Ariana Grande Defends Her Decision To Walk Away From The Grammys



Getty Images

Earlier this week, a report from Variety spilled the news that Ariana Grande would be skipping out on the 2019 Grammys — not just for a performance, but for attending the ceremony altogether — after a disagreement with producers. The report alleged that Grande and the show’s staff agreed to a medley performance of her No. 1 hit “7 Rings” and another song, but that the singer pulled out when producers insisted they’d get to choose the second song.

These types of last-minute disputes often get chalked up to timing or resource constraints when insiders finally go on the record and discuss them. That’s precisely what Grammys producer Ken Ehrlich did in an AP interview on Thursday (February 7), saying that Grande “felt it was too late for her to pull something together.” Grande, however, had a much different perspective.

In a series of tweets, she defended her decision to walk away and called out Ehrlich for lying. “I can pull together a performance over night and you know that, Ken,” she wrote. “It was when my creativity & self expression was stifled by you, that I decided not to attend.”

Grande elaborated on what exactly happened, saying she offered three songs for the performance (that were presumably turned down by producers). “It’s about collaboration. It’s about feeling supported,” she wrote. “It’s about art and honesty. Not politics. Not doing favors or playing games. It’s just a game y’all.. and I’m sorry but that’s not what music is to me.”

Perhaps most tellingly, Grande also tweeted that she “passed a Grammys bus with my face on it typing those,” referring to how this year’s ceremony had been hyped and advertised with her likeness.

Even if Grande won’t be at this Sunday’s Grammys, she’ll certainly be very busy for the next 72 hours. Her fifth album, Thank U, Next, drops at midnight, and she’s been rolling out teasers all day on social media. Fans also believe the album’s final track, “Break Up With Your Girlfriend, I’m Bored,” will hit ahead of the album’s actual release — a theory supported by a visual teaser Grande tweeted shortly after her Grammys statements.

With an appearance on the Grammys stage or not, it’s clear that this will be the weekend of Ariana Grande. Check out the album’s latest teaser below.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2SjBX3a
via IFTTT

Hey, how do you think a sentient baguette would move?

Hey, buddy.
Hey, buddy.

Image: Simon Pask/Getty Images

2017%252f10%252f20%252fa0%252fchloebryan11.0b114.jpg%252f90x90By Chloe Bryan

If a baguette was alive and could move around, how would it move?

This is the vital question posed by a comedian and animator named Dave (@sheepfilms on Twitter), who gave the internet its latest thing to debate on Thursday. According to Dave, there are four possible ways a baguette could move: worm, gallop, robot rotate, and caterpillar.

Please observe: 

SEE ALSO: Is there something wrong with me if I only hear Yanny and not Laurel?

A poll tweeted shortly after the video reveals number 3 (robot rotate) as the clear frontrunner. I agree, as this is the only scenario in which the baguette’s crusty exterior would not be compromised. You know what they say: A floppy baguette is no baguette at all. (No one says that.)

Here’s a survey. How would a baguette move?

— Dave (@sheepfilms) February 7, 2019

On Twitter, most people agree with me, proving that I am right. I knew it! However, some people did suggest other alternatives. For example, what if the baguette just rolled around on its side like a log? That might be good, although perhaps a little slow.

Please feel free to bring this up at your next social gathering. Everyone will love it.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WNed66
via IFTTT

Watch Seth Myers attempt his best Boston accent while eating intensely hot wings

Seth Meyers is a renowned king of late night comedy. But is he the king of surviving scorchingly spicy hot wings? 

On the third episode of Hot Ones, a YouTube series in which celebrities answer big life questions while eating increasingly spicier chicken wings, Meyers did not disappoint. 

During the first six wings, Meyers is surprisingly coherent on topics such as politics and eSports. But by the seventh wing, he begins to break down. The schadenfreude is deliciously good when he’s asked to perform impersonations of Boston accents as he laughs through the intense pain. 

