Who are the 12 Catalan leaders facing years in prison?

More than a year has passed since Catalonia’s regional parliament voted to declare independence from Spain following a contested referendum that saw Spanish police violently disperse Catalan voters.

Since then, pro-independence Catalan politicians and activists have been held in pre-trial detention on charges of rebellion, disobedience, and embezzlement of public funds for their alleged roles in the referendum and subsequent declaration of independence from Spain.

Others, such as former Catalan president Carles Puigdemont, have fled Spain to avoid charges and lobby for Catalonia’s independence in the European Union.

Twelve defendants will stand trial on Tuesday before the Spanish Supreme Court for their alleged roles in the events leading to the October 2017 declaration.

The defendants face a combined total of roughly 200 years if they are given maximum sentences.

According to court filings, their attorneys intend to claim the Catalan separatists are being prosecuted for their political beliefs, such as Catalan nationalism, and the act of voting.

The majority of the politicians to stand trial come from two political parties: the left-wing Catalan Republican Left (ERC) and the centrist European Democratic Catalan Party (PDeCAT).

Leaders of the Catalan National Assembly (ANC) and Omnium Cultural (OC) – two pro-independence civil society organisations – will also stand trial.

Oriol Junqueras

Oriol Junqueras, the former vice president, is the highest-ranking member of the former government to stand trial before the Spanish high court. He faces charges of rebellion and embezzlement and is accused of understanding the “grave risk” of violence related to the referendum, but pushing forward anyway.

Spain’s attorney general asked for the longest prison term for Junqueras [Javier Barbancho/Reuters]

Junqueras, a former history teacher, mayor, and member of the European Parliament still heads the ERC from prison, giving him considerable politic sway in national Spanish politics.

Junqueras told Politico in an interview he will “only consider acquittal” and will not ask for a pardon if found guilty.

The Spanish attorney general (AG) is asking for 25 years’ imprisonment, while the solicitor general (SG) demanded 12 years.

Joaquim Forn

Forn, the former Catalan minister of the interior, who oversaw carrying out the AG’s orders in Catalonia, is also charged with rebellion and embezzlement.

His indictment also states he understood the risk of violence related to the referendum but chose to go forward regardless.

Forn has a long political history in Barcelona, serving as a member of the city’s municipal council since 1999 and first deputy mayor from 2011-2015.

The AG has asked for 16 years, while the SG asked 11.

Jordi Sanchez and Jordi Cuixart

The two “Jordis” are pro-independence civil society leaders – Sanchez of ANC and Cuixart of OC. The two men helped organised large pro-independence protests in the days before the October 1, 2017 referendum and are charged with sedition and rebellion.

They were originally accused of sedition by the AG in September, and the imprisonment of the two was ordered on October 16, 2017 by Spanish judge Carmen Lamela.

They faced accusations of encouraging violence against Spanish national police during the protests, but numerous media outlets have published a video of the two men climbing atop a car to ask demonstrators to remain peaceful.

Te cuentan que subir a un coche es delito de rebelión y 20 años de cárcel. Pero resulta que los Jordis subieron para pedir calma a la gente y desconvocar la manifestación.pic.twitter.com/5EHglWqXF4

— Joan Mangues (@jmangues) January 30, 2019

Rights groups, including Amnesty International, have asked for their release.

The AG has asked for 17 in prison for both, while the SG asked for eight years.

Carme Forcadell

Carme Forcadell, the former president of the Catalan parliament, was charged with rebellion and accused of voting for independence ahead of the declaration of independence. She was accused of “medullary” involvement as former president of ANC, a position she held from 2012-15.

The AG has asked her to be sentenced for 17 years, while the SG asked for 10.

Raul Romeva

Romeva, a Catalan politician, former MEP, economist and analyst, was the head of foreign affairs under Puigdemont.

Catalan protesters block roads over Spanish cabinet meeting

Llarena accused Romeva of trying to create a the “structures of a [Catalan] state” independent from Spain and of trying to promote the acceptance of a Catalan state in his role as charge of foreign affairs.

Romeva told Reuters news agency the imprisoned “see the trial as an opportunity to address public opinion and society in Catalonia, Spain and obviously at an international level”.

The Catalan leaders are accused of crimes “we have not committed”, said Romeva, adding: “That is why the only possible sentence is acquittal.”

The AG has asked he serve 16 years, while the SG asked for 11.

Dolors Bassa

Bassa is an educator and trade unionist who began her political career in 2007. She was elected to the Catalan’s parliament in 2015 and served as the counselor of labour, social affairs and families under Puigdemont.

Bassa was charged with rebellion and embezzlement for using her ministry to assume part of the costs related to the independence referendum.

The SG asked for 16 years, while the SG asked for 11.

Carles Mundo

Mundo, a lawyer, ex-counselor of justice under Puigdemont and ERC member was imprisoned along with Junqueras in November 2017 following the independence declaration. He was charged with embezzlement and disobedience.

He was released on bail in December 2017 after winning re-election in the regional vote called by the Spanish government. Mundo made a surprise announcement that he was leaving politics in January 2018, shortly after he was freed.

Both the AG and SG asked for seven years’ imprisonment. 

