Cambodia ‘fails’ acid attack victims even with tougher penalties

Phnom Penh, Cambodia – On a March evening in 2017, Sorn Chanty was returning home from beauty school in Cambodia’s capital, Phnom Penh, when a man ran at her, grabbed her bag and threw acid in her face. 

When an ambulance eventually arrived, the crew told the 24-year-old, who was screaming, to get inside but refused to drive her to hospital or perform first-aid procedures.

Once her ex-boyfriend came to the scene, the crew agreed to take her to hospital but Chanty said when they got there, the driver refused to let her out of the vehicle until her former partner had paid $30.

They then had to pay another $25 to be allowed inside the emergency room, and an extra $60 on treatment before a labour union stepped in and funded the rest.

Chanty is one of 17 Cambodian survivors of acid violence featured in a report released on Tuesday by Human Rights Watch (HRW) accusing the country’s government of failing to enforce legislation it passed seven years ago that requires legal and medical support to victims of such attacks.

Corruption paralysing Cambodia healthcare (2:27)

The 48-page study, What Hell Feels Like – Acid Violence in Cambodia, said while the number of attacks had sharply dropped,not one acid-attack victim interviewed had received free treatment – as enshrined in 2012’s Acid Law.

“Instead, survivors face the full range of problems anyone in need of emergency and other serious medical treatment faces in Cambodia, including denial of treatment until they show proof that they can pay or provide out-of-pocket payments,” HRW said.

“In May 2017, even the head doctor at the burn unit at Preah Kossamak Hospital – the largest public hospital in Cambodia and the only one with a dedicated burn unit – was unaware that acid victims have a right to be treated free of charge.”

Health Ministry Ly Sovann told Al Jazeera in a message that the government offered “free services to acid attack victims from public hospitals” but did not respond when asked as to why survivors claimed they had been forced to pay for treatment.

Breaking stigma of Bangladesh acid victims (2:20)

‘What hell feels like’

Cheap and easily available, acid has been used in deliberate attacks in nearly every part of the world, leaving victims scarred for life physically and emotionally.

Cambodia is among the countries with a troubling history of acid violence, experiencing a sharp increase in reported cases in 2000. 

The Cambodian government finally took steps to curb the problem with the passing of the Acid Law, imposing tougher sentences on those found guilty of such crimes and making it easier – and cheaper – for survivors to get treatment.

But even though the legislation led to a fall in the number of attacks – at least 25 have been reported since the law came into effect compared with 36 in 2010 – few cases have made it to court and fewer still to a conviction. Even those found guilty have rarely served out their sentence.

“While the Cambodian government has passed legislation to curb the availability of acid used in such attacks and to provide accessible healthcare and legal support to victims … perpetrators rarely go to prison and victims rarely receive adequate healthcare or meaningful compensation,” HRW said.

‘His body is scarred after I threw acid on him’

One evening two years ago, after yet another beating from her drunken husband, 41-year-old Phun Sreang picked up a bottle of acid and poured it over his face as he slept.

“At that time, I was so angry with him because he had beaten me so many times after he had been drinking,” Sreang told Al Jazeera from her home in Cambodia’s Tbong Khmum province. The couple had been married for 20 years.

The liquid immediately started eating into the skin around the face and body of Sreang’s husband, 54-year-old Roem Til. Despite being rushed to hospital, he lost all the sight in his left eye and some in his right.

Sreang was arrested, but swiftly released because her husband did not want to see her prosecuted. Now, Sreang is her husband’s carer.

“He is still hurting and he cannot walk,” Sreang said. “He has scars on his body after I threw acid on him.”

Acid still remains relatively easy to buy despite the regulations on the production and sale of the liquids that were introduced in the legislation.

It took Al Jazeera only an hour to find a goldsmith tool supplier who was willing to sell acid – four litres for $5 – even though the law requires that all purchasers of acid must present an “identification card and/or license authorisation stating the professional occupation relevant to the usage of strong acid”.

A Cambodian vendor with a bottle of sulphuric acid from a box at her shop near the Cambodia-Thai border [File: Heng Sinith/AP Photo]

The situation has been made worse by the end of civil society support for the victims of acid attacks.

Funding for the Cambodian Acid Survivors Charity (CASC) was reduced, and the organisation shut down entirely in 2015.

Erin Bourgois, who spent two years as CASC’s project manager before it folded, said the organisation’s goal, like any non-profit, was to put itself out of business.

“It was an emotional time and hard to see the impact it had on survivors as we phased out these services,” Bourgois told Al Jazeera. “We were hopeful that the [government] would fulfill its promise in enforcing and implementing the law to further reduce acid attacks and assume the responsibility of providing support to survivors,” she said.

While the Acid Law had been “pivotal” in reducing acid attacks and violence, she said the government now needed to deliver.

“Without proper implementation, acid attacks will continue and survivors will not receive the critical support services needed to heal and achieve justice,” she added.

Back in Tbong Khmum, Sreang, a cassava farmer, says she would welcome more support as her husband is almost immobile and cannot work.

“Our relationship is better than before the acid attack and he cannot use violence like before,” she said. “He loved me so much that he was so jealous and got angry with me, mistreated and hurt me.”

Sreang said she will always harbour deep regret for her actions that day.

“People should not throw acid because it causes the victim to feel pain like my husband. It’s also difficult for us, we feel regret and pity for him.”

