Manafort shared Trump polling data with Ukrainian associate during 2016 campaign


Paul Manafort

Paul Manafort’s lawyers maintain that all of their client’s misstatements to Robert Mueller “were not intentional” and happened because he was poorly prepared for his meetings with the special counsel. | Brendan Smialowski /AFP/Getty Images

Paul Manafort shared polling data on Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign with a Ukrainian associate who has ties to Russian intelligence, and he also met with the colleague in Madrid while working on the presidential campaign, according to a court filing from Manafort’s lawyers published on Tuesday.

Manafort, the convicted former Trump campaign chairman, is accused of lying to special counsel Robert Mueller’s prosecutors about both of those interactions with the associate, Konstantin Kilimnik, and also of not telling the truth about his meetings with Kilimnik “on more than one occasion” to discuss a Ukrainian peace plan.

Story Continued Below

Those details, as well as an exchange between Manafort and an unidentified person who was looking for an introduction with President Donald Trump, were not previously known until Tuesday, when Manafort’s attorneys put them into a court filing that was supposed to be redacted. Instead, a simple cut-and-paste of the blacked-out markings onto another word processing document easily showed what was behind the redactions.

Manafort’s attorneys filed a new version of the 10-page document more than an hour later with the U.S. District Court in Washington that again blacked out the material, but by then the earlier version had already been downloaded and shared widely on the internet.

A spokesman for Manafort declined comment about the first filing, which was submitted in federal court in response to charges that Manafort had lied to the special counsel’s prosecutors while meeting with them on a dozen occasions as part of his guilty plea last September.

Manafort’s lawyers maintain that all of their client’s misstatements to Mueller “were not intentional” and happened because he was poorly prepared for his meetings with the special counsel, which started days before he pleaded guilty and then began in earnest the day after his Sept. 14 plea hearing.

The Manafort attorneys told the judge that their client’s missteps came at a time when he’d been held for months in solitary confinement in an Alexandria, Virginia, jail, a stay that they said had “taken a toll on his physical and mental health” and also led to “depression and anxiety.” Manafort, who appeared in a wheelchair during a court hearing in October, also has severe gout, his lawyers said.

“These circumstances weighed heavily on Mr. Manafort’s state of mind and on his memory as he was questioned at length,” the attorneys wrote.

Mueller accused Manafort of lying to his prosecutors in late November and later explained that the breaches came in five different areas, including his contacts with both Kilimnik and the Trump administration. Citing Manafort’s electronic communications, the special counsel said he had remained in touch with Trump aides, including a May 26, 2018, text exchange that came months after his initial indictment authorizing a “person to speak with an administration official on Manafort’s behalf.”

In the court filing Tuesday that failed to properly redact the sealed materials, the Manafort attorneys also revealed that Mueller had accused their client of exchanging a text message with an unidentified third-party who was asking permission to use his name “as an introduction in the event the third-party met the President.”

“This does not constitute outreach by Mr. Manafort to the President,” the lawyers wrote.

In their filing, Manafort’s lawyers also told the federal judge that they did not need a hearing to hash out Mueller’s charges. Instead, they said, they would be open to letting the matter be resolved during pre-sentencing reports ahead of Manafort’s sentencing date in March.

The lawyers also said they reserved the right to fight back if Mueller brought new charges surrounding the allegations that he lied to prosecutors.

In their filing, Manafort’s lawyers said Mueller’s team had access to all of their client’s electronic devices, email accounts and his passwords.

They also defended their client’s recollections of his meetings with Kilimnik, a Russian-Ukrainian citizen who served as his key representative on the ground in Ukraine during a series of political campaigns there in which Manafort served as a highly paid consultant. Manafort denied that he was trying to conceal the meetings with Kilimnik, who has also been charged in Mueller’s wide-ranging investigation, and instead had just forgotten about them until he’d been presented evidence to refresh his memory.

“Such a failure is unsurprising here, where these occurrences happened during a period when Mr. Manafort was managing a U.S. presidential campaign and had countless meetings, email communications, and other interactions with many different individuals, and traveled frequently,” the Manafort attorneys argued.

U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered Mueller to respond by Jan. 14 with “factual and evidentiary basis” for why it is accusing Manafort of lying during his cooperation. She also gave Manafort’s lawyers until Jan. 18 to respond to the special counsel’s filings. Berman also said she’d review all the filings before deciding whether to hold a Jan. 25 hearing on the issue.

