Waymo defends laser sensors after Elon Musk drags them

Waymo engineers are all about LiDAR.
Waymo engineers are all about LiDAR.

Image: sasha lekach / mashable

By Sasha Lekach

Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s recent strongly worded thoughts on LiDAR laser sensors, which bring 3D imaging to a self-driving car’s computer, are still reverberating throughout the autonomous vehicle community. Waymo’s head engineers and scientists are now defending its sensor choices for the company’s self-driving taxi service.

At a Waymo event during the Google I/O developer conference at headquarters in Mountain View, California, the Alphabet-owned company’s CTO Dmitri Dolgov and other engineering leaders all but shook their heads when Musk’s recent comments about autonomous vehicles came up on Wednesday.

Musk has disparaged LiDAR sensors in favor of a camera- and radar-based sensor system for his electric vehicles, which he claims can transform into a fleet of 1 million robo-taxis by next year. He called  LiDAR “lame” and unnecessarily expensive.

While getting into Waymo’s self-driving taxi service, Waymo One, which launched in December in self-driving Chrysler Pacifica minivans, Dolgov was asked by a reporter about Musk’s ambitious goals to have fully self-driving vehicles up and running by the end of next year wherever Tesla owners have cars. Dolgov retorted: “You should probably ask Elon.” 

Waymo, for their part, have been testing in 25 different U.S. cities, but the company’s not ready to give any concrete timelines on expanding its ride service beyond Phoenix. In Phoenix only about 1,000 riders have used the vehicles, and safety operators are still in the front seat. A partnership with ride-hailing app Lyft in the coming months will expand the service in the Phoenix area.

As to the sensors, Dolgov said cameras, radar, and LiDAR systems “complement each other” and that Waymo takes the best of each. The price is dropping and will continue to do so as it becomes more widespread, he explained.

Drago Anguelov, head of research, said LiDAR gives “much richer data that’s much more accurate.” Plus it’s safer, he argued. While Musk is a big believer in the power of cameras, Anguelov said, “just using cameras is more limiting.”

A LiDAR sensor on the back of a Waymo car.

A LiDAR sensor on the back of a Waymo car.

Image: sasha lekach / mashable

Satish Jeyachandran, head of hardware and previously at Tesla for six years, immediately spoke up to say that “every sensor is important to create capable and safe self-driving cars.” Waymo has developed its own hardware, including LiDAR sensors that they sell to companies in other industries, like robotics, agriculture, security. Jeyachandran said the company’s are hailed for the improved field of view they provide. 

SEE ALSO: Elon Musk is annoying the hell out of people who work with self-driving cars

In contrast to Musk calling out one of the different sensing tools, Jeyachandran said that “when it comes to self-driving, the whole suite is more important than individual inputs.”

Waymo thinks LiDAR is anything but lame.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2H5V5cq
via IFTTT

