Erdogan says ‘organised crimes’ took place in Istanbul vote

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Monday defended his party’s plans to demand a full recount of votes cast in mayoral elections in Istanbul, claiming that “almost all” of the voting was marred by irregularities.

Erdogan suffered a major setback in last week’s local elections after the opposition took control of the capital, Ankara, and won a tight race for Istanbul, after nearly 25 years of rule by the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and its predecessor.

Erdogan himself rose to prominence as Istanbul’s mayor in the 1990s before emerging as national leader.

A partial recount of votes – mostly of ballot papers that were previously deemed invalid – demanded by Erdogan’s party, is taking place in several Istanbul districts, but the party said it will apply to the country’s top electoral board to demand a recount of all of the ballots.

“The citizens are saying ‘protect our rights, we are seeing that organised crimes have taken place,’” Erdogan told reporters before his departure for a visit to Moscow.

Is Turkey’s president under threat?

“As a political party, we have determined that certain organized acts were carried out,” he said.

“There is an element of robbery in all of this. There was some theft at the ballot box.”

Opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) candidate Ekrem Imamoglu’s lead over the ruling party candidate, former Prime Minister Binali Yildirim, narrowed to close to 16,000 votes from the initial 25,000 votes in Istanbul on Monday, after 90 percent of the invalidated ballots were recounted.

‘Airs of victory’

Imamoglu has urged the country’s electoral board to “do its job” and confirm his election win.

But Erdogan said that “nobody has the right to put on airs of victory in a city of more than 10 million voters with a 13,000-14,000-vote lead.”

“As for the irregularities, it was not just in some places; almost all of it is irregular.”

Erdogan said when there was a problem with a margin of vote victories in other countries, appeals and even new elections were not unusual.

He added, however, that his party would accept results confirmed by the top electoral board.

The CHP candidate for mayor of Ankara, Mansur Yavas,  received a document certifying his election win and took over the municipality in a brief ceremony on Monday.

“May it be Istanbul’s turn next,” he said

After 16 years in power, Erdogan is praised by supporters who say he oversaw a period of economic growth and prosperity.

But his critics at home and among Western allies say the Turkish leader has undermined democracy by purging dissent especially in the wake of a 2016 failed coup Ankara blames on a US-based Turkish preacher.

Erdogan campaigned hard portraying the local vote for mayors and district councils as a fight for the nation’s survival, but the election became a test of AKP’s support after an economic slowdown hit Turkey.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G4jKxI
via IFTTT

What is a no-deal Brexit and how would it affect the UK?

London, United Kingdom – Fears that the UK will leave the European Union without a Brexit deal are back at the top of the agenda as the clocks tick towards a new deadline on April 12 – just days from now.

Yet despite the potential for considerable disruption, British people are being told by their government to keep calm and carry on – because contingency plans are well advanced. 

Alongside the stockpiling of food and medicines, use of motorways as lorry parks, and emergency planning by local councils, military chiefs have also been ordered to keep 3,500 troops on standby.

There are even undisclosed plans to declare martial law.

In the world’s oldest democracy, Brexiters present this as an effort to wrest democratic control from Europe.

Cynics are not convinced, pointing to secret cabinet documents about no-deal planning – codenamed Operation Yellowhammer – that were uncovered by journalists and paint a more chaotic picture.

These warn of a “critical three-month phase” after leaving the EU and “unforeseen issues and impacts” during which even the best made plans could be overwhelmed.

In a divided Britain, the prospect of “no deal” evokes both fear and enthusiasm – but how would it affect the country?

Politics

Brexit has already put the UK’s political system under strain, opening deep divisions in the two main parties, Conservative and Labour, which a no-deal scenario could bring to a head.

Experts say Brexit has also damaged perceptions of politicians, routinely ridiculed in the popular press for their failure to agree a reasonable solution.

Observers believe Brexit has empowered the far right, with long-term implications for Britain’s democracy, while also intensifying calls for political reform – especially modernisation of the old-fashioned voting system.

A no-deal Brexit could also have damaging implications for Europe itself, further straining relations with the UK’s neighbours, harming key economic partners, and potentially exacerbating populist pressures.

Economy

A no-deal Brexit would mean that there would be no “transition period” to ease the UK out of the bloc and all EU regulations would instantly cease to apply – causing disruption that some economists say could shave at least 2 percent off GDP by the end of 2020. 

The UK government would not have to pay an annual £13bn ($17bn) to the EU budget, but would also lose key subsidies such as the £3bn ($3.9bn) for farmers under the Common Agricultural Policy.

Overnight, Britain would lose the benefits of the EU’s 70 international trade deals, reverting instead to World Trade Organization (WTO) rules governing how it deals with imports and exports.

EU tariffs, VAT and a ban on food of animal origin would confront UK exporters with the same obstacles to trade as those facing other non-EU countries.

The prices of some imports, especially fresh vegetables and fruit, could soar by up to 10 percent in British shops and a likely fall in the value of the pound would further fuel inflation.

New import controls at borders could disrupt freight traffic as lorries going to and from the EU complete customs declarations, causing bottlenecks on motorways in southern England.

Higher import prices, freight delays on both sides of the Channel – and inevitable panic buying – could exacerbate shortages.

In theory, a no-deal Brexit frees up the UK to agree trade deals with other countries – something it cannot do as an EU member – but the benefits are limited, because these take years to complete. 

When it comes to financial services, EU leaders know which side their bread is buttered on – and a raft of “mini-deals” to soothe capital markets have already been agreed.

In the longer term, however, there are fears a no-deal Brexit will chill investment in the UK, hitting jobs, and that manufacturers will abandon Britain for the continent.

Some sectors could be hit hard. House prices could plummet, mobile phone roaming charges could rise, and British people will lose consumer protections for products bought in Europe.

Northern Ireland is even at risk of blackouts, because no deal would undermine the legal basis of the all-island electricity market it shares with the Irish Republic.

Security

Opponents of a no-deal Brexit fear its impact on the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Such a scenario would load pressure to enforce customs controls creating a “hard border” manned by uniformed authorities – a move that would threaten to revive old tensions.

A no-deal Brexit would cut UK access to EU criminal databases, with the counter-terrorism chief of London’s Metropolitan Police warning this would be “very bad” for policing.

And British people had better get used to their beloved queues – the EU would reciprocate on any UK border checks, leading to long delays at passport control. 

They may even have to go through airport security twice if they transfer to a connecting flight.

