Modi’s rebranding: Tea seller in 2014, watchman in 2019

New Delhi, India – Clever catchphrases and viral social media campaigns were a defining feature of the bid for power launched five years ago by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The ruling Hindu nationalist party is credited with introducing professionally managed campaigning for elections.

Modi continues to be the champion of the hashtag and his party’s pioneering advantage on social media seems intact, as he makes a bid for a second term in office with a freshly minted campaign slogan: ‘Main bhi chowkidar’ (Me too watchman).

More than 900 million registered voters are expected to elect 543 members to the lower house of parliament in multiphase elections beginning on April 11.

The ‘chowkidar’ campaign was launched in response to a slogan coined earlier this year by opposition Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi: ‘Chowkidar chor hai’ (The watchman is a thief). Gandhi’s slogan had sought to highlight the prime minister’s role in facilitating an alleged scam in the purchase of Rafale fighter jets from the French company Dassault Aviation for nearly $9bn.

The counter-campaign quickly became another example of the BJP coming up with a winning repartee to an attack by the opposition.

“When we were running the campaign that our ‘watchman is a thief’, Modi was completely shaken and just to counter that campaign, he has come up with ‘Main bhi chowkidar’” campaign,” Congress leader Sanjay Nirupam, told Al Jazeera.

Modi’s new campaign ‘Main bhi chowkidar’ also allows him to go into the area of defence and national security which is an area of comfort for him

Dilip Cherian, public relations executive

Launched a fortnight ago, Modi’s ‘Main bhi chowkidar’ campaign features a title song, four short films, caller tunes, mass rallies, T-shirts, caps, badges, and a customary hashtag along with Modi’s trademark video conferences with his supporters.

The party also made use of the ‘conversation cards’ feature launched by Twitter and sent personalised messages to those who supported the chowkidar campaign from the prime minister’s official handle.

Modi changed his Twitter profile and added the prefix ‘chowkidar’ to his name [Noah Seelam/AFP]

Modi even changed his Twitter profile and added the prefix ‘chowkidar’ to his name, tweeting: ‘Your chowkidar is standing firm and serving the nation. But I am not alone. Everyone who is fighting corruption, dirt, social evils is a chowkidar. Everyone working hard for the progress of India is a chowkidar. Today, every Indian is saying #MainBhiChowkidar.”

Political mileage

BJP leaders, cabinet ministers and hundreds of thousands of Modi’s online supporters soon followed and added the ‘chowkidar’ prefix to their names. The hashtag used by the Indian prime minister, who has a nearly 47 million followers on Twitter, trended for several days.

For months, Gandhi has relentlessly taunted Modi with his ‘Chowkidar chor hai’ slogan, accusing the government of corruption and granting favours to corporations that are close to the prime minister. Modi and his BJP party have denied the corruption claims.

This is not the first time that Modi and his party have successfully turned opposition criticism into political campaigns.

In the run-up to the 2014 elections, BJP launched the ‘Chai pe charcha’ (Conversations over tea) campaign, after senior Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar dubbed Narendra Modi a ‘chaiwala’ (tea seller) and mocked his prime ministerial ambitions saying that a place will be identified for him to distribute tea.

The senior Congress leader’s comments were perceived as elitist and a sign of the party’s arrogance, causing serious damage to the party which had fought for India’s independence in 1947.

The BJP won the 2014 elections in a landslide, while the Congress party was reduced to 44 seats, its worst performance on record.

Supporters of India’s main opposition Congress shout slogans against Prime Minister Modi in Kolkata [Rupak De Chowdhuri/Reuters]

Social media head of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), the party which currently governs Delhi, said that unlike the 2014 ‘Chai pe charcha’ campaign, the current one isn’t going to help the BJP in the upcoming elections.

“At a deeper level what we see is that the BJP and Modi have tried to take the focus away from the real issues that are plaguing the country. The real issues of economy, jobs and women safety are not being talked about,” Ankit Lal told Al Jazeera.

But BJP’s national spokesman told Al Jazeera that the ‘chowkidar’ campaign was adopted as a result of the negative campaign by the opposition.

