Huawei Mate X hands on: The most promising foldable phone yet

The race to build the best foldable phone is officially on.

Not to be outdone by Samsung’s Galaxy Fold, Huawei announced its very own foldable phone called the Mate X at Mobile World Congress. And holy moly does it look superior than Samsung’s foldable phone in every way.

SEE ALSO: 6 major challenges foldable phones need to overcome to prove they’re not a fad

The world’s second-largest smartphone manufacturer believes the Mate X is two things the Galaxy Fold isn’t: the future of design and the future of technology. 

The Chinese tech giant is going as far as calling its foldable phone “the world’s fastest foldable 5G phone.” 

Compared to the Galaxy Fold, the Mate X has some noticeable advantages that make it a more promising foldable phone.

Open and close. Open and close.

Open and close. Open and close.

Image: raymond wong/mashable

For example, whereas the Fold’s screens are compromised — the exterior features a skinny and small 4.6-inch screen with huge bezels all around it and the unfolded larger interior screen has a cutout for the selfie cameras in the upper right — the Mate X’s screens are larger and stretch closer towards the edges in all modes.

The Mate X has a 6.6-inch (2,480 x 1,148) front display with 19.5:9 aspect ratio and a 6.38-inch display (2,480 x 892) with 25:9 aspect ratio on the rear when folded up. 

Unfold the whole thing and you get a larger 8-inch (2,480 x 2,220) screen with 8:7.1 aspect ratio which can be used to view more content or open two apps simultaneously.

Look, no big ugly bezels!

Look, no big ugly bezels!

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

Watching a Huawei spokesperson fold and unfold the screen was truly a sight to behold. He made the Galaxy Fold look like an unfinished prototype in comparison.

And whereas Samsung’s not telling anyone how thick its Galaxy Fold is when folded up, Huawei’s proudly showing off the Mate X’s 5.4mm thickness when unfolded and 11mm thickness when folded in half. 

Unlike the Galaxy Fold, the Mate X folds backwards, not inwards.

Unlike the Galaxy Fold, the Mate X folds backwards, not inwards.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

I didn’t get to touch or hold the Mate X in my hands (nobody did), but 11mm isn’t thin for a smartphone. That said, for a foldable phone, it could be the one of the thinnest. It’s hard to say until we have proper dimensions for other foldable phones.

Check out that “falcon hinge” design.

Image: raymond wong/mashable

Besides the larger displays, the Mate X also sports a “grip bar.” It’s inside the narrow body where the Leica-designed cameras and USB-C port live.

The grip bar is where makes the Mate X easy to use with one hand.

The grip bar is where makes the Mate X easy to use with one hand.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

The grip bar is also an ergonomic way to, well, firmly grip the Mate X with one hand. Think of it like a rolled-up magazine.

The Mate X’s insides are equally as impressive. The foldable device is powered by Huawei’s own 7-nanometer Kirin 980 chip and Balong 5,000 5G modem.

Huawei says the 5G modem is so fast and its quad 5G antenna so ahead of the competition that the Mate X is capable of download speeds of up to 4.6 Gbps — 10x faster than most 4G modems and 2x faster than the 5G modems offered by Qualcomm’s X50 5G modem and Samsung’s Exynos 5,100 5G modem, which are only capable of download speeds up to 2.3 Gbps.

The Mate X will support fast 5G downloads with its Balong 5000 5G modem.

The Mate X will support fast 5G downloads with its Balong 5000 5G modem.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

With fast 5G connectivity, Huawei says consumers will be able to download a 1GB movie in 3 seconds.

The Mate X also includes 512GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM.

Huawei also says it’s packed a sufficient enough battery — a 4,500 mAh power cell — to power the Mate X. Additionally, the Mate X supports 55-watt charging, allowing it to be charged up to 85 percent in 30 minutes.

Other snazzy features include a power button that doubles as a fingerprint reader.

You can still see a slight crease, but Huawei's Mate X might just be the best foldable phone we've seen yet.

You can still see a slight crease, but Huawei’s Mate X might just be the best foldable phone we’ve seen yet.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

It’s difficult to convey just how cool-looking the Mate X is. Huawei seems to have put a lot of thought into designing the device. However, as great as the screens are, it still faces the same challenges all foldable phones need to overcome.

Huawei made no mention of how durable the phone is (though it did show off a special case for it) or how well third-party Android apps work on the various display modes. The 4,500 mAh is larger than the one in the Galaxy Fold and the faster charging is great, but will it really last?

And at €2299, which is about $2,600, the Mate X is considerably more expensive than the Galaxy Fold. 

The Mate X might be the most promising foldable phone we’ve seen yet, but that’s really not saying much. Phone makers still face a huge uphill battle convincing people that foldable phones will be worth buying.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Vn9BlN
via IFTTT

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2019 hands-on: Faster and smarter in every way

Huawei wants to be known for more than just its excellent Android phones. Last year, the tech titan surprised everyone with the thin and powerful MateBook X Pro — arguably one of the best laptops of the 2018 — as a serious competitor to Apple’s MacBook Pro.

At Mobile World Congress, Huawei announced a revamped version with updated specs including a faster Intel 8th-generation Core i7 processor, more powerful discrete graphics, faster wired and wireless connectivity, and several new ways to wirelessly connect a Huawei phone to boost productivity.

Huawei also took the wraps off a more affordable MateBook 14 with many of the same features. It’s a great time to consider a Windows 10 laptop if you’re not satisfied with the compromises in Apple’s latest MacBook Pros.

SEE ALSO: Huawei MateBook X Pro is a MacBook Pro copy that’s better than the original

There’s only one way to tell the 2019 MateBook X Pro from the old one: The lid of the aluminum laptop only says “HUAWEI.” The company’s ditched the lotus flower from its logo to give the new Matebook X Pro a cleaner look. I like it.

Aside from this one cosmetic change, the MateBook X Pro’s hardware is identical to the original and that’s fine by me because it still looks great and feels very premium.

The Windows 10 laptop is still 0.57-inches thin and weighs 2.93 pounds. The 13.9-inch display has the same 91 percent screen-to-body ratio with ultra thin bezels and the touchscreen is still very responsive. The touchscreen also has a new trick: you can perform a three-finger swipe down to take a screenshot.

The same pop-up camera embedded in the keyboard is back on the 2019 MateBook X Pro.

The same pop-up camera embedded in the keyboard is back on the 2019 MateBook X Pro.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

The webcam is still embedded in the keyboard and pops up with a press, and yes, it still points up your nose. Not a flattering angle, but it beats putting a piece of tape over the webcam on other laptops. 

And the keyboard is of course still a pleasure to type on with good key travel. Same goes for the trackpad; it’s large, smooth, and responsive.

The keyboard is not flat on the MateBook X Pro like it is on MacBooks.

The keyboard is not flat on the MateBook X Pro like it is on MacBooks.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

The power button's still a fingerprint sensor, too.

