Angry Birds enters a new dimension with the AR game ‘Isle of Pigs’

First there was virtual reality. Now, the next frontier for Angry Birds is augmented reality.

Angry Birds VR: Isle of Pigs arrived in February, giving fans of Rovio’s bird-flinging, pig-smashing series a whole new way to play. Inside a VR headset, you interact with the series trademark slingshot from a first-person perspective as you physically move around the playing field to line up your shots.

Angry Birds AR: Isle of Pigs is set to deliver the same experience on a smaller set of screens. The iOS-exclusive (for now) game is a free-to-download release coming sometime in the spring, and it brings that same first-person VR vibe to your iPhone .

Cms%252f2019%252f3%252f4f9d19f3 70d5 2300%252fthumb%252f00001.jpg%252foriginal.jpg?signature=awwc2qwxrd8jp7q54zx0wc g3p0=&source=https%3a%2f%2fvdist.aws.mashable

This new Isle of Pigs will of course only run on ARKit-enabled iPhones, but that shouldn’t be a problem for most users. Apple’s support for ARKit goes all the way back to the iPhone 6S, so as long as you have that phone or a newer one, you’re fine.

If you haven’t played the VR game at all but are familiar with Angry Birds as a series, getting on board with Isle of Pigs shouldn’t be hard. You play from a first-person perspective, with your iPhone’s screen serving as your slingshot’s-eye-view of each level, but the rules are otherwise the same.

SEE ALSO: ‘The Occupation’ might be a fun game, but I was stuck in a vent too long to find out

Each level is a rickety assemblage of building blocks that you’re supposed to smash to pieces using a variety of birds, all of which behave differently once you launch them. The ultimate goal isn’t to knock over every piece, but to find and utterly destroy all of the spherical green pigs tucked into the nooks and crannies of each level.

There are secrets to uncover too, as well as a varied arsenal of bird behaviors to master. But each subsequent level’s growing complexity never changes your basic mission: delete every pig you can find.

Whether or not you’re familiar with the series, the first-person perspective fundamentally changes the way you interact with Angry Birds. Your slingshot no longer lives in a fixed location for each level. Instead, you move yourself around the playing field, adjusting your distance and shot angle as you please.

Angry Birds AR: Isle of Pigs

Image: rovio

Angry Birds AR: Isle of Pigs

Image: Rovio

The AR factor means you need a relatively flat and empty IRL surface to stand over. Preferably one that affords you 360 degrees of access, since being able to fully circle the playing field is sometimes the key to finding the most effective path through a level.

I picked up on all of this very quickly during a brief preview session. The first-person perspective feels immediately intuitive, especially if you already understand how the game is played. It’s a great feeling to work your way around a level — and I mean literally, walk around it — ducking down or standing up on tiptoes in your hunt for the best angle of attack.

The leap to AR is also freeing for those who might not enjoy the experience of spending extended amounts of time wearing a VR headset. The AR Isle of Pigs is essentially the same game, but by removing the headset from the equation it becomes a much more approachable game for couples and groups of friends to enjoy together.

I’m excited to spend more time playing Angry Birds AR: Isle of Pigs when it launches for iOS in the spring (pre-orders should be open now in the App Store). And take heart, non-iOS people; there’s no news yet, but Rovio did say it’s looking at other AR-supported platforms as well.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TNCZF6
via IFTTT

Apple updates 21.5 and 27-inch iMacs with six-core Intel processors

New iMacs are finally here.

Nearly two years since their last update, Apple’s finally beefing up its its 21.5-inch and 27-inch iMacs with faster Intel processors and more powerful AMD Radeon Pro Vega graphics.

SEE ALSO: Apple launches 10.5-inch iPad Air and new iPad mini with Pencil support

The new 21.5-inch iMac with 4K Retina display and 27-inch iMac with 5K Retina display look and feel identical to the previous-gen iMacs last refreshed in June 2017. 

Apple’s changed nothing about the iMac’s iconic aluminum chassis and glass screen. Same screen sizes and resolution, same brightness and wide (P3) color gamut, and same ports (two Thunderbolt USB-C, four USB 3, SDXC, Gigabit Ethernet, and headphone jack).

Inside of sleek machines, however, is all new.

The 21.5-inch 4K iMac and 27-inch 5K iMac start at $1,299 and $,1799, respectively.

The 21.5-inch 4K iMac and 27-inch 5K iMac start at $1,299 and $,1799, respectively.

Image: apple

The entry-level 21.5-inch 4K iMac is powered by an Intel 8th-gen Core i5 processor and can be configured with a new six-core Core i7 processor option. Apple says the new Intel chips deliver “up to 60 percent faster performance.

Graphics performance has also jumped on the new iMac. With AMD Radeon Pro Vega graphics, Apple claims “up to 80 percent” improvement for GPU-intensive operations such as video editing and gaming. Whether or not the 21-inch 4K iMac can run Fortnite at 60 fps is something we’re sure everyone is dying to find out, though.

The 21.5-inch iMac comes with 8GB of 2,666MHz DDR4 RAM and can be configured with up to 32GB of RAM. For storage, it’s got a 1TB hard drive and can be customized with a 1TB Fusion Drive or 256GB/512GB/1TB of SSD.

Enable more virtual instruments in music software such as Logic.

Enable more virtual instruments in music software such as Logic.

Image: apple

Video editing will be faster with the new Radeon Pro Vega graphics.

Video editing will be faster with the new Radeon Pro Vega graphics.

Image: apple

The larger 27-inch iMac with 5K Retina display also comes with faster CPU performance courtesy of new Intel 9th-gen processors. The new 27-inch iMac now comes standard with six-cores and can be configured with eight-cores, which can “turbo boost” up to a 5GHz clock speed. CPU performance is up to 2.4x faster compared to the previous model.

