Dems eye Lewandowski, Christie and Manafort as new star witnesses


Corey Lewandowski

Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski leaves a hotel in New York in April 2018. “If they want to call Corey that’d be their biggest mistake,” said former federal prosecutor Joe diGenova. | Mark Lennihan/AP Photo

congress

House Democrats are prepping a new oversight strategy to circumvent Trump’s stonewalling.

Democrats investigating Donald Trump for obstruction of justice are eyeing a new strategy to break the president’s all-out oversight blockade: calling witnesses who never worked in the White House.

Key lawmakers tell POLITICO they hope to make an end run around Trump’s executive privilege assertions by expanding their circle of testimony targets to people outside government who nonetheless had starring roles in Robert Mueller’s final report. That includes presidential confidants like former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

Story Continued Below

Other Russia-related figures who never served in Trump’s administration and would make for prime congressional witnesses include Paul Manafort and Rick Gates, the former top campaign officials who both pleaded guilty and faced extensive questioning by federal prosecutors working on the Mueller probe, as well as a former attorney for Michael Flynn who is cited in the special counsel’s report in an episode involving a dangled presidential pardon.

“These people could be called without any reasonable shred of a claim of executive privilege,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), a pro-impeachment member of the Judiciary panel that’s leading the obstruction probe.

The new line of thinking comes amid Democrats’ mounting frustration at the White House’s ability to slow their investigations to a crawl by blocking witnesses and documents. Such a move might circumvent the president’s resistance and show much-needed momentum for the party.

Democrats have hoped a series of high-profile hearings featuring witnesses who played central roles in the Mueller report would galvanize the public. And lawmakers who favor impeachment have argued that hearing directly from these individuals could stoke sentiment in favor of beginning proceedings to remove the president.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) first telegraphed his interest in a widening orbit of Trump figures back in early March when the committee blasted out requests for documents and testimony not just from the White House, but from longtime Trump associates, the president’s two adult sons and people who worked for his namesake company, charity, 2016 campaign, transition and inauguration.

Most of the Democrats’ targets either ignored the committee’s requests, said they had no documents for the committee or refused to cooperate. A handful turned over limited materials, and the committee has issued subpoenas for others.

Last week, the full House voted to give Nadler authority to go directly to federal court to compel compliance. And Democrats also secured access to some of Mueller’s underlying evidence, including interview transcripts, witness notes and other materials central to the special counsel’s 448-page report.

While Trump’s lawyers have so far blocked House Democrats from talking to former White House counsel Don McGahn, who is cited more than any other aide in the report’s obstruction section, they notched a win by securing closed-door testimony this Wednesday from Hope Hicks, the longtime Trump confidante and former White House communications director.

While Hicks is expected to decline to discuss her White House tenure — the period that is the primary focus of the committee’s investigation — she may open up about her work on the campaign and transition team. And even if Hicks appears but doesn’t answer key questions, some lawmakers say it could encourage other witnesses to show up and cooperate.

Still, Trump isn’t going to make things easy for Democrats.

The president’s lawyers, in an unrelated matter, appeared to lay the groundwork for an effort to block even outside advisers from speaking to Congress about their interactions with Trump and his inner circle by arguing that even some people who don’t work for the White House can be subject to claims of executive privilege.

“The Executive Branch’s confidentiality interests are not limited solely to communications directly involving the President and other Executive Branch officials,” Michael Purpura, a deputy White House counsel, wrote in a letter to the House Oversight Committee last month. “Rather, a President and his senior advisers must frequently consult with individuals outside of the Executive Branch, and those communications are also subject to protection.”

Rhode Island Rep. David Cicilline, a senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said any White House effort to block these witnesses from testifying would probably fail in the courts.

“They don’t have any privilege,” he said, though he noted the committee would have to invite them to appear voluntarily before testing any executive privilege claims.

The House Intelligence Committee also has taken steps to secure witness testimony from figures outside the White House in their probe of potential counterintelligence risks identified in Mueller’s probe.

Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) last Thursday issued subpoenas for testimony from Flynn — Trump’s first national security adviser who still awaits sentencing after pleading guilty to lying to the FBI — as well as Gates, the former Trump deputy campaign chairman and a longtime Manafort aide. Flynn and Gates are still cooperating with prosecutors in other ongoing criminal matters, and it’s unclear whether they will respond to the committee subpoenas.

Several of the other people at the top of Democrats’ wish list are staying silent about the prospect they’ll face new rounds of congressional scrutiny.

An attorney for Lewandowski, the combative former Trump campaign manager, declined comment. His client is cited in the Mueller report as the recipient of a message the president dictated to him to give to then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions requesting the scope of Mueller’s probe be limited to “future election interference.”

The former Trump campaign manager didn’t deliver the message to Sessions but instead tried to pass it along to Rick Dearborn, then a senior White House official who had worked for Sessions in the Senate. According to the Mueller report, Dearborn “was uncomfortable with the task and did not follow through.”

Reached by phone about the prospects he’d be called to testify to Congress, Christie replied, “No comment, my friend.” The former New Jersey governor, who still speaks to Trump, described to Mueller’s investigators a 2017 conversation in which Trump seemed to believe firing Flynn would help to end the Russia probe.

Flynn’s former lawyer, Robert Kelner, also declined comment. He’s mentioned in the Mueller report as the recipient of a November 2017 voicemail from then-Trump attorney John Dowd just after Flynn withdrew from a joint defense agreement with the president to cooperate with the special counsel.

Legal experts say Democrats would be smart to make it a top priority to bring in the central players from the Trump world beyond his administration.

