This Twitter thread explores the ridiculous things people do in ads for bathtub trays

2017%252f09%252f12%252fd7%252fsambw.5d18f%252f90x90By Sam Haysom

Almost every advert in the world is, to some extent, a little bit unbelievable.

It could be that the people in the ad are smiling a little too much, or that everything just looks that tiny bit too perfect.

SEE ALSO: This student’s genius bath hack has taken the internet by storm

Or it could be that the accessories the company in question has chosen to jazz up their product are so ridiculous that the whole thing falls apart on closer inspection.

Enter bath trays. As pianist Sharon Su perfectly illustrated in a Twitter thread this weekend, they may be the worst offenders of all.

Here’s Su’s thread, in all its glory.

The people who manufacture bathtub trays seem to have no idea what women actually do in the bath and I find that strangely comforting pic.twitter.com/wHWCRteSYO

— Sharon Su (@doodlyroses) March 24, 2019

You know it’s not a complete bath without a glass of red wine, a tiny latte, and an empty mug. Ambience brought to you by a phone video of a woman playing a ukulele and a handful of rose petals where your undressed salad normally goes pic.twitter.com/yFkBPczJfK

— Sharon Su (@doodlyroses) March 24, 2019

As a woman, I enjoy painting my nails in the bathtub while simultaneously grabbing handfuls of cornflakes, reading about global warning, and watching people playing lady and the tramp with a giant sandwich pic.twitter.com/OlBddJn8xq

— Sharon Su (@doodlyroses) March 24, 2019

This company has figured out what women really want while bathing: half a bottle of j’adore perfume to continually spray while nomming on cherries and sipping an electric blue cocktail pic.twitter.com/TO5QblI48N

— Sharon Su (@doodlyroses) March 24, 2019

The EXCESS in this photo! White AND red wine! Green AND purple grapes! Eight kinds of cheese! And the piece de resistance…not one, but TWO phones pic.twitter.com/NulMR2S1yE

— Sharon Su (@doodlyroses) March 24, 2019

Look if you’re not chowing down on waffles and hot dogs while gazing at stock photography of the ocean then what are you even doing pic.twitter.com/2EQvQNsa9k

— Sharon Su (@doodlyroses) March 24, 2019

In short I have learned that I am apparently bathing all wrong and will rectify this immediately

— Sharon Su (@doodlyroses) March 24, 2019

Time to embrace this, people: get your trays, your unlikely snacks, your various alcohols, and your undressed salads, stat.

It’s bath o’clock.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2OmcbWC
via IFTTT

King: Rob Gronkowski Returning to Patriots in 2019 Wouldn’t Shock Drew Rosenhaus

New England Patriots' Rob Gronkowski speaks with members of the media during a news conference Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2019, ahead of the NFL Super Bowl 53 football game against Los Angeles Rams in Atlanta. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Matt Rourke/Associated Press

Agent Drew Rosenhaus said he wouldn’t be surprised if tight end Rob Gronkowski, his longtime client, returned to the New England Patriots some time in 2019.

On Monday, Peter King of NBC Sports reported Rosenhaus received a call from Pats head coach Bill Belichick to check on Gronk’s status Thursday, and he urged the three-time Super Bowl champion to make a final decision. The result was an Instagram post Sunday announcing his retirement.

“It’s time. I just won another championship. I’m going out on top,” Gronkowski told Rosenhaus. “I just want to do nothing for a while. I just want to be me. I just want to have fun.”

At his peak, the 29-year-old New York native was one of the best tight ends in NFL history. He eclipsed the 1,000-yard mark four times and scored at least 10 touchdowns in five of his first six seasons, including an NFL-leading 17 receiving scores in 2011.

Nine years of hard-hitting play combined with a variety of injuries in recent years took a toll, though. He tallied a mundane 47 catches for 682 yards and three touchdowns across 13 regular-season games in 2018.

Gronkowski did show flashes of his old playmaking self during the latter stages of the playoffs. He recorded six catches apiece in both the AFC Championship Game and Super Bowl LIII, which saw the Patriots earn a 13-3 victory over the Los Angeles Rams.

Although it illustrated he could still be a high-impact player, he told reporters in January that making it through an entire campaign had become a struggle:

“The season is a grind. It’s up and down. I’m not going to lie and sit here and say every week is the best. Not at all. You go up. You go down. You can take some serious hits. Try to imagine getting hit all the time and trying to be where you want to be every day in life. It’s tough. It’s difficult.

