The Last Time a President Got a Pass on a Scandal-Plagued White House

Alice Roosevelt Longworth, a writer and the eldest child of President Theodore Roosevelt, had it right when she said, “[Warren] Harding was not a bad man. He was just a slob.” Whether he knew it or not, the 29th president’s administration had been a ticking time bomb since the moment he won the presidency. He kept bad company, a group of friends and hangers-on who ran amok and enriched themselves on the Harding name. Some of the highest-profile American scandals, including Teapot Dome, happened under his watch. Sometimes he knew, sometimes he didn’t; sometimes he was a participant and other times guilty only by association. Regardless, Harding died in office on August 2, 1923, and the fact that he was still extremely popular and not yet a man in disgrace gave the Republicans a lifeline.

Harding’s vice president and successor, Calvin Coolidge, seemed a nonentity. The Nation described him as a “midget statesman” and Alice Longworth popularized an observation from her doctor that Coolidge “look[ed] as if he had been weaned on a pickle.” Upon learning that Harding died, a number of senators responded with disbelief—Henry Cabot Lodge bellowed, “My God! That means Coolidge is president!” Peter Norbeck of South Dakota said Coolidge could “no more run this big machine at Washington than could a paralytic.” And Harold Ickes, the Chicago Republican who would later play a major role in Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, disparagingly observed, “If this country has reached the state where Coolidge is the right sort of a person for president, then any office boy is qualified to be chief executive.”

Story Continued Below

But Coolidge, despite all of these expectations, sailed through his first one-year term to a smooth election in 1924. While he may have been saddled with his predecessor’s scandals, the public was more interested in enjoying the prosperity that he had also inherited. Distancing himself from the scandals and associating himself with that prosperity proved a winning strategy for Coolidge during both his campaign and his presidency. The Republican Party’s reputation did not appear to suffer from the scandals, either. In fact, it wasn’t until the stock market crash of 1929 that voters started to turn against the party.

The circumstances that allowed Coolidge’s political survival and the smooth sailing of the entire Republican Party are worth revisiting today as a different scandal-plagued president—albeit one who, unlike Coolidge, is reaping the whirlwind of his own scandals—looks to win a second term during relatively prosperous times.

***

It was only a matter of weeks into his term before Coolidge suspected that trouble was brewing. It took just three months from the time of Harding’s funeral for the scandals to break. The first to explode was the Veterans’ Bureau, which during Harding’s time had wielded an enormous amount of influence with a $500 million budget and 30,000 jobs to dish out. Its previous secretary, Charles Forbes, had been involved in a lucrative kickback scheme in which he pillaged his own department to spruce up his ranch. Terrified of the embarrassment this could mean for the administration, Harding quietly asked Forbes to resign and then asked him to leave for Europe, from where he resigned, so as not to attract attention. The plan was not entirely successful, however, as details began to trickle out, which resulted in a Senate investigation of Forbes on March 2, 1923. But like all things, the coverup is sometimes as bad as the crime, and Harding must have been deeply concerned that the Senate would learn he had pushed the scandal under the rug. The Senate spent six months gathering facts and finished just at the time Harding died. Three months later, Forbes returned from Europe to stand trial. He was convicted and sentenced to a $10,000 fine and two years in prison.

The Forbes scandal was a hiccup, but not an insurmountable challenge for Coolidge. Harding had done enough and justice had been served, so the president could tell a story of accountability and move on so long as it remained an isolated incident. Unfortunately, it didn’t.

The next shoe to drop was Teapot Dome, which until Watergate would be considered the greatest political scandal in U.S. history. The scandal centered around three oilfields that in 1909 had been legally allocated to the United States Navy—a safeguard against possible shortage of oil in time of emergency. They were Naval Reserve No.1, at Elk Hills, California; No. 2, at Buena Vista, California; and No. 3, at Teapot Dome, Wyoming.

Harding’s interior secretary, Albert Fall, had his own plan and had persuaded Harding to transfer authority over the reserves to his department. Rather than receive competing bids for the leases of the reserves, he would sole-source the leases under a national security justification. He would then lease the three reserves to three separate friends with terms that were disproportionately favorable to the oil companies. The punch line of Fall’s scheme was that by making the oil companies richer, he would earn kickbacks in the form of no-interest loans, Liberty Bonds, livestock and cash that would make him a very rich man. Fall would then retire from government and use the money to build out his Three Rivers Ranch in New Mexico.

When the scandal emerged, Coolidge, who had heard whisperings while serving as vice president, quickly understood the implications of Teapot Dome but didn’t realize in the initial months of his presidency that the scandal went all the way up to his predecessor. He just knew he had some shady characters in the Cabinet and some housecleaning was in order. The former Interior secretary was damaged goods, and it was becoming increasingly clear that both the Navy secretary and the attorney general were equally complicit. He would deal with these individuals, but he needed to simultaneously ensure that any further investigation remained bipartisan so as not to taint him or the Republican Party going into the election.

