Venezuela’s Maduro rejects EU ultimatum on fresh elections

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has rejected calls by European nations to hold early elections, calling the opposition leader’s self-declaration as president constitutionally null.

“Nobody can give us an ultimatum,” Maduro said in an interview with broadcaster CNN Turk aired on Sunday, a day after France, Germany and Spain threatened to recognise opposition leader Juan Guaido as president if elections were not announced within eight days.

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini also issued a statement that said the bloc as a whole could recognise Guaido if steps toward new elections were not taken “over the next days”.

WATCH: Venezuela – US accused of interference (02:42)

Maduro’s foreign minister, Jorge Arreaza, had already rejected the deadline during an emergency UN Security Council meeting on Saturday.

“Venezuela will not allow anyone to impose on us any decision or order,” Arreaza said, adding that Caracas has “excellent friends” it can call on for support to defend itself.

Washington, which was among the first to recognise Guaido as leader of the oil-rich country, urged the world on Saturday to “pick a side” on Venezuela and financially disconnect from Maduro’s government.

“Now, it is time for every other nation to pick a side. No more delays, no more games. Either you stand with the forces of freedom, or you’re in league with [Nicolas] Maduro and his mayhem,” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told the UNSC on Saturday.

Guaido stunned Venezuelans on Wednesday by declaring himself interim president before cheering supporters in the Venezuelan capital, buoyed by massive anti-government protests.

An industrial engineer by training, Guaido was elected to the Nation Assembly in 2015.

The 35-year-old also served as the head of the comptroller commission that investigations allegations of government corruption.

WATCH: Venezuela opposition leader declares himself interim president (09:15)

Meanwhile, on Saturday, Maduro seemed to go back on his decision to expell US diplomatic staff from Venezuela.

The embattled leader said on Wednesday that Caracas would break off diplomatic relations with the US and gave it a 72-hour deadline to pull out its diplomats from the country.

Maduro told CNN that he was open to dialogue with President Donald Trump, which he said was unlikely but not entirely impossible. 

Maduro has by and large retained the loyalty of the country’s armed forces, except for the defection of a military attache to Washington who pledged allegiance to Guaido.

Colonel Jose Luis Silva declared himself a supporter of Guaido, saying: “He is the only legitimate president.”

WATCH: Inside Story – How to solve the political crisis in Venezuela (24:42)

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WmUc6f
via IFTTT

‘SNL’ drags ‘The Bachelor’ hard in a ‘Virgin Hunk’ parody

The latest season of The Bachelor kicked off on Jan. 7, featuring former NFL linebacker and self-admitted virgin Colton Underwood as the object of the 30 contestants’ desires. (Or whatever, The Bachelor is weird.)

This Saturday Night Live sketch recasts the show as Virgin Hunk and completely shreds it, taking potshots at the awkward speed dating vibe, the conniving and manipulative behavior it takes to win, and the IRL show’s struggles with diversity. 

The whole thing only works as a comedy sketch because the women of Saturday Night Live are so damn funny.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2UjRAE7
via IFTTT

College Basketball Player Turned WWE Star Nia Jax Not Afraid to Fight Back

B/R

It was a month before Christmas, and Nia Jax had just punched Becky Lynch in the face.



Everything in the world of professional wrestling is supposed to look real. The whole point is to make the audience suspend their disbelief long enough to buy into a storyline.

That’s the magic of good pro wrestling: We know what we’re seeing, yet we still question it. But then there are the moments that are indisputably real.

Lynch—a veteran wrestler who recently experienced a meteoric rise to the top of WWE after christening herself “The Man”—had joined her SmackDown teammates to “invade” WWE’s Raw show on Nov. 12. They were there to hype the upcoming Survivor Series matches between the WWE’s Raw and SmackDown brands.

Jax had her back to the corner of the ring when Lynch approached her. Jax swung a right hand toward Lynch’s face. The WWE’s main broadcast angle made it look like the punch missed entirely. But one look at Lynch told a different story: Blood was pouring out of her broken nose and covering her blue SmackDown shirt.

Jax quickly headed backstage. Her first stop was to check in on Lynch to make sure she was OK. Lynch assured her she was fine. Jax then sought out Vince McMahon to make sure the boss was comfortable with what had just happened. He was.

Jax retreated into herself that night. It’s what she tends to do in big moments or before big performances; she becomes self-reflective, quiet and withdrawn. As she reflected on what happened hours earlier in the ring and got a taste of the hatred fans were sending her way on social media for punching Lynch, she realized something important.

What happened next could be good or bad for her career. But it was an opportunity.


WWE

Long before the world knew her as Nia Jax, Savelina Fanene was born on May 29, 1984, in Sydney, Australia. Her family moved to Hawaii shortly after, where Jax and her cousins would play games in lush green fields until the sun came down.

When she was five or six years old, Jax discovered an old newspaper clipping on her dad’s bedroom nightstand. She picked it up and looked at the photograph on the newsprint: It was her father’s cousin Peter Maivia, the famous “High Chief” wrestler and patriarch of the legendary Anoa’i pro wrestling family Jax and her cousin Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson were part of.

In the photo, Maivia was covered in so much blood that his hair was drenched in it. But he was grinning ear to ear, and he was holding a bright championship belt.

“He had this big smile on his face,” Jax says. “I thought it was one of the coolest things I’d ever seen.”

Her father, Joseph Fanene, discovered Jax staring at the newspaper and reassured her that Maivia wasn’t hurt. “He’s OK, Bubby Girl,” he told her, using the moniker he’d given her. “It’s OK. He’s not hurt.”

Jax wasn’t sure. After all, Maivia was covered in blood. How could he be OK?

