Crisis Text Line might know the best way to ask if someone is suicidal

Research shows that asking someone if they’re suicidal doesn’t make them more likely to attempt suicide. Still, starting that conversation can feel intimidating for people worried about offending or embarrassing a loved one. 

That’s why Crisis Text Line, a free, nonprofit emotional support texting service, has released new data suggesting that one way of framing that question is more effective than another. 

After using artificial intelligence to analyze its dataset of 75 million text messages, collected since the service’s launch in 2013, Crisis Text Line found that assessing suicide risk with an “expression of care” was most likely to reduce a texter’s suicidal feelings. 

Texters were nearly twice as likely to feel less suicidal when a counselor used a compassionate approach as opposed to a blunt one. 

In the former scenario, a counselor would repeat the texter’s reason for reaching out, then ask about suicide risk by explicitly mentioning care and concern for their safety. 

SEE ALSO: 21 reasons to keep living when you feel suicidal

A counselor speaking to a texter dealing with a breakup, for example, would say this: “Sometimes when people go through a breakup, they may have thoughts of ending their life. I want to check in, have you had any of these thoughts?” 

Another example might look like this: “With all of your sadness about the breakup, I just want to check in about your safety. Have you had any thoughts about death or dying?” 

“I just want to check in about your safety. Have you had any thoughts about death or dying?” 

By contrast, language like, “Are you feeling suicidal?,” “Do you want to hurt yourself?” and, “Are you having suicidal thoughts?” was less effective. 

Nearly 6 percent of texters reported feeling less suicidal in a post-conversation survey when they’d experienced an explicitly caring approach, compared to 3.3 percent who were asked outright about suicidal thoughts or behavior. 

In addition to analyzing 75 million messages, Crisis Text Line’s clinical staff reviewed about 400 transcripts to evaluate how texters responded to counselors’ different approaches. As a result, they found that an “apology” method — saying sorry, expressing hesitancy, or implying they’d rather not ask about suicide — was also less effective.

That reflected phrasing like, “I’m sorry, but I have to ask, are you thinking of killing yourself?” and “Since you mentioned feeling depressed, I need to ask, are you planning to kill yourself?” 

The findings led Crisis Text Line to institute a new policy of always asking texters whether they feel suicidal, and training counselors to always use the “expression of care” method. Previously, counselors only asked the question when they felt someone was at risk of suicide. 

“Let’s give people the words to use and show them it’s not hard to use, and you will do more good than harm,” said Shairi Turner, an internist, pediatrician, and chief medical officer of Crisis Text Line.

For someone contemplating suicide, an apology that precedes a question about whether they’re thinking of taking their life may invoke feelings of shame and isolation, Turner added. An affirmative, caring tone, on the other hand, normalizes the conversation and makes it easier for someone to share their suicidal thoughts.  

“How you set up that conversation is actually critically important,” said Christine Moutier, a member of Crisis Text Line’s clinical advisory board and chief medical officer of the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.

If you’re struggling, take the time you need today for self-care and reach out to someone you trust. Help is available, and you are not alone. Please call @800273TALK or text “Talk” to 741741. They’re here for you. pic.twitter.com/10snzgKOt2

— American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (@afspnational) June 8, 2018

While Moutier believes the new insights from Crisis Text Line add to existing knowledge about how to ask a loved one if they’re experiencing suicidal thoughts or behavior, she notes that the best practices are based on a population of people who’ve reached out to a stranger for help. It’s possible that a different approach might work better with people who don’t seek help, but there’s no way the Crisis Text Line data can answer that question. 

In general, though, Moutier urges people to be empathetic when asking a loved one about suicide. 

“When the receiving person can simply tolerate it, hold it in a way that doesn’t judge, and doesn’t jump in with a solution or quick fix, but receives it in a loving, compassionate way, that’s the ideal,” says Moutier. 

Turner says that while we may not ever understand why a suicidal person attempts to take their life, we can get better at asking them before it’s too late. 