Jordi Turull

Turull, a lawyer and PDeCAT member whose political career began in 1987, had been a deputy in the Catalan parliament since 2004 when he was chosen as the counselor and spokesman of the presidency by Puigdemont in 2017.

He is charged with rebellion and embezzlement. 

Llarena accused Turull of propelling mobilisations in favour of the referendum and designing and managing the referendum’s advertising.

The AG asked for 16 years, while the SG asked for 11 years.

Josep Rull

Rull, a PDeCAT member and parliamentarian for 20 years, was the Counselor of Territory and Sustainability under Puigdemont. He was charged with rebellion and embezzlement.

Pro-independence demonstrators hold a poster of Rull outside of the prison that housed him in Catalonia [David Ramos/Getty Images]

Rull was accused of playing a “significant” role in the independence movement since 2015, as well as stopping Spanish national police from carrying out efforts to stop the independence referendum.

He has been in pre-trial detention since March 2018. The AG asked for 16 years, while the SG asked 11.

Meritxell Borras

Borras is a prominent figure in Catalan politics. She has been active in local politics since 1995 and is the daughter of Jacint Borras, one of the founders of the defunct pro-independence Democratic Convergence of Catalonia (CDC).

The centrist CDC was the foremost secessionist party until its members voted to dissolve and reform as the in 2016, partly due to its many corruption scandals. Many of its former members went on to join PDeCAT

Borras, who was the Counselor of Government and Institutional Relations under Puigdemont, has been charged with disobedience and embezzlement. Both the AG and SG have asked for 7 years.

Santi Vila

Vila was a long-time member of CDC and subsequently PDeCAT. He was the Counselor of Business and Culture at the time of the independence referendum and has been charged with embezzlement and disobedience in relation to his alleged involvement.

Vila paid a 50,000 euro ($57,000) bail in November 2017. He resigned from PDeCAT in June 2018. Both the AG and SG have asked for 7 years.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2tfNQYV
via IFTTT

Kareem Hunt Signs Browns Contract; GM Says RB ‘Deserves a Second Chance’

KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI - NOVEMBER 11:  Kareem Hunt #27 of the Kansas City Chiefs carries the ball during the game against the Arizona Cardinals at Arrowhead Stadium on November 11, 2018 in Kansas City, Missouri. (Photo by Jamie Squire/Getty Images)

Jamie Squire/Getty Images

Kareem Hunt has received a second chance to continue his NFL career after agreeing to a deal with the Cleveland Browns on Monday. 

Ian Rapoport of NFL Network offered details on the contract:

Ian Rapoport @RapSheet

The #Browns signed RB Kareem Hunt to a 1-year deal that could be worth more than $1M not factoring in the suspension, source said. More than the minimum. After this year, he’ll be an RFA.

General manager John Dorsey spoke about the decision to sign Hunt:

“My relationship and interaction with Kareem since 2016 in college was an important part of this decision-making process, but we then did extensive due diligence with many individuals, including clinical professionals, to have a better understanding of the person he is today and whether it was prudent to sign him. There were two important factors: One is that Kareem took full responsibility for his egregious actions and showed true remorse and secondly, just as importantly, he is undergoing and is committed to necessary professional treatment and a plan that has been clearly laid out.

“We fully understand and respect the complexity of questions and issues in signing a player with Kareem’s history and do not condone his actions. Given what we know about Kareem through our extensive research, we believe he deserves a second chance but certainly with the understanding that he has to go through critical and essential steps to become a performing member of this organization, aside from what the NFL determines from their ongoing investigation.”

After TMZ Sports released hotel footage showing Hunt shoving and kicking a woman in an altercation at a Cleveland hotel in February, the Kansas City Chiefs released the second-year running back. 

Kansas City Chiefs @Chiefs

Statement from the Kansas City Chiefs on Kareem Hunt

➡ https://t.co/MrjIX1Y7Ke https://t.co/efSMqUDio1

“I deeply regret what I did,” Hunt said in a statement. “I hope to move on from this.”

Prior to Hunt’s release, Rapoport reported he had been placed on the commissioner’s exempt list pending the results of an investigation into the hotel altercation. Dorsey also noted the Browns are aware Hunt could be facing a suspension.

Until Hunt is reinstated from the exempt list, he will be unable to participate in practices, play in or attend games with his new team. The 23-year-old is subject to a suspension under the NFL’s personal conduct policy.

Per Rapoport, “a suspension is coming” for Hunt and noted the running back has met with NFL investigators.

Hunt also released a statement after signing with the Browns:

“First off, I would like to once again apologize for my actions last year. What I did was wrong and inexcusable. That is not the man I was raised to be, and I’ve learned a great deal from that experience and certainly should have been more truthful about it after the fact. I’m extremely grateful that John Dorsey, Dee and Jimmy Haslam and the Cleveland Browns organization are granting me the opportunity to earn their trust and represent their organization in the best way possible on and off the field. I am committed to following the necessary steps to learn and to be a better and healthier person from this situation.” 

