Super Bowl Opening Night 2019

  1. Gronk Dodges Retirement Questions 🎥

    via Twitter

  2. Wade Phillips Says Donald Will Be DPOY Again 🎥

    via Twitter

  3. McCourty Twins Talk Trash to Each Other at the Podium 😆🎥

    via Twitter

  4. Gronk Going Wild 😆

    Yahoo Sports @YahooSports

    Never change Gronk 😂

    (via @nflnetwork) https://t.co/l8Daxchq7z

  5. McCourty Doesn’t Like Gronk’s Moves 😅

    NFL @NFL

    “Gronk was just dancing some of the worst dance moves I’ve ever seen.” 👀

    @McCourtyTwins

    📺: #SBOpeningNight on @NFLNetwork https://t.co/iDOq93AbQv

  6. Respect

    NFL @NFL

    Belichick and McVay. So much respect. 💯💯💯 #SBLIII

    📺: #SBOpeningNight on @NFLNetwork https://t.co/zt1UAPiZMR

  7. All the Sharks 😂

    Los Angeles Rams @RamsNFL

    .@marcuspeters: world traveler 😂

    #SBOpeningNight | #SBLIII https://t.co/V96EDouDpu

  8. Brady and Talib Remember Playing Together 🎥

    via Twitter

  9. The Teams Shake Hands on Opening Night 🤝🎥

    via Twitter

  10. True That 👏

    NBC Sports Radio @NBCSportsRadio

    @NdamukongSuh said “Brady’s a future HOFer…its an honor to sack him” https://t.co/8StesdiTvd

  11. Never Gets Old

    Henry McKenna @McKennAnalysis

    Here was a Sean McVay recall test. https://t.co/is6XchJnEo

  12. Talking Shop on Opening Night

    NFL @NFL

    #SBLIII QBs!

    See you Sunday. #SBOpeningNight https://t.co/jaIifQaNEa

  13. Issa Photoshoot

    Los Angeles Rams @RamsNFL

    Photos by @marcuspeters™

    #SBOpeningNight | #SBLIII https://t.co/F2dJopUxdW

  14. Bill’s in the Building

    Andy Nesbitt @anezbitt

    Bill Belichick is here. https://t.co/MfRkLt6mvX

  15. Anderson Knows

    Jori Epstein @JoriEpstein

    Rams RB C.J. Anderson asked if he can say anything nice about Patriots.

    Anderson: “Oh yeah, Tom Brady he the GOAT!” 🐐

  16. The Circus Is in Town

    Matt Lombardo @MattLombardoNFL

    #SuperBowl Opening Night has always been a circus. This year, there’s an actual clown credentialed and asking questions … 🤡 https://t.co/jUHdMupmQZ

  17. Talib Says He Sets the Drip Tone for a Team 😂💎

    via Twitter

  18. Suh Letting People Know

    Thomas O’Toole @ByThomasOToole

    Ndamukong Suh asked what people get wrong about him: “They think I’m a villain on and off the field. Just don’t take my play as who I am.” https://t.co/qx7tH3Pupr

  19. Donald Knows Rams Defense Is Stacked

    NFL @NFL

    “You got myself. You got @DanteFowler. You got @MichaelBrockers. You got @samysosa_3. You got @NdamukongSuh.”

    @AaronDonald97 is confident in the @RamsNFL pass rush 💪 #SBLIII

    📺: #SBOpeningNight on @NFLNetwork https://t.co/Jb3Pa2YXZN

  20. Suh Is on It

    Kevin Duffy @KevinRDuffy

    Suh says the Patriots offense starts with the running game. https://t.co/f9KCLbWrsB

  21. Revenge Game?

    Cecil Lammey @CecilLammey

    Brandin Cooks talks about his trade as “fuel to the fire” #SBLIII @1043TheFan says “we know Patriots do a lot of different things. We need to focus on ourselves and our gameplan.” https://t.co/6OeGKb410a

  22. McVay’s Boots 👀

    Jonathan Jones @jjones9

    Sean McVay’s white boots https://t.co/6ZSjbSZV2x

  23. Gurley Due for a Big Game 👀

    NFL @NFL

    “Things didn’t finish out as strong as they started…

    But I’m here at the @SuperBowl!” – @TG3II 😁

    📺: #SBOpeningNight on @NFLNetwork https://t.co/mIgKX0LvPe

  24. McVay Praises Brady

    CBS Sports Network @CBSSportsNet

    What’s it like standing on the opposite sideline of Tom Brady?

    Sean McVay explains to @Nate13Burleson that sometimes it’s hard to not get caught up in the awe of arguably the greatest QB ever. https://t.co/3JNRTxBDA2

  25. Cooks Didn’t Forget Where He Came From

    Mark Daniels @MarkDanielsPJ

    Brandin Cooks says he became a smarter player thanks to Bill Belichick and Josh McDaniels https://t.co/KdsqN9AzNF

  26. He’d Be Impossible to Tackle

    Cecil Lammey @CecilLammey

    Aaron Donald says he wanted to be a RB but ate himself out of that opportunity. Was a big fan of Jerome Bettis. #SBLIII @1043TheFan https://t.co/50wMuabek0

  27. Aqib Talib Ready 👏

    NFL Network @nflnetwork

    .@AqibTalib21 is feeling it!

    📺: #SBOpeningNight Live on NFL Network https://t.co/E1lysfQWJ1

  28. He’s Okay 😅

    Mark Craig @markcraignfl

    Not a bad defensive player … https://t.co/an7u7ITu66

  29. Gurley on the Runway

    Los Angeles Rams @RamsNFL

    .@TG3II takes the stage at #SBOpeningNight!

    #SBLIII | #LARams https://t.co/iEBfSAx1J6

  30. Goff’s Reaction ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    Brooke Pryor @bepryor

    Jared Goff also seems a little confused with this entrance https://t.co/j8xaYB6bYu

  31. Wade Quotes Future 😯

    Bleacher Report @BleacherReport

    Wade Phillips a @1future fan?! 😂

    “I’ve been poppin’ since my demo.”

    (via @RamsNFL)
    https://t.co/bHF1ETz77n

  32. Media Day for the Super Bowl Is Different

    Brooke Pryor @bepryor

    This is the first time I’ve ever had cheerleaders open a media day https://t.co/Lin6WwQnky

  33. Look at the Opening Night Gear 😂

    Doug Kyed @DougKyed

    Looks like Bill Belichick was the inspiration for some of the Super Bowl LIII Opening Night gear players will be wearing.

    I don’t know why these pictures are tiny. https://t.co/nPdyQgQ19R

  34. Gurley in the House 🐐

    Patriots on CLNS @PatriotsCLNS

    Big applause for Todd Gurley as he’s introduced at #SuperBowl Opening Night https://t.co/VlIV9fegSA

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G9evOz
via IFTTT

Super Bowl Opening Night 2019

  1. Gronk Dodges Retirement Questions 🎥

    via Twitter

  2. Wade Phillips Says Donald Will Be DPOY Again 🎥

    via Twitter

  3. McCourty Twins Talk Trash to Each Other at the Podium 😆🎥

    via Twitter

  4. Gronk Going Wild 😆

    Yahoo Sports @YahooSports

    Never change Gronk 😂

    (via @nflnetwork) https://t.co/l8Daxchq7z

  5. McCourty Doesn’t Like Gronk’s Moves 😅

    NFL @NFL

    “Gronk was just dancing some of the worst dance moves I’ve ever seen.” 👀

    @McCourtyTwins

    📺: #SBOpeningNight on @NFLNetwork https://t.co/iDOq93AbQv

  6. Respect

    NFL @NFL

    Belichick and McVay. So much respect. 💯💯💯 #SBLIII

    📺: #SBOpeningNight on @NFLNetwork https://t.co/zt1UAPiZMR

  7. All the Sharks 😂

    Los Angeles Rams @RamsNFL

    .@marcuspeters: world traveler 😂

    #SBOpeningNight | #SBLIII https://t.co/V96EDouDpu

  8. Brady and Talib Remember Playing Together 🎥

    via Twitter

  9. The Teams Shake Hands on Opening Night 🤝🎥

    via Twitter

  10. True That 👏

    NBC Sports Radio @NBCSportsRadio

    @NdamukongSuh said “Brady’s a future HOFer…its an honor to sack him” https://t.co/8StesdiTvd

  11. Never Gets Old

    Henry McKenna @McKennAnalysis

    Here was a Sean McVay recall test. https://t.co/is6XchJnEo

  12. Talking Shop on Opening Night

    NFL @NFL

    #SBLIII QBs!

    See you Sunday. #SBOpeningNight https://t.co/jaIifQaNEa

  13. Issa Photoshoot

    Los Angeles Rams @RamsNFL

    Photos by @marcuspeters™

    #SBOpeningNight | #SBLIII https://t.co/F2dJopUxdW

  14. Bill’s in the Building

    Andy Nesbitt @anezbitt

    Bill Belichick is here. https://t.co/MfRkLt6mvX

  15. Anderson Knows

    Jori Epstein @JoriEpstein

    Rams RB C.J. Anderson asked if he can say anything nice about Patriots.

    Anderson: “Oh yeah, Tom Brady he the GOAT!” 🐐

  16. The Circus Is in Town

    Matt Lombardo @MattLombardoNFL

    #SuperBowl Opening Night has always been a circus. This year, there’s an actual clown credentialed and asking questions … 🤡 https://t.co/jUHdMupmQZ

  17. Talib Says He Sets the Drip Tone for a Team 😂💎

    via Twitter

  18. Suh Letting People Know

    Thomas O’Toole @ByThomasOToole

    Ndamukong Suh asked what people get wrong about him: “They think I’m a villain on and off the field. Just don’t take my play as who I am.” https://t.co/qx7tH3Pupr

  19. Donald Knows Rams Defense Is Stacked

    NFL @NFL

    “You got myself. You got @DanteFowler. You got @MichaelBrockers. You got @samysosa_3. You got @NdamukongSuh.”

