Pete Davidson grows up in ‘Big Time Adolescence: Review

Griffin Gluck and Pete Davidson in Big Time Adolescence.
Griffin Gluck and Pete Davidson in Big Time Adolescence.

Image: Sundance Institute

2017%252f05%252f02%252fd1%252fangiehanheadshothighres3.50ab4.jpg%252f90x90By Angie Han

One of the reasons Pete Davidson’s tumultuous 2018 was so surprising is that, well, we’re not used to Pete Davidson being surprising. Even on Saturday Night Live, a show that delights in pushing its actors into ever-stranger scenarios, he tends to play variations on a type: the young slacker who meets all of life’s complications with an indifferent shrug and an oblivious smile.

Naturally, Big Time Adolescence finds him playing basically that character, yet again. This time, however, it’s played with enough nuance to suggest there’s more to Davidson than that schtick. 

SEE ALSO: Pete Davidson and John Mulaney ranting about Clint Eastwood’s new movie is already a 2019 highlight

Davidson’s Zeke is that guy in every suburban hometown who was a bad-boy legend in high school, and then more or less stopped maturing right there. At 23, his best friend is 16-year-old Mo (Griffin Gluck of American Vandal), the kid brother of his childhood girlfriend. 

Mo is bright and sweet and has a promising future ahead of him, or would if only he were able to see past Zeke and his eternally adolescent lifestyle. Mo may be past the days when he thought the drive-thru lady knowing Zeke’s name was the sickest thing ever, but he hasn’t yet moved on to the realization that getting recognized by the drive-thru lady is as good as Zeke might ever get.

Much of Big Time Adolescence feels familiar, in ways good and bad. On the one hand, it adds to the intimacy. You know these guys, you recognize these rooms, you’ve been to their parties, you’ve lived their ennui, and it doesn’t take much doing to get you back into that headspace – particularly when director Jason Orley is so good at nailing the details, like the way Zeke and Mo puff up for each other when they’re around girls.

On the other, Big Time Adolescence feels like a movie we’ve seen countless times before, and not even an opening scene that’s essentially a big-screen adaptation of the “record scratch” meme can shake up the formula. The film is often funny but rarely uproarious, kinda sweet but not terribly touching. The life lessons it ultimately imparts are perfectly reasonable, but they’re also ones you’ve heard from your own nagging parents dozens of times before. 

What does stand out is Zeke. The character aligns so closely with Davidson’s public persona that it’d be easy to assume he’s barely acting at all; he’s even got all the same tattoos that Davidson does. That’d be selling Davidson short, however. Zeke isn’t a particularly deep guy, but Davidson ensures he’s three-dimensional, coloring the edges of his performance with emotions like fear and regret that Zeke can’t even recognize in himself.

By movie’s end, Zeke’s still the kind of guy who considers himself a child and thinks that, if anything, it’s the 23-year-olds with jobs and apartments and grad school applications who are the weird ones. There’s only so much that guy is ever going to change. 

But Davidson? Zeke is proof that he’s maturing as an actor, and ready to take his next steps.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2FXGr99
via IFTTT

Mike Freeman’s Super Bowl 10-Point Stance: Can Todd Gurley Recapture His Mojo?

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA - JANUARY 20: Todd Gurley #30 of the Los Angeles Rams runs the ball against the New Orleans Saints during the fourth quarter  in the NFC Championship game at the Mercedes-Benz Superdome on January 20, 2019 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by Kevin C.  Cox/Getty Images)

Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

Has the NFL found a way to stop Todd Gurley? What’s it like to match wits with Bill Belichick? And will anything stop the NFL money train? (Spoiler: Not likely.) All that and more in this week’s Super Bowl edition of the 10-Point Stance straight from Atlanta.

1. Stop that man

One thing we know Bill Belichick will spend this week doingbesides playing cat and mouse with the Super Bowl media—is continuing to look for ways to slow down Rams running back Todd Gurley.

Gurley is one of the NFL’s most devastating weapons. He’s a three-time Pro Bowler and was named the 2015 Rookie of the Year and the 2017 Offensive Player of the Year. At times, he can totally wreck a defense.

However, a recent strategy has constrained Gurley. Sean Payton and the Saints used it to near-perfection in the NFC Championship Game, where Gurley rushed four times for 10 yards. Belichick likely has seen the same things other teams have.

Put simply, the idea is to clog up the Rams offensive line. As one NFC head coach remarked, Gurley is a “get-started back.” He needs a clean beginning to get his momentum going.

This is true of many backs, but it is especially true of Gurley. He isn’t shifty like Zeke Elliott.

The Saints, I’m told, used an old defensive trick with great success. Defensive linemen covered the Rams guards and occupied them. Since the guards couldn’t move to the second level and attack the linebackers, the linebackers were free to target Gurley and slow him down before he could get up to full speed.

This strategy is risky, because if the linebackers shoot and miss, the runner has a wide-open field. The Saints felt it was worth the try, and they were correct.

Like New Orleans, New England has a well-coached and disciplined defense.

When asked about his late-season struggles Monday at the Super Bowl Opening Night, Gurley smiled and said, “Things didn’t finish out as strong as they started, but I’m here at the Super Bowl and that’s all that matters.”

In three of his last four games dating back to the regular season, Gurley failed to rush for even 50 yards. But the calm with which he has handled that rough stretch has impressed his head coach, for one.

“You learn about people when they do go through a little bit of adversity,” Sean McVay said at Tuesday’s Super Bowl press conference. “I couldn’t have been more proud or pleased with just the way he handled that. He demonstrated that mental toughness that we expect. You show me anybody that’s great in anything that they do, I’ll show you somebody that’s persevered and demonstrated that mental toughness to overcome some obstacles and some adversity.”

To be fair, the Saints did myriad things to slow Gurley beyond just hustling to the football.

But there is no question the Saints followed a game plan you can bet the Patriots are dissecting as you read this.

