A year on, Parkland shooting victims remembered

Hundreds of thousands of students and adults across the United States bowed their heads in a moment of silence on Thursday to mark the first anniversary of the shooting rampage at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida that left 17 people dead.

“It’s a permanent sore spot,” said Fort Lauderdale High School junior Jake Lynch.

The massacre on February 14, 2018 inflamed the national debate over guns, turned students and survivors into political activists and gave rise to some of the biggest youth demonstrations since the Vietnam era.

A moment of silence at more than 1,000 Florida schools was held at 10:17am local time, though the shooting actually began in the afternoon.

School officials picked a different time because Stoneman Douglas students were being dismissed early to avoid being on campus at the hour of the attack.

The time 10:17 was selected to denote the 17 slain.

Many Stoneman Douglas students arrived to school on Thursday wearing the burgundy #MSDStrong T-shirts that have become an emblem of the tragedy.

Outside the school, clear plastic figurines of angels were erected for each of the 14 students and three staff members killed. 

Bouquets are placed at a memorial on campus on the one year anniversary of the shooting which claimed 17 lives at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florid [Joe Skipper/Reuters] 

Reporters were not allowed inside the school, but students worked on service projects as a way of trying to turn the tragedy into something positive, and grief counselors and therapy dogs were made available along with massages and pedicures.

An interfaith service was scheduled for later in the day at a park nearby.

‘A second chance at life’

Freshmen Jayden Jaus and Matthew Sabia, both 14, helped mark the day by packing lunches for children in Haiti, putting rice, vitamins and soy into bags.

Jaus told the Associated Press the moment of silence was “a bit emotional and a little intense” as the principal read the victims’ names over the public address system.

Many other Stoneman Douglas students skipped school. For some it was too emotional; others did not want to be in the spotlight.

Sophomore Julia Brighton would not go inside, instead she placed flowers at the outdoor memorial.

She told the Associated Press she suffered with nightmares for months. Staying outside “felt like it would be a better experience for me instead of being at school and putting myself through that,” she said.

Bouquets are placed at a memorial on campus on the one year anniversary of the shooting which claimed 17 lives at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida [Joe Skipper/Reuters] 

Alexis Grogan, a junior, said she was spending the day picking up rubbish on the beach, dedicating her work to those who died.

“I survived something, and I don’t want to waste what I call a second chance at life because those who have passed don’t get that,” she said. “We have to make a difference for them,” she added.

Classes were almost over last Valentine’s Day when authorities say 19-year-old former student Nikolas Cruz stormed the place with an AR-15 assault rifle. Cruz, now 20, had a long history of emotional problems and threats. He is awaiting trial.

Victims’ families who have spoken publicly said they would spend the day quietly, visiting their loved ones’ graves or participating in low-key events like a community walk. 

“We don’t need (the anniversary) to remind us what happened. We live with it every day,” said Andrew Pollack, whose 18-year-old daughter Meadow died in the attack.

The massacre led some Stoneman Douglas students to form the group March for Our Lives, which holds rallies around the country for tougher gun regulations and registers young people to vote.

Teen students have also partnered with media organisations to documents the stories of children killed by a gun. Over the past year, more than 1,200 children were killed in gun violence, according to the Gun Violence Archive.  

Weeks after the massacre, Florida’s Republican-controlled Legislature and GOP governor raised the age to buy a rifle from 18 to 21 and passed a so-called red-flag law allowing judges to take away the weapons of those who are considered a danger to themselves or others.

Several other states have followed suit.

But other states moved in the opposite direction, making it easier to carry weapons in public and strengthening legal protections for people who claim they shot someone in self-defence.

Overall, 40 states passed some kind of legislation related to guns in 2018, either imposing restrictions or expanding gun rights.

Schools elsewhere also marked the anniversary.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IeDkeX
via IFTTT

Trump shocks GOP with emergency declaration


Donald Trump

Some Republicans have panned the idea of declaring a national emergency as setting a bad precedent for future presidents. Yet if President Donald Trump moves forward, he’s probably going to have plenty of the party behind him. | Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images

National Emergency

Senate Republicans were stunned to learn Trump is ignoring their warnings against such a move.

The surprise announcement Thursday that President Donald Trump will use his emergency powers to try and build his border wall blindsided some Republicans, confused others and sent the Senate GOP into a general state of shock.

The news, delivered by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on the Senate floor, came after weeks of warnings from his own party not to declare a national emergency at the border.

Story Continued Below

Trump has decided to challenge Republicans’ resolve anyway — but he may not like the outcome. Aides privately predicted Trump will lose a vote on the Senate floor once the Democratic House passes a resolution of disapproval to block the move.

Meanwhile, the GOP Senate majority was casting about for answers.

“I wish he wouldn’t have done it,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who McConnell interrupted on the Senate floor to make his announcement. “If [Trump] figures that Congress didn’t do enough and he’s got to do it, then I imagine we’ll find out whether he’s got the authority to do it by the courts.”

“In general, I’m not for running the government by emergency, nor spending money. The Constitution’s pretty clear: spending originates and is directed by Congress,” said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who like almost everyone else on Capitol Hill wants more information. “So I’m not really for it.”