The Chiefs originally selected Hunt in the third round of the 2017 NFL draft. He proved to be a dynamic player, racking up 2,984 yards from scrimmage and 25 total touchdowns in 27 career games over the past two seasons

Nonetheless, his signing in Cleveland comes as a bit of a surprise, as Nick Chubb was impressive as a rookie and Duke Johnson Jr. is a promising third-down back.

Running back didn’t appear to be an area of need for the Browns, but they addressed it nonetheless with their controversial signing of Hunt.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2SLTgZW
via IFTTT

US-backed Syrian forces battle to capture last ISIL enclave

ISIL snipers and landmines have slowed a US-backed ground force as it pushes to retake the armed group’s last enclave in eastern Syria.

Black smoke clouds rose over ISIL’s final territory in Deir Az Zor province on Monday as coalition fighter jets fired missiles in support of the Kurdish-led militia known as the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). 

The SDF launched an offensive on Saturday attempting to expel about 600 Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, ISIS) fighters from a 4-square-kilometre area in Baghouz village, near the Iraqi border on the eastern banks of the Euphrates River.

The US-led coalition maintained a steady beat of bombings on the enclave after an early morning ISIL counter-attack caused several SDF casualties.

“[ISIL] launched a counter-attack on our forces and we are now responding with rockets, air strikes and direct clashes,” said SDF spokesman Mustafa Bali.

About 1,500 civilians had fled the enclave on Monday. “It seems there are still many civilians inside Baghouz,” Bali said. “We are compelled to go cautiously and accurately in this battle.”

Bali said there were “dozens of SDF hostages” captured by ISIL.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a UK-based war monitor, said the alliance of Kurdish and Arab fighters had pressed forward in the face of tough obstacles.

Observatory chief Rami Abdel Rahman said the SDF was “advancing slowly” on the edges of Baghouz, but cautioned landmines, snipers and tunnels dug by ISIL fighters were hindering progress.

Planned US troop withdrawal

Backed by coalition air strikes, the SDF alliance has been battling to eliminate ISIL from Deir Az Zor since September.

The armed group overran large parts of Syria and neighbouring Iraq in 2014, but a series of military offensives have reduced that territory to just Baghouz.

In December, US President Donald Trump announced a full withdrawal of US troops from Syria, saying ISIL had been “beaten”.

The surprise announcement prompted the US military to caution in a report published this month that the group “could likely resurge in Syria within six to 12 months and regain limited territory” if sustained pressure is not maintained.

ISIL still retains a presence in Syria’s vast Badia desert and has claimed a series of deadly attacks by sleeper cells in SDF-held areas.

Analysts have warned the US decision to pullout troops from Syria will leave a vacuum that will “increase the international and regional conflict” for power and influence in Syria.

“After the defeat of ISIS we cannot say that the roots of violence and terrorism are over, as ISIS is an ideological status and not only a military structure,” Assaad Bechara, political analyst and editor of Lebanon’s Al-Joumhouria newspaper, told The Associated Press on Monday.

“The American allegations of quitting Syria after accomplishing the mission of defeating ISIS lacks a lot of proof and are totally illogical,” Bechara added.

Kurds scramble for safeguards

Trump’s decision to withdraw about 2,000 US troops has also left Syria’s Kurds scrambling for reassurances.

A US departure makes them more vulnerable to a long-threatened attack by neighbouring Turkey, which considers the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG) a “terrorist” organisation.

The YPG has spearheaded the SDF, the US’ main ally in Syria.

The Kurds have largely stayed out of Syria’s nearly eight-year civil war, instead focusing on building their own semi-autonomous institutions in the northeast of the country.

But the expected US pullout has seen them grappling to mend ties with the Damascus regime, which is also against Kurdish self-rule.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2MYGySx
via IFTTT

Kyler Murray ‘Firmly and Fully’ Commits to NFL over Career in Baseball with A’s

Tyler Conway@jtylerconwayTwitter LogoFeatured ColumnistFebruary 11, 2019
FILE - In this Dec. 29, 2018, file photo, Oklahoma quarterback Kyler Murray (1) looks to pass during the first half of the Orange Bowl NCAA college football game against Alabama, in Miami Gardens, Fla. Representatives of the Oakland Athletics and Major League Baseball met Sunday, Jan. 13, 2019, with Heisman Trophy winner Murray, a day before the quarterback’s deadline to enter the NFL draft, a person with direct knowledge of the session said. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee, File)

Wilfredo Lee/Associated Press

Kyler Murray is heading to the NFL and leaving baseball in his rearview mirror.

In a statement released Monday, Murray said, “I am firmly and fully committing my life and time to becoming an NFL quarterback.”

This article will be updated to provide more information on this story as it becomes available.

Get the best sports content from the web and social in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.

    The Perfect Offseason Blueprint for Every Team 📋

    via Bleacher Report

    Watch the Top 25 Plays of the 2018 Season 🎥

    via Twitter

    Coaches on the Hot Seat Entering 2019

    via Bleacher Report

    Paying Carr $20M Might Be Gruden’s Smartest Move

    via Bleacher Report

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2I6djhz
via IFTTT

Denver teacher strike: Thousands walk out for better pay

Teachers in Denver, Colorado, walked out of their classrooms on Monday after failing to reach a deal with administrators on pay.

The educator’s strike, the first in the city in 25 years, in the latest example of educator discontent, following a wave of walkouts over the last year.

Denver’s school district said schools will remain open during the strike as more than 2,000 educators walk out, local media reported. Instead, classes will be staffed by administrators and substitute teachers.

However, the district has cancelled classes for 5,000 preschool children because it does not have the staff to take care of them.

The strike follows more than a year of negotiations over wages, the Denver Post reported.

Teachers started picketing before the start of the school day and students crossed through the picket lines on their way to class in some locations. Before noon, students were also filmed picketing alongside their teachers in support.

Monday’s strike is the first for teachers in Colorado in 25 years after failed negotiations with the school district over base pay [David Zalubowski/AP Photo]

At a press conference on Monday morning, union leaders expressed frustration at failed talks to reach a deal over the weekend.

Union president Henry Roman said teachers were committed to reaching a deal but said that both sides needed a cooling off period.

Another negotiation session is expected on Tuesday.

“They need us. They need our labour, they need our minds, they need our talents to really make it happen,” lead union negotiator Rob Gould said.

As a product of the Denver Public School System, I support Denver teachers going on strike.

— Tuhina Verma Rasche (@tvrasche) February 11, 2019

The main sticking points in the talks over a contract governing Denver’s incentive pay system, which started over a year ago, are lowering bonuses to put more money in teachers’ base pay and how to allow teachers to advance in pay based on education and training, as followed by most school districts.

The union pushed for lower bonuses for high-poverty and high-priority schools to free up more money for overall teacher pay and criticised the district for spending too much money on administration.

However, the district sees those particular bonuses as key to boosting the academic performance of poor and minority students.

Wave of teacher strikes

The strike is the latest action in a wave of teacher activism since last spring, when teachers went on strike in West Virginia. Similar strikes and protests have occurred in Kentucky, Oklahoma and Arizona. 

Last month, teachers in Los Angeles, California walked out of their classrooms for several days.

The Los Angeles teachers ended up getting the same six percent raise offered early on by the nation’s second-largest school district. However, they also sought and won promises for smaller class sizes and adding more nurses and counsellors.

In Denver, teachers say that the non-traditional pay system in the district leads to high turnover, which they say hurts students. 

They also hope that a win on pay will help them when it comes time to negotiate other issues when their overall contract expires in two years.

The state says a walkout will cost about $400,000 a day and would eat up one or two percent of the district’s annual operating budget in about a week.

In encouraging both sides to come to an agreement, Colorado Governor Jared Polis has pointed out that this money will no longer be available to help pay teachers once it is spent on the strike.

Teachers carry placards as they walk a picket line outside South High School in Denver [David Zalubowski/AP Photo]

Although teachers in some states are barred from striking, teachers in Colorado have a right to walk off the job.

As required by state law, teachers gave notice last month that they planned to strike. But the walkout was put on hold because the school district asked the state to intervene.

The strike was on again after Polis, a Democrat, decided on Wednesday not to get involved, believing the positions of both sides were not that far apart.

However, Polis said the state could decide to intervene and suspend the strike for up to 180 days, if a walkout dragged on.

The state does not have the power to impose any deal on either side, but it can try to help the union and school district reach a deal and can require them to participate in a fact-finding process.

According to an email sent to parents, students at Denver Discovery School were told not to bring their backpacks, binders, or anything of value to school during the strike, the Denver Post reported. Students’ mobile phones would be collected at the start of the day and returned at the end of the day.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Gl9nbk
via IFTTT

Where cybersecurity legislation ‘goes to die’ in Congress


Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson | Getty Images

Sen. Ron Johnson’s aides say inaction on cyber bills doesn’t necessarily mean the senator is working to derail those measures. | Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson leads the committee with broad oversight over the nation’s most important cybersecurity issues, including protecting consumers and U.S. elections from hackers.

But he’s also a major reason little legislation on these topics ever passes, according to lobbyists, cybersecurity policy experts, lawmakers and congressional aides from both parties who spoke with POLITICO.

Story Continued Below

Johnson or members of his staff have derailed many of the most significant cybersecurity-related bills in the past four years, including legislation to secure elections, study whether the growing use of encrypted apps hampers law enforcement, and hold companies accountable for the proliferation of insecure connected devices, people who track the legislation told POLITICO.

His panel “is the place where legislation goes to die on cybersecurity,” said Mieke Eoyang, a former Hill aide and vice president for the national security program at Third Way, a centrist think tank in Washington that works on national technology policy issues.

While no official accounting exists of cybersecurity bills in Congress, Third Way counted 15 in the last Congress that passed the House and didn’t advance through the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which Johnson has led since 2015.

“The record speaks for itself,” former House Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul (R-Texas) told POLITICO, expressing frustration over the fact that Johnson hasn’t advanced cybersecurity bills that his panel approved.

Many of the 15 people POLITICO spoke with for this story refused to be named for fear of angering a chairman who holds sway over legislation now pending in Congress. But all agreed that Johnson either actively stymied cybersecurity matters or has shown little interest in advancing them in his committee, which oversees the Department of Homeland Security, one of the government agencies most focused on digital security.

