U.K. study finds cocaine-contaminated shrimp

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2LDjBaa
via IFTTT

Ajax vs Tottenham: Mauricio Pochettino hints at exit should Spurs win Champions League

Mauricio Pochettino said that he would be able to “go home” happy if Tottenham won the Champions League, effectively leaving him with little else to achieve in the game.

Spurs can reach the final if they overturn a 1-0 deficit in their semi-final second leg against Ajax on Wednesday night. And at his pre-match press conference at the Johan Cryuff Arena on Tuesday night, Pochettino suggested there would be almost nothing left for him to do in football if he lifts the famous trophy in Madrid on 1 June, because it would cap off his first five years at Spurs so perfectly.

Pochettino said that winning this competition – which would also be his first major trophy as Spurs manager – would be the perfect conclusion to an initial five-year cycle in charge at the club. “Winning the Champions League? It should be fantastic, no? Close the five-year chapter and go home.”

We’ll tell you what’s true. You can form your own view.

From
15p
€0.18
$0.18
USD 0.27
a day, more exclusives, analysis and extras.

When pressed whether he would leave Spurs, Pochettino said that he was not joking, but that he meant winning the Champions League would emphatically draw a line under his time at the club so far and raise questions about what could come next.

“It is not a joke,” he said. “Maybe I work with Daniel [Levy], sitting, working in different for sure. To win the Champions League with Tottenham, in this circumstance, in this season, maybe I need to think a little bit to do something different in the future, for sure. Because to repeat this miracle, you know…But for sure I hope [to go] home. Whatever happens tomorrow, I go home.”

leftCreated with Sketch.
rightCreated with Sketch.

1/23 Player ratings: Spurs vs Ajax

We run the rule over the two teams after a tough night for Tottenham.

AFP

2/23 Hugo Lloris − 6

Was left utterly helpless for Ajax’s first goal, with his defence akimbo and Donny van de Beek breathing down his neck. Made a very smart stop to deny the same player just moments later.

Getty Images

3/23 Toby Alderweireld − 6

Struggled in the very early stages, as did every player in white. But improved after Jan Vertonghen’s nasty head injury, which forced Spurs to switch to playing four at the back.

REUTERS

4/23 Davinson Sanchez − 6

Like Toby Alderweireld, improved immeasurably after the tactical switch. Was kept busy in a nervy first-half, although did do very well to twice catch up with threatening Ajax counter-attacks.

Getty

5/23 Jan Vertonghen − 6

Bravely attempted to battle on after a nasty clash of heads with team-mate Toby Alderweireld left him looking like a considerably better groomed Terry Butcher. Wisely substituted himself and appeared to be in danger of collapsing on the touchline, although fortunately made a recovery in the Tottenham dressing room.

Getty Images

6/23 Kieran Trippier − 5

Tottenham’s three at the back system was designed to protect Kieran Trippier’s flaws, but he made an inauspicious start to this match, playing Donny van de Beek onside for Ajax’s opener. Didn’t get much better and overhit a number of passes in the second-half, which resulted in a chorus of groans.

Man City via Getty Images

7/23 Victor Wanyama − 5

What a player he was before his knee unfortunately crumbled to dust at the start of last season. In fairness he began to get a grip on the game after a painfully shaky start, but he remains a weakness.

Getty

8/23 Christian Eriksen − 6

A difficult night for the Dane, who was often caught in two minds over whether to remain alongside Victor Wanyama in Tottenham’s midfield or glide forward. Did get much better in the second-half, although he is capable of much, much more. Spurs will need him to step up in Amsterdam.

Getty Images

9/23 Dele − 6

Has been running on empty for at least a fortnight now. Like the vast majority of Tottenham’s players, improved after the tactical switch and had a good chance to equalise at the start of the second-half, instead wastefully heading over the bar. He deserves some time off, to be frank.

Getty Images

10/23 Danny Rose − 5

He just cannot resist diving in, can he? Woefully disorganised in the opening exchanges and could have been sent off for petulantly lashing out at Joel Veltman. Bombed forward well but not his greatest night.

Getty Images

11/23 Lucas Moura − 5

Barely noticed he was playing. Kept exceptionally quiet by Ajax’s kindergarteners at the back.

Getty

12/23 Fernando Llorente − 5

In many ways, the quintessential Fernando Llorente performance. Ugly, gutsy, clumsy, ever so slightly amusing and not especially that effective: tried hard but spurned one of Tottenham’s best chances when he headed wide under little pressure in the first-half.

AFP

13/23 Andre Onan − 6

Didn’t have an awful lot to do. Difficult to think of what to write really, so here are some stats: 2 clearances, 16 passes, 15 of which were long balls. Interesting! Also did his fair share of time-wasting, the rotter.

REUTERS

14/23 Joel Veltman − 6

Spent much of this match in a petty two-man war with Danny Rose. When he wasn’t pulling the full-back’s shirt or himself being dragged back he was effective going forward, combining nicely with the standout Donny van de Beek.

Getty Images

15/23 Daley Blind − 7

The veteran Dutchman enjoyed a successful return to England. Marking Fernando Llorente isn’t an especially onerous task but he did it well enough, and his pace helped him keep Lucas Moura equally quiet on the rare occasions Spurs were able to counter-attack.

AFP/Getty Images

16/23 Matthijs de Ligt − 7

Matthjis de Ligt is nineteen. Nineteen! The youngest ever player to captain his team in a Champions League semi-final was suitably composed this evening, keeping Fernando Llorente quiet and impressing with his silky smooth passing range.

AFP/Getty Images

17/23 Nicolas Tagliafico − 6

Booked for rashly diving in on Christian Eriksen when the rest of Ajax’s defence were well positioned. Solid apart from that.

