Brazil: Native groups protest against ‘anti-indigenous’ Bolsonaro

Brasilia, Brazil – Thousands of indigenous people from across Brazil are gathering in the capital of Brasilia this week for the biggest indigenous protest in the country, the Free Land Camp.

More than 4,000 indigenous people from hundreds of tribes across the country are expected to camp out in front of government buildings for three days of native celebrations and protests against far-right President Jair Bolsonaro.

On Wednesday, indigenous communities began assembling hundreds of coloured tents just metres away from the National Congress.

“We have no way to fish, to [get] food, to bathe,” said Angoho Ha-ha-hae, the wife of the leader of the Pataxo tribe, whose water source was destroyed when a dam burst earlier this year. “We depend on the government, and where is it? We need help.”

The Articulation of the Indigenous People of Brazil (APIB), the main organisation behind the annual event, said this year’s protest is taking place in a “very grave context”.

“Since the government [of Bolsonaro] took office, several measures have been implemented that directly affect the rights of indigenous people,” says Luiz Eloy Terena, APIB’s legal counselor.

Terena told Al Jazeera some of these measures include the transfer of land demarcation and environmental licensing to the Ministry of Agriculture, and the extinction of the government offices responsible for the education and health of indigenous people. 

“The president’s statements defending mineral exploration in our lands … and this idea that native people should be integrated and assimilated,” he said. “This year’s Free Land Camp is happening because of all of those things”.

Joenia Wapichana, the first indigenous congresswoman in Brazil, said during her short time in office that “the government is not open” to the indigenous struggle.

“The government is completely anti-indigenous,” she told Al Jazeera. “[Jair Bolsonaro] is only open to those who defend mining and land grabbing, which is his intention.”

Joenia Wapichana, the first indigenous congresswoman in Brazil, poses with other members of the Wapichana tribe at the Free Land Camp in Brasilia [Mia Alberti/Al Jazeera] 

APIB has documented a “series of attacks and invasions” of indigenous lands, as well as “persecution, racism and intolerance” shown toward native people since Bolsonaro took office at the beginning of the year. Several other indigenous organisations have also denounced land conflicts and a substantial increase in violence since January. Many believe the government’s relaxed stance on environmental issues is giving farmers and companies the green light to disrespect existing limitations, especially in the Amazon.

Bolsonaro has often said he is in favour of opening up the Amazon, the world’s largest forest, to foreign exploitation, especially by the United States. In a Facebook Live broadcast a week before the Free Land Camp, Bolsonaro said “the richness that exists [in the Amazon], should be explored rationally for the welbeing of our people and especially for the indigenous communities”. 

The Brazilian president also accused several NGOs of “enslaving” the indigenous, and said that he wanted “to free them”.

“We want the best for the Brazilian indians, human beings like any others, but this ‘party’ is not going to continue in our government”, he said in the video.

‘We are not violent’

Just a days after Bolsonaro’s statement, Minister of Justice Sergio Moro approved the deployment of special-forces police for this week’s event at the government’s request. In a statement, Moro said the national forces will be acting to “secure the public order and the safety of people and patrimony … and the defence of the Union [building] and the Ministries square in Brasília”, where the National Congress and the Supreme Court are located.

In a statement sent to Al Jazeera, the Ministry of Justice said the National Public Security Force will be used “if necessary” to ensure the “safety of the patrimony of the Union (ministries) and its servers”. 

Responding to Moro’s decision, APIB accused Bolsonaro’s government of wanting to “exterminate the indigenous peoples of Brazil” and not being available to “hear” and “help” them.

“Our camp has been happening peacefully for the past 15 years to give visibility to our daily struggles. (…) We are not violent, violence is attacking our sacred right to free protesting with armed forces,” the group said in a statement.

Thousands from the indigenous communities across Brazil are camping out in front of government buildings to demand more rights [Mia Alberti/Al Jazeera]

This week’s events will include a vigil in front of the Supreme Federal Court to demand more land demarcation. On Friday, the indigenous communities are expected to march towards the National Congress. In 2017, the march ended in clashes with police and an exchange of arrows and tear gas.

On Wednesday, Sonia Guajajara, the first woman to run for vice president in the country, told those at the event that “we will not surrender to unfair and fascist policies”. 

“We are not only fighting for our constitutional rights but our right to exist,” she said. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Uz4EW4
via IFTTT

Chiefs’ Tyreek Hill Will Not Be Charged by District Attorney in Child Abuse Case

Kansas City Chiefs' Tyreek Hill warms-up before an NFL football game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the New York Jets, Sunday, Dec. 3, 2017, in East Rutherford, N.J. (AP Photo/Bill Kostroun)

Bill Kostroun/Associated Press

Kansas City Chiefs wide receiver Tyreek Hill and his fiancee Crystal Espinal won’t face charges in the child abuse case involving the couple’s three-year-old son.

Per Pro Football Talk’s Mike Florio, Johnson County district attorney Stephen Howe announced no charges would be filed. Howe said even though the investigation determined a crime did occur, “the evidence does not conclusively establish who committed the crime.”

Per Brooke Pryor of the Kansas City Star, Howe noted Hill’s son is safe but didn’t specify if he was removed from the home. 

“It bothers us when we see something that’s happened to a child like this and we can’t do anything about it,” he added

Per Pryor, even though the criminal investigation is now closed, the child protection investigation is ongoing and things could change if new information comes out because Kansas has a five-year statute of limitations in these types of cases. 