Manafort is scheduled to be sentenced Feb. 8 by U.S. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis III in Northern Virginia for his conviction on eight felony counts of bank and tax fraud. He also has a March 5 sentencing date before Jackson in Washington for his guilty plea on conspiracy against the U.S. and conspiracy to obstruct justice.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2RdkyIK
via IFTTT

Nielsen compares ‘Bird Box’ numbers to other Netflix originals

Image: Saeed Adyani / Netflix

2016%2f10%2f06%2fcf%2funtitled48.27c77By Kellen Beck

It looks like Bird Box is the massive hit that Netflix says it is.

Nielsen, which measures viewer ratings of television shows and now some streaming services, backed up Netflix’s bold claims about Bird Box‘s popularity, Variety reported Tuesday. Within the first seven days of its release on Netflix, Nielsen reports that it was watched by 26 million viewers in the U.S. alone.

SEE ALSO: Will there be a ‘Bird Box’ sequel?

Netflix reported that in that seven day span, Bird Box had been viewed by 45 million accounts around the globe. Unfortunately Nielsen only looks at U.S. data for Netflix, so we can’t fully confirm Netflix’s claim, but it doesn’t seem unreasonable given the U.S. numbers.

Nielsen gave a deeper look at the Bird Box data though, Variety reported, including showing how it stacks up against some other Netflix originals.

Bird Box had a weaker start than staples like Orange Is the New Black

While Bird Box beat out 2017’s fantasy/action movie Bright over its first week, Bird Box had a slower start with only 3.5 million viewers on its first day compared to Bright‘s 5.4 million. Bright ended the week reaching 20 million viewers, 6 million fewer than Bird Box.

Compared to some Netflix original series, Bird Box had a weaker start than staples like Orange Is the New Black and Stranger Things. The premiere of Orange Is the New Black Season 6 had an average of 5.3 million viewers over its first three days compared to Bird Box‘s 3.9 million average. Both of those pale in comparison to Stranger Things‘ premiere which hit an impressive 15.8 million viewers in its first three days compared to Bird Box‘s 11.7 million viewers.

Some of the success of Bird Box stems from its explosive popularity on social media, where people shared tons of memes and jokes around the movie as well as discussed the horror movie’s mysterious monsters. Thanks to that word of mouth, Bird Box bloomed into quite a hit for Netflix.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2C6hC6s
via IFTTT

This wearable AI translator lets you talk freely and naturally in different languages

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2RdeoZ8
via IFTTT

Kliff Kingsbury Reportedly Finalizing Contract to Become Cardinals Head Coach

FILE - In this Nov. 10, 2018, file photo, Texas Tech Kliff Kingsbury walks off the field during the first half of an NCAA college football game against Texas, in Lubbock, Texas. Former Texas Tech quarterback Kliff Kingsbury is again on the hot seat as coach of his alma mater. (AP Photo/Brad Tollefson, File)

Brad Tollefson/Associated Press

Kliff Kingsbury is making the jump to the NFL

The former Texas Tech head coach and USC offensive coordinator is reportedly “finalizing a deal” with the Arizona Cardinals to become the team’s new head coach, according to Peter Schrager of Fox Sports. It will be Kingsbury’s first NFL coaching gig.

His career began as a player, as he spent four years as a quarterback for Texas Tech and parts of three seasons in the NFL before he played in Europe and Canada. 

The 39-year-old then moved into coaching, spending time on the staffs at Houston (2008-12) and Texas A&M (2012) in the college ranks before becoming head coach at Texas Tech. In six seasons guiding the Red Raidershe led the team to a 35-40 record and three bowl games (1-2). 

His tenure ended in disappointment, however, with three straight losing seasons. Kingsbury had just two winning campaigns in Lubbock. 

Nonetheless, he garnered a reputation as a cutting-edge offensive mind, and just over a week after he was fired at Texas Tech following the 2018 season, USC hired him to be its offensive coordinator and quarterbacks coach. 

With the NFL knocking, though, Kingsbury saw his time in Los Angeles end before it began. 

Adding a bright, young offensive mind made sense for the Cardinals, who are grooming Josh Rosen as a franchise quarterback. Kingsbury already worked with players such as Case Keenum, Baker Mayfield and Patrick Mahomes in college and was an NFL quarterback himself, however briefly, so he’ll be expected to get the most out of Rosen.

