Don’t police people’s online expressions of grief about Notre-Dame

Image: Chesnot/Getty ImagesGetty Images

By Rachel Thompson

Watching the footage of Notre-Dame cathedral engulfed with flames, it’s hard to feel anything other than heartbreak and grief. 

Interspersed between the devastating imagery of the burning building were people’s own photos of the cathedral, accompanied by messages and memories of what the building meant to them. 

This act of sharing one’s personal connection to the monument proved divisive, however. Some tweeted that they felt people were making the tragedy about themselves, others interpreted the tweets as bragging about having travelled to Paris. 

To me, the backlash to these expressions of sadness felt both callous and cynical. In moments like these, where centuries of history goes up in smoke, do we really want to police people’s (very real) grief? 

SEE ALSO: The most striking newspaper tributes to Notre-Dame

Just as we mourn the loss of humans who we know and love, we grieve for the loss of buildings that meant something to us, and to the world. This was a moment of collective sadness for a building that represented many things to many people. 

It is a place of worship first and foremost, a symbol of Catholicism, an architectural wonder, a home to works of art, and an emblem of France. To Parisians, Notre-Dame is part of the very fabric of the city and its skyline, it is Paris’ beating heart, its nucleus. To people who travel to Paris from far and wide, Notre-Dame is a sight many have saved up to behold, it is the backdrop to marriage proposals, to photographs, to fond memories.

Why, therefore, when the cathedral’s meaning is so profoundly personal, must we take it upon ourselves to tell others how they should articulate their emotional responses to such an event?

While the file was still ablaze, so too were our social media timelines with footage of the tragedy unfolding in real time. It was difficult and, at times, devastating to watch. I, as many others did too, had to tap out of Twitter because it was too upsetting to watch. Later, when I logged back on, it was heartwarming to see photos of smiling faces standing outside Notre-Dame. That is how we should remember this building. People posted travel photos, even photos taken on the very same day as the tragedy, they shared anecdotes, memories, and the wish that they’d visited more often. Reading and seeing these tributes was profoundly moving.  

In the grand scheme of the world’s problems, one landmark church burning might seem almost less important. But it’s our collective history burning – all of us who have ever visited or seen it or studied it, and more…

💔 for Paris and Notre Dame pic.twitter.com/3R0AbhPgpG

— Kirsten Alana Photography 📷 ✈ (@KirstenAlana) April 15, 2019

I am absolutely terrified of heights, but made myself climb to see Notre Dame’s gargoyles back in 2006. I took this photo and I’m so glad I did. What a terrible loss. #NotreDame pic.twitter.com/p4aizqy2ez

— b.andherbooks (@bandherbooks) April 15, 2019

We each grieve in different ways and some people are more private than others in expressing that emotion. Just as we don’t tell each other how to deal with the loss of people, we shouldn’t police the way people choose to articulate sadness on the internet. 

To reframe that, we might consider the outpouring of tweets and photos as expressions of love for something beautiful. Social media is — and should be — a place to talk about things that matter to us, buildings that are important to us, without fear of being judged and labelled selfish. 

Truth is, we often are hesitant about showing vulnerability on the internet for fear of how others might misinterpret it. I posted my own tribute to Notre-Dame and how I wished I’d looked up more when I used to visit Paris regularly. But before I hit send on my tweet, I wondered for a moment if that tweet might be construed. It’s always good to sense-check tweets before we sent to make sure we’re not being insensitive, but holding back vulnerability because strangers might think we’re making a tragedy about ourselves just feels sad. 

Ultimately, these negative responses to people’s tributes say a lot more about those reacting than they do about those posting the tributes. 

What happened to Notre Dame in Paris today is horrifying. The video was difficult to watch. But what’s so beautiful is the amount of love for the site and those in Paris – people worldwide sharing photos & fond memories of their time visiting.

— Katlyn Gerken (@KatlynGerken) April 16, 2019

Loss should be talked about — even if it’s not human loss. 