Johnson came to Congress in 2010 touting his background in manufacturing as the basis for his strong anti-regulatory bent, which critics say is a chief reason he’s resisted cyber bills that could enforce new standards on industry. And since Donald Trump won the White House in 2016, the senator has adopted many of the president’s views — such as downplaying Russian interference in the last presidential election — and sought to focus on topics favored by conservatives.

“I think he’s more interested in the waste, fraud and abuse, and more the political issues,” a former committee staffer told POLITICO. “Immigration — that’s a political issue. Border security — that’s a political issue. Rooting out government fraud and waste — that’s a political issue.”

But Johnson and his aides say his critics have it all wrong. They maintain that he has explicitly focused on cybersecurity, and he and his defenders note he has proven instrumental to passing several key bills, such as one bolstering cybersecurity protections in the federal procurement process and a 2018 reorganization of the DHS cybersecurity wing.

“Protecting our nation against ever-evolving cyber threats is a significant challenge and one I take very seriously,” Johnson said in a statement to POLITICO. “We will continue our bipartisan, aggressive oversight and legislative efforts in the 116th Congress.”

He also noted that he has sent more than 100 oversight letters on cybersecurity to various agencies, such as a letter to Health and Human Services about how its new cyber center would interact with DHS.

“It’s something very important to him,” one of his aides said, speaking anonymously to POLITICO to provide background on his record. In this session of Congress, the aide said, his chief priorities are working on increasing the number of federal cybersecurity workers and delineating areas of responsibility in the federal government when it comes to cyber.

This week, his committee will mark up three cybersecurity bills that address research, workforce development and DHS’ cyber hunt and incident response teams. The business meeting was scheduled after POLITICO interviewed Johnson aides for this story.

Yet in October 2017, Johnson argued against major federal action on cybersecurity and criticized past congressional work on the matter, saying it was best left to the private-sector experts.

“When it comes to cyber, we’re all Gilligans,” he said at the time, comparing members of Congress to the bumbling, eponymous protagonist of the TV show “Gilligan’s Island” and another character, the Professor.

Johnson aides estimated that he has held 11 hearings or roundtables on cybersecurity during his four years atop the Senate Homeland Security panel, although POLITICO counted just five hearings that mentioned the subject in their titles. By comparison, the House Homeland Security Committee has held 12 hearings in the past two years.

To his critics, Johnson’s aversion to legislating on digital security became apparent soon after he came to Congress and opposed landmark cybersecurity legislation sponsored by Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and then-Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), both former leaders of the Homeland Security Committee. That sweeping bill included steps meant to nudge critical infrastructure owners to secure their systems and improve information sharing between industry and the federal government.

“He parachuted into the negotiations that had been going on for years, and with little background or awareness of the issues, he played a spoiler role and prevented progress toward consensus,” said one person familiar with past legislative efforts. The bill was defeated in 2012 after pushback from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others.

Johnson argued that the bill was bad for businesses because he contended it would introduce new regulations, according to a former congressional staffer.

Since he took over the Senate Homeland Security Committee, observers say a common pattern emerged on cyber bills: a string of questions from his staff, and then silence.

For instance, when McCaul and Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) introduced a bill in 2015 to study the spread of encryption on personal devices, it went to Johnson’s committee. A Hill aide said the chairman was interested but kept asking for changes, all which McCaul and Warner accommodated. Johnson didn’t act, and the aide said Johnson staffers explained that time ran out on the measure before the congressional session ended.

That same year, DHS unveiled a plan to reorganize part of the department chiefly responsible for cybersecurity. A former Obama administration official who advocated for the bill said Johnson staffers once again asked a lot of process questions. “They put us through the paces,” the official said. “It was painful.”

Three years later, the Homeland Security bill did become law.

Johnson’s committee didn’t take action during Congress’ last session on legislation to improve the security of connected devices, a bill sponsored by Warner and Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.).

His panel also didn’t act on a modified version of the Secure Elections Act, a bipartisan bill that would, among other provisions, seek improved coordination between DHS and state and local election officials to improve overall election security and thwart attempts to hack voting machines. Sponsors of the bill tried to attach it to another measure in Johnson’s committee, but they withdrew it amid complaints from state officials.

Still, Johnson critics say he has done little to advance the legislation. In various conversations, according to a lobbyist familiar with the matter, Johnson said he was not planning to co-sponsor the Secure Elections Act, or any similar legislation, because he believed the “threat is overblown.”

But Johnson aides say inaction on cyber bills doesn’t necessarily mean the senator is working to derail those measures. His aides said some of their constraints are because floor time for full Senate debates and consideration is rare, which means anything the committee moves needs unanimous support, and some of the cyber bills the critics cite fell short of getting that in his committee.

For instance, the aides said, both Democrats and Republicans on the panel expressed skepticism about the capabilities of DHS to handle more cybersecurity responsibilities. And contrary to allegations that Johnson delayed the department’s reorganization efforts, his aides said, he gave his blessing to attaching the proposal to an omnibus spending bill early in 2018, only for an anonymous senator to block it.

He worked with other committees to overcome any objections, allowing it to pass later in the year, the aide said. They said he doesn’t let politics interfere in the committee’s work, pointing to several occasions where he worked closely with Obama administration DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson.