Getty

18/23 Lasse Schone − 7

A wonderfully workmanlike performance in the middle of the two child geniuses either side of him. Three tackles. One clearance. One interception. He is the oil which keeps this impossibly slick Ajax team running so very smoothly.

REUTERS

19/23 Frenkie De Jong − 8

Hard to believe he is just 21-years-old, when he plays with all the languid composure of Xavi winding down his career at Al Saad in the Qatar Stars League. Everything comes so naturally to him. Had a field day against the statuesque Victor Wanyama: no player completed more passes.

Getty Images

20/23 Hakim Ziyech − 8

To describe his defence-bisecting through ball as merely an ‘assist’ does it a disservice. In reality it was as effective and aesthetically pleasing as a goal, putting it on a plate for Donny van de Beek to open the scoring.

Getty Images

21/23 Donny van de Beek − 8

Took his goal wonderfully well, holding the line and then waiting nervelessly for Hugo Lloris to make his move. Almost doubled Ajax’s advantage just a few moments later.

Action Images via Reuters

22/23 David Neres − 6

Gave Kieran Trippier a thoroughly uncomfortable evening, pinning the Englishman back for long periods and thoroughly ruining Mauricio Pochettino’s three at the back gameplan.

Getty Images

23/23 Dusan Tadic − 7

What on earth have Ajax done with the inconsistent maverick that so frustrated Southampton supporters for four seasons? Played his part in the opening goal and was an entertainingly buzzy presence throughout.

UEFA via Getty Images

1/23 Player ratings: Spurs vs Ajax

We run the rule over the two teams after a tough night for Tottenham.

AFP

2/23 Hugo Lloris − 6

Was left utterly helpless for Ajax’s first goal, with his defence akimbo and Donny van de Beek breathing down his neck. Made a very smart stop to deny the same player just moments later.

Getty Images

3/23 Toby Alderweireld − 6

Struggled in the very early stages, as did every player in white. But improved after Jan Vertonghen’s nasty head injury, which forced Spurs to switch to playing four at the back.

REUTERS

4/23 Davinson Sanchez − 6

Like Toby Alderweireld, improved immeasurably after the tactical switch. Was kept busy in a nervy first-half, although did do very well to twice catch up with threatening Ajax counter-attacks.

Getty

5/23 Jan Vertonghen − 6

Bravely attempted to battle on after a nasty clash of heads with team-mate Toby Alderweireld left him looking like a considerably better groomed Terry Butcher. Wisely substituted himself and appeared to be in danger of collapsing on the touchline, although fortunately made a recovery in the Tottenham dressing room.

Getty Images

6/23 Kieran Trippier − 5

Tottenham’s three at the back system was designed to protect Kieran Trippier’s flaws, but he made an inauspicious start to this match, playing Donny van de Beek onside for Ajax’s opener. Didn’t get much better and overhit a number of passes in the second-half, which resulted in a chorus of groans.

Man City via Getty Images

7/23 Victor Wanyama − 5

What a player he was before his knee unfortunately crumbled to dust at the start of last season. In fairness he began to get a grip on the game after a painfully shaky start, but he remains a weakness.

Getty

8/23 Christian Eriksen − 6

A difficult night for the Dane, who was often caught in two minds over whether to remain alongside Victor Wanyama in Tottenham’s midfield or glide forward. Did get much better in the second-half, although he is capable of much, much more. Spurs will need him to step up in Amsterdam.

Getty Images

9/23 Dele − 6

Has been running on empty for at least a fortnight now. Like the vast majority of Tottenham’s players, improved after the tactical switch and had a good chance to equalise at the start of the second-half, instead wastefully heading over the bar. He deserves some time off, to be frank.

Getty Images

10/23 Danny Rose − 5

He just cannot resist diving in, can he? Woefully disorganised in the opening exchanges and could have been sent off for petulantly lashing out at Joel Veltman. Bombed forward well but not his greatest night.

Getty Images

11/23 Lucas Moura − 5

Barely noticed he was playing. Kept exceptionally quiet by Ajax’s kindergarteners at the back.

Getty

12/23 Fernando Llorente − 5

In many ways, the quintessential Fernando Llorente performance. Ugly, gutsy, clumsy, ever so slightly amusing and not especially that effective: tried hard but spurned one of Tottenham’s best chances when he headed wide under little pressure in the first-half.

AFP

13/23 Andre Onan − 6

Didn’t have an awful lot to do. Difficult to think of what to write really, so here are some stats: 2 clearances, 16 passes, 15 of which were long balls. Interesting! Also did his fair share of time-wasting, the rotter.

REUTERS

14/23 Joel Veltman − 6

Spent much of this match in a petty two-man war with Danny Rose. When he wasn’t pulling the full-back’s shirt or himself being dragged back he was effective going forward, combining nicely with the standout Donny van de Beek.

Getty Images

15/23 Daley Blind − 7

The veteran Dutchman enjoyed a successful return to England. Marking Fernando Llorente isn’t an especially onerous task but he did it well enough, and his pace helped him keep Lucas Moura equally quiet on the rare occasions Spurs were able to counter-attack.

AFP/Getty Images

16/23 Matthijs de Ligt − 7

Matthjis de Ligt is nineteen. Nineteen! The youngest ever player to captain his team in a Champions League semi-final was suitably composed this evening, keeping Fernando Llorente quiet and impressing with his silky smooth passing range.

AFP/Getty Images

17/23 Nicolas Tagliafico − 6

Booked for rashly diving in on Christian Eriksen when the rest of Ajax’s defence were well positioned. Solid apart from that.

Getty

18/23 Lasse Schone − 7

A wonderfully workmanlike performance in the middle of the two child geniuses either side of him. Three tackles. One clearance. One interception. He is the oil which keeps this impossibly slick Ajax team running so very smoothly.

REUTERS

19/23 Frenkie De Jong − 8

Hard to believe he is just 21-years-old, when he plays with all the languid composure of Xavi winding down his career at Al Saad in the Qatar Stars League. Everything comes so naturally to him. Had a field day against the statuesque Victor Wanyama: no player completed more passes.

Getty Images

20/23 Hakim Ziyech − 8

To describe his defence-bisecting through ball as merely an ‘assist’ does it a disservice. In reality it was as effective and aesthetically pleasing as a goal, putting it on a plate for Donny van de Beek to open the scoring.

Getty Images

21/23 Donny van de Beek − 8

Took his goal wonderfully well, holding the line and then waiting nervelessly for Hugo Lloris to make his move. Almost doubled Ajax’s advantage just a few moments later.

Action Images via Reuters

22/23 David Neres − 6

Gave Kieran Trippier a thoroughly uncomfortable evening, pinning the Englishman back for long periods and thoroughly ruining Mauricio Pochettino’s three at the back gameplan.

Getty Images

23/23 Dusan Tadic − 7

What on earth have Ajax done with the inconsistent maverick that so frustrated Southampton supporters for four seasons? Played his part in the opening goal and was an entertainingly buzzy presence throughout.

UEFA via Getty Images

Pochettino repeated his instruction to his players that they have to “dream” in order to overturn Ajax and reach the final. Even though simply being in this position itself represents huge progress. 

“I think we are living a dream,” he said. “Five years ago, when we arrived, it was to reduce the gap with the top four. Then the possibility to play Champions League. Then to qualify for the last 16, then to quarter-finals and now to be in the semi-final. For us it’s a bonus, for myself it’s a bonus. 

“Of course now we are there, we want to try to win and be in the final. I’m not thinking about if we are creating history. The most important is to try and enjoy, to try and bring to the players that belief, as we have done to get here. We must also dream.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2VTfavZ
via IFTTT

Several killed in Syria’s rebel-held northwest

At least 15 civilians have been killed in Syria‘s northwest region as Russian-backed government forces continued air raids and shelling in the last rebel-held territory in the country, activists and volunteer medics have said.

Five civilians including three children were killed when an air raid hit three homes and a vegetable market in the village of Ras al-Ain in Idlib’s eastern region on Tuesday afternoon, Ahmed Sheikho, a Syrian Civil Defence spokesman told Al Jazeera.

At least 20 others were injured in the attack in Ras al-Ain, he added.

Hussein al-Sheikh, whose home was among those that were hit, said he lost three cousins in the attacks – the youngest was five-years-old.

“I was standing near the front door watching the kids play just a few metres away,” al-Sheikh, whose house lies just a few metres away from his uncles’ home, told Al Jazeera.

“Suddenly we heard another explosion and we knew it was much closer than usual,” he said.

Al-Sheikh saw his uncle’s house collapse just after the three children ran towards the entrance.

In a “matter of minutes”, the children were being evacuated from under the rubble.

“It was a difficult scene to watch,” the 40-year-old said. “I can’t express what I saw.”

Tuesday’s air raids and shelling hit a string of other towns and villages, including the rebel-held Jisr al-Shughoor district, where six people were killed, activists told Al Jazeera. The area is close to a strategic commercial highway, sought by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and military ally Russia.

Opening the commercial and passenger routes through Idlib province would reassert the government’s control over an economy fragmented during years of conflict.

‘Civilian structures’ hit

Attacks earlier on Tuesday also hit villages in adjoining parts of Hama province, according to the Syrian Civil Defence organisation, also known as the White Helmets, killing four civilians.

Sheikho said that dozens of air raids rained over “civilian structures”.

“The sounds of warplanes and explosions have not subsided for days – not in the day, and not in the evening,” he added.

In the past few days, government-led shelling struck at least four hospitals, or medical points, knocking them out of service.

Since April, at least seven facilities have been put out of service, United Nations spokesman Stephane Dujarric said.

“The United Nations is extremely concerned about attacks on healthcare facilities and hospitals in northwestern Syria,” Dujarric said.

The tactic has been used in the past ahead of fully-fledged assaults on provinces and cities held by opposition groups that fought against al-Assad’s government throughout Syria’s bloody civil war – now in its ninth year.

Idlib province lacks adequate medical facilities, which is one of the major issues faced by members of the White Helmets, many of whom volunteer as emergency medical workers.

“This lack of infrastructure forces us to transfer the injured to far-away locations,” Sheikho, whose team covers the southern region of the province, said.

“Even when we’re on the road, our vehicles are targeted,” he said. “We’re never, ever safe.”

Such indiscriminate attacks, as Sheikho put it, have led to massive delays in transferring those injured to a medical facility for treatment.

The White Helmets have faced so-called double-tap attacks – one bomb followed soon after by a second at the same location, according to Sheikho – which have killed many members of the organisation in the past.

The latest shelling and air raids are part of an intensified campaign launched by forces loyal to Assad on April 26.

The UN said on Tuesday the escalation in the northwest has displaced more than 150,000 people in the past week.

“We are alarmed by ongoing reports of aerial attacks on population centres and civilian infrastructure, resulting in hundreds of civilians dead and injured,” said David Swanson, of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

“More than 152,000 women, children and men have been displaced in Aleppo and Idlib governorates over the past week alone,” he told AFP news agency.

In southern Idlib alone, at least 65 people have been killed and more than 146 injured since the escalation began, according to the Syrian Civil Defence group.

Idlib is a densely populated province, home to nearly three million people, most of whom are internally displaced, and is controlled by a range of armed opposition groups – some backed by Turkey.

The biggest group in control of much of Idlib is Hay’et Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which is independent of the Turkish-backed umbrella of opposition factions in the region.