People aren’t making this tragedy about themselves, they’re talking about why it matters to them, and to the world. It takes courage to do so, and we should recognise that, not denigrate it. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2GqpJy9
via IFTTT

African Union sets deadline for Sudan power transfer

The African Union has warned Sudan’s military that the country has 15 days to install a civilian government or risk getting kicked out of the bloc, as a sit-in demanding the army hand over power entered its 11th day on Tuesday.

Sudan must aim to hold “free, fair and transparent elections” as soon as possible, the AU’s Peace and Security Council said it in a statement on Monday.

“A military-led transition would be completely contrary to the aspirations of the people of Sudan,” it added.

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed on Monday became the first foreign leader to meet with members of Sudan’s ruling military council and pledged his support for the neighbouring country.

Sudan military vows to reform intelligence service amid protests (2:32)

“The Transitional Military Council has met many demands of the protesters, but some of the demands of the protesters need time to answer,” said General Jalal Eldin Alshaik, a member of the council, after the meeting.

He also vowed that the sit-in would not be dispersed from outside the army’s headquarters and appeared to change the council’s position on former president Omar al-Bashir’s extradition to The Hague.

“The decision whether to extradite al-Bashir to the [International Criminal Court] will be made by a popularly elected government and not the transitional military council,” he said at a press conference in Addis Ababa.

The council had previously said al-Bashir – who was arrested after Thursday’s military coup – would not be extradited to face charges of war crimes in Darfur.

Fears of old guard’s return

Fearing that the core of the old establishment is far from gone, the Sudanese Professionals Association (SPA) on Monday reiterated its call for the military council to be dissolved and substituted with a civilian one that would only include “limited” army representation.

The umbrella organisation, which spearheaded the months of protests that precipitated al-Bashir’s removal, also demanded the sacking of Sudan’s prosecutor general and judiciary head, as well as the disbanding of the former president’s National Congress Party (NCP).

“The objectives of the revolution cannot be achieved totally and completely in the face of the backstage manipulations by the remnants of the regime,” SPA member Taha Osman told reporters in the capital, Khartoum.

“The key demand is the formation of a civil council to guarantee that the revolution is safeguarded and all the goals are achieved.”

On April 11, after nearly four months of the popular uprising, a military takeover ended al-Bashir’s 30-year authoritarian rule. In a televised address to the nation, Sudan’s then-Defence Minister, Lieutenant General Ahmed Awad Ibn Auf, announced that al-Bashir – who had seized power himself in a 1989 coup – had been arrested and taken to a “safe” location.

But the protesters’ elation quickly turned to anger as Ibn Auf, a long-time al-Bashir loyalist, announced the establishment of a two-year transitional military council and later was sworn in as its head.

Defying a newly imposed curfew, the demonstrators continued taking to the streets, denouncing Ibn Auf’s statement as a “farce”. Barely 24 hours later, the military council was forced to appoint its second leader in two days, with Lieutenant General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan replacing Ibn Auf.

Transfer of power 

Since then, negotiations have taken place between the council and protest organisers, who on Saturday submitted a list of demands to Sudan’s military rulers. 

The military council is yet to formally respond to those demands, which include the transfer of power to a civilian-headed transitional authority for a period of four years, at the end of which elections will be held.

It has, however, made a number of moves in an apparent bid to appease the protesters, including the lifting of the night-time curfew.

Al-Burhan has also vowed to restructure state institutions and “uproot the [Bashir] regime and its symbols” – but has also said that the transition to civilian rule could take up to two years.

Separately, al-Bashir’s National Congress Party issued a statement criticising its treatment in recent days. 

“[The coup] has encouraged some political forces to call for political exclusion and to launch a hatred campaign towards the National Congress Party – calling for its dissolution and confiscating its property, and we will deal with that according to the legal procedures,” the party said.

Inside Story: Sudan protesters continue to demand civilian government (25:09)

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IBHBaS
via IFTTT

The most striking newspaper tributes to Notre-Dame

Fire rages through the iconic Notre-Dame Cathedral on April 15, 2019 in Paris, France.
Fire rages through the iconic Notre-Dame Cathedral on April 15, 2019 in Paris, France.

Image: Philippe Wang/Getty Images

By Rachel Thompson

850 years of history went up in smoke on Monday when a fire ravaged the medieval Notre-Dame cathedral in Paris, France. 