Report: Tyronn Lue, Lakers at Contract ‘Impasse’; Jason Kidd Eyed as Assistant

“,”id”:404,”type”:”error”},”playlists”:{},”profiles”:{},”promo”:{},”schedules”:{“selectedTeam”:404},”search”:{“site”:{“query”:””,”results”:[]},”tags”:{“query”:””,”results”:[]}},”sections”:{},”stub”:{},”tags”:{},”template”:{“html”:{“className”:”no-js”,”lang”:”en”},”title”:”error | Bleacher Report”,”meta_tags”:{“aol-te-auth”:”1c424580-0f86-4d9b-88b2-bc8c0d029d4c”,”blitz”:”mu-6e4ce5cd-57f20d11-7c0ecee9-d55c79e2″,”msvalidate.01″:”7A63840181953B2A5A1FEA25FB45A991″,”robots”:”NOODP,NOYDIR”,”verify-v1″:”+Ntj422Jc4V03qgBqLYbF3LMvrursV0X2btn2Zoqn9w=”,”description”:”Sports journalists and bloggers covering NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, MMA, college football and basketball, NASCAR, fantasy sports and more. News, photos, mock drafts, game scores, player profiles and more!”,”keywords”:”Bleacher Report, bleacherreport.com, sports, writers, articles, comments, blogs, Formula 1, Premier League, Hockey, Soccer, Recaps, Boxscores, Stats, Schedules, Tennis, Golf, WWE, fantasy football, Lebron James”,”viewport”:”width=device-width, initial-scale=1″,”fb:app_id”:”135174055162″,”al:iphone:url”:”teamstream://”,”al:iphone:app_store_id”:”418075935″,”al:iphone:app_name”:”Bleacher Report”,”al:ipad:url”:”teamstream://”,”al:ipad:app_store_id”:”484725748″,”al:ipad:app_name”:”Bleacher Report”,”al:android:url”:””,”al:android:app_name”:”Bleacher Report”,”al:android:package”:”com.bleacherreport.android.teamstream”,”al:web:url”:”http://bleacherreport.com/”,”og:site_name”:”Bleacher Report”,”og:locale”:”en_US”,”p:domain_verify”:”0c768466449ebb550411234d6d4ffc30″,”theme-color”:”#000″,”twitter:app:name:iphone”:”Bleacher Report”,”twitter:app:id:iphone”:”418075935″,”twitter:app:name:ipad”:”Bleacher Report”,”twitter:app:id:ipad”:”484725748″,”twitter:app:name:googleplay”:”Bleacher Report”,”twitter:app:id:googleplay”:”com.bleacherreport.android.teamstream”,”twitter:widgets:new-embed-design”:”on”,”twitter:site”:”@bleacherreport”},”scripts”:[],”styles”:[{“href”:”https://static-assets.bleacherreport.com/css/global.7551afad8cd77b6659691df2b20d0c01.css”,”key”:”globalCSS”,”type”:”text/css”,”rel”:”stylesheet”},{“href”:”https://static-assets.bleacherreport.com/css/atomic.332e4ce214d53bdc3e37c9ae4d6516a1.css”,”key”:”atomicCSS”,”type”:”text/css”,”rel”:”stylesheet”}],”links”:[{“key”:”manifest”,”rel”:”manifest”,”href”:”/manifest.json”},{“key”:”safariMaskIcon”,”rel”:”mask-icon”,”href”:”/img/favicon/safariMaskIcon.svg”,”color”:”#000000″},{“key”:”appleTouchIcon”,”rel”:”apple-touch-icon”,”sizes”:”180×180″,”href”:”/img/favicon/appleTouchIcon.png”},{“key”:”icon32″,”rel”:”icon”,”sizes”:”32×32″,”href”:”/img/favicon/favicon32.png”},{“key”:”icon16″,”rel”:”icon”,”sizes”:”16×16″,”href”:”/img/favicon/favicon16.png”}]},”tracks”:{},”ui”:{“assetURL”:”https://static-assets.bleacherreport.com”,”bundleName”:”bundle.10e579463f5ba8ce67d290f125ae43f5.js”,”comments”:true,”scrollPlay”:true,”skinAd_exists”:true,”teamStreamLimit”:60,”teamStreamLoading”:false,”topAd_exists”:true,”trendingLimit”:60,”userAgent”:{“family”:”Chrome”,”major”:”41″,”minor”:”0″,”patch”:”2228″,”device”:{“family”:”Other”,”major”:”0″,”minor”:”0″,”patch”:”0″},”os”:{“family”:”Windows”,”major”:”7″,”minor”:”0″,”patch”:”0″}},”videosInViewport”:[],”referrer”:””,”hideGettyCopyright”:false,”hideFooterLinks”:false,”hidePrivacyNotice”:false,”hideNav”:false,”hideShare”:false,”hide”:{},”isEmbedded”:false,”isFromCnn”:false,”customBrowser”:false,”isMobileDevice”:false,”os”:null,”theme”:”light”,”pageType”:”error”,”currentPage”:404,”url”:”https://bleacherreport.com/404″},”user”:{“device_id”:false,”league”:false,”bio”:null,”country”:”US”,”default_tags”:[22,23,18,19,16,20],”first_name”:null,”id”:null,”is_br_verified”:false,”last_name”:null,”photo_path”:null,”profile_id”:null,”tags”:[],”title”:null,”type”:”Anonymous”,”updated_at”:null,”username”:null,”siteLocale”:”USA”,”trackingId”:”056fbab6-747d-4bd5-9c42-faefc194973e”,”name”:”null null”,”birthday”:null,”identities”:{}}};
–>

Error 404: We couldn’t find that page, sorry.