There’s just something so satisfying about watching a grown man, tears streaming, say “Da Bomb is too hot. It’s wicked hot.” 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2RQOnKU
via IFTTT

Six Nations Scotland v Ireland preview at BT Murrayfield

Downtime with… Stuart Hogg Do you have any…

Joe Schmidt’s team are under more pressure than they have been for a while after that defeat by England, observers criticising their rigid game plan, and the Murrayfield crowd will surely make life uncomfortable for them, but the visitors will be cheered by the way Scotland allowed Italy back into the game with their ill-discipline in the last 15 minutes of their opening fixture.

The Scots already had such a healthy lead that the three late tries didn’t affect the result – but switch off in the same manner against Ireland and they are likely to pay a heavier price.

The visitors would love nothing more than a succession of penalties allowing them to take territorial advantage and squeeze the Scots with their set-pieces, while Scotland have that X-factor with Russell and Hogg leading the attack.

It is something of a clash of styles: off the cuff v straight-laced.

What’s the big team news?

Sean Maitland replaces last week’s hat-trick hero Blair Kinghorn on the left wing, his experience getting him the nod as the Scots field a familiar back three in preparation for an aerial assault from Ireland.

Six Nations Scotland v Ireland preview

Winging in: Fit-again Sean Maitland starts ahead of Blair Kinghorn (Getty Images)

Up front, tighthead WP Nel and flanker Sam Skinner were ruled out by injury and are replaced by Simon Berghan and Josh Strauss respectively. Jonny Gray, who has recovered from a shoulder injury, also comes into the starting line-up, with Ben Toolis dropping to the bench.

Scotland fans will also be pleased to see Fraser Brown fit to be named among the replacements, the hooker sure to offer a dynamic presence if he takes the field.

Ireland have made five changes to their starting XV – four of them injury-enforced. Rob Kearney comes in at full-back for Robbie Henshaw and Chris Farrell replaces Garry Ringrose at outside-centre.

Quinn Roux starts in place of Devin Toner and Jack Conan wears the No 8 shirt in CJ Stander’s absence.

The other change in the back row sees Sean O’Brien picked ahead of Josh van der Flier, who moves to the bench.

Six Nations Scotland v Ireland preview

On your marks: Chris Farrell and Quinn Roux start for Ireland (Getty Images)

What have the coaches said?

Scotland coach Gregor Townsend: “It’s massive. It’s probably the biggest challenge we’ll face in the Guinness Six Nations, given the way Ireland have been playing in the last few years.

“They will test us in a number of areas – defensively, set-piece, attack and kicking game. It is a challenge our players relish taking on.”

Ireland coach Joe Schmidt: “You can expect people to be saying a lot about how we play, and what Plan A, B, C or D looks like. I think we have a very varied game. We play strong off set-piece, we play a varied kicking game, we play with a varied attacking game. And we try to vary our defensive game.”

Any interesting statistics?

  • Home sides have won six of the last seven Six Nations meetings between these two teams.
  • Ireland’s starting XV has 200 more caps-worth of experience than Scotland’s – 706 compared to 475. Looking purely at the forward packs, Ireland’s has nearly twice as many caps as the hosts – 368 to 199.
  • Scotland conceded more than twice as many penalties as Ireland in round one – 11 to four.
  • Six of the top 12 ball-carriers last weekend were Irish – Jacob Stockdale, James Ryan, Garry Ringrose, Robbie Henshaw, Bundee Aki and CJ Stander.
  • Scotland made more metres (819) and line breaks (five) than any other team in this year’s first round.
Six Nations Scotland v Ireland preview

Key figure: Josh Strauss impressed off the bench against Italy (Getty Images)

What time does it kick off and is it on TV?

Scotland v Ireland, Saturday 8 February, BT Murrayfield

The first game of round two kicks off at 2.15pm in Edinburgh and is live on BBC One and BBC Radio 5 Live Sports Extra, as well as TV3 and RTE radio in Ireland.

Romain Poite is the referee for this match – coincidentally he also took charge of the 2017 game between these two sides that Scotland won – and is assisted by fellow Frenchmen Pascal Gauzere and Alexandre Ruiz. England’s Rowan Kitt is the TMO.

What are the line-ups?

