Nearly half of e-scooter injuries involve head trauma, CDC study says

Oh look, no helmets.
Oh look, no helmets.

Image: CHRIS DELMAS/AFP/Getty Images

By Sasha Lekach

Electric scooter riders, protect your head! 

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said in a report out this week that nearly half of all e-scooter injuries involve head trauma. Maybe worse, most of the incidents could have been prevented by simply wearing a helmet or other safety equipment.

The CDC published the study in collaboration with the Austin Public Transportation Department (APTD) and Austin Public Health (APH). It examined electric scooter trends in the Texas capital from September through November 2018.

The researchers identified 271 people with potential e-scooter-related injuries during the study. Further analysis of the report combined the number of confirmed injuries (160) with other probable injuries (32). Of those 190 injured riders, 48 percent experienced injuries to the head.

Furthermore, 70 percent of these riders suffered injuries to their upper limbs such as their hands,  wrists, arms, and shoulders. Fifty-five percent experienced injuries to their lower limbs.

SEE ALSO: The CDC’s study on e-scooter injuries reveals the obvious: wear a helmet

The study also found that about half of the injured riders suffered a severe injury, meaning bone fractures, severe bleeding, long hospital stays, or organ damage. Broken bones were slightly more common on riders’ arms (11 percent) than their legs (6 percent), according to the study.

But what really stands out: less than one percent of riders were wearing a helmet when they were injured.

Helmet use is quickly becoming a growing problem for e-scooter companies. A JAMA study earlier this year found that 40 percent of injuries involved the head and only about 4 percent of injured riders wore helmets. This has led to companies creating helmets that are easier to carry, some even collapse.

Companies like Morpher are now making helmets with folding features. SoCal-based electric vehicle-share company Wheels this week also unveiled its patent filing for a helmet that fits onto the e-bike itself. After each ride, biodegradable hygienic liners could be replaced on the shared helmet. The vehicle would detect when the helmet was removed and then returned to its slot above the back wheel.

The first iterations of the built-in helmet design are expected to come later this year to its bikes in the Los Angeles and San Diego areas.

A design for a helmet on the go.

A design for a helmet on the go.

Image: wheels

A group promoting e-scooter and e-bike-share access, The Micromobility Coalition, said in a statement from executive director Ryan McConaghy Thursday that he welcomed the attention the CDC put on e-scooter safety and called for “smarter standards like protected bike lanes and infrastructure to help ensure cars and all micromobility can coexist safely on our roadways.” He also urged riders to follow traffic laws and safety rules from the rental companies to mitigate scooter incidents.

Lime’s chief policy officer, David Spielfogel, said in an email statement that the e-scooter company is always looking to improve safety for riders and everyone else on the road. “If we want to help people move around their communities efficiently and equitably, we need to ensure options besides cars are trusted as safe and reliable,” he wrote.

Lyft launched scooters in several U.S. cities last year and has been encouraging safe riding, better street design in cities, and partnering with advocacy groups — all in the name of safety.

Last month Bird scooter-share company released its own safety report and encouraged helmet-wearing, careful riding, and appropriate parking and scooter etiquette. In January, California modified its helmet laws to allow adults over 18 to decide whether or not to wear a helmet while on an e-scooter. 

With all this in mind, we’ll leave you with a simple piece of advice: Please just wear a helmet if you’re going to ride an electric scooter.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/300N2GC
via IFTTT