“[I]f we can arm people to be the experts to help each tother,” she says, “then I think we’ll make tremendous headway into helping those who are in pain.” 

If you want to talk to someone or are experiencing suicidal thoughts, text the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 or call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255. Here is a list of international resources.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2FVVaBn
via IFTTT

Can the US force Nicolas Maduro to step down?

Venezuela‘s economy has been in crisis for years with skyrocketing hyperinflation forcing millions of people to flee the country.

In a bid to remove President Nicolas Maduro from office, the US has now imposed sanctions on Venezuela’s state oil company, blocking seven billion dollars in assets and recognising opposition leader Juan Guaido as the interim president.

Washington has called on the military, which is so far standing by Maduro, to accept a peaceful transfer of power and warned of consequences if not.

How far will Washington go to change the government in Caracas?

Presenter: Richelle Carey

Guests:

Jairo A Lugo-Ocando – Director of executive education and graduate studies at Northwestern University in Qatar

Charles Shapiro – Former US ambassador to Venezuela

Diego Moya-Ocampos – Principal analyst for country risk at IHS Markit in the Americas team

Source: Al Jazeera News

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Gb2RTn
via IFTTT

AOC’s far-right fan club


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Coverage of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Fox News has become so frequent that she poked fun at the network in a tweet, quoting Spanish-language lyrics from the New York City band Aventura to suggest Fox has an “obsession” with her. | Andrew Harnik/AP Photo

politics

‘I aspire to be the conservative AOC,’ said one congressman.

They detest what she stands for. They think her policies would destroy the country. Ad they wish she would just go away.

All the same, many of President Donald Trump’s most media-conscious supporters can’t help but admit it: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has got serious political game.

Story Continued Below

“I aspire to be the conservative AOC,” Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) told POLITICO. Gaetz, an outspoken 36-year-old in his second term who has achieved a measure of prominence as a highly isible Trump defender, said there’s just one problem with that aspiration: “I can’t dance for shit.”

“AOC has what I call ‘gameness’ or competitive heart — the combination of grit, determination, fighting spirit that you can’t coach,” Steve Bannon, Trump’s former chief strategist, told POLITICO. “You either have it or you don’t, and she has it big league.”

Such admiration, in spite of vast ideological and demographic differences, is a testament to just how quickly the 29-year-old former activist and waitress has achieved political stardom. It’s also a sign that many parts of Trump’s playbook — a populist image, an authentic social media presence, a willingness to lash out at mainstream media gatekeepers and fact-checkers, and a lack of deference to party leaders — are becoming enduring features of American politics, rather than some aberration made possible only by Trump’s unique persona or the state of the Republican Party circa 2015.

The president’s most media-savvy supporters recognize Ocasio-Cortez’s approach because it is so similar to Trump’s, a comparison they often make.

“Laughing at Trump, as the libs did, sure stopped him from being POTUS,” the far-right activist Mike Cernovich tweeted in November, adding, “Laughing at AOC, as the cons are doing now, sure is hurting her.”

Since Ocasio-Cortez’s upset of Democratic incumbent Joe Crowley in last summer’s primary, Cernovich has regularly weighed in on her political potential, arguing that she is a left-wing Trump with a better understanding of social media and the benefit of positive coverage from mainstream outlets.

“I think her policies and everything are a disaster but I just look at her effectiveness,” Cernovich said, praising her as an exemplar of the 19th-century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche’s concept of will to power. “No one’s more effective than her right now.”

The self-described democratic socialist has also caught the attention of “Dilbert” creator Scott Adams, a prominent pro-Trump voice on social media who began insisting in the summer of 2015 that the real estate mogul would win the presidential election, based in part on his belief that Trump had mastered the principles of hypnosis.

In November, Adams, who has studied the art of persuasion, gave Ocasio-Cortez an A+ grade on her persuasion skills in a tweet. He responded to a skeptic who argued that her appeal was limited by responding, “Same thing was said of Donald Trump in 2015.”