This story was reported with a Cambodian journalist who requested their name not be used due to fears it could jeopardise their current job.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Sc1k6Y
via IFTTT

Pornhub says Patriots fans watched less porn than Rams fans during Super Bowl

Pornhub traffic from New England dropped way more than site traffic from California.
Pornhub traffic from New England dropped way more than site traffic from California.

Image: Patrick Smith / Getty Images

2018%252f04%252f02%252f74%252fheadshot.edeb7.jpg%252f90x90By Morgan Sung

It turns out New Englanders were less likely to engage in hand-to-gland combat during the Super Bowl than Angelenos, according to Pornhub data. 

Pornhub released its annual Super Bowl analytics, and the results are unsurprising: New Englanders were notably more hyped about the big game than Angelenos. But, Porbhub added, overall traffic to the site fell when the game started and shot right back up as it ended.

According to Pornhub, Massachusetts and New Hampshire had the largest drops in traffic during the Super Bowl, down by 42 percent. Maine and North Dakota also paid a significant amount of attention to the game, and each had a 37 percent drop in traffic.

California, meanwhile, was less invested in watching the Patriots beat the Rams, and only saw a 19 percent drop in Pornhub traffic during the same time period. Pornhub traffic in Mississippi and Louisiana fell 2 percent and 3 percent, respectively. 

Pornhub traffic dipped 20 percent during the Super Bowl.

Image: pornhub

Traffic dropped 20 percent across the nation by 6 p.m. EST, right before kickoff. It stayed down, even dipping further at 9 p.m., before spiking up 9 percent above average after the game ended. 

“That’s a massive increase in traffic when you consider that 11 p.m. is Pornhub’s peak traffic time in the United States,” Pornhub reported. 

Massachusetts and New Hampshire had the biggest drops in traffic.

Image: pornhub

City to city, Los Angeles wasn’t as engaged in the game nearly as much as Boston was. While Pornhub traffic fell up to 50 percent below average in Boston during the Super Bowl, the lowest traffic fell in Los Angeles was to 22 percent. 

People in Los Angeles were less invested in the Super Bowl than people in Boston were.

Image: pornhub

Traffic didn’t fall as much during this Super Bowl as in past years. When the Patriots and Philadelphia Eagles went head-to-head in 2018, Pornhub traffic dropped 24 percent. When the Patriots and Atlanta Falcons played each other in 2017, traffic dropped 25 percent. People across the U.S. may have been less invested in the Super Bowl and more interested in getting off this time around. 

SEE ALSO: Pornhub reports bump in traffic amid government shutdown

People were at least in the game day spirit: Pornhub’s popular searches for Sunday included “Super Bowl/Superbowl” and “Patriots.” Searches for “touchdown” surged 3115 percent, and searches for “football cheerleader” were up 972 percent. People were also horny for “cheerleader orgy,” as searches for it increased by 644 percent. 

Pornhub probably had better entertainment on offer than the mess of the halftime show

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2UF5C3l
via IFTTT

NBA Rumors: Lakers Talking Jabari Parker for Caldwell-Pope Trade with Bulls

BROOKLYN, NY - JANUARY 29:  Jabari Parker #2 of the Chicago Bulls smiles during the game against the Brooklyn Nets on January 29, 2019 at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2019 NBAE (Photo by Nathaniel S. Butler/NBAE via Getty Images)

Nathaniel S. Butler/Getty Images

The Los Angeles Lakers have discussed a trade for Jabari Parker with the Chicago Bulls, ESPN.com’s Brian Windhorst reported on The Hoop Collective podcast (h/t HoopsHype’s Bryan Kalbrosky).

In one proposed deal, Parker would go to Los Angeles, with Kentavious Caldwell-Pope heading to Chicago. Caldwell-Pope has the power to veto any trade, though, which could make moving the veteran guard difficult for the Lakers.

The Los Angeles Times Tania Ganguli reported in December that Caldwell-Pope’s representatives were working “to find him a better situation.” 

The 25-year-old has seen his minutes go from 33.2 per game in 2017-18 to 23.9 per game this season. Although he’d likely have a bigger role with the Bulls, he may not want to go to a team that owns the NBA’s fourth-worst record (12-41).

Were the Lakers and Bulls to swap Caldwell-Pope and Parker, it would essentially be an exchange of unwanted veterans on expiring deals.

One NBA executive told Bleacher Report’s Ken Berger the Bulls were prepared to “trade [Parker] for anything they can get.” Caldwell-Pope, meanwhile, isn’t providing much spacing for Los Angeles—he’s a 34.8 percent three-point shooter—and offers little to warrant bringing him back for next season.

Parker at least has something approaching untapped potential. He’s an even worse long-range shooter than KCP—32.5 percent—but is still only 23. It’s too early to write Parker off as a useful player, and putting him next to LeBron James might bring out the best version of the fifth-year forward.

The Lakers don’t have much downside to acquiring Parker. Assuming Caldwell-Pope was the biggest asset on Los Angeles’ end, the team wouldn’t be giving up much. Parker’s $20 million team option for 2019-20 also gives the Lakers an easy escape plan if things don’t work out.

Ganguli and colleague Broderick Turner reported Monday that Lakers president of basketball operations Magic Johnson had offered Kyle Kuzma, Lonzo Ball, Brandon Ingram, Rajon Rondo, Lance Stephenson, Michael Beasley and two first-round picks to the New Orleans Pelicans for Anthony Davis.

