Ultima Thule already looks weird, and we’ve only had a glimpse

Ultima Thule — an uncharted world over 4 billion miles away — is coming into view.

On Monday, planetary scientists released a fuzzy image of Ultima Thule, snapped the day prior by the New Horizons exploration spacecraft from some 1.2 million miles away. Previously, New Horizons swooped by Pluto in 2015, capturing the icy, mountainous world in unprecedented detail.

Increasingly rich, detailed images of Ultima will start arriving on January 2, but already the deep space object looks elongated, not round, said New Horizons deputy project scientist John Spencer from the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, the Maryland headquarters of the New Horizons program. The program is a collaborative effort between NASA, the Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), and the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, where scientists navigate and control the spacecraft.

“It’s the first glimpse of what’s going to get rapidly better from here on — it’s our first taste,” Spencer said. 

Ultima Thule as an elongated blob.

Ultima Thule as an elongated blob.

Image: JHuAPL/Nasa

Whether Ultima’s surface is heavily cratered and if it has a rich surface geology — like that of Pluto — remains to be seen. 

“Anything is possible out there in this very unknown region,” he said. 

Ultima lies 1 billion miles beyond Pluto, in a ring of icy worlds known as the Kuiper Belt. Planetary scientists believe the objects out there have been frozen in time for some 4 billion years — preserving what happened during our solar system’s early formation, long ago.

SEE ALSO: How NASA recorded the eerie Martian wind, without a microphone

“The Kuiper Belt is just a scientific wonderland,” Alan Sterns, principal investigator of the New Horizons mission, said on Sunday. 

“We’ve never, in the history of spaceflight, gone to a target that we know less about,” Stern added.

Already, Ultima has proven mysterious. As New Horizons travels closer to the object, the pattern of light reflecting off of Ultima, or its light curve, is inconsistent. With most other objects, these light patterns repeat as the objects spin. 

An artist's conception of what Ultima Thule might look like.

An artist’s conception of what Ultima Thule might look like.

Image: nasa

“It’s really a puzzle,” said Stern in a statement last week.

But much of Ultima’s mystery will diminish in the next few days. Just 33 minutes into the new year local time, New Horizon’s will swoop some 2,200 miles above Ultima, capturing detailed snapshots of the uncharted world. But because Ultima is so far away, these rich images won’t be immediately available. The data will be transmitted back to Earth, and on January 2 the first detailed snapshots will emerge of this elongated, though still largely mysterious, object.

Ultima will soon become the most distant world humanity has ever visited.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2QeXrIx
via IFTTT

Why 2018 Was A ‘Really Big Triumph’ For The Curve Community



Netflix

Representation was a major buzzword in 2018, and widespread calls for increased diversity behind the scenes have led to noticeable improvements on screen. In particular, people of color and the LGBTQ community celebrated visibility wins thanks to movies like Black Panther and shows like Pose. But there’s one community that’s had to struggle a little more this year to be heard, and finally, it seems, they’ve made enough noise.

The community in question goes by many names — curve, plus-sized, body-positive, fat-positive, or sometimes, just fat — but much like any other marginalized group of people, they’re bound together by the same desire to be treated with respect.

In what seemed like a banner year for the community, stories derived from the curve experience hit the big and small screens one after another, from the Amy Schumer-starring I Feel Pretty all the way to Jennifer Aniston and Danielle Macdonald’s beloved Dumplin’. In between, Netflix dropped their controversial-but-widely viewed Insatiable and the Shannon Purser/Noah Centineo rom-com, Sierra Burgess Is a Loser, while those with more mature taste turned to AMC’s Dietland.

Netflix

Danielle Macdonald and Jennifer Aniston in Netflix’s Dumplin’; Shannon Purser in Netflix’s Sierra Burgess Is a Loser

With each release came assessments of whether that representation was actually representative of the plus-sized experience. And from the community’s collective critique of these and previous portrayals, people are finally starting to catch on to the dos and don’ts of telling body-positive stories. “It feels like we’re at the very beginning of a lot more widespread representation, so I hope people continue to be loud,” Sophie Carter-Kahn, one half of the duo behind the She’s All Fat podcast, told MTV News.

Each season of the podcast, she and her co-host April K. Quioh break down, assess, and generally talk about all things — including pop culture — that impact the plus-sized community and fat-positivity movement.