SCOTLAND: Stuart Hogg; Tommy Seymour, Huw Jones, Sam Johnson, Sean Maitland; Finn Russell, Greig Laidlaw (captain); Allan Dell, Stuart McInally, Simon Berghan, Grant Gilchrist, Jonny Gray, Ryan Wilson, Jamie Ritchie, Josh Strauss.

Replacements: Fraser Brown, Jamie Bhatti, D’arcy Rae, Ben Toolis, Rob Harley, Ali Price, Pete Horne, Blair Kinghorn.

IRELAND: Rob Kearney; Keith Earls, Chris Farrell, Bundee Aki, Jacob Stockdale; Johnny Sexton, Conor Murray; Cian Healy, Rory Best (captain), Tadhg Furlong, Quinn Roux, James Ryan, Peter O’Mahony, Sean O’Brien, Jack Conan.

Replacements: Sean Cronin, Dave Kilcoyne, Andrew Porter, Ultan Dillane, Josh van der Flier, John Cooney, Joey Carbery, Jordan Larmour.

Follow Rugby World on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WPxfIR
via IFTTT

Kurds in Iraq say US withdrawal from Syria a mistake

Mala Qara Village, Iraq – A pair of armoured vehicles parked in a corner of the Peshmerga headquarters in northern Iraq form a stark reminder of the threat the region is facing by ISIL.

“They were full of explosives when we captured them,” Kurdish Peshmerga commander General Sirwan Barzani said, as he discussed the battle his forces fought two years ago against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as ISIS). 

ISIL fighters came within 25km of Erbil, the capital of the semi-autonomous Kurdish region of northern Iraq, before the Peshmerga got the upper hand in continuous battles, retaking control of towns in the region from 2014 to 2016.

While ISIL has since been driven from Mosul and other towns and villages in northern Iraq, they are still active in the area, Barzani said.

The current Kurdish-run Peshmerga front line is situated along the high ridge running north from the town of Makhmur, about 65km southwest of Erbil to Gwer, behind which ISIL fighters are hiding in the caves and on cliff faces on steep hills, Barzani said; it is terrain that makes it difficult to dislodge them.

A military operation last year to rid the area of ISIL was only partially successful, Barzani said, blaming constraints placed on his battle plan by Iraqi officials and US and coalition forces.

Barzani says there are other pockets of ISIL fighters to the south and west of the Peshmerga front lines, but the areas are controlled by Iraqi forces, so there is nothing he can do about them.

There is an uneasy cooperation between the Iraqi military and the Kurdish-run Peshmerga. They worked together against their common enemy, ISIL, but relations soured in October 2017 when Iraqi forces backed by Iranian militias retook control of oil-rich Kirkuk and other contested areas that Kurdish forces had held since 2014.

The Iraqi offensive came in the wake of a Kurdish referendum on independence that the Iraqi leadership in Baghdad and much of the rest of world dismissed as illegal. 

The US, a long-time ally of the Iraqi Kurds, did nothing to stop the Iraqi military advance.

With the announcement by the Trump administration about the US withdrawal from Syria, Barzani said he is concerned the US will abandon the Syrian Kurds, who have been essential in the fight against ISIL. 

US withdrawal

Major General Jabbar Yawar, secretary-general of the Peshmerga ministry, said, “It is very important that the US stays in both Iraq and Syria and keep playing the leadership role in the global coalition against ISIS.”

Yawar denied Iraq’s Peshmerga work with their Syrian counterparts, often called the Rojava Peshmerga named after the Kurdish region in eastern Syria. 

“As Peshmerga forces, we have no connection with Rojava or any interference whatsoever. For us, it is the matter of another country, Syria, and we have no hand in any of it,” Yawar said. 

He said Iraqi Peshmerga have fought inside Syria only once. 

“During the ISIS attack on Kobane we were formally asked to send reinforcements, which we did with the coordination from the coalition forces and the Peshmerga stayed there for a year,” Yawar told Al Jazeera. 

Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has proposed a so-called “safe zone” inside Syria running east of the Euphrates river to the border.

Barzani said that will force Syria’s Kurdish fighters, who so far have been allied with the United States, to make a deal with Damascus. 

“The fighters they will go to [Syrian President Bashar al-Assad], they will have an agreement with him, of course, it’s very clear,” Barzani said.