“That was my first experience with wrestling and with our family legacy,” she says. But unlike others in her family—and in other families with histories in professional wrestling—Jax had no intention of becoming a professional wrestler. Not back then, anyway. She was an athlete, and her sport was basketball. She wanted to play in the WNBA.

After a few years in Hawaii, Jax’s family moved to Carson, California, a small but growing town north of Los Angeles. When she was 18, a modeling agent saw her at an “air band” performance—think of it as a lip sync battle on steroids—and a few days later asked her if she had ever considered modeling. She hadn’t, but she approached her father to discuss the opportunity. “Go for it, Bubby Girl,” he said.

Jax signed a modeling contract with Wilhelmina International Inc., one of the top agencies in the world. She moved to New York and began her modeling career, but after a short time, she started to miss athletics. She moved back to California and enrolled at Palomar College in San Diego, where she played basketball. She played two solid seasons before being offered another scholarship, this time at Cal State San Bernardino.

The offer brought Jax to a fork in the road. She’d had surgery to repair her knees three times. Maybe basketball wasn’t her future.

“I think the Lord was trying to tell me something,” Jax says.

She enrolled at Cal State San Marcos instead and finished her business degree while continuing to model on the side.

Then, as if by fate, she found her way into the family business.


PARIS, FRANCE - MAY 19:  Nia Jax attends WWE Live AccorHotels Arena Popb Paris Bercy on May 19, 2018 in Paris, France.  (Photo by Sylvain Lefevre/Getty Images)

Sylvain Lefevre/Getty Images

Jax was attending WrestleMania 28 with her aunt when she had a revelation: This was something she could do. With her family’s encouragement, Jax signed up at a wrestling school—the same school where her cousin Dwayne had originally trained—and quickly discovered that she had an aptitude for professional wrestling. After just a few days of training, she was tops in her class.

On May 7, 2014, Jax signed with World Wrestling Entertainment and reported to the WWE Performance Center in Orlando, Florida.

Her first day at her new job was surreal; in her class was Finn Balor, who had enormous success as Prince Devitt in Japan before signing with WWE, and Dash Wilder, who is now half of the popular tag team The Revival.

New signees at the performance center are not allowed to even get in a ring for at least the first month after they arrive. There’s a lot of physical training and discussions about pro wrestling and psychology, but you don’t set foot in a ring until they believe you are ready.

Just as Jax was about to start actually practicing professional wrestling, she and her aunt Ata Maivia Johnson—The Rock’s mother—were involved in a serious car crash in August 2014. Jax’s injuries sidelined her for months, but she returned to training in early 2015.

Four months later, she was told she’d be making her in-ring debut.

“I was like, ‘What? It’s only been four months of training,’” Jax says. “‘What is going on here?’”

But she had immense faith in Sara Amato, a veteran wrestler who trains new female signees at the performance center, and decided to listen when Amato gave her a pep talk.

“You don’t understand what you have,” Amato told her. “You’re going to do fine.”

“She saw something in me that I didn’t even see in myself at the time,” Jax says.

Amato spent extra time with Jax, encouraging her and going through film of Jax’s practice sessions to critique her performance. Jax (using the name Zada) made her in-ring debut at an NXT live event May 7, 2015, teaming with Devin Taylor against Bayley and Carmella in the third match on the show. She was nervous. Even as she made her way into the ring, she was telling herself: “You can do this. You can do this.”

But once she hit the ring, instinct took over. She could do this. Better yet, she was born for this.

Just four months after her debut, vignettes began airing on NXT television announcing her impending arrival as Nia Jax. In October 2015, she made her official television debut, beating Evie (Dakota Kai) in just over two minutes.

Just like that, she was off to the races. Less than a year after her first television match, Jax was drafted to Raw’s roster and began her WWE career in earnest.


In the days following the Lynch accident, Jax did a lot of thinking.

“Everything’s an opportunity in our business, whether you think it is or not,” Jax says. “When the incident with Becky happened, it probably was one of those moments that I really was like, ‘Oh my gosh, this is a huge turning point in my career. This could go extremely horribly for me and might be the end of my career. Or we can turn this into something pretty cool for not just me, but for others that are involved.’”

Jax drew inspiration for her next steps from a movie. The Campaign is a political comedy starring Will Ferrell and Zach Galifianakis as bumbling politicians running for a Congressional seat in their home state.

During one campaign stop, Ferrell and Galifianakis are shaking hands and kissing babies when Ferrell accidentally punches a newborn baby right in the face. Ferrell’s response to the baby-punching incident is to question why nobody asked him how his hand was feeling. It is tone-deaf, oblivious and quite funny.

Jax, a huge fan of the movie, decided to incorporate it into her character following the incident. She hopped on Twitter, shared a photo of her injured hand and asked why nobody was asking her about it.

🌺 @NiaJaxWWE

Hey…we don’t deliver mail, things happen. Is anyone gonna ask me about how my fist feels? https://t.co/RjRVcVWTEQ

The response from WWE fans was swift and ugly. She’d injured their favorite performer, and they let her know how they felt about it.

“Oh man. That was it,” Jax says. “The things that were said about me!”

Fan outcry was so brutal that her colleagues began checking in to see if she was OK. She called The Rock to discuss the situation. He was good at taking any situation and making it work to his advantage, and he encouraged her to do the same.

Jax spent Christmas with Charlotte Flair, a WWE star who is one of her closest friends outside the ring. Flair, the daughter of Ric Flair, one of the greatest performers in the history of the sport, encouraged her to look on the bright side. A rising tide lifts all boats, and Jax’s errant punch had helped to create a fervor and tension around the women’s championship picture.