2. C.J. Anderson has the right of way for the Rams

LOS ANGELES, CA - JANUARY 12: Los Angeles Rams running back C.J. Anderson #35 stiff arms Dallas Cowboys outside linebacker Leighton Vander Esch #55 at Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum on January 12, 2019 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by John McCoy/Getty

John McCoy/Getty Images

While Gurley is the Rams’ most talented running back, the NFC head coach who discussed his recent downturn felt the recently acquired C.J. Anderson is a better fit for the how the Rams offensive line blocks.

In bulldozing his way to at least 120 yards on the ground in three of his past four games, Anderson has emerged as more than just a lightning-in-a-bottle success story.

Teams who have game-planned against the Rams say Anderson doesn’t need clean lanes to be effective, and defenses have a harder time tackling himbecause of his physicalitythan they do Gurley.

As strange as that may sound, it’s true. At least, that’s what I’m hearing from some of the best assistants and coaches in the NFL.

However, those same coaches also think McVay will find a way to get Gurley going against the Patriots. He’ll need to against a New England braintrust that is sure to have a plan to slow Anderson.

3. The Patriots’ secret sauce

Elise Amendola/Associated Press

For more than three decades, Belichick has posed one of the NFL’s greatest challenges to opposing coaches. But what makes it so difficult to prepare for a Belichick team? We asked former Jaguars head coach Jack Del Rio.

“This question requires an extremely long answer,” Del Rio told B/R. “It’s the total sum that the Belichick-led Patriots bring at you. The collective preparation. The team-first culture that is cultivated year-round. The personnel being led by the coach, so they get pieces that fit and produce under pressure. Their ability to play any style they want…pound it, spread it, go fast, be methodical.

“Their situational awareness and overall preparedness. Special teams are special and give them an edge in most matchups because they commit true talent to those units. Most teams play backup [players] on special teams, with little thought to those special teams. Defensively, they repeatedly take away opponents’ best players. One thing you see is Bill’s defense improves as the year goes on, especially in the secondary.

“And there is the consistency. Just amazing that in the NFL, where rules are designed to create parity, we are witnessing this record-setting run. Oh, and by the way, Tom Brady continues to lead and produce.

“Sustained success like this just doesn’t happen. You have to appreciate the Belichick-led Patriots, even if you’re sick of seeing them in the Super Bowl.”

4. Brady and Belichick’s future has NFL buzzing

Steven Senne/Associated Press

Tom Brady has made it clear this week during Super Bowl interviews that he isn’t retiring after Sunday’s game. He’s playing a lot better than we would expect a 41-year-old to play. Why would he retire?

But some people I speak to around the league, including several NFL assistant coaches and front office executives, think both Brady and Belichick will retire if the Patriots beat the Rams.

That scenario may be more wishful thinking than reality, but it isn’t an isolated idea. It’s something to watch for after Sunday night.

5. The O-line matters

Jae C. Hong/Associated Press

It’s not exactly launching a spacecraft to Mars to say that offensive lines are important and their continuity is vital to operating a successful offense in the NFL.

However, many of us still forget that.

We focus so much on the speed of the skill players and the no-look passes from Patrick Mahomes that we fail to remember it all starts with the lines. One of the big reasons why the Patriots are in the Super Bowl is because the Chiefs didn’t sack Tom Brady once in the AFC title game.

The Rams line has done a similarly good job protecting Goff and opening up holes for the running game.

Perhaps not coincidentally, the Rams and Patriots have had their starting offensive lines intact for the longest time this year, according to ESPN Stats & Info (via ESPN’s Trey Wingo).

So while neither line will get much attentionheck, even kickers get more attention, especially when they double-doinkthey are sure to play a huge role in which team wins Sunday.

6. Crisis management

Susan Walsh/Associated Press

A league source tells me that during the final days of the recent government shutdown, several NFL owners spoke to President Donald Trump about the effects the shutdown could have on the Super Bowl.

The owners told Trump that if the shutdown continued into Super Bowl week, it could damage the game by affecting security at the event and air travel to and from the game.

“This could badly hurt the Super Bowl,” one owner told the president, according to the source.

Who the owners were remains a mystery, but Trump is close to a handful of them, including Cowboys owner Jerry Jones and Patriots owner Robert Kraft.

7. The mind is a powerful weapon

ATLANTA, GEORGIA - JANUARY 28: Nickell Robey-Coleman #23 of the Los Angeles Rams answers questions during Super Bowl LIII Opening Night at State Farm Arena on January 28, 2019 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Photo by Kevin C.  Cox/Getty Images)

Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

The last time I saw a Super Bowl team as confident as the Rams appear to be against the Patriots, it was 2008.

In the week leading up to Super Bowl XLII, Giants wide receiver Plaxico Burress predicted his team would beat the Patriots, 23-17. Considering the Patriots had yet to lose that season, his prediction seemed absurd. Even Brady laughed.

But if you knew the Giants, you knew how much they believed they’d win, and sometimes belief is all it takes. Indeed, the Giants won, 17-14.

Until I saw the Rams this week, I hadn’t seen that kind of confidence ever since.

That doesn’t mean the Rams will win, but they think they can. And on this stage, that counts.

8. NFL pension fund falling short

CHARLOTTE, NC - AUGUST 17:  Detail photos of footballs with the signature of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell during the game between the Carolina Panthers and the Miami Dolphins at Bank of America Stadium on August 17, 2018 in Charlotte, North Carolina.  (

Grant Halverson/Getty Images

One day, long after this Super Bowl, many who played in the game will retire quietly. They won’t leave as stars. They won’t leave with millions in their bank accounts. They’ll likely be dealing with a rash of injuries acquired over their careers and will be facing financial difficulties. And they will need their NFL pensions. 

They may not get them.

The Society of Actuaries studied the NFL pension plan and found it has $2.2 billion in assets against $2.7 billion in liabilities, leaving a $500 million shortfall.

The plan is only 83 percent funded, according to the SOA’s latest study (which took into account holdings as of April 1, 2017). Last year, it was 78 percent funded, per the SOA.