The US announcement, which came as a surprise to its allies, could undermine any leverage US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) might have had with Assad.

There are no details yet of who will be in charge of the safe zone, but Erdogan has said he will establish it himself if he does not get international support. 

‘Fighting for land’

Barzani said Erdogan will use the buffer zone drive Kurds out, as they did in the Syrian Kurdish town of Afrin last March.

“If the fighters belonging to Turkey and the terrorists belonging to Erdogan will be there, they will be fighting for the land. It’s not a safe zone, it’s a warzone,” Barzani said.

Privately, Kurdish politicians said they are concerned any Turkish advance in Syria could cause another influx of refugees into Iraq’s Kurdish region, which currently hosts about 250,000. They note Erdogan’s “security zone” includes all Kurdish areas east of the Euphrates and a US pullout would be considered a defeat in the eyes of Syrian allies Russia and Iran.

The Peshmerga say the most convincing argument for the US to stay is the continued presence of ISIL in the region.

“For us, the Peshmerga, ISIS is not finished. They still carry out terrorist acts especially in areas called disputed territories in Kirkuk, Diyala, Salahaddin, Makhmour and around Mosul. They carry out daily attacks and they have even grown in strength,” Yawar said.

“Even Syrian Democratic Forces SDF say that the US forces should stay. ISIS is still a global terrorist organisation. It may have lost the land and the caliphate, but it still exists and it is dangerous.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2RNduxR
via IFTTT

Billionaire threatens to unload on Dems if they don’t impeach Trump


Tom Steyer

Billionaire investor Tom Steyer, at least publicly, has no official timeline for next steps his PAC might take if Democrats don’t make move aggressively to obtain Trump’s tax returns or begin building a credible impeachment case. | Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo

Politics

Tom Steyer is cranking up his pressure campaign to oust the president — and he has top Democrats in his sights.

Billionaire Tom Steyer is cranking up pressure on key House Democrats to impeach President Donald Trump where he thinks they’ll feel it most — back in their home districts.

Steyer’s first three targets are three powerful committee chairman, Richard Neal (D-Mass.), Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Elijah Cummings (D-Md.). But the liberal megadonor isn’t stopping there: He will soon turn his attention to rank-and-file members seated on the committees that would be involved in impeachment proceedings, including freshmen.

Story Continued Below

And Steyer’s Need to Impeach PAC is considering going after the top three Democratic leaders, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.).

The previously unreported plans to single out additional members on the Ways and Means, Judiciary and Oversight Committees, detailed by Steyer and his advisers, represent the latest turn in Steyer’s multi-million-dollar campaign to impeach Trump. And the thinly veiled threat against Democratic upper brass puts the former hedge fund manager turned activist squarely at odds with leaders of the party.

“There’s a gigantic cost to not listening to your constituents,” Steyer said in an interview with POLITICO. “There’s a gigantic cost to thumbing your nose at democracy.”

Kevin Mack, Steyer’s lead strategist on Need to Impeach, said the PAC has virtually unlimited resources to spend in targeted districts. The group has committed $40 million to the campaign for 2019 so far. The offensive includes TV and digital ad buys, paid staff in key districts and volunteers to organize canvassing.

“We haven’t ruled out going into leadership districts,” said Mack. “Why does Steny Hoyer get a pass, why does Jim Clyburn get a pass? They’re all hiding behind the Mueller report.”

Though Mack said the PAC isn’t ready to back primary challengers against Democrats, that’s not being ruled out, either.

Steyer’s frustration with Democrats’ hesitancy to impeach Trump is palpable. But the former hedge fund manager believes that veteran lawmakers like Neal, Nadler and Cummings will listen to their constituents if Need to Impeach gives voters a loud enough bullhorn.

Steyer, at least publicly, has no official timeline for next steps his PAC might take if Democrats don’t make move aggressively to obtain Trump’s tax returns or begin building a credible impeachment case against the president. He simply said he will continue to place negative ad buys in districts like Neal’s and Nadler’s, informing their constituents where their representative stands on impeachment.