HTS has been designated a “terrorist” group by Russia, and their presence has been used as a justification for intensified attacks despite a deal that was meant to avert a fully-fledged assault in Idlib.

The deal, signed by Moscow and Ankara, included the creation of a so-called “demilitarised” zone in the region.

The UN has called for all sides to abide by the deal, signed September last year with the objective of avoiding a humanitarian disaster and preventing an influx of refugees from entering bordering Turkey.

Additional reporting by Mohammed Khalaf in Idlib.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2LsGc9y
via IFTTT

How Climate Could Shape the 2020 Race

For three decades in American politics, climate change has been the issue that wasn’t. Even as the temperature steadily rose, and evidence mounted that it was human behavior—and human policies—that were driving this change, candidates mostly deflected. And it wasn’t hard: During the 2016 general election, no journalist even asked the presidential candidates a debate question on the topic.

But that’s not the case this time. Climate change matters for Democratic voters: A Monmouth University poll last month showed the issue as the second most important to Iowa caucus-goers after health care, and a CNN national poll found that 82 percent of Democratic respondents said it’s “very important” that their party’s nominee for president supports taking “aggressive action” to slow the effects of climate change, the highest support among several items on the progressive wish list. Most of the candidates seem convinced it’s a key weakness for Trump, and the front-runners have all embraced the issue. (The latest to weigh in, Beto O’Rourke, chose climate as the subject of his first comprehensive policy plan: a $5 trillion proposal for clean-energy infrastructure.) The question is not whether the candidates are going to talk about global warming, but how.

Story Continued Below

As the race takes shape, two key questions are materializing: What do climate-motivated voters really want? And how is the issue likely to change the race?

To review the sad history briefly: The high point of presidential climate campaigning to date probably came in 1988, when George H.W. Bush announced that he planned to “fight the greenhouse effect with the White House effect.” (He didn’t.) In the years that followed, candidates routinely avoided the issue. Al Gore strategically avoided it in 2000, and then, even in the wake of Gore’s magnificent Oscar-winning 2006 documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, Barack Obama barely mentioned it in his 2008 run, aside from a throwaway pledge that “the rise of the seas” would begin to slow in his administration and unfulfilled plans made in a campaign speech on energy independence to implement cap and trade and create 5 million “green jobs.” In 2012, it took Hurricane Sandy, in the final days of the campaign, to shake a few pro forma words out of Obama and Romney. Donald Trump owned the issue in 2016: It was hard for anyone to top his insistence that the whole thing was a “hoax manufactured by the Chinese.”

But if you look a little more closely, climate has been breaking through despite the candidates’ attempts to avoid it. Bernie Sanders began making a big issue of climate during his insurgent run for the Democratic nomination last time around. It was one of the most reliable applause lines in his stump speech, and in one face-off with Hillary Clinton (who also had comprehensive and useful climate plans), he declared it the most important issue of all. As with his “Medicare for All” proposal, that has helped pull the Democratic field leftward for 2020. Climate was edging its way into the presidential discussion, and now the edging is over.

In part, this is because climate has made such strong incursions into national politics outside the race. Last November, young people staged a sit-in at Nancy Pelosi’s office demanding a “Green New Deal”—turning a policy proposal into a national touchstone when Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez joined in. Fox and conservatives railed against the Green New Deal, but polling, at least among Democrats, has stayed strong, and so far the party’s candidates have mostly paid it homage: The standard response falls along the lines of “I support the concept.” Pete Buttigieg, as is his wont, framed it pretty well, saying, “It correctly situates this as a major national emergency. It identifies this as a problem whose destructive powers is comparable to a Great Depression or world war, except this time we see it coming. So shame on us if we don’t do something.”

However, even such strong endorsements likely won’t be enough for an increasingly confident climate movement; nor will status quo ante pledges like the recent House vote in favor of rejoining the Paris climate accords. Given the reality of the Republican Party’s grip on the White House and Senate, not to mention the accords’ limited ambition, that vote was a wishy-washy exercise in virtue signaling not much better than announcing you believe in climate science.

***

When it comes to what activists are looking for, the most important thing is moving beyond symbolism to on-the-line commitments that can be cashed in after Inauguration Day. The group 350 Action, for which I serve as a board member, has the most comprehensive climate scorecard, tracking three key issues.

The first thing to watch as the race evolves is support for the Green New Deal—as an actual policy, not as a political slogan. Since the plan isn’t fully fleshed out, it’s hard to hold candidates completely accountable now, but the Sunrise Movement, the young people who launched the initiative, are holding 100 town halls across the country that began in April. Expect candidates to try to grab those crowds, and in the process commit themselves more fully to the emerging plan.

The second is what’s become known as “Keep It in the Ground”—a specific promise to stop new permits for drilling and mining on federal ground, and to apply a climate test to all new proposed infrastructure. A version was first introduced as a bill in the Senate by Sanders and Sen. Jeff Merkley in 2015, but it’s important as we head into 2020 because a president could accomplish much of it by executive fiat, without waiting for Congress to come on board. With building trade unions in opposition, it takes a certain nerve to support it; Elizabeth Warren’s powerful stance on this in recent weeks will likely draw many others along.

The third test is easiest: a simple pledge not to take money from the fossil fuel industry. After years of statistics showing the powerful links between oil money and oily votes, there’s simply no patience left for taking cash from the companies now facing lawsuits for repeatedly lying about global warming.

So on these measures, how are the candidates doing? At least five—Sanders, Warren, O’Rourke, Kirsten Gillibrand and self-proclaimed climate candidate Jay Inslee—have hit the trifecta so far (After lots and lots of questions on the subject, O’Rourke this week signed a pledge to stop taking fossil fuel money). A few have failed spectacularly: former Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper is known as “Frackenlooper” in environmental circles because (and you can look it up on YouTube) he once proved his fealty to the state’s oil barons by drinking a glass of fracking fluid. Most other candidates are still a little watery.