“Where’s Paul Manafort? He’s in a prison somewhere. He’s readily available. Get him a suit. Get him a haircut. Have him testify,” said John Q. Barrett, a St. John’s University law professor, in reference to the former Trump campaign chairman, who is serving a 7½ year sentence for a series of financial fraud, lobbying and witness tampering crimes.

He also argued that others, including Flynn, Gates and former Trump attorney Michael Cohen should be summoned back to the Hill for questions, particularly those who can’t claim attorney-client or executive privilege on their conversations.

“The people who were actors in the conduct are available,” said Barrett, a former associate who worked under independent counsel Lawrence Walsh during the Reagan-era investigation into secret U.S. arms sales to Iran. “They’re fully and cleanly available to the Congress.”

More broadly, Barrett said House investigators should consider casting a wider net in search of current or former Trump staffers willing to defy orders from above to stay silent.

“Go to homes and ring doorbells. Ask. You never know who’s found Jesus, who’s got qualms, who recognizes criminality, who’s broken with the authority of the president to command their life,” he said. “Maybe that springs some information.”

But Democrats may regret calling witnesses who remain loyal to Trump and are willing to push back on lawmakers, said Joe diGenova, a former federal prosecutor who represented two witnesses in the Mueller probe: Mark Corallo, a former spokesman for the president’s legal team, and Trump campaign aide Sam Clovis.

“You know what happens in a hearing like that, the witness says, ‘You know what, Mr. Nadler, go to hell. I’m sick of you. I’m sick of what you’ve done to my family,’” added diGenova, who nearly joined the president’s team of personal attorneys in March 2018 and continues to give Trump informal legal advice.

“If they want to do that, I’d be there with a camera to watch that. How stupid. They think people are gonna roll over and play dead for these morons? They may accept just to have the opportunity to spit in the face of Elijah Cummings, Schiff and Nadler, and I would recommend that they do it,” diGenova said.

“If they want to call Corey that’d be their biggest mistake,” diGenova added. “Ooohoo! I hope they do it. They’re going to regret it.”

Lewandowski reportedly had that exact experience when he testified to the House Intelligence Committee behind closed doors last year, telling Democrats he no longer intended to answer their “fucking” questions.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2MSbkzO
via IFTTT

Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong released from jail

Joshua Wong, who became the face of the 2014 “Umbrella Movement” as a teenager, walked free from prison on Monday and urged the territory’s leader Carrie Lam to step down amid days of mass protests against a controversial extradition bill that would allow suspects to be sent to China for trial.

The 22-year-old was released from the Lai Chi Kok Correctional Facility after completing a two-month sentence for his part in the so-called Umbrella pro-democracy protests that brought the city to a standstill five years ago.

Before being jailed, Wong had called for the Hong Kong government to scrap the planned changes in the extradition law, which has for now been shelved indefinitely.

Hong Kong’s Chief Executive on Sunday apologised to the public and “promised to accept criticism with the most sincere and humble attitude”. But protesters have continued to demand her resignation.

“She is no longer qualified to be Hong Kong’s leader,” Wong told reporters. “She must take the blame and resign, be held accountable and step down.”

How will Hong Kong deal with growing public discontent?

On Saturday, the chief executive had bowed to public pressure and suspended deliberation of the bill, but did not drop the proposal completely. The territory’s leader is chosen from a pre-selected list of candidates vetted by the government in Beijing.

Some camped out overnight on the streets after Sunday’s mass protest when an estimated two million people – most of them dressed in black – marched through the centre of the city to show their opposition to the bill.

Police said 338,000 were counted on the designated protest route in the “peak period” of the march. 

In the morning, as rain began to fall, the remaining demonstrators moved into a space outside Hong Kong’s Legislative Council allowing police to reopen roads to traffic.

The government building was closed Monday and was the scene of violent confrontations on June 12 in which about 80 people were injured. 

‘Extraordinary timing’

Wong, clutching his belongings and dressed in a white shirt, was mobbed by media and supporters as he walked out of jail.

Al Jazeera correspondent Sarah Clarke, reporting from Hong Kong, described Wong’s release as “extraordinary timing” for the pro-democracy groups and those opposed to the extradition treaty.

Wong’s sentence was reduced to two months from three because he was only 17 when he was arrested in 2014.

The pro-democracy activist won his appeal against a separate conviction and six-month sentence for unlawful assembly and was released after spending more than two months in prison in that case.

Soon after leaving prison Wong laid flowers at a makeshift memorial outside a shopping mall where a protester fell to his death on Saturday night after hanging a banner on some scaffolding.

Strikes and other smaller events were planned for Monday.

Former Hong Kong legislator Lee Cheuk-yan told AP demonstrators are looking at the long-term .

“If Carrie Lam does not respond to the five demands by the protesters, people will come back and the struggle will continue,” Lee said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WQC9sP
via IFTTT

LaMelo Ball Rumors: Australia’s NBL Pursuing ‘Next Stars’ Contract Agreement

BC Prienu Vytautas's LaMelo Ball in action during the Big Baller Brand Challenge friendly tournament match between BC Prienu Vytautas and BC Zalgiris-2 at the BC Prienai-Birstonas Vytautas arena, in Prienai, Lithuania, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2018. LiAngelo Ball and LaMelo Ball, sons of former basketball player LaVar Ball, have signed a one-year contract and play their first match for Lithuanian professional basketball club Prienu Vytautas. (AP Photo/Liusjenas Kulbis)

Liusjenas Kulbis/Associated Press

LaMelo Ball may be taking his talents Down Under. 

According to Marc Stein of the New York Times, Australia’s NBL is “in pursuit” of the 17-year-old phenom with the hopes he will sign a “Next Stars” contract. The program is essentially an alternative to college for those who are looking to play for a year before they are eligible for the NBA draft.

