EPL Schedule 2019-20: Official List of Fixtures for New Premier League Season

Manchester City coach Pep Guardiola lifts the English Premier League trophy after the English Premier League soccer match between Brighton and Manchester City at the AMEX Stadium in Brighton, England, Sunday, May 12, 2019. Manchester City defeated Brighton 4-1 to win the championship. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein)

Frank Augstein/Associated Press

Defending champions Manchester City will open their 2019-20 Premier League campaign against West Ham United on August 10.

The Sky Blues are bidding to win their third title in a row, a feat Manchester United twice achieved in the Premier League era.

Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s side will face Chelsea in the pick of the opening-day fixtures, while Liverpool will play Norwich City at Anfield in the first match of the season.

Arsenal will hope to get off to a winning start against Newcastle United, and Tottenham Hotspur begin their season at home to newly promoted Aston Villa.

Here’s the schedule for the opening weekend of 2019-20 campaign, while the full list can be found here:

Premier League @premierleague

🚨 Announce 2019/20 #PLfixtures 🚨

Full list 👉 https://t.co/iQKSNaf596

#PremierLeaguefixtures https://t.co/dKBinVJGV9

City in Pursuit of Premier League Hat-Trick

Man City won the title last season for the second campaign running. Their league success was part of a sensational domestic treble that saw them win the Carabao Cup and FA Cup.

They picked up 98 points last season and 100 the campaign before, so it could take a monumental effort to get over the line ahead of them by next May.

Liverpool came extremely close, though:

Squawka Football @Squawka

There can only ever be one winner, but what an incredible season from both teams. 👏 https://t.co/1c7osZ2ASl

The Reds, who won the UEFA Champions League last season, will most likely be their closest challengers once again.

They have re-established themselves as one of Europe’s elite under manager Jurgen Klopp, and they’ll be hoping a similar effort to last season earns them the trophy this time around as they bid to win their first league title since 1990.

B/R Football @brfootball

Tried so hard
And got so far https://t.co/HpnM6Pqvst

The remaining sides in last season’s top six will hope to be much closer to City and Liverpool. Third-placed Chelsea were 25 points behind the Reds, while sixth-placed United were 31 back.

Spurs’ project under Mauricio Pochettino hit its highest point last season when they reached the Champions League final, so they’ll be aiming to put in more of a challenge domestically in what will be their first full campaign in their new stadium.

Likewise, Chelsea capped Maurizio Sarri’s first season with victory in the UEFA Europa League, but Eden Hazard has joined Real Madrid, Sarri has been heavily linked with the vacancy at Juventus, and the club also face the prospect of a transfer ban this summer.

As for United, they have achieved 70 or more points in just two of the last six seasons, so that will be their ambition at a minimum, along with a return to the top four.

Meanwhile, of the promoted sides, Sheffield United have the least difficult opening game. They travel to Bournemouth, compared with Norwich and Villa’s respective trips to Liverpool and Tottenham.

The Blades were last in the top flight in 2007, and they spent six years in League One before returning to the Premier League via automatic promotion from the Championship.

Premier League founding members Villa are back after their relegation in 2016, the first time they had dropped out of the top flight since 1987.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Wyvizm
via IFTTT

Israel strikes Gaza after rocket ‘intercepted’ from territory

Israeli warplanes have attacked a Hamas target in Gaza following a Palestinian rocket strike, the Israeli military said, in the first serious crossborder escalation since a surge in fighting last month.

In a statement on Thursday, Israel‘s military said fighter planes attacked “underground infrastructure” in a compound belonging to the Hamas group that rules the Gaza Strip after Israeli air defences intercepted a rocket launched from the besieged territory. There were no reports of injuries or casualties.

The latest hostilities followed Israel’s closure of offshore waters to Gaza fisherman on Wednesday in what it said was a response to incendiary balloons launched across the frontier that caused fires in fields in southern Israel this week.

“Due to the continuous launching of incendiary balloons and kites from the Gaza Strip towards Israel, it has been decided tonight [Wednesday] not to allow access to Gaza’s maritime space until further notice,” the Israeli defence ministry department responsible for Palestinian civil affairs, COGAT, said.

A spokesman for the Israeli fire service said incendiary balloons from Gaza caused seven fires on Tuesday alone. In the past year, Palestinians have succeeded in setting fire to large areas of farmland in southern Israel.

A rocket was launched from Gaza at Israeli civilians last night. It did not reach its target, as it was intercepted by the Iron Dome Aerial Defense System. We responded to the attack by striking an underground terror infrastructure in a Hamas compound in Gaza.

Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) June 13, 2019

May violence

In two days of heavy fighting in early May, projectiles from Gaza killed four civilians in Israel, local health officials said. In the same period, Israeli strikes killed 21 Palestinians, over half of them civilians, according to Gaza health authorities. 

A truce mediated by Egypt, Qatar and the United Nations ended that round of violence.

Some two million Palestinians live in Gaza, whose economy has suffered years of Israeli and Egyptian blockades as well as recent foreign aid cuts and sanctions by the Palestinian Authority, Hamas’s rival in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

Israel says its blockade is necessary to stop arms reaching Hamas, with which it has fought three wars since the group seized control of Gaza in 2007, two years after Israel withdrew its settlers and troops from the small coastal enclave.

Israel and Palestinian factions in Gaza have fought three wars since then.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2KhtYit
via IFTTT

Uganda bans public gatherings in Kasese District amid Ebola fears

Uganda has banned public gatherings in western Kasese District as officials attempt to contain an Ebola outbreak which has killed two people in the country days after the virus spread from neighbouring Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

Emmanuel Ainebyona, a health ministry spokesman, confirmed the move on Thursday hours after officials declared that a 50-year-old Congolese woman had become the second patient to die of the disease in Uganda.