Apple’s also equipped the larger iMac with AMD Radeon Pro Vega graphics, which offer “up to 50 percent” faster graphics performance. 

These processor and graphics improvements will benefit creatives the most according to Apple. In a press briefing, Apple highlighted several examples for which this extra power could be used for,. For instance, users can expect to see up to 50 percent improved performance working with Photoshop projects, or the ability to create up to two times the amount of virtual instruments in Logic, or view up to 16 simultaneous multi-cam streams compared to the previous seven in Final Cut Pro X.

RAM configuration is the same as the smaller iMac: 8GB of 2,666MHz DDR4 RAM, configurable up to 32GB. Storage is also identical to the previous generation 27-inch iMac: 1TB Fusion Drive standard with configurations of up to 1TB of SSD or 2TB of SSD depending on the specific model.

The iMac family in 21.5 and 27-inch, and the iMac Pro in 27-inch.

The iMac family in 21.5 and 27-inch, and the iMac Pro in 27-inch.

Image: apple

The new iMacs start at $1,299 for the 4K 21-inch model and $1,799 for the 5K 27-inch version, which is the same pricing as the previous generation iMacs. Both are available from Apple immediately.

I know what most people are thinking: “Cool performance update, but where’s the redesign because it’s been seven years.” Apple doesn’t have an answer to that and honestly, it shouldn’t bug you. The iMac looks no less modern or iconic in 2019 than it did when the current design debuted in 2012. Thinner bezels may matter on phone — a device you put in your pocket — but they aren’t of as much importance on a desktop computer that sits on a table, in an office, a living room, or bedroom, and is rarely transported.

Really, we want to find out what the performance gap is between the new iMacs and the entry-level iMac Pro. Can you get away with a regular 5K iMac without spending $5,000 or more on the iMac Pro? We’ll hopefully have some answers when we get these bad boys in for a full review.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2FgQAL0
via IFTTT

Inside Skopje, Europe’s most polluted capital city

Skopje, North Macedonia – Every winter, the pollution in Skopje skyrockets to alarmingly high rates. In 2018, Skopje became the most polluted capital city in Europe reaching the highest annual mean of PM 2.5, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

Tiny particles named for their diameter of 2.5 micrometres – about three percent of the diameter of a human hair – PM 2.5 are considered the most dangerous air pollutants for health.

They are small enough to penetrate the respiratory system and even the bloodstream and have been linked to premature deaths and various diseases.

“By breathing this air, we are slowly dying,” Tomislav Maksimovski, a Skopje resident, told Al Jazeera. 

“We feel the pollution. You can feel it in your mouth and lungs. Our children are suffering and our parents are coughing. We don’t deserve to live in such a polluted city.”

Skopje, in the centre of the Balkan Peninsula, is nestled in a valley between mountain ranges that hem the city in from the north and the south. This landscape proves deadly in the winter.

As warm air rises up from the mountains, it meets the colder, heavier air travelling downwards. This temperature inversion creates a blanket of smog that settles heavily over the valley, trapping polluted air on the city streets and in the lungs of the residents. 

Several factories operate in Skopje, many of which burn coal and other non-ecological sources of fuel. [Joi Lee/Al Jazeera]

“Some of the pollution problems specific to the western Balkans may be due to industries, in general older than in the rest of Europe, as well as domestic heating,” said Alberto Gonzalez Ortiz, an air quality expert from the European Environment Agency (EEA).

“For instance, the use of coal implies that the PM emissions are high. The vehicles may also be older than in other parts of Western Europe.”

Many of the power plants and small factories in North Macedonia exist from the communist-era, before the 1990s, and burn brown coal (lignite) which is cheap, abundant but highly polluting.

A 2016 study by the Health and Environment Alliance found that within areas of former Yugoslav countries, 16 lignite plants emit as much pollution as all of the European Union’s 296 power plants combined.

The loosely regulated fleet of old vehicles that crowd Skopje is also highly polluting.

Many of those came by way of the EU when the previous VMRO-DPMNE government in the country allowed the import of old vehicles in 2010.

Many of these were running on diesel and no longer met EU environmental standards.

‘Stop poisoning our only children,’ reads a banner at a protest in Skopje [Joi Lee/Al Jazeera]

But one of the biggest contributors to pollution are the combustion processes, at 77 percent, which includes household heating.

“Another reason for the pollution is that too many citizens, because of their financial situation, use firewood for heating,” said Jani Makraduli, North Macedonia’s deputy minister of environment.

Although the country’s electricity tariffs, alongside Serbia, are among the lowest in Europe, energy can cost up to a third, or even a half, of the average monthly salary, especially during winter.

Most residents cannot afford clean energy heating sources, and as many as 42 to 45 percent of the city’s residents turn to firewood to heat their homes.

A lot of those are purchased on the black market – cheaper but more toxic to the environment.

Heart diseases and strokes account for 80 percent of the premature deaths associated with air pollution, with lung diseases and lung cancer in tow, as well as other respiratory cardiovascular disease and cancer.

“Some of the more serious complications from polluted air are the carcinogenesis,” said Nikola Brznov, a doctor who works in the emergency department at Mother Teresa University Hospital in Skopje.

Younger generation at risk

Air pollution is also linked to negative health impacts on newborns and children, including on neural development and cognitive capacities that can lower performance and quality of life as the child grows older.

“After long-term exposure to polluted air, our organs start to manifest that in some chronic illness, mainly respiratory diseases and heart diseases. In the long run, I think the younger generation will be affected,” added Brznov.