For her part, Ocasio-Cortez, whose staff did not respond to requests for comment, has dismissed the similarities. She told The Hill that likening her to Trump is “irresponsible … given the fact that he’s actively trying to assert mythology and hurt immigrants, and we’re trying to advance a progressive agenda, single-payer health care and a living wage.”

Meanwhile, Ann Coulter, another early Trump believer, has become privately preoccupied with Ocasio-Cortez’s ability to command mass attention, according to a person close to the conservative commentator.

“Terrified is a good word,” said the person. “She’s terrified of her.” The person recounted a recent conversation with Coulter in which, “She was ranting about, ‘AOC’s going to be the next president even if she’s not old enough to run.’” Coulter did not respond to emails requesting comment.

Cernovich dismissed Ocasio-Cortez’s conservative skeptics as “cultists” who are, “the same as Dems who couldn’t see Trump’s methodology.” But not everyone on the right is willing to cede Ocasio-Cortez the status of political prodigy.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Trump ally, mustered only a backhanded compliment for the young Democratic socialist.

“Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is an energetic, enthusiastic, stunningly self-confident person who has the enthusiastic help of much of the liberal media,” he told POLITICO. “Whether uninformed moral self-righteousness and charisma can overcome stunningly false facts will be a real test of how far American education has decayed.”

She has also been the subject of a barrage of critical coverage in conservative media portraying her positions as outlandish, her public statements as fact-challenged and her working-class biography as embellished, among other critiques.

Coverage of the congresswoman on Fox News has become so frequent that she poked fun at the network in a tweet, quoting Spanish-language lyrics from New York band Aventura to suggest Fox has an “obsession” with her.

The White House, meanwhile, has projected nonchalance. Asked last week by Fox’s Sean Hannity to respond to a statement from Ocasio-Cortez calling for drastic action on climate change, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders responded, “I don’t think we’re going to listen to her on much of anything — particularly not on matters we’re gonna leave in the hands of a much, much higher authority — and certainly, not listen to the freshman congresswoman on when the world may end.”

Asked earlier this month about the congresswoman calling him a racist, Trump shrugged:, “Who cares?”

For some on the populist right, the answer to handling the media-savvy congresswoman lies in the old adage, “If you can’t beat them, join them.” For them, the congresswoman’s ability to rally the left to populist causes could be an opportunity.

Bannon mentioned regulating technology firms and their use of data, as well as confronting China, as possible points of cooperation between Ocasio-Cortez and the populist right.

Coulter, for her part, has taken to Twitter to appeal to the congresswoman directly.

“Ocasio-Cortez wants a 70-80% income tax on the rich. I agree! Start with the Koch Bros. — and also make it WEALTH tax,” she tweeted at the beginning of the month. Last week, Coulter followed up by tweeting a report about financier Ken Griffin making the most expensive home purchase in U.S. history, writing, “Attention Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2FVUSdL
via IFTTT

James Corden’s cell phone guessing game is hilariously tense

Ever wondered what the contents of a celebrity’s cell phone might be? Well, now you know. Or at least, now you know the most recent text, photo, and the last song played on the phone of one celebrity in particular.

In the game above, James Corden uses those three clues to interrogate actors Charlie Day, Regina Hall, and Eugene Levy, with the aim of correctly guessing who the mystery phone in question belongs to.

We won’t say who whose phone it is here — you’ll have to watch the video for that — but we will say this: Corden ends up guessing wrong.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2TkKY8p
via IFTTT

Saudi Arabia to release Houthi prisoners after ill soldier freed

The Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen said seven Houthi prisoners will be released after a Saudi soldier was freed and arrived in Riyadh in a rare exchange of goodwill between combatants in the devastating three-year war.

Saudi prisoner Mousa Awaji returned on a Red Cross plane from Sanaa on Tuesday with the rebels saying he was freed because of an illness, Houthi TV channel al-Masirah reported, citing Abdulqadir Murtada, a Houthi official.