“At the moment, I know it sucks. But look what it’s done for Becky. Look what it’s done for me,” Flair told her. “Look what it’s done for you as a heel.”

Flair’s words of encouragement helped Jax see how good things could come out of a bad situation. “I didn’t really think of it that way when I was getting told to go die and never come out of my hole again,” Jax says. “Some of the tweets really were going off the rails. But when she put it in that perspective, I started to think about it differently. Now, it’s something that people will remember forever. It was crazy, but it turned into something pretty cool.”


WWE

Jax’s in-ring persona could not be more different from who she is in real life.

Though her wrestling persona has tended toward dastardly deeds, in reality she’s funny, smart and sarcastic. She is using her blossoming career to help her capitalize on a couple of projects she’s passionate about outside the ring. One such project is WWE’s Be a STAR campaign, which seeks to end bullying among youth.

“I grew up not being the same as everybody else. When you’re young, you just want to fit in, and then you get bullied when you don’t look like everyone else,” Jax says. “It’s OK to be different. It’s OK to be unique. Look where being unique has gotten me.

“I love promoting that message to young boys and young girls who feel like they don’t fit in. I want them to know there’s nothing wrong with not fitting in. Nobody should feel less than others just because they don’t fit in.”

Jax treats the subject of body positivity with the same passion. She’s larger than your typical female WWE superstar, and to her, that’s a good thing. It gives her another platform to reach young kids who might not be enthused about the way they look solely because they don’t look like everyone else. They don’t fit the mold, and that’s OK. It’s better than OK, actually. It’s beautiful.

“I want the young fans that we have to be able to say: ‘Look at Nia Jax out there. She’s embracing her body. She’s embracing who she is, and she’s showing the whole world,’” Jax says. “‘She’s walking down the runway in front of people.’ That’s very empowering for everybody, and that’s extremely important for me.”


On Sunday, Jax will compete in the second women’s Royal Rumble match. The winner goes on to face the champion of her choosing at WrestleMania, which means we could see Jax in the ring with Ronda Rousey, Lynch, Asuka or an unforeseen titleholder.

When she walks through the curtain in Phoenix to make her entrance, boos will cascade down from fans.

Which is perfectly fine with Jax.

Everything is an opportunity, after all.

And she’s going to make the most of this one.

Nia Jax competes in the 2nd annual women’s Royal Rumble match tonight on the WWE Network.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2DDzNSZ
via IFTTT

Donald Trump and Roger Stone wrote their own SNL Weekend Update jokes

It was a big week in U.S. politics. Donald Trump’s temper tantrum-fueled partial shutdown of the government came to an end, for one. And Roger Stone, a longtime Trump ally and adviser, because the latest figure in the president’s orbit to be indicted.

I’m starting to think this Trump guy might have done some crimes at some point. But I digress.

Those two nuclear news items — the government re-opening and the fall of Stone — dominated an entire Weekend Update segment on Saturday Night Live. Inherently funny stuff. Trump is, of course, well-established as an incoherent idiot. And Stone… the facts of that guy’s life are absurd. Make sure you watch this one until the end.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G5kBQ7
via IFTTT

Harvey Weinstein documentary ‘Untouchable’ hits Sundance: Review

A young Harvey Weinstein.
A young Harvey Weinstein.

Image: Barbara Alper / Getty Images / Sundance Institute

2017%252f05%252f02%252fd1%252fangiehanheadshothighres3.50ab4.jpg%252f90x90By Angie Han

Harvey Weinstein and Sundance have a history.

The producer had long been a fixture, picking up future hits and hobnobbing with talent. It was also, we learned in 2017, where he perpetrated some terrible crimes. In 2018, Weinstein sat out the festival for the first time since the ’80s.

In 2019, Weinstein had a presence at the fest yet again – but not as a power player on the ground. This year, he is the subject of Untouchable, Ursula Macfarlane’s 98-minute documentary about the abuses he’s waged on others over the past four decades.

SEE ALSO: ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ pulled from GLAAD Media Awards after sexual assault allegations

If you’ve been following the Weinstein story since The New Yorker and The New York Times blew it open, Untouchable won’t have any new bombshells to offer. The stories are ones we’ve heard before, from victims who’ve gone on the record in other articles. The observations about Weinstein’s character and talent and personality, and the recollections about the toxic work environment he created, feel familiar by now.

And for all Untouchable rails against the systemic injustices that kept Weinstein in power, and the complicity of the people who looked the other way, it doesn’t really shed any new light on on the institutions or the industry that let him flourish.

What Untouchable does have is the power of these women’s stories, told by them directly to the camera. Though the information isn’t new, the camera picks up other details the printed word can’t: the long pause as one woman struggles with words she can barely bring herself to form, the tremor in another’s voice as she remembers how she tried to piece herself back together. 

The fact that Untouchable is at Sundance this year instead of Harvey Weinstein is certainly a step forward.

The tales from others – like the male executive who remained with Miramax after one of his female friends told him she’d been raped by him – are less harrowing, but serve a similar purpose: All of these firsthand accounts make flesh and blood the people Weinstein affected. 

Untouchable finishes on a tentative note. On the one hand, it presents the #MeToo movement and the Women’s March as a sign that times are changing – “If we could do it in Hollywood, people can do it anywhere.” On the other, it scrupulously points out that locking up one bad person won’t solve the problem.

It’s the part of Untouchable that feels the least confident, but that seems appropriate, too. Even a year and a half after Weinstein’s behavior made front-page headlines, even after he fired from his own company, stripped of his honors, and eventually arrested for his crimes, it remains unclear where we as a society are not just with Weinstein, but with other men like Weinstein.

