India: 4 killed as political violence erupts in West Bengal state

Three supporters of India’s ruling right-wing party and another from a rival were killed in a gun battle in West Bengal state.

At least 18 others were wounded in clashes that broke out Saturday in the eastern state that has been on edge since Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) launched an aggressive campaign to win parliamentary seats last year.

“Three of the dead were BJP workers while the other was a [regional] Trinamool party supporter,” an unnamed police official told AFP news agency.

Local BJP leader Mukul Roy tweeted three BJP workers were “shot dead” in Sandeshkhali, West Bengal.

The clashes broke out over the hoisting of BJP flags and the putting up of posters, said BJP’s general secretary in the state, Sayantan Basu.

“They tried to throw away our party flags and posters and when we protested, our workers were shot from point blank range,” Basu was quoted as saying by Press Trust of India.

Local minister Jyotipriyo Mullick, who belongs to the Trinamool party, said one of their supporters was “hacked and shot dead by BJP workers”.

“When he was on his way to attend a party meeting, he was hacked at first. When he managed to free himself, he was shot dead,” Mullick told reporters in Sandeshkhali.

3 BJP workers shot dead by TMC goons in Sandeshkhali, West Bengal. @mamataofficial is directly responsible for unleashing violence against BJP workers.

We will be reaching Union Home Minister Sh @amitshah ji to apprise him of Sandeshkhali killings.

— Mukul Roy (@MukulR_Official) June 8, 2019

Rival supporters have regularly clashed in the politically volatile state where the BJP won 18 seats, up from the two it managed in 2014, en route to its massive nationwide win last month.

Modi’s party won 303 seats in the national parliament, increasing its previous tally of 282 seats in 2014.

The Trinamool Congress party – which has its stronghold in West Bengal and is led by the firebrand Mamata Banerjee – accuses the BJP of fomenting trouble in the state.

West Bengal has witnessed some of the most violent feuds between rival parties. Last month, a BJP supporter was shot dead in state capital Kolkata and a car belonging to a Trinamool member was pelted with rocks.

Last year, a BJP worker was killed and his body was hanged from a tree. Modi called the killings “shameful and anti-democratic”.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/31m4UMA
via IFTTT

The Real Winners and Losers from UFC 238

0 of 9

    Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

    UFC 238 hit the United Center in Chicago on Saturday with a stacked event.

    Henry Cejudo became a two-weight world champion by defeating Marlon Moraes in the main event to claim the vacant UFC bantamweight title. After a hot start, Moraes quickly faded. Cejudo took control of the fight and battered his opponent en route to the win.

    The co-main event delivered a Knockout of the Year contender.

    Champion Valentina Shevchenko served notice to the remainder of the flyweight division by obliterating Jessica Eye with a head kick in the opening minute of the second round.

    The other marquee fight was a possible title eliminator in the lightweight division. Tony Ferguson won after the doctor called a stop to the fight between the second and third rounds. Donald Cerrone blew his busted nose, which caused his eye to swell shut. Since he could not see, he could not continue.

    Those are simply the results of the three most hyped bouts, but who are the real winners and losers coming out of Chicago?

    Let’s take a look at the full event and examine who walks out of the Windy City in better, or worse, shape than they entered with the real winners of losers of UFC 238.

1 of 9

    Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

    What a strange main event.

    Henry Cejudo defeated Marlon Moraes to become a double champ, but it was a strange fight.

    Cejudo was a loser heading into the fight. He showed up to the pre-fight press conference wearing a crown and cape, and his antics only got more ridiculous from there in what was clearly an attempt to market himself. Cejudo was one of the more likable fighters in the UFC not too long ago, but this persona he has created isn’t doing him any favors.

    As for the fight, Moraes began fast and looked incredible. Without suffering major damage, he slowed and looked tired in the second, which allowed Cejudo to gain momentum and land strikes of his own. He landed brutal knees in the clinch to quicken Moraes’ demise.

    Cejudo finished him off with ground-and-pound in the third round.

    This could have been a much better matchup but whatever happened to Moraes cheapened it. Maybe Cejudo still wins, but at least Moraes would have put up a better fight and looked like a true challenger. At least it would have gone into the championship rounds if he hadn’t gassed out.

    But on Saturday, the main event faltered seemingly out of nowhere. Cejudo took advantage like a champion should, but fans cannot be happy with how things played out.

2 of 9

    Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

    How do you go about beating Valentina Shevchenko?

    She’s nearly the equal of Amanda Nunes. In fact, Nunes is the only one she’s lost against in the UFC. Shevchenko lost two close decisions to the UFC’s bantamweight and featherweight champion, and she’s a flyweight. If you are a 125-pound fighter, how do you go about defeating her? What’s your plan?

    The champion is the best striker in the division, and she is one of the best grapplers as well. She doesn’t have holes that other fighters have. No matter where the fight goes, she is likely better than you, and that’s without mentioning her physical strength and power.

    Jessica Eye needed to make this fight dirty, but all that did was give Shevchenko more holes to exploit. Eye couldn’t stand at range or grapple with her because those were sure ways to get beat. Eye had to throw caution to the wind and try to create something that was never going to be there. After big body kicks, Shevchenko went high and iced her in a brutal, heart-stopping knockout.

    Shevchenko is so far ahead of the rest of the flyweights in the world it is almost comical. She’ll be the champion for a long time unless she decides to once again try for the bantamweight title. She has no equals at 125 pounds.

    Flyweights around the world: She is your queen. Bow down.

3 of 9

    Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

    The fight may not have had the ending we all wanted, but for two rounds, Tony Ferguson and Donald Cerrone delivered in spades.

    Even with the abrupt finish due to Cerrone’s swollen eye, the lightweight division won because the UFC has a full slate of options.

    Could Ferguson receive the title shot that was thought to be on the line? Sure. Could he take a fight against Conor McGregor instead if McGregor returns and wants it? Absolutely. But the potential McGregor vs. Cowboy fight is still available too, because Cerrone did not look bad in defeat.

    Also, the UFC lightweight belt isn’t on the line until September. The UFC has time to run this matchup back should both fighters want it.