Stein noted the NBL’s Illawarra Hawks are a possible destination but explained the “contracts are negotiated with the league rather than individual teams and players are then placed by the league with various franchises.”

Ball would not be the only notable name to play in the league.

Jacob Rude of USA Today‘s Lonzo Wire noted teams have signed Brian Bowen, Terrance Ferguson and RJ Hampton to deals. Hampton, in particular, stands out as a 5-star prospect and the No. 5 overall player in the class of 2019, per 247Sports’ composite rankings.

Ball’s route to college is already over, as his father, LaVar, acknowledged during a halftime interview at the Big Baller Brand All-American Game. Andrew Joseph of USA Today‘s For the Win noted as much in April, pointing out the elder Ball said LaMelo would either play in Australia or China.

His collegiate eligibility figured to be a significant issue after he played professionally in Lithuania, had an agent and was involved with Big Baller Brand.

That prevented schools from seriously recruiting him even though he is a 5-star prospect and the No. 3 point guard in the class of 2019, per 247Sports composite rankings.

Like Hampton, Ball would have the opportunity to get paid and improve his game against professionals before a potential jump to the NBA, where his brother was recently included as part of the trade package going from the Los Angeles Lakers to the New Orleans Pelicans in exchange for Anthony Davis.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Rkm3lk
via IFTTT

Brexit: Absent Johnson emerges unscathed from TV debate

London, United Kingdom – The elusive favourite to become Britain’s next prime minister emerged unscathed from a television debate that failed to scrutinise his pledge to take the UK out of the European Union without a Brexit deal – despite refusing to take part.

Boris Johnson – who was “empty chaired” in the Channel 4 programme – risked coming under sustained fire from five rivals seeking to lead the ruling Conservative Party and hence become Britain’s next leader.

While rank outsider Rory Stewart – who has mounted a credible challenge to Johnson by advocating a more moderate Brexit position – scored well with the audience.

But Britain’s next prime minister will be decided by the Conservative members of parliament (MPs).

An ongoing theme in the press has been that Johnson – a highly paid newspaper columnist whose florid language often gets him into trouble – retains the potential to ruin his own chances.

His five rivals in the C4 debate – the first in a contest set to conclude in July – largely refrained from attacking him in his absence, saving their animosity for the Labour Party opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn.

Only Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt – seen as one of the likeliest eventual challengers as the field is narrowed down to two candidates to be put to a vote of Conservative Party members – went on the attack.

“We have been talking about Brexit for 25 minutes and where is Boris?” asked Hunt.

“If he can’t join this team with five colleagues, how is he going to fare with 27 European countries? He should be here to answer that question.”

Dr Simon Usherwood, Reader in politics at the University of Surrey and Deputy Director of the UK in a Changing Europe think-tank, said, the debate was not a “game changer” and Johnson’s absence left one with a “ghost at the feast feeling”.

A former foreign secretary who resigned in protest at the Brexit deal reached with the EU by Prime Minister Theresa May, Johnson won 114 MPs’ votes in the first round of voting last week, giving him a commanding lead in the race to succeed her.

However, observers will be watching carefully how he fares in a debate on the state broadcaster BBC scheduled for Tuesday – after at least one of last night’s candidates is eliminated.

Dr David Jeffery, a lecturer in British politics at the University of Liverpool who has studied the Conservative Party, said: “The only real question is: will Boris ruin his chances in the next debate?”

Mike Bird, the Conservative leader of Walsall council – a region in the West Midlands that voted heavily for Brexit – said: “I don’t think he will win: he was the man who was going to lose this election rather than win it.

“Boris has got great charisma. People on the street love him. But conversely there are those in government and local government who say he keeps dropping the ball.”

Raab under attack

Hardline Brexiter Dominic Raab – a former Brexit secretary – came under sustained attack for hints last week that whoever becomes the next prime minister could suspend parliament to force through a “no deal” Brexit, which economists say would be disastrous.

Home Secretary Sajid Javid, one of the contenders in the race, told the audience: “We are not selecting a dictator of our country, we are selecting a prime minister of one of the proudest parliamentary democracies in the world.”

Environment Secretary Michael Gove – whose chances have been overshadowed by an admission that he took cocaine – piled further pressure on Raab.

“One of the reasons why I argued why we should leave the European Union was to make our parliament stronger, to reinvigorate our democracy,” he said.

“It would be a terrible thing that, having said that we should have more power in this country and trust our institutions more, we did as Dominic Raab seems to be implying and shut the doors on parliament.”

Stewart – the international development secretary and a popular writer – has made an overt appeal to the centre ground against a no deal Brexit.

He told the audience: “One of the reasons why I absolutely want to reject this push for no deal Brexit and I absolutely want to reject the politics of Corbyn is that I think the energy in this country is in the centre-ground, with pragmatism, with compromise.”

Usherwood, said that although Stewart “had some good lines, “that’s still going to have more of an impact with the public at large rather than MPs – who are not likely to have seen anything that is going to change their minds.”

Jeffery added that Stewart delivered some punchy lines, “but he is still trailing massively in MPs nominations and latest polling still has him trailing far behind Boris – so I don’t think it’s changed the narrative.”

Bird, a supporter of Raab’s Brexit position, said Gove came across as a “man of experience” and was set to go head to head with Hunt.

“I have said from Day 1 that I think Raab has got a lot to offer and he would have been my choice – having said that Michael Gove does come across as the man of greater experience, but we could see Raab narrowing that gap.”

The Farage factor

The other absent elephant in the room in the C4 debate was the maverick politician Nigel Farage, whose new Brexit Party – the big winner in European elections in May – poses a serious threat to the Conservative Party.