Melo’s Time in Houston Turns into a Nightmare | Game of Zones S6E4

  1. McCollum and the Blazers Snapped Postseason Losing Streak for “Jennifer”

  2. Stars Invest in Plant-Based Food as Vegetarianism Sweeps NBA

  3. The NBA Got Some Wild Techs This Season

  4. Jarrett Allen Is One of the NBA’s Hottest Rim Protectors

  5. Wade’s Jersey Swaps Created Epic Moments This Season

  6. Westbrook Makes History While Honoring Nipsey Hussle

  7. Devin Booker Makes History with Scoring Tear

  8. 29 Years Ago, Jordan Dropped Career-High 69 Points

  9. Bosh Is Getting His Jersey Raised to the Rafters in Miami

  10. Steph Returns to Houston for 1st Time Since His Moon Landing Troll

  11. Lou Williams Is Coming for a Repeat of Sixth Man of the Year

  12. Pat Beverley Has the Clippers Stealing the LA Shine

  13. LeBron Keeps Shredding NBA Record Books

  14. Young’s Hot Streak Is Heating Up the ROY Race with Luka

  15. LeBron and 2 Chainz Form a Superteam to Release a New Album

  16. Wade’s #OneLastDance Dominated February

  17. Warriors Fans Go Wild After Unforgettable Moments with Steph

  18. Eight Years Ago, the Nuggets Traded Melo to the Knicks

  19. Two Years Ago, the Kings Shipped Boogie to the Pelicans

  20. ASG Will Be Competitive Again If the NBA Raises the Stakes

Right Arrow Icon

Game of Zones Season 6, Episode 4, Melo and the Model: Melo has a tough time adjusting to the Rockets’ system 😬

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2UW3pjO
via IFTTT

US Senate fails to override Trump veto on Yemen war

The US Senate failed on Thursday to overturn President Donald Trump‘s veto of legislation that would have ended US military assistance for the Saudi-UAE war in Yemen.

The vote handed a victory to the White House for its policy of continuing to back Saudi Arabia.

The vote was 53 to 45, falling short of the two-thirds majority needed to override a veto, despite a handful of Trump’s fellow Republicans joining Democrats in backing the War Powers Resolution.

It was only the second veto of Trump’s presidency, both this year. Neither piece of legislation garnered the two-thirds support in both the Senate and the House of Representatives needed to override the veto.

The resolution’s passage earlier this year marked the first time both the Senate and House supported the provision of the War Powers Act limiting the president’s ability to send troops into action without congressional authorization.

Backers of the resolution said they wanted to reassert Congress’s constitutional power to declare war, and send a strong message to Saudi Arabia about the devastating civilian toll of the four-year-long civil war in Yemen. 

“We’ve been materially assisting a foreign power in its efforts to bomb its adversaries. And sometimes helping that foreign power to bomb innocent civilians on the ground in the process,” Republican Senator Mike Lee, a co-sponsor of the resolution, said before the vote.

Senator Bernie Sanders, who is running for the Democratic 2020 presidential nomination and was a sponsor of the resolution that passed Congress, framed Thursday’s veto vote as a life or death issue.

“We can save thousands upon thousands of people if we override Donald Trump’s veto,” he tweeted shortly before the vote.

Congress increasingly frustrated

The war in Yemen, which pits Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates against Houthi rebels backed by Iran, has killed tens of thousands of people and spawned what the United Nations calls the world’s most dire humanitarian crisis, with the country on the brink of famine.

Many members of Congress have also become increasingly frustrated with Saudi Arabia over its human rights record, anger fueled by the murder of Saudi writer Jamal Khashoggi at a Saudi consulate in Turkey last year. 

Saudi officials have rejected accusations that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) ordered the killing, despite a conclusion by US intelligence that MBS was complicit in the journalist’s murder.

The resolution’s opponents argued that support for the Saudi-UAE coalition was not an appropriate use of the War Powers Act, because the military provides supports such as targeting assistance, not troops.

“The premise of this resolution is fundamentally flawed and I believe a misrepresentation of what is happening on the ground in Yemen,” Republican Senator Jim Risch said before the vote.

Risch, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, is writing legislation to address the situation with Saudi Arabia.

He declined to discuss possible specific provisions of the measure, but said he hoped to introduce it in May with the goal of finding something that could pass both the Republican-controlled Senate and Democratic-controlled House and be signed, not vetoed, by Trump.

Amid US and international anger over the civilian toll of the Yemen conflict, the Trump administration last year stopped providing refuelling support for Saudi aircraft in Yemen.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2ZVISQn
via IFTTT

Report: Nets’ D’Angelo Russell Cited for Marijuana Possession at Airport

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - APRIL 20:  D'Angelo Russell #1 of the Brooklyn Nets reacts in the second half against the Philadelphia 76ers at Barclays Center on April 20, 2019 in the Brooklyn borough of New York City.The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Brooklyn Nets 112-108. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

Elsa/Getty Images

Brooklyn Nets star D’Angelo Russell was cited for marijuana possession Wednesday night at New York‘s LaGuardia Airport, according to A.J. Perez of USA Today

Police reportedly found marijuana hidden inside a container that was made to look like an Arizona Iced Tea can in Russell’s luggage during a routine search of his checked bag.