Overland Park police announced in March they were investigating two separate allegations of child abuse or neglect on March 5 and 14 at Hill and Espinal’s home, including one that resulted in their son suffering a broken arm.

Per NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport, the league isn’t expected to make a ruling about possible discipline for Hill until after the police conclude their investigation. 

Hill has spent his entire three-year career with the Chiefs since being a fifth-round draft pick in 2016. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Wd1PLK
via IFTTT

UN evacuates 325 refugees out of Tripoli as clashes continue

The United Nations refugee agency evacuated 325 refugees from a detention centre on the southern outskirts of Tripoli amid escalating violence near the Libyan capital.

UNHCR said in a statement on Wednesday those rescued from the Qasr bin Ghashir centre were transported to another detention facility in Azzawya, northwestern Libya, where they were “at reduced risk of being caught up” in ongoing fighting between renegade military commander Khalifa Haftar’s eastern forces and troops loyal to the UN-recognised Government of National Accord (GNA).

The move was triggered by reports on Tuesday of the use of armed violence against detainees who were protesting against the conditions in which they were being held, UNHCR said, with 12 refugees requiring hospital treatment after being attacked.

Wednesday’s evacuation brings to 825 the number of refugees and migrants transferred further from clashes in four operations in the last two weeks, the agency added.

“The dangers for refugees and migrants in Tripoli have never been greater than they are at present,” said Matthew Brook, UNHCR’s deputy chief of mission in Libya.

We have evacuated 325 refugees from the Qaser Ben Gasheer detention centre in Tripoli.

It was triggered by reports of armed violence against detainees who were protesting the conditions at the centre. Gunshots were reported to have been fired in the air. https://t.co/WdZR2xL7aY pic.twitter.com/ucN4cHulQo

— UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency (@Refugees) April 24, 2019

About 3,000 refugees and migrants remain trapped in detention centres in Tripoli, according to the UN, and remain at risk from the “deteriorating security situation” around the capital. Many of the detainees fled war and persecution in their home countries.

Hundreds killed, thousands displaced

Tripoli’s southern outskirts have been engulfed by fighting since Haftar’s Libyan National Army (LNA) launched an offensive on April 4 aimed at wrestling control of the capital from the GNA, which is supported by an array of local militias.

The showdown threatens to further destabilise war-wracked Libya, which splintered into a patchwork of rival power bases following the NATO-backed overthrow of former leader Muammar Gaddafi in 2011 and has been split into rival eastern and western administrations since 2014.

Both the LNA and GNA have repeatedly carried out air raids against one another and accuse each other’s forces of targeting civilians.

At least 272 have been killed and more than 1,200 others wounded since the LNA started its offensive earlier this month, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

#Tripoli toll is now 272 dead, 1282 wounded & more than 30 000 displaced. WHO & partners are working to make sure primary health care facilities have supplies & resources to serve displaced families. @OCHA_Libya

— World Health Organization in Libya (@WHOLIBYA) April 23, 2019

At least 36,000 people have been forced to flee their homes because of the conflict, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) said on Wednesday.

UN conference cancelled

The violence has forced the UN to abandon its plans for a conference aimed at brokering an agreement to hold elections as part of a solution to Libya’s long-running political crisis.

The meeting was scheduled to bring Haftar and GNA Prime Minister Fayez al-Serraj together in the country’s southwestern town of Ghadames from April 14 to 16.

Haftar, who casts himself as a foe of “extremism” but is viewed by opponents as a new authoritarian leader in the mould of Gaddafi, has vowed to continue his offensive until Libya is “cleansed” of “terrorism”.

Al-Sarraj said last week the international community needs to be “united and firm” in supporting him, and warned some 800,000 migrants and refugees as well as Libyan nationals could flee across the Mediterranean to Europe’s shores if the instability in Libya continues.

The UN puts the number of people in Libya who have fled their homelands at more than 700,000.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2L18pEe
via IFTTT

Partisan enemies find a common cause: Whacking tech companies


Ted Cruz and a sign reading 'censored'

Sen. Ted Cruz speaks at a Senate hearing on April 10. Bipartisan pairs like Cruz and Sen. Elizabeth Warren have united over concerns about tech giants’ unchecked power. | Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images

technology

Issues that have already drawn cross-party buy-in run the gamut from antitrust enforcement to bolstering publishers’ power against tech platforms.

Ted Cruz and Elizabeth Warren have bonded over ripping Facebook. Massachusetts liberal Ed Markey has teamed up with Missouri conservative Josh Hawley to sponsor an online privacy bill. Even Nancy Pelosi and Donald Trump have found a common target in tech, each jabbing the industry over a series of perceived misdeeds.

From the most conservative free market Republicans to staunchly progressive Democrats, the desire to rein in the tech sector has created surprising new partnerships among political enemies.

Story Continued Below

Democrats have long counted Silicon Valley as part of their political base, while Republicans have pushed for a hands-off approach to tech innovation. But in Washington, the distrust from both parties regarding how the tech industry has handled itself on everything from privacy to political discourse makes it clear that Congress is hungry to bring about a tougher era of government regulation.

“I think we’ve reached a tipping point. I think it’s a sign there’s really no going back from here,” said Michelle Richardson, director of the Center for Democracy and Technology’s Privacy and Data Project. “The interest here is deep and will be long-term and there’s no way we’re going to get out of having some federal regulation on some of these issues.”