It’s early days, however, and environmental groups have mastered the art of bird-dogging candidates in Iowa and New Hampshire, waiting along rope lines to get the comments that quickly spread across the net. Expect new issues to emerge. Trump, for instance, recently offered a new approval designed to spur construction of the Keystone Pipeline. If it looks like TransCanada is anywhere near breaking ground on the project, Democrats will be expected to fight back hard, backing up thousands of activists who are pledged to conduct civil disobedience.

***

Expect the issue to spill over into other areas too. As a powerful New Yorker piece recently made clear, climate change is causing much of the exodus from Central America that ends up on the southern border, and since the U.S. has poured more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than any other nation, it’s hard to escape the conclusion that some of those children Trump stuck in cages were driven there by us. Just as Syria’s drought helped trigger the refugee crisis that reshaped European politics, Guatemala’s might do the equivalent here, and it’s hard to predict in which direction.

Increasingly, climate change is the classic intersectional issue, one where many types of injustice converge, the fight led by people who live on the front lines of devastation. Connecting climate with health, with jobs, with justice hasn’t watered down the issue: It’s made it a priority for many more Americans who can see how the crisis touches their everyday lives.

And not just the crisis, but also the opportunity it presents, which is why the economic discussion during the campaign is likely to turn in some measure on climate as well. The transition to renewable energy at scale is the most obvious big source for new jobs, and in one state after another, solar and wind entrepreneurs have begun to rival or surpass their fossil fuel counterparts as job creators. Even Trump’s commitment to the coal industry has been insufficient to turn the economic tide: Coal-fired power plants have closed more quickly in his first term than in both of Obama’s.

Environmentalists are pushing for a presidential debate sometime during primary season that focuses exclusively on climate change. If they get it, expect a chance for some to prove their mastery of climate wonkery. (Inslee really does know the issue inside and out.)

And there could be other surprises, too. Trump actually used to believe in climate action, signing on to calls for carbon cuts barely five years ago. He said recently that he might run on his environmental record — a silly idea, unless the oil industry decides it’s scared enough of ongoing litigation (and the Green New Deal) that it would accept a modest carbon tax, in which case Trump might be the guy they chose to push it forward. And if he did, the Democrats would be caught between wanting the right deal and wanting any deal.

For climate activists, as for all progressive groups, the Democratic primary offers a hard choice. We’re eager to make sure that the next president finally does something truly serious about climate change. But like all progressives, we’re terrified of another Trump term and worried just a tad about pushing too hard, about setting up the candidate for defeat by getting them too far out on a limb. It would all be easier if we hadn’t wasted the past 30 years, but that inaction has left us at a moment when physics demands enormous change. And so, in the end, we will push. On a planet where the poles are rapidly melting, what choice do we have?

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2VNi6dI
via IFTTT

Most Airbnb guests worry about hidden cameras

Disclosure

Every product here is independently selected by Mashable journalists. If you buy something featured, we may earn an affiliate commission which helps support our work.

Image: Carl Court/Getty Images

Angela Moscaritolo

for

PCMag

Uploads%252fcard%252fimage%252f786605%252fd59218b0 cf68 489d 87cc 54720a7fccfd.jpg%252foriginal.jpg?signature=h fnx 1dcutvyyf8oouz9zvl8hs=&source=https%3a%2f%2fblueprint api production.s3.amazonaws

Follow @https://twitter.com/PCMag

PCMag.com is a leading authority on technology, delivering Labs-based, independent reviews of the latest products and services. Our expert industry analysis and practical solutions help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Ever worry about hidden cameras secretly filming your every move when staying in an Airbnb? You’re not alone. (And you may not be wrong.)

In an IPX1031 survey of 2,000 Americans who have stayed in an Airbnb, conducted from April 2 to 7, 58 percent said they worry about hidden cameras. Their concerns aren’t unfounded. Eleven percent of respondents said they have actually discovered a hidden camera in an Airbnb.

Airbnb’s policies allow cameras in common areas but not in bedrooms and bathrooms. The company also requires hosts to disclose all surveillance devices in their listings. Unfortunately, not all Airbnb hosts follow the rules.

In the most recent incident to make headlines, a family staying at an Airbnb in Ireland earlier this year discovered that they were being secretly filmed with an internet-connected camera. They found the camera in a living-room smoke-alarm case after scanning the surrounding Wi-Fi networks. The family said Airbnb was initially dismissive of the incident but eventually removed the host from its platform.

Most Airbnb users are uncomfortable with the possibility of surveillance devices monitoring them, regardless of where they’re located, IPX1031 found. Just a quarter of respondents said they’re okay with cameras in common areas such as the living room or kitchen.

More than half of respondents (52 percent) also said they worry about hosts having access to the property during their stay. Despite these concerns, only around two out of five surveyed renters (42 percent) research Airbnb hosts via Google and social media before booking with them.

For more from the IPX1031 survey, check out the infographic below.

Image: ipx 1031

    This article originally published at PCMag
    here

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2PSg86r
    via IFTTT

    Odell Beckham Jr. Wants to Make Baker Mayfield, Browns the ‘New Patriots’

    In this April 1, 2019 photo Cleveland Browns' Odell Beckham answers questions during a news conference in Berea, Ohio. Browns coach Freddie Kitchens says he’s not upset with star receiver Odell Beckham’s absence from the team’s voluntary offseason workout program. (AP Photo/Ron Schwane)

    Ron Schwane/Associated Press

    Cleveland Browns wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr. said he wants to help the Browns become the “new Patriots” after arriving in an offseason trade from the New York Giants.