Her 5-year-old grandson was the first confirmed Ebola death in Uganda. The boy’s 3-year-old brother also is infected and is currently undergoing treatment. 

The three individuals were part of a family group that travelled to DRC to care for a relative, who also died of Ebola, before returning to Uganda.

The infections marked the first confirmed cross-border cases of the virus in the current epidemic, which was previously confined to the eastern DRC’s North Kivu and Ituri provinces after emerging ten months ago. 

More than 2,000 cases have been recorded in the DRC since the start of the outbreak in August, the country’s 10th to date, and more than 1,400 people have died.

An expert World Health Organization committee will convene in the Swiss city of Geneva on Friday to weigh whether to declare the epidemic a global health emergency following its spread into Uganda.

Two previous such meetings decided the outbreak was not yet fit for a declaration of that nature, despite being of “deep concern”.

‘Not under control’

Uganda and the wider East Africa region have been on high alert over Ebola since the start of the epidemic.

In a precautionary move, Uganda has vaccinated some 4,700 health workers in more than 150 facilities with an experimental drug designed to protect them against the virus, which spreads through contact with bodily fluids of those infected, causing haemorrhagic fever with severe vomiting, diarrhoea and bleeding.

Among those vaccinated are the members of a rapid response team who have been deployed to Kasese to trace likely cases and vaccinate those who might have come into contact with any people who have contracted the disease.

The vaccine is experimental but is estimated to be 97.5 percent effective and, according to the WHO, may protect a person for up to 12 months.

Experts have long feared it could spread from the eastern DRC to neighbouring countries, with regional insecurity and deep community mistrust hampering emergency responders’ efforts.

More than 100 attacks on treatment centres and health workers in DRC have been recorded since the beginning of this year, according to WHO.

Last week, the United Nations agency warned that a quarter of all cases in the outbreak may be going undetected, with scores of victims dying without having been admitted to Ebola treatment centres.

Michael Ryan, executive director of WHO’s Health Emergencies Programme, cautioned the epidemic was “not out of control, but it is certainly not under control”.

The world’s worst epidemic of Ebola, a haemorrhagic fever, killed about 11,300 people in West Africa as it raced through Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia from 2013 to 2016.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Zii8Iq
via IFTTT

‘There’s China and there’s everything else:’ Trump’s trade wars scramble domestic political fights


Donald Trump

President Donald Trump’s campaign believes he can beat the Democratic field by standing up as the fiercest defender of American interests against China. | Patrick Semansky/AP Photo

global translations

Trump has pushed Republicans away from their long-held positions on free trade.

President Donald Trump’s multi-front trade war on the global stage has opened two distinct political battles over tariffs in the domestic arena that will shape the future of U.S. trade policy: in his race for reelection, and in the coming reckoning in Congress on his legislative priority, a renegotiated NAFTA.

The new politics of trade is scrambling traditional party alignments in a fashion unseen in modern American history.

Story Continued Below

A new episode of POLITICO’s Global Translations podcast detailed how far Trumpism has pried Republicans away from their free-trade orthodoxy — a gambit that comes to a head next month. Meanwhile, the 2020 presidential primary is pushing Democrats toward a far more confrontational position with China compared with the stances of the Obama and Clinton administrations.

“I think there are two totally separate discussions going on,” said Lori Wallach, a trade specialist at Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group, who’s been in these battles for decades. “There’s China, and there’s everything else.”

Within the 2020 presidential race, Trump’s campaign believes he can beat the Democratic field by standing up as the fiercest defender of American interests against the economic and strategic threats from China. Reprising his 2016 argument that past political leaders — including the Obama administration and Democratic front-runner Joe Biden — reacted too timidly while Beijing spent decades flouting international rules, Trump is eager to show he made good on his promise to stand up to China through the volley of tariffs he has imposed — and the threat of more.

But the president’s fearless — or reckless — enthusiasm for tariffs as a weapon has sparked a second battle: within his own party and in the halls of Congress where the passage of the new U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement now hangs in the balance due to Trump’s threats of tariffs against allies.

Earlier this year, Senate Republicans made clear that the North American deal could not proceed until Trump’s tariffs were removed from Canadian and Mexican steel and aluminum. But no sooner had Trump relented, than he threatened new tariffs on Mexican products as a way to pressure Mexico on migration policy. Republican senators mounted unprecedented pushback against his plans and have made clear that any additional tariffs could block the agreement. While House Republicans have been more supportive of Trump — and face primary contests in which GOP voters demand loyalty to Trump — Republican senators who don’t necessarily face reelection in this cycle, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas), are becoming more vocal.

Meanwhile, the clock is ticking. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has not yet decided to bring the agreement up for a vote — and the clock is ticking with summer recess approaching. If not passed before the August recess, the deal could be swept away by congressional priorities such as raising the debt ceiling — and then will give way to campaign season.

“I surely hope that he has learned from history that lower tariffs are good,” said Chuck Grassley, the Republican senator from Iowa who chairs the Senate Finance Committee and made the lifting of steel tariffs a precondition for passage of the USMCA.

Whether the president believes tariffs are an end to themselves is not clear. Said Grassley, “I have heard him say something along this line that leads me to believe that he wants lower tariffs. … ‘What do you mean you don’t want a trade war? We’ve had a trade war and we lost.’ So he wants to do something about that.”

But while he’s under pressure in Congress on tariffs against allies, when it comes to China, it’s a different story. Trump’s confrontation with China is being matched by muscular rhetoric from progressive Democratic hopefuls like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. They — like Trump — see an opportunity to paint Biden as too weak and complacent about taking on the many economic and security threats they perceive as emanating from Beijing.

