional testimony, though it did not identify the lawyer, according to the memo. The document did not say if Mr. Cohen was asked to lie, nor did it identify which counsel he spoke with.” NYT
BONUS GREAT WEEKEND READS, curated by Daniel Lippman:
— “The Inside Story of Mike Isabella’s Fallen Empire,” by Jessica Sidman and Spiegel in Washingtonian: “How alcohol, infighting, and a sexual harassment scandal turned the prince of DC dining into a pariah.” Washingtonian
— “How MSNBC Created a Cable-News Addiction Epidemic,” by Michael Hirschorn in Vanity Fair: “It can feel like monitoring every twist and turn of Trump’s tumultuous presidency is a crucial civic duty. But the TV is distracting from the real story.” Vanity Fair
— “Beneath the Surface of Bruce Springsteen,” by Michael Hainey in Esquire – per Longreads.com’s description: “At Esquire, Bruce Springsteen talks to Michael Hainey about Trump’s divisive politics, raising kids to become solid citizens, how to learn to deal with the baggage of your upbringing to be the person you truly want to be, and how, at age 69 after two serious bouts of depression, he’s still figuring it all out, just like the rest of us.” Esquire
— “The Open Office and the Spirit of Capitalism,” by Scott Beauchamp in American Affairs Journal: “The borderless fluidity of open offices seems perfectly suited to the ambitions of the internet age—while also replicating its failed aspirations toward ‘connectivity.’ Just as hyper-modulated online interactions … cordon people into niche micro experiences, so the open office counterintuitively isolates office workers.” American Affairs Journal (h/t ALDaily.com)
— “Feds Say Imprisoned Hacker Ran a Drone Smuggling Ring,” by the Daily Beast’s Kevin Poulsen: “The white-hat consultant turned black-hat hacker was this close to getting out of prison when he was charged with running a wild scheme from behind bars.” Daily Beast
— “The Genius Neuroscientist Who Might Hold the Key to True AI,” by Shaun Raviv in Wired – per Longform.org’s description: “Karl Friston’s free energy principle might be the most all-encompassing idea since Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection.” Wired
— “Secrets of the Magus,” by Mark Singer in the New Yorker in April 1993: “Ricky Jay [who died Nov. 24] does close-up magic that flouts reality. But, rather than headline in Las Vegas, Jay prefers to live in the mysterious world of ancient mountebanks, eccentric entertainers, and sleight-of-hand artists, whose secrets he preserves with a scholarly passion, and who are his true peers in the realm of illusion.” New Yorker
— “Four years to go: Qatar on course for its improbable World Cup,” by the Guardian’s David Conn in Qatar – per TheBrowser.com’s description: “The rich, tiny, embattled Gulf State is spending $10 billion on new stadiums and $200 billion on new infrastructure including a metro. If the expected 1.5 million football fans arrive, a two-way culture shock seems inevitable. Qatar is a conservative Muslim country where homosexuality is illegal, ‘modest’ dress is required at sporting events, and public drinking is illegal.” Guardian
— “The Insect Apocalypse Is Here,” by Brooke Jarvis in the NYT Magazine: “What does it mean for the rest of life on Earth?” NYT Magazine
— “The Club and the Mob,” by James Meek in the London Review of Books, reviewing “Breaking News: The Remaking of Journalism and Why It Matters Now,” by Alan Rusbridger: “Before [the internet], we were isolated recipients of the news; now, we are self-consciously members of groups reacting to news in shared ways. This facilitates solidarity for the truly oppressed, for campaigners, for those with minority interests. But it also means that the paranoid, the suspicious, the xenophobic and the conspiracy-minded know they’re not alone.” LRB … $18.30 on Amazon(h/t TheBrowser.com
— “‘I Don’t Want to Shoot You, Brother,’” by ProPublica’s Joe Sexton – per Longreads.com’s description: “Officer Stephen Mader chose not to shoot R.J. Williams, choosing instead to de-escalate. He was right — Williams’ gun wasn’t loaded, so he was never a real threat — but another officer on the scene shot him anyway. And then Mader got fired.” ProPublica
— “Meet Alexa: inside the mind of a digital native,” by Sophie Elmhirst in the Dec./Jan. issue of 1843 Magazine: “She is 24 and Instagram is her life, even though she sometimes wishes it wasn’t. But what happens when she meets a guy who doesn’t feel the same way about social media?” 1843 Magazine
— “Turning the desert into detention camps,” by Philip Wen and Olzhas Auyezov in Reuters – per TheBrowser.com’s description: “An attempt to catalogue the vast network of prison-like camps and detention centres which the Chinese government is constructing in its western province of Xinjiang to intimidate and indoctrinate indigenous Muslims. There could be as many as 1,200 such centres — at least one for every county and township.” Reuters
MEDIAWATCH — STEPHEN BROWN will be executive editor of POLITICO Europe. He most recently has been managing editor of the publication.
