Suspect in custody after deadly Pittsburgh synagogue shooting

A suspect has been taken into custody in Pittsburgh, in the US state of Pennsylvania, after a shooting that caused “multiple casualties” at a synagogue, according to police.

At least three police officers were shot in Saturday’s incident near the Tree of Life Synagogue in the Squirrel Hill neighbourhood, said Chris Togneri, police spokesperson.

It was not clear what the condition of the officers was.

Togneri also said police have no more information at this time because they were still trying to clear the building and determine if any more threats exist.

The local CBS affiliate reported that eight people were confirmed dead, while Fox put the death toll at four.

Al Jazeera’s John Hendren, reporting from Washington DC, said the shots began at about 10am local time as worshipers were gathering for Sabbath [Saturday] services.

“There were perhaps 60 to a hundred people inside there. Police have reported that 12 people were shot, eight of them fatally. Three of those killed were police officers. All of this is a preliminery information,” he said.

The Tree of Life synagogue describes itself on its website as a traditional, progressive and egalitarian congregation. Few other details were immediately available.

Local TV news footage showed police at that location with rifles and wearing helmets and other tactical gear.

Paramedics also were stationed near the synagogue and police vehicles were blocking some streets in the area.

US President Donald Trump took to Twitter to say he was watