‘No one should ever underestimate the speaker’: How Pelosi won the shutdown battle


Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi worked behind the scenes to keep her caucus in line — even as some of her own members grew skittish about the shutdown’s impacts on constituents. | M. Scott Mahaskey/Politico

government shutdown

Pelosi’s victory will help define her over the next two years as she clashes with Trump.

Two months ago, Nancy Pelosi was battling an internal Democratic rebellion trying to bar her from the speakership.

Pelosi faced doubts over whether she was the right person to lead the new Democratic majority, despite shepherding her party to victory on Election Day, and some colleagues demanded she step down after 16 years in power.

Story Continued Below

Now — just weeks after reclaiming the speaker’s gavel — the California Democrat has already bested President Donald Trump in a gut-wrenching fight that may help define the 116th Congress, while strengthening her hold over rank-and-file lawmakers.

Trump surrendered to Pelosi and Schumer in astonishing fashion Friday after insisting for 35 straight days that he would never reopen the government without winning on his central 2016 campaign promise: a big, beautiful border wall between the United States and Mexico.

But just as she did with her Democratic critics weeks ago, Pelosi waited Trump out until he couldn’t take the heat anymore. Amid a wave of news stories on furloughed federal workers showing up at food banks or in unemployment lines, airports across the country facing slowdowns, thousands of IRS employees who weren’t returning to the job when ordered back without pay — or, perhaps more so, the public blaming him for the chaos – Trump wilted. Pelosi held firm.

“No one should ever underestimate the speaker, as Donald Trump has learned,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters Friday.

Pelosi’s victory over Trump will cement her power as she and House Democrats flex their muscles with their newfound majority. It will have substantial implications for the relationship between the two power players as they clash on everything from the Russia investigation to immigration to health care. And it’s already endearing Pelosi with progressives who’ve long awaited a leader who could stand up to — and defeat — the party’s No. 1 enemy at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Trump not only failed in his effort to secure a single penny of border wall funding; he also bowed to Pelosi’s demand to reschedule the State of the Union, a nationwide TV moment he was loath to pass up while posturing against Democrats.

Yet it wasn’t easy for her. Pelosi worked behind the scenes to keep her caucus in line — even as some of her own members grew skittish about the shutdown’s impacts on constituents and privately urged her to counter a recent Trump compromise with an offer of her own.

Pelosi’s reply? Don’t give an inch and stay together, she told nervous Democrats as recently as this week. If we counter-offer Trump on the wall, we lose, Pelosi insisted. And we’re winning.

Even Republicans seemed to concede that Pelosi’s was truly Trump’s match.

“She’s not one to bluff,” said Rep. Mark Meadows, the Freedom Caucus leader and Trump ally who encouraged Trump to shut the government down in the first place.

It’s also a reminder that although polls show Trump is more popular with his base than Pelosi is with her own, Pelosi’s enormous legislative acumen — sharpened by years of arm-twisting and friendly cajoling — dwarfs the political infighting skills displayed by the ex-real-estate mogul who’s long touted himself as the one of the toughest negotiators in the world.

Pelosi, it turns out, drives a much tougher bargain.

“I don’t know if it’s because she’s a woman, but [Trump] certainly underestimated her,” House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) said. “I told somebody that I don’t know what kind of nickname he will find for Nancy, but ‘Low Energy’ won’t be one of them.”

Trump himself has expressed frustrations with how the entire process played out. During a tense meeting with staff Thursday, after watching negative coverage of the shutdown highlighting insensitive comments made by his own top officials, Trump complained that Pelosi was never going to give him what he wanted on his border wall, according to two people briefed on his comments.

The next day, Trump caved.

Yet Trump’s fold came at just the right time for Pelosi, who presides over a caucus filled with anxious centrists and freshmen desperate for any signs of progress that the stalemate — the longest shutdown in U.S. history — was ending.

Many Democratic lawmakers were getting an earful from constituents back home who were ready to see the shutdown end, no matter who was to blame for starting it. And some members were upset that leadership canceled a scheduled recess this week, forcing them to be in Washington while postponing town halls and other events back in their districts.

During several meetings of the more pragmatic-minded New Democrats Coalition, lawmakers expressed exasperation that the Pelosi-favored hashtag “#TrumpShutdown” wasn’t enough to shield them from angry constituents back home. Other members, like freshman Rep. Abigail Spanberger of Virginia, complained that the messaging strategy Pelosi had laid out may work for solid blue districts but wouldn’t hold water in her Republican-populated stronghold.

Even House Democrats who supported Pelosi’s “no negotiations until the government is open” stance privately agreed that the longer the shutdown dragged out, the tougher it’d be to stay unified. Democrats, the party long known for championing policies that help the poor, were worried that food stamp checks and affordable housing assistance might not be distributed in February if the standoff continued. Some even privately admitted they may have to cave to Trump’s border wall demand if their constituents continued to take financial hits.

The ultimate test for Pelosi came after Trump’s surprising gesture last Saturday to offer Dreamers three years of non-deportation status in return for border-wall funding. While Democrats just one year ago shut the government down trying to protect those very undocumented immigrants, Pelosi pre-empted Trump’s nationwide address by panning the idea entirely even before he took the podium.

That move angered many of Pelosi’s rank-and file members. They fretted that her immediate rejection of a compromise — and refusal to counter Trump’s offer — would make them look obstinate to constituents who just needed to pay their mortgages.

