New far-right coalition forms ahead of European Parliament vote

Four far-right nationalist parties plan to form a new group in the European Parliament after next month’s elections, their officials have announced, as they called other like-minded movements to join the alliance.  

Italy’s interior minister and co-deputy prime minister, Matteo Salvini, is spearheading efforts to constitute the new group, which will be called the European Alliance of People and Nations. Salvini is the leader of the anti-migrant League party whose popularity has shot up after it formed a government with the Five Star Movement (M5S) last year. 

A press conference held in the Italian city of Milan on Monday under the slogan “for a common-sense Europe,” saw the participation of Jorg Meuthen, leader of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which is currently the third-largest group in the Bundestag, the German parliament.

Other participants were the anti-migrant Finns party of Finland, which did not send its leader, but candidate Olli Kotro, and Anders Vistisen, an MEP of the anti-Islam Danish People’s Party.

“We are working towards a new European dream,” Salvini told journalists in Milan, adding that the League is doing so “with movements which are alternatives to those that have ruled Europe in the past decades.”

“From today, this family aims to expand and include movements we have not collaborated with before,” the League leader continued. “We aim to finally be in government as a force for change in Europe. Some of the issues are common: the control of borders and the fight against terrorism,” Salvini said.

‘A fortress Europe’

AfD’s Meuthen said the new group aimed at uniting “right-wing, nationalist forces” in the European Parliament and to “reform Europe without destroying it”.

“If we want to hold on to our rich heritage, then we must create a fortress Europe,” said Meuthen, whose party has been accused of denying the Holocaust and put under special surveillance by Germany‘s domestic intelligence agency.

Meuthen hailed Salvini for the work he has done so far in preventing refugees and migrants from arriving on Europe’s shores. 

Kotro, of the Finns party, added that the group was working “against the ideology of multiculturalism which is destroying Europe, particularly political Islam”, while Andersen said “the national identity of 27 European countries” was “at risk”.

It is not yet clear whether the bloc’s 28th member state – the UK – will participate in the elections as the country continues to grapple with the process of leaving the European Union. British Prime Minister Theresa May is seeking an extension to the deadline for departure, which could force the UK to take part in the vote on May 23-26.

If it does participate, the UK could provide an additional contingent of Eurosceptic MEPs to the European Parliament.

Concerns over migration helped fuel the rise of far-right nationalist parties in Europe [File: Yara Nardi/Italian Red Cross via Reuters]

Web of alliances

European parties have formed a number of cross-national groups in the European Parliament. Italy’s League is currently a member of the anti-EU, nationalist bloc Europe of Nations and Freedoms (ENF), alongside France‘s National Rally and Austria’s Freedom Party. 

Group alliances can shift and Eurosceptic parties can currently be found in four different European parliamentary groups.

These include the Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy, whose head is former UK Independence Party (UKIP) leader Nigel Farage – seen as one of the architects of Brexit – which also contains the AfD. 

The Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) counts Poland‘s Law and Justice (PiS) party in its ranks, while the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP), the largest in the European Parliament, includes several pro-European conservatives and Hungary’s anti-migrant Fidesz. Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s party was partially suspended from the group in late March. 

Rise of the League

Salvini said he had no plans to put himself forward as a Spitzenkandidat (lead candidate), but was eager to emphasise that the initiative had originated in Italy. He has also previously called for right-wing nationalists parties across Europe to rally in Italy on May 18.

But while populist far-right parties share a common focus on sovereignty and Euroscepticism, as well as anti-migrant and anti-Islam views, they clash over other issues such as the state’s role in the economy, ties with Russia and the redistribution of refugees arriving on Europe’s southern shores.

Since forming a government with the anti-establishment M5S last year, the League has overtaken its senior coalition partner in the polls. According to the European Parliament’s own projections, the League is en route to becoming the second-largest party in the parliament after May’s vote, behind Germany’s ruling centre-right CDU/CSU party.