The appointment of a bipartisan commission was a stroke of political genius. It implicated both Democrats and Republicans and achieved the more important goal of playing for time as the various trials dragged out long enough to avoid impact on the election. That June, the commission called for the prosecution of Fall and his cronies, but most convictions and subsequent sentencing occurred after the election. By that point, the public had largely lost interest and moved on. Albert Fall was less fortunate, as he earned the distinction of being the first Cabinet secretary in U.S. history to serve prison time.

The third major scandal to break—this time at the Department of Justice—had the most sweeping implications for Harding’s legacy and was potentially the most threatening to Coolidge’s election prospects. Attorney General Harry Daugherty was a shady, crooked individual who abused his office repeatedly and unabashedly for personal gain. He personally ran a bootlegging operation in which his henchmen accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars from bootleggers in exchange for immunity, which was not always granted.

Daugherty also ran the Justice Department as a ruthless tyrant and drew the ire of many enemies. As attorney general, he obstructed justice, most notably during the Teapot Dome investigations. When, on February 20, 1924, Montana Senator Burton Wheeler introduced a resolution specifically calling for an investigation of the attorney general, Daugherty responded—or at least the FBI chief did on his behalf—by harassing him both publicly and privately. As Wheeler pursued the investigation, witnesses were physically intimidated, had their rooms ransacked and their documents stolen, all with the goal of preventing them from testifying. When that failed to halt Wheeler, Daugherty manufactured bribery charges against him in his home state of Montana.

Daugherty’s misdeeds eventually caught up with him and while he escaped prosecution—mainly because some of the key figures had mysteriously died or committed suicide—Coolidge had had enough. Harding may have been blinded by loyalty, but Coolidge knew exactly who Daugherty was and pushed him out on March 28, 1924.

By mid-1924, Coolidge was forced to confront the undeniable truth behind many of the accusations, particularly the suggestion that senior members of the Cabinet had been deeply involved. This was a dilemma for the new president, who in addition to having been at least nominally part of Harding’s Cabinet had retained his advisors. So much had unfolded in just his first few months as president and now, with the 1924 presidential election fast approaching, Coolidge knew he had to distance himself from his predecessor. Harding had been good to him, but the scandals occurred on his watch, and it was much easier for a dead man’s head to roll.

With Harding unable to defend himself and those responsible for the many scandals hardly eager to out themselves, Coolidge didn’t wait long to throw his dead predecessor under the bus. It was a good strategy. Not only did he get a free pass on the scandals, but the more the press and some politicians attempted to connect him and his administration to the past, the more unpopular such opponents became. Perhaps the greatest victim was John W. Davis, the 1924 Democratic presidential nominee, who foolishly misread the public and tried to connect Coolidge to the Harding scandals. He paid a heavy political price at a time when the electorate found this in poor taste.

Coolidge didn’t have to lift a finger to win the 1924 presidential election with the second-largest popular vote in Republican history. It was fortunate, too, as the unexpected death of his son left him too emotionally distraught to campaign. But as William Allen White observed: “In a fat and happy world, Coolidge is the man of the hour. Why tempt fate by opposing him.” His ascension to the presidency in 1923 fulfilled the country’s desire for a return to normalcy, making for an easy case to the American people that they should “Keep It Cool with Coolidge” and vote for a continuation of prosperity—even as scandal after scandal was continuing to land on the morning newspapers.

***

If the Coolidge presidency seemed uneventful, it’s because it was. He bickered a bit with Congress, but by and large he sat back and let the good times roll. The country, intoxicated with the perks of prosperity, mortgaged its future at every level as it marched blindly toward the greatest economic catastrophe in history.

Meanwhile, the late president lay six feet underground and was saddled with the growing reputational damage that came with each new revelation. When it came time to dedicate his memorial on July 4, 1927, President Coolidge was “too busy,” lest he risk any association with his radioactive predecessor. Nan Britton’s publication of The President’s Daughter dealt the dead president a devastating blow as she detailed their torrid affair in 440 pages of salacious anecdotes of sex and scandal. Successive biographies and autobiographies followed, each deepening the narrative of Harding’s failure. In many respects, Warren Harding became a lightning rod for the Republican Party. All that was bad was attributed to the late president, while all that was good and prosperous could be associated with Republican policies.

Harding was undoubtedly flawed and a failure of a president, but his death was exploited in the most Machiavellian terms by the very political opportunists he had elevated. Harding was corrupt, but so were many others in the Republican Party. His tragic death probably saved the party from implosion by giving it a fall guy. Had he survived, it all would have exploded just as he was gearing up for reelection, and unlike Coolidge he would have had no way to escape. There were simply too many scandals involving too many cronies and public servants, and had he not died it is unlikely he would have finished his term in office.

Not only did Coolidge not suffer the political consequences of his predecessor’s scandals, but the prosperous times similarly insulated the entire party against voters’ discontent—at least until the end of the decade.