Rep. Kurt Schrader, a centrist Blue Dog from Oregon, publicly expressed the private fears of several rank-and-file Democrats earlier this week — that his party lost the messaging war over the weekend by flatly turning Trump down. Being seen as refusing to negotiate, no matter how unrealistic Trump’s offer was, “is not a good strategy,” Schrader said.

Other members tried to nudge Pelosi to counter Trump by gathering signatures for letters — one from the Blue Dogs and another led by several dozen Democratic freshmen — urging the California Democrat and other congressional leaders to come together and find a resolution to the deadlock.

Pelosi sprang into action and tried to calm her members’ unease during a closed-door meeting of House Democrats Wednesday. She was forced to act before more lawmakers went public with their criticisms, threatening the visage of Democratic unity she and Schumer had worked so hard to project.

“Understand, there is a plan. It is working for us,” Pelosi told the caucus, recounting how she and other Democrats beat back then-President George W. Bush’s efforts to privatize social security in 2005 by staying unified and sticking to a simple message, much like they were doing now. Democrats did the same when Republicans shutdown the government in 2013 in a bid to defund Obamacare, she said. They didn’t counter Republicans then, Pelosi noted —and ultimately, they won.

“So, for week-in and week-out, we had to say to our group, ‘Stick with the plan,’” Pelosi said, according to a source in the room. “And so, what we are saying is, ‘Open up government. And then we can discuss.’”

“She said the best thing to do is stand your ground and not to propose our own solution,” said one Democratic aide familiar with Pelosi’s message. “She was saying, ‘You have to let them screw the pooch on this to look good,’ that it would weaken us to offer a solution.”

Beyond that, Pelosi did one major thing Trump couldn’t: she kept the divisions in her caucus private. As an unpredictable loose cannon who changed his position on what he wanted from day to day, Trump was unable to keep Republicans unified behind his border wall demand—one they never fully embraced to begin with.

After a few weeks, many Republicans began urging Trump — in publicly and private — to re-open the government. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) even reportedly told him he was losing the public-relations battle over the shutdown.

Pelosi allies, meanwhile, did their best to keep protests of her strategy private. And her critics listened, a major reason for Pelosi’s success.

Pelosi also played up poll numbers showing the public blaming Trump to ease wary Democrats. Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) said Pelosi was keenly aware that Trump was suffering far more in public opinions polls than Democrats throughout the shutdown, and the difference became more stark the longer the crisis went on.

“She was able to cite [polls] saying, ‘We’re winning the argument. This is not time to start to showing cracks,” he said.

Pelosi’s newfound power from the shutdown victory offers a sharp contrast from her most recent struggles. A substantial faction of Democrats in the past two years privately — or even publicly — questioned whether she’d be a liability for the party.

Pelosi, 78, has led the caucus for more than 16 years and has become a favorite foil for Republicans, many who ran TV ads against her to try to defeat Democratic opponents in the midterms. Some in the party felt she’d been around too long and wanted to new leadership in the Trump age.

That was short-lived, however. Pelosi has reclaimed her right to be called one of the most powerful speakers in recent years. And her colleagues are openly calling her a “bad ass” as they praise her efforts.

“This is phase two of her new leadership,” said Rep. Dean Phillips, a Minnesota Democratic freshman from a swing district, in a short Friday interview. “I very much respect how she has led this caucus with principle.”

The comment from Phillips is striking given that he was one of more than 30 lawmakers who called on Pelosi to do more to end the shutdown just two days ago. Now he appears to see why she held out: “I fully support, as well as just about everybody in the Democratic Caucus, to not use shutdowns as a political maneuver.”

Pelosi herself declined to take a victory lap Friday, despite being pressed by reporters several times on whether she bested Trump in this fight. Even during a public signing of the three-week stopgap bill to reopen the government, the cable news cameras hanging on her every word, Pelosi wouldn’t gloat.

“I don’t unify our caucus, our values unify us,” Pelosi told reporters. “Our unity is our power and that is maybe what the president underestimated.”

Democrats, however, haven’t been so subtle in rubbing their victory in Trump’s face. In fact, they flooded Twitter with praise for Pelosi and how she outfoxed Trump.

One tweet from Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.) included a picture of the cover of the president’s famous book, The Art of the Deal, with Pelosi’s image replacing Trump’s.

“I think [Pelosi] always organizes her political strategy around a moral core,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.). “And the core of her argument her was that you do not shut down the government of the United States over a policy difference.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2FO3tiA
via IFTTT

Zuckerberg is breaking promises to Instagram and WhatsApp. Be concerned.

Mark Zuckerberg is doing exactly what he promised Instagram and WhatsApp he wouldn’t: messing with their independence by creating one system to rule them all. 

The Facebook founder plans to bring the back ends of Messenger, WhatsApp and Instagram closer together with that of his own social network, as Facebook has now confirmed to the New York Times

This consolidation may come with benefits for the billions of users involved, such as making it easier for anyone to send messages across the apps. But it’s also the biggest sign yet that Zuckerberg is tightening his grip on services he once promised complete autonomy — and it comes on the heels of  the Instagram and the WhatsApp founders exiting Facebook. 

So at a time when trust in Facebook is at an all-time low, and when Silicon Valley is abuzz with rumors over bad blood between the founders, Facebook CEO is looking to wield even more control over its most prominent apps.

This is be a massive, multi-year undertaking for the social network. From the report (emphasis ours):

The move, described by four people involved in the effort, requires thousands of Facebook employees to reconfigure how WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook Messenger function at their most basic levels. While all three services will continue operating as stand-alone apps, their underlying messaging infrastructure will be unified, the people said. Facebook  plans to complete it by the end of this year or in early 2020 …

Zuckerberg also ordered all of the apps to incorporate end-to-end encryption … a significant step that protects messages from being viewed by anyone except the participants in the conversation. After the changes take effect, a Facebook user could send an encrypted message to someone who has only a WhatsApp account, for example. Currently, that isn’t possible because the apps are separate.

As of next year, then, Messenger, WhatsApp, and Instagram will run on the same infrastructure. Besides requiring years of engineering work, that could have unforeseen implications for the more than 2.5 billion people who use these services. It also raises questions of security and regulation. 

The move also puts the departures of Instagram’s Kevin Systrom and WhatsApp’s Jan Koum into fresh light. Because this is the kind of thing Zuckerberg once pledged to them and their users that he had no intention of doing.

Back in 2012, when he first announced the $1 billion Instagram acquisition, Zuckerberg pledged to keep the photo sharing app independent. “We need to be mindful about keeping and building on Instagram’s strengths and features rather than just trying to integrate everything into Facebook,” the CEO wrote in a statement. 

Similarly, when Facebook acquired WhatsApp for $19 billion, the two companies were adamant that WhatsApp would remain independent from the social network. 

“WhatsApp will remain autonomous and operate independently,” founder Jan Koum wrote in a blog post at the time. “There would have been no partnership between our two companies if we had to compromise on the core principles that will always define our company, our vision and our product.”

Systrom and Koum were both replaced with longtime Zuckerberg lieutenants. Both were said to have clashed with Zuckerberg on issues of independence. Namely, the founders’ ability to run their services in isolation from the Facebook machine.

In the last year, as Instagram’s growth has exploded,  we’ve seen more Facebook tie-ins than ever before. The app has experimented with cross-platform notifications and placed prominent links back to Facebook in its app. Instagram’s founders reportedly balked at Facebook removing references to Instagram when users posted photos from the photo sharing app back to Facebook. 

Things are worse for WhatsApp. Not only are there ads and business messaging features now, but one of Koum’s co-founders is on record as saying “I sold my users privacy.

WhatsApp and Instagram are still both technically independent services. Each has its own standalone app, and you can still use both without a Facebook account. 

But for the people working on these services, a years-long project to merge their existing technical infrastructure with Facebook sends a clear message about their vaunted independence: those days are over.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2sPioRc
via IFTTT

The dick running feud is the perfect internet drama to close out your week

We’re proud to report that there are two — yes, two — dick runners named Claire who are popular for using fitness tracking apps to jog out phallic routes for the internet. The issue? One insists she came first, and she’s calling for a “cease and dicksist.” 

The two women have gained Instagram notoriety over the past few years for their various penis-shaped running routes. Both of them call themselves “Dick Run Claire,” and both meticulously plot out genitals of all shapes and sizes, phallic and yonic. It’s like a massive, city-sized Etch-A-Dick. 

The Claires’ online rivalry climaxed this week when one of them was featured in a Vice article, and the other saltily reached out on Twitter. 

SEE ALSO: The Navy drew a giant dick in the sky

“That woman follows me, and steals my runs,” Claire Wyckoff tweeted, along with a request to write about “Dick Run stealing.” 

Claire Pisano, who posts screenshots of her runs under @dick_run_claire, got into dick running accidentally in 2015 when she got lost on a run while visiting her brother.

“I had posted it to my Facebook and obviously my friends thought it was funny so I just started randomly working in dickruns once in a while,” Pisano explained in an Instagram DM. She says she didn’t join Instagram until years later. 

But according to Wyckoff, who changed her Instagram handle to @og_dick_run_claire to reflect the dispute, Pisano is a dick run plagiarist. Wyckoff says she started dick running in 2014, which is also when she began “pioneering it as an art form.”

Here’s Wyckoff’s infamous handjob route — which she posted about a year and half before Pisano posted hers. Note that Wyckoff accounted for a testicular sprint, while the Pisano’s route didn’t include the balls. 

“Learning to read maps and manipulate the Nike+ app to run-draw the best schlongs possible,” Wyckoff said in an Instagram DM. “Back then, GPS art wasn’t even a thing so I think it took off partly cause of the hilarious subject matter but also [because of] the ‘innovation’ of it.” 

Wyckoff says she noticed Pisano commenting on and liking her Instagram posts in early 2018, and was at first flattered. 

“I get a lot of people wanting to run dicks,” Wyckoff said. “As they should! Dick runs for all.” 

But it bothered her when Pisano’s account started going viral, with the same name and same concept. Both runners have also done strikingly similar vagina routes — dubbing the yonic jogs #pussyrun and #twattrot, respectively. 

“I work in a creative industry,” Wyckoff said. “You don’t steal another writer’s joke … when your ideas are currency, bitch stole my money.”

To Pisano, it’s all a non-issue because at the end of the day, it’s just dicks. 

“She can be upset if she wants, but dick runs are just funny and I don’t think we should take it too seriously,” she added. 

On Twitter, Pisano insisted she follows the #dickrun hashtag, not Wyckoff. In a tense exchange, Wyckoff called out Pisano for commenting on one of her posts, proving that she knew about Wyckoff’s work in dick running.

How about an article educating you on how to follow a hashtag? Cause I follow the dickrun hashtag, not you. Regrets you popped into my feed that way.

