Kemba Walker on Free Agency: ‘Nothing’s Changed’; Hornets ‘Where I Want to Be’

Charlotte Hornets' Kemba Walker (15) reacts after a basket against the Philadelphia 76ers during the second half of an NBA basketball game in Charlotte, N.C., Tuesday, March 19, 2019. (AP Photo/Chuck Burton)

Chuck Burton/Associated Press

As he gets set to hit free agency, All-Star guard Kemba Walker pledged his allegiance to the Charlotte Hornets on Thursday.

As seen in the following video courtesy of WCNC’s Kelsey Riggs, Walker expressed his desire to remain in Charlotte:

Kelsey Riggs @KelseyRiggsWCNC

Kemba said back in September, “This is where I want to be.”

When asked if that stance has changed: https://t.co/sTlAq3Opwr

“Nothing’s changed,” Walker said. “This is where I want to be.”

The 28-year-old Walker has spent his entire, eight-year NBA career in Charlotte since originally getting selected by the then-Charlotte Bobcats with the No. 9 overall pick in the 2011 NBA draft out of UConn.

Walker is coming off the most productive season of his career, as he appeared in all 82 games and averaged 25.6 points, 5.9 assists and 4.4 rebounds. He also shot 43.4 percent from the field and 35.6 percent from three-point range.

Despite the three-time All-Star’s elite level of play, the Hornets finished ninth in the Eastern Conference at 39-43 and missed the playoffs for the third consecutive season.

Without Walker, it seems likely that Charlotte would revert to being one of the NBA’s worst teams in 2019-20.

Walker has often been asked about his free agency plans this season, and he has remained firm in his desire to stay with the Hornets. In an interview with NBA.com’s Shaun Powell in February, Walker talked about how badly he wants to help the Hornets develop into a contender: “I want to build something here. I want to try and make us one of the top teams one day. I love this place. I want to help take this organization to places it has never been.”

Walker also discussed how much it means to him to play under owner Michael Jordan: 

“Michael drafted me. When that happened, the first thing that went through my mind is this guy is giving me an opportunity. So I’m going to give it everything I got. That’s what I do for MJ, ever since I’ve been here, each and every night. To try to play the game the right way. Play hard. And a lot has to do with him.”

If Walker hits the open market, he figures to be among the hottest commodities in a stacked free-agent class. Other potential free agents include Kevin Durant and Klay Thompson of the Golden State Warriors, Kawhi Leonard of the Toronto Raptors and Kyrie Irving of the Boston Celtics.

Walker is arguably as good or better as a pure scorer than any of them besides Durant, which is high praise considering he has played in relative anonymity with the Hornets.

If Walker and the Hornets are unable to reach a deal that keeps him in Charlotte, Walker will be a target for multiple teams looking to take the next step, potentially including the Los Angeles Lakers, who desperately need another star to play alongside LeBron James.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2P7vJ1C
via IFTTT

Dems torn over response to Trump’s immigration crackdown


Nancy Pelosi

Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters Thursday she’s only talked with the president in passing about immigration in recent months, stressing to him that Congress and the administration should come together on a comprehensive package. | Win McNamee/Getty Images

Congress

House Democrats are wrestling with how to counteract the president’s hard-line policies.

LEESBURG, VA. — House Democrats are grappling with how to address the surge of migrants at the border, amid divisions over how to respond to President Donald Trump’s hard-line approach.

For Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her deputies, the risks of diving into a fight with the president are clear.

Story Continued Below

It was health care and the economy, not immigration, that Democrats ran on and helped deliver the House. And Democrats worry about playing into Trump’s narrative — and potentially losing control of the debate — if they spend too much time reacting to Trump’s controversial moves, from his purge of top immigration officials to the possibility he’ll reinstitute controversial policies to split children from their parents.

But Democrats also acknowledge that despite Trump’s bluster, thousands of Central American migrants are indeed streaming toward the border each day and overwhelming a dysfunctional system.

And the party can’t escape the issue if it wanted to, as both Pelosi and Democratic Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) faced multiple questions on the topic Thursday morning at House Democrats’ three-day retreat here.