    @AaronDonald97 is confident in the @RamsNFL pass rush 💪 #SBLIII

    📺: #SBOpeningNight on @NFLNetwork https://t.co/Jb3Pa2YXZN

  20. Suh Is on It

    Kevin Duffy @KevinRDuffy

    Suh says the Patriots offense starts with the running game. https://t.co/f9KCLbWrsB

  21. Revenge Game?

    Cecil Lammey @CecilLammey

    Brandin Cooks talks about his trade as “fuel to the fire” #SBLIII @1043TheFan says “we know Patriots do a lot of different things. We need to focus on ourselves and our gameplan.” https://t.co/6OeGKb410a

  22. McVay’s Boots 👀

    Jonathan Jones @jjones9

    Sean McVay’s white boots https://t.co/6ZSjbSZV2x

  23. Gurley Due for a Big Game 👀

    NFL @NFL

    “Things didn’t finish out as strong as they started…

    But I’m here at the @SuperBowl!” – @TG3II 😁

    📺: #SBOpeningNight on @NFLNetwork https://t.co/mIgKX0LvPe

  24. McVay Praises Brady

    CBS Sports Network @CBSSportsNet

    What’s it like standing on the opposite sideline of Tom Brady?

    Sean McVay explains to @Nate13Burleson that sometimes it’s hard to not get caught up in the awe of arguably the greatest QB ever. https://t.co/3JNRTxBDA2

  25. Cooks Didn’t Forget Where He Came From

    Mark Daniels @MarkDanielsPJ

    Brandin Cooks says he became a smarter player thanks to Bill Belichick and Josh McDaniels https://t.co/KdsqN9AzNF

  26. He’d Be Impossible to Tackle

    Cecil Lammey @CecilLammey

    Aaron Donald says he wanted to be a RB but ate himself out of that opportunity. Was a big fan of Jerome Bettis. #SBLIII @1043TheFan https://t.co/50wMuabek0

  27. Aqib Talib Ready 👏

    NFL Network @nflnetwork

    .@AqibTalib21 is feeling it!

    📺: #SBOpeningNight Live on NFL Network https://t.co/E1lysfQWJ1

  28. He’s Okay 😅

    Mark Craig @markcraignfl

    Not a bad defensive player … https://t.co/an7u7ITu66

  29. Gurley on the Runway

    Los Angeles Rams @RamsNFL

    .@TG3II takes the stage at #SBOpeningNight!

    #SBLIII | #LARams https://t.co/iEBfSAx1J6

  30. Goff’s Reaction ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    Brooke Pryor @bepryor

    Jared Goff also seems a little confused with this entrance https://t.co/j8xaYB6bYu

  31. Wade Quotes Future 😯

    Bleacher Report @BleacherReport

    Wade Phillips a @1future fan?! 😂

    “I’ve been poppin’ since my demo.”

    (via @RamsNFL)
    https://t.co/bHF1ETz77n

  32. Media Day for the Super Bowl Is Different

    Brooke Pryor @bepryor

    This is the first time I’ve ever had cheerleaders open a media day https://t.co/Lin6WwQnky

  33. Look at the Opening Night Gear 😂

    Doug Kyed @DougKyed

    Looks like Bill Belichick was the inspiration for some of the Super Bowl LIII Opening Night gear players will be wearing.

    I don’t know why these pictures are tiny. https://t.co/nPdyQgQ19R

  34. Gurley in the House 🐐

    Patriots on CLNS @PatriotsCLNS

    Big applause for Todd Gurley as he’s introduced at #SuperBowl Opening Night https://t.co/VlIV9fegSA

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G9evOz
via IFTTT

US Senate advances anti-BDS legislation

The US Senate has advanced legislation addressing security policy in the Middle East, including new sanctions on Syria and a measure taking aim at boycotts of Israel. 

Democrats had blocked the package in the Senate during the 35-day partial government shutdown, saying the chamber should first consider legislation to reopen the government.

But after Friday’s agreement to end the shutdown at least until February 15, most of the Senate’s Democrats on Monday joined Republicans in favour of taking up the legislation, introduced by Republican Senator Marco Rubio.

The measure is still several steps from becoming law, and may never get there. Even if passed by the Senate, it must also be approved by the House of Representatives, where Democrats hold a majority of seats.

The legislation includes provisions to impose new sanctions on Syria and guarantee security assistance to Israel and Jordan. Those are seen as efforts to reassure Washington’s allies worried about shifts in US policy since President Donald Trump abruptly announced plans last month for a quick withdrawal of his country’s troops from war-torn Syria.

However, the act also includes a controversial measure that combats the Boycott, Divest and Sanctions (BDS) movement, a Palestinian non-violent campaign for human rights. 

It would allow US states and localities to retaliate commercially against companies or individuals supporting BDS.

Opponents consider the BDS provision an impingement of free speech.

“While I do not support the BDS movement, we must defend every American’s constitutional right to engage in political activity. It is clear to me that this bill would violate Americans’ First Amendment rights,” said Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats and was a “no” vote on Monday.

Some Republicans accused Democrats of supporting the BDS movement, which aims, among others, to pressure Israel to end its occupation of the Palestinian territories, as well as grant of full citizenship rights to Palestinians in Israel and ensure Palestinian refugees’ right of return to the homes that they or their families were expelled from to make way for the formation of the state of Israel in 1948.

In turn, some Democrats accused Republicans of trying to use the BDS measure to divide moderate and liberal Democrats.

