These super slow motion close-ups of birds are totally mesmerising

By Laura Byager

Getting close enough to watch a bird of prey blinking is not an easy thing to achieve. In fact, it’s safe to say that, IRL, it would be pretty much impossible.

Luckily, we have The Slow Mo Guys on YouTube to make this gorgeous sight available to us, up close and in super slow motion. 

Thanks to their super slow motion shooting, the clip above gives a pretty spectacular view of a golden eagle blinking sideways using its nictitating membrane — a see-through blinking eyelid. 

Fascinating. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2V8aMVP
via IFTTT

Report: Zion Williamson’s $8M Insurance Policy Revealed After Injury vs. UNC

Duke's Zion Williamson sits on the floor following a injury during the first half of an NCAA college basketball game against North Carolina in Durham, N.C., Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2019. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome)

Gerry Broome/Associated Press

Duke superstar freshman Zion Williamson reportedly has an $8 million loss of value insurance policy in case of significant injury.

According to Darren Rovell of The Action Network, Williamson cannot collect on the policy unless he slips past the No. 16 overall pick in the 2019 NBA draft, however.

On Wednesday, Williamson left the game in the opening seconds of an 88-72 loss to rival North Carolina after suffering what Duke head coach Mike Krzyzewski called a “mild knee sprain.”

Williamson’s injury happened on an awkward play that saw his left Nike shoe fall apart while attempting to plant his foot.

Duke clearly wasn’t the same without Williamson, as it shot just 34.7 percent from the floor and had to lean almost entirely on RJ Barrett and Cam Reddish. Of the 72 points Duke scored in the game, Barrett and Reddish combined for a whopping 60 of them.

Williamson is perhaps the front-runner for Naismith College Player of the Year honors, as he is shooting a remarkable 68.3 percent from the field and averaging 21.6 points, 8.8 rebounds, 2.2 assists, 2.2 steals and 1.8 blocks per game.

While it is unclear exactly how serious the injury is and how long it will keep him out, Coach K’s comments suggest it won’t be a long-term issue.

Assuming Williamson enters the 2019 NBA draft, the only thing that could cause him to fall out of the top 16 would likely be a career-threatening injury or a significant off-court issue. Because of that, the odds of him collecting on the insurance policy are extremely low.

A back injury limited Michael Porter Jr. to just three games at Missouri last season, and he has yet to appear in an NBA game for the Denver Nuggets this season. Even though there were questions regarding his NBA future at the time of the 2018 draft, Denver still took him with the No. 14 overall pick based on potential alone.

Williamson is a far more highly touted prospect and the likely No. 1 overall pick when healthy, so unless his injury is far more severe than originally thought, the insurance policy shouldn’t come into play.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Elkhvb
via IFTTT

The 1975 used their BRIT Awards speech to call out misogyny in the music industry

When accepting awards, some artists deliver a long list of thank yous. Others use the opportunity to  highlight important issues. 

When accepting the 2019 BRIT award for Best British Group, The 1975’s lead singer Matty Healy used his speech to call out misogyny in the music industry by quoting an article by music journalist Laura Snapes, who’s deputy music editor at The Guardian. 

SEE ALSO: Beyoncé and Jay-Z accept BRIT award in front of Meghan Markle portrait

“I want to read a couple of sentences that a friend of ours, Laura Snapes, said this week and I thought we should all think about it,” Healy said before reading aloud from Snapes’ op-ed on misogynistic behaviour in the music industry. Snapes’ piece was written in the wake of a New York Times report alleging Ryan Adams “offered to jumpstart” the careers of female musicians and then “pursued them sexually.” 

“In music, male misogynist acts are examined for nuance and defended as traits of ‘difficult artists,’ Healy quoted, “while women are treated as hysterics who ‘don’t understand art.’”

You can watch Healy’s acceptance speech here.

“Women in the music industry need male allies like Matty Healy who are willing to challenge the status quo”

In an email to Mashable, Snapes explained the importance of male allies like Healy in the music industry. 

“I am encouraged and grateful that a powerful male musician used his platform to talk about the double standards facing male and female musicians in front of the most powerful people in the British music industry,” Snapes told Mashable. 

“It’s a sad fact that when women talk about their experiences of misogyny, people don’t always listen.”

On Twitter, Snapes shared her delight and surprise at being quoted on stage at the BRIT awards.

“Women in the music industry need male allies like Matty Healy who are willing to challenge the status quo and question the dynamics that have buoyed their careers,” Snapes told Mashable. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TaHxV2
via IFTTT

Jimmy Fallon gleefully celebrates reaching a huge YouTube milestone

By Sam Haysom

In the battle for the most popular late night show, viewing figures are no longer the only metric. Nowadays there are plenty of ways to measure success, and YouTube is a big one.

And despite the massive popularity of The Late Show with James Corden (which, despite only launching in 2015, has already passed 18 million subscribers), it’s The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon that’s become the first to hit the 20 million figure.

In the clip above, Fallon counts down live on a big screen before dancing with a giant bear in a rain of confetti. Why not, eh?

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2IqObm3
via IFTTT

Steve Irwin gets his own Google Doodle to commemorate his birthday

Holding a crocodile, nothing less.
Holding a crocodile, nothing less.

Image: Google

2016%252f09%252f16%252fe7%252fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lzex.0f9e7.jpg%252f90x90By Johnny Lieu

On Friday, the late Steve Irwin would’ve turned 49.

To commemorate the late animal conservationist and TV personality, who passed away in 2006, Google will unveil a Doodle in his honour.

SEE ALSO: Test your internet prowess with Google’s phishing quiz

The main Doodle features Steve holding on to a crocodile, as he was remembered for. It’s animated, so when users click through, there’s more images with the family and other animals.

“Today’s Google Doodle acknowledges the life and achievements of my husband Steve Irwin, whose efforts to protect wildlife and wild places have been recognised as the most extensive of any conservationist,” Terri Irwin, the wife of Steve, wrote in a blog post.

“We are so proud that his legacy lives on, as that was his greatest wish. He once said, ‘I don’t care if I’m remembered, as long as my message is remembered.’” 

Cms%252f2019%252f2%252f8e6f4283 b0ba f899%252fthumb%252f00001.jpg%252foriginal.jpg?signature= rspo4jt1h7mwath rypghqiit8=&source=https%3a%2f%2fvdist.aws.mashable

The Doodle will be live in Australia, the U.S., Europe, Asia, the Middle East and South America from Feb. 22 at 12:01 a.m. in each country, and run from 24 hours.

On the day, Google Assistant users can also hear about Steve’s journey when they ask, “Hey Google, crikey.” 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2VbxhsS
via IFTTT

James Corden hilariously parodies the new Calvin Klein ad featuring Noah Centineo

By Rachel Thompson

Listen, we all wanna be part of the Cool Kid Crowd™

For James Corden, that crowd happens to include none other than Kendall Jenner, A$AP Rocky, Noah Centineo, and Shawn Mendes — AKA the stars of the latest Calvin Klein ad.

True to comic form, Corden stars in a hilarious parody of the commercial, which sees him playing the uncool kid who’s desperate to hang out with the four stars. Spoiler alert: everyone hangs out without him. 

Hey, we’ve all been there. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2ElAb8S
via IFTTT

Self-care apps are here to make us happy. Why do they feel so bleak?

It’s 2019: How are you tracking your happiness?

If you’re not already logging and quantifying your moods, don’t worry. Apple declared self-care apps the top app trend of 2018, and they’ve been growing in number by the month. There are thousands available to guide you along your happiness journey. And while it’s hard to come out against a pro-snacking, nap-positive app genre, the boom in self-care and digital wellness shouldn’t automatically be a cause for celebration. It’s a reason for pause  — and maybe even cause for concern, given the questionable quality of some of them. 

Take Happify, a subscription-based app that allows you to build your “happiness score” with a series of scientific-ish tests, and track your weekly happiness with quantitative analysis. Or Sanity & Self, which promises it can help you remain “mindfully productive” with a seven-day course and achieve your core purpose in life in just five sessions. As you work to improve your happiness:sadness ratio, consider setting reminders to meet your daily goal-of-choice using the lifestyle optimization app Strides

Take a “class” in self-care with Sanity & Self

Image: screenshot/sanity & self

Quality, schmality

Type “self-care” into the app store, and you’ll find a plethora of apps loosely categorized under the genre. These are apps that allow you talk to a *real* therapist, guide you to “paint the stress away,” or offer to send you daily affirmations.

Some use evidence-based techniques more than others. There’s limited evidence that meditation apps are effective, for example, but at least there’s proof that meditation itself is good for you. And I’m not sure how snarky you can be about an inoffensive app like Aloe Bud, which reminds you to do the simple things in life: drink water and go to bed. 

SEE ALSO: One woman’s quest to find the right meditation app in a messed-up world

Then there are apps like Calm Harm, which was designed by a clinical psychologist. It’s used by social workers in conjunction with counseling and relies on evidence-based DBT (dialectical behavior therapy) principles. Calm Harm isn’t supposed to replace psychotherapy; instead, it’s meant to help soothe nerves in moments of crisis.

Unfortunately, this kind of app appears right alongside far more suspect apps that have little or no scientific grounding. Take the app labeled #SelfCare, which allows users to experience calmness voyeuristically through the use of an avatar. The avatar is stationed in boho paradise: underneath a comfy white duvet cover with a succulent plant on the windowsill to soothe them. #SelfCare encourages users to breathe and offers aesthetically pleasing in-app purchases to complement their experience, including an animated zodiac wheel duvet for your avatar for 99 cents. Your avatar (not you) can even slip into a pair of fictional fur slippers for free.

Breathe into this app

Breathe into this app

Image: screenshot/#selfcare

Calm yet? How strange. Me neither.