“We’re not saying, ‘We’re so brilliant, listen to us,’ we’re saying, ‘Listen to your constituents,’” Steyer said. “It’s not like we can just hold our breath until something happens.”

There’s little incentive for Neal, Nadler and Cummings to oblige. They are in safe blue districts and have warned that the political cost of launching impeachment proceedings against Trump before special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings are known could be high for newly empowered House Democrats. Nadler, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, has repeatedly said Democrats need to “wait and see” on impeachment.

Cummings, who shortly after the election unveiled a laundry list of investigations his Oversight Committee will conduct, scoffed at the idea that Steyer’s campaign could change his mind.

“He ought to spend his money on something else,” said Cummings. “I’m going to run my committee with integrity, transparency and accountability.”

“I was mayor of a big city,” Neal, the Ways and Means chairman and former mayor of Springfield, Massachusetts, quipped. “No, it doesn’t bother me, no.”

Need to Impeach chose Neal for its first campaign targeting a congressional district. The effort, which started this week, includes paid staff and a $109,000, two-week television ad buy in the relatively small Springfield market. The group says it will soon add another $100,000 in digital ad buys.

“It’s time to hold Donald Trump accountable, and we can do our part here in Massachusetts. All we need is our Congressman Richard Neal to be with us,” the TV spot says. “Neal can subpoena Trump’s tax returns and vote to start impeachment hearings against the most lawless and corrupt president in American history.”

Neal’s position remains unchanged: He wants to wait until Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling and potential collusion with the Trump campaign is finished. Neal is consulting the Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives and the Joint Committee on Taxation to determine the appropriate legal steps to move forward with the “unprecedented request” for Trump’s tax returns, the congressman’s spokesman William Tranghese said.

“There’s a discernible process that’s acknowledged and at the moment I think my position is consistent with the party leadership on the Democratic side,” Neal said.

Steyer said he’s spoken with Democratic leaders and has “some sense of where they stand,” though he wouldn’t disclose details of his conversations. The campaigns targeting Nadler and Cummings will start shortly after Steyer’s Feb. 12 town hall in Springfield. Steyer will hold town halls in both Nadler and Cummings’ districts.

Need to Impeach will also have a presence in the districts represented by Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters. But the campaign in Waters’ district is designed to boost the California Democrat. Waters was an early supporter of impeachment and demanding Trump’s tax returns.

“There is a lot of things we can talk about in Congress that I care about and agree with leadership on that are not going to happen,” Steyer said. “This is an actual crisis … we can deal with that crisis or talk about legislation that’s not going to happen.”

But more than a year into Steyer’s multi-million dollar impeachment push, Democrats aren’t changing their calculus.

“I hear people say, ‘Why didn’t they do it the first day,’” Pelosi told POLITICO this week, referring to impeachment proceedings. “You have to do it right.”

She added: “You have to protect the prerogatives of the House of Representatives and you cannot be scattershot about that.”

Steyer lives in Pelosi’s district and the two have “been friends for many years,” Pelosi said. But “why don’t we keep our focus on the Republicans?” she asked.

“Wait a minute, let me get this straight, a billionaire from California is coming into the district to spend money against Richie, who used to be the mayor of Springfield, and is now the chairman of the Ways and Means committee who is making us very proud of Massachusetts,” Pelosi said.

It is, she added, a “waste of time and money.”

Heather Caygle and John Bresnahan contributed to this report..

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WLUlA9
via IFTTT

Tesla’s self-driving car rival gets big money from Amazon

Watch out, Tesla. One of your rivals, Aurora, just got serious money from retail behemoth Amazon. 

Aurora isn’t just another self-driving tech company. Co-founder Sterling Anderson was the head of Tesla’s Autopilot program and was sued by his former employer back in 2017 for allegedly taking information and engineers with him to his new company. The case eventually settled and Aurora paid Tesla $100,000.

Now, Amazon is one of several backers in a $530 million funding round announced Thursday for Aurora, which is based in Palo Alto but maintains a big presence in Pittsburgh.