The bill creating a commission to study encryption, the aides said, didn’t muster support of the entire panel. The same was true with the Secure Elections Act, the aides said, adding that Johnson himself only supported elements of the bill. His comments on election interference have been misconstrued, they said — he considers it a threat, but wanted to give the threat context by pointing out that widespread hacking of election infrastructure would be difficult.

For every critic who says Johnson is not focused enough on the DHS side of his committee’s responsibilities, another says he’s not focused enough on his governmental affairs responsibilities, the aides said.

And not everyone who spoke to POLITICO sees Johnson as a hindrance to getting cyber legislation through Congress.

“He played a key role in passing [the DHS cyber reorganization bill] and leading the way on chemical facility security reauthorization legislation that contained an important cyber risk management provision,” said Matthew Eggers, the Chamber’s vice president of cybersecurity policy.

“There are a few things we’re considering legislatively that will be tough to tackle this Congress,” he said, such as legislation to provide liability protections to approved cybersecurity vendors. That’s a bill Johnson’s panel scheduled for consideration last year but pulled amid what he said were committee disagreements. “We look forward to working with Chairman Johnson on getting these priorities across the finish line.”

Martin Matishak contributed to this report.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2I45ER3
via IFTTT

Phil Mickelson Wins 2019 Pebble Beach National Pro-Am Ahead of Paul Casey

Timothy Rapp@@TRappaRTTwitter LogoFeatured ColumnistFebruary 11, 2019
Phil Mickelson follows his drive from the fourth tee of the Pebble Beach Golf Links during the final round of the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am golf tournament Sunday, Feb. 10, 2019, in Pebble Beach, Calif. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg)

Eric Risberg/Associated Press

Phil Mickelson came into Monday’s play at the Pebble Beach National Pro-Am with a three-stroke lead and two holes to play after weather delays forced him into action for an additional day. He maintained that advantage, finishing 19-under to win for the fifth time at the tournament.

Paul Casey (-16), Scott Stallings (-15), Jason Day (-13) and Si Woo Kim (-13) rounded out the top five.

This article will be updated to provide more information soon.

Get the best sports content from the web and social in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.

    Mickelson’s Pebble Win Could Herald a Big Year

    via Yahoo

    Phil Just Being a Wizard 🎥

    via Twitter

    Romo Pulls Out of Pro-Am Due to Family Commitment

    via Bleacher Report

    Spieth: Tom Brady Wouldn’t Talk to Me After Augusta

    via Golf Channel

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2E6ZgV5
via IFTTT

Pompeo says US ‘not covering up’ Jamal Khashoggi’s murder

The US government will continue investigating the murder of Saudi writer Jamal Khashoggi, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said during a visit to Hungary on Monday.

“America is not covering up for a murder,” he said, adding that the United States would take more action to hold accountable all those responsible for Khashoggi’s death.

The US-based Saudi columnist was killed inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2. After initially offering contradictory statements, the kingdom confirmed that Saudi agents killed him inside the consulate, but denied its senior leaders were behind the killing.

Khashoggi’s body was dismembered and has not been found.

‘Aiding in the cover-up’

The murder outraged members of Congress. On October 10, 2018, a bipartisan group of US senators triggered the terms of the Global Magnitsky Act, requiring the president to investigate and determine if a foreign person is responsible for Khashoggi’s death within 120 days.

The White House had until Friday to submit their report – a deadline it failed to meet, according to several seniors. 

A State Department spokesman said Pompeo provided an update to Congress on Friday in the form of a letter, but the spokesman did not elaborate. 

Senator Tim Kaine, in a statement on Sunday, accused the administration of US President Donald Trump of “aiding in the cover-up of the murder”.

“America should never descend to this level of moral bankruptcy,” Kaine added.

Michael McCaul, a Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said on Saturday that “everyone involved in this gruesome crime must be identified and held accountable”. 

“I call on the administration to immediately comply with the requirements of the law, and to provide Congress with the information required,” he said.

House Foreign Affairs Lead Republican @RepMcCaul released the following statement in response to the Administration’s failure to meet the requirements of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act.

Full Release➡ https://t.co/rBudpQAUOA pic.twitter.com/2vbCtEF8Ed

— House Foreign Affairs GOP (@HouseForeignGOP) February 9, 2019

Although the White House has sanctioned 17 Saudi individuals for their involvement in the murder, including two top aides to MBS, members of Congress from both parties have called for greater action to be taken against the kingdom and its leaders. 

According to US media, the CIA concluded that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) ordered the murder, a conclusion Saudi Arabia denies. 

In December, the Senate passed a non-binding resolution condemning Saudi Arabia for its conduct in Yemen and for Khashoggi’s murder. Politicians have vowed to bring the measure and similar legislation up again this year.

Last week, the House Foreign Affairs Committee advanced a bill that would end US involvement in the Yemen war. The “War Powers” resolution will now go to the House of Representatives floor for debate.

Separately last week, Saudi Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Adel al-Jubeir dismissed the possibility MBS, the de facto ruler of the kingdom, had any role in Khashoggi’s killing.

“We know that the crown prince did not order this. We know that this was a rogue operation,” he said, echoing the same theory Trump had pointed to following the murder.

