Saudi women’s rights activist Samar Badawi appears in court

Prominent women’s rights activists including Samar Badawi were in a Saudi court on Thursday over charges linked to their human rights activism.

Badawi is a Saudi lawyer and sister of blogger Raif Badawi who was sentenced to 10 years in prison in 2012 for criticism of officials in the kingdom.

It was the first time Samar Badawi appeared in court since her arrest on July 30, 2018. She was apprehended along with Nassima al-Sadah, a women’s rights activist from Saudi Arabia‘s Eastern Province, and Amal al-Harbi.

Ten people, including Loujain al-Hathloul, Eman al-Nafjan, and Hatoun al-Fassi, are facing the court. 

The European Saudi Organization for Human Rights said Thursday’s hearing was taking place in the Specialized Criminal Court, a counter-terrorism court that often tries activists and political dissidents.

Under Saudi Arabia’s Counterterrorism Law, the activists face 20 years in prison.

Amnesty International’s Philip Nassif told Al Jazeera he was concerned the activists won’t have fair trial or due process, and urged the United States to take action for their release.

“Among those detained are three American citizens,” Nassif told Al Jazeera.

“It is a travesty that the US administration under President Donald Trump has not held the Saudi authorities accountable for egregious human rights abuses.”

🔴 Breaking news

The so-called “Special Criminal Court” in Riyadh is holding at this time the first trial session for the human rights activist Samar Badawi, who is still under arbitrary detention since 31/7/2018 with no guilt. pic.twitter.com/nGhKskuMmQ

— Prisoners of Conscie (@m3takl_en) June 27, 2019

Legal representation remains unclear, though rights groups have said the activists’ lawyers were not present during previous court appearances or interrogations.

Saudi rights group ALQST said Badawi and other women activists had been subjected to “severe and brutal torture and sexual harassment” while being held.

Amnesty urges Saudi Arabia to rule out death penalty for teenager

Human Rights Watch described the arrests as part of an “unprecedented government crackdown on the women’s rights movement”, which began just weeks before the lifting of the women’s driving ban on May 15, 2018.

“ALQST has long expressed the concern about the profoundly unfair nature of trials in Saudi Arabia with complete lack of transparency and failure to adhere to international standards,” Drewery Dyke from ALQST told Al Jazeera.

“We believe Samar Badawi is a prisoner of conscience and we call for her unconditional release.” 

Torture?

Raif Badawi’s wife, Ensaf Haidar, and their three children live in Canada. Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland condemned Samar Badawi’s arrest last year and called for her release – a move that riled Saudi authorities.

The Saudi government accused Canada of trying to “meddle with Saudi sovereignty” and recalled their ambassador from Canada while expelling Ottawa’s ambassador to the country.

The Saudi authorities accused the activists of “contact with foreign entities with the aim of undermining the country’s stability and social fabric”.

The Saudi press branded the activists “traitors” and supporters of the crackdown described them as “agents of embassies” on social media.

Rights organisations documented numerous cases of alleged torture and ill-treatment of the detained activists in recent months. 

Amnesty cited victims’ testimony that masked men severely tortured and sexually harassed some of the women.

Saudi slams UN report on Khashoggi killing as ‘unfounded’

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2XyG4u4
via IFTTT

Trump’s hawks ramp up campaign to shred last part of Iran nuclear deal


Sen. Marco Rubio

“My sense of it is the administration is not in a waiver mood right now,” Sen. Marco Rubio said. | Andrew Harnik/AP Photo

foreign policy

The administration is consumed by a debate over how hard to go after Tehran amid heightened tensions.

For President Donald Trump, it’s déjà vu all over again on Iran.

Iran’s expected breach on Thursday of the uranium stockpile limits set by the 2015 nuclear deal is reviving a fierce debate within the Trump administration and on Capitol Hill about just how hard Trump should go to undermine the agreement.

Story Continued Below

Even though Trump pulled out from the deal struck by President Barack Obama, an important portion of the agreement was left intact that allows work on Iran’s civil nuclear program and facilitates international projects to encourage its advancement.

The State Department has issued waivers to allow those projects to continue and doing away with them would almost certainly blow up the deal entirely. That’s precisely the goal that Trump administration hawks, led by national security adviser John Bolton, have been pursuing — thus far, with only limited success.

The next inflection point in the battle is likely to come Thursday, when Iran has said it will surpass the enrichment levels established by the deal. And Bolton and his allies on Capitol Hill are expected to ratchet up pressure on the State Department — and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo — not to renew the waivers when they are next reviewed in August.

In recent days, senior administration officials, including Vice President Mike Pence, were briefed on a new essay by Michael Doran, a Hudson Institute senior fellow and former George W. Bush administration national security official, according to two people with knowledge of the briefing.

The essay argues for dropping the waivers, noting that for Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khameini, they “constitute the cornerstones of the JCPOA, the structure that provides international cover for Iran’s nuclear-weapons program,” according to two people briefed on the situation. The piece has also ping-ponged through offices at the National Security Council and the State Department, these people said. Bolton, among others, has read the piece, which has ping-ponged through offices at the National Security Council and the State Department, these people said.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who has publicly called for ending the nuclear waivers, tweeted the essay on Wednesday, calling it a “crucial analysis” and stating that it is “time to finally shred the deal.”