In a campaign ad, Sanders touts his votes against NAFTA, the Central America Free Trade Agreement and China’s entry into the WTO. “We need trade policies in this country that benefit the working people of the United States and not just the CEOs of large corporations,” Sanders says in the ad.

Sanders has also criticized Biden, saying, “Joe voted for NAFTA and permanent normal trade relations, trade agreements with China. I helped — led the effort against that. I don’t think there’s much question about who’s more progressive.”

While Biden makes the case that constructive engagement with China is in America’s interest, Warren has come out with a platform she calls “economic patriotism” that also plays up the problem of China. “The Chinese are bad actors on trade. That means that our best way to fight back is with strength and with a coherent plan,” she said.

The emerging dynamic involves campaigns taking even harder lines on China, urged on by influential voices on the left — raising the possibility of a broader shift in American attitudes that could outlive the Trump administration.

“I also support the use of tariffs against the Chinese because they have so willfully and blatantly violated all norms of international trade, and they continue to do that — whether it’s currency manipulation, whether it’s stealing of intellectual property rights, or anything of that sort,” said Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO.

However, like Republican senators, Trumka opposed the use of tariffs against Mexico and Canada.

“Tariffs are a legitimate form of an economic weapon or a trade weapon. They are legitimate if used properly, but they should be used like a rifle shot. You use them when someone is violating an agreement, and you use it to correct that action or to stop that action,” he said. “It’s not to be used as a shotgun, where you just shoot it out there and it hits everywhere.”

Since Mexico and Canada did not violate the terms of the North American Free Trade Agreement, he said, “there shouldn’t have been tariffs imposed on them.”

Many Republicans recognize Trump will need the support of America’s allies to be successful in the confrontation with China.

Grassley said it was a mistake to walk away from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal in 2017, but he is heartened that U.S. allies like Canada, Japan, and those in Europe are a “united front” against China, because they’re all facing the same challenge.

“They may not like the specific tactics the president’s using,” Grassley said. “But they know that his heart is in the right place of getting China to live by the international rules of trade.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2F42nwX
via IFTTT

India’s Adani wins approval for long delayed Australian coal mine

India’s Adani Enterprises on Thursday received the go-ahead to start construction of a controversial coal mine in Australia‘s outback after a state government approved a final permit on groundwater management.

The Carmichael mine has been a lightning rod for climate change concerns in Australia and was seen as a factor in the surprise return to power of the conservative Liberal-National coalition in a national election in May.

First acquired by Adani in 2010, the project is slated to produce 8-10 million tonnes of thermal coal a year and to cost up to $1.5bn, but has been mired in court battles and opposition from green groups.

“We’re ready to start work on the Carmichael Project and deliver the jobs these regions so badly need,” Chief Executive Lucas Dow said in a statement.

The go-ahead comes after Queensland’s Department of Environment and Science said it had approved Adani’s Groundwater Dependent Ecosystem Management Plan following a rigorous assessment “based on the best available science.”

The approval potentially paves the way for half a dozen new thermal coal mines to come online in Australia by opening up Queensland’s remote Galilee basin with rail infrastructure to the coast 320km away at Abbot Point.

Holders of other coal deposits in the basin include some of Australia’s wealthiest iron ore magnates such as Gina Rinehart, who has a joint venture with India’s GVK Group, and controversial one-term politician Clive Palmer.

‘Bad news’ for environment

Conservation groups expressed disappointment with the decision and vowed to continue fighting the development.

The approval was “bad news” for the World Heritage-listed Great Barrier Reef, the Australian Marine Conservation Society said.

“Climate change is the greatest threat to our reef’s future and we cannot risk opening up the Galilee basin for other major coal projects which would heat our oceans and lead to more stress on our beautiful corals,” it said.

The decision comes as other developed nations step up strategies to meet Paris Agreement emissions targets, and as many banks and insurers scale back exposure to coal and to new thermal coal mines in particular.

China open pit coal mine

Demand for coal is falling in the West but remains strong in Asia [File: China Photos/Getty Images]

Thermal coal is mainly used for power generation and is being increasingly replaced by renewable energy sources in the United States and Europe.

But it remains the dominant source of power generation across much of Asia. The International Energy Agency expects coal demand to hold steady through 2023, buttressed by rising consumption from China and India, the likely destination for most of Carmichael’s output.

“You hear a lot about all the reduction in demand in the EU, the US, Australia, but there is still very big demand for coal in the rest of the world, increasing demand in fact,” Abby Macnish, head of investments at TWD Invest, which has about 350 million Australian dollars ($242m) under management, told the Bloomberg news agency. “It’s still the main energy source to produce electricity.”

Australia’s federal and state governments have repeatedly said that the mine must stand on its own merits, and a recent drop in prices for low-grade thermal coal has raised doubts about whether the mine can prove economically feasible.

Adani has scaled back initial plans for a 60 million tonne per year mine and has said that it will self-fund the project, backed by ready buyers in its own Indian power plants and its trading business.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2F7tY0l
via IFTTT

UK maritime group warns of incident in the Gulf of Oman

Thursday's maritime alert came after attacks last month on oil tankers off the coast of the United Arab Emirates [File: Hamad Mohammed/Reuters]
Thursday’s maritime alert came after attacks last month on oil tankers off the coast of the United Arab Emirates [File: Hamad Mohammed/Reuters]

A United Kingdom maritime safety group is warning that an unspecified incident has taken place in the Gulf of Oman and is urging “extreme caution” amid heightened United States-Iran tensions.

The UK’s Maritime Trade Operations, which is run by the British navy, put out the alert early on Thursday. It did not elaborate further, but said it was investigating the incident.