Stewart has insisted that he would include Farage in talks to resolve the Brexit impasse that has paralysed British politics, but other candidates insist it would not be wise to “out Brexit the Brexit Party”.

Hunt told the audience: “I think all of us agree that the only way to deal with the Brexit Party is to deliver Brexit. But you don’t beat the Brexit Party by becoming the Brexit Party.”

Bird told Al Jazeera: “As far as I am concerned Farage is a one trick pony. Jeremy Hunt made the point: the answer to Nigel Farage is to deliver Brexit. Talking to Farage like Stewart has is absolutely the wrong thing to do.”

Jeffery added that evidence from the European continent showed that centre-left parties which aim to match the rhetoric and policy positions of radical right populist movements merely end up emboldening them.

“The difference here is that the Brexit Party spans the ideological spectrum with one unifying image, which is to deliver Brexit.

“If you deliver Brexit it will take the wind out of the Brexit Party’s sails.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2KmeY2R
via IFTTT

US Open Golf 2019: Gary Woodland Holds Off Brooks Koepka for 1st Major Title

Gary Woodland watches his tee shot on the first hole during the final round of the U.S. Open Championship golf tournament Sunday, June 16, 2019, in Pebble Beach, Calif. (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)

Marcio Jose Sanchez/Associated Press

The majors during the 2019 season have been all about golf royalty with all-time legend Tiger Woods winning the Masters and world No. 1 Brooks Koepka capturing the PGA Championship.

It was time for some new blood at the U.S. Open.

Gary Woodland won his first career major title at Pebble Beach Golf Links in Pebble Beach, California, with a two-under 69 in Sunday’s final round. The score brought his tournament total to 13-under and three strokes ahead of Koepka, who finished as the runner-up after winning the past two U.S. Opens.

PGA TOUR @PGATOUR

BANG. 🏆

@GaryWoodland walks off a winner!

What a way to finish the U.S. Open.

#LiveUnderPar https://t.co/KSV6MGxFAz

PGA TOUR @PGATOUR

🏆 @GaryWoodland has won the U.S. Open!

It’s his first career major championship victory.

#LiveUnderPar https://t.co/Gk9yeB6kQj

Here is a look at the top finishers:

1. Gary Woodland, -13

2. Brooks Koepka, -10

T3. Xander Schauffele, -7

T3. Jon Rahm, -7

T3. Chez Reavie, -7

T3. Justin Rose, -7

T7. Adam Scott, -6

T7. Louis Oosthuizen, -6

T9. Henrik Stenson, -5

T9. Chesson Hadley, -5

T9. Rory McIlroy, -5

The full leaderboard can be found at the PGA Tour’s official website.

Woodland’s win was all the more remarkable considering he had never finished better than a tie for 23rd place at his previous eight U.S. Opens. The 35-year-old hadn’t even finished in the top 10 of a major until the 2018 PGA Championship, which Koepka happened to win.

It appeared as if Woodland would be squaring off with Justin Rose in addition to Koepka at the start of Sunday’s round. Woodland held a one-stroke lead over Rose through 54 holes, and they were both looking to hold off Rory McIlroy and Koepka, among others.

McIlroy entered the final round five strokes off the lead and had the opportunity to make a move before he dug himself an early hole with a double bogey on No. 2. He was uneven from there with three birdies and two bogeys on the rest of the front nine and never found his footing to make a legitimate push before a double bogey on No. 16 sent him tumbling down the leaderboard for good.

The same cannot be said about Koepka, who logically served as the biggest threat to the 54-hole leaders given his recent dominance. He won his second straight PGA Championship in May after he became just the seventh golfer in history to win back-to-back U.S. Opens the past two years.

He had been lurking this entire tournament and made his charge in the early going Sunday with birdies on four of the opening five holes. He looked to be on cruise control to his second major of the year and fifth since the start of the 2017 season but couldn’t keep up the blistering pace and finished with a three-under 68.

Kyle Porter @KylePorterCBS

Brooks currently comparing tobacco brands with Chez on the 12th tee if you’re wondering how nervous he is about winning three straight U.S. Opens.

Justin Ray @JustinRayGolf

Brooks Koepka will become the first player in U.S. Open history to shoot five straight rounds in the 60s (final round last year, all four this year).

However, Rose did some of his work for him and fell as Koepka climbed.

Rose shot even par on the front nine while others made their moves and fell well off the pace with bogeys on Nos. 12, 13 and 15. That made it a two-man race because, unlike Rose, Woodland did not back down when the two-time reigning champion dialed up the pressure.

The eventual champion was a steady one-under on the front nine and extended his lead to two with a birdie on No. 14 and tricky par save on No. 15. Koepka missed a birdie putt on No. 18 that would have trimmed the deficit to one and applied more pressure, which coincided with Woodland’s shot of the tournament on No. 17.

The American had to chip from the fringe and well away from the hole for his second shot on the par-three 17th. A mishit would have put him in position for a bogey at best, but he put it feet from the hole and saved par and any stress on his final hole.

PGA TOUR @PGATOUR

When he needed it most.

@GaryWoodland wows with the wedge.

He’ll take a 2-shot lead to 18. https://t.co/H522Q3AUFx

Woodland made his mark Sunday, but the U.S. Open at Pebble Beach will forever be synonymous with Tiger Woods.

The 15-time major winner did not move closer to Jack Nicklaus’ record of 18 but gave fans a glimpse of his greatness in the closing stretch of the final round. He shot a two-under 69 for his best round of the tournament thanks to a late spurt with birdies on Nos. 7, 8, 13, 14, 16 and 18 after he was an ugly plus-four through six holes.