Not Found from 500

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Vngwj7
via IFTTT

Senate intelligence committee subpoenas Donald Trump Jr: reports

The United States Senate Intelligence Committee has subpoenaed one of the president’s sons, Donald Trump Jr, to answer questions about his contacts with Russia, US media reported on Wednesday, citing unnamed congressional sources.

The panel is seeking to question Trump Jr about congressional testimony he gave in September 2017 to the Senate Judiciary Committee which was subsequently contradicted in public testimony by former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, one source told Reuters News Agency. 

During his Judiciary Committee appearance, the source said, Trump Jr was asked about the extent of his involvement in a plan to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

“Like I said, I was peripherally aware of it, but most of my knowledge has been gained since as it relates to hearing about it over the last few … weeks,” Trump Jr told the committee, according to an official transcript.

In testimony before the House of Representatives Oversight Committee, however, Cohen, who began serving a federal prison sentence earlier this week, said he briefed Trump family members “approximately 10 times” about the Moscow Trump Tower project, and that Donald Jr and his sister Ivanka were among the family members he briefed.

A Senate Intelligence Committee spokeswoman declined to discuss details of its long-running investigation into allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election. The subpoena is a sign that the panel is still conducting its investigation even after the release of Special Counsel Robert Mueller‘s report.

A lawyer for Donald Trump Jr did not immediately respond to Reuters’s request for comment. 

Confrontation intensifies

The reports came as a battle between House Democrats and the Trump administration intensified. 

Separately on Wednesday, the Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee approved a measure to hold US Attorney General William Barr in contempt for refusing to hand over an unredacted copy of Mueller’s Russia report. The measure now goes to the full House for a vote, and likely sets up a court battle and possible fines or jail time for Barr. 

President Donald Trump also invoked the legal principle of executive privilege to block the report’s disclosure. 

Trump, seeking re-election in 2020, is stonewalling numerous probes by House Democrats, ranging from Mueller’s inquiry to matters such as Trump’s tax returns and past financial records.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2H8g26u
via IFTTT

Trump investigations: A list of ongoing battles with Congress


Donald Trump

Pete Marovich/Getty Images

The White House has repeatedly rebuffed House Democrats’ oversight demands, from requests for President Donald Trump’s taxes to testimony from the former White House counsel. Democrats have gone so far as to issue subpoenas in some cases, but Trump has vowed to fight each one.

Here are the major battles being waged and where they stand:

MUELLER REPORT

Story Continued Below


Democratic demand: The House Judiciary Committee issued a subpoena for the unredacted Mueller report and all underlying evidence.

White House pushback: The Justice Department has refused, citing laws blocking the disclosure of grand jury information. Democrats issued a subpoena for the report on April 19 and the Justice Department defied a May 1 deadline, citing efforts to work with Congress to provide a largely unredacted report to a select group of senior lawmakers. The committee voted on May 8 to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for not providing the unredacted report.

Accessing the unredacted report is a crucial part of Democrats’ oversight agenda – not just because it could contain damaging details about Trump but because Democrats have spent months attempting to retrace Mueller’s steps on their own.

MUELLER TESTIMONY


Democratic demand: The House Judiciary Committee is seeking testimony from Mueller.

White House pushback: Democrats are privately working on the logistics with the Justice Department but so far haven’t reached a deal. Democrats are eyeing May 15 but have not gotten confirmation from Mueller that he will attend, and Trump’s claims of executive privilege could delay any testimony. In May, Trump reversed himself and stated that Mueller “should not testify.”

Democrats see Mueller’s testimony as the linchpin of their investigative efforts, the moment when he will help crystallize for the country the import of the evidence he gathered on Russia’s effort to support Trump’s election and Trump’s effort to obstruct his investigation. But little is known about whether Mueller wants to testify, whether he’s prepared to say anything outside of the findings from his report or if he’ll take any issue with Attorney General William Barr’s handling of his work.

DON MCGAHN’S ROLE


Democratic demand: The House Judiciary Committee issued a subpoena for documents and testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn.