With more studies explaining the link between pollution and health, as well as air monitoring apps like MojVozduh (MyAir) that draw data from over 40 measuring stations in Macedonia, citizens are more educated about the scale and effect of pollution.

However, concerns still exist in huge numbers, including those of parents across the city who are worried for their children’s futures. 

In 10 years, our health and that of our children will deteriorate significantly

Tomislav Maksimovski, Skopje resident

“I am afraid of the pollution and I am concerned for my kids,” said Ivana Georgievska, a mother of three. “That’s why we try to use our free time to go out of the city for fresh air, either on Vodno mountain or in the village.”

Maksimovski, who has one child, said in “10 years, our health and that of our children will deteriorate significantly.”

Late last year, the government announced, for the first time, a strategy towards combating pollution, aiming to halve it in Skopje over the next two years.

Some key factors include encouraging and supporting residents to move from fuel-burning heating to more ecological sources like gas or central heating.

However, many residents are doubting the government is making an appropriate investment, having set aside only a small annual budget of 1.6 million euros ($1.8m), which experts say is not enough.

“We are not seeing that the government is fighting pollution,” said Davor Vrgovikj who is part of the Cancerogenous Society which organises weekly protests in Skopje.

“Our main demand is for more funds to be allocated. We don’t care what political party it is. We don’t ask for medals. We just want clean air.”

Skopje, the capital of North Macedonia, seen through a hazy layer of smog [Joi Lee/Al Jazeera]

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2UJybgz
via IFTTT

Xiaomi’s new gaming phone has 12GB of RAM, pressure-sensitive display

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is a powerful gaming phone with some cool special features.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is a powerful gaming phone with some cool special features.

Image: Xiaomi

2016%252f09%252f16%252f6f%252fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymdezlza1.53aea.jpg%252f90x90By Stan Schroeder

Xiaomi has launched the Black Shark 2, a new gaming-oriented phone with top-notch specifications and some special features that gamers will love. 

The most notable among these is the pressure-sensitive OLED screen, which lets you create virtual control buttons on the screen itself, instead of buying a hardware add-on. 

SEE ALSO: Xiaomi’s Redmi Note 7 Pro is just like that flagship you like, only it costs $200

Xiaomi calls this technology Magic Press. It’s similar to the iPhone’s 3D Touch, but it lets you independently map the virtual button parameters on the left and right side of the screen, including pressure threshold and touch range.

As expected from this category of phone, the Black Shark 2 has specs that measure up to, or exceed, the best flagships around. It’s powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 processor, comes with 6/12GB of RAM and 128/256GB of storage, a dual 48/12-megapixel rear camera, a 20-megapixel selfie camera and a 4,000mAh battery. Also notable are stereo speakers, advanced liquid cooling, and HDR support.

Image: Xiaomi

Visually, the Black Shark 2 looks like a part of an alien spaceship, with green lines and accents all over the phone’s black surfaces. The look might not be for everyone but it’s a welcome relief from your typical, run-of-the-mill smartphone. 

Xiaomi’s Black Shark 2 is currently only available in China, starting at 3,200 yuan ($477). The more expensive variant with 12GB of RAM costs 4,200 yuan ($626). 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TNpkxO
via IFTTT

Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless Review: Excellent sound quality for a hefty price

Superior sound quality • Durable build quality

Battery life lags behind the competition • Touch controls may be hit or miss

Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless is a great first attempt at truly wireless headphones. You’ll get incredible sound and build quality, but the total battery life is somewhat disappointing.

Wires are so passè. That cord dangling from your neck is less of an accessory than it is a burden. How many times has it gotten caught in your zipper, got snagged on a door handle, or tangled in a knot? We’re living in 2019, and those kinds of daily burdens should be a thing of the past. Right?

That’s the narrative smartphone manufacturers have sold since dumping the headphone jack. And, it’s mostly true. Wires can be cumbersome. It’s not quite the disaster you often see recreated in a tragic infomercial, but wires can be messy. You also have to worry about losing a dongle if you want to keep your beloved tether. Needless to say, maybe it’s better to just switch to Bluetooth headphones and avoid the hassle.

Bluetooth headphones helped us get away from a wired experience. They showed us that we can live in a world with great sound and no wires. But, there was an even brighter future where earbuds were completely wire-free. Just like the time you pretended two Bluetooth headsets were futuristic headphones. AirPods made that a mainstream reality and there’s now a crowded field of truly wireless competitors.

SEE ALSO: 4 ways you’re using your headphones totally wrong — Clarification Please

Sennheiser are throwing their own earbuds into the wireless ring. For $299.95, Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless earbuds feature the excellent build and sound quality that you expect from a trusted name among audiophiles across wired and, now, wireless generations. Average battery life and a premium price hold it back from a no-brainer purchase, but the Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless earbuds definitely live up to the lofty expectations. 

Sleek, simple design

The Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless case is slightly bigger than an Apple Airpods case and provides two additional charging cycles.

The Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless case is slightly bigger than an Apple Airpods case and provides two additional charging cycles.

Image: CHARLES POLADIAN/MASHABLE

Sennheiser did not want to blend into the crowd with its first foray into truly wireless earbuds. There’s the brushed metallic ring with a bold Sennheiser logo that lets the world know what’s in your ears. Sennheiser also opted for the more sport-y earbud instead of a sleeker stem option favored by Apple or Anker. That’s not too much of an issue since most truly wireless earbud options have the same form factor as the Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless. 

In the box you’ll get a charging cable, the charging case, earbuds, and three additional silicone tips. Not a bad assortment at all and you should find tips that fit your ears.

After a quick charge, I put the Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless earbuds in and felt the world around me disappear. There’s a good deal of noise cancellation just from the design alone. Pairing for the first time required pressing both earbuds for around five seconds. You’ll hear a friendly vocal prompt and “Connected” when you successfully pair with a device.