“To take hits to the thigh, to take hits to your head, abusing your body, isn’t what your brain wants. When your body is abused, it can bring down your mood. You have to be able to deal with that, too, throughout the season. You have to be able to deal with that going into games.”

It doesn’t sound like Gronkowski would be interested in another year of offseason practices, training camp, preseason games and 16 regular-season contests.

But based on Rosenhaus’ comments and Gronk’s performance in the playoffs, don’t be stunned if the tight end makes a triumphant return as the team gears up for another title run late in the year.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2HIkaNk
via IFTTT

Thailand parties manoeuvre for position amid election confusion

Bangkok, Thailand – Thailand’s main political parties were jostling for position on Monday amid confusion about the winner of a weekend poll that was fought under a complicated new voting system including elements of proportional representation.

The Elections Commission delayed its announcement on the results from late on Sunday to Monday morning and then the afternoon, citing technical issues.

It then said it would reveal only the names of the winners of the 350 directly-elected constituency seats, having suspended allocations of the 150 seats available under the proportional party list system.

The names of the winners were uploaded to its website at 4pm (09:00G) showing that Pheu Thai had won 138 and Palang Pracharat, the army-backed party set up to campaign for junta leader Prayuth Chan-ocha, 96.

Third was Future Forward, a party set up only a year ago by billionaire car parts tycoon Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, with 29 seats.

Coalition talks

Pheu Thai leader Sudarat Keyuraphan earlier told reporters that the party, which is backed by exiled tycoon Thaksin Shinawatra and has won every election since 2001, was in talks to from a coalition.

“We want to be at the core of the government because we did the best in the election,” she said.

But across town, the army-backed Palang Pracharat was telling the media that it had the necessary numbers to form a government.

Kobsak Pootrakool, the party’s spokesperson, told Al Jazeera the party had won the popular vote and was also in the process of building a coalition that would ensure it a majority in the lower house.

“We have received the most votes of all the parties that were running in the election,” he told Al Jazeera in an interview at the party’s headquarters, adding that they were in the process of building a coalition of like-minded parties.

“The people made their decision clear,” Kobsak said. ” For the party it has turned out to be quite satisfactory.”

The elections on Sunday were the first since the coup in 2014 but were held under a new constitution designed to weaken the power of the main political parties and entrench military influence through its appointment of the upper house, which will also have a role in choosing the prime minister. Campaigning was spirited, but constrained by repressive legislation.

“In the Thai political system and tradition, it’s the party with the largest number of MPs who has the first go at forming a coalition,” said Pravit Rojanaphruk, a senior journalist at Khaosod English. “It’s not like the American system. We are entering a period of intense political jockeying.”

The popular vote showed Palang Pracharat with 7.6 million votes, Pheu Thai with 7.2 million and Future Forward with nearly 5.3 million. As part of the new system, the calculation of the party list is being done in a new, more complicated way.

The Election Commission was criticised for the delay in announcing the result – it now says a complete picture will be available only on May 9 – raising concerns about irregularities.

Rohan Hettiarchi, the head of mission for the Asian Network for Free Elections, which observed the polls, said the postponements risked undermining trust among the electorate.

In a meeting on Monday, the Elections Commission blamed ‘technical issues’ for the sudden decision, he said.

“We need to verify what really happened and whether there were any irregularities,” he told Al Jazeera. ANFREL deployed 34 monitors around the country covering at least 1,000 polling stations.

Future Forward, which campaigned in support of democracy and to reform the military, did well in Bangkok and among younger voters.

Low turnout

Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit said the party was overwhelmed at the support it had received and was open to talks with Pheu Thai to form a government.

“We are willing to form a coalition with the party that got the most seats in the lower house, with conditions,” he said at a press conference. “We are ready.”

Turnout was much lower than had been expected after the long queues at polling stations during early voting the week before. Just over 65 percent of the 51 million registered voters cast their ballot, the commission said.

Palang Pracharat’s Kobsak said people had backed the party because it promised security and because they ” loved” Prayuth. He noted that many older people had turned out for the party, showing photos on his phone of grey-haired men and women being helped out of vehicles and into the polling station.

He said such people didn’t usually vote in Thailand.

Titipol Phakdeewanich, an expert in Thai politics at the University of Ubon Ratchathani, said he was not completely surprised at the support for the army-backed party although it did not bode well for Thailand.