    All options are available to the UFC matchmakers, and fans benefit from whatever direction they choose to go. It’s simply impossible to make a bad choice with the talent available. So, while the fight had an ending many weren’t satisfied with, it left the UFC with suitable options for the immediate future.

    We were treated to a wild battle for 10 minutes. Now the UFC can treat us all to a variety of amazing lightweight bouts featuring the best fighters in the world. Mix and match however they please, and we’ll get elite-level scraps entertaining us through the end of the year.

4 of 9

    Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

    What a heavyweight scrap fans were treated to at UFC 238.

    Tai Tuivasa and Blagoy Ivanov exchanged heavy punches for 15 minutes, each landing and hurting the other at various points. In the end, Ivanov took the unanimous decision.

    While the fight may have proved that both men are leather-tough, their next opponents, whoever they may be, benefitted from this fight. It was the kind of battle some fighters never recover from. The damage sustained will not go away overnight, if at all, which would be unfortunate after such an entertaining bout.

    They survived 15 minutes against one another, but can they sustain that kind of damage going forward? Probably not.

    These types of scraps are exciting to watch, but they take a physical toll on the fighters. Sometimes that gets lost on fans, but it won’t be lost on whoever comes next for both Ivanov and Tuivasa. Expect those opponents to test their mettle early when the Octagon door closes. We’ll see what the lasting effects of this absolute war are when they get chin-checked next time out, but don’t be surprised if their opponents enter as the betting favorites.

5 of 9

    Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

    Tatiana Suarez was supposed to win this fight. She is highly regarded, and many see her as the future champion. It is not just that she could be champion, but that she will be.

    With each performance, she compounds those expectations because she doesn’t show many avenues to defeat her. While Nina Ansaroff came on strong in the third round, it was far too late for it to matter.

    Suarez’s power wrestling, excellent jiu-jitsu and growing striking make her a terrifying fighter to face. She mauled Carla Esparza previously and followed that up with another strong performance against Ansaroff in Chicago.

    We have seen many heralded fighters come through the UFC and falter along the way, especially when the spotlight is on them and they are seen as the next big thing. Suarez didn’t stumble. She didn’t trip up. She rose to those expectations and moved past Ansaroff.

    A title shot is next. There is no other recourse for the UFC.

    MMA Fighting’s Luke Thomas used a GIF of Thanos when talking about Suarez. It was an apt comparison, because she is inevitable.

6 of 9

    Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

    Off the top, let’s give credit where it’s due. Alexa Grasso finally showed why she was one of the top prospects coming out of Invicta FC. She looked fantastic.

    Now, why is Karolina Kowalkiewicz a loser? In short, the loss effectively ended her time as an elite strawweight.

    Kowalkiewicz entered the UFC with a three-fight win streak that included Randa Markos and Rose Namajunas, which earned her a title shot against Joanna Jedrzejczyk. While she came up short, she rocked Jedrzejczyk and showed she was a legit contender.

    But since 2017, Kowalkiewicz is 2-4 and has dropped three straight fights.

    She is 33 years old, meaning she has likely peaked athletically, which will not allow her the chance to grow as quickly as she needs to. Is she still talented and a game fighter? Absolutely. But the division is passing her by with younger talent like Grasso.

    Kowalkiewicz is an easy fighter to cheer for, but Father Time looks to be claiming another victim, and the loss at UFC 238 was a big indicator that her spell as a serious threat is over.

7 of 9

    Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

    Calvin Kattar picked up his fourth win inside the Octagon and made it back-to-back victories with his knockout over Ricardo Lamas.

    Kattar entered as the No. 15-ranked contender, with his only loss coming at the hands of Renato Moicano. His Saturday night victory—and the way in which it came, a first-round knockout—should help him finally earn respect as one of the division’s best. That makes him a huge winner in the featherweight division.

    It is an incredibly deep division, and making noise against an opponent like Lamas cuts through the riff-raff to put Kattar in prime position for big bouts. The win moved him from a fringe contender right into the hunt.

    And even more importantly, Kattar is a class act.

    In the post-fight interview in the cage, Kattar briefly addressed the recent death of his childhood best friend and then used his time to implore those who are struggling with substance-abuse issues to reach out and seek the help they need to overcome addiction.

    Mr. Kattar, well done.

8 of 9

    Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

    China has always seemed like a market the MMA world could expand into, but early attempts fell flat in making an immediate impact. This includes the UFC’s 2013-14 run of The Ultimate Fighter. Now, five years later, we are starting to see some of those efforts come to fruition.

    Weili Zhang had one of the biggest wins for a Chinese MMA fighter on March 2 over Tecia Torres, and later that month, it was eclipsed when Xiong Jingnan defeated Angela Lee at ONE Championship: A New Era. On Saturday, Xiaonan Yan kept it rolling with a unanimous-decision victory over Angela Hill.

    These are three key victories for the nation’s top talent over credible opposition. The continual progression will help grow the sport’s influence in the country and see more fighters come through the ranks to enter the sport’s largest promotions.

    Xiaonan‘s victory at UFC 238 doesn’t claim the spot for most important win in Chinese MMA history, but it is another example of how the sport has grown over the years. Fighters are not just entering the sport; now, they are becoming contenders and champions.

9 of 9

    Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

    UFC 238 Main Card

  • Henry Cejudo def. Marlon Moraes by TKO at 4:51 of the third round
  • Valentina Shevchenko (c) def. Jessica Eye by KO at 0:26 of the second round
  • Tony Ferguson def. Donald Cerrone by TKO (doctor stoppage) at the end of the second round
  • Petr Yan def. Jimmie Rivera by unanimous decision (29-28, 29-28, 30-27)
  • Blagoy Ivanov def. Tai Tuivasa by unanimous decision (29-28, 30-27, 30-27) 3 5:00

ESPN Preliminary Card

  • Tatiana Suarez def. Nina Ansaroff by unanimous decision (29-28, 29-28, 29-28)
  • Aljamain Sterling def. Pedro Munhoz by unanimous decision (30-27, 30-27, 30-27)
  • Alexa Grasso def. Karolina Kowalkiewicz by unanimous decision (30-27, 30-27, 30-27)
  • Calvin Kattar def. Ricardo Lamas by KO at 4:06 of the first round

UFC Fight Pass Preliminary Card

  • Xiaonan Yan def. Angela Hill by unanimous decision (29-28, 29-28, 29-28)
  • Darren Stewart def. Bevon Lewis by unanimous decision (29-28, 29-28, 30-27)
  • Eddie Wineland def. Grigory Popov by TKO at 4:47 of the second round
  • Katlyn Chookagian def. Joanne Calderwood by unanimous decision (30-27, 29-28, 29-28)

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IxQd0B
via IFTTT

Iowa poll: Biden stretches lead over Sanders


Joe Biden

Former vice president Joe Biden at a campaign event at The River Center on May in Des Moines, Iowa. | Scott Olson/Getty Images

2020 elections

Elizabeth Warren holds a strong position as Pete Buttigieg surges.