For a Cardinals team that finished last in both points and yards per game last season, upgrading the offensive scheme was a must. Given Kingsbury’s lack of NFL experience, however, bringing aboard a highly experienced defensive coordinator should also be a priority.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Ccz0pZ
via IFTTT

‘Major’ irregularities with DR Congo vote count: Poll observers

'Major' irregularities with DR Congo vote count: Poll observers
The electoral commission on Sunday delayed releasing the election results indefinitely [Baz Ratner/Reuters]

An observer mission to Democratic Republic of Congo’s presidential election said it had witnessed 52 “major” irregularities in the 101 vote-counting centres it observed, including people tampering with results.

There are 179 counting centres currently tallying the vote across Congo.

The report released on Tuesday by Congo-based SYMOCEL said 16 percent of vote counting centres it had observed relied on tallies transmitted by voting machines instead of hand-counted tallies as required by law.

It also said 92 percent of the vote-counting centres it had observed did not post vote tally sheets outside as required by law.

Meanwhile, an opposition party said its leader was the “presumed winner” of the December 30 poll adding that Felix Tshisekedi has had contact with departing President Joseph Kabila “to prepare a peaceful and civilized transfer of power”.

Kabila adviser Kikaya Bin Karubi, however, on Tuesday denied any such contact.

The statements by UDPS party secretary-general Jean-Marc Kabund appeared to go against electoral regulations that say only Congo’s electoral commission can announce election results.

The UDPS also warned that the commission could be delaying the announcement of the December 30 election results in a bid to manipulate the outcome.

The electoral commission on Sunday delayed it indefinitely.

A spokesman for the ruling coalition rejected the accusation, asking “Why would we have to steal?”.

Meanwhile, Zambian presidency said in a statement on Tuesday President Edgar Lungu is traveling to South Africa on Tuesday for an “urgent consultative meeting” with President Cyril Ramaphosa about DR Congo’s presidential election.

SOURCE:
News agencies

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Rd10o1
via IFTTT

A quick history of Trump’s evolving justifications for a border wall


Donald Trump

President Donald Trump’s evolving justifications are taking on new significance now that he is weighing whether to declare a national emergency in a controversial attempt to circumvent Congress and secure the billions of dollars that would be needed to build the barrier. | Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

white house

The president has been consistent in demanding a border wall. He hasn’t been so consistent in explaining why.

President Donald Trump has been steadfast in his demands for a border wall, launching his campaign on a promise to build one and continually insisting from the White House that he will deliver on that pledge.

But Trump has been less consistent in explaining why the U.S. needs such a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Story Continued Below

His evolving justifications are taking on new significance now that Trump is weighing whether to declare a national emergency in a controversial attempt to circumvent Congress and secure the billions of dollars that would be needed to build the barrier.

Trump, who has thrust the government into a partial shutdown with his wall demands, is taking his case to the American public with a primetime televised address on Tuesday and a border visit on Thursday.

Here’s a look back at how Trump has explained why the U.S. needs a “big, beautiful wall”:

June 2015

Trump wasted no time pitching his wall, weaving it into his presidential run announcement at Trump Tower in New York.

During the speech, he set up the wall promise by taking a hardline stance against Latino immigrants, labeling migrants coming from Mexico as “people that have lots of problems,” adding that they’re bringing “drugs” and “crimes.” and going so far as to call them “rapists.” He later added that they’re also coming from “South and Latin America” and “probably from the Middle East.”

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best,” he said during the speech. Because of that, he promised voters that he will “build a great wall” and “will have Mexico pay for that wall.”

Mexico later denounced Trump’s claim that they will pay for a wall, and multiple reports have been published that show undocumented immigrants, in addition to legal immigrants, are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens.

September 2016

In a major immigration speech prior to the general election, Trump lamented that the U.S. doesn’t know the scope of the illegal immigration problem and laid out a series of threats that he claimed immigrants posed.

Trump accused Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton of promising “uncontrolled, low-skilled immigration that continues to reduce jobs and wages for American workers, and especially for African-American and Hispanic workers within our country.”

“Most incredibly, because to me this is unbelievable, we have no idea who these people are, where they come from,” Trump said at the time. “I always say Trojan Horse. Watch what’s going to happen, folks. It’s not going to be pretty.”

To combat that, Trump said the U.S. should build a wall.