The fire caused the building’s spire and roof to collapse, but the main structure and two bell towers have been saved, per officials. 

SEE ALSO: French officials respond to Trump’s suggestion for putting out the Notre Dame fire

The morning after the blaze broke out, newspapers around the world paid tribute to the iconic monument, one of France’s most famous buildings. 

French daily newspaper Le Parisien led with the headline “Notre-Dame Des Larmes,” which means “Our Lady of Tears.” 

Libération used a photograph from the moment the building’s spire collapsed and the headline “Notre Drame,” meaning “Our Tragedy.”  

The Daily Telegraph in the UK opted for a particularly striking photo. 

“Nine centuries of history lost to the unholy inferno,” read the Daily Mail’s front page. 

French daily newspaper C News went with “La Desolation”.  

“Inferno devastates Notre-Dame,” read The Guardian’s front page. 

A sad day for Paris.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Gqm7w5
via IFTTT

Twitter Goes in on Dubs 😅

  • Josiah Johnson @KingJosiah54

    “How y’all blow a 31-point lead to the Clippers at the crib?”

    Warriors: https://t.co/N4SSxF0jup

  • Hoop Central @TheHoopCentral

    Warriors blew a 31-Point lead to the 8th seed Clippers
    https://t.co/jzZdKInsM0

  • PinPoint @SportsPinPoint

    “How many points did the Clippers come back from?” https://t.co/vEr8GebiGS

  • A @peacelivehappy

    Kevin Durant to the Clippers confirmed

    #clippers #warriors https://t.co/JIBYJLxh5V

  • Cowboy Kof @KofieYeboah

    Warriors blew a 31 points lead? https://t.co/60Lvktj04M

  • Jeopardy! Sports @JeopardySports

    “Who are: the Golden State Warriors?”
    #JeopardySports #NBAPlayoffs https://t.co/UDB1kiTavz

  • Complex Sports @ComplexSports

    NBA fans watching the Warriors blow a 31-point lead https://t.co/HVHUXNj7b5

  • LakeShowYo @LakeShowYo

    No one:

    Everyone when Warriors blow 31pt lead: https://t.co/KXYbzqKwgT

  • JOE @JWepp

    After watching Warriors blow a 31 point lead in the playoffs

    Twitter: https://t.co/v6LZQUXE9o

  • COOZY @coozybaby

    Me with the warriors slander when they lose https://t.co/CEBVu7veLR

  • Shea Serrano @SheaSerrano

    twitter is so much fun when the warriors lose lol

  • Lord davane. House Free Throws. @YoItsKenneth

    WARRIORS BLEW A 31 POINT LEAD LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    SHOT 40/45 FROM THE FREE THROW LINE AND LOST

    LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOO

    BRUH 31 HAUNTS GSW FANS FOREVER

    https://t.co/w0fwIUAnGC

  • HoopMixOnly @HoopMixOnly

    Lou Williams just had 36 points and 11 assists. To lead a comeback down 31 points to the Warriors. https://t.co/wbyeQW12DM

  • Kawhi Stan @TheVokality

    Clippers vs Warriors series summary:
    #LACvsGSW #warriorsground https://t.co/Ea8yHJkz17

  • 6lack Star @Jaywop6

    The Warriors blew a 31 point lead where they shot 45 FREE THROWS https://t.co/fpXlnukixz

  • Tyler Pierce @_tylerpierce

    The Warriors were up 31 and shot 45 free throws….and still lost https://t.co/NFvjeOO933

  • Johnny Sauce @Real_JPIII

    KD refuses to brush his hair and tonight loses to a team called the Clippers https://t.co/YnvUtmTubu

  • Raymond Feltons Burner @RaymondFelton23

    @BleacherReport :Warriors in the 3rd and 4th https://t.co/ilUCy8hVou

  • Lu¢¢i🍀 @DripLawd

    All clippers fans pulling up next game like https://t.co/6qLSIn1lNZ

  • OK cool Hook ’em🤘 @Cam_Unstoppable

    Warriors slander going up all night! https://t.co/DtuSq8ONTl

  • Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2PcDlzK
    via IFTTT

    Twitter Goes in on Dubs 😅

  • Josiah Johnson @KingJosiah54

    “How y’all blow a 31-point lead to the Clippers at the crib?”