Coalition spokesman Turki al-Maliki said the exchange came because the Houthis did not provide Awaji with proper medical treatment, and efforts were under way to end the detention of other prisoners, state media reported.

Murtada said the release came as an “initiative” by Houthi leader Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, according to the Houthi-run Saba news agency.

The United Nations special envoy to Yemen, Martin Griffiths, helped coordinate the release. In a tweet, he welcomed the gesture, saying he hoped to see “more similar humanitarian gestures from the parties”, and looked forward to the implementation of a prisoner-exchange agreement.

The SE welcomes the unconditional release by AA of the sick Saudi prisoner, whom the ICRC will transfer from Sanaa to Riyadh today. The SE hopes to see more similar humanitarian gestures from the parties. #Yemen

— OSE_Yemen (@OSE_Yemen) January 29, 2019

Afrah Nasser, a Yemen political analyst, told Al Jazeera it was important for the international community to pressure both sides to release more prisoners of war. She added the rebels’ move also had symbolism.

“It’s very remarkable that they released a sick Saudi captive in order to send a message about the destroyed or devastated healthcare system. The Houthis are really playing it clever at this moment,” Nasser said.

Yemen’s warring parties have yet to agree to full terms of a prisoner swap – one of the least contentious confidence-building measures agreed at UN-sponsored peace talks held in December amid Western pressure to end the bloody conflict.

The UN is pushing for the exchange and the implementation of a ceasefire in the main port city of Hodeidah to pave the way for a second round of discussions to end a war in which tens of thousands of people have been killed in almost four years.

Agreement in peril

While the prisoner swap was a positive sign, a humanitarian group warned on Tuesday that a ceasefire agreed in Hodeidah is on the verge of collapsing, after a retired Dutch general in charge of the truce stepped down from his role.

The US-based International Rescue Committee said recent clashes in the city between Houthi rebels who control it and pro-government forces backed by a Saudi-led coalition have increased dramatically since last week.

“In recent days, with clashes erupting inside Hodeidah and both parties accusing each other of violations, the agreement is increasingly in peril,” Frank McManus of the group said.

The developments threaten to unravel a ceasefire and prisoner swap signed in December, the group said, urging the international community to step up pressure on the warring parties to stick to their commitments.

The warning comes a day after the UN envoy for Yemen urged warring sides to withdraw their troops from the city – a lifeline for millions of Yemenis facing starvation.

The two parties agreed at the talks to a mass prisoner swap and the ambitious ceasefire pact in Hodeidah, the Red Sea city home to the impoverished country’s most valuable port.

The UN Security Council this month unanimously adopted Resolution 2452, which calls for the deployment of up to 75 monitors to oversee the fragile ceasefire and pullback of forces from Hodeidah.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2BdiZk7
via IFTTT

Apple has realized that international iPhone prices are (often) insane

The iPhone is about to get cheaper in some markets.
The iPhone is about to get cheaper in some markets.

Image: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

2016%252f09%252f16%252f6f%252fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymdezlza1.53aea.jpg%252f90x90By Stan Schroeder

Apple’s iPhone revenue has plunged in the December quarter, and the company is ready to make some changes. 

According to CEO Tim Cook, Apple will reduce prices of the iPhone in markets where local currencies have weakened against the dollar. 

SEE ALSO: Apple’s Tim Cook explains suffering iPhone sales

“As we’ve gotten into January and assessed the macroeconomic condition in some of those markets, we’ve decided to go back to more commensurate with what our local prices were a year ago in hopes of helping the sales in those areas,” Cook told Reuters (via The Next Web). 

If you’ve never bought an iPhone outside of the U.S., you may not be aware of just how staggering the price difference is. I’ve been pointing it out over and over and over — it’s hard to justify spending $1,760 for a maxed-out iPhone XS (UK pricing at launch) when the exact same model costs $1,349 in the U.S. And it’s even harder in a country like Hungary, where the price is even higher and the average customer’s purchasing power is far lower than in the U.S. 

Yes, a part of the price difference is in taxes, and yes, the U.S. pricing does not reflect local taxes, and yes, Apple has additional distribution costs in markets other than the U.S. But the simple truth is that iPhone prices are too high for many international buyers, and Apple definitely can do something about it. Now, we’ve simply reached the point where the company is willing to address the issue. 

In the same interview, Cook talked about the growth of its services business. There, revenue is up 19 percent year-over-year, and the company is poised to launch new services in 2019, including (probably) a video streaming service. Cook noted that the services gross margin gets more efficient as services business gets larger, and the business gets larger when the company sells more iPhones, so reducing its price makes sense. But it’s worth noting that Cook sang a different tune in 2017, when the company launched the iPhone X, its first $1,000 phone. 

In any case, it’ll be interesting to see how new iPhones are priced internationally come September. Unfortunately, Apple does not break down iPhone unit sales in earnings reports at all, let alone by market, so assessing the potential benefits from this new strategy will be hard. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Wt1w01
via IFTTT

Calls for UAE to be punished after crowd violence mars Qatar win

Football fans on social media are calling on FIFA and the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) to punish the UAE after Emirati fans pelted Qatari players with shoes and bottles during the Asian Cup semifinal.

Qatar thrashed hosts UAE four goals to nil in a bad-tempered meeting in the Emirati capital, Abu Dhabi, on Tuesday.

Qatari fans were not allowed to attend the fixture because of an ongoing ban on Qatari citizens entering the UAE. Surplus tickets were also bought out by Emirati government-linked bodies and distributed to “loyal” local fans, meaning The Maroons were up against a stadium full of hostile onlookers.

The game started with Emirati fans booing the Qatari national anthem and the atmosphere grew more aggressive as Qatar took the lead and later doubled it before the first half ended.

Qatari players were filmed being struck by and dodging slippers, shoes, and bottles thrown by local fans after scoring their second goal.

Shameful and disgusting scene at the @afcasiancup semifinal

UAE fans throwing shoes at Qatari players after Qatar takes a clear lead against the host team


pic.twitter.com/yxm4HelWM1

— IstandWithQatar.org (@IstandWithQatar) January 29, 2019

Videos and images of the scene quickly went viral on social media sparking outrage among both Qatari fans and others.

Emirati defender Ismail Ahmed was also sent off before the match ended for elbowing Qatar’s Salem el-Hajri in the face.

Many called for the UAE to be punished for setting the tone for the crowd’s behaviour and for its failure to protect the Qatari team.

“UAE fans threw shoes at Qatari players. They started off the game with booing national anthem. International bodies should reconsider giving UAE the chance to host reputed sporting events,” wrote Twitter user Olivia Thomas.

UAE fans threw shoes at Qatari players. They started off the game with booing national anthem. International bodies should reconsider giving UAE the chance to host reputed sporting events @iyad_elbaghdadi @Ali_H_Soufan @Reem_AlHarmi @ALThani_M @alibakeerpic.twitter.com/NENY16AQIL

— Olivia thomas (@oliviathomas43) January 29, 2019

Qatar fan Arwa al-Mansoori said football governing body FIFA and the AFC had to punish the Emirati authorities for the crowd’s behaviour.

“We demand penalties for the disrespectful and uncivilized action from the UAE fans towards the Qatari team. What happened to our team is not acceptable!” she wrote alongside a video of a Qatari player being struck by a shoe on his chest.

We demand penalties for the disrespectful and uncivilized action from the UAE fans towards the Qatari team. What happened to our team is not acceptable! @fifacom_ar @fifaworldcup_ar pic.twitter.com/YXY1nDPwhI

— Arwa Al-Mansoori (@ArwaAlmansoori) January 29, 2019

FIFA and the AFC have not yet commented on the issue of crowd violence. Al Jazeera reached out to both bodies for comment. 

Qatar has been the target of a land, sea, and air blockade by the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Egypt since June 2017.