Former vice president Joe Biden is leading the crowded Democratic presidential field in Iowa, with Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders in a tight secondary grouping alongside South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg in the third poll of the first-in-the-nation presidential nominating state.

The new Des Moines Register/CNN/Mediacom survey of likely Iowa caucusgoers released Saturday shows that although Biden’s support registered at 24 percent — a fall of 3 points from the last poll — he has stretched his lead to 8 percentage points over Sanders, from 2 percentage points in March.

Story Continued Below

Both Sanders and Warren registered at 16 percent and 15 percent respectively, with Sanders’ support decreasing by 9 percentage points. Sanders narrowly lost the 2016 Iowa caucuses to Hillary Clinton.

Buttigieg made a strong debut at 14 percent, or 1 point behind Warren. Sen. Kamala Harris remains steady at 7 percent compared with the last Iowa poll. Former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke dropped 3 points and is now at 2 percent.

Biden’s supporters are less willing than others to say they are “extremely enthusiastic” about the former vice president, with only 29 percent versus the 39 percent for the supporters of all the other candidates. Biden also has the most name recognition in the field, which suggests he has less room to grow compared with the other candidates.

The Iowa Poll, headed by pollster Ann Selzer, is a closely watched barometer of the state’s politics. Conducted June 2 through June 5, the poll surveyed 600 Iowa Democrats likely to take part in the Iowa’s 2020 caucuses who their choice for president would be. The poll had a 4.0 (overall) percent margin of error. Selzer & Co., an Iowa polling firm, conducts the Iowa Poll.

Iowa’s caucuses are scheduled for Feb. 3, 2020.

About two-thirds of likely Iowan caucusgoers, regardless of how they plan to participate, say they prefer that the winner in Iowa be a candidate with a strong chance of beating President Donald Trump over someone who shares their views of major issues.

This poll also marks the first Des Moines survey since Biden and 8 other democratic presidential candidates have entered the 2020 race, bringing the total number of candidates to 23.

Tomorrow also marks the Iowa cattle call in the Democratic cycle, where 17 Democratic candidates will speak at the Iowa Democratic Party Hall of Fame Celebration in Cedar Rapids. The multiple-candidate event will be the first time the runners will be on the same stage. Biden will not be in attendance, citing family reasons.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2I7GY8p
via IFTTT

Sir Winston Chases Down Joevia to Win 2019 Belmont Stakes

Exercise rider Brian Calo rides Sir Winston during a workout at Belmont Park in Elmont, N.Y., Thursday, June 6, 2019. The 151st Belmont Stakes horse race will be run on Saturday, June 8, 2019. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Seth Wenig/Associated Press

This year’s Triple Crown season has ended with Sir Winston coming from behind down the stretch to capture the 2019 Belmont Stakes title Saturday. 

Coming out of the gate, Joevia controlled the race most of the way. It wasn’t until the final turn that jockey Joel Rosario kicked Sir Winston into gear to earn the biggest victory of his career. 

NBC Sports @NBCSports

In the stretch, Sir Winston makes some MOVES to win the final jewel of the #TripleCrown! https://t.co/nYoDaBjFab

Here are the results from Belmont Park:

1st: Sir Winston

2nd: Tacitus

3rd: Joevia

4th: Tax

5th: 

6th: 

7th: 

8th: 

9th:

10th: 

If there was a defining characteristic of the three Triple Crown races, it was how unpredictable everything was. It started with a controversial finish at the Kentucky Derby with Country House being awarded the victory after Maximum Security was disqualified for interference. 

Country House also won at Churchill Downs with the second-longest odds in history (65-1), ahead of only 1913 champion Donerail (91-1), per Action Network’s Evan Abrams

The Preakness Stakes got things back on track with War of Will, who went off the board with the second-best odds, coming out on top. Any hope for a Triple Crown champion was dashed even before the race because Country House, along with the rest of the top four finishers at the Kentucky Derby, didn’t make the trip to Pimlico. 

Per the Belmont Stakes’ official website, Sir Winston came off the board tied with Spinoff and Bourbon War for the fifth-best odds in the field (10-1). 

This article will be updated to provide more information soon.

Get the best sports content from the web and social in the new B/R app. Get the app to get the game.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WCJ74R
via IFTTT

US politicians ask Pompeo to clarify policy on Libya

A group of US politicians has asked President Donald Trump‘s administration to clarify its policy on Libya, saying armed groups in the North African country were using confusion over the White House’s stance to justify engaging in conflict. 

In a letter to US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Friday, eight members of the House of Representatives urged the White House to “clearly” reject a military offensive launched by Libyan commander Khalifa Haftar to seize the capital, Tripoli, from the country’s internationally recognised government. 

Haftar, who is allied to a rival administration in the country’s east and is backed by US allies including the United Arab Emirates and Egypt, began the offensive on April 4, vowing to “cleanse” the capital of “terrorist groups”.

The US initially demanded an “immediate” halt to Haftar’s offensive, with Pompeo issuing a statement on April 7 opposing Haftar’s offensive. 

But in late April, the White House issued another statement saying Trump and Haftar had spoken over the phone on April 15. During that call, Trump recognised Haftar’s “significant role in fighting terrorism and securing Libya’s oil resources,” the statement read.  