Public relations exercise

Since coming to power in 2014, Modi has coined numerous slogans to highlight issues and government programmes such as ‘Beti bachao beti padhao’ (Save daughter, educate daughter), ‘Swach bharat abhiyan’ (clean India campaign), ‘Digital India’, ‘Make In India’ and ‘Startup India’.

But the opposition has accused the Modi government of wasting taxpayers’ money on public relations exercises.

Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader Brinda Karat described the marketing of Modi as “unprecedented”. “From the government money, for example, in the Beti bachao beti padhao campaign, half of the funds were spent on advertisements,” Karat said.

In December last year, the government told parliament that it had spent over Rs 5,200 crore ($7.5bn) in advertisements through electronic, print and other media since 2014.

Media reports have estimated that the election campaign for the BJP-led-National Democratic Alliance (NDA), will cost around ₹2,500 crore ($3.6bn) with 20-25 creative agencies deployed to manage its traditional and social media strategies.

The chairman of the Perfect Relations public relations firm, Dilip Cherian, told Al Jazeera that “such media campaigning has worked for Modi in the past and he thinks that it might work for him again”.

Cherian said that “Modi’s approach is brave” as he takes the opposition head on with his “offensive strategy”.

“Modi’s new campaign ‘Main bhi chowkidar’ also allows him to go into the area of defence and national security which is an area of comfort for him,” Cherian said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Usq3Es
via IFTTT

Lincoln Aviator SUV returns with 28-speaker sound system

Disclosure

Every product here is independently selected by Mashable journalists. If you buy something featured, we may earn an affiliate commission which helps support our work.

It's like a really easy treasure hunt for speakers.
It’s like a really easy treasure hunt for speakers.

Image: Lincoln

By Sasha Lekach

The Lincoln Aviator SUV is back and making some noise after the American car maker pulled the three-row SUV back in 2005. 

The noisy return might have something to do with its revamped sound system. As part of a collaboration with audio company Revel, the car interior features 28 speakers dispersed nearly everywhere throughout the car, including the doors and seats. Eight speakers sit above passengers’ heads in the ceiling.

This makes for what the company calls a 360-degree listening experience, and it can be customized into three modes: stereo with the listener between the speakers; audience for a wider sound; and on-stage with an all-round experience. It’s basically like a concert blasted into your car and you’re on the stage.

SEE ALSO: These speakers stack like legos and communicate ‘like a hive’

Your typical car, say a Honda Accord, usually comes with about six speakers. So the difference is more than incremental.   

Cms%252f2019%252f4%252fada8a584 cffc ba79%252fthumb%252f00001.jpg%252foriginal.jpg?signature=xjrxwkgmhbh7hj7lbufj3j1jhmk=&source=https%3a%2f%2fvdist.aws.mashable

The sound experience goes beyond just the speakers. The windshield and side glass are laminated to keep outside noise out. The doors and wheel arch liners were also built with acoustics in mind. A double-lined wall behind the dash separates the engine and main cabin to keep out even more sound. The bottom of the car is supposed to make fewer rumbling noises, even at different speeds.

The car is even more musically-inclined than most: the infotainment system plays notes from the Detroit Symphony Orchestra as alerts for 25 car features. 

The Aviator, which starts at $51,000, will be available starting this summer for the first time since 2005. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2HWYwVK
via IFTTT

‘Toy Story 4’ debuts first 17 minutes at CinemaCon

If you’ve ever wished that sweet family films would have more existential despair in them, Toy Story 4 may be for you. And not just because of Forky.

At Disney’s CinemaCon presentation Wednesday, producer Jonas Rivera revealed that the Pixar sequel would see Tom Hanks’ Woody “questioning everything — maybe even his own purpose.” 

SEE ALSO: People are relating hard to a new ‘Toy Story’ character’s lust for the void

The first 17 minutes of the film, screened at CinemaCon, certainly seem to bear that out. 

The film opens “nine years ago,” when Woody was still Andy’s toy. He successfully spearheads a rescue mission for a toy lost outside in the rain, but the adventure comes to a bittersweet end when he discovers that Bo Peep (Annie Potts) is being given away.

Woody tries to save Bo, but she declines. “It’s time for the next kid,” she tells him, and Woody lets her go. 