It was tempting for Coolidge to consider a run in 1928, and at the time the country was so prosperous that he probably could have won. The 1920s was the Republican era, a period in which the prosperity was so great that it overshadowed the man in the White House. The party cared little if the president was Calvin Coolidge or Herbert Hoover, so long as he was Republican and the party could build on its political endowment. Little did they know that this political endowment was resting on a far shakier foundation than they realized. The approach was nearsighted, and as the writer Henry “H.L.” Mencken observed at the time, “[Coolidge’s] chief feat during five years and seven months in office was to sleep more than any other President—to sleep more and say less … While he yawned and stretched the United States went slam-bang down the hill—and he lived just long enough to see it fetch up with a horrible bump at the bottom.”

Harding, Coolidge and Hoover had all been architects of the policy that put American business first. Each bears responsibility for rebuffing demands to regulate the financial sector and for permitting rampant stock market speculation. Both the financial sector and the stock market were in dire need of regulation, and we know in hindsight that the trickle-down effect of booming economic times had created a bubble that was ready to burst. The success of the economy was in fact widening income inequality and further depressing the persisting agricultural crises. In truth, it all could have come crashing down during any one of the three presidents’ administrations. But by a stroke of bad luck and opting into a continuation of the same policies, Herbert Hoover was left holding the bag and to navigate the impossible.

Hoover’s election in 1928 was seen as a vote for prosperity, and by all accounts he had the right pedigree to continue the momentum. As a star member of both the Harding and Coolidge Cabinets, in which he served as Commerce secretary, Hoover distinguished himself as both a savvy and competent executive. With the country’s economy continuing to boom and a nasty anti-Catholic campaign targeted at the Democratic nominee, Al Smith, Hoover had an easy time winning in a massive landslide that even flipped some Democratic, Southern states.

The celebration was short-lived. Less than a year after taking office, calamity hit. As the market crashed in October 1929, so too did the Republican era of good and plenty.

Excerpted from Accidental Presidents: Eight Men Who Changed America by Jared Cohen (Simon & Schuster, April 9, 2019).

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IjiBF1
via IFTTT

A tiny computer dreams of becoming a cowboy in this adorable animation

This is One Good Thing, a weekly column where we tell you about one of the few nice things that happened this week.


Do androids dream of electric sheep? Who knows — but tiny computers certainly dream of bitmap horses! 

At least this computer does. In an animation titled “a computer dreams of being a cowboy,” your heart will take the hardest hit to the feels from an inanimate object since The Little Toaster

SEE ALSO: Mainline 90s nostalgia with the forgotten cartoon channels of YouTube

This short animation is the work of illustrator, musician, and storyboard artist Louie Zong. In it, the digital dream of a computer sings his longing for another life of riding horses and yeehaw-ing, set to the tune of “Take Me Home, Country Roads” by John Denver. 

It even changes one of the lyrics “West Virginia, mountain mama,” to “I’ve seen a bitmap, but not for real” just to drive home his little heart’s yearning. Ouch. 

Zong used a virtual singer software to create the robotic vocals, which he’s previously done for an animation about a similarly forlorn yet hopeful computer, “hello world.” 

We suggest you check out his other work if you’re into bright, chiptune-y melodies and animations that are filled with heartwarming characters on incredible journeys. 

In the meantime, we’ll be here trying to find a way to get this little rootin-tootin computer to the country roads. 01011001 01100101 01100101 01101000 01100001 01110111 0001010 (Yeehaw.) 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2TWYoXW
via IFTTT

Is oil money fuelling war in South Sudan?

Hundreds of thousands of people have been killed since South Sudan’s civil war began in December 2013, and millions more have been forced to flee their homes.

On one side of the conflict are troops and militias backing President Salva Kiir. On the other, those supporting former Vice President Riek Machar.

A peace deal was signed in 2018 to end the war, but the situation is far from settled, with atrocities having been committed by both sides, and continued fighting between the government and armed groups.

In February 2019, the United Nations Human Rights Council released a report describing what it believes is funding the war: the country’s rich oil industry.

It says that the state-owned Nilepet oil company “has diverted oil revenues which should be shared with states into the coffers of elites in the government,” and that its operations “have been characterised by a total lack of transparency and independent oversight.”

South Sudan is floating on oil. South Sudan is full of oil. Only 12 percent of the whole country is explored.

Ezekiel Lol Gatkuoth, South Sudan’s minister of petroleum

According to the report, “oil revenues and income from other natural resources have continued to fund the war, enabling its continuation and the resulting human rights violations.”

The country’s oil sector is supervised by the minister of petroleum, Ezekiel Lol Gatkuoth, who denies the UN‘s allegations and others.

“I have been in the Ministry of Petroleum since 2016 and I can assure you there is no single dollar that has been used to buy arms in the ministry and even in the country,” he told Al Jazeera. “The focus is peace, peace, peace. We are not investing in war and we will not at all invest in war … Nilepet has not been financing any activities that is related to violence in the country.” 