In their Friday letter, the members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs said the “generic read-out” of Trump’s call with Haftar “has led to perceived uncertainty regarding the US position”. 

Today @HouseForeign members wrote to @SecPompeo regarding the conflict in #Libya. Libyan armed actors are using confusion over US policy to continue conflict, jeopardizing political settlement & threatening regional stability. We need answers.

📰 Release: https://t.co/6Gc6xvYosv pic.twitter.com/ONefNwxL4t

— Rep. Ted Lieu (@RepTedLieu) June 7, 2019

“Libyan armed actors are now using that confusion over US policy as justification to continue the conflict, further jeopardising prospects for a political settlement and threatening regional stability,” said the bipartisan group, which included six Democrats and two Republicans. 

‘Security vacuum’

The fighting near Tripoli has killed nearly 600 people, wounded nearly 3,000 others and forced more than 80,000 people to flee their homes. Haftar’s forces have meanwhile become bogged down in the southern outskirts of the city. 

The US politicians said the “protracted conflict” was recreating the same “security vacuum” which the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISILor ISIS) exploited in 2014 when it established in Libya its most powerful affiliate outside of Syria and Iraq.

The fight for Tripoli, explained

Noting ISIL has claimed six attacks since the battle for Tripoli began, the legislators said: “The best way to prevent further terrorist attacks is to reach a ceasefire and return to a political process.”

The letter added: “We therefore request that you publicly clarify that the US opposes a military solution in Libya and that the US condemns all actors undermining stability and perpetuating violence.”

Al Jazeera’s Patty Culhane, reporting from Washington DC, said the US politicians were trying to attract media attention to the Libyan conflict. 

“What these congress men and women are trying to do is make this an issue that gets covered because this is an administration that tends to react to what they read and see in the media. And right now

the conflict in Libya is really not being covered at all.” 

Meanwhile, a senior official with the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA) claimed on Friday that the US was “standing by us as the legitimate government of Libya”. 

Deputy Prime Minister Ahmed Maetig made the remark in Washington DC after talks with US legislators and officials at the State Department. He also said the GNA requested the US to use its influence to end its regional allies’ support for Haftar. 

Following Maetig’s talks with congress people and the State Department in Washington on Friday, the US State Department was careful in its comments on the visit.

But the State Department was careful in its comments on Maetig’s visit. Speaking to the AFP news agency on the condition of anonymity, an official said Washington wanted the GNA and Haftar to resume talks and seek a political solution. 

In separate reports in late April, the Bloomberg and the Guardian newspapers said the change in US policy followed a meeting between Trump and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and a phone conversation with UAE’s Crown Prince Mohamed bin Zayed

Both leaders urged Trump to back Haftar, the reports said. 

Libya has been wracked by chaos since the 2011 NATO-backed overthrow of the country’s longtime ruler, Muammar Gaddafi.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2wLcXEB
via IFTTT

Venezuela: Thousands cross as Maduro reopens border with Colombia

Thousands of people have crossed into Colombia to buy food and medicine after Venezuela‘s President Nicolas Maduro reopened a border that had been shut down for the past four months.

Long lines of Venezuelans stood at two international bridges near the city of Cucuta on Saturday, waiting to have their documents checked by Colombian officials, with some carrying children on their shoulders.

Venezuelan border guards dressed in green uniforms helped in controlling the crowd.

The South American country’s government ordered the borders with Aruba, Bonaire, Curacao, Brazil and Colombia closed in February as the opposition tried to deliver food and medical supplies into the country.

Most of the aid was provided by the United States, a key ally of opposition leader Juan Guaido who declared himself to be Venezuela’s rightful president in January. But Maduro dismissed the aid as an infringement on Venezuela’s sovereignty and prohibited it from entering.

In May, the government reopened borders with Aruba and Brazil, but the Simon Bolivar International Bridge and the Francisco de Paula Santander International Bridge with Colombia had remained closed.

Venezuela crisis – Border with Colombia reopened (1:48)

Announcing the frontier’s reopening on Friday, Maduro said: “We are a people of peace that strongly defends our independence and self-determination.”

‘Relief’

Al Jazeera’s Alessandro Rampietti, reporting from the Colombian capital Bogota, said the reopening of the border came as “a relief for the tens of thousands of Venezuelans who rely on crossing into Colombia for food and medicine they cannot find back home”.

The closure had forced many Venezuelans to cross the frontier illegally to get basic necessities that were all but unattainable in Venezuela, he said, adding: “But that has become more difficult during the rainy seasons, and these paths are also controlled by criminal groups.”

Maduro’s announcement caused worry in Colombia, Rampietti said, with “a number of mayors and governors of Colombian regions on the border called for a national security meeting, fearing an increase in the pace of the exodus of Venezuelans”.

People wait to cross the Colombian-Venezuelan border over the partially opened Simon Bolivar international bridge in San Antonio del Tachira

The border closure had caused economic problems for Venezuelans who had increasingly come to rely on Colombian cities for basic goods [Carlos Eduardo Ramirez/Reuters]

More than a million Venezuelan refugees and migrants live in Colombia, where the government and aid agencies have scrambled to provide housing, food and healthcare to their ever-growing influx.

On Friday, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) said that 4 million Venezuelans, or almost 15 percent of the population, have left the country to escape its economic and political crises.

The UN agency also said the number of Venezuelan refugees and migrants rose by a million after November, indicating a rapid escalation as conditions deteriorated and a conflict between the government of Maduro and opposition intensified this year.

Rampietti said Maduro’s decision on Friday indicated his government “does not see the situation on the border as much of a threat as they did in the past months”. That’s because the “the opposition gave up on their plans to try and move US aid inside Venezuela,” he said. 

The once-wealthy oil nation is now facing severe shortages of basic goods and hyperinflation that is expected to surpass 10 million percent this year, according to a recent International Monetary Fund estimate.

The chaos has been further aggravated by US sanctions on Venezuelan oil exports and has forced an estimated 5,000 people to leave the country each day, according to the UNHCR.

Children at risk of statelessness

Hollywood actress Angelina Jolie, who is special envoy for the UNHCR, on Saturday urged the international community to provide more support for Colombia, Peru and Ecuador – the three South American countries with most migrants from Venezuela. 