A montage catches us back up to the present, where Woody (as established at the end of Toy Story 3) is now Bonnie’s toy. Except Bonnie doesn’t actually seem all that interested in playing with him — she keeps leaving him in the closet while she brings out other toys like Dolly (Bonnie Hunt), Jessie (Joan Cusack), and Buzz (Tim Allen). 

Woody’s clearly bothered by this, but nevertheless does what he can to make Bonnie happy. When she seems upset by the prospect of going to kindergarten orientation, he stows away in her bag to keep her company.

It’s in that classroom that Bonnie creates Forky (Tony Hale), and it’s on the way home that Woody realizes, thanks to an ear-splitting scream, that Forky has become sentient. 

<img class="" data-credit-name="
” data-credit-provider=”custom type” data-fragment=”m!c770″ data-image=”https://mondrian.mashable.com/uploads%252Fcard%252Fimage%252F963374%252F7dd930ba-27bc-40f9-9e01-de45f6af12fb.gif%252Foriginal.gif?signature=GR6_cC-tYrTBZbMcAacp1PXCIW0=&source=https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com&#8221; data-micro=”1″ src=”https://mondrian.mashable.com/uploads%252Fcard%252Fimage%252F963374%252F7dd930ba-27bc-40f9-9e01-de45f6af12fb.gif%252Ffit-in__1200x9600.gif?signature=B_9nAUdfwNOHOqgz9z9DHGIvleA=&source=https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com”&gt;

Image:

Once they’re back home, Woody tries to introduce Forky to the rest of the group, as Forky, trembling and terrified, makes a run for it and jumps into the trash, where he thinks he belongs. (Forky was made of discarded scraps, you see.)

“Oh, chutes and ladders,” says Woody. 

While the opening scenes of Toy Story 4 aren’t terribly depressing — this isn’t Up, folks — they establish some intriguing emotional throughlines for the rest of the story to follow. 

Woody, throughout the Toy Story movies, has generally taken for granted that his life’s purpose is to make his human happy. But between Bo Peep’s departure, Forky’s birth, and his own not-terribly-close bond with Bonnie, he seems primed to rethink some things. 

Then there’s the simple fact of Forky’s existence. Exactly what turns something from an inanimate object to a sentient toy? I need Toy Story 4 to tell me before I fill up my entire house with trash on the off chance that I’ve played with it one time and thus willed it into existence.

Answers to all those and more — hopefully — when Toy Story 4 opens June 21. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2IaQwje
via IFTTT

Disney promotes ‘Dark Phoenix’, promises more ‘Deadpool’ at CinemaCon

The X-Men are part of the Disney family now, and never has that felt clearer than at the studio’s CinemaCon presentation Wednesday.

Disney touted both Dark Phoenix and New Mutants as part of its upcoming slate, alongside the usual Avengers and Star Wars and Pixar projects.

SEE ALSO: Jessica Chastain takes an online quiz to find out which of the ‘X-Men’ she is

What exactly the X-Men’s future looks like at the Mouse House, though, remains unclear. 

Deadpool clearly isn’t going anywhere. “You’ll be seeing more of Deadpool in the years ahead,” promised studio chairman Alan Horn, after sharing Ryan Reynolds’ cheeky tweet about Fox joining Disney.

And New Mutants, despite delayed release dates, reports of reshoots, and rumors of a straight-to-streaming distribution plan, does seem to be headed to cinemas — it was included on a slide of Disney’s 2019 theatrical releases.

But the core X-Men franchise led by James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, Jennifer Lawrence, and Sophie Turner is evidently coming to a conclusion. Dark Phoenix, out this summer, was described by 20th Century Fox’s Emma Watts as “the perfect sendoff” to the X-Men series.

At least we can hope it goes out on a high note. Though most of the Dark Phoenix trailers have not, to be perfectly frank, inspired much confidence, the CinemaCon footage looked appealingly dark.

The scene opens with the X-Men in space, on a mission to save some stranded astronauts, with Nightcrawler’s teleportation and Quicksilver’s super-speed coming in especially handy. 

Things take a turn for the disastrous, however, when they run into a mysterious force and Jean finds herself absorbing an enormous amount of power. She screams.