Touch controls in both ‘buds

Image: CHARLES POLADIAN/MASHABLE

Touch controls can be found on both earbuds. Tap the left earbud to pause music, double tap to skip. Leaving your finger on the earbud lowers the volume.

There are similar controls on the right earbud. Tapping once answers a call and holding down raises the volume. Two taps turns on Transparent Hearing so you can hear what’s going on around you. Controls were relatively intuitive once you remember which earbud was responsible for what. The only gripe was with the volume controls. There’s always the fear of going to low or high, or a preemptive recognition of a tap instead of a hold.

That aside, everything feels intuitive. Pull an earbud out and your music is automatically paused. As you move to put it back in after a quick conversation, Spotify resumes just as you near your ear. These controls do vary by your platform of choice. I had no issues with Spotify, but I couldn’t control playing from a SoundCloud tab, for example. It was also a seamless experience when taking the earbuds out of the charging case. They would pair instantly and I never had to re-connect to my Macbook. 

The tapping does feel awkward initially, but you’ll get used to having control at your fingertips. It’s a much better alternative than having to rely on your phone for everything.Touch controls also just feel more natural than having buttons on the earbuds.

Superb sound quality

Image: Charles Poladian/mashable

Once in, you’ll forget about everything else. All the talk about Qualcomm apt-X Low Latency compatibility, a 7mm dynamic, and 2-mic noise canceling technology add up to a great listening experience. Music sounds full, rich, and well-balanced. Bass floats in the middle adding weight without bombast. Higher pitched songs never feel tinny. Music sounds robust and what you would expect when you see the Sennheiser name.

I typically listen to rock with some folk thrown in. I never thought anything was overpowered in the mix while listening my prefered genres. Going further afield, Ariana Grande came in crisp with bright production. Every genre I tested was handled with ease. You’ll be able to tease out the little flourishes layered in your favorite songs.

If the preset experience is too vanilla for you, or you need some extra oomph, the Smart Control app has an equalizer. You’ll be able to tinker until you find the perfect mix. It’s a little overly designed and more straight-forward controls may be better appreciated instead of sliding around on a sine graph. The Smart Control app also adjusts Transparent Hearing settings.

Not-so-great battery life

The build quality is what you would expect from a premium Sennheiser product. The gray knit charging case is larger than other cases. While it looks nice, it is slightly inconvenient if you’re trying to reduce clutter or bulges.

All told, you’ll get 4 hours of battery life on fully charged earbuds and 8 hours for a fully charged case. That’s 12 hours of battery life, which trails both the AirPods and the Jabra Elite 65+. Bose SoundSport Free wireless headphones have 15 total hours of battery life. The Anker Soundcore Liberty Air features 25 total hours of battery life. 

The case doesn’t feel flimsy and there’s a satisfying snap as you close the case. You’ll get a similar feeling when you slide your earbuds into the case and they snap into place. 

There’s also a LED status light that gives you a general sense of the power level for you case and the earbuds when they’re charging inside the case. Green means fully charged, pulsing yellow means the earbuds are being charged. A steady yellow with the earbuds in the case means the charging case is out of juice and the earbuds are not charging. A steady yellow without the earbuds means the charging case has less than 50% battery. 

Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless earbuds each have LED indicators. They’ll let you know if they earbuds are pairing, connected, or if your earbuds need a charge.

A wireless future

Personally, I think I’ll always be terrified of sacrificing a Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless earbud to the aether. I have been known to be clumsy and I’m not at my best during the morning commute. I’m worried about dropping an earbud and never seeing it again. 

But, I think that fear is only a natural part of evolution. I lamented that I would lose the dongle after the headphone jack was eliminated. I haven’t, yet. There was a similar fear when I made the switch to wireless Bluetooth earbuds. Surely, these buds attached by a lone wire will be no match for my inconsiderate “shove all the things into any available pocket” approach to life. It was fine.

I thought I would lose the ear tips after switching from over-the-ear headphones to earbuds way back when. I occasionally do! But, again, I shouldn’t let these momentary setbacks prevent me from the potential that tech has to offer.

So, it may be scary and there may come a day when an earbud finds a new home at a train station in Brooklyn tucked alongside other forgotten detritus. Until then, let’s celebrate.

And there’s a lot to celebrate with Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless. They sound great even if they can be slightly uncomfortable after wearing them for a long time. There’s an app that’s actually useful! You can control all sorts of things with it. 

The touch controls and overall build quality add even more value to this truly wireless option. It’s what you hope to get when spending $299.95 for a premium pair of earbuds.

Sennheiser just about nails it on its very first attempt. But, there are some nagging quibbles. The battery falls short compared to the competition. The combined 12 hours is fine, and you’ll likely not worry about the next charge for days if you’re dropping them into the case when you’re not using them.

However, you’re always going to go back to that price. For five cents under $300, it’s not too outlandish to think that your purchase should, at the very worst, be somewhere in the middle of the pack. You could spend thousands of dollars on the “best,” but we’re talking about consumer products. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless falls flat here considering its competitors with better battery life are much cheaper. Anker’s option are over $200 cheaper while Airpods, the Jabra Elite 65+, and Bose options are around half the price.

Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless delivers in quality and, if you’re an audiophile, that might be all that matters. There’s no questioning the overall quality here and Sennheiser produced a great pair of headphones in the increasingly competitive true wireless market.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2FcZHg4
via IFTTT

The first reactions to the Theranos documentary are in, and yikes

HBO's Theranos documentary is finally out.
HBO’s Theranos documentary is finally out.