He says that expanding the country’s oil production – oil makes up 60 percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) and almost all of its exports – and attracting foreign investors, will increase the money available for development projects.

“Now myself and my colleagues in the government, we are also working to make sure that the production is increased, and we resume the oil blocks that has been dormant for the last five years, this is also going to be translated into money, so that we can have more money and then we will provide services to the people of South Sudan,” he said.

But with a lack of transparency – one organisation obtained secret documents suggesting that Nilepet paid $80m to war-related officials and activities over a 15-month period beginning in March 2014 – the concern is that these expansions would simply deepen corruption.

South Sudan ranks 178 out of 180 countries on Transparency International’s corruption index. But Gatkuoth says South Sudan’s president has initiatives to address these issues.

“Corruption is everywhere in the world but the most important thing is how you deal with it,” he said.

“People are being dismissed, people are being held accountable … We have been actually really targeting people who have been actually involved in corruption and they are in jail and they are prosecuted. To me, the president is doing exactly the right thing and we are open book. In the Ministry of Petroleum or Finance or the whole government, we are open book.”

Source: Al Jazeera

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2YThlhW
via IFTTT

Five years after West Africa’s Ebola pandemic: Where are we now?

Yusuf Kabba is a 30-year-old teacher living in Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone. 

He is softly spoken and confident but there was a time when he was depressed and felt isolated.

“I spent a lot of time alone trying to deal with what had happened to me. I had major body issues and I was also dealing with losing friends and relatives, some died in front of me.”

He is one of the tens of thousands of Ebola survivors who have been struggling to rebuild their lives since the virus struck West Africa in 2014. 

He was a single, carefree 25-year-old student when he fell ill in October 2014.

It took him months to recover from the disease.

Many Ebola survivors experience side effects including vision problems, tiredness and male infertility.

Although he was lucky to survive and not face stigma from his community, he was mentally and physically traumatised by Ebola.

Kabba is the head of the Association of Ebola Survivors. The organisation has over 4,000 members who attempted and failed to sue the former government of Sierra Leone, led by President Ernest Bai Koroma, for violating the human rights of its citizens during the outbreak.

“I remember, one day the health workers sat in front of us and refused to work,” said Kabba. “They said they were waiting for the government to give them their health allowance and protective clothing. I was with other patients, we were suffering, in a lot of pain but they said they could not help us.”

The case was rejected by the regional ECOWAS Court in Nigeria’s capital Abuja on March 1.

Healthcare workers adjust gear before they enter a room where there is a baby suspected of dying of Ebola in Beni, North Kivu Province of the Democratic Republic of Congo, December 13, 2018 [Goran Tomasevic/Reuters]

It accused Koroma’s administration of misappropriating $42m of Ebola funding, much of which came from the international community to assist with the crisis.

Their claim was strengthened by a 2015 internal government audit carried out by Sierra Leone’s auditor general who found that a third of resources allocated to fight Ebola in 2014 could not be properly accounted for. It added that proper use of the funds could have saved more lives.

Nearly 4,000 people died in Sierra Leone and around 250 of them were healthcare workers. 

“We believe as victims that part of the money could have been used to help us in our recovery. Our lives were changed, some are still dying from complications, many are traumatised and so many orphans need care. They violated our right to health and our right to life,” said Kabba.

The current government of Julius Maada Bio was not in office during the Ebola pandemic. 

Reacting to the ECOWAS Court ruling, a government spokesman said more would be done to help the survivors affected by Ebola during the outbreak.

Tens of thousands affected

The 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa is the largest since 1976 when the virus was first discovered in what is now the Democratic Republic of Congo.

By the time it was declared over in 2016, more than 28,000 people had “confirmed, probable and suspected cases” and more than 11,000 had died. At least 10,000 survivors were registered in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. Thousands of them included orphans many of whom are caring for themselves today.

Medical teams with Doctors without Borders, known by their French initials MSF, in West Africa were the first to sound the warning in early 2014, after the World Health Organization (WHO) reported the first case in December 2013 in Guinea.

The patient was an 18-month-old boy from a small village on the Guinea-Sierra Leone border. He is believed to have been infected by bats.

WHO believes the virus was brought into Sierra Leone in January 2014 by a woman who had been visiting the boy’s home when he fell sick.

At least 639 people have died from Ebola in eastern DRC since August [Al-hadji Kudra Maliro/AP]

Dr Axelle Ronsse is MSF’s emergency director for the Democratic Republic of Congo, a country which has had more than 10 Ebola outbreaks in 40 years.

Ronsse is coordinating MSF, and local teams, managing the current outbreak in DRC. She says it was frustrating when the United Nations, WHO and local health officials refused to act on their calls for help to contain the virus in Guinea. 

“The response was that MSF is always eager to sound the alarm. By the time the agencies and local health ministries acted, it was too late.”

Ebola was not known in the three affected countries and the early response in Sierra Leone has been described as chaotic and confused.

Brigadier General Foday Sahr was the head of the Medical Wing of the Sierra Leone Army.