“I think like any other show or any other kind of media, the things that work best are when you have someone trying to tell their own experience and talk about their own story,” Carter-Kahn said, which is part of the reason why Dumplin’ was her favorite work of the year.

Based on the 2015 best seller by Julie Murphy, Dumplin’ tells the story of an overweight girl in Texas, named Willowdean Dixon, who joins a local pageant run by her beauty queen mother. The book and movie have been praised for their nuanced portrayal of what it’s like to be young and fat.

Danielle Macdonald, who portrays Willowdean in the movie, “fell so in love with” the book after reading it, she told Elle magazine. Then she heard it was being made into a movie. “I felt like I wanted [the role] for my teenage self — I never got that kind of movie growing up. It was kind of cathartic.”

Getty Images

Macdonald at the Los Angeles premiere of Dumplin’

That dearth of representation shaped what Murphy wanted to accomplish through her book. “For plus-sized representation, it’s really important for me to see characters who don’t have to lose weight in order to have a satisfying story arc, characters who don’t have to constantly rely on humor or this sort of one-dimensional thing that defines them,” Murphy said. “And then I think another great thing that representation can do is to show us multiple kinds of people, and so I think that means multiple kinds of fat people, because there’s not just one way to be fat.”

To achieve that aim, Murphy avoided the obvious weight-loss storylines and funny sidekick roles often reserved for plus-sized characters and created a world — a more realistic world, by the way — where the main character isn’t the token fat girl. Murphy used Millie, another teen who joins the pageant alongside Willowdean, to show a different plus-sized teen experience, and employed Willowdean’s loving Aunt Lucy to exemplify a positive adult role model. “If kids can’t see positive representation of people who look like themselves, it’s really hard for them to grow up and be a positive representation of themselves,” she explained.

Both Murphy and Carter-Kahn agree on the impact these accurate, positive representations of the plus-sized community stand to have. “I think that getting to see fat people being successful and thriving, that would’ve meant so much to me as a young plus-sized kid, a teenager. That would’ve opened up my mind and the world of possibility that was there for myself a hell of a lot quicker,” Murphy reflected, while Carter-Kahn said simply, “It would have been everything to me. Everything.”

Growing up with stories that frequently portrayed larger people as a weight-loss story, a villain, or just lazy impacted both women’s abilities to see themselves as the hero of their own story. “When I would read books, if I was imagining myself as the protagonist, I would imagine myself as thin, because I was like, well, if I wanted to be a protagonist, I had to be thin,” Carter-Kahn recalled.

She found her protagonist story line on Instagram, through the body-positivity movement. “When I was first getting into it I would spend literally hours just finding different people who looked like me on Instagram and looking through their posts and trying to imagine myself feeling that confident or imagine myself wearing the clothes they were wearing,” she said. “So for me, it’s very clear how visual representation makes a huge difference in being able to see yourself in a certain way or see bodies like yours in a certain way.”

As the online body-positivity movement organically grew, people in charge of making content caught on to the hashtag, and the response was loud and clear. “The audience has been waiting for this for so long,” Carter-Kahn said. “I think that the reaction to it is so genuine and that is going to continue to fuel things.”

Although Murphy points out that these stories didn’t have to wait until 2018 to surface — “I don’t necessarily think that now is the perfect time because I know that I would have loved to see a fat character like this when I was 10, 12 years old, 15” — but now is as good a time as any.

Hulu

Saturday Night Live‘s Aidy Bryant stars in Hulu’s Shrill, coming in 2019

“Change only happens if people force it to happen… I think that, you know, no pun intended, we’ve all been really hungry for this for a really long time,” Murphy said. “There’s been lots of really important, especially to me, fat characters and fat stories that have come before this moment that I think every time we see a fat character and a fat character just getting to live their life joyously on screen is a triumph, so this is one of those moments that just feels like a really big triumph for a lot of people.”

And with the upcoming release of Hulu’s Shrill, based on the bestselling book by Lindy West and starring Aidy Bryant, there is more triumph to come in 2019.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2QdxrNJ
via IFTTT

Nick Foles to Start vs. Bears After Tests Reportedly Confirm Bruised Ribs

Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Nick Foles (9) calls for the snap during the first half of the NFL football game between the Washington Redskins and the Philadelphia Eagles, Sunday, Dec. 30, 2018 in Landover, Md. (AP Photo/Mark Tenally)

Mark Tenally/Associated Press

Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Nick Foles will start on Sunday in the NFC Wild Card Game against the Chicago Bears after tests reportedly confirmed that he avoided any broken bones.