His two-under for the tournament wasn’t the dominant performance he unleashed at this course in 2000 when he won the U.S. Open by a record 15 strokes, but it gave Woods something to build on headed toward The Open Championship in July.

PGA TOUR @PGATOUR

It’s how you finish.

A wave of appreciation from @TigerWoods. https://t.co/foppR9UZJ4

“Just keep fighting,” he said of his round, per Bill Speros of Golfweek. “Just because I got off to a bad start doesn’t mean it’s over. Keep grinding, keep playing. And I was able to turn my round around today as well as yesterday. So rounds that could have easily slipped away and kind of gone the other way pretty easily I was able it to turnaround.”

Woods wasn’t the only one chasing Nicklaus’ record, as Viktor Hovland broke the Golden Bear’s 72-hole scoring record for an amateur in U.S. Open history.

PGA TOUR @PGATOUR

69-73-71-67 for the 21-year-old.

A birdie at the last to finish. 💪 https://t.co/71KMTQJkK2

Hovland shot a four-under 67 in the final round to bring his tournament total to four-under. Todd Kelly of Golfweek noted he became the first golfer to finish as the low-scoring amateur at both the Masters and U.S. Open in the same year since Matt Kuchar did so in 1998.

Perhaps one day he will be a first-time major winner as well, but Sunday belonged to Woodland.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2KpyNXc
via IFTTT

Yemen’s Houthis claim new attack on Saudi Arabia’s Abha airport

Yemen’s Houthi movement launched a new drone attack targeting the Abha airport in southern Saudi Arabia, the group’s Al-Masirah TV said on Monday.

There was no immediate confirmation of the attack from Saudi Arabia, which on Saturday launched air attacks on Houthi rebel forces in Yemen’s capital Sanaa, part of an escalation of tit-for-tat attacks that has stoked regional tensions.

The Houthis have stepped up drone and missile attacks on cities in neighbouring Saudi Arabia in recent months as tensions have risen between Iran and Gulf Arab states allied with the United States further afield across the Middle East.

In March 2015, a Saudi-led coalition intervened in Yemen in support of the internationally recognised President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, who was forced out of power by the Houthis.

Last week, the Houthis launched several drone and missile strikes targeting southern regions of Saudi Arabia, including Abha, Khamis Mushait and Jizan.

At least 26 people were wounded in a missile attack on Jizan airport carried out by the Houthis on Wednesday.

Proxy war

Since the Western-backed coalition led by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) began their military campaign nearly four years ago, more than 10,000 people have been killed.

The civil war has pushed the impoverished country to the verge of famine, according to the United Nations and aid agencies.

The Yemen conflict is widely seen in the region as a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran. Attacks on oil tankers near the Straits of Hormuz has raised tensions, with the US and Saudi Arabia pointing fingers of blame at Tehran.

But the Houthis have denied taking any orders from Tehran and say they took up arms to fight corruption.

The rebels said they had the right to defend themselves in the face of more than four years of Saudi-UAE bombing and an air and sea blockade.

The Houthi forces’ spokesman had issued a warning on Friday to airlines and civilians to avoid Saudi airports and military sites threatening further raids.

“We tell the Saudi regime that our operations against airports and military sites will continue as long as Saudi aggression against our country continues.

“We also call on airline companies and civilians to stay away from airports and military sites as they have become legitimate targets,” spokesman Yahya Sariee said in a Facebook post.

In May, two oil pumping stations in Saudi Arabia were targeted by Houthi drones causing minor supply disruptions highlighting an apparent significant leap in the drone capabilities of the Houthis.

Abha Airport map, Saudi Arabia

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2FdNlVs
via IFTTT

Report: Julius Randle Declines $9M Pelicans Contract Option, Enters Free Agency

New Orleans Pelicans center Julius Randle (30) plays against the Indiana Pacers during the first half of an NBA basketball game in Indianapolis, Friday, Feb. 22, 2019. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

Michael Conroy/Associated Press

Julius Randle reportedly declined his $9 million player option for the 2019-20 season with the New Orleans Pelicans on Sunday and will now have the opportunity to hit free agency this summer.

Shams Charania of The Athletic and Stadium reported Randle’s decision to test the open market.

The option was part of the two-year, $18 million deal he signed with New Orleans last summer after the Los Angeles Lakers renounced his rights.

“If you ask every [NBA] player if they had their dream scenario, their dream scenario is everyone just wants to be wanted,” Randle told The Undefeated’s Marc J. Spears in September 2018. “For me talking to New Orleans, they wanted me. I was a part of their future.”

Randle’s departure would add to the list of dramatic changes for the Pelicans as they prepare for next season. They are set to make the No. 1 overall pick in the 2019 NBA draft on Thursday.

ESPN.com’s Adrian Wojnarowski reported New Orleans will send Anthony Davis to the Los Angeles Lakers for Brandon Ingram, Lonzo Ball, Josh Hart and three first-round draft picks when the free-agent moratorium period ends on July 6.

In four seasons with the Lakers, the 2014 seventh overall pick topped out at 16.1 points per game. All Randle did in his lone season in New Orleans was post a career-high 21.4 points while adding 8.7 rebounds and 3.1 assists per game.

He finished the season on a strong note, averaging 24.6 points and 7.6 rebounds following the All-Star break.

Randle proved this past season that a change of scenery was the best thing for his career. Now, he will have the opportunity to try to find a new home to continue his upward trajectory.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2FfJl73
via IFTTT

Tens of millions lose power in Argentina, Uruguay blackout

Buenos Aires, Argentina – A massive power outage plunged tens of millions of people in Argentina, Uruguay and parts of Paraguay into the dark on Sunday, in what government officials called an “extraordinary” and unprecedented blackout, the cause of which is not yet known.