Saudi Arabia indicted 11 people in the killing, including several officials close to the crown prince, and is seeking the death penalty against five of them.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2UNcNGW
via IFTTT

Daniel Radcliffe Has Become One Of Our Most Fearless Actors



Courtesy of TBS

By Evan Romano

Daniel Radcliffe doesn’t even take off his jacket when he gets back inside.

New York City is in the midst of a “polar vortex,” and I’m meeting the man best known for a decade of playing a certain boy wizard in a not-yet-open hotel bar in Downtown Manhattan. He doesn’t drink anymore — and hasn’t for several years — so it’s no surprise to find his coffee waiting for him at a corner table. When he returns from the frozen tundra outside, he’s dressed casually in jeans, with a beard masking a face instantly recognizable from years of fantasy fiction. Before long, we’re talking about something we have in common: a deep knowledge of film, but with certain unforgivable blind spots.

“Paul Dano’s knowledge of film is maybe better than any director I’ve ever worked with, like it’s extraordinary,” he says, referring to his co-star on 2016’s Swiss Army Man, a career highlight of his from the past few years. “And I just don’t have it at all. Like, sometimes people will direct you by referencing another moment in another film, and the amount of times that I have to be like oh, I’m so sorry, I’ve never seen Terminator.”

To be fair, Radcliffe’s been a little busy. He recently finished a run on Broadway in The Lifespan of a Fact, alongside Bobby Cannavale. And between binging podcasts (his favorites include Case File, How Did This Get Made?, and anything from Crooked Media) and reading Japanese author Keigo Higashino’s The Devotion of Suspect X, he hasn’t had much time to catch up on awards season chatter. Though, his favorite film of the year is Adam McKay’s Vice, starring Christian Bale — “He can play his body like a musical instrument at this point,” he says — an actor who, like Radcliffe, had to navigate the oft-tumultuous path from child actor to leading man.

To state the obvious: Yes, Radcliffe played Harry Potter, he of the eponymous series of book-based movies that took the world by storm and grossed nearly eight billion dollars. But Radcliffe’s post-Potter days have seen him become a unique fixture in today’s Hollywood landscape — with the aid of a massive, successful franchise to start his career, he’s settled his twenties into a period of experimental, quirky roles. A villainous tech trust-fund kid in a big-budget sequel? Why not. A heartbroken boyfriend who suddenly sprouts satanic horns from his forehead? Let’s do it. A farting, magical corpse that gets ridden like a jetski? Sure.

The latest in this eccentric series is Miracle Workers, a new TBS limited series from writer and creator Simon Rich, a contributor to both Saturday Night Live and The New Yorker. As the de facto ensemble lead, Radcliffe plays Craig, an angel who’s long been churning away on menial tasks in the Department of Answered Prayers for Heaven Inc., a forgotten job in the big corporation in the sky led by a kooky and unstable CEO, better known as God (Steve Buscemi).

It’s an inspired choice, playing an angel — one that his 96-year-old grandmother still doesn’t quite understand. “She just laughed at me and said, ‘That’s very miscast.’”

But Craig is a welcome challenge for Radcliffe, who’s been taking on unexpected on-screen roles since he graduated from Hogwarts. Where Harry Potter saw him evolve from a shy kid into a confident leading man, 2013’s What If saw him as a romantic comedy everyman, and Swiss Army Man saw him… well, play dead, Miracle Workers finds him channeling the most neurotic version of himself. As has become a theme, this is a very different Daniel.

Indie movies are where he’s felt the most comfortable these past few years. While smaller films prove much more difficult to fund, they’re also where an actor goes to take risks — something he very much wants to do. Last year, he found his way into a movie called Guns Akimbo (an absolutely insane-looking film), which, he says, “I’m sure came out of somebody going, ‘Dan Radcliffe doesn’t mind crazy shit, let’s send him this.’”

If the reputation that he’s cultivated is that he’s interested in different, outlandish stuff, then that’s one he’s happy to own. But he also won’t rule out the chance to star in another blockbuster, should the right one come along, mentioning that it would just be about “waiting for that script to come in where there’s something different about it and there’s something challenging.” He says that he’s open to any kind of part in that sort of movie. “As long as I don’t feel like I’m having to rein myself in to do it,” he adds.

As 2018 saw some of Hollywood’s biggest names taking on more nuanced, compelling work in television — Michael Douglas, Amy Adams, and Jim Carrey, among others — it’s no surprise to see Radcliffe land at TBS. But what was it, exactly, that drew him in? The security sure doesn’t hurt. While he’s been attracted to the unique roles that exist in the indie film world, there’s never absolute certainty that those are going to happen. “Until the day before I fly out to start doing an indie movie, I’m kinda thinking this might not happen,” he says. “Because I’ve had that happen before. I’ve had it been a few days out before a shooting, and suddenly the whole thing is scrapped.” The safety that comes along with American television — knowing, say, a year out that you’re going to be doing this series, on this date, for this period of time — is certainly an attractive quality to an in-demand performer.