Eagles head coach Doug Pederson confirmed to reporters Monday that Foles would play after Mike Garafolo of NFL Network reported Foles only suffered bruised ribs during Philadelphia’s 24-0 Week 17 victory over Washington that saw the team clinch a playoff spot.

Third-stringer Nate Sudfeld entered the Washington game after Foles exited. Starter Carson Wentz is still out with a stress fracture in his back.

The Eagles can thank Foles for leading them to the playoffs after Wentz’s injury, as he helped them to three straight wins to end the season.

He threw for a combined 962 passing yards, six touchdowns and three interceptions against the Los Angeles Rams, Houston Texans and Washington. The effort built on Foles’ legendary status with the franchise after he won Super Bowl MVP honors while leading the Eagles to their first championship of the Super Bowl era in a 41-33 win over the New England Patriots last year.

The Bears played a key role in the Eagles’ path to the postseason, beating the Minnesota Vikings on the road in Week 17 to open the door for Philadelphia to qualify with a win.

The Eagles will need Foles back and healthy to overcome Khalil Mack and the rest of the stout Bears defense at Soldier Field. Chicago finished the 2018 campaign first in the league in points allowed (17.7), third in yards allowed (4,795) and third in sacks (50).

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Vm9DLl
via IFTTT

Bangladesh election makes mockery of democracy: BNP chief Alamgir

Dhaka, Bangladesh – The leader of the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) has said that Sunday’s general election was a “fraud” and marred by widespread irregularities.

“Yesterday’s election was totally fraud,” Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir told Al Jazeera after Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina registered an unprecedented victory.

The ruling Awami League (AL) captured 288 out of 298 seats for which elections were held, winning a whopping 96 percent of the seats, drawing criticism from the opposition.

“Ballot papers were stuffed on the night before the election. Except for few, irregularities were found in almost all the constituencies. It was preplanned, and the result was decided much earlier,” Alamgir alleged.

The BNP leader said that the vote rigging was facilitated by “the government agencies, the police and other law enforcement agencies in collaboration with election commission officials”.

This election will destroy people’s remaining faith in election system in Bangladesh.

Asif Nazrul, professor of law at Dhaka University

“This is a mockery of democracy. Bangladesh has lost an opportunity to comeback to democracy,” said Alamgir, who is among the seven candidates to win their seats.

The BNP had boycotted the last election held in 2014.

The massive win reminded of the controversial February 1996 parliamentary elections in which the BNP won 278 seats amid boycotts. It had triggered countrywide protests forcing the BNP out.

Call for fresh election

Later on Monday, the opposition alliance Jatiya Oikya Front (National Unity Front) re-iterated their demands for fresh election under a “nonpartisan government”.

“A drama in the name of national election was staged yesterday and the countrymen perceived from their hearts that how the election process of a sovereign country was destroyed,” Kamal Hossain, convener of the Jatiya Oikya Front, said at a press conference on Monday.

Hossain, a former ally of Hasina and a well-respected jurist, became the face of the opposition alliance as the BNP leader and former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia was barred from polls because of corruption conviction. 

The front said it will submit a memorandum to the election commission on Thursday.

But at a press conference held at the election commission office in Dhaka Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) KM Nurul Huda put to rest the opposition demand for re-election.

“There is no scope to hold the national election again,” Huda said a day after the 11th general election.

The CEC on Monday put its stamp on the unofficial results, and added that the voter turnout in the violence-marred polls was 80 percent.

The fatigue of the month-long election process was visible on Dhaka’s roads on Monday where traffic was thin with para-military vehicles still making rounds of the streets.

‘Kicked out of the polling booth’

Meanwhile, many Bangladeshi voters came on social media to share their stories, some of them complaining of irregularities on the election day.

Mahbub Uddin Khokon blamed the “fraudulent” election for his defeat [Mahmud Hossain Opu/Al Jazeera]

Shaquib Ahmed, a Dhaka resident, told Al Jazeera that he was kicked out of the polling booth after he voted for the BNP.

“There was no curtained area in the room to vote. As I put my seal on the BNP symbol a man standing beside me snatched the ballot paper away and shouted, ‘what do you think you are doing?’” he said.