The Reuters news agency, citing four shipping and trade sources, reported two tankers were evacuated following an unspecified incident. The ships’ crews were unharmed, according to Reuters.

The sources identified the tankers as the Marshal Islands-flagged Front Altair and the Panama-flagged Kokuka Courageous.

Joshua Frey, a spokesman for the US Navy’s Bahrain-based 5th Fleet, said his command was “aware” of a reported incident in the area.

“We are working on getting details,” Frey told The Associated Press.

Iranian media reported, without offering any evidence, that there had been an explosion in the area targeting oil tankers.

The maritime alert came after attacks last month on oil tankers off the coast of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

US National Security Adviser John Bolton said Iran was likely behind the May 12 incidents, without offering evidence.

The UAE, meanwhile, claimed the preliminary findings of a probe into the attacks revealed they were part of a “coordinated” operation likely carried out by a state actor, but stopped short of pinning the blame on any specific country.

Iran has denied being involved in the incidents.

SOURCE:
Al Jazeera and news agencies

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2XbWTut
via IFTTT

Erdogan: Purchase of Russian S-400 air defence systems complete

Turkey has already purchased S-400 defence systems from Russia and hopes they will be delivered in July, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Wednesday, an announcement likely to ratchet up tensions with NATO ally Washington.

Turkey and the United States have sparred publicly for months over Ankara’s order for the S-400s, which are not compatible with NATO’s systems.

“Turkey has already bought S-400 defence systems. It is a done deal. I hope these systems will be delivered to our country next month,” Erdogan said.

The purchase has raised eyebrows among Turkey’s NATO allies and provoked anger in Washington, which expected Ankara to opt for the American Patriot air defence system instead.

The Pentagon announced on Friday that if Turkey did not give up on the S-400 system by July 3, Ankara would be blocked from purchasing F-35 fighter jets and Turkish pilots currently training in the US would be expelled.

Turkey plans to buy 100 F-35s from the US.

On Monday, US officials announced that Washington had halted the training of Turkish pilots on F-35 fighters at an airbase in the US state of Arizona.

US acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan said last week he had sent a letter to his Turkish counterpart Hulusi Akar informing him of Washington’s decision to pull Turkey out of the F-35 programme.

‘Spirit of the NATO alliance’

Turkey has criticised the letter from Washington and said it did not live up to the spirit of the NATO alliance. It is working on a response to be sent in the coming days, according to the Turkish defence minister.

Turkey has already bought S-400 defence systems. It is a done deal.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey’s president

The US says Turkey’s acquisition of the Russian system poses a threat to Lockheed Martin Corp’s F-35 stealth fighters and has warned of potential US sanctions if Ankara presses on with the deal.

Erdogan vowed to seek answers on his country’s “exclusion from F-35 project for reasons that have no rational or legitimate basis”, adding that Turkey was not only a customer but also a programme partner of the F-35 project.

Speaking at a meeting of his AK Party members, Erdogan said: “We will call to account in every platform Turkey being excluded from the F-35 programme for reasons without rationale or legitimacy.”

“We have so far paid $1.250bn,” he said.

Shanahan said on Friday the US offer for the Patriots was “very competitive” but Erdogan said Russia offered a better deal including reasonable pricing and a joint-production promise.

“This is not an attack system but a defence system. Won’t we take necessary measures to defend our country?” he said.

“Did we ask for such a defence system from America? Yes, we did. Did they deliver? No, they didn’t,” he said.

Turkey has repeatedly proposed a joint-working group to assess the impact of the S-400 deal, but Washington has not yet taken up the suggestion.

Erdogan also said he wanted to talk about the issue on the phone with the US before he meets President Donald Trump in Osaka, Japan, at the end of this month.

The Turkish leader said he “would like to discuss this issue by telephone and reverse it from the current situation back to where we started”.

Russia said on Tuesday it planned to deliver its S-400s to Turkey in July.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/31twiIQ
via IFTTT

Blues Stun Bruins 4-1 on Road in Game 7 to Win Franchise’s 1st Stanley Cup Title

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS - JUNE 12:  Jordan Binnington #50 of the St. Louis Blues stops a shot against Marcus Johansson #90 of the Boston Bruins during the first period in Game Seven of the 2019 NHL Stanley Cup Final at TD Garden on June 12, 2019 in Boston, Massachusetts. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images)

Patrick Smith/Getty Images

The St. Louis Blues are NHL champions for the first time in their 51-season history courtesy of a 4-1 win over the Boston Bruins in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Final on Wednesday at TD Garden.

NHL @NHL

There’s just no containing that first-time #StanleyCup Champions feeling for the @stlouisblues! https://t.co/1jwlNOOHNv

Jordan Binnington made 32 saves for the Blues, who earned the three-goal win despite the Bruins outshooting them 33-20. Ryan O’Reilly had a goal and an assist, giving himself 23 postseason points en route to winning the Conn Smythe Trophy:

NHL @NHL

His 23 points are the most ever in one @StLouisBlues postseason.

Ryan O’Reilly is your Conn Smythe Trophy winner! #StanleyCup https://t.co/2YfFJTa8FA

O’Reilly and Alex Pietrangelo scored first-period goals to give St. Louis an early 2-0 lead. After a scoreless second, Brayden Schenn and Zach Sanford added insurance tallies in the third.

Matt Grzelcyk scored an empty-net goal for the Bruins with 2:10 remaining, spoiling Binnington’s shutout chance after 32 consecutive saves.

Pietrangelo, who was on the ice for all four goals, added an assist. Jaden Schwartz led the Blues with two of his own.

The first period set the tone for the rest of the game.

Anyone watching the opening frame through 16 minutes could not have seen the Blues leading 2-0 into intermission. If anything, the Bruins may have been up by a couple of scores, having outshot St. Louis 12-4 during the period.

Alison Lukan of The Athletic posted a chart that explains just how dominant Boston was for the vast majority of the opening 20 minutes:

Alison @AlisonL

I mean, seriously…. https://t.co/WEVCXwb3HR

The Point did as well, noting that the Bruins had three times as many shots, two times as many slot shots and more than twice the offensive-zone possession time:

The Point @ThePointHockey

Boston was buzzing all period, but it’s the Blues who exit the first with a 2-0 lead even if the Bruins had more slot shots than St. Louis had shots on net. They can thank Jordan Binnington for that. #STLBlues #WeAllBleedBlue #NHLBruins #StanleyCup https://t.co/QFDwlagyGv

However, Binnington formed a brick wall in front of numerous high-quality chances:

St. Louis Blues 🏆 @StLouisBlues

Binnington again!!!! #stlblues #WeAllBleedBlue https://t.co/ogPI3VzDLz

St. Louis Blues 🏆 @StLouisBlues

The Jordan Binnington highlight reel continues. #stlblues #WeAllBleedBlue https://t.co/xi0ujdKY0Q

St. Louis Blues 🏆 @StLouisBlues

BINNINGTON!!!!! #stlblues #WeAllBleedBlue https://t.co/PEBEQZpFo0

The goalie made three saves on the Bruins’ lone power play, which was the only one either team had on the night. 

It seemed as though Boston was destined to break through, but the excellent opening didn’t translate into goals. Eventually, St. Louis made the B’s pay.

With three-and-a-half minutes left in the first, a Sammy Blais hit kept the puck in the Bruins’ defensive zone. The Blues worked it around to Jay Bouwmeester, who found O’Reilly for a nifty deflection and the game’s first goal at 16:47:

St. Louis Blues @StLouisBlues

HUGE HIT BY BLAIS!!!! BIGGER GOAL BY O’REILLY!!!! #stlblues #WeAllBleedBlue https://t.co/U6rNorBs2n

The score took the air out of TD Garden and simultaneously stunted any momentum the B’s amassed. 

The goal also had historical significance:

Chris Johnston @reporterchris

Ryan O’Reilly is the first player to score in four straight Stanley Cup Final games since Wayne Gretzky in 1985.

NHL Public Relations @PR_NHL

Ryan O’Reilly is the third player in NHL history to score his team’s opening goal in four straight games during a #StanleyCup Final.

The others:
Sid Smith in 1951 (Games 1-4)
Norm Ullman in 1966 (Games 3-6)

#NHLStats #Game7 https://t.co/JL1aY22ibg

StatsCentre @StatsCentre

Ryan O’Reilly’s 1-0 tally tonight made him the 1st player to score 5 goals in a #StanleyCup Final since 2011 (Brad Marchand). Including O’Reilly, the last 7 players to achieve that had never played in a SCF before

ESPN Stats & Info @ESPNStatsInfo

Ryan O’Reilly becomes the third player in NHL history – and first in 53 years – to score his team’s opening goal in four consecutive games during a Stanley Cup Final.

O’Reilly’s goal gives him 22 points this postseason, the most points in a single postseason in Blues history. https://t.co/oN1XWEZ133

The Blues would have certainly signed up for a 1-0 lead after the Bruins outplayed them for the majority of the period, but an untimely Boston line change from Brad Marchand led to a Pietrangelo goal with eight seconds left:

St. Louis Blues @StLouisBlues

WHAT. A. MOVE!!!!!! #stlblues #WeAllBleedBlue https://t.co/G6DqltYLaJ

Schwartz set up the goal with some nifty puck-handling and the timely pass, but Greg Wyshynski of ESPN.com set the scene regarding the line change:

Greg Wyshynski @wyshynski

Marchand was trying to change when the puck came out of the zone, got caught up, and then suddenly the Blues had numbers down low on Rask. #Game7

Greg Wyshynski @wyshynski

On that second goal, you can see the Bruins getting caught on that change back at the bench, skating back into the zone like three planes lined up to land. Great forecheck by Schwartz. Better pinch by Pietrangelo. #Game7 https://t.co/NPXlTYk4UU

Critics did not take kindly to it after the Blues earned their 2-0 lead:

Adam Herman @AdamZHerman

Marchand changing while the Blues were in transition and there were 10 seconds left in the period is one of worst decisions I’ve ever seen.

Scott McLaughlin @smclaughlin9

Inexcusable mistake from Marchand. 10 seconds left in the period. You didn’t need to change that badly.

Fluto Shinzawa @FlutoShinzawa

Just a lousy decision by Brad Marchand. Could have at least slowed down Alex Pietrangelo had he stayed on the ice.

The final tally after the first period: St. Louis 2 (on four shots), Boston 0 (on 12 shots).

Schenn nearly made it 3-0 midway through the second, but goalie Tuukka Rask and Zdeno Chara somehow kept the puck out of the net after it initially hit the crossbar:

#StanleyCup Game 7 on NBC @NHLonNBCSports

Take it away, Doc. 👀🔊 https://t.co/km35Vh39eH

During that period, Boston only had nine shots on goal and zero minutes on the power play, which was crucial considering that the Bruins entered the night having converted on 32.9 percent of their postseason power-play attempts.

The third period featured a much more frenetic pace than the first two periods, but the difference there was that the Blues were able to keep pace with the Bruins’ chances.

Eventually, St. Louis broke through thanks to a Schenn goal at 11:25, effectively sealing the victory:

#StanleyCup Game 7 on NBC @NHLonNBCSports

Schenn You Believe It?!