Jean makes it back to earth, but she’s different now. “When I lose control, bad things happen,” she says, tearfully. “But it feels good.” 

Jessica Chastain’s still-mysterious villain seems into it, though. “My power destroyed everything it ever came into contact with, until you,” she says. “They fear you, and what they fear…” 

“They seek to destroy,” Jean says.

The others are less enamored of this new Jean. Xavier warns that “she’ll kill us all,” while Magneto confronts her directly. 

“Are you threatening me?” Jean asks.

“That’s right,” Magneto says.

“That would be a bad idea,” she responds. And she means it. We see her pulling at him with her telekinesis like it’s nothing, while his face contorts in pain.

As teases for superhero movies go, this one’s solid. The explosions look expensive, the emotions seem acute, the characters (especially Chastain’s) seem intriguing. If Fox’s X-Men movies truly are done — and it sounds like they are — there are worse ways to go out than with a loud, bright bang.

And after that? We’re guessing these characters are too well loved to stay gone for long. Perhaps we’ll see them rising from the ashes once again, rebooted and reborn this time as Disney heroes.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2YQ1xMW
via IFTTT

Australia passes tough social media laws regarding removal of violent content

Australia has announced tougher penalties on social media platforms to ensure they act on violent content.

The laws threaten executives of social media companies with jail, and fines placed on these companies if they fail to remove “abhorrent violent material” from their platforms. 

SEE ALSO: Facebook makes vague noises about ‘restrictions’ on live video after tragedy

The amendment, only just announced by the country’s prime minister on Saturday, was passed in Australia’s parliament on Thursday. 

It’s in response to the highly-shared livestream of the Christchurch terrorist attack, which social media companies struggled to wipe off their platforms. 

Facebook revealed that it removed 1.5 million instances of the video, with 1.2 million blocked at upload. Internet service providers in New Zealand and Australia opted to block sites which hosted the video, and unblocked them when it was removed.

“Big social media companies have a responsibility to take every possible action to ensure their technology products are not exploited by murderous terrorists,” Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison said in a statement.

“It should not just be a matter of just doing the right thing. It should be the law.”

Despite this, the laws have been criticised by industry figures for being a knee-jerk reaction, given the lack of consultation around the bill, and how swiftly the idea was rushed to law.

What the law says

The Criminal Code Amendment (Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Material) Bill requires internet companies remove “abhorrent violent material” from their platforms, defined as the streaming of terrorism, murder, attempted murder, torture, rape, and kidnapping on social media.

If companies don’t remove the content within a “reasonable time” they could face fines of 10 percent of their annual turnover. The law also threatens jail time, of a maximum of three years, to individuals who are found guilty.

Companies around the world are also required to notify the Australian Federal Police if they are hosting “abhorrent violent material” which originates from Australia on their platforms within this undefined “reasonable time.”

It’s unclear exactly how much time companies are given to remove the content. The circumstances could vary, depending on how much content needs to be removed, and the capabilities of the company to do so.

Laws passed without ‘meaningful consultation’

DIGI, an industry group which represents Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, and Verizon Media in Australia, said the laws were passed without “meaningful consultation.” 

It added the laws do nothing to address hate speech, which it points to as the “fundamental motivation” for the Christchurch terrorist attack. 

“Let’s be clear: no one wants abhorrent content on their websites, and DIGI members work to take this down as quickly as possible,” Sunita Bose, managing director of DIGI, said in a statement.

“But with the vast volumes of content uploaded to the internet every second, this is a highly complex problem that requires discussion with the technology industry, legal experts, the media and civil society to get the solution right — that didn’t happen this week.”

“This is a highly complex problem that requires discussion with the technology industry.”

Bose said Australia’s laws are out of step with the notice and take down regimes operated in the U.S. and Europe, and encourage “companies to proactively surveil the vast volumes of user-generated content being uploaded at any given minute.”

But some say Australia’s laws ignore how the internet works, like Lucie Krahulcova, policy analyst for Australia and Asia Pacific at digital rights organisation Access Now.

“Overall, this is the most recent incident in a downhill trend to ram through short-sighted and reactionary legislation that will hurt individuals, undermine the economy, and place Australia alongside repressive governments around the world,” Krahulcova said.

