Nokia 9 and its five rear cameras appear in new video leak

Nokia might be working on something big.
Nokia might be working on something big.

Image: Joan Cros/NurPhoto via Getty Images

2016%2f09%2f16%2f6f%2fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymdezlza1.53aeaBy Stan Schroeder

It appears that Nokia really is making a phone with five rear cameras. 

The Nokia 9 PureView, as it’s allegedly called, got leaked twice on Monday: as a promotional video, courtesy of MySmartPrice, and as a still (possibly from the same video), posted by reliable leaker of all things mobile, @evleaks

SEE ALSO: How GoPro rebooted itself: CEO Nick Woodman talks strategy — MashTalk

We’ve seen allegedly leaked pictures of the Nokia 9 before, but the video (below) reveals several of the phone’s features. 

According to the video, the phone’s camera system will sport Zeiss optics, with the ability to take “5 simultaneous shots” and capture “10x more light.” Users will be able to change the photo’s focus after it’s been taken, a cool but fairly common feature on today’s phones. 

Nokia 9 PureView will have a 5.99-inch display with an under-the-display fingerprint scanner, a Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor, 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. Contrary to some early rumors, the screen does not appear to have a notch, and has a fair bit of bezel both on top and bottom. 

Qi wireless charging is also on board, but there’s no word on battery capacity. The phone will run Android One with all the perks that come with it, such as guaranteed upgrades and security updates. There’s no word on when the phone will launch. 

If you’re wondering why a smartphone needs five cameras on the back in the first place, that’s a bit harder to answer. The trend of ever-increasing number of cameras on phones is definitely strong — most flagships that came out in late 2018 had (at least) three. The idea, in most cases, is to have a number of different lenses for different tasks — widescreen, macro, zoom, et cetera. Five rear cameras sounds like overkill at this point — and the performance will depend on how well the software handles all that information — but I’m eager to see what Nokia has done with this one. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Stawjn
via IFTTT

See Toto’s ‘Africa’ played on some sweet potatoes and a squash

By Marcus Gilmer

2018 was a big year for Toto’s 1982 hit “Africa” when the tune got an update courtesy of the boys in Weezer. Next up: a cover of the tune using some vegetables to kick off the new year of 2019.

That’s what YouTuber Pupsi has done, posting a video that shows him cutting up some sweet potatoes and a squash and then using them to play “Africa.” The music he makes with them is pretty darn incredible. One note: Pupsi calls the squash a “pumpkin” in the title of the video but clarifies in a comment, “I should have called it a squash xD. In Finnish all squash are just ‘pumpkins.’”

Whatever you call the veggies he uses, it’s pretty stellar stuff. And probably delicious, once baked at 350 degrees for 25 minutes with some salt and seasoning. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2AsQrmc
via IFTTT

Mike Freeman’s 10-Point Stance: Is the Rooney Rule Broken?

Oakland Raiders head coach Jon Gruden, right, speaks next to Mike Mayock, center, and owner Mark Davis at a news conference announcing Mayock as the general manager at the team's headquarters in Oakland, Calif., Monday, Dec. 31, 2018. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

Jeff Chiu/Associated Press

What to make of the Raiders’ hiring process. Will someone steal John Harbaugh from the Ravens? What should the Steelers do with Antonio Brown and Le’Veon Bell? All that and more in the week’s 10-Point Stance.

1. Raiders’ GM hire raises questions

The Raiders’ hiring on Monday of former NFL Network analyst Mike Mayock to become the team’s general manager is an perfect example of the Rooney Rule in action—its strengths, its weaknesses and how teams can circumvent it if they want to.

First, it’s important to note that Jon Gruden, according to several league officials, has wanted to hire Mayock since first taking the Raiders job. When Oakland fired Reggie McKenzie early last month, Gruden got his opportunity and seized it.

There was always going to be a problem with this for Gruden, though. He needed to comply with the Rooney Rule, which requires that teams consider minority candidates when filling GM or head-coaching vacancies.

The Raiders, according to my sources and the reporting of others, contacted former Giants general manager Jerry Reese about the position. He declined to interview. They also, I’m told, interviewed former Giants college scouting director Marc Ross and former Eagles front-office executive Trey Brown. Brown’s candidacy was first reported by ESPN’s Dan Graziano.

Numerous sources say the bottom line is that none of Reese, Ross and Brown had any realistic chance of getting the job. It was always Mayock’s if he wanted it.

The Raiders haven’t publicly released any information about how they hired for the position and didn’t respond to B/R this week when asked to speak about their process.

But remember, this isn’t the first recent time that questions have been asked about the Raiders and the Rooney Rule. Oakland owner Mark Davis essentially admitted to hiring Gruden before firing coach Jack Del Rio. It was clear then that the two interviews of Tee Martin and Bobby Johnson weren’t real interviews. They couldn’t be if Davis had already settled on Gruden.

Tim Kawakami @timkawakami

If Gruden hadn’t said yes this time, Davis said he probably would’ve sat down with Jack Del Rio and talked about changing up the coordinators and likely would’ve kept Del Rio.

The Raiders’ circumvention in that case was so brazen that the NFL strengthened the rule last month. Teams must now do more than interview a minority candidate, as was the previous requirement. They must interview a minority candidate from outside the organization or one from a list compiled by the NFL.

It must be mentioned that the Raiders have historically been on the opposite side of this trend. Al Davis, Mark’s father, was one of the great racial and gender pioneers in sports history. He hired the first female team executive, Amy Trask, the first black head coach in the NFL’s modern era, Art Shell, and the second Latino head coach, Tom Flores. What he did in the past, though, doesn’t serve as a force field for what seems to be the blatant circumvention of the rule now.