Salvini’s League is now polling ahead of its coalition partners [File: Yara Nardi/Reuters]

However, while right-wing populists are likely to gain ground in the upcoming election, their influence will find a number of obstacles, according to Carlo Ruzza, a professor of political sociology at the University of Trento’s School of International Studies. 

“The main limitations lie in their ideology itself. Putting the nation first … will make it difficult to form alliances and there are fundamental tensions in their coalition,” Ruzza said, adding that the two main centrist groups, which have traditionally called the shots in the European Parliament, alongside the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE), would keep the influence of right-wing populists in the European Parliament in check.

“The very creation of the group can be counterproductive in the first place: opening up to the AfD means that Orban will think twice before leaving the EPP because the group in the making could be quite large and also very extreme,” Ruzza added.

On the other hand, as the European elections are fought at the national level, Salvini is “selling a package” to Italians. 

“His objective remains to further erode the electorate of [former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s] Forza Italia and perhaps that of the M5S, too,” Ruzza argued. 

“He’s well-accepted and liked by the far-right, but he tries to avoid communicating that too clearly to the rest of Italians for fear it could detrimental.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2VuUjvv
via IFTTT

How Elle Fanning Found Her Voice For Teen Spirit



Frazer Harrison/Getty Images

By Ilana Kaplan

This past year has delivered a bevy of female musician narratives with A Star Is Born’s Ally (Lady Gaga), Vox Lux’s Celeste (Natalie Portman) and Her Smell’s Becky Something (Elisabeth Moss). Now there’s another character to be added to the queue care of Teen Spirit’s Violet (Elle Fanning).

In Max Minghella’s directorial debut, Fanning portrays a lonely, aspiring singer living on a farm with her mother in the Isle of Wight, England. In between waiting tables and going to school, she spends her free time with her horse and singing at open mic nights. Everything changes for her when Vlad (Zlatko Buric), a former opera singer, takes on the role of her manager and coach, helping her compete for an American Idol-like TV series called Teen Spirit. Viewers get to see the growth of Violet as a vocalist as she pursues her dream.

Like Portman and Moss, Fanning is not known for her vocals — solely her acting. Though Teen Spirit proves that Fanning’s talents are multidimensional, she still needed to prepare for her role as a pop star — to a degree. The key to nailing the part of Violet was showing her as a growing artist. “She’s not particularly a polished pop star yet,” Fanning explained in a phone interview. “She’s a growing performer and since you shoot the movie out of water, it was something that we really had to think about when I was performing to make sure that I was not doing too much, and making sure I was doing enough.” To help ensure Fanning was improving, she went to the apartment of the film’s executive music producer, Marius de Vries, each day to record videos of her singing all of the songs each day. “I had to listen back and watch myself to see how I could improve my performance,” she recalled.

In addition to refining her vocals, Fanning, who’s American, needed to learn Polish and refine an English accent, which she worked on with coaches. While Fanning had done English accents before, she had lower her voice to imitate one from Isle of Wight.

“We were looking for someone who could sing brilliantly, be able to retain and perform complicated choreography, speak with a British accent, learn Polish, ride a horse, and carry every frame of the film,” Minghella said of Violet’s character. “It was a near-impossible list of requirements and I don’t know if there’s another living soul who has the faculties to pull this movie off.”

With the role of Violet, Fanning tried to envision what kind of pop star she would be, by listening to and watching YouTube clips of pop artists she thought Violet would admire: Katy Perry and Taylor Swift. Before she arrived on set, Perry came to lunch during filming, which Fanning unfortunately missed.

What she found in Violet’s story, though, were parallels to Dua Lipa’s ascension. She even ended up going to one of her shows with de Vries to help her with the role. On a personal level, Fanning drew from her first concert: Gwen Stefani. But Fanning knew that Violet ultimately needed to be her own star.

“I mostly just had the songs that I was given, and it was Marius and I that worked together to form [the character]. I didn’t get to talk to anybody,” she said.