— Claire Pisano (@stillmostlytrue) January 18, 2019

Describing hashtags as “the biggest thing connecting users,” Pisano explained that she wasn’t “super engaged in any community” until the hashtag follow feature was released. She began liking and commenting on Wyckoff’s posts as a way to get more involved in the dick running Instagram niche.  

As Pisano pointed out, Wyckoff wasn’t the first dick runner to begin with, and told Mashable that “there are a TON of dick runners” on Instagram. She nodded to the hashtag #stravaart as an example of how creative people can be with fitness tracking apps, and acknowledged that human beings have been drawing dicks on things for thousands of years

“Which honestly makes sense, the running community in general has fun people,” Pisano said. “So many accounts of random dick drawings or things that look like dicks … we are just an immature race I guess.” 

And she doesn’t shy away from the fact that Wyckoff was the first Claire to dick run. 

“Of the Claire’s no one denies you dick ran first, but neither of us was THE first to the dickrun,” Pisano added in another tweet. “Luckily there’s enough road dicks for all of us.”

But that’s not enough for Wyckoff, who wants justice for her original dick runs. 

“As far as I know, I invented it,” Wyckoff asserted. It’s not the fact that other runners are dick running that bothers her, it’s that Pisano “is leading people to believe in interviews that this was her idea.” 

Wyckoff told BuzzFeed that she wants a battle of the dicks to settle this once and for all.

“I think we should have a dick run-off — a dickathlon,” she said.

To Wyckoff, a proper dickathalon would require a panel of judges. Her picks are Jerry O’Connell, Kristen Bell — “a dick running fan since 2014” — and/or Stephen Colbert. 

“We’d each run and be judged on different factors, just like a figure skater,” she explained through DMs. The dick run rubric would include penis authenticity (“does it look like a dick?”), length and girth, and flair. 

“What extra did we bring to the table?” she asked in her hypothetical dick run grading system. “And by table I mean dick.” 

Although Pisano chose to stop engaging with Wyckoff and aggressive comments that “felt mean spirited,” she’s open to an “overall dick run community event.” 

To Pisano, the dick running point system would depend on whether the competition is in a city, where there’s a grid system, or in a more rural area, which allows for less boxy and more creative dicks. 

“It would be like a pumpkin carving contest,” she reasoned. “The criteria aren’t so stringent, it’s just what the people like.” 

At the end of the day, Wyckoff wants everyone to “Run a dick, don’t be one.” 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2MwYGT1
via IFTTT

Live: Raptors Taking on the Rockets

  1. Doug Smith: Raptors @SmithRaps

  2. Harden Pregame Half-Court Shot

    Bleacher Report @BleacherReport

    Harden ready to go off for 60 PTS tonight 🔥

    (via @NBA)
    https://t.co/Zg07hOkmpb

  3. Kenneth Faried Gets Another Start for Rockets

    via Houston Chronicle

  4. Leonard & Anunoby Return, Paul Out for Houston

    via Raptors Republic

  5. Harden x Future 🔥

    Bleacher Report @BleacherReport

    MVP Talk 😤

    @JHarden13 x @1future https://t.co/Z3yd9kEcyx

  6. Josh Lewenberg @JLew1050

  7. Vivek Jacob @VivekMJacob

  8. ClutchFans @clutchfans

  9. Alykhan Bijani @Rockets_Insider

  10. Jonathan Feigen @Jonathan_Feigen

  11. Eric Smith @Eric__Smith

  12. Tim MacMahon @espn_macmahon

  13. Chris Mannix @SIChrisMannix

  14. Doug Smith: Raptors @SmithRaps

  15. Craig Ackerman @ca_rockets

  16. NBA @NBA

  17. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  18. Toronto Raptors @Raptors

  19. Chris Walder @WalderSports

  20. Josh Lewenberg @JLew1050

  21. Jonathan Feigen @Jonathan_Feigen

  22. Doug Smith: Raptors @SmithRaps

  23. Ryan Wolstat @WolstatSun

  24. Chris Mannix @SIChrisMannix

  25. Alykhan Bijani @Rockets_Insider

  26. Toronto Raptors @Raptors

  27. Chris Walder @WalderSports

  28. NBA @NBA

  29. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  30. NBA @NBA

  31. Michael Grange @michaelgrange

  32. Eric Smith @Eric__Smith

  33. Adam Fromal @fromal09

  34. Doug Smith: Raptors @SmithRaps

  35. Toronto Raptors @Raptors

  36. NBA @NBA

  37. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  38. Ben DuBose @BenDuBose

  39. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  40. NBA @NBA

  41. The Step Back @The_Step_Back

  42. Jonathan Feigen @Jonathan_Feigen

  43. Ben DuBose @BenDuBose

  44. Ryan Wolstat @WolstatSun

  45. Ryan Wolstat @WolstatSun

  46. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  47. Daryl Morey @dmorey

  48. Mark Berman @MarkBermanFox26

  49. Chris Mannix @SIChrisMannix

  50. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  51. NBA TV @NBATV

  52. Mark Berman @MarkBermanFox26

  53. ESPN Stats & Info @ESPNStatsInfo

  54. NBA @NBA

  55. NBA @NBA

  56. Ben DuBose @BenDuBose

  57. Toronto Raptors @Raptors

  58. Alykhan Bijani @Rockets_Insider

  59. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  60. Josh Lewenberg @JLew1050

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2DzE4qr
via IFTTT

Live: Raptors Taking on the Rockets

  1. Doug Smith: Raptors @SmithRaps

  2. Harden Pregame Half-Court Shot

    Bleacher Report @BleacherReport

    Harden ready to go off for 60 PTS tonight 🔥

    (via @NBA)
    https://t.co/Zg07hOkmpb

  3. Kenneth Faried Gets Another Start for Rockets

    via Houston Chronicle

  4. Leonard & Anunoby Return, Paul Out for Houston

    via Raptors Republic

  5. Harden x Future 🔥

    Bleacher Report @BleacherReport

    MVP Talk 😤

    @JHarden13 x @1future https://t.co/Z3yd9kEcyx

  6. Josh Lewenberg @JLew1050

  7. Vivek Jacob @VivekMJacob

  8. ClutchFans @clutchfans

  9. Alykhan Bijani @Rockets_Insider

  10. Jonathan Feigen @Jonathan_Feigen

  11. Eric Smith @Eric__Smith

  12. Tim MacMahon @espn_macmahon

  13. Chris Mannix @SIChrisMannix

  14. Doug Smith: Raptors @SmithRaps

  15. Craig Ackerman @ca_rockets

  16. NBA @NBA

  17. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  18. Toronto Raptors @Raptors

  19. Chris Walder @WalderSports

  20. Josh Lewenberg @JLew1050

  21. Jonathan Feigen @Jonathan_Feigen

  22. Doug Smith: Raptors @SmithRaps

  23. Ryan Wolstat @WolstatSun

  24. Chris Mannix @SIChrisMannix

  25. Alykhan Bijani @Rockets_Insider

  26. Toronto Raptors @Raptors

  27. Chris Walder @WalderSports

  28. NBA @NBA

  29. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  30. NBA @NBA

  31. Michael Grange @michaelgrange

  32. Eric Smith @Eric__Smith

  33. Adam Fromal @fromal09

  34. Doug Smith: Raptors @SmithRaps

  35. Toronto Raptors @Raptors

  36. NBA @NBA

  37. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  38. Ben DuBose @BenDuBose

  39. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  40. NBA @NBA

  41. The Step Back @The_Step_Back

  42. Jonathan Feigen @Jonathan_Feigen

  43. Ben DuBose @BenDuBose

  44. Ryan Wolstat @WolstatSun

  45. Ryan Wolstat @WolstatSun

  46. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  47. Daryl Morey @dmorey

  48. Mark Berman @MarkBermanFox26

  49. Chris Mannix @SIChrisMannix

  50. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  51. NBA TV @NBATV

  52. Mark Berman @MarkBermanFox26

  53. ESPN Stats & Info @ESPNStatsInfo

  54. NBA @NBA

  55. NBA @NBA

  56. Ben DuBose @BenDuBose

  57. Toronto Raptors @Raptors

  58. Alykhan Bijani @Rockets_Insider

  59. Houston Rockets @HoustonRockets

  60. Josh Lewenberg @JLew1050

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2DzE4qr
via IFTTT

‘All for nothing’: Trump’s wall retreat bewilders allies


Donald Trump returns to the West Wing after his press conference

President Donald Trump leaves after speaking about a temporary reopening of the federal government while making a statement in the Rose Garden on Friday. | Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images

White House

Before the president was done talking on Friday, a group text chain with several former Trump aides lit up with complaints.

Before President Donald Trump finished speaking from the Rose Garden, putting a temporary end to the five-week government shutdown, a running group text between several of his former aides lit up with complaints.

“[Speaker Nancy] Pelosi ordered everything off the menu and left Trump hanging with the bill,” one Trump ally texted to the group.

Story Continued Below

“President Nancy Pelosi, she runs the country now,” said a second former White House official. “We went from indefinite shutdown, to down payment, to cave — all within a span of 24 hours.”

That official said that Trump’s core supporters and former aides are “furious” and “melting down.”

Bewildered by his decision to accept a deal without funding for a wall on the southern border — not even the “down payment” the White House had requested a day earlier — some of his most loyal supporters fretted that Trump was in danger of losing his fervent base that has fueled his presidency. It didn’t help that special counsel Robert Mueller had just released more details about the Trump campaign’s alleged attempts to backchannel with WikiLeaks during the election.

It all left Trump staring at a tough road ahead. Having staked his nascent 2020 reelection messaging to the wall fight, Trump now can’t claim victory as Democrats start entering the field. After stumbling in his first bout with Pelosi, Trump must now face an invigorated Democratic-led House keen to investigate the White House. And following Mueller’s reveal of more evidence that Trump’s 2016 team tried to furtively gather intel about hacked Democratic emails, Trump will have to fend off increasing calls for impeachment.

Trump’s allies in Congress and some conservative immigration advocates did come to the president’s defense on Friday, arguing that he was taking the high road and calling Democrats’ bluff on a vow to negotiate on border security once the government reopened.

Trump also defended himself late Friday on Twitter.

“I wish people would read or listen to my words on the Border Wall. This was in no way a concession. It was taking care of millions of people who were getting badly hurt by the Shutdown with the understanding that in 21 days, if no deal is done, it’s off to the races!” he wrote.

But the moment still seemed deflating for a president who prides himself on winning so much, “you’re going to get tired of winning.”

During the month-long shutdown, Trump’s approval ratings dropped to record lows, his much-touted economy lost steam because of the shutdown and conservative immigration activists rolled their eyes over the his wall fixation.

And the wall is the one issue that Trump’s allies say he can’t lose on. Just three weeks ago, GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham predicted doom if Trump didn’t get wall funding.

“He’s not going to sign a bill that doesn’t have money for the wall. … If he gives in now, that’s the end of 2019 in terms of him being an effective president,” Graham said on FOX News. “That’s probably the end of his presidency.”

Now he’ll find out.

The agreement Trump announced on Friday funds the government until Feb. 15, giving congressional negotiators three weeks to work out a larger immigration deal. Democratic leaders, including Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, expressed optimism that such an agreement could be reached. But others, including numerous Republicans, were less confident.

“There isn’t any insurance policy on that,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.)

Trump made the decision to reopen the government Friday after the Federal Aviation Administration grounded flights bound to New York’s LaGuardia Airport because air traffic control staff, who were not being paid, called in sick.

“FAA shutting airports is a losing card,” said a former Trump adviser who remains close to the White House. “He doesn’t care about federal workers. But pissing off travelers — watch out.”

It’s not the first time Trump has lost a legislative battle in his two years as president. He failed to get Republicans to unite over a plan to repeal Obamacare in 2017. And he rebuffed a bipartisan immigration reform package in 2018. But Friday’s retreat was the most high-profile to date.

“I’m not sure allies are going along with it, more just letting it happen. It’s like watching a House completely engulfed in flames; there’s nothing you can do except watch,” a former campaign aide told POLITICO when asked about the reaction from hard-line immigration groups like the Federation for American Immigration Reform, whose president Dan Stein appeared to tepidly endorse Trump’s latest strategy.

In a statement, Stein said Trump “acted in good faith” to reopen parts of the federal government that have been shuttered for more than a month. “The ball is now in Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer’s court to demonstrate theirs.”

Three former Trump aides disagreed with Stein’s assessment, claiming the president raised a white flag on Friday and surrendered the already-limited leverage he had left. All three expressed dismay at the president’s strategy over the past 72 hours — from him submitting to Pelosi’s request to delay the State of the Union until the government reopened to endorsing a wall-less spending bill while congressional Democrats and Republicans hash things out.

“He allowed 35 days of chaos and hurt all for nothing,” said the second former White House official. “I’m so glad people will start being paid, but this could have been done in December.”

The White House allies said their chief concern going forward is a situation in which Trump backpedals again if a deal isn’t struck in the coming weeks. The White House has left a national emergency declaration on the table, suggesting the president could still invoke executive authority to secure funding for a barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Attorneys in the White House counsel’s office have spent weeks reviewing the legality of such a move, parsing the various options, according to one Republican close to the White House.

“He’s going to cave again in [three] weeks,” predicted the former campaign official. “Democrats have Trump by the balls.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2UeGOPy
via IFTTT

50 percent of Facebook users could be fake, report claims

Hmm.
Hmm.

Image: Christophe Morin / IP3 / getty

2017%252f09%252f18%252f2b%252fjackbw5.32076.jpg%252f90x90By Jack Morse

A long-running feud was thrust back into the spotlight today with a contentious report claiming that over half of Facebook’s monthly active users are actually fake.  

The report, written by Facebook critic Aaron Greenspan, alleges that the social media giant has no way to accurately measure its true user base — or in other words, accounts that are matched up to real people — and that Facebook’s reported metrics substantially overestimate the number of real monthly active users. 

Notably, Greenspan is a former Harvard classmate of Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. In 2009, Adweek reported Facebook and Greenspan reached a confidential settlement over a trademark dispute regarding the term “the Face Book.” Greenspan’s new report, however, alleges substantially more than a possibly stolen name.  

SEE ALSO: Facebook removes hundreds of fake Russian pages operating in Europe and Asia

“The fact of the matter is that Facebook does not now and will not ever have an accurate way to measure its fake account problem,” claims the report. “Taking all of these factors into account, we estimate that 50 percent or more of Facebook’s current MAUs are actually fake.”

Facebook vehemently disputes Greenspan’s analysis. “This is unequivocally wrong and responsible reporting means reporting facts, even if it’s about fake accounts,” wrote a company spokesperson over email. 

At least one group appears to be taking the report’s allegations seriously, however: Facebook investors. Seeking Alpha, a financial analysis website, notes that Facebook shares fell on Jan. 24 shortly after the Greenspan report was issued. 

So, is this report just empty bluster from someone with an axe to grind? Or is there actually something to the claim? The report itself attempts to weigh in on that, with Greenspan writing that “[readers] are accordingly welcome to dismiss this analysis as biased, but should be aware that nonetheless, it may still be correct.”

He also writes, because I guess why not throw in a little personal shade while you’re tossing around allegations of massive corporate malfeasance, “Mark Zuckerberg is by no objective measure a genius.” 

Facebook, for its part, has admitted in the past that fake or duplicate accounts exist on its platform. In 2017, the company noted that as many as 270 million accounts could fall into one of those two categories. However, that number is a far cry from what Greenspan claims. 

In the end, pinning down the exact number of fake Facebook accounts is likely an impossible task. That doesn’t mean accurate estimates don’t exist, however. Which just leaves us with the 2-billion-plus user question of whose estimate do you find more believable: Facebook’s, or Greenspan’s?

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2RRu8kM
via IFTTT

Dwyane Wade on 2019 NBA All-Star Voting: ‘I’m Not Picking Me’

Miami Heat guard Dwyane Wade (3) shoots the ball during the first half of an NBA basketball game Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2019, in Miami. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)

Brynn Anderson/Associated Press

Miami Heat guard Dwyane Wade told reporters Friday that he wouldn’t choose himself to play in this year’s NBA All-Star Game.