Specific issues that have already drawn cross-party buy-in run the gamut from antitrust enforcement to bolstering publishers’ power against tech platforms to the protection of children’s data. Nearly all, however boil down to a central concern over tech giants’ market power as well as the outside command that power gives them over both the terms of online conversation and the handling of Americans’ most private information.

That shared concern could seriously boost the prospects of not just the targeted bills that odd couples have produced so far, but also more sweeping legislation aimed at reining in tech titans like Facebook, Google and Amazon, particularly with respect to their vast scale and power and their data practices. And it lends heft to 2020 presidential aspirants’ pledges to crack down on Silicon Valley, as Democratic candidates like Sens. Warren (Mass.) and Amy Klobuchar (Minn.) already find themselves developing common cause across the aisle on tech issues.

“I think all of these issues relate to getting the economy to work for the American people, respond to these tremendous concentrations of economic power and the enormous dominance of certain technology platforms,” Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), who’s sought to work on tech policy with conservative Republicans including Reps. Matt Gaetz (Fla.) and Doug Collins (Ga.), told POLITICO. “It’s not just one group, Republican or Democrat or independent; it’s being felt by the American people.”

The point of unity between Warren and Cruz (R-Texas) was more a one-off than a concerted legislative effort. But it still proved striking given the participants, as a leading figure of the Democratic left and a famously prickly, firmly conservative Republican found major rhetorical overlap in their views of social media. Warren last month took issue with a POLITICO report that Facebook briefly took down a few of her campaign ads calling for the breakup of the company, saying it showed the social network “has too much power.” Cruz found himself leaping to her defense.

“First time I’ve ever retweeted @ewarren But she’s right—Big Tech has way too much power to silence Free Speech,” Cruz tweeted in response to the post, adding that the company posed “a serious threat to our democracy.” Weeks later the Texas Republican quoted Warren’s tweet at a Senate Judiciary hearing on allegations of an anti-conservative bias in tech — another first for the pair of lawmakers.

The trend encompasses both houses of Congress, and the Senate in particular has seen a number of unexpected partnerships form as part of a push to craft new rules for how companies handle consumer data.

One such odd pairing: Markey (D-Mass.), a liberal privacy hawk who has embraced the Democratic Party’s rising progressive flank, and Hawley (R-Mo.), a prominent GOP tech critic who fashions himself a libertarian-leaning conservative.

Despite their other policy differences, the lawmakers recently joined to unveil a broad-reaching bipartisan measure to expand children’s privacy protections. In rolling out their bill, Markey framed the topic as a rare area of consensus for lawmakers on Capitol Hill. “If we can agree on anything, it should be that children deserve strong and effective protections online,” he said in a statement.

Meanwhile, a number of other cross-party Senate pairings — including Sens. Klobuchar and John Neely Kennedy (R-La.) and Sens. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) and Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). — have teamed up to unveil their own bipartisan data privacy bills, as lawmakers in both houses talk up plans to address the issue.

The privacy concerns are emblematic of broader shared scrutiny over tech’s unchecked power. Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Klobuchar recently sent a joint letter to the Federal Trade Commission voicing concern about “potential privacy, data security, and antitrust violations” by tech titans.

In the House, Cicilline has been one of the more vocal lawmakers in highlighting the opportunity for meaningful bipartisan cooperation on tech. He recently teamed up with Collins, the House Judiciary Committee’s top Republican, to reintroduce a bill that would give news publishers greater leverage to negotiate how online platforms distribute their content. The measure would amend existing antitrust statutes to grant publishers safe harbor to negotiate collectively with large platforms like Facebook and Google.

And Cicilline has even found common ground with Gaetz, a Trump surrogate who’s made his name on winding up liberals, despite the two lawmakers trading blows on Twitter over other issues on which they’re diametrically opposed. Cicilline is primarily concerned about anti-competitive practices by Google and Facebook, while Gaetz has spearheaded allegations that the internet giants suppress conservative views. But they’ve quietly discussed working together on tech issues, including, Gaetz says, in a series of one-on-one huddles on the House floor.

“Mr. Cicilline and I disagree on some issues. We agree on others. This is one where I think we will find agreement,” Gaetz told POLITICO.

A Cicilline spokesperson confirmed the lawmaker has “discussed tech-related issues with Gaetz directly,” and Cicilline said he and his staff are in “constant communication” with House Judiciary Republicans and their teams, including Gaetz’s, on tech issues.

The charge of anti-conservative bias in tech championed by Gaetz in recent years has risen from a fringe right-wing talking point to the highest levels of the Republican Party, with Trump emerging as a consistent critic.

The president on Tuesday again raised allegations that his favorite social media platform, Twitter, suppresses conservative viewpoints, accusing them of playing “political games” with their content moderation decisions.

“They don’t treat me well as a Republican. Very discriminatory, hard for people to sign on. Constantly taking people off list,” Trump said in a pair of tweets, adding: “No wonder Congress wants to get involved — and they should. Must be more, and fairer, companies to get out the WORD!”

To be sure, given the broader partisan division that’s gripped Washington, some are cautious in considering whether the curious alliances will actually succeed in delivering meaningful regulation for the tech industry.

“They’re bedfellows, maybe, but it’s like a king-sized bed. I think there’s still a fair of room between them on a fair amount of issues,” said Justin Brookman, director of consumer privacy and technology policy Consumer Reports. “Certainly you’re seeing the rhetoric align a little more, and that’s important. But whether we’ll see action? We’ll see.”