Proponents of the nuclear deal have argued that the international nuclear projects facilitated by the waivers help give the U.S. greater visibility and intelligence into Iranian activities; critics say they give an international stamp of approval to Iran’s illicit activities.

Cruz and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), both Bolton allies, said they have spoken to Trump privately about the matter, pressing him to intervene to ensure the waivers are not renewed again. The State Department previously pushed for continuing waivers related to Iranian oil sales, a “foolhardy” position, according to Cruz, who acknowledged the debate embroiling the White House.

“There continues to be a robust debate within the administration,” Cruz said in an interview, adding that he is calling for the administration to pursue strong “snapback” sanctions and remove the waivers as soon as Iran violates the agreement. “The natural next step is to decline to extend those waivers another time.”

“Why would we give them anything?” asked a second Republican senator of Iran. “They just called the president mentally retarded. They are almost as bad as the Democrats now.”

Trump departed for the G-20 meeting in Japan on Wednesday where American officials are expected to discuss next steps with their European allies. Trump on Monday signed an executive order imposing additional sanctions against Khamenei and other senior officials in retaliation for Iran’s downing of a U.S. drone.

The move led to a war of words between Trump and Iranian president Hassan Rouhani, with Trump tweeting that “Any attack by Iran on anything American will be met with great and overwhelming force. In some areas, overwhelming will mean obliteration.” Rouhani charged in a televised address that the White House’s actions were “mentally retarded.”

“The Iranian regime continues threatening to shorten its nuclear breakout timeline by increasing its stockpile of enriched uranium and enriching uranium at higher levels — all of which is only possible because the terrible nuclear deal didn’t force Iran to permanently and irreversibly abandon its nuclear-related capabilities,” Garrett Marquis, a National Security Council spokesman, said in a statement. “The regime should stop its nuclear pursuit now and answer the president’s diplomacy with diplomacy, not terror.”

Iran’s expected breach on Thursday will also cast a spotlight on the remaining signatories of the deal, who will be responsible for enforcing its noncompliance. Those countries face a July 7 deadline imposed by Tehran to come up with a better deal — and get economic relief from U.S. sanctions — or Iran has said it will start enriching uranium not just above the levels allowed by the deal, but closer to the level required for a nuclear weapon.

“This will put pressure on the administration, but they can deflect that pressure onto the Europeans because they are signatories to an agreement that was violated,” said Ray Takeyh, senior fellow for Middle East Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. “This actually could help the administration make its case — despite all the bells and whistles that John Kerry talked about — that this agreement is unenforceable if the Europeans refuse to respond to an explicit violation of the agreement.”

In early May, under pressure from America’s European allies, the State Department extended five of the seven waivers it had originally issued allowing work on civilian nuclear projects in Iran. But instead of granting the waivers for 180 days, as it had done previously, the administration said it would review the decision in 90 days.

Defenders of the waivers say the projects have incentivized Iran to abide by the terms of the deal, and that revoking them would almost certainly do the opposite.

“Let the focus be on Iran’s violation and not on Iran’s violation and a further U.S. provocation,” said Jarrett Blanc, who served as the State Department coordinator for Iran nuclear implementation under Obama. But, he added, referring to senior Trump administration officials and their allies in Congress, “Bluntly speaking, I think that these guys are childish buffoons who tend to make the wrong decision whenever possible.”

Critics of the waivers have particularly homed in on the work being done at the Fordow and Arak plants, drawing attention to documents in the Israeli-exposed Iran nuclear archive indicating that the Fordow plant was built only to make nuclear weapons and never had a civilian dimension. Recent comments from Iran’s nuclear chief, Ali Arakbar Salehi, indicating that Iran surreptitiously imported a second set of parts for its nuclear reactor at Arak have also elicited calls to suspend the waiver on projects at that plant.

“We should not be issuing waivers to allow Iran to continue nuclear research at the Fordow facility, a bunker built into the side of the mountain for the express purpose of building a nuclear bomb,” Cruz told POLITICO on Wednesday.

Many hawks think there’s no such thing as a civilian nuclear project anyway.

“I don’t believe them over there when they are talking about using them for nonmilitary use,” said Senate Armed Services Chairman Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.). “Everything they do is for military use.”

Senators said that Trump is getting competing information about which to way to go on what could be one of his most explosive foreign policy decisions yet. Asked if his hard-line message is resonating, Rubio indicated it was.

“My sense of it is the administration is not in a waiver mood right now,” Rubio said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2xdvEB1
via IFTTT

‘Hell is coming’: Europe on alert as heatwave intensifies

Europe’s record-breaking heatwave is forecast to intensify further on Thursday with authorities on high alert as temperatures threaten to exceed 40 degrees Celsius in some parts of the continent.

The stifling heat prompted traffic restrictions in France, sparked forest fires in Spain, and fanned debate in Germany over public nudity as sweltering residents stripped down.

Meteorologists blame a blast of hot air from northern Africa for the heat this week, which has already set new records in Europe for June. According to reports, the high temperatures have already claimed the lives of three people.