Shell and Davis.

Shell and Davis.Noah Berger/Associated Press

The Raiders also are far from alone in this area. Several team officials said that circumvention of the Rooney Rule is at an all-time high. One source, who is African-American and currently interviewing with teams, said that in many cases, the Rooney Rule has become an exercise in box-checking.

“I think it goes like this for a lot of teams: ‘Let’s comply with the Rooney Rule by interviewing this black guy, but we’re gonna hire the white guy we want regardless,’” he said.

The proof is in the numbers.

When the Rooney Rule went into effect in 2003, there were three minority head coaches, according to the Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport. The number grew to a peak of eight by 2011. But five of the eight head coaches fired since midway through this past season were black, leaving the total at three. With the retirement of Ozzie Newsome from the Ravens, there is also now only one minority general manager.

The rule was supposed to increase the numbers of minority members in key positions, and it did for a while. But now, the opposite is happening.

That could change with this hiring cycle, but it seems unlikely. Among the big names being discussed are Mike McCarthy, John Harbaugh, Jim Harbaugh, Bruce Arians and Josh McDaniels. There are a handful of black coaches being highlighted, like Chiefs offensive coordinator Eric Bieniemy, but not many.

The issue is complex, polarizing and thorny—just like many issues of race.

The rule does work in some ways. People of color will interview with general managers and owners they otherwise might not meet.

But what is clear, and there is no doubt about this, is that there are teams (not all) that are following the letter of the rule but not the spirit of it. This is why the number of coaching and front-office minorities is disturbingly low.

It’s also why, unfortunately, this issue is going to linger.

2. So how do you fix the problem?

The short answer: You can’t. It’s impossible.

If an owner or GM sees a certain race of people as not as qualified as another, then no rule can fix that.

And the data shows that is indeed what’s happening in some cases. Candidates of color are being overlooked, and the only explanation is that the hirers aren’t truly interested in hiring them. There are plenty of qualified candidates. That isn’t the reason. The reason is human nature.

Until you can open the eyes of owners and let them see people as they are, and operate without fear of those people and without seeing them as inferior, the Rooney Rule will change little.

This is dire, but it’s also the truth.

3. Words of wisdom from a genius

As we begin to plow through the coaching and front-office carousel, it’s important to remember these words from one of the best coaches of all time, Bill Walsh. His description of the coaching hierarchy—written more than 40 years ago in his book Finding the Winning Edge—is still dead on today.

The excerpt here comes from former NFL executive Mike Lombardi. It’s worth your time:

Michael Lombardi @mlombardiNFL

This applies today. Walsh said this 40 plus years ago. https://t.co/9EVDN83trb

4. The push is on for Coach Harbaugh

Gail Burton/Associated Press

That’s the Ravens’ Harbaugh, John. Not Michigan’s Jim. Sometimes it’s easy to get the two mixed up.

The Ravens announced last month they were working on a contract extension for John. But, as of right now, as far as we know, he hasn’t signed it.

There are a number of teams truly interested in Harbaugh, especially after the Ravens were able to turn quarterback Lamar Jackson into one of the NFL’s best weapons.

5. Steelers, part 1: Trade Antonio Brown

Don Wright/Associated Press

You may have heard about the details in this story about Antonio Brown’s awful behavior—the disputes with teammates, the skipped practices, the overall “embarrassing” and detrimental-to-the-team situation—but if you haven’t, it’s a must read.

I’ve said this before: Parts of that Steelers locker room are out of control. Mike Tomlin is a good coach, but he clearly can’t get a handle on some of the things going on in there.  And in his defense, I’m not sure many coaches could.

One way to change that culture is get Brown out of it. Trade him and get the best deal you can. That may seem extreme, but what Brown is doing is getting ridiculous. He’s incredibly talented, but it’s clear he cannot be counted on.             

Omar Vega/Associated Press

6. Steelers, part 2: The team missed Bell

One other thing on the Steelers. The team and many others completely underestimated the value of Le’Veon Bell. His replacement, James Conner, is good, but Bell is a closer. He extends drives and makes big plays better than almost any runner in the sport. He is also a skilled blocker who would protect quarterback Ben Roethlisberger with some dazzling blitz pickups.

Bell adds wins because he is a rock. Late in the year, when the Steelers needed his steadiness, it wasn’t there.

One example of this is a remarkable statistic from ESPN Stats & Info:

ESPN Stats & Info @ESPNStatsInfo

The Steelers are the 3rd team to start 7-2-1 or better through 10 games & fail to reach the playoffs since the current playoff format was adopted in 1990.

The other 2 teams were the 1995 Raiders (8-2) and 1993 Dolphins (8-2), who both lost QBs to injury.

To me, Bell would have changed that. He’d have won the few extra games to turn a disappointing 9-6-1 finish into a playoff season. He’s that valuable.

7.  Meanwhile in Jacksonville, another mess

John Raoux/Associated Press

One of the most disappointing teams this year was the Jaguars, who finished 5-11 and last in the AFC South. In one year, the Jaguars went from almost beating the Patriots in the AFC title game to a total train wreck.

The Jaguars and Steelers have one similar issue, and it’s the need to get the locker room under control. The head of the team’s football operations, Tom Coughlin, knows this is an issue, which is why he blasted two Jaguars players, T.J. Yeldon and Leonard Fournette, after their season finale Sunday.

The Jaguars face a number of issues this offseason, including who is going to play quarterback next year. It’s all but certain Blake Bortles won’t be back.

And Bortles was a problem. But a locker room with no discipline or accountability, in many ways, is an even bigger issue.