As Untouchable was making its way to Sundance this year, The Atlantic published an exposé detailing sexual abuse allegations against director Bryan Singer, another Hollywood hotshot whose behavior had long been an open secret. On the first day of Sundance, news broke that Singer would keep his job directing Red Sonja despite those accusations. 

The fact that Untouchable is here this year instead of Weinstein is certainly a step in the right direction. But the actual verdict isn’t in yet. Other abusers still have their jobs and their reputations, and defenders who’ll jump at any opportunity to wonder if these poor men haven’t been punished enough. We’ve still got a long way to go before anyone can reasonably claim Hollywood has solved its sexual abuse problem.

So Untouchable ends the only way it really can: with a voice warning, “It’s not over. It continues.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2FQmQHH
via IFTTT

We really need a new word for binge-watching

In Binged, Mashable breaks down why we binge-watch, how we binge-watch, and what it does to us. Because binge-watching is the new normal.


If you were born a working-class kid near the English city of Leicester before Queen Victoria’s reign, then you may have been one of the first people in the world to use the word “binge.” Which, back then, meant “soaking wood so it swells and won’t leak in the rain.”

The first writer to record the word, in 1848, also mentioned Leicestershire locals had started to use “binge” for another kind of soaking: getting wasted. And that’s how it spread around the world — from alcoholism (binge-drinking) to excessive food consumption (binge-eating, introduced around a century ago), until finally, around 2014, largely thanks to Netflix, we began to talk of binge-watching.  

But now, five years later, it’s time we reconsidered this nasty linguistic turn. 

SEE ALSO: The quest to binge-read ‘Lord of the Rings’ in one day

Yes, I know, this is a strange thing to say in an article that’s part of a series called “Binged.” English is democratic that way; enough people use a word and we all have to adopt it to be understood. But that doesn’t mean we can’t also fight back against a word that starts to sound a little queasy when you, er, binge-use it. (Trust us.) 

The thing about the phrase binge-watching is it’s the only one of those three kinds of consumption where the meaning has flipped. Try telling everyone in the office you binged on vodka every night this week; you’d get fearful looks and a meeting with your manager. Boasting about binges that involve family-sized bags of chips and whole cakes? Your doctor may want a word about life-threatening eating disorders

So why is it socially acceptable to talk about binge-watching the latest hot Netflix series? Unlike those other contexts, it isn’t really an addiction — not unless you find yourself on an uncontrollable, self-hating downward spiral where you have to go back to Season 1, Episode 1 over and over again, forgoing your sleep, your health, your job. 

Spoiler alert: Even the Battlestar Galactica-obsessed characters in this famous 2012 Portlandia sketch did not go that far.  

Alternatives to binging

Synonyms for binge include spree and jamboree. Both of which would be more fun, if a little twee — later, guys, I’m going on a TV spree! If you want to get a little more medieval about it, you could talk about a televisual feast.  

At the same time, modern English already has a perfectly good, positive, aspirational word used to describe consuming many pieces of entertainment in a row — it’s a marathon. These days, it seems, the word is most commonly connected to movies — but starting with Nick at Nite in 1985, TV channels used to call multi-episode blocks of the same show a marathon.

Why marathon hasn’t been applied to the streaming realm isn’t clear. Maybe comparing non-stop streaming to running 26.2 miles at a time when more of us than ever have actually done the latter, just sounds too much like a humblebrag. Binge-watching may have become popular because it is self-deprecating: Hey, I was just stuffing tons of crud into my eyeballs!

Yet we actually have more reason to use marathon in the Golden Age of TV, where plenty of shows that have better plots and production values than Oscar-winning movies. (Game of Thrones vs. Argo? No contest. Sorry, Ben Affleck). 

Even if what you’re marathoning is Gossip Girl rather than The Wire, there’s no need to think of it as a low-nutrition, low-culture guilty pleasure that you’re “binging.” This scene from the 2000 movie Finding Forrester, in which famous reclusive writer Sean Connery boasts of having the New York Times for his main course of reading and the trashy National Enquirer for dessert, has the unapologetic truth of it.   

The problem is that our language isn’t precise enough yet. There are at least two kinds of behavior that we mean when we talk about binge-watching. There’s the kind where you watch an episode, get sucked in by the cliff-hanger, and fire up the next episode even though you had other things you wanted to do instead: wash, rinse, repeat. 

Sure, let’s call that version binging; there is at least a small element of out-of-control behavior involved. Stomach-churning, guilt-inducing procrastination is somewhat binge-worthy.

But then there are the times when your whole goal is to watch a lot of TV. You’ve had a long hard day, or it’s a rainy weekend, or you’re fighting off the flu. You just want to crash on the couch, snuggle up with blankets and a pet and maybe (just maybe) a significant other, and watch a show that isn’t hard to follow and makes you feel good: Parks and Rec, say. 

Good for you! Own it! Treat yourself!

What alternative name could we could call this type of positive viewing: Treat TV, perhaps? My classy colleague Alexis Nedd proposed an even classier name: a TV retreat. Yes, we’re retreating from reality for a while, just as we do when we take a spa day or a hot springs weekend. 

In both cases when we return, we feel relaxed, with an inscrutable grin on our faces from all the fun we’ve been through. 

After all, given the word’s origin as a synonym for soaking, we could accurately describe a nice bath as taking a binge. There’s a reason why we don’t: It sounds way too negative for what it is. The same rationale should apply to the gentle, uplifting soaking of our poor overworked brains in the light of the big screen. 

