Beyonce and Jay-Z accept BRIT award in front of Meghan Markle portrait

Music royalty Beyoncé and Jay-Z paid respect to literal royalty.
Music royalty Beyoncé and Jay-Z paid respect to literal royalty.

Image: Larry Busacca/PW18/Getty Images for Parkwood Entertainment

2018%252f04%252f02%252f74%252fheadshot.edeb7.jpg%252f90x90By Morgan Sung

Beyoncé and Jay-Z continue to be icons. 

The power couple accepted the BRIT award for Best International Group on Wednesday for their collaboration album “EVERYTHING IS LOVE.” 

The pop culture royalty couldn’t attend the London ceremony, so they sent a pre-recorded acceptance speech with a nod to literal royalty. 

SEE ALSO: Every Louvre artwork featured in Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s ‘Apesh*t’ video

Standing in front of an oil painting of Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex and television star turned princess, the Carters were dressed in colorful suits similar to the ones they wore in the “APES**T” music video

“Thank you so much to the BRIT awards for this incredible honor,” Beyoncé said, holding the award up in front of a jewel-laden, crowned Markle. “Everything is love. Thank you.” 

“You’re welcome,” Jay-Z responded, never looking away from the camera. 

In a longer statement on Instagram, Beyoncé gave a shout out to Markle.

“In honor of Black History Month, we bow down to one of our Melanated Monas,” she wrote. “Congrats on your pregnancy! We wish you so much joy.” 

Some saw it as a critique of British media treatment of Meghan Markle and her family. George Clooney recently defended the Duchess, stating that she was “pursued and vilified” by tabloids, and at the beginning of her relationship with Prince Harry, the monarchy put out a rare statement condemning the “the outright sexism and racism of social media trolls and Web article comments.” 

Beyonce want the hive to protect Meghan. We got it Queen

— DasiaBeinfab 💋 (@morris_dasia) February 20, 2019

Wow at Beyonce and Jay-Z not only making an acceptance video, but doing so in front of a portrait of Meghan Markle. Very classy, pointed support of a black woman being treated repulsively by the UK tabloids #BRITs

— Laura Snapes (@laurasnapes) February 20, 2019

Some thought the Carters were shading the Grammys, where they won Best Urban Contemporary Album but didn’t make an appearance. Fans theorized that they were done with the awards show after it snubbed Beyoncé in 2017 and Jay-Z in 2018, and has consistently chosen non-Black artists for Album of the Year. 

Leave it up to Beyoncé and Jay-Z to make the most subtle but powerful statements.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2NeZlJp
via IFTTT

Huge fire kills dozens in old part of Bangladesh capital Dhaka

Dozens of people have been killed after a massive fire broke out in apartment buildings also used as chemical warehouses in a centuries-old part of Bangladesh‘s capital, Dhaka, according to fire officials.

“So far we have recovered 45 bodies. The number of bodies may increase. The search is still going on,” fire service chief Ali Ahmed told AFP news agency on Thursday.

The death toll was expected to rise.

The blaze at Chawkbazar in the old part of Dhaka, which began around 10.40pm (16:40 GMT) on Wednesday, might have originated from a gas cylinder before quickly spreading through the building where highly flammable chemicals were stored, the fire service chief said.

The flames raced through four adjoining buildings, which were also used as chemical warehouses, including for storing plastic granules and body sprays.

“There was a traffic jam when the fire broke out. So people could not escape,” he said, describing a part of town where the streets are very narrow.

The fire erupted at Chawkbazar, in the old part of Dhaka [Mohammad Ponir Hossain/Reuters]

Another fire official told reporters that the blaze has been “confined” but not yet doused despite the efforts of more than 200 firefighters.

“It will take time. This is not like any other fire,” he said, adding the blaze became so devastating due to the “highly combustible” chemicals stored there.

A police inspector at the Dhaka Medical College Hospital said at least 45 people were injured, including four people whose conditions were very critical.

A similar fire in 2010 in an old Dhaka building, which was also used as a chemical warehouse, killed more than 120 people in one of the worst fire tragedies in Dhaka.

People look at a list with the names of those injured in the fire [Mohammad Ponir Hossain/Reuters]

SOURCE:
News agencies

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2GBrt95
via IFTTT

7 takeaways from Mark Zuckerberg’s Harvard discussion about Facebook

Mark Zuckerberg has a lot on his mind, and he’s ready to go off-script… sort of.