The quartet accuses Doha of supporting terrorism and opposition groups they have proscribed, charges Qatar vehemently rejects.

Qatari nationals and migrant workers in Doha celebrate Qatar’s semifinal win [Ted Regencia/Al Jazeera]

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2RrbTh5
via IFTTT

What Russia stands to lose in Venezuela

As Washington intensifies its push to drive Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro from power, Russia’s Vladimir Putin has vowed to support his South American “strategic partner” and warned of the “catastrophic” consequences if the US were to send military assistance to opposition leader Juan Guaido.

When the United States called a special United Nations Security Council session on Saturday, focused on the crisis in Venezuela, Russia used the session to warn against foreign intervention in the Latin American nation and accused the US of attempting a “coup”.

Russian private military contractors have flown into Venezuela in recent days to increase security for Maduro, according to Reuters news agency.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has denied the reports.

On Friday, Russia offered to mediate between Maduro’s “legitimate” government and the opposition if necessary, saying it was ready to cooperate with all political forces that acted responsibly.

Moscow stands to lose a great deal if the Maduro government collapses, experts say.

Pete Duncan, a Russian politics professor at University College London said: “Losing ties with Venezuela would be a huge blow to Russia. Putin will do his utmost to prevent regime change.”

In the mid-1990s, Russia looked to Latin America for business opportunities.

Under Hugo Chavez – Maduro’s predecessor – Russia became one of Venezuela’s strongest allies with economic ties ranging from oil and loans to arms sales.

Duncan said that since Putin came to power in 2000, he has sought to cultivate partners in Latin America to counterbalance US influence in the region and to enhance Russia’s great power status in the world.

Anton Barbashin, a political analyst at the Wilson Centre, said: “A major reason why Russia supports Maduro – the same principle why it supports [Syria’s President Bashar] al-Assad – is the belief that no foreign power should meddle in the sovereign affairs of a particular state.”

Vladimir Rouvinski, a foreign policy expert at Icesi University in Colombia, told Al Jazeera that the Kremlin views Venezuela as the backyard of the US – in Washington’s sphere of political influence – in the same way that Ukraine is in Russia’s backyard – or what the Kremlin calls – “the near-abroad”.

External observers typically view Cuba as Russia’s key Latin American ally, but Rouvinski said Russia has never managed to restore the same level as confidence in Havana as in Soviet times.

The level of confidence between Moscow and Caracas is unrivalled.

“Venezuela is Russia’s last asset in Latin America,” said Rouvinski.

Russia’s political elites believe the political developments that have occurred since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 – such as Georgia and Ukraine’s efforts to achieve independence from Russia – are the result of US intervention.

“Russia wants to at least have a ‘symbolic involvement’ in Latin America as payback for US intervention in the near-abroad,” said Rouvinski.

Putin found an ally in Venezuela. The late Chavez, and now Maduro have shared Putin’s worldview, opposed to US hegemony.

Ties between the US and Venezuela began to sharply deteriorate when the socialist President Chavez was elected in 1999.

Under the administration of President George W Bush beginning in 2001, Chavez became highly critical of Washington’s “imperialistic” foreign policy in the Middle East including the invasion of Iraq.

The US, meanwhile, has criticised the increasing authoritarian trends and human rights abuses in Venezuela.

In 2015, Caracas and Washington relations hit rock bottom when former President Barack Obama issued an executive order, declaring Venezuela a “threat to US national security” and ordered sanctions against seven Venezuelan officials.

The US sanctions against Venezuela, which have intensified under President Donald Trump, prohibit US-based companies or people from buying and selling new debt issued by the state-run oil body, Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) or the government.

‘Economic warfare’

Former special rapporteur Alfred de Zayas, who visited Venezuela over a period of 21 years has criticised the US sanctions, describing them as “economic warfare” that aims to strangle the economy and facilitate regime change.

Maduro’s alliance with Russia has been important in strengthening a sense of sovereign Venezuelan national identity, in defiance of the US.