“It’s complicated but it isn’t hard to do if you have good intentions,” Pelosi told reporters of the need to pass comprehensive immigration reform to deal with the broader issues at hand. “And I’m not giving up on the president on this.”

But House Democrats have no plans to put a comprehensive immigration bill on the floor anytime soon, and privately, senior Democrats can’t even agree about the best approach to the issue that Trump has made a centerpiece of his presidency.

Democrats say any bipartisan immigration talks are likely fruitless with Trump in the White House. And the efforts could backfire, sparking conflict within the party over the left’s calls to abolish ICE.

The debate has resurfaced within the caucus over the last week as top Democrats watched with alarm as the president purged top officials from the Department of Homeland Security at the behest of senior adviser Stephen Miller, who is guiding the White House’s immigration crackdown.

“I think that Democrats need to say, ‘Well what is our vision to solve the crisis?’” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said in an interview. “The reality is there is a problem — the numbers are increasing. We can’t have a situation of 100,000 people coming to our border and be able to deal with that humanely and justly. So what is our solution?”

Some Democrats have floated the idea of a floor vote on Congress’ last major attempt at a comprehensive immigration overhaul — a bipartisan Senate bill written in 2013 by the so-called “Gang of Eight.” The idea has come up in multiple leadership meetings over the last week, though the proposal has not gained traction with Pelosi and her team, according to multiple lawmakers in the room.

Meanwhile, other top Democrats — led by California Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a senior member of the House Judiciary Committee — have begun drafting legislation to provide more financial aid to Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras, where most migrants are coming from to seek refuge in the U.S.

But it’s not clear if or when that plan might come to the floor, and House Democrats are skeptical it would be well received in the GOP-controlled Senate or by a White House that is moving to cut aid to the northern triangle of Central American countries.

For now, Democrats are starting with a fact-finding mission. Several members, led by Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, have planned a multi-day trip to Texas and California that will depart immediately after the caucus’s policy retreat.

House Democrats also have plans to vote in the coming weeks on more narrow immigration bills, including restoring legal protections for children of unauthorized immigrants, known as “Dreamers.” The House could also vote on a resolution condemning Trump’s threats to shut down the border.

But neither of those proposals would directly address what’s happening at the border right now. Border patrol agents apprehended 92,607 people in March — two-thirds of whom are families or unaccompanied children. It’s the highest monthly total since 2007.

Pelosi told reporters Thursday she’s only talked with the president in passing about immigration in recent months, stressing to him that Congress and the administration should come together on a comprehensive package.

Pelosi also argued that Congress has already addressed immigration in one way this year — passing legislation to reopen the government after the 35-day showdown over Trump’s border wall — but the president hasn’t fully used the money provided in that bill.

“We had bipartisan legislation, bicameral legislation that gave the president a formula to bring order to the border,” Pelosi said. “And it was about funding for more judges, it was about humanitarian assistance to accommodate those coming in.”

Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) noted Thursday that the bill to end the shutdown provided funding to boost agency personnel, improve detention facilities and speed up asylum processing.

“We provided a substantial additional investment in those areas. We may, in fact have to do more,” Cicilline told reporters. “We’re not looking on helplessly.”

Communication between the White House and House Democratic leaders has been sparse. Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney met with a handful of Senate Democrats to talk about the migrant crisis earlier this week but has not had a similar meeting with Pelosi or her staff, according to an aide.

Lawmakers will eventually be forced to confront questions over immigration and the border when the House takes up legislation to fund the Department of Homeland Security; that bill is expected to reach the floor in June.

But Democrats are wary of trying to do anything immigration-related with Trump given how erratic he has been in the past — seemingly open to a bipartisan deal only to back away and instead push hard-line policies like family separation.

“There’s a clear solution there for the taking. The problem is, the president doesn’t want a solution because if he gets a solution, his single reason for being goes away,” Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) said of the 2013 comprehensive reform bill. “He’s not interested in solving this problem, he’s using it as fuel.”