Float on and enjoy your TV retreat, everyone. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2HAixSL
via IFTTT

Novak Djokovic Beats Rafael Nadal to Win 2019 Australian Open Men’s Final

Serbia's Novak Djokovic reacts after a point against Spain's Rafael Nadal during the men's singles final on day 14 of the Australian Open tennis tournament in Melbourne on January 27, 2019. (Photo by Greg Wood / AFP) / -- IMAGE RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE - STRICTLY NO COMMERCIAL USE --        (Photo credit should read GREG WOOD/AFP/Getty Images)

GREG WOOD/Getty Images

Novak Djokovic won a record seventh Australian Open on Sunday, as he cruised past Rafael Nadal in the final 6-3, 6-2, 6-3.

The world No. 1 and top seed, who is now a 15-time Grand Slam champion, put in a spellbinding performance, having secured a vice-like grip on the match from the off.

Djokovic dominated the early exchanges with some exceptional play on serve, leaving Nadal, who hadn’t lost a set in this competition, looking surprisingly short of ideas. That trend continued throughout the match, with the Serb playing to a stunning standard.

Djokovic, who has won three Grand Slams in a row, is the only man to have won this event seven times, moving clear of six-time winners Roy Emerson and Roger Federer.

Djokovic Makes History Down Under

MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA - JANUARY 27:  Novak Djokovic of Serbia celebrates a point in his Men's Singles Final match against Rafael Nadal of Spain during day 14 of the 2019 Australian Open at Melbourne Park on January 27, 2019 in Melbourne, Australia.  (Photo

Cameron Spencer/Getty Images

Given his record in previous Australian Open finals—Djokovic was six from six on this stage—it was no shock to see him settle into this match the quicker of the two players.

Nadal was tight in the initial exchanges, and his opponent capitalised, grabbing a break on Nadal’s first service game and moving 3-0 up. From that point, there was never any chance of the Spaniard getting back into the set.

Nadal, who was looking for his first Australian Open title since 2009, was making some basic errors too:

#AusOpen @AustralianOpen

Finals jitters for Rafa?

#AusOpen https://t.co/xs2LMyttQy

Meanwhile, on the back of some remarkable serving, Djokovic was able to canter to the opening set, with the second seed unable to make any impression when returning:

SI Tennis @SI_Tennis

Djokovic wins 20 of 21 points on his serve and takes the first set, 6-3.

He looks mighty tough to beat tonight… https://t.co/smfL2UFl6b

After losing the first set, a response was expected from Nadal at the start of the second, but the stanza followed a similar pattern to the opener. If anything, the chasm between the two men grew.

At 2-2, Djokovic was able to grab another break to take control of the second set. In the next game, his serve came under pressure for the first time, as Nadal pushed the game to deuce; even so, the top seed found the answers and consolidated.

Nadal had no answer for Djokovic at times.

Nadal had no answer for Djokovic at times.Michael Dodge/Getty Images

From there, he turned on the style, with more excellent shots forcing another break. Djokovic wrapped up the second set with three consecutive aces. Tennis journalist Tumaini Carayol commented on how demoralising the match was becoming for Nadal:

Tumaini Carayol @tumcarayol

Nadal absolutely crushes a forehand return, then watches Djokovic redirect it past him and then serve three aces. This is cruel.

As statistician Mohandas Menon relayed, with this kind of advantage, the Serb has proved to be virtually unbeatable:

Mohandas Menon @mohanstatsman

In Grand Slam events, results..
when Rafael Nadal is down 2 sets:Won2-Lost17 (11%)
when Novak Djokovic is up 2 sets:Won187-Lost1 (99%) – lost only to Austrian Jurgen Melzer at Roland Garros in QF 2010
#AusOpen

At the start of the third set, Djokovic continued to pour on the punishment. He produced a remarkable winner to begin the third game. And after some sloppy play from the Spaniard, another break was secured.

Per Ben Rothenberg of the New York Times, Nadal was on course for an unfamiliarly heavy loss:

Ben Rothenberg @BenRothenberg

Nadal has never lost in straight sets in a Slam final before. #AusOpen

The second seed looked like he knew it too, as Djokovic coasted through the remainder of the set behind his unflappable serve to add yet another Grand Slam to his trophy cabinet.

Djokovic is comfortably the standout player in the men’s game, and he appears on course for a remarkable 2019 after this stunning start to the year.

After resting up following this latest triumph, thoughts will turn to the French Open. The prospect of this version of Djokovic going toe-to-toe with Nadal on clay is a mouthwatering one.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2S8sElH
via IFTTT

15 pictures that are not at all what they seem

2019%252f01%252f14%252f0a%252f37332315 1821935147865956 8602836188425879552 n.82af5.jpg%252f90x90By Sage Anderson

In the age of Photoshop, you never know what photos have been edited beyond belief.  

But sometimes, weird optical illusions can occur. These photographic tricks leave our brain filling in the gaps in hilarious, weird, and sometimes raunchy ways. 

SEE ALSO: 23 Pictures That You Have to Look at Twice

Let yourself do a double take, because not everything is as it seems. 

1. 

2.

3.

4.

5.

6. 

7. 

8.

9. 

10. 

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2DD7fcq
via IFTTT

The Foolish Quest to Be the Next Barack Obama

Kamala Harris was dubbed the “Female Obama” even before she announced she was going to “pull off an Obama-sized feat in 2020,” as McClatchy put it when the California senator formally entered the Democratic presidential primary this week. Now, her campaign envisions replicating the coalition that backed Barack Obama’s 2008 primary upset: “Asians, Latinos and other voters of color, as well as educated white liberals” and young voters.

Julián Castro has the same idea. After the 44-year old grandson of Mexican immigrants announced his candidacy, his brother Joaquín predicted that he would have “strong support” among Obama voters because “his message resonates” with them.