Plenty of apps try to make you quantify your self-care. I’m particularly terrified of Happify, which — in addition to helping people improve their happiness score — tries to teach people how to practice empathy. Empathy, the app reveals, is scientifically proven to spark joy (not that you would practice empathy for any other, you know, spiritual or moral purpose). 

Happify's self-assessment scale

Happify’s self-assessment scale

Image: screenshot/happify

You can also track your weekly happiness score  with this happiness scale until you reach maximum happiness optimization.

Users can build their happiness score with activities in Happify

Users can build their happiness score with activities in Happify

Image: screenshot/happify

After using the app a few times, I felt like I needed self-care from spending all this time monitoring my self-care. Spiritually, I was busted.

There are apps like Happify that are annoying, and then there are apps that feel downright toxic. Consider Youper, a five-star-rated “emotional health assistant” that uses AI technology to track your emotional health. In practice, the app functions as a kind of robotic life coach. Users type their most pressing problems into the app, and the app provides them with an automatic “therapeutic” response.

See what happened here.

Thanks for listening, bot.

Thanks for listening, bot.

Image: screenshot/youper

Youper gives users a range of goals they can work toward — for example, making 2019 the year they become a “Wonder Woman” (an absurd, faux feminist, patently unachievable goal of the First Wives Club variety). 

As you can see, I probably went a little farther in my responses than most. The fact that Youper didn’t recognize that pattern is disturbing. Because this is an app operated by a robot, not a trained psychotherapist, Youper’s responses are often absurd.

Think of it as a Samuel Beckett play, but somehow, incomprehensibly worse.

Image: youper/screenshot

By the end of my first “session” with my therapist, the AI had already diagnosed my thinking patterns. I was thinking too much in the present as well as the past. I was catastrophizing. I was engaging too much in “should” thinking. I was using “negative glasses.”

I was doing everything wrong.

As a former social worker who spent years providing one-on-one counseling to young adults, this kind of depersonalized, automatized, rapid-fire assessment terrifies me. Typically, therapists wait multiple sessions before they publicly assess a client’s thinking patterns. Rarely are we supposed to provide advice. We help clients find their own solutions, and it takes time. Assessments are supposed to be conducted by real, breathing, caring, thinking humans — not hypercritical bots responding to programming as opposed to actual human needs and personalities.

It’s borderline dangerous for an automated “therapist” to operate that way.

It can make you feel like you’re doing real work, when in fact you’re doing something superficial.

“A psychotherapeutic relationship that is purely digital is the antithesis of what therapy should be is or is,” Sara Richardson, a social worker in private practice, told Mashable. “[There are exceptions] when a person doesn’t have access to a clinic because of financial reasons or mobility issues … But often these apps can serve as resistance to actual real work. It can make you feel like you’re doing real work, when in fact you’re doing something superficial.” 

Richardson isn’t opposed to the idea of these apps. She’s just anxious that wellness apps will replace the most critical part of the process: the therapeutic relationship.

“Technology does allow so many people to access each other through the internet. But it shouldn’t replace human connection,” Richardson says. “That’s its fundamental failure.”

SEE ALSO: The Crisis Text Line analyzed 75 million texts to pinpoint the best way to ask if someone’s suicidal

SaraKay Smullens, a social worker and the author of Burnout and Self-Care in Social Work, is herself concerned that self-care apps are treating the surface of the presenting problem instead of the underlying trauma. A self-care app might help you fall asleep, but it can’t tell you why you’re not sleeping in the first place. It might remind you to eat, but it won’t reveal to you why you’re not eating. It can improve your breathing, but it won’t unpack why you need breathing assistance.

“Technology offers so much, but you can fall into a trap with these apps if the apps aren’t speaking to what’s really overwhelming you,” Smullens told Mashable. “For me, that’s a philosophy of the examined life.”

No amount of animated zodiac blankets can save us from ourselves.

Options are limited

Even if the quality of the apps is inconsistent and evidence for their success mixed, nothing has stopped the wellness app boom. Part of this growth spurt has to do with the self-care trend itself. The apps have the wind of an entire cultural movement at its back.

For some users, the answer is even simpler than that: They need help. There are no resources for them in their home environment.

After the 2008 recession, states cut approximately $4 billion in public mental health funding, shifting the bulk of costs to consumers. These days just 55 percent of psychiatrists accept insurance, making mental health all but a luxury for cash-starved millennials already confronting stagnant wages and staggering student debt. Couple that with long hours spent at work and a freelance gig economy, and, well, of course people need reminders to take a shit.

It’s no wonder people are turning to self-care apps for care, regardless of their therapeutic value. 

“Well, I personally think they’re better than nothing,” Antonia Frydman, a psychotherapist who serves patients struggling with anxiety and depression , told Mashable. “If they’re talking about sleep and exercise, that’s at the very core of self-care. These can be compliments to therapy, which is unfortunately inaccessible to a lot of people…. We’re all so addicted to our phones, the only way some of are going to unwind is through iPhone media. They [the apps] can be the minimum you need to not be totally miserable and survive in this capitalistic society.”