Earlier this month, recently sworn-in Representative Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat and Palestinian-American who supports the BDS movement, condemned the bill on Twitter, saying, “this is the US where boycotting is a right & part of our historical fight for freedom & equality”.

The American Civil Liberties Union has also said the anti-BDS measure’s inclusion in the wider bill “sends a message to Americans that they will be penalised if they dare to disagree with their government”.

The BDS movement was launched in 2005 by Palestinians seeking to generate international pressure on Israel to respect Palestinian human rights.

Proponents say the effort draws from the anti-apartheid campaign in South Africa in the 1980s and the earlier African American Civil Rights movement of the 1950s and 60s.

Israel sees BDS as a strategic threat and accuses it of anti-Semitism – a claim activists firmly deny, calling it an attempt to discredit them.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2FWbulE
via IFTTT

Here’s how to disable Facetime on your iPhone, iPad or Mac

A nasty FaceTime bug means it's worth keeping the feature off.
A nasty FaceTime bug means it’s worth keeping the feature off.

Image: Thomas Trutschel/Photothek via Getty Images

2016%252f09%252f16%252fe7%252fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lzex.0f9e7.jpg%252f90x90By Johnny Lieu

A nasty bug which lets you hear and see someone at the end of a FaceTime call — without them answering — has been pretty concerning.

While Apple has said it will be rolling out a fix to the issue later this week, you’ll want to disable the feature for the time being.

SEE ALSO: Disastrous FaceTime bug lets you spy on person you’re calling

This means you’ll need to switch FaceTime off on each Apple device you own. Turning it off on one device (even though you may be logged in to these devices with the same Apple ID) doesn’t automatically do the same for other devices.

Fortunately, it’s pretty simple to turn the feature off on iPhone, iPad or Mac. 

How to turn off FaceTime on your iPhone or iPad

FaceTime turned off on iOS.

FaceTime turned off on iOS.

Image: Mashable screenshot

  1. Open Settings on your iPhone or iPad

  2. Search for the FaceTime option, or scroll to the option, and select the icon

  3. Switch the FaceTime toggle to off

How to turn off FaceTime on your Mac

Image: Mashable screenshot

  1. Open the FaceTime application on your Mac

  2. Select “FaceTime” in the menu bar

  3. Then select “Turn FaceTime Off”

You can also choose to sign out of FaceTime completely on your Mac, as follows:

  1. Open the FaceTime application on your Mac

  2. Select “FaceTime” in the menu bar

  3. Then select “Preferences”

  4. Click “Sign Out”

You should be good to go from there – be wary of any FaceTime requests from unknown callers, of course. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2B7vAFB
via IFTTT

What Are the Lakers’ Options After Anthony Davis’ Trade Request?

New Orleans Pelicans' Anthony Davis dribbles the ball past Los Angeles Lakers' LeBron James during the second half of an NBA basketball game Friday, Dec. 21, 2018, in Los Angeles. The Lakers won 112-104. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

Jae C. Hong/Associated Press

LOS ANGELES — In a Monday morning tweet, ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski dropped the bombshell that Anthony Davis will pass on signing a $240 million “supermax” extension with the New Orleans Pelicans this summer and prefers to be traded.

That’s great news for the Los Angeles Lakers, who have long made Davis their top priority.

The Lakers may have home-court advantage, so to speak, seeing as Rich Paul represents both Davis and LeBron James. However, the decision ultimately rests with New Orleans general manager Dell Demps and team owner Gayle Benson.

Paul “did not place pressure on the Pelicans to move Davis” prior to the NBA‘s Feb. 7 trade deadline, according to Wojnarowski.

With Davis having made his intentions known, it’s now all about timing for the Pelicans. Davis is owed $25.4 million this year, $27.1 million in 2019-20 and has a $28.8 million player option for the 2020-21 season that he’s likely to decline. The Pelicans must decide if they’re better off trading him now or waiting until the summer (or beyond).

The Pelicans may choose to stall so the Boston Celtics can come to the table. Until July 1, the Celtics cannot legally trade for Davis without trading away Kyrie Irving since both stars are on designated rookie-scale extensions. NBA rules stipulate that a team cannot have two such players acquired via trade simultaneously, so the Celtics have to wait until Irving opts out this summer before they can trade for Davis.

However, according to Chris Haynes of Yahoo Sports, “Boston is not a top target for Davis,” and “there’s a growing belief of uncertainty that Kyrie Irving will not re-sign with Boston.” 

Assuming Paul adamantly pushes for Davis to join James and the Lakers, and no other team puts together a needle-moving offer, what makes the most sense for Los Angeles?

According to Brad Turner and Tania Ganguli of the Los Angeles Times, the Lakers would need to include most of their young prospects and a first-round pick. Meanwhile, Haynes suggested the “Lakers’ package would almost have to include Lonzo Ball, Brandon Ingram and Kyle Kuzma along with other sweeteners and salary-cap fillers.”

Is it worth blowing up their young core to add Davis now? Or should they gamble on him signing with them as a free agent in 2020? Here are their options.

Option 1: Lakers Go All-In Now

If the Lakers can pair Davis and James this season, they should, period. If the cost is multiple young players and future draft picks, so be it.