Caracas has historically taken a pro-Russian stance. Venezuela voted against the resolution condemning Russia’s annexation the Ukrainian peninsula Crimea in 2014, and it was one of the few countries to formally recognise South Ossetia and Abkhazia, the regions of Georgia which broke away in 1991.

Since the annexation of Crimea and the resulting sanctions by the US, an increasingly isolated Russia has sought to strengthen its ties to Venezuela.

In recent years, Russia has become a “lender of last resort” of Venezuela’s collapsing economy, destroyed by a drop in oil prices, hyperinflation and US sanctions.

In 2017, Reuters reported that the Russian government and Russia’s largest state-owned oil company, Rosneft, advanced Venezuela at least $17bn in loans and credit lines between 2016 and 2017, becoming Venezuela’s largest sponsor, after China.

PDVSA has been secretly negotiating with Russia since at least early 2018, offering Rosneft ownership interests in up to nine of Venezuela’s most productive petroleum projects, according to Reuters.

Can the US force Maduro to step down?

Rosneft already has minority stakes in five joint projects with PDVSA, which produced 59 billion barrels of oil in 2017, more than eight percent of Venezuela’s annual output.

Maduro also signed a deal giving Rosneft 49.9 percent of the US-based, Venezuelan-owned refiner Citgo as collateral for a $1.5bn loan to PDVSA.

Political significance

Rosneft’s increasing influence in PDVSA helps to position Russia as a middleman in sales of Venezuelan oil to customers worldwide, including the US market.

The Russian gas giant currently resells approximately 225,000 barrels per day of Venezuelan oil – about 13 percent of the nation’s total exports, according to the PDVSA trade reports.

Since, as Rouvinski said, relations between Russia and Venezuela have been based on personal top-level diplomacy, a change in Venezuela’s leadership threatens Rosneft’s influence in Latin America.

Venezuela’s opposition has also said, once in power, it will not honour Rosneft and PDVSA’s joint ventures.

But Russia never expected to make tangible profits in Venezuela, according to Ravnitski.

The collapse of Maduro’s government would have a far greater political significance than an economic importance for Moscow.

“Without his support, the opposition would have a much easier time taking power,” said Rouvinski.

As Venezuela’s opposition gains strength and international backing, experts are certain that Putin will do whatever it takes to keep Maduro in power.

As Duncan said: “Russia has no reason to back down.”

How to solve the political crisis in Venezuela?

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2FXR5wj
via IFTTT

Stephen Colbert mocks Trump’s tweet about bringing back global warming

Trump tweeted about global warming again.

On Monday night, the president said on Twitter that he wanted global warming wanted to “come back fast,” because of the freezing temperatures that have hit the midwest. Quick to correct him, and his spelling of “global waming,” however, was Stephen Colbert on Tuesday night.

“These temperatures are actually caused by global ‘waming’ sir. Polar vortex breaks up and dips out, it’s all predicted,” he said. “Besides, just because it’s cold now, it doesn’t mean climate change is a myth.”

Colbert turned the conversation to things that Trump wishes weren’t real, like the Mueller investigation, and a nervy Matthew Whitaker. 

“He seems really nervous … Is this the Attorney-General, or the henchman telling the evil queen he doesn’t have Snow White’s heart in a box,” Colbert joked.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2HDoSgb
via IFTTT

Marie Kondo sparks joy tidying up Jimmy Kimmel’s office

In case you hadn’t noticed because you’re hidden under a pile of your old shitty t-shirts, Marie Kondo has been sparking joy and making people clean out their cupboards worldwide.

The best-selling author and Netflix show host has brought her signature KonMari method to households around the world, sparking the attention of Jimmy Kimmel.

The late show host has been doing his show for 16 years, so he’s got plenty of stuff to clean out of his office. So he asked Kondo for help, and as you’d expect, there’s a lot of tidying to be done.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2SagfxL
via IFTTT