    Warriors: https://t.co/N4SSxF0jup

  • Hoop Central @TheHoopCentral

    Warriors blew a 31-Point lead to the 8th seed Clippers
    https://t.co/jzZdKInsM0

  • PinPoint @SportsPinPoint

    “How many points did the Clippers come back from?” https://t.co/vEr8GebiGS

  • A @peacelivehappy

    Kevin Durant to the Clippers confirmed

    #clippers #warriors https://t.co/JIBYJLxh5V

  • Cowboy Kof @KofieYeboah

    Warriors blew a 31 points lead? https://t.co/60Lvktj04M

  • Jeopardy! Sports @JeopardySports

    “Who are: the Golden State Warriors?”
    #JeopardySports #NBAPlayoffs https://t.co/UDB1kiTavz

  • Complex Sports @ComplexSports

    NBA fans watching the Warriors blow a 31-point lead https://t.co/HVHUXNj7b5

  • LakeShowYo @LakeShowYo

    No one:

    Everyone when Warriors blow 31pt lead: https://t.co/KXYbzqKwgT

  • JOE @JWepp

    After watching Warriors blow a 31 point lead in the playoffs

    Twitter: https://t.co/v6LZQUXE9o

  • COOZY @coozybaby

    Me with the warriors slander when they lose https://t.co/CEBVu7veLR

  • Shea Serrano @SheaSerrano

    twitter is so much fun when the warriors lose lol

  • Lord davane. House Free Throws. @YoItsKenneth

    WARRIORS BLEW A 31 POINT LEAD LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    SHOT 40/45 FROM THE FREE THROW LINE AND LOST

    LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOO

    BRUH 31 HAUNTS GSW FANS FOREVER

    https://t.co/w0fwIUAnGC

  • HoopMixOnly @HoopMixOnly

    Lou Williams just had 36 points and 11 assists. To lead a comeback down 31 points to the Warriors. https://t.co/wbyeQW12DM

  • Kawhi Stan @TheVokality

    Clippers vs Warriors series summary:
    #LACvsGSW #warriorsground https://t.co/Ea8yHJkz17

  • 6lack Star @Jaywop6

    The Warriors blew a 31 point lead where they shot 45 FREE THROWS https://t.co/fpXlnukixz

  • Tyler Pierce @_tylerpierce

    The Warriors were up 31 and shot 45 free throws….and still lost https://t.co/NFvjeOO933

  • Johnny Sauce @Real_JPIII

    KD refuses to brush his hair and tonight loses to a team called the Clippers https://t.co/YnvUtmTubu

  • Raymond Feltons Burner @RaymondFelton23

    @BleacherReport :Warriors in the 3rd and 4th https://t.co/ilUCy8hVou

  • Lu¢¢i🍀 @DripLawd

    All clippers fans pulling up next game like https://t.co/6qLSIn1lNZ

  • OK cool Hook ’em🤘 @Cam_Unstoppable

    Warriors slander going up all night! https://t.co/DtuSq8ONTl

  • Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2PcDlzK
    via IFTTT

    ‘Game of Thrones’ star Isaac Wright has tweeted about all those Bran Stark memes

    “I’ve seen things you wouldn’t believe…”

    Image: hbo

    By Sam Haysom

    If there’s one thing the Game of Thrones fanbase loves (possibly) even more than theories, it’s roasting Bran Stark.

    With his thousand-mile stare and habit of coming out with largely unnerving sentences, the kid is just very meme-worthy.

    SEE ALSO: Bran Stark is a creep, and here are the memes to back it up

    The good news? You can now be safe in the knowledge that Isaac H. Wright (the man behind the Bran) is well and truly on board with the memes as well.

    Wright tweeted that on Monday night, the day after episode one of Season 8 aired. He also retweeted this response:

    Oh, Bran. When will you finally do something that justifies the 800 hours of television we wasted watching you slowly go beyond the wall and back?