The analysis states that MLB and NHL pensions are funded above industry average, at 88 percent and 137 percent, respectively. The NBA pension fund was funded at 61 percent as of 2016.

Pensions mean more to NFL players than athletes in other sports because in the NBA and MLB, for example, salaries are guaranteed. That isn’t the case in the NFL. While the money in football is remarkable, most players will spend their entire lives recovering from injuries they suffer while playing the game. Those pensions are crucial to rank-and-file players.

Two other interesting facts from the analysis: If Jared Goff retired today, his pension would be $25,000 per year. Brady’s would be $121,000.

9. The Pro Bowl may be a hot mess, but it’s a popular hot mess

Phelan Ebenhack/Associated Press

This year’s Pro Bowl was typical Pro Bowl. It was fun at times, nonsensical at times and absolutely unwatchable. It was generally as physical as flag football.

As bad as the game was, however, it won’t be going away anytime soon. There are more than eight million reasons why.

According to ESPN’s Bill Hofheimer, more than 8.9 million people watched this year’s Pro Bowl. That’s an incredible number.

If the league keeps getting that kind of viewership for the Pro Bowl, nothing will stop the game from happening. Not even if it’s terrible. 

10. Money makes the league go ’round

ARLINGTON, TEXAS - JANUARY 05: Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones and Executive Vice President Charlotte Jones Anderson visit with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell before the game between the Seattle Seahawks and Dallas Cowboys in  the Wild Card Round at AT&T

Tom Pennington/Getty Images

Around nine years ago, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell set a goal that seemed ridiculous: By the year 2027, he wanted league to record $25 billion in annual revenue.

When he made that statement, the league’s revenues were a fraction of that number. Now, according to a Bloomberg analysis, the NFL “generated about $15 billion this past season,” which suggests $25 billion by 2027 is possible.

The NFL continues to rake in advertising money and is beginning to officially monetize the massive gambling market. The league recently signed a deal with Caesars Entertainment to become its official casino sponsor. (Where’s my casino sponsorship, come to think of it?) 

But in this writer’s opinion, the NFL’s dogged pursuit of cash and power means it sometimes compromises itself when it comes to decency. The league abused its power when it came to Deflategate. It abused its power when it came to Bountygate. It could not have mishandled the Ray Rice case worse. The league has bungled plenty of other situations because it might be bad for the bottom line.

At times, the NFL’s arrogance has even prevented it from making basic decisions correctly, like its failure to issue a public statement saying its game officials made a mistake in the NFC Championship Game.

As the NFL pursues mounds of cash, it should remember what former commissioner Paul Tagliabue said in the aftermath of Bountygate. He spoke to GQ about Goodell’s relationship with players, but his words could be expanded to include the NFL’s overall view when it comes to money.

“If they see you making decisions only in economic terms, they start to understand that and question what you’re all about,” Tagliabue said.

Mike Freeman covers the NFL for Bleacher Report. Follow him on Twitter: @mikefreemanNFL

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Gf7Oed
via IFTTT

Serena Williams Graced Lip Sync Battle With The Beyoncé Performance Of A Lifetime



Larry Busacca/PW/WireImage

By Trey Alston

On the tennis court and onstage, Serena Williams does the same thing – serve fools. On the Tuesday (January 29) episode of Lip Sync Battle, model and actress Brooklyn Decker’s performance of Beyoncé’s “Sorry” received a strong jolt when the tennis pro appeared and joined in on the fun. Her brief, one-minute appearance was filled with looks, spice, that feeling of being star-struck.

Decker went head-to-head in an intense lip-sync battle against tennis player Andy Roddick, singing to “Sorry,” when she unveiled her trump card hidden behind a fake wall: Serena Williams, perched on top of a bus, with her signature game face on. She joined in on the festivities while the judges looked on in amazement. No one expected her there, yet she was. It became clear after approximately three seconds that it wasn’t Decker’s performance anymore – it was Williams’s.

The tennis legend’s sexy performance was iconic due in part to the fact that she also appeared in a similar manner in Beyoncé’s official video for “Sorry.” Williams retained her sensuality from the visual and brought it back to the stage.

Immediately after the performance ended, she told a bewildered LL Cool J that the live version was “so fun.” Is it time for Serena Williams’s music career yet? Watch the clip above and decide for yourself.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G0IiK4
via IFTTT

Trump: Border security talks a waste of time if they don’t include a ‘wall or physical barrier’


Donald Trump

President Donald Trump has not let on how involved the White House will be in negotiations with the conference committee. | Alex Wong/Getty Images

President Donald Trump on Wednesday warned lawmakers beginning negotiations to avert another government shutdown that they are “wasting their time” if they are not discussing construction of a physical barrier along the nation’s southern border, a long-standing demand of the president’s.

A 17-member bipartisan committee made up of lawmakers from both houses of Congress is set to meet for the first time Wednesday afternoon to hash out the contours of a border security package that can pass both chambers of Congress while still meeting the president’s demands. Fresh off of the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, Trump has signaled that he is prepared to shut down the government again if the bipartisan committee fails to craft a deal that satisfies his border security demands.

Story Continued Below

“If the committee of Republicans and Democrats now meeting on Border Security is not discussing or contemplating a Wall or Physical Barrier, they are Wasting their time!” he tweeted.

While Democrats have shown an openness to the idea of appropriating money to build fencing or a different kind of barrier along parts of the border, they have continued to roundly reject Trump’s demands for a border wall. Lawmakers face a tight deadline to reach a deal on an issue that has evaded Congress for years — funding for a quarter of the federal government runs out again at midnight on Feb. 15, potentially putting 800,000 federal workers into shutdown limbo just three weeks after the previous shutdown ended.

But members of both parties in Congress have shown a skepticism that any large-scale deal is possible, and some seem more intent on avoiding another grueling shutdown, especially with Trump threatening unilateral action in the form of a national emergency declaration if he doesn’t get $5.7 billion in funding for a wall. Such an emergency declaration would almost certainly be met with a swift legal challenge.