He says it is unfortunate that Ebola was not taken seriously until it reached the densely populated capital. By then, his unit was tasked with setting up a surveillance system to ensure the sick were confined.

“We realised very quickly that we had poor health systems and needed to strengthen them.”

Five years after the outbreak, Shar is cautiously optimistic that Sierra Leone would cope if Ebola returned today.

“The government is investing more in health services, but we need more investment in doctors and nurses. Unfortunately, the emphasis on basic hygiene like hand washing is fading away. The practice of minimal contact is also forgotten.”

Kabba, the head of the Association of Ebola Survivors, is less optimistic and fears Ebola could return. He does not believe the country is any better prepared today than it was in 2014.

“We still have poor sanitation in Freetown, the water facilities at public institutions that were in place during Ebola are no longer used or they’ve been removed. People still spend time with and touch the bodies of dead relatives even though we stopped this burial practice during Ebola.”

He says there are few clinics in Freetown and healthcare services are still largely unavailable to people in rural areas. 

Meanwhile, MSF continues to monitor some of the survivors three years after the countries were declared Ebola-free. 

“The last patient was born at the end of the outbreak and she is now four years old and healthy.”

The NGO believes that although the healthcare systems in the three nations took a battering, they are now better prepared to detect Ebola earlier should it return. There is now greater emphasis on developing relationships with local communities as early as possible.

MSF doctor Ronsse says this has meant that healthcare workers have been able to start on vaccinations to prevent the spread of the virus and use experimental drugs on the sick.

The new treatment centres allow closer contact with patients, who must be isolated.

Heavy-duty protective wear used during the 2014-2016 pandemic has been modified to include clear plastic gloves, so health workers can be nearer to patients without putting themselves at risk.

In Sierra Leone, Kabba remains disappointed by the ECOWAS Court ruling and says the case was not brought to seek financial compensation, but to receive acknowledgement from the authorities that they failed their citizens during the Ebola pandemic. 

It appears that he just may get that acknowledgement soon, after the new government recently indicated that it is willing to sit down for the first time with survivors to listen to their concerns. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G4pJUl
via IFTTT

US ‘to label Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist group’

The United States is expected to designate Iran‘s elite Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) a terrorist organisation, the Wall Street Journal reported citing unnamed officials.

The move would mark the first time Washington formally labels another country’s military a terrorist group.

The decision, which critics warn exposes US military and intelligence officials to similar actions by unfriendly governments abroad, is expected to be announced by the US State Department as early as Monday, the officials told the Wall Street Journal. 

The change of designation has been rumoured for years. 

The Pentagon declined comment and referred queries to the State Department. The State Department and White House also declined to comment. 

The Iranian mission to the United Nations did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, a strident Iran critic, has advocated for the change in US policy as part of the Trump administration’s tough posture toward Tehran. 

The announcement would come ahead of the first anniversary of President Donald Trump‘s decision to pull out of a 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran and to reimpose sanctions that had crippled Iran’s economy. 

The United States has already blacklisted dozens of entities and people for affiliations with the IRGC, but the organisation as a whole is not. 

The latest sanctions were imposed in March on a network of companies and individuals said to be transferring billions of dollars and euros to IRGC.

In 2007, the US Treasury designated the IRGC’s Quds Force, its unit in charge of operations abroad, “for its support of terrorism,” and has described it as Iran’s “primary arm for executing its policy of supporting terrorist and insurgent groups”.

Implications of move

Iran has warned of a “crushing” response should the US goes ahead with the designation. 

IRGC commander Mohammad Ali Jafari warned in 2017 that if Trump went ahead with the move “then the Revolutionary Guards will consider the American army to be like Islamic State all around the world”. 

Such threats are particularly ominous for US forces in places such as Iraq, where Iran-aligned Shia militia are located in close proximity to US troops. 

Republican Senator Ben Sasse said the move would be an important step in the US’s maximum pressure campaign against Tehran. “A formal designation and its consequences may be new, but these IRGC butchers have been terrorists for a long time,” Sasse said in a statement. 

“There are legitimate arguments both ways, but there are definitely second and third-tier level (implications) that have to be considered,” a US official told the Wall Street Journal.

Those who have argued against the move, “think those second and third-tier levels haven’t been fully considered”.

“New leadership has decided to look at things differently,” added the official.

Former Under-Secretary of State and lead Iran negotiator, Wendy Sherman, said she worried about implications for US forces. 

“One might even suggest, since it’s hard to see why this is in our interest, if the president isn’t looking for a basis for a conflict,” said Sherman, who is director of the Center for Public Leadership at the Harvard Kennedy School. 

“The IRGC is already fully sanctioned and this escalation absolutely endangers our troops in the region.” 

Revolutionary Corp reach 

Set up after the 1979 Islamic Revolution to protect the Shia clerical ruling system, the IRGC is Iran’s most powerful security organisation. It has control over large sectors of the Iranian economy and has a huge influence in its political system. 