The blackout struck 7:07am local time, triggered by what Argentine government officials called a failure in a coastal grid that serves a number of countries, and a “total disconnection.”

It paralysed transportation systems, closed shops, caused long queues at petrol stations, and delayed provincial elections in Argentina, forcing voters to cast ballots by flashlight or by the light of their mobile phones.

The lights went out as Blanca Brito was leaving her house to head to work at a hair salon in the capital, Buenos Aires.

“At that hour, you couldn’t see anything. The bus was traveling in slow motion, because the driver was afraid he might hit someone. It was terrible,” said Brito, a manicurist, standing in the dark in the Crema Rusa salon as she waited for clients to arrive.

Aida Suarez, her colleague and a recent arrival from Venezuela, said her thoughts went to her home country. “They are things that take you back, to live a little of what you have already lived,” she said.

‘Extraordinary event’

At the Parilla de Rolo restaurant in the capital, there was no power for the entire morning. But the lights came on around 1:30 pm and within an hour, hungry clients were streaming in amid the waft of meat on the grill.

Running the cash register, Adriana Rasgido sighed in relief. They had stocked up for Father’s Day, and bills had to be paid.

“Five years ago, there were power outages all the time. I went five days without power at home at one point. But never at work. This is the first time I’ve seen anything like this,” she said.

By mid afternoon, nearly half of Argentina, with a population of 44 million people, was still without power.

“This is an extraordinary event that should never have happened,” Argentine Energy Secretary Gustavo Lopetegui told reporters a press conference in Buenos Aires Sunday afternoon. “It’s very serious. We can’t leave the country without power from one moment to another.”

Argentine power distributor Edesur said that the failure originated at an electricity transmission point between the Yacyreta and Salto Grande power stations, in the northeast part of Argentina.

‘Nothing ruled out’

The government is not ruling anything out, including a cyberattack, although Lopetegui said it is not among the primary potential causes being considered.

Carlos Garcia Pereira, head of Transener, Argentina’s largest power-transmission operator, said the failure in the system could be caused by something as simple as humidity during a day of heavy rainfall.

Lopetegui stressed that Argentina’s power system is “very robust” and is generating more than it requires.

An investigation is underway to determine who is responsible, and if sanctions are necessary.

“It is important to clarify that this total disconnection happens automatically. It’s the computers that run the system that do it, when they detect imbalances that could cause major harm, and in milliseconds the system disconnects in order to protect itself,” said Lopetegui.

“There was no alert here,” he added. “There was no possibility for an alert here because it’s something that a human can’t detect. There is no human intervention.”

By 3:30 pm on Sunday, 56 percent of Argentina had its power restored, and most of Uruguay, with a population of 3.5 million, was back online. Uruguay officials blamed the blackout on “flaws” in Argentina’s system.

Every province in Argentina except for the southern-most Tierra del Fuego, which is on its own system, was affected.

In Neuquen city in west Argentina, most businesses were closed and street lights were out on Sunday. But at the Alto Comahue mall, one of the few places that was open amid the blackout, the generators rumbled loudly, blowing warm air into the rainy, winter morning.

The mall was a popular location for a Father’s Day outing, and families camped out on benches and crowded the food court.

At a coffee shop, three young men hunched over laptops were making use of the internet.

“We work for a digital platform,” said Nicolas Doguoli, adding that they don’t usually work at the mall.

Cecilia Nowell contributed reporting from Neuquen

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WNFadn
via IFTTT

Are the U.S. and China on a war footing in space?


A Chinese rocket

China’s space ambitions have raised concerns within the Pentagon. | STR/AFP/Getty Images

Defense

Trump wants a Space Force, Beijing is developing weapons it could use in orbit, and ‘there is not a lot of dialogue’ between the two countries.

A top Chinese general has a warning for any U.S. leaders planning an arms race in space: Be prepared to lose.

Outspending a rival power into economic exhaustion might have helped the U.S. win the Cold War, said Qiao Liang, a major general in the Chinese air force who co-wrote a book called “Unrestricted Warfare: China’s Master Plan to Destroy America.” But he said it won’t work against a wealthy manufacturing powerhouse like China.

Story Continued Below

“China is not the Soviet Union,” Qiao said in an interview with the South China Morning Post, a news partner of POLITICO. “If the United States thinks it can also drag China into an arms race and take down China as it did with the Soviets … in the end, probably it would not be China who is down on the ground.”

Qiao’s words come as both Washington and Beijing are pouring money and resources into an increasingly militarized space race that some security specialists and former U.S. officials fear is heightening the risk of war. The aggressive maneuvers include President Donald Trump’s proposal for a standalone Space Force — which Qiao dismisses as “an unwise move” — and efforts by both countries to develop laser and cyber weapons that could take out each other’s satellites.

The rivalry is plainly on the minds of leaders at the Pentagon, which cites “space” 86 times in a new threat assessment of China’s military. It also warns that the People’s Liberation Army is working on “enabling long-range precision strikes” and developing directed-energy weapons for use in orbit.

Trump, Vice President Mike Pence and a slew of U.S. military leaders have cited China’s military space programs as a key rationale for proposing the Space Force, which would gather nearly all the Defense Department’s space-related programs into a new military branch — similar to one China created four years ago. Congress is considering the administration’s plan, although some defense hawks are skeptical.

Pence has also expressed alarm at China’s success in landing un-crewed probes on the moon, a place U.S. astronauts last visited in 1972. “Last December, China became the first nation to land on the far side of the moon and revealed their ambition to seize the lunar strategic high ground and become the world’s preeminent spacefaring nation,” Pence said at a meeting of the National Space Council in March.