Trump has not let on how involved the White House will be in negotiations with the conference committee, though Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Tuesday he would prefer that president to stay out of the talks.

It’s also unclear how effective using the DACA program as a bargaining chip will be for Democrats looking to strike a deal, one of the White House’s key bets. The caucus has been burned before by Trump’s offers of relief for immigrants who came to the U.S. as minors, and anything resembling amnesty for those groups could alienate immigration hardliners in the president’s base.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2HGyeb0
via IFTTT

Samsung ushers in the era of 1TB smartphone

Those rumors that Samsung’s Galaxy S10 might come with a 1TB storage option may just be true. 

Samsung announced on Tuesday that it’s started to mass-produce its 1TB Universal Flash Storage (eUFS), the type that’ll be used in smartphones of the future. 

SEE ALSO: Samsung’s Galaxy S10 may come with a cryptocurrency wallet

It took Samsung just four years to bring eUFS from 128GB to 1TB, the company said in a press release, while keeping it tiny enough to use in a smartphone. 

For an idea of just how much storage this is, Samsung says it’ll be enough to store 260 10-minute 4K videos. While that actually doesn’t sound that amazing, Samsung points out that your typical 64GB smartphone can only store 13 such videos.

The new chip is not only more capacious than previous versions, it’s also faster. Transfer speeds on the 1TB eUFS 2.1 reach 1,000 MB/s, which is roughly twice the sequential read speed of your typical 2.5-inch SATA SSD, and 10 times the speed of a typical microSD card. Random read speed has also improved by 38 percent (compared to the 512GB eUFS), making it 500 times faster than a “high-performance microSD card”.

For most users, 1TB storage on a smartphone might seem like overkill. But for certain types of power-users it’ll be very welcome. If you’re serious about video, for example, the ability to store more 4K videos and handle them faster will be a life-saver. Be warned, though; 1TB smartphones likely won’t be cheap, at least until they become more commonplace. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2UsURky
via IFTTT

Viola Davis educates a clueless Jimmy Kimmel on menopause

You’d be surprised just how little some men know about women’s bodies. 

Jimmy Kimmel just proved himself completely clueless when it comes to the concept of menopause, something that affects literally half the population. 

Luckily, How To Get Away With Murder star and general queen Viola Davis was there to educate the clueless host – after giving him a solid 10 seconds of silence.

“You know what? Menopause is hell, Jimmy,” Davis said. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2ToFQ3e
via IFTTT

How millennials can contribute to their financial futures while supporting their values (Promotional Feature by UBS)

Image: Photo by rawpixel on Unsplash

2017%252f05%252f23%252f8e%252fhttps3a2f2fblueprintapiproduction.s3.amazonaws.com2.3ee73.png%252f90x90By UBS

Millennials have made headlines for everything from their tendency to job-hop to their fondness for avocados. There’s a reason the media has a laser-focus on millennial habits: In the not-too-distant future, the spending power of this avocado-loving generation has significant implications for governments, NGOs, and businesses the world over.

Financial experts are keeping a close watch on millennial investment data to gain insight into what this generation cares about and how it affects their long-term choices. According to a UBS Investor Watch report, millennials are optimistic about achieving their financial goals — even though they tend to invest conservatively. They also express interest in sustainable investments. This suggests that they’re more likely to put financial support behind initiatives that generate environmental, social, and governance results

When it comes to millennials’ value systems, findings suggest this generation is more philanthropically minded than its reputation might imply. Studies have found results about millennial core values that include a prioritization of civic duty and diversity, as well as a tendency to view themselves as members of a global community. They also appear to display greater concern for protecting the environment than do previous generations. In addition, the UBS Investor Watch report found that millennials often prioritize long-term financial considerations such as retirement planning or caring for aging parents. This data flies in the face of the stereotype of millennials as self-centered, short-sighted, and entitled. 

Millennials seem predisposed to make investments that reflect their personal values. Here’s a look at why sustainable investing may be attractive to this often misunderstood generation. 

Sustainable investing — and why it matters

<img class="" data-credit-name="Photo by Alena Koval from Pexels
” data-credit-provider=”custom type” data-fragment=”m!1085″ data-image=”https://mondrian.mashable.com/uploads%252Fcard%252Fimage%252F888189%252F60cfc621-2a5a-4140-bfd7-2071bc7ef245.jpg%252Foriginal.jpg?signature=13aNg9lTej6DMh2wloJidV_aghY=&source=https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com&#8221; data-micro=”1″ src=”https://mondrian.mashable.com/uploads%252Fcard%252Fimage%252F888189%252F60cfc621-2a5a-4140-bfd7-2071bc7ef245.jpg%252Ffit-in__1200x9600.jpg?signature=DqwxRym-EmfXd6rdTf6AojzrEK8=&source=https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com”&gt;

Image: Photo by Alena Koval from Pexels

Millennials’ moral compasses may play a role in defining their financial habits. A recent UBS whitepaper outlines a few key findings regarding millennial spending: One trend is that they place emphasis on backing socially responsible organizations, both philosophically and financially. 

Millennials also appear willing to align their investments with companies that display greater corporate responsibility. The whitepaper points out that millennials are nearly twice as likely to check product labeling for sustainability criteria than are other age groups. Investors under the age of 35, too, are twice as likely to sell an investment if it is associated with a company that displays “unsustainable” behavior.

Not only are millennials more inclined to work for or buy products from organizations with a social good component — they’re also more likely to invest in such companies in the long-term. According to research, almost half (49 percent) of millennials with a net worth of more than $1 million say that social responsibility is an important factor in choosing investments. This is a greater percentage than any previous generation.

Given millennials’ tendency to view themselves as global citizens, it makes sense that they appear more likely to use private capital for public good. And thankfully in today’s investment landscape, investors no longer have to choose between supporting noble causes and generating financial return. Sustainable investing provides a potential solution to both social responsibility aspirations and financial returns. 

