Yankees News: Giancarlo Stanton Placed on 10-Day IL with Biceps Injury

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - OCTOBER 09:  Giancarlo Stanton #27 of the New York Yankees strikes out in the ninth inning against the Boston Red Sox during Game Four American League Division Series at Yankee Stadium on October 09, 2018 in the Bronx borough of New York City. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

Elsa/Getty Images

The New York Yankees will have to play their upcoming games without Giancarlo Stanton, who was placed on the 10-day injured list with a biceps strain Monday. 

Stanton is a huge part of the Yankees lineup, entering the day with a .250 average through the first three games without a home run. Even with other big hitters in the middle of the order, an extended absence could be a significant setback for the team.

Aaron Judge and Gary Sanchez will have more pressure on them to pick up the slack while Stanton is unavailable.

While inconsistency has been a bit of an issue, as well as strikeouts, the 2017 NL MVP has been mostly what the Yankees expected when they traded for him last offseason. The slugger drove in 100 runs in 2018 while hitting 38 home runs, the second most of his career.

This was only one year after leading the majors with 59 homers and 132 RBI for the Miami Marlins.

New York will just hope the latest injury doesn’t recreate questions about his durability.

Stanton only missed seven total games over the past two seasons, but he had problems staying on the field before that with an average of 115 games per year from 2012-16.

Considering he is making $26 million this season, every missed game will be especially disappointing for the Yankees.    

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2COCBvL
via IFTTT

White House whistleblower tells House panel about ‘systematic’ security clearance problems


Jared Kushner

Investigations into the White House security clearance process intensified following reports that President Donald Trump ordered his then-chief of staff to grant Jared Kushner a top-secret security clearance. | Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

White House

Tricia Newbold says as many as 25 White House officials were granted clearances after initially being denied.

A White House Personnel Security Office employee is alleging that senior Trump administration officials often rebuffed national security concerns to grant high-level security clearances to people who were initially denied access to top-secret information, a pattern she described as troubling and one she said continued for months.

That employee, Tricia Newbold, laid out a series of explosive allegations, often implicating Carl Kline, the former White House personnel security chief. She kept a list of White House officials whose clearance applications were initially denied but eventually overruled, and said the list included as many as 25 people, some of whom had daily access to the president.

Story Continued Below

“According to Ms. Newbold, these individuals had a wide range of serious disqualifying issues involving foreign influence, conflicts of interest, concerning personal conduct, financial problems, drug use, and criminal conduct,” aides wrote in the 10-page memo, summarizing Newbold’s testimony.

Newbold, who sat for an interview with the House Oversight and Reform Committee on March 23 about the Trump administration’s security clearance process, is the highest-ranking White House official to speak out about the issue which has come under intense scrutiny from lawmakers.

She told the committee that coming to Congress was her “last hope” to bring “integrity” back to her office, noting that her internal complaints were ignored even as she amassed a list of more than two dozen officials whose clearances were approved despite an initial denial.

“I do not see a way forward positively in our office without coming to an external entity, and that’s because I have raised my concerns throughout the [Executive Office of the President] to career staffers as well as political staffers,” she said, according to a memo prepared for members of the committee. “And I want it known that this is a systematic, it’s an office issue, and we’re not a political office, but these decisions were being continuously overrode.”

“I would not be doing a service to myself, my country, or my children if I sat back knowing that the issues that we have could impact national security,” Newbold added in her interview with committee staffers for the Republican and Democratic sides of the committee.

The committee’s investigation into the White House security clearance process intensified earlier this year after it was reported that President Donald Trump ordered his then-chief of staff to grant a top-secret security clearance to Jared Kushner, the president’s senior adviser and son-in-law, a directive that overruled intelligence officials.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the committee’s chairman, has requested documents and witness interviews from the White House related specifically to Kushner’s clearance. The White House has said it would not comply with the “overly intrusive” request for information.

The committee will vote to authorize a subpoena for Kline on Tuesday, Cummings said in a letter to White House Counsel Pat Cipollone in which the chairman of the powerful House committee chided the top White House lawyer over his refusal to turn over documents to the panel.

“You have refused to provide any information about the specific individuals the committee is investigating, the specific instances of abuse, wrongdoing, or mistakes we have identified, or the problematic practices of the White House Security Office over the past two years,” Cummings wrote.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the top Republican on the Oversight panel, said Cummings was releasing “cherry-picked” information and claimed that Newbold’s list of 25 people includes “non-political officials such as a GSA custodian.”

“It is extremely unfortunate and disappointing that Chairman Cummings is now using this sensitive topic as a pretense for a partisan attack on the White House,” Jordan said.