Republicans that have previously panned the idea as setting a bad precedent for future presidents were careful in how they answered questions in the immediate aftermath of the president’s decision.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said it was a “bad idea” but needed to learn more. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said it was “unnecessary” because Trump has other ways of getting money but said he needed further guidance. And Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) fretted that it was a “dramatic expansion” of the emergency powers.

Others were blunter.

“It’s a mistake on the president’s part,” said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine). “I also believe that it will be challenged in court. It undermines the role of Congress and the appropriations process.”

“I’m not enthusiastic about it, but I don’t know whether that’s actually going to happen, and if so, what follows from there. I don’t know what authority he may or may not invoke,” said Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.).

The question is not simply a theoretical one. Republicans might have to go on record on the Senate floor in the coming days over the matter. Under congressional rules, the Senate would be forced to act on a resolution of disapproval passed by the House, and just four Republicans would need to join with 47 Democrats to rebuke the president at the simple majority threshold.

And given the broad uncertainty over Trump’s plans, even concerned Republicans like Toomey and Paul declined to take a hard line one way or the other.

One GOP senator, requesting anonymity, even wondered whether Trump had botched his message to McConnell in their private conversation. This senator, like most Republicans, would prefer Trump to stop short of declaring a national emergency and use existing anti-drug corridor laws to fund the border wall.

“I have some concerns,” added Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). “There are ways you could transfer funds that I could be fully supportive of, and there are other ways that I’d have a lot of problems with.”

Yet if Trump moves forward, he’s probably going to have plenty of the party behind him. And he seems likely to be able to sustain a veto if necessary, given McConnell’s support of the president — despite the Kentucky Republican having publicly warned Trump not to take this step in front of TV cameras just a few days ago.

“I think it’s fine. I think it helps a lot of Republicans feel better about voting for this bill,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) as he prepared to vote on legislation that provided $1.37 billion for a border barrier, far less than the $5.7 billion Trump had demanded.

Still, a battle over Trump’s executive powers will draw attention to the Senate GOP’s on-again, off-again rift with the president over his hard-line immigration positions. And a veto override vote against their own president is not what Republicans want to be dealing with as the 2020 campaign begins.

Some Republicans breathed a sigh of relief that Trump’s unilateral move would at least end, for now, a wall fight that sparked a 35-day partial shutdown and threatened another.

But the move also represents a blow to any GOP effort to work on immigration reform while Trump is president.

“I always kind of take pause to the assertion of executive power,” said Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). “The main reason is it could detract attention away from the long-term solution that can only occur through an act of Congress.”

Marianne LeVine contributed to this report.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2GsvNHE
via IFTTT

Markieff Morris, Thunder Reportedly Agree to Contract Despite Lakers’ Interest

DETROIT, MI - DECEMBER 26: Markieff Morris #5 of the Washington Wizards looks down court against the Detroit Pistons in the second half of an NBA game at Little Caesars Arena on December 26, 2018 in Detroit, Michigan. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. The Pistons defeated the Wizards 106-95. (Photo by Dave Reginek/Getty Images)

Dave Reginek/Getty Images

Veteran forward Markieff Morris agreed to sign with the Oklahoma City Thunder on Thursday following his buyout from the New Orleans Pelicans, according to Shams Charania of The Athletic and Stadium.

Charania noted the Houston Rockets, Toronto Raptors and Brooklyn Nets were among the other interested teams. Broderick Turner of the Los Angeles Times reported last week that the Los Angeles Lakers would have considered signing Morris if he were healthy.

New Orleans acquired Morris and a 2023 second-round pick from the Washington Wizards in exchange for swingman Wesley Johnson prior to the trade deadline, but Morris never appeared in a game for the Pelicans.

In 34 games this season for the Wizards prior to the trade, Morris was averaging 11.5 points and 5.1 rebounds while shooting 43.6 percent from the field and 33.3 percent from three-point range.

Morris’ numbers have been down the past two seasons after putting up career-best stats in his final full season with the Phoenix Suns and first full season with the Wizards.

In 2014-15, Morris was at his best with averages of 15.3 points and 6.2 rebounds per game. He was traded to Washington the following season, and then in 2016-17, he averaged 14.0 points and 6.5 rebounds per contest for the Wiz.

Despite starting 73 games last season, his production dipped to 11.5 points and 5.6 rebounds per game.

While the 29-year-old largely came off the bench in Washington this season with just 15 starts, his numbers didn’t suffer much because of it.

Morris has come off the bench more than 200 times over the course of his 555-game NBA career, and that should bode well for him since he figures to settle into a bench role with the Thunder.

With career averages of 11.8 points and 5.6 rebounds per game, Morris is a versatile asset who can contribute on both ends of the floor with his new team.

Since the Wizards were struggling and unlikely to make a run in the Eastern Conference with point guard John Wall out for the season, Morris now has a much better opportunity to be part of a playoff run.

Assuming he brings his usual level and style of play to the table, Morris could be one of the best acquisitions on the buyout market this season.   