“People are trapped in this illusion of peace and stability portrayed by the military,” he told Al Jazeera. “It’s not really stability. It’s military suppression. It’s not sustainable in the long-term. If you want peace you need to get people to accept democracy and to learn to live with differences in opinion and ideas.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2YlrXWt
via IFTTT

Stray Kids Are Back And Bolder Than Ever With Celebratory New Single ‘MIROH’



JYP Entertainment

How do you sum up a Stray Kids song? The JYP Entertainment rookies have been (self-) producing some of the boldest, most sonically interesting K-pop tracks since their debut a year ago, and their latest, “MIROH,” is no exception. (In fact, it might be their most fascinating lead single yet.) Their signature sound is more of a mood; it’s loud and in your face — boisterous, even — but it’s one that’s fitting for a group of nine individuals on the cusp of adulthood in an ever-uncertain world.

That, you could say, is the concept of “MIROH.” Inspired by the word miro, or “maze” in Korean, “MIROH” is the beginning of a new chapter for Stray Kids. Their previous I Am… series focused heavily on the theme of identity. Who am I? Am I you? And most importantly: Who am I trying to be? With their new mini album, Clé 1: MIROH (out now), it’s clear that these coming-of-age questions are still at the forefront of their minds — but they’re now more confident than ever.

Stray Kids are maturing in every sense of the word. Their sound is more refined, yet still exciting. “MIROH” — produced by members Bang Chan, Han, and Changbin, otherwise known as 3racha — is a cacophony of sounds, rhythms, chants, and animal noises. The hook is massive, a perfect stadium-sized banger of a track. But perhaps its most unique quality is that it doesn’t follow any sort of familiar structure. There’s no bridge, or breakdown; it’s a relentless 3 minutes and 28 seconds that showcases the group’s impressive rap line and explosive choreography.

The music video sets up the world of MIROH — a concrete jungle of sorts — where, having escaped the brainwashed society of District 9, Stray Kids seemingly stage a coup to overthrow the powerful men at the top. It’s an act of teen rebellion, perfectly in line with the group’s overall message. “It’s not hard, in this rough jungle,” leader Bang Chan sings. “It was me who ran into it, I’m okay.”

“MIROH” is a celebration, yes, but it’s also a warning call. The powerful choreography was heavily influenced by Haka, the ceremonial dance of the Māori culture. It’s typically done as a challenge to opponents.

Overall, everything about “MIROH” is big — the hook, the choreography, the concept — but it never feels empty. That’s a real strength for Stray Kids. They make music that matters to them, and in doing so, they connect with an audience, many of whom are also navigating their own mazes and facing their own anxieties at every turn.

When it comes to Stray Kids, every new release is an evolution — and much like growing up, wildly unpredictable.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TV0Frj
via IFTTT

‘Us’ stars Lupita Nyong’o and Winston Duke put their horror movie knowledge to the test

Cms%252f2019%252f3%252f51609be2 7298 8392%252fthumb%252f00001.jpg%252foriginal.jpg?signature=prvxqpsdf2lqz29t1mltunsc8js=&source=https%3a%2f%2fvdist.aws.mashable

Nikolay Nikolov

Lupita Nyong’o and Winston Duke played a game of Know Your Role during the London press junket for Us. 

Jordan Peele’s new film has been hailed as a horror masterpiece that explores duality and doppelgängers. But how much do its stars actually know about horror movies?

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2HSkND6
via IFTTT

Celebrities react to the most hilariously thirsty fan tweets about them

You know Mean Tweets? Well, this is sort of the opposite.

In the compilation above from The Graham Norton Show, the likes of Chris Pine and Matt Damon are confronted with a range of inventively thirsty tweets about them — from Pine’s full-frontal nude scene in Outlaw King to Matt Damon’s temporary ponytail (to which there were many, many creative responses).

It’s not all thirsty stuff, either — there are some reactions to meeting Taylor Swift, for instance, that are simply excitable in the extreme, as well as a selection of the most brutal James Blunt comebacks.

But mostly it’s the thirsty stuff.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2utgHtf
via IFTTT

POLITICO Playbook: Mueller is done. What’s next for Washington

SPOTTED: A.G. BILL BARR walking in to Hank’s Oyster Bar on Sunday night for dinner with his wife and daughter. … ROD ROSENSTEIN riding his bike late Sunday in Bethesda.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP was delivered a massive political victory Sunday. BARR wrote Capitol Hill saying ROBERT MUELLER found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. That was the central question of this investigation, and we now have the answer from Mueller — via Barr — a man whom both sides called honorable and who both sides said should be allowed to do his job to its conclusion.