Were that trade to go through, Los Angeles would be sacrificing a lot of depth, allowing Parker an opportunity to prove himself as a worthy rotation regular going forward.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2S8j9Um
via IFTTT

Chinese communities worldwide usher in Lunar New Year

Chinese communities on Tuesday began celebrating the Lunar New Year, an occasion for families to get together for intimate dinners and welcome the last of the Chinese zodiac’s signs, the Pig.

The Lunar New Year is the most important holiday of the Chinese calendar, with hundreds of millions of people travelling to celebrate it with their families in what is the world’s largest annual human migration.

In mainland China, authorities were expecting a total of almost three billion trips by car, train and aeroplane in the 40 days surrounding the holiday.

On Chinese New Year’s Eve, families hold traditional dinners and watch a marathon televised gala. Children receive red envelopes filled with money for good luck.

Events such as traditional lion dances are held in decorated public spaces while supermarkets stock up on mooncakes and tangerines.

A woman holding a flower-shape candle prays on the first day of the Chinese Lunar New Year at the Tanzhe temple in Beijing’s Mentougou District [Andy Wong/The Associated Press]

Festivities will take place across the globe, from Southeast Asia’s centuries-old Chinese communities to the more recently established Chinatowns of Sydney, London, Vancouver, Los Angeles and beyond.

Despite a slowing economy, more Chinese are travelling abroad during the holidays, booking family trips to Thailand, Japan and other top destinations.

Authorities were expecting an average of 1.77 million international trips per day this week – an 8.9-per-cent increase compared to last year.

Celebrations in major Chinese cities, including Beijing and Shanghai, were more quiet than usual after authorities last year banned fireworks due to pollution and safety concerns.

People rush to plant the first joss stick of the Lunar New Year at the stroke of midnight at the Kwan Im Thong Hood Cho temple in Singapore [Feline Lim/Reuters]

In Hong Kong, flower markets were filled with residents picking out orchids, mandarins and peach blossoms to decorate their homes – with stalls also boasting a dizzying array of pig-themed pillows, tote bags and stuffed toys.

Thousands of incense-carrying petitioners crammed into the city’s famous Wong Tai Sin temple overnight, a popular location to mark the first prayers of the New Year.

In Japan, the capital’s famous Tokyo Tower was due to turn red in celebration of the New Year – a first for the city. 

Parades and lion dances in Western cities such as New York and London were expected to draw large crowds.

Performers rehearse a re-enactment of a Chinese New Year Qing Dynasty ceremony at the Temple of Earth in Beijing’s Ditan Park in Beijing [Thomas Peter/Reuters]

Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen used her social media accounts to deliver a political sideswipe at Beijing with a message highlighting the island’s democratic credentials and linguistic pluralism.

“In Taiwan, we are able to maintain our cultural traditions,” she said in a video in which she delivered the traditional new year greeting in five Chinese languages: Mandarin, Taiwanese, Hakka, Teochew and Cantonese.

China still sees Taiwan as part of its territory to be reunified, despite the two sides being ruled separately since the end of a civil war in 1949.

Relations between Taipei and Beijing have had a rocky start to 2019 after Chinese President Xi Jinping delivered a bellicose speech last month describing the island’s unification with the mainland as “inevitable”.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2UHVkPV
via IFTTT

Republicans defy Trump on national emergency


Mitch McConnell, Roy Blunt, John Thune, John Cornyn

Senate Republicans, including Roy Blunt (second from left), John Thune (middle) and John Cornyn (right), are opposed to the idea of President Trump declaring a national emergency to build his border wall. | Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Congress

Resistance from GOP senators could expose a split in the party and force the president to issue his first veto.

Many Senate Republicans are deeply opposed to President Donald Trump declaring a national emergency to build his border wall, with enough resistance that the president might ultimately be forced to veto a measure intended to block him.

Interviews with a dozen GOP senators on Monday revealed broad efforts to wave Trump from doing an end run around Congress, part of an effort to avoid a politically perilous floor vote that could place them at odds with the president.

Story Continued Below

If the House were to pass a formal resolution of disapproval, the Senate would be forced to take it up with a majority threshold required for passage under procedural rules. That would mean just four GOP defections along with all Democrats would be enough to rebuke the president.

Trump could still win that vote, as no GOP senators would commit to voting against the president, deeming it too hypothetical given the ongoing bipartisan negotiations on border security. But just a handful of Republicans right now are publicly committing to standing with Trump, suggesting the president could face a brutal intraparty fight should he move forward.

“The president’s going to get sued and it won’t succeed in accomplishing his goal … [Speaker Nancy] Pelosi will introduce a resolution of disapproval that will pass the House and come over here and divide Republicans,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas). “It strikes me as not a great strategy.”

“While I’m in favor of what this president wants to do [on the border wall], I think it sets a dangerous precedent and I hope he doesn’t do it,” said MIssouri Sen. Roy Blunt, the No. 4 GOP leader.

As the shutdown dragged on last month, six Republicans bolted from Trump’s position and endorsed a Democratic bill to reopen the government. That wasn’t enough to break a filibuster, but it would be enough for a disapproval measure.

Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), the party whip, said the GOP is focused on the bipartisan conference committee producing something that can pass the Senate and that he hoped a unilateral move by the president would be a “last resort.”

“We don’t think that’s necessary,” he said. “There are concerns and our members are conveying those.”

Two Republicans who voted for that Democratic spending bill two weeks ago said they were concerned that the president might declare a national emergency and were deliberating how they might react.

“I can’t say for certain about what I would do. But I in general am opposed,” said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who said a broad declaration to shift billions around to fund the border wall “taken to an extreme would rend the appropriations process meaningless and it also is in my judgment of dubious constitutionality.”

“My strong preference would be to follow the legislative process to secure the border in the normal [way],” said Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah). He said a vote to block the president from moving forward is “something which I will be studying.”

House Democrats are eager to challenge the president, with the side benefit of provoking an intraparty clash for Republicans. A Democratic leadership aide said a disapproval resolution is “likely” if Trump declares an emergency though no final decision has been made.

Trump also has ways to reprogram some funds or deploy other executive actions that could avoid a conflict with Congress. But Trump has pointedly hinted he could declare an emergency.

“I don’t take anything off the table. I don’t like to take things off the table. It’s that alternative. It’s national emergency, it’s other things and, you know, there have been plenty national emergencies called,” Trump told CBS on Sunday.

The level of opposition in his own party could hinge on how broad a move the president makes and whether it could set the precedent for future Democratic presidents to steamroll Congress,

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said that while he was “highly sympathetic” with the president’s frustration about the lack of wall funding, he wants the administration “to lay out the legal case” for a national emergency. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said he hoped to avoid a national emergency declaration and voiced concern about granting too much power to the executive branch.

“I’m here to stand up for this institution, keep the powers separate,” Tillis said. When asked whether he’d vote against a national emergency, Tillis responded that he needs to see what the president actually does.

Trump has some support from Senate Republicans to declare a national emergency. Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) said Monday that if Trump were to go that route, he would stand with him and be “proud of the president that he’s willing to stand up and do what’s right to protect this country.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) also tweeted last week that he would support Trump using emergency powers to build a wall or barrier if Congress and the White House are unable to reach a deal by Feb. 15 when the next shutdown could hit.

The president would likely veto the resolution should it be passed, which would require just 34 supportive senators to sustain. Yet going through that process would undermine him politically, focusing attention on the president’s conflict with his own party and his first veto rather than other accomplishments.

“As a practical matter, the president might be able to get his veto sustained,” said Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.). “The 99 percent likelihood is that a court would enjoin that emergency declaration and for the rest of the president’s first term the matter of the emergency would be tied up in the court and there would be no wall.”

Heather Caygle contributed to this report.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2SaViU7
via IFTTT

Arizona, Sean Miller Reportedly Among Teams Under NCAA Inquiry After FBI Probe

Arizona head coach Sean Miller in the second half during an NCAA college basketball game against Oregon, Thursday, Jan. 17, 2019, in Tucson, Ariz. Oregon defeated Arizona 59-54. (AP Photo/Rick Scuteri)

Rick Scuteri/Associated Press

Arizona Wildcats men’s basketball head coach Sean Miller is reportedly facing a cloudy future.

According to a report from Pat Forde, Pete Thamel and Dan Wetzel of Yahoo Sports, Arizona is one of the schools under formal NCAA inquiry following the FBI’s investigation into college basketball corruption. The report noted there is “a confluence of complications that cast a shroud over Miller’s future” as a result.

Among those complications is the upcoming trial of Christian Dawkins—a former runner for agent Andy Miller—as well as “potential NCAA fallout from the recent felony plea in federal court by former Arizona assistant coach Emanuel ‘Book’ Richardson, which amplifies the question of how the NCAA will handle Miller’s responsibility for the actions in his program.”

This article will be updated to provide more information on this story as it becomes available. 

Get the best sports content from the web and social in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WHBarl
via IFTTT

Central American caravans advance amid shifting border policies

Tapachula, Mexico – The church bells were chiming at 3am, but Juan Alberto Orellana was already awake. He and other Central American migrants and refugees were preparing to head north on Sunday from Tapachula, in southern Mexico.

The central plaza was abuzz with activity as people got up from their pieces of cardboard, blankets, and patches of dirt and concrete. For the hundreds of people who slept in the plaza and others arriving from other neighbourhoods, getting ready did not take long.

Like most people, everything Orellana brought with him from Honduras fit into a small backpack. He left home on January 19, fleeing poverty. Work in the banana plantations around his hometown of Olanchito did not pay enough to get by, he said.

“People cannot live in Honduras,” Orellana told Al Jazeera in the plaza on Sunday, as he waited to begin the collective trek north.

“The cost of living is really high,” he said, adding that the high rate of violent crime was also a factor in his decision to leave Honduras.

Orellana joined the roughly 2,000 migrants and refugees leaving Tapachula on foot. Many hope to make it to the US, while others plan to remain in Mexico, but the destination on Sunday was Huixtla, a town 41km up the highway in the state of Chiapas.

Tens of thousands of Central Americans have fled over the past four months in a series of highly visible large groups called caravans. The overwhelming majority are from Honduras, followed by El Salvador and Guatemala. 

The group that set out on Sunday from Tapachula is part of the latest wave of the ongoing exodus. A caravan left Honduras on January 15, and other groups, families and individuals have been streaming up to the Tecun Uman border crossing between Guatemala and Mexico ever since.

