GOP running out of options on Trump’s border emergency


John Thune

Since the House resolution is written so simply, there are few ways to alter the resolution through “germane” amendments. “They’re applying a pretty tight filter,” said Sen. John Thune, the No. 2 GOP leader. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Congress

The Senate parliamentarian is unlikely to allow Republicans to significantly amend a resolution blocking the president’s emergency declaration.

Senate Republicans are unlikely to be permitted to dramatically amend the House-passed resolution overturning the president’s national emergency, suggesting they will be confronted with a simple referendum on the president’s controversial declaration later this week.

The Senate parliamentarian is expected to allow few if any significant amendments at a majority threshold, according to people familiar with conversations with parliamentary staff. Some GOP senators, like Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), have been seeking to modify the resolution to profess alarm at the situation on the border and proclaim support for a wall even as senators pan the president’s end-run around Congress.

Story Continued Below

But because the House resolution is written so simply, there are few ways to alter the resolution through “germane” amendments and the parliamentarian has “made it clear” that substantive votes are unlikely to be allowed, said a senior Republican aide.

That means there are fewer exit ramps from a clash with the president over his extraordinary use of the emergency law, which Republicans fear will set a precedent so that Democrats unilaterally shift billions of dollars for liberal priorities in the future.

“They’re applying a pretty tight filter,” said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), the No. 2 GOP leader. “There are a few amendments that could meet the germaneness test, but there are [others] that don’t do it.”

“It’s almost impossible to write a germane amendment under whatever their germane rules are. So I don’t think they’re going to allow any amendments,” said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

Republicans could try to appeal any parliamentarian ruling they disagree with, but it’s unclear whether there’s an appetite for re-writing Senate precedent on the fly later this week.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that the Senate will vote on the House resolution Thursday.

The Kentucky Republican said that he “may well” support amending the National Emergencies Act, but that any changes “would be prospective” and “wouldn’t apply to the current situation.”

“We’re looking at some ways to revisit the law. There’s a lot of discomfort with the law,” McConnell added, noting the law as written may be “too broad.”

Vice President Mike Pence met with Republican Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Rob Portman of Ohio, Mike Lee of Utah and Toomey on Tuesday to hear them out about possible changes to the law, according to a person familiar with the meeting. Some of those senators have been seeking a deal with Trump to change the National Emergency Act in exchange for potentially supporting the president on the disapproval vote this week.

Pence went into the meeting in “listening mode” the person said, adding that the vice president would relay the ideas to the president but made no commitments: “He made clear [the administration] is committed to acting to secure the border.”

Absent an agreement with the administration over altering the National Emergency Act to give Congress back more power, opponents of Trump’s move say he may be headed for a resounding defeat.

“It’ll probably be a straight up vote and I think you’ll get around mid 50s to high 50 as far as disapproval numbers,” Paul said.

Trump has become increasingly interested in the upcoming vote, tweeting in support of party unity and urging Republicans to stick together.

Around a dozen Senate Republicans are weighing whether to oppose the president on the resolution of disapproval, which needs just a simple majority to be passed and force Trump to issue the first veto of his presidency.

“Republican Senators have a very easy vote this week. It is about Border Security and the Wall (stopping Crime, Drugs etc.), not Constitutionality and Precedent,” Trump tweeted on Monday. “Get tough R’s!”

Marianne LeVine contributed to this report.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2XVuhmE
via IFTTT

Jordan Peele’s Us Is A Home-Invasion Story With A Satisfying Twist



Claudette Barius/Universal Pictures

By Monica Castillo

The anticipation for Jordan Peele’s Us has been steadily building since the project was announced last year. Or, more accurately, it’s been there since Peele took home a screenwriting Oscar for his critically acclaimed, commercially successful, and hotly debated directorial debut, Get Out. After Friday night’s (March 8) frenzied premiere of Us at the 2019 SXSW Film Festival, we can confirm that the horror flick lives up to the hype. Where the most terrifying parts of Get Out were steeped in modern day issues surrounding race in America, Peele’s second take at big-screen screams is a similarly nuanced story that peels back the layers of everyday horrors — taking the home invasion trope and turning it upside down to ask, “What if we’re the monsters of our own story?”