The Facebook CEO returned to his alma mater Wednesday to discuss Facebook and the numerous issues facing the platform. Zuckerberg joined the head of Harvard Law’s Berkman Klein Center for internet and society, Jonathan Zittrain, for the chat. 

The talk was the first of several that Zuckerberg plans to host, making good on his 2019 personal challenge “to host a series of public discussions about the future of technology in society,” which Zuckerberg announced in January.

The two engaged in an earnest and even jovial hour and forty five minute conversation about issues like democracy, privacy, surveillance, misinformation, and more. 

Encryption, ‘information fiduciaries’ and targeted advertisements: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg sat down with @zittrain for a wide-ranging conversation on privacy, democracy, ethics, and platforms https://t.co/yRjmHS9a2s

— Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society (@BKCHarvard) February 20, 2019

Zuckerberg wasn’t exactly candid — the man is talented at hitting Facebook talking points — the conversation was a rare example of some extemporaneous conversation and even apparently genuine thoughtfulness from Zuck.

The CEO didn’t exactly share anything new — “I’m not sitting here and announcing a new program,” Zuckerberg said at one point while batting around some hypotheticals — but the discussion did provide an opportunity see where his head is on some far reaching issues.

The conversation is, um, lengthy. But you can watch it in full below. 

However, if you’d care to keep those 105 minutes of your time, here are seven takeaways from Mark Zuckerberg’s discussion at Harvard.

1) Facebook doesn’t want to serve you trash

When it comes to the type of content Facebook serves you, Zuckerberg emphasized that he cares more about decisions that will strengthen Facebook over the long term than on short term profits. He said that serving clickbait or manipulative ads could cause people to feel resentful of Facebook. This was a similar sentiment to Zuckerberg’s January 2018 announcement that Facebook newsfeed would reprioritize content from and about friends and family.

Then again, all of the videos in the Up Next video sidebar — a preview of the content that Facebook would serve me next —were #relatable meme videos and cooking how-tos. 

Give me that sweet cooking content.

Give me that sweet cooking content.

Image: screenshot: rachel kraus/mashable

Not exactly the high quality content I seek; perhaps there’s a difference between how the CEO wants Facebook to operate, and how it actually functions.

2) Zuckerberg isn’t kidding about combining (and encrypting) messaging platforms.

Early in the conversation, Zuckerberg made the case for unifying the policies that govern Facebook’s messaging platforms. This was an initiative Zuckerberg confirmed during the Q4 earnings call, initially reported by the New York Times

Zuckerberg and Zittrain engaged in a conversation about the merits and risks of end-to-end encryption. Zuckerberg pointed out that Facebook-owned WhatsApp is all end-to-end encrypted, while Messenger has that option, but encryption is not the default.

“It doesn’t make sense to have different messaging platforms with different policies,” Zuckerberg said. 

And, for the record, he’s on Team Encryption.

3) He’s a tad conflicted about privacy, though.

For the guy behind this awkward moment, there were relatively few instances during which Mark Zuckerberg managed to put his foot in his mouth. But one came when Zuckerberg apparently forgot about his own video chat product, Portal.

“We definitely don’t want to live in a society where there’s a camera in everyone’s living room watching those conversations,” Zuckerberg said while discussing encryption vs. platform monitoring.

Zittrain quickly pointed out that Facebook itself does have a living room video product, which briefly derailed Mark with a blush and awkward laugh. But Zuckerberg specified that since Portal works over Messenger — which Zuckerberg is planning to encrypt — it would be secure; Facebook specified at launch that Portal would not spy on users. Therefore, according to Mark, Portal would not be applicable to the “Orwellian” scenarios that Zittrain had brought up for discussion.

4) Facebook should not be “the arbiter of truth.”

One of Facebook’s hairiest issues since the 2016 election has been how to mitigate and fight the spread of misinformation on the platform. Zuckerberg and Zittrain discussed several ways for going about this, including fact checkers and other independent bodies. But Zuckerberg was unequivocal: he does not think the power to decide what he described as “the different levels” of truth should rest with Facebook.

“We do not want to be the arbiters of truth,” Zuckerberg said.

5) Clear History is still in the works

Zuckerberg said that the tool that would enable Facebook users to scrub the browsing history data that Facebook has on them, called Clear History, is still in the works. But he acknowledged that that capability was proving to be complicated and time consuming.

“The plumbing goes so deep into all the different systems,” Zuckerberg explained. That alluded to the truth that Facebook collects so much data from so many places that clearing it all is turning out to be harder than Facebook originally thought.