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IFTGvL
    via IFTTT

    ‘Game of Thrones’ power rankings: It’s couples week!

    The Game of Thrones power rankings decide who is most likely to rule Westeros at the end of Season 8.

    We’re making these predictions based on what the showrunners are likely to think is the best possible story. You can see the rankings for the previous episode, “The Dragon and the Wolf,” here.


    Though it may have seemed like a low-key episode that concerned itself mostly with reuniting characters, Game of Thrones‘ Season 8 opener “Winterfell” has in fact introduced plenty of new options that could tip the final balance of power in Westeros.  

    Chief among these: The possibility that we will see two monarchs in charge of Westeros at the end of the series, an option that has many powerful antecedents in real-world history. Think of the Catholic monarchs in Spain in the 15th century, Ferdinand and Isabella, or the Protestant co-regents in Great Britain in the 17th century, William and Mary.  

    This possibility was mentioned explicitly in the case of Dany and Jon, but there are a couple of other power couples we could see occupying a pair of Iron Thrones at the end of the show. Here’s the least likely:

    10. Cersei & Euron (new entry)

    Now that the Queen in King’s Landing has found herself a new lover, what could possibly go wrong? Surely this lovable and upstanding pair will get it together, unite their banners and ships, and never once think of stabbing each other in the back.

    I’m kidding, but only kind of. The lure of leaving this volatile couple in charge at the end of it all may be irresistible from a story perspective. Not only would it subvert our expectations if these two could make it work, but Euron’s ignorance of Cersei’s pregnancy — along with his promise to put a king inside her — would make for some nice symmetry. 

    As in Season 1, Cersei would have fooled a powerful and arrogant military leader into thinking that her and Jaime’s kid was his. Letting a man think he’s in charge while pulling the strings and grooming the next generation: This is a more comfortable and familiar position for Cersei than ruling solo, which continues to paint a giant target on her back.  

    9. Daenerys Targaryen (-5) 

    Blinded by love and by her own arrogance, Dany cannot see a whole bunch of threats to her position. The people of the North hate her, which doesn’t bode well for the coming siege of Winterfell. Her dragons are off their food. And while they can smell a secret Targaryen in their midst (Jon), she doesn’t suspect a threat to her rule — not even when he turns out to be a pro dragon rider on his first time out. If there’s one thing Game of Thrones likes to punish characters for, it’s puffed-up cluelessness.    

    8. Jaime Lannister (unchanged)

    Sure, Jaime looks like he’s walked into a whole pile of trouble. He just encountered the creepy grown-up omniscient version of the kid he threw out of a window eight seasons ago. And from the look of the teasers for the next episode, one or two other characters may have one or two other bones to pick with him — such as Dany, whose father he killed. The Kingslayer’s ravens are all coming home to roost at once. 

    But this is all happening so early in the season that there’s plenty of opportunity for Jaime’s fortunes to turn again — and for the most redemptive story arc in the whole series to reach a surprising end. After all, Jaime still has a greater claim on the throne than his sister-lover. 

    7. Sansa Stark (-4)

    As she did at the end of last season, the Lady of Winterfell once again proved herself the most eminently sensible person in Westeros. Who else is thinking about provisions for the Long Night? Who else sees Cersei for what she really is, even after the treacherous Queen’s promise of troops to fight the White Walkers? 

    We still think Sansa’s in with a shot of being the last leader standing in Westeros by default. Especially if she teams up with an old frenemy in the shape of … her husband.  

    6. Sansa & Tyrion (new entry)

    Much of the audience had the same realization when Sansa and Tyrion met again for the first time since Joffrey’s wedding: oh yeah, they never actually divorced, did they? And while Sansa’s line about “I used to think you were the smartest man in the world” was played as a dis, it was also the closest she has come to a flirtatious compliment. 

    Maybe she can learn to love being married to the Imp, at least for the sake of jointly ruling the kingdom. Tyrion was indeed dumb to trust Cersei, which is why he needs a partnership with someone like Sansa. 

    In short, these two are looking like the cleverest couple of survivors in Westeros at the moment. They were both forced to play the game, and both learned a lot from it. Putting them in charge at the end would be the smartest ending, if not the most satisfying. 