But Brookman added that “common rhetoric and acknowledgment of the problem is a really important first step” toward concrete legislation. “The first step is a common understanding that there’s a problem, and we’re definitely seeing a lot more of that,” he said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2VrABnF
via IFTTT

Why Madonna’s Legacy of Reinvention Is More Relevant Than Ever



Getty Images

By Erica Russell

She’s been a dance-floor cowgirl. A disco diva in leg warmers. A punky bubblegum pop star. An erotic mistress. A spiritual guru. An American dream girl. A rebel heart. We’re four decades into the chameleonic Queen of Pop’s career, but there’s one thing that Madonna has never been: uninspiring.

On the cusp of her 14th studio album, Madonna has reinvented herself yet again, this time as Madame X: a professor, a cabaret singer, a cha-cha instructor, and a spy in the house of love, as she divulged in cryptic promotional posts to her millions of Twitter followers. “Madame X is a secret agent traveling around the world, changing identities, fighting for freedom, bringing light to dark places,” the musician mused in a video teaser for the forthcoming concept album, out June 14. Perhaps serendipitously, the statement itself nods to Madonna’s career-long trajectory: She has, quite literally, changed her identity time and time over, fought for freedom of expression, and brought illumination to the depths of our often murky pop-culture waters.

Born Madonna Louise Ciccone on August 16, 1958, the artist moved to New York City in the late 1970s to pursue a career as a dancer. It was there, after dropping out of college and taking gigs as a backup dancer, she found her true calling as a solo singer and performer. Her eponymous 1983 debut album set the standard for the sound and energy of post-disco dance-pop, while her sophomore release, Like a Virgin, solidified her as a determined provocateur, delivering with its titular single one of the most controversial, memorable, and, particularly for its time, scandalous pop hits in history. To this day, her 1984 MTV VMAs performance, during which she revealed her underwear and humped the stage while wearing a wedding gown, remains one of pop culture’s most infamous and legendary moments.

Through the countless albums that followed, Madonna has maintained her status as one of the prototypical inventors of pop reinvention, refusing to, as one might say, stay in her lane. On 1992’s sexually-charged Erotica, she introduced Mistress Dita, her dominating alter ego, while embracing the club-friendly new jack swing and house music of the time. Six years later, she emerged as an enlightened earth mother amid the effervescent trip-hop of Ray of Light. In 2005, she ventured back into the glare of the discotheque lights on her critically acclaimed electronic opus, Confessions on a Dance Floor. Every album released between and since has seen Madonna wholly transform herself.

Over the span of her game-changing career, Madonna has both defined and redefined what it means to be a pop star, a performer, and an icon. She topped charts, broke records, and, most importantly, railed against the rules previously set for female mainstream musicians in the industry, voraciously fighting for control over her production and image while simultaneously ushering in new norms for women’s self-empowered sexual exhibition in music, injecting the pop machine with a much-necessary punk spirit. She set a revolutionary precedent that nearly every pop artist who has emerged since has acknowledged, whether overtly or subtly within their own art. Even in 2019, nearly 40 years after her debut, contemporary pop’s biggest players are still taking notes.

Madonna’s continued acts of public reinvention, for example, both within her art and her persona, have left a lasting mark on the culture of pop music, normalizing it for artists to reinvent their image, sound, and creative themes upon each new “era,” or album release. In the 2010s, Miley Cyrus twerked her way from the post-Disney dance-pop of Can’t Be Tamed to the controversial hip-hop of Bangerz, before switching things up again with the sunny country-tinged pop-rock of Younger Now. Similarly, across her albums, Katy Perry transformed from rebellious pin-up girl next door to electro-pop teenage dream to prismatic princess of love and light, among other personas. Stars like Taylor Swift, Rihanna, Justin Timberlake, and Gwen Stefani have all reinvented themselves. And Britney Spears, Madonna protégé and pop heir, is similarly no stranger to reinvention — or dutiful homage, for that matter. (Just compare Spears’ performance of “Breathe On Me” during her 2004 Onyx Hotel Tour to Madonna’s “Like a Virgin” performance from the 1990 Blond Ambition Tour.)

On a broader scale, Madonna also helped shape the way pop artists release music. After the decline of the rock-oriented concept album in the 1980s — thanks in part to the rise of MTV and the increased focus on singles-driven music video releases — Madonna helped reignite interest in the art of the concept album within mainstream pop with thematic albums like Erotica and American Life. Her blueprint can be seen all over modern popular albums, from Halsey’s Hopeless Fountain Kingdom to Marina and the Diamonds’ Electra Heart; Janelle Monáe’s The ArchAndroid to Lorde’s Melodrama.

Of course, it would be heresy to wax on Madonna’s legacy without addressing her penchant for flirting with all manner of controversy, a skill she elevated to an impressive art form. From sharing a steamy kiss with Spears at the 2003 VMAs to dangling from a disco ball crucifix during her 2006 Confessions Tour — not to mention the burning crosses featured in her “Like a Prayer” music video, which was at one point banned from MTV — Madonna has scandalized and titillated in equal measure, pushing the boundaries with her signature embracement of hyper-sexual and religious themes.

Without her early pioneering in unapologetic pop provocation, Christina Aguilera may never have gotten quite so “Dirrty,” Lady Gaga may not have danced with “Judas,” and Rihanna may not have dabbled in “S&M.” Madonna’s assertive omnipresence can be felt in the work of provocative artists like Billie Eilish, Lauren Jauregui, Grimes, and Lana Del Rey, to name a few. Even Beyoncé has cited her as an influence.