Such investments include backing initiatives that support meaningful environmental or social change. For instance, companies and entrepreneurs that are part of UBS’ Global Visionary program, which recognizes organizations and individuals who endeavor to improve the planet. A couple of companies that fall into this category include Canopy, a non-profit dedicated to protecting the world’s forests and supporting indigenous communities, and CrossBoundary Energy, a renewables organization that provides solar power to companies throughout Africa.

Sustainable investing shows no signs of slowing down. Data suggests that the practice will grow significantly over the next five years as millennials’ net wealth continues to mount. UBS expects the percentage of investors who back sustainable ventures to climb from 39 percent to 48 percent globally. What’s more, the same UBS study found that a full 58 percent of investors expect sustainable investing will become a “standard approach” in the next decade.

All of this bodes well for businesses beyond those that sell avocado toast: Industries ranging from renewable energy organizations to social good enterprises stand to benefit from this influx of investment in the coming years. As millennials contribute more of their wealth to sustainable solutions, this generation is prepared to put their dollars where their values are — and potentially make the world a better place in the process.

The value of investments can go down as well as up. Your capital and income is at risk.

ESG/Sustainable Investing Considerations: Sustainable investing strategies aim to consider and in some instances integrate the analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into the investment process and portfolio. Strategies across geographies and styles approach ESG analysis and incorporate the findings in a variety of ways. Incorporating ESG factors or Sustainable Investing considerations may inhibit the portfolio manager’s ability to participate in certain investment opportunities that otherwise would be consistent with its investment objective and other principal investment strategies. The returns on a portfolio consisting primarily of ESG or sustainable investments may be lower or higher than a portfolio where such factors are not considered by the portfolio manager. Because sustainability criteria can exclude some investments, investors may not be able to take advantage of the same opportunities or market trends as investors that do not use such criteria.  Companies may not necessarily meet high performance standards on all aspects of ESG or sustainable investing issues; there is also no guarantee that any company will meet  expectations in connection with corporate responsibility, sustainability, and/or impact performance.

UBS and Mashable are not affiliated. 

In providing wealth management services to clients, we offer both investment advisory and brokerage services which are separate and distinct and differ in material ways. For information, including the different laws and contracts that govern, visit ubs.com/workingwithus. 

©UBS 2019. All rights reserved. UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG. Member FINRA/SIPC.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2B9MKCc
via IFTTT

Syria safe zone: ‘A long-term problem rather than a solution’

Ankara, Turkey – President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said 300,000 Syrian refugees have returned to their war-torn country as he revived talk of creating “safe zones” for millions more.

While Turkish officials have not provided details on where the zones would be located or how they would be administered, analysts said it was likely the refugees would be placed in areas of northern Syria under nominal Turkish control.

Turkey currently hosts more than 3.6 million registered Syrian refugees, according to the UN refugee agency (UNHCR).

Tensions between locals and Syrians have built over the course of the nearly eight-year war, compounded by competition for jobs and resources as Turkey faces recession.

Since it launched the Euphrates Shield military operation in north Syria in August 2016, Ankara has encouraged refugees to remain in camps close to the border – welcoming only the most vulnerable into Turkey.

The operation – and the Olive Branch campaign of last year that saw Turkey seize the Kurdish enclave of Afrin – has left a swath of Syrian territory under the control of Turkey’s rebel allies.

“After Afrin and other places came under the control of Turkish-supported groups, some Syrians returned to these areas but it’s a controversial issue,” said Nihat Ali Ozcan, an analyst at the Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey.

“Erdogan insisted that Syrian civilians will return but although this seems a good idea, it could create a huge problem.

“The people who lived there originally are very mixed – Kurds, Arabs and so on. I think it will create a huge security concern and could see confrontation between these groups.”

Long-term issues

Kamal Alam, a visiting fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London, said settling people under Turkish authority was a “temporary move before the Syrian government sets things right”.

“That is a long-term problem rather than short-term solution,” said Alam.

In the wake of military incursions, Turkish development agencies have moved into Syria to rebuild the water, transport, and energy infrastructure as well as public services such as schools and hospitals.

Across northern Aleppo province, Turkish investment has provided jobs for locals while municipal councils are run with Turkish support.

Children study the Turkish language in school and goods from across the border fill shop shelves. Turkish-trained police officers patrol the streets of cities such as Azaz, al-Bab and Jarabulus.

According to the Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency, Turkey has spent $33bn on Syrian refugees since the start of the war and anticipates spending a further $8.2bn this year.

“Turkey has put in considerable financial and human resource investment in northern Syria, which looks like a state within a state,” said Alam.

“Syria has rightly called this a violation of the UN charter of intervention, both as an occupying military force and creating a parallel state structure.”

Despite the level of rebuilding, it remains to be seen whether north Aleppo could accommodate the millions of Syrians inside Turkey, or how they would be administered.

“Who knows,” said Mitat Celikpala, an international relations professor at Istanbul’s Kadir Has University, when asked about how the zones would be governed. “This is an issue to negotiate with the other powers.”

Refoulement 

The feasibility of returning Syrians to a war zone is also in doubt.

Turkey has granted citizenship to more than 55,000 Syrians since the start of the war and the government has been sending mixed messages to refugees.

Last month, Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu told parliament he would like to see the 380,000 Syrians born in Turkey since 2011 granted citizenship.

The plan to resettle refugees could also violate international law as sending refugees back to war zones – known as refoulement – is prohibited.

“Syria is not ready for any kind of voluntary return and Turkey cannot force people back to Syria before an internationally agreed level of security is established,” said Metin Corabatir, president of the Ankara-based Research Centre on Asylum and Migration.

“I don’t think a mass return will happen at this time. Any security solution should have a UN or an international element because these areas are still not fully safe. It is not conducive for civilians to return to any area of Syria.”

The debate around a refugee safe zones, which was first suggested by Turkey’s then-Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu in 2012, has become more confused since the announcement of the withdrawal of US troops from northeast Syria.

This has led to the suggested creation of a secure zone between the Turkish border and territory controlled by the US-backed militia that Turkey considers a terrorist group.