“This approach is totally out of place in a functioning democracy. This signals a green-light to all governments who consider human rights as an afterthought and a byline to follow suit.”

Whether or not Australia’s laws will prove effective remains to be seen. In a statement on Wednesday, Digital Rights Watch chair Tim Singleton Norton warned that the laws would create unintended consequences.

“The reality here is that there is no easy way to stop people from uploading or sharing links to videos of harmful content,” he said.

“No magic algorithm exists that can distinguish a violent massacre from videos of police brutality.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TVuOSu
via IFTTT

Australia: Fines, jail for social media firms for violent content

Australia will fine social media companies up to 10 percent of their annual global turnover and imprison executives for up to three years if violent content is not removed “expeditiously”.

The new law, passed by the country’s parliament on Thursday, is in response to the attack by a self-confessed white supremacist on two mosques in Christchurch on March 15, killing 50 people as they attended Friday prayers.

The gunman broadcast his attack live on Facebook and it was widely shared for over an hour before being removed, a timeframe Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison described as unacceptable.

“Together we must act to ensure that perpetrators and their accomplices cannot leverage online platforms for the purpose of spreading their violent and extreme propaganda – these platforms should not be weaponised for evil,” Attorney-General Christian Porter told Parliament while introducing the bill. 

Christchurch attacks: Should Facebook be commended or condemned?

The passing of the law means it is now an offence in Australia for companies, such as Facebook Inc and Alphabet’s Google, which owns YouTube, not to remove any videos or photographs that show murder, torture or rape without delay.

Companies must also inform Australian police within a “reasonable” timeframe.

“It is important that we make a very clear statement to social media companies that we expect their behaviour to change,” Mitch Fifield, Australia’s minister for communications and the arts, told reporters in Canberra after the law was passed on the parliament’s last sitting day before elections in May.

Juries will decide whether companies have complied with the timetable.

A Google spokesperson declined to comment on the legislation specifically, but said the company has already taken action to limit violent content on its platforms.

Last week, Facebook said it was exploring restrictions on who can access their live-video streaming service, depending on factors such as previous violations of the site’s community standards.

Australia’s opposition Labor party backed the legislation, but said it will consult with the technology industry over possible amendments if it wins power. 

An attempt by the minor Greens party and independent lawmakers to have the vote scrutinized by a parliamentary committee was rejected.

Critics of the legislation said the government moved too quickly, without proper consultation and consideration.

“Laws formulated as a knee-jerk reaction to a tragic event do not necessarily equate to good legislation and can have myriad unintended consequences,” said Arthur Moses, head of the Australian Law Council.

“Whistleblowers may no longer be able to deploy social media to shine a light on atrocities committed around the world because social media companies will be required to remove certain content for fear of being charged with a crime.” 

‘Long overdue’: Facebook bans white nationalism on its platforms

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Uwry4l
via IFTTT

‘Aladdin’ CinemaCon footage goes all in with Will Smith’s Genie

Disney’s remake train is still chugging along mightily, and the next stop on this nostalgia tour is Aladdin

The studio unveiled a never-before-seen clip from the upcoming remake at CinemaCon Wednesday, featuring Will Smith’s take on the much-loved number “Friend Like Me.” 

SEE ALSO: Disney’s first full ‘Aladdin’ trailer shows extended look at Will Smith in all his Genie glory

And while it’s certainly a little odd to hear Smith’s Genie boast that we’ve never had a friend like him when we literally did have a friend almost exactly like him, in 1992, Smith’s enthusiasm sells the song well enough.

The exclusive footage opens with Aladdin (Mena Massoud) in the cave of wonders, having been instructed to obtain the lamp and touch nothing else. Abu, however, picks up a red gemstone, bringing forth fire and lava all around the cave. Just as all seems to be lost, they’re whisked away by a magic carpet.

Back on solid ground, Aladdin examines the lamp and notices something swirling inside. As he rubs off the dust to get a closer look, an enormous blue genie emerges. “Oh great one who summons me, terrible one who commands me, I stand by your oath, loyal to your wishes three,” he booms.