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Szkl3l
via IFTTT

Cardi B’s Pianist, Chloe Flower, Can’t Stop Laughing At Your Grammy Memes



Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

By Emilee Lindner

It only took a few minutes for Cardi B’s performance at the Grammys to go viral on Sunday. Or, more specifically, her pianist went viral. Chloe Flower, with some divine ferociousness, flew her fingers all over a crystal-encrusted piano and then plunked out the monstrous bass line of “Money,” maintaining intense eye contact with the camera the whole time. Inches away, Cardi twerked and her dancers spread-eagled in unison. It wasn’t until she met up with Cardi at an afterparty that she realized she was now internet famous.

“Are you on Twitter?” Cardi asked. “Because you’re all over it.” Chloe checked her phone.

“There were all these memes,” Flower told MTV News. “Like ‘Walking into my meeting like…’ Then they would show my face looking at the camera. It made me laugh so hard.”

Overnight, Chloe gained 50,000 followers across social media. The next day, she signed an exclusive deal with Sony Music.

But this moment has been long in the making. She began tinkling the ivories at 2 years old, eventually training at Manhattan School of Music and Juilliard. In 2010, she signed with Babyface’s Soda Pop Records, laying down piano instrumentals. In sessions with the legendary R&B producer, she picked up production skills — “I don’t like to take breaks, and some of the producers there were taking breaks, so I ended up learning the programming myself.” Since then, she’s produced tracks for Celine Dion, Nas, and 2 Chainz.

On Instagram, you can find Chloe delicately remixing pop songs like Ariana Grande’s “Thank U, Next” or Drake’s “Don’t Matter to Me.” She wears designer gowns and five-inch heels. She plays on Liberace’s own glass piano, on loan to her by the Liberace Foundation. When Cardi saw her account, she got the Grammy gig.

Rehearsals had Chloe practicing her fierceness — something that she honed in on by channeling Beyoncé. Cardi inspired Chloe as well, along with the all-female team who made the whole thing happen: creative director Tanisha Scott, stylist Brookelyn Styles, and many others.

“Being with [Cardi] in the studio, knowing her work ethic, her work ethic is intense,” she said. “She doesn’t just show up and do it, she’s involved.” As for the Best Rap Album trophy Cardi took home on Sunday? “She deserves that.”

On the day of the performance, Chloe was similarly disciplined: She woke up early, hopped into an infrared sauna to sweat for 30 minutes and then started to practice. Because eating makes her sleepy and nervous, she eats very little on performance days, only fruits and vegetables. And in the week leading up to the ceremony, she secluded herself, avoiding pre-Grammy shindigs and dinners with friends — no matter how tempting. In her dressing room she requested a keyboard, where she could practice some more. “I try to mentally prepare,” Chloe said. “It’s a very regimental form. I can play perfectly from home any time, but when you’re in front of a huge audience and the pressure’s there, it becomes real.”

That sort of mental state is indicative of her everyday regimen as well. She practices at least 10 hours a day, sometimes up to 14 hours, but not always in the gowns you see on Instagram. “I’m either in my couture or in sweatpants,” she said. “I don’t, like, own a pair of jeans and a T-shirt. I’m always really dressed up or I’m in sweats. Like sweats sweats. Like those huge ones.”

Onstage, Chloe wore a Fouad Sarkis gown that was decided on so late that it was held together with tape. Originally, she was supposed to wear a leggy rockstar-esque dress, but that simply wouldn’t do. “When Cardi saw it, she was like, ‘I want her to look more extravagant. And I want her to look more couture. She’s not going to stand out enough in a short dress.’”

“Because the dress was picked so last minute, my stylist was on the floor underneath me, making adjustments like right before the gate was lifted,” Chloe said. “It was close.”

And because Flower works closely with the Liberace Foundation, they loaned her another piano for the performance — the one Cardi danced on. “If Cardi’s going to be twerking on a piano, it should be that one,” Chloe said. “I know Liberace was up there smiling.”

She wrote a colorful intro to “Money” — one that was completely different from the thunderous track, something to trick the viewer into thinking they were watching a classical recital. Perhaps her elegant-to-baddie mood change was why we were all drawn to her in the first place. Making the piano look badass only helps her overall goal: to promote music education. “I want the world to know that part of the reason I did this is I really want kids to be excited about learning instruments,” she said.

With her newfound fame and Sony deal, Chloe has plans for a covers album with original orchestration — “an iconic female album,” she calls it. She dreams of working with Beyoncé and Ariana Grande, and becoming a go-to producer. “There are not that many female producers out there,” she said. “Which is why I wanna be one of the female producers that people work with.”

And you definitely will be seeing her on stage again. “My ideal concert would be dancers everywhere, pretty sets, piano,” she said. “I loved being on stage with all those girls.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2DIXFmU
via IFTTT

Brexit defeat weakens May’s hand in last-ditch Brussels talks

London, United Kingdom – The United Kingdom‘s beleaguered prime minister has suffered another symbolic defeat in parliament over the next steps in her bid to secure a Brexit deal with the European Union.

Theresa May‘s effort to secure continued backing for her attempt to wring concessions from Brussels on a key sticking point in her deal over Britain’s withdrawal from the bloc was defeated by a majority of 45 on Thursday.