The 34-year-old Ahmed says he was later abused at Dhaka’s Tejgaon College polling centre. “I did not protest as there were other people with him and it was very intimidating,” Ahmed told Al Jazeera.

Mahbub Uddin Khokon, a former BNP member of parliament, blamed the “fraudulent” election for his defeat in Noakhali 1 constituency.

“The election commission and the government collectively committed fraud against the nation, the voter, and the constitution,” said Khokon, who is the secretary of Supreme Court Bar Council.

“The night before the election they stuffed ballot boxes in each centre with the help of the police,” he alleged.

“I met with the chief election commissioner three times before the election to take action against the police who were lodging false cases against opposition members. He did not do anything.”

Hasina rejects rigging charges

But Prime Minister Hasina, who is set for a fourth term in office, rejected the vote rigging charges, saying people voted her party to power for development work done in her 10-year rule.

More than 600,000 security forces were deployed to prevent violence [Mahmud Hossain Opu/Al Jazeera]

“The countrymen have gained benefit of the development work of my government, and thus they cast their votes for us,” She told foreign observers on Monday.

Hasina has led Bangladesh on path of rapid economic growth and plans to turn this poor South Asian nation of 160 million people into a middle income country by 2021.

An election observer from India, a close ally of Bangladesh, lauded election as “peaceful”. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi was quick to congratulate Hasina on securing absolute a majority in 350-member parliament. Another 50 seats are reserved for women.

Many observers from South Asian countries, Al Jazeera spoke to, said that some polling stations were not crowded and in many cases wore a deserted look.

Abdur Rahman Salah Rasheed was one of the election observers who was taken to four polling stations in Gazipur.

Rasheed, the acting secretary general of election commission of Maldives, said that in the morning polling centres were “deserted”.

“We asked them why there are not many people. They told us it was foggy and early morning. Some of the places were crowded though.

Chief Election Commissioner Huda ruled out re-election [Al Jazeera]

“We went to Dhaka 17 centre for counting but did not find any opposition polling agent. We even asked them where is opposition?”

One member of observer mission, who refused to be identified, showed his bafflement at the scale of the ruling party’s victory.

At least 19 people were killed in Sunday’s election, which was marred by reports of voting irregularities such as ballot stuffing and intimidation.

An observer team from the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation on Sunday said the vote was peaceful. “We have heard the news about the deaths, but they do not reflect the overall situation, which was peaceful,” it said in a press release.

“The election was credible based on all acceptable standards,” Hameed A Opeloyeru, the head of the observer team told reporters.

The election was credible based on all acceptable standards.

Hameed A Opeloyeru, head of the OIC observer team

But Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB), in a written statement released on Monday, expressed concern at the allegations of misconduct during the election.

It called for forming a judicial committee to investigate the allegations.

Leading up to the polls, opposition complained of mass arrests and intimidation by police and ruling party supporters, but the government said the accusations were “exaggerated”.

Asif Nazrul, a professor of law at Dhaka University, said “the election will destroy people’s remaining faith in election system in Bangladesh”.

“It was not an election at all. It was an ugly and brutal hijacking of people’s right to choose their representative by all the state apparatus in alliance with ruling party goons.

“It would lead into tyranny and hurt the dignity of the society very deeply,” he said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2QfBE3l
via IFTTT

Amazon sends customer a picture of their package mid-air

As the holidays wrap up, so, too, do the constant deliveries. But not before one Reddit user got quite a surprise: Amazon’s picture-proof alert for his delivery captured his package in mid-air, flying toward his front door. 

That’s quite a toss, to be honest, and even better photo-capturing skills.

SEE ALSO: UPS delivery driver spots a doorbell camera and busts out a little dance

And for those skeptical that maybe the package is just wedged into the door for a unique perspective that simply makes it look like it’s been thrown, well, the same Reddit user shared this video to support his claim.

Thrown packages are a frequent problem that has gained attention from the rise of home security cameras, with plenty of drivers caught on tape doing their best tosses.

There’s even a whole new subreddit devoted to some of these more unique deliveries. 

Then there’s this beauty. 