Newbold, who currently serves as the adjudications manager in the personnel security office, has worked at the White House for nearly two decades under both Republican and Democratic presidents. She was suspended without pay for two weeks earlier this year, an action she described as retaliation.

During her interview with the committee, Newbold acknowledged the president’s right to unilaterally grant security clearances, but she said that power doesn’t come without a cost.

“Once we adjudicate it, the president absolutely has the right to override and still grant the clearance, but we owe it to the president and the American people to do what is expected of us, and our job is to adjudicate national security adjudications regardless of influence,” Newbold testified to the committee.

The memo noted that the White House “sought to block” Newbold and other witnesses from speaking out to lawmakers. It also said other whistleblowers have “corroborated” Newbold’s allegations, “but they were too afraid about the risk to their careers to come forward publicly.”

Newbold explained that she often clashed with Kline, who was her boss. She also outlined three specific examples in which three senior White House officials — identified only as one, two and three — had their clearance denials overruled.

In the case of one of those officials, Newbold said Kline dismissed concerns of “foreign influence, outside activities … and personal conduct” of that individual by simply noting in the person’s file: “The activities occurred prior to federal service.” Newbold also said a separate government agency reached out to her to understand “how we rendered a favorable adjudication” for that individual.

“Ms. Newbold informed committee staff that this was an indication of the agency’s ‘serious concerns’ regarding the White House’s adjudicative outcome,” the memo states.

Kline often personally intervened to override concerns about granting a clearance to certain officials, according to Newbold.

In the case of another senior White House official, Newbold said she told Kline that she planned to deny that clearance application based on an “extremely thorough” 14-page memo detailing “foreign influence and outside activities.” According to Newbold, Kline granted that individual a clearance after telling Newbold to “not touch” the issue.

Newbold also told the committee that Kline asked her to “change” an unfavorable recommendation for a senior National Security Council official. “I said I absolutely would not,” Newbold said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2I4spTl
via IFTTT

Raiders 2019 NFL Draft Rumors: Kyler Murray, Dwayne Haskins to Work Out for OAK

Oklahoma quarterback Kyler Murray goes through passing drills at the university's Pro Day for NFL scouts in Norman, Okla., Wednesday, March 13, 2019. (AP Photo/Alonzo Adams)

Alonzo Adams/Associated Press

The Oakland Raiders are doing their due diligence on the quarterbacks in the class of 2019 ahead of this year’s NFL draft.

Albert Breer of The MMQB reported: “Coach Jon Gruden and general manager Mike Mayock will work [Kyler] Murray out in Dallas on Monday, I’m told, and they’ll work [Dwayne] Haskins out on Tuesday in Columbus [Ohio]. Doing them back-to-back should bring pretty good perspective in comparing them.”

This article will be updated to provide more information on this story as it becomes available.

Get the best sports content from the web and social in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2YBvX5n
via IFTTT

Drake, Snoop Dogg, And More Pay Tribute To Nipsey Hussle



(Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for The Recording Academy)/(David Crotty/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images)/(Allen Berezovsky/Getty Images)

Nipsey Hussle was an icon, not only in his native Los Angeles but around the world. The rapper — who was tragically shot and killed Sunday (March 31) outside of his Marathon clothing store — inspired countless with his authentic street stories and inspirational, entrepreneurial raps. Off wax, Nipsey’s community efforts and business acumen made him a force to be reckoned with. He was a figure whose tired smile and perennially calm speaking voice carved a figure wiser than his 33 years portrayed. His death sent fellow artists into mourning. It wasn’t supposed to happen: He’d only just released his debut studio album, Victory Lap, last year after working the higher end of rap’s mixtape circuit for over 13 years.

Artists from far and wide took to social media to mourn the rapper and send their best wishes to his partner, Lauren London, and his two children, Emani and Kross. An overwhelming sentiment shared was anger. “Sad, mad, and disappointed about my guy @NipseyHussle,” tweeted Ice Cube. Meek Mill also expressed a similar sentiment. “Broke me…. we really fighting for our lives against our own kind and really have to take risk and match the level of hatred that we are born in,” the Philadelphia rapper wrote. “I’m tired, prayers for my brother and his family.”

Aside from anger, the most prominent face of mourning came from a positive space. Pictures of the rapper smiling and interview clips were, and still are, everywhere, choosing to highlight his brilliance and tendency to drop life gems in passing conversation. Drake and Nas posted the rapper in different states of enjoyment on Instagram; Nas’s picture in particular shows the rapper with a wide grin while soaked in sunlight.