    Beckham, who predicted Cleveland quarterback Baker Mayfield will eventually earn enshrinement in the Pro Football Hall of Fame, spoke about his expectations for the team with Cam Wolf of GQ ahead of his appearance at the Met Gala on Monday night.

    “I plan on being there for the next five years and trying to bring as many championships there as possible,” he said, “turning [the Browns] into the new Patriots.”

    The 26-year-old superstar’s arrival gave Cleveland one of the NFL‘s most promising offenses as he joins a group already headlined by Mayfield, running backs Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt, fellow wideouts Jarvis Landry and Antonio Callaway as well as tight end David Njoku.

    Beckham also discussed his close-knit relationship with Landry, his collegiate teammate with the LSU Tigers, and his exit from New York with Wolf.

    “I would take a bullet for him,” he said. “I hope it’d hit me in the arm, but I’d take a bullet for him.”

    “It just became not the right fit,” the three-time Pro Bowl selection explained about the Giants, before adding, “I’m probably the happiest I’ve ever been in my life.”

    1. OBJ’s Trade to Cleveland Has the Browns Hyped

    2. Le’Veon’s Power Move Pays Off After Signing Massive Deal with Jets

    3. Friends to Foes, Ex-UGA Teammates Meet in Super Bowl

    4. Cooks Gave a Super Gift to This Rams Employee

    5. Mahomes Loves Ketchup as Much as Torching Defenses

    6. Bears Hoping to Ride Club Dub to the Super Bowl

    7. The Worst Fantasy Football Punishments for Last Place

    8. NFL Players Bring Soccer Traditions to the NFL

    9. JuJu Is a Man of the People

    10. Bills Superfan ‘Pancho Billa’ Continues to Inspire

    11. Happy 26th Birthday to OBJ 🎉

    12. Mahomes Is ‘Showtime’ Off the Field Too

    13. Thielen’s Ride from Underdog to Record-Breaking WR

    14. Shanahan and His Son Carter Are Hyped for Carter V

    15. Browns Winning Off the Field with Community Service

    16. Conner’s Journey from Beating Cancer to Starting RB

    17. Does Donovan McNabb Deserve Your 2019 Pro Football Hall of Fame Vote?

    18. B/R Fantasy Expert Matt Camp Gives His Picks for Keep or Release After Week 2

    19. Does Hines Ward Deserve Your 2019 Pro Football Hall of Fame Vote?

    20. Shaquem Griffin Starting for Seahawks in Week 1

    Right Arrow Icon

    His production dropped over the past two years in large part because of his injuries. He was limited to four appearances in 2017 after suffering a fractured ankle. He played the first 12 contests last year before missing the final month with a quad injury.

    The Browns’ chances of ending the league’s longest playoff drought (16 years) are highly dependent on Beckham returning to his previous All-Pro form.

    1. OBJ’s Trade to Cleveland Has the Browns Hyped

    2. Le’Veon’s Power Move Pays Off After Signing Massive Deal with Jets

    3. Friends to Foes, Ex-UGA Teammates Meet in Super Bowl

    4. Cooks Gave a Super Gift to This Rams Employee

    5. Mahomes Loves Ketchup as Much as Torching Defenses

    6. Bears Hoping to Ride Club Dub to the Super Bowl

    7. The Worst Fantasy Football Punishments for Last Place

    8. NFL Players Bring Soccer Traditions to the NFL

    9. JuJu Is a Man of the People

    10. Bills Superfan ‘Pancho Billa’ Continues to Inspire

    11. Happy 26th Birthday to OBJ 🎉

    12. Mahomes Is ‘Showtime’ Off the Field Too

    13. Thielen’s Ride from Underdog to Record-Breaking WR

    14. Shanahan and His Son Carter Are Hyped for Carter V

    15. Browns Winning Off the Field with Community Service

    16. Conner’s Journey from Beating Cancer to Starting RB

    17. Does Donovan McNabb Deserve Your 2019 Pro Football Hall of Fame Vote?

    18. B/R Fantasy Expert Matt Camp Gives His Picks for Keep or Release After Week 2

    19. Does Hines Ward Deserve Your 2019 Pro Football Hall of Fame Vote?

    20. Shaquem Griffin Starting for Seahawks in Week 1

    Right Arrow Icon

    That said, Mayfield is more important if the Browns are going to come anywhere close to the Patriots’ success under Tom Brady.

    The first overall pick in the 2018 draft finished his rookie year strong with 19 touchdowns and eight interceptions during the season’s second half. The addition of Beckham, a true No. 1 receiver when healthy, will raise expectations around the quarterback for 2019.

    Mayfield’s performance will determine whether Cleveland has legitimate championship aspirations.

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2PQgwlT
    via IFTTT

    The Kidney Brokers: Yemeni organs sold for $5,000 in Egypt

    An Egyptian hospital and officials at the Yemeni embassy in Cairo were involved in a large-scale organ-trafficking ring from 2014 that included hundreds of patients and brokers from Yemen and Egypt, an Al Jazeera investigation has revealed.

    Through interviews and documents obtained by Al Jazeera, the investigation exposes officials who have been giving out false papers for personal gain in order to facilitate the organ-trafficking.

    The organ-trafficking ring preyed on poor Yemenis willing to travel to Egypt and sell a kidney in a desperate bid to gain income that would keep them going, at least for a while.

    One of these Yemenis was Ahmed*, who was told in 2014 by a friend that he could get $5,000 for one of his kidneys. He agreed, and before he knew it, he was on a plane to Cairo.

    Ahmed* sold his kidney for $5,000 in Egypt in 2014 [Al Jazeera]

    At the time, Yemen wasn’t yet home to the world’s worst humanitarian crisis and a destructive war that has left 80 percent of its population in need of humanitarian assistance.