Team president Earvin “Magic” Johnson and general manager Rob Pelinka will try to hold onto as many assets as they can, but if the Lakers’ offer isn’t lucrative enough, the Pelicans will wait to trade Davis until the summer. As a result, Los Angeles may decide to pay a premium to give the franchise a chance to win a title while adding the certainty of Davis on the roster.

After all, waiting for potential trade targets to become free agents hasn’t always panned out for the Lakers. Look no further than Paul George.

Davis has a 15 percent trade kicker in his contract, but since he earns nearly the maximum for a player with six years of experience, he’d receive a relatively insignificant bump of $65,976 (paid by the Pelicans). The Lakers would need to send out at least $20.3 million to the Pelicans for salary-matching purposes, so Kentavious Caldwell-Pope’s expiring $12 million contract could be a valuable piece in a Davis deal.

Caldwell-Pope, who Paul also represents, can block any trade under the one-year Bird rule that comes into effect when a player re-signs with the same team for one additional season. He also has a 15 percent trade bonus that would cost the Lakers almost $641,000 if they ship him out prior to the Feb. 7 deadline.

Another factor to consider is roster space, since the Pelicans cannot go over the 15-man roster limit in a trade. If the Lakers send out four players, New Orleans either would have to cut three additional players or include them in a deal. A third team could come into play to facilitate a solution.

Jae C. Hong/Associated Press

For example, if the Lakers and Pelicans agreed on a package of Caldwell-Pope, Kuzma, Ball and Zubac (future draft picks have no dollar value in trades), the Lakers would be able to bring back as much as $28.5 million in salary from the Pelicans, although they can exceed that number when trading for players on minimum contracts (like Jahlil Okafor, Cheick Diallo, Ian Clark, Tim Frazier and Kenrich Williams). Since Davis and three of those five players would work mathematically, a two-team trade is relatively straightforward.

Assuming the Lakers send their 2019 first-round pick to the Pelicans but don’t add any contracts that extend beyond this season, they would still have Mo Wagner, Svi Mykhailiuk, Isaac Bonga, Hart and Ingram under contract along with Davis and James. That would give Los Angeles up to $20.9 million in salary-cap space this summer, although additional trades to add another star or open more space would remain a possibility.

If Johnson and Pelinka traded away everyone other than James and Davis, the Lakers would have a projected $30.5 million in cap space to work with in July, just short of the $32.7 million max they’d need for Kyrie Irving, Kawhi Leonard or Klay Thompson. Would any of those players be willing to come to L.A. at a slight discount? Would other targets like Kemba Walker or Khris Middleton justify letting go of Ingram and Hart?

Alternatively, the Lakers could keep their remaining depth and stay over the salary cap, enabling them to try to re-sign players like Rajon Rondo, Lance Stephenson, JaVale McGee, Tyson Chandler and/or Michael Beasley. Los Angeles would also gain a mid-level exception of roughly $9.2 million to spend and the bi-annual exception at $3.6 million.

Trading for Davis now could hinder the Lakers’ chances of signing a third star free agent in July, but they may still have some viable trade pieces and enough flexibility to build a contender around James and Davis.

Option 2: Lakers Go All-In in July

If the Lakers wait to make their best offer until the summer, the Celtics could entice the Pelicans with as many as four 2019 first-round picks (from the Los Angeles Clippers, Memphis Grizzlies, Sacramento Kings and their own). Boston can also include Jayson Tatum and/or Jaylen Brown (perhaps with Marcus Smart for salary-matching purposes), which should trump any offer the Lakers can cobble together.

That’s where Paul would earn his agent fee, assuming Davis is set on joining the Lakers.

Paul could attempt to scare away the Celtics by warning them that Davis would leave for the Lakers as a free agent in 2020. In that case, the Lakers would be wise to protect their cap space for another year. The goal would be to poison the Davis trade market this summer so the Lakers are bidding against themselves.

That’d be the goal, but there are no guarantees of success. Even though the first option could cost more in assets, it may be preferable since the second could disappear if the Pelicans choose to send Davis to Boston or elsewhere. 

Elise Amendola/Associated Press

If Paul, Davis and Johnson can box the Pelicans in this summer, the Lakers can first use their cap room to sign a max free agent like Irving (which would add insult to injury for Boston) and then trade for Davis.

The mechanics would be difficult. The Lakers likely would need Zubac (and perhaps Stephenson or Beasley) to agree to a sign-and-trade to make the numbers work. It would ultimately depend on how many young players Los Angeles is willing to give up in the trade for Davis.

By getting under the cap, the Lakers would renounce their rights to Rondo, Caldwell-Pope and their other free agents. They would gain the $4.8 million room exception, which would be their only remaining tool to sign players outside of minimum contracts.

If the Lakers wind up with Irving, Davis and James, they wouldn’t have the means to add significant depth, but they should be able to flesh out a high-level veteran roster around their star triumvirate.

Option 3: No Third Star

Alternatively, the Lakers could skip free agency altogether in July, which means no Irving or a third star.

Davis’ trade kicker also could complicate matters, as it’d cost the Pelicans an extra $4.1 million if they trade him in July. Davis can choose to waive the bonus if he so chooses—perhaps he would for the Lakers but wouldn’t for the Celtics. Again, that’s assuming he’s locked in on joining James in Los Angeles.

In July, the Lakers would be able to include up to $5.6 million in cash to New Orleans to facilitate a deal. Ahead of the Feb. 7 trade deadline, the most the Lakers can send is $3.7 million, as they already sent $1.5 million to the Philadelphia 76ers earlier in the year to buy the Bonga pick (39th overall).

As far as draft picks, the Lakers own all of their future selections except for this June’s second-rounder, which will either go to the Atlanta Hawks or the Kings (originally from the Roy Hibbert trade with the Indiana Pacers). Los Angeles can trade multiple future firsts, but not in consecutive years.

New Orleans holds the cards, at least for now. The Lakers can push for a deal ahead of the trade deadline, but unless the Pelicans are ready to make that move, it isn’t going to happen.

On Monday, the Pelicans released a statement which read in part: “We will do this on our terms and our timeline. One that makes the most sense for our team and it will not be dictated by those outside of our organization.”

This much is clear: If the Lakers want to pair two of the best players in the league, they must be willing to part with their young core.

Email Eric Pincus at eric.pincus@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @EricPincus.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Th1K8s
via IFTTT

What you should know about Billy McFarland’s pre-Fyre Fest scam Magnises

Image: Patrick McMullan/Getty Image

2018%252f04%252f02%252f74%252fheadshot.edeb7.jpg%252f90x90By Morgan Sung

Fyre Festival may have been two years ago, but the drama that led up to the entire mess is still unfolding. 

Since the release of two back-to-back documentaries about the disastrous music festival, Fyre founder Billy McFarland is back in the spotlight. McFarland was a professional grifter even before scamming festival attendees out of millions of dollars. With his company Magnises, he managed to swindle investors into backing his glorified fraternity. 

SEE ALSO: Twitter users are obsessed with Netflix and Hulu’s super petty Fyre Festival feud

Although Magnises claimed to be a luxury credit card, it was essentially a membership for millennials who wanted to be rich, but couldn’t afford to be rich. Members would have their credit or debit card copied over to a magnetic strip mounted onto a metal card — instead of its own financial institution, Magnises promised its members social perks like last minute Beyoncé tickets and access to an exclusive townhouse with an open bar. Membership was “referral only” to add to its exclusivity. 

The company crashed and burned well before the Fyre fiasco. Here are four things you need to know about Magnises, according to Business Insider‘s wild interviews with people involved. 

McFarland tried to rent a $30k townhouse because he thought it would get him laid 

Real estate agent Jenny Bapst was interviewing for a position at Magnises and helped McFarland find a new townhouse after the company was evicted from its original headquarters for causing so much damage during its parties. Bapst said they viewed several, but she couldn’t figure out how they’d legally run a commercial business from a residential property. 

When they checked out a $30,000/month house, the Magnises COO shut McFarland down because they couldn’t afford it. But McFarland was determined: 

McFarland insisted that he get the place. Bapst confronted him in the bathroom, trying to figure out if they could afford it or of she was just wasting her time.

“That’s when he told me, literally, ‘Jenny, do you think I would get laid more by models if we get this space?’” Bapst said.

I would get laid more by models” isn’t the best reason to further bankrupt your company. 

McFarland tried (and failed) to go undercover to figure out how their competition ran their business 

As Magnesis took off, so did another company that offered discounted and exclusive access to events. Select, which is still in operation, “spent its early years developing relationships with restaurant companies and event venues” while Magnesis focused on marketing. Magnesis members only got access to Hamilton tickets because McFarland managed to get them last minute from scalpers

In a quest to figure out Select, McFarland lied about his name during a hospitality industry networking event. McFarland told Select executives that his name was “Lyon or Daniel or something else that’s not his name” and asked if their partnerships with restaurants was “legit,” which was code for admitting that Magnises’ partnerships weren’t.

“At the end of the conversation, finally my colleague was like, ‘Yeah, I’m not gonna tell you anything about our company,” Select COO Christopher Stanley said. “And by the way, I know who you are, Billy. He was just a very weird dude.” 

If anything, McFarland’s crumbling company foreshadowed how much of mess Fyre Festival would be. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2SeiRui
via IFTTT

Lakers Rumors: Lonzo Ball Not Interested in Pelicans If Traded for Anthony Davis

Los Angeles Lakers' Lonzo Ball warms up before an NBA basketball game against the New Orleans Pelicans, Friday, Dec. 21, 2018, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

Jae C. Hong/Associated Press

Representatives for Los Angeles Lakers point guard Lonzo Ball would favor a move to a different team were he to be part of a Lakers’ trade package for New Orleans Pelicans star Anthony Davis, according to Shams Charania of The Athletic and Stadium.

Charania reported Ball doesn’t want to go to a franchise that had “an established point guard.” Elfrid Payton is New Orleans’ starting point guard, while Jrue Holiday has plenty of experience at the point as well.

This article will be updated to provide more information on this story as it becomes available.

Get the best sports content from the web and social in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2HEyuHm
via IFTTT

Terry Crews and sexual violence survivors narrate moving #MeToo videos

Four deeply moving videos released by the #MeToo movement were screened at the Sundance Film Festival on Saturday, with one voiced by actor Terry Crews.