The world will dearly miss Nipsey Hussle’s talent and, most importantly, his character. Read the rest of the music world’s reactions below.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TNcZVC
via IFTTT

Report: Zion Williamson Shoe Deal Expected to Reach $100M in Major Bidding War

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 31: Zion Williamson #1 of the Duke Blue Devils reacts in the second half against the Michigan State Spartans during the 2019 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament East Regional Final at Capital One Arena on March 31, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Lance King/Getty Images)

Lance King/Getty Images

Sixteen years ago, LeBron James sparked the biggest bidding war the shoe game had ever seen, eventually inking a $90 million contract with Nike.

Zion Williamson, who spent much of his Duke career garnering comparisons to James, may be set to eclipse him.

Nick DePaula of ESPN reported that some believe Williamson’s first shoe contract could be over $100 million.

“In my lifetime, I think it’s going to be the biggest bidding war ever done,” said Sonny Vaccaro, a legendary former shoe executive who signed Michael Jordan to Nike in 1984. “I would put them all on go.”

No rookie shoe contract has eclipsed the $90 million mark James set in 2003. In fact, LeBron took less money to sign with Nike over a strong number from Reebok, though the final numbers on that deal are not known.

There have been rumors of potentially enormous shoe contracts—Andrew Wiggins was reportedly looking at $180 million from Adidas coming out of high school—but none have come to fruition. Wiggins wound up signing an endorsement deal with the company worth around $12 million to $13 million per year coming out of college.

It’s possible estimates in this case will be wildly inflated again, but Williamson’s overall brand value is the highest of any college basketball player in recent memory. He exceeded anyone’s wildest expectations, setting himself up as the clear-cut No. 1 pick in June’s draft and going down as one of the most exciting players in college hoops history.

There’s no question that Williamson will wind up making eight figures per year on his first shoe deal. But given the shaky results of some recent major shoe contracts—Derrick Rose and James Harden have both signed huge Adidas contracts that have not resulted in gangbuster sales—the market could be more tepid than Vaccaro expects.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TSVlA4
via IFTTT

Mosquito scent discovery could change a billion lives

Researchers in the United States have genetically modified mosquitoes to make humans less attractive to them – a discovery that could dramatically reduce the spread of mosquito-borne diseases, such as dengue, malaria and Zika.

Female mosquitoes have been long known to use an array of sensory information to find people to bite.

They can sense exhaled carbon dioxide from as far as 10 metres away, as well as being able to detect body odour, heat and moisture.

But new research, published in the journal Current Biology, has shown an acidic component in human sweat plays a key role in attracting the insect.

“We wanted to understand the genetic basis of how the mosquitoes detect their human hosts,” Matthew DeGennaro, a mosquito neurobiology researcher at Florida International University, told Al Jazeera.

Gene identified

The scientists identified a gene – known as Ir8a – expressed in the mosquito’s antenna.

This gene appears to allow female mosquitoes, the ones that suck blood, to smell lactic acid, a particular acidic vapour in human sweat.

Using advanced CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology, the researchers were able to disrupt that gene, making the female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes significantly less interested in humans.

“Removing the function of Ir8a removes approximately 50 percent of host-seeking activity,” said DeGennaro.

The genetically-modified mosquitoes were less likely to detect and bite humans, making them much less likely to spread mosquito-borne illnesses.

For a species such as Aedes aegypti, which lives alongside half of the world’s population – and spreads diseases that kill millions of people each year – this genetic modification has huge potential health benefits.

“The transmission of diseases like dengue, yellow fever, Zika, and malaria can be blocked if we stop these mosquitoes from biting us,” said DeGennaro.

Repellent potential

While the release of genetically-modified mosquitoes into the wild to combat the spread of dengue fever has been a controversial practice, this latest research is not only focused on the potential of cross-breeding them with wild populations.

The researchers say their work can also offer a more advanced understanding of how mosquitoes hunt and feed on their human targets and will allow them to develop improved mosquito repellents.

These could include life-saving perfumes or scents that would disrupt mosquitoes’ sense of smell and protect people from being bitten.

“Odours that mask the IR8a pathway could enhance the efficacy of current repellents like DEET or picaridin. In this way, our discovery may help make people disappear as potential hosts for mosquitoes,” said DeGennaro.

Researchers were able to disrupt the Ir8a gene, making female mosquitoes significantly less interested in humans [Photo by Florida International University/Flickr] 

In the same way the researchers say they may be able to use the discovery to over-stimulate parts of the insect’s detection system, and use the scent to lure them away from our humans and into traps.