Exceptional for arriving so early in summer, the heatwave will on Thursday and Friday likely send thermometers above 40C in France, Spain and Greece.

In Spain, hundreds of firefighters and soldiers, backed by water-dropping aircraft, battled on Wednesday to put out a wind-fuelled forest fire that erupted in Torre del Espanol in the northeastern region of Catalonia.

The worst is expected on Friday when 33 of the 50 Spanish provinces face extreme temperatures, which could reach 44C in Girona.

“Hell is coming,” one Spanish TV weather presenter tweeted.

In France, temperatures “unprecedented” for their timing and intensity since detailed surveys started in 1947 were expected to reach at least 39C over two-thirds of the country, said weather service Meteo-France.

Health official Jerome Saloman said the impact of the extreme heat was starting to be felt in France, with an increase in weather-related calls to emergency medical services.

Some schools were expected to close Thursday and Friday while several cities – including Paris and Lyon – restricted traffic to limit a build-up of air pollution.

French authorities were taking no chances after the August 2003 heatwave was blamed for 15,000 deaths in the country, with television and radio broadcasts issuing warnings.

In Greece, where about 100 people died in last year’s deadly fires at the Mati coastal resort, hospitals and officials were on red alert with temperatures of 45C.

Global warming raises risk

Scientists warn global warming linked to human fossil fuel use could make such scorchers more frequent.

“Global temperatures are increasing due to climate change,” said Len Shaffrey, professor of climate science at the University of Reading.

“The global rise in temperatures means the probability that an extreme heatwave will occur is also increasing.”

But French winemakers said the hot weather was more than welcome as it could produce a superior vintage.

“Two of three days of heatwave in Bordeaux at this time, it’s magic!” said Philippe Bardet, head of the Bordeaux Wine Council.

Temperatures above 40C would help burn off any of the mildew caused by residual damp, which is “very, very good for quality”, Bardet said.

The 70-year-old record for the highest temperature recorded for June was beaten in Germany as 38.6C was recorded in Brandenburg, the German Weather Service (DWD) confirmed Wednesday.

Meanwhile, police in Brandenburg cautioned a naked man for driving his moped wearing only his helmet and sandals.

And in Munich, security guards ordered a group of women sunbathing topless on the banks of the river Isar to cover up.

The move backfired, according to the Munich newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung, which quoted another sunbather as saying she and others took their tops off “out of solidarity”.

It said an urgent motion was introduced in a city council meeting to allow topless bathing.

Scores of people have drowned in Poland and Lithuania as they tried to cool off in lakes and rivers, authorities said.

The Polish weather institute IMGW said the country’s highest ever June temperature was recorded on Wednesday in the southwest: 38.2C.

The Czech Hydrometeorological Institute also recorded the country’s highest June temperature: 38.9C in the northern town of Doksany.

In Belgium, vastly different temperatures were expected with 19C on the north coast and 33C in the south, according to broadcaster RTBF.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Nfsvvy
via IFTTT

US regulator cites new flaw on grounded Boeing 737 MAX

Boeing 737 MAX aircraft are now subjected to intense scrutiny and testing designed to catch flaws [AFP]
Boeing 737 MAX aircraft are now subjected to intense scrutiny and testing designed to catch flaws [AFP]

The US Federal Aviation Administration identified a new risk that Boeing must address on its beleaguered 737 MAX aircraft before the grounded jet can return to service.

The risk was discovered during a simulator test last week and it is not yet clear if the issue can be addressed with a software upgrade, or will require a more complex hardware fix, sources with knowledge of the matter said on Wednesday.

“Boeing agrees with the FAA’s decision and request and is working on the required software to address the FAA’s request,” Boeing said in a statement.

The FAA did not elaborate on the latest setback for Boeing, which has been working to get its best-selling airplane back in the air following a worldwide grounding in March in the wake of two deadly crashes within five months.

The new issue means Boeing will not conduct a certification test flight until July 8 in a best-case scenario, the sources said, but one source cautioned it could face further delays beyond that.

Boeing crisis dominates Paris Air Show 2019

The FAA will spend at least two to three weeks reviewing the results before deciding whether to return the plane to service, they said.

Last month, FAA representatives told members of the aviation industry that approval of the 737 MAX jets could happen as early as late June.

The world’s largest plane-maker has been working on the upgrade for a stall-prevention system since a Lion Air crash in Indonesia in October, when pilots were believed to have lost a tug of war with software that repeatedly pushed the nose down.

A second deadly crash in March in Ethiopia also involved the system. The two accidents killed 346 people.

“On the most recent issue, the FAA’s process is designed to discover and highlight potential risks. The FAA recently found a potential risk that Boeing must mitigate,” the FAA said in the statement.

“The FAA will lift the aircraft’s prohibition order when we deem it is safe to do so.”

Boeing’s aircraft are being subjected to intense scrutiny and testing designed to catch flaws even after a years-long certification process.

It was not clear if the situation that resulted in an uncommanded dive can be addressed with a software update, or if it is a microprocessor issue that will require a hardware replacement.

A hardware fix could add new delays to the plane’s return to service.

SOURCE:
News agencies

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2FAKyWN
via IFTTT

Pools in France close after women defy burkini ban

French women are demanding that public pools change regulations to accommodate burkini wearers [Reuters]
French women are demanding that public pools change regulations to accommodate burkini wearers [Reuters]

The two public swimming pools in southeast France shut down despite the current heatwave after a row over the use of full-body Islamic “burkini” swimsuits.

Seven burkini-clad women, accompanied by activists from the Alliance Citoyenne rights group, went to the Grenoble pools on Sunday demanding the right to bathe – despite a municipal ban on the swimwear worn by Muslim women. They called the ban was discrimination.

The women want the public pools, which currently require men to wear swim briefs and women to wear bikinis or one-piece swimsuits, to change their regulations to accommodate burkini wearers.

Local member of parliament Eric Ciotti, of the right-wing Republicans party, said on Twitter the burkini “has no place in France where women are equal to men”.

But Alliance Citoyenne likened the women’s action to that of American civil rights icon Rosa Parks.

The lifeguards at the pools asked for the shutdown on Wednesday because “they are there to maintain safety and they can’t do that when they have to worry about the crowds” generated by the controversial swimsuits, the town hall said in a statement.

“We are working towards a positive solution” to the problem, it added.

Banning burkinis

The row is the latest in France over face-and-body-covering garments worn by Muslim women, which many perceive as subjugating women in a country with strict laws on secularism.

France – the country with Europe’s largest Muslim population – was the first European country to ban the full-veil in public spaces in 2011.

The European Court of Human Rights upheld the move in 2014, rejecting arguments that outlawing full-face veils breached religious freedom.

Earlier this year, French sports retailer Decathlon was forced to back down from a plan to sell a runner’s hijab in France after criticism.

Far-right politicians expressed their opposition to the burkini on Monday, the day after the event in Grenoble.

The burkini was at the centre of a standoff in several French seaside towns three years ago. Some towns banned the garment claiming it was a security threat, only to have the bans later overturned by a court.

SOURCE:
News agencies

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2JfzTSy
via IFTTT

US Democratic debate night one: What did the candidates say?

The first of back-to-back nights of debate took place on Wednesday with 10 of the 20 US Democratic presidential candidates who qualified for the debate going head-to-head on a range of issues, including healthcare, immigration and US foreign policy towards Iran.

Senators Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren, Representatives Tulsi Gabbard and Tim Ryan, Washington Governor Jay Inslee, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, former Representatives Beto O’Rourke and John Delaney and former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Julian Castro took the stage Wednesday night in Miami, Florida. 

Aside from technical difficulties, Wednesday’s debate offered few major surprises, but some heated exchanges, as the candidates sought to appeal to voters by highlighting individual platforms and points of divergence. 

From healthcare to immigration, and the economy to Iran what did the candidates say as the lead up to the 2020 race heats up?

Healthcare

One of the issues showcasing differences among the 10 candidates on stage was healthcare.

Candidates battled over whether to abolish private insurance and shift to a Medicare-for-All system.

Warren and de Blasio were the only two candidates to raise their hands in support of eliminating private insurance.

Warren, a leader of the party’s progressive wing who has been surging in opinion polls, said private insurance was taking advantage of Americans. She backs a government-sponsored Medicare-for-All approach and criticised those who say it is not politically feasible.

“What they are really telling you is they just won’t fight for it. Healthcare is a basic right, and I will fight for it,” she said.

DNC debate

Senator Elizabeth Warren and former Texas congressman Beto O’Rourke take part in the first night of the Democratic presidential debate on June 26, 2019 in Miami, Florida [Joe Raedle/Getty Images/AFP]  

Most of Warren’s rivals Wednesday night, including O’Rourke and Klobuchar, called for universal healthcare but also favoured preserving the private insurance market. 

Delaney, an outspoken critic of Medicare for All who supports a universal healthcare approach that includes private insurance, said Democrats should not throw away a system that some Americans are happy with.

“I think we should be the party that keeps what’s working and fixes what’s broken,” Delaney said.

De Blasio cast the debate as part of “the battle for the heart and soul of our party”. 

O’Rourke said private insurance was “fundamental to our ability to get everybody cared for,” but de Blasio cut him off.

“Congressman O’Rourke, private insurance is not working for tens of millions of Americans when you talk about the copays, the deductibles the premiums – it’s not working. How can you defend a system that’s not working?”

Inslee said he was the only candidate on the stage that had passed a public healthcare option and a law protecting a woman’s right to reproductive health and health insurance.

That drew a sharp response from Klobuchar.

“There are three women up here who have fought pretty hard for a woman’s right to choose,” she said, looking at Warren and congresswoman Gabbard.

Immigration

One of the more heated exchanges on Wednesday night came during the questioning about immigration.

O’Rourke and Castro battled over the separation of families and detention of migrants at the southern border. Castro said he would decriminalise border crossings by migrants, which he said led to the separation of families. He challenged O’Rourke and others to support him.

O’Rourke said that as a congressman he helped introduce a bill that would ensure that those who are seeking asylum and refuge in the United States are not criminalised. 

Castro responded: “I’m not talking about the ones that are seeking asylum, I’m talking about everybody else.” He accused O’Rourke of not doing his homework.