“We will build a great wall along the southern border, and Mexico will pay for the wall,” he said. “They don’t know it yet, but they’re going to pay for it. And they’re great people and great leaders but they’re going to pay for the wall. On Day One, we will begin working on intangible, physical, tall, power, beautiful southern border wall.”

January 2017

During his first address to a joint session in Congress, the president said a wall is the answer to the “pleas of the American people for immigration enforcement and border security.” He claimed that a wall would “restore integrity and the rule of law to our borders.”

“It will be started ahead of schedule and, when finished, it will be a very effective weapon against drugs and crime,” he said of the wall at the time.

April 2018

Trump’s justification for his wall demands took on a new dimension when a migrant caravan, which consisted mostly of Central Americans, started making its way to the southern border. Trump denounced the roughly 1,000-person caravan, and said that it was another reason why the United States needed a border wall.

Trump also called on Mexico to stop the migrants, and threatened to make the enforcement a condition of the new NAFTA deal that the U.S., Canada and Mexico were negotiating at the time.

The full caravan, which happens annually, did not make it to the border and instead stopped in Mexico.

October-December 2018

Prior to the midterm elections, Trump began denouncing another caravan of thousands of migrants, mostly from Honduras, as a deadly threat, and repeatedly pointed to the caravan as further proof of the need for a wall.

In a dramatic move, Trump also deployed troops to the Southern border to stop the caravan, and threatened to shut down the U.S.-Mexico border.

But soon after the midterms, Trump dramatically scaled back his talk of the caravan and did not follow through on his threats to take more drastic actions.

January 4

In one of his most recent cases for the wall, Trump claimed that his predecessors expressed to him that they wished they had built a wall.

“This should have been done by all of the presidents that preceded me,” Trump told reporters last Friday. “And they all know it. Some of them have told me that we should have done it.”

However, all four living presidents have denounced Trump’s plan.

Former Presidents George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter have released statements saying that they have not discussed the border wall with the president. Barack Obama’s spokesman declined to comment, but the former president has pushed back against Trump’s pledge to build a wall in the past.

January 4-8

White House officials have falsely claimed that Customs and Border Patrol agents caught thousands of known or suspected terrorists at the U.S.-Mexico border.

Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Friday and throughout the weekend said that CBP had caught 4,000 known or suspected terrorists “that came across our southern border.” Vice President Mike Pence on Tuesday morning also repeated that claim during an interview with “Good Morning America.”

However, NBC News reported that only six non-U.S. persons that officials encountered at the southern border were on the Terrorist Screening Database from Oct. 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018. Thirty-five American citizens or lawful permanent residents that CBP came across at the U.S.-Mexico border were also on the database.

Counselor to the president Kellyanne Conway on Monday walked back the false claim, saying that it was an “unfortunate misstatement.”

After the statistic was debunked, some administration officials began using a broader statistic to point to a threat along the southern border.

More than 3,000 “special interest aliens” were encountered at the southern border in 2018. However, the definition is vague and only includes that the person has traveled to or come from 35 countries labeled “special interest” following the 9/11 attacks due to historic ties to terrorism.

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen in a series of tweets, however, noted that being on that list does not mean they are a threat to national security.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2C4AVgg
via IFTTT

Google Assistant can be your interpreter, and it’s just as cool as it sounds

Google's $149 Home Hub will soon be able to take advantage of Google's new 'Interpreter Mode.'
Google’s $149 Home Hub will soon be able to take advantage of Google’s new ‘Interpreter Mode.’

Image: raymond wong / mashable

2016%2f09%2f16%2f8f%2fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lza3.c1888By Karissa Bell

As cool as smart displays — like Google’s Home Hub — are, I’ve never really wanted one. I’ve always been quite happy with the Google Home and Google Home mini speakers I have around my house. 

But Google Assistant’s latest trick has me re-thinking that for the first time. Today, the company introduced a new feature called “Interpreter Mode,” which allows its assistant to act as a real-time translator during a conversation between two people.

It’s exactly as cool as it sounds.

SEE ALSO: Google Assistant hits 1 billion devices as war against Alexa heats up

The concept is similar to Google’s Pixel Buds, the $159 ear buds Google launched in 2017 that can provide real-time translations in your ears. But Interpreter Mode is even better, because it allows both people to benefit from Google’s translation abilities. Its capabilities are also a little more advanced, as product manager Vincent Lacey explained.

“This is native integration with Google Assistant itself; it should be a lot more seamless, a lot faster,” Lacey said.