The effect is “like getting on an elevator with someone who has put on way too much cologne,” Larry Zwiebel, a biologist at Vanderbilt University, told US broadcaster NPR.

In February this year, the World Health Organization warned that an emerging resistance to insecticides could lead to a large increase in malaria cases and mortality.

The effects of climate change, which will make more parts of the world hospitable to mosquitoes and the diseases they spread, are also expected to hamper control efforts.

It’s in this context that new and innovative insect control methods like those developed by the Florida researchers are going to become increasingly important.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2uIQMhf
via IFTTT

Killing Obamacare kills Trump’s health agenda, too


Donald Trump

By eliminating Medicaid expansion, reversing the Affordable Care Act would make President Donald Trump’s plan to eliminate HIV vastly more expensive. | Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

health care

President Donald Trump’s renewed push to gut Obamacare could sabotage the rest of his health agenda.

President Donald Trump wants to eliminate HIV in the U.S., contain the opioid crisis and lower the cost of prescription drugs — but all of those need Obamacare to be successful. And Trump just promised to kill it.

His HIV plan relies on key pieces of Obamacare to expand access to prevention and treatment services for Americans at risk of contracting the deadly virus. Expanding opioid prevention relies heavily on Medicaid, which expanded under Obamacare. And Trump’s push to lower drug prices would use an innovation program that tests drug cost modeling — and was created by Obamacare.

Story Continued Below

So while the notion of killing Obamacare altogether arouses the GOP base, the reality is that the decade-old law is so intertwined with the entire U.S. health care system that repealing large chunks of it would destroy the ability to do things Trump actually likes.

Even members of Trump’s team have raised red flags. Outgoing FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said Thursday that overturning Obamacare could thwart an initiative to get cheaper forms of insulin on the market. Carl Schmid, an AIDS Institute leader and co-chair of Trump’s HIV advisory board, called the ACA decision “an unfortunate distraction from ending the HIV epidemic initiative.”

“He’s just completely consigning his own initiatives to the ash heap if the ACA goes down,” said Sara Rosenbaum, a health law and policy expert at George Washington University. “It has become the fabric of the health care system.”

If the law is struck down in court, as the president is rooting for, an estimated 25 million people will lose coverage through private insurance and Medicaid expansion, and insurers will no longer be required to cover people with pre-existing conditions like HIV/AIDS.

The HIV and opioid crises are intertwined because HIV infections have increased with people sharing needles for injecting drugs. Any Obamacare changes that hurt one of those efforts will have serious ramifications for the other.

“Trump’s attempt to dismantle the ACA would critically undermine the goal of ending the HIV epidemic in the United States in the near term,” said Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), co-founder and co-chair of the bipartisan congressional HIV/AIDS caucus.

“It would be like pulling the chair out from under the initiative,” said Jen Kates, director of Global Health and HIV Policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation. In the days before Obamacare’s guarantees of coverage despite pre-existing conditions, people with HIV seeking individual insurance were denied 100 percent of the time, she said.

Advocates and lawmakers have similar concerns about the national response to the opioid crisis, which Trump declared a public health emergency in 2017, which Trump declared a public health emergency in 2017. The Affordable Care Act’s expansion of Medicaid covers about 1.2 million people getting mental health and addiction treatment, according to a study published in Health Affairs.

Finally, Trump’s plan to lower drug prices to what patients pay overseas depends on various parts of the ACA, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid’s Innovation Center — a vehicle for testing new payment models.

The president last week abruptly shifted his previous position and signaled support for a federal judge’s ruling that the ACA in its entirety should be thrown out, despite objections from his health secretary and attorney general. Obamacare’s fate is likely to once again be settled by the Supreme Court. Trump has promised something better in its place, but no one knows what that might be.

If Obamacare goes, prevention services and screening requirements provided under the ACA’s essential health benefits would be eliminated. This would occur as Obamacare was expected to soon require that PrEP, a drug that can prevent new HIV infections, be made available for free in all health insurance plans.

Without those protections, fewer people could be diagnosed and get care — directly undermining a key goal of the Trump administration’s HIV strategy: to detect infections and treat people more quickly to avoid spread of the disease. Recent CDC data shows about eight in 10 new infections are transmitted by people who don’t know they’re infected.

Public health experts are deeply concerned by any potential rollback in services, particularly in Medicaid, which covers more than 40 percent of all people living with HIV, according to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation. Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion is credited with increasing coverage of people with HIV — which jumped from 36 percent in 2012 to 42 percent in 2014 and has probably grown since many more states have bolstered their Medicaid rolls.