White House pushback: McGahn defied a committee request to provide documents by a May 7 deadline, and has yet to say whether he’ll testify to the committee on May 21. McGahn delivered some of the most damning testimony Mueller received implicating Trump in potential obstruction of justice. His testimony, combined with notes from his deputy Annie Donaldson, portrayed a White House in chaos and a president fuming at the special counsel’s investigation and repeatedly attempting to disrupt the probe — including asking McGahn to tell Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to fire Mueller.

The White House on May 7 intervened in the dispute, urging the Judiciary Committee to stop requesting files directly from McGahn and to approach the White House instead, since the administration may want to invoke executive privilege. Democrats say the privilege has already been waived, since Trump allowed McGahn to speak to Mueller and share documents.

CHATS WITH PUTIN


Democratic demand: The House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees asked the White House and State Department to turn over “all documents and communications, regardless of form and classification, that refer or relate to any communications between President Trump and President Putin, including in-person meetings and telephone calls.”

White House pushback: The White House said it would not provide the documents, citing longstanding precedents that protect the privacy of presidents’ conversations with world leaders. It remains unclear whether House Democrats will issue a subpoena for the documents.

Democrats have long been suspicious of Trump’s one-on-one meetings with the Russian leader, especially in Helsinki last year when the president publicly bucked his intelligence agencies and appeared to side with Putin’s denials of election interference.

ACCOUNTING FIRM’S TRUMP DOCS


Democratic demand: The House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena to accounting firm Mazars USA seeking eight years of Trump’s financial documents.

White House pushback: Trump filed a lawsuit — in his personal capacity — against the committee in an attempt to invalidate the subpoena. The suit is currently making its way through federal court.

The committee said it needed the documents in order to corroborate a number of claims made by Trump’s former personal attorney and fixer Michael Cohen, who alleged that Trump artificially inflated and deflated the value of his assets as he sought loans and a reduction in his overall tax burden.

BANKS’ TRUMP DOCS


Democratic demand: The House Intelligence and Financial Services committees issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One for Trump’s financial records.

White House pushback: Trump filed another lawsuit to block the subpoenas, with his lawyers contending that the subpoenas were only issued to “harass” the president and damage his re-election prospects.

The committees say they need the documents as part of their joint investigations into potential foreign influence on the U.S. political process and abuse of the U.S. financial system for illicit purposes.

TRUMP’S TAXES


Democratic demand: The House Ways and Means Committee has requested six years of Trump’s personal and business tax returns.

White House pushback: The Treasury Department has twice rejected the committee’s demand, setting the stage for a potential subpoena or for Democrats to go directly to court. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal (D-Mass.) that the committee’s request “lacks a legitimate legislative purpose.” Democrats say the purpose of the request is to ensure that the Internal Revenue Service is enforcing all relevant tax laws.

WHITE HOUSE SECURITY CLEARANCES


Democratic demand: The House Oversight Committee is conducting a wide-ranging investigation centering on alleged abuses with the White House security clearance system. The panel has requested documents and witness testimony from the White House.

White House pushback: The White House has rejected virtually all of the committee’s demands. Democrats say the White House hasn’t turned over a single document related to the security clearance process, and it instructed Carl Kline, the former personnel security director, to defy the committee’s subpoena for his testimony. Kline eventually agreed to appear before the panel for a transcribed interview, during which he confirmed allegations from a whistleblower that he overruled some clearance applications that were initially denied. But he also said nobody at the White House directed him to do so.

Reports emerged earlier this year that the president himself intervened to ensure that his senior adviser and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, was granted a full security clearance, despite recommendations to the contrary from career national security officials.

BROAD CORRUPTION AND OBSTRUCTION INQUIRY


Democratic demand: The House Judiciary Committee in early March sent letters to 81 Trump-connected individuals and entities seeking records and testimony from the White House, Trump’s businesses, charity and family, as part of a broad inquiry into potential obstruction of justice and corruption.

White House pushback: The response from the recipients has been mixed. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler later said that his committee received “a large number” of responses from the individuals and entities as well as “tens of thousands” of documents.