“If I’m choosing an All-Star, I’m not picking me,” he said, per Ira Winderman of the Sun Sentinel. “It’s not an indictment on anything, but guys that deserve to be All-Stars will be All-Stars.”

He continued:        

“For the first time, I actually agree with [TNT analyst] Charles Barkley and what he said. It’s a lot of guys that get their first chance to be All-Stars, and if they deserve it, then they deserve it and they should have those spots. I appreciate the love from my fans to even vote me, to have as many votes as they did. But from an All-Star standpoint, there’s multiple guys that deserve to be in there and I hope they get their opportunity.”

Wade was third in the All-Star voting for Eastern Conference starting guards (behind Kyrie Irving and Kemba Walker). He needed a top-two finish to earn the honor.

The 16-year veteran, who is retiring at the end of the season, is a surefire first-ballot Hall of Famer who has made 12 All-Star games and eight All-NBA teams. The three-time NBA champion has stayed productive at age 37, posting 13.8 points, 4.2 assists and 3.6 rebounds per game off the bench.

If the coaches select Wade as a reserve this year, it would be to honor his basketball legacy. That isn’t uncommon in sports. Baseball Hall of Famer Cal Ripken Jr. notably made the 2001 MLB All-Star Game despite a downswing in his performance at age 40.

Fans will find out whether Wade made the East’s squad Thursday during TNT’s NBA Tip-Off, which begins at 7 p.m. ET. The 2019 All-Star Game will take place Feb. 17 at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina, at 8 p.m.       

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2CGCn8U
via IFTTT

US intensifies anti-Maduro push as Russia backs Venezuelan ally

The United States on Friday intensified its push to drive Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro from power, as US diplomats left the embassy in Caracas and Russia vowed to back its South American ally.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Saturday will urge members of the United Nations Security Council to recognise opposition leader Juan Guaido as Venezuela‘s legitimate head of state.

Washington requested the meeting of the 15-member council after a string of countries threw their weight behind Guaido, who heads Venezuela’s congress, and urged Maduro to step down.

Russia opposes the request and has accused Washington of backing a coup attempt, placing Venezuela at the heart of a growing geopolitical duel. Moscow will insist on compliance with international law, Russia’s RIA news agency cited Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov as saying on Friday.

Maduro said he welcomed a debate over Venezuela’s situation and thanked Pompeo for making the UN request, in a jocular response during a Friday news conference.

“I was about to say to the foreign minister ‘ask for a security council debate,’ (but) Mike Pompeo got ahead of me,” Maduro said. “Thanks, Mike … We’re going to tell the truth about the articles of the constitution, about the coup.”

Earlier, American diplomats left the US embassy in Caracas in a convoy of vehicles with a police escort en route to the airport, according to a Reuters witness.

In a fiery speech on Wednesday, Maduro broke off diplomatic relations with Washington and ordered the US personnel out within 72 hours. 

The State Department on Thursday told some US government workers to leave Venezuela and said US citizens in the country should consider leaving. It did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the movement of embassy personnel on Friday. 

UN human rights boss Michelle Bachelet called on Friday for an investigation into alleged excessive use of force by Venezuelan security forces against protesters, adding that she was “extremely concerned” that the situation could rapidly spiral out of control.

‘No fake dialogue’

Guaido, who has galvanised Venezuela’s opposition, proclaimed himself interim president on Wednesday during a march of hundreds of thousands in Caracas. He is considering making a request for funds from international institutions including the International Monetary Fund, two people familiar with the talks said on Friday.

However, he still has no control over the Venezuelan state and the military, which have so far remained loyal to Maduro.

Guaido has promised future amnesties to military members if they disavow Maduro.

On Friday, Guaido repeated his offer to the armed forces around Venezuela, asking soldiers “to put themselves on the side of the constitution”. He also called for mass protests next week. 

Venezuela’s opposition leader Juan Guaido gestures as he speaks during a news conference in Caracas [Carlos Garcia Rawlins/Reuters]

Most Latin American nations have joined the United States in supporting Guaido’s claim on the presidency, although Mexico’s new leftist government has said it would not take sides. Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said on Friday his administration would be willing to mediate.

Guaido said he would reject any negotiations that did not include Maduro’s exit, setting up a transition government and free elections to pick a new president.

“No one wants fake dialogue … the only thing we want to negotiate is the end of the usurpation,” he told a crowd clustered in a plaza in Caracas’s Chacao district, an opposition stronghold.

For his part, Maduro said he would be willing to engage in talks with the opposition in order to avoid violence.

“I’m committed to a national dialogue. Today, tomorrow and always, I’m committed and ready to go wherever I have to. Personally, if I have to meet with this young man … I’ll go,” the leader said.

Analysts believe Maduro’s strategy may be focused on gaining time.

“In the past, when Maduro’s government has faced [similar situations] he has always opted for a strategy in which he calls for national and international dialogue,” said Carlos Eduardo Pina, a Venezuelan political scientist.

“He is aiming to gain time. He has done this the past and he has succeeded,” Pina added. “[Maduro] has managed to dismantle the opposition forces, their leaders, and their supporters, making them seem as incapable of reaching their own political agenda.”

US seeks to cut off funds

To ratchet up pressure on Maduro, who began a second term on January 10 following an election last year widely considered to be fraudulant, the United States is seeking to cut off funds for his government, US officials said on Thursday. 

Guaido is also readying a new board to run state-run oil firm PDVSA’s US unit Citgo Petroleum, people familiar with the discussions said.

Maduro warned off any attempt to take control of Citgo, the country’s primary offshore asset.

“It is the property of the Venezuelan people, and we will defend it,” he said.

The Maduro-appointed board of Citgo is preparing a legal strategy to defend itself, sources close to the talks said.

Oil prices edged higher on Friday as the political turmoil threatened to tighten the global supply of crude.

Washington has signalled that it could impose new sanctions on OPEC member Venezuela’s vital oil sector.

“The oil situation has been an ethical moral dilemma for us,” said US Senator Richard Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate.

“Cutting off all trade in oil would be the last step. It would make it even worse for the average person.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2RQLdeH
via IFTTT

Google lawyers tried to quash some protections for employee activists

The Google brass was totally in favor of those massive employee walkouts, right?

Google CEO Sundar Pachai has said that he and the company support employee efforts to organize and improve Google; however, Bloomberg reported Thursday that Google attorneys have simultaneously advocated that a federal legal precedent protecting employees’ rights to organize over company email should be undone. And Google’s arguments could actually have an impact on national policy around worker’s rights.

SEE ALSO: Employees publicly call on Google to end its censored Chinese search engine

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under the Trump administration has been working to roll back many of the precedents created during the Obama administration that protect employee organizing. It has even been looking to reassess the statute about employee organizing over email specifically. Inadvertently or not, Google’s statement may provide cover and legitimacy for the effort to overturn this precedent.

“Google seems to be stealthily supporting the current administration’s policies when it comes to repressing workers’ rights to come together for their own empowerment,” attorney Bryan Schwartz, a member of the National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA), who has advocated for the rights of Tesla workers, told Mashable over the phone. 

Employee organizing at Google has gained mainstream attention in recent months, in large part thanks to the 20,000 employee-strong Google Walkout for Real Change staged in November to protest the company’s mishandling of sexual assault allegations, diversity, and more. The campaign has also launched subsequent initiatives, such as an end to all forced arbitration. Employees have also advocated against Google programs seen antithetical to Google’s values, such as a Chinese search engine and Department of Defense contracts. Internal organizing on Google’s workplace forums and emails were reported to be central to these efforts.

The action from Google attorneys was reportedly unrelated to these employee campaigns. The attorneys filed the argument as a rebuttal to a complaint brought by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) about a separate case in which Google is accused of retaliating against an employee who expressed dissent against liberal causes in employee forums.

In the filing, obtained by Bloomberg via a FOIA request, Google denies wrongdoing in that case. But amongst a host of other defenses, it also advocates that the NLRB undo a legal precedent, created in 2014 in a case called Purple Communications, that protects employees’ ability to organize over company email, without employer retaliation.

Despite the fact that the Google walkouts and the NLRB case are unrelated, Google employee organizers responded to the Bloomberg report with a statement on Twitter calling out the seeming disingenuousness of their employer:

In an email to all of Google, Sundar assured us that he and Google’s leadership supported the Walkout. But the company’s requests to the National Labor Relations Board tell a different story, showing that Google would rather pay lawyers to change national labor law than do what’s right. Google is aiming to silence us at a time when our voices are more essential than ever: from Maven, to Dragonfly, to the Walkout, collective action and worker organizing has helped check unethical and selfish executive decision making, where “official channels” continually failed. If these protections are rolled back, Google will be complicit in limiting the rights of working people across the United States, not just us. We will continue to stand up for justice, equity, and a safe workplace, in solidarity with all workers.

STATEMENT: In an email to all of Google, Sundar assured us that he and Google’s leadership supported the Walkout. But the company’s requests to the National Labor Relations Board tell a different story, … (1/4)https://t.co/JdiudManXS

— Google Walkout For Real Change (@GoogleWalkout) January 24, 2019

Google maintains that it supports its employees, and that the legal defense was just one of many used in the filing. Google provided the following statement to Mashable when asked about how this legal action might impact Google employees:

Google is one of the most open workplaces in the world. Employees have multiple internal forums to express their views, raise concerns and connect, including thousands of internal communities and tens of thousands of email groups. We’re not lobbying for changes to any rules. This was a legal defense that we included as one of many possible defenses in the response to a charge. This case is without merit and we are defending the claim vigorously.

But challenging the 2014 NLRB ruling would have an impact beyond Googlers since it is a national precedent, not a company policy. Last August, the NLRB put out a call for input on the Purple Communications decision, the case that created the precedent protecting organizing over company email. If enough companies weigh in against the precedent, it could justify the NLRB’s decision to reverse the precedent — an act that would be consistent with similar recent NLRB efforts

A complaint from liberal-leaning Google would be a high profile way to do just that.

“They seem to be trying to lay the paperwork to give themselves cover to flip the Purple Communications decision,” Schwartz said. “It seems that Google is helping forward the administration’s agenda on that.”

Weakened worker protections, enabled through the legal actions of some of our most powerful and supposedly progressive corporations, could be a frightening prospect for workers. In our era of shutdowns, furloughs, and layoffs, employee organizing often proves to be workers’ best hope for exercising power in the workplace. And Google’s actions, paired with the administration’s agenda, could threaten that power.

“It sounds like Google is talking out of both sides of its corporate mouth, trying to pacify employees,” Schwartz said. “But then it advocates to the government to squelch workers’ rights to concerted activities.”

That might just be something to walk out for.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WkeGML
via IFTTT