Image: HBO

2016%252f09%252f16%252fe7%252fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lzex.0f9e7.jpg%252f90x90By Johnny Lieu

HBO’s Theranos documentary has finally aired, and you bet people have thoughts.

The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley was always going to be a creepy watch, but what’s particularly shocking are the details of how Elizabeth Holmes managed to fool enough rich people into given her millions of dollars for technology that didn’t work.

SEE ALSO: ‘The Inventor’ is a monster movie. Elizabeth Holmes is its star.

Holmes, who modelled herself after Steve Jobs, even wore a black turtleneck. At least one person dressed for the occasion.

There was no question how Holmes, and who she was as a person, helped her get in the room with investors.

White privilege is when an investor will give you millions of dollars because your great grandad was an entrepreneur and your uncle was a doctor so you must be a natural at those things. #TheInventor pic.twitter.com/c7Td5QaomS

— kat calvin (@KatCalvinLA) March 19, 2019

Honestly, the biggest takeaway I have from @HBODocs #TheInventor is that Elizabeth Holmes was a textbook beneficiary of white privilege. No minority with the same lack of credentials and lack of actionable results would’ve gotten a far as she did.

— Joreen Belocura (@AgeofIrony) March 19, 2019

It’s been interesting to watch #TheInventor & the #FyreFestival docs to see how easy it is for some ppl to raise millions of dollars from investors without showing proof of anything yet POC struggle to get even ONE meeting w/ investors to show an already working concept.

— CJ Johnson (@cjjohnsonjr) March 19, 2019

Non-blinking, blue eyed, deep-throated, black turtleneck wearing, blonde white woman in need of a deep conditioner:

“One drop of blood can be put in a box and spit out the results of 200 tests.”

White Men & Walgreens:


(Invests millions with no proof!)#TheInventor

— Janell8ItAll (@LiveLoveLifeDo) March 19, 2019

There were also the claims that Holmes faked a deep voice when speaking in public, for some reason.

Elizabeth Holmes… her put on fake deep voice for gravitas is a lot… #TheInventor

— Bärí A. Williams (@BariAWilliams) March 19, 2019

We are four minutes in on this #Theranos doc on HBO and I cannot stop laughing at Elizabeth Holmes “deep voice”

This story is absolutely fascinatingly absurd. #TheInventor

— Mattie-Lou Chandler (@MattieLouC) March 19, 2019

two seconds into the theranos documentary and chris screams IS THAT HER REAL SPEAKING VOICE

— amy brown (@arb) March 19, 2019

Also, can you imagine how exhausting it must be to keep up a fake voice 24/7? #TheInventor

— Brandi McNeil (@BrandiMcN) March 19, 2019

Ultimately, though, most of the reactions came back to the same thing: shock and outrage that people were willing to give Holmes so much money.

This documentary is scary because the same people being fooled into putting money in this sham company are people who have control over our economy. Investing our hard earned money without checking under the hood. #TheInventor #Theranos

— Lost Einstein (@LostEinstein) March 19, 2019

The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley is now streaming on HBO GO and Now.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2JnNlad
via IFTTT

Preet Bharara Expects a ‘Lengthy, Detailed’ Mueller Report

Preet Bharara decided not to do the easy thing and write a made-for-TV book about the sprawling legal inquiries into Donald Trump’s campaign and presidency.

But that’s all anyone wants to ask the former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York about, along with his personal view of the president who summarily fired him in March 2017 after assuring him he could stay.

Story Continued Below

Bharara, on his million-strong Twitter feed and his podcast, “Stay Tuned with Preet,” analyzes the Trump probes with the gimlet eye of an ex-prosecutor known for his media savvy and his takedowns of corrupt pols and Wall Street bad boys. And while he’s careful not to go beyond the facts — or dish what he knows from his old job — it takes little to entice Bharara to dive into Muellermania with the rest of us.

Bharara is critical of James Comey’s decision, in the heat of the 2016 campaign, to blast Hillary Clinton as “extremely careless” even as the FBI’s then-director was arguing that her email habits didn’t warrant prosecution. “The only way you can explain a decision not to prosecute is to talk a lot about the reason,” he says, citing the long-standing practice of declining to release derogatory information about a subject who isn’t charged with a crime. “It’s understandable, but it causes more harm than good, probably.”

But he thinks Robert Mueller, the special counsel brought in to investigate that allegedly tainted election after Trump fired Comey, will want to explain himself, at least privately. Bharara predicts Mueller will deliver a robust report to Attorney General William Barr that will lay out precisely why and how he decided to prosecute — or not — various individuals swept up in the Russia probe, including the president.

“He could give something bare-bones to the AG, because he’s said what he was going to say in publicly filed documents and indictments,” Bharara said in an interview. “Or, I think it’s slightly more likely — a hunch I have — that he’ll write a very lengthy, detailed document that goes into the prosecutions and the declinations at great length, with a lot of supporting exhibits as well.”

Then, he says, Barr will face an excruciating dilemma: how much of the report to reveal to Congress and to the public. Disclose too much, and he’ll anger his boss in the White House. Disclose too little, and Democrats will howl. With stakes this high, Americans’ confidence (or lack thereof) that Mueller’s inquiry has been rigorously impartial has become a proxy for our wheezing collective confidence in the justice system and even democracy itself, a subject that concerns Bharara greatly.

In leaky Washington, the broad outlines of such an explosive report likely wouldn’t stay hidden for long, Bharara predicts. “And once it is known that it’s” — he picks a number out of thin air — “a 480-page document, then let the games begin.”