The @StLouisBlues are up 3-0 in the final period of the season. https://t.co/xhjgQgXAW5

Sanford added yet another goal with just 4:48 remaining:

St. Louis Blues @StLouisBlues

SANFORD!!!!! 4-0!!!!!!! #stlblues #weallbleedblue https://t.co/PQDC2ACIdA

All four Blues goals occurred in the slot or right in front of the net: They may not have shot more than Boston, but their high-quality chances proved to be the difference.

Grzelcyk erased the zero with 2:10 left, but the damage had been done on a night where almost nothing went Boston’s way.

Marisa Ingemi of the Boston Herald noted three key points that did not happen:

Marisa Ingemi @Marisa_Ingemi

Said it on the video hit before the game, and still believe it; Bruins need one of three things to happen – first line breaks out, Tuukka steals it, special teams dominate.

It’s been the opposite of all three.

Instead, the B’s failed to find their rhythm:

Marisa Ingemi @Marisa_Ingemi

This is the weirdest game I can remember the Bruins playing all season. Nothing is in sync.

St. Louis, which earned a Stanley Cup berth in each of its first three years of existence, hadn’t made the championship round since the 1969-70 season, when Hall of Fame defenseman Bobby Orr and the Bruins swept St. Louis in four games.

The circumstances were much different this season, as no team held more than a one-game lead during the Stanley Cup Final.

In the end, the Blues won their third Stanley Cup road game in four tries, cementing the franchise’s first title.

The Blues’ first Cup is all the more impressive considering the team was 15-18-4 on Jan. 2, which gave St. Louis the league’s lowest point total at that juncture.

Richard Deitsch @richarddeitsch

https://t.co/XGAmDIgplN

Five days later, Caesars Palace listed St. Louis as a massive 250-1 underdog to win the Cup:

B/R Betting @br_betting

Stanley Cup champions 🏆 https://t.co/7nOwcsZ0mJ

However, St. Louis finished the season 30-10-5 thanks largely to new goaltender Binnington, whose 1.89 GAA was a league-best mark. The midseason call-up went 24-5-1 in 30 regular-season starts and started every postseason contest.

The Blues rode that heat wave into the playoffs, where they outlasted the Winnipeg Jets, Dallas Stars and San Jose Sharks before taking down the Bruins, who tied for the NHL’s second-best regular-season point total.

Along the way, St. Louis won 10 of 13 road games during a postseason where it had home-ice advantage only once.

The Blues will now celebrate at home, as they gave their city its first NHL champion.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2X89oah
via IFTTT

Blues Stun Bruins 4-1 on Road in Game 7 to Win Franchise’s 1st Stanley Cup Title

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS - JUNE 12:  Jordan Binnington #50 of the St. Louis Blues stops a shot against Marcus Johansson #90 of the Boston Bruins during the first period in Game Seven of the 2019 NHL Stanley Cup Final at TD Garden on June 12, 2019 in Boston, Massachusetts. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images)

Patrick Smith/Getty Images

The St. Louis Blues are NHL champions for the first time in their 51-season history courtesy of a 4-1 win over the Boston Bruins in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Final on Wednesday at TD Garden.

NHL @NHL

There’s just no containing that first-time #StanleyCup Champions feeling for the @stlouisblues! https://t.co/1jwlNOOHNv

Jordan Binnington made 32 saves for the Blues, who earned the three-goal win despite the Bruins outshooting them 33-20. Ryan O’Reilly had a goal and an assist, giving himself 23 postseason points en route to winning the Conn Smythe Trophy:

NHL @NHL

His 23 points are the most ever in one @StLouisBlues postseason.

Ryan O’Reilly is your Conn Smythe Trophy winner! #StanleyCup https://t.co/2YfFJTa8FA

O’Reilly and Alex Pietrangelo scored first-period goals to give St. Louis an early 2-0 lead. After a scoreless second, Brayden Schenn and Zach Sanford added insurance tallies in the third.

Matt Grzelcyk scored an empty-net goal for the Bruins with 2:10 remaining, spoiling Binnington’s shutout chance after 32 consecutive saves.

Pietrangelo, who was on the ice for all four goals, added an assist. Jaden Schwartz led the Blues with two of his own.

The first period set the tone for the rest of the game.

Anyone watching the opening frame through 16 minutes could not have seen the Blues leading 2-0 into intermission. If anything, the Bruins may have been up by a couple of scores, having outshot St. Louis 12-4 during the period.

Alison Lukan of The Athletic posted a chart that explains just how dominant Boston was for the vast majority of the opening 20 minutes:

Alison @AlisonL

I mean, seriously…. https://t.co/WEVCXwb3HR

The Point did as well, noting that the Bruins had three times as many shots, two times as many slot shots and more than twice the offensive-zone possession time:

The Point @ThePointHockey

Boston was buzzing all period, but it’s the Blues who exit the first with a 2-0 lead even if the Bruins had more slot shots than St. Louis had shots on net. They can thank Jordan Binnington for that. #STLBlues #WeAllBleedBlue #NHLBruins #StanleyCup https://t.co/QFDwlagyGv

However, Binnington formed a brick wall in front of numerous high-quality chances:

St. Louis Blues 🏆 @StLouisBlues

Binnington again!!!! #stlblues #WeAllBleedBlue https://t.co/ogPI3VzDLz

St. Louis Blues 🏆 @StLouisBlues

The Jordan Binnington highlight reel continues. #stlblues #WeAllBleedBlue https://t.co/xi0ujdKY0Q

St. Louis Blues 🏆 @StLouisBlues

BINNINGTON!!!!! #stlblues #WeAllBleedBlue https://t.co/PEBEQZpFo0

The goalie made three saves on the Bruins’ lone power play, which was the only one either team had on the night. 

It seemed as though Boston was destined to break through, but the excellent opening didn’t translate into goals. Eventually, St. Louis made the B’s pay.

With three-and-a-half minutes left in the first, a Sammy Blais hit kept the puck in the Bruins’ defensive zone. The Blues worked it around to Jay Bouwmeester, who found O’Reilly for a nifty deflection and the game’s first goal at 16:47:

St. Louis Blues @StLouisBlues

HUGE HIT BY BLAIS!!!! BIGGER GOAL BY O’REILLY!!!! #stlblues #WeAllBleedBlue https://t.co/U6rNorBs2n

The score took the air out of TD Garden and simultaneously stunted any momentum the B’s amassed. 

The goal also had historical significance:

Chris Johnston @reporterchris

Ryan O’Reilly is the first player to score in four straight Stanley Cup Final games since Wayne Gretzky in 1985.

NHL Public Relations @PR_NHL

Ryan O’Reilly is the third player in NHL history to score his team’s opening goal in four straight games during a #StanleyCup Final.

The others:
Sid Smith in 1951 (Games 1-4)
Norm Ullman in 1966 (Games 3-6)

#NHLStats #Game7 https://t.co/JL1aY22ibg

StatsCentre @StatsCentre

Ryan O’Reilly’s 1-0 tally tonight made him the 1st player to score 5 goals in a #StanleyCup Final since 2011 (Brad Marchand). Including O’Reilly, the last 7 players to achieve that had never played in a SCF before

ESPN Stats & Info @ESPNStatsInfo

Ryan O’Reilly becomes the third player in NHL history – and first in 53 years – to score his team’s opening goal in four consecutive games during a Stanley Cup Final.

O’Reilly’s goal gives him 22 points this postseason, the most points in a single postseason in Blues history. https://t.co/oN1XWEZ133

The Blues would have certainly signed up for a 1-0 lead after the Bruins outplayed them for the majority of the period, but an untimely Boston line change from Brad Marchand led to a Pietrangelo goal with eight seconds left:

St. Louis Blues @StLouisBlues

WHAT. A. MOVE!!!!!! #stlblues #WeAllBleedBlue https://t.co/G6DqltYLaJ

Schwartz set up the goal with some nifty puck-handling and the timely pass, but Greg Wyshynski of ESPN.com set the scene regarding the line change:

Greg Wyshynski @wyshynski

Marchand was trying to change when the puck came out of the zone, got caught up, and then suddenly the Blues had numbers down low on Rask. #Game7

Greg Wyshynski @wyshynski

On that second goal, you can see the Bruins getting caught on that change back at the bench, skating back into the zone like three planes lined up to land. Great forecheck by Schwartz. Better pinch by Pietrangelo. #Game7 https://t.co/NPXlTYk4UU

Critics did not take kindly to it after the Blues earned their 2-0 lead:

Adam Herman @AdamZHerman

Marchand changing while the Blues were in transition and there were 10 seconds left in the period is one of worst decisions I’ve ever seen.

Scott McLaughlin @smclaughlin9

Inexcusable mistake from Marchand. 10 seconds left in the period. You didn’t need to change that badly.

Fluto Shinzawa @FlutoShinzawa

Just a lousy decision by Brad Marchand. Could have at least slowed down Alex Pietrangelo had he stayed on the ice.

The final tally after the first period: St. Louis 2 (on four shots), Boston 0 (on 12 shots).

Schenn nearly made it 3-0 midway through the second, but goalie Tuukka Rask and Zdeno Chara somehow kept the puck out of the net after it initially hit the crossbar:

#StanleyCup Game 7 on NBC @NHLonNBCSports

Take it away, Doc. 👀🔊 https://t.co/km35Vh39eH

During that period, Boston only had nine shots on goal and zero minutes on the power play, which was crucial considering that the Bruins entered the night having converted on 32.9 percent of their postseason power-play attempts.

The third period featured a much more frenetic pace than the first two periods, but the difference there was that the Blues were able to keep pace with the Bruins’ chances.

Eventually, St. Louis broke through thanks to a Schenn goal at 11:25, effectively sealing the victory:

#StanleyCup Game 7 on NBC @NHLonNBCSports

Schenn You Believe It?!

The @StLouisBlues are up 3-0 in the final period of the season. https://t.co/xhjgQgXAW5

Sanford added yet another goal with just 4:48 remaining:

St. Louis Blues @StLouisBlues

SANFORD!!!!! 4-0!!!!!!! #stlblues #weallbleedblue https://t.co/PQDC2ACIdA

All four Blues goals occurred in the slot or right in front of the net: They may not have shot more than Boston, but their high-quality chances proved to be the difference.

Grzelcyk erased the zero with 2:10 left, but the damage had been done on a night where almost nothing went Boston’s way.

Marisa Ingemi of the Boston Herald noted three key points that did not happen:

Marisa Ingemi @Marisa_Ingemi

Said it on the video hit before the game, and still believe it; Bruins need one of three things to happen – first line breaks out, Tuukka steals it, special teams dominate.

It’s been the opposite of all three.

Instead, the B’s failed to find their rhythm:

Marisa Ingemi @Marisa_Ingemi

This is the weirdest game I can remember the Bruins playing all season. Nothing is in sync.

St. Louis, which earned a Stanley Cup berth in each of its first three years of existence, hadn’t made the championship round since the 1969-70 season, when Hall of Fame defenseman Bobby Orr and the Bruins swept St. Louis in four games.

The circumstances were much different this season, as no team held more than a one-game lead during the Stanley Cup Final.