OUT AND ABOUT — SPOTTED at a party last night celebrating Brendan Buck and Rebecca Berg: Luke Russert, Phil and Chelsea Mattingly, Derek and Alex Moe Flowers, Kevin Madden, James Arkin, Sam and Danielle Feist, David Swerdlick, Brendan Martin, Dan Ronayne, Paul Kane, Scott Mulhauser and Kara Carscaden, Kevin Madden, Ryan Williams, Kevin Sheridan and Erika Gutierrez, Jay Newton-Small, AshLee Strong, Frank Thorpe, David Drucker, Jake and Jenna (Sakwa) Kastan, Ryan Lizza and Olivia Nuzzi, Mike and Mary Kathryn Steel, Ken and Emily Spain, Will Ritter, Antonia Ferrera and Doug Heye.
— SPOTTED at a book party last night hosted by the Niskanen Center at Juleanna Glover’s house for Tyler Cowen and “Stubborn Attachments: A Vision for a Society of Free, Prosperous, and Responsible Individuals” ($17 on Amazon): Siobhan Gorman, Mike Franc, Gretchen and Tom Toles, Evelyn Farkas, Andrew Sullivan, Michael Kinsley, Jay Newton-Small, Eli Lake, David Brooks and Anne Snyder Brooks, Josh Dawsey, Joey Coon, Kevin Cirilli, Neil Irwin, Tim Burger, John McConnell, Ben Schreckinger, David and Suzanne Chavern, David and Adele Malpass, Heather Podesta and Steve Kessler, Miriam Sapiro and Stephen Labaton, Jerry Taylor, Eric and Jennifer Felten and Janet Donovan.
WEEKEND WEDDING – OBAMA ALUMNI: “Kalisha Dessources, Shomari Figures” – N.Y. Times: “Ms. Dessources, 28 … is studying for a Ph.D. in sociology at Yale. … She was formerly a policy adviser to President Obama’s White House Council on Women and Girls, directing policy work on women and girls of color. … Mr. Figures, who is 33 and works in Washington, is a lawyer and legislative aide in the United States Senate. From 2015-17, he served as White House liaison to the Department of Justice, and previously was the White House domestic director of presidential personnel for President Obama.” With a pic. NYT
BIRTHWEEK (was yesterday): Sarah Silverman (hat tip: Doug Heye)
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Brad Mielke, host of ABC News’ “Start Here” podcast. What he’s been reading recently: “I finally got around to reading an incredible Ian Frazier piece in the New Yorker about the wildfires that ripped through towns in the Plains. We’re used to hearing about how California is a tinderbox, but this is a minute by minute account of how a network of small prairie towns, connected by hundreds of thousands of dried-out acres, can suddenly be wiped out. It’s a wowzer.”Playbook Plus Q&A
BIRTHDAYS: former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is 79 … former Attorney General Edwin Meese III is 87 … Stone Phillips is 64 … Nancy Haberman is 71 … Cal Thomas is 76 … Ken Babby … Alex Short … Grant Everett Starrett … Bob Carey … Rep. Carol Shea Porter (D-N.H.) is 66 … former Rep. Pete Gallego (D-Texas) is 57 … Jason Huntsberry … Emily Schultheis … Carrie Wofford (h/ts Ben Wofford and Colin Crowell) … Kelly Klass of Locust Street Group (h/t Ben Jenkins) … Rep.-elect Deb Haaland (D-N.M.) is 58 … Marc La Vorgna, founder of MLV Strategies … GPG’s Mina Moore … Lauren Cross … Sam Schneider … Megan McCafferty … Caroline Gangware …
… Mark Irion, head of strategic communications in D.C. at Hogan Lovells (h/t Chase Kroll) … Eleanor Schiff … Dan Puskar … Mairead Lynn, Democratic press secretary for the Senate HELP committee … Erin Bailey … Sara Siskind … Andrew Howell, partner at Monument Policy Group, is 5-0 … Patricia Rojas-Ungar, new VP at Outdoor Industries Association … John Hollis, author and comms officer at GMU (h/ts Stewart Verdery) … former Sen. Wayne Allard (R-Colo.) is 75 … Conyers Davis is 4-0 … Mark A. Shiffrin is 62 … Audrey Lavin … Celeste Brown … Rayshon Payton … … Dan Puskar, executive director of the Public Lands Alliance, is 4-0 (h/t Jedd Rosche)