The film follows the Wilsons, a typical American family, on their less-than-idyllic vacation trip to Santa Cruz. Adelaide (Lupita Nyong’o) isn’t a fan of the beach, but after some playful coaxing from her husband, Gabe (Winston Duke), she relents. They take their kids, Zora (Shahadi Wright Joseph) and Jason (Evan Alex), to meet with another family of four, the Tylers. Their day trip incidentally sets off a series of frightening events that, much like Get Out, will most likely set off alarm bells.

If you want to go into the movie unspoiled, then you may want to pause here.

Claudette Barius/Universal Pictures

The basic premise of the evil in the film is that we are our own worst enemy. In Peele’s twisted vision, that manifests in warped copies of the Wilsons. They show up one night to confront their picture-perfect middle-class doppelgängers, jealous of the privileged lives they’ve enjoyed while their less fortunate copies were kept underground in terrible conditions. The Wilsons are understandably unnerved by this group of outsiders — and even more so when they realize that the evil they fear looks exactly like them.

This, according to Peele, is a metaphor for America. “We’re in a time where we fear the other, whether it’s the mysterious invader that we think is going to come and kill us and take our jobs, or the faction we don’t live near, who voted a different way than us,” he said during a post-premiere Q&A. “We’re all about pointing the finger. And I wanted to suggest that maybe the monster we really need to look at has our face. Maybe the evil, it’s us.”

Us, in many ways, is also a love letter to horror. The Wilsons join a long line of twins and doubles in horror movies like The Shining, Dead Ringers, and Body Double. (In fact, similar to Get Out, there are many references to Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining throughout, and it was even one of the films Peele asked the cast to watch before production commenced.) For actors, this kind of character work is always a thrilling challenge. But with the help of a director and storyteller like Peele — one who nurtures these kinds of horror tropes and devices, filtering them through his own worldview — it’s also the chance to take on a role that has more than one meaning.

The entire cast is stupendous, but Nyong’o is the star of the movie with an all-consuming performance as both the Wilson matriarch and her deranged other half, known as Red. Adelaide bears the unseen scars of childhood trauma; as a young girl, she wandered off from her parents along the Santa Cruz boardwalk and found herself face to face with a creepily silent little girl who looked just like her. So her apprehension toward a nice day at the beach with her family is warranted. And Nyong’o throws herself into the dark madness of her doppelgänger, a woman with a voice hoarse from disuse, and like Adelaide, leads her family during the course of the movie.

Claudette Barius/Universal Pictures

Where Adelaide is flighty and shaken by the events, her doppelgänger moves with freakishly smooth intention, the movie’s trademark golden scissors pointed down as both hands grasp tightly on the now-deadly weapon. Through both careful editing and staging, Peele creates the illusion that the original family members are facing off against their troubled selves, and Nyong’o has some of the tensest confrontations as Adelaide’s doppelgänger is the only one who can talk and tell her family’s sad side of the story. This setup also allows Nyong’o to become a bit of an action star, staging a fight between her two characters that plays more like a dance, with one side acting more composed and the other wildly thrashing to survive.

For his part, Duke sheds the macho bravado of his breakout role in Black Panther for a persona that’s goofier, not quite as observant to all the weird coincidences leading up to the attack but still fiercely protective of his family when it comes time for action. While Nyong’o’s performance is perhaps the most eye-catching, Duke’s portrayal is also demanding, physically and mentally. As his evil double, Duke puts on a stone-faced furrowed brow, his shoulders are hunched until it’s time to unleash his brute strength.

In between the two parents — of both the original family and their unhinged doppelgängers — are the kids. Wright Joseph takes on a confident cool girl attitude as eldest Zora, someone who’s always mildly annoyed by her little brother and is always embarrassed by her dad’s corny jokes. Her doppelgänger has a weird good-girl vibe to her. Her hair is straightened and she’s obedient to her mother’s every command. With a Wolfman mask as a security blanket, Jason is the quieter child of the two. Where Zora may resort to her ability to outrun her doppelgänger, Jason outsmarts his evil, fire-happy double within the rules of their own existence.