Sadly, not all deliveries can be punctuated with adorable squirrel visitors and silly dances

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Arh76V
via IFTTT

Nick Foles to Start vs. Bears After Tests Reportedly Confirm Bruised Ribs

Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Nick Foles (9) calls for the snap during the first half of the NFL football game between the Washington Redskins and the Philadelphia Eagles, Sunday, Dec. 30, 2018 in Landover, Md. (AP Photo/Mark Tenally)

Mark Tenally/Associated Press

Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Nick Foles will start on Sunday in the NFC Wild Card Game against the Chicago Bears after tests reportedly confirmed that he avoided any broken bones.

Eagles head coach Doug Pederson confirmed to reporters Monday that Foles would play after Mike Garafolo of NFL Network reported Foles only suffered bruised ribs during Philadelphia’s 24-0 Week 17 victory over Washington that saw the team clinch a playoff spot.

Third-stringer Nate Sudfeld entered the Washington game after Foles exited. Starter Carson Wentz is still out with a stress fracture in his back.

The Eagles can thank Foles for leading them to the playoffs after Wentz’s injury, as he helped them to three straight wins to end the season.

He threw for a combined 962 passing yards, six touchdowns and three interceptions against the Los Angeles Rams, Houston Texans and Washington. The effort built on Foles’ legendary status with the franchise after he won Super Bowl MVP honors while leading the Eagles to their first championship of the Super Bowl era in a 41-33 win over the New England Patriots last year.

The Bears played a key role in the Eagles’ path to the postseason, beating the Minnesota Vikings on the road in Week 17 to open the door for Philadelphia to qualify with a win.

The Eagles will need Foles back and healthy to overcome Khalil Mack and the rest of the stout Bears defense at Soldier Field. Chicago finished the 2018 campaign first in the league in points allowed (17.7), third in yards allowed (4,795) and third in sacks (50).

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2EWhRVH
via IFTTT

Police fire teargas, live ammunition at protesters in Khartoum

Sudanese security forces fired tear gas and live ammunition at hundreds of demonstrators in central Khartoum on Monday as demonstrators attempted to march to President Omar al-Bashir’s palace calling on him to “step down”.

Crowds of men and women chanting “freedom, peace and justice” and “revolution is the people’s choice” gathered in the capital’s downtown area where they were quickly confronted by anti-riot police, witnesses told AFP.

Officers made dozens of arrests, as others looked on from rooftops and armoured vehicles with machine guns parked up in surrounding streets. Hundreds of policemen and security forces deployed to key squares across the capital in the early morning to prevent the march.

Al Jazeera’s Hiba Morgan, reporting from Khartoum, said: “Police have fired tear gas and live ammunition [during the protests]. Some [protesters] have been reportedly injured. It is not clear yet if there are fatalities.”

According to Sara Abdelgalil, President of the Sudanese Doctors’ Union in the UK, hospitals reported at least four protesters were wounded during the demonstrations. 

“One fractured skull, one live bullet to the thigh, one in the neck and a burn in the neck from the teargas. There are also cases of acute asthma attacks and other minor injuries,” Abdelgalil told Al Jazeera. 

Several lawyers on strike outside courthouses in Khartoum and in Sudan’s second-largest city Wad Madani were also arrested, one of the lawyers told Reuters news agency.

Anger over rising prices, shortages of basic commodities and a cash crisis has fueled demonstrations across Sudan over the past two weeks. The demonstrations quickly developed into growing anti-government rallies demanding that al-Bashir step down immediately.

Authorities have shut schools and declared states of emergency in several regions since protests first broke out in the northeastern city of Atbara on December 19. Security forces have repeatedly used tear gas, stun grenades and live ammunition against demonstrations, witnesses say.

According to government estimates, at least 19 people, including two security personnel, were killed in clashes in the initial days of demonstrations. Amnesty International last week said it estimated the death toll to be at 37.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has appealed “for calm and restraint” and called on “the authorities to conduct a thorough investigation into the deaths and violence”.

Sudan is facing an acute foreign exchange crisis and soaring inflation despite Washington lifting an economic embargo in October 2017.

Inflation is running at 70 percent and the Sudanese pound has plunged in value, while shortages of bread and fuel have regularly hit several cities.

Monday’s march was called for by a group of professionals including doctors, teachers and engineers, after it organised a similar rally on December 25.

“We will march towards the presidential palace calling for President Omar al-Bashir to step down,” the Sudanese Professionals’ Association said in a statement late on Sunday.

Opposition groups and prominent rebel chief Abdel Wahid al-Nur from war-torn Darfur have also urged their supporters to participate in the march.