8. The Cooper Factor

ARLINGTON, TEXAS - DECEMBER 09:  Amari Cooper #19 of the Dallas Cowboys makes a touchdown pass reception against the Philadelphia Eagles in the fourth quarter at AT&T Stadium on December 09, 2018 in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images

Ronald Martinez/Getty Images

Just by watching, you can see the remarkable impact wide receiver Amari Cooper has had on the Cowboys offense since coming over in a trade from the Raiders. But when you look at the numbers, his contribution looks even more impressive.

This data was compiled by the Dallas Morning News’ Jon Machota, and it’s eye opening:

Jon Machota @jonmachota

Since the Cowboys traded for Amari Cooper:

Record before: 3-4
Record after: 7-2

Total offense before: 320 YPG
Total offense after: 362 YPG

Passing offense before: 183 YPG
Passing offense after: 250 YPG

3rd down % before: 32% (30th in NFL)
3rd down % after: 48% (1st in NFL)

Sometimes, data lies. In this case, it says everything you need to know.

9. Andrew Luck‘s special season

NASHVILLE, TN - DECEMBER 30: Andrew Luck #12 of the Indianapolis Colts waves to the crowd while leaving the field after beating the Tennessee Titans at Nissan Stadium on December 30, 2018 in Nashville, Tennessee. (Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images)

Andy Lyons/Getty Images

Quarterback Andrew Luck won’t win the MVP this year. It will likely go to Patrick Mahomes, as it should. But that doesn’t mean that Luck has been anything short of remarkable this season. Some interesting data points on Luck, provided by the Colts:

He finished the year with 4,593 passing yards. That was the fifth-most in the NFL.

His 430 completions and 39 touchdowns each ranked second. 

He threw touchdowns to 13 different players. That tied an NFL record.

Not only has Luck produced big and won games, he’s spreading the ball around to all of his targets. No, he’s not the MVP, but he did prove he’s among the league’s most valuable assets once again.

10. The future is bright

Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson and Browns quarterback Baker Mayfield had a fun duel on Sunday. The Ravens won, but we saw something special from both players. We also saw a future rivalry that could end up being one of the best in football.

It’s going to be incredibly fun to watch, and not just because of what happens on the field. They seem pretty cool off the field, too.

The Checkdown @thecheckdown

Lamar came off the sideline to pick Baker up 🙌 @Lj_era8 https://t.co/s5vkdJFX4M

Yes indeed, this is going to be fun.

Mike Freeman covers the NFL for Bleacher Report. Follow him on Twitter: @mikefreemanNFL.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2SxMaVM
via IFTTT

Ben Roethlisberger: Le’Veon Bell Holdout Was ‘Distraction,’ Hurt Steelers

Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger (7) passes in the first half of an NFL football game against the New Orleans Saints in New Orleans, Sunday, Dec. 23, 2018. (AP Photo/Butch Dill)

Butch Dill/Associated Press

Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger said Tuesday that the Le’Veon Bell situation adversely impacted the team in 2018.

After finishing the season 9-6-1 and missing the playoffs by a half-game, Big Ben appeared on KDKA-FM radio (h/t Chris Adamski of TribLive.com) and discussed what Bell’s season-long holdout did to the team:

“It hurts you when you don’t have one of the better players in the game, but I think the biggest thing that hurts us was that it was a distraction. At his position, we got to see James Conner and Jaylen Samuels, and I thought we got to see guys come into their own and see a glimpse of the future. I was really encouraged about life without Le’Veon.”

While Bell’s replacements were highly productive, his holdout was a constant topic of conversation throughout the 2018 campaign until the deadline passed for him to sign his franchise tender, making him ineligible to play.

Bell’s absence allowed Conner to step in and seize the starting job, and the second-year man put up big numbers in the process, with 973 rushing yards and 12 touchdowns to go along with 55 receptions for 497 yards and another score in 13 games.

Conner did his best Bell impression and was named to the Pro Bowl, just like Bell has been on three occasions.

With Conner injured down the stretch, Samuels stepped up to the plate as well.

The rookie fifth-round pick rushed for 142 yards in a Week 15 win over the New England Patriots and finished the season with 455 yards from scrimmage and three touchdowns on just 82 touches.

With Bell set to move on, the Pittsburgh backfield appears to be in good hands with Conner and Samuels leading the way.

The stats suggest that the Steelers should have been a playoff team in 2018, as they were sixth in scoring and 16th in points allowed.

Pittsburgh played down to its opponents too often, though, and lost key games to low-end teams such as the Denver Broncos and Oakland Raiders.

Missing the playoffs was a disappointing conclusion for the Steelers since they beat the Patriots and played the Kansas City Chiefs tough, which suggests they would have had a legitimate chance to win the AFC.

It is difficult to say precisely what stopped them from making a fifth consecutive playoff appearance, but if Bell’s holdout took focus away from the task at hand as Roethlisberger suggested, it may have been the main culprit.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2F0t5Yl
via IFTTT

Chromebooks to become safer from hackers with ‘USB Guard’ feature

Chromebooks running Chrome OS will get a little harder to hack soon.
Chromebooks running Chrome OS will get a little harder to hack soon.

Image: Raymond Wong/Mashable

2016%2f09%2f16%2f6f%2fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymdezlza1.53aeaBy Stan Schroeder

Leaving your Chromebook unattended in a public place will get a little less dangerous soon. 

A new Chrome OS feature, noticed recently by ZDNet, will block access to the USB port while the Chromebook’s screen is locked. 

SEE ALSO: Why every super paranoid internet user needs a cheap Chromebook

This will make it harder for someone to install malware by gaining physical access to a locked Chromebook as the system will automatically reject any USB drives, including malicious ones. 