Citizenship

A no-deal Brexit has significant implications for expatriates – the 1.3 million Britons in EU countries and 3.7 million Europeans in Britain.

British people in the EU have been advised to register as residents, and may lose access to free or discounted healthcare.

The UK has pledged to protect the rights of EU citizens and their families in Britain – but they will need to apply for “settled status”, and the rules are stricter in a no-deal scenario.

British travellers will not need a visa to stay for 90 days in the Schengen area, but may need one if they stay longer.

And once there, they will notice important changes. It will be more expensive to use UK bank cards, they will have to pay for health insurance, and they may require an International Driving Permit.

Pet owners will no longer be able to use the existing “pet passports” that make it easy to take their animals abroad, and will have to visit a vet months in advance of travelling.

Reporting by Gavin O Toole in London

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G7AHZ5
via IFTTT

Man subscribes to BBC push notifications, immediately feels he’s being badgered by a curious child

So many questions.
So many questions.

Image: Shutterstock / StepanPopov

By Rachel Thompson

Turning on push notifications can be a very useful and informative thing to do. It can also be a very annoying addition to your existence, rather akin to being prodded by someone whose sole purpose is to inform you of horrifying news from around the world. 

But, TV comedy writer James Colley discovered that some push notifications — namely those sent by BBC Science Focus Magazine — are a bit like interacting with a child who has an incessant supply of questions about the world. 

SEE ALSO: Co – Star’s absurd push notification inspired the most dramatic meme

“I’ve accidentally set up push notifications for the BBC science magazine and it’s like being followed about by an inquisitive but annoying child,” wrote Colley on Twitter. 

I’ve accidentally set up push notifications for the BBC science magazine and it’s like being followed about by an inquisitive but annoying child pic.twitter.com/xVgCR5ivdo

— James Colley (@JamColley) April 8, 2019

Seriously though, do plants die of old age? 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2D2RXg5
via IFTTT

‘Game of Thrones’ Season 8: Which dragons will survive — if any?

At this point we’re emotionally prepared to watch nearly every person die in Game of Thrones Season 8. But there’s probably a far worse casualty of winter: the dragons. Because even if they somehow survive the Great War to come, there’s a high chance they’ll need to be killed anyway.

I deliver this theory with an extremely heavy heart. Dragons are my favorite characters on the show. The concept of having a weapon of mass destruction for a pet is so awesome that I regularly dress my dog up in a custom-made Etsy Drogon costume. Last season, I threatened to burn everyone alive if Drogon died. I wrote a whole guide on how to cope with Viserion’s death. If I had it my way, Gendry would be forging some rad Valyrian steel armor for Daenerys’ reptile babies as we speak.

But it’s increasingly looking as if the dragons will, like the White Walkers, need to be wiped out by the end of this song of ice and fire.

First, though, let’s go over some basic facts about the three dragons we know, and what we can learn about the other dragons we never met from Game of Thrones history. We will almost certainly be getting some dragon on dragon violence in Season 8, which last happened during the Dance with Dragons, the historic Targaryen civil war that began the extinction of these magical creatures.

Size matters

In the dragon versus dragon battles detailed in the recently released Targaryen history book Fire and Blood, it’s clear size matters.

Who's a big boy?!

Who’s a big boy?!

Image: hbo

As we know, Drogon is by far the biggest of Daenerys’s three dragons, while Viserion was always the smallest. In the books, he’s also the clumsiest, and the one nicest to people who aren’t his mom (hello foreshadowing). In Season 7, Drogon’s comparable to a Boeing 747 plane, Game of Thrones showrunners say. Meanwhile Viserion is roughly three times smaller, according to fan calculations

Dragons also famously never stop growing as long as they live, but that’s not true for Viserion, who is now dead. But as of Season 8, that probably won’t matter too much, since Rhaegal and Drogon won’t have much time to keep growing even if their undead brother doesn’t at all.

SEE ALSO: Everything to remember from ‘Game of Thrones’ Season 1

There’s speculation as to why Drogon is bigger, which will be relevant for when we start talking about the possibility of other dragons in the world. For one, Drogon’s egg was always the biggest. For another, it’s also believed that caging dragons stunts their growth, and Daenerys did just that to Viserion and Rhaegal in Season 4, while Drogon got to roam around Old Valyria.

That matters because both Targaryens and maesters believe dragon size is also affected by their proximity to volcanoes known as the Fourteen Flames along the Valyrian peninsula. Drogon probably got a boost from his time in the old country, and all three of them got a boost while on Dragonstone.

Something that hasn’t come up in the show, though, is that Winterfell is actually built on top of mysterious hot springs no one can explain. Northern legends speak of the heat coming from a dragon hidden beneath the crypts of Winterfell. Meanwhile maesters theorize the hot springs are connected to the Fourteen Flames.

So maybe spending time in Winterfell will help our two living dragons grow even stronger. Or maybe they’ll find another, more ancient dragon.

What we can predict about the impending dragon battles

Our favorite fan speculation about how the dragon-on-dragon violence will shake out in Season 8 is that — in a parallel to the Season 1 scene when Khal Drogo kills Viserys — the dragons with their namesakes will do the same. That means big boy Drogon will take down Viserion.

In addition, Targaryen history proves that size isn’t everything.

Speed sometimes outmatched sheer size in previous dragon vs. dragon showdowns. Age also played a role, with smaller, swifter, younger dragons besting bigger, slower, and much older dragons. But age doesn’t matter for our three dragon siblings, who hatched at the same time.

Another very important factor is the dragon’s relationship with his/her dragonrider. The more time they have to form a strong bond, the more they move as one. So that presents an interesting problem for our three presumed dragonriders in Season 8.

Daenerys has spent the most time with her mount, and is the only one who’s waged battle with him. If — as we all suspect — Jon rides Rhaegal (the dragon named after his father), he’ll have some serious catching up to do to keep up with the other two. Because the Night King arguably has the strongest psychic relationship to the creatures he raises from the dead.

What we know about ice dragons, and what Viserion is now

Season 6 showed that Dany shared a telepathic connection with her three babies. But a White Walker’s control over its resurrected wights is beyond telepathic — it’s a puppet master controlling a puppet. Also that likely means any connection Dany had with Viserion was completely severed when the Night King touched him.

There was some debate among fans whether Viserion was a wight dragon (a zombie-like mindless dead creature completely controlled by its master), or a White Walker dragon (a living, autonomous being transformed into a White Walker — like Craster’s baby in Season 4). We’re betting on the former. Which is worse, since he won’t remember mommy Dany.