The IRGC is in charge of Iran’s ballistic missiles and nuclear programmes. Tehran has warned that it has missiles with a range of up to 2,000km, putting Israel and US military bases in the region within reach.

The IRGC has an estimated 125,000-strong military with army, navy and air units and answers to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IgklyL
via IFTTT

Lakers News: Lonzo Ball Says Father LaVar Won’t Help Choose His Next Agent

NEW YORK, NY - DECEMBER 12:  Tina Ball, Lonzo Ball, LaVar Ball, LaMelo Ball and LiAngelo Ball attend the Los Angeles Lakers Vs New York Knicks game at Madison Square Garden on December 12, 2017 in New York City.  (Photo by James Devaney/Getty Images)

James Devaney/Getty Images

Los Angeles Lakers point guard Lonzo Ball told the Los Angeles TimesTania Ganguli that his father LaVar Ball will not be involved in his search for a new agent.

Chris Haynes of Yahoo Sports reported earlier Friday that LaVar remained the “shot-caller” and that Creative Artists Agency has emerged as the front-runner to represent the 2017 second overall pick.

Lonzo and agent Harrison Gaines recently mutually agreed to part ways.

“Harrison Gaines has been a trusted advisor and close friend for many years,” Ball told ESPN’s Ramona Shelburne in a statement. “He guided my NBA career with integrity and always had my best interests at heart.”

Haynes noted LaVar was approaching agencies about the potential to get all three of his sons—Lonzo, LiAngelo and LaMelo—on the same team. Per Haynes, “most” agents became uninterested when it appeared LaVar would be running the show.

This comes less than two weeks after Shelburne and ESPN colleague Paula Lavigne reported Lonzo had cut ties with Big Baller Brand co-founder Alan Foster after $1.5 million went missing from the Lakers star’s personal and business accounts. Lonzo and Big Baller Brand are suing Foster (who owns 16.3 percent of the company), seeking $2 million in damages.

Foster had a close relationship with LaVar and the Ball family since 2010.

In the wake of the Big Baller Brand chaos, Ball took to Instagram to say he was “moving on to bigger and better” while also saying “#MyOwnMan.”

B/R Kicks @brkicks

.@ZO2_ just posted this on Instagram. Is he leaving Big Baller Brand for Nike? 👀 https://t.co/eWbW41TNlQ

Also of note, LaVar recently told TMZ Sports to ask his son if he would be leaving Big Baller Brand for Nike or another established brand: 

it appears Lonzo is truly being his own man.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2YSp9QV
via IFTTT

‘Crazy Ex-Girlfriend’ creator explains that shocking series finale

Warning: The following contains heavy spoilers for the series finale of Crazy Ex-Girlfriend. Proceed with caution.

After four seasons of delightful, moving, and occasionally infuriating musical chaos, our time with Crazy Ex-Girlfriend and the much beloved Rebecca Bunch has come to an end.

If you’re anything like me post-CXG finale, you’re struggling to reconcile a whole lot of feelings. 

On the one hand, Rebecca (the consistently excellent Rachel Bloom) has finally blossomed into the self-assured, fulfilled, ambitious, and — dare I say it — happy woman we’ve always yearned to see. The finale revealed that Rebecca, flipping the script on her big Valentine’s Day decision, closes out her story by opting out of choosing from her three suitors, instead dedicating her time to pursuing her dreams and becoming a songwriter. 

It’s a bold, heroically feminist, all-around badass decision that’s enough to make any longtime CXG fan burst into a celebratory rendition of “We’ll Never Have Problems Again.” 

And yet, on the other hand: Rebecca. Picked. No. One. (!!!)

SEE ALSO: ‘Jane the Virgin’ reveals the details of Michael’s surprise return and we’ve never been more confused

I mean, I get not picking Josh. (Who in their right mind would pick Josh?) But Rebecca rejects Nathaniel? She bails on Greg? She doesn’t even consider running into the sunset with Jason?! I just couldn’t believe it. So much of my passion for CXG was fueled by my desire for Rebecca to finally find “the one” and I was heartbroken to learn that I would never get to witness that happily ever after.

Seated at a finale screening feeling confused (and deeply grateful I hadn’t worn my #TeamGreg T-shirt), I restrained myself from belting out, “You ruined everything!” as series co-creator and general storytelling genius Aline Brosh McKenna entered the room to take questions from the audience.

Then — in a moment of direct honesty that could make even Dr. Akopian proud — Brosh McKenna set me straight.

“It’s always been a search for identity, because [Rebecca] is someone who tries on these other kinds of disguises,” Brosh McKenna explained to assembled reporters. “So her figuring out what her passion is and what she needs to pursue and what she loves and what she wants to do with her life was always the primary goal.”

“I think some shippers are gonna be mad at us, but it doesn’t seal anything off either.”