Aurora doesn’t build self-driving cars. It provides software for partners, including Volkswagen, Hyundai, and Chinese carmaker Byton — which promises vehicles capable of Level 4 autonomy by 2021. Last year Aurora secured the first state permit to test its vehicles throughout Pennsylvania, beating out Uber.

Now Amazon wants in on the action. Amazon’s no stranger to autonomous technology. It just launched its own autonomous, electric robots to help deliver packages, and is transporting some cargo in self-driving trucks

In a statement, Amazon said autonomous vehicles could help its employees: “We are always looking to invest in innovative, customer-obsessed companies, and Aurora is just that. Autonomous technology has the potential to help make the jobs of our employees and partners safer and more productive, whether it’s in a fulfillment center or on the road, and we’re excited about the possibilities.”

In a bland statement about the unspecified Amazon investment, Aurora wrote on its blog, “Amazon’s unique expertise, capabilities, and perspectives will be valuable for us as we drive towards our mission.”

Back in 2017, the Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon had a team looking into ways to move all those Amazon products and packages in driverless cars. 

A quick look at Amazon’s job listings show that robotics, logistics, and automation are top priorities. Those autonomous delivery drones never took off, but driverless cars look like they could be coming relatively soon. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2UL4MSI
via IFTTT

Instagram will start cluttering your feed with IGTV videos

Instagram is putting IGTV videos in your main feed.
Instagram is putting IGTV videos in your main feed.

Image: Chesnot/Getty Images

2016%252f09%252f16%252f8f%252fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lza3.c1888.jpg%252f90x90By Karissa Bell

Remember IGTV, the video service Instagram launched last year to take on YouTube?  (You might know it as that icon with a red dot you accidentally tap when trying to get to your direct messages.)

Well, Instagram is trying to make it more difficult for you to ignore IGTV. The app is now placing IGTV “preview” videos right in your main feed.

The videos will appear when someone you follow posts a new video to IGTV. Instagram will automatically add a clip from that video to your feed, along with a link to watch the full video in IGTV.

The move is Instagram’s most aggressive push yet to get people to watch IGTV videos. The app has included a prominent link to IGTV since its launch, putting the IGTV icon with a big red dot next to the app’s inbox. But placing videos directly in feeds is a much less subtle push — and the latest sign that IGTV hasn’t taken off the way the way the company had hoped.

Despite initial hype, many creators have been ignoring the service. As New York Magazine noted back in October, influencers have little incentive to make videos for the platform when they get significantly less attention than YouTube videos. And the standalone IGTV app is currently ranked so low in Apple’s App Store, it doesn’t even appear in Apple’s rankings of the top iOS apps. (It was ranked  #1,442 in July, the last time it appeared in Apple’s top charts, according to App Annie, Instagram is currently the #1 app in the App Store.)

For Instagram, the update could give IGTV a much-needed boost. But with IGTV being that unpopular, some users are likely to be annoyed at seeing the extra videos in their feeds.

Of course, if you don’t follow anyone who regularly posts to IGTV, you don’t have much to worry about, at least for now. But if Instagram can’t succeed in getting more eyeballs on IGTV, it’s not difficult to imagine that it could one day start putting IGTV clips from people you don’t follow into your feed. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2tffkO9
via IFTTT

Noel Gallagher & Vincent Kompany: Manchester City, music & drama

Media playback is not supported on this device

Watching City ‘more nerve-wracking’ than being on stage – Noel Gallagher

With three Premier League titles, three League Cups, an FA Cup and two Community shields, there is little you can teach Vincent Kompany about football at the highest level.

And with eight UK number one singles, 11 UK number one albums and more than 75 million album sales worldwide, there is not much Oasis star Noel Gallagher does not know about music.

But can we learn anything from them?

In a special interview with Football Focus to mark his testimonial year and 10th season at City, Vincent met Noel to discuss football, Oasis and a decade of drama at Etihad Stadium.

Here are five things we found out:

1. Man City gave up on the title in 2012

Vincent Kompany says Manchester City “gave up” on the title after defeat at Arsenal

Manchester City’s title success in 2012 culminated in one of the most memorable moments in Premier League history – but there was a point when Kompany had lost all hope of ending the club’s 44-year wait to be English champions.