And it’s no coincidence that Madonna’s heavenly disembodied voice delivers a sermon in the celestial music video for Ariana Grande’s 2018 single, “God Is a Woman.” Grande, a fellow Italian-American performer who cut her teeth in the New York City entertainment biz, has frequently cited Madonna as one of her most significant influences, but without Madonna’s audacious early forays into so-called blasphemous imagery, Grande (who also faced some controversy for her single) may not have found a space in which to explore her own brand of feminine divinity.

In 2019, Madonna sure as hell doesn’t need to provoke. Her iconoclastic and innovative artistry, though problematic at some points in her career (the star has been heavily criticized for being a repeat offender of cultural appropriation), continues to inform the landscape of pop music, despite declining album sales in recent years. Her music, imagery, and confrontational boldness may not seem so revolutionary today in the age of modern feminism, but that’s because she made it so. And yet with ageism and sexism still rampant in the music industry, her work is far from over: As a 60-year-old woman in a highly visible entertainment field, her mere refusal to quiet down, cover up, and fade away is an act of brilliant rebellion.

“Is Madonna still relevant?” From misogynistic critiques to ageist diatribes as to why she’s supposedly “too old” to express herself in the way she wants to, a quick Google search yields an aggravating insight into why her presence is necessary. So no, Madonna’s relevancy doesn’t hinge on the success of her albums, or whether or not she still quite shocks the public as she did back in 1984, or if her new music is sonically groundbreaking. Rather, she remains relevant because, quite frankly, she’s still here; still uncompromising and still reinventing; still flipping off a culture that seeks to push her out. And still breaking new ground for the artists who came after her.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2L1kSrz
via IFTTT

The Sudanese librarian who provides books to protesters

Khartoum, Sudan – Abdirahman Moalim first came to the sit-in outside Sudan’s army headquarters in Khartoum to join thousands of his fellow countrymen in calling for Omar al-Bashir to step down as president.

But Moalim, a librarian by profession, saw he could do more.

“I saw most of the protesters were young. At the sit-in, they only had their phones and were reading from it. I then thought what if I bring them books so that they can read and protest at the same time,” Moalim, popularly known as Kabila, told Al Jazeera.

Kabila, who works at the Modern Kabo library in Khartoum, soon realised what books the protesters wanted to read.

“They mostly read books about politics and power. Almost no one reads fiction books,” the 35-year-old told Al Jazeera.

A librarian for more than 14 years, Kabila was surprised by the speed of change he is witnessing in his country. The protesters forced the military to remove al-Bashir as president on April 11.

“All my life I have only known one leader. A bad leader. From the books we read to our everyday life al-Bashir affected our lives in a bad way,” he added, as a group of young protesters sat nearby reading books.

Books about revolutions

Many books, especially those about the conflict in Darfur in the country’s west, and books about revolutions from across the world were hard, if not impossible, to find on the shelves of book stores in the Sudanese capital, according to Kabila.

“They were paranoid. They were scared of people finding out what is happening. They wanted to keep people in the dark,” he added as a large group of protesters chanted songs calling for the military to hand power over to a civilian authority.

The open-air library has no shelves or stands with books spread in straight lines on the tarmac [Hamza Mohamed/Al Jazeera]

The open-air library has no shelves or stands with books spread in straight lines on the tarmac. Protesters pick the book they fancy and read it while standing or walk over to the sand walk.

Others choose to squat. Arif Abdala just stumbled across the library a few hours ago and can’t get himself away from the books.

“It is my first time here and I like it a lot. So many good books to read. Many of them were not available before,” the 27-year-old primary school teacher told Al Jazeera.

“I don’t know how long I will be here. I have been here three hours now,” he added, reading former South African President Nelson Mandela‘s autobiography, Long Walk to Freedom.

Not all of the protesters who came to Kabila’s open-air library found it by accident while walking around the sit-in site.

Raising awareness through books

Rafaa Muhammad saw it on social media after some of her classmates shared photos of some of the books.

“I’m here with my friends and we can’t decide what books to read,” the 23-year-old university student said with a laugh.

“I will also share it on social media so that many young people know it and take advantage of it. It is really amazing,” she added.

Some protesters are buying the books and taking them home.

“I bought this book about the Darfur conflict. I have been looking for it for many years. I know Kabila from before so I told him ‘I was not leaving without the book’. I told him I need it for my home library,” Hassan Gasim told Al Jazeera.

“Books like this were extremely difficult to find before. We need them to understand our countries better. We have them now thanks Kabila,” he added.

To keep the protesters coming back and reading more books, Kabila changes the books on display every day.

The demand was so high that Kabila had to enlist two of his friends to volunteer for him.

“I like what he is doing. He is raising awareness and informing our people. That is why I came here to help him,” Alfadil Alkhidir, an electrical technician, said.

“Everyday after I finish work at 3pm I come here and help him until midnight,” he added.

For Kabila, raising awareness through books is what he always wanted to do.

“Our youth need to be informed and there is no better way than through books. I want to see change in our country and that can only happen if we are informed in a good way,” he said.

Follow Hamza Mohamed on Twitter: @Hamza_Africa

Demand was so high that Kabila had to enlist two of his friends to volunteer for him [Hamza Mohamed/Al Jazeera]

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2XE0mP1
via IFTTT

Trump vows to fight ‘all the subpoenas’ as partisan tensions spike


poster=”http://bit.ly/2UXJ7v9;

true

white house

The Trump administration is aggressively responding to lawmakers’ efforts to probe all aspects of the presidency.