DEMOCRATS ARE NOW OPERATING IN A POLITICALLY TIGHT SPOT, and many of them are beginning to privately admit that. They are going to demand access to the full Mueller report — something Barr indicated he is open to, with some redactions — but in addition, some Democrats are going to push for the underlying paper, the material Mueller used to make his determinations. And they want Barr to talk about why he didn’t pursue obstruction charges.

THE BIG QUESTION DEMOCRATS WILL FOCUS ON … BARR said Mueller left “unresolved” whether TRUMP obstructed justice, and he and Rosenstein determined there was not sufficient evidence to bring obstruction charges. This, of course, is the gaping hole that Democrats will plunge right into: how and why Barr — a political appointee — came to that conclusion. He seemingly took just 48 hours or so to decide that the evidence wasn’t sufficient — and Democrats will desperately want to see the report, and hear from him why he made the decision he made. Barr’s letter

WAPO’S ROZ HELDERMAN and JOSH DAWSEY: “That has left the question of Trump’s actions — which included the firing of FBI Director James B. Comey, the public attacks on his attorney general Jeff Sessions, the regular cries of ‘witch hunt’ and the taunting of witnesses — as one that will now be wrestled with in the political arena.

“The obstruction question, as a legal matter, came down to whether the special counsel had evidence that Trump acted with ‘corrupt intent’ as he demeaned and demonized the investigation. ‘Proving intent is genuinely difficult, because it requires you to get inside someone’s mind — and divining intent is art, not science,’ said Chuck Rosenberg, a former U.S. attorney in Virginia and former counsel to Mueller.” WaPo

— NYT’S MIKE SCHMIDT (@nytmike): “One of the main reasons for a special counsel is to remove political influence from an investigation. In this case, the special counsel refused to come to a determination on obstruction and then the two top DOJ political appointees made the call.”

IT’S CONTINUING … HOUSE JUDICIARY CHAIRMAN JERRY NADLER (D-N.Y.) said he will call Barr to testify: “In light of the very concerning discrepancies and final decision making at the Justice Department following the Special Counsel report, where Mueller did not exonerate the President, we will be calling Attorney General Barr in to testify before @HouseJudiciary in the near future.”

— SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI/SENATE MINORITY LEADER CHUCK SCHUMER’S JOINT STATEMENT: “Attorney General Barr’s letter raises as many questions as it answers. The fact that Special Counsel Mueller’s report does not exonerate the president on a charge as serious as obstruction of justice demonstrates how urgent it is that the full report and underlying documentation be made public without any further delay. Given Mr. Barr’s public record of bias against the Special Counsel’s inquiry, he is not a neutral observer and is not in a position to make objective determinations about the report.”

DEMOCRATS have spent years praising MUELLER, saying his work was beyond reproach, and the Congress should follow his lead. Democrats certainly run the risk of beating this drum too loud for too long in the face of evidence that indicates there is no there there, they tell us privately. The political cost of dragging this on is skyrocketing for Democrats, so the leadership has the incentive to keep their investigation tightly focused on discrete, answerable questions.

BUT … THE UNCERTAINTY over all of this ensures that this is one of the central issues for Congress for the next several months. Leave aside Trump business dealings, internal White House machinations and other investigations, committees are going to want to probe Barr, Mueller and how and why this happened.

TRYING TO MAKE SENSE OF THINGS? … READ THIS: DARREN SAMUELSOHN and JOSH GERSTEIN: “What just happened? The questions behind the Mueller report”

— GARRETT GRAFF in Wired, “Mueller Says No Collusion, Barr Raises a Million Questions”

TOP-ED — NEAL KATYAL in the NYT, “The Many Problems With the Barr Letter: By unilaterally concluding that Mr. Trump did not obstruct justice, the attorney general has made it imperative that the public see the Mueller report.”

NEXT UP … JOHN BRESNAHAN and HEATHER CAYGLE: “Battle over Mueller’s probe moves to Capitol Hill”: “Two things were quickly clear: first, the end of Mueller’s exhaustive two-year probe means the political war over whether to impeach President Donald Trump — a battle that has already begun to consume Congress since Democrats took control of the House in November — is only just beginning; and secondly, Mueller gave both sides enough to keep pounding their own message for weeks and months to come.