“People know that we have a White House that has flirted with this and every time anything gets close to being serious, they walk back and walk out of the room,” added a senior Democratic aide. “I just think it’s impossible to deal with Stephen Miller in the White House.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2uZXfVj
via IFTTT

Kings Head Coach Rumors: Luke Walton ‘Clear’ Front-Runner If Fired by Lakers

Los Angeles Lakers head coach Luke Walton during an NBA basketball game Sunday, March 24, 2019, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)

Marcio Jose Sanchez/Associated Press

If Luke Walton gets fired as head coach of the Los Angeles Lakers, he may not have to go far to find his next job.

According to Sam Amick of The Athletic, Walton is the “clear front-runner” for the Sacramento Kings‘ head coaching job. Amick noted Philadelphia 76ers assistant Monty Williams and San Antonio Spurs assistant Ettore Messina are also candidates.

Amick also confirmed an earlier report by ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski that Kings general manager Vlade Divac plans to fire head coach Dave Joerger on Thursday.

Walton’s future with the Lakers is very much in question after L.A. went 37-45 this season despite signing LeBron James. In his previous two seasons as head coach of the Lakers, Walton went 26-56 and 35-47, giving him a career record of 98-148.

It was widely assumed that Magic Johnson would fire Walton, but Johnson abruptly resigned as the Lakers’ president of basketball operations this week, leaving general manager Rob Pelinka and owner Jeanie Buss in charge of deciding Walton’s future.

Despite his struggles with the Lakers, the 39-year-old Walton would undoubtedly be a hot coaching candidate if he gets fired. In his two seasons as an assistant coach with the Golden State Warriors, Walton won an NBA championship and went 39-4 as an interim head coach while Steve Kerr was out after undergoing back surgery.

In his third season as Sacramento’s head coach, Joerger led the Kings to a somewhat surprising 39-43 record in 2018-19, which marked their best finish since they last made the playoffs in 2005-06 with a record of 44-38.

While the Kings finished nine games out of a playoff spot, they ended up ninth in the Western Conference and have a strong foundation to build on moving forward.

Guards De’Aaron Fox and Buddy Hield enjoyed breakout seasons under Joerger, while 2018 No. 2 overall draft pick Marvin Bagley averaged 14.9 points and 7.6 rebounds per game as a rookie. If Walton goes from L.A. to Sacramento, he will arguably benefit from an upgrade in young talent.

Brandon Ingram, Kyle Kuzma, Lonzo Ball and Josh Hart had mixed results under Walton in 2018-19, and the trio of Fox, Hield and Bagley may give Walton more to work with. The biggest negative is the fact that Sacramento doesn’t have a true superstar like LeBron.

Walton would have his work cut out for him with the Kings given their 13-year playoff drought, but with less pressure to perform in Sacramento and perhaps more talent at his disposal, it may be his best landing spot.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2D78qQu
via IFTTT

A Map Of The Soul: Persona Syllabus To Help Wrap Your Brain Around BTS’ New Album



Big Hit Entertaiment

With the release of Map of the Soul: Persona fast approaching, now seems like a good time to remind the general public that BTS have more to offer than their colorful visuals, sharp performances, and charming personalities. In fact, ask any fan of the Korean septet and they’ll probably tell you how they’ve spent the weeks leading up to Persona‘s release on April 12 brushing up on the psychological theories of Carl Jung, Greek mythology, French, Singin’ in the Rain, and art history, all while combing through the dozens of cryptic clues and callbacks sprinkled throughout the Bangtan Universe. (Yes, they even have their own fictional narrative.)

If you’re wondering what all of this has to do with BTS, then you clearly haven’t been paying attention to what really draws people from all over the world — of all different ages, genders, and ethnicities — to their diverse discography. More specifically, the deeper themes, subjects, and messages within their music. Because when you become an ARMY, you practically enroll in higher education. And you don’t need to understand Korean to see how RM invokes the spirit of American actor Gene Kelly in the latest “Boy With Luv” teaser, or the parallel between their fruitful concept photos and the Greek god Dionysus.

Still, there’s a lot to unpack with this comeback (or, new release). Whether you’re a new ARMY looking for a crash course in Bangtan or a longtime fan who simply needs help wrapping your brain around the difference between persona and shadow, this primer is for you.