6) The short term future of Facebook is private messaging and ephemeral stories

Zittrain and Zuckerberg wrapped up the discussion by considering Facebook’s future. Zuckerberg said that the way people were already using the app indicated that people wanted to chat and share both more privately, and less permanently. 

“There are a lot of things that people don’t want as the permanent record, but want to express,” Zuckerberg said. 

First, that means Zuckerberg and Facebook are very aware of the growth and popularity of messaging apps.

“Over the next 5 years, I think we’re going to see all of social networking reconstituted around this base of private communication,” Zuckerberg said. “It’s something i’m very excited about.”

What Zuckerberg thinks is taking the place of public broadcasting via status updates is ephemeral stories.

“Of the type of broadcast content that people are doing, the thing that is growing the fastest is stories —ephemeral sharing,” Zuckerberg said. “That just gives you a sense of where the hub of social activity is going.”

7) The long term future of Facebook is… wearables?!

The conversation took a strange detour into a high tech future in which Zuckerberg envisioned typing just by thinking and AR-ing everything. Zuckerberg explained that our current app and phone-based system isn’t so integrated into the way we naturally communicate, and thinks technology will reshape platforms “to be fundamentally more about people and how we process the world.”

What that means for Zuckerberg is more seamlessly integrated hardware with the way we communicate and obtain information naturally. He wasn’t so down with Google Glass, but thought glasses — similar to what Zittrain was wearing, Zuckerberg said — would be a good way to integrate technological communication in the future. 

So, Snapchat Spectacles?

Looking forward to the next chat, Zuck!

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2IEMqBZ
via IFTTT

LeBron James Says Playoff Intensity ‘Activated’ for Rest of Lakers Season

Los Angeles Lakers' head coach Luke Walton, right, talks things over with LeBron James, left, during the first half of an NBA basketball game against the Philadelphia 76ers, Sunday, Feb. 10, 2019, in Philadelphia. The 76ers won 143-120. (AP Photo/Chris Szagola)

Chris Szagola/Associated Press

If anyone in the NBA knows how to reach another level under playoff pressure, it is LeBron James. After all, the four-time MVP has been in the last eight NBA Finals, but he is facing a new challenge on the Los Angeles Lakers.

“It’s been activated,” he said Wednesday when discussing the intensity needed to reach the playoffs, per Baxter Holmes of ESPN.com.

The Lakers sit in 10th place in the Western Conference and are three games behind the eighth-seeded Los Angeles Clippers.

This is somewhat new territory for James, 34, considering he has been in the last 13 playoffs and is often more worried about seeding following the All-Star break than whether his team will even qualify for the postseason.

Los Angeles is facing an uphill battle, even with its top playmaker’s intensity dialed up. Holmes noted ESPN Stats & Information projects the Lakers to have the fourth-most difficult remaining schedule in the league, which kicks off again Thursday against the formidable Houston Rockets.

That James is ready to pick up the intensity should at least provide an answer to some of the team’s lingering questions Joe Vardon of The Athletic reported on Monday. According to the report, some with the team are “privately a little concerned” about James’ health and whether he will “pick up his intensity and propel this team back into the playoffs.”

James suffered a groin injury during a Christmas Day win over the Golden State Warriors when the Lakers were fourth in the Western Conference. However, he said he feels “pretty good where I’m at physically,” per Holmes, which is welcome news for the Lakers after they went 6-11 from Dec. 27 through Jan. 29 when he was out.

The only way the Lakers will make the playoffs is with James remaining and healthy and performing at a high level. He is apparently ready to do just that.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2T787hQ
via IFTTT

Hosting a Trump-Kim summit: The Singapore experience

Singapore – At first it was on, then off, and then on again – in the end, Singapore had just two weeks to get everything ready for the much-anticipated, first-ever encounter between a sitting US president and North Korean leader.

That such a strategically complex and delicate event came off as seemingly flawless – despite the short lead – offers lessons to Vietnam‘s Hanoi, the site of the second summit between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un on February 27-28.

“Vietnam has a slightly easier job in that the US and North Korean governments have a template of sorts, a playbook, from the Singapore summit last June,” Eugene Tan, associate professor of law at Singapore Management University, told Al Jazeera.

“Singapore certainly has been consulted by Vietnam, and Singapore will provide as much input as requested. It’s more about ironing the kinks from the first summit and should be easier the second time around.”

It certainly wasn’t easy the first time.

Police officers lead Kim’s motorcade heading to Capella Hotel [File: Yong Teck Lim/AP Photo]

The top organisational issue in the lead-up to the Singapore summit on June 12, 2018 was security, starting with the physical protection of the two leaders and the safety of the locations of their respective hotels and meeting site. Once those spots were agreed upon by the US and North Korean advance teams, each side needed to separately approve every detail surrounding the high-stakes talks.