    5. Samwell Tarly (new entry)

    It’s the Revenge of the Nerds scenario: shy, bookish Sam so driven to rage by the actions of sorority queen Dany that he enters the power game himself, and wins. It would make for a hell of a plot twist — and a realistic one, since we’ve never seen Sam as mad as he was in “Winterfell.” 

    As the new head of wealthy House Tarly, Sam presumably has a few banners he can call — not to mention the newly homeless Night’s Watch, a Valyrian steel sword, and a friend whose claim to the throne Sam thinks he’s upholding. In the chaos that would ensue after a human victory or ceasefire with the White Walkers, with everyone racing to resume internal conflict, that may be enough. 

    It would also make for one of the more satisfying endings, story-wise. The significant Sam-like portion of the nerd audience would just love to crow about this former crow’s unexpected last-minute victory.      

    4. Dany & Jon (new entry)

    As any good political adviser would, Varys, Tyrion and Ser Davos saw the value in selling Jon and Dany as a pair of monarchs. What will keep the commoners of north and south united through the Long Night of Winter better than a good-looking young royal couple they can stan — the William and Kate of Westeros?

    With a brains trust like that behind them, and a mainstream TV audience that also stans the couple, we have to give this possible ending its due. Of course, it wouldn’t be in keeping with the original theme: Game of Thrones author George R.R. Martin specifically designed his story to subvert the “happily ever after” endings of high fantasy, particularly the ones about kings and queens ruling wisely with no further incident until the end of their days. 

    Much more likely that one of them will rule while lamenting the loss of the other, which brings us to:   

    3. Jon Snow, a.k.a. Aegon Targaryen the Sixth (+2)

    Now he knows his true name, there’s no turning back. Informed by Sam that he alone is the rightful ruler of Westeros, Jon’s face went through a galaxy of turbulent emotions. He has repeatedly been promoted far beyond the roles he asked for; this would be the ultimate example. 

    Jon has always tried to do the right and honorable thing. Here the right and honorable thing basically involves usurping his girlfriend’s usurpation. Will he end up betraying her and holding her in his arms as she dies, mirroring what happened with his wildling love Ygritte?

    What a bind! What an ending, Jon alone, heartbroken and miserable, stuck on a throne he hates, for the rest of his days!   

    SEE ALSO: ‘Game of Thrones’ fans are analysing Arya Stark’s secret weapon design

    2. No One (-1)

    It’s still one of the most satisfying curveballs the story can throw us. Either annihilate everyone with no last-minute redemption — which, let’s be honest, even an audience schooled in Thrones‘ ability to slaughter characters does not actually expect to happen for real. Or set up a Night’s Watch-style democracy, as Tyrion suggested a season ago. 

    If it’s the latter, Gendry the Baratheon bastard blacksmith would be a natural choice to melt his dad’s nasty sword-filled chair down once and for all — which would make for one hell of a final scene. 

    1. The Night King (+1)

    Although he was a no-show this week, the mysterious leader of the White Walkers left a hell of a gruesome calling card. It’s the same severed-limb spiral pattern seen in Season 1, Episode 1, and it reminds us that the most stoically silent Thrones character may have agency of some sort beyond resurrecting corpses. Perhaps he does intend to rule an undead zombie version of Westeros after all! 

    Plus the repeated mentions of the Iron Islands as a fallback location for living humanity makes us think that the entire remaining cast may end up there, shivering in the constant fog, lamenting the loss of all the trees Euron cut down to build his insta-fleet. Alive but in exile across the sea, just as Dany was in Season 1: What’s more bittersweet an ending for our remaining heroes than that?

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2GpaZPQ
    via IFTTT

    ‘Game of Thrones’ fan spots some grim foreshadowing in an old episode of the show

    Warning: Contains icy spoilers for Game of Thrones Season 8, episode 1.

    Nobody can confidently predict the ending of Game of Thrones. But there are several things that seem, at this point, to be almost inevitable.