It is unclear whether Ankara would consider this area suitable for refugee resettlement.

The UN refugee agency and Turkey’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs were contacted for comment but did not respond.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2TnVonK
via IFTTT

POLITICO Playbook: Talks to avoid a shutdown begin … What to watch

THE HOUSE-SENATE COMMITTEE that will negotiate the legislative future of PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP’S border wall meets for the first time this afternoon in HC-5, a basement Capitol meeting room.

WHEN THE PRESIDENT opened up the government last week, he did so on the recommendation of some advisers, who were leading him to believe that a large-scale immigration compromise was possible – if not likely – with Democrats.

BUT IMMIGRATION POLICY IS TRICKIER than just about any other issue that Congress deals with. Remember: In 2013, the Senate spent five months wrestling over immigration policy, it passed a bill, only to see the effort die in the House. That was with BARACK OBAMA in the White House, and JOHN BOEHNER as speaker. This was before the wall and before TRUMP.

AXIOS’ JONATHAN SWAN scooped that White House aide JARED KUSHNER has spent some time with a whiteboard, sketching out how he could transpose his success in passing criminal justice reform on immigration reform. The massive difference: Republicans and Democrats broadly agreed on criminal justice reform, and many wanted to see the same policies put into law.

CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM HAD A LIFE BEFORE KUSHNER. OBAMA and PAUL RYAN almost moved a bill, but ran out of time before the end of his presidency. Swan’s Axios story

WHAT TO WATCH FOR … Left to their own devices, the House and Senate appropriators — the folks on the committee — could absolutely come to a funding agreement. Watch to see how involved the White House gets. … Keep an eye on time. There are just 16 DAYS to get this wrapped up. …

… Watch for fissures in the conference. Yes, many folks on the panel are dealmakers, as a few stories have pointed out this week. But some of the House members have well-formed and pretty strident immigration views. … There’s some disagreement on this, but we believe if the debt limit gets into these talks, it only complicates matters, and stakes get raised exponentially.

INSIDE THE TALKS … GRIM OUTLOOK: RACHAEL BADE and BURGESS EVERETT: “Big border deal fades before talks even begin”: “Democrats are ruling out the idea of negotiating on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, skeptical that Trump would actually provide a permanent fix for the young undocumented immigrants after he previously rejected just such a deal. Meanwhile, top Republicans also doubt an expansive agreement could be put together in the next three weeks.

“The fading prospects of the negotiation mean Trump is likely to receive only a fraction of the $5.7 billion he’s been seeking for his southern barrier in any deal, if one can be put together at all by Feb. 15. Then he would have to decide whether to unilaterally move funds around by declaring a legally dubious national emergency or embrace another debilitating shutdown.

“‘I’ve tried to work with this administration on issues involving immigration with a great level of frustration. And I do not want to take so many innocent people whose fate is hanging in the balance of this political debate and start off with the premise that we have a likelihood of solving their problem,’ said Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois, a Democratic negotiator on the conference committee, which meets for the first time Wednesday.” POLITICO

— WAPO’S BOB COSTA and ERICA WERNER: “‘Whatever works’: Lawmakers negotiate to avert another shutdown absent signal from Trump”: “Republicans intent on averting another government shutdown sought Tuesday to expand border security talks to dealing with U.S. debt and other issues as lawmakers operated with no clear signal from President Trump on what he would accept.

“The latest idea to tack on an increase in the nation’s borrowing limit to discussions over Trump’s demand for $5.7 billion for a U.S.-Mexico border wall divided Republicans and was immediately rejected by Democrats, a less-than-promising development on the eve of congressional negotiators’ first meeting. ‘I don’t want to sink the whole thing,’ Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said when asked about the flurry of proposals by her colleagues. …

“Multiple Republican lawmakers and aides said they anticipate a meeting Thursday at the White House between Trump and Republican members of the bipartisan group, although details remained uncertain. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Trump should stay out of the negotiations. ‘When he mixes in, it’s a formula for failure’ he said. ‘I’d ask President Trump, ‘Let Congress deal with it on its own.’’” WaPo

— POLITICO/MORNING CONSULT POLL … STEVE SHEPARD: “Poll: Voters oppose another shutdown, emergency declaration”

Good Wednesday morning. EARLY MORNING DESSERT: JOHN BOEHNER speaking in Marco Island about the government shutdown: “When I was looking for legislative strategy, the last place I looked was talk radio. The second last place I looked was the knucklehead caucus, who don’t know how to vote yes on anything. They did the president a total disservice.” Naples News

SPOTTED, TRUMP HOTEL EDITION: Brad Parscale, Corey Lewandowski, Don Jr. and Kimberly Guilfoyle, David Bossie, Nick Ayers, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Jason Miller were all at the Trump Hotel on Tuesday night.

THE QUIET WHITE HOUSE … THE PRESIDENT has nothing on his schedule today besides his intelligence briefing. So far this week, the president has just had lunch with the VP on his schedule. Nothing else.

COMING ATTRACTIONS — “Stacey Abrams to give Democratic response to State of the Union,” by Marianne LeVine: “Although she lost the race, Abrams is viewed as a rising star in the party. Most recently, Democrats have pushed her to consider running in Georgia’s 2020 Senate race against Republican Sen. David Perdue. She recently met with Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairwoman Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) about the 2020 race.” POLITICOListen to Anna’s recent Women Rule podcast with Abrams

TRUMP VS. THE GOP … NYT’S PETER BAKER — “A Growing Chorus of Republican Critics for Trump’s Foreign Policy”: “They think pulling out of Syria and Afghanistan would be a debacle. They think North Korea cannot be trusted. They think the Islamic State is still a threat to America. They think Russia is bad and NATO is good. The trouble is their president does not agree.