The minimum you need to not be totally miserable

Thank you, mobile technology.

A better way forward

To be fair, there are plenty of people who do take pleasure in self-care apps. It might be a placebo effect, but it’s something. 

Here’s how T.J, a former social services administrator, describes her nuanced approach to self-care apps. T.J. doesn’t see it as a cure-all. She’s careful about which apps she selects.

“I’ve used Talkspace [a teletherapy app that provides therapy over mobile] to get me through some hurdles, but generally when I can get Groupons or a discount,” T.J. told Mashable. “I think it’s good for motivation and helping yourself when your routines are breaking down due to stress, but not good for psychodynamic work.”

T.J.’s approach is reflective of how some counselors would like to frame the self-care app boom. When the *good,* evidence-based apps are used correctly, as a complement to ongoing psychotherapy, they can boost the therapeutic process.

“If you’re trying to figure out the meaning of your life, they’re not going to help you with that,” Frydman says. “But these apps can be helpful in how you regulate yourself.”

“I will sometimes recommend a CBT [cognitive behavioral therapy] thought tracking app,” Richardson says. “It can supplement therapy you’re already doing. Apps that help you manage bowel movement or manage pain — I think those can be really useful.”

Smullens encourages people to find the strategy that works for them, whatever form it takes: “Don’t force yourself into any self-care strategy that somebody else says is right for you. So much of life today is the expectation to fit yourself into someone else’s paradigm.”

And if you really feel like you need to download a self-care app, proceed with caution. Be mindful of which apps you download. If you have access to a licensed therapist, ask them which ones are worth considering. Don’t download apps based on listicles written by journalists who haven’t interviewed real clinicians. Don’t be distracted by apps that were supposedly created by “real psychologists” (that doesn’t necessarily mean anything). 

Use apps that are humble in their mission: an app that reminds you to breathe at your desk is more likely to be successful than an app that promises to permanently alter your mood. The more limited the app’s goal, the more likely you are to accomplish it. 

Apps can’t do the real, full work of self-care. Let’s see these apps for what they are — band-aids — and leave it at that.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2SPGpGV
via IFTTT

Trump’s War on California

President Donald Trump loves bashing California—its “ridiculous” sanctuary cities, its “gross mismanagement” of its forests, even the “disgusting” streets of San Francisco. He also enjoys slagging California liberals, like House Intelligence Committee Chair “Liddle” Adam Schiff, House Financial Services Committee Chair “Low IQ” Maxine Waters, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who “has behaved so irrationally & gone so far to the left that she has now officially become a Radical Democrat.” On Wednesday, after Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom decided to scale back the state’s troubled high-speed rail project, the president gleefully mocked it as a green fiasco: “Send the Federal Government back the Billions of Dollars WASTED!”

Now that progressive Democrats are pushing for a California-style Green New Deal to fight climate change, and progressive California Senator Kamala Harris has become a front-runner for the Democratic nomination to challenge Trump, the president’s allies have begun framing 2020 as a last stand against the hippie-lefty Californication of America. Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk has warned that “Democrats want California to be the blueprint for America,” while Dan Patrick, the Republican lieutenant governor of Texas, has suggested that Trump’s reelection slogan should be: “I’m not going to let the Democrats turn America into California.”

Story Continued Below

California has earned its reputation as the politically correct capital of Blue America, a heavily urban majority-minority coastal state where it’s legal to smoke pot but illegal for retailers to provide plastic bags or cops to ask suspects their immigration status. Taxes are high, the first year of community college is free and driver’s licenses have a third option for residents who don’t identify as male or female. But while California has plenty of problems, from worsening wildfires to overpriced housing to that troubled bullet-train project that became the latest target of presidential mockery, there’s one serious hitch in the GOP plan to make California a symbol of Democratic dysfunction and socialistic stagnation: It’s basically thriving.

“California is doing awesome,” says Congressman Ted Lieu, an immigrant from Taiwan who co-chairs the policy and communications committee for the House Democratic Caucus. “It’s a beautiful, welcoming, environmentally friendly place that proves government can work. Who wants to run against that?”

California is now the world’s fifth-largest economy, up from eighth a decade ago. If it’s a socialist hellhole, it’s a socialist hellhole that somehow nurtured Apple, Google, Facebook, Tesla, Uber, Netflix, Oracle and Intel, not to mention old-economy stalwarts like Chevron, Disney, Wells Fargo and the Hollywood film industry. California firms still attract more venture capital than the rest of the country combined, while its farms produce more fruits, nuts and wine than the rest of the country combined. During the Great Recession, when the state was mired in a budget crisis so brutal its bond rating approached junk and it gave IOUs to government workers, mainstream media outlets were proclaiming the death of the California dream. But after a decade of steady growth that has consistently outpaced the nation’s, plus a significant tax hike on the wealthy, California is in much sounder fiscal shape; while federal deficits are soaring again, the state has erased its red ink and even stashed $13 billion in a rainy day fund.