    But it was the poorest country in the Middle East with half the population living below the poverty line.

    In Yemen, selling your organs is not illegal. However, it is illegal in Egypt, where three donors Al Jazeera spoke to, and hundreds of others who told their story to a Yemeni NGO, went to sell their organs.

    Recruited by a broker

    The trafficking ring found its donors through brokers in Yemen who would find willing individuals and connect them with brokers in Egypt to arrange their travel, accommodation, and surgeries.

    The brokers get involved for different reasons. One Egyptian broker Al Jazeera spoke to became involved after his brother needed a kidney and bought one from a Yemeni donor.

    “After the operation, [the Yemeni donor] went back home and we stayed in touch … he started telling me he could find others willing to donate if I knew of anyone who needed transplants.”

    The Yemeni broker Al Jazeera spoke to was initially recruited to be a donor but was not compatible with any of the ring’s clients.

    The Yemeni broker began recruiting others to donate when he found out he was incompatible with the ring’s clients [Al Jazeera]

    Instead, he was asked to find others in Yemen who would be willing to sell a kidney and was told he would make a $1,000 commission on every donor he recruited.

    Nabil al-Fadhil, head of the Yemeni Organization for Combating Human Trafficking, told Al Jazeera that his organisation verified some 1,000 cases of organ sales, but they were certain that there were tens of thousands.

    Nabil al-Fadhil, head of the Yemeni Organization for Combating Human Trafficking [Al Jazeera]

    “Of the thousand we interviewed, 900 had sold their kidneys then came back to Yemen as brokers looking to find new victims,” al-Fadhil said in an interview at the end of 2018.

    Egyptian hospitals implicated

    Patients in need of a kidney would get in touch with the network, which maintained a pool of candidates to act as donors.

    Once a compatible donor was found, he would have the surgery almost immediately and be flown back to Yemen with little to no time to recover, leaving him vulnerable to health complications that made returning to his typically labour-intensive work very difficult.

    Several hospitals across Egypt have been accused of operating on these donors, and the government has busted prominent doctors and institutions working in trafficking rings over the past five years.

    “We work with public and private hospitals,” the Egyptian broker confirmed to Al Jazeera.

    In al-Fadhil’s records from 2014, one hospital kept coming up, one that saw no arrests in spite of his notifying anti-trafficking organisations in Egypt: Wadi El Neel Hospital in Cairo.

    It is one of 48 hospitals licensed by the Egyptian government to perform transplant procedures and Al Jazeera sources in Egypt say it is referred to as the Mukhabarat (or Intelligence) Hospital by many Egyptians.

    “The Mukhabarat Hospital is used for Yemeni [donors] only, and the receiving patients are Saudis and other foreigners,” the Yemeni broker told Al Jazeera.

    Al Jazeera reached out to the hospital and spoke to an individual who presented himself as a manager there.

    He denied the accusations, citing Egyptian law: “If the patient is Yemeni then the donor must be Yemeni, with a passport accredited by the embassy, and the embassy’s approval to donate. This law has been in place for years. Everything but that is nonsense.”

    In Egyptian hospitals licensed to perform transplant surgeries, donors are also required to testify that they are donating by choice, either in writing or on camera, which all three of our Yemeni donors did.

    ‘Yemeni embassy’s involvement’

    All three donors claim they sold their organs to non-Yemeni nationals.

    “They found a woman from the UAE who needed a kidney, so we did the blood and tissue tests, and found that we were a match. So I went in for the surgery … Afterwards, she asked me how much I got, I said $5,000. She told me that she had paid $50,000,” Ahmed* told us.

    Besides having to be of the same nationality, the donor and recipient of an organ must be related, according to the Yemeni embassy in Cairo.

    Brokers claim that the Yemeni Embassy in Cairo facilitated the organ trafficking trade by processing false papers [Al Jazeera]

    Proof of relation is signed off on by the Yemeni Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Justice, but it is the responsibility of the embassy that receives the paperwork and coordinates with the Egyptian Ministry of Health to finalise approval for a transplant.

    According to our Yemeni broker, they were quite lenient, for a price.

    “The embassy announced it was illegal to donate an organ unless it was to a family relation and the relationship would have to be approved by the embassy.

    “There were 15 or 20 people waiting [to donate] but they stopped them. So, the network sent me to Yemen to get the necessary paperwork to prove a relationship.” the broker told Al Jazeera.

    “I made a deal with a judge to pay him 80,000 Yemeni rials [$320] per case, and he’d get it signed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. I had done three when they got in touch and told me to stop because they’d found someone at the embassy who could approve the requests for $500 each,” he explained.

    According to the Egyptian broker, cooperation by Yemeni officials was instrumental to the process. “To be honest, our work would be impossible without cooperation with government entities there [in Yemen] that makes bringing Yemenis over to Egypt much easier for us.”

    Al-Fadhil said he had come to suspect the embassy’s involvement.

    “There were laws in Egypt being broken, and our embassy could have acted, but they just denied it … the embassy is still involved to this day because this business makes them a lot of money,” he said.

    After repeated efforts to contact the embassy, Al Jazeera received a response from the media attache, Baleegh al-Mukhlafi, who said: “The only thing the embassy does is to address medical authorities after the documents required by the [Egyptian] Ministry of Health and the courts have been completed.”

    The embassy denied any other form of involvement.

    Yemenis trapped in Egypt

    There are now many Yemenis already in Egypt who are resorting to selling their organs to make ends meet, says al-Fadhil.

    They came to Egypt to escape the violence in Yemen and are unable to return because of the worsening situation and because of the closure of Sanaa airport.

    In addition, the Egyptian government began denying entry to Yemeni citizens in 2014 and 2015, leading to a decrease in the overall number of cases.

    “Yemenis who went to Egypt when the war broke out are now stuck there and have been forced to sell their kidneys out of desperation. We’ve recorded more than 200 such cases,” al-Fadhil told Al Jazeera.

    What al-Fadhil and others working to end this trade would like to see is a change in government policies that would end this trade.

    However, given the state Yemen is in today, it is unlikely that any significant changes will be made. Even civil resistance to human trafficking is struggling to survive.

    “We still face threats and a lot of pressure. This is probably going to be my last interview because we’re living in a country where even humanitarian work is prohibited.”

    A few months after our interview in 2018, al-Fadhil’s organisation was shut down by Houthi forces and he was forced to leave Yemen.

    “There’s no way we can actually work to stop this when we’re in the middle of war and destruction and poverty and people can barely afford food. There’s no solution except to stop the war, rebuild the country, hire people … that’s the only solution … and it’s just not possible.”

    *Names have been changed to protect the identities of those featured in this article

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2vGdbMW
    via IFTTT

    Don McGahn won’t comply with House Democrats’ subpoena


    White House Counsel Donald McGahn

    According to Robert Mueller’s report, Don McGahn told investigators that President Donald Trump instructed him to tell Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to fire Mueller. | Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

    Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is refusing to comply with a congressional subpoena for documents related to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, deferring to a last-minute instruction from the White House to disregard House Democrats’ demands.

    William Burck, McGahn’s attorney said that his client would defy the committee’s subpoena for documents that were due by Tuesday as part of the panel’s investigation into allegations that President Donald Trump obstructed justice.

    Story Continued Below

    “The committee seeks to compel Mr. McGahn to produce White House documents the executive branch has directed that he not produce,” Burck wrote in a letter, obtained by POLITICO, to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.).

    “Where co-equal branches of government are making contradictory demands on Mr. McGahn concerning the same set of documents, the appropriate response for Mr. McGahn is to maintain the status quo unless and until the committee and the executive branch can reach an accommodation,” Burck added.

    The committee’s subpoena to McGahn also demanded that he testify publicly on May 21. A source involved in the negotiations said the White House’s request only applies to documents and is silent on whether McGahn would be permitted to testify in public later this month.

    Nadler’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Democrats have argued that because McGahn already provided voluminous testimony and documents to Mueller — much of which has already been made public — executive privilege no longer applies.

    But McGahn’s successor as White House counsel, Pat Cipollone, indicated to Burck earlier Tuesday that the White House considers documents in McGahn’s possession to be subject to executive privilege and that any discussion about sharing them with Congress should be between lawmakers and the White House.

    “The White House records remain legally protected from disclosure under longstanding constitutional principles, because they implicate significant executive branch confidentiality interests and executive privilege,” Cipollone wrote to Burck on Tuesday. “For these reasons, the Acting Chief of Staff to the President, Mick Mulvaney, directs Mr. McGahn not to produce these White House records in response to the committee’s April 22 subpoena.”

    The White House’s intervention in McGahn’s testimony is the latest skirmish in a broader effort to defy Democratic investigators’ demands for documents and testimony that the president and his Republican allies have said amounts to a political witch-hunt.

    McGahn delivered some of the most damning testimony in Mueller’s investigation of whether Trump attempted to obstruct the probe of his 2016 campaign’s links to the Russian government.

    His testimony, combined with notes from his deputy Annie Donaldson, portrayed a White House in chaos, a president fuming at the special counsel investigation and repeatedly attempting to disrupt the probe.

    Jordyn Hermani contributed to this report.

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2PTU2QT
    via IFTTT

    Mac DeMarco’s New Album Features Two Tributes To His Pal Mac Miller



    Getty Images

    Mac DeMarco‘s new album, Here Comes the Cowboy, is out this Friday (May 10), and it finds him continuing to mellow our from the rubbery, weed-fueled jams that defined his early releases. Here, he’s quieter and more contemplative, as we heard on 2017’s This Old Dog. One of the most delicate, prettiest entries comes via a sparse, nocturnal number called “Heart to Heart.” As DeMarco reveals in a new interview with Entertainment Weekly, it was penned as an ode to his pal Mac Miller, who died in September 2018.

    The pair had grown close in the year leading up to Miller’s sudden death, when gradually what began as a tongue-in-cheek feud over the similarities of their names grew into a genuine friendship. “We had this strange history, and then we became really close, and I was going over to his place multiple times a week, up until the point that he passed away,” DeMarco said.

    Miller’s influence also led to DeMarco including another quiet number, “Skyless Moon,” on the album despite DeMarco’s uncertainty whether or not it would make the final cut. “We just listened to it in silence, and he just looked at me after, and he was like ‘Yes! Yes!’” DeMarco said. “I probably wouldn’t have [put the song] on the album otherwise.”

    Last summer, a day after Miller’s death, DeMarco dedicated his song “Watching Him Fade Away” to Miller at a show in Central Park. He also wore one of Miller’s Swimming hats for his recent appearance on The Tonight Show.

    DeMarco’s rollout for Here Comes the Cowboy has been fraught with mini media controversies since he announced the title and first single, “Nobody,” in March. Mitski fans found both titles similar to her own 2018 album, Be the Cowboy, which also features a song called “Nobody.”

    DeMarco addressed this in the new interview, saying, “I thought Mitski was a rapper.” He also said he apologized to her and they cleared things up: “She was very cool about it. I just thought it was a cool coincidence, and I think she took it that way as well.” Her tweets on the subject suggest that as well.

    The visuals for Here Comes the Cowboy have been wild, by the way, and Tuesday’s latest video is no exception. It’s for a song called “On the Square” and it features humans with animalistic heads. Check that out below. Read the entire interview over at EW.

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2vLiydy
    via IFTTT