In the end, the Blues won their third Stanley Cup road game in four tries, cementing the franchise’s first title.

The Blues’ first Cup is all the more impressive considering the team was 15-18-4 on Jan. 2, which gave St. Louis the league’s lowest point total at that juncture.

Richard Deitsch @richarddeitsch

https://t.co/XGAmDIgplN

Five days later, Caesars Palace listed St. Louis as a massive 250-1 underdog to win the Cup:

B/R Betting @br_betting

Stanley Cup champions 🏆 https://t.co/7nOwcsZ0mJ

However, St. Louis finished the season 30-10-5 thanks largely to new goaltender Binnington, whose 1.89 GAA was a league-best mark. The midseason call-up went 24-5-1 in 30 regular-season starts and started every postseason contest.

The Blues rode that heat wave into the playoffs, where they outlasted the Winnipeg Jets, Dallas Stars and San Jose Sharks before taking down the Bruins, who tied for the NHL’s second-best regular-season point total.

Along the way, St. Louis won 10 of 13 road games during a postseason where it had home-ice advantage only once.

The Blues will now celebrate at home, as they gave their city its first NHL champion.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2X89oah
via IFTTT

Saudi-UAE coalition vows action after Houthi missile attack

The Saudi-led coalition said it would “take stern action” to deter the Houthi rebels after the Yemeni rebels carried out a missile attack on Abha airport in Saudi Arabia that left at least 26 injured.

Turki al-Malki, the coalition spokesman, said the missile hit “proves this terrorist militia’s acquisition of new advanced weapons and the continuation of the Iranian regime’s support and waging of cross-border terrorism”.

Houthi rebels, who have faced persistent coalition bombing since March 2015 that has exacted a heavy civilian death toll, have stepped up missile and drone attacks across the border in recent weeks.

In a statement on Wednesday, the coalition said a projectile hit the arrivals hall at Abha airport, causing material damage. Three women and two children were among the wounded, and were of Saudi, Yemeni and Indian nationalities, it said.

Eight people were taken to hospital while most were treated on site.

The attack could amount to a war crime and proved that the Houthis have acquired “advanced weapons from Iran”, the coalition said, vowing to take “urgent and timely” measures in response.

There was no immediate response from Iran, which has denied arming the Houthis.

The European Union said “such provocative attacks pose a threat to regional security and undermine the UN-led political process in Yemen“.

Houthi-affiliated Almasirah TV reported that the Houthi forces launched a cruise missile attack on Abha airport, which is about 200km north of the border with Yemen and serves domestic and regional routes.

The alliance led by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) intervened in Yemen in 2015 to try to restore the internationally-recognised government of President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi that had been forced out of power by the Houthis.

Abha airport Saudi Arabia

The airport in the town of Abha in Saudi Arabia’s southwest [Google]

The rebels on Wednesday insisted they had the right to defend themselves in the face of five years of Saudi-led bombing and an air and sea blockade.

“The continuation of the aggression and siege on Yemen for the fifth year, the closure of Sanaa airport and the rejection of a political solution make it inevitable for our people to defend themselves,” Houthi spokesman Mohammed Abdulsalam said in a statement reported by Almasirah.

‘Eye for an eye attacks’

The Abha attack comes as the Saudi-UAE-led coalition intensified air raids on Houthi positions in the northern Yemeni province of Hajjah.

The rebels have also stepped up drone and missile attacks on the kingdom amid tensions between Iran and the United States, Riyadh’s main ally. On Tuesday, the official Saudi Press Agency (SPA) said Saudi air defence forces intercepted two Houthi drones that targeted Khamis Mushait in the kingdom’s south on Monday. The attack did not cause damage or casualties, the agency reported. 

The rebels said they had targeted the King Khalid airbase near Khamis Mushait.

Last month, the Saudi air force also shot down a bomb-laden drone deployed by Houthi rebels that targeted Jizan airport, close to the southern border with Yemen, the coalition said.

Two oil pumping stations in Saudi Arabia were hit by Houthi drones causing minor supply disruptions highlighting an apparent significant leap in the drone capabilities of the Houthis.

Commenting on Wednesday’s missile attack on Abha airport, Al Jazeera’s Mohammed Al-Attab said the incident proved the coalition’s goal of destroying Houthi’s missile capabilities had failed, allowing the rebels to hit back.

“The Houthis … are saying these kind of attacks are revenge for Saudi Arabia’s escalation and their attacks on civilian areas over the past four years,” Al-Attab said from the Yemeni capital, Sanaa. 

“They have killed so many civilians; this brutal war has even targeted weddings, funerals, markets and hospitals,” he added.

Abha airport, Saudi Arabia

A Yemeni rebel missile attack on an airport in southwestern Saudi Arabia wounded 26 civilians on Wednesday [AFP]

Hussain Bukhati, a pro-Houthi journalist, told Al Jazeera the missile attack was part of a move by the group to target the coalition with “eye-for-an-eye” attacks, adding Houthi forces in Sanaa still had “many surprise” attacks planned.

Bukhati said it was the second time the Houthis had used a cruise missile, the first after the group deployed one last year to hit a nuclear power station being constructed in the UAE.

The uptick in violence comes as a United Nations-led peace push falters despite the rebels’ unilateral withdrawal from the lifeline Red Sea port of Hodeidah last month.

The Yemeni government has accused UN envoy Martin Griffiths of bias towards the rebels despite the Security Council’s expression of renewed support in him on Monday.

The conflict in Yemen has killed tens of thousands of people, many of them civilians, aid agencies say.

It has triggered what the UN describes as the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, with 24.1 million – more than two-thirds of the population – in need of aid.

Abha Airport map, Saudi Arabia

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2MJA6SQ
via IFTTT