Plans needed to be developed for crowd control and inevitable inconveniences to the public, including roadblocks, diversions, delays and security checks.

Airspace would have to be limited to make way for military air patrols, and commercial air travellers would have to expect delays on flights in and out of Singapore.

Water patrols would also have to be stepped up, particularly in the waters surrounding the tiny resort island of Sentosa where Trump and Kim were to meet.

The summit was held on the tiny resort island of Sentosa, connected by a single bridge to Singapore’s main island [File: Wong Maye-E/AP Photo

Navy ships would have to be deployed in the waters surrounding the meeting location with helicopters circling above, while patrol vessels would have to escort passing ships.

In addition to the unpredictability of the first face-to-meeting among formerly sworn enemies, diplomatic challenges included the politically sensitive question of who would foot the bill for Kim and his delegation at one of Singapore’s priciest hotels – and how Singaporean taxpayers would feel about that.

Next was the question of what to do with the media circus coming to town – more than 2,500 journalists were accredited to cover the summit.

Kim and Trump moments before their historic handshake [File: Kevin Lim/The Straits Times]

Template for Hanoi

These challenges and others had to be settled quickly – comparable summits can be scheduled six months to a year in advance, according to diplomats and protocol officers.

Diplomatic teams from both countries spent the days leading up to the Singapore summit crisscrossing Sentosa island to case out venues and hash out protocol – down to the careful matters of honouring the notion of a meeting of equals, such as having separate doors through which Trump and Kim would enter into their first greeting.

Singapore meanwhile scrambled to find Korean speakers among its own police and civil defence officers to help communicate and translate with the North Korean entourage.

Police and security-related personnel were told not to take time off around the time of the summit, and the nation’s armed forces were told to stand by, along with fighter jets and attack helicopters.

In addition to deploying some 5,000 police, civil defence, and other officers, Singapore additionally employed private security firms to support access control, crowd control, traffic management duties and other security measures.

Police officers patrol outside the St. Regis Hotel, the hotel chosen for Kim’s stay [File: Yong Teck Lim/AP Photo]

Jogging bodyguards

Although Singapore, like Hanoi, keeps tight control over public demonstrations, officials had to be watchful for public spectacles.

In addition to reporters and TV camera crews wandering across the island, passersby and onlookers would naturally be expected to stop and watch the action – such as Kim’s bodyguards in Western style-suits jogging along his motorcade, a common sight when the security-conscious North Korean leader ventures out in public.

Members of the public in Singapore take photos of Kim’s motorcade [Yong Teck Lim/AP Photo]

Multiple security zones were set up.

The first was at the summit site itself, held where access could be controlled on Sentosa island at an old colonial-era manor now called the Capella, a luxury five-star hotel and resort.

The second zone was some eight kilometres away, in Singapore’s Tanglin area where the two leaders and their entourages were based. The luxury Shangri-La Hotel was chosen for Trump’s stay, while the equally high-end St. Regis Hotel was selected for Kim – the two hotels are roughly 800 metres apart.

Trump stayed at the luxury Shangri-La Hotel [File: Yong Teck Lim/AP Photo]

Signs of high-level security included heavily armed Gurkha guards and police out in full force, but optics were not limited to displays of military hardware. World War II cannon barrels, for example, were decorated with flowers and olive branches.

Meanwhile, Singapore solved the question of where the thousands of journalists in town would work – they hastily assembled a media work station in a Formula One pit building in central Singapore, livestreaming summit events from 10km away on Sentosa.

A demonstration of Singapore’s soft power, the International Media Centre featured unusual amenities that ensured that journalists saw the best of the country’s legendary efficiency.

More than 2,500 journalists were accredited to cover the summit [File: Joseph Nair/AP Photo]

Backlash over costs

At the time of the summit, Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said he expected the country to spend some $14.8m on hosting costs – a figure later lowered to $11.8m.

Some Singaporeans questioned the idea of paying for Kim’s presidential hotel suite, estimated at around $7,400 per night. The total cost for putting up the North Korean leader and his entourage has not been made public; the US delegation paid its own way, as is the norm for bilateral events hosted by a third party.

Further criticism came after Kim, accompanied by two Singapore government ministers, took in the sights surrounding the glitzy Marina Bay Sands casino and resort, a request made by North Korea to Singapore just several hours before it happened.