It is another humiliation for the prime minister that makes it less likely she will secure changes to the controversial “backstop” mechanism to avoid the creation of a hard customs border in Northern Ireland after Brexit.

Professor Anand Menon, director of the UK in a Changing Europe academic think tank, said: “It damages her strategy in the sense that it might give the EU some pause for thought because they will be a bit concerned that the majority she thought she had is sizzling away.”

Although Thursday night’s defeat has no practical effect, it reverses a modest achievement chalked up by the British PM two weeks ago when she secured a majority for a Brexit motion – calling for changes to the backstop – in a parliament that remains deeply divided.

Why is Brexit sending so many in search of their Irish roots?

Conservative opponents of the backstop say this plan to avoid the creation of a border in Northern Ireland – which would contradict the UK’s commitments under the Good Friday peace agreement – would keep Britain in a permanent customs union with the EU.

However, the latest vote now shows that May is once again losing control of her own Conservative party in the absence of a formal deal with the EU as the clock ticks ever closer to March 29, when the UK is due to leave the bloc – deal or no deal.

Menon said the government must now “think long and hard” about its tactics for February 27 – when May is due to return to parliament with an update on her talks with Europe – because of the real danger of losing a vote on a key amendment aimed at blocking a “no deal” Brexit.

The cross-party move led by Labour MP Yvette Cooper and Conservative Oliver Letwin would mean that if the PM has not got a deal through parliament by March 13, MPs could vote to require her to seek an extension of the March 29 “Article 50” deadline.

Menon said: “Everything has crystallised around the 27 February. If the Cooper-Letwin amendment goes through, it means the prime minister has got to say that either she wants no deal or to extend Article 50 – and then the credibility of her threat which has been ‘Either sign my deal or there will be no deal’ will dissipate.”

Following the latest vote, EU leaders may be less likely to bend to May’s pleas for the concessions on the “backstop” that will convince Conservatives who hate it to support her because Brussels knows she has not got a Commons majority behind her Brexit strategy.

‘Soft’ Brexit

EU leaders may now even step up pressure on May to agree with the opposition Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn on his proposals for a “soft” Brexit that keeps the entire UK in a customs union with its European neighbours.

With just 41 days until the Brexit deadline, Corbyn is due to hold talks with Brussels’ chief negotiator Michel Barnier in a bid to break the deadlock and persuade May to accept a customs union.

May seeks to reassure citizens of Northern Ireland over Brexit

Although a Labour motion was also defeated in the latest round of voting on Thursday night, the result will cheer the party’s leadership as it shows growing support for their cross-party approach and a “softer” Brexit.

Corbyn said after Thursday night’s vote: “The government cannot keep on ignoring parliament or ploughing on towards March 29 without a coherent plan.

“She can’t keep on just running down the clock and hoping that something will turn up that will save her day and save her face.”

May’s defeat will again focus attention on a hardline group of her own MPs in the so called European Research Group (ERG) of Brexiteers, who abstained in the vote on her motion, resulting in her defeat.

Although the ERG was itself divided, its members rebelled because supporting May would have confirmed parliament’s recent instructions to the government to avoid a “no deal” Brexit.

Economists say a “no deal” Brexit – by which the UK would walk away from the EU without a negotiated agreement – would be disastrous.

ERG supporters say ruling out “no deal” removes the UK’s negotiating leverage in Brussels as May tries to change the terms of the “backstop”.

Critics of the ERG claim they want a “no deal” Brexit because – despite the threat to peace in Northern Ireland – they believe this would give the UK more future flexibility in negotiating trade deals globally and would enhance the country’s sovereignty.

Who paid for Brexit? | People and Power (25:00)

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2TPAjDd
via IFTTT

Scottie Pippen: LeBron James Lacks Michael Jordan’s ‘Clutch Gene’

Los Angeles Lakers forward LeBron James is shown during the second half of an NBA basketball game against the Atlanta Hawks Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2019, in Atlanta. The Hawks won 117-113. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

John Bazemore/Associated Press

Scottie Pippen has shared his opinion on the never-ending debate about who the better player is between LeBron James and Michael Jordan. 

Appearing on ESPN’s First Take (h/t USA Today‘s Scott Gleeson), Pippen explained why he believes Jordan is the superior player:

“When I look at LeBron, he’s not what Michael was as a player. He’s not even what Kobe Bryant was as a player. So, when you talk about trying to compare Michael’s instinct, his ability to take over games, his ability to want to have the last shot, LeBron doesn’t have that gene. That’s not in him. Kobe has that gene. I see a little bit of it in Paul George. Kawhi (Leonard), (Russell) Westbrook. … Not too many players go on the basketball court with that.” 

Pippen has addressed the topic multiple times in the past, including last year when he told reporters any comparisons between Jordan and James aren’t fair to either player. 

“The comparison is unfair. They played different positions. I know a lot of times we love answering the question because we want to hear the storylines behind it, but the truth of the matter is it’s not a fair comparison to LeBron or Michael. One guy is considered a two guard and one guy is considered a small forward. They definitely are great in their era. They’re both the greatest in their era, but to say who is the greatest, we will never know that.