The power button’s still a fingerprint sensor, too.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

Inside, the MateBook X Pro is all new. There’s an Intel 8th-gen Core i7 8565 processor that’s up to 10 percent faster than the previous 8550 chip. The laptop’s configurable with up to 16GB of RAM and SSD storage is configurable at purchase up to 1TB compared to the previous version which maxed out at 512GB.

The graphics performance has also improved as well. Huawei’s included an NVIDIA GeForce MX250 discrete GPU with 2GB of GDDR5 video RAM. And if you want, you can use an external GPU with NVIDIA’s newest RTX 2080 graphics cards to get even more graphics performance for resource-intensive  tasks such as video editing and gaming.

Both USB-C ports are now Thunderbolt 3 on the 2019 MateBook X Pro.

Both USB-C ports are now Thunderbolt 3 on the 2019 MateBook X Pro.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

One of my favorite things about the first-gen MateBook X Pro is its mix of old and new ports. The 2019 MateBook X Pro has all of the same ports (full-sized USB-A, two USB-C ports, and headphone jack), but both USB-C ports are now full-speed Thunderbolt 3 with support for up to 40Gb/s data transfer speeds. Previously, only one of the ports was Thunderbolt 3. Huawei’s also added faster WiFi (up to 1.7Gbps) and 2x faster Bluetooth connectivity.

Huawei could have stopped at updating the internal hardware and called it day, but it didn’t. Recognizing certain strengths from mobile, Sean Ding, senior product manager for Huawei in the U.S., told me the company set about creating an “intelligent experience” that connects its new MateBook X Pro with its smartphones.

Besides faster CPU and GPU performance, the new MateBook X Pro also connects with Huawei smartphones.

Besides faster CPU and GPU performance, the new MateBook X Pro also connects with Huawei smartphones.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

One of these features is called “OneHop to transfer” enabled via Huawei Share 3.0. Tap a Huawei phone to the NFC chip embedded in the palm rest area to the right of the trackpad and you can instantly transfer photos, videos, or documents between the two. Huawei says users will be able to transfer up to 500 photos in a minute at a transfer rate of 30 Mbps.

Another “OneHop” feature lets you record the MateBook X Pro’s screen by simply shaking your Huawei phone near the NFC chip.

A third feature is called “Clipboard Sharing” and lets you copy and paste text between the laptop and a Huawei phone. It’s similar to Apple’s “Universal Clipboard” feature which lets iPhone users copy and paste between iOS devices and Macs.

I didn’t get to see any of these OneHop features in action since the software was pre-production on the demo MateBook X Pro on hand. But if they work as well as Huawei claims, they could be a hit with productivity junkies.

MateBook 14: For dongle haters

The MateBook 14 has a 90 percent screen-to-body ratio with super slim bezels all around it.

The MateBook 14 has a 90 percent screen-to-body ratio with super slim bezels all around it.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

The new MateBook X Pro is Huawei’s new top-of-the-line laptop, but if you want something more affordable you might wanna go with the new MateBook 14.

Huawei says the MateBook 14 sits between its entry-level MateBook D and premium MateBook X Pro lineup.

It shares many of the features as the MateBook X Pro, but in a less svelte design. It has a larger touchscreen with 2,160 x 1,440 resolution, same pop-up webcam, and fingerprint sensor embedded in the power button.

Specs are similar as well with new Intel 8th-gen Core processors, up to 16GB of RAM, up to 512GB of SSD storage, and up to NVIDIA GeForce MX250 graphics. The MateBook 14 also has the same improvements to WiFi and Bluetooth.

If you need HDMI, the MateBook 14 has it.

If you need HDMI, the MateBook 14 has it.

Image: raymond wong/mashable

The MateBook 14 still has two old school USB-A ports.

The MateBook 14 still has two old school USB-A ports.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

Where the MateBook 14 really differs from the MateBook X Pro is ports. The MateBook 14 has two full-sized USB-A ports (one is USB 2.0 and the other is USB 3.0), one USB-C port (non-Thunderbolt 3), a full-sized HDMI port, and a headphone jack. In other words, the MateBook 14 is for users who would rather not live the #donglelife.

The laptop also has an “eye comfort mode” that uses a special chip algorithm to filter out blue light from the display. Huawei says this special mode reduces eye strain.

Pricing will be make or break these laptops

Both the MateBook X Pro and MateBook 14 (pictured) have cleaner branding on the lid.

Both the MateBook X Pro and MateBook 14 (pictured) have cleaner branding on the lid.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

Both of Huawei’s new laptops appear mighty. I’m particularly interested in the new MateBook X Pro considering how much I liked the original.

My only concern is pricing. Huawei sold the MateBook X Pro at an incredible value: $1,200 for the Intel Core i5 processor with 256GB and $1,500 for the Intel Core i7 with 512GB of SSD and discrete NVIDIA graphics. With these prices, it was no wonder the laptops were sold out for weeks after launching in the U.S.

Huawei hasn’t announced U.S. pricing for the two new MateBooks, but Ding told me they will most likely cost more, suggesting the laptops will be priced similar to computers from competitors.

Higher pricing won’t be something U.S. consumers will openly welcome, but Huawei doesn’t seem worried. Ding says the company’s PC business grew 335 percent globally last year and it’s already sold over 100 million computers worldwide.

That’s impressive growth, but one of the main reasons anyone buys a Huawei laptop is because they’re a great value. I personally recommended the MateBook X Pro to a handful of friends last year even though they’d never heard of the brand or were skeptical of the quality of the laptop. They all ended up buying the MateBook X Pro because it offered so much bang for the buck. 

If not priced aggressively, Huawei’s new laptops might not be able to adequately compete with PC giants like HP and Dell in the U.S. But until then, fingers-crossed the price tag will be just right.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2EsuUwi
via IFTTT

Premier League Live: Man Utd vs. Liverpool

  1. MailOnline Sport @MailSport

  2. JJ Watt Loving Super Sunday 😍

    JJ Watt @JJWatt

    Bacon & eggs, oatmeal, cup of coffee
    Man United v. Liverpool
    Italy v. Ireland Six Nations

    Beautiful Sunday morning ahead! https://t.co/IKmz2CcGkY

  3. Matic Ruled Out ‘A Couple of Weeks’

    via Bleacher Report

  4. Chad Johnson @ochocinco

    Manchester United vs Liverpool ⚽ https://t.co/Hn4dtrvLik

  5. Old Trafford Is Buzzing

    Joe Prince-Wright @JPW_NBCSports

    This is the best atmosphere I’ve heard at Old Trafford for quite some time. Amazing noise. Bitter rivals. So much on the line for both clubs.

    🙌🏟🔥

    Manchester United v Liverpool is on @NBCSN right now

    #MUFC v #LFC #MUNLIV #PLonNBC https://t.co/ILM9wGFm5m

  6. This Is Anfield @thisisanfield

  7. Kris Voakes @krisvoakes

  8. roger bennett @rogbennett

  9. Live: Man Utd vs. Liverpool

    via Bleacher Report

  10. Martial Not in Man Utd Squad vs. Liverpool

    Sky Sports Premier League @SkySportsPL

    #MUFC XI to face #LFC: De Gea, Young, Smalling, Lindelof, Shaw, Herrera, McTominay, Pogba, Mata, Rashford, Lukaku.