Still, Viserion is in completely unknown territory. There are northern legends about ice dragons, but they are a totally different species than Daenerys’ Valyrian dragons. They are literally made of ice (the opposite of Valyrian dragons, which are “fire made flesh”), breathing ice instead of fire.

Viserion’s biology and species didn’t change after he was resurrected, but there are no records of what happens when a fire dragon’s magic is mixed with a White Walker’s ice magic. But according to io9, the Season 7 finale’s leaked script clarifies that Viserion is breathing blue flames at the Wall, not ice (making him not a real ice dragon as defined by George R. R. Martin).

Valyrian dragons are far from the only species of dragons

That brings up another fun fact we should remember about the dragons in the Game of Thrones universe: Valyrian dragons were far from the first or only types of dragons. 

Actually, some maesters believe that the “bloodmages of Valyria used wyvern stock to create dragons” (wyvern are a type of non-fire breathing lizard). So they’re not technically even real dragons, but hybrids. The Valyrians might’ve tried to create a tamable version of true dragons from the wild.

There’s rumor of a different, more ancient species of dragon still living in Asshai by the Shadow, too (which is where Melisandre is from). In the World of Ice and Fire companion book, it’s explained that:

There were dragons in Westeros, once, long before the Targaryens came, as our own legends and histories tell us. If dragons did first spring from the Fourteen Flames, they must have been spread across much of the known world before they were tamed. And, in fact, there is evidence for this, as dragon bones have been found as far north as Ib, and even in the jungles of Sothoryos. But the Valyrians harnessed and subjugated them as no one else could.

So it’s highly possible there were dragons in Westeros during the Long Night, when the White Walkers first invaded thousands of years ago (which happened before the Valyrian empire). We don’t know what happened to all those dragons — maybe they were eliminated by the White Walkers, who would not take kindly to fire-breathing weapons of mass destruction.

Maybe this isn't the first dragon the Night King ever rode ...

Maybe this isn’t the first dragon the Night King ever rode …

Image: hbo

There’s even evidence that the dragons from Asshai were used to build the Five Forts, a very similar structure to Westeros’ Wall made out of dragonglass and built after the Long Night. So it sounds like dragons played some sort of role last time the White Walkers came.

How a new dragon might rise in Season 8

We’ve already mentioned in passing a few ways that unknown dragons could emerge in Season 8. Maybe one’s been hiding out in the crypts of Winterfell. Maybe another native Westerosi dragon has been holed up elsewhere for all this time, since dragons live very, very long. Maybe Melisandre will come back from her trip in Season 7 with a dragon from Asshai.

There's lots of ice dragon imagery from the Wall in the books.

There’s lots of ice dragon imagery from the Wall in the books.

Image: hbo

In a 1999 interview, George R. R. Martin not only stated that there were once dragons everywhere, but also that: 

“There are no more dragons known to exist … but this is a medieval period, and large parts of the world are still terra incognita, so there are always tales of dragon sightings in far off mysterious places. The maesters tend to discount those.”

There are even other hints that Dany and/or Jon could summon a new dragon, because in the books Melisandre often talks of visions of a dragon rising from stone.

There’s a lot of speculation about what that actually means. She thinks it’s waking the dragon statues on Dragonstone. But fans speculate it could be an ice dragon from the Wall. Regardless, Dany and Jon’s conversation in the Season 7 finale about her being barren is a huge indication that they’ll have a baby, whether human or reptilian. 

Why the dragons need to die

But here comes the sad part. Because if we look at the history and the themes of Game of Thrones, it becomes clear that all dragons must die.

George R. R. Martin is all about showing how history repeats itself, even when (actually especially when) people have forgotten that history. This is the second time the White Walkers have risen. Daenerys is the second Targaryen with three dragons who vowed to conquer Westeros. 

We all know this isn't going to work out for either of them.

We all know this isn’t going to work out for either of them.

Image: hbo

Remember that, at the beginning of this whole story, people kept saying that magic died a long time ago. They mention the lack of White Walkers and dragons as evidence that magic is gone forever and, according to most maesters, that’s a good thing. If history is to repeat itself now though — if peace is truly to be restored to the world by the end of the series — then that means magical beings who wreak havoc and destruction need to be terminated.

And the dragons can be just as devastatingly destructive as the White Walkers.

There’s also another key piece of evidence that the dragons will need to die along with the White Walkers by the end of Season 8. And it’s to do with the irregular seasons that we’ve all accepted as just a normal part of the Game of Thrones universe.

Many times, George R. R. Martin has stated that the reason behind the irregular seasons is magical in nature, not scientific (as some have speculated). He also said that, by the end of the story, we would get an explanation for the irregular seasonal patterns. And presumably, that will involve learning how to fix it.

Songs of ice and fire have a tendency to end tragically in 'Game of Thrones.'

Songs of ice and fire have a tendency to end tragically in ‘Game of Thrones.’

Image: hbo

Despite the awe they inspire, magical beings like the dragons and White Walkers are unnatural. As we mentioned, the Valyrian dragons were unholy experiments made from blood magic. The White Walkers defy the natural cycle of death and life. 

The magical beings associated with changing temperatures and weather patterns in this song of ice and fire are: White Walkers (who literally bring winter with them) and dragons (who literally have fire-made flesh and are tied to volcanic eruptions like the Doom of Valyria). 

Don’t believe us? Consider that in the Season 6 reveal scene of how the White Walkers were created, the Children of the Forest tie a man to a weirwood tree. Thousands of years later, Bran revisits that same weirwood tree in a vision, and it’s the White Walker’s home base — now covered in snow.

Ultimately, it’s hard to believe it’s just a coincidence that, at the same time that the White Walkers return from several centuries of slumber, the first dragons are also born into the world. And George R. R. Martin famously promised the series would have a “bittersweet” ending.

What could be more bittersweet than the realization that to save the world, magic must die. And that the story we’ve watched unfold for eight seasons is about restoring natural order to a magical imbalance between ice (the White Walkers) and fire (dragons and the Lord of Light) that began ages ago.

This isn’t just the song of ice and fire coming together. It’s the song’s final notes.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2VvRlXI
via IFTTT

Theresa May attempts Brexit explainer video, gets meme’d into oblivion

Theresa May is at the centre of another meme.
Theresa May is at the centre of another meme.