Kim and his entourage visiting Singapore’s Marina Bay [File:Yong Teck Lim/AP Photo]

Even with Singapore’s original estimate in host costs, marketing executives say the nation received at least 10 times that in positive media exposure.

Jason Tan, of the communications firm Zenith Singapore, said $14.8m would have bought around 90 seconds of commercial airtime on the largest advertising event in the United States, the Super Bowl.

“With the summit, we received a week of global coverage, positive brand halo, and genuine interest in Singapore as a country,” Tan told Al Jazeera.

Larger than positive media exposure was the boost to Singapore’s strategic importance on the world stage, said Vu Minh Khuong, an associate professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore.

“The host enhances its strategic position as the place of choice for highly important events and showcases to the world it is a meaningful player in making the world a better place,” he told Al Jazeera.

Follow @tgbenner on Twitter

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Is0mPl
via IFTTT

Lyft reportedly will beat Uber to IPO

Lyft is gearing up for its IPO.
Lyft is gearing up for its IPO.

Image: David Becker/Getty Images

2016%252f10%252f18%252f6f%252f2016101865slbw.6b8ca.6b5d9.jpg%252f90x90By Sasha Lekach

The two competing ride-hailing apps Lyft and Uber both filed paperwork before the end of 2018 to go public in 2019. Now it looks like Lyft’s initial public (IPO) offering will beat out Uber’s.

CNBC reported Wednesday that Lyft’s IPO will launch around March 18, while Uber’s will need a few more weeks to prepare.

SEE ALSO: Lyft beats rival Uber in race to file for IPO

Uber dwarfs Lyft in most ways — it’s valued at around $90 billion, while CNBC said Lyft’s latest valuation is around $20 million. Uber also has a vast presence. It’s available in more than 600 cities around the world while Lyft only operates in the U.S. and Canada. 

Last week Uber voluntarily shared its fourth quarter earnings, and while its losses were down below $1 billion, its rider growth slowed. Lyft doesn’t share as detailed, consistent financial reports as Uber, but The Information put together some metrics last year showing some growth.

The IPO head start could give Lyft a small advantage as the first and only ride-hailing service publicly traded on the stock market. 

Lyft declined to comment on details about the speculated IPO date, as did Uber.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2BMNrlg
via IFTTT

Juventus Rage at UCL Loss

  1. michhhael @m1897

    FT: AM 2-0 Juve

    Spineless, gutless and clueless.

    Allegri wears this one: Best player in the world. Stacked squad. And never played shittier football since Capello days. That’s a hell of an achievement.

  2. Patrick Gullaci @pgullaci

    Such a pathetic display from Juve tonight. Utterly embarrassing.

    As I’ve said, I’m not one of those total Allegri haters but this match is almost solely on him. He said we’d play to win yet our build up was incredibly slow, backwards passing, late subs. Just terrible.

  3. Carlo Garganese @carlogarganese

    Embarrassing & cowardly from Allegri. You don’t win Champions League playing conservative football. Starting De Sciglio instead of Cancelo straight away shows fear. I’ve always defended Allegri til this season but Juve may need a new coach to win CL. Sacchi right all along

  4. Matthew Ward @Matthew_Ward_92

    I love Allegri and have always supported him, however this loss is just as much on him as it is on the rest of the team. Dreadful second half performance, playing negative football, no attacking threat whatsoever.

  5. Zach Lowy @ZachLowy

    Allegri has had a great coaching career, one of the most accomplished and impressive managers in Europe, but I’d never want him anywhere near my football club.

    Such a gutless coach.

  6. EiF @EiFSoccer

    So incredibly disappointed with Juventus and in particular Massimiliano Allegri tonight.

    Simply unforgivable to not start João Cancelo in a game like this when he’s arguably been the world’s best RB this season and Juve’s most important player. Puzzling team selection.

  7. michhhael @m1897

    Save your shitty tweet @OfficialAllegri

  8. Lara @Lara1897

    now we wait for allegri’s same old stupid meaningless tweets about how we need to learn from our mistakes.. AGAIN

  9. Milan Obsession @milanobsession

    Juventus not measuring up in the Champions League is nothing new.
    But paying millions for Cristiano Ronaldo to fail along with them is priceless. https://t.co/1WEGRinZSU

  10. ♠ @SJftbI

    Ronaldo technically scored though https://t.co/S70yw11Wjm

  11. James 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇳🇬 @LilJamesOP1

    Ronaldo disasterclass. HAHAHAHAHHAH. Could never be my GOAT.