It remains unclear if all recipients have responded to the request or provided documents, though longtime Trump confidant Thomas Barrack and former top White House adviser Stephen Bannon have confirmed they turned over documents. Others have refused to comply, with some asking for a so-called “friendly subpoena” to secure their compliance and others stating that they do not possess the documents requested.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Vphlb3
via IFTTT

‘Avengers: Endgame’ will stream exclusively on Disney+

That subscription just got so much more tempting.
That subscription just got so much more tempting.

Image: Film Frame ©Marvel Studios 2019

By Alison Foreman

Disney’s first major move in the streaming wars comes with a super-sized punch. 

Announced Wednesday, Avengers: Endgame will be available to stream exclusively on Disney+ starting December 11 — a little less than a month after the new streaming platform debuts on November 12. 

For dedicated Netflix, Prime Video, and Hulu subscribers with a love of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, that may mean adding another service to their monthly entertainment bill this winter. 

At the time of launch, Disney+ will carry an initial subscription price of $6.99 per month — as well as be available at a discounted offering of $69.99 per year.

While it was anticipated that Disney would corner the market on streaming Marvel films, the exclusive streaming of Avengers: Endgame will likely prove a massive draw for customers. 

SEE ALSO: There are officially too many damn video streaming services

At present, Endgame has made $2.27 billion dollars at the worldwide box office, making it the second-highest grossing film of all-time, after Avatar — and continues to climb towards that #1 spot. Disney+ is primed to make the most of their winning film, lining up a number of Marvel spin-off series for streaming exclusivity as well. 

Viewers looking to own Endgame (and possibly see it sooner) can turn to Amazon, where it is already available for pre-order. While no official digital release date for Endgame has been announced, it is anticipated to arrive sometime this summer as its predecessor, Avengers: Infinity War, shared a similar release date and hit the digital shelf on July 31, 2018. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2H9efQ0
via IFTTT

Predictive text memes: The rush of a personality quiz with none of the work

Post your results.
Post your results.

Image: Mashable / Vicky Leta

By Chloe Bryan

Predictive text memes are all over Twitter for a few reasons. First, they’re easy to do: All you need is 30 seconds and a phone; no Photoshop required. Second, they’re in a pliable format with nearly endless room for variation. And finally, they scratch that weird itch many of us feel on the internet: The desire for an online entity — a quiz, an astrology app, a device full of our own data — to tell us something about ourselves.

This particular brand of meme is made using autocomplete, which is available in some form on most smartphones. Apple, for example, says it uses your “past conversations, writing style, and even websites you visit in Safari” to suggest the word it thinks you’d like to type on your iPhone next. 

While the service is often finicky, I’ve found it to be genuinely helpful — even though it produces an unmistakable “dystopia!” feeling in the pit of my stomach. My iMessage app clearly knows stuff about me: It suggests my friends’ names, it throws in a “y’all” where I’d say “y’all,” and it often assumes I’m talking about dogs (I am). This makes it a fairly compelling online Ouija board — for me and for other people who like to mess around on the internet.

type “sex is” and let ur keyboard finish your sentence

mine: sex is your favorite place in your mind

— ‎ ‎ً (@grandegoalsx) February 25, 2019

Autocomplete memes seem to pop up in time of relative meme scarcity, i.e. when people are super bored. They ask participants to type a phrase on their phones, then post what autocomplete suggests to finish the sentence. 

Unsurprisingly, these memes mostly involve things everyone is thinking about all the time, like sex, dying, and personal identity. In January, for instance, a bunch of people used predictive text to write their own epitaphs, which is a gloomy but sort of irresistible proposition. Who hasn’t imagined their own funeral? (My epitaph: “Here lies Chloe. She was really good at something.”) In February people used a predictive text meme to define sex. (Mine: “Sex is not bad.”)

Here lies Stephani Adair. She was going to call you after work today and will not be able to.

— Stephani (@stephani06) January 1, 2018

SEE ALSO: How SparkNotes’ social media accounts mastered the art of meme-ing literature

The memes have even invaded the ever-popular astrological space a few times. In March, Hank Green tweeted out a template for a “predictive text horoscope,” which elicited some fun results. And the “I am a [sign] and that’s why” game — another foray into astrology memes — ended up being pretty on the nose for a few people.

