Georgia was born as an independent post-Soviet republic just four years after me, so in a sense, we grew up together. We both had to learn everything from scratch, make painful mistakes and navigate the legacy of Soviet rule.

Nowhere is that legacy more visible than in the buildings and monuments the Soviets left behind. Almost 30 years after Georgia gained independence, they squat on the hillsides of our towns and cities as if awaiting the return of their Soviet masters.

“One of the means to show the power of the state has always been architecture, be it pyramids or baroque palaces,” Georgian architect and urban planner, Irakli Zhvania, told me. “It was always the means to show your own people how powerful you are, to show them that they are small, they are little and they should be afraid of the state.”

Decades have passed since that era, and that empire does not exist any more. So why should my generation, which has absolutely no mental connection with the Soviet ideology, live in its shadow? Should we not get rid of Soviet-era architecture, these symbols of oppression? 

I was surprised to find out during the production of my Al Jazeera Correspondent film, The Soviet Scar, that these questions are infuriating for some people in my country.

During the Soviet era, successive leaderships built thousands of monuments to their power [Al Jazeera]

‘A lot of freedom but no bread to eat’

Yuri Mechitov is a renowned Georgian photographer who was roughly my age during Georgia’s push for independence. In 1989, he took the iconic black and white photograph of a Georgian woman defiantly holding a black flag in the hours after Soviet forces cracked down on peaceful protesters in Tbilisi.

Mechitov said that my generation has been “brainwashed” by the West while his generation has little to show for helping bring down the Soviet Union.

“The Soviet Union was, of course, our home, even if it was a closed country. You couldn’t easily buy jeans or new LPs and we regarded that as a problem at the time, but now it seems silly. We ruined the country for a chewing gum,” he said, referring to the shortages of non-essential goods that anti-Soviet protesters were fed up with. “Now I have a lot of freedom, but no bread to eat.”

As part of the generation that grew up with Georgian independence, my schoolteachers frequently extolled the virtues of our glorious ancient past and its free spirit – but all I could see around me was a nation that had been living in a kind of box for 70 years.

They are just buildings. Even the buildings in human history which keep the memory of tragedy, they are monuments and they are kept. If we go around the world and start to demolish everything that was built during [the time of] some tyrant, we are going to erase half of our history and half of the monuments.

Irakli Zhvania, Georgian architect

‘Generations were raised in these buildings’

For me, Soviet-era architecture is a throwback to Soviet authoritarianism.

Most of all, it’s the blocks. Row after row. Street after street. The ugly, utilitarian housing blocks that families like mine were forced to live in are a painful reminder of the way lives were destroyed – including the one of my great great grandfather who was purged for no reason.

Families whose properties had been confiscated were assigned to the blocks by profession or religious affiliation to keep a ready concentration of workers around industrial areas but also to more easily monitor and collect information on specific groups.

“This was a very good tool [for the state] to be very well informed about a certain community. A very good source of information and control … You could hear what your neighbour is talking about behind a wall, who is visiting whom, what they are doing and so on,” explained architect Irakli Zhvania, who leads the Ugly Walk in Tbilisi.

‘Generations were raised in these buildings, it is part of their lives and it is part of their collective memory,’ said architect Zhvania [Al Jazeera]

Several years older than me, Zhvania had experienced the last breaths of the Soviet system first hand and started the walks as a way of remembering the history of Soviet rule through architecture.

For many of Mechitov’s as well as Zhvania’s generation, the demolition of Soviet residence blocks and monuments would be unthinkable.

“Generations were raised in these buildings. It is part of their lives and it is part of their collective memory,” Zhvania said.

He also believes that we should not be angry at buildings for the nature of the regime that commissioned them, pointing to the architectural value of some of the Soviet-era structures.

“First of all, they are just buildings. Even the buildings in human history which keep the memory of tragedy, they are monuments, and they are kept,” he said. “If we go around the world and start to demolish everything that was built during [the time of] some tyrant, we are going to erase half of our history and half of the monuments.”

The abandoned Archeology Museum was built in Tbilisi in 1988 [Al Jazeera]

Zhvania’s comments made me look at the legacy of Soviet architecture in a different way, and made me think of the abandoned Archeology Museum built in Tbilisi in 1988.

It was built by two Georgian architects, Shota Kavlashvili and Shota Bostanashvili, and is a unique piece of architecture. It would be a shame to demolish it just because it was built during the period of the Soviet occupation.

Another Soviet-era building that should be preserved was designed by architects Giorgi Chakhava and Zurab Jalaghania. Built in 1975, it used to house the Ministry of Highway Construction in Tbilisi. 

I still believe that many of the structures left over from Soviet times – especially the ones built during the era of Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev – no longer serve us and should be taken down.

But in the end, we – the Georgian people – should have an honest discussion about the past and decide how to deal with our country’s Soviet legacy, which I call “the Soviet scar”.

Built in 1975, this structure used to house the Ministry of Highway Construction in Tbilisi [Al Jazeera]

Israeli Education Minister Naftali Bennett has said he will keep his party in government, averting the prospect of early elections in the country.

In a dramatic press conference on Monday, Bennett, who heads the far-right Jewish Home party, slammed the record of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but stopped short of resigning.

“Something bad is happening to us from within,” said Bennett, according to I24. “For quite a few years, including the last decade of the government headed by Netanyahu, that the state of Israel stopped winning.”

“I saw it with my own eyes in the second Lebanon war, as a commander of the air force in the western area of Lebanon. I saw the confusion, I saw the problems, the lack of determination. I saw the lack of spirit.”

“There is no apocolypse on the horizon. There are enemies. The enemies are not the ones that worry me,” he added.

Last week Bennett and Justice Minister Ayalet Shaked threatened to withdraw from the government coalition if Bennett wasn’t named defence minister, in the wake of Avigdor Lieberman’s resignation.

Netanyahu subsequently said he would take on the defence portfolio himself on Sunday.

The prime minister said in a televised address that “there is no place for politics or personal considerations” when it comes to Israel’s security.

He also urged his coalition partners not to bring down the government, saying holding snap elections now would be “irresponsible” as Israel is in “one of our most complex periods in terms of security”.

Netanyahu’s meeting on Sunday with Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon, a key coalition partner who has also pushed for early elections, was seen as a last attempt to prevent the collapse of the coalition – which currently has a one-seat majority in parliament – but ended with no conclusion.

Bennett had threatened to withdraw from the coalition to protest a ceasefire in Gaza agreed between Israel and Hamas-led factions on Tuesday.

Following Netanyahu’s announcement, the Jewish Home party on Sunday evening said it “does not change anything” regarding its demand that Bennett is made defence chief.

“This is a government that is nominally right-wing but acts left-wing,” the party said in a statement, as reported by the Times of Israel.

“The government is a government with leftist policies, a collapsed deterrence against Hamas, the failure to evacuate Khan al-Ahmar, a weak policy toward terrorists and their families after terror attacks.”

Many viewed Netanyahu’s speech in which he denounced those threatening to resign to be in fact, the start of the election campaign.

The Kulanu party’s Knesset faction chair MK Roy Falkman said that the country is heading for early elections with or without the ministers’ resignations.

“The coalition hasn’t been functioning properly for several weeks. We will go to elections even if Bennett and Ayelet Shaked don’t resign,” Folkman told Army Radio, as reported by the Times of Israel.