Even more worrying, neither country seems interested in placing the issue on the diplomatic agenda to lower the tensions, some security advocates say. That’s in contrast to the decades of space cooperation that have existed between the U.S. and Russia.

“One of my biggest concerns is that for all the talk about how horrible an armed conflict with China would be for everyone, all the current U.S. policies and actions seem to be preparing for armed conflict instead of avoiding it,” said Brian Weeden, the director of program planning at the Secure World Foundation, which advocates for using space in a peaceful and sustainable way.

“There is not a lot of dialogue between the U.S. and China,” Weeden said.

But other space experts say China is a greater threat to the United States than most people realize — and even an “imminent threat,” independent analyst Namrata Goswami said.

“If anything, [the threat from China] is under-appreciated and underplayed in the U.S.,” she said. “I suspect that is because the U.S. military might not want to call attention to its own vulnerabilities regarding its space assets.”

Qiao said China is not seeking a space war. But he said it is preparing to counter any nation, including the U.S., that seeks to pose a threat to China’s national security.

Qiao said China’s economic prowess leaves it well positioned to prevail in an expensive contest with the U.S.

“When the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in the Cold War and the arms race, the United States was the largest manufacturing country, and the Soviet Union was not even the second,” he said. “But today it is China who is the world’s top manufacturer.”

Recent reports from U.S. spy agencies and think tanks indicate that China’s efforts are advancing quickly. Those include estimates that China will soon be able to field high-powered lasers designed to attack objects in low-Earth orbit — and evidence that Chinese weapons can already attack targets much farther from the Earth than the United States can.

China’s reliance on space assets is also expanding: It has more than 120 intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance satellites of its own — a number second only to the United States. About half of those assets owned and operated by the Chinese military and could be used to track and target U.S. forces around the world, the report warns.

The threat getting the most attention is the danger China’s orbiting weapons might pose to the satellites the United States relies on for communications, navigation and surveillance — for both military operations and economic well-being.

China is heavily investing in so-called counterspace technology, including the development of at least three antisatellite missile systems, according to an April report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies. It is also developing satellites that touch other satellites in orbit, the report said. While that technology can be used for repairs in orbit, it can also be used to disable a satellite or tear off a solar array to affect a satellite’s power source.

The Pentagon’s China Military Power report found that China is also pursuing new jamming and “directed energy” weapons that can interfere with satellites. In a conflict, that technology would probably be used to “blind and deafen the enemy,” the report said.

China also reorganized the People’s Liberation Army in 2015 to create a Strategic Support Force, a military branch dedicated entirely to space, electronic and cyber warfare. The new branch was designed to bring space assets from across the Chinese military under one organization, similar to the goal of the U.S. Space Force.

The space-centric branch, which reports directly to the Central Military Commission, is focused primarily on satellite launches and intelligence, navigation and communication operations, but also conducts research and development on new counterspace capabilities, according to a Defense Intelligence agency report published in February.

Chinese military units are also training with missiles that could damage or destroy satellites, the Defense Intelligence Agency reported in February. And they will probably have a ground-based laser that can blind optical sensors on satellites in low-Earth orbit by 2020.

Unlike the United States or Russia, China is also believed to have the capacity to use missiles to attack satellites in the more distant geosynchronous orbit, or 22,000 miles above Earth.

If any country were to launch a kinetic strike in geosynchronous orbit, the debris field would make the area, which is today used for critical missions like early missile warning and weather observations, unusable.

“We have much more to lose in GEO than any other country,” said Kaitlyn Johnson, an associate fellow who specializes in space security at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “We wouldn’t want to have a first strike capability.”

Military experts also worry that China could try to seize areas of the moon that contain strategic resources including ice that could be used for rocket fuel or life support.

But they say it’s much more likely China would want to use dominance in space to influence conflicts on Earth. Being able to threaten the military’s GPS or communications satellites might deter the U.S. from getting involved in a conflict in the South China Sea, Weeden said.

The U.S. Space Force is intended to close some of those gaps by grouping space troops together to build expertise and giving the new service autonomy over its budget requests. One of the biggest goals of the new branch is to speed up space acquisition, allowing new technology to be fielded faster, and to develop a space “doctrine” that would oversee how the U.S. fights conflicts when space platforms are at stake.

The Chinese government insists that it is merely responding to aggressive U.S. moves to dominate space militarily. And Qiao called it “bullying and hegemonic” for the United States to insist that other countries can’t follow suit.

“The U.S. space troops have long existed,” Qiao said. “They just did not become an independent force. … Moreover, the U.S. possessed anti-satellite capabilities as early as the 1970s and 1980s. China only developed anti-satellite capabilities by the end of the 1990s and even in the first decade of this century.”

He insisted that China has little choice but to enhance its own capabilities.

“China’s purpose to develop space capabilities, firstly, is we do not want to be blackmailed by others,” Qiao maintained in the interview. “Second, we hope to use space peacefully. But if others want to oppress us by occupying the heights of space and opening up a ‘fourth battlefield’ China will certainly not accept it.”

Still, China remains far from overcoming American dominance, Qiao said. “We cannot surpass the U.S. in the next decade or two, but we will narrow the gap in a comprehensive way,” he said. “And it is possible to we may take the lead in some individual areas.”

Weeden agreed.

“China is developing many of the same space capabilities the U.S. did decades ago, while the U.S. is focused on sustaining its capabilities and making them more resilient,” he said. “On the whole, the U.S. is still far more capable than China is but the relative advantage is narrowing.”

The two nations have some diplomatic channels through which they could cooperate in space, including the United Nations’ Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, of which both the U.S. and China are members. In 2015, the Obama administration also established a dialogue with China on space safety, which is quietly continuing under Trump, although the meetings are mostly high-level talks, Weeden said.