“What are you people?” Adelaide asks halfway through the film. Her double replies with a menacing smile, “We’re Americans.”

The true meaning behind these doppelgängers will likely be the subject of debate when the movie comes out later this month. Are they a metaphor for America? For a classist society? For the countless unspeakable horrors buried deep in our nation’s soil? Or is their origin not as important as the film’s final, satisfying twist?

Chances are the film’s mythology won’t be what stays with you in the hours, days, and months after seeing Us. Instead, you’ll remember the way Nyong’o moves, the way her face contorts into a singular sinister grimace, the way her tears fall — and the way she lets the mayhem totally consume her, frame by frame.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2T5OUJy
via IFTTT

Out-of-context Twitter accounts keep your favorite shows alive online

The joy of Parks and Recreation will never leave me, not even in the dark corners of Twitter. It’s a strange yet reaffirming thought for me and the other 166,000 people who follow the “out of context parks” account.

As its name suggests, the account takes scenes from the beloved NBC comedy and posts them without any context, leaving it up to the reader to interpret the meaning. 

While not affiliated with the network or the show officially, it is still part of a burgeoning trend on the social media platform. Pop culture-based out-of-context accounts have been popping up all over the place in the last few years. 

From iconic TV shows like Buffy the Vampire Slayer to critical faves like The Good Place, from Marvel movies to recent Oscar nominee The Favourite, there are out-of-context pages devoted to all kinds of entertainment.

SEE ALSO: Crush Twitter proves that sometimes subtweets can be good

The basic principle boils down to the same thing: posting close captioned screenshots without additional comment. The jokes really just needs to be taken at face value and are actually the perfect buffer from a sullen cycle of bad news and bad tweets. 

Why wouldn’t I want to be interrupted by Leslie Knope and Ben Wyatt in the middle of my mindless Twitter scroll? As a lover of obscure board games and Adam Scott being nerdy, Cones of Dunshire will always warrant my attention.

Kaysi Long created the Parks account in the summer of 2017. She told Mashable she was inspired by a similar account dedicated to cult favorite Buffy. 

“I thought it’d be fun to do the same thing for a TV show I love,” she shared via email. She noticed the engagement started picking up heavily within the first 6 months. 

Long binged the show and took several screen caps along the way. “I have a ton saved up now so I haven’t had to spend too much time watching it again and again. How I decide what to post is usually pretty random,” she said. The exception is when there’s really something timely to share. 

The allure of out-of-contexts as they pertain to movies, TV, games, comic books or even people (who can say no to even more ways of taking in John Mulaney’s humor) stems from the need to consume content repeatedly and quickly.

It’s also the simplest form of a throwback. 

When I discovered the out-of-context account for The Office, another all-time favorite, I spent a joyous 15 minutes laughing as I recalled the specific details of every post. This post got me so much that I immediately felt the need to revisit the opening of Season 4’sMoney” and listen to the opening music, which is indeed very cheerful. 

The concept of sharing a singular moment of dialogue goes way back. First it was posting quotes or even lyrics without any context on AIM or Facebook, and now it’s as Instagram captions. It’s ~cool~ and fun. 

Twitter out-of-context humor is a whole other ballgame. It can be fleeting and varied, taking the most basic lines and proclaiming them to be entertaining.

For example, @NYTMinusContext tweeted nothing but random verbatim phrases from various New York Times articles. It amassed 205,000 followers in it’s almost 5 years of existence. It’s easy to see why. 

seriously, I will tear my hair out and eat it. HA-HA-HA

— NYT Minus Context (@NYTMinusContext) February 23, 2018

everything on planet Earth is falling apart

— NYT Minus Context (@NYTMinusContext) March 10, 2018

In its more recent wave, this format gets a visual and cultural makeover. The image elevates the comedy, and it speaks to our need of dissecting pop culture at a minute level.

Twitter provides the means to do this easily. 

A scene stripped down to its barest form will still come off as amusing. Emma Stone’s maniacal “Fuck! fuck! fuck! fuck!” is a real mood, regardless of whether or not you’ve seen The Favourite. 