President Donald Trump spiked partisan tensions to new heights Wednesday, saying his administration will challenge “all the subpoenas” sent his way by congressional Democrats.

The president’s comment came the same day the Justice Department sent a letter to House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) stating it would not comply with a supboena demanding a department official testify in the committee’s investigation of the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census.

Story Continued Below

The refusal was the latest clash in an increasingly hostile standoff between the White House and Congress. Since the publication last week of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election, the Trump administration is aggressively responding to lawmakers’ efforts to push forward with probes into all aspects of the presidency.

Trump said Democrats’ ramped-up investigatory efforts — which this week have also included fights over subpoenas of the president’s financial records and former White House counsel Don McGahn — are a ploy to defeat him in 2020.

“We’re fighting all the subpoenas,” the president said on the White House’s south lawn before departing for a summit on the opioid crisis in Atlanta.

The Justice Department’s refusal letter sent Wednesday to Cummings marks the second time the Trump administration has ignored a congressional subpoena this week. On Tuesday, the White House instructed former personnel security director Carl Kline not to answer questions for the House Oversight Committee’s investigation into the White House security clearance process.

Cummings said Tuesday he is moving toward a vote to hold Kline in contempt for refusing to comply with a subpoena.

On the citizenship question, Cummings seeks the testimony of Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Gore, which was scheduled to take place Thursday. In response to Cummings’ subpoena, a DOJ official wrote that Gore would not appear because the committee would not allow a department attorney to accompany him during his testimony.

“We are disappointed that the committee remains unwilling to permit Department counsel to represent the interests of the Executive Branch in the deposition of a senior Department official,” Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote in the letter.

In early April, Boyd wrote to Cummings claiming Gore voluntarily answered “hundreds of questions” during an interview with the committee in March but refused to answer particular queries “that sought information concerning confidential Executive Branch deliberations that are protected under well-established law.”

In this letter, dated April 9, Boyd wrote that Gore would not comply with the subpoena unless accompanied by a department attorney. Barring DOJ counsel during compelled testimony “would unconstitutionally infringe upon the prerogatives of the Executive Branch,” Boyd wrote.

Cummings responded at the time denying the request but saying he would allow a DOJ attorney to be present in a separate room during Gore’s testimony.

This particular probe focuses on Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross’ decision to put a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, a controversial addition that some have argued will drive down response rates among minority communities. The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard arguments about the Trump administration’s decision to add the question and will rule on the matter by June 30.

Trump on Wednesday gave a fiery response to questions about Democratic efforts to pry information from his administration, claiming partisan motives spurred the slew of subpoenas.

“Look, these aren’t, like, impartial people,” he said. “The Democrats are trying to win 2020. They’re not going to win with the people that I see. And they aren’t going to win against me.”

He added that the only way Democrats could “luck out” is by “constantly going after me on nonsense.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2GEVLqa
via IFTTT

Russell Westbrook Is a Man Without a Plan

The snapshots and GIFs and viral videos all captured some version of the same joyful scene Tuesday night: Damian Lillard, master of clutch time, connecting from 37 feet as the final buzzer sounded. Lillard, wryly waving buh-bye to the Oklahoma City Thunder. Lillard, mobbed by teammates and grinning.

Beyond the happy mayhem, in the distant background, another star silently strode away, shoulders slumped, never looking up.

If Lillard was a portrait of dynamism and precision and triumph, Russell Westbrook was his polar opposite—a picture of despair.

Both men earned their fate.

With a 50-point game and a buzzer-beater for the ages, Lillard powered the Portland Trail Blazers to a thrilling closeout victory and a trip to the Western Conference semis.

With his ghastly marksmanship and a fitful final stretch, Westbrook dragged the Thunder to another horrific first-round collapse.

His shooting line in Game 5: 31 shots, 11 makes. His totals for the series: 111 shots, 40 makes.

It’s been three years since Kevin Durant severed his partnership with Westbrook and fled to Oakland. In that time, Westbrook has set fire to the record books, made triple-doubles routine, claimed a Most Valuable Player award and accomplished virtually nothing for his franchise.

The Thunder have yet to crack 50 wins in the Westbrook eranot even this season, with Paul George making his own MVP run. The Thunder have yet to win a playoff series in the Westbrook era. Their postseason record: 4-12.

“He’s a transcendent player,” a veteran Western Conference executive said, “but I’m not convinced he’s a transcendent winner.”

The failures are not Westbrook’s alone, of course. The Thunder need more shooting, more depth. But what they need most is a franchise star who is willing to confront his shortcomings and adapt, and Westbrook has long resisted any such self-awareness.

“Now I do what I want,” Westbrook sang after Durant left town, and so he hasshooting as much as he wants, from wherever he wants, results be damned.

Westbrook shot 29 percent on three-pointers this season—poor even by his standards—and yet he attempted 411 of them, the 40th-highest total in the league. Westbrook is among the league’s most lethal rim attackers, and yet he keeps launching deep twos in transition and pull-up 26-footers in crunch time.

“When I’ve watched Russ play, I’m wowed at the effort and the energy that he puts into the game,” said former NBA center Brendan Haywood, now an analyst for NBA Radio and NBA TV. “But I think there’s another step, there’s another layer that he needs to get to, and that is thinking the gameunderstanding that it’s not just ‘Go hard, play aggressive, play with a chip on my shoulder.’ Sometimes you have to understand the defense and the game plan and attack the game a little bit differently. And I don’t think that he’s gotten that down just yet.”