But the Wolf Amendment, which was first passed in an appropriations bill in 2011, forbids the U.S. government from working with China and prohibits any bilateral cooperation between the China National Space Administration and NASA on national security grounds. And there’s virtually no collaboration between the militaries of the two nations today.

To open the door for conversations that could ease tensions and avoid miscommunication, the U.S. and China must “crawl before we walk,” Audrey Schaffer, the director of space strategy and plans at the Defense Department, said at a March event on U.S.-China space relations hosted by the Secure World Foundation.

Some potential first steps include the two countries sharing information like their national defense strategies, providing launch notifications of space vehicles or opening routine, secure communications channels between U.S. and Chinese diplomats. Each step would help build trust and transparency, Schaffer said, and pointed to the strong relationship between the U.S. and Russia in space as evidence that it can be done.

“Even then when the relationship was just as strained, if not more so, we did manage to work bilaterally and multilaterally with the Soviets to really create mechanisms that would help reduce the risks of conflict and enhance stability,” Schaffer said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WGFYvL
via IFTTT

Israel names illegal Golan settlement after Trump

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has inaugurated a new illegal settlement in the occupied Golan Heights named after US President Donald Trump, in a gesture of appreciation for the US leader’s recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the territory.

Netanyahu on Sunday called Trump a “great friend” of Israel and described the Golan, which overlooks northern Israel, as an important strategic asset.

“The Golan Heights was and will always be an inseparable part of our country and homeland,” he said.

The settlement will be called “Ramat Trump”, Hebrew for “Trump Heights” and isn’t exactly new. Currently known as Bruchim, it is over 30 years old and has a population of 10 people.

“Thank you PM @netanyahu and the State of Israel for this great honor!” Trump tweeted later on Sunday.

Israel is hoping the rebranded settlement will encourage a wave of residents to vastly expand it.

“It’s absolutely beautiful,” said US ambassador to Israel David Friedman, who attended Sunday’s ceremony.

Noting that Trump celebrated his birthday on Friday, he said: “I can’t think of a more appropriate and a more beautiful birthday present.”

Israel captured the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 Middle East war and annexed it in 1981. Most of the international community considers the move illegal under international law.

But during a visit to Washington by Netanyahu in March, just weeks before the Israeli elections, Trump changed decades of US policy by signing an executive order, officially recognising the strategic mountainous plateau as Israeli territory.

Trump’s support for Israeli Golan Heights draws global anger

The decision, the latest in a series of US diplomatic moves benefitting Israel, was widely applauded in Israel.

“Few things are more important to the security of the state of Israel than permanent sovereignty over the Golan Heights,” Friedman said.

“It is simply obvious, it is indisputable and beyond any reasonable debate.”

After a cabinet meeting at the site on Sunday, Netanyahu and Friedman unveiled a sign trimmed in gold with the name “Trump Heights”, adorned with US and Israeli flags.

‘Cheap PR stunt’

Reporting from Jerusalem, Al Jazeera’s Harry Fawcett said opposition parties have been pointing out that Netanyahu’s transitional government ahead of September’s election doesn’t have the authority to enact a new settlement in the occupied Golan Heights.

Gaza, Golan and Netanyahu’s Election Plan | UpFront

“But that hasn’t stopped Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He’s taken his cabinet up there for what he called a ‘festive cabinet meeting’ which was attended unusually by the US ambassador David Friedman,” Fawcett said.

Following Sunday’s decision to inaugurate the community, developing the settlement still requires overcoming several additional bureaucratic obstacles.

With Netanyahu running for reelection in the second national election this year, it remains unclear whether he will be able to complete the task.

Zvi Hauser, an opposition legislator who formerly served as Netanyahu’s Cabinet secretary, called Sunday’s ceremony a cheap PR stunt.

“There’s no funding, no planning, no location, and there’s no real binding decision,” he said.

Developing Trump Heights will not be easy. Ringed by high yellow grass and landmines, it is located roughly 20km from the Syrian border and a half hour drive from the nearest Israeli town, Kiryat Shmona, a community of about 20,000 people near the Lebanese border.

According to Israeli figures, almost 50,000 people live in the occupied Golan Heieghts, including about 22,000 Jewish Israelis and nearly 25,000 Arab Druze residents.

While Israel has encouraged and promoted settlement in the Golan, its remote location, several hours from the economic center of Tel Aviv, has been an obstacle.

The area is home to small agriculture and tourism sectors but otherwise has little industry.

Corruption charges

As Netanyahu unveiled the newly rebranded illegal settlement, his wife Sara on Sunday admitted to the misuse of public funds and asked a Jerusalem court to approve a plea bargain convicting her of fraud and breach of trust.

Under the charges in an amended indictment, Sara Netanyahu would plead guilty to exploiting the mistake of another person and pay a fine along with compensation, but corruption charges against her would be dropped.

Sara was initially charged in June 2018 with fraud and breach of trust for allegedly misusing state funds to pay for catered meals costing $100,000, by falsely declaring there were no cooks available at the prime minister’s official residence.

Separately, Prime Minister Netanyahu is facing possible indictment for bribery, fraud and breach of trust in the months ahead.

He is reportedly seeking legislation that would result in him being granted immunity.

“Of course the bigger question now confronts Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He has three corruption cases of his own,” Al Jazeera’s Fawcett said.

“He was unable to cement a coalition after the last election. He’s now … had the Israeli parliament call new elections for September 17.

“All of the stuff that has been going on in the Golan today is very much part of his efforts to try to get re-elected and also appeal to his friend in the White House, Donald Trump.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2x0gije
via IFTTT