Out-of-context accounts indirectly share a purpose: to reel you in. I started following “out of context bojack horseman” early last year without having ever seen BoJack Horseman. After liking enough tweets, I knew I had to prioritize checking this comedy off of my Netflix queue. 

If just the screenshots were enough to crack me up, the entire show would definitely win me over, right? Reader, it did. 

It proves out-of-context humor can please anyone and doubles as a great way to lure you into learning more about its original source. 

This formula even got an official Netflix stamp of approval. To promote its original witty teen drama Sex Education, the streaming platform created a verified no context account for this extremely quotable show. 

They wanted the scenes to resonate with fans and to make the people who hadn’t seen the show feel the FOMO. It’s a great way to keep the fandom growing, as the account’s 98,000 followers show.

I WAS W A I T I N G FOR THIS QUOTE URGHH ICONIC

— Anna ❤💍 Charlie (@zahartovana_) February 4, 2019

Famed comic book writer Gail Simone, known for her work with Deadpool and Birds of Prey, is a Twitter aficionado who has created several “ridiculous” conversation-starter pop culture hashtags, including #lackofcontexttheater in 2017. 

“I love that you say something absurd, and soon, hundreds, maybe thousands of people who get the joke jump in and add to it,” she told Mashable.

In this case, she wanted to point out the weird writing of comic books that, devoid of contextual panels around it, sometimes hint at mysterious psychosexual horrors and kinks. “There’s an entire 1940’s story where Batman and the Joker spend the entire issue talking about boners, and you can’t help but laugh.”

Simone didn’t think her hashtag would blow up the way it did but even after a couple of years, the underlying trend holds up. “I went back and read all of the tweets and they made me laugh all over again,” she shared. 

“It’s simply a matter of seeing something familiar and wholesome and imagining there’s more to it.” 

It is funny to imagine an unseen world where Batman is really obsessed with Joker’s constant boners. That’s why folks are so involved with the hashtag. And that’s why they’re so involved with the entire trend of pop culture out-of-context accounts.  

Everyone gets to be in on and enjoy the joke, even if they’re not fully familiar with its genesis.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Uxt6YB
via IFTTT

NFL Rumors

Broncos-Falcons in HOF Game

via Bleacher Report

Report: Jets Boost Offer for Le’Veon

via Bleacher Report

Report: Barr Spurns NYJ to Stay in MIN

via Bleacher Report

via Bleacher Report

via Bleacher Report

Report: Chargers to Sign 3x Pro-Bowler Thomas Davis

via Bleacher Report

via Bleacher Report

Buzz: MIA Targeting Tyrod After Missing Out on Bridgewater

via Bleacher Report

Josh McCown Unsure If He’ll Play in 2019

via Bleacher Report

via Bleacher Report

Why Lynch’s Aggressiveness Could Doom 49ers

via Bleacher Report

Biggest Trade Targets of the Offseason 👀

via Bleacher Report

Updated Stock Watch After Early FA Signings 📈

via Bleacher Report

Report: C.J. Mosley Expected to Sign with Jets

via Bleacher Report

How Much Will Le’Veon Bell Get?

via ProFootballTalk

Josh McCown Uncertain About NFL Future

via NFL.com

Best Draft Prospects Nobody’s Talking About

via Bleacher Report

Report: Browns Expected to Sign DT Sheldon Richardson

via Bleacher Report

BS Meter on Top Free-Agent Rumors

via Bleacher Report

Projecting NFL Free Agency’s Top Contracts 🤑

via Bleacher Report

Packers Steal S Adrian Amos from Rival Bears

via Bleacher Report

via Bleacher Report

Lions Reportedly Join Packers, Bears in Hunt for Mark Ingram

via Detroit Lions

Report: Falcons Called About Eric Weddle

via Atlanta Falcons

Report: Suh Unlikely to Re-Sign with Rams

via Bleacher Report

Report: Colts Signing Devin Funchess

via Bleacher Report

Report: Mike Davis Agrees to 2-Yr Deal with Bears

via Bleacher Report

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Ch3iJn
via IFTTT

No breakthrough but US, Taliban hail progress in Doha talks

The longest round yet between the US and the Taliban has concluded in Doha [Qatari Foreign Ministry/Handout via Reuters]
The longest round yet between the US and the Taliban has concluded in Doha [Qatari Foreign Ministry/Handout via Reuters]

After 16 days of discussions, US and Taliban negotiators have wrapped up their longest round of talks yet hailing progress on some key issues – but without producing a major breakthrough.