The Trump HIV plan doesn’t count on states expanding Medicaid, but “they were also not expecting a state to lose access to Medicaid expansion as a result of a court case,” said Bill McColl, AIDS United’s vice president of advocacy and policy.

To make its HIV plan work, the Trump administration planned to rely on non-profit health clinics and hospitals that receive steep discounts on drugs. Obamacare expanded this program, known as 340B, to rural, critical access and community hospitals. That drug savings money is credited with keeping many of these facilities open and alleviating some of the burden on health centers that treat uninsured and low-income HIV patients.

If financially strapped rural hospitals lose their 340B status due to the elimination of Obamacare, it will place a huge burden on other places that treat HIV patients, like the Ryan White Clinics, said Peggy Tighe, the lead lobbyist for Ryan White Clinics for 340B Access.

The cuts to 340B would also hurt anti-addiction treatment because some of the patients treated for HIV infections in rural hospitals and clinics are also opioid users, Tighe said.

More than 170 hospitals were added to the drug discount program thanks to Obamacare in the seven states the Trump administration’s HIV plan targets, according to the Health Resources and Services Administration. About 1,000 rural hospitals throughout the country joined the program, according to 340B Health, which lobbies for these health care facilities.

By eliminating Medicaid expansion, reversing the ACA would make Trump’s plan to eliminate HIV vastly more expensive, “although still a worthy goal,” Schmid said.

The billions Congress has appropriated to expand opioid treatment services would be undermined without the health care law’s coverage and consumer protections, such as the requirement that insurers cover addiction care the same way they cover other medical services.

“You cannot strengthen a response to these problems if your foundation is weak,” said Andrew Kessler, founder and principal at Slingshot Solutions.

When it comes to drug prices, ending Obamacare immediately would raise costs for seniors and state governments, while other Americans might see their drug coverage disappear entirely thanks to the loss of the ACA’s mandate that all health plans cover prescription medications.

Seniors would likely spend around $2,000 or more in out-of-pocket drug costs each year without Obamacare, estimates Juliette Cubanski, Kaiser Family Foundation’s associate director of Medicare policy. That’s because the ACA requires drugmakers to provide big discounts to seniors in the coverage gap phase of Medicare Part D. And states would no longer be entitled to the larger discounts on drugs provided to Medicaid programs under Obamacare.

Meanwhile, Trump administration efforts to get cheaper medicines to market could falter. Obamacare created the biosimilar pathway, a way for companies to bring cheaper versions of some of the most costly and complex biologic medicines to market.

Eliminating the biosimilar pathway could cripple efforts to get cheaper versions of insulin to patients. Starting in 2020, insulin will be regulated as a biologic, finally giving companies seeking to make cheaper copycats a way to get a product approved that could be automatically substituted for branded insulin, whose cost has been rising.

Gottlieb, who as FDA chief has made biosimilars a priority, acknowledged at a Senate Appropriations hearing Thursday that if Obamacare is overturned it would thwart FDA’s plan to increase access to them.

“It’s a very important pathway and we fully support it, obviously,” Gottlieb said in response to questions from Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont). “We think it has been profoundly impactful with consumers.”

Other Trump plans to lower the cost of medicines also would be stymied, like the president’s idea to test aligning Medicare payments for pricey doctor-administered drugs to the lower costs paid by other wealthy nations.

This and other similar demonstrations can’t be done without Obamacare’s Innovation Center, which gives the government broad powers to test new health policies without congressional approval.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2WHXkch
via IFTTT

Pakistan hikes fuel prices amid spiraling inflation

Islambad, Pakistan – Pakistan’s government has hiked fuel prices by up to 6.45 percent, as the country continues to face widening fiscal and current account deficits amid spiralling inflation.

On Monday, countrywide fuel prices increased to Rs98.89 ($0.70) per litre, with diesel prices at Rs117.43 ($0.83), a government notification said, hitting nine-month highs.

Pakistan subsidises the price of most fuels in the country, but has been cutting those payments in recent months as the newly elected Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government struggles to contain ballooning government expenditure amid an overall economic slowdown.

In the past six months, the country has received at least $8 billion in grants and loans from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and key strategic and economic partner China, with whom Pakistan is embarking on the $56bn China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project.

The influxes have helped stave off a looming foreign reserve crisis, with central bank reserves back up to $8.56bn, or just over two months of imports, according to a central bank statement released on Thursday.