Story Continued Below

Julián Castro’s fellow Texan Beto O’Rourke was also touted as Obama’s natural political successor. “He’s Barack Obama, but white,” said one anonymous donor to POLITICO, marveling at O’Rourke’s Senate campaign and his online fundraising haul.

Other candidates, still waiting in the wings, can be expected to eye the Obama coalition for themselves. If Cory Booker or former Attorney General Eric Holder enter the race, surely more Obama comparisons will be made. Nobody would confuse Joe Biden for Barack Obama, but he does have the unique credential of having been Obama’s vice president and would hope to impress his voters. Bernie Sanders, who won over young white progressives but not older African-Americans in 2016, has been spending more time in front of black audiences ever since.

The demographic path Obama charted in the 2008 Democratic primary is a tantalizing one: Put together African-Americans with young voters and white liberals who live near Whole Foods, and you can send every other Democrat packing. But there’s a big problem with trying to recreate Obama’s 2008 success in 2020. In a field with so many choices and so much diversity, African-American voters are far less likely to function as a monolithic bloc.

The black vote became decisive in 2008 once the field winnowed down to Obama and Hillary Clinton. Clinton’s early polling lead was buoyed by African-Americans. But after Obama captured the hearts of liberal white Iowans, African-Americans recognized he had a shot at making history, and thereafter were nearly unanimous in rallying to his side.

Where that made the biggest difference was in the Southern states of South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana, where African-Americans accounted for about half of the Democratic electorate. Obama edged Clinton in the entire race by only 29 pledged delegates, and those five states netted Obama 65 more delegates than Clinton won—more than doubling his eventual margin of victory.

Eight years later, African-American primary voters held no grudges and gave Clinton their overwhelming support. In turn, Clinton racked up a 153-delegate lead over Sanders in those five crucial Southern states. She netted another 122 delegates over Sanders in Tennessee, Texas and Virginia—three Super Tuesday states where black voters were between one-fifth and one-third of Democratic primary voters. (In Texas, Clinton also beat Sanders handily among Latinos, who made up one-third of the vote.) Those eight states helped Clinton by early March build a lead that was essentially mathematically impossible for Sanders to overcome, and accounted for most of Clinton’s final pledged-delegate margin of victory of 359.

Clinton’s 2016 coalition diverged from Obama’s in one key respect: The white part of her coalition was mainly composed of more moderate, less educated senior citizens instead of younger progressives likely to hold college degrees. But the clear constant in the two victories was bedrock black support.

The power of the black vote was evident in the 2018 Democratic primaries, too. African-American Stacey Abrams romped over her white opponent in Georgia’s gubernatorial primary. In Florida, Andrew Gillum, the lone African-American in a seven-person field, eked out a victory with a little more than one-third of vote after running up the score in four populous counties with large black constituencies. Abrams and Gillum ran to the left in their primaries, hewing closely to the Obama ’08 model by bringing white progressives into their winning coalitions.

This trend is why the South Carolina presidential primary—the first majority-black primary in 2020—is garnering increased attention at the expense of the lily-white affairs in Iowa and New Hampshire. And appropriately so. Black voters are a major component of the Democratic Party and should play a sizable role in picking the nominee.

But their role may be more complex this time around. The primaries of 2008 and 2016 quickly came down to binary choices. In 2008, North Carolina’s John Edwards limped into the South Carolina primary, came in third, and called it quits, making it a two-person race for the rest of the South and beyond. And 2016 was always a contest between Clinton and Sanders (Jim Webb’s plea for time notwithstanding). With the white vote divided, once black voters forcefully swung behind Clinton, the race was over.

This white male pundit has no special insight into the mindset of today’s African-American voters. But early polling suggests they are not rushing unanimously toward any one bandwagon. This week’s POLITICO/Morning Consult poll shows Biden leading among African-Americans with 26 percent, followed by Sanders with 14 percent. Harris comes in third with 7 percent (most of the poll was conducted just before she announced her candidacy) while Booker (2 percent) and Holder (1 percent) are near the bottom of the pack.

It is often noted that Obama trailed Clinton in early 2007 polling, and that was among black voters as well. But even back in January of that year, the same stage of the primary season as today, Obama was scoring double digits and held a solid second place, ahead of more established figures like Edwards, John Kerry and Al Gore. None of the current and probable candidates of color begin the race in the strong position Obama held.

Early polling is not always predictive because many voters aren’t yet paying close attention. But according to South Carolina’s leading African-American politician, Rep. Jim Clyburn, the black voters who are paying attention are still shopping, albeit from an initial short list. “From African-Americans, I’ve only heard three names being discussed: that’s Booker, Harris and Biden” he told the New York Times. He even went as far as to predict Biden, who has long vacationed in South Carolina and maintained political ties to local leaders, would win the state and “everybody else would be running for second place.”

If that proves true, or if no one candidate wins South Carolina by a large margin, it sets up a dynamic different than the recent past. In 2008 and 2016, the landslide winner of South Carolina went on to the sweep the rest of the critical Black Belt states of Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana. This time, South Carolina may be more of a winnower, culling the field but not catapulting one candidate into the lead. Different Southern states may go different ways. No one would reap a decisive delegate haul.

An argument that has gained prominence is that the best way to win a Democratic primary is to be an African-American candidate who runs left. National Journal’s Josh Kraushaar observed after the 2018 gubernatorial primaries: “African-American candidates were able to build an energized Democratic coalition of black voters, white liberals, and younger voters to swamp more-established candidates in primaries. But white liberal candidates struggled to expand their support beyond the most predictable precincts, unable to build racially diverse coalitions for their progressive messages.”

As Theodore R. Johnson further explained in POLITICO Magazine last October, white Democrats have moved left since 2000, but “the notoriously pragmatic black electorate” has not. Fifty-five percent of white Democrats now self-identify as liberals, double the share of black Democrats. Successful progressive black candidates have cannily black voters’ desire “to elect people who understand the experience of being black in America” while also “running to the left of their competition to have a shot at winning white liberals.”

In Slate, Jamelle Bouie speculated along similar lines that a black candidate could have the edge this primary cycle. White candidates, he suggested, either can’t adequately convey “social solidarity” with black voters, or in trying too hard to convey it, spark backlash among white voters. Black candidates, Bouie argues, “can stay somewhat silent on race, embodying the opposition to the president’s racism rather than vocalizing it and allowing them space to focus on economic messaging without triggering the cycle of polarization that [Hillary] Clinton experienced.”

But if black voters are not a political monolith in 2020, that would greatly expand the plausible permutations for assembling a winning coalition in the Democratic primaries. In 2016, Sanders and his democratic socialist “revolution” failed to impress most “notoriously pragmatic” African-Americans. But he did narrowly win among black voters under 30, who are presumably more idealistic. If he held on to that niche and most of his earlier base of young white voters, in a fractured field, that might be enough.

On the other end of the ideological spectrum, former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a possible dark horse entry, has been purposefully antagonizing the left by deriding en vogue ideas like free college for all and a federal job guarantee as “unrealistic ideological promises.” Political suicide in today’s Democratic Party? Maybe. But McAuliffe might be able to convey “solidarity” and win some share of the black vote by selling his biggest gubernatorial accomplishment, restoring the voting rights of approximately 173,000 ex-felons almost single-handedly. Then, with the help of older, moderate white voters, he might rebuild a version of the Hillary ’16 coalition. Weirder things have happened! Though Biden, if he really does have the inside track in South Carolina, would be better positioned to pull off a multiracial coalition of pragmatists.

The candidates who are people of color may have the best grasp on how to win a sufficient amount of narrower slices of the Democratic base. For example, Harris, who has Jamaican and Indian ancestry, is leveraging her membership in the 300,000-member Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, which may help her consolidate college-educated black women. The website Jamaica Global recently praised Harris for emphasizing her Jamaican heritage at a 2018 campaign appearance in South Florida, which has a significant Jamaican-American population. And media outlets in India have taken note of how Harris regularly extols her Indian mother. But despite Harris’ potential for stitching together a broad, racially diverse coalition, if Castro proves successful in consolidating the Latino vote, he could give Harris a scare in her delegate-rich home state of California.

Beyond how well they perform in their own racial and ethnic communities, candidates of color will have to decide which white subgroups to pursue. Johnson’s analysis, written before the November 2018 midterms, raised a red flag. Referring to African-American progressives like Abrams and Gillum, he warned, “If these nominees are unsuccessful, it would suggest, rightly or wrongly, that black progressive candidates may still be a bridge too far for too many Americans, just as Jesse Jackson was in 1984. And it may very well disrupt the white liberal-black voter coalition within the Democratic Party … ”

Abrams and Gillum did lose their general elections in 2018. Therefore, as potent as a progressive black-white coalition can be in the primary, nonwhite Democratic candidates will have to examine whether an overly aggressive pursuit of white progressives would harm their ultimate chances of becoming president. Then again, self-described liberals compose a majority of white Democrats, and you can’t win the general if you don’t win the primary. Harris and Castro, as well as Booker and Holder if they run, probably should still lean left, but they need not feel obligated to chase Sanders to the furthest left pole on everything.

One thing is certain: Even if the black vote doesn’t repeat its Democratic primary role as a monolithic gatekeeper, black voters—plural—are still of the utmost importance. And that means issues affecting the black community are of the utmost importance as well. But candidates and their campaign strategists will need to tailor their messages based on factors like age, education level, region, gender and ideology, just as campaigns often do when wooing white voters. In the process of doing so, they may learn differences in issue priorities and positions among African-American subgroups.

In 2008, the campaign that convinced the most Democrats that it was poised to make history was the campaign that fused the winning coalition. In 2020, the campaign that grasps the complexity of the Democratic Party, and crafts a platform and message to navigate that complexity, will most likely be the campaign that successfully builds its own distinctive, and dominant, coalition.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2HBsvDf
via IFTTT

Iran inches closer to unveiling state-backed cryptocurrency

Shut out of the global financial system, Iran inches closer to a workaround to US sanctions with the possible unveiling of its first state-backed cryptocurrency in the near future.

The virtual currency is anticipated to be announced at the annual two-day Electronic Banking and Payment Systems conference, which kicks off on January 29 in the capital, Tehran. The theme of this year’s gathering is “blockchain revolution.”

Blockchain is a fixed distributed ledger technology that allows a network of computers to verify transactions between two parties, as opposed to validating them through a trusted, third-party entity.

Details of Iran’s new cryptocurrency were revealed last summer, after the Trump administration started re-imposing sanctions on Iran over alleged “malign activities”.

Can Iran survive US sanctions?

The most severe blow to Iran’s economy landed in November, when some of its banks were barred from SWIFT, the Belgian-based global messaging system that facilitates cross-border payments.

Countries excluded from SWIFT cannot pay for imports and cannot receive payment for exports, leaving them crippled financially, and having to rely on alternative methods of moving money.

Iran’s cryptocurrency is expected to be rolled out in phases, first as a rial-backed digital token, to facilitate payments between Iranian banks and other Iranian institutions active in the crypto space, and later possibly as an instrument for the Iranian public to pay for local goods and services.