“More than two years into his administration, the disconnect between President Trump and the Republican establishment on foreign policy has rarely been as stark. In recent days, the president’s own advisers and allies have been pushing back, challenging his view of the world and his prescription for its problems.” NYT

BURGESS EVERETT and GABBY ORR: “Why Trump is still beefing with ‘Da Nang Dick’”

2020 WATCH … ANNA spoke with DAYTON MAYOR NAN WHALEY for the latest Women Rule podcast. Whaley, who is co-chair of the COMMITTEE TO DRAFT SHERROD BROWN FOR PRESIDENT 2020, talked about all things Brown, what voters in the Midwest are looking for and her own political journey. Subscribe and listen

— STEVE SHEPARD: “Poll: Kamala Harris gaining among Democratic voters”: “A majority of Democrats, 57 percent, said they would be more likely to support a candidate who backs Medicare for all, in which all Americans get their health insurance from the government, the poll shows. Only 22 percent would be less likely to support a candidate who would prefer Medicare for all, over preserving and improving the existing system under the Affordable Care Act.

“The poll, conducted Jan. 25-27, also shows Harris gaining steam amid the rollout of her campaign, which began on Jan. 21, when she announced on ‘Good Morning America’ that she would run for president. She’s now the third choice of Democratic voters, who were asked to pick their favorite person for the party’s nomination next year.” POLITICO

— STEPHANIE MURRAY in Dover, N.H.: “Bloomberg creates his own lane in New Hampshire swing”: “Michael Bloomberg looked alot like a traditional presidential hopeful on Tuesday with a well-attended speech in New Hampshire, a factory visit and a walking tour of local businesses. But he didn’t sound much like a Democratic candidate.

“Other than his sharp criticisms of Donald Trump on climate change, the government shutdown and the president’s governing style, the New York billionaire seemed intent on testing the limits of how far he could deviate from Democratic Party orthodoxy.” POLITICO

— “Tulsi Gabbard campaign in disarray,” by Daniel Strauss and Alex Thompson: “Two-and-a-half weeks after the Hawaii Democrat told CNN she had decided to run for the White House—an announcement that even her own staff didn’t know was coming, after weeks of debating the timing of the rollout—the 37-year-old congresswoman has struggled to contain the chaos.” POLITICO

“Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti will not run for president,” by David Siders, Chris Cadelago and Daniel Strauss

THE INVESTIGATIONS — “Steven Mnuchin Draws Claims of Conflict of Interest in Decision on Russian Oligarch,” by NYT’s Ken Vogel: “Democrats in Congress raised ethical concerns on Tuesday about connections between Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and a billionaire Republican donor who stands to benefit financially from the Trump administration’s decision to lift sanctions on the Russian oligarch Oleg V. Deripaska’s companies.

“In a letter to Mr. Mnuchin, two senior Democratic lawmakers said the Treasury secretary’s connection to an entertainment business owned in part by the donor, Len Blavatnik, a major investor in Mr. Deripaska’s giant aluminum company, Rusal, was a potential conflict of interest.” NYT

TRUMP INC. — “Trump’s company plans to expand check of employees’ legal status following report that it hired undocumented workers for years,” by WaPo’s Jonathan O’Connell, Elise Viebeck and Tracy Jan: “President Trump’s company plans to institute E-Verify, a federal program that allows employers to check whether new hires are legally eligible to work in the United States, in every one of its golf clubs, hotels and resorts, following a Washington Post report that its club in Westchester County, N.Y., employed undocumented immigrants for years.

“‘We are instituting E-Verify on all of our properties as soon as possible,’ Eric Trump, one of the president’s sons and executive vice president of the Trump Organization, said Tuesday, acknowledging that the company currently uses the program only at some locations. ‘We’re starting with the golf properties, and we are going to be doing all of them.’” WaPo

SCOOP — “Malpass Is a Trump Finalist for World Bank President, Sources Say,” by Bloomberg’s Jennifer Jacobs, Saleha Mohsin and Andrew Mayeda: “A Donald Trump loyalist, Treasury Undersecretary David Malpass, is a finalist to be the president’s choice for the next World Bank president, according to people familiar with the matter.” Bloomberg

TOP-ED — RYAN CROCKER in WAPO, “I was ambassador to Afghanistan. This deal is a surrender”: “A framework agreement was announced on Monday calling for a cease-fire that could lead to the full withdrawal of U.S. troops. … The framework was reached without the involvement of the Afghan government. The Taliban has said all along that it refuses to negotiate with the government, considering the government the illegitimate puppet of the U.S. occupation.

“By acceding to this Taliban demand, we have ourselves delegitimized the government we claim to support. This current process bears an unfortunate resemblance to the Paris peace talks during the Vietnam War. Then, as now, it was clear that by going to the table we were surrendering; we were just negotiating the terms of our surrender. The Taliban will offer any number of commitments, knowing that when we are gone and the Taliban is back, we will have no means of enforcing any of them.” WaPo

CHRISTIE WATCH — “Chris Christie rips Kushner’s dad: ‘One of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes that I prosecuted,’” by WaPo’s Michael Brice-Saddler: “Former New Jersey governor Chris Christie … claims Kushner was still ‘seething’ from events that took place more than a decade prior — when Christie, as a U.S. attorney, prosecuted Kushner’s father, Charles, for tax evasion, witness tampering and illegal campaign contributions, sending the elder Kushner to prison for 14 months. …

“He added, ‘It’s one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes that I prosecuted when I was U.S. attorney,’ Christie said during a segment with PBS’s ‘Firing Line With Margaret Hoover.’ ‘And I was a U.S. attorney in New Jersey, Margaret — so we had some loathsome and disgusting crime going on there!’” WaPo

HAPPENING THIS WEEKEND — Get “Freezin’ for a Reason” on Saturday with Special Olympics DC. POLITICO is thrilled to partner with the “Polar Plunge,” an annual event that supports more than 1,600 Special Olympics DC athletes on Saturday, Feb. 2. Attendees will enjoy ICE YARDS festivities, including icy cocktails and local D.C. brews, fun activities, live music, an ice bar, food from neighborhood restaurants, D.C.’s largest group shotski attempt and so much more. You can register as an individual, as a team or join an existing team and take the plunge. Register

K STREET FILES — “Coca-Cola tried to influence CDC on research and policy, new report states,” by Jesse Chase-Lubitz

SPOTTED: Jim Mattis at the Palm. Lanny Davis was also there for lunch Tuesday, and Roger Stone went over to his table for a “friendly conversation that of course captured the attention of the room,” according to our tipster. Stone was also spotted at the Hamilton for dinner last night. … Former Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) on the Acela from NYC to D.C.

BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Chris Jansing, MSNBC senior national correspondent, celebrating in Hawaii. What she’s been reading recently: “Steve Kornacki’s ‘The Red and the Blue’ is just like he is on TV — smart and fascinating and a little bit nerdy — plus compellingly readable. I’ve downloaded ‘Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption,’ by Bryan Stevenson to bring on vacation.” Playbook Plus Q&A

BIRTHDAYS: Mike Sommers, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute and former Boehner COS, is 44 … POLITICO’s G. Robert Hillman (hat tips: Ken Vogel, Ben Schreckinger and Jonathan Topaz) … former Vice President Dick Cheney is 78 … the king of Jordan, Abdullah II, is 57 … Bob Ryan … POLITICO’s Natasha Korecki … Chris Ariens, director of video at AdWeek … Max Taves … Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) is 39 … Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.) is 47 … former Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.) is 8-0 … Alfred C. Liggins III … Rohit Chopra … Nels Olson, vice chairman and co-leader of board and CEO services of Korn Ferry … Lisa Desjardins, correspondent for the “PBS NewsHour” … former U.S. Ambassador to Hungary Colleen Bell … BuzzFeed’s Sarah Mimms is 31 … Lauren Schuck … CBS News’ Steven Portnoy …

… Maeve Reston, CNN national political reporter … David Cordish is 79 … Len Bickwit of Miller & Chevalier (h/t Megan Duero) … Eileen McMahon … Erin Waters (h/t Todd Breasseale) … Cecil Swamidoss (h/t Heather Podesta) … Nathan Leamer, policy adviser to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, is 33 (h/ts Zach Graves and David Bahr) … Caitlin Poling … Hastie Afkhami, head of digital and SVP at Subject Matter … Peter Lauria (h/t Liana Baker) … Alexis Serfaty … Andrew Ireland … Doug Coulter … Drew Bond … ABC7’s Kelly Lamp Wasilefski … Edelman’s Caroline Gallrein … Bush WH alum Lea Hutchins, who recently married Michael Gilliam — pic … Brice Anderson is 61 … Wayne E. White … Evan Glass … Wanda Moebius of Johnson & Johnson … Marcela Sanchez, comms officer at World Bank … Ileana Futter

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2B9Mxio
via IFTTT

Richard E. Grant’s fan letter to Barbra Streisand gets lovely reply 47 years after he sent it

You might not know this, but even massive celebrities have major fangirl moments. 

Take Richard E. Grant, for instance, who tweeted a letter he’d penned at age 14 to his idol, Barbra Streisand, alongside a picture of himself posing outside her house. 

SEE ALSO: ‘Black Panther,’ ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ score multiple Oscar nominations

What followed was the most delightfully pure exchange between Streisand and “lifelong fan” Grant, who’s now 61 years old.  

As a lifelong fan of someone you’ll understand what it meant for me to take this snap outside the home of @BarbraStreisand Asked Security for permission & he replied ‘It’s a public road, but thanks for asking’ Wrote her this letter when I was 14. My wife is very understanding! pic.twitter.com/3SohXKpgZT

— Richard E. Grant (@RichardEGrant) January 29, 2019

If you look at the letter closely, you’ll see that 14-year-old Grant was very concerned for Streisand’s wellbeing and offered her a break at his family home in Swaziland, south-east Africa. 

After stating that he and his family were “very big fans” after seeing Streisand in Funny Girl, he said that he had been following her career “avidly” and owned all her records.

“I am fourteen years old I read in the paper that you were feeling very tired and pressurized by your fame and failed romance with Mr Ryan O’Neal,” wrote Grant. “I would like to offer you a two-week holiday, or longer, at our house, which is very beautiful with a pool and a magnificent view of the Ezulwini Valley. Which the Swazi people call Valley of Heaven. I think you will agree when you see it.”

He explained that because the local cinema only shows films for three days at a time, there’d be little chance of her being “mobbed in the street.” 

“Here you can rest,” wrote Grant. “No one will trouble you and I assure you you will not be mobbed in the street as your films only show in our one cinema for three days, so not that many people will know who you are, so no chance of being mobbed. Please consider this respite seriously. You will always be welcome.”

Though Streisand didn’t take up Grant’s very sweet offer at the time, his tweet got a lovely reply from Streisand 47 years later. 

Dear Richard What a wonderful letter you wrote me when u were 14 ! and look at u now! You’re terrific in your latest movie with Melissa congratulations and love Barbra

— Barbra Streisand (@BarbraStreisand) January 29, 2019

Grant — who just received an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actor for Can You Ever Forgive Me? — posted a gloriously gushing reply to Streisand’s tweet. 

I cannot begin to properly express what your generous reply has meant to me! THANK YOU. And most especially for NOT calling Security to have me arrested!! ❤❤❤❤❤❤ https://t.co/IqLWDYGqsa

— Richard E. Grant (@RichardEGrant) January 29, 2019

It didn’t end there, though. Grant wasn’t lying when he said how much Streisand’s reply meant to him. 

My pal Nicole Wilcox took this photo as my daughter read me @BarbraStreisand ‘s tweet/response to a letter I sent her 47 yrs ago. Am completely crinkle faced & overcome with emotion. My ‘Message in a bottle’ miracle. 😭😍😇 pic.twitter.com/bJMko098we

— Richard E. Grant (@RichardEGrant) January 30, 2019

He posted a photo that his friend took of him as his daughter read out Streisand’s reply to his letter. 

We’re not crying, we just have something in our eye. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2GaK4rx
via IFTTT