Bharara argues that, unlike Clinton — or, say, a businessman suspected of defrauding a bank, but not ultimately charged with a crime — the president of the United States isn’t entitled to prosecutors’ silence. So even if Americans never find out why minor Russiagate figures such as Donald Trump Jr. or Jared Kushner weren’t charged, Congress should be told what, if any, role the president played in Russia’s efforts to elect him, along with what he did to cover it up.

“Donald Trump has a unique benefit and a literally unique system of accountability that no one else has,” Bharara says, pointing to Justice Department policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted. “There’s something called impeachment. … And the only way in which Congress is going to have the ability to know [if Trump broke the law] without doing its own completely duplicative separate investigation,” he says, “is to get that information.”

His bottom line: “So I think the president stands alone.”

Parlor speculation aside, Bharara has written an engaging book about the law (“You sound surprised,” he quips when I tell him this) that comes at an urgent time in the United States, with America’s warring political tribes either losing faith in the justice system — half of Americans believe the Mueller probe is a “witch hunt” — or investing so much faith in the former FBI chief that many are bound to be disappointed by his final product.

“It was very important to me that this not be a book for lawyers and aspiring lawyers,” Bharara told me in an interview in one of his several post-SDNY offices — this one the concrete-floored media company founded by his entrepreneur brother, Vinit Bharara, and where his podcast is produced.

The book may nonetheless inspire a few young Americans to become the next Preet Bharara, but it also aims more broadly to impart lessons from his career on “how to do the right thing, how to exercise discretion, how to tell truth from falsehood, how to keep an open mind,” as he puts it. Part memoir, part guidebook and part leadership-circuit speaker-bait, “Doing Justice” makes for breezy reading given its weighty subject matter.

Unlike many other prominent prosecutor types, Bharara is loose and funny, practiced at speaking in layman’s terms and cracking jokes — including one we struck from the record. And the war stories he shares in the book all come with lessons that apply well beyond the law, from the infamous Menendez brothers case that taught him to hone his instincts to the story of a mob boss whose love of food induced him to confess to his crimes.

Bharara still has confidence in the justice system, even with Trump as its titular head. He isn’t especially troubled by the accusation that the president, through former acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker, tried to lean on his successor, Geoffrey Berman, to intervene in the SDNY’s probe of hush-money payments Trump allegedly made through his former lawyer.

“Berman has a professional reputation to uphold and he’s going to go into what the facts require because those are the kinds of people he leads. And he would have a revolution on his hands if he did,” Bharara says. “How is that going to work? The whole world will know about it in a minute and a half and your credibility as leader is shot.”

Bharara is concerned, however, about the larger state of American democracy in the age of Trump, and the gaps in the law he has exposed by flaunting such norms as: presidential candidates should release their tax returns, eliminate potential conflicts of interest once they win the White House and not hire their own children.

“We didn’t contemplate that someone was going to just defile them in that way,” says Bharara, a Democrat who is working on a democracy and rule-of-law task force with former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman, a Republican of decidedly pre-Trump vintage.

But he’s also concerned about ordinary Americans’ increasingly partisan view of how the law ought to work — he worries about those on the right who still chant “LOCK HER UP!” at Trump rallies, just as he worries about those on the left who think Mueller, rather than a political process, will deliver them from Trump. He sees little chance the Senate would convict Trump even if the House impeached him, barring some major revelations from Mueller.

“All these people who hope that he’s going to take this scourge of a man out of the White House are going to be really disappointed when he doesn’t do that,” Bharara says. “I think it’s perfectly possible that the Mueller report will not be that damaging to the president. And all of us need to be prepared to accept that and move on.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2U02wdy
via IFTTT

Gaza rights groups denounce Hamas crackdown on economic protests

Gaza, Palestine – Several human rights organisations and political factions have denounced attacks on protesters by Hamas security forces in the Gaza Strip, who had demonstrated for several days against the increasing cost of living and tax hikes.

The new movement, formed about a month ago, was launched under the slogan of “We want to live” by a group of media activists not affiliated to political parties.

The first protest, which took place on Thursday, was repressed by dozens of Hamas security forces, who dispersed protesters by beating them and firing live bullets in air. Videos of the crackdown were widely circulated on social media.

Hamas security forces also broke into citizens’ homes and carried out arrest campaigns throughout the strip in Gaza City and Jabaliya refugee camp in the north, Deir al-Balah in the middle district, and Khan Younis and Rafah in the south.

Protesters said they were attacked with batons by Hamas forces while protesting against the dire living conditions in Gaza Strip. Israa Buhaisi, a journalist with Al-Alam news channel told Al Jazeera her father and brother were beaten up by Hamas security forces, while they were trying to intervene between said forces and a group of protesters getting attacked by them.

“A group of protesters had gathered near the centre of Deir Al-Balah camp, holding posters and chanting slogans of ‘We want to live. We want to work. Our future is lost,’” Buhaisi said.

“This a totally popular movement. People took out to the street to ask for a solution for their miserable life in Gaza.”

A force of Hamas police came to the place and asked the activists to evacuate the area, but the protesters refused to leave, the 34-year-old said.

Supporters of Hamas have claimed that the movement was backed by its rival government based in the occupied West Bank, the Palestinian Authority.

A Hamas spokesperson denied to Al Jazeera the existence of a popular-backed independent movement but in an official statement, said that the Hamas security forces had arrested employees previously under the payroll of the West Bank government, who were “blackmailed by the PA to provoke chaos in the Gaza Strip in exchange for the return of their salaries.”

“We emphasize that we support peaceful demonstration, but we will not allow the exploitation of the protests to provoke chaos,” Iyad al-Buzom said.

The security forces arrested a number of protesters and took them to an unknown area, then they raided a number of homes in the refugee camp, mostly belonging to the Buhaisi family. 