Image: Jack Taylor/Getty Images

By Sam Haysom

This was only ever going to end one way, wasn’t it?

On Sunday afternoon, UK Prime Minister Theresa May released a video update on Brexit in which she addressed the camera from a sofa.

SEE ALSO: Trevor Noah roasts Brexit using multiple British accents

Clearly it was intended to be a laid back, casual attempt to distract from the confusing and deeply nightmarish hellstorm that Britain’s attempt to leave the EU has become.

Anyway, you can probably guess what happened next.

Mere hours after May’s video was posted, the parodies were rolling in.

This one splices May’s speech with the apocalyptic British movie Threads.

It wasn’t long before that quote, in particular — “Let me explain what’s happening with Brexit” — had reached full-blown meme status.

Oh dear.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2YWwRcN
via IFTTT

Samsung Galaxy S10+ can be tricked by a 3D-printed fingerprint

Disclosure

Every product here is independently selected by Mashable journalists. If you buy something featured, we may earn an affiliate commission which helps support our work.

Samsung Galaxy S10 and S10+'s in-display fingerprint scanner may not be as secure as you thought it was.
Samsung Galaxy S10 and S10+’s in-display fingerprint scanner may not be as secure as you thought it was.

Image: zlata Ivleva/mashable

By Stan Schroeder

Samsung’s ultrasonic in-display fingerprint scanner can apparently be fooled by using a 3D-printed fingerprint. 

If you have the phone owner’s fingerprint and access to fairly inexpensive 3D printing equipment, the entire process takes minutes and the resulting fingerprint copy will unlock the phone quite reliably. 

SEE ALSO: Watch Samsung’s Galaxy Fold get folded many, many times

Imgur user darkshark explained the process on Imgur (via The Verge). He took a photograph of his fingerprint from the side of a wine glass with his smartphone. He then created a 3D model of the fingerprint with 3DS Max software, and printed it on a piece of resin with the AnyCubic Photon LCD printer. 

The result: a square piece of resin containing a 3D model of the fingerprint. Put that on the Galaxy S10+ and it will unlock it, as darkshark claims, “in some cases just as well” as the actual finger. 

The printer that darkshark had used costs a little over $400, and while the process requires some specialized software and know-how, it doesn’t look like something that would be very hard to replicate. 

Of course, someone aiming to do that with another person’s phone would need physical access to the phone and the owner’s fingerprint, but as darkshark points out, if you have someone’s phone, you probably have their fingerprints on it, too. 

“I can do this entire process in less than 3 minutes and remotely start the 3d print so that it’s done by the time I get to it,” darkshark claims. “Most banking apps only require fingerprint authentication so I could have all of your info and spend your money in less than 15 minutes if your phone is secured by fingerprint alone.”

The fact that biometric identification methods like face recognition and fingerprint scanning aren’t as secure as a good password is not new. But you wouldn’t know it from Samsung’s own documents. In the S10+ user manual, Samsung never says that the fingerprint scanner is any less secure than other authentication methods. In a February post about the scanner on Samsung’s web page, the company says the following: “With the new ultrasonic fingerprint ID technology, there are no tradeoffs. You don’t have to sacrifice user experience for security.” 

In the same post, Samsung claims that it uses “a machine learning algorithm to help detect the differences between real fingerprints and forged 3D replicas.”

But the method described by darkshark casts doubts on the viability of Samsung’s ultrasonic fingerprint scanner as a method of protecting your data. Hopefully this will be addressed in future iterations of these scanners or through software updates; for now, if your phone contains sensitive data, you should probably use a password instead. 

We’ve reached out to Samsung about the issue and will update this post when we hear from them. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2U2ciIm
via IFTTT

India’s BJP releases manifesto ahead of upcoming elections

India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has made 75 promises, which include the contentious decision to scrap a decades-old law providing special rights to the residents of disputed Kashmir region, according to the party’s election manifesto.

Modi’s BJP has consistently advocated ending Kashmir’s special constitutional status, which prevents non-residents from buying property in Indian-administered Kashmir, arguing that such laws have hindered its integration with the rest of the country.

“We believe that Article 35A is an obstacle in the development of the state,” the party’s manifesto said.

Political leaders in Muslim-majority Kashmir, where India is fighting an armed rebellion against its rule, have warned that repealing the law would lead to widespread unrest.

Modi has made his strong stance on national security a key part of the BJP’s election campaign, following a recent flare up in tensions with arch foe Pakistan, which also lays claims to Kashmir.

“Nationalism is our inspiration,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said at the release of the BJP’s election manifesto at the party headquarters in New Delhi.

Amit Shah, the head of the Hindu nationalist BJP party, along with other top leaders released the party’s manifesto for the upcoming elections that begin on Thursday.

The BJP also promised to reserve 33 percent of seats in the Indian parliament and state assemblies for women, if it is voted back to power.

India enforces ban on civilian vehicles on key Kashmir highway

“Women’s welfare and development will be accorded a high priority at all levels within the government, and the BJP is committed to 33 percent reservation in parliament and state assemblies through a constitutional amendment,” the manifesto said.

Farm income

The BJP promised a capital investment of 100 trillion Indian rupees ($1.44 trillion) on infrastructure by 2024, to help create jobs for the millions of youth entering the workforce every year.

The party pledged to simplify the goods and services tax (GST), which disrupted businesses and hurt economic growth when it was introduced by Modi’s government in 2017.

The Hindu nationalist party said it will pass a controversial citizenship bill that would grant Indian nationality to Hindus from neighbouring countries.

The party said it committed to building a temple for Hindu god Ram in Ayodhya in place of medieval era Babri mosque, which was demolished by Hindu mobs in 1992.

The main opposition Congress Party led by Rahul Gandhi is seeking alliances with regional parties to thwart Modi, accusing the BJP of undermining India’s secular foundations.

Surveys suggest the BJP is the front-runner going into the election, although some have said it could lose the clear majority it won five years ago.

The national elections will see close to 900 million voters cast their ballots in nearly a million polling booths – the world’s biggest ever democratic exercise.

Voters will elect 543 of 545 MPs to India’s lower house of parliament, the Lok Sabha.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2YU8AEa
via IFTTT

How Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Broke All the Rules of New York Politics

NEW YORK — Hundreds of parents and students were sitting on folding chairs or standing against the wall in dimly lit linoleum floored party hall underneath the elevated train on a gray day in Queens. They were there, they said, to rally on behalf of public schools and against charter schools, to learn about how to opt-out of high-stakes testing and how to make more schools less segregated and more equitable.