Crews came forward with his own story as a survivor of sexual assault in 2017, in the wake of accusations against Harvey Weinstein and the surge of the #MeToo movement against sexual abuse.

“For me to remain silent, I would have felt like a fraud,” says Crews. “In the year that’s gone by, I’ve learned that silence is violence. They depend on you being quiet. 

“My advice to any survivor: I will not be shamed. I did nothing wrong.”

The other three videos are also voiced by survivors of sexual violence: Daniela Contreras, Emily Waters, and a 31-year-old who chose to remain anonymous.

[h/t New York Times]

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2CP8YJX
via IFTTT

Republicans may block Trump from another shutdown


Sen. Roy Blunt and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell

“I wouldn’t think anybody would have another shutdown,” said Sen. Roy Blunt, pictured with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Blunt is one of the key border security negotiators. | Alex Wong/Getty Images

Congress

The Senate GOP has no appetite for another political debacle and is pushing Trump away from closing the government again.

Senate Republicans can’t stomach another shutdown.

After weathering 35 days of a partial government closure, the Senate GOP is dreading the possibility another one will hit in less than three weeks — a sentiment that could prevent President Donald Trump from closing the government again.

Story Continued Below

Though House Republicans aren’t ruling out supporting the president should he choose another confrontation over his border wall, the Republican Senate majority — which actually has governing power — has another view.

“I did not love the shutdown. I wouldn’t think anybody would have another shutdown,” said Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), one of the key negotiators trying to strike a deal on border security.

Most GOP lawmakers dutifully stuck with Trump in public as the partial government shutdown dragged on. But privately, Republican support began to crack as their polling and the economy both suffered. After a half-dozen GOP senators defected last week, Trump dropped his demands for border wall money before a full-scale revolt unfolded.

There is broad recognition within the administration, including on the president’s part, that shutting down the government is not an effective strategy for extracting concessions, according to White House aides.

But while White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Monday that Trump “doesn’t want to go through another shutdown,” she declined to rule it out if Congress doesn’t come up with a border security plan to Trump’s liking. Neither did House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), a close Trump confidant.

The prospect of a second shutdown after the longest one in history is something Senate Republicans still take seriously despite rising hopes it can be avoided with a bipartisan border deal or even some sort of executive action by the president. Asked how seriously she is taking the potential for another funding debacle, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) replied: “Very.”

“I want to be able to say that: ‘no, it’s not possible that we would go back into another shutdown.’ But I didn’t think the first one that was 35 days was possible either,” she said.

Senators are already making calls to gauge what their fellow conference committee members might support ahead of their first meeting Wednesday. And Republicans writ large are touting the panel as a possible solution for the problem.

But if that committee fails, as many on the Hill privately believe is likely, Trump has touted two paths to again try to build his wall: a shutdown or a national emergency on the border.

“The preferred manner of going forward would be some type of executive action vs. shutdown. But that doesn’t mean that shutdown is off the table,” said Meadows, who helped push Trump to shut down the government in the first place.

Senate Republicans loathe both options, but for now, they’d choose almost anything over another funding lapse.

As Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) put it: “I don’t think we want to face another shutdown. And I certainly don’t think we want to have emergency action taken. So the president and Congress will have to come together.”

“It goes almost without saying that shutdowns are a very bad idea. And we should not use them as a political weapon,” Romney added, as he enjoyed his first day in the Senate with the government fully open.

“There’s a lot of lessons learned. Just like I learned in 1995 when I thought it was a good thing to shut down the government,” said Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the most senior GOP senator. “Government’s a service for people of this country and they can’t be served when government’s not functioning.”

The Republican retreat from the border wall confrontation was evident on Monday not just among the rank and file.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) barely mentioned the standoff over the border, other than to ding Democrats for voting against a Middle East policy bill during the shutdown.

It seemed few Republicans had any desire to rehash the episode.

“There is little or no appetite for it,” said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine). “Those who thought that shutdowns were a good idea have been disabused by that.”

Some Republican centrists are even suggesting that a bipartisan border agreement could withstand a veto threat.

“I think the committee will come up with a deal … If they come up with something that isn’t crazy, I think it’ll have enough votes to override a veto in the House and Senate,” Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho said Monday. Simpson is among at least two House Republicans who have drafted their own long-shot funding plans, ready to be unveiled in case border security talks collapse again.

“Because we’ve all learned, hopefully, that shutdowns don’t work, and they’re stupid.”

But even as some Republicans look to use their influence with Trump to nudge him away from another self-destructive shutdown, others are just as queasy about being at odds with the president.

Take Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who is up for reelection in 2020 and could face a tough Democratic challenge. She disliked the shutdown and said it made everyone in Congress look bad, but she was not among those thinking about bolting from Trump’s position last week before the president himself caved.

“We need to work with the president,” Ernst said Monday. “We need to have border security.”

Ernst’s view is even more broadly shared in the House, where following a House GOP leadership meeting on Monday, senior Republican lawmakers claimed they were ready for another shutdown if House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer don’t give in on a border wall.