Last week, the International Monetary Fund’s Pakistan mission chief Ernesto Ramirez Rigo held two days of meetings with Pakistani Finance Minister Asad Umar, central bank officials and others ahead of an expected IMF bailout.

The bailout, which both Pakistani PM Imran Khan and IMF chief Christine Lagarde alluded to after a meeting in February, would be Pakistan’s 13th IMF programme since 1980. 

Spiraling inflation

The fuel price hike comes amid spiralling consumer inflation in the South Asian country, with consumer price inflation (CPI) hitting 8.21 percent last month, according to the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS), the highest level since June 2014.

The inflation numbers have been mainly driven by the increasing prices of fuel and food, according to a PBS statement.

Pakistan battles to control inflation

On Friday, Pakistan’s central bank increased the country’s interest rates by 50 basis points to 10.75 percent, saying that the economy was under considerable strain.

“The current account deficit remains high, fiscal consolidation is slower than anticipated and core inflation continues to rise,” said a statement accompanying the announcement.

As a result, the central bank has pared back its expected annual GDP growth rate projection from around 6 percent to 3.5 percent.

“The increase in petrol prices tends to raise inflationary expectations,” said Saad Ali, head of research at Karachi-based Inter Market Securities. “Almost all sectors are affected by it, because in Pakistan most goods are still being transported through trucks, and therefore through diesel.”

Ali said the central bank was currently attempting to control an increasing import bill by raising the cost of borrowing and through currency depreciation. The Pakistani rupee has lost roughly 23 percent of its value against the US dollar in the last year.

“The initial problem that we had was the current account deficit and the foreign exchange depletion,” said Ali.

“The current account deficit was widening because of consumer demand – industries were importing, consumers were demanding more imported consumer items – so to curtail that the government and central bank had to first devalue the currency and increase interest rates.”

Ali said the measures taken thus far had managed to bring the current account deficit to a more manageable number, but that rising inflation continued to pose a significant threat.

“All of this is a reflection of the government and central bank trying to curtail demand,” he said. “There will be less growth, but lower GDP growth will be a sign that they have succeeded.”

Asad Hashim is Al Jazeera’s digital correspondent in Pakistan. He tweets @AsadHashim.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2OBLtcN
via IFTTT

Racism, bureaucracy, uncertainty: Refugee crisis brews in Cyprus

Names marked with an asterisk* have been changed to protect interviewees’ identities.

Nicosia, Cyprus – Zainab* was the only person from the group of migrants on board the ship that was dumped on a rocky, foreign beach.

It was a hot day in August 2016, and the then-17-year-old’s only possessions were the worn clothes on her back.

For three days, she slept on the beach, unaware she had arrived in Cyprus, far from the West African country she had fled.

Eventually, strangers took her to a youth shelter in Larnaca, where she met a group of Somali girls who told her where she was. 

“I never imagined that a country called Cyprus existed,” she said, sitting in a cafe in downtown Nicosia two and a half years later. “Whenever I think back to where I was in 2016 I am grateful for what I have today.”

Zainab had fled her country, which Al Jazeera will not name in order to protect her identity, where she feared persecution. She crossed into Senegal on foot, searching for a better life. 

Alone, lost and afraid, she wandered for days before a driver who almost hit her with his car decided to help her.

“I told him my story and he said he wanted me to be safe,” she said. “He took care of my expenses and dropped me off where the ship was.”

When politicians think they can occasionally use racism to gain votes in parliament, it is very difficult to reverse the situation.

Doros Polykarpou, head of anti-racism NGO KISA

Life on board the smugglers’ ship was tough. Zainab was the only girl there, and the ship’s crew did not specify the destination they were heading to, only to “Europe”.

“There were many people on the ship, I can’t say how much or from where exactly,” she said. “It was not easy because the crew bullied and insulted us on a daily basis. My mind was also preoccupied with how my future would look like.”

It was at Larnaca’s youth shelter where she met John*, now a close friend.

They are the same age and fled from the same country.

“I left because of political reasons,” John said. “I was scared for my life. I had no choice but to leave in order to survive, which I believe is the case for all asylum seekers.”

The two friends have applied for asylum but their case is still pending, almost three years on.

Cyprus, due to its geographical location, is one of the most accessible points of entry for migrants trying to make it to Europe. 

With almost 6,000 applications for a population around one million, the island in 2018 had more claims for asylum per capita than any other EU member state, according to government data.

A migrant child is helped off the MV Lifeline, a vessel for the German charity Mission Lifeline, as it arrives in the harbour of Valletta, Malta, on June 27, 2018. Lifeline had been waiting to be allocated a port for six days after rescuing 234 migrants off the coast of Libya last June 21 [AFP]

“According to European law, if you are a minor you get accepted [as a permanent resident] and [are] not subjected to the asylum-seeking process,” Zainab said. “But Cyprus is not following that law.”