Well, at least that’s what they said. We don’t actually have a way to know if anyone’s results matched their actual personalities. Frankly, I don’t think my results match my actual personality, but it was fun to type them out for you in this post. That is, perhaps, the appeal of predictive text memes: As with BuzzFeed quizzes and retweeted horoscopes, the real allure is posting your results.

Libra, this month is a great time to go to the store, but watch out for people who ate a bit of the investors.

— M(illenial)inda (@melinda_staup) March 20, 2018

Devon Maloney explored this phenomenon in a 2014 article for Wired focusing specifically on online quizzes. She wrote:

The reason quizzes have proliferated, of course, is the same reason they have any social relevance at all: We share our results with each other. As quizzes have become a lucrative option for online publishers, they’ve also a signifier of self, as indicative of who we are as the profile pictures we choose, the music we publicly listen to on Spotify, or even what kind of bath towels we just bought on Amazon. The fun isn’t taking the quiz—it’s showing the result to others.

Predictive text memes are a natural next step in this tradition. We use them in the same way we use quizzes, which is to share what we want to share online under the guise of “prediction.” Autocomplete results are curated traits designed to appear natural.

The real allure is posting your results.

Of course, performing a personality online is not a new concept. But it’s interesting to see how the ways we do so have developed in tandem with our relationships to technology. Predictive text memes are very 2019: They get their information not from a Q&A, but from information you’ve been providing quietly in the background the entire time you’ve had your phone. 

Sometimes this produces disturbingly on-point results, like a creepily accurate targeted ad, and sometimes it produces garbage that doesn’t make sense. One of my attempts at an “introduce yourself” meme, for example: “My name is Chloe. I was born in a new one. My age is a new one. I like to see a new one.” (I did not share this, as it is neither accurate nor acceptably self-deprecating.)

Luckily, predictive text memes are mostly just fun diversions. (As far as memes go, they’re not even particularly good.) Even more luckily, you can simply retry them again and again until you get a result that feels right. 

It’s your epitaph, after all.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2Ydwklr
via IFTTT

World Reacts to Spurs Miracle Comeback

  1. Dirk Nowitzki @swish41

    You are kidding me!!!

  2. JJ Watt @JJWatt

    NOOOO WAYYYY!!!!
    Tottenham-Ajax

  3. Chad Johnson @ochocinco

    These last two days of Champions League matches were visual & definitive representation on why it’s called “The Beautiful Game” ⚽

  4. Tottenham Hotspur @SpursOfficial

    Raw emotion. This is what it means.

    💙 💙 💙

    #UCL ⚪ #COYS

    https://t.co/N6hkZlDBsS

  5. Gary Lineker @GaryLineker

    There. Is Nothing. Like. Football.

  6. Nihal Arthanayake @TherealNihal

    Just burst into tears in front of my wife. She gave me a hug. I’m proper emosh. #COYS

  7. Jonathan Northcroft @JNorthcroft

    Football, you are spoiling us.

  8. Chad Johnson @ochocinco

    Does Lucas have Twitter❓

  9. Peter Crouch @petercrouch

    Has the @ChampionsLeague always been this stressful 🥴

  10. Trent Arnold @trentaa98

    Ready for anyone. 🔴 #YNWA #UCL https://t.co/kGAs7JxW5E

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2H85lSO
via IFTTT

US: House panel votes to hold Attorney General Barr in contempt

Washington, DC – Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee voted on Wednesday to recommend a contempt citation against US Attorney General William Barr, setting the stage for a constitutional confrontation with the White House over Special Counsel Robert Mueller‘s full Russia report.

The 24-16 vote by the key Judiciary Committee came along party lines with all Democrats voting in favour, and all Republicans present opposed. One Republican was absent.

“The Trump administration and its enablers may brazenly try to cover up the misdeeds uncovered by special counsel but on this committee we will represent the American people and ensure the truth is known” said Representative Jerrold Nadler, the Democrat chairman of the committee ahead of the vote.

The approval of the contempt resolution, which now goes to the full House for a vote, will likely prompt a court battle that may result in fines or jail time for Barr. 

The vote came after weeks of talks between the lawyers for the committee and the attorney general failed to yield an agreement over access to Mueller’s full, unredacted report.

“Democrats are angry Mueller did not provide a road map for impeachment,” said Representative Doug Collins, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee.