Though he only connected on 29 percent from beyond the three-point arc this season, that didn't stop Russell Westbrook from firing almost six three-point attempts per game.

Though he only connected on 29 percent from beyond the three-point arc this season, that didn’t stop Russell Westbrook from firing almost six three-point attempts per game.Zach Beeker/Getty Images

Of the 30 players who averaged at least 20 points per game this season, Westbrook ranked dead last in effective field-goal percentage, at 46.8. Widen the field to players with at least 15 points per game, and he’s 69th of 70 players, sandwiched between Dennis Schroder and Andrew Wiggins, and behind such scoring legends as Jordan Clarkson, Tim Hardaway Jr. and Jeremy Lamb.

For all his ferocity and pyrotechnics, Westbrook is a drag on his team’s offense. The Thunder ranked 17th in offensive efficiency this season, despite having two of the league’s top 15 players.

And now they’re out of the playoffs, losing to a Blazers team with less star power and without its starting center. Before the series, 19 of 20 ESPN analysts predicted the Thunder would win the series. Instead, they were dispatched in a gentlemen’s sweep.

“Clearly underperforming,” an Eastern Conference team official said of the Thunder, citing the talent of Westbrook and George. “That alone should be enough to get out of the first round, and it’s not happening.”

No, it’s not all on Westbrook. But every glitch in his game was on display Tuesday night. After playing a measured (and effective) game early on, setting up teammates and fueling an early Thunder lead, Westbrook reverted to old, bad habits. OKC blew a 15-point lead in the final eight minutes, with Westbrook misfiring from 19 and 21 feet, forcing tough shots in the paint and throwing the ball away on a critical late possession. Just as Lillard’s mesmerizing buzzer-beater symbolized his night, so, too, did Westbrook’s final play: a wild, barreling layup attempt that clanged off the rim with 18 seconds left.

“There’s a difference between playing hard and playing to win,” Haywood said. “I think that’s the difference right now between Russ and Dame.”

Survey scouts and analysts and former players, and the advice for Westbrook is generally the same: Either refine your jumper, or stop firing so many deep shots. Shoot less, pass more. Westbrook can collapse a defense anytime he wants to, which should provide plenty of open looks for teammates.

Westbrook’s confidence and passion are admirable, but those qualities quickly bleed into overconfidence.

“I think that Russell has to take a step back,” Charles Barkley said on the TNT broadcast late Tuesday. “He’s always going 100 percent speed all the time.”

To his credit, Westbrook dialed down his usage rate this season (to 30.1 from 32.5 last season) and gave more of the floor to George. But he still shoots at a rate that far exceeds his actual ability to convert. The Blazers defense repeatedly played off Westbrook, daring him to shoot, as if he were Tony Allen.

For a time, Westbrook’s fierce charisma and passion charmed the world. But with every passing season and every premature playoff exit, his flaws become more pronouncedand the list of detractors grows.

“I wouldn’t want to coach Russell Westbrook,” ESPN analyst Seth Greenberg, a former college coach, said on Tuesday’s edition of Get Up. “As exciting, as tough, as physical, as competitive as he is, in the end, is he a winning player? … Can you win with a guy dominating the ball like that all the time?”

Even satirical news sites are crushing him now. “Dedicated Russell Westbrook Stays Late After Practice to Miss 100 Extra Shots,” The Onion wrote this week.

Westbrook wove his stardom out of his athletic gifts, and it’s possible those gifts are eroding. His free-throw ratea ratio of free throws per field-goal attemptdipped to a career-low 30.6 percent this season. He drew fewer fouls. He attacked less. His field-goal and free-throw percentages were down.

Given his age (30), his punishing style of play and his 11 seasons of heavy minutes, it’s likely Westbrook is already past his peak.

Though Westbrook has averaged a triple-double in the three seasons since Kevin Durant left Oklahoma City, the Thunder have yet to win more than 49 games  in any of those years.

Though Westbrook has averaged a triple-double in the three seasons since Kevin Durant left Oklahoma City, the Thunder have yet to win more than 49 games in any of those years.Craig Mitchelldyer/Associated Press

“There’s no debate,” the analytics director for an Eastern Conference team said. “You just look at what his metrics are this year versus the past, and where his age is and the amount of minutes and style of play, and there’s no debate.”

Players who rely solely on athleticism often age poorly, with no broader skill setshooting, playmaking, defenseto fall back on.

It all leaves Westbrook with a clear, almost-Darwinian choice: adapt or (metaphorically) die.

Three years ago, Durant fled town and Westbrook got everything he wanted: total control of the offense and the Thunder franchise. “Now I do what I want,” he sang. Maybe it’s time to do something different.

Howard Beck, a senior writer for Bleacher Report, has been covering the NBA full time since 1997, including seven years on the Lakers beat for the Los Angeles Daily News and nine years as a staff writer for the New York Times. His coverage was honored by APSE in 2016 and 2017.

 Beck also hosts The Full 48 podcast, available on iTunes.

 Follow him on Twitter, @HowardBeck.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2XHPTSS
via IFTTT

UN rights chief condemns ‘shocking’ Saudi mass executions

The UN human rights chief on Wednesday called Saudi Arabia’s mass executions of 37 men “shocking” and “abhorrent”, joining a growing chorus of condemnation by rights groups and activists. 