What does Map of the Soul: Persona even mean?

As artists, BTS are extremely calculated and detail-oriented. (Leader RM and vocalist Jungkook are both Virgos, so there’s a lot of Type A energy in this group.) So it should come as no surprise that they’ve been constructing a meticulously-plotted visual narrative since 2015 — the threads of which are sewn throughout their music videos. The story follows seven young men whose devastating fates are intertwined, and the one who’s given a chance to save his friends by going back in time.

Now, what does this have to do with Map of the Soul: Persona? We’ll get to that in a bit, but for now it’s important to know just how far ahead BTS plan their releases. Because Persona was actually teased on a shirt during a live performance of “DNA” back in 2017. BTS dropped even more clues in the music video for vocalist Jin’s 2018 solo number “Epiphany” — “in the end,” the ending script reads in Korean, “what I have to find is that which is the beginning of all things, the milestone: the map of the soul” — and during the group’s performance at the Mnet Asian Music Awards last December with a brief vignette that read: “You gave me power. You gave me love. So now I’m a hero, so now I’m a boy with love. I’ll show you the map of the soul. I’ll show you the dream.”

So, what is this map of the soul referring to? Swiss psychologist Carl Jung. (Again, BTS are more than seven handsome faces!) It’s specifically referring to a book by Murray Stein, titled Jung’s Map Of The Soul, which is even being sold in their Korean management company’s online store. In the video for “Intro: Persona,” RM is confronted with many different versions of himself, while words like “persona,” “shadow,” and “ego” are seen scribbled on a classroom chalkboard behind him. This is a direct reference to Jung’s theories.

According to Jung, persona is how we present ourselves to the world; it’s our public image, or the mask we wear to conceal our true nature. “The persona is that which in reality one is not, but which oneself as well as others think one is,” Jung wrote. Masks have played a crucial part in BTS’ artistic vision, from the “Fake Love” music video to vocalist V’s solo single “Singularity” to their 2019 Golden Disc Awards performance, in which they all removed physical masks in dramatic fashion.

Ultimately, Persona will find BTS, now all in their early and mid-20s, grappling with questions of identity and self. As RM boldly asks in his scorching intro track, “Who the hell am I?” Of course, it’s only the first part in a larger journey of self-discovery, as BTS could explore Shadow and Ego in future releases — the “shadow” representing the dark side of your personality and “ego” representing the center of your consciousness. These parts of the psyche make up your identity, or Self.

But before BTS can move forward, they have to look back.

“Boy With Luv”

For fans, the group’s forthcoming single with singer Halsey, titled “Boy With Luv,” is nostalgic. Not only does the title nod to their 2014 single “Boy In Luv” but the point choreography seen in the teasers is also similar.

Then there’s the fact that “Intro: Persona” samples the group’s 2014 song, “Intro: Skool Luv Affair.” When BTS debuted as a group of teens in 2013, they made music that spoke to their generation; their “School Trilogy” examined the societal pressures and anxieties young people endure at the hands of an apathetic government and their own confusing emotions. Now, nearly six years later, BTS are still asking Big Questions — but they have the advantage of hindsight.

Back then, they were boys in love who acted out, sometimes aggressively, when their feelings were not reciprocated; now, they’re boys with love, whose love comes from within.

By revisiting this very distinct place in their past, BTS are reflecting on an uncertain time others in their position would probably want to forget, or at least ignore. In doing so, they’re acknowledging that they can’t change the past — but they can learn from it.

At the end of the Love Yourself highlight reel (released in 2017), Jin seems to hint at this: “If we could turn back the clock, where should we go back to? Once we reach that place, can all our mistakes and errors be undone? Will happiness be ours to stay? Though many seasons pass, there are places that cannot be reached. Yet another storm to be faced and to be weathered head-on. Living without fear, hesitating and parting. Merely living as the person I am.” Interestingly enough, RM refers to his shadow as “hesitation” in “Intro: Persona.”