In separate statements released on Tuesday, both Taliban and US officials said the marathon negotiations in Qatar produced developments on the withdrawal of US troops and security issues related to any pullout by Washington.

Zalmay Khalilzad, the US peace envoy for Afghanistan, said the talks had “improved” the conditions for peace in the country.

“Peace requires agreement on four issues: counter-terrorism assurances, troop withdrawal, intra-Afghan dialogue, and a comprehensive ceasefire. In January talks, we agreed in principle’ on these four elements,” Khalilzad said in a series of tweets, after the conclusion of the talks in Doha.

“We’re now ‘agreed in draft’ on the first two,” he added.

(1/4) Just finished a marathon round of talks with the Taliban in #Doha. The conditions for #peace have improved. It’s clear all sides want to end the war. Despite ups and downs, we kept things on track and made real strides.

— U.S. Special Representative Zalmay Khalilzad (@US4AfghanPeace) March 12, 2019

A spokesperson for the Taliban, meanwhile, said progress was achieved on the issue of withdrawal of all foreign forces from Afghanistan and US-sought assurances over the future of security in the country in the event of a troop withdrawal.

Al Jazeera’s James Bays, reporting from Doha, said that there was “no breakthrough” but “no breakdown either”.

“This is significant because of the scale of these talks – these are the most important talks that have taken place during 18 years of war,” he added.

Diplomatic efforts to end the US’s longest-running conflict intensified last year after the appointment of the Afghan-born Khalilzad to lead direct talks with the Taliban, which has been running an armed rebellion since it was dislodged from power in 2001.

About 14,000 US troops are based in Afghanistan as part of a Washington-led NATO mission to train, assist and advise Afghan forces. Some US forces also carry out counter-terrorism operations.

SOURCE:
Al Jazeera News

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2NXuiCf
via IFTTT

This Instagram account of brutally honest book titles will make you feel so seen

An Ode to… is a weekly column where we share the stuff we’re really into in hopes that you’ll be really into it, too.


As a girl who spends around six hours a day commuting to and from work, when I first learned about the novel, The Girl on the Train, I thought, “Excuse me? Paula Hawkins used my future memoir title.”

After explaining to my friend how disappointed I was that The Girl on the Train was taken, we started a running bit in which we would jokingly come up with other potential memoir titles extremely specific to me, that I could use should I ever decided to write a book about the bizarre and embarrassing happenings in my life. 

It became a delightfully comical tradition, but it wasn’t until I stumbled upon the @storyofmyfuckinglife Instagram account that I realized just how many deeply relatable book titles there could be in this world.

<img alt="A collection of extremely relatable book titles." class="" data-credit-name="@storyofmyfuckinglife / instagram” data-credit-provider=”custom type” data-fragment=”m!4534″ data-image=”https://mondrian.mashable.com/uploads%252Fcard%252Fimage%252F945883%252F81990e46-8ea8-4ee1-b487-ad7b4c058da4.png%252Foriginal.png?signature=sATAaT4phb6hwTdSQ3HJGuIZcjk=&source=https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com&#8221; data-micro=”1″ src=”https://mondrian.mashable.com/uploads%252Fcard%252Fimage%252F945883%252F81990e46-8ea8-4ee1-b487-ad7b4c058da4.png%252Ffit-in__1200x9600.png?signature=M5w-Hn5i05ryb1gMdPlAqxgq7mY=&source=https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com”&gt;

Image: @storyofmyfuckinglife / instagram

SEE ALSO: Crush Twitter proves that sometimes subtweets can be good

The @storyofmyfuckinglife account posts drawings of books with hypothetical titles that are so relatable they’ll shake you to your core. The books will call out some of your deepest insecurities while simultaneously reminding you you’re not alone in them, which is what makes the account so charming.