Speaking in Cartagena following a meeting with Colombia’s President Ivan Duque, the actress said more than 20,000 Venezuelan children were at risk of statelessness.

The parents of Venezuelan children born abroad often struggle to register their baby’s birth, either because they do not have access to an ever-shrinking number of Venezuelan consulates or because they do not have migration papers.

Duque said he hoped Jolie’s visit would alert the world to the seriousness of the migration crisis.

Relations between Venezuela and Colombia, who share a land border stretching 2,220 kilometres, have been broken since February 23 when Duque announced his support for Guaido.

Dozens of countries around the world recognise Guaido as interim president, saying Maduro rigged his 2018 re-election, but their support has not been enough to unseat Maduro, who still has the backing of the top military brass.

Maduro accuses his foes of plotting with Washington to bring about a coup.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2KDxCCD
via IFTTT

Mexico crisis shows the limits of Trump’s brinksmanship


Donald Trump

President Donald Trump’s negotiating style with a host of adversaries, real or perceived, is becoming eerily familiar in Washington. | Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

white house

The president’s negotiating style has settled into a familiar — and increasingly ineffective — pattern.

You might say it’s The Art of the Deal.

First, spark a crisis by threatening harsh consequences if hazy, unspecified demands aren’t met.

Story Continued Below

Then, torque up the suspense as an artificial deadline approaches, while nervous observers warn of the dire consequences of going over the cliff.

And finally, cut a vague, imperfect or constitutionally questionable deal at the last minute, claiming victory and savaging the critics.

This is the pattern, well-worn by now, of President Donald Trump’s negotiations with a host of adversaries, real or perceived — and it’s getting eerily familiar in Washington.

This past week, Trump’s threat was to impose a series of escalating tariffs on Mexican goods entering the United States, and his demand was that Mexico curb a surge of migrants coming largely from Central America.

But it might as well have been the government shutdown — the result of Trump’s demand for $5.7 billion to fund his border wall — his on-again-off-again negotiations with Kim Jong-Un, or, next up, the president’s trade feud with China.

In the case of Mexico, Trump didn’t get all he wanted. Mexican negotiators, for instance, would not agree to changes that would make it easier for the United States to turn down asylum seekers from Central America, though they did assent to allowing some of them to stay in Mexico while their claims are heard in the U.S.

They also agreed to send 6,000 additional troops to their southern border with Guatemala, and got the U.S. to back off threats to impose a 5 percent tariff on all exports that was set to go into effect on Monday.

Those are actions, however, that Mexico has already undertaken, notes Shannon K. O’Neil, senior fellow for Latin America studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, who warned against the tariffs in an op-ed this week. “So it’s doubling down on what they were doing,” O’Neil told POLITICO, adding that it’s doubtful Mexico has the capacity to meaningfully stem the tide of migrants.

The ambiguity of the deal offers just enough for the president to claim victory, however. The U.S.-Mexico joint declaration issued Friday evening by the State Department contains no firm metrics to gauge the success — or failure — of the agreement, instead stating that Mexico “will take unprecedented steps” aimed at curbing migrant flow into the U.S. and “decisive action” to stop human smuggling. It does indicate, however, that the countries will continue discussions over the next three months and may announce additional measures.

That was enough for Trump, who tweeted on Saturday morning that “the reviews and reporting on our Border Immigration Agreement with Mexico have been good” and warned people away from the “false reporting (surprise!) by the Fake and Corrupt News Media.”

“Mexico will try very hard, and if they do that, this will be a very successful agreement for both the United States and Mexico!” Trump said.

The eight-day episode, however, cracked open fissures among Republicans, with business groups and GOP senators angrily lobbying the White House to convince the president to back down.

“Existing tariffs and the threat of new tariffs are already slowing manufacturing jobs in America, so it is our hope that the two nations are on a continued path of long-term certainty and stability,” John Bozzella, the president and CEO of Global Automakers, a trade association that represents the U.S. outposts of several international motor vehicle manufacturers, said in a statement.

Cory Gardner, the Colorado Republican who is considered the most vulnerable senator of the 2020 election cycle, slammed the prospect of tariffs in a letter to his GOP colleagues on Friday, arguing that they “would negate all the economic benefits of tax reform.”

The brouhaha also exposed the diminishing effectiveness of the president’s negotiating style, if only because of its growing predictability, which is signaling to those across the table that neither he — nor his threats — can be taken seriously.

It was eerily reminiscent of the president’s threat in late March to close the U.S. southern border if Mexico didn’t stop the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs into the United States — only to back down six days later and issue Mexico a “one-year warning” instead.

Trump then said he would first impose tariffs before closing the border. “The only thing, frankly, better and less drastic than closing the border is tariff the cars coming in, and I will do it,” he said. “I don’t play games.”

The proof, ultimately, of a bargain with Mexico that Trump said “everyone is very excited about” will come months from now, when, according to the joint declaration, the U.S. and Mexico will take “further actions” if it the current agreement does not have the expected results.

O’Neil, of the Council on Foreign Relations, predicts the president will again be disappointed, because Mexico simply lacks the resources to stem the migrant flow.

“Even if they have the political will, they don’t have the capacity,” she said. “So what happens three months from now? You’ve delayed but you haven’t necessarily ended this threat of tariffs.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WPwpyQ
via IFTTT

Rajon Rondo Unplugged

If the Toronto Raptors are in need of a strategy to finish off the Golden State Warriors, Los Angeles Lakers point guard Rajon Rondo has one he devised last summer. It featured LeBron James, but as Rondo says: “I could definitely coach in the playoffs, because it’s all about adjustments. Give me a couple of days to go back and figure out, ‘OK, what are you going to run?’ or ‘What do we need to run?’ I’m great at that.”

That Rondo, LeBron and the rest of the Lakers failed even to make the playoffs, much less face the Warriors, did nothing to convince him otherwise. And all that would be easy to dismiss as delusional coming from someone other than “Playoff Rondo,” the alter ego he acquired for his recurrent ability not only to elevate his game in the postseason but also to transform underdog squads into nightmares for top-seeded opponents.