Aladdin barely has time to be intimidated before the Genie assures him that he’s kidding, magics a drum set and a trumpet for Abu, launching into “Friend Like Me.” 

Those concerned by Smith’s blue Genie look may be relieved to hear that it actually looks just fine in this context.

By the end, Aladdin and Genie find themselves dancing in a cave full of animals and fireworks, until Genie magics everything back to the way it was. “You can clap now,” he says, miming a mic drop.

The video then transitioned into a sizzle reel of other scenes from the movie: Aladdin asking Jasmine (Naomi Scott) to trust him and join him on the magic carpet ride, Jasmine’s tiger licking Aladdin’s face, Jasmine and her friends dancing at a ball, Aladdin sprinting across rooftops in a high-speed chase.

In contrast to The Lion King, Aladdin seems less like a shot-for-shot recreation of its ’90s original than an attempt to recapture some of its energy. 

It approximates the colorful freneticism of the original number, cycling through eye-poppingly bizarre scenarios so fast we can barely keep up — but the specific details of those scenes are different. 

Likewise, Smith’s performance seems to owe a lot to Robin Williams’, but feels more straightforward, relying less on wacky voices and impressions and more on Smith’s easy charisma. 

Those concerned by Smith’s blue Genie look may be relieved to hear that it actually looks just fine in this context, perhaps because it’s no stranger than anything else on display in this sequence. 

Here’s hoping it works just as well in the rest of Aladdin. The film opens May 24.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2YNI6UQ
via IFTTT

Elon Musk’s favorite Autopilot feature just got updated

Elon Musk let us know earlier this year that when he drives, he uses Tesla’s semi-autonomous driving system called Autopilot. For the the electric car company CEO, the “Navigate on Autopilot” feature makes highway traffic somewhat bearable. 

Musk will be happy to know that on Wednesday, the lane-changing suggestions from the car’s computer system just got easier to use.

Instead of approving the suggestions to change lanes or get over to make a highway exit every single time, you can now change the settings before you drive. You used to have to utilize the turn stalk to confirm the lane change suggested by Navigate. Tesla says that 9 million suggested lane changes have happened since the feature came out in October. Now, three new Autopilot settings: “Enable at start of every trip,” “Require lane change confirmation,” and “Lane change notification” give more streamlined options on how the highway assistance tool works.

If you select “no” on “require confirmation,” the car will go ahead and make the lane changes and adjustments. If you choose to have notifications, you’ll get a chime, visual notification, and for some car models, a vibration on the steering wheel about the upcoming change. No matter how you configure the settings, you always have the option to cancel the suggestion on the screen or with your turn signal. 

Someone like Musk might choose to have the tool turn on any time they’re on the highway (Navigate on Autopilot can only be used on freeways in certain places) and using the navigation system. No need to turn it on. 

It’s tempting to call this an autonomous feature but Tesla is firm that this still requires drivers pay attention, check surroundings, and make sure their hands are detected on the wheel. It won’t work otherwise. It’s still up to the driver to override any of the car’s decisions, especially if they see something. 

SEE ALSO: Tesla’s latest Autopilot update warns drivers about red lights

The update is available through an over-the-air update for Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability users as of Wednesday.

Also, for the haters: I love my @Tesla, and have very few problems. I got the basic model, nothing overly fancy, and it was cheaper than my minivan!

— Sheryl Crow (@SherylCrow) April 3, 2019

This might not be an update for Tesla owners like singer Sheryl Crow, who tweeted Wednesday that she has the “basic model, nothing overly fancy.” Autopilot is an additional $3,000 while ordering the car or $4,000 to add the semi-autonomous feature after you have the car. So we’d wager her basic Tesla doesn’t have the driver assistance, although it does sound like she could use some help with her car.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TWII6W
via IFTTT

Ex Nissan boss Ghosn arrested on new financial misconduct charges

Former Nissan chief Carlos Ghosn has been re-arrested in Tokyo on fresh financial misconduct allegations.

Authorities arrested the 65-year-old less after he was dramatically freed on bail last month following more than 100 days in detention.

According to local media, prosecutors entered Ghosn’s temporary accommodation in central Tokyo early on Thursday morning and he left with them by car shortly afterwards.