These kinds of civic meetings occur every day in New York, but they don’t attract the kind of attention this one has: half-a-dozen television cameras, a line around the block to get in, reporters from the local press and from national magazines.

Story Continued Below

“I know you are not here to see me,” said Diane Ravitch, the author of more than a dozen books and one of the leading thinkers on education policy over the last 40 years. “But to see AOC.”

And sitting off in the corner, wearing a black blazer pinned with the official congressional seal, is what makes this town hall different from every other town hall. It explains the cameras and the crowds, and why there is a dedicated time for selfies afterwards and why a photographer from Time Magazine is crouched down before the front row, perma-clicking her way through the two-hour event.

AOC of course is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the first term congresswoman who has exploded like a supernova across the political sky since last summer, when she defeated Joe Crowley, the boss of the Queens County Democratic Party and someone widely thought to be the next speaker of the House. And when she lands back in her district, her reception is no different.

“It’s like if Camelot came to Queens,” said one onlooker. On this day Ocasio-Cortez is the star upon which the whole room seems to revolve. Politicians who have been working in the trenches since before she was born come by to pay tribute (and of course to grab the quick selfie).

It is hard to not pick up a faint air of resentment in some corners.

“I send a tweet when I see something I think is cool, and it gets, like, six likes,” John Liu, a state senator, former city comptroller, former city councilman and one-time candidate for mayor told the crowd. “AOC sneezes and it gets a half-million retweets!”

The congresswoman smiled tightly.

“I say that only half-jokingly,” said Liu, only half-recovering.

In the world of New York politics, beating Joe Crowley was something that was Just. Not. Done. “It’s unfortunate that he had a primary,” Bronx borough president Ruben Diaz said on election night. It has now been 10 months. And although in Washington Crowley was seen as a future Democratic leader, in New York, he was an old-school power-broker, someone who commanded a party organization that could make loyal soldiers into elected office holders. He was someone who anyone who wanted to be governor, senator, mayor or speaker of the City Council had to pay tribute to, and now he has left the scene, he has left behind a cadre of devoted party regulars and political establishment not quite sure how to handle the young phenom who ousted him.

And she, in turn, hasn’t been quite sure how to handle the permanent political class she repudiated by beating Crowley. For now, the insular New York establishment is eyeing AOC warily. They want to emulate her—even Gov. Andrew Cuomo, her sworn enemy, has been hitting social media harder, something Albany legislators attribute to Ocasio-Cortez—but they also fear her ability to bring out an army of supporters if they cross her. They are wondering how well she will play with them if, after having achieved office without them, if she can be brought into their tent.

Power in New York has not traditionally been achieved through social media stardom; it has been achieved through the slow and painful courting of various constituency groups. It is achieved block association by block association, community board by community board, labor union by labor union. Now that she is a star, city insiders wonder, is AOC willing to labor in those trenches? Does she even need to? What happens if she doesn’t?

***

Ocasio-Cortez got a slow start in New York. The New York Times called her out for failing to open a district office for her first several months on the job, relying on local elected officials for constituent service work. She has kept up a steady pace since, however marching in the Saint Pat’s For All Parade, where—until she ducked out a few blocks in to climb in a black SUV for a Vanity Fair interview—she, for a moment, just seemed like just another pol among pols; taking questions at a community board meeting over Amazon’s decision to pull out of a proposed headquarters in New York and on the closure of the Rikers Island jail; meeting with tenant activists in the Bronx and with fellow women elected officials in Queens for a Women’s History Month event. She has sat for a series of long interviews with NY1, the local all-news cable station, and sparred with the New York Post, which has waged a crusade on the alleged hypocrisy of a self-described environmentalist using a car to get around the city.

Her staff, highly conscious of the crowds she can attract, and the fact that she commands an audience whether she wants to or not, doesn’t publicize her events or put out a public schedule, instead relying on others to tweet or Instagram them after the fact. When her district office opened in early March, dozens of reporters turned out even though it was not publicized, and AOC fended off questions about the subways and Amazon alongside her thoughts on the unfolding crisis in Venezuela.

In New York, the streets may be dynamic, but the politics remain sclerotic. Even the most ambitious strivers have to suffer a long and slow climb up the ladder, starting out on the community board, then to the City Council, then the State Legislature, then borough wide office or beyond if they can slice it. Bill de Blasio, the current mayor, was elected to the school board in 1999 and has been in one office or another ever since. The three leading candidates to replace him have been in office a combined 61 years. The governor’s father was a governor, and the father of the governor before him was secretary of state. Members of the U.S. Congress tend to operate in relative anonymity, layered over by elected officials closer to the ground. Incumbents face primary challenges fairly regularly, but with their ability to marshal labor unions, political clubs and senior centers they tend to dispatch the upstarts with ease.

Ocasio-Cortez upended that calculus. Running against Crowley, she railed against the entire political establishment, from the county party he led to the clubs that were in hock to him to the unions and civic organizations that dutifully endorsed the all-but-certain victor. And now that she has ascended to a level of fame beyond the neighborhood, beyond the district, beyond the city, the two sides—the entrenched political infrastructure and the thousand-kilowatt freshman—are eyeing one another warily and learning to live together.

“Any time I talk to someone—companies, corporations looking to do business in New York, non-profits rolling out an issue campaign, the first question they always ask me is, ‘Where is AOC on this?’” said one New York City lobbyist. “I have been doing this for years, and I have never once had a client say to me, ‘Can I get Kirsten Gillibrand to my event?’ Once or twice I guess people have asked about Chuck Schumer, but every single person wants to know about AOC.”

“Every call I am on, people want to know: What is our AOC strategy?” added another lobbyist, who, like others interviewed for this story, asked for anonymity to avoid crossing someone with a loyal Twitter following of 3.7 million fans. “The only other person I can compare it to is Al Sharpton, where people want to know where he is on the playing field or if she is even on it at all.”

The two couldn’t be more different. Although both prod the Democratic Party to the left, especially on civil rights, AOC is the 29-year-old upstart who lacks clear allegiances to the political infrastructure of the city. Sharpton is a 64-year-old pillar of the New York political establishment, one aspiring pols needs court, or at least figure out a way to neutralize. Mike Bloomberg called him the night he was elected Mayor of New York and they met the next morning. Every year on Martin Luther King Day, Sharpton hosts a celebration at his headquarters in Harlem. Pols of all stripes, from Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Mayor de Blasio to first term members of the City Council crowd the tiny stage waiting their turn to pay homage. This year, Ocasio-Cortez was blocks away, engaged in a “public conversation” with Ta-Nehesi Coates at Riverside Church near Columbia University.