The 23-year-old continued on his flight to Louisville, Kentucky, but received a summons to appear in court.

Per Perez, Russell would be forced to enter the league’s marijuana program if he is convicted of possession, but he wouldn’t be suspended until the third violation.

The Nets offseason began only recently, with the team losing its first-round matchup to the Philadelphia 76ers in five games. The squad’s last game came on April 23.

Meanwhile, this is a big summer for Russell, who is a restricted free agent for the first time. He has an opportunity to test the market, although the Nets will have a chance to match any deal.

“I definitely want to be here. But I also know it’s a business, too,” Russell said about potentially remaining with the Nets, per Ian Begley of ESPN.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2VcLIkW
via IFTTT

White House lawyer mocks Mueller report as ‘law school exam paper’


Emmet Flood

Emmet Flood’s letter to Barr came one day after the public release of a redacted version of the special counsel’s report. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

White House

In a five-page letter, a top White House lawyer argued that Trump should be able to stop officials from talking to Congress about the report.

A top White House lawyer slammed Robert Mueller in a letter made public Thursday, calling out the special counsel for playing politics by submitting findings to Attorney General William Barr that are “part ‘truth commission’ report and part law school exam paper.”

Emmet Flood’s blistering rebuke of Mueller’s work came in a five-page letter to Barr dated April 19, one day after the public release of a redacted version of the special counsel’s report that detailed President Donald Trump’s efforts to interfere in the Russia probe but declined to make a determination on whether Trump obstructed justice.

Story Continued Below

The missive is the latest salvo in a long-running spat between the White House and the special counsel’s office over what information Mueller’s team should be allowed to release — and what Congress should see. It argues that Trump should be able to stop officials from talking to lawmakers about the report’s findings and attempts to justify the White House refusal to comply with congressional subpoenas seeking further information about instances described in the report.

Flood, who has handled Trump’s official White House response over the past year on the Russia probe, argued to Barr that Mueller had failed in his “one job” under the Justice Department regulations used to appoint him — to explain in a confidential memo to Barr why he had decided for or against prosecuting the president.

“The SCO instead produced a prosecutorial curiosity,” Flood wrote, arguing that the report “suffers from an extraordinary legal defect: It quite deliberately fails to comply with the requirements of governing law.”

Flood took issue specifically with the 182-page section of the report that detailed a dozen instances in which Trump might have obstructed justice. He blasted the document for laying “raw evidentiary material combined with its own inclusive observations on the arguable legal significance of the gathered content.”

“This species of public report has no basis in the relevant regulation and no precedent in the history of special/independent counsel investigations,” Flood wrote.

He also questioned the notion suggested by “some commentators” that Mueller’s work was in effect a guide for congressional investigators with the power to impeach Trump, arguing that the special counsel in his capacity as a temporary DOJ official “should not be in the business of creating ‘road maps’ for the purpose of transmitting them” to Congress.

Mueller spokesman Peter Carr declined comment on Flood’s letter, which was made public by the White House amid a larger legal standoff between House Democrats and the Justice Department over whether Congress should be sent the complete special counsel report without redactions.

On Wednesday, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd sent House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler a letter declining to comply with a subpoena for the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence, saying the request is “not legitimate oversight.”

Flood replaced Ty Cobb last May in the White House, giving Trump an experienced attorney who helped President Bill Clinton manage his impeachment defense in the late 1990s. Flood briefly served last year as acting White House counsel during the transition from Don McGahn to Pat Cipollone.

In his letter to Barr, Flood also explained that Trump doesn’t consider the release of the Mueller report to be a waiver of executive privilege claims for future testimony from his aides or for the release of underlying special counsel documents such as witness interview transcripts and FBI agent notes. Presidents have historically used the executive privilege principle to shield internal White House conversations.

Trump during the special counsel investigation waived executive privilege, allowing the release of more than 1.4 million pages of documents and voluntary interviews from dozens of staffers. The president also didn’t assert the claim during the release of the final report.

But Flood signaled House Democrats will be in for a fight if they want to interview former White House aides like McGahn, Hope Hicks or Steve Bannon, as part of an effort tied to impeachment and post-Mueller oversight.