    Watch build-up to the @premierleague clash live on Sky Sports PL now or follow: https://t.co/sI4VZpusw8 https://t.co/kTrGRDQo6Z

  11. Injured Martial Misses Liverpool Game

    Simon Peach @SimonPeach

    Ole Gunnar Solskjaer says Anthony Martial “didn’t get through the session” yesterday. Jesse Lingard on the bench as the #MUFC caretaker boss says he is not ready for the full 90 minutes

  12. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  13. Squawka Football @Squawka

  14. Match of the Day @BBCMOTD

  15. Salah, Firmino Start vs. Man Utd

    This Is Anfield @thisisanfield

    📝🔴 Confirmed #LFC lineup vs. Man United: Alisson, Milner, Matip, Van Dijk, Robertson, Fabinho, Henderson, Wijnaldum, Mane, Firmino, Salah.

  16. Man Utd Fans React as McTominay Starts Ahead of Fred

    via mirror

  17. Klopp Explains Why Alexander-Arnold Was Dropped vs. Man Utd

    via men

  18. SportsJOE @SportsJOEdotie

  19. Kris Voakes @krisvoakes

  20. Simon Peach @SimonPeach

  21. Martial Arrived Separately to Rest of Squad

    utdreport @utdreport

    Video: Martial arriving at Old Trafford earlier than the squad #mulive [@JordanMcmurdie] https://t.co/HsGYzev26W

  22. Neville’s Brilliant Reaction to Souness Saying Klopp Wouldn’t Take Man Utd Draw

    via mirror

  23. 👀

    Sky Sports Premier League @SkySportsPL

    “His agent will be into him and he’ll be wanting his move away and his pay off.” 💰

    @GNev2 says Pogba is currently playing like the player @ManUtd thought they signed, but worries about the impact of the player’s agent and his commitment. 👀

    Watch live on Sky Sports PL now! https://t.co/XjoGzbB2rF

  24. Simon Stone @sistoney67

  25. Joe Prince-Wright @JPW_NBCSports

  26. Goal @goal

  27. ‘Let’s Not Get Carried Away by Pogba’

    via Goal

  28. Kris Voakes @krisvoakes

  29. Samuel Luckhurst @samuelluckhurst

  30. Samuel Luckhurst @samuelluckhurst

  31. Kris Voakes @krisvoakes

  32. Ian Doyle @IanDoyleSport

  33. Ian Doyle @IanDoyleSport

  34. Liverpool FC @LFC

  35. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  36. MailOnline Sport @MailSport

  37. Hesham Bilal-Hafiz @hesham786

  38. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  39. Ian Ladyman @Ian_Ladyman_DM

  40. SportsJOE @SportsJOEdotie

  41. Man United News @ManUtdMEN

  42. Kyle Bonn @the_bonnfire

  43. Full Time DEVILS @FullTimeDEVILS

  44. Samuel Luckhurst @samuelluckhurst

  45. Simon Peach @SimonPeach

  46. Men in Blazers @MenInBlazers

  47. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  48. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  49. This Is Anfield @thisisanfield

  50. Simon Peach @SimonPeach

  51. Standard Sport @standardsport

  52. Simon Stone @sistoney67

  53. Joe Prince-Wright @JPW_NBCSports

  54. Kris Voakes @krisvoakes

  55. The United Stand @UnitedStandMUFC

  56. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  57. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  58. Simon Stone @sistoney67

  59. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  60. Liverpool Offside @LFCOffside

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Estuls
via IFTTT

Premier League Live: Man Utd vs. Liverpool

  1. MailOnline Sport @MailSport

  2. JJ Watt Loving Super Sunday 😍

    JJ Watt @JJWatt

    Bacon & eggs, oatmeal, cup of coffee
    Man United v. Liverpool
    Italy v. Ireland Six Nations

    Beautiful Sunday morning ahead! https://t.co/IKmz2CcGkY

  3. Matic Ruled Out ‘A Couple of Weeks’

    via Bleacher Report

  4. Chad Johnson @ochocinco

    Manchester United vs Liverpool ⚽ https://t.co/Hn4dtrvLik

  5. Old Trafford Is Buzzing

    Joe Prince-Wright @JPW_NBCSports

    This is the best atmosphere I’ve heard at Old Trafford for quite some time. Amazing noise. Bitter rivals. So much on the line for both clubs.

    🙌🏟🔥

    Manchester United v Liverpool is on @NBCSN right now

    #MUFC v #LFC #MUNLIV #PLonNBC https://t.co/ILM9wGFm5m

  6. This Is Anfield @thisisanfield

  7. Kris Voakes @krisvoakes

  8. roger bennett @rogbennett

  9. Live: Man Utd vs. Liverpool

    via Bleacher Report

  10. Martial Not in Man Utd Squad vs. Liverpool

    Sky Sports Premier League @SkySportsPL

    #MUFC XI to face #LFC: De Gea, Young, Smalling, Lindelof, Shaw, Herrera, McTominay, Pogba, Mata, Rashford, Lukaku.

    Watch build-up to the @premierleague clash live on Sky Sports PL now or follow: https://t.co/sI4VZpusw8 https://t.co/kTrGRDQo6Z

  11. Injured Martial Misses Liverpool Game

    Simon Peach @SimonPeach

    Ole Gunnar Solskjaer says Anthony Martial “didn’t get through the session” yesterday. Jesse Lingard on the bench as the #MUFC caretaker boss says he is not ready for the full 90 minutes

  12. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  13. Squawka Football @Squawka

  14. Match of the Day @BBCMOTD

  15. Salah, Firmino Start vs. Man Utd

    This Is Anfield @thisisanfield

    📝🔴 Confirmed #LFC lineup vs. Man United: Alisson, Milner, Matip, Van Dijk, Robertson, Fabinho, Henderson, Wijnaldum, Mane, Firmino, Salah.