Humanitarian visas

During the second half of January, migrants and refugees benefited from a temporary special policy established by the Mexican government, under a new administration that took power on December 1. The government has been issuing renewable one-year humanitarian visas that permit people to live, work and travel throughout Mexico. 

Between January 15 and 29, Mexican officials processed 15,552 humanitarian visa requests at the border. The National Immigration Institute announced Sunday it had issued 11,255 visas, having fully processed 72 percent of the applications.

Most of the 2,000 Central Americans who departed from Tapachula on Sunday had obtained humanitarian visas. For many of them, travelling with a caravan is not a choice; they cannot afford transportation.

Migrants and refugees spread out for kilometers along the highway a few hours into the walk, taking breaks in the shade of mango trees. Eventually, Kenia Marisol Alvarado and many others got rides to Huixtla from passing trucks.

Alvarado left home in a remote rural area of the Santa Barbara department of Honduras more than two weeks ago with her husband and their eight-year-old son. She and her husband both worked as agricultural day labourers when they could, but the work was sporadic and only paid six dollars a day.

Kenia Marisol Alvarado, her husband and son, and another family walk into Huixtla after a truck driver dropped them off at the highway turn-off [Sandra Cuffe/Al Jazeera]

Like many Central Americans issued humanitarian visas, Alvarado and her family are planning on staying in Mexico. But they have no savings and had never left Honduras before, so they are travelling up into Mexico with the caravan until they can get their bearings and figure out the best place to look for work to support themselves and the other two children, aged three and six, they left with relatives back in Honduras.

“We came to work and also to be able to pay school costs for our kids. The situation [in Honduras] is extreme. There is no work,” Alvarado told Al Jazeera.

Alvarado’s family and another family with young children were dropped off at the highway turn-off to Huixtla by a passing pickup truck driver. Alvarado’s son was in good spirits. “That’s an A!” he exclaimed excitedly, pointing at the last letter in the town name, spelled out in large rainbow letters at the side of the street into town.

The family does not have to worry about immigration checkpoints because they have humanitarian visas. But not everyone in the caravan has them. The Mexican government ended its temporary special policy without warning after two weeks, suddenly announcing January 29 that it would accept no new applicants.

We came to work and also to be able to pay school costs for our kids. The situation [in Honduras] is extreme. There is no work.

 Kenia Marisol Alvarado, Central American caravan participant 

Central Americans were still streaming to the Tecun Uman border crossing and many are still stuck in limbo, while others have crossed into Mexico without processing. Further north, another caravan is travelling up through Mexico without humanitarian visas.

When waves of Hondurans and Salvadorans began arriving at the border between Guatemala and Mexico in mid-January, there was initially an immense amount of mistrust regarding the Mexican government’s promises of visas. 

For years, Mexico has been deporting more Central Americans than the US. Past experiences and policies led many Central Americans to believe the visa request process was a ruse to deport them, and hundreds of people avoided the process and crossed Mexico. By the time the group arrived in Mexico City last week, they numbered more than 2,500.

Mexican immigration officials set up in the capital city stadium serving as a migrant and refugee shelter and once again offered humanitarian visas for those. As of Sunday, 661 people had taken them up on the offer and 590 had already been issued visas at the stadium, according to the National Immigration Institute.

‘Remain in Mexico’ policy

Some 1,400 people from the advance caravan had already arrived Sunday in El Saltillo, Coahuila, in northern Mexico. Instead of following in the footsteps of every caravan last year and heading to Tijuana, they will go to a Mexican city bordering Texas, either by Eagle Pass or Laredo, according to Agencia Reforma, a Mexican newswire. 

The migrant and refugee caravan that departed Sunday from Tapachula has tentative plans to go to Tijuana, but news of violence, deteriorating shelter conditions, lack of employment opportunities and long wait lists to seek asylum in Tijuana has travelled south. Several people travelling with the group, as well as others leaving independently told Al Jazeera they will head to other border areas instead. 

Tijuana is now the site of the controversial Remain in Mexico policy, under which the US returns asylum seekers to Mexico to await court dates and the outcome of their cases. Implementation of the policy, now dubbed the Migration Protection Protocols, began last week and is currently only in effect at the San Ysidro port of entry between Tijuana and San Diego.

The policy has come under fire from immigrant rights and support groups. Homicides in Tijuana homicide rate hit an all-time high last month, and the regulations could also push migrants and refugees to travel to other border areas along routes controlled by criminal and paramilitary groups.

On Friday, Mexico detained and deported Nora Phillips, the legal director of Al Otro Lado, an immigrant rights group that works closely with and litigates on behalf of Central American migrants and refugees in Tijuana. Her passport was flagged for unconfirmed reasons, as was that of the group’s policy director Erika Pinheiro, who was denied entry to Mexico last month.

ALERT!! Our Legal Director and Litigation Director have been REMOVED from Mexico. Apparently the US govt issued security alerts on our passports to prevent us from traveling. Our Legal Director is being returned on a flight that lands at LAX terminal 2 at 12:10. Please SHOW UP

— Al Otro Lado (@AlOtroLado_Org) February 1, 2019

US President Donald Trump continues to focus on the border. Claiming the advancing caravans are a threat to security, he persists in his demand for border wall funding. If not met, he could once again shut down the federal government this month. He has also threatened to declare a national emergency to build the wall – a move that would likely be met with legal challenges.