“It is one thing for a President to encourage complete cooperation and transparency in a criminal investigation conducted largely within the Executive Branch; it is something else entirely to allow his advisors to appear before Congress,” Flood wrote.

Flood’s letter also echoed Trump’s long-stated complaints about the origins of the Mueller probe, taking issue with “illegal leaks” of classified or sensitive information used to target the president and launch an investigation in the first place. While the White House lawyer didn’t name names, his ire was focused foremost on former FBI Director James Comey, who shared his contemporaneous notes about meetings with Trump with journalists.

“Not so long ago, the idea that a law enforcement official might provide the press with confidential government information for the proclaimed purpose of prompting a criminal investigation of an identified individual would have troubled Americans of all political persuasions,” Flood wrote. “That the head of our country’s top law enforcement agency has actually done so to the President of the United States should frighten every friend of individual liberty.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2H5pJmr
via IFTTT

Mark Zuckerberg could become Facebook’s ‘designated compliance officer’

Facebook’s new “designated compliance officer”?

Image: Niall Carson / PA Images / Getty

By Matt Binder

Facebook may be facing more than just a $3 to $5 billion fine from the Federal Trade Commission.

According to a report in Politico, the FTC may require Facebook to create a privacy oversight committee as well as appoint a “federally approved privacy official” at the company. The committee would be “independent” but could consist of Facebook board members. 

SEE ALSO: Mark Zuckerberg’s cringey laugh was a slap in the face of Facebook’s victims

The FTC could also designate Mark Zuckerberg as the company’s “designated compliance officer,” in which he would assume personal accountability for Facebook’s privacy failures. 

It’s a way for the government to send a message about data privacy to other big tech companies. But some civil rights groups say that the “independent” committee—which would involve Facebook executives—wouldn’t go far enough to prevent future privacy violations.

Speaking to Politico, the Electronic Privacy Information Center’s Marc Rotenberg blasted the settlement details as “not meaningful.” 

“A board doesn’t create new privacy rights for internet users,” he said. “And to say that Mark Zuckerberg is personally responsible — Mark Zuckerberg is Facebook, so what does that mean? It doesn’t add anything.”

Others were quick to point out that Zuckerberg, the founder and CEO of the company, has been in charge during countless Facebook data leaks and violations, including the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

In addition to the FTC probe, the social media company is also facing a criminal investigation concerning its data-sharing practices with third parties.

Facebook talked about its privacy issues at its F8 developer conference earlier this week.

“Today we’re going to talk about building a privacy-focused social platform,” said Zuckerberg at the event. “Privacy gives us the freedom to be ourselves. That’s why I believe the future is private.”

The negotiation between Facebook and the FTC is ongoing.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2vBczIe
via IFTTT

Facebook bans ‘dangerous’ individuals from Facebook, Instagram

Alex Jones has few platforms left to him.
Alex Jones has few platforms left to him.

Image: drew angerer/Getty Images

By Rachel Kraus

Facebook has stepped up the enforcement of its own rules, announcing the Facebook and Instagram bans of a host of controversial public figures including Alex Jones, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, and others. 

It has taken action against these figures and others because Facebook considers them “dangerous,” per a definition in Facebook’s Community Guidelines. It is banning the individuals and affiliated pages from both Facebook and Instagram.

SEE ALSO: 2018 was the year we (sort of) cleaned up the internet

“We’ve always banned individuals or organizations that promote or engage in violence and hate, regardless of ideology,” a Facebook spokesperson said. “The process for evaluating potential violators is extensive and it is what led us to our decision to remove these accounts today.”

Following the actions of other tech platforms, Facebook banned Alex Jones and InfoWars pages from Facebook in August 2018. Today’s ban affects Jones’ and InfoWars’ Instagram pages.

The ban is also affecting: 

Some of the account pages still remained live at the time of writing, but Facebook said it is in the midst of removing the pages from the platforms.

Facebook said it evaluates pages and individuals as “dangerous” with an extensive process to determine whether they meet the criteria for this categorization. Some of the criteria include if they call for (or carry out) acts of violence against people in protected groups (like race or religion), if they self-identify as following a hateful ideology, and if they post content that violates hate speech policies. Facebook may also take action against vocal supporters of people designated as “dangerous,” and remove events in which these people are participating.