“In my eye, Wilt Chamberlain is the greatest basketball player. But Michael and LeBron should never be compared. It’s almost like comparing Kareem to me. That wouldn’t be fair.”

Pippen’s comments about James’ clutch gene are unusual given his numbers late in playoff games are better than what Jordan did in his career:

ESPN Stats & Info @ESPNStatsInfo

Here you go #NBATwitter

We’re back at it again…

LeBron James connected on his 7th career go-ahead shot in the final 5 seconds of the 4th quarter/OT in his playoff career.

His 2 buzzer-beaters this postseason are 1 shy of MJ’s career playoff total. https://t.co/Uh61h9WwsT

Jordan does have the luxury of a 6-0 record in the NBA Finals, whereas James has gone 3-6 in his career. 

Regardless of which player will be remembered more fondly in the history books, Jordan and James are two of the greatest superstars the NBA has ever seen. Both players have accomplished more on and off the court than the vast majority of athletes in any sport could ever hope to achieve.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2If3pup
via IFTTT

Funding bill includes new limits on Trump’s immigration crackdown


Donald Trump

The bipartisan homeland security spending bill amounts to a subtle rejection of President Donald Trump’s aggressive enforcement tactics, rejecting several of his administration’s requests.

The bipartisan homeland security spending bill released early Thursday pushes back on aspects of President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown — even while providing $1.4 billion for border barriers and nearly 5,000 additional beds to detain undocumented immigrants.

Tucked into the 1,159-page bill are provisions that limit Trump’s ability to round up undocumented immigrants and that increase oversight of the officers who carry out those sweeps. On the border, restrictions on barrier construction will bar the administration from erecting fences on several large properties in South Texas, including a butterfly sanctuary and a historic Catholic church.

Story Continued Below

The bill ignores the Trump administration’s request to fund 750 additional Border Patrol agents, according to a Democratic summary of the measure and a joint explanatory statement. Additionally, it ignores the administration’s request for 2,000 more Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.

The legislation amounts to a subtle rejection of Trump’s aggressive enforcement tactics — a needling that reflects the new power dynamic since Democrats took control of the House in January.

The $1.4 billion in border barrier funding is well below the $5.7 billion that Trump sought in negotiations. Beyond that, the legislation limits the type of border barriers the administration may erect to already-deployed designs, which means Trump can’t use any of the border wall prototypes his administration built in the San Diego area.

The president himself has resisted committing to the spending compromise, saying earlier this week that he wasn’t “happy” with the deal. But he also said he didn’t expect another government shutdown — which is what would happen if he vetoed the spending package currently moving through Congress.

The bipartisan bill incensed some groups that favor lower levels of immigration, a lobby that enjoys close ties to Trump administration policymakers.

One measure within the bill would prohibit DHS from detaining or deporting a sponsor, potential sponsor, or household member of an unaccompanied minor based on information shared with HHS.

The exemption does not apply to sponsors with felony convictions or charges. Similarly, it does not apply to people linked to businesses that employ minors for less than a legal wage, or that involve prostitution.

Democrats have pushed for such protections to ensure that sponsors who step forward to claim unaccompanied children will not face the threat of arrest and deportation, but immigration hawks say it’s a free pass for undocumented immigrants.

Jessica Vaughan, a policy director with the restrictionist Center for Immigration Studies, said in a tweet Thursday morning that the provision amounted to “de facto sanctuary for anyone near” an unaccompanied minor.

The bill also would increase funding for “alternatives to detention,” which typically include ankle bracelets and case management by telephone. The Democratic summary of the bill said funding increases would allow such monitoring for 100,000 migrants, up from 82,000.

Vaughan called these alternatives “costly and ineffective” unless paired with additional funding to allow ICE officers to arrest and deport migrants “when they (inevitably) violate the terms” of the agreement.

The legislation would step up oversight of ICE by increasing the number of inspections of detention facilities, although an internal audit in June deemed such inspections inadequate. In addition, the agency would be required to issue public reports on the number of migrants and families in custody.

At the same time, some immigrant advocates argued the bill would overfund enforcement agencies and wouldn’t go far enough to protect migrants.

ICE and CBP would each receive roughly a 7 percent budget increase, bringing the agencies’ funding to approximately $7.6 billion and $15 billion, respectively.

The legislation would prohibit the use of restraints on pregnant women in DHS custody, with exceptions for flight risks and people who could harm themselves or others.

In December, ICE reportedly weighed loosening guidance around the use of such restraints. The agency rescinded an Obama-era policy in late 2017 that called for the release of pregnant women from detention. Instead, new ICE guidance made it a “case-by-case” decision.

“Restraints are alas a tiny issue in the realm of policy on ICE’s detention of pregnant women,” tweeted Scott Shuchart, a former DHS official and current senior fellow at the liberal Center for American Progress. “Pregnant women will still be stressed and endangered in unsafe immigration detention.”

The spending bill would fund a yearly average of 45,274 detention beds, according to Republican and Democratic offices involved in the negotiations. That number represents a 12 percent increase over funded levels in fiscal year 2018 — a significant concession, but far below the 52,000 beds Trump had requested.