In an interview, Sharpton sounded as if he were fine with the oversight—for now.

“She told me on King Day she had already committed to the church but that she would do the [annual National Action Network] convention,” Sharpton said in an interview. “I don’t know where it will go down the road but so far I am willing to keep an open mind and an open door.”

Sharpton met with Ocasio-Cortez in her D.C. office soon after she was sworn in, a meeting set up by his staff. He showed her how to dance James Brown-style after a video of her own dancing went viral.

“She is going to have to navigate and understand the differences and the various segments of the nation and this city,” Sharpton said. “I have seen people blow up before. You have to make sure that you are firm in what you believe and that every exit ramp is leading to something and not a dead end.”

It was an open question after she defeated Crowley whether or not Ocasio-Cortez would be willing to do the often laborious work of local politics, since she won so far outside the traditional path.

“She isn’t really a politician. She is a rock star,” said one political operative closely aligned with the establishment. “I say this not to dismiss her, because I think she is really smart and capable, but it is like if Kim Kardashian were a member of Congress. Do you think she would be going to community boards? Why do the scut work of local politics if you can get glossy magazine covers? Believe me, Jerry Nadler would love to just be on the cover of Time, but it’s not something that is available to him.”

The fact of Ocasio-Cortez’s celebrity has made it more difficult for the political establishment and the congresswoman to get to know one another. Figuring out where she is on any given issue can be a guessing game, since with her small staff, local power brokers say she can be tough to reach. Case in point: It has been three months since she was sworn in, and Ocasio-Cortez has yet to meet one-on-one with either the governor, the mayor, the head of the state Democratic Party or the heads of the Queens and Bronx Democratic Parties.

“I wouldn’t even know how to reach her, and she certainly hasn’t reached out to me,” said Michael Reich, the head of the Queens County Democratic Party, and a Crowley ally who Ocasio-Cortez accused of running “a foreclosure mill” during the 2018 campaign. “She is on the national level, the international level, and I don’t think she has any interest in the local level, frankly.”

Grassroots organizers say otherwise—so perhaps it depends on who’s talking. Her allies that say even as her celebrity has grown, Ocasio-Cortez and her staff remain unusually responsive.

We work with a lot of legislative offices, but they are actually open to discussing ideas,” said Liat Olenick, a founder of Indivisible BK. “It’s a one of the few places that really has a collaborative approach and really is just into discussing ideas. It took us three months just to get a reply form Senator Schumer. They have been super-responsive right from the bat and they seem super-committed not just to their constituents but to the whole network of grassroots organizers in the city.”

Last month, Ocasio-Cortez skipped the annual New York Jewish Community Relations Council congressional breakfast, a requisite stop for members of a city that is 13 percent Jewish. But she did attend a Hanukkah celebration a few months before organized by Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, a small group of left-wing activists, where Ocasio-Cortez delighted the crowd by telling them that her family traced Sephardic Jewish roots in their heritage.

“She is very well-known and followed and very well-liked in activist circles and in the very progressive circles, and I think that is a good thing,” said state Democratic Party chairman Jay Jacobs. “My sense of it is that she is going to decide at a certain point whether she is going to want to continue to be featured as the anti-establishment person, or if she is going to work with the establishment. She can still maintain her progressive position, but it would be more beneficial to what she wants to accomplish.”

In New York, the political left can be taxonomized into four overlapping groups. There is the center-left, inhabited by Governor Andrew Cuomo, former Mayor Mike Bloomberg and the pro-business Partnership for New York City: pro-business, socially liberal and keenly aware of New York’s place on the international stage. There is the mainstream left of the political clubs, African-American and Latin voters, suburban regulars and Cuomo-aligned labor unions. There is the organized left, made up of groups like the Working Families Party, good government outfits like Common Cause and Citizens Union, and some of the more unskilled labor unions.

Then there is, for lack of a better term, the disorganized left—a hodge-podge of groups like the Democratic Socialists of America, Indivisible, the ACORN-aligned Black Institute and the immigrant rights organization Make The Road New York. The disorganized left prefers advocacy to electoral work, protest and purity to deal cutting and law-making. This is Ocasio-Cortez’s home.

The center-left, backed by the real estate industry and embodied by Governor Cuomo, is at once wary of AOC and determined to dismiss her as a flash in the pan, someone who benefited from a very low-turnout primary to surprise a congressman who had made Washington D.C his home.

“How do you explain me winning that district by 36 percent?” Cuomo said at a press conference the day after he easily dispatched Cynthia Nixon in a primary three months after Ocasio-Cortez’s own, a victory he called “a fluke.” “I am not a socialist. I’m not 25 years old.”

That there was a new political order in town became apparent almost as soon as Cuomo uttered those words. A few weeks later, Amazon announced that a portion of Queens, near but not in AOC’s district, had been selected as the home of one of its new headquarters. The city had been courting the company for years, but after the announcement some of those same politicians who had been lobbying Amazon to come to New York abruptly switched sides. Faced with opposition from local pols, the company reversed course and pulled out of New York, a blow to the business community that allies and enemies of the congresswoman attributed to “The AOC Effect.”

Allies of the governor have been quick to point out that Ocasio-Cortez’s opposition to Amazon left her with a 31 percent approval rating across the state, 11 points lower than Cuomo’s. And as much as AOC has been willing to torch opponents on social media, she has remained conspicuously quiet on Cuomo, who has long been Lord Voldemort to the left. When she does weigh in on some of the major issues facing the state and the city, such as drivers’licenses for illegal immigrants, school segregation and marijuana legalization, it tends to be after the battle lines have been clearly drawn, and it is clear who is lining up on which side. Nine members of the state’s congressional delegation recently released a public letter calling for the public financing of campaigns. Ocasio-Cortez was left off the letter.

Which is not to say that Ocasio-Cortez has ignored New York politics altogether. Not only was she nominally aligned with Cuomo’s challenger Nixon, she also helped and benefitted from some major organizing work that went into defeating a handful of Democratic incumbents in the state Senate who were aligned with Cuomo and the GOP majority. That group helped weaken Cuomo’s stranglehold on the state.