I got to see Interpreter Mode in action at the concierge desk at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, one of three hotels where concierge staff is piloting the tool with hotel guests. I watched it interpret conversations from English to Chinese and Chinese to German — Interpreter Mode supports translations between 27 different languages — using both voice and text.

What stood out most to me during my brief demo was just how much Google has been able to simplify the complex task of interpretation. 

You start by saying “Okay Google, German interpreter,” (or Spanish, French, etc.), and Google Assistant is able to detect the languages being spoken and translate back to the other person using voice and text. 

Because Interpreter Mode lets both participants hear and see what the other is saying, it’s inherently much more conversational than what you’d get with Pixel Buds or by straight up talking into the Google Translate app on your phone. You know, like an actual interpreter.

Not that Interpreter Mode was totally perfect. In the demos I witnessed, there were some stumbles and awkwardness, like mistranslated words and confusion around how conversations should flow when you’re using a digital display as your interpreter. (There’s an audio cue each time the assistant is ready for the next speaker to start talking.) 

But these were relatively minor issues. More importantly, the experience was good enough that Interpreter Mode actually seems like a viable way to converse with someone you wouldn’t otherwise be able to communicate with — at least for everyday conversations. 

Though the company is testing the tech at a couple hotels, Google isn’t planning a big launch with businesses just yet, but it’s not difficult to imagine Interpreter Mode coming in handy in other scenarios, like at airports or with other businesses. 

The feature is also one of the best reasons yet to invest in a smart display, like the Google Home Hub. Google says Interpreter Mode will work on normal Google Home speakers as well, but without the added benefit of a written translation.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2CYFwT3
via IFTTT

NFL Rumors: ABC ‘Kicking Around’ Pursuing CBS or Fox’s Sunday NFL Package

FILE - This Wednesday, May 10, 2017, file photo shows the ABC logo, a Disney brand, in an advertisement at a bus stop near their television studio on the West Side of Manhattan, in New York. The Walt Disney Co. reports financial results on Thursday, Nov. 9, 2017. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer, File)

Mary Altaffer/Associated Press

ABC may be getting back into the NFL business.

According to Andrew Marchand of the New York Post, “ABC is kicking around the idea of going hard after CBS’ or Fox’s NFL Sunday packages. Besides the games on Sundays, it also would allow ABC to pick up a Super Bowl or two.”

Marchand added, “This is somewhat speculation at this point, informed by sources familiar with Disney’s discussions. ESPN and ABC—both owned by Disney—declined comment.”

Per that report, the NFL’s agreements with Fox and CBS for Sunday’s daytime games lasts through the 2022 season, as are Fox’s deal for Thursday Night Football and NBC’s deal for Sunday Night Football.

ESPN has the rights to Monday Night Football through the 2021 season. ABC last had NFL rights between 1970-05, when it broadcasted Monday Night Football. The Pro Bowl was also simulcast on ESPN and ABC starting last season.

If ABC does get involved in the negotiations, however, it could be another leverage point for the NFL to increase its licensing fees.

For perspective, Fox reportedly paid $3 billion for five years of TNF rights last year and is currently paying $1.1 billion a year for its Sunday NFL programming. CBS is on the hook for around $1 billion a year for its Sunday package, while NBC is paying $950 million a year for SNF. And ESPN is paying a whopping $1.9 billion a year for its NFL rights, centered around MNF.

Those prices are likely to rise, though Disney may be willing to play ball nonetheless. As Marchand noted, “Disney could try to prop up ABC by using Sunday football to lure more male viewers, which it currently lacks. It also has been proven for years that the NFL is either the top reason, or one of them, for an overall broadcast network’s success.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2TC77Po
via IFTTT

Latin America in 2019: Stories to watch

In the last 12 months, Latin America has seen a series of high-stakes elections, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) deliver its biggest-ever bailout package and Venezuela’s economic collapse explode into the most severe migration crisis in the region’s history.

As nationalists take the reigns of the region’s two largest economies and corruption scandals continue to dog politicians from Mexico City to Montevideo, here are the stories to look out for in 2019.

1. Brazil’s Bolsonaro shakes things up

January 1 saw Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil’s first right-wing president since the country’s 1964-1985 military dictatorship, assume office

The controversial former military captain made a series of disparaging remarks about women, LGBT people and black Brazilians, worrying many that social policies may be rolled back under his presidency. The fears appeared well-founded as Bolsonaro issued a series of executive orders impinging on the rights of minorities as one of his first acts as president.