Violet’s potential for pop stardom is documented throughout the movie, but perhaps even better told throughout the film’s riveting soundtrack, which features Fanning covering an array of some of the buzziest songs in pop music, including Robyn’s “Dancing On My Own,” Sigrid’s “Don’t Kill My Vibe,” and Ellie Goulding’s “Lights.” “Max is obsessed with music and has a real affection for pop, so we came into the project with a script full of songs that Max loved,” said Tony Seyler, Interscope Executive VP of Film/TV Marketing and Licensing. Most of the soundtrack is comprised of live songs from the film, but some were re-recorded to sound more polished.

The soundtrack, produced by Jack Antonoff, even featured an original song co-written by Carly Rae Jepsen and the Bleachers singer called “Wildflowers” — Jepsen can even be heard on background vocals.

Minghella always saw Antonoff as a hero and never believed he’d be able to work with him on the original song. “We met up at a diner in Toronto to talk about the movie and he played me a rough demo of ‘Wildflowers,’” he said. “After the first verse I was already singing along. Jack then worked with Elle to really embody the song with the energy of the character.”

To say Fanning was thrilled to work with Antonoff was an understatement. “I got to experience Jack in the studio, and watch him work exactly where he was working on Lorde and Lana Del Rey’s album and all of these musicians I love. He’s such a genius,” Fanning said. She’s even in shock now when she sees her name come up as an artist on Spotify and Apple Music. “It’s kind of mind-boggling,” she admits.

While Fanning had several performances throughout Teen Spirit, the most impactful was her final number, when she covered Sigrid’s “Don’t Kill My Vibe.”

“It was my last performance, it was the song that I knew the least because it was chosen late in the game, so I didn’t get to practice that one as much as all the rest,” she recalled. “And I knew it was going to be a super crucial moment in Violet’s journey.”

The performance featured a pivotal moment for Violet, her finally having this outcry or angry roar. “It was for Violet, but I also realize it was for me, Elle,” she said.

Fanning feels differently about Teen Spirit than her other work, which is due in part to her singing being highlighted. “Putting the songs out and even just putting this movie out is very vulnerable,” she said. “Singing, there’s something about it that just makes you feel very raw and very seen.”

With Fanning revealing she’s an accomplished singer as well as an actress, it begs the question: Will she release an album of her own? “I think this movie opened up this door,” she said. “I don’t know if my music would be exactly like Violet’s music. But I would be open to that.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2D45nZA
via IFTTT

The case for Jon Snow to end up on the Iron Throne

A brooding Jon Snow as king is poetic justice.
A brooding Jon Snow as king is poetic justice.

Image: Vicky Leta / Mashable

By Saloni Gajjar

Who should end up on the Iron Throne? We’ve got some ideas. 


Jon Snow is the true heir to the Iron Throne.

If he’s left standing at the end of Game of Thrones, which I believe will happen, Jon is the only worthy ruler of the Seven Kingdoms. Let’s get the most obvious reason out of the way first. The overarching title of the books, A Song of Ice and Fire, literally refers to him. The Season 7 finale confirmed the long-assumed theory that Jon is actually Aegon Targaryen, the true born son of Lyanna Stark (Ice!) and Rhaegar Targaryen (Fire!). He now officially has an even better claim than his aunt/lover Daenerys.

They don’t know it just yet but his entire journey has prepared him to ascend on that Throne. 

SEE ALSO: ‘Game of Thrones’ teaser shows bad omens for Jon Snow and Jaime Lannister

Sure, he joined the Night’s Watch when he was simply Ned’s bastard. Even I didn’t think he was important then (I read the books between Seasons 3-4). Robb was off fighting wars, Arya was escaping one enemy after the next, Sansa was suffering Joffrey’s cruelty, Bran and Rickon were on the run. In the meantime, Jon emerged as a goddamn leader. 

He infiltrated the Freefolk camp and returned to Castle Black with vital information. His guidance helped the crows win the Wildling attack in Season 4 even if it meant he lost the (first) love of his life Ygritte. Then, Jon did the impossible: he brokered peace between the two warring parties who had spent hundreds of years hating and murdering each other. It’s an unfathomable achievement and proves he can unite the toughest of clans. 