ICE was detaining 48,502 people as of Feb. 2, with a yearly average of 45,814 detainees in its custody.

Democrats continued to argue that the bill “establishes Congress’s intent” to reduce the detention population to 40,520 by the end of the fiscal year. No clause within the bill makes that mandatory, but Democrats say that ICE will need to cut detention levels to arrive at a 45,274-bed yearly average.

Still, ICE will retain the ability to reprogram funds, which one Republican office involved in the legislative negotiations claimed would allow the agency to detain as many as 58,500 people during the year.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Gqhmnh
via IFTTT

The New-Age Rom-Com Tropes That Will Reshape How We Think About Love

We have entered a new era of romantic comedies, and like any new era, this one comes with a slew of distinctions from society’s previous form, all of which descend from one major shift.

Much like the new philosophical way of thinking moved us into the Age of Enlightenment, and like the advent of the cotton gin and steam engine brought about the Industrial Revolution, society’s recent social progress has ushered us into the Rom-Comaissance — marked largely by the death of the classic rom-com tropes.

No longer will we stand for the decades-old stereotypes infiltrating the genre, the inexplicable perfections in every visual, the happy coincidences that drum every story beat. We want lighthearted love stories that we can believe in — or at least, that we can see glimpses of reality in. (We don’t want everything to be different — all the necessary story elements remain: the meet-cutes and romantic gestures, the not-so-realistic concepts.)

This Valentine’s Day, there are two movies in theaters that exemplify the new age rom-com — What Men Want and Isn’t It Romantic.

In What Men Want, Taraji P. Henson gender-reversed Nancy Meyers’ What Women Want for a story about a high-powered sports agent struggling to be recognized for her value at work who gains the power to read the minds of the opposite sex after some mysterious tea and a head injury.

And in another head injury romp, Rebel Wilson stars in Isn’t It Romantic, about a rom-com skeptic who gets stuck inside a romantic comedy and must live through the story to find her way out.

Both movies take very different approaches to address the problematic tropes that we used to sweep under the rug. MTV News spoke with representatives from both films to dissect the progress we see on the screen.

Trope No. 1: The Single, Impossibly Gorgeous Leading Lady

Paramount Pictures

In both new rom-coms, we have leads who look different than the lean, button-nosed Meg Ryans and Kate Hudsons we’ve grown used to seeing in the roles.

On one side, we have Henson, a Black woman, and on the other, we have Wilson, a women who, as she noted to MTV News, looks like most women in the United States. “The average American woman is a size 16-18, which is my size,” Wilson said.

But even though both stars look different than the standard rom-com lead, neither movie used their looks as central story lines — they were both just women — which was, kind of, part of the beauty of seeing them in these roles.

In fact, Henson’s race “was not a factor” for What Men Want director Adam Shankman. “The fact that she was a woman was essential, but a woman who maintains the power that Taraji just wears so easily.”

Warner Bros. Pictures

Likewise, Isn’t It Romantic director Todd Strauss-Schulson insisted that their movie had “literally nothing” to do with Wilson’s body. “It’s not an important thing,” he said. “There’s plenty of women that look like her that have lots of love in their life, and big families, and lots of boyfriends, and it’s nothing to do with that.”

This repeated sentiment reflects a very progressive way of thinking — that we can appreciate seeing different types of women on screen, and at the same time, we can see them for more than just their appearance.

And how, you might ask, did rom-coms get to this progressive place?

Well, it certainly didn’t hurt that both Henson and Wilson served as executive producers of their respective movies, meaning both women had a say in how their characters (and other women in the film) were portrayed. How’s that for behind-the-scenes representation?

Trope No. 2: The Gay Best Friend

Paramount Pictures

While it is certainly OK to be both gay and your best friend’s flamboyant good witch, that’s definitely not the only way to be gay — but you might not realize that if your only interactions with members of the LGBTQ community occurred within the world of classic romantic comedies.

Fortunately, the Rom-Comaissance has brought with it an expanded understanding of the marginalized community. Take, for example, Josh Brener’s Brandon in What Men Want. As Ali’s (Henson) assistant, Brandon’s primary role is to be of service to his very busy sports agent boss and, because of that, his life does seem to mostly revolve around her — a setup that could easily fall into the GBF trap, but doesn’t, thanks to their contemptuous boss/employee dynamic.

That wasn’t always the case, though, Shankman noted. Originally, Brandon was more of a “fairy godmother” to Ali — which he didn’t find to be believable. “It was problematic for me. And I was extremely upfront about that,” the director recalled. “I was the only gay person in the room when those discussions were happening.”

Because of his ability to speak up and his collaborators’ willingness to listen, Shankman was able to paint a more realistic picture of what he envisioned it would be like to be a gay man in a workplace characterized by its toxic masculinity and then translate that to the screen.

“He would have to really want to be there because he loves sports and because he believed in himself,” Shankman said. “And so that’s going to be a different kind of guy than the one who was written who was like, picking her shoes out for work.”

In other words, there can be 99 people in the room, and all you need is one behind-the-scenes representative willing to speak out against stereotypes.