Of course, every state is in better economic shape than it was during the Great Recession, but California has enjoyed its renaissance while pursuing policies Republicans associate with economic ruin. It has an $11-an-hour minimum wage, scheduled to rise to $15 by 2023. Its unusually aggressive implementation of Obamacare since 2013 has reduced its uninsured rate from 17 percent to just 7 percent. Its ambitious clean energy and climate policies in many ways inspired the Green New Deal; the state is committed to generating 50 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030 and 100 percent by 2045, and its stringent fuel-efficiency standards help explain why it’s home to half the nation’s electric vehicles.

In general, California is flourishing while pursuing the exact opposite of the policies Trump is pursuing in Washington. And it has sued the Trump administration dozens of times, not only taking the lead on the new 16-state lawsuit against the president’s emergency wall declaration, but fighting for loan forgiveness for students defrauded by for-profit schools, net neutrality and Obamacare’s guarantees of free birth control, while fighting to stop the ban on travel from several Muslim countries, the ban on transgender service members, and a slew of environmental rollbacks. For example, Trump is trying to dismantle California’s strict fuel-efficiency rules, which have become de facto national rules since other blue states have adopted them and every automaker has complied with them, and California Attorney General Xavier Becerra is now battling the administration in court to protect them.

“If people want to call what California is doing socialism, fine, but it isn’t having a negative impact on the economy,” says political scientist Chris Hoene, executive director of the California Center for Budget and Policy. “By just about every measure of productivity, we’re at the upper end of the spectrum.”

That hasn’t stopped Republicans from making California their go-to nightmare scenario. In 2018, Senator Ted Cruz warned that liberals wanted Texas to be “just like California, right down to the tofu and silicone and dyed hair.” Democratic candidates for governor were accused of trying to turn Nevada and Florida into California, and Colorado into “RadiCalifornia.” In the Georgia governor’s race, Republican Brian Kemp’s stump-speech mantra about Democrat Stacey Abrams was that she was trying to import “radical California values.” The Republican National Committee’s nickname for Harris in its news releases is “California Kamala,” and it rarely mentions her without mentioning her “San Francisco values.”

California is so gigantic that it’s hard to pinpoint what its values really are. There are huge differences between its cities, exurbs, and rural areas, between crunchy Northern California and glam Southern California, between upscale coastal California and downscale inland California. But it’s undeniably a socially and politically progressive state, with laws banning pet stores from selling dogs that weren’t rescued, restaurants from giving their customers plastic straws unless asked, and employers from asking job applicants about their current salaries. Even the traditionally Republican suburbs of Orange County voted Democratic in 2018. And while economic conservatives consider its high-tax, pro-regulation policies “anti-business,” researchers have not found evidence that those policies drive businesses to other states or squelch innovation in California, although they do seem to encourage some retirees to move elsewhere. The president tweets on a platform created in California. It’s somewhat odd to portray the state that created health clubs, blue jeans, Pandora and Hulu as Venezuela in the making.

In fact, the secret sauce of the California dream seems to have something to do with attracting entrepreneurs who want to change the world as well as their bank accounts. Christine Moseley, the CEO of a San Francisco business-to-business startup called Full Harvest, was an executive for a global logistics conglomerate and then an organic juice chain before moving to the Bay Area to start an eco-friendly company of her own. She ended up developing a kind of Airbnb for ugly produce, a platform that connects farmers who have fruits and vegetables they can’t sell to grocery stores with juice companies and other buyers who don’t care what the food looks like as long as it’s fresh. America wastes about 40 percent of its food, contributing to global hunger as well as global warming; in three years, Full Harvest has sold 10 million pounds of produce that would have gone to waste.

“California was the perfect place to do this,” Moseley says. “It’s the tech and innovation capital of the world, but it’s also the place for people who care about food and the environment, and the place for people who want to solve big problems.”

A lot of those dreamers come to California from abroad; more than 10 million of the state’s 40 million residents are immigrants, and a quarter of those immigrants are undocumented. “There is a Revolution going on in California,” Trump tweeted during the legal battle over sanctuary cities last April, and he didn’t mean it as a compliment. In his Oval Office address about his border wall last month, the president pointedly cited two murders committed by undocumented immigrants in California, and earlier this week he complained on Twitter this week that California is leading the fight against his declaration of a national emergency.

But illegal border crossings into California are at their lowest level since 1971, and the state government doesn’t view its undocumented residents as a threat. They’re eligible for driver’s licenses, subsidized health care for their kids, and in-state tuition rates, while police officers are prohibited from working with ICE to try to deport them. University of California Chancellor Janet Napolitano, who ran the Department of Homeland Security under President Barack Obama, created legal services centers throughout the system to help undocumented students.