    Top of the list of near-guarantees? Jon and Daenerys’ relationship is not going to end well. I’m not just talking about the fact they’re related, either — I mean one of them, at least, is definitely not going to survive the show’s ending.

    SEE ALSO: ‘Game of Thrones’ fans are analysing Arya Stark’s secret weapon design

    There’s plenty of evidence to back this up — Jon’s already technically dead; George R.R. Martin has said the ending of the story will be “bittersweet”; his past stories about dragon-riders point towards a battle that will likely lead to the deaths of most involved; the cast were all apparently in tears reading the final script, suggesting at least a few of our favourites will probably snuff it. At this point, the evidence just keeps stacking up.

    Anyway, following Jon and Daenerys’ post-dragon-riding scene in the first episode of Season 8, Reddit user u/fanofthrones5555 shared the following connection with a moment from Season 3, Episode 5.

    Sorry, Dany — the last time Jon Snow took his partner to a private place in the icy North, things didn’t end well.

    Still, if I had to make a guess, I don’t think the show will follow the same pattern twice. 

    This time I think it’ll be Jon Snow’s luck that runs out.

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IoOFrO
    via IFTTT

    The Lannister crossbow in ‘Game of Thrones’ Season 8, explained

    OK, Game of Thrones fans, we’ve got good news and bad news.

    The good news is that Ser Bronn of the Blackwater is back, baby! 

    The bad news is he’s back because Cersei tasked him with killing his two former bromantic employers, Tyrion and Jaime Lannister. 

    To be more specific, Qyburn made the request on her behalf, after rudely interrupting Bronn’s orgy-filled retirement. Then he handed Bronn a familiar-looking crossbow as the weapon of choice for the hit job because, as Qyburn admits, “She has a keen sense of poetic justice.”

    Of course this all starts with the OG Lannister sadist

    Of course this all starts with the OG Lannister sadist

    Image: hbo

    That “poetic justice” comes from the crossbow’s storied history in the Lannister family. Because it first came into the family’s possession thanks to Joffrey’s keen sense of cruelty. 

    In Season 3, he shows his new gold-engraved weapon to Margaery, seeming to believe murder gets her as hot as it gets him. Calling it “one of the finest weapons in the Seven Kingdoms,” he later tortures Sansa with it in front of everyone in the throne room. Finally, Joffrey fulfills his sadistic fantasies by using it to brutally murder Ros, the sex worker Littlefinger gave to Joffrey after discovering she’d been spying on the brothel owner.

    SEE ALSO: ‘Game of Thrones’ fans are analysing Arya Stark’s secret weapon design

    But that’s not even the full story.

    The last time we saw the crossbow, Tyrion was the one wielding it. He picked it up after strangling Shae to death, and aimed it squarely on Tywin as he sat on the shitter. We all know how that went down. And there’s a bit of twisted poetic justice that Tyrion uses it to kill Tywin only after Tywin keeps repeating the word “whore” to describe the women Tyrion has loved.

    Tyrion might at least appreciate the irony of Cersei's weapon choice

    Tyrion might at least appreciate the irony of Cersei’s weapon choice

    Image: hbo

    As Bronn points out earlier in the Season 8 scene, Cersei could have sent any one of her men to do the dirty work of killing Jaime and Tyrion — I mean, she just got an army of world-renowned sellswords. But she picked Bronn and this particular weapon for a reason. 

    It’s because Cersei is a sadistic bitch like her son Joffrey. She wants to make sure her brothers don’t just die painful deaths, but also emotionally distressing ones after learning that a man they both trusted betrayed them.

    To quote Bronn in the Season 8 premiere, “That fucking family.”

    But will he actually go through with it? 

    Bronn saved Jaime's life once -- and he left a bag of gold behind to do it

    Bronn saved Jaime’s life once — and he left a bag of gold behind to do it

    Image: hbo

    Bronn did take the crossbow from Qyburn. And he already kind of betrayed Tyrion once before, when Tyrion needed a champion for his trial by combat in Season 4. Bronn took Cersei’s buyout then, so his track record isn’t great. 

    There’s also the issue of Jaime never making good on his promise to give Bronn an even better wife and bigger castle if he helped him in Dorne back in Season 6.