“Trump may have escaped any criminal charges from Mueller’s probe, yet impeachment is clearly still on the table as far as many Democrats and progressive outside groups are concerned. For Republicans, the message from the Mueller report was clear and insistent – ‘The country needs to move on.’ Meanwhile, Democrats immediately countered with ‘Release the whole Mueller report.’ The struggle is now over which side wins that messaging war with the American public.” POLITICO

“Pelosi wins breathing room on impeachment after Mueller findings,” by John Bresnahan and Heather Caygle

FROM 30,000 FEET — NYT’S PETER BAKER, “A Cloud Over Trump’s Presidency Is Lifted”: “For President Trump, it may have been the best day of his tenure so far. The darkest, most ominous cloud hanging over his presidency was all but lifted on Sunday with the release of the special counsel’s conclusions, which undercut the threat of impeachment and provided him with a powerful boost for the final 22 months of his term. There are still other clouds overhead and no one outside the Justice Department has actually read the report by Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, which may yet disclose damning information if made public. …

“Emboldened and angry, the president can now proceed with his administration without the distraction of new search warrants and indictments by Mr. Mueller’s team or the worry that the special counsel might charge Mr. Trump’s family members or even uncover a smoking gun that would prove that his campaign collaborated with the Russian government to elect him in 2016.” NYT

— WAPO’S JOSH DAWSEY, ASHLEY PARKER and PHIL RUCKER: “[A] feeling of euphoria swept over the White House staff Sunday as aides celebrated the end of the Mueller investigation, according to a senior White House official, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal discussions.” WaPo

THE POLITICS GOING FORWARD FOR TRUMP: This whole episode — costly and cumbersome as it was for Trump world — fits neatly into the contours of his political strategy. He can now say that the government — the swamp, the deep state, take your pick — spent two years trying to overturn the results of the 2016 election and couldn’t. Mueller and his gang of Democrats, Trump can say, even had to come to the conclusion that he did nothing wrong. When Democrats continue to investigate him as the election draws near, Trump can try to paint them as out of control. More from Anita Kumar and Gabby Orr on Trump’s post-Mueller reset

— THE VICTORY LAP: @realDonaldTrump at 4:42 p.m.: “No Collusion, No Obstruction, Complete and Total EXONERATION. KEEP AMERICA GREAT!”

BLAKE HOUNSHELL, “Trump Didn’t Collude With Russia. So Why Does He Love Putin So Much?: The Mueller report has settled a great mystery of the Trump era. But only one”: “We should all be aware of the dangers of confirmation bias, the bad habit of interpreting evidence to fit our pre-cooked conclusions. That’s been a major peril of the Russiagate story, and I’m sure I’ve been guilty of it on occasion. News outlets have hyped and torqued up stories about purported links between Trump and Russia that have evaporated on close inspection. Even carefully reported and cautiously written scoops have been subject to overheated interpretation once they landed on Twitter and cable news. (Baby cannon, anyone?)

“But there are also many aspects of Trump’s behavior toward Russia, both as a candidate and as president, that remain baffling. His obsession with that Kremlin bogeyman, NATO. His failure to disclose his pursuit of a hotel project in Moscow even as he ran for the White House, and his subsequent lying about it. His real estate business’ many years of heavy reliance on Russian money.” POLITICO Magazine

EVERY STORY on the front page of the NYT is Mueller-related. NYT A1

Good Monday morning. QUITE THE ONE-TWO PUNCH: Nikki Haley and Paul Ryan are speaking at the Asian Leadership Conference in Seoul on May 14 and 15. Details

NEW … NETANYAHU CUTTING TRIP TO U.S. SHORT … NYT’S MIKE IVES: “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel cut short his visit to the United States on Monday, hours after a rocket launched from Gaza struck a house in central Israel, injuring seven people.

“‘In light of the security events I decided to cut short my visit to the U.S.,’ Mr. Netanyahu said, adding that he would fly back immediately after meeting President Trump ‘in the coming hours.’

“While in Washington this week, Mr. Netanyahu had been expected to address a policy conference organized by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, known as Aipac, on Tuesday. His appearance at the conference has now been canceled.” NYT

WAPO’S PAUL KANE: “Hoyer delivers strong defense of U.S.-Israel alliance in veiled rebuke of Rep. Omar”: “House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) delivered a strong defense Sunday of the U.S.-Israel alliance and directed a thinly veiled rebuke to a fellow Democrat whose remarks sparked charges of anti-Semitism that roiled the party’s new majority.