“Dionysus”

The Persona track list also features a few clues, including one track that was seemingly inspired by Greek mythology. The god Dionysus is often associated with wine and theater. (Depending on who you ask, he’s also responsible for bringing wine to Asia.) As a potential nod to the god of wine, some of the album’s concept photos feature certain members posing with grapes. While the grapes are obvious, there’s also a connection between Dionysus and Jung.

Given his interests, Dionysus was known to free people from their inhibitions, and in Greek theater this earned him the reputation of being called the “masked god.” Essentially, you’re not yourself when you drink, so the “mask” in this case symbolizes another (more inebriated) extension of yourself. Because of Dionysus’s passion for drink and art — and his unconventional upbringing — it made him a bit of an outsider among the gods. Do BTS view themselves as outsiders? We’ll have to wait and see.

“Jamais Vu”

In addition to a Korean-language song named after a Greek god, one of the cuts on the album is titled after a French saying: “Jamais Vu.” (BTS truly transcend all cultures.) It translates to “never seen” and the phrase describes the eerie phenomenon in which you react to something as though you’ve never experienced it before, despite the fact that you have. For example: There will be times when I type the word “lent” and thoroughly convince myself that it is not a real word, when, in fact, it is.

What does this have to do with BTS? Honestly, I have no idea. Of course astute ARMYs already have theories, and once again it all goes back to the group’s Skool Luv Affair era. If “Intro: Persona” and “Boy With Luv” are directly linked to songs on their 2014 album, then it’s possible “Jamais Vu” is, too.

Singin’ in the Rain

Hidden in plain sight in the first teaser for “Boy With Luv” is a movie poster for the 1952 movie musical Singin’ in the Rain. The second teaser reveals even more nods to the classic film, including an entire set piece, dance sequence, and RM’s homage to Gene Kelly.

Maybe BTS are just big fans of Singin’ in the Rain. That’s certainly possible. But remember the time travel narrative I promised we’d revisit? Well, here we are. Without going too much into detail — in addition to the music videos, there’s an entire BTS webtoon you can read to catch up — we know that Jin is the one who’s been given a chance to save his friends with the ability to travel back in time, but he mysteriously keeps going back to one day in particular: April 11.

And for those of you without encyclopedic knowledge of movie musicals from the 1950s, Singin’ in the Rain was originally released on April 11, 1952. Pure coincidence or masterfully designed? That’s for you to decide, or for BTS to reveal.

Then again, part of the fun is how little the group does reveal about their own fictional universe. It’s a Choose Your Own Adventure novel of sorts, open to interpretation — not unlike the group’s music. BTS never tell the listener what to think or how they should go about thinking it; instead, they share their own coming-of-age stories with those who need to hear it most. You don’t need a psych degree to understand that.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2VEOuvs
via IFTTT

Twitter is overrun with ‘celebs as things’ threads and it rules

By Chloe Bryan

Do you ever look at your favorite celebrity and think “candle?” 

If so, we invite you to log on to Twitter, which is currently full of “celebrities as everyday objects” threads. Want to see Ciara as Bath & Body Works candles? It’s there. Chris Hemsworth as hammers? Makes sense — also there. Harry Styles as Fabergé eggs? Not there yet, but we imagine someone will make it soon. 

Naturally, the threads originated with Stan Twitter: The devotion to their faves is so strong that it makes sense they’d see them in things like coffee pots, sneakers, and, uh, bacteria. There are a lot of threads about Taylor Swift, in particular. (The Swifties reman incredibly powerful.)

And, as with any meme that’s been around for more than an hour, there are plenty of meta examples to enjoy, too.

SEE ALSO: Instagram’s thirst memes can open up healthy conversations about sex

Some other threads we’d like to see if anyone has the time: Kim Kardashian West as Anthropologie vases, Cardi B as novelty socks, and Nate Silver as wrenches. Thank you!

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G3Uk36
via IFTTT

Jeff Bezos encourages Amazon competitors to meet or exceed its new minimum wage

Disclosure

Every product here is independently selected by Mashable journalists. If you buy something featured, we may earn an affiliate commission which helps support our work.