There is no system to process asylum seekers, she continued. “Some get recognition in three months, but others have been waiting for three years.”

Doros Polykarpou, head of anti-racism NGO KISA, told Al Jazeera that discrimination is at play.

“[Asylum seekers that don’t] belong to ethnic groups considered by Cypriot society as genuine refugees – such as Syrians or Palestinians” often face difficulty in getting applications processed, he said.

“Historically, we had good relations with Syria and Palestine,” he said. “The people have similar features to the Cypriots. They have very good skills that are needed.”

The government, he continued, sent a message to the public that these groups, especially Syrians, need to be looked after, but did not include African or Asian asylum-seekers.

The rhetoric towards migrants and asylum-seekers, spurred by officials, has been marred with hostility and mistrust. 

The interior minister has said that refugees pose as a security threat to Cypriots while, in his Christmas message, the archbishop preached that the refugees will side with Turkey against Greek Cypriots in an inevitable war.

Polykarpou blames the media and politicians for this attitude, which gained momentum in the wake of the 2007 economic crisis, as it was easier to blame refugees for the country’s dire economic situation.

“When politicians think they can occasionally use racism to gain votes in parliament, it is very difficult to reverse the situation,” he said. “The moment you manage to put certain messages in people’s minds, you need years of work to backtrack on this.”

Zainab says that ordinary Cypriots treat her better than officials and bureaucrats.

“For me, I can say that Cyprus is a home,” she said. “It is the place where I have been nurtured from being unaccompanied to an adult. Also, I am back in school, which would have been impossible in my own country.”

Yet Zainab and John, like other refugees, often feel pushed close to a breaking point by their pending legal status.

“You think about your future every day,” Zainab said. “These thoughts kill you slowly.”

Some refugees are not aware of their rights, such as receiving legal aid for the asylum application process. 

“The entire system is set up to not to have a job, not to have a house, to face daily rejection from society,” says Polykarpou, “and not to have a chance to become a refugee unless you belong to the ethnic groups the government decided to give protection to.”

Al Jazeera contacted Cyprus’ Asylum Service several times for comment but did not receive a response.

You face a lot of frustration and they treat you in a humiliating way.

Zainab, West African refugee in Cyprus

According to Cypriot law, refugees are expected to look for work and/or register with the labour office one month after they submit their asylum application.

Available jobs such as working in agriculture or waste management are low-paid and, in a Catch-22 situation, asylum seekers can only register with the government if they have a fixed address and a rental contract.

When they turned 18, Zainab and John had to leave the migrant youth shelter and find alternative accommodation.

“The shelter says they will help you with that but I didn’t receive that help,” John said. “You have to do your research and contact people who left the shelter before you to see if they know of a spare room available.”

The average rent in Nicosia for a two-bedroom home is 700 euros ($786).

The government’s Social Welfare office gives subsidies of 100 euros a month for individual accommodation and 230 euros for a family, irrespective of its size. However, refugees told Al Jazeera that their payments arrive late or are not made.

“The landlords don’t want to rent houses to asylum-seekers,” said John. “[It is one] of the biggest challenges we face because they know the government will not pay them on time.”

“You face a lot of frustration and they treat you in a humiliating way,” Zainab said. 

She lives with three other young women. 

“I know some girls who up until now haven’t received rent for three months, and the only way they can survive is through prostitution.”

They both agree that the welfare office “is the worst.”

“They will see you beg and cry and they don’t care,” John said. “One time I went to the office to collect the rent money but they told me it was not available. I could have lost my accommodation. How am I supposed to live or survive then?”

The money was later paid out, after the UN’s refugee agency intervened.

“Sometimes, at the welfare office, they look at you up and down, the way you dress and tell you to change your hairstyle,” Zainab said. 

“The worst thing I could ever wish upon someone is for them to be an asylum seeker, especially in Cyprus,” John said.

But the two friends are determined to keep their heads up and are grateful for each other’s presence.

“When we are at school, we have each other’s backs,” Zainab said, referring to the high school scholarship they received at Casa College, in collaboration with UNHCR. 

“I want to study international relations to help refugees, asylum-seekers, migrants – the people that I have met here.

“People should recognise that we are here not because we want to be here but because of circumstances. A lot of asylum-seekers would prefer to work rather than be dependent on welfare but the government see us as being here only to take.”