“Hoyer, a longtime ally of Israel, came down squarely on the side of standing with Israel at a time when younger Democrats and some contenders for the party’s 2020 presidential nomination criticize Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s rightward shift and his moves closer to President Trump and Republicans.

“‘I stand with Israel, proudly and unapologetically. So, when someone accuses American supporters of Israel of dual loyalty, I say: Accuse me. I am part of a large, bipartisan coalition in Congress supporting Israel. I tell Israel’s detractors: Accuse us,’ Hoyer said at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s annual conference at Washington’s Convention Center.” WaPo

TRUMP’S MONDAY — The president will meet with Benjamin Netanyahu at 11:45 a.m. Netanyahu is cutting his White House events short, so the schedule is in flux. The president will have a photo op with the 2018 Stanley Cup champions, the Washington Capitals, in the Oval Office at 3 p.m.

THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY — “‘Now we’re in charge’: Dems freeze out GOP on bipartisan bills,” by Melanie Zanona and Sarah Ferris: “During the last two sessions of Congress, Democrat Bobby Rush and Republican Richard Hudson introduced legislation together to improve workforce-training programs. But this year, Rush altered the language to the bill and stripped out a previous key element: Hudson.

“‘He reintroduced it, and he’s added all this money to it, and didn’t consult me,’ the North Carolina Republican said. Hudson is among several frustrated Republicans who have lashed out at their Democratic colleagues in recent days, arguing that Democrats have shut them out of the legislative process by refusing to work cooperatively on bills — including some they once co-authored.

“Republicans claim Democrats, at the direction of their leadership, are determined to deny GOP incumbents any big victories heading into 2020 on a host of issues — from prescription drugs to immigration reform — and are dropping the bipartisan approach they seemed to promise during the last election. Democrats have one response: Welcome to the minority.” POLITICO

MARKET WATCH — REUTERS: “‘Flashing amber’: Global stocks tumble, bonds rally on U.S. recession risk,” by Swati Pandey in Sydney: “Investors ditched shares on Monday and fled to the safety of bonds as risk assets fell out of favor on growing fears of a U.S. recession, sending global yields plunging.” Reuters

THE LATEST ON BREXIT — “Brexiteers mull gamble to remove Theresa May,” by POLITICO Europe’s Tom McTague in London: “For the Brexiteers, it’s stick or twist time. With members of parliament poised to wrest control of Brexit from the government, senior Conservative Euroskeptics held talks with Theresa May Sunday in a last-ditch bid to resolve the crisis without a full-blown Tory civil war.

“After EU leaders last week imposed a new, hard deadline of April 12 — by which time the U.K. must either agree May’s deal, walk away with no deal or ask for a long extension to Article 50 — the choice facing Conservative Brexiteers has quickly crystalized. They can either stick with the deal to avoid something worse imposed by parliament or gamble everything on no deal, even if this may come only after a long delay and a general election under a new Tory leader. The answer to this question, which will likely be settled in the coming days, could shape British politics for decades to come.

“The only thing that appears certain, after a tsunami of devastating headlines Sunday about Tory MPs turning against their leader, is that the prime minister’s days now look numbered.” POLITICO Europe

FOR YOUR RADAR — “Second Parkland shooting survivor kills himself. Here’s what leaders are doing about it,” by Miami Herald’s Monique Madan

SPOTTED: Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández and his delegation having lunch at Cafe Milano on Sunday.

FIRST IN PLAYBOOK — Hugh Hewitt is joining the Richard Nixon Foundation as CEO and president. Hewitt, who was hired as a researcher and helped build and open the library 40 years ago, will continue to host “The Hugh Hewitt Show,” his weekday radio show, write columns for WaPo and appear on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

ENGAGED — Matt Mittenthal, senior director of communications for BuzzFeed News, on Friday proposed to Laura Nahmias, co-author of POLITICO New York Playbook and a reporter for POLITICO New York. “[W]e met when I covered state politics and he was press secretary for attorney general Eric Schneiderman, but he asked me out when he moved to BuzzFeed two years ago. He proposed out on Long Island, and secretly invited some of my friends to come out and celebrate with us for the weekend.”