Jeff Bezos wants other retailers to consider a higher minimum wage.
Jeff Bezos wants other retailers to consider a higher minimum wage.

Image: Leonard Ortiz/Digital First Media/Orange County Register via Getty Images

By Alex Perry

After intense public pressure, Amazon raised its minimum wage. Now it’s challenging other companies to do the same.

On Tuesday, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos published his annual letter to shareholders, and the most interesting tidbit may have been a statement directed at other companies, not Amazon.

Bezos patted Amazon on the back for raising its minimum wage to $15 per hour late last year in the letter, calling it as much of a moral imperative as it was a good business decision.

SEE ALSO: Elizabeth Warren is coming after AmazonBasics. Why Amazon shouldn’t fight it.

“We strongly believe that this will benefit our business as we invest in our employees. But that is not what drove the decision,” Bezos wrote. “We had always offered competitive wages. But we decided it was time to lead – to offer wages that went beyond competitive. We did it because it seemed like the right thing to do.”

European Amazon employees protested Black Friday sales last year to call attention to poor working conditions.

European Amazon employees protested Black Friday sales last year to call attention to poor working conditions.

Image: MAURIZIO GAMBARINI/AFP/Getty Images

Bezos went on to encourage other retailers to raise their minimum wage standards not only to $15 per hour, but perhaps even higher. He wants Amazon’s competitors to “throw the gauntlet” because it’s “a kind of competition that will benefit everyone.”

While it probably can’t hurt for Bezos to encourage corporations to pay their employees more, the optics of his statement might be questionable. He suggested companies pay their workers $16 per hour in the spirit of competition, but that extra dollar is more than just a game to minimum wage workers. 

If Walmart raised its minimum wage from $11 per hour to $16, would Amazon follow suit?

Even with the pay increase, Amazon’s reputation hasn’t been sterling over the past year. Accusations of worker mistreatment in the company’s warehouses have been around for years, with some employees going on strike during Prime Day and Black Friday last year. Prominent U.S. politicians have taken to regularly criticizing Amazon on those grounds.

Amazon reportedly even paid some employees to defend the company on Twitter during the summer.

Still, more money for workers is a win regardless of optics. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Uz9rvp
via IFTTT

The Secret to Slowing Down the Bucks and Giannis

B/R

The Milwaukee Bucks are a juggernaut. This season, they led the league in points per game and scoring margin; they placed second in threes made, and so on. Giannis Antetokounmpo, perhaps the league’s MVP, is central to the team’s identity. Everything starts with him, and it often ends with him too. He is a 7-foot point guard who initiates offense, a 7-foot center who jams everything. In the half court, with Giannis at the wheel, the Bucks scored more than one point per possession this season, one of just four teams to do so, per Synergy Sports. There is not a man alive who can stop him from twirling toward the rim and exploding.

But for Giannis and the Bucks, there is one odd outlier: the team’s performance against zone defense. When teams forced Milwaukee out of its swift rhythm, its offense ranked 10th in the league. Its turnover percentage against the zone, 13.4, was the worst mark in the NBA. Antetokounmpo, who typically makes professional basketball appear comically easy, turned the ball over nearly a quarter of the time against the zone, nearly doubling his usual rate. It’s no wonder the Bucks faced more zone than all but two teams, per Synergy.

Now, with the playoff bracket set and the Bucks owning home-court advantage throughout, we should see this strategy in the spotlight. Particularly in the early going—against underdogs like the No. 8 Pistons—zone defense may be the only way to stop Milwaukee. Any opposing game plan starts with Antetokounmpo, who averaged 27.7 points, 12.5 rebounds and 5.9 assists this year. It’s crucial, if you’re the team facing Milwaukee, for him to not have the ball. That’s what the zone can offer: an alternative way out, and a thorn in the Bucks’ side.

Consider the game they played April 1 in Brooklyn. After starting at a gallop and building a 22-point lead, the Bucks stalled as the Nets switched to a zone. Milwaukee, one of the league’s fastest teams, stopped running. Players stood along the perimeter and swung the ball around, lazily killing clock. When it came time to press forward toward the rim, guys found a crowded paint and were coaxed into challenging layups.