Known as a “Rubber Ducky” attack and often seen on TV (for example, it’s prominently used in the final season of Netflix’s ‘House of Cards’), this type of attack involves connecting a USB drive, which contains self-installing malware, onto a computer to gain unauthorized access. 

The exception to this comes via another new Chrome OS feature called USB Bouncer, which lets the user whitelist certain devices so that they’ll always be accepted by the system. 

The features are currently available in beta versions of Chrome and are likely to appear in a stable version soon. If you’re running a recent Chrome OS Canary build, the feature can be enabled by setting the flag “chrome://flags/#enable-usbguard” in Chrome OS. 

Engadget notes that Apple has introduced a similar feature to its iOS devices this summer, locking down the USB port after an hour of inactivity. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2BV2usq
via IFTTT

Chelsea Sign Christian Pulisic from Borussia Dortmund for €64M

DUESSELDORF, GERMANY - DECEMBER 18: Christian Pulisic of Borussia Dortmund controls the ball during the Bundesliga match between Fortuna Duesseldorf and Borussia Dortmund at Esprit-Arena on December 18, 2018 in Duesseldorf, Germany.(Photo by TF-Images/TF-Images via Getty Images)

TF-Images/Getty Images

Chelsea have secured the signing of Christian Pulisic from Borussia Dortmund for €64 million (£57.6 million). 

The 20-year-old will remain at the German club on loan until the end of the season before moving to Stamford Bridge in the summer, Dortmund confirmed on Wednesday:

Borussia Dortmund @BlackYellow

Borussia Dortmund has agreed with @ChelseaFC on the transfer of Christian Pulisic for a fee of €64 million 📝

Pulisic will remain at BVB on loan until the end of the season. https://t.co/jAur5xWwuQ

B/R Football @brfootball

BREAKING: Borussia Dortmund have agreed a €64m deal with Chelsea for @cpulisic_10, who will stay with the German club on loan until the end of the season https://t.co/knG8UPvqJW

Pulisic had only 18 months left to run on his Dortmund contract, and club sporting director Michael Zorc explained they could not turn down such a good offer given the circumstances, per the club’s website (h/t Goal):

It was always Christian’s dream to play in the Premier League. That certainly has to do with his American background, and as a result we were unable to extend his contract. Against this background, we have decided to accept an extremely lucrative bid by Chelsea, given the low contract maturity.”

The attacking midfielder posted a farewell message on his Twitter feed:

Christian Pulisic @cpulisic_10

Liebe Borussen 🖤💛 (🇺🇸🇬🇧) https://t.co/nAKgF1sHdI

Pulisic debuted for Dortmund’s senior team back in January 2016 having impressed in the youth ranks.

In 2016-17, he played an increasingly important role, making 29 Bundesliga appearances, while he returned four goals and five assists in the German top flight in 32 appearances in 2017-18. 

The current campaign has been less fruitful for the United States international.

He has been afforded just five starts in the Bundesliga as Lucien Favre’s side have established themselves as front-runners in the title race.

Pulisic remains one of the most exciting young prospects in Europe, though, and Chelsea have done well to sign him.

He should be a valuable attacking asset as he can operate on either flank or through the middle playing as a No. 10.

Some have speculated that Chelsea may have brought him in as a replacement for Eden Hazard, who has been heavily linked with Real Madrid:

Sam Matterface @sammatterface

Obviously Dortmund didn’t want to sell immediately but Chelsea could have done with the dynamism Pulisic brings now. I wonder if this is a pre emptive strike and Chelsea are already plotting for life beyond Hazard? Hope not, the #PL needs to retain it’s stars.

Scott Groom @ScottCGroom

Pulisic to Chelsea surely just means Hazard’s inevitable exit from Stamford Bridge has just got closer?

But even if the Belgian stays put at Stamford Bridge, Pulisic has the quality to become a first-team star under manager Maurizio Sarri. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2GQToma
via IFTTT

Everything Was Awesome


A person waves an American flag.

Sean Gardner/Getty Images

Politics

There’s still a case that a lot is going right in America, despite the circus in Washington. But 2019 is shaping up to be a much rougher ride.

Once again, I bring you good tidings of great joy!

Unemployment in the United States is at its lowest level since 1969, consumer confidence is near its highest level since 2000, and crime in the nation’s largest cities is at its lowest level since 1990. For a week this November, U.S. petroleum exports exceeded imports for the first time ever, a remarkable milestone in America’s steady march toward independence from foreign oil. Economic growth is up, poverty is down, electric vehicle sales are at an all-time high, and the Miami Dolphins recently reminded us all that miracles still happen in this amazing country.

Story Continued Below

Welcome to the fifth annual Everything Is Awesome column! This holiday tradition began in 2014, after Republicans won a landslide in the midterm elections by warning Americans that an Ebola epidemic was imminent and everything was awful. That was the year The Lego Movie came out, and the point of appropriating the title of its theme song was not to claim that everything was literally awesome in America, but to spread some good cheer with a reminder that most things were actually getting better. That held true in 2015 and 2016, even though Donald Trump won the presidency by describing the country as a dumpster of existential despair, and in large part in 2017, even as Trump and his critics seemed to be competing to provide the bleakest descriptions of America’s dismal trajectory.