“I was strategically thinking before the season, ‘OK, I can match so-and-so with Cuz [DeMarcus Cousins] … I can match LeBron with such-and-such.’ I was already planning on how to beat these Golden State Warriors,” he says.

“Regardless of my roster, LeBron James on my team, my expectation is we’re going to the Finals. I didn’t want to be the guy that doesn’t get him there. He’s not only the best player in the world but one of the smartest. So you put my IQ and LeBron’s IQ versus Draymond Green’s. Not to discredit Steph [Curry] or any of those other guys, but all three of us have always been the most vocal guys on the court, and two versus one is better. That’s what my mentality was. … It obviously just didn’t unfold the way it was supposed to.”

Sitting in a Manhattan Beach sidewalk cafe last weekend, Rondo reflected on a tumultuous season with LeBron and the Lakers; his series of one-year stints with four different teams after eight-and-a-half seasons, four All-Star appearances and one championship with the Boston Celtics; his Playoff Rondo persona; and the lingering perception that he is equal parts agitator and organizer.

He concedes his reputation as a disruptive force was valid earlier in his career.

“I feel like a lot of people are intimidated when I come into a system or organization because of what they’ve heard versus actually knowing me,” he says. “I get so many people who are like: ‘Oh, I’m so surprised. It’s unreal how you really are.’ You’re judging me off of articles and what you perceive of me on TV versus understanding who I really am and my daily routine and how I work at it.”

Being the father of an 11-year-old daughter and seven-year-old son has been part of his transformation.

“As you get older, you mature and look at life different,” he says. “I can be pretty selfish at times. … Now it’s not about me anymore. It’s about my kids. It’s the mindset of thinking of them first. My legacy is going to be how people view them. That’s just life.

“During the early years in Boston, some days I’d be great, some days I wouldn’t. I’d shy away from the weight room. I was like, I’m 21, I feel great, I don’t need to stretch, I don’t tie my shoes when I play. It was about understanding that you have to do it consistently, and that’s one of the hardest things in life to do: be consistent. It didn’t happen right away for me.”

Consistency eluded the Lakers on almost every front this season. Rondo’s vision of knocking off the Warriors reached its high point on Christmas Day, with the Lakers thrashing them in Oracle Arena, 127-101.

“That was a big momentum game for us,” he says. “It wasn’t playoffs, but it was the biggest game of some guys’ careers. Christmas game, against the champs, and guys stepped up. That gave me hope as far as, ‘In the fourth quarter, this is another guy I can depend on’ or showing LeBron, ‘This is a guy you can trust’ or ‘This is a guy you’d love to be in a pick-and-roll with because of how he played it against the champs.’ Because their defensive schemes are unreal compared to every other team that we play. But then we were all like, ‘Shit, LeBron’ because that’s when he went down.”

Rajon Rondo spent much of last offseason trying to think of ways he could maneuver the Lakers past the Warriors in a playoff matchup that never happened.

Rajon Rondo spent much of last offseason trying to think of ways he could maneuver the Lakers past the Warriors in a playoff matchup that never happened.Noah Graham/Getty Images

James missed 18 of the next 19 games with a groin injury. He returned to a team in disarray thanks to trade rumors that had half the young roster being shipped to New Orleans for Anthony Davis.

“Even some of the old guys were affected,” Rondo says. “I can’t say a name, but I remember me and the guy were on the bench for the Atlanta game right before the [All-Star] break. The guy was cussing and talking bad about the situation during the game. I was like: ‘Snap out of it. That shit is over with. We’ll get through it. As vets, we have to move forward and not focus on what the young guys are focusing on. Set an example.’ It was a little crazy to see a vet distraught over that.

“Me, I’m kind of numb to it. I was in trade rumors every year in Boston. Eight straight years. You can’t really relate to it until you’ve gone through it. Not knowing the future, waking up every day—and now you’re on the phone reading stuff. When I was going through it, there wasn’t so much social media; it was just on TV. You’d hear it, or someone would text you about it, but it wasn’t so much in your face, with eight different blockbuster or proposed trades and your name in every one of them. Every Instagram scroll, you’re in it. So, psychologically, it probably took a toll. …

“Guys may have felt like, ‘Oh, I need to prove myself so I won’t be traded’ or ‘They’re going to trade me anyway.’ Each game you didn’t know what the mentality was for those guys: ‘Should I give my all to this organization that is about to trade me in two days?’”

The rumors were compounded by the fact that James had dinner with Davis, gushed about how much he’d like to play with him and is represented by the same agent, Rich Paul of Klutch Sports Group.

“Every guy on our team, LeBron was their favorite player growing up,” Rondo says. “Everyone had the shoes, his jersey. You’re the biggest fan in the world. It’s like you’re playing with MJ, and then you get there, and it’s like your mom and dad, or the person that you looked up to and idolized, doesn’t want you. And then to have that sitting in your gut, not knowing. Guys aren’t at the age where they can have a man-to-man conversation versus texting you. Everybody wants to text you: ‘How you doing? We cool?’ People don’t understand how to have a real conversation and talk out problems.”

Team president Magic Johnson’s abrupt resignation sent another ripple through the locker room.

“We walked in, talked about it a little as a team, tried to focus on the game,” he says. “But it was such a distraction you really couldn’t focus.”

For the most part, though, Rondo argues playing for the Lakers wasn’t as chaotic as it has come to appear from the outside.

“Biggest market, biggest media, you know what you’re coming into with LeBron James on the team,” he says. “To me it wasn’t as crazy. The way things ended, the way Magic exited, maybe. Things happen. You learn. … I think we held it together as best as possible.”

A recent ESPN.com article detailing the turbulence within the team pinned some of it on James’ agent, Paul. That wasn’t apparent to Rondo.

“He wasn’t around that much,” Rondo says. “I’m not a fool, but he doesn’t have a dominant personality; he’s not, ‘Look at me.’ He’s super chill. We’ve had a lot of conversations. I didn’t see him as a threat or controlling anything at all.”

While Rondo praised James for his work ethic, his generosity as a teammate and his contributions off the court, he also sees someone who didn’t have the early benefit of Hall of Fame veterans to mentor him, as Rondo did.