Trope No. 3: The Bedroom Blackout

Warner Bros. Pictures

One notable thing about rom-coms is that no one ever actually has sex. There are cues to indicate that sex happens or is going to happen, but usually when things get steamy, the screen cuts to black. (Did Richard Gere’s Edward and Julia Roberts’s Vivian actually go all the way on that piano? One can only assume.)

Well, in these new rom-coms, there’s no sexy sugarcoating.

“Women are always magical, sexual… It’s either that or they’re delicate flowers,” Shankman noticed — which, to filmmakers, means there’s “an opportunity to do more fun storytelling.” In this case, that opportunity was for more raunchy female comedy in the vein of Broad City or PEN15 (but not quite so explicit).

In one scene, Henson’s Ali is a maniac while in bed with love interest Will (Aldis Hodge) — she gets bug-eyed and basically uses him as a sex doll. Her wild behavior only becomes funnier when Ali can read Will’s thoughts later on. “While we were shooting it, I was laughing so hard because I had never seen a movie where a woman was represented as being terrible in bed,” Shankman said.

Isn’t It Romantic hits that nail right on the head after Wilson’s Natalie wakes up after, apparently, a night with love interest Blake (Liam Hemsworth). Blake is feeling particularly bright after a night of passion, but Natalie keeps it totally real, saying that they didn’t actually have sex and their lives just cut to the next morning. It turns out, every time Natalie tries to initiate sex, life cuts it out.

That kind of blatant comedy is present throughout the movie, which Strauss-Schulson hoped would help charm the viewers. “The movie wants to be so fun and funny that you open up to it,” he said. “So at the end when feeling comes at you, it doesn’t have anything to penetrate. It just kind of catches you.”

Which leads us to one final, very important trope of the past.

Trope No. 4: A Man Will Complete You

Warner Bros. Pictures

To prepare for Isn’t It Romantic, Strauss-Schulson spent 14 days watching every rom-com made between 1988 and 2007, and he noticed a few patterns. Crazy closets, running to stop a wedding, shellfish and ordering Chinese food from Mr. Wong’s, half-moon windows, and “so many flowers in places that flowers don’t even belong.”

But one thing irked him the most — the suggestion that “another person is holding the key to love for you in your life. That another person can complete you. That another person can make you whole. And if you just swipe right enough times that loneliness and sadness and isolation will be vanquished from your life,” he said.

Strauss-Schulson did not want to perpetuate that harsh narrative; he wants you to leave the theater — single or not — knowing that you are already complete and you always have been. “If you can accept yourself, you can love yourself and you can be open to yourself, then you can be open to the world, and suddenly you can invite love in,” he said. “That’s what we tried to do at the end of this, at the end of this movie, is to tell that story. A rom-com about falling in love with yourself.”

Paramount Pictures

And in a true sign that we’re in the midst of a movement, Shankman had the exact same idea for What Men Want, telling collaborators early on in his involvement that he “will not make a movie about a woman who’s made whole by the love of a man” — instead presenting a story about “developing a truthful relationship with yourself and understanding your own power, sense of self-worth, and your own value.”

It’s this idea that’s key to the Rom-Comaissance — that you, or I, or anyone can find love, if only we look within ourselves. That’s where we’ll find our real happily ever afters.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2If38HT
via IFTTT

More than 1,200 children were killed by guns in the US last year

Lexus Skyy posted a picture of her two-year-old son David Jermaine “DJ” Hall, dressed in a miniature bow tie and suspenders, on Facebook on November 3, 2018. 

“It is with heavy hearts that we honor and say goodbye to our previous Prince David Jermaine Hall,” the post read. 

Hall died after being shot on October 29, 2018, in Montgomery, Alabama. 

Skyy later told a student reporter at Since Parkland, a website documenting a year of child victims of gun violence, that her son rarely left her side. 

“You see me out shopping, you see DJ. You see me getting my hair done, you see DJ,” she was quoted as saying. “I realised that God kept you close so I could cherish every moment.”

Hall is one of at least 1,200 children killed by a gun over the past year – more than 80 of whom were under the age of three.

Since Parkland, a project involving more than 200 teen reporters nationwide who worked with The Trace, The Miami Herald and other McClatchy news group newspapers, tells their stories.

The project was started the summer after a gunman opened fire in Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018. Seventeen students and educators were killed. 

Since Parkland was “conceived as an antidote to” the imbalance between the large-scale media coverage of mass shootings and little attention paid to “chronic gun violence that exposes children in some city neighbourhoods to danger everyday”, the website said. 

Students start movement, make gains

While mass shootings have plagued the country for years, the Parkland shooting marked a pivotal moment in the US as students-turned-activists led a nationwide movement to end gun violence. 

Parkland shooting survivors David Hogg and Emma Gonzalez, among others, remain national figures.

After the shooting, they immediately organised and planned the March For Our Lives, held on March 24, 2018 to call for a ban on assault weapons, a halt to the sale of high-capacity magazines, tightening of the background check process, the limiting of firing power on the streets, the disarmament of domestic abusers and an end to gun trafficking.