“California recognizes their basic humanity,” says Kevin Johnson, dean of the University of California-Davis law school. “And if you look at the labor market, immigrants are a big reason why California has such a dynamic economy.”

Traditionally, another reason has been government investment; for example, the strength of its public universities helped attract the aerospace industry, build the technology mecca of Silicon Valley, and turn the San Diego area into the national capital of “precision medicine.” But government also helped finance the ill-fated solar manufacturer Solyndra, as well as the beleaguered San Francisco-to-Los Angeles bullet train that Governor Newsom tapped the brakes on last week. Newsom is also scaling back a similarly massive water project designed to alleviate droughts and protect the Sacramento River delta. Sometimes Republicans cite misleading statistics to make California look bad—yes, it has the “most debt” and the “most families on welfare,” because it has the most people—but sometimes, California’s dreams have exceeded its government’s ability to execute them.

There has been no need to exaggerate California’s most serious problem, the exorbitant housing costs that threaten its middle class and, as Newsom warned in his State of the State address, are starting “to define life in this state.” The state’s highest-priced cities have blocked development of new housing through zoning restrictions and not-in-my-back-yard activism; a five-year-old plan to build 75 mixed-income apartments in San Francisco’s hip Mission neighborhood was just delayed again after opponents sought to protect a laundromat on the lot as a historic landmark. California’s poverty rate is near the nation’s average, but by a separate measurement that takes housing costs into account, it’s tied for the nation’s worst. Overall, California has dropped to 49th in the nation in per-capita housing supply, a trend Newsom has vowed to reverse; he has already begun suing California cities that don’t meet state-mandated affordable housing goals.

But while the problem of unaffordable housing is a real drag on growth, and a real threat to the social and economic mobility that drives the California dream, it’s the kind of problem that only desirable places have. There’s plenty of affordable housing in Siberia. “We attract people that places like Mississippi can’t,” Lieu boasts. Nancy Pfund, a Bay Area venture capitalist and “impact investor” who took early stakes in Tesla and Pandora, says California is still a magnet for talent, because it’s still a breeding ground for disruption. She’s now investing in local companies like Zola Electric, which is taking Silicon Valley solar technology to Africa; Apeel Sciences, which has created natural plant-based coatings that keep produce fresh for longer, attacking the food waste problem in a different way; and even the Real Real, the luxury consignment platform that helps consumers recycle their brand-name fashion and reduce the demand for manufacturing more of it.

“In California, we’ve got the combination of capital, innovation, and regulations that reward investments in progress,” Pfund says. “And that’s created an ecosystem of entrepreneurs who want to spread the progress around the world.”

She’s talking about entrepreneurs like Dawn Barry, the president of San Diego-based Luna DNA, a community-based Big Data genomics platform powered by blockchain, which is a very California collection of words. Basically, it’s a way for people to get paid for sharing medical data from genealogy services like 23 and Me as well as their iPhones so researchers can study them. It’s complicated, but it’s the kind of startup that makes sense in a place like San Diego, which has big research institutions like Sanford-Burnham, Scripps and UC San Diego, big tech companies like Qualcomm, and big genomics players like Illumina, where Barry was a top executive.

“There’s just this attitude here that we’re going to reshape medicine,” she says. “Nobody thinks it’s crazy that you want to do things totally differently.”

That attitude didn’t work out for Solyndra’s cutting-edge solar panels that looked like mini-ladders instead of rectangles, or for the high-speed rail project that started construction in the sparsely populated Central Valley in the middle of the line rather than the dense urban centers at the endpoints. California’s cap-and-trade program for reducing carbon emissions has gotten off to a bumpy start, too, and its leading electric utility, Pacific Gas & Electric, declared bankruptcy after the wildfires.

So the idea of California as a leftist hellhole is likely to persist. “California is going to hell in a handbasket,” Fox News personality Tomi Lahren declared during a recent segment on the border. A conservative Town Hall columnist, in a 2018 essay titled “To Hell With California,” urged the state to secede from the U.S., although he said he didn’t want to nuke it. (“Well … OK, I don’t.”) There’s already a Twitter meme proposing a new Harris campaign slogan: “Make America California.”

California does feel like a potential harbinger of a more multicultural, more progressive American future, which may be one reason Trump is so openly hostile to it, even threatening to withhold aid from its wildfire victims. A lot of Newsom’s plans for California are to counter what’s happening in Washington; he wants to reinstate Obamacare’s individual health insurance mandate in California, extend health subsidies to undocumented adults in California, and pursue even more ambitious climate goals. Meanwhile, the Democratic candidates to take on Trump are pushing platforms that would take a lot of California policy to the national stage.

The story of California is the story of America—immigration, innovation, investing in what works,” Lieu said. “Plus we’ve got amazing beaches, and Disneyland! How cool is that?”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2E5d41k
via IFTTT

On the rocks: Can the Scottish whisky industry survive Brexit?