“Every offense has pace and tempo, and they’re able to get to their pick-and-roll early, but with zone, now they’re forced to think,” says Steve Jones Jr., who worked for the Nets’ video department from 2013 to 2015 and provides extensive tape studies on Twitter. “It forces you to do something you don’t want to do, which for a defense is always going to be key.”

Perhaps taking too much time, and thinking too hard, is kryptonite for some supercharged teams of today’s NBA. Yet we rarely see the zone deployed, as only two teams ran it at least 10 percent of the time this year (Brooklyn and Miami). That’s partly because, basically, it’s uncool, somehow deemed both a sort of cheat code and an ineffective last resort. According to Nets coach Kenny Atkinson, it’s considered “borderline blasphemy” across the league. For a coach, he adds, “It feels like you are a man without a country when you play zone in the NBA.”

This year, Atkinson’s Nets went for it anyway, running zone more than 25 times the league’s median rate. “You have to be committed. Not many believe, which is understandable,” Atkinson says, adding that when it comes to the zone, there is a “strange dynamic with coaches and players.” Zone is pure rotation and communication; it pulls zealous defenders away from their counterparts and into the team concept. It’s “not macho. Not mano a mano, like you’re shying away from your individual matchups.”

It’s true that the zone is anticlimactic. It even brings an offbeat amateur feel to the NBA floor. But it is a defensive scheme well-built for the moment at hand. The current NBA is hyperactive; not every team always feels like swinging the ball from side to side, waiting for a shot to open up. Of course, if they do swing it around, jumbling the defense, a zone can fall apart. But that’s life in the NBA, where all defensive solutions are imperfect and temporary at best.

Kathy Willens/Associated Press

“It’s more of a constant team effort. If you do your job in the zone, and the guy to your left or to your right is doing his, you can shut a team down,” Heat forward Kelly Olynyk says. Miami was the only team to run more zone defense than Brooklyn this year, and the results were incredible. The Heat’s zone permitted just 0.924 points per possession; the NBA’s best overall defense allowed 0.948, per Synergy. “Whether it’s Houston running high pick-and-roll with James Harden, [they] don’t have that opportunity anymore. They’ve gotta move the ball. Other guys have to make plays.”

During a recent game against the Hornets, the Nets ran a high school-style box-and-one zone against Charlotte‘s version of Harden, Kemba Walker. The do-everything guard was confused. He asked Nets center Jarrett Allen about the scheme and noted he hadn’t experienced it before in the NBA. “It brings a different type of look for the other team,” Allen says. “The NBA has been man for a long time, and bringing a zone just completely throws some teams off.”


Naturally, more teams are trying it. Last year, only one team ran zone 150 times all season (roughly twice per game), but there were 10 such teams this year. It’s curious what took so long.

Back in 2011, the Mavs led the league in defensive zone possessions. The roster was aging and lacked the athleticism to battle one-on-one. They reached the Finals, where they leaned on zone once again, sparking an upset of the Miami Heat.

A year later, Mavericks owner Mark Cuban joined ESPN’s First Take to discuss that series. LeBron James had faltered, averaging an uncharacteristic 17.8 points per game. Skip Bayless frequently questioned his “clutch gene,” but he missed the root cause.

“LeBron disappeared and shrank in crunch time and the fourth quarter,” Bayless said.

“So we get no credit for not putting him in a position to succeed?” Cuban replied.

“He put himself in—all he did was stand out on the perimeter,” Bayless added.

“How do you think we defended that? Why do you think he was standing out there?” Cuban asked.

“You didn’t have to defend him,” Bayless retorted.

“Oh right,” Cuban said mockingly, “so no matter what we did, he was just gonna stand there and do nothing?”

“Well, that’s all I saw,” Bayless offered.

“That’s exactly right,” Cuban said. On YouTube, the exchange is titled, “Mark Cuban Owns Skip Bayless!” and is approaching two million views. “That’s all you saw.”

In fact, Cuban explained, LeBron was flummoxed by the Mavs’ zone D. He attempted 15 shots per game that series, down almost four from his season average. That was the plan.