“With Caravans marching through Mexico and toward our Country, Republicans must be prepared to do whatever is necessary for STRONG Border Security. Dems do nothing. If there is no Wall, there is no Security,” Trump tweeted on Sunday.

‘To avoid gangs, you had to leave’

Danilo Rivera wants to make it up to the border, but he does not plan to cross into the US. More than anything else, he just wants to see his kids again. 

Rivera first left San Pedro Sula, Honduras in 2001, when he was 21 years old. Fleeing street gangs establishing themselves in the country, he made it to Los Angeles, where he lived for 15 years.

“The only way to stay out [of the gangs] was to leave my country,” Rivera told Al Jazeera in the Huixtla town plaza, where other migrants and refugees were arriving and seeking out shaded areas to rest.

In 2016, Rivera’s wife was expecting their second child. Rivera returned to Honduras to apply at the US Embassy for residency as the spouse of a US citizen. But he had been unable to cover the lengthy and costly process of applying for a pardon for a drug possession charge years earlier, and his application was rejected.

Rivera has been trying to make it back to his kids ever since. He made his way up through Mexico three times over the past three years, successfully evading Mexican immigration officials. But he was apprehended in the US and deported every time.

The only way to stay out [of the gangs] was to leave my country.

Danilo Rivera, Central American caravan participant

Rivera left San Pedro Sula for a fourth time in recent years on January 17, on the heels of the caravan that departed two days earlier. He expected to have to once again ride the dangerous La Bestia train and hope to make it to the US undetected by Mexican immigration officials.

The humanitarian visa policy came as a surprise. Rivera’s plan now is to settle in Mexicali and find work. He will remain separated by the border from his family, but he is hopeful that his now ex-wife will bring their two children, aged three and 10, to visit.

“I want to thank Mexico for this opportunity,” said Rivera. “It’s a dream I had not anticipated.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2REEteV
via IFTTT

Former Koch official runs EPA chemical research


Water sample

Democratic lawmakers and environmentalist say the prevalence of administration officials who came from the chemicals industry contributes to its hands-off approach to the chemicals. | AP Photo/Lynne Sladky

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT

Previously undisclosed documents obtained by POLITICO show David Dunlap began working on the issue almost immediately upon arriving at EPA in October.

The Trump administration has placed a former Koch Industries official in charge of research that will shape how the government regulates a class of toxic chemicals contaminating millions of Americans’ drinking water — an issue that could have major financial repercussions for his former employer.

David Dunlap, a deputy in EPA’s Office of Research and Development, is playing a key role as the agency decides how to protect people from the pollution left behind at hundreds of military bases and factories across the country.

Story Continued Below

President Donald Trump has not nominated anyone to run the office. That effectively allows Dunlap to avoid the Senate confirmation process while overseeing a central part of EPA’s work that could impose cleanup costs on companies that have used the chemicals, including major Koch subsidiary Georgia-Pacific. The paper and pulp conglomerate is already facing at least one class-action lawsuit related to the chemicals.

Previously undisclosed documents obtained by POLITICO show Dunlap began working on the issue almost immediately upon arriving at EPA in October. He had spent the previous eight years as Koch Industries’ lead expert on water and chemical regulations, a position that typically includes helping companies to limit regulatory restrictions and liability for cleanups.

Democratic lawmakers and environmentalist say the prevalence of administration officials who came from the chemicals industry contributes to its hands-off approach to the chemicals, which are appearing in drinking water supplies across the country to rising public alarm. Known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, the chemicals have been linked with kidney and testicular cancer, as well as other ailments.

Both Republicans and Democrats have urged a stronger approach from acting EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler — who faces a confirmation vote in the Senate Environment Committee Tuesday — but he has stopped short of using all the tools in the agency’s arsenal.

Just last week, POLITICO reported the agency has decided against setting drinking water limits for the two most well-understood chemicals in the class in a forthcoming plan for the chemicals, and the new documents show Dunlap was involved in high-level meetings preceding that decision.

Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware, the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said Dunlap’s hiring adds to his concerns about the Trump administration’s handling of the issue.

“Coming on the heels of Mr. Wheeler’s failure to commit to setting a drinking water standard for PFAS, this potential conflict of interest within the agency paints a bleak picture about EPA’s priorities on chemical safety with respect to these particular substances. I look forward to learning more about Mr. Dunlap’s role in the development of EPA’s PFAS management plan,” Carper said in a statement.

Dunlap’s ethics agreement bars him from “participating in any particular matter involving specific parties” related to Koch Industries, but the agency’s ethics officials have typically taken a narrow interpretation of such prohibitions. And while Dunlap voluntarily recused himself from work on formaldehyde, which Georgia-Pacific produces, the agreement includes no mention of PFAS.

Koch Industries spokesperson David Dziok said that Dunlap worked on a broad set of issues related to water and chemicals during his time with the company, but that “PFAs were not part of the portfolio he managed.”

Dunlap did not respond to a request for comment. EPA did not answer specific questions about Dunlap’s involvement in the agency’s work and his potential conflict of interest.

Dunlap’s calendars, obtained by POLITICO under the Freedom of Information Act, show he participated in at least nine PFAS meetings in his first six weeks on the job, including an Oct. 22 briefing with Wheeler, chief of staff Ryan Jackson and other top political officials. At the time, agency leaders were writing a wide-ranging chemical management plan in which they decided not to set a drinking water standard for the two specific chemicals — PFOA and PFOS. That plan has been under review at the White House since December.