While it would not directly facilitate payments between Iran and other countries, the state-backed digital currency could lay the groundwork for Iran to join a blockchain-based international payments system that could emerge as an alternative to SWIFT.

There is no official confirmation of an active participation between Iran and other nations in this area, or when any potential multilateral initiatives will yield results, but developments in recent months provide clues.

On November 5, the day the second tranche of US sanctions against Iran came into effect, the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, Abdolnasser Hemmtai, said the regulator has already commenced work on an alternative in anticipation of the SWIFT disconnect.

Crypto-rial

On the other hand, during the ChainPoint 18 conference in Yerevan, Armenia on November 14, Iran signed a trilateral blockchain cooperation agreement with Russia and Armenia.

Following the finalisation of the agreement, the Russian signatory Yuri Pripachkin, who heads the Russian Association of Cryptoindustry and Blockchain, said, “According to our information, an active development of an Iranian version of SWIFT is currently under way.”

Iran looks to Europe as US reimposes sanctions

Russian President Vladimir Putin later said that Russia is “actively working” with partners to establish financial systems that are fully independent of SWIFT without naming partner countries.

Given the long ties between Tehran and Moscow, and the fact that both are sanctioned by the US, it stands to reason that they would eye blockchain technologies to overcome financial restrictions.

Member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) are other likely parties to a potential blockchain-based multilateral financial system.

Following in the footsteps of regional rivals Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, who recently launched a joint cryptocurrency, Iran could also use the crypto-rial or a similar sovereign digital currency to skirt sanctions and trade with other partners.

The Blocking Iranian Illicit Finance Act that was introduced by Senator Ted Cruz on December 13 to sanction Iran’s upcoming sovereign cryptocurrency identifies the governments of China, Russia, Venezuela and Turkey as potential state actors that might aid Iran in developing the crypto-rial.

Beyond facilitating payments as part of bilateral, or multilateral agreements with strategic partners, the crypto-rial will fall short of combating US restrictions.

Coupled with the digital currency’s centralised nature, the sanctions will ensure it will have no place in credible international exchanges. It will fail to give ordinary Iranians an international reach they have been bereft of for decades, just like the fiat currency it is backed by.

Cryptocurrency is growing in popularity but is struggling to achieve mass usage. [Justin Lane/EPA]

That being said, a digital rial will certainly have local advantages. As blockchain and cryptocurrency developer Yashar Rashedi pointed out, one has to note that central bank cryptocurrencies (CBCCs) are not aimed at replacing common cryptocurrencies.

“They certainly can’t replace the likes of Bitcoin due to their centralised nature, but their existence is harmless,” he told Al Jazeera.

“Even as CBCCs may never find widespread everyday use among the general public, they may be able to offer some new features to startups and developers that had to work with centralised bank APIs before them”.

Iran’s evolving stance on crypto

Iran’s official stance on crypto has changed and evolved to give authorities more control over how blockchain technology is integrated into the country’s economy.

Are cryptocurrencies here to stay?

Last April, with the reinstatement of US sanctions looming, Iran issued a blanket ban prohibiting all financial institutions from handling cryptocurrencies, citing concerns over money laundering and other criminal activity.

But the move was also interpreted as an attempt by authorities to prevent capital flight as the Iranian rial plunged to an all-time low.

The same month, officials revealed Iran’s plans for a state-backed cryptocurrency were still on track and that it was working to establish a regulatory framework for crypto.

Officials have since indicated the new regulatory structure could greenlight cryptocurrency “mining” as an industry and possibly license crypto exchanges.

The framework is expected to be announced by the end of the current Iranian year in late March, according to central bank officials.

State-backed crypto-currencies are a far cry from the decentralised financial revolution originally envisioned by crypto-pioneers who were early to embrace Bitcoin, the most well-known digital currency.

The US reimposed sanctions against Iran in August and November. [Abedin Taherkenareh/EPA]

Bitcoin is not controlled by any state or central authority and offers anonymity to those using it for peer-to-peer transactions. A decentralised network of computers spread across the globe verifies Bitcoin transactions and mines new Bitcoins.

Prospects of a digital currency

By contrast, Iranian officials have announced that the country’s virtual currency will be controlled by Iran’s central bank and built on a private blockchain infrastructure that could not be mined.

Iran is not the first government to attempt to co-opt the crypto space to help its ailing economy.

Venezuela launched a controversial, state-backed cryptocurrency, the petro, last year. Allegedly backed by the country’s oil reserves, the petro has been widely derided.

Doubts hang over Bitcoin’s future

The Trump administration banned trade in the Venezuelan petro.

While Iran’s digital currency faces many hurdles, some of the country’s crypto enthusiasts believe the government’s embrace of blockchain could create a more fertile environment for the sector.

“It will create the possibility of tokenising things and may increasingly bring the general public into the fold in terms of online exchange of money, something that will end up to the benefit of entrepreneurs,” Tehran-based millennial blockchain entrepreneur Amir Habibzadeh told Al Jazeera.

“On the other hand, moving toward blockchain-based transactions will ultimately mean real-time clearance and will open up possibilities for replacing the incumbent SHETAB interbank payment system with a blockchain-enabled alternative,” he said.

Soroush Hakimi, a 26-year-old Iranian neuropsychologist working to develop a blockchain-based crowdfunding platform, is hopeful the country’s regulators would not stifle innovation.

“I’m very hopeful about the future,” he told Al Jazeera.

“Startups working in this field have established a good benchmark while research groups and blockchain labs at universities have significantly grown, so I see both the government and academia honing in on blockchain technologies.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2HAkxuh
via IFTTT