  16. Man Utd Fans React as McTominay Starts Ahead of Fred

    via mirror

  17. Klopp Explains Why Alexander-Arnold Was Dropped vs. Man Utd

    via men

  18. SportsJOE @SportsJOEdotie

  19. Kris Voakes @krisvoakes

  20. Simon Peach @SimonPeach

  21. Martial Arrived Separately to Rest of Squad

    utdreport @utdreport

    Video: Martial arriving at Old Trafford earlier than the squad #mulive [@JordanMcmurdie] https://t.co/HsGYzev26W

  22. Neville’s Brilliant Reaction to Souness Saying Klopp Wouldn’t Take Man Utd Draw

    via mirror

  23. 👀

    Sky Sports Premier League @SkySportsPL

    “His agent will be into him and he’ll be wanting his move away and his pay off.” 💰

    @GNev2 says Pogba is currently playing like the player @ManUtd thought they signed, but worries about the impact of the player’s agent and his commitment. 👀

    Watch live on Sky Sports PL now! https://t.co/XjoGzbB2rF

  24. Simon Stone @sistoney67

  25. Joe Prince-Wright @JPW_NBCSports

  26. Goal @goal

  27. ‘Let’s Not Get Carried Away by Pogba’

    via Goal

  28. Kris Voakes @krisvoakes

  29. Samuel Luckhurst @samuelluckhurst

  30. Samuel Luckhurst @samuelluckhurst

  31. Kris Voakes @krisvoakes

  32. Ian Doyle @IanDoyleSport

  33. Ian Doyle @IanDoyleSport

  34. Liverpool FC @LFC

  35. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  36. MailOnline Sport @MailSport

  37. Hesham Bilal-Hafiz @hesham786

  38. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  39. Ian Ladyman @Ian_Ladyman_DM

  40. SportsJOE @SportsJOEdotie

  41. Man United News @ManUtdMEN

  42. Kyle Bonn @the_bonnfire

  43. Full Time DEVILS @FullTimeDEVILS

  44. Samuel Luckhurst @samuelluckhurst

  45. Simon Peach @SimonPeach

  46. Men in Blazers @MenInBlazers

  47. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  48. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  49. This Is Anfield @thisisanfield

  50. Simon Peach @SimonPeach

  51. Standard Sport @standardsport

  52. Simon Stone @sistoney67

  53. Joe Prince-Wright @JPW_NBCSports

  54. Kris Voakes @krisvoakes

  55. The United Stand @UnitedStandMUFC

  56. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  57. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  58. Simon Stone @sistoney67

  59. Empire of the Kop @empireofthekop

  60. Liverpool Offside @LFCOffside

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Estuls
via IFTTT

Femme birds and lesbian frogs: Meet the queer animals of Instagram

We need to change adoption laws to make it easier for gay penguins to form families.
We need to change adoption laws to make it easier for gay penguins to form families.

Image: picture alliance via Getty Image

2016%252f09%252f16%252fe5%252fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lzew.e9fc9.jpg%252f90x90By Heather Dockray

In 2008, a gay penguin couple went viral for the best of reasons: They stole an egg from a straight couple in order to become parents, then replaced the missing egg with a rock. Genius. 

It’s rare to see queerness represented in the animal world — if you can even call it queerness, given that these are, in fact, animals who don’t have human sexualities. Still, that hasn’t stopped the LGBTQ community from anthropomorphizing them wherever they can.

To anthropomorphize is to be human. Who doesn’t want to see a lesbian earth mother frog dispensing self-care advice? Or a high femme owl warding off a heteronormative holiday with her deadly, femme fatale stare? Tell me the last time you saw a masculine-of-center bird represented in media. How many serial monogamist flamingos do you know in your personal life? 

These moments are few. But thanks to Instagram, “queer” and queer-adjacent animal representation is starting to spike.

SEE ALSO: Zodiac shaming is a real thing. Don’t do it.

Welcome to 2019, where “queer” animals are able to build large Instagram followings. To be clear: None of the queer-animal-centered Instagram accounts claim to fully know the sexuality of the animals they depict. The “lesbian warthog” from Instagram account @lesbian_animals could very well be a pansexual warthog. Or maybe she just experimented with female warthogs in college after seeing a particularly dapper drag king warthog at the local warthog cabaret.

Or maybe she’s just a warthog and therefore has no idea what any of these humans posting about her are talking about.

So while queer Instagram animals might not have a sexuality in the same way humans have a sexuality, there’s something about them visually that feels so deeply, constitutionally queer. Queer people can see themselves in them.

As strange as that is, it matters. 

The inherent queerness of birds

Take a look at @femmebirds, an Instagram account dedicated to the bird femme community. Created by Meaghan O’Malley of Butches and Babies and Katie Horowitz, the account celebrates the femmeness at the heart of bird identity:

“Birds just don’t give a fuck, which I think is inherently femme,” O’Malley told Mashable in a phone interview. “They’re also very sensitive and hollow-boned.”

O’Malley started the account after discovering @butchbirds on Instagram, an account dedicated to the severely underrepresented butch bird community. Both accounts share photos of birds that are aesthetically queer.  

Worship the raw masc power of Bryce, a newly appointed young butch owl. Bryce is the Shane of the queer owl community. He fucks.

Next, open your heart to these queer pastel parrotlets processing critical attachment theory:

But these accounts do more than just share photos of animals. Both @femmebirds and @butchbirds draw from queer tropes to generate meaningful conversation. 

For O’Malley, @femmebirds allows her to discuss queerness in a way that feels lighthearted and slightly removed. It can be challenging and painful to discuss LGBTQ issues in more traditional contexts. Who really wants to explore the nuances of gender performance in a Twitter thread?

When queer identity is re-imagined in bird form, the conversation feels lighter, more manageable. It’s easier to discuss femme visibility among parrots (who are inherently absurd) than among humans:

“I am not really an animal person, but I love birds and their anthropomorphic personalities … and I think it’s a little bit easier with animals to connect with what you’re feeling and experiencing,” O’Malley said. “Femme birds are specifically adaptable in that way. The vast majority of birds we post are assigned male at birth. Male birds tend to be the most femme in nature. Some people have been curious about why we use male birds. But that has everything to do with our perception of femme identity.”

O’Malley is able to facilitate a conversation about the meaning of femme identity — who it belongs to, and why we associate it with just one sex — without it becoming a contentious internet forum.

These are birds, for God’s sake.

Language is key to understanding these accounts. @Femmebirds routinely repurposes vocabulary from queer culture, such as bottoming or lesbian processing, to discuss bird behavior. In doing so, O’Malley is able to have a conversation about femme visibility and even poke fun at some of the more rigid conventions through a careful curation of words.

Look at this queer femmebird trying to process her emotions with her cis boyfriend:

This femmebird walks her runway like a goddamn professional: She’s “steadfastly true to herself, her values, and her fabulous shoulder-padded/glittery pantsuited/silky bowtied aesthetic.”⁣

View this post on Instagram

This week’s Femmebird Icon is none other than Dorothy Zbornack, the tallest, fiercest, sharpest-tongued Golden Girl. Dorothy was known for her […occasionally problematic…] ability to quickly read the room, and you, for filth. When forced to explain or justify her gender and/or sexuality, she remained steadfastly true to herself, her values, and her fabulous shoulder-padded/glittery pantsuited/silky bowtied aesthetic. ⁣ ⁣ While not the tallest bird of prey, the secretarybird reminds us so much of Dorothy that we felt this comparison needed to happen. Like Dorothy and her suffer no fools approach to Stan’s hijinks/Blanche’s delusions/Rose’s non sequiturs/Sophia’s trickery, secretarybirds quietly and carefully stalk their prey and then skillfully and aggressively, well, uh, stomp them to death. Thank you for being a friendbird, Dorothy.⁣ ⁣ NB: These pairings are our best bird testaments to these icons and their energy/aesthetics. These femmebird icons are people who have contributed to the expression and identity of femme, in many cases to our intersecting movements, and generally to our conceptions and expressions of justice and/or style. Finally, these Femmebird Icons include folx who are real and fictional AND folx of all gender identities and expressions who may or may not identify as femme, but who have inspired us nonetheless.⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ [femme bird: secretarybird] #femmebirds #femmebirdicons

A post shared by Femme Birds (@femmebirds) on

Human lesbians may struggle with scissoring. Great crested grebes sure do:

These femmebirds are absolutely crushing the cis-heteropatriarchy:

Let’s be clear: @femmebirds and @butchbirds are, at their hearts, extremely funny accounts. Yes, they inspire thoughtful comment threads about gender performance and identity. They’re also weird as hell, in wonderful, tender ways that remind me of the pre-bad internet era. 