“The police started to beat the protesters in the area and clashes erupted between the two sides,” Buhaisi said.

“Vehicles belonging to the security forces arrived at the scene and attacked protesters in the area. My father, who is 60 years old, tried to mediate to stop the assault, but he was also beaten up by the forces and they broke his hand.”

According to Buhaisi, around 70 members of the family are still in detention by Hamas security forces. They took my dad, who is a cancer patient, but they released him the same day,” Buhaisi added.

Movement supported by factions

Nearly a dozen Palestinian factions in the Gaza Strip have declared their support for the youth movement and their support for what the group calls “just demands” – which include establishing a labour office that protects workers’ rights from exploitation; ending control of goods and prices by some parties and monitoring the work of private sector; and suspending all taxes that burdening citizens.

The factions also denounced the Hamas security attack on protesters, and called on the movement to respond to the demands of easing taxes.

Baker Abu Safia, a member of the leftist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), said that the Palestinian people have been very patient during the last 12 years of the blockade.

“We support this popular movement,” he told Al Jazeera. “People have the right to express themselves. We all live under occupation and the sacrifices of the people must be respected.”

In a statement, the factions said that the catastrophic crisis currently affecting the Gaza Strip is essentially caused by the Israeli occupation, and the Israeli-Egyptian imposed blockade since 2007.

The factions also pointed out a number of domestic political issues, such as the Palestinian political division between Hamas and Fatah, and the punitive measures adopted by the PA against the population of the coastal enclave, such as forcing many of its employees into early retirement and not paying the Israeli power plant to supply the population of Gaza with electricity.

The statement also laid fault on the decisions of Hamas officials in Gaza to impose more taxes, which has contributed to the high costs of living and the deteriorating conditions of Palestinians in the strip.

Worsening of public freedoms

“There were serious violations against human rights, the right to peaceful demonstration and freedom of expression,” Mustafa Ibrahim, a human rights researcher in the Independent Commission of Human Rights (ICHR) told Al Jazeera.

“The security forces, which the public prosecution abetted by preventing media coverage, violently beat up, detained and broke into civilian homes under the pretext that protesters threw stones and that the demonstration is supported by PA and Fatah.”

“This attack on human rights has clearly shown that the security forces don’t respect the human rights situation,” Ibrahim said, adding that 20 journalists were detained. “This reflects the deterioration of the state of public freedoms in Gaza.”

Ibrahim’s colleague in the occupied West Bank, Ammar Dweik, told local Palestinian news agency Maan that Hamas has apologised to the ICHR for the attack on its members, but the rights group is awaiting further investigation and accountability, and most importantly an end to transgressions against citizens.

“We will continue to monitor violations in the Gaza Strip, and demand access to visit detention centres in the Gaza Strip,” Dweik said.

In turn, Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) condemned in a statement Hamas police officers’ attack on peaceful protesters, calling it “a crime and violation according to the national and international laws” and called upon the security services to “respect the right to peaceful assembly and right to freedom of expression.”

PCHR also called upon the security services “to immediately and unconditionally release the dozens of detainees, and for the competent authorities to take the necessary measures to stop such violations and respect civilians’ public freedoms.”

‘Everyone is under siege’

Mohsen Abu Ramadan, a Gaza-based political analyst, said that this movement came as a result of the unprecedented high rates of poverty and unemployment in the Gaza Strip, which has reached 70 percent among the youth.

Around 20,000 university graduates each year find no jobs, which has caused a number of social problems in the strip. Furthermore, the withdrawal of a number of international NGOs working in Gaza has deepened the economic problems.

“The violent reaction of the Hamas security forces has incensed public opinion,” Abu Ramadan said, explaining that Hamas should have dealt better with the movement without resorting to physical attacks.

“Everyone in Gaza is under occupation and under siege,” he said. “People here have embraced the resistance wing of Hamas and are still participating in the weekly Friday return march protests.

“The state of anger is not directed against Hamas but against the current situation of the people, but Hamas does not seem to read the message and reacted emotionally,” he said.

Regarding the pro-Hamas claims that the PA is behind the movement, Abu Ramadan said: “I think these excuses are readily prepared from both sides. I blame some parties specifically in the official Palestinian media, who used these protests to incite against Hamas.

The demonstrations do have a popular backing, he said, adding that it was not appropriate for any party to use them for their own interest.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2OfCj5t
via IFTTT

India-Pakistan cricket row over army caps and politics in sport

Controversy around the Indian cricket team wearing military caps on the field to pay homage to its troops has reignited a decades-old debate over the mixing of politics with sports.

India’s national side came under scrutiny for “militarising” the game after its players wore army camouflage caps during a match against Australia in the eastern Indian city of Ranchi.

The outing, earlier this month, was in solidarity with the Indian paramilitary police killed in a suicide attack by a Pakistan-based group in the disputed Kashmir region and to raise donations for the National Defence Fund. 

But analysts and sports diplomacy experts questioned the Indian cricket team’s move, saying the gesture did “no favours to either national security nor sport”.

“It’s fine to raise money for the troops as long as the fundraising happens off the field,” Mukul Kesevan, an Indian writer and historian, told Al Jazeera.

Pakistan, which came to the brink of war with India in the aftermath of the bombing in the Pulwama district of India-administered Kashmir, criticised the Indian team for “politicising” the sport.

“We believe that cricket and sports should not be used for politics and we have said this very clearly,” the Pakistan Cricket Board chairman, Ehsan Mani, said while revealing that he had lodged a formal protest in a letter to the International Cricket Council (ICC).

“Their [India] credibility in the cricketing world has gone down very badly.”