The arrest, which Ghosn termed “outrageous and arbitrary”, was the latest twist in a case that has gripped Japan and the business world since November.

“It is part of another attempt by some individuals at Nissan to silence me by misleading the prosecutors. Why arrest me except to try to break me? I will not be broken,” he said, insisting that he is innocent. 

Ex-Nissan chief Carlos Ghosn says he didn’t hide money

Reports emerged on Wednesday that prosecutors were weighing rearresting Ghosn as they investigate claims related to at least $32m in Nissan funds transferred to a distributor in Oman.

The former high-flying executive already faces three charges of financial misconduct related to allegations he under-reported his compensation and sought to transfer personal investment losses to Nissan’s books.

He has denied any wrongdoing and took to Twitter for the first time on Wednesday, using a newly created account that his spokespeople confirmed was authentic, to announce plans for a news conference.

“I’m getting ready to tell the truth about what’s happening. Press conference on Thursday, April 11,” said the tweet, sent in English and then Japanese.

A Nissan spokesperson said the firm’s internal probe had uncovered “substantial evidence of blatantly unethical conduct” and that their focus was on “addressing weaknesses in governance that enabled this misconduct.”

Ghosn currently faces two separate charges of deferring his salary to the tune of nine billion yen ($81m) and not revealing this in official documents to shareholders. 

The Brazil-born auto sector pioneer, widely credited with saving Nissan from the brink of bankruptcy, also faces a charge of seeking to shift personal investment losses onto Nissan’s books and then using company funds to pay a Saudi associate who stumped up collateral for him.

Ghosn was first arrested at a Tokyo airport on November 19. He has since been re-arrested on multiple occasions over a series of allegations, employed a little-used article of Japanese law to force a day in court and emerged on bail dressed in a workman’s uniform and cap in a bizarre attempt to avoid the media.

Nissan and Mitsubishi Motors ousted Ghosn as chairman following his arrest while he stepped down as chairman and chief executive of Renault in January. 

Nissan is set to hold an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting on Monday to remove Ghosn from the board and bring in Renault’s new chairman Jean-Dominique Senard as a new member.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2YOVUhG
via IFTTT

Democrats hit Trump on taxes, Mueller and finances in 1 day


Rep. Bill Pascrell

Rep. Bill Pascrell: “For much of his adult life, Trump has used his power to shield himself from scrutiny or accountability. Subjecting his tax records to sunlight can finally hold him to both.” | J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo

Congress

Lawmakers and aides say the three-prong attack was an accident, not some secret plan.

In a single day, House Democrats demanded President Donald Trump’s tax returns for six years, moved to get a decade’s worth of his financial records and prepared to issue a subpoena for the full Mueller report from the Justice Department.

Top House Democratic lawmakers and aides say the triple-headed attack was more by accident than design, but it’s also clear that April 3 marks a turning point for the new Democratic majority. In less than eight hours, House Democrats moved to an all-out investigative assault on Trump, one that the White House and Republican leaders blasted as unnecessary, openly partisan and a huge distraction from the country’s business.

Story Continued Below

House Democrats, though, see investigating Trump — even if special counsel Robert Mueller didn’t find clear-cut evidence of illegal behavior or collusion in his Russia inquiry — as their overriding duty.

Trump was immediately dismissive of the request by Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, to the IRS for six years of his personal and business tax returns. Trump fell back on the argument that he was still under audit, yet also signaled that he wasn’t in any mood to comply with the Democratic demand.

“Is that all? We are under audit, despite what people said, and working that out,” Trump told reporters. “I’m always under audit, it seems, but I’ve been under audit for many years because the numbers are big, and I guess when you have a name, you’re audited. But until such time as I’m not under audit, I would not be inclined to do it.” Under IRS policy, sitting presidents and vice presidents are audited.

But Neal said the request was well within his committee’s rights, and he urged the IRS to comply by an April 10 deadline.

“I today submitted to IRS Commissioner [Charles] Rettig my request for six years of the president’s personal tax returns as well as the returns for some of his business entities,” Neal said in a statement. “We have completed the necessary groundwork for a request of this magnitude and I am certain we are within our legitimate legislative, legal, and oversight rights.”