Sigh. It’s a good goal. Of course Rebecca needs time to find herself. I can admit that. If the finale’s “11 O’Clock” number serves any purpose (aside from making fans bubble over with nostalgia), it’s to emphasize just how many different iterations of this character — be it sequined or striped, happy or sad, confident or unsure —  we’ve seen. 

Rebecca needs a steadfast identity she can embrace and celebrate, untethered to a partner. She should take time to sort out her passions and coax fantasy Rebecca out into the real-world. She deserves to focus on her vocal training and piano lessons. After four seasons of hard-won growth, Rebecca has earned the right to prioritize herself and her ambitions. 

And yet, while I want that for her, I can’t help but wish she was charging into her next battle of self-discovery with one of the guys in tow — because that’s a dream she’s so desperately wanted throughout the series. I mean, doesn’t she deserve it? 

“It’s sort of not the point,” Brosh McKenna said. “The point that we’re making is when someone says, ‘Who are you?’ you don’t say, ‘I’m Mike’s wife’ or ‘I’m Tim’s girlfriend’ or ‘I’m Lisa’s girlfriend.’ You say, ‘I’m me and I do this and this is what I believe and I like tacos and I’m in a book club and these are my best friends — and I have a spouse.’ I think the idea that [romance] is a destiny and that there’s a happy ending and there’s a kiss and then you’re all set is not a good message for women or men.” 

Sigh, again. It’s a very, very good answer. The one thing Rebecca has learned for certain throughout CXG‘s run is that hanging your happiness on a partner’s validation is a futile and self-destructive gesture. Picking the guy was never the point — even when the show did everything in its power (ahem, “Love’s Not A Game“) to make us think it was.

“I think some shippers are gonna be mad at us, but it doesn’t seal anything off either,” McKenna explains. “It’s a question of who she will be compatible with in the moment that the timing is right for her and them, whoever it is.”

Okay, so she’s saying Greg and Nathaniel and (ugh) Josh still have a chance?!

“Maybe! You can enjoy the romance and enjoy the moments of connection, but not make that the destination,” Brosh McKenna dangled — adding, “I think it’s a nice set up for some fan fiction.”  

A third (and final) sigh. Over four dramatic, messy, and practically perfect seasons, Crazy Ex-Girlfriend has given us plenty of hard-to-swallow realities, but this just might be the toughest. 

Rebecca Bunch will have to find love on her own and we, her invisible but dedicated fan base, won’t be allowed to watch. Here’s hoping her new audience — the one she actually asked for and is working hard to earn — will be as happy for Rebecca as we would be when and if she finally picks her one. 

CXG: Seasons 1 – 3 can currently be found on Netflix.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Uu6FH6
via IFTTT

Russell Westbrook Becomes 1st Player to Average Triple-Double 3 Straight Seasons

Oklahoma City Thunder guard Russell Westbrook (0) gestures to the crowd in the second half of an NBA basketball game against the Los Angeles Lakers, Tuesday, April 2, 2019, in Oklahoma City. Westbrook became just the second player in NBA history to have 20 points, 20 rebounds and 20 assists in a game as the Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the Los Angeles Lakers 119-103. (AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki)

Sue Ogrocki/Associated Press

Oklahoma City Thunder star Russell Westbrook is the first player in NBA history to average a triple-double in three straight seasons.

Westbrook needed just three assists entering Friday’s game to hit the mark. He got there midway through the first quarter against the Detroit Pistons.

Bleacher Report @BleacherReport

Russ averages a triple-double for the 3rd straight season. Never done before in NBA history.

#WhyNot https://t.co/MeLGrbTT7s

OKC THUNDER @okcthunder

The Brodie’s 3rd assist tonight that set him up for #hist0ry.
@russwest44 | #WhyNot? https://t.co/1X4Ib78uY4

Westbrook’s critics have focused on what he’s not doing instead of what he can do.

Certainly, his shooting numbers leave a lot to be desired. The 2016-17 NBA MVP is tied for 24th among qualified point guards with a 42.6 field-goal percentage. His three-point percentage (28.6) is the second-worst out of 187 qualified players.

But considering there have been four seasons in NBA history where a player has averaged a triple-double, and Westbrook has three of them in three consecutive years, his accomplishment is very much worth celebrating.

With Paul George‘s struggles down the stretch following a shoulder injury, Westbrook has had to move back into the alpha role for the Thunder as they jockey for playoff positioning.

Westbrook entered Friday leading the NBA with 10.5 assists per game and also averaging 23.0 points and 11.1 rebounds.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Kc64Wo
via IFTTT

Snap just outlined its plan to fight Facebook

CEO Evan Spiegel discussed the future of the Snapchat camera at the Snap Partner Summit.
CEO Evan Spiegel discussed the future of the Snapchat camera at the Snap Partner Summit.

Image: Neilson Barnard / Getty Images for Snap Inc.

By Karissa Bell

Snap has long been known for its secretive ways. Even after going public in 2017, CEO Evan Spiegel rarely divulges much about the company publicly, save for quarterly earnings calls.