BIRTHWEEK (was yesterday): Jeanette Manfra, assistant director of cybersecurity at CISA … (was Saturday): former European Commission President José Manuel Barroso turned 63

BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Daniella Gibbs Léger, EVP for communications and strategy at CAP. What she’s been reading recently: “This was a few months ago, but it stuck with me — an article on D.C.’s opioid epidemic. I have been struck how the coverage of the crisis over the last few years seemed to focus mostly on those struggling in rural areas.” Playbook Plus Q&A

BIRTHDAYS: Sofia Boza-Holman, director of strategic media for VP Mike Pence … Michael Ortiz, head of public affairs at Roivant Sciences, is 36. He and his wife recently welcomed Lola … Nick Kalman, Fox News politics producer, “celebrating by watching his Yankees lose to the Nats” (hat tips: Dan Knight and Arlette Saenz) … former Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) is 61 … Golin’s Meredith Shiner … Emily Schillinger, VP of public affairs for the American Investment Council … Jessica Emond … Aaron David Miller is 7-0 … Naftali Bennett is 47 … POLITICO’s Arthur Allen … AP political editor Steven Sloan … Apple’s Chad Bolduc … Alissa Rooney, director of media and PR at Oxfam America … Andrew Revkin … Debbie Kirsch … Christopher Hale is 3-0 … Marnee Banks, chief comms officer at the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership and a Jon Tester alum … Katey McCutcheon, press secretary for Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) … FT’s Henry Foy …

… Lauren Aronson, a principal at Mehlman Castagnetti Rosen & Thomas … Sarah Badawi … Peter Friedman … Patrick Bailey, chief counsel for gov’t affairs at Senate HSGAC … Suzanne Helman … Grant Dubler, LD for Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), is 3-0 (h/t wife Lisa Dubler) … Anna Brower … Dawn Ennis … Nelson Reyneri … Danielle Engel … Kristen Atwood … Kate Mente … James Gelfand … Laura Rusu … Thom Loverro … Trout Kinney … Nina Kiersted … Gloria Pan … Anthony Garrett … The Boston Globe’s Felice Belman … Lane Hudson … PBS’ Pete Van Vleet … Lauryl Dodson Jackson … Danielle Craig … Andrew Okuyiga … Stina Skewes-Cox … Nick Kimball … Kevin Luiz … Chas Danner, weekend editor at N.Y. Magazine … Sarah Eyman … Doug Bellis … Kristin Nicholson … Traci Siegel … Mike Monroe (h/ts Teresa Vilmain)

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2HSkGYc
via IFTTT

The stream for Apple’s event is already up, and it’s tons of fun

Disclosure

Every product here is independently selected by Mashable journalists. If you buy something featured, we may earn an affiliate commission which helps support our work.

That security guy is really thorough.
That security guy is really thorough.

Image: Stan Schroeder/Apple

2016%252f09%252f16%252f6f%252fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymdezlza1.53aea.jpg%252f90x90By Stan Schroeder

There’s an Apple event later today — one in which the company will likely announce a video streaming service, and possibly more. 

But something unusual has happened this time; nearly a full day before the start, you can already tune into the live stream

SEE ALSO: How to stream Apple’s March 25 event

Of course, it’s a publicity stunt, which Apple seems to favor more and more in recent times (remember Tim Cook’s fake DM fail ahead of the 2018 iPhone launch event?), but this one’s far more elaborate than anything we’ve seen before. 

At first, the stream appears to just be showing the insides of the empty Steve Jobs Theater, where the event is scheduled to take place at 1 p.m. ET Monday, from several angles. But look closely, and things start happening: Some innocuous, like a guard inspecting the place with a flashlight, and some odd, like the curtain being raised and a chat conversation being shown on the theater’s screen. 

It’s hard to say whether the stream is actually showing the venue or whether it’s all been pre-recorded or digitized (I’d bet on the latter), but it’s definitely cooler than Apple’s website just showing a message that the event will begin in so many hours. 

There are obvious hints as to what Apple might unveil at the actual event, including Captain America showing up at one point, but there are also numerous Easter Eggs hidden in the stream as well if you’re willing to look for them. For the full experience, turn up the volume.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2FyeYcy
via IFTTT

Forum voor Democratie: Why has the Dutch far right surged?

Last week’s provincial elections in the Netherlands saw the far-right Forum voor Democratie (FvD), or Forum for Democracy, make significant gains in the upper house of the Senate.

Winning most votes and 13 seats – more than Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s party – the result surprised observers. FvD previously had no seats in the 75-member house.