As 2018 draws to a close, it’s a nice time to remember that America is still pretty awesome. And even though the stock market ended the year down after years of gains, even though there are more uninsured Americans and homeless Americans after years of declines, even though the federal deficit is soaring at a time it ought to be shrinking, even though U.S. carbon emissions are rising again and wildfires are worse than ever, even though global confidence in America is at an all-time low, even though duplicitous tech giants seem to be tracking our every move, even though the president’s national security adviser, campaign manager, deputy campaign manager and personal lawyer have all pleaded guilty to felonies, even though …

Huh, come to think of it, that’s a lot of “even though.” It’s awesome that the jobless rate is down to 3.7 percent, but in the data and in the news, it’s starting to feel like something actually is changing, and we’re slouching toward non-awesomeness. The federal government has shut down for no good reason; the commander in chief is raging in his residence at the investigators who have implicated him in felonies; and the supposed grownups in his administration, most recently Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, have been fleeing for the exits. Even among Washington Republicans who have tolerated and sometimes encouraged the president’s relentless assaults on longstanding political norms, there’s a growing unease that the daily chaos of the Trump show has become unsustainable, that the wheels are coming off the national bus, and that things are going to reach some sort of breaking point in 2019.

So this might be the final edition of this holiday tradition. But for the sake of auld lang syne, let’s step back one more time to evaluate where we are, how far we’ve come and, yes, where we might be going.

***

In 2017, the stock market rose 25 percent, and Trump sent no fewer than 32 separate tweets bragging about its awesomeness. On August 3: “Stock market at all-time high. That doesn’t just happen!” On November 27: “Stock Market has more record gains. Hopefully Republican Senators will give us the much needed tax cuts to keep it all going!” And on December 26, shortly after Congress did indeed pass a $2 trillion package of upper-end tax cuts: “Stock Market is poised for another year of SUCCESS!” The Dow had increased 149 percent during President Barack Obama’s eight years in office, but Trump insisted he deserved the credit for a spectacular turnaround, repeatedly attacking the press for failing to acknowledge his genius.

“The Fake News Media barely mentions the fact that the Stock Market just hit another New Record,” he complained. “Can you imagine if ‘O’ was president and had these numbers – would be biggest story on earth!”

Actually, the Dow hit 124 all-time highs in Obama’s second term; he just didn’t make a big deal about its awesomeness. Most presidents don’t talk much about the stock market, for good reasons: It’s not a particularly reliable evaluator of presidential policies, or the best reflection of the state of the economy, and they don’t want to own the problem when it goes south. But a bull market is good news for Americans with retirement accounts, and it’s certainly a positive indicator, which is why it made an appearance in all four prior everything-is-awesome roundups.

Anyway, Trump has been a lot quieter about the Dow in 2018, because it lost 6 percent of its value. He did weigh in on November 12, shifting the blame after the market fell nearly 2,000 points in two weeks: “The prospect of Presidential Harassment by the Dems is causing the Stock Market big headaches!” But it’s been quite a while since he’s described day-to-day fluctuations in the equities markets as an indisputable verdict on his own policies, the way he did constantly before the bears overtook the bulls.

Again, the labor market is still strong, and GDP growth has been solid in 2018; the Dow is not the economy. But the Dow isn’t the only sign of economic anxiety these days. The housing market has gotten soft. The corporate bond market looks dicey. Inflation has ticked upward, while real wages have been almost entirely flat, as corporations have plowed most of their tax cuts into stock buybacks rather than worker salaries or bonuses. Economists are increasingly worried about a slowdown in 2019 and perhaps a recession in 2020.

That wouldn’t necessarily be Trump’s fault. The economy moves in cycles, and the U.S. has enjoyed a record 98 consecutive months of job growth since the Great Recession ended, so it’s overdue for a stumble. Presidents tend to get excessive credit or blame for the economic conditions on their watch. This explains why Republicans refused to acknowledge the obvious improvements under Obama, who took office when the economy was shedding 750,000 jobs a month and contracting at a depression-level 8 percent rate; Trump even accused the fastidiously nonpartisan Bureau of Labor Statistics of manipulating the unemployment rate to produce good news under Obama, though he changed his tune after the first positive jobs report came out during his own presidency. In reality, presidents don’t control the business cycle, and to Trump’s recent frustration, they don’t control the Federal Reserve, either. It’s unfortunate that basic economic data have been drafted into America’s all-consuming partisan wars.

Still, presidents do affect the economy. While it was silly to blame Obama for the vicious downturn he inherited in 2009, he could plausibly argue that his economic stimulus and other policies helped drive the recovery over the rest of his term, just as his critics could plausibly argue that the recovery was too slow and tepid. And while it was silly for Trump to take credit for the recovery he inherited last year, he could plausibly argue that his tax cuts provided a shot of economic adrenaline this year, which might be the first year with 3 percent growth since 2000. But Trump also owns the red ink created by those tax cuts. The deficit rose to $779 billion this year, unprecedented during an economic expansion, and is expected to balloon above $1 trillion next year. That explains why the Medicare trust fund, which had grown increasingly stable during the Obama years, is now on track for insolvency in 2026, three years earlier than the projections in its previous report.

While some of the less awesome aspects of the American economy pre-dated Trump, he’s barely even tried to keep his grandiose promises to fix them. He talked big about rebuilding crumbling infrastructure, but so far he’s been an obstacle to new public works. He vowed to end the opioid epidemic that has ravaged the U.S. workforce, but deaths from drug overdoses have soared to an all-time high. Income inequality is growing and prescription drug prices are still rising, despite Trump’s rhetoric about reversing those trends.

Trump’s most direct impact on the economy may ultimately come from the global trade war he’s launched against China as well as some of America’s closest allies. His tariffs are already raising the prices of products made with steel, which is one reason General Motors recently announced it was shutting down five U.S. factories. (The reopened U.S. Steel factories that the president keeps touting at his rallies, meanwhile, are entirely fictitious.) Foreign retaliation to his tariffs is also causing problems, depressing U.S. exports of soybeans and other targeted products. And the trade war is still in its early stages; one reason the markets are so jittery is that Trump has suggested he wants a much broader and more intense war. No one can be certain how that would turn out, and markets don’t like uncertainty.