Yes, fine, this got him stabbed by his own men and he died briefly. But are you telling me Jon cheated death (like some kind of “prince that was promised”) for no reason? He returned with a mission and a man bun, reunited with Sansa, and with her help regained control of Winterfell by defeating the Boltons.

SEE ALSO: ‘Game of Thrones’ had a safe word for Kit Harington during Battle of the Bastards shoot

Jon became both the Lord Commander and the King in the North despite it seeming like he has no birthright claim. He did all on his own merit. In the words of Davos Seaworth while introducing Jon to Dany, “all those tough sons of bitches chose him as a leader because they believe in him.” They are right! Jon is the only one who’s had his priorities straight for years. He knows where the real threat is; he knows it’s not about politics or mind games.

That’s why he’ll be a good ruler. He’s tough when needed (RIP but not really Alliser Thorne and Olly), fair when it’s right (he spared the Umbers and Karstarks after the Battle of the Bastards). His upbringing has made him empathetic towards everyone, no matter their low or high birth. 

In the impending and possibly apocalyptic war against the Army of the Dead, Jon will clearly take charge. Once it’s over, he will be there to pick up the icy pieces. By uniting almost everyone besides Cersei to fight the Night King, he’s already done way too much for Westeros not to be able to rule it after. 

Let Game of Thrones end with rightful king Jon Snow/Aegon Targaryen taking his place on the Throne. He will rise to the occasion, as he has done in the past, and the kingdom will be better off for it.

Game of Thrones Season 8 premieres on April 14.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2U023nP
via IFTTT

K-pop Twitter can’t tell which way BTS’ Jimin is facing in this new video clip

By Sage Anderson

There’s nothing the internet loves more than a good visual illusion combined with some mildly interesting conspiracy theories. 

Maybe that’s not entirely true, but K-pop Twitter was certainly hyped up earlier this morning trying to uncover the mystery behind a new teaser video from BTS. In the short clip for their upcoming song “Boys With Luv” featuring Halsey, a short part of the single plays while the boys simultaneously take a turn. 

SEE ALSO: Mattel unveils new BTS doll collection

Fans were stumped trying to figure out which direction Jimin (second from the left) faces at the end of the video. 

The confusion seems to occur when fans focused in on the feet. Does he end up facing to the front or to the back? Is it just the lighting messing with our minds? What is going on here? 

When I focus on solely the feet I see spinning in both directions, focusing on the back I see something else. My eyes are going cross crossed pic.twitter.com/lj56xBstsR

— aria with luv (@namgistudio) April 7, 2019

As they attempt to dissect the trailer for any hidden meanings, as fans do, Twitter has also been left questioning whether this optical illusion could be intentional. Could this possibly play a role in the song’s narrative? Is Jimin, in fact, the aforementioned “Boy With Luv”? 

OKAY time to end this 😒😒

1) Jimin is facing the front!!

2) BH purposefully darkened blurred out his face to give the illusion of him turning around to NOT MAKE IT SO OBVIOUS! That’s the plot of this comeback with jimins story hellooo..#FrontOrBackpic.twitter.com/6bVlxr6e8L

— chenie || Dionysus ho (@kim_namthicc) April 8, 2019

It seems like we’ve got another dress debate on our hands, folks. Even if fans can’t conclusively decide on #FrontorBack, K-pop Twitter has put their stanvestigative hats on and are ready to crack this case wide open. Or at least wait until the full MV drops, whichever comes first. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2I8fkt8
via IFTTT

Best NCAA Tournament Moments 2019

Road to the Championship 🏆

Before TTU takes on UVA in the Natty, look back at the best moments from the tournament.

Ja Morant Put on a Show 🍿

No. 12 Murray State upset No. 5 Marquette behind a legendary performance from Morant.

Zion vs. Tacko Was Epic 🔥

No. 1 Duke rallied to beat No. 9 UCF after clutch buckets from Zion and RJ

Duke Survived Another Wild Finish 👀

No. 4 VT took No. 1 Duke down to the wire in a March Madness classic.