For instance, as much as you might feel like you’re the only person who goes back through emails to manually delete excess exclamation points, the account is here to remind you you’re not. This book titled, I Put Too Many Exclamation Points In This Email And Now I Need To Go Back And Delete A Few So They Don’t Think I’m Full Of Shit, beautifully captures the email editing process.

There’s a book cover to accurately put the Sunday Scaries into words, one to help rationalize why you spend so much time over-explaining things, and even one to highlight all that extra effort you put into impressing your co-workers.

It’s clear this account truly understands people, and it appears to be run by the same geniuses behind @tldr.wikipedia — the sassy social media encyclopedia that posts parody Wikipedia posts — so you can rest assured the content will continually deliver.

If you’ve ever found yourself apologizing to someone instead of saying “excuse me,” @storyofmyfuckinglife gets it. And you know what? This nice pink book cover might help you come to terms with the fact that you try incredibly hard to never upset anyone. 

Though at times the @storyofmyfuckinglife book covers are so ridiculously on-point that they can almost feel like direct personal attacks, they ultimately serve as lighthearted, hilarious additions to an Instagram feed, and might even lead to some helpful introspection.

If you’re ever feeling inspired to create your own book cover, the account takes submissions. But just make sure you keep your potential memoir title to yourself. 📚✨

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2HfwPak
via IFTTT

Mullah Omar in Afghanistan book claims ‘not credible’: official

New York, USA – Claims that the late fugitive Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar lived near US bases in Afghanistan are “not credible”, Afghan national security adviser Hamdullah Mohib said on Monday. 

Mohib, an aide to Afghanistan’s President Ashraf Ghani, said the revelations made in Dutch journalist Bette Dam’s controversial new book, Searching for an Enemy, read like Taliban propaganda. 

In her book, Dam said the one-eyed former Afghan Taliban leader Omar lived near a US base in Afghanistan for years, not in Pakistan, as US officials have said.

“There are lots of doubts about where and how [she] managed to get the information,” Mohib told a small group of policymakers at the Asia Society, a think-tank in Manhattan.

“Since the Taliban are still in an active psychological warfare, it plays right into their interests to give the kind of interviews they would want to. If they were asked questions, they would obviously play into their psychological warfare game,” he said.

Refuted claims

Dam, a guest lecturer on Afghanistan at Sciences Po in Paris, has previously published a book on Afghanistan.

The author says she spent five years interviewing Taliban members for her book, which was published in Dutch last month.

According to Dam’s book, Omar lived in hiding just three miles (4.8km) from a major US military base in his home province of Zabul.

“The credibility of the information and the methodology is still under review, but from what we have assessed so far, they are not credible. We will continue to make assessments on this part,” said Mohib.

The Taliban has always maintained that Omar lived in Afghanistan until his death in 2013, reportedly from an infection. On Monday, the group released two photos on Twitter of a modest mud brick courtyard and a simple room where a spokesman said Omar had lived for the last seven years of his life.

The room in #Zabul where #AmirUlMumineen lived. Mullah Sahib lead IEA from this tiny room & stayed there until his passing away. Mullah Sahib used to sunbathe in the small garden with roses.

More documented details will be published in a soon to be released book. pic.twitter.com/RoTCLRkho9

— Zabihullah (ذبیح الله م ) (@Zabihullah_4) March 11, 2019

A statement from the group on Monday said Omar “never visited Pakistan or other country for a single day. He passed away because he refused treatment in another country for a curable disease. The report (Bette’s book) published in this regard is correct”. 

Omar’s hardline Taliban ruled Afghanistan from 1996 until 2001, and has waged an anti-government armed campaign ever since.

Omar, who delegated effective Taliban leadership after 2001, acted more like a spiritual leader, according to Dam’s book, and the movement kept his death secret for two years. 

He was wanted in the United States for providing a safe haven to former al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who masterminded the 9/11 attacks on the US and hid out in Pakistan.

The book’s publication comes at a sensitive time, with US President Donald Trump eager to end the 17-year war in Afghanistan and US envoys holding peace talks with the Taliban in Qatar. 