Whatever one thinks of Trump and his policies, he is a constant source of uncertainty at home and abroad. He threatened to bomb North Korea, then declared he had fallen in love with Kim Jong Un. He proclaimed in early December that he would proudly “take the mantle” of a government shutdown rather than blame the Democrats, then tried to blame the Democrats for the shutdown a week later. He promised a middle-class tax cut, then seemed to forget the promise the next day. Republicans used to complain that Obama initiatives like health care reform, Wall Street reform and regulation of carbon emissions created “job-killing uncertainty,” but Trump’s efforts to dismantle all those initiatives have created uncertainty as well.

One thing to remember about uncertainty is that uncertain things sometimes turn out better than expected. Trump’s incendiary tweets and saber-rattling public pronouncements do seem to be bringing China and other targets of his tariffs to the negotiating table, and his threats to quit NAFTA have produced a deal that seems marginally more favorable for the U.S. than the original. So far, the widespread fears that Trump’s erratic behavior would lead to nuclear war or economic calamity have not been realized. He has not provoked a constitutional crisis by firing special counsel Robert Mueller, even though he did fire an FBI director and recently forced out his own attorney general for refusing to interfere with Mueller’s investigation. He has not defied the authority of any of the federal judges he has attacked. He has not dismantled our democracy or defaulted on our debt. He upset the foreign policy establishment when he abruptly pulled U.S. troops out of Syria, but whether or not that was a wise move, the worst-case scenarios that have been floated about Trump don’t usually involve his unwillingness to use force.

So be of good cheer! The U.S. still has a powerful economy and a functioning democracy! But the other thing to remember about uncertainty is that uncertain things sometimes turn out worse than expected. And things are already weird.

***

There’s been a clear but unspoken deal in Washington during the two years of full Republican control: Trump would nominate conservative judges and sign conservative legislation, and in return GOP congressional leaders would refrain from investigating his scandals, opposing his policies or stridently denouncing his behavior. The deal has mostly held up despite revelations that president paid hush money to his mistresses during his campaign and evaded hundreds of millions of dollars in federal taxes; despite his for-profit university and his charitable foundation getting exposed as essentially fraudulent; despite his attacks on his own FBI, Justice Department and intelligence agencies; despite presidential gaslighting so brazen and repetitive that The Washington Post’s fact-checkers had to invent a new falsehood category called the “Bottomless Pinocchio.”

But now Democrats have taken back the House, so the deal is off. Meanwhile, the Mueller investigation is clearly heating up, with the focus apparently shifting to the president’s actions and his family’s finances. And even congressional Republicans are freaking out about the mass exodus of the Trump administration adults they had been counting on to babysit an impulsive president. In other words, the uncertainty of the past two years is likely to look quaint compared with the high-volume insanity coming in 2019.

It is conceivable that the Washington circus will have little effect on the economy or even the country. American politics is already dysfunctional, and so far that hasn’t stopped businesses from hiring or consumers from buying. But it’s hard to imagine that the economy will be helped much by a Washington paralyzed by investigations and brawls and presidential tantrums. And the Trump-led backlash against Mueller’s methodical investigation—the cries of “WITCH HUNT,” the Mafia-like attacks on “rats” who snitch to law enforcement, the partisan excuses for lying to the FBI, tampering with witnesses and other serious crimes—is already making America look like a banana republic.

The United States is no longer seen as a global beacon of strength and hope; an international survey by the Pew Research Center found that only 27 percent of people around the world have confidence in the current president, and even fewer among America’s closest allies. It is unlikely that America’s moral standing will be restored by a year of public furors over Trump’s domestic and international financial escapades, to say nothing of his refusal to accept intelligence that Russia meddled in U.S. elections and that Saudi Arabia slaughtered an American-resident journalist.

The real danger of the coming storm, though, is not just that it will show other nations America at its worst, but that it will intensify America’s worst domestic trend, the ferocious partisan polarization that subsumes every issue into a political and cultural fight to the death. The president recently said that “the people will revolt” if he is impeached, an unsubtle reminder of the violent paranoia he has encouraged in his base ever since he first offered to pay the legal fees of supporters who beat up protesters at his campaign rallies. Trump’s fallback rhetorical move is to dehumanize his adversaries as unpatriotic enemies of the people, whether they’re Democrats or reporters or migrants seeking asylum or black athletes kneeling to protest police brutality or people who say “Happy Holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas.” He might think of this as basic political hardball, a logical extension of the cable shoutfests from which he gets much of his news. But it isn’t fun to think about the history of countries where the leaders themselves drop the pretense of governing for everyone, and egg on their supporters like that.

It’s not awesome for a political system to be paralyzed by investigations and efforts to obstruct those investigations; it’s even less awesome for a nation to be inflamed along partisan lines about the legitimacy of those investigations. But what’s really not awesome, as most Washington Republicans admit privately, is the conduct that prompted the investigations, and the daily barrage of lies launched by the commander in chief at the heart of the investigations. The preferred Beltway cliché for the president’s behavior is “not normal,” and it’s true that it is not normal for the leader of the free world to unleash relentless attacks on the intelligence of prominent African-Americans, to portray Syrian refugees and Central American immigrants as potential terrorists and carriers of disease, to suggest that the worst wildfires in U.S. history were caused by a failure to rake leaves. But Trump’s attacks on America’s longstanding bipartisan norms are not just not normal; they are not good. As I noted in the caveats to last year’s awesomeness roundup, Trump’s incessant bullying, obsessive TV-watching, petulant name-calling, over-the-top bragging, transparent blame-shifting, racial scapegoating and shameless lying are behaviors that no good parent would tolerate from a child.