“No one person can have it all,” Rondo says. “Who did he respect coming in? Who were his vets that showed him the ropes on how to be a leader?

With both Rondo and LeBron James hurt for large swaths of the season, it was difficult for the two veterans to form bonds with the Lakers' young roster.

With both Rondo and LeBron James hurt for large swaths of the season, it was difficult for the two veterans to form bonds with the Lakers’ young roster.Harry How/Getty Images

“That’s why KG was so big for me. When things didn’t go well in Boston, Kevin would be one of the first guys to call me and tell me, ‘That was right today’ or ‘That was wrong today.’ The biggest thing he taught me was that you can’t pick and choose when you want to be a leader. You have to do it every day. …

“I was fortunate, later, to have great leaders like KG and [coach] Doc Rivers. Sam Cassell came in; Eddie House, Keyon Dooling, PJ Brown. I took a little bit from all of them. … I don’t know who LeBron had his first couple of years as far as how to be a leader or what it takes. He might not be a vocal leader or deal with confrontation, but he’s in the gym every day. He’s leading that way.

Injuries undermined whatever leadership the Lakers had. Along with James’ absence, Rondo, thanks to two separate hand injuries, missed 31 games.

“We were on the training table a lot together,” Rondo says. “Seeing him go through that, never been injured, that was obviously tough dealing with. A guy like that, when you have to sit still, that changes a lot of things: your perspective, not trusting [your body] again, trying to get back. I’m sure he went through a whole bunch of that.”

It’s also tough to lead from the training table.

“It’s different between being a player and a hurt player,” Rondo says. “You’re not playing, so [if you] judge everyone else … people may not be as receptive. They’ll be like, ‘Oh, you sound like a coach now; you don’t understand.’ LeBron misses games and doesn’t travel, I don’t travel—all that time away from the team, you can’t come together as quick as you want. We couldn’t get the chemistry together.”

Once the team began to fray, having six players on one-year deals didn’t help.

“If the organization doesn’t give a guy a multiyear deal, how much can that guy really invest in the team?” Rondo asks. “His thinking is: You don’t really believe in me. You’re just trying to fill a void. I’m just a plug-in. You can say you’re playing for a contract; on mediocre teams, OK, but on championship-caliber teams, it doesn’t work that way. Guys aren’t willing to make sacrifices.”


For someone who wants—maybe even needs—to know exactly what he’s doing before he does it, changing teams every summer is not ideal; being dealt midway through the 2014-15 season by the Celtics to the Dallas Mavericks was even worse.

Coach Rick Carlisle saw similarities in Rondo’s pass-first mentality and floor leadership to the Hall of Famer who had left the team in 2012, Jason Kidd, and hoped Rondo could immediately fill the void.

“Whenever I go to a team, I just sit back and let things unfold,” Rondo says. “Everybody kept telling me, ‘Be like J-Kidd, be like J-Kidd.’ I’m like, ‘I’m not J-Kidd, but I understand the mentality of what you’re trying to get me to do.’ They said J-Kidd pretty much controlled a lot of things as far as pace and offensive flow. Coming in midseason, that couldn’t be my mindset. Because I needed to understand what Rick wanted from me as a point guard. Understanding the personnel—Tyson [Chandler], getting used to Monta [Ellis], where Chandler Parsons needs the ball, where Dirk [Nowitzki] likes his spots—it wasn’t a challenge. It was just a matter of time to figure it out.”

Time that the Mavs opted not to invest after they won 50 games but got bounced in the first round by the Houston Rockets. Rondo was benched midway through the second game of the series, after which he and the team agreed to part ways. Then it was on to Sacramento for a season of trying to keep a lid on a feud between Cousins and coach George Karl.

Rondo points to being benched at his next stop, with the Chicago Bulls, and then returning to the starting lineup and helping lead them to the playoffs as a lesson in patience and restraint.

Rondo was perplexed at why the Bulls brought him and Dwyane Wade to Chicago only to start playing younger players halfway into the season. It was a decision the team reversed as it almost scored a first-round win over the Celtics in the playoffs.

Rondo was perplexed at why the Bulls brought him and Dwyane Wade to Chicago only to start playing younger players halfway into the season. It was a decision the team reversed as it almost scored a first-round win over the Celtics in the playoffs.Rocky Widner/Getty Images

“The team tells me, ‘We want you running the show; we don’t want you looking to the sidelines,’” he says. “About 40 games in, we’re playing Indiana, and at halftime I had a [plus-minus of] negative-20. We come out of the locker room for the second half, and [coach Fred Hoiberg] says, ‘You’re not starting.’

“We have a meeting the next day, and they say, ‘We want to experiment.’ I’m thinking we’re trying for a championship. … Why would you go younger when you have a future Hall of Famer [Dwyane Wade] and Jimmy Butler on the rise? We’re not trying to win?

“I had to eat that. It wasn’t ego. They paid me $14 million. It’s the most I’ve been paid in my career for one year. You say this is what you wanted, but you trade for Cameron Payne and you start Michael Carter-Williams and Jerian Grant over me. We went through four point guards, and I was on the bench, just sitting there, still being professional, still getting my work in.

“People in my circle would tell me: ‘Stay with it. Don’t give them what they want. Don’t overreact.’ That was tough because knowing what I could do with this team, it was, ‘Fuck, I’m not even playing?’ … If you’re going to start one- or two-year point guards with no experience, Dwyane Wade and Jimmy Butler are going to eat their ass up on the court. They won’t even be a factor. I know how to keep guys happy. I know how to manage the offense, who needs shots, who doesn’t.”

Rondo was reinserted into the starting lineup, and the Bulls stunned the higher-seeded Celtics by winning the first two games of their first-round series before Rondo broke his thumb and the Bulls lost four in a row.

“I wouldn’t say it was satisfying … [but] what they did backfired on them,” he says. “There was no, ‘Let’s figure this out, let’s go over the game plan.’ It was, ‘We’re done with you, put you on the shelf,’ and then obviously they had to come back to me. I finished playing Game 2 with a broken thumb, and then we don’t win another game. How is that even possible? I guess I am important.”