While many Conservatives deride these actions as free speech violations, experts support deplatforming — or, the tactic of removing the social platforms of people who promote extremism — as a way to combat the spread of hate and hateful ideology online. The shrinking relevance of figures who have been deplatformed, like Milo Yiannopoulos, provides evidence that, in the often overwhelming fight against the rising tide of extremism online, deplatforming works.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2PR2BMt
via IFTTT

Alex Morgan, Carli Lloyd Headline USA’s 2019 Women’s World Cup Roster

“,”id”:404,”type”:”error”},”playlists”:{},”profiles”:{},”promo”:{},”schedules”:{“selectedTeam”:404},”search”:{“site”:{“query”:””,”results”:[]},”tags”:{“query”:””,”results”:[]}},”sections”:{},”stub”:{},”tags”:{},”template”:{“html”:{“className”:”no-js”,”lang”:”en”},”title”:”error | Bleacher Report”,”meta_tags”:{“aol-te-auth”:”1c424580-0f86-4d9b-88b2-bc8c0d029d4c”,”blitz”:”mu-6e4ce5cd-57f20d11-7c0ecee9-d55c79e2″,”msvalidate.01″:”7A63840181953B2A5A1FEA25FB45A991″,”robots”:”NOODP,NOYDIR”,”verify-v1″:”+Ntj422Jc4V03qgBqLYbF3LMvrursV0X2btn2Zoqn9w=”,”description”:”Sports journalists and bloggers covering NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, MMA, college football and basketball, NASCAR, fantasy sports and more. News, photos, mock drafts, game scores, player profiles and more!”,”keywords”:”Bleacher Report, bleacherreport.com, sports, writers, articles, comments, blogs, Formula 1, Premier League, Hockey, Soccer, Recaps, Boxscores, Stats, Schedules, Tennis, Golf, WWE, fantasy football, Lebron James”,”viewport”:”width=device-width, initial-scale=1″,”fb:app_id”:”135174055162″,”al:iphone:url”:”teamstream://”,”al:iphone:app_store_id”:”418075935″,”al:iphone:app_name”:”Bleacher Report”,”al:ipad:url”:”teamstream://”,”al:ipad:app_store_id”:”484725748″,”al:ipad:app_name”:”Bleacher Report”,”al:android:url”:””,”al:android:app_name”:”Bleacher Report”,”al:android:package”:”com.bleacherreport.android.teamstream”,”al:web:url”:”http://bleacherreport.com/”,”og:site_name”:”Bleacher Report”,”og:locale”:”en_US”,”p:domain_verify”:”0c768466449ebb550411234d6d4ffc30″,”theme-color”:”#000″,”twitter:app:name:iphone”:”Bleacher Report”,”twitter:app:id:iphone”:”418075935″,”twitter:app:name:ipad”:”Bleacher Report”,”twitter:app:id:ipad”:”484725748″,”twitter:app:name:googleplay”:”Bleacher Report”,”twitter:app:id:googleplay”:”com.bleacherreport.android.teamstream”,”twitter:widgets:new-embed-design”:”on”,”twitter:site”:”@bleacherreport”},”scripts”:[],”styles”:[{“href”:”https://static-assets.bleacherreport.com/css/global.7551afad8cd77b6659691df2b20d0c01.css”,”key”:”globalCSS”,”type”:”text/css”,”rel”:”stylesheet”},{“href”:”https://static-assets.bleacherreport.com/css/atomic.332e4ce214d53bdc3e37c9ae4d6516a1.css”,”key”:”atomicCSS”,”type”:”text/css”,”rel”:”stylesheet”}],”links”:[{“key”:”manifest”,”rel”:”manifest”,”href”:”/manifest.json”},{“key”:”safariMaskIcon”,”rel”:”mask-icon”,”href”:”/img/favicon/safariMaskIcon.svg”,”color”:”#000000″},{“key”:”appleTouchIcon”,”rel”:”apple-touch-icon”,”sizes”:”180×180″,”href”:”/img/favicon/appleTouchIcon.png”},{“key”:”icon32″,”rel”:”icon”,”sizes”:”32×32″,”href”:”/img/favicon/favicon32.png”},{“key”:”icon16″,”rel”:”icon”,”sizes”:”16×16″,”href”:”/img/favicon/favicon16.png”}]},”tracks”:{},”ui”:{“assetURL”:”https://static-assets.bleacherreport.com”,”bundleName”:”bundle.96b8d57e00e29098f64deb19e1ddf42d.js”,”comments”:true,”scrollPlay”:true,”skinAd_exists”:true,”teamStreamLimit”:60,”teamStreamLoading”:false,”topAd_exists”:true,”trendingLimit”:60,”userAgent”:{“family”:”Chrome”,”major”:”41″,”minor”:”0″,”patch”:”2228″,”device”:{“family”:”Other”,”major”:”0″,”minor”:”0″,”patch”:”0″},”os”:{“family”:”Windows”,”major”:”7″,”minor”:”0″,”patch”:”0″}},”videosInViewport”:[],”referrer”:””,”hideGettyCopyright”:false,”hideFooterLinks”:false,”hidePrivacyNotice”:false,”hideNav”:false,”hideShare”:false,”hide”:{},”isEmbedded”:false,”isFromCnn”:false,”customBrowser”:false,”isMobileDevice”:false,”os”:null,”theme”:”light”,”pageType”:”error”,”currentPage”:404,”url”:”https://bleacherreport.com/404″},”user”:{“device_id”:false,”league”:false,”bio”:null,”country”:”US”,”default_tags”:[22,23,18,19,16,20],”first_name”:null,”id”:null,”is_br_verified”:false,”last_name”:null,”photo_path”:null,”profile_id”:null,”tags”:[],”title”:null,”type”:”Anonymous”,”updated_at”:null,”username”:null,”siteLocale”:”USA”,”trackingId”:”056fbab6-747d-4bd5-9c42-faefc194973e”,”name”:”null null”,”birthday”:null,”identities”:{}}};
–>