No one in Washington genuinely believes the Mueller investigation is going to wind down with a whimper in 2019. It is building toward a deafening roar that will force the system and the public to grapple with allegations of presidential crimes, or else with a presidential decision to shut down an investigation into those allegations. The president is a survivor, and his approach to survival mode will determine our foreign policies, our domestic policies and the politics of just about everything.

The underlying thesis of this annual awesomeness essay was that the actual conditions in America are more important than the frequently untethered political debate in Washington. And in 2018, yet again, there was much to celebrate about those conditions—peace and prosperity, more or less. But in 2019, that thesis might not be true anymore, because the political debate might dominate American life in a way it hasn’t in a long time, and has the prospect of changing the country itself. So perhaps this will be the last time I use this forum to say: Have a happy—and awesome—New Year.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2F3SXDz
via IFTTT

Miss Piggy rings in 2019 with, well, the most Miss Piggy tweet imaginable

If it ain't broke.
If it ain’t broke.

Image: Kelsey McNeal/ABC via Getty Images

2016%2f09%2f16%2fe7%2fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lzex.0212fBy Rachel Thompson

New Year’s Resolutions are all well and good, but what about those of us who are already damn near perfect? 

Miss Piggy is one such individual who understands the New Year’s predicament faced by countless perfect people across the land. 

Her first tweet of 2019 put paid to any notions of self-improvement for the year ahead. 

New Year, New Moi? HA!! As if. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it, sweetie. pic.twitter.com/g10bfiUEWU

— Miss Piggy (@MissPiggy) January 1, 2019

Couldn’t agree more, to be quite frank. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Tt6gRd
via IFTTT

‘Rat-hole’ mines in India turn death traps for migrant workers

Magurmari, Meghalaya – The only tangible mementos that Shefali Begum, 18, and Nafisa Begum*, 16, have of their husbands are the ‘salwar kameez’ (common dress in South Asia) the two brothers had brought for them shortly before heading off to work in an illegal coal mine in northeastern India.

Now, the two women fear they may never see their husbands again.

The brothers Omor Ali, 26, and Shirapat Ali, 25, left their village Magurmari in West Garo Hills of Meghalaya in the first week of December to work at a mine in Ksan on the other side of the state in East Jaintia Hills.

Days later, on December 13, Shefali and Nafisa were told their husbands were among the 15 men trapped in the illegal mine at Ksan when floodwater from a nearby river poured into it.

Twenty days later and despite a rescue operation involving scores of emergency workers and Indian Navy divers, there has been no news of the men, nor any sign of their bodies.

At least seven men from Magurmari are trapped in the “rat-hole” mine. For the impoverished village, these “rat-hole” mines have become death traps. The Ksan “rat-hole” mine – named because men dig through narrow crevices to extract coal – is nearly 113 metres deep.

Workers from India’s National Disaster Response Force have been trying to pump out the flood water, but to no avail, according to Santosh Kumar Singh, assistant commander at the rescue force.

On December 31, a Navy diver reached the bottom of the mine, but found only coal at the mouth of one lateral hole.

“Rat-hole” mining was banned in 2014 by India’s National Green Tribunal following a petition that said the acidic discharge from the coal mines was polluting the Kopili River downstream.

Mine owners in Meghalaya, which has an estimated 576 million metric tonnes of coal reserves, have challenged the ban in the Supreme Court. The Meghalaya government has also sought a way around the ban, claiming to be losing an annual revenue of Rs 700 crore because of it.

The Ksan incident, however, has brought to the fore how entrenched the practice remains in the hilly state. Most of those employed in “rat-hole” mines are men and teenagers from villages such as Magurmari.

With both her sons, Omor Ali and Shirapat Ali, trapped in the mine, Omela Bibi (left) says there is no man left in the household. [Priyanka Borpujari/Al Jazeera]

Death traps 

Most of the 400 families in Magurmari do not own any agricultural land, forcing the men to find work in coal mines, according to Altaf Hussein, uncle to the Ali brothers.

The pair would work at a mine for two-three months and return home for 10 days. According to Hussein, they were paid Rs 30,000 ($430) every month, more than three times the money they would make working as masons in Magurmari.

Omela Bibi, mother to Omor and Shirapat, was quiet, and her sunken eyes were fixed to the ground. “I would never let them go for such work had I known what grueling work they undertake,” the 48-year-old said. 

The older Ali brother is father to a seven year-old-daughter and two sons, aged four and two. 

His wife Shefali was dealt a double blow on the day the men got trapped – her 18-year-old brother Raziul Islam was also among the 15 trapped miners.

Islam, a bright student who only graduated high school last year, went to work in the mines in order to buy an auto rickshaw. His father, Sohor Ali, is despondent.

“I could not afford the auto rickshaw I told him we would manage expenses somehow. I touched his feet and begged him, but he just wouldn’t listen,” said Ali, who works as a day labourer on nearby farms. 

A second family in Magurmari also had two family members trapped in the Ksan mine. Mizanur Sheikh, 32, and his brother-in-law, Abdul Mozid, went to the mines to pay off their debts.

Sheikh used to work at the mines, but quit to sell vegetables in the local market, a venture that did not go too well. He took a series of loans, first for the business, and later for medical expenses after he contracted malaria. Today, he has a debt of Rs 113, 000 ($1,625).

Mozid, who drove a small van until four months ago, borrowed money from various people to build a new house.