Shooting survivors Tyra Hemans, centre-left, and Emma Gonzalez, centre-right, from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, hug as Hemans addresses the conclusion of the ‘March for Our Lives’ event demanding gun control [Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]

Millions of people across 800 cities took part in a global protest under the banner #NeverAgain to end gun violence and demanded action from Congress, according to March for Our Lives website.

“Just because a bullet has not touched your life does not mean you or any of our American communities are safe,” reads the March for Our Lives mission statement.

“Our country must make the safety of its citizens a number one priority, and we must hold those in power accountable for perpetuating the root causes of this violence.”

Students hold a rally in Janesville, Wisconsin, to demand stricter gun control [Scott Olson/Getty Images/AFP]

Since the march, the students have travelled the country by bus to amplify their message, made countless television appearances and taken to social media to call out politicians and groups for not doing more to support stricter gun control laws. 

Their efforts prompted a number of companies, including First National Bank and Enterprise, to end partnerships with the National Rifle Association (NRA). 

Polls show Americans favour tougher gun laws after decades of mass shootings. But the political might of the NRA made supporting gun restrictions a risky proposition for many officials.

On the political front, the administration of US President Donald Trump moved to ban bump stocks, a device that allows a semiautomatic rifle to fire at the rate of a machine gun. 

A bump stock was used in the October 2017 Las Vegas shooting that killed 58 people. The ban takes effect next month. 

According to the Reuters news agency, at least 20 states are set to examine gun safety bills this year. And with the Democrats back in control of US House of Representatives, politicians recently introduced legislation that would regulate ammunition magazines that accept more than 10 rounds and prohibits their future manufacture for civilian use.

Nearly 40,000 people killed from US gun violence

The most recent figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that gun violence is on the rise.

The CDC recorded 39,773 gun deaths in 2017 across the country, an increase of more than 1,000 from the previous year. The number is the largest in the CDC’s 50-year long database.

Nearly 24,000 of the gun deaths in 2017 were suicides, while about 14,500 were homicides. Data from 2018 is not available. 

In May 2018, a gunman opened fire at a school in Texas, killing 10 people and wounding 13 others. 

According to the Gun Violence Archive, there were more than 300 mass shootings – defined by the FBI as an incident in which four or more people are killed – in 2018, including in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Thousand Oaks, California, and Annapolis, Maryland. 

But Since Parkland hopes to highlight the stories of gun violence that often do not land in the headlines, giving an “an unprecedented account of the full scale and contours of gun violence as it impacts American children”.

Four-year-old Ava Grace Field and her two-year-old brother, Ashen, along with their mother were shot dead by their father in March 2018. Ava “lived in a world of pigtails and constant smiles,” the website reported

Onjeray “OJ” Devereaux-Hale, 14, was killed in August 2018 when he and his friend were playing with a gun. He was a “kind-hearted athlete,” the website said. 

Nequacia Porsha Jacobs-Lewis, 18, was shot dead on February 24 while looking outside her window in Dallas, Texas. She had planned to go to the University of Texas. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2N7m1v9
via IFTTT

Senate confirms Trump nominee William Barr to be next attorney general


William Barr

The Senate approved William Barr’s nomination in a 54-45 vote, with three Democrats joining nearly every Republican in support. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The Senate on Thursday confirmed William Barr to be the next attorney general of the United States despite Democratic concerns over how he would oversee special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

The Senate approved Barr’s nomination in a 54-45 vote, with three Democrats joining nearly every Republican in support.

Story Continued Below

Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Doug Jones (D-Ala.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) split with most in their party to back Barr. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) was the only Republican to oppose Barr’s nomination, citing his record on privacy issues.

Senate Democrats this week continued to express alarm over how Barr would oversee Mueller’s investigation into possible collusion between President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia.

Democrats blasted Barr for a memo he wrote last year to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, that described Mueller’s investigation into possible obstruction as “fatally misconceived.” They have also raised concerns that Barr wouldn’t make public Mueller’s final report on the probe.

“The memo calls into serious question Mr. Barr’s ability to impartially oversee the obstruction of justice issue in the Mueller investigation at a moment in history when that is an essential question,” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said Wednesday. Durbin added that he is “alarmed by Mr. Barr’s continued hedging about what he will do when Mr. Mueller completes his investigation.”

Barr has noted that under Justice Department regulations, the Mueller report is confidential but has pledged to be as transparent as he can.

At his confirmation hearing last month, Barr pledged his independence from Trump and vowed that he wouldn’t fire the special counsel without good cause.

“I will not be bullied into doing anything I think is wrong by anybody whether it be editorial boards or Congress or the president,” he said. “I am going to do what I think is right.”

Barr will replace former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who angered Trump after recusing himself from the Mueller investigation. This is Barr’s second stint as attorney general, having previously led the Justice Department under President George H.W. Bush.

Republicans argued Democrats should be pleased that a veteran DOJ official was taking the post.

“When it comes to Bill Barr, I can only tell my Democratic colleagues there is nobody better that I know to recommend to you,” Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said this week. “This is as good as it gets on our side.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2SWJTqm
via IFTTT