  12. B/R Football @brfootball

    Atletico ruin Juve’s night 😂 https://t.co/VSZfPVkG68

  13. Luis Rivera @LR10EIite

    Ronaldo heat map today https://t.co/ll0kuBL80S

  14. Zaniotti @Tottieist

    “But we signed Ronaldo to win the champions league” https://t.co/d9FBcFV05V

  15. Squawka Football @Squawka

    Cristiano Ronaldo has lost for the second time in seven Champions League games vs. Atlético Madrid.

    He still went through the last time it happened. 👀 https://t.co/LcDcGjXJJC

  16. Tass @FaZeTass

    Cristiano Ronaldo to produce a scintillating display back in Turin & send Juve through #MysticTass https://t.co/dS41rEY32L

  17. BWRAO @JuventusNation

    FULL TIME: Atletico Madrid 2, Juventus 0

    Juventus’ season with so much put on the Champions League is now potentially 90 minutes away from ending.

  18. BWRAO @JuventusNation

    When you go out and sign Cristiano Ronaldo, what the hell do you think? https://t.co/EQTSuxy7y1

  19. Johnny Sineiro @johnnysineiro

    @IFTVofficial Ronaldo hat trick next game. Watch.

  20. BB @The_Juventino

    Much deserved win for Atletico in the second half. Simeone outclassed Allegri.

  21. Alex Mascitti 🇺🇸🇮🇹 @AlexMascitti

    I think Allegri should leave in the summer. He’s taken this team as far as he can. Need a new coaching staff and a completely new midfield.

  22. Patience-Jeremy Lin @DoinItForUAnth5

    @CordellCockett3 I hope so to. Fricken allegri man. This is what you get for being conservative and going for a tie

  23. BWRAO @JuventusNation

    Especially knowing that Atleti know all they need to do is defend in Turin. https://t.co/61DT52ZyiY

  24. Dave Long @DaveLong79

    Utter crap. We’ve come to win, apparently. That equals Can on for Pjanic with 20 mins left, forwards isolated, midfield overrun and two goals conceded from set pieces. Well played, Allegri. Night, all.

  25. Andy Brassell @andybrassell

    That second half from Atlético….phew. A lot of this season had suggested they didn’t have a performance like that in them any more, but that was absolutely magnificent.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2It0VII
via IFTTT

Juventus Rage at UCL Loss

  1. michhhael @m1897

    FT: AM 2-0 Juve

    Spineless, gutless and clueless.

    Allegri wears this one: Best player in the world. Stacked squad. And never played shittier football since Capello days. That’s a hell of an achievement.

  2. Patrick Gullaci @pgullaci

    Such a pathetic display from Juve tonight. Utterly embarrassing.

    As I’ve said, I’m not one of those total Allegri haters but this match is almost solely on him. He said we’d play to win yet our build up was incredibly slow, backwards passing, late subs. Just terrible.

  3. Carlo Garganese @carlogarganese

    Embarrassing & cowardly from Allegri. You don’t win Champions League playing conservative football. Starting De Sciglio instead of Cancelo straight away shows fear. I’ve always defended Allegri til this season but Juve may need a new coach to win CL. Sacchi right all along

  4. Matthew Ward @Matthew_Ward_92

    I love Allegri and have always supported him, however this loss is just as much on him as it is on the rest of the team. Dreadful second half performance, playing negative football, no attacking threat whatsoever.

  5. Zach Lowy @ZachLowy

    Allegri has had a great coaching career, one of the most accomplished and impressive managers in Europe, but I’d never want him anywhere near my football club.

    Such a gutless coach.

  6. EiF @EiFSoccer

    So incredibly disappointed with Juventus and in particular Massimiliano Allegri tonight.

    Simply unforgivable to not start João Cancelo in a game like this when he’s arguably been the world’s best RB this season and Juve’s most important player. Puzzling team selection.

  7. michhhael @m1897

    Save your shitty tweet @OfficialAllegri

  8. Lara @Lara1897

    now we wait for allegri’s same old stupid meaningless tweets about how we need to learn from our mistakes.. AGAIN

  9. Milan Obsession @milanobsession

    Juventus not measuring up in the Champions League is nothing new.
    But paying millions for Cristiano Ronaldo to fail along with them is priceless. https://t.co/1WEGRinZSU

  10. ♠ @SJftbI

    Ronaldo technically scored though https://t.co/S70yw11Wjm

  11. James 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇳🇬 @LilJamesOP1

    Ronaldo disasterclass. HAHAHAHAHHAH. Could never be my GOAT.