While those two older chemicals are no longer used in the U.S., EPA estimates that there are between 5,000 and 10,000 similar chemical compounds, used in everything from nonstick cookware to water resistant jackets to microwave popcorn bags. Industry has argued that the newer compounds are less dangerous to human health, but scientists say there is reason to worry that the entire class of PFAS compounds poses a risk. Public health advocates are pushing EPA to regulate the chemicals as a class, arguing that evaluating each one individually will take decades, if it happens at all.

The calendars also show Dunlap helping to shape EPA’s approach to these newer compounds that are still in use. He participated in an Oct. 31 call with career staff in his division on two chemicals, GenX and PFBS, for which they were preparing health assessments. Research has shown those new chemicals can also be dangerous, and that those dangers may be greater when people are exposed to them in combination with other chemicals, as they often occur in drinking water. Environmental groups have said the chemicals should be evaluated together to account for those risks, but EPA took the opposite approach when it released the GenX and PFBS health assessments two weeks later.

Then on Nov. 5, Dunlap was scheduled to join a call with staff scientific leads to discuss the next slate of chemicals for which they would prepare health assessments. Dunlap’s former employer has a stake in which chemicals EPA focuses on: A company spokesperson said Georgia-Pacific may still be using PFAS in its products, as it has in the past, but she would not say which specific chemicals it uses. There are very few legal requirements for companies to tell the public or regulators which chemicals they use in their processes and at which factories.

In response to questions about Dunlap’s role, an EPA spokesperson said, “Addressing PFAS is an Agency-wide effort with David Ross, the EPA’s Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water, serving as the EPA staff lead on addressing PFAS.”

However, the research overseen by Dunlap lays the groundwork for any regulatory decisions Ross is coordinating. EPA officials have underscored the importance of research to their PFAS work in a number of public presentations, including briefings to the agency’s Science Advisory Board and at meetings in affected communities.

Georgia-Pacific, which manufactures products like Brawny paper towels and Dixie cups, has not only used PFAS in some of its food packaging products, but has also owned facilities where the chemicals were disposed, creating a cleanup liability that could prove costly.

The company is already facing a class-action lawsuit from citizens in the town of Parchment, Mich., where last summer state officials discovered the chemicals in drinking water at concentrations as much as 26 times higher than EPA’s recommended limit. That contamination was traced to a paper mill that Georgia-Pacific previously had a stake in.

Georgia-Pacific spokesperson Karen Cole said the company believes that “only a very small percentage of our food wrap and related products — if any” contain the chemicals today, and noted that PFOA and PFOS were phased out of use in food wrappers “several years ago.” She said Georgia-Pacific does not apply the PFAS itself, but gets paper from a supplier that in some cases has previously treated it with PFAS.

“We are currently evaluating past manufacturing practices to better understand any potential previous use of these materials,” she said by email.

In his LinkedIn profile, Dunlap describes himself as the “lead and subject matter expert” on water and chemicals issues for Koch’s entire suite of companies during his eight years there. Even if he did not directly manage the company’s work on PFAS, it would be “hard to believe that he had not touched any decisions on PFAS with that broad of a scope of responsibilities,” said Erik Olson, who leads the Natural Resources Defense Council’s public health work.

Olson said Dunlap’s oversight of EPA’s research on the chemicals raises red flags. “You want an independent, hardheaded scientific review of these issues; you don’t want somebody who is already taking the industry party line,” he said.

According to federal disclosures, Koch Industries spent at least $90,000 in 2018 lobbying on issues related to chemicals. The American Chemistry Council, the chemicals industry’s largest lobbying group, which Georgia-Pacific has worked through in the past to influence policy on toxic chemicals, spent $9 million last year lobbying lawmakers, EPA and other agencies, including on PFAS issues.

The Food and Drug Administration governs the use of chemicals in food wrappers, and has approved 21 PFAS blends for such use, according to Tom Neltner, the chemicals policy director for the Environmental Defense Fund who has conducted research on paper mills’ use of the compounds. But he said the greater liability that paper companies like Georgia-Pacific may face comes from manufacturing waste that contains the chemicals, such as leftover paper trimmings.

That waste can end up in landfills or compost that is used to grow fruits and vegetables, Neltner said.

“There’s a legitimate threat there and, from my perspective, the conflicts of interest that [Dunlap] has having worked as a regulatory compliance director at Georgia-Pacific raises questions about whether he can make those objective decisions or should be recused,” he said.

Moreover, Georgia-Pacific may well have cleanup responsibility for other sites like the one in Michigan. During the time it operated the manufacturing plant, from 2000 to 2015, Georgia-Pacific closed a landfill that had also been used by other companies, including at least one that the company says it believes used a 3M-patented PFAS. The class-action lawsuit filed by citizens alleges that Georgia-Pacific did not properly close the landfill to prevent the chemicals from leaching into nearby water. Georgia-Pacific is currently working with the state of Michigan to trace the chemicals’ movement through groundwater.