By “moving to this contempt citation at lightning speed”, the committee Democrats were pursuing “craven and insincere politics that seem to be yielding no benefits for the American people,” Collins said.

Trump invokes executive privilege

Hours ahead of the vote, Republican President Donald Trump invoked executive privilegeto block the release of the unredacted version of the Mueller report. 

Federal courts have recognised a limited right by presidents to keep executive branch materials confidential.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said the privilege claim was in response to Nadler’s “blatant abuse of power” and “at the attorney general’s request”.

House Democrats argued that Trump has already waived any right to executive privilege by allowing aides to provide information to the special counsel.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) said on Wednesday that “it’s not true the president waived executive privilege by sharing materials with the special counsel’s office”, according to Reuters news agency, quoting an unnamed department official.

Wednesday’s developments come as a battle between House Democrats and the Trump administration intensifies. Trump has sought to block aides and former staffers from cooperating with a number of congressional investigations looking into the president’s behaviour and finances.

‘If we don’t put the breaks, we won’t have a democracy’

The Judiciary Committee is seeking to have Mueller testify at a hearing later this month, perhaps as soon as May 15, and has asked former White House Counsel Don McGahn to appear on May 21.

White House lawyers are attempting to block McGahn from testifying. Reversing his earlier stance, Trump indicated in a series of tweets he’s now opposed to Mueller testifying.

“The president keeps saying there is not going to be a ‘do over’. And he has talked about a number of people have said we should just be finished. That is the worst thing we could do,” Representative Elijah Cummings, the Democrat chairman of the House Oversight Committee, told Al Jazeera.

“If we do not put brakes on what is happening in our country, we will no longer have a democracy,” Cummings said. “We are being blocked every which way from getting information. We also being blocked from having access to members of the administration.”

Representative David Cicilline, a Democrat, told reporters in the US Capitol that sentiment among Democrats was hardening against Trump’s refusal to cooperate with the House review of the Mueller probe.

“Everyone recognises that the administration is attempting to stonewall and prevent progress because they want to run out the clock. We recognize that,” Cicilline said.

Republicans discounted the Judiciary Committee vote to hold Barr in contempt as partisan exercise. 

“It’s a political contempt vote and we fully expected it,” said Representative Mark Meadows, a Republican who chairs the conservative Freedom Caucus in the House ahead of the vote.

“When you play politics with somebody who has been as honest and forthright as Attorney General Barr has been, I think the American people will see it for what it is. It’s political,” Meadows told Al Jazeera.

‘In favour of prosecution’

Barr has come under criticism for his handling of Mueller’s 22-month investigation. More than 500 former Justice Department officials have signed an open letter calling Trump’s actions described in the Mueller report criminal.

“We believe strongly that … the overwhelming weight of professional judgment would come down in favour of prosecution for the conduct outlined in the Mueller report,” the letter said. 

The redacted version of the Mueller report did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired with Russian operatives.

The investigation did, however, examine “multiple acts by the president that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations”.

Mueller did not conclude that Trump committed obstruction of justice, but did not exonerate him either. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein subsequently concluded that Trump did not break the law.

The Justice Department has made a less redacted version available for House and Senate leaders and some committee heads, but the Democrats have said that is not enough and have so far declined to read it.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has criticised Barr for mischaracterising the Mueller report said last week she believed Barr lied to Congress when he told House and Senate hearings he did not know of any concerns among Mueller’s team about his actions.

Mueller had written a letter to Barr in March that said the attorney general’s summary of the investigation had failed to adequately characterise the substance of the investigation.

US Attorney General William Barr testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on ‘The Justice Department’s Investigation of Russian Interference with the 2016 Presidential Election’ [Nicholas Kamm/AFP]

Barr was grilled by Democrat senators in a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 1.

Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are seeking to bring an end to the controversy over the Mueller report. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham has said he does not intend to call Mueller to testify. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell gave speech in the Senate on Tuesday arguing the matter should be closed.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2YkKbXp
via IFTTT

Senate Intel Committee subpoenas Donald Trump Jr.


Donald Trump Jr.

Darren Hauck/Getty Images

The Senate Intelligence Committee issued a subpoena to President Donald Trump’s eldest son, a source familiar with the matter said.