Bolsonaro’s first week in office has also seen the head of the country’s environmental protection agency resign following criticism from the president and troops deployed to stop criminal attacks in the northern city of Fortaleza. 

Jair Bolsonaro has courted controversy by criticising minorities [File: Silvia Izquierdo/AP Photo]

His pledge to move Brazil’s embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem has also raised eyebrows in a country which is the world’s largest exporter of halal meat. 

Supporters are hopeful, however, that Bolsonaro can tackle rampant corruption and crack down on crime in Brazil, which saw a record 63,880 homicides in 2017 and Bolsonaro himself stabbed on the campaign trail

The appointment of a graduate of the University of Chicago – whose alumni reformed Chile’s economy under dictator Augusto Pinochet – as economy minister has also raised investor hopes that Bolsonaro’s Brazil will be good for business.

2. A Mexican maverick makes his mark 

Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, a leftist populist, became Mexico’s new president in December, but even before entering office, AMLO, as he is known, was making his influence felt and causing a headache for investors.

In October, the then-president-elect said the future of a multibillion-dollar airport project near Mexico City would be decided in a public referendum. Less than one percent of the electorate took part in the four-day vote, which rejected the continuation of the project.

Mexico’s new leader is seen as a wild card by many [File: Edgard Garrido/Reuters]

AMLO has vowed to honour the results of the referendum, putting his administration on a collision course with investors and causing the peso to plunge. 

Tackling the extreme violence that has plagued Mexico for more than a decade is high on AMLO’s agenda, with his predecessor Enrique Pena Nieto receiving harsh criticism for his failure to address the gang-and-drugs-related bloodshed. 

“Delivering on that front will be pretty hard for AMLO in the coming year because state governments and local governments are in on it with a lot of the cartels and they benefit, so it’s going to be pretty hard for him to crack down on that without a complete purge of the political class of Mexico’s various levels of government,” Max Klaver, senior analyst a Foreign Brief, a geopolitical risk analysis website, told Al Jazeera.

The new administration will also be judged on how it tackles migration.

During his campaign, AMLO promised to improve job prospects in Mexico so that migration would be “an option, not a necessity” and, in a move which likely pleased his northern neighbour, the Mexican president made a deal with leaders from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador to create a fund to stem the flow of US-bound migrants one of his first acts in office.

3. Venezuela plunges deeper into crisis

Hundreds of thousands of people fled Venezuela’s deepening economic crisis last year, while widespread shortages of food and medicine made daily life a struggle for those who remained

“Venezuelans are losing their purchasing power on a daily basis and the lack of access to food has caused malnutrition,” Venezuelan journalist Nayrobis Rodriguez told Al Jazeera.

With the IMF predicting an inflation rate of 10,000,000 percent in 2019 and President Nicolas Maduro continuing to blame the economic crisis on an “imperialist conspiracy”, the situation is likely to deteriorate even further in the next 12 months. 

Millions have fled Venezuela since the crisis began in 2015 [File: Carlos Garcia Rawlins/Reuters]

However, as migrants and refugees stream into neighbouring countries, the regional response is beginning to grow teeth.

In September, seven countries presented a petition to the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate Maduro for crimes against humanity, while Colombia’s Ivan Duque, whose country has accepted the most Venezuelans since the crisis began in 2015, continues to butt heads with the Colombian president in an increasingly bitter war of words

January 10 will see Maduro begin his second six-year term in office despite a dozen Latin American countries and Canada saying they will not recognise Maduro’s new mandate, which was won in a vote largely boycotted by the opposition and deemed illegitimate by the international community

4. Migration strains relations

The US enters 2019 locked into a government shutdown centred on funding for President Donald Trump’s wall on the border with Mexico. 

Migration has taken centre stage in US politics in recent months as Trump sought to sow fear over the thousands of Central American migrants and refugees who made their way to the border to apply for asylum.

The question of where the migrants will wait out the asylum process has placed a strain on the US’s relationship with Mexico.

Despite Trump’s tough stance on migration, domestic instability and violence in several Central American countries are likely to continue to force people to leave their homes in 2019.

Political and economic instability are forcing people from their homes in Central America [File: Adrees Latif/Reuters]

“As the political and economic situations in a lot of Central American countries worsen, and as US policies towards a lot of those countries become a bit more draconian and catalyse the problems that cause migration in the first place, I think it follows that migration will likely increase from those countries,” analyst Max Klaver said.

Regional ties are also set to be increasingly strained by large numbers of people crossing into neighbouring countries to flee the crises in Venezuela and Nicaragua, with public backlash expected to increase as public services in host countries struggle to cope with the influx of new arrivals.

5. Macri fights to survive Argentina’s economic crisis

The Argentine peso lost a third of its value in 2018, prompting protests against austerity measures and a staggering $57bn bailout package from the IMF – the largest ever given by the international body.

After such dramatic upheaval, the economy is likely to be on voter’s minds as they head to the polls in October’s presidential election. 

Though embroiled in a myriad of ongoing corruption investigations, including one involving billions of dollars in bribes for public works contracts, former President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner remains popular with voters and is expected to be President Mauricio Macri’s main competition come October.

2018 saw Argentina enter its worst recession in almost a decade [File: Marcos Brindicci/Reuters]

Nicolas Saldias, a researcher at the Washington, DC-based Wilson Center focusing on Argentine politics and economics, said that the benefits of the IMF package might not come quickly enough to convince voters to back Macri.

“The economy is doing very badly, Macri is dealing with the worst recession since at least 2009 and the country in 2019 will only be recovering, it won’t actually be growing,” Saldias said.

“If the economy begins to grow in the second half of the year, that will give Macri some goodwill. If there’s a strong enough recovery, it will certainly help President Macri […] if the economy’s doing better, he may be able to pull out a victory in the second round in November,” he told Al Jazeera.

6. Nicaragua’s crackdown continues

Widespread protests rocked the presidency of Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua in April, quickly turning deadly as the government began a violent crackdown on dissent.

“Nicaragua is experiencing one of the worst human rights crisis in its recent history,” Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director at Amnesty International, told Al Jazeera.

At least 322 people have been killed since protests began, mostly by agents of the state or pro-government armed groups, and more than 2,000 people have been injured, according to Amnesty. Thousands more have fled, mostly to neighbouring Costa Rica.

More than 300 people have been killed since protests began in April, according to Amnesty International [File: Oswaldo Rivas/Reuters]

Ortega has said “thieves” and “coup-mongers” are responsible for the unrest, sending journalists and protesters to jail on “terrorism” charges.

As the situation on the ground becomes increasingly dangerous, government repression shows no signs of easing.

“During the last weeks, many well-known human rights organisations have been shut down and their leaders persecuted by the government. Independent media outlets have been closed as well, and journalists have been criminalised or forced to leave the country,” Guevara-Rosas said.

“Given the lack of political will and the negligent denial by the government of the serious human rights violations occurring in the country, it is expected that the situation will worsen.

“With the suspension of human rights organisations and other civil society groups, there are no monitoring mechanisms and other forms of accountability available to citizens in Nicaragua”.

7. Cuba braces for change

In April 2018, Miguel Diaz-Canel Bermudez became the first person outside the Castro family to lead Cuba since the country’s revolution six decades ago

Despite widespread use of the “#Somoscontinuidad” (“We are continuity”) hashtag by Diaz-Canel and his ministers, there have been various indications that change may be afoot on the Communist-run island.

In December alone, the government reversed or delayed three controversial proposals after unprecedented public pushback in a country where, for decades, the government has issued most laws and regulations with little public debate.

Cubans have been discussing a draft constitution ahead of a referendum in February [File: Tomas Bravo/Reuters]

Cubans will get their say again in a public referendum on the new constitution, scheduled for February 24.

Widely seen as a means of invigorating Cuba’s crumbling economy, which recorded a meagre 1.2 percent growth in 2018 and has similar projections for next year, the reforms – if passed – would be the most significant political change in Cuba for more than four decades.

However, human rights organisations and analysts have raised questions about how much change is possible while the rigid one-party system remains in place and many aspects of life on the island remain under state control.

“It is similar to passing legislation in the US that everyone will own a house without the government having the financial means to provide it. Without major changes to the system […] Cuba will remain a country struggling to develop,” said Carlos Seigle, a professor of economics at Rutgers University.

8. A test for Bolivia’s Morales

Evo Morales has led Bolivia since 2006. As its first indigenous president, he is a political icon in the Andean country, celebrated for extending the enfranchisement of the majority-indigenous population and improving the economy through partial nationalisation of the oil and gas sector.