Glasgow, Scotland – Robert Burns, Scotland’s beloved 18th-century national poet and songwriter, penned words in praise of it. Winston Churchill, Britain’s war-time prime minister, breakfasted on it. And Robert Mitchum, screen legend and Hollywood hell-raiser, often got into trouble because of it. 

Scotch whisky, made only in Scotland, is a drink that has devotees across the globe. It has seen off world travails and even prohibition in the US to become the planet’s most sought-after international spirit with, in 2017, a UK export value of 4.36bn pounds ($5.65bn).

But this very Scottish industry is facing a new challenge – Brexit.  

The Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) trade body was not unique among UK industry in supporting a Remain vote.

Business hates uncertainty – and the European Union accounts for over 30 percent of overseas Scotch whisky sales.

Britain is due to leave the EU on March 29, after most people in England and Wales – unlike those in Scotland and Northern Ireland – voted to leave the bloc.  

If there is no deal agreed to govern that exit, then Britain is going to be trading with the EU and the rest of the world, on World Trade Organization (WTO) terms.

“There is a risk of losing benefits, including lower tariffs, secured through the EU’s bilateral trade deals with markets representing around 10% of Scotch exports,” according to the SWA.

The group’s chief, Karen Betts, said earlier this year that a no-deal Brexit would impact customs declarations at the UK-EU border, marking a “significant change to the straightforward way in which Scotch whisky enters the EU”, as she warned of greater costs.

We want to be able to continue to export Scotch whisky to Europe and the rest of the world as easily as we can today.

Scotch Whisky Association spokesperson

David Thomson owns Annandale Distillery in Southern Scotland. 

Despite harbouring reservations about the EU, the self-described “reluctant Remainer” told Al Jazeera that his vote to stay in the 28-member group was rooted in the hope of business prospects. 

“My reason for voting Remain was because I feared greatly the situation that we now face,” said Thomson, 64, whose distillery produces fine single malt Scotch whisky in Dumfries and Galloway.

“The uncertainty is the very difficult part of this to live with.”

Indeed, as the clock ticks down towards the Brexit deadline, uncertainty has gripped all four nations of the UK.

‘Water of life’

The negotiations with the EU, conducted by Britain’s beleaguered Prime Minister Theresa May, have so far failed to find favour with Westminster MPs who have voted down her proposed Brexit deal amid disputes over the Irish border.

For Thomson and his wife Teresa Church, co-owner of the whisky business, Brexit has brought Annandale Distillery’s international links, not least with the EU, sharply into focus.

“We currently export our products to the European Union, duty-suspended,” he said. “There’s an agreement that allows us simply to put them on a lorry that can carry bonded goods across the North Sea and deposit our products, duty-suspended, in Germany and the Netherlands – but also in Scandinavia. And that is just so easy – but I think that will become more difficult.”

Thomson explained that he sourced both his “special digitally printed bottles” for their main product from France and corks and capsules from Italy.

“I’m allowing an extra 20 percent for the forthcoming financial year for purchases out of the European Union in anticipation of a fall in the [UK] pound and the potential for tariffs,” he said.

The Scots Gaelic term for whisky – uisge beatha, or “water of life” – is useful for understanding the affection with which Scotland and its people hold this amber nectar. 

From Burns Night, the annual celebration of Robert Burns, in January to Hogmanay (or New Year’s Eve) in December, Scotch whisky greases the wheels of Scottish social gatherings like no other tipple.

A whisky barrel advertising Laphroaig single malt peated Whisky from Islay [Alasdair Soussi/Al Jazeera]

“Whisky is part of our family, it is intrinsic to us,” said Rachel MacNeill.

She lives on Islay, an island off the West coast of Scotland home to 3,000 people, which currently hosts eight operating whisky distilleries – a ninth will fill its first cask this year. 

MacNeill, founder of the Islay Whisky Academy, told Al Jazeera: “Your consciousness of the island just absorbs the distilleries. The distilleries physically look out to the sea – but they are like a lighthouse light that shines out to the world.”

The EU-supporting Scottish government, run by the pro-independence Scottish National Party (SNP), which is today making provisions for a possible second Scottish independence referendum, is fiercely protective of the Scotch whisky industry.  

Like most Remain-supporting bodies and individuals in Britain, it is fearful of the consequences of a no-deal Brexit, which would see the UK crash out of the EU without an agreement.

A spokesperson for the SWA told Al Jazeera: “Scotch whisky is a flagship export, with 39 bottles shipped from the UK to 180 global markets every second, and we are used to adapting to changes in the way in which we trade

“[But the] prospect of a no-deal exit is concerning. We want to be able to continue to export Scotch whisky to Europe and the rest of the world as easily as we can today, without having to deal with new trade barriers, the re-emergence of tariffs or untested customs procedures. To that end, we support the [UK] government’s Withdrawal Agreement.”

Countries like India, China and Brazil – these are markets that the EU as a bloc have generally not been able to fully capitalise on with all our exports.