Addressing police generals on Sunday, al-Bashir cited a Quran verse about retribution in an apparent defence of security measures against protesters: “What is retribution? It’s killing, is it not? It is execution. Our Lord described as life because it is a means of deterring others so that we can maintain security.”

Activists and opposition figures had renewed calls on Sunday for the mass protest on the eve of Sudan’s Independence Day.

Al-Bashir is expected to deliver a nationwide address to mark the holiday later on Monday.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2VjmDBj
via IFTTT

Warren battles the ghosts of Hillary


Elizabeth Warren and Hillary Clinton

Like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, gendered terms like “shrill” or “scoldy” are already ascribed to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, as people dismiss her as a viable 2020 contender. | Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

2020

In interviews with POLITICO, advisers and allies project confidence that perceptions of her as cold or aloof will fade once people see her campaign.

The anti-Elizabeth Warren narrative was written before the Massachusetts senator even announced she was exploring a presidential run.

She’s too divisive and too liberal, Washington Democrats have complained privately. Her DNA rollout was a disaster — and quite possibly a White House deal-breaker. She’s already falling in the polls, and — perhaps most stinging — shares too many of the attributes that sank Hillary Clinton.

Story Continued Below

In the year of the woman, it adds up to one unwelcome mat for the most prominent woman likely to be part of the 2020 field. But it also presents an unmistakable challenge: How does Warren avoid a Clinton redux — written off as too unlikable before her campaign gets off the ground?

In interviews with POLITICO, nearly a half-dozen current and former Warren advisers and associates acknowledged the rap on her, even as they dismissed it as little more than D.C. chatter. Any comparison to Clinton will recede, they said, once Warren hits the campaign trail in early states and weaves her own narrative in front of real voters. Amplified by an advanced video and digital operation her team has assembled over the past year-and-a-half, in part to help humanize her as a candidate, Warren will quickly remind people of her early years as an anti-Wall Street, pro-consumer crusader, they argue.

Those attributes will thrust her back to the front of the Democratic pack, those close to Warren predict.

“Elizabeth is not that,” a onetime Warren adviser said of portrayals of the senator as cold or unlikable. The person was given anonymity to address the Clinton comparison frankly. “I don’t think it’s fair. I know her. I think she is a warm and affectionate person. Once she’s on the stump and gets going on her economic message, she’s quite good … Hillary had three decades’ worth of animosity — it was just the way the world had treated her — that had built a crest around her that you really couldn’t penetrate. I don’t feel like Elizabeth has that kind of edge to her.”

“All of us are just scratching our heads over why this is happening. She has a great operation, she’s very smart about it all,” added Warren’s biographer, Antonia Felix. “She’s not just a viable candidate, she’s someone who can actually win. It’s like they’re throwing cold water on that.”

Others see sexism in the barrage of Warren criticism and alleged parallels to Clinton. If there’s a public perception that’s personally rankled Warren, it’s the depiction that she’s cold, according to one of her former advisers.

“They say that about women — anybody who runs for president. As you go up the political ladder and go up in the polls, you will get that criticism,” said Mary Anne Marsh, a Boston-based Democratic strategist. “First it was Hillary Clinton. Then it was Nancy Pelosi. Now it’s Elizabeth Warren. Who knows who is behind her.”

Fair or not, Warren will have work to do to overcome wariness of her likely candidacy. A USA Today/Suffolk poll released last week assessing excitement behind potential 2020 Democratic candidates showed a net negative for Warren — more people opposed the idea of her candidacy for president than supported it. And a quarterly poll of Iowa Democrats saw Warren’s standing among potential White House seekers drop 7 percentage points — 16 percent to 9 percent — from September to December.

Likely driving those numbers was the DNA episode, which dominated media coverage of Warren in the weeks leading up to the midterms. Unlike her counterparts in the Senate who are eyeing a White House run, Warren skipped visits to Iowa and even nearby New Hampshire during the campaign.

Though Warren wasn’t absent from the election — she spent or helped raise $11 million for Democratic candidates in early states and other competitive midterm races — skipping early states and the usual media bump that goes with those trips arguably contributed to her struggle so far to craft a national narrative.

“From an earned-media perspective she hasn’t been out defining herself. She’s been defined by the speculative echo chamber that is Washington and” potential Democratic 2020 rivals, said Democratic strategist Dave Jacobson.