However, Morales’s reputation has taken a beating in recent years after he asked the Supreme Court to nullify the results of a 2016 referendum, which rejected his bid to run for a fourth term. The institution, which is tightly bound to the presidency, went a step further and scrapped term limits altogether for every political office in the country.

Protests against Evo Morales have grown ahead of October’s presidential elections [File: David Mercado/Reuters]

Morales is now up for re-election in October, but the road ahead looks rocky as opposition is growing, including among some of his supporters. 

Journalist and political analyst Raul Penaranda told Al Jazeera that by ignoring the referendum result and running again, Morales is undermining the democracy he championed during his early administrations and the constitution that he himself created.

“What he has shown is that he does not believe in democracy and he does not believe in the popular vote,” Penaranda said. 

9. International scandals

Corruption is never far from the headlines in Latin America, but 2018 was notable for the number of prominent figures who came under investigation as far-reaching corruption probes around the region widened their nets.

More of the same is anticipated in the next 12 months as both Bolsonaro and AMLO dig in on campaign promises to quash corruption in their countries and ongoing investigations in Peru, Argentina, Brazil and Colombia are expected to reach their conclusions.

Prominent figures in Brazil, Argentina and Peru headed to court in 2018 over corruption charges [File: Mariana Bazo/Reuters]

Guatemala has already made headlines for expelling a UN-backed anti-corruption commission – which has been investigating President Jimmy Morales – from the country in January.

“If we’re looking for silver linings, I think it’s been nice to see that there has been a very solid and inspiring mobilisation of citizen activism demanding justice and demanding accountability on behalf of their elected officials,” said analyst Max Klaver.

“I expect that that’s what we’ll continue to see, but these are issues that are really woven into the political fabric of a lot of these countries. I think in the next year and beyond there will probably be more things will be uncovered and this likely goes deeper than it already is … and it’s pretty deep already,” he told Al Jazeera.

Meanwhile, in Chile, an unprecedented investigation into historic sexual abuse by the country’s Catholic Church – now the largest clerical sex abuse and cover up probe in Latin American history – will be turning up the heat ahead of the Vatican’s anti-abuse summit scheduled for February.

10. China extends its influence

Chinese investment in Latin America and the Caribbean has increased exponentially in the last decade or so, with direct investment surging from less than $50bn in 2006 to almost $250bn in 2017, according to the Brookings Institute, a Washington, DC-based think-tank. 

US disengagement with the region, including its withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, has made space for a new global power to invest in much-needed infrastructure projects and China has stepped up to the plate, offering the region a place in President Xi Jinping’s trademark One Belt, One Road initiative.

“Trump’s continued and/or increased antagonism towards Latin American countries could push key economies, especially Mexico and Colombia, to seek stronger relations with China,” Max Nathanson, global business manager for the governor of Colorado and a former research fellow at American University’s China-Latin America Sustainable Investments Initiative told Al Jazeera.

President Xi Jinping made an historic trip to Panama in December after the countries established diplomatic ties a year earlier [File: Carlos Jasso/Reuters]

China is now a leading commercial partner for several Latin American countries including Brazil, Argentina and Chile, but concerns are mounting over the possible diplomatic impact of increasing Sino-Latin American relations.

In 2018, El Salvador and the Dominican Republic cut ties with Taiwan and established full relations with China. The majority of Taiwan’s 17 remaining diplomatic allies are small cash-strapped countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, all of whom could come under increasing Chinese influence in the year ahead.

Beijing also plays a key role in propping up Maduro’s government in Venezuela through investment in its oil sector, but as prices fluctuate and the country becomes more unstable, this may change.

“It appears that its commercial relationship with Caracas has thus far been prioritised over human rights concerns, but if the Venezuelan oil ceases to be profitable, China may change course,” Nathanson said.

Other stories to watch:

Women around Latin America having been protesting against violence and restrictive abortion laws as part of the #NiUnaMenos movement [File: Tomas F Cuesta/AP Photo]

Throughout the region, the #NiUnaMenos (Not One Woman Less) movement shows no signs of slowing down as women’s rights activists push back against widespread violence against women and restrictive abortion laws in several countries. 

In Colombia, Ivan Duque will continue struggling to unite a country still divided over a peace deal with FARC rebels, while also battling the country’s remaining armed groups and trying to put a lid on drug trafficking. 

Along with Bolivia and Argentina, El Salvador and Uruguay will also head to the polls to choose new presidents in 2019. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2CZdaYP
via IFTTT