For his part, the governor has mostly kept his distance. “He is very wary of her,” said one state lawmaker, who attributed the governor’s continued progressive evolution—and his newfound eagerness for social media—in part to her rise. “Everyone is on guard. They don’t want to come in her crosshairs.”

Ocasio-Cortez did endorse fusion voting, an arcane political practice that permits minor parties like the Working Families Party to appear on a general-election ballot while cross-endorsing candidates who appear on other lines. Although he hasn’t said as much, progressives think Cuomo wants to eliminate it to further weaken the WFP and quiet his critics on the left. Ocasio-Cortex wasn’t endorsed by the WFP—like the rest of the organized left, the party thought Crowley was a shoo-in—but they quickly endorsed her after the primary and did battle on her behalf as Crowley flirted with a third-party run. And Ocasio-Cortez strategized with the group about how to handle Cuomo after Nixon lost.

“Mostly our relationship has been fantastic,” said Bill Lipton, the state head of the WFP. “She is the most authentic progressive politician in America, and she has breathed life and momentum into the campaigns that many of us have been working on for decades.”

But even as leaders of the institutional left praise how much Ocasio-Cortez has done for their issues, and are staggered at her ability to command the media’s attention—“It is like watching Michael Jordan play every day in his prime” said Neal Kwatra, a political operative who has advised both Cuomo and de Blasio–several said that they are still working out the terms of their relationships with her. AOC has taken some community leaders aback by asking that when they do meet, they bring rank-and-file members of their organizations with them.

“I didn’t get the sense that she is interested in playing well with others,” said one labor leader. “People have ways of doing things and I don’t get the sense that she is interested in substantive questions if she doesn’t want to meet us as individuals.”

And the organized left wonders about her commitment to their cause, and how she is going to work with some of the infrastructure they have built through the years. Other left-leaning members of Congress such as Nydia Velazquez and Jerry Nadler have worked hand-in-glove with the WFP and labor unions to push favored candidates and causes. But the new liberal resistance that emerged post-Trump is unaffiliated with the institutional left and lacks the kind of organizational leader that AOC could be, if she wants to be.

“There is a vacuum of vision, and AOC is the natural person to fill that out, but they have to want to,” said Kwatra. “She is a genius at branding and policy explainers, at understanding the news cycle and social media, but the question is does she want to build a progressive movement and use her considerable leverage in order to bring those ideas to fruition here on the ground in New York?”


After her election, Ocasio-Cortez helped bring to life a new group, called Movement School, that was designed by some of her organizers to train the next generation of campaign workers. The group has held a few meetings, but it remains to be seen what will come of it. Much of the cohort that powered her victory has remained politically active, coming together to sink the Amazon deal and to push for further police reforms at City Hall.

This cohort—well-educated, young, and upwardly mobile—could become a new force in city politics, one that operates outside of the traditional organizational lanes.

“It’s all about the gentrifyers who don’t want to be gentrified,” said one Bronx-based political operative. “Her supporters come from newly formed communities. They rally around issues, they don’t rally around neighborhoods and they don’t rally around neighborhood leaders.”

AOC resisted the notion that she killed Amazon “with two tweets,” as she put it, but in the first citywide election since she was sworn-in, for the job of Public Advocate, the second highest ranking post in the city, it was clear that AOC had bent the politics of the city. Throughout the campaign, the candidates railed against the online retailer, and at debate all but one pledged to cease shopping from the website even though many of them too had previously signed a letter of support welcoming the company to the city.

And in order to stave off another AOC-like surprise, the state changed the date of the congressional midterm so that it aligns with the rest of the state’s elections. Incumbent members of Congress from across the city are facing left-wing primary challengers, as these upstarts believe they can capture some of AOC’s magic. In response, the city’s political leaders are holding the reins even tighter.

“There are labor leaders who I could barely get a meeting with in 2018 who are now sitting down with me and trying to dissuade me from running again,” said Suraj Patel, an attorney who got more votes than AOC in his ultimately failed bid to unseat U.S. Rep. Carolyn Maloney in the 12th District and who is considering running again. “Twenty-twenty is going to be like Star Wars 2: The Empire Strikes Back.”

Crowley was determined to hold his post as Queens County boss after he lost, but it became untenable once he got a job as a lobbyist in D.C. for Squire Patton Boggs. Local leaders feared that AOC would make a play to install an ally in his place, and some privately told me that they were willing to engage in all-out war should she try to do so. In the end, she showed no interest in the position, which ultimately went to Queens Rep. Gregory Meeks, a longtime party stalwart.

“She isn’t a Queens person, but she isn’t a Bronx person either,” said Reich, the executive director of the Queens Democratic Party. “She grew up in Westchester. The family owns two homes. She has this thing that, ‘My mother scrubbed floors.’ Well, her father was an architect. It’s unfortunate he passed away early but they had a home in Yorktown Heights and a condo in the Bronx. She has no connection to Queens at all.”

As easy as it would be to tell the story that Ocasio-Cortez has forgotten her district in light of her Vogue shoots, “60 Minutes” interviews and Time Magazine covers, it isn’t true. Although her fellow elected officials have complained that she hasn’t used the media spotlight to focus on the district much, no one could reasonably accuse her of not being around. “I have seen her more in the past six months than I saw Joe Crowley in the past 10 years,” said one neighborhood activist.

After Ocasio-Cortez won, there were rumblings that someone from the Crowley camp, or another local elected official would challenge her in 2020. That seems unlikely now, as Ocasio-Cortez’s stature in the district has risen as she has become a national figures. “It’s like if a Kennedy lived in Queens,” said one local. But after the latest round of redistricting is another matter, and local members of Congress have already begun holding conversations with state legislators about what the lines will look like after the next election. Ocasio-Cortez floated to The Intercept that she could be “redistricted out,” but it would hard to just make her disappear without sparking a progressive revolt. At this point, political insiders say that the lines would have to be drawn awfully fine to even imagine a district that she wouldn’t end up winning.

“No incumbent congressmember would want her drawn into their district,” said Bill Lipton, the head of New York’s Working Families Party. “She’s too popular and too good a campaigner. And the WFP and every progressive activist in the state will knock on doors day and night to ensure she’s re-elected.”