The half-hour workplace dramedy finds Radcliffe appearing alongside Karan Soni of Deadpool, Blockers breakout Geraldine Viswanathan, and, of course, Buscemi. Should it continue beyond its initial run, the same cast will appear in entirely new roles in an entirely new story each season — much in the style of American Horror Story, or, as Rich says over the phone, what Buscemi occasionally does with The Coen Brothers.

Courtesy of TBS

(Left to right) Geraldine Viswanathan, Daniel Radcliffe, Steve Buscemi, and Karan Soni of ‘Miracle Workers.’

For Rich, it was Radcliffe’s willingness to fully commit to the ridiculousness in films like Swiss Army Man that made him so appealing to work with. (After you play a farting corpse that slowly but surely comes back to life, it’s hard to imagine much being off-limits after that.) “When you’re setting something in an absurd world, it’s really important to have at your center an actor who can ground it emotionally,” the showrunner says. “I think that’s why so many writers and directors gravitate toward Dan — you need him to ground your world. It’s like a ballast to the absurdity.”

This is most apparent during the scene in which Craig shares the story of his hapless time on earth. While his counterparts were gladiators and royalty, Craig was confined to a cave for his entire life, stuck in a crouch, eating mud. “I knew that’s the kind of scene that somebody like Dan would happily submit to,” Rich says.

Radcliffe takes a moment to mention a phrase that James McAvoy, his co-star on 2015’s Victor Frankenstein, likes to use: “character lead.” This comes after I ask if he might, perhaps, see his own career following down the path of character actor. His answer is an enthusiastic why not. “There’s no reason you can’t be a leading man but also be a character or weird,” he says. “Ultimately, very few people are leads for their whole career, you know? Ultimately, you turn into [a] character actor somewhere along the line, and so I’m very excited and looking forward to that happening.”

When considering a foray down that road, who better to look to than Buscemi? “He’s somebody that has become a bonafide A-list star actor whilst never doing anything but really fucking weird, interesting roles,” Radcliffe says of his “fucking awesome” co-star.

It might sound strange, but Radcliffe, now 29, has been acting for two decades. And in that time, he’s learned a few valuable lessons. “I am never going to sit down and watch a DVD of a film I’m in 20 years from now,” he says. “So ultimately I think the realization that that’s the most important thing and that if you don’t have a good time making it, then what’s the point? You could make the best film in the world and it goes off and does amazing things, but if your memory of it was that it was a really unhappy time, then I think it’s to be avoided.”

With the success of Potter in his rearview mirror, a growing reputation in the field, and a varied, eccentric resume over the past several years, he’s got no need to work just for the sake of working. “I can do what I want,” he says. “So I should.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2E3Mwyp
via IFTTT

House Dems urge leadership to condemn anti-Semitism after Omar tweet


Ilhan Omar at the State of the Union

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) suggested in a tweet Sunday night that Republican support for Israel is fueled by campaign donations from pro-Israel groups like AIPAC. | Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

A pair of House Democrats is calling on leadership to condemn anti-Semitism and denounce controversial remarks made by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), as the party faces growing pressure to respond to accusations that one of their members is anti-Semitic.

Reps. Josh Gottheimer (N.J.) and Elaine Luria (Va.), who are both Jewish, are collecting signatures for a letter they plan to send to Democratic leaders expressing deep concern over “recent rhetoric from certain members within our Caucus, including just last night, that has disparaged us and called into question our loyalty to our nation.” The letter, which was obtained by POLITICO, is being circulated to Jewish Democrats.

Story Continued Below

Omar, one of the first two Muslim women elected to Congress, suggested in a tweet Sunday night that Republican support for Israel is fueled by campaign donations from pro-Israel groups like AIPAC.

“We urge you to join us in calling on each member of our Caucus to unite against anti- Semitism and hateful tropes and stereotypes,” the lawmakers wrote in the letter. “In recent weeks, we have had conversations with multiple members of our Caucus who share our concerns about this rhetoric; we have also raised these concerns with Democratic leadership.”

“We must speak out when any Member – Democrat or Republican – uses harmful tropes and stereotypes, levels accusations of dual loyalty, or makes reckless statements like those yesterday,” they added.

Both Omar and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) have been repeatedly attacked by the GOP for their critical views toward Israel and support for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which targets Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. But Omar’s latest tweet earned rebukes from members of her own party, including from freshman Reps. Max Rose (D-N.Y.) and Anthony Brindisi (D-N.Y.).

“We hope that our Caucus will take swift action to address these issues in the coming days by reiterating our rejection of anti-Semitism and our continued support for the State of Israel,” Gottheimer and Luria said in the letter to leadership.

Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has threatened to take disciplinary action against Omar if Democratic leaders remain silent. One option under consideration, according to his office, is forcing a vote on a resolution from Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) condemning anti-Semitism.

GOP Conference Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) also called on Omar to lose her seat on the Foreign Affairs Committee.

Republicans are accusing Democrats of hypocrisy after they were quick to punish Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) last month for defending white nationalism and white supremacy, which McCarthy said recently was equivalent, or even “more so,” to the rhetoric from Omar and Tlaib.

“When a member on our side of the aisle said something, they were very clear about what they thought should happen,” McCarthy said. “We took action on our own side. When they stay silent, they are just as guilty.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2SJ6t5V
via IFTTT