Warren’s camp has been taking steps to prepare for her first full-fledged introduction to a national audience. In 2017, the campaign hired on a full-time videographer and now has several staffers dedicated solely to video. So far, Warren has invested more heavily in her digital infrastructure than any of her potential 2020 Democratic competitors.

One purpose of the ubiquitous video is to capture Warren in more relatable, personable moments and move them to social media platforms. Last week, for instance, while waiting at the airport for holiday travel, Warren recorded what looked to be an off-the-cuff video blasting President Donald Trump for his “tantrum” that prompted a government shutdown.

Felix and other longtime associates of Warren say the senator’s ability to explain kitchen table economic issues to middle-class voters will shatter any “Pocahontas” caricature built up by the right. Those skills will become evident once she starts traveling to early states like Iowa and New Hampshire, which is expected in January. Once Warren is in front of crowds, they say, her bona fides as a working-class champion that shot her to national prominence, with best-selling books and daytime television sessions with Dr. Phil, will break through, they argue.

When it comes to the questions about her likability, Warren’s been there before.

In her first Senate campaign in 2012, Warren ran on a populist economic message but was depicted as detached from the average voter — someone who dined with intellectuals at Harvard — while her competitor positioned himself as a regular guy.

“We were running against a Republican in Scott Brown whose whole case was likability. He was the person you wanted to have a beer with,” said Doug Rubin, a Boston-based Democratic consultant who worked on Warren’s 2012 campaign. Rubin said what ultimately resonated with voters was Warren’s ability to explain the complex economic issues that average people face. “I think there is a real power in her values and her work.”

Warren’s reputation as standoffish stemmed in part from the arms-length distance at which she kept reporters in the Senate hallways, where until recently she rarely stopped for interviews. The early intent was for Warren to project more “workhorse than showhorse,” but a different perception took hold.

“It got under Warren’s skin,” the former adviser said. Warren would say: “‘Now I’m being portrayed as this aloof person.’ She didn’t like that.”

Kate Donaghue, a grass-roots Democratic organizer and Democratic National Committee member in Boston, described Warren as someone who thrives on relationships: calling all of her major supporters on their birthdays, moving to the other side of a crowded room to give a quick hello hug, and often being the main star at Donaghue’s annual holiday party.

But like Clinton, gendered terms like “shrill” or “scoldy,” are already ascribed to Warren, as people dismiss her as a viable 2020 contender, said Adam Jentleson, a progressive strategist and former staffer to former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). What’s been lost in recent coverage of Warren, he said, are her talents as a public speaker who can connect with the average person.

“She is an extremely powerful speaker, and I think that’s something that is not mentioned very often and I wonder why,” he said. “The case against her is she’s too divisive, she’s made some missteps and therefore she’s done. I think people who think that haven’t seen her work a room recently. … Anybody who discounts her raw power as a speaker is making a big mistake.”

But the biggest criticism facing Warren was her October decision to release a DNA test in defense of her claims of Native American heritage. The move, and the way she carried it out, was roundly blasted as a political miscalculation. She was criticized for seeming to play into Trump’s taunts of her as “Pocahontas.”

Warren was also panned for the timing of the rollout, less than a month before critical midterm elections. Democrats called it a distraction at a time when party leaders needed to unify behind a message to defeat Republicans and some condemned her as having played into Trump’s hands.

To Warren’s team, addressing claims of Native American ancestry and whether they played a role in Warren’s ascent as an academic at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard Law was a necessary evil that was dealt with over the course of months in 2018. That included opening up to The Boston Globe, which in an investigation found that Warren’s ancestry claims played no role in her hiring at Harvard or four prior positions at other law schools.

If Warren were to run for president, it was an issue that had to be detonated with plenty of breathing room before the 2020 cycle, several sources with knowledge of the decision said.

So far, though, it has stubbornly stuck around.

Patty Judge, the former Iowa lieutenant governor who funds the quarterly Iowa poll that saw Warren’s approval fall by 7 points, attributed the drop to the negative reports after Warren’s DNA release. That could change once Warren brandishes her retail side, she said.

“She’s dynamite when you’re with her. She’s magnetic. She’s very compelling,” Judge said. “Probably what she needs to do is get out here and get a lane established for herself.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Qf8Zvw
via IFTTT