The Taliban are meeting with US officials in Qatar for the latest round of peace talks [Qatari Foreign Ministry Handout via Reuters]

The talks have focused on withdrawing foreign troops, a ceasefire and guarantees that Afghanistan is not used as a springboard for “terrorism”. 

The Taliban has refused to talk directly with the Afghan government, which they denounce as a puppet government. Mohib said the peace process would achieve little if his government and the Afghan people were not consulted.

“If the negotiations with the Taliban are to bring peace, we must then take into account what the Afghan people want and what we are prepared to have peace with,” Mohib said.

“There will have to be compromises, and if there is no consensus on what those compromises are and whether the Afghans are prepared to pay that price, there will be no peace. So, the entire effort is futile before the Afghan people are consulted.”

Taliban officials have so far rejected the Afghan government’s offer to hold direct talks. Kabul is planning to hold a grand council of tribal elders and political leaders in coming weeks to discuss how to end the Taliban insurgency, Mohib said.

Some 14,000 US troops are based in Afghanistan as part of a US-led NATO mission to train, assist and advise Afghan forces. Some US forces also carry out what they call “counterterrorism operations”. 

Taliban fighters have stepped up pressure on Afghan forces as peace talks continue.

The group killed 20 soldiers and captured 20 more during raids in Bala Murghab district of the western province of Badghis, beginning on Saturday night, Qais Mangal, a defence ministry spokesman told the Reuters news agency.

Follow James Reinl on Twitter @jamesreinl

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2HjryhY
via IFTTT

Trump’s FAA increasingly isolated as other countries ban Boeing jet


Boeing 737 jet

Workers walk near a Boeing 737 MAX 8 being built for for Ethiopian Airlines on March 11. Airlines in several countries grounded the same model jetliner following a deadly crash in Ethiopia. | AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

U.S. lawmakers of both parties called Tuesday for the FAA to join a growing list of governments in grounding Boeing’s beleaguered 737 MAX 8 jetliner — a step that would threaten major disruptions of some domestic air traffic and one of the nation’s top manufacturers.

The pressure from members of Congress, a flight attendants union and dozens of countries and foreign-based airlines is leaving the FAA increasingly isolated, a day after the agency said it’s awaiting more information about the Ethiopian Airlines crash that killed 157 people Sunday, including eight Americans. Though the cause of the crash has not been determined, it bears similarities to an October air disaster in Indonesia in which 189 people died, raising questions about whether a Boeing stall-prevention system on the MAX 8 sent the plane into a fatal dive just after takeoff.

Story Continued Below

Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said Tuesday that the FAA shouldn’t wait for those answers before taking the MAX 8 out of service — echoing similar statements Monday from Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.).

“Today, immediately, the FAA needs to get these planes out of the sky,” Warren said Tuesday. She also called for congressional hearings on “whether an administration that famously refused to stand up to Saudi Arabia to protect Boeing arms sales has once again put lives at risk for the same reason.”

Meanwhile, the United Kingdom, Ireland, France and Germany became the latest countries Tuesday to jump into the fray, barring 737 MAX planes from their airspace. They joined a flood of other nations that have barred the Boeing jet, including China, Australia, Malaysia, Oman and Singapore, as well as airlines based in countries such as Mexico, Norway and South Korea.

The European Union’s equivalent of the FAA, though, is taking a similar stance, saying it is awaiting more data before it makes a decision to ground the fleet.

The cascade of groundings represents a break from decades of other countries largely following the FAA’s lead on the safety of U.S. aircraft. It comes just two years after the global aviation industry registered its safest year ever, with no passenger jet fatalities reported anywhere in the world in 2017 — a feat for which President Donald Trump claimed credit last year.

But the crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia bore unnerving likenesses, with both involving new aircraft with experienced pilots that plunged into the earth soon after takeoff. A preliminary investigation of October’s Lion Air crash in Indonesia raised questions about a new Boeing safety feature that could have forced the plane’s nose down despite the pilots’ efforts to right its course — as well as complaints from pilots’ groups that the manufacturer failed to ensure that airlines knew about the change in technology.