DNC debate

Democratic presidential candidates take part in the first night of the Democratic presidential debate [Joe Raedle/Getty Images/AFP] [Daylife] [Daylife]

Candidates pointed to the recent deaths of Oscar Alberto Martinez Ramirez and his 23-month-old daughter, Valeria, who drowned while attempting to cross the Rio Grande River between the US and Mexico.

Several candidates blamed President Donald Trump and his immigration policies for their deaths. The family had grown frustrated over the long wait in Mexico to apply for asylum in the US.

“Watching that image of Oscar and his daughter Valeria was heartbreaking. It should also piss us all off,” Castro said.

De Blasio earned loud applause when he reminded citizens immigrants were not their enemies.

“For all the American citizens who feel you are falling behind and the American dream is not working for you, the immigrants didn’t do that to you!” De Blasio said. “The big corporations did that to you.”

Economy

All 10 Democrats railed against a national economy and Republican administration they said exists only for the rich.

“Who’s this economy really working for? asked Warren, who received the first question. 

“When you’ve got a government, when you have an economy that does great for those with money and is not doing great for everyone else, that is corruption, pure and simple,” the US senator and former Harvard law professor added. “We need to call it out.”

The Massachusetts senator said the economy is working well for “giant oil companies” and those who want to invest in private prisons, but not for those struggling and Americans facing the effects of climate change.

O’Rourke said in English that “this economy has got to work for everyone” and that, right now, it isn’t. Then he switched to Spanish, saying in that language that “we need to include everyone” in a booming national economy.

He added that the Trump administration has focused on helping the wealthy and large corporations over everyday Americans – echoing similar sentiments of the other Democrats on stage.

Iran

Booker was the only one of the 10 candidates on stage in Miami on Wednesday not to raise his hand when asked if he would sign onto the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran as originally negotiated. Under the agreement, Iran agreed to limit its enrichment of uranium and submit to UN inspections in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.

Pressed to explain his rationale, Booker said as president he would “do the best I can to secure this country”.

Trump pulled the United States out of the accord in May 2018 and has imposed increasingly tough sanctions to pressure Iran into a better deal. Since then tensions between the two countries have intensified, especially over the last month.

Gabbard offered strong words against Trump’s foreign policy, saying the president’s “chickenhawk cabinet” has “led us to the brink of war in Iran”.

Greatest threats to the US?

The 2020 Democratic presidential hopefuls gave a range of answers about what they see as the greatest threat facing the US.

China was mentioned by Klobuchar, Castro, Ryan and Delaney.

Climate change was mentioned by Warren, Booker and O’Rourke.

Inslee, who’s made climate change the emphasis of his campaign, pointed instead to Trump.

Gabbard and Delaney pointed to nuclear war. Klobauchar also mentioned Iran.

And de Blasio said Russia because the country “is trying to undermine our democracy”.

Was Trump watching?

Despite flying to Asia Wednesday for the G20 summit, Trump tuned in from Air Force One and did not miss the chance to knock his would-be opponents on Twitter. 

His verdict as the evening got underway? “BORING!”

Who’s up for night two?

On Thursday, Senators Michael Bennet, Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders, former Vice President Joe Biden, Representative Eric Swalwell, Mayor of South Bend, Indiana, Pete Buttigieg, former Governor of Colorado John Hickenlooper, entrepreneur Marianne Williamson and startup investor Andrew Yang will go head-to-head.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2X6k3mK
via IFTTT

Protests in Indian cities after Muslim man beaten to death

Protests were held in several Indian cities on Wednesday following the lynching of a Muslim man last week by a Hindu mob that suspected he was a thief.

Increasing anger about the killing in Jharkhand prompted Prime Minister Narendra Modi to make his first comments on the matter on Wednesday, telling the upper house of parliament he was “pained” to hear about it and calling for “the strictest possible punishment to the accused”.

Mobile phone videos shared on local television channels showed 24-year-old Tabrez Ansari tied to a pole and begging for mercy as some men beat him with sticks and forced him to chant “Jai  Shri Ram” (Hail Lord Ram), a slogan increasingly used by Hindu far-right groups.

Is this the New Jharkhand and New India that are being talked of? Watch Tabrez Ansari being forced to chant Jai Shri Ram and Jai Hanuman. @HemantSorenJMM @ShoaibDaniyal @Dipankar_cpiml @drajoykumar @JharkhandNow @svaradarajan @sharmasupriya @KunalSarangi @karwanemohabbat pic.twitter.com/mOD5grSEsu

— Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (@JharkhandJanad1) June 23, 2019

Ansari was caught by a group of villagers who suspected he was a thief in the Seraikela-Kharsawan area of Jharkhand on June 18, said Avinash Kumar, a deputy superintendent of police in the area.

Eleven villagers have been arrested and a special investigation team set up to probe the matter, Kumar said.

Villagers called the police and lodged a case against Ansari, and police took him to the hospital, but Ansari died due to his injuries while in custody four days later, Kumar said. Two police officers from the area have been suspended, police told local media.

Indian local media reports said Ansari’s wife has accused police of deliberately taking him to jail first – instead of a hospital – despite the critical injuries he suffered.