His most satisfying moment came in a hotel ballroom before Game 2 against the Celtics.

“Teams always go back and make adjustments,” he says. “But if I put in an offense for Game 2 that they haven’t seen, in the fourth quarter when I hit you with it, it’s going to be too late.

“So me, Jimmy and Dwyane were in the ballroom for an hour and 20 minutes after the shootaround for Game 2. We put in the offense. I explained to them how we were all interchangeable in these positions and this is where you can attack. It was unbelievable because we went out and did it and we won. It was just how I had envisioned it that morning.”

He had a similar impact at his next stop, in New Orleans. Even though Cousins, then with the Pelicans, suffered a season-ending torn Achilles tendon in January, New Orleans rallied to snare the sixth playoff seed and then swept the third-seeded Portland Trail Blazers.

Rondo found out this season how much he meant to the Pelicans when they played the Lakers in L.A. and people throughout the organization told him “Coach ‘Do” was missed. But his run with New Orleans ended as it did with the Mavericks, Kings and Bulls: with an exit interview in which he was praised for what he contributed but not offered a chance to stay.

“They’re blaming my age,” he says. “Nah, I don’t believe that’s the case. Guys at 33 are getting four-year deals. It seems like there’s a GM exit pitch: You compliment on this, this and this. You don’t really get to the nitty-gritty but say, ‘We love you, and good luck.’ … Then, when July 1 comes, things change. But I don’t have a clue what it could be.”

He’d welcome a second chance at making his plan for LeBron become a reality, but he has no idea if he’ll get it. If not, he will look for another place where he can give younger players rides to the airport, invite them over for meals and share what he’s seen over the first 13 years of his career.

“I tell those guys, ‘Anything I can help with, call me, because I’ve been there,’” he says.

As for Playoff Rondo, he considers his postseason performance the result of a rather simple equation: more rest plus more time to prepare plus more playing time.

“Being able to lock in on one team, I can break down as much tape as I want,” he says. “Give me the time and personnel, and I’ll be able to dissect and figure it out.”

He thirsts to help another superstar make a title run. For now, though, he’s simply watching the Finals, devising schemes to knock off whatever team comes out on top. He may not know where he’s playing next, but he’s already working on what he wants to do when he gets there.

Ric Bucher covers the NBA for Bleacher Report. Follow him on Twitter: @RicBucher.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IrzUlV
via IFTTT

Report: Mike D’Antoni, Rockets Nearing Agreement on Contract Extension

Houston Rockets head coach Mike D'Antoni watches from the sidelines during the first half of Game 1 of an NBA basketball first-round playoff series against the Utah Jazz, Sunday, April 14, 2019, in Houston. (AP Photo/Eric Christian Smith)

Eric Christian Smith/Associated Press

The Houston Rockets and head coach Mike D’Antoni are reportedly nearing an agreement on a contract extension.

According to ESPN’s Tim MacMahon on Saturday, Rockets owner Tilman Fertitta has removed the buyout language that existed in the previous contract offer and ultimately led to talks breaking down.

D’Antoni is currently under contract through 2019-20, meaning he could become a free agent after next season if he and the Rockets do not finalize an extension.

This article will be updated to provide more information on this story as it becomes available.

Get the best sports content from the web and social in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2QWBuzT
via IFTTT

US envoy says Israel has ‘right’ to annex West Bank land

The US ambassador has said Israel has the right to annex at least “some” of the occupied West Bank, in comments likely to deepen Palestinian opposition to a long-awaited US peace plan.

The Palestinians have rejected the peace plan before it has even been unveiled, citing a string of moves by US President Donald Trump that they say show his administration is irredeemably biased.

The Palestinians are likely to see the latest comments by US ambassador to Israel David Friedman as a new nail in the coffin of a peace process that is already on life support.

In an interview published by the New York Times on Saturday, Friedman said some degree of annexation of the West Bank would be legitimate.

“Under certain circumstances, I think Israel has the right to retain some, but unlikely all, of the West Bank,” he said.

Senior Palestinian official Saeb Erekat said any such policy would be tantamount to “US complicity with Israeli colonial plans”.

The establishment of a Palestinian state in territories, including the West Bank, that Israel occupied in the Six-Day War of 1967, has been the focus of all past Middle East peace plans.

No firm date has yet been set for the unveiling of the Trump administration’s plan, although a conference is to be held in Bahrain later this month on its economic aspects.

Failed state helps nobody

The public comments made by administation officials so far suggest the plan will lean heavily on substantial financial support for the Palestinian economy, much of it funded by the Gulf Arab states, in return for concessions on territory and statehood.

“The absolute last thing the world needs is a failed Palestinian state between Israel and Jordan,” Friedman said in the NYT interview. “Maybe they won’t take it, maybe it doesn’t meet their minimums.”

Life under occupation: Palestinians face land shortage

“We’re relying upon the fact that the right plan, for the right time, will get the right reaction over time,” he said.

Friedman, a staunch supporter of the Israeli settlements, told the NYT that the Trump plan was aimed at improving the quality of life for Palestinians but would fall well short of a “permanent resolution to the conflict”.

He said he did not believe the plan would trigger Palestinian violence.

But he said the US would coordinate closely with Arab ally Jordan, which could face unrest among its large Palestinian population over a plan perceived as overly favourable to Israel.

Publication of the plan looks set to be further delayed after the Israeli parliament called a snap general election for September, the second this year. The plan is regarded as too sensitive to release during the campaign.

Pompeo questions reception of US plan ‘loved only by Israelis’

During campaigning for the first general election in April, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pledged to annex illegal Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, a move long supported by nearly all legislators in his alliance of right-wing and religious parties.

In February this year, Netanyahu told lawmakers he had been discussing with Washington a plan that would effectively annex illegal settlements.

In a rare public show of disunity between the close allies, the White House then flatly denied any such discussion.

Following persistent expansion of the settlements by successive Netanyahu governments, more than 600,000 Jewish settlers now live in the West Bank, including annexed East Jerusalem, among some three million Palestinians.

The international community regards the settlements as illegal and the biggest obstacle to peace.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WMtg2T
via IFTTT