A loss to Arsenal in April left City eight points behind leaders Manchester United with just six games left.

“We gave up when we lost to Arsenal away,” said Kompany. “The league was done.

“But we had this kind of team mentality. We were fighting in training all the time because of the characters we had, which brought the best out of us for the last six games.”

City, of course, famously clawed their way back into the title race with five straight wins to lead the table going into the final game of the season.

That set the scene for one of the most dramatic season finales the Premier League has produced, Sergio Aguero’s stoppage-time winner against QPR snatching the title away from United and sending the sky blue hordes into delirium.

“That’s the moment that defined so much for this club,” added Kompany. “A lot of the players coming through today and being in this environment have to thank that squad and Kun [Aguero] in particular for that goal.”

Vincent Kompany scored the only goal as City beat United to go top of the table with two games left in April 2012

2. Man City are bigger than Oasis

Back in the summer of 1997, when Brit Pop was at its peak, Oasis released their third studio album Be Here Now, shifting more than 424,000 copies on the first day of release, becoming the fastest-selling album in British chart history.

Meanwhile, at Maine Road, Frank Clark’s Manchester City were about to kick-off the 1997-98 season in Division One. The campaign would end in disaster, with the club relegated to the third tier of English football for the first time in their history.

Supporting Manchester City was a different experience in the 1990s compared to today

Those days seem a long way away now, with City firmly among the world’s elite and attracting supporters from all over the world.

But does that mean they are now bigger than Oasis?

“I think that’s fair to say,” said Gallagher. “I was in Osaka, Japan last year for the first game of the season and we just ambled into a bar and it was full of Japanese Man City fans. We were like ‘wow, this is the start of something’.

“It shows that if you get the right people involved in a football club and you’re measured in what you do, you can make great things happen.”

3. Watching City is more nerve-wracking than playing in front of thousands

‘When you’re watching City in the big, tense games, anything can happen’

From Glastonbury to Wembley via Knebworth and Madison Square Garden, Gallagher has played at some of the biggest venues in the world in front of millions of fans. But that is nothing when compared to watching his beloved City.

“Watching City is more nerve-wracking,” said Gallagher. “When I’m doing my thing you’re in control. When you’re watching City in the big, tense games they are out of your control and anything can happen.”

4. Noel would rather be a footballer than a rock star

Would you give up being a rock star to be a footballer?

Both perform week in, week out, in front of millions of adoring fans. Both travel the world playing in iconic venues and enjoy a luxurious lifestyle most of us could only dream of.

But given the choice what would you rather be – footballer or rock star?

“I’ve never met a musician, who is any good, who didn’t want to be a footballer,” said Gallagher.

“Vinny represents an entire City and an entire club. And if he makes a mistake then people’s weekends are ruined. For music it’s different, you’re part of someone’s night out, but you’re still performing in front of big crowds.”

But would Noel rather be a footballer?

“They’d probably earn more money than me now so I’d say yes!”

5. Kompany is a Mancunian… nearly

Kompany has won nine major trophies since joining Manchester City in 2008

Kompany marked a decade at City last summer. His arrival from Anderlecht coincided with the takeover of the club by Sheikh Mansour; a defining moment in English football that transformed City into one of the world’s most powerful football clubs.

To mark his testimonial year, Kompany hosted a dinner in a central Manchester hotel earlier this week. As well as celebrating his decade in sky blue, the event raised money for Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham’s ‘A Bed Every Night’ initiative, which is seeking to tackle the issue of homelessness in the city.

Kompany says it is a cause close to his heart and a chance to give something back to a city that has embraced him as one of their own.

“I’m an adopted Mancunian,” said the 32-year-old. “This city has grown on me. I have a wife from Manchester and have three kids who think they are more Mancuniuan than anything else, which is a problem I need to address!

“It’s suited me from day one and the club, where it is today, it’s unbelievable to have been part of this journey.

“I feel that this place is able to do incredible things when they pull together and I want to raise as many funds as I can to tackle the issue of homelessness in Manchester.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2UR4Hx7
via IFTTT

Rukban camp in Syria receives first aid in 3 months

A camp where babies are dying despite it being in a zone in Syria controlled by the United States military finally received its first aid delivery in three months.