Zainab and John hope to be recognised as asylum-seekers before the summer. They want to travel the world and are working on a play about seeking asylum to raise awareness.

 “We are dreamers,” John said. “Tomorrow will be a better day.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2JSxbWs
via IFTTT

Another tense Brexit week begins: What will happen next?

London, United Kingdom – At the start of another week, which was meant to be the first after the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union, the Brexit outlook is as uncertain as ever. 

What is happening today?

A second round of non-binding “indicative votes” on Monday aims to test support for alternatives to Prime Minister Theresa May‘s divorce deal with the EU.

The votes will take place at 8 GMT, and results will come in at around 10pm.

All eyes are on whether the vote will lead to MPs forcing May’s hand towards a “softer Brexit”, possibly leading to a general election.

Parliament rejected all eight alternative options put to a vote last week. 

Holding a second referendum and a customs union with the EU received the most support.

On the day the country was originally scheduled to leave the EU, March 29, MPs voted down May’s deal with the bloc for the third time. Unlike the previous two votes, this ballot was held on only one of two constituent parts of the deal, the withdrawal agreement, which sets out the terms of departure and includes a 20-month transition period.

A non-legally binding political declaration laying out the future relationship between the UK and EU was not voted on. 

May lost the vote by a margin of 58, down from 230 in January and 149 in March. 

In a surprising move, May had told members of her own Conservative Party, which is bitterly divided over Brexit, that she would stand down if they backed her deal. But even that attempt to win over rebels who would rather see a “hard Brexit” proved insufficient.

The prime minister could bring the agreement before Parliament for a fourth time this week. 

Will Parliament finally find a consensus?

A week ago, MPs voted to temporarily seize control over the parliamentary timetable from the government in an attempt to break the Brexit deadlock and advise on a way forward through a series of “indicative votes.”

Out of the 16 options tabled by MPs, eight were chosen by the Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, and none secured a majority. 

The speaker is likely to select three or four options this time, leaving out proposals that were previously rejected by large margins, such as revoking Article 50 and leaving with no deal. 

The idea of holding a confirmatory public vote on a Brexit deal received the most votes last week – something which was seen as a victory by campaigners for a so-called people’s vote. 

Labour’s deputy leader, Tom Watson, renewed his call for the party to support a second referendum option. 

But a number of Labour MPs from leave-voting constituencies previously defied the party whip and voted against the proposal, making it difficult to see where additional votes could come from. An amendment seeking a second referendum could still be introduced at a later stage.

Options for a “softer Brexit”, particularly a customs union and the so-called “Common Market 2.0”, could win the decisive support of MPs who abstained in the last round of votes. 

The latter would see the UK join the European Economic Area (EEA) and European Free Trade Association while being part of a customs union with the EU.

Will today’s votes change the course of Brexit?

The votes are non-binding.

Should MPs be successful in achieving a majority for an alternative course, they may seek to legislate for the government to seek a long extension to the Brexit deadline with the EU.

Is a no-deal Brexit off the table?

No.

No deal remains the default option under Article 50, and the current Brexit deadline is April 12. 

If no alternative option is agreed upon to make the case for a longer extension with the EU, the UK may “accidentally” crash out of the bloc in two weeks’ time.

The Irish border has been the main point of contention in the Conservative Party.

Hard-Brexiteers fear the backstop protocol in the withdrawal agreement – an insurance policy designed to keep an open border in the island of Ireland – could tie to the UK to the EU’s trade rules indefinitely. 

The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) of Northern Ireland argues that it would create a border between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

That border will have to be managed in case of a no-deal scenario. Germany and France have both scheduled meeting with the Irish Taoiseach, Leo Varadkar, this week.

The EU said in a statement last week it had completed its no-deal preparations.

More than 170 Conservative MPs wrote to May this week to ask her to take the UK out of the EU “with or without a deal”.

Why is everyone talking about a general election?

If Parliament agrees on a way forward that May can’t endorse, the prime minister may decide to trigger a general election. However, a general election will need the approval of at least two-thirds of the British Parliament, and there’s currently no appetite for it in the Conservative benches.

Meanwhile, a number of cabinet ministers are openly preparing for a leadership challenge as the prime minister’s position looks increasingly fragile.

If the indicative votes process does lead to MPs choosing a “soft Brexit” scenario, it could put pressure on hard-Brexiters to vote for May’s deal when she brings it back a fourth time. 

In order to do that, she will need the speaker – who has previously ruled that the same deal couldn’t be brought before the House twice – to allow it.

Reporting by Ylenia Gostoli 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2FOtME7
via IFTTT