“It’s just not Cricket”, I hope ICC ll take action for politicising Gentleman’s game … if Indian Cricket team ll not be stopped, Pak Cricket team should wear black bands to remind The World about Indian atrocities in Kashmir… I urge #PCB to lodge formal protest pic.twitter.com/GoCHM9aQqm

— Ch Fawad Hussain (@fawadchaudhry) March 8, 2019

An ICC spokesperson told Al Jazeera that the Indian cricket board – the BCCI – asked for prior approval to wear the olive-and-black caps “as part of a fundraising drive and in memory of soldiers, which was granted”.

“Given the fact that it happened in the aftermath of the India-Pakistan border skirmishing, it just seems pointed in a way that has no business on a cricket field,” said Kesavan.

J Simon Rofe, Global Diplomacy programme director at the University of London, said funds can be raised “without having an overt visual dimension”.

He referred to the annual ‘Pink Test’ supporting breast cancer and the World Cricket Tsunami Appeal match held in Melbourne in 2005.

“There are ways of expressing support for a good cause without it having overt military, let alone political connotations,” Rofe, author of Sport and Diplomacy: Games within Games, told Al Jazeera. 

Cricket and diplomacy nexus

Athletes, including cricketers, have used sport to make political and personal statements in the past.

According to ICC’s code of conduct, players and team officials are not permitted to convey political, religious or racial messages through clothing or equipment.

The ICC shall have the final say in determining whether any such message is approved, the world body said.

In 2014, English cricketer Moeen Ali was banned from wearing “Free Gaza” and “Save Palestine” wristbands during a series against India.

Pakistan-born South African bowler Imran Tahir was sanctioned for revealing a tshirt featuring the portrait of Pakistani singer-turned-preacher Junaid Jamshed, who died in a plane crash in 2016.

“You have two examples from the past already, where both Tahir and Ali were sanctioned for something similar,” PCB’s Mani said, urging the ICC to take strong action against the Indian cricket board.

But, according to Rofe, “the BCCI is a significant diplomatic player and that’s really what’s at stake here”. 

“The agenda of the BCCI is significant to the ICC and the fact that you’ve got the Indian Premier League coming up with a lot of the world’s best players, the nexus of cricket and diplomacy is in India,” he said.

Sporting boycott

Boycotts and sanctions over political differences are common in international sport, especially at the highest level.

The United States boycotted the 1980 Moscow Olympics in protest of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

South Africa, during the apartheid era, was subjected to a variety of sporting sanctions by major international governing bodies for its institutionalised racial segregation.

Athletes from Arab countries, which do not have diplomatic ties with Israel, often refuse to compete against Israeli opponents.

India, in an attempt to isolate Pakistan in the cricketing world in the wake of the Pulwama attack, urged the ICC to severe ties with countries from which “terrorism emanates”, a plea that was rejected by the ICC.

Pakistan and India are scheduled to play at the cricket World Cup in June in England, but there are growing calls within India to pull out.

Dear Pakistanis u are desirous to put on military style caps/shirts during PSL Final. Pak Armed Forces humbly acknowledge your love & support. Sports are beyond politics & we believe that our bondage is beyond such gestures alone. Enjoy the game in CityOfLights.#PakistanZindabad

— Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor (@OfficialDGISPR) March 14, 2019

“There’s always going to be politics in international sport … because people do feel strongly about the right to assert what they think is a political virtue, in the context of a sporting encounter,” added Kesevan.

Rofe echoed the argument, saying the idea that “sport and politics don’t mix is a myth”.

“Sport provides both the spectators and the athletes with a platform and some will take advantage of that for very good reasons and some will take advantage of it for covert or indeed, hostile reasons.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TfDQt5
via IFTTT

Facebook reveals more details about how Christchurch terror attack video spread

Facebook received a report 29 minutes after the video started.
Facebook received a report 29 minutes after the video started.

Image: Carl Court/Getty Images

2016%252f09%252f16%252fe7%252fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lzex.0f9e7.jpg%252f90x90By Johnny Lieu

Facebook has revealed more details about the spread of the Christchurch terror attack video, and its seemingly relentless attempts to stop it.

The social media giant said in a post the video was watched fewer than 200 times during the live broadcast, and that it was watched around 4,000 times in total before being removed.

SEE ALSO: Facebook’s former chief security officer compares company to ‘The Matrix.’ Whoa.

Facebook said it received a user report 29 minutes after the original video started, and 12 minutes after the live stream had finished. 

The company also revealed it removed the attacker’s video “within minutes” of being contacted by the New Zealand Police. Before Facebook was alerted, a link to a copy of the video hosted on a file-sharing site was already posted on 8chan.

The original video was hashed to remove existing and further posts. Digital hashing breaks down a video and stores it on a database, so that it can be employed to prevent visually similar videos from appearing. 

Facebook said other variations of the video, like screen recordings, were harder to detect, and so it employed audio technology to weed them out. 

Within 24 hours of the attack, Facebook said it removed 1.5 million instances of the video, with 1.2 million of those videos blocked at upload. It’s since shared 800 visually-distinct videos of the attack to a collective database.

Despite their efforts, Facebook and other social media platforms have come under intense scrutiny due to the continued spread of the video. 

Internet service providers in New Zealand and Australia have taken action against sites which host the video, although curiously, this enforcement so far doesn’t seem to apply to social media platforms.

On Tuesday, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said she had “some communication” with Facebook’s chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg on the issue.

“We have been in contact with Facebook; they have given us updates on their efforts to have it removed, but as I say, it’s our view that it cannot — should not — be distributed, available, able to be viewed,” she said, as per the Associated Press.

“It is horrendous and while they’ve given us those assurances, ultimately the responsibility does sit with them.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2HEJXVL
via IFTTT