Saudi Arabia’s interior ministry said on Tuesday it beheaded dozens of its citizens over terrorism-related crimes, publicly pinning two of the bodies to a pole as a warning to others.

“I strongly condemn these shocking mass executions across six cities in Saudi Arabia yesterday,” UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said in a statement. 

“It is particularly abhorrent that at least three of those killed were minors at the time of their sentencing,” she added. 

The men had been convicted of charges including attacking security installations with explosives, killing a number of security officers, and cooperating with “enemy organisations” against the interests of the country.

Bachelet said the executions were carried out despite repeated warnings from rights officials and UN rapporteurs about lack of due process and fair trial guarantees amid allegations that confessions were obtained through torture.

The Chilean UN official urged Saudi Arabia to review its counterterrorism legislation, expressly prohibit the death penalty for minors, and halt pending executions including of three men on death row – Ali al-Nimr, Dawood al-Marhoon and Abdulla al-Zaher – whose cases she said had been taken up by the UN rights system.

Speaking to Al Jazeera from the Swiss city of Geneva, Ravina Shamdasani, spokeswoman for Bachelet, said the UN had “sought to take measures to prevent these executions from taking place in the first place”, and urged the Saudi authorities to not carry out the penalties, but “unfortunately, this was to no avail”. 

“We are now concerned because there are others who remain on death row and we are calling on the authorities to halt any imminent execution, to review the legislation relating to the death penalty, and in particular to outlaw the execution of those who are convicted as minors,” Shamdasani said. 

‘Sectarian decision’ 

Tuesday’s sentences were carried out in Riyadh, the Muslim holy cities of Mecca and Medina, central Qassim province, and Eastern Province, home to the country’s Shia minority.

Bachelet pointed out most of the 37 belonged to the Shia-Muslim minority and some had been involved in protests.

New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW) said on Wednesday at least 33 of the 37 men put to death were Shia and it was the largest set of executions in the kingdom since January 2016, when 47 people were killed. 

This is the largest mass executions of Shias in the history of Saudi Arabia since the 1900s

Ali al-Ahmed, director of the Institute for Gulf Affairs

Amnesty International also said late on Tuesday the majority of those executed in six cities belonged to the Shia minority and were convicted after “sham trials”, including at least 14 people who participated in anti-government protests in the kingdom’s oil-rich Eastern Province in 2011-2012.

Ali al-Ahmed, director of the Institute for Gulf Affairs, a US-based think-tank, said a few Sunnis were among those executed “so the list doesn’t look like a sectarian decision”, he told Al Jazeera from Washington, DC. 

“This is the largest mass executions of Shias in the history of Saudi Arabia since the 1900s,” al-Ahmed added. 

The Shia community in Saudi Arabia “will face greater challenges”, he warned. 

Prolific executor

Saudi Arabia is one of the world’s most prolific executor. 

Along with Iran, Vietnam and Iraq, the kingdom accounted for 78 percent of total reported executions last year, according to Amnesty’s annual report, published this month.

Amnesty said the kingdom has stepped up the rate of executions in 2019, with at least 104 people put to death since the start of the year compared with 149 for the whole of 2018.

Tuesday’s mass execution was “another gruesome indication of how the death penalty is being used as a political tool to crush dissent from within” the country’s Shia minority, said Lynn Maalouf, the group’s research director for the Middle East.

European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said the executions heightened doubts about respect for the right to a fair trial in Saudi Arabia and could generate sectarian violence.

“Mass executions are not the mark of a ‘reformist’ government, but rather one marked by capricious, autocratic rule,” HRW’s Middle East director Michael Page said. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2IEwoXU
via IFTTT

Tomorrow X Together And Some Very Good Boys Star In New ‘Cat & Dog’ Video



BigHit Entertaiment

Tomorrow X Together burst onto the K-pop scene last month with their upbeat, synth-pop debut single “Crown.” Now, the quintet is back with another colorful music video — this time, for their energetic hip-hop track “Cat & Dog.” And it’s an instant mood enhancer.

The whimsical visual is all bright colors and playful choreography, as members Soobin, Yeonjun, Beomgyu, Taehyun, and Hueningkai serve aegyo (cute expressions) with typical teenage attitude — a contrast that, much like the song, somehow really works. Watch the video below, but be prepared: This is the kind of song that will get stuck in your head, and before you know it you’ll be barking for no reason.

Given the title, there’s also plenty of cat and dog imagery throughout the video, including animated ears and meme-worthy scenes of the members cuddling up to their furry counterparts.

Look at these Very Good Boys:

BigHit Entertainment
BigHit Entertainment
BigHit Entertainment
BigHit Entertainment
BigHit Entertainment

If “Crown” was an introduction to the group as a dynamic whole, then “Cat & Dog” is an introduction to the individual members, each radiating their own kind of youthful energy: Yeonjun’s confident mumble-adjacent rap; leader Soobin’s soft and explosive duality; Beomgyu’s powerful expressions; and Taehyun’s vocal charms. And youngest member Hueningkai is a standout — his charisma in front of the camera is infectious.

The K-pop rookies have a busy summer ahead of them. Not only are they kicking off their first U.S. showcase in May with sold-out stops in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and more — not bad for a group that’s only two months old — but the teens will also be taking the stage at iHeartRadio’s Wango Tango festival in June and KCON New York in July. And knowing this ambitious bunch, this is only the beginning of the Summer of TXT.

It’s a good thing they have a song for that, too.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2XCRh9a
via IFTTT