Forget everything you learned about Judith Butler and Michel Foucault and just soak up the comedy of this sex talk between parakeet lesbians.

I will always hate birds. But I am deeply thankful for Instagram’s queer bird community for giving this highly marginalized group some representation in media.

Lesbian guinea pigs, gay lions, and closeted cats

There are plenty of animals in the kingdom who possess big dyke energy.

Instagram account @lesbian_animals, which has been around since 2016, identifies the non-avian queer members of the animal kingdom. They’re less visible than out and proud pigeons. But that doesn’t mean they’re not worth paying attention to.

Consider, for example, the queer guinea pig community. Without this account, we wouldn’t even know they existed.

Possums really broke into the viral spotlight last year. But — with all those memes and all those tweets — did you ever once hear about the vibrant LGBTQ possum scene?

Probably not. Shout out to @lesbian_animals for bringing this marginalized demographic to the forefront.

When was the last time you learned about queer chosen families in the animal world? Look at how these queer koalas have forged community in spite of oppression:

Accounts like @lesbian_animals are more than just collections of queer koala friends. They meet a psychological need, highlighting “queerness” in the world around us, even if that queerness is absurdist projection.

Just like everyone else, queer people want to see themselves on television, in movies, in government, and sometimes even boning in the wild. 

So forgive me if I take deep satisfaction in this lesbian otter tape dispenser. As a queer person, I am sick and tired of seeing only cis heteronormative seal tape dispensers. 

Finally, I feel seen: by animals, and by the people creating these accounts.

It’s more than just queer animal tape dispenser representation

For all the joy it brings me to see a genderqueer rockabilly owl, queer animal representation isn’t ultimately about the animals. It’s more than that. As O’Malley describes it, it’s about the people behind the accounts and the people engaging with these accounts connecting with each other.

When you like a photo of two lesbian dogs in matching knit hats, you’re not identifying with the dogs. You’re  sharing a moment with the account’s creator, who knows what knit hats signify in the lesbian community and can laugh about it with you.

As much as you think you’re connecting with animals, you’re actually connecting with people.

Here’s how O’Malley describes the human affect behind her femme bird account: 

“Femme identity has always been something I tentatively danced around. I didn’t fully embrace it until about a decade ago. It’s been challenging because there’s so much gatekeeping around it. I was really unsure if I would be able to create femme-centric content … [but] posts that tend to resonate the most are dramatized versions of my own experience. Posts that say: ‘I am femme but I don’t feel like I’m good at it’ tend to get the most affirming feedback. It makes me feel like less of an outsider femme. I have not been able to connect to other femmes as a human but I have through my bird language.” 

Let me use my bird language to connect to the kind readers who’ve made it to the end of this story.

We see you all: the masc owls, the drag queen parrots, and even the heteroflexible parakeets. These Instagram skies are open. There’s a home for you all, my fellow queer birds, even if it’s just on a platform.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2H0D2G4
via IFTTT

Xiaomi has a 5G phone and its killer feature is the price

Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi is known for launching full-featured phones with low prices, and the company’s event ahead of the Mobile World Congress trade show in Barcelona did not stray far from that concept. 

On Sunday, Xiaomi launched the Mi Mix 3 5G, a powerful phone with 5G capabilities that costs 599 euros ($680). 

SEE ALSO: Xiaomi’s flexible phone is real and puts Samsung and Royole to shame

The Mi Mix 3 5G is exactly the same as the regular Mi Mix 3, only it comes with Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon 855 chips and the company’s X50 5G modem. Xiaomi claims the X50 allows for really fast 5G performance; one example says users will be able to download a 15-minute 1,080p video, or twenty-six 320 Kbps mp3 files, in just 1 second. 

The company did a live demonstration on stage in Barcelona with a short 5G video call, which went well but the call’s quality didn’t really give a good feel for how fast the connection really was. Ultimately, it’s likely that the quality of the 5G network you’re connected to will be the bottleneck for speeds, so you shouldn’t worry too much about the phone’s 5G performance. 

Image: xiaomi

Even though the Mi Mix 3 5G is based on a phone that launched back in October, it still has pretty impressive specs: a 6.39-inch notch-less Super AMOLED screen (the selfie camera is revealed via a manual sliding mechanism), 6/8/10GB of RAM, 128/256GB of storage, a dual 12-megapixel rear camera, a dual 24/2-megapixel selfie camera, and a 3,200mAh battery. 

The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G will be available in May in authorized mi stores and through Xiaomi’s main retail channels. It will be available in two colors: onyx black and sapphire blue. There’s no word on pricing in the U.S.

The Mi Mix 3 5G is an interesting device. It’s coming to market pretty fast, the price is good, the specs are great and the phone’s 5G capabilities will make it a part of a very small group, with some competitors — say, Samsung’s Galaxy S10 5G — being far more expensive. We’ll have to wait for other Chinese smartphone makers, including Huawei, Oppo and OnePlus, to properly launch their 5G phones, but Xiaomi’s Mi Mix 3 5G will probably be very competitive. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2IAyybC
via IFTTT

Jared Kushner heads to Middle East to promote peace plan

Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump‘s son-in-law and White House senior adviser, is on his way to the Middle East to promote the economic portion of a long-awaited US plan for peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

Kushner, 38, left the US for a five-nation tour late on Saturday, according to White House officials.

Accompanied by US Middle East envoy Jason Greenblatt and US envoy on Iran Brian Hook, Kushner plans stops in Oman, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.

During their week-long trip, the White House team will gauge the level of support for the economic part of Trump’s “deal of the century“, the Reuters news agency reported earlier in February.

Seeking regional support for the economic plan, expected to include international funding proposals for the impoverished Gaza Strip, is a step on the way to the eventual unveiling of Trump’s sweeping proposals to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

They will not brief Arab diplomats on the political component of the proposed deal, which covers all core issues of the decades-old conflict, Reuters reported.

Despite working on the plan for close to two years, Kushner has yet to release any details and has delayed its release repeatedly.

The Palestinians have pre-emptively rejected the plan, with President Mohammed Abbas saying he will not negotiate with the United States in the wake of Trump’s controversial decision to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel in December 2017.

Meanwhile, speaking in Warsaw on February 14, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Kushner will unveil the peace proposal after Israel holds elections on April 9.

Netanyahu said Kushner briefed participants at a security conference in Poland about the anticipated plan but would not go into details for fear of it leaking.

Netanyahu said he heard nothing new from Kushner besides a reference to a 2002 Saudi Peace Initiative, which offered full Arab recognition of Israel in return for a withdrawal from territories it captured in the 1967 Middle East war. Netanyahu said Kushner said the plan may have made sense at the time but was no longer relevant.

“It is not appropriate for today. The reality has changed,” Netanyahu said.

He wouldn’t comment on any concessions Israel would have to make under any US-backed proposal.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TcqQZl
via IFTTT

Trump’s Secret to Victory in 2020: Hispanic Voters

When President Donald Trump tweeted, on January 20, that he had reached 50 percent approval among Hispanic Americans, most fair-minded observers reacted with skepticism, if not outright disbelief. Trump was, after all, still the same man who announced his candidacy by accusing Mexico of sending “rapists” across the border, the same man who ordered refugee children separated from their parents, the same man who has made building a wall to shut out migrants the focal point of his presidency. Yet here he was, crowing characteristic bravado: “Wow, just heard that my poll numbers with Hispanics has gone up 19%, to 50%. That is because they know the Border issue better than anyone, and they want Security, which can only be gotten with a Wall.”

So, when even the pollsters responsible for the data Trump was touting—Marist Institute for Public Polling, for NPR and PBS NewsHour—cautioned of the high margin of error for that subset, and a possible over-sampling of Republicans, many on the left promptly dismissed it as an anomaly.

Story Continued Below

One month later, however, and Trump making an aggressive play for Hispanic-American votes in Florida and beyond. Meanwhile, new polls suggest Marist might have been onto something—and that Democrats should be genuinely worried that Hispanic voters could help re-elect Trump and keep the U.S. Senate in Republican control. If so, it will be a cosmic twist of fate: A party that has staked its future on a belief that America’s demographic picture is changing decidedly in its favor could find itself losing to a man whose politics of fear should be driving precisely those voters into the Democrats’ waiting arms.

In theory, the rosy predictions that once gave rise to chest-beating liberal books like “The Emerging Democratic Majority” are proving true: 2020 will be the first U.S. election in which Hispanics are the largest racial or ethnic minority in the electorate, according to the Pew Research Center. Pew estimates that 32 million Hispanics will be eligible to vote—a full two million more than black eligible voters, and more than 13 percent of the electorate. Hispanics figure to comprise at least 11 percent of the national vote, as they did in 2016 and 2018.

Many expected Hispanics to vote overwhelmingly against Trump in 2016. A Latino Decisions poll just before the election found Trump with support of just 18 percent of Hispanics. But the actual figure was 28 percent, which—given Trump’s incendiary rhetoric about immigrants—some analysts and pundits refused to believe from exit polls until further studies confirmed it. That was essentially just as good as Mitt Romney, as the 2012 Republican nominee, did with Hispanics—and it was enough to help Trump squeak to an Electoral College victory.

If Clinton had improved her share of the Hispanic vote by just three percentage points in Florida (from 62 percent to 65 percent of the Hispanic vote) and Michigan (from 59 percent to 62 percent), she would have won both states, and their 45 Electoral College votes. That would have been enough to make her president. Slightly bigger swings—let alone the Democrats’ 88 percent-8 percent margin among African-Americans—could have added Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin into the blue column as well.

Now, here’s the brutal truth for Democrats: If Hispanic Americans are in fact showing surging approval of Trump, he could be on his way to matching or exceeding the 40 percent won by George W. Bush in his 2004 re-election. If Trump does 12 percentage points better than his 2016 numbers with the growing Hispanic vote, it pretty much takes Florida, Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina off the table for Democrats, who would then need to sweep Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin to reach the necessary 270 electoral college votes. At the same time, that 12-point shift would give Trump a clear shot at winning Colorado and Nevada, states where Hispanic voters make up well over 10 percent of the electorate, and where Clinton won by five percentage points or less in 2016.

And if the Democratic path to the presidency looks hard without overwhelming Hispanic support, control of the Senate looks almost impossible. Any realistic scenario to gaining the necessary three seats—four if Trump retains the presidency—requires Democrats to defeat incumbents Cory Gardner in Colorado and Martha McSally in Arizona. Both have higher than average Hispanic electorates. Gardner won his seat in 2014 by evenly splitting the Hispanic vote. McSally, who was just appointed to succeed John McCain, narrowly lost her 2018 race to Kyrsten Sinema by winning just 30 percent of Hispanics. Any improvement among Hispanics for Republicans—or even just a lack of enthusiasm for turning out to vote against Trump—could easily return Gardner and McSally to the Senate, and leave Democrats in the minority.

***

Let’s take a closer look at the numbers.

A new poll from Morning Consult, partnering with Politico, found Trump’s approval rebounding to 45 percent overall, with Hispanic approval jumping especially sharply—to 42 percent, after bottoming out at 22 percent on January 21. That result, like the early Marist number, suffers from high margin of error for the ethnic subset. A more conservative rolling average puts the figure at around 35 percent, and rising.

Other polls also show Trump in the mid-30s with Hispanics. A new Economist/YouGov poll finds 32 percent approval rating among Hispanics; another from The Hill and HarrisX has it at 35 percent. In mid-January, Reuters/Ipsos found his approval among Hispanics at 36 percent, the highest since the 2016 election.

That’s about where Trump’s Hispanic approval spent most of 2018, according to previous Morning Consult polls, but about 10 points above where Reuters/Ipsos and Gallup polling showed him throughout the year. Whether keeping pace or on the rise, these polls suggest that Hispanics are responding to Trump as president more like Americans as a whole—close to 45 percent of whom approve of Trump—than like African-Americans, whose Trump approval remains around 10 percent.

That doesn’t necessarily translate into votes, cautions Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist Institute for Public Polling. Despite that 50 percent approval rate, his poll found that only 27 percent of Hispanics said that they definitely plan to vote for Trump in 2020, with 58 percent definitely voting against him. Still, a definite 27 percent, if accurate, is already essentially equal to the percentage of Hispanic voters who chose Trump in 2016 (28 percent), or Mitt Romney over Barack Obama in 2012 (27 percent), or Republicans in the 2018 congressional midterms (29 percent).

There appears to be room for growth. Morning Consult’s polling showed Trump approval among Hispanics at or above 40 percent for much of his first year in office, perhaps in something of a grace period, to which he could potentially return.

And remember: pollsters in 2016 thought Trump would get only about 18 percent of the Hispanic vote; he actually got 28 percent. If polls are, for some reason, still underestimating his appeal among Hispanics by a similar margin, he could be on his way to 40 — and re-election.