Error 404: We couldn’t find that page, sorry.

Not Found from 500

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2vxJ5uS
via IFTTT

Huge crowds join protest against Sudan’s military leaders

Hundreds of thousands of protesters have joined a sit-in outside Sudan‘s defence ministry to press the ruling military council to hand over power to a civilian administration.

The huge crowd was answering a call by an alliance of activists and opposition groups to join a protest march through Khartoum on Thursday.

The Declaration of Freedom and Change Forces (DFCF) alliance said on Thursday it had submitted a draft constitutional document containing its vision for the transitional period to the Transitional Military Council (TMC).

Protesters and activists have been negotiating with the TMC to form a joint civilian-military body to oversee the period following the forced departure of long-time President Omar al-Bashir.

However, the parties are deadlocked over who would control the new council, and what the features of a transitional government would be.

Opposition groups say the ruling council must be civilian-led and have promised to maintain a sit-in outside the ministry until their demands are met, but the TMC has shown no sign of willingness to relinquish ultimate authority.

The proposed joint council would replace the existing 10-member TMC that took control after the military overthrew President al-Bashir three weeks ago.

But protest leaders from the DFCF alliance say the generals are not serious about handing power to civilians.

The army has been pushing for a council of seven military representatives and three civilians, while the alliance demands a council made up of eight civilians and seven generals.

The disagreement prompted the alliance to announce Thursday’s “million-strong march to assert our main demand, which is for civilian rule”.

People came from a number of different provinces to join the march, a witness told Reuters News Agency.

Demand for quick response

At a televised news conference on Thursday, a spokesman for the DFCF said it expected a response from the military to its constitutional draft within two or three days.

The military council has warned it will not allow “chaos” and urged protesters to dismantle makeshift barricades they have set up around the main protest hub outside army headquarters.

It also demanded demonstrators open roads and bridges blocked by protesters who have remained outside the headquarters despite al-Bashir’s departure.

Ahmed Adam, who teaches at the University of London, told Al Jazeera that people on the streets were waiting for the military council to fulfil its promise and hand over power to civilians.

“The fear is that the current situation might lead to a confrontation. Some regional powers are involved in the situation and they actually back the military council to stay in power. People on the ground want the opposite,” he said.

The protesters have won support from Western governments for their demands.

However, Gulf Arab states have provided the military council with a three-billion-dollar credit lifeline to support an “orderly” transition.  

The African Union on Tuesday gave Sudan’s military rulers another 60 days to hand over power to a civilian authority or face suspension after an earlier deadline was missed.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2PHvFWp
via IFTTT