“I don’t think many people were moved in this shutdown on the left or the right,” added Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.). “Everyone felt justified in their position, and there’s not a great deal of learning that occurred.”

Rep. Kay Granger (Texas), top Republican on Appropriations Committee, said Trump shouldn’t take a shutdown off the table at this point. “Maybe moving forward after this, but not right now,” Granger said.

Among hard-line conservative Republicans who urged Trump to use a shutdown to pressure Democrats, there is no doubt what the president should do: keep the pressure on Democrats to deal. And if they don’t, then Trump can consider declaring a national emergency or some other option.

“We’ve got three weeks here to see what we can work out,” said House GOP Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney (Wyo.). “I think everybody would like to be able to work something out. But it’s gonna depend on the Democrats.”

If a second shutdown is truly looming, Rep. Tom Reed (R-N.Y.) said Congress should pass stopgap funding bills every day to protect federal workers while keeping the pressure on Congress to strike a deal.

“I hope that is the case, and people have learned the lesson not to do this, that nobody wins in a shutdown.” Reed said, referring to the short-term funding bill that Trump signed on Friday.

Rep. Rodney Davis (R-Ill.), who was among the few Republicans to support Democratic funding bills to reopen the government this month, acknowledged that nobody wants another shutdown. But he said Democrats — specifically, Pelosi — would take the heat this time if the border security talks collapsed, despite polls consistently showing the public sided with Democrats.

“It’s on them. They’re the ones who said reopen the government because we’ll come and tell you what we want,” Davis said. “Republicans and the president moved. They did what Speaker Pelosi asked.”

McHenry warned not to read too much into polls showing Trump was hurt by the shutdown: “So to say that is going to have some lasting impact is not commensurate with the last two years of experience.”

Senate Republicans would disagree. They face a more difficult Senate map in 2020 than they did last year and could be dragged into the minority if Trump’s popularity collapses. And if in two weeks the conference committee isn’t going anywhere, they’re the ones that will have to put a bill on the floor to fund the government — and potentially shirk Trump’s demands for the wall.

Eliana Johnson contributed to this report.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2RTC8C0
via IFTTT

A new meme makes fun of JK Rowling’s fake woke additions to ‘Harry Potter’

2018%252f04%252f02%252f74%252fheadshot.edeb7.jpg%252f90x90By Morgan Sung

J.K. Rowling just can’t let go of Harry Potter, and this meme calls her out for it.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, the last book in the series, was released in 2008. The movie version of the finale was released in 2011. But in the last eight years, J.K. Rowling has been milking the franchise dry with “Pottermore” short stories and dropping random details about Hogwarts and its dwellers years after the books were published. (In fairness, if you write Harry Potter, you’re probably allowed to never live it down.) 

Retroactive additions to the story include trying to make the series more diverse, like claiming that Hogwarts had Jewish students (despite never mentioning them in the story), and some inexplicably nasty history, like stating that witches and wizards simply shit themselves before the castle had indoor plumbing. (Why?)

The “No one/J.K. Rowling” meme calls out the overenthusiastic writer for constantly editing the imaginary world. 

Most of them are super explicit. 

waiter: anything to drink?

JK Rowling: the sorting hat can fuck but chooses not to

— dustin Couch (@Dustinkcouch) January 21, 2019

anyone:

jk rowling: dobby assassinated princess diana

— emily (@theemiree) January 28, 2019

me:

JK Rowling: Dobby threw the first brick at stonewall

— chaotic soft / neutral disaster (@umangkalra__) January 27, 2019

No one:

JK Rowling: Maybe Harry DID fuck Hermione

— Various Jams (@VRSJMS) January 25, 2019

me:

jk rowling: i had sex with dobby

— jen merritt!!! (@jennifermerr) January 28, 2019

No one:

JK Rowling: hagrid fucked the spiders

— elle (@666bitchcraft) January 28, 2019

no one:

jk rowling: the sorting hat’s penis rests on ur forehead when u wear it

— almonds (@twoalmonds) January 21, 2019

no one:

jk rowling: dobby shot xxxtentacion

— e҉ (@notlipglosse) January 27, 2019

no one:

jk rowling: dobby’s favourite queen member was john deacon

— 𝙩𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙖 (@jchndeac) January 28, 2019

me:

jk rowling: ron spent all 7 years at hogwarts fantasizing about a loyal unique imaginary best friend named “Harry Potter” as a way to cope with an unbearably plain life as a regular kid who wasnt super good or bad at school, who wasnt popular but wasnt an outcast either

— jonny sun (@jonnysun) January 28, 2019

me:

jk rowling: buckbeak is into light choking but hasn’t found the right partner

— Rachel Whitehurst (@RachLWhitehurst) January 26, 2019

Me:

JK Rowling: the Whomping Willow was gay

— sarah schauer 🦂 (@SJSchauer) January 25, 2019

No one:

JK Rowling: Dobby has a 10 inch cock

— fraser (@iNabberTV) January 25, 2019

How long until jk rowling decides that voldemort was a socialist

— Conor Arpwel (@Arpwel) January 21, 2019

J.K. Rowling hasn’t addressed the meme yet, but it may be only a matter of time before she announces wizards had universal healthcare. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2sRwQYX
via IFTTT