Sam Simmons, head of whisky at UK drinks company Atom Brands

But some industry leaders spy opportunities.

Sam Simmons is head of whisky at UK drinks company Atom Brands. He told Al Jazeera that the Scotch whisky “ecosystem was one built on optimism”.

“Countries like India, China and Brazil – these are markets that the EU as a bloc have generally not been able to fully capitalise on with all our exports,” he said.

He continued: “Trading in the EU has also probably caused problems with trading into the US. There’s a lot of barriers to Scotch in the distribution and sales regulations in the United States, and the UK becomes more likely, than the EU, to secure new deals in the US.”

Sam Simmons believes there may be opportunities for the whisky industry after Brexit [John Paul/Al Jazeera]

Thomson also contends that the decision to quit the EU has opened his eyes to other potential markets for his small whisky producer.

“The market that I’m really targeting at the minute is Singapore,” said Thomson, who re-started production at Annandale Distillery in 2014 after it originally closed in December 1918. 

He said the island state’s high GDP and existing whisky-drinking culture meant that Singaporeans were “definitely prepared to pay for premium products.”

“Maybe we’re just going to have to work a lot harder to win business around the world, he said, “which is maybe no bad thing at all.”

The Pot Still in Glasgow, Scotland has been a bar since the late 1800s and it’s a good place to get an introduction to Scotch whisky [File: Michelle Locke/The Associated Press]

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2GSZbWR
via IFTTT

Hundreds evacuated from ISIL’s last Syria holdout

Hundreds of people including women and children have been evacuated from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant’s (ISIL, known as ISIS) last holdout in Syria, bringing US-backed forces closer to retaking the last sliver of the “caliphate”.

An official from the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) said on Thursday that the civilian evacuation is expected to be completed on the same day.

AFP correspondents reported on Wednesday seeing at least 17 trucks carrying men, women and children out of the last patch of ISIL territory in the eastern Syrian village of Baghouz.

SDF spokesman Adnan Afrin said most of the hundreds who have left were civilians, but also included ISIL fighters.

“Civilians and fighters from many nationalities have surrendered,” he said, adding that “there was a group of ISIL fighters hidden among the civilians… but as far as we know, our colleagues have arrested them”.

SDF: evacuation of civilians from last ISIL enclave in east #Syria expected to be completed Thursday; we will engage remaining ISIL fighters once evacuation complete

— Zeina Khodr (@ZeinakhodrAljaz) February 21, 2019

‘Deal’?

Backed by US-led coalition air strikes, the SDF have trapped ISIL fighters in less than half a square kilometre of Baghouz.

The SDF have slowed their advance in recent days to protect civilians ahead of a final push to defeat ISIL.

Hundreds of women, children held as ISIL loses last Syria bastion

“There are still large groups of civilians inside, as well as ISIL fighters,” Adnan said.

Thousands of people – mostly women and children related to ISIL members – have streamed out of Baghouz in the past weeks, but the flow had largely stopped in recent days.

The United Nations on Tuesday said around 200 families, including many women and children, were “reportedly trapped” in Baghouz.

Hundreds of alleged members, including foreigners, have been detained after fleeing the pocket in recent weeks.

At its height, the ISIL “caliphate” spanned an area the size of the United Kingdom, with the armed group imposing their brutal rule on millions.

Complicated

After years of battling ISIL, the SDF holds hundreds of foreigners suspected of being ISIL fighters, as well as related women and children.

Syria’s Kurds have long urged their home countries to take them back, but many European nations have been reluctant.

The implosion of the proto-state, which once spanned swathes of Syria and neighbouring Iraq, has left Western nations grappling with how to handle citizens who left to join ISIL.

US President Donald Trump on Saturday urged European powers to take back hundreds of their citizens who fought for ISIL in Syria.

Britain, however, has rebuffed Trump’s appeal and is expected to revoke the citizenship of a teenager who fled London to join ISIL when she was just 15, a lawyer for her family said Tuesday.

Shamima Begum, 19, is being held in a refugee camp in northeast Syria, and at the weekend gave birth to her third child.

On Wednesday, she said she was shocked by the decision and considering applying to settle in the Netherlands, the homeland of her husband.

At odds with its demands of other countries, the US said Wednesday it would refuse entry to a US-born ISIL propagandist who wants to return from Syria.

Hoda Muthana, a 24-year-old from Alabama, in late 2014 posted a picture of four women appearing to torch their passports, including an American one.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said she “does not have any legal basis, no valid US passport, no right to a passport, nor any visa to travel to the United States”.

But Muthana told The Guardian she had been brainwashed online and “deeply regrets” joining the movement.

Beyond Baghouz, ISIL retains a presence in the Badia desert and has claimed deadly attacks in SDF-held areas.

Syria’s war has killed more than 360,000 people and displaced millions since it started in 2011 with the repression of anti-government protests.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Isuk60
via IFTTT