Under the Superfund law, a company can be held liable for cleanup even if it wasn’t primarily responsible for the contamination.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WJ4DRQ
via IFTTT

Zuckerberg on Facebook’s 15th anniversary: critics are too ‘negative’

Mark Zuckerberg thinks Facebook's critics are a real buzzkill.
Mark Zuckerberg thinks Facebook’s critics are a real buzzkill.

Image: Zach Gibson / Getty Images

2016%252f09%252f16%252f8f%252fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lza3.c1888.jpg%252f90x90By Karissa Bell

Facebook is officially 15 years old and Mark Zuckerberg would really love it if all the haters could just, like, stop being so negative already.

The Facebook CEO published a note to commemorate Facebook’s 15th anniversary and, in the words of Facebook’s official Twitter account, reflect “on how the world has changed, the challenges we’ve faced, the progress we’ve made, and where we’re going.” 

In the note, Zuckerberg once again recounts his dorm room decision to create “a simple website organized around people,” which eventually grew to more than 2 billion users.

The CEO also notes the “new social and ethical issues” Facebook is now grappling with and that the company plans to invest billions of dollars into security this year. 

“This year we plan to spend more on safety and security than our whole revenue at the time of our IPO,” Zuckerberg wrote. Facebook took in more than $3.7 billion in revenue in 2011, the year of its initial public offering.

But besides promising new investment into fixing Facebook’s problems, Zuckerberg once again claims that Facebook’s toughest critics are simply being too “negative.”

At the same time, there is another force at play as well. As networks of people replace traditional hierarchies and reshape many institutions in our society — from government to business to media to communities and more — there is a tendency of some people to lament this change, to overly emphasize the negative, and in some cases to go so far as saying the shift to empowering people in the ways the internet and these networks do is mostly harmful to society and democracy.

To the contrary, while any rapid social change creates uncertainty, I believe what we’re seeing is people having more power, and a long term trend reshaping society to be more open and accountable over time. 

Though similar to comments Zuck has made in the past, the comments struck many observers as particularly tone deaf, especially when considering Facebook’s role in Russian election interference, mob violence in India, and genocide in Myanmar

Zuckerberg also continues a talking point that we’ve seen in speeches from Sheryl Sandberg that “some people” resisting change will “overly emphasize the negative.”

This is… wild. Dismissing valid criticisms (i.e. Myanmar) as noise from people resistant to change is gross. pic.twitter.com/nlEjPNxGEu

— Ryan Mac (@RMac18) February 4, 2019

In a message marking Facebook’s 15th birthday, Mark Zuckerberg confirms what we’ve been saying for a long time. The company thinks it is being unfairly picked on by a media worried about its business model. pic.twitter.com/CjNiVwSgsI

— Dave Lee (@DaveLeeBBC) February 4, 2019

imperfect analogy, but imagine Facebook as a town. People tell the mayor “the schools are terrible!!!” and the mayor responds with “but our roads work! Shouldn’t we celebrate that you can get to school?”

And also the mayor is permanent.https://t.co/VwGnqfttj3

— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) February 4, 2019

The note is Zuckerberg’s latest attempt to push back at critics. Last month, the CEO penned a Wall Street Journal op-ed in defense of Facebook’s multibillion-dollar advertising business. 

“We’re very focused on helping people share and connect more, because the purpose of our service is to help people stay in touch with family, friends and communities,” he wrote.

You can read Zuckerberg’s full note here.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2HMMPSa
via IFTTT

Google CEO Sundar Pichai totally stans ‘thank u, next’

“Thank you, next!”

Image: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images / Kevin Winter/Getty Images

2016%252f10%252f18%252f6f%252f2016101865slbw.6b8ca.6b5d9.jpg%252f90x90By Sasha Lekach

Hearing Google CEO Sundar Pichai mention pop star Ariana Grande’s smash hit during an investor earnings call was endlessly amusing.

While talking up YouTube’s success Monday, Pichai included the detail that Grande’s “thank u, next” music video broke records, with more than 50 million views within 24 hours of premiering on the Google-owned video streaming site last November.

SEE ALSO: Ariana Grande’s ‘thank you, next’ just broke YouTube

During the dry, formal phone call with investors, listeners were caught off guard hearing the CEO drop the artist’s full name and slang-tastic song title after listing revenue numbers and percentage gains.

We weren’t the only ones amused by the juxtaposition.

I just wasn’t prepared for Google CEO Sundar Pichai to mention “Ariana Grande’s ‘thank u, next’” during this earnings call

— Emily Birnbaum (@birnbaum_e) February 4, 2019

Sundar on earnings call: “Thank u, next”

Ok he was simply mentioning the title of the Ariana Grande video, which premiered on YouTube, but it’s funnier this way

— Richard Nieva (@richardjnieva) February 4, 2019

what is it about hearing Sundar Pichai talk about how popular Ariana

Grande videos were on YouTube during an earnings call that just sounds like he isn’t likely to dance to her music or perhaps anyone else’s?

— Laura Sydell (@Sydell) February 4, 2019

THANK U, NEXT

*shot*

Sundar talking about how great YouTube Premieres has been (plus other features) highlighting Ariana’s music video debut $GOOG

— Kerry Flynn 🐶 (@kerrymflynn) February 4, 2019

It was a subtle moment of levity during the cut-and-dry earnings call which discussed Google parent company Alphabet’s more than $31 billion in earnings.

We can totally see Pichai rocking out and we’re so f*cking grateful.  

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2t3eAf4
via IFTTT