  12. B/R Football @brfootball

    Atletico ruin Juve’s night 😂 https://t.co/VSZfPVkG68

  13. Luis Rivera @LR10EIite

    Ronaldo heat map today https://t.co/ll0kuBL80S

  14. Zaniotti @Tottieist

    “But we signed Ronaldo to win the champions league” https://t.co/d9FBcFV05V

  15. Squawka Football @Squawka

    Cristiano Ronaldo has lost for the second time in seven Champions League games vs. Atlético Madrid.

    He still went through the last time it happened. 👀 https://t.co/LcDcGjXJJC

  16. Tass @FaZeTass

    Cristiano Ronaldo to produce a scintillating display back in Turin & send Juve through #MysticTass https://t.co/dS41rEY32L

  17. BWRAO @JuventusNation

    FULL TIME: Atletico Madrid 2, Juventus 0

    Juventus’ season with so much put on the Champions League is now potentially 90 minutes away from ending.

  18. BWRAO @JuventusNation

    When you go out and sign Cristiano Ronaldo, what the hell do you think? https://t.co/EQTSuxy7y1

  19. Johnny Sineiro @johnnysineiro

    @IFTVofficial Ronaldo hat trick next game. Watch.

  20. BB @The_Juventino

    Much deserved win for Atletico in the second half. Simeone outclassed Allegri.

  21. Alex Mascitti 🇺🇸🇮🇹 @AlexMascitti

    I think Allegri should leave in the summer. He’s taken this team as far as he can. Need a new coaching staff and a completely new midfield.

  22. Patience-Jeremy Lin @DoinItForUAnth5

    @CordellCockett3 I hope so to. Fricken allegri man. This is what you get for being conservative and going for a tie

  23. BWRAO @JuventusNation

    Especially knowing that Atleti know all they need to do is defend in Turin. https://t.co/61DT52ZyiY

  24. Dave Long @DaveLong79

    Utter crap. We’ve come to win, apparently. That equals Can on for Pjanic with 20 mins left, forwards isolated, midfield overrun and two goals conceded from set pieces. Well played, Allegri. Night, all.

  25. Andy Brassell @andybrassell

    That second half from Atlético….phew. A lot of this season had suggested they didn’t have a performance like that in them any more, but that was absolutely magnificent.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2It0VII
via IFTTT

The key Republicans to watch on Trump’s national emergency

President Donald Trump’s declaration of a national emergency to fund his border wall has come under withering bipartisan criticism. Whether he’s able to hold off a congressional push to block the move will soon become clear.

House Democrats are expected to pass a formal resolution of disapproval of Trump’s declaration, which would then head to the Senate floor where only a simple majority is needed for passage.

Although many GOP senators criticized Trump for declaring a national emergency, few have said whether they would break with the president. Here are some of the crucial voters to keep an eye on — a collection of more centrist Republicans and GOP incumbents who could face tough reelection bids in 2020. If four Republicans join all Democrats, Trump could impose his first veto.

Opposition to Trump’s declaration of national emergency:

Mild Strong

Lamar Alexander

Lamar Alexander, Tennessee

The president has made a strong case for increased border security, but declaring a national emergency is unnecessary, unwise and inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution.

—Statement

Thom Tillis

Thom Tillis, North Carolina

It doesn’t matter who the President is or what party they belong to: I strongly believe in the separation of powers and curbing the kind of executive overreach that Congress has allowed to fester for the better part of the last century, including during the Obama Administration…. I don’t believe a national emergency declaration is the solution.

—Statement

Lisa Murkowski

Lisa Murkowski, Alaska

“I’ll be very direct. I don’t like this. I don’t like this. … I think it takes us down a road and with a precedent that if it’s allowed, that we may come to regret.”

—Associated Press

Rand Paul

Rand Paul, Kentucky

I’m disappointed… with the president’s intention to declare an emergency to build a wall. I, too, want stronger border security, including a wall in some areas. But how we do things matters. Over 1,000 pages dropped in the middle of the night and extraconstitutional executive actions are wrong, no matter which party does them.

—Official press release statement

Susan Collins

Susan Collins, Maine

If it’s a clean disapproval resolution, I will support it

—Transcript of press gaggle

Rob Portman

Rob Portman, Ohio

The national emergency to me is not the preferred way to go…It’s a gray area if you look at the constitutional arguments – pro and con – they’re based on case law that came before the National Emergency Act was put into effect by Congress. So probably he has the right to do it …But that doesn’t mean that he should do it, I  just think those are two separate questions.