The Best Comeback of the Tourney ✨

No. 1 UVA stormed back to beat No. 3 Purdue in OT after an unreal buzzer-beater.

MSU Sent Duke Home

No. 1 Duke couldn’t survive another close game in an upset loss to No. 2 MSU.

UVA’s Redemption Tour Continues

After a key foul No. 1 UVA stunned No. 5 Auburn with a comeback win.

No. 3 TTU Shut Down No. 2 MSU

Texas Tech makes school’s first ever national championship game

via Bleacher Report

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2I46cFC
via IFTTT

Sudan: All eyes on army as anti-Bashir protests intensify

Activists demanding the exit of Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir say a soldier has been killed while attempting to protect anti-government protesters from security forces trying to break up a rally in front of the leader’s residence.

In an apparent escalation of the four-month calls for political change, demonstrators in the capital, Khartoum, held a sit-in on Monday for a third straight day outside the complex, which also houses the headquarters of the Sudanese army.

Forces belonging to the widely-feared National Intelligence and Security Service used tear gas, rubber bullets and live ammunition in a bid to disperse the protesters, according to the Sudanese Professionals Association (SPA), one of the groups spearheading the demonstrations.

Activists told the Associated Press news agency a soldier was killed on Monday while trying to protect those rallying against Bashir.

Speaking to Al Jazeera from Britain’s capital, London, SPA spokeswoman Sara Abdeljaleel said other army officers had also tried to defend the demonstrators on Monday and during previous clashes between civilians and the security services on Saturday and Sunday.

“In the last 72 hours, there has been a positive [development], to some extent, … that army officers are supporting protesters and protecting them from the National Intelligence and Security Service,” Abdeljaleel said.

“We keep asking for the army to … protect this revolution and keep it peaceful,” she added.

Later on Monday, Interior Minister Bushara Juma said seven people were killed and 2,496 arrested during demonstrations in Khartoum and elsewhere over the weekend. 

The latest deaths take the overall toll to 38 since the protests began, according to officials. Human Rights Watch says more than 50 people have been killed, including children and medics.

Seeking ‘transition’ talks with army

Protesters in recent days have been appealing for solidarity with the military, shouting slogans such as “Sudan is rising, the army is rising” and holding placards reading “The army and the people are one” to encourage soldiers to back their demands.

On Monday, the protesting Alliance for Freedom and Change group called on the army to hold direct talks with demonstrators about “forming a transitional government”.

“We reiterate our people’s demand that the head of the regime and his government have to immediately step down,” Omar el-Digeir, a senior member of the group, said in a statement outside the army headquarters.

“We also call on the Sudanese armed forces to withdraw their support for a regime that has lost its legitimacy,” Digei added.

‘Crunch’ point

The demonstrations against the 75-year-old president were sparked by a government decision to triple the price of bread in December, but quickly escalated into broader protests against Bashir’s three-decade rule.

In response to the nationwide protests, Bashir in late February imposed a state of emergency which led to the protests largely being confined to Khartoum and Omdurman, the capital’s twin city.

But the movement now appears to have entered a critical new phase after the organisers last week urged protesters to take to the streets on Saturday, which marked the 34th anniversary of the overthrow of the government of Jaafar al-Nimeiri. 

In Khartoum, the rally saw anti-government protesters reaching the army headquarters for the first time since the demonstrations erupted.

Analysts said the recent intensification of the protests signalled that Sudan was heading towards an imminent “crunch” point.

“Either the military will have to side with the regime and aide and abet the crackdown … or they will have to take a stand and at least ask for the president to resign,” Abdelwahab el-Affendi, a professor of politics at the Qatar-based Doha Institute, told Al Jazeera.

Bashir took power in a 1989 coup which toppled the elected government that had taken office following the military’s overthrow of al-Nimeiri four years earlier. 

Critics accuse Bashir of mismanaging the economy, leading to soaring food prices, regular shortages of fuel and widespread cash shortages.