***

So why might Trump be suddenly surging with Hispanic voters?

It’s easy to assume that all Hispanic Americans must detest and disapprove of the president who derides and vilifies immigrants coming across the southern border. But it hasn’t been the reality. It is a large, diverse population that does not act as a monolith.

As a whole, Hispanic Americans are becoming politically more and more like non-Hispanic white Americans. Two-thirds of the Hispanic electorate now is American-born, and they are far more likely to approve of Trump than naturalized immigrants, according to Pew Research Center data. They remain more Democratic than non-Hispanic white voters in part just because so many of them are young adults and share many of their generation’s progressive views.

But as the political analysis site FiveThirtyEight recently noted, Hispanic Democrats are considerably less liberal than others in the party. Hispanics make up about 12 percent of those who identify as Democrats or who tend to lean Democratic; but they are 22 percent of Democrats who describe themselves as moderate or conservative. Hispanics, roughly half of whom are Catholic (and another quarter are former Catholics), skew conservative on social issues, including abortion.

After Trump’s midterms misfire of trying to rally the Republican base through immigrant-bashing, there is evidence, too, that the 2020 playbook will return to the more tried-and-true method of characterizing Democrats as extreme leftists. He, and other leading Republicans, are lately criticizing Democrats more on abortion, taxes and “socialist” positions on health care and climate change. He’s also made a targeted appeal to Cuban-Americans in Florida by vocally supporting the overthrow of Nicolas Maduro, the socialist leader who has seized power in Venezuela. There is good reason to think that those efforts will be effective on Hispanic voters—or, at least, effective enough.

The Democratic Party certainly hasn’t been wowing them. Hispanic approval of congressional Democrats, and of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer individually, is generally poor. There are few, if any, elected Democratic Hispanics who are national household names. After Clinton passed on the opportunity to put a Latino on the national ticket in 2016, the 2020 presidential field has just one Hispanic in the mix: Julian Castro, who has been overshadowed by a white fellow Texan, Beto O’Rourke.

Meanwhile, Democrats’ hope of a deal to protect the “Dreamers” who came to the United States as children, but have remained in legal limbo for years, ended with nothing to show for it. Immigration reform and labor issues have taken a back seat in the Democratic-controlled House to climate change, health care, and gun control—similar to what happened the last time Democrats took control of the House, in 2009.

And most importantly, things are pretty good for most Hispanic Americans. Trump is correct that they have enjoyed record-low unemployment, notwithstanding a small uptick at the start of this year. And, despite all of Trump’s rhetoric, and the fear it genuinely induced, not much has actually changed for most Hispanic families here. Deportations are a little down from Obama administration peaks, while immigrant arrests are a little up.

The good economy might be Obama’s doing more than Trump’s, but regardless it’s a powerful incentive to keep the current political leadership in place.

None of this is to suggest that Hispanics are entering a prolonged love affair with Trump. But it does mean that the eventual Democratic nominee can’t simply assume that Hispanic voters will flock to the polls to prevent his second term. If anything, the challenge for the party looks tougher than in 2016—when it arguably cost them the White House.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Iw9YJ3
via IFTTT

How Netflix is shaking up Hollywood’s traditional Oscar model

With its stark black-and-white depiction of Mexico City in the 1970s and the savage government crackdown on student protesters, Roma opened up mainstream US moviegoers to a cinematic world rarely captured in Hollywood masterpieces.

But more than just becoming the first Best Picture nominee for a film with the main character speaking the Mesoamerican indigenous language Mixtec, the Netflix original production directed by Alfonso Cuaron has turned the movie business on its head.

In conventional showbiz, the best movies were awarded Oscars, and the best television programmes scored big at the Emmys. Yet with the advent of online streaming for on-demand film content, the distinction between the silver screen and the tube has become fuzzy.

Earlier this month, Steven Spielberg reaffirmed his commitment “to give audiences the motion picture theatrical experience” in remarks that many observers considered a jab at Netflix, the latest titan to join the elite Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) lobbying group.

“Joining the Motion Picture Association further exemplifies our commitment to ensuring the vibrancy of these creative industries and the many talented people who work in them all over the world,” Ted Sarandos, Netflix chief content officer, said in an MPAA statement in January.

The media-streaming service, with subscription-based offerings increasingly dominating the industry, blew up the traditional Oscar arrangement this year. It briefly released some of its best feature-length streaming content, including “Roma,” “The Ballad of Buster Scruggs”, “Mowgli”, and “Bird Box”, in a small number of cinemas in Los Angeles and New York City before their online releases. 

At Hollywood’s Dolby Theatre on Sunday, the 91st Academy Awards, commonly called the Oscars, will highlight the unprecedented number of accolades for a Netflix original film. The nominees were announced January 22, with “Roma” tied for the most nominations with “The Favourite” at 10 each.

Alfonso Cuaron, left, during the Roma screening and live streaming Q&A event at Bugis Plus in Singapore [Ore Huiying/Getty Images/Netflix]

“All of the major pundits at Gold Derby are 100 percent in for Roma,” said Sasha Stone of Awards Daily. “That is quite a stronghold. Either they will all be right or all be wrong.”

Netflix hired a leading strategist and spent some $25m to promote Roma, which cost only $15m to make. Disney, Black Panther; Warner Bros, A Star is Born; and Universal, First Man have also invested heavily to give their own Best Picture nominees a competitive edge.

From House of Cards to Beasts of No Nation

Despite theatre chains protesting against Netflix’s gambit to qualify for Oscar glory, this year the theatrical earnings for Best Picture nominees were the highest since 2010, a combined North American box office total of more than $1.3bn. However, that figure excludes the relatively small amount generated by Roma, as Netflix, Inc does not publish information on how its films perform financially. 

Netflix, with around 140 million paying subscribers worldwide, is modifying its business model. Although the cinematic releases were limited and not intended to generate revenue, the move served to increase the company’s Oscar chances and also signified flexibility by the Los Gatos, California-based entertainment firm to adapt to the market.

Netflix, which released about 80 films in 2018, has become a content powerhouse rivalling some of the top movie studios. It reportedly has even floated the possibility of buying a theatre chain.

A general view of the atmosphere during Netflix’s See What’s Next event at Villa Miani on April 18, 2018, in Rome, Italy [File: Ernesto S Ruscio/Getty Images/Netflix] 

Though the company originally began in 1997 with DVD rentals, its 2007 pivot to online streaming paved the way for a massive international expansion. Then, in 2012 the company began its foray into content production with the TV series “Lilyhammer”. Among its earliest TV hits were House of Cards and Orange is the New Black. Later, popular series included Narcos, Master of None, and The Crown.

The war drama Beasts of No Nation and the political documentary, The Square, were among the earliest Netflix original films to receive critical acclaim.

Gabriel Rossman, a sociologist at the University of California, Los Angeles who studies the film industry, said that Netflix originally changed direction because they were “paying a lot for licensing and renewals”. He explained that once the “studios started asking for more royalties, then [Netflix] shifted from a ‘buy’ decision to a ‘make’ decision”. 