Boeing and the FAA have said they’re working together on a software update, but in a bulletin Monday, they said it would not be implemented until April.

Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao said Monday that her agency is “very concerned … and we’re monitoring the situation very carefully.”

“I want people to be assured that we take these accidents very seriously,” she said.

The FAA is so far sticking to its position that it’s too soon to declare the plane unsafe to fly. “[T]his investigation has just begun and to date we have not been provided data to draw any conclusions or take any actions,” the agency said in a notice Monday.

The European Aviation Safety Agency is staking out a similar position. “We are waiting to have a solid, fact-based information,” an EU official told POLITICO Europe.

The MAX 8 is a variation on the 737, the most widely sold jetliner in the world, and is a significant money-maker for Boeing, with thousands of the planes on order to airlines around the world. The plane is intended to be a fuel-efficient competitor to the already more-popular Airbus A320neo, which may well pull even further ahead amid the ongoing turmoil. It’s also a significant part of the fleets of Southwest and American Airlines, which have about 60 of the Max 8 planes between them.

Boeing said Tuesday that “we have full confidence in the safety of the 737,” despite the growing number of countries abandoning its plane.

“We understand that regulatory agencies and customers have made decisions that they believe are most appropriate for their home markets,” the company added. “We’ll continue to engage with them to ensure they have the information needed to have confidence in operating their fleets.”

Southwest has said it remains “confident in the safety and airworthiness of our fleet of more than 750 Boeing aircraft,” and American said it will “closely monitor the investigation via Boeing and the NTSB.”

But not all employees of the airlines are feeling reassured.

The national president of a union representing American Airlines flight attendants said it has asked CEO Doug Parker to “strongly consider grounding” MAX 8 jets “until a thorough investigation can be performed.”

“Our flight attendants are very concerned with the recent Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crash, which has raised safety concerns with the 737 MAX 8,” the Association of Professional Flight Attendants’ Lori Bassani said in a statement. “Many respected global carriers are grounding the planes.”

Bassani added that flight attendants won’t be “forced to fly if they feel unsafe.”

Kathryn A. Wolfe, Brianna Gurciullo and Saim Saeed contributed to this report.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2HsyDMw
via IFTTT

Amazon to change vendor policy amid monopoly concerns, report says

Anti-trust legislation: the words that strike fear into the hearts of big tech.
Anti-trust legislation: the words that strike fear into the hearts of big tech.

Image: Peter Steffen/picture alliance via Getty Images

2017%252f09%252f19%252ffa%252frakheadshot.f59fb.jpg%252f90x90By Rachel Kraus

Do you hear that? Oh, it’s nothing. Just the rumblings of CHANGE.

Amazon may end a third-party vendor policy that prohibits merchants from selling their wares at lower prices outside of Amazon Marketplace, according to a new report from Axios. The news comes days after senator and presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren unveiled her policy proposal for “breaking up Big Tech,” including Amazon.

SEE ALSO: Elizabeth Warren is coming after AmazonBasics. Why Amazon shouldn’t fight it.

The report comes from a single anonymous source “with direct knowledge of the company’s decision.” Axios claims the decision to change the price policy has been made. However, the outlet has published false reports based on anonymous sourcing before. So the news should be taken with a grain of salt; Mashable has reached out to Amazon to confirm whether it will indeed change this policy.

However, even a discussion of changes at Amazon show how just the specter of anti-trust regulation could already be having an effect. As Axios points out, Amazon changed this policy in Europe in 2013 in response to antitrust complaints. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Con) also asked the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice to investigate the “price parity provisions” in December. And perhaps discussions of changing policy just need time to kick around at Amazon — but it sure looks like Warren’s announcement, and subsequent national attention to the issue of monopolies in tech, lit a fire under those Amazon butts.

Pre-emptive, voluntary measures have historically been a way that companies seek to avoid more onerous future legislation. The idea is that companies demonstrate they’re willing to make good faith changes on their own, so they won’t be forced by law to make even bigger changes in the future. We will probably see more moves like this from Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Apple. But if Elizabeth Warren takes her agenda into the White House, or even the halls of Congress, it might not be enough.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2VVDaeq
via IFTTT