If it can work against LeBron—in his prime, no less—there is hope for the Eastern Conference this year. The Mavs “wanted to get the ball out of his hands and into the hands of someone else,” Cuban said. Bucks’ opponents will try to do the same.

For much of the season, Milwaukee’s supporting cast was excellent, but it has stumbled lately at an awkward time. Malcolm Brogdon, the team’s best spot-up and three-point shooter, will likely miss the opening series with a plantar fascia tear. Nikola Mirotic fractured his thumb in late March and might not be ready for Game 1. Eric Bledsoe hit 29.3 percent on catch-and-shoot threes, the type of look that zones often allow. (Antetokounmpo was even worse at 22.4 percent.) Brook Lopez, who was money for most of the season, shot 3-of-20 from beyond the arc in April. It’s unclear whether Khris Middleton is ready to handle the scoring burden if Giannis is forced to defer.

Paul Sancya/Associated Press

Teams should be happy to take their chances with these second and third bananas. Olynyk would be. “One hundred percent you’ll see it in the playoffs,” he says of the zone scheme.

“Guaranteed,” Atkinson echoes.

If the playoffs go according to plan, and Milwaukee meets Toronto in the Conference Finals, we’re nearly certain to see it then. The No. 2 seed Raptors ran zone on 2 percent of their plays this year—good for 10th-most in the league—to phenomenal results, allowing just 0.93 points per possession, per Synergy. Zone may well help decide which team represents the East in the Finals.

But before we get there, the zone might help underdog Detroit too. The Pistons won 19 fewer games than the Bucks and lost all four against them this year. They might as well give it a go. The NBA playoffs, after all, are often ruled by whichever player hogs the ball most effectively. That’s probably Antetokounmpo.

The Pistons have a worthy counterpart in Blake Griffin. The veteran forward averaged a career-high 24.5 points per game this year. He was a force offensively, namely in pick-and-roll and in isolation. One wonders if a single defender has any chance of containing Griffin. If not, there is a certain scheme that might help.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2G7MeXi
via IFTTT

Sharp reveals new phone display that bends in half like a clamshell

Will foldable phones be a fad?
Will foldable phones be a fad?

Image: bob al-greene/mashable

By Raymond Wong

Many foldable phones will do battle this year. 

And while there’s a tremendous amount of excitement for devices like Samsung’s Galaxy Fold and Huawei’s Mate X, what if they’ve got it all wrong? What if, instead of a phone transforming into a tablet, the future is a regular-sized phone display that folds in half into a smaller device that fits better in your pocket?

SEE ALSO: 6 major challenges foldable phones need to overcome to prove they’re not a fad

At MWC 2019 earlier this year, TCL teased a handful of foldable phone concepts. Some looked similar to the Galaxy Fold and Mate X with form factors that folded open into larger tablets. But the most intriguing design was for a device with a screen that bent in half like a stack of cash.

TCL’s device was merely a concept, but now Sharp’s revealed a foldable screen that could bring it to life.

A video from OLED-info demonstrates a prototype 6.18-inch AMOLED display that folds along the x-axis instead of the y-axis like the Galaxy Fold and Mate X screens do. It kind of looks like a GameBoy Advance SP when closed.

The screen has a 3,040 x 1,440 resolution and can reportedly withstand up to 300,000 bend cycles. 300,000 may not seem like a lot, but here’s some quick math for you: 100 bends a day works out to 36,500 bends a year. Divide 300,000 bends by 36,500 per year and you’re looking at a screen lifespan of at least 8.2 years (assuming there’s no other malfunctions).

Even at 200 bends a day, Sharp’s foldable screen would last 4.1 years, which is quite good. In comparison, the Galaxy Fold can only withstand up to 200,000 bends according to Samsung.

It’s way too soon to say whether foldable phones will take off in any meaningful way — the first ones from Samsung and Huawei are super expensive ($1,980 and $2,600, respectively) being positioned as luxury devices for early adopters and there are still many notable challenges to overcome — but one thing seems obvious: there’s still a lot of experimenting to do and that’s exciting.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2D8z8rX
via IFTTT