Rossman said Netflix “basically created a premium cable channel with a business model not that different from what HBO has been doing”. He added that the subscription-based similarity makes HBO the closest competitor to Netflix, although the latter does not rely on cable providers. HBO Now, a subscription video-on-demand service, closely approximates the Netflix approach – as opposed to HBO Go, which requires a cable subscription.

The mass media expert speculated that in the long run, Netflix could hurt traditional studios, competing for talent behind and in front of the camera. But with so much more production capacity, Netflix is a boon for TV writers who benefit from any new studio willing to consider content pitches. Meanwhile, the price of production continues to climb.

In 2017, Manchester by the Sea, by Amazon Studios – another upstart player in the industry – received six Oscar nominations and won two. Although Netflix and Amazon are branching out into original film production, they are both more focused on TV. Hulu, for its part, could potentially enter the Oscar world later on, but for now, has not made the leap.

And the winner is:

Going forward, Netflix may have much more to fear from planned new online streaming services offered by Disney, Comcast, and Warner Bros, than from any future attempts by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to restrict Oscar entry. 

Rossman, the UCLA professor, told Al Jazeera that the National Association of Theatre Owners could enact rules that would cement the exclusive 90-day “release window”, thereby hurting not just Netflix, but also independent films that have also become more recognised by the Academy Awards in recent years.

In any event, some recent studies suggest that, contrary to the claims of Netflix critics, frequent moviegoers are often also the most routine consumers of online streaming services.

Netflix has started moving away from its “day-and-date release” strategy of simultaneously making content available on every platform, signalling its willingness to abide by the traditional order of initial cinematic release followed by releases on other platforms.

Anne Thompson of the trade publication IndieWire, told Fortune Magazine that Netflix has groomed several Oscar contenders purely as a “branding benefit” for the company.

Regardless, many industry professionals predict Roma and Netflix will win big this year, and 2019 could be the first time a foreign film wins Best Picture.

If so, the golden statues awarded on Sunday evening could work wonders in bestowing industry credibility upon Netflix, no longer much of an outside player in Hollywood.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2SXPXjd
via IFTTT

How to watch the 2019 Oscars online without cable or even a TV

Just to let you know, if you buy something featured here, Mashable might earn an affiliate commission.

2017%252f11%252f13%252fbf%252fleahstodart02lowrescopy.7d073.jpg%252f90x90By Leah StodartMashable Deals

Got plans Sunday night? We’ll give you some: The 2019 Oscars are on. (That heads up was just for casual watchers, guys — we know film buffs have had this date etched in their brain since April.)

The 2019 Academy Awards will take place at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles on Sunday, Feb. 24 from 8 p.m. EST to 11 p.m. EST and will go host-less for the second time in ceremony history after Kevin Hart officially stepped down.

SEE ALSO: Where to watch all of the 2019 Oscar-nominated films

No host? No problem. The Oscars are always an entertaining shit show, especially when you watch with friends and people start to lose it when their favorite movie gets robbed. But this year is a must-see for other reasons. Diversity barriers are being broken all around, with the biggest involving representation milestones for people of color, non-black POC, and the LGBTQ+ community. Thanks to Black Panther, it’s also the first time a superhero movie has been nominated for Best Picture.

Even the stage is making statements like never before.

I think we can all agree that the world is filled with TOO MANY straight lines & square thinking. For the #Oscars this year I have designed a world based on the idea of inclusion & warm welcoming shapes that stretch out & envelope not only the audience but everyone watching. pic.twitter.com/uStpUiDnFX

— David Korins (@DavidKorins) February 18, 2019

A Star Is Born co-stars and nominees Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper will probably be sitting together and oh yeah, and Queen is performing. NO BIG DEAL OR ANYTHING.

If you’re itching to watch the Oscars but only have a laptop, then a streaming service is going to be your best friend. If you really want to be cheap sly, sign up for the free trial then cancel it before you get charged. Of course, we’d recommending sticking with the streaming service of your choice and taking full advantage of all the programming on offer.

Here’s how to watch the Oscars without cable (and find a full list of nominations here): 

Hulu with Live TV — $39.99/month after seven-day free trial

Best Picture nominee “Bohemian Rhapsody” starring Gwilym Lee and Rami Malek.

Image: 20th century fox

Consider this to be ol’ reliable. Hulu’s live TV option is the easiest way to watch the Oscars if you’re already paying for regular Hulu. At $39.99 per month, it’s cheaper to get ABC here than it is with most competitors. (Budget-friendly Sling TV recently got rid of its broadcast add-on.) You’ll get over 60 channels in total including ABC, CBS, Cartoon Network, FX, and TLC.

If needing ABC is a one-time emergency, you can sign up for a one-week free trial. When that ends you’ll be charged $39.99 per month — which isn’t bad, considering you’re getting Hulu originals plus live TV, plus recent reruns of shows like The Bachelor and Saturday Night Live.

YouTube TV — $40/month after free five-day trial

Best Picture nominee  “A Star is Born” starring Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper.

Image: Warner Bros. Pictures

Not feeling Hulu? Film junkies can also keep tabs on the big night with YouTube’s live TV subscription. One of the only other streaming services to offer ABC, YouTube TV has over 60 channels including ABC, Freeform, National Geographic, and a ton of sports channels.

Again, you can sign up for a five-day free trial if watching live online is just a one-time need. After your five-day trial ends, you’ll be charged $40/month.

Playstation Vue — $44.95/month after five-day free trial

Best Picture nominee  “Black Panther” starring Chadwick Boseman and Lupita Nyong’o.

Image: marvel studios

For dual film and gaming fans, PlayStation Vue could be clutch. Sony’s live TV subscription offers four packages, with ABC available in the lowest tier. (ABC live streaming isn’t available everywhere, so enter your zip code first to be sure.) Vue’s Access plan offers 49 channels including ABC, AMC, The Food Network, and HGTV. 

To watch the Oscars, you can sign up for a five-day free trial and cancel it before it ends. After that, you’ll have to pay $44.99 per month.

ABC Live Stream — Free with TV provider login

Best Picture nominee  “Vice” starring Amy Adams and Christian Bale.

Image: ANAPURNA Pictures

Or you could just watch the Oscars on ABC’s official site, duh. ABC Go isn’t a streaming service with a subscription — instead, as long as you have a login from a TV provider like Comcast or Optimum, you can watch live for free. (Obviously if you’re reading this post, you probably don’t have a subscription to a TV provider — but that doesn’t mean someone you know won’t give you their password. Thanks mom!) If you can figure out a way to log in here, it’s way easier than having to remember to cancel a free trial.

You can also tune in at 1 p.m. to see interviews with celebrities and other fun extras as part of the Oscars countdown or watch a live stream of the red carpet on Twitter.

Looking for more streaming content? Here you go:

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2NoR0ml
via IFTTT