The Dutch went to the ballot box just two days after an attack in Utrecht in which three people were killed. In the aftermath of the violence, all parties apart from FvD suspended their campaigning.

The party is led by 36-year-old Thierry Baudet, who was quick to blame the government’s migration policy for the assault.

“This is a combination of an honour killing and a half-terrorist motive,” he told supporters at a rally afterwards. 

Dutch prosecutors say they plan to bring “terrorism charges” against a man of Turkish origin for the attacks. 

FvD, which currently holds two seats in parliament, opposes immigration and advocates for “Nexit”: the Netherlands leaving the European Union.

Baudet talks about a “Dutch First” economic and cultural ideology which shares parallels with US President Donald Trump’s “America First” rhetoric. 

Posing the question ‘Does Islam have a place in the Netherlands?’ in our national political debate shows that questioning elementary rights of immigrant communities has become mainstream.

Jan Jaap de Ruiter, professor

In his victory speech on Wednesday, Baudet blamed the establishment for what he described as the decay of Dutch culture. 

“We are standing amidst the debris of what was once the greatest and most beautiful civilisation the world has ever known,” he said, blaming universities, journalists and politicians for undermining the potential of the Netherlands on the world stage.

Baudet has become known in the Netherlands for his hardline views. He has spoken out against immigration, the EU and last year said in an interview that women were less ambitious than men.

Laura van der Sanden, who lives and works in Amsterdam, says she is taken aback by the results, particularly given the perceived liberal Dutch mentality.

“I’m surprised,” she told Al Jazeera. “Actually, it’s more accurate to say that I’m disappointed.” 

Professor Jan Jaap de Ruiter at Tilburg University, who lives in Utrecht, says that while some people are shocked by the success of FvD, there were signs of its rise before the attack in the city. 

“The polls already indicated he was going for a major win,” he said, suggesting Baudet’s ability to position himself as an intellectual while advocating for populist policies has encouraged people to vote for his party.

Baudet is very well versed, his victory speech was full of references to classical literature and poets.

“It attracts some people because he’s talking about a Netherlands which is independent and not part of the European Union. He conjures up this nostalgia for a Netherlands which has never really existed.”

Turnout in the provincial elections was slightly higher than four years ago at 54 percent, although lower than in general elections.

Diederick van der Wijk, cofounder and director of Refugees Forward – an organisation which helps refugees in the Netherlands to develop business ideas, says that FvD plays on people’s fears. 

FvD provides the traditionally powerful the false hope that this process of emancipation by immigrant communities can be stopped, and that the old boys can maintain their positions of power. The Dutch should rather embrace this transition into a more natural and sustainable balance of economic and political power.”

He said that the Netherlands should address how immigration is discussed in public debate.

“Forum voor Democratie’s rise is a big punch in the face for immigrants of first, second and third generations who work hard to make a contribution to Dutch society and climb up the ladders in their professional careers.

“Posing the question ‘Does Islam have a place in the Netherlands?’ in our national political debate shows that questioning elementary rights of immigrant communities has become mainstream.”

They’ve repackaged a lot of nativist, racist and harshly anti-immigration rhetoric in what is a seemingly a sleek and sophisticated exterior, but ultimately they’re racists in suits.

Kafui Adjogatse, Amsterdam resident

Anas Ragheb, a Syrian who has settled in the Netherlands, is a social entrepreneur. He said that the narrative around refugees in the country has also contributed to FvD’s success.

“There is too much talk in the media about refugees being jobless and staying on welfare for longer than four years,” he said.

“The consequences of this victory for the Forum voor Democratie are huge on the community of newcomers. The hate speech and Islamophobia will increase and society will be polarised.”

When the Senate is seated in May, Prime Minister Rutte’s People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy, which has now lost its majority in the upper house, will now need to work with the opposition groups. 

“We are going to have to get to work. We have to talk with other parties so we can continue to lead this country well,” he said on Wednesday after the results.

Geert Wilders’s far-right Freedom Party, which shares some parallels with FvD, lost four seats in the elections going from nine to five. 

Kafui Adjogatse, a Briton who works in international development in Amsterdam, is concerned about how FvD and Baudet have managed to gloss over their hardline views. 

“They’ve repackaged a lot of nativist, racist and harshly anti-immigration rhetoric in what is seemingly a sleek and sophisticated exterior,” he says, “but ultimately they’re racists in suits.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2FCy1l1
via IFTTT