—Interview with CNBC

Ron Johnson

Ron Johnson, Wisconsin

I’m going to take a look at the case the president makes and I’m also going to take a look at how quickly this money is actually going to be spent versus what he’s going to use. If he’s not going to be spending it this fiscal year or very early in the next fiscal year, I would have my doubts.

—Interview with “Meet the Press”

Ben Sasse

Ben Sasse, Nebraska

We absolutely have a crisis at the border, but as a Constitutional conservative I don’t want a future Democratic President unilaterally rewriting gun laws or climate policy..If we get used to presidents just declaring an emergency any time they can’t get what they want from Congress, it will be almost impossible to go back to a Constitutional system of checks and balances.

—Statement to National Review

Chuck Grassley

Chuck Grassley, Iowa

As I’ve said many times, I have concerns about the precedent that could be set with the use of emergency action to re-appropriate funds. Accordingly, I will study the President’s declaration closely. The Constitution grants Congress the authority to appropriate federal dollars, so I’m sure such action will be litigated in the courts.

—Statement

Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio, Florida

Today’s national emergency is border security. But a future president may use this exact same tactic to impose the Green New Deal. I will wait to see what statutory or constitutional power the President relies on to justify such a declaration before making any definitive statement. But I am skeptical it will be something I can support.

—Official press release statement

Mitt Romney

Mitt Romney, Utah

I will reserve judgment on any potential executive action by the President until I am able to fully evaluate it, but as I’ve said, I do not believe declaring a national emergency is the right approach. I would also expect the President to stay within statutory and constitutional limits.

—Statement

Mike Lee

Mike Lee, Utah

My initial assessment is that what President Trump announced is legal…Whether or not it should be legal is a different matter. Congress has been ceding far too much power to the executive branch for decades. We should use this moment as an opportunity to start taking that power back.

—Statement

Pat Toomey

Pat Toomey, Pennsylvania

I made no secret of the fact that I hoped the president would choose to avoid unilateral action and work with Congress on a legislative solution to secure the border. My staff and I are reviewing the president’s declaration and its implications very closely.

—Statement

David Perdue

David Perdue, Georgia

Now that the federal government is fully funded, including a down payment on border security, Senator Perdue looks forward to reviewing the details of the declaration

—Statement

Cory Gardner

Cory Gardner, Colorado

I continue to believe that shutdowns are never the right answer and Congress is most appropriately situated to fund border security… I’m currently reviewing the authorities the Administration is using to declare a national emergency.

—Statement

Martha McSally

Martha McSally, Arizona

“I will continue to study the emergency declaration and additional funding proposal to ensure it increases border security while not adversely impacting our military.”

—Statement

John Cornyn

John Cornyn, Texas

“I haven’t seen it yet. I’m going to see what he does. If he uses existing congressional authority then that’s one thing. If he decides to do something outside of that that would be another so I need to see what he’s going to do.”

—Interview with POLITICO

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2T23RQP
via IFTTT

Beyoncé And Jay-Z Recreated Their ‘Apeshit’ Video — With A Regal Twist — For The BRITs



YouTube

Beyoncé and Jay-Z weren’t even at the 2019 BRIT Awards, and they still managed to win the night.

The couple picked up the trophy for Best International Group for their work as The Carters at Wednesday’s awards show, which is basically the British equivalent of the Grammys. Since they couldn’t be in London to accept the prize, the pair sent in a video message that managed to become iconic in just 30 short seconds.

In it, Bey and Jay recreated their classic “APESHIT” video, where they casually hang out in the Louvre, admiring the Mona Lisa. In the new vid, though, they pay homage to Meghan Markle by standing in front of a gorgeous portrait of the duchess wearing a tiara. Beyoncé took the lead in thanking U.K. fans for the award, saying, “Thank you so much to the BRIT Awards for this incredible honor. You guys have always been so supportive. Everything is love. Thank you.”

It’s at that point when Jay deadpans, “thank you,” Beyoncé giggles, and they turn around in unison to face the portrait. You can also hear Blue Ivy’s voice in the background, which is just about the cutest thing ever.

As for the meaning behind that incredible portrait — which I can only assume was custom-made for The Carters and is hanging somewhere in their house — British journalist Laura Snapes pointed out on Twitter that it could represent a public statement of support for Markle. The biracial duchess has been the target of intense media scrutiny lately, and this could be Bey and Jay’s way of celebrating her regality in the face of such turmoil.

Whatever the meaning, this is definitely an acceptance video for the ages. Check it out above.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2ImJp90
via IFTTT