The United Nations and the Syrian Arab Red Crescent reached the Rukban camp in southeast Syria with 118 trucks packed with food supplies, basic medicines, education items and children’s recreational kits.

Aid workers arrived on Wednesday night after tortuous negotiations with the Syrian government, and are expected to spend a week distributing material to the camp’s 40,000 residents.

Trapped between Jordan on one side and US-backed rebel forces on the other, Rukban received aid just twice in the last year, in January and November.

Sajjad Malik, UN resident and humanitarian coordinator, said: “This large-scale delivery of essential humanitarian supplies to the extremely vulnerable in Rukban happened not a moment too soon.”

About 80 percent of the inhabitants of Rukban are women and children. At least eight children died this winter in freezing temperatures and because of a lack of adequate medical care.

Jordan, the Syrian government, and the US with its local allies have played a part in hindering aid supplies. Jordan shut its borders in 2016 and stopped the aid flow, while the Syrian government has used the squeeze as a strategy to coerce people to give in to Bashar al-Assad’s rule.

UN-SARC cooperation

The Syrian government allowed the Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC)  to join forces with the UN to supply the aid.

In a statement SARC said vaccines would also be given to the children. “A vaccination campaign will be launched, under the supervision of a medical team, to immunise children against measles, polio, tuberculosis and hepatitis,” it said.

Imad Ghali, an activist at the camp, described the moment the aid arrived. “I saw faces full of happiness, a scene that I’ve never seen in a long time,” he said. “It was like dead people returning to life.”

Ghali said people gathered to collect the aid despite the rain and the storm in the camp on Thursday.

He said the trucks carried more than 8,000 food baskets containing rice, hummus, lentils, oil, sugar and wheat.

Ghali said the camp was still lacking doctors and medical facilities, including specialised equipment.

“We have almost 200 people who need specialised urgent care and treatment, like pregnant women who need caesarean operations,” he said. There was nothing to help those suffering from conflict injuries, he added. 

Nejm, one of the displaced Syrians in the camp, said while the aid would provide much-needed relief, it was too late for the families who had lost their babies.

“What can they do with it now?” he said. “It is very, very late for them.”

Nejm, a father of two, said even though the supplies were in the camp, he had to wait for his turn. 

The first to receive aid were the people of the Bani Khaled tribe in the camp. The displaced from the historic city of Palymra were next in line and then those from Qaryateen and other areas. 

Nejm said there was corruption in the camp and urged aid workers to pay attention to the people who distributed aid.

“I am from Palymra, so our head will go and collect it, but sometimes wrong people claim aid for people and later sell it in the camp,” he said. 

He also said help should be sent every month for as long as the people were still in the camp. He begged for a lasting solution to his plight for the sake of his son and other children.

“My son was forced to leave school four years ago. He is just sitting around doing nothing. He has lost his future,” Nejm said. “We want to go to the north on border with Turkey, we want to leave.”

‘Safe exit route needed’

Abdulfattah Basleh, a teacher in the camp, also demanded a safe exit route, saying he was desperate to stop living off aid.

“We lose children, our women’s health deteriorates and after we pay this price, the UN starts to mourn us and delivers aid as if they are the heroic saviour of the refugees,” he said.

“I ask for the opening of safe corridors under international guarantees to let people go to the north or to regime-held areas.”

Other than distributing aid, the UN and SARC will also be conducting “an intention survey” to assess how many residents in the camp wish to leave voluntarily and to where.

Sajid Mallik of the UN admitted the delivery of assistance could only be a temporary measure.

“A long-term, safe, voluntary and dignified solution for tens of thousands of people, many of whom have been staying at the Rukban settlement for more than two years in desperate conditions, is urgently needed.”

Some people on the ground expressed a will to go to areas controlled by the government and others such as Nejm prefered the last rebel-held enclave on the border with Turkey.

Nejm said he hopes if he can get to northern Syria, he may be able to take his family to another country, somewhere he would feel safe.

“If we go back to the regime, they might arrest us or ask us to join the army,” he said, voicing a fear of many.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2tff95r
via IFTTT