Neal added: “I take the authority to make this request very seriously, and I approach it with the utmost care and respect. This request is about policy, not politics; my preparations were made on my own track and timeline, entirely independent of other activities in Congress and the administration.”

Some of the most hardline Democrats on Ways and Means were overjoyed by Neal’s move, saying Trump’s tax returns should have been released months or even years earlier, as other presidents had done.

“Americans have a right to know if their president is compromised or corrupt,” Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) said. “For much of his adult life, Trump has used his power to shield himself from scrutiny or accountability. Subjecting his tax records to sunlight can finally hold him to both.”

Pascrell insisted that Democrats were “prepared legally and morally.”

“If they want a fight,” he said, “they’ll get a fight.”

House and Senate Republicans strongly objected to Neal’s move, calling it an attempt to “weaponize” Congress’ tax panels.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) slammed “political fishing expeditions” and said he wouldn’t support Neal’s request. Like the Ways and Means Committee, Senate Finance can request any individual‘s tax returns.

“I think a person like me that’s had an equal opportunity approach to oversight, treating Republican administrations the same as Democratic administrations, speaks for itself,” Grassley said in a statement. “So, I will not go along with efforts to weaponize the authority of tax-writing committees to access tax returns for political purposes. Such an action would be unprecedented.”

Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas, the top Republican on Ways and Means, was even more blunt in his objections: “This particular request is an abuse of the tax-writing committees’ statutory authority, and violates the intent and safeguards of Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code as Congress intended.”

Neal’s IRS letter came just hours after Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), chairman of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, said Trump’s accounting firm asked the panel to issue a subpoena before sending lawmakers 10 years of his financial records. Cummings said the firm intended to turn over the documents once it got the subpoena, a move that he promised would happen quickly.

“They have told us that they will provide the information pretty much when they have a subpoena,” Cummings said. “And we’ll get them a subpoena.”

Cummings had formally requested the documents in a March letter that referenced aspects of earlier testimony from Michael Cohen, Trump’s former attorney and fixer, before the Oversight Committee. Cummings had asked the firm to turn over the information by Wednesday.

The Maryland Democrat’s comments came shortly after the Judiciary Committee green-lighted a subpoena for the full Mueller report, a move that is also likely to trigger a legal confrontation between the White House and Congress, but one that Democrats insist is necessary.

“We must make it harder for future presidents to behave this way,” Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said as his panel voted to give him the power to subpoena the full report. “We need a full accounting of the president’s actions to do that work.”

Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), the ranking member on Judiciary, rejected the Democratic move as pure political grandstanding.

“Without facts on their side, Democrats have put all their hope in optics,” Collins said.

Rep. Dan Kildee (D-Mich.), who sits on the House Ways and Means Committee, said the trifecta of Democratic oversight moves on Wednesday was purely coincidental.

“It was simply a matter of the work that the chairman has been doing being completed,” Kildee said of Neal. “There was no real timing to any of this, it’s not like something was coordinated.” He added that the Democratic-led panel had spent months painstakingly crafting a legal argument that members feel confident could win in court, with extensive research and frequent consultations with the House counsel.

“The fact that we’re doing them is significant,” a senior Democratic aide added. “But the fact that we’re doing them on the same day is not. It is just accidental that it happened that way.”

House Democrats are also using their powers to go after Trump on policy. Earlier Wednesday, the House voted to formally condemn the White House’s legal efforts to dismantle Obamacare, forcing eight Republicans to go on the record opposing their own president.

Democratic leaders will also force members in the coming days to go on the record condemning Trump’s threats to close down the U.S.-Mexico border, presenting another unified front against the White House.

But it is on oversight of Trump that Democrats will get headlines, and it’s the area where their base has urged them to move aggressively.

“All three committees and the chairs made it abundantly clear they were looking for voluntary cooperation in response to their requests for information or testimony,” said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), a member of the Intelligence and Oversight committees.

“It’s a sign that there’s oversight finally in this place,” Krishnamoorthi added. “We were elected in the majority in part to act as a check and balance in addition to getting things done. … I’m not surprised about what happened today.”

Anita Kumar contributed to this report.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2TUhZaU
via IFTTT