The president has acknowledged that the economic concerns raised by protesters are “legitimate”, but refused to step down.

Instead, he has overseen a crackdown on critics and argued his opponents should seek power through the ballot box when his term ends in 2020.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2X0U243
via IFTTT

Democrats crafting Mueller response if report drops during recess


Robert Mueller

Though lawmakers are loath to interfere with pre-planned recesses, Democrats have been urgently clamoring for a glimpse of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s findings since he finalized his report | Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

Attorney General William Barr is likely days away from issuing a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings, but Washington may be a ghost town when he does.

The House leaves for the week on Wednesday morning while Democrats hold their annual retreat in Leesburg, Va. Then members will scatter to their districts for a two-week recess, leaving Democrats urgently clamoring for a glimpse of Mueller’s report with a choice: to react from the road or underscore their concern by reconvening early at the Capitol.

Story Continued Below

It’s unclear if top House Democrats have planned a response once the initial version of Mueller’s report is shared with Congress. But lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee, which is leading the House Democrats’ Mueller response, say they’re at least open to the idea of coming back to Washington.

Yet it doesn’t appear Democrats have settled on a strategy. Though they’ve described the urgency of the situation as striking at the core of American democracy, they have yet to say whether there’s a concerted plan to respond when Mueller’s findings are delivered — let alone whether members should return to Washington when it happens. Partly, it’s because they’re uncertain how much of the report Barr will let them, and the public, see. And it’s unclear if he’ll offer closed-door briefings for lawmakers to reveal what’s under the numerous redactions he intends to make.

“If it’s necessary for us to be in Washington to review what’s in the report, then certainly members of the judiciary committee should be given the opportunity to come back and I think it’s important that we take it up,” said Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.), one of 24 Democrats on the panel.

Though lawmakers are loath to interfere with pre-planned recesses, Democrats have been urgently clamoring for a glimpse of Mueller’s findings since he finalized his report on Russian contacts with the Trump campaign in 2016 — and whether President Donald Trump obstructed the investigation.

Mueller completed his report three weeks ago but Barr has kept a tight seal on it, releasing only a four-page assessment that Democrats say may have skewed the underlying report in Trump’s favor.

Barr has indicated he is currently redacting the report for sensitive information — like grand jury testimony and classified material — before delivering a version to Congress in the middle of the month. The attorney general is scheduled to testify before Congress this week to discuss budget issues, but Democrats are likely to bring up Mueller’s report.

But Judiciary Committee Democrats say anything less than sharing the full report with Congress is unacceptable, and last week they authorized Chairman Jerry Nadler to subpoena Barr for the entirety of Mueller’s findings.

Nadler has yet to issue the subpoena but can do so unilaterally at any time. Republicans on the panel, led by Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) ramped up the pressure on Democrats to return from recess too. In a letter to Democrats Monday morning, Collins said the panel should call Mueller himself to testify the week of April 22.

“Although the House is expected to be in recess that week, I think we can agree this business is too important to wait, and Members of the Committee will surely return to Washington at such a critical moment in our country’s history,” Collins wrote.

If Barr does share any confidential findings with Congress — such as classified material, evidence relevant to ongoing investigations or material that could be damaging to “peripheral third parties,” who Barr has signaled he wants to protect from public embarrassment – it’s likely to be done in a secure setting in the Capitol or at the Justice Department, which would require lawmakers to be in Washington.

For this reason, Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), another Judiciary Committee member, said he thinks his colleagues should return to address the report if it arrives during the recess. But others were more circumspect, deferring to House leaders’ judgment and suggesting they can react to Mueller’s report from home if necessary.

“I guess it depends on what’s in it. We waited this long. I can’t imagine that – it’s hard to know whether it would require an immediate reconvening of the committee,” said Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.).

Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) said committee Democrats discussed returning from the recess but hadn’t settled on a final strategy.

An aide to Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, a Judiciary Committee member and chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said he’d defer to Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) for any plans to urge members to return to Washington to address Mueller’s findings.

Andrew Desiderio contributed to this report.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G7jsXL
via IFTTT