“Both Mozid and Mizanur decided that they only way out of debt was to work in the mine because it pays better,” said 17-year-old Sameer Azad*, Mizanur’s cousin.

“We told him not to go, but do kids listen to parents?” said Mohammad Ali, Mozid’s father. His other three sons do daily wage jobs, but Mizanur was the highest earning member of the family. 

“The lenders have been coming now, but we cannot blame them as they are poor too,” Mohammad Ali said.

Bodiot Zaman shows a copy of the identity card of his trapped son Abdul Kalam Sheikh [Priyanka Borpujari/Al Jazeera]

‘We would crawl up to 30 feet inside’

The physical dangers of working in the “rat-hole” mine take a backseat before the relatively better wages from working at the mine.

Abdul Karim worked in such a mine until seven years ago, when a large rock fell on his spine and confined him to a wheelchair.

“We would crawl up to 30 feet inside in a crevice that’s just about two feet high, and slide on our backs to chip out the coal with a pickaxe,” said the 28-year-old.

But the accident did not deter his elder brother, 32-year-old Abdul Kalam Sheikh, from working in “rat-hole” mines six years ago.

“He pondered for long, especially after my accident, but he decided that the wages were worth it,” Karim told Al Jazeera.

With Karim immobile, Kalam was the sole breadwinner in the family. He had educated all four of his younger sisters. One of them finished her bachelor’s degree this year – a rarity in a village where most girls are married off before they turn 18.

Kalam has a son who will soon turn one; the couple is expecting their second child next month. He had gone to Ksan few days after Omor and Shirapat – they had told him over the phone that the money was good.

When the news broke of the miners’ fate, his uncle, Rupiot Zaman went to Ksan along with six others from Magurmari.

“There was no evidence of anyone living in the plastic sheds where the men lived. No clothes, no bags. Only the cots that they slept on were there,” he said.

The men returned home four days later, empty handed. 

“We were hoping that at least the bodies would be found, but the water was not receding and it was expensive for us to arrange food everyday,” said Zaman, who has worked in a coal mine for more than 15 years

Cajoling her crying four-month-old daughter, while her two-and-half years old clings to her, Nafisa said, “My husband had sent his photo when he reached there on someone else’s phone in the village, since I don’t have a smartphone. The only other photo I have of him is from his ID card.”

As I leave, the angry voice of a woman breaks the eerie silence in the village: “Close those mines, otherwise all our sons will be gone.”

Names with (*) have been changed since they are minors.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2CKYkVG
via IFTTT

Two Indian women enter Sabarimala temple in Kerala amid protests

New Delhi, India – A centuries-old ban has been breached by two women who entered an ancient Hindu temple in the southern Indian state of Kerala despite strong protests by right-wing conservative groups.

“Today, two women entered Sabarimala Temple. We had issued standing orders to police to provide all possible protection to any woman who wants to enter the temple,” Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan told reporters in Kerala’s capital city, Trivandrum, on Wednesday.

A video posted online by Indian news agency, ANI, showed the two women, Bindu and Kanakaduraga, hurriedly walking towards the shrine wearing black clothes with their heads covered.

The temple was briefly shut down for a “purification ritual” by the priests following the announcement of the women entering the temple.

The Sabarimala shrine was historically closed to women of menstruating age until the country’s Supreme Court overturned the ban in September. 

Sabarimala Ayyappa temple’s website explains that since Lord Ayyappa was “Nithya Brahmachari” – or celibate – women in the 10-50 age group are not allowed to enter.

Since the top court’s verdict, Hindu hardliners, opposed to the decision, have attacked female pilgrims, threatened journalists and pelted stones at police.

On Tuesday, a 620-km human wall was formed by women in Kerala “in support of gender equality” from Kasargod in the north to the capital, Trivandrum.

#WATCH Two women devotees Bindu and Kanakdurga entered & offered prayers at Kerala’s #SabarimalaTemple at 3.45am today pic.twitter.com/hXDWcUTVXA

— ANI (@ANI) January 2, 2019

Manithi Selvi, who attempted to enter the temple last month but had to back down after being hounded by violent protesters, hailed the duo’s entry as a “brave feat”.

“This is a massive victory for the women of India. These two women have protected India’s constitutional rights and smashed the walls of patriarchy. But this is only the first step, we need to guard our rights in the family, in the home, in the workplace,” Selvi told Al Jazeera.

“Those who have tried to purify the temple today after the women entered are standing against the constitution of this country. We have to reject these ideas,” she added.

Bindu, one of the women who entered the temple on Wednesday, was threatened by right-wing protesters earlier and her house was vandalised, said Selvi.

Following their entry, conservative Hindu groups said they will continue to oppose women entering the temple.

“The temple has now been closed for cleaning ritual following this incident where the women forcefully entered the temple. We will definitely go back to the top court to fight this battle out. It’s not over yet and we will win,” Rahul Easwar, president of the Ayyappa Dharma Sena (Ayyappa Religious Army), that claims to protect the interests of the Lord Ayyappa told Al Jazeera.

Kerala’s #SabarimalaTemple shut for purification rituals. Two women devotees in their 40’s had entered the temple in the early morning hours today. pic.twitter.com/jMefTpCsCE

— ANI (@ANI) January 2, 2019

The Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has backed the anti-women protesters despite the court orders, in what critics say is a move to fan Hindu religious sentiment to make inroads into the region.

Menstruation is rarely discussed openly in India and menstrual blood is considered impure by many communities.

Across cities and towns, menstruating girls and women are not allowed to prepare food, enter a temple or touch an idol.

An estimated one million Hindu pilgrims travel to the Sabarimala temple in the southern state of Kerala annually.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2F2A9Ui
via IFTTT