‘No more lynching’

Dozens of people gathered in New Delhi carrying placards calling for justice for Ansari’s killing. In Gujarat and West Bengal, hundreds took to the streets carrying posters that read ‘No more lynching in the name of religion’.

India protest against lynchings

A woman holds a placard during a protest in Kolkata [Rupak De Chowdhuri/Reuters]

Protests were planned in about 50 cities. It wasn’t immediately clear how many took place.

Opposition Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi termed the lynching a “blot on humanity”.

Hate crimes against minorities have spiked in India since Modi and his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came to power in 2014.

Dozens of Muslim men have been attacked or lynched by Hindu mobs since then, many on suspicion of slaughtering cows, which are considered holy in the Hindu religion.

Last year, the Supreme Court condemned “horrendous acts” of mob violence and asked the government to enact a new law to deal with an increase in incidents of lynchings.

Two days after Ansari’s killing, a Muslim religious school teacher in West Bengal’s Kolkata alleged he’d been pushed off a moving train when he refused to chant “Jai Shri Ram” as some Hindu men in the train demanded.

Stop Mob Lynchings…!!#IndiaAgainstLynchTerror pic.twitter.com/IrRnwobpYk

— Gulzar Ahmed (@abuariamomehdi) June 25, 2019

Many people took to social media to condemn the BJP-led government in Jharkhand state, where civil society groups have recorded at least 13 lynchings of minorities, mainly Muslims, in the past three years.

“An environment has been created across the country that enables and encourages this kind of violence,” said  Harsh Mander, a founding member of Karwan-e-Mohabbat (“a caravan of love”), a solidarity campaign for victims hit by hate violence, including lynchings.

“For perpetrators, such attacks are an act of heroism. Ansari was not only lynched by a mob, there was an obvious religious hatred in the manner it was done by asking him to shout Hindu slogans,” Mandar told Al Jazeera in a previous interview.

The United States last week released an annual report on international religious freedoms that said religious intolerance was increasing in India and extremist narratives had “facilitated an egregious and ongoing campaign of violence, intimidation, and harassment against non-Hindu and lower-caste Hindu minorities.”

India rejected the report saying it saw “no locus standi for a foreign government to pronounce on the state of our citizens’ constitutionally-protected rights.”

“Because he was a Muslim he was beaten so brutally,” Ansari’s wife Shaishta Ansari told the television channel NDTV.

“My husband was my only support. Who will I live for now? I want justice.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2RCLsXv
via IFTTT

Jozy Altidore Scores, Leads USA Past Panama to Top Group D at 2019 Gold Cup

KANSAS CITY, KS - JUNE 26: Jozy Altidore of USA scores a goal to make it 0-1 during the Group D 2019 CONCACAF Gold Cup match between Panama v United States of America at Children's Mercy Park on June 26, 2019 in Kansas City, Kansas. (Photo by Matthew Ashton - AMA/Getty Images)

Matthew Ashton – AMA/Getty Images

The United States men’s national soccer team defeated Panama 1-0 in a de facto Group D title game in the 2019 Gold Cup at Children’s Mercy Park in Kansas City, Kansas, on Wednesday.

After each squad won its first two matches of the tournament, this clash would determine the final standings for Group D, with positioning in the quarterfinals at stake. Thanks to a strong edge in goal differential, Team USA entered play with the ability to wrap up first place with a draw or a victory.

Below is a look at the latest tournament action.

Group D Standings

United States 3-0-0, 9 pts, +11 goal differential

Panama 2-0-1, 6 pts, +3 goal differential

Guyana 0-1-2, 1 pt, -6 goal differential

Trinidad and Tobago 0-1-2, 1 pt, -8 goal differential

With Group D on the line, neither team could come up with many quality looks early on in what turned out to be a fairly uneventful first half. But when tested, both the United States’ Sean Johnson and Panama’s Jose Calderon proved to be up to the task.

It wasn’t until the 21st minute that either team had much of a scoring opportunity. While Jozy Altidore managed a clean look, he was unable to beat Calderon:

FOX Soccer @FOXSoccer

The USMNT’s best chance came from Jozy Altidore in the 21st minute but things remains 0-0 at the half. #GoldCup2019 https://t.co/OnMdyqivtG

That would prove to be the closest either team would come to scoring in the first half, though there were a few other looks as well.

Just like in the first half, the second half began in quiet fashion. Looking to spark his team, United States coach Gregg Berhalter inserted Christian Pulisic in the 65th minute…and the offense instantly came to life.

On the ensuing corner kick, Altidore got USMNT on the board with a bicycle kick:

FOX Soccer @FOXSoccer

JOZY ALTIDORE WITH THE BICYCLE KICK! 🔥

He scores his 42nd international goal and puts the USMNT out in front 🇺🇸 https://t.co/CVuFexT8Wj

TOM MARTIN ™ @TomKCTV5

Jozy Altidore scores and Kansas City goes wild. https://t.co/3KO2IaMQFv

The goal was the United States’ 11th of the tournament, tying the program’s Gold Cup record:

ESPN Stats & Info @ESPNStatsInfo

The USMNT wins Gold Cup Group D, thanks to Jozy Altidore’s 42nd career goal for the USA.

The 11 goals scored by Team USA in group play match their most in a single Gold Cup group stage (also had 11 in 2013).

The US will face Cinderella story Curaçao in the quarterfinals. https://t.co/C85IkwlBz7

That would prove to be the game’s only goal—and it was enough to get the United States the points it needed to wrap up the victory.

On a night where the United States only needed a draw, Berhalter elected not to start Pulisic, Gyasi Zardes or Zack Steffen. While it may not have been the prettiest of victories, the team found a way to get the job done.

Perhaps most importantly, Altidore’s standout performance did not go unnoticed:

Ives Galarcep @SoccerByIves

Gyasi Zardes replaces Jozy Altidore in the 82nd minute. Big goal and strong showing for Altidore, who makes his case to be the starter in the knockout rounds. One of the few real bright spots tonight for the #USMNT

Callum Williams @CalWilliamsComm

Jozy Altidore departs after a good showing and a big goal. No doubt Berhalter will be scratching his head over the next few days with regards to who his starting forward will be in the #GoldCup QF’s #USMNT

Having Altidore play at a high level could be the key to Team USA defending its title and winning its third crown in its last four attempts.

What’s Next?

Both teams are on to the quarterfinals, where they will each be back in action Sunday at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia. Panama will face Jamaica at 5:30 p.m. ET, and the United States will take on Curacao at 8:30 p.m. ET.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2ZVQRfn
via IFTTT

Libya: GNA-allied forces claim recapture of key town from Haftar

Forces allied to Libya‘s UN-recognised government say they have retaken Gharyan, a strategic town south of the capital, Tripoli, although forces loyal to renegade military commander Khalifa Haftar denied the claims.

Gharyan is the main forward base for the eastern-based Libya National Army (LNA) under Haftar which has been fighting to take control of Tripoli.

Mustafa al-Mejii, spokesman for forces loyal to the internationally-recognised Government of National Accord, told AFP news agency: “Gharyan is under our total control.”

Dozens of pro-Haftar fighters were killed and at least 18 were taken prisoner, he said.

The claim came after the spokesman for Haftar’s forces accused “sleeper cells” of allowing Government of National Accord (GNA) forces to enter part of Gharyan, 100 kilometres southwest of Tripoli, without admitting the loss of the town.

He said the fighting was ongoing and that the situation was under control.

Witnesses told Reuters that GNA troops seized the main operations room of the LNA in Gharyan, as well as LNA vehicles and other gear. The town hosts LNA field hospitals and is also where supplies arrive from the east. 

The LNA has set up a helicopter base outside the town.

Images were circulated on social media networks of GNA forces patrolling Gharyan and of prisoners said to be pro-Haftar fighters.

Mejii hailed what he described as a “significant victory” and said he now expected Haftar’s forces to “collapse”.

Libya has been mired in chaos since a NATO-backed uprising that toppled and killed longtime ruler Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, with a multitude of militias vying for control of the oil-rich country.

Haftar, a retired general who took part in the revolt against Gaddafi, unleashed an offensive in May 2014 to purge Libya of armed groups he branded “terrorists”.

After a rapid advance from the east and south of the country, Haftar seized Gharyan on April 2, and two days later launched an offensive on Tripoli where the GNA is based.

But counter-attacks by forces loyal to the GNA have resulted in a stalemate on the capital’s southern outskirts.

The battle for Tripoli has killed over 650 people, including combatants and civilians, according to the World Health Organization. More than 94,000 have been displaced by the fighting. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2xczKcM
via IFTTT

DHS chief under fire amid rolling immigration purges


 Kevin McAleenan

Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan, who took over the post less than three months ago, is under heavy criticism from prominent Trump allies. | Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP Photo

Hard-liners inside and outside the Trump administration are pressing for the removal of President Donald Trump’s acting Homeland Security secretary amid a rolling leadership purge that began in April and shows no signs of ending, according to five people in the Trump administration and four former Department of Homeland Security officials.

Kevin McAleenan, who took over the post less than three months ago, is under heavy criticism from prominent Trump allies, including former Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Thomas Homan, who may become the administration’s immigration czar.

Story Continued Below

Like three other officials purged from immigration agencies since the April resignation of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, McAleenan stands accused of disloyalty to the Trump White House’s hard line on immigration because of a perception that he didn’t support ICE raids targeting migrant families scheduled to begin last weekend.

Acting Customs and Border Protection Commissioner John Sanders, a McAleenan ally, said Monday that he’ll resign effective July 5. Sanders did not offer a public explanation for his resignation.

Several critics of the administration, including former DHS officials, have characterized the latest shakeup as another instance of White House senior adviser Stephen Miller seizing an opportunity to fill key immigration posts with allies. But one senior administration official said the president also agrees with these stances.

“The two issues the president is driving the train on at all times are trade and immigration,” the official said. “There is disbelief inside the administration that we can’t enforce the law and people are trying to find the right personnel who will do it and not look for ways out of it.”

Miller and DHS did not respond to requests for comment. The White House press office also did not immediately respond to a request for comment on McAleenan.

The turmoil mirrors a chaotic situation along the southern border, where thousands of migrants are arriving each day and detained children are being denied basic necessities like toothbrushes and soap. Current and former DHS employees complain that the leadership turnover and attendant jostling for power has slowed the government’s ability to respond to what is now widely recognized to be a crisis.

“It’s awful for morale,” said one current CBP official. “Whoever’s going to be confirmed to acting [commissioner] next, we’re back to square one, getting a new person briefed. … It’s like starting all over in a transition.”

Homan suggested on “Fox & Friends” that this week’s planned ICE raids were delayed because McAleenan leaked information about them.

“You’ve got the acting secretary of Homeland Security resisting what ICE is trying to do,” Homan said. “In the Washington Post or in numerous media outlets, he does not support this operation, and I tell you what, if that’s his position, then he’s on the wrong side of this issue. You don’t tell the men and women of ICE, a day before they go out there and do this operation — look, this story was leaked. They gave the locations of the cities, the day it was supposed to start, how many targets.”

Homan spoke while sitting in front of a DHS seal, looking like a government official — something he has not been since June 2018. The seal was in a room set up in his basement at his Virginia home, according to two former DHS officials. Trump told Fox News on June 14 that Homan would be his new “border czar,” but Homan said a day later that the announcement was “kind of premature” and indicated that he hadn’t yet decided whether to take the job. An administration official said Wednesday that Homan has not yet been given a clear description of what the job would entail.

“Homan’s getting paid a lot better as border czar of Fox News than border czar of the White House,” said Ali Noorani, executive director of the pro-migrant National Immigration Forum. “And he kind of has the same job, to go on Fox News and carry the administration’s message.”

Several administration officials and hard-line immigration advocates have targeted McAleenan in recent days, arguing behind the scenes that he’s too liberal to run DHS because he served under President Obama and has given money in the past to Democratic candidates and organizations. Conservative media outlets, including the Washington Examiner, have run critical stories to amplify that narrative.

Brandon Judd, president of a union that represents Border Patrol agents and a Trump ally, also torched McAleenan in a Fox News op-ed over the weekend.

Judd — who has attacked McAleenan in the past for being insufficiently committed to Trump — said that if McAleenan did leak information about the raids then he “was inexcusably willing to put the public at risk and law enforcement officers in harm’s way in order to further his own agenda.”

“There is no question that the president is sensitive to the lack of progress in resolving this crisis at the border and frustrated with the pace of changes, and it has become increasingly evident that one of the main reasons for the lack of progress is because Kevin McAleenan has been reluctant to take action that would more effective,” said Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the restrictionist Center for Immigration Studies. “A lot of ideas proposed have been bottled up by him and his front office.”

The Trump White House assumed McAleenan could work with Democrats on Capitol Hill to secure more funding and policy changes, since he’s worked under both Republican and Democratic administrations, Vaughan said. But “he has not been able to deliver on those things.”

Within the last month Trump installed a pair of vocal immigration hard-liners into key immigration positions, naming Mark Morgan acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Ken Cuccinelli acting director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Both had drawn the president’s attention by making provocative statements about immigration on Fox News; Morgan, for instance, said he could tell whether a migrant child would later join MS-13 merely by looking into that child’s eyes.

Morgan appears already on the move. POLITICO and other outlets reported Tuesday that he’s expected to be named the new acting commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, although the White House has not made an official announcement.

Cuccinelli, meanwhile, scored a coveted perk during his first month that his predecessor, Francis Cissna, never enjoyed. Trump designated him to be one of 10 officials to get a government-funded car to drive him from his Virginia home to USCIS headquarters.

A USCIS spokesperson confirmed that Cuccinelli had been granted the benefit, but said that he “is currently driving himself to the office.”

Both newly installed officials occupy new “principal deputy director” positions created at their respective agencies to allow them to serve in an acting capacity under the 1998 Federal Vacancies Reform Act — a bureaucratic sleight-of-hand that could circumvent the confirmation process.

Cuccinelli, a former Virginia attorney general and head of a conservative political action committee, would face a hard road to confirmation in the Senate because he backed challenges to mainstream Republicans in recent years, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Morgan would at the least face strong Democratic opposition.

“I think the White House is looking for a certain model,” said one current administration official. “Cuccinelli and Morgan have been on Fox every day. I don’t think you’ll ever see Sanders up there.”

The latest personnel shake-up happened just days after the administration caught flak for its treatment of roughly 300 migrant children at a Texas facility who were filthy, hungry, and largely unsupervised, according to lawyers who interviewed some of them.

Several conservative immigration advocates said the DHS shakeup was unrelated to the ensuing public outcry, and instead had been brewing for weeks. Moving Morgan and Sanders into their current slot just sets the stage for the administration to now get rid of McAleenan, one advocate said.

“Things have not changed at DHS since Nielsen left,” said a top official at a restrictionist immigration organization. “I disagreed with them getting rid of Francis Cissna but right now, they are looking in the right place.”

But “having all of this churn and not having stable leadership makes it very difficult to address the problems,” said Leon Fresco, former deputy assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Office of Immigration Litigation. “Whenever you change a leader, you automatically lose a month as the person gets acclimated.”

Gabby Orr contributed to this report.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2FwVSD5
via IFTTT