    But also, the circumstances have changed. Tyrion isn’t in a cell waiting to be executed anymore. He’s Hand of the Queen (a different Queen). And he once told Bronn, “If the day ever comes where you’re tempted to sell me out, remember this: Whatever the price, I’ll beat it. I like living.”

    Hopefully Bronn remembers that some Lannisters do, in fact, pay their debts.

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2XhWQKa
    via IFTTT

    UN Libya envoy: Haftar offensive on Tripoli ‘sounded like a coup’

    The United Nations’ top envoy for Libya has said that renegade General Khalifa Haftar tried to stage a coup when he issued an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Fayez al-Serraj of the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA).

    Speaking to BBC Radio on Monday, Special Representative Ghassan Salame said Haftar’s decision to issue in the course of his offensive arrest warrants against Serraj and other top Tripoli officials “sounded more like a coup than counter-terrorism”.

    Haftar announced an attack against Tripoli on April 4 to wrest control of western Libya from armed groups that back the UN-backed GNA, headed by Serraj. 

    The 75-year-old, who casts himself as a foe of “extremism” but is viewed by opponents as a new authoritarian leader in the mould of former strongman Muammar Gaddafi, has vowed to continue his offensive until Libya is “cleansed of terrorism”.

    Mired in chaos

    Libya, which has been mired in chaos since the NATO-backed toppling of Gaddafi in 2011, has been split into rival eastern and western administrations since 2014.

    In March 2016, GNA chief al-Sarraj arrived in Tripoli to set up a new government, but the Haftar-allied administration in the eastern city of Tobruk refused to recognise its authority.

    Haftar’s push on the capital threatens to further destabilise the oil-rich country and reignite a full-blown civil war.

    Both sides accuse each other of targeting civilians.

    At least 174 people have been killed and 756 wounded since the LNA started its offensive on April 4, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). It says it has deployed additional surgical staff to support hospitals receiving trauma cases.

    About 15,700 people have been forced to flee their homes because of the conflict, according to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), with a “significant number” of others still stuck in conflict zones.

    Haftar’s side confirmed the warrant had been issued and Serraj’s government said it had been immediately rejected.

    Military stalemate 

    Diplomats believe Haftar for now faces no pressure from backers to stand down including the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and France, who see him as the best bet to end the factional chaos plaguing Libya since Gaddafi’s fall in a 2011 uprising.

    “We are in fact in a military stalemate since eight days, or nine days,” Salame said, adding that both sides had carried out 30 air attacks each that had not changed the situation on the ground.

    Qatar’s Foreign Minister said in a tweet on Tuesday that Haftar’s actions were obstructing international efforts towards dialogue in Libya.

    Air strikes and shelling have hit civilian infrastructure and residential homes, especially in the south of Tripoli where Haftar’s forces have sought to penetrate government defences. The UN humanitarian agency OCHA said targeting civilians was a violation of international humanitarian law. 

    The UN mission in Libya (UNSMIL) warned in a statement that “the bombing of schools, hospitals, ambulances and civilian areas is strictly prohibited,” adding that it was documenting all such offences for the UN Security Council. 

    A school was hit on Saturday in an air strike blamed on Haftar’s forces, Tripoli officials said.

    Two missiles also struck education ministry warehouses late on Sunday, destroying 3.1 million school books, an official in the Tripoli government told Reuters news agency. OCHA said in a tweet five million books and national exam results had been destroyed.

    Within less than 48hrs from bombing a school, Ministry of Education warehouses were shelled & burnt. 5m books &national exams results were destroyed . Humanitarian community in #Tripoli #Libya warns again: TARGETING CIVILIANS FACILITIES IS A VIOLATION OF IHL. #NOTATARGET pic.twitter.com/NsdfQNbiNn

    — OCHA Libya (@OCHA_Libya) April 15, 2019

    Salame, whose plans for a national reconciliation conference this week had to be postponed because of the fighting, said he hoped both sides will realise in the coming days that neither could achieve an outright military victory.

    Inside Story: Are foreign powers worsening the conflict in Libya? (25:30)

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IkjOwR
    via IFTTT