People close to AOC’s brain trust say that there has been no talk of whether her ambitions lie beyond her congressional district. She has become such a star in such a short period of time, achieving national recognition before she was even elected, that she is content to enjoy the ride for as long as she can. There has been consistent chatter that Ocasio-Cortez will join a thin field and run for mayor in 2021, but that seems unlikely considering she would have to give up her perch and the lofty left versus right battles she is facing now to deal with municipal concerns. A run for the Senate down the road seems far more likely, but who knows. The last several months have been such a whirlwind, such a no-one-could-have-seen-it-coming surprise, that even Ocasio-Cortez has admitted that she doesn’t know when the show will end. And her detractors say much the same thing.

“She is today’s news. Will she be tomorrow’s?” asked Reich. “I guess we will see.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2U2cgQK
via IFTTT

Captain America: Beard or no beard? The ‘Avengers: Endgame’ cast voted.

Bearded Cap or clean-shaven Cap? It's the debate that's raged since 'Infinity War'....
Bearded Cap or clean-shaven Cap? It’s the debate that’s raged since ‘Infinity War’….

Image: marvel studios 2018/2019

By Shannon Connellan

Look, it’s a truth universally acknowledged that Captain America and the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe take things next-level with facial hair.

But enough about our extremely correct opinion, what do the Avengers think?

At Marvel’s Avengers: Endgame press conference held in Los Angeles on Sunday, directors Anthony and Joe Russo joined the MCU cast and a bunch of empty chairs for a little chat.

SEE ALSO: The Marvel Cinematic Universe would be 1,000 times better if EVERY hero rocked facial hair

While the cast were forbidden from revealing too much about the Endgame plot, there was one long-raging debate that got its time on the floor: Captain America’s beard.

New York Times reporter Kyle Buchanan caught the moment, in which the cast were asked to raise their hands if they preferred their fellow Avenger Chris Evans bearded, as seen in Infinity War, or not bearded, as seen in other Cap appearances, including teasers for Endgame.

Nice guys Mark Ruffalo and Jeremy Renner notably abstained from the vote, while Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige voted for both. 

Brie Larson took her time to decide, but eventually voted for bearded Cap, along with Chris Hemsworth, Don Cheadle, Scarlett Johansson, and the Russo brothers. Meanwhile, Danai Gurira, Karen Gillan, and Paul Rudd all prefer a clean-shaven Cap.

“I’m going for neither,” said Downey Jr. “I like Chris Evans with a beard with prothesis over it, when Joss Whedon asked him to come be the tag for the first Avengers.” 

Yes, he actually did both, as RDJ explained Evans was filming Snowpiercer at the time and had to keep his beard.

What did Evans himself vote for? Guys, he prefers bearded Cap!

And what about the rest of your MCU favourites, bearded or non-bearded? We daresay it’s mostly better as the former.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2CZNWJq
via IFTTT

Nigeria’s medical brain drain: Healthcare woes as doctors flee

Abuja, Nigeria – In March, hundreds of Nigerian doctors gathered at a hotel in Abuja, the capital, and another in Lagos, the country’s commercial centre, to take a test conducted by the Saudi Arabian health ministry.

In a symbol of the Nigerian medical “brain drain”, those yet to migrate must complete foreign exams in order to get work placements abroad.

Weeks before the attempt by Saudi Arabia to lure Nigeria’s greatest medical talents, dozens had sat the regular Professional Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) exams at the British Council. Once they pass, it will enable them to work in the UK.

According to some estimates, about 2,000 doctors have left Nigeria over the past few years.

Doctors have blamed the mass exit on poor working conditions – only four percent of Nigeria’s budget is allocated to health.

While the annual healthcare threshold per person in the US is $10,000, in Nigeria it is just $6.

“More than half of those seeking visas to [India] are going for medical care that is not available here in Nigeria. Indigent Nigerians would be at the mercy of the dilapidated health infrastructure,” Onwufor Uche, consultant and director of the Gynae Care Research and Cancer Foundation in Abuja, told Al Jazeera. 

“It has become worse; a doctor [in Nigeria] earns N200,000 monthly ($560), necessitating moving to countries where they can be better paid for their services … This ultimately means that eight of 10 Nigerians are presently receiving substandard or no medical care at all.”

Middle-class and wealthy Nigerians often travel for healthcare. Even the septuagenarian Nigerian president, Muhammadu Buhari, seeks medical care in London. 

British, American, South African, Emirati and Saudi Arabian agencies operate in Nigeria to recruit the best doctors.

Nigeria’s polling agency, NOI Polls, in partnership with Nigerian Health Watch in 2017, found that most doctors seek work abroad. 

“The trend of doctors emigrating to other countries is at an all-time high,” Chike Nwangwu, head of NOIPolls, told Al Jazeera in Abuja. “Our survey … showed that 88 percent of doctors are considering work opportunities abroad.”

Reasons for emigrating include better facilities and work environment, higher salaries, career progression and an improved quality of life.

One doctor in 5,000

Medical schools and residencies are subsidised by government funds, an investment that is now benefiting other countries.

With an estimated population of over 180 million, there is one doctor per 5,000 people in Nigeria, according to Isaac Folorunso Adewole, the health minister, compared with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation of one per 600 people. 

There are 72,000 doctors registered with the Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria (MDCN); over half practise outside the country.

“Nine in every 10 doctors are considering work opportunities outside Nigeria. And it is projected to keep rising as doctors continue to face systemic challenges,” said NOIPolls’ Nwangwu. “I actually think [Nigeria] is already at the state of emergency with the availability of medical doctors.”

The country’s worsening health sector also grapples with strikes by health workers.

The government is often in conflict with the Nigerian Medical Association, an umbrella union of doctors, over working conditions. The union argues that government officials fail to stick to agreements, leading to industrial action.

When asked last year why Nigerian doctors had to wait a long time to get residency training, Adewole appeared to make light of the issue, saying: “It might sound selfish, but we can’t all be specialists; we can’t. Some will be farmers; some will be politicians … The man who sews my gown is a doctor. He makes the best gown. And some will be specialists, some will be GPs, some will be farmers.”

As well as angering some doctors, the apparent failure to act seriously also affects patients. 

“The government needs to urgently start addressing the issues and concerns of the medical workers and especially the doctors. The truth is, most of these doctors leave for better working conditions and you can’t blame them,” said Mariam Abdullahi, a 38-year-old patient at a hospital in Abuja.

“I am being referred to strange faces and different doctors almost at each of my bi-monthly visits and I’m always told the last doctor left the country. As a patient I feel heartbroken anytime my doctors leave, but what can I do when the system treats them poorly?”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Vtbeyw
via IFTTT