But that may be starting to change. This week, the company hosted its first big public event in its history: a one-day Partner Summit, where the company announced several new features aimed at turning the messaging app into a wider platform. 

Snap announced new camera features, a gaming platform, new developer tools, and a new lineup of original shows.

But one of the most intriguing revelations is one you’d find only from reading in between the lines of the company’s news. Snap quietly walked the public through how it plans to fight Facebook at a time when the social network seems as if it will stop at nothing to completely crush Snap. 

First, Snap laid out a detailed strategy to get users to spend more time within the app. Second, the company intends to increase Snap’s visibility elsewhere by partnering with apps like Tinder and Houseparty to share content. Finally, Snap announced the launch of a new ad network that will appear inside of other companies’ apps — and will ultimately help advertisers reach an audience far outside of the Snapchat app.

It’s a bold plan — and one that may not result in the user growth the company needs — but it gives us our clearest idea yet on how Snap sees its longterm future. 

Though the app only just began adding new users again, Snap has proved pretty successful at maintaining young users’ attention.

The most obvious takeaway is that it wants to double down on its already highly-engaged teen audience to grab even more of their time and attention. With a new slate of original shows (with teen-friendly premises like “Two Sides,” a scripted drama detailing the angst of a highschool breakup) and a new gaming platform that includes Zynga’s spin on Fortnite, Snap is clearly looking to entice its younger users. 

The same is true for its camera updates, which include new utility-driven features like the ability to solve math problems in the app. That Snap is leaning into camera-based search may seem like a head-scratcher to some, but consider the implications of Snapchat becoming a de-facto part of your math homework and it’s not hard to understand.

And, if Snapchat’s history is any indication, there’s a good chance all this will have the desired effect. Though the app only just began adding new users again, Snap has proved pretty successful at maintaining young users’ attention.

SEE ALSO: Snapchat’s new Status feature lets your friends see what exactly you’re up to

The company revealed Thursday that it reaches 75 percent of 13 to 34-year-olds, and 90 percent of 13 to 24-year-olds in the U.S. — that’s more than the share reached by Facebook or Instagram, Spiegel claimed.

Something else that could help Snapchat with its lingering growth problem: getting more visibility outside of its app. The company has been doing this with its Snap Kit developer platform for awhile now, but its new strategy with Stories is even more aggressive. By allowing Snapchat users to post Stories directly to apps like Tinder or Houseparty, Snap is showing that it’s willing to open itself up in a way that would have once been unthinkable.

Instagram may have stolen Snapchat’s thunder on Stories, but by bringing Snapchat’s Stories to other apps (and extremely popular ones at that), the company now has the chance to prove its version is still just as sticky.

Finally, on the business front, Snap announced what could end up being one of its most important updates: the Snap Audience Network, a new advertising platform that allows Snap’s advertisers to run their ads in other apps. 

It’s a move straight out of Facebook’s playbook (the social network has its own Facebook Audience Network) and one that could make Snap that much more appealing to advertisers. It won’t launch for some time still, and Snap has still not revealed details on exactly how it will work but, as Recode points out, it gives the company an opportunity to make more money even if it can’t grow its user base in a meaningful way. 

Put all of this together and Snap’s strategy starts to look much more cohesive than what many of its critics have suggested. 

Now, it’s up to Snap to prove that it can actually pull it off.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IbPaVv
via IFTTT

Elon Musk explains why there is a camera inside of the Tesla Model 3

Back in 2017 we learned that the Tesla Model 3 has an inactive camera above the rearview mirror looking into the car. Seems … creepy. Well, recently on Twitter, CEO Elon Musk revealed what that camera is doing there. 

It’s to help Tesla compete with Uber and Lyft in the future, duh. 

It’s there for when we start competing with Uber/Lyft & people allow their car to earn money for them as part of the Tesla shared autonomy fleet. In case someone messes up your car, you can check the video.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 5, 2019

So to add your vehicle to Tesla’s ride-hailing fleet, you won’t need to upgrade — there will already be a camera equipped to watch your future customers, just to make sure they’re not making a huge mess in your self-driving car. 

Waymo, which already has an autonomous taxi service in the Phoenix area, has cameras inside its modified Chrysler Pacifica mini-vans. Those are there to check for forgotten items or any damage to the vehicle, as the Verge reported after riding in the robo-car for a day.

SEE ALSO: Elon Musk’s favorite Autopilot feature just got updated

Musk knows that most people have a hard time grasping that something they buy today can work with something that doesn’t exist yet, but he promised to explain more later this month. 

That’s exactly the idea. What’s not well understood is that Tesla cars being made *today* will be able to do that for you. Just a matter of finishing the software & going through regulatory approval. Will be explained in depth via live webcast on April 22.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 5, 2019

So even though you are very much required to be in your vehicle and behind the wheel driving it today, tomorrow is a different story. 

Meanwhile, let’s really hope the cameras aren’t like those in creepy Airbnb rentals (aka secretly recording you).

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G2MFTJ
via IFTTT