Donald Trump Jr. received the subpoena to appear before the committee as a follow-up to his prior testimony as part of the Republican-led panel’s ongoing Russia probe.

Story Continued Below

A spokesperson for the committee declined to comment.

“We do not discuss the details of witness engagements with the committee,” the spokesperson said. “Throughout the investigation, the committee has reserved the right to recall witnesses for additional testimony as needed, as every witness and witness counsel has been made aware.”

Trump Jr. and his personal attorney did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The subpoena could lead to a clash with committee Republicans. The source familiar with the matter said Trump, Jr. is weighing not appearing before the committee.

The news was first reported by Axios.

It is unclear exactly why the committee is seeking to interview Trump Jr. again. In February, the president’s former personal attorney and fixer Michael Cohen said he briefed Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump several times about the negotiations surrounding the Trump Tower Moscow project. In public, however, Trump Jr. has downplayed his involvement in the negotiations.

Trump Jr. also came under legal scrutiny during special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation for his role in a 2016 Trump Tower meeting with a Russian lawyer who promised dirt to the Trump campaign on Hillary Clinton.

The special counsel, in the final redacted report released last month, said Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort — the other senior Trump campaign officials in the meeting — didn’t face charges because his investigators lacked evidence to prove they took the meeting with the general knowledge they might ultimately be committing a crime.

Mueller also said the promised opposition research didn’t necessarily qualify as an illegal donation.

The Mueller report also includes a mysterious redaction that hides the fallout from Trump Jr.’s refusal to participate in a voluntary interview with the special counsel. The blacked-out section has set off speculation Mueller tried to subpoena Trump Jr., or the president’s son invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

While Trump Jr.’s lawyer hasn’t commented on the matter, Rudy Giuliani, the president’s personal attorney, in an interview last month tamped down talk that the redaction deals with the Fifth Amendment. “I can tell you I have no knowledge that anybody took the Fifth,” Giuliani said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2H7hSWl
via IFTTT

Dark web review site Deep Dot Web used referrals links to earn millions

The internet economy.
The internet economy.

Image: ALFSnaiper / getty

By Jack Morse

Referral links just got a whole lot edgier. 

The dark web review site Deep Dot Web was taken down by law enforcement Tuesday, knocking offline a centralized repository of knowledge detailing how and where to score illegal drugs and goods online. It turns out, the Department of Justice revealed, that the operators of the site allegedly employed referral links to earn commissions on all future sales made on linked sites. 

For example, if you went to Deep Dot Web and found a link to the now-shuttered dark web market Wallstreet Market, created an account, and then made purchases with that account, Deep Dot Web would reportedly earn a commission on that sale. All future purchases were tied back to that original referral link. 

“I advise you to reconsider the anonymity of the Tor network.”

“The significance of this takedown and this prosecution cannot be overstated,” U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady told reporters. He added that Deep Dot Web “truly facilitated the operations” of the dark web economy. 

This was not a small scheme. Brady noted that 23 percent of all transactions on AlphaBay (RIP) were referred by Deep Dot Web. According to DOJ officials, the site’s two operators netted $15 million — split evenly between the two — before their respective arrests. 

Again, that’s $15 million made by referral links — the exact same mechanism helping to fund many of your favorite digital media publications and online content producers — for things like cocaine and heroin. 

“This case represents the single most significant law enforcement disruption of the dark web to date,” Brady added. 

And like that, it's gone.

Image: screenshot / deep dot web

Notably, officials gathered at Wednesday’s press conference issued a stern warning for anyone trying to operate anonymously online. 

“To the users of these anonymous marketplaces,” FBI special agent Robert Allan Jones said, “I advise you to reconsider the anonymity of the Tor network.”

SEE ALSO: Dark web drug market ‘Wallstreet Market’ seized by German police

Jones added that the FBI “will continue to seize these marketplaces and your transaction data.”

Importantly, following a clarifying question from a reporter in attendance at the press conference, DOJ officials noted that, at present, they don’t target dark web customers. Rather, just sellers and site operators — the latter of which apparently includes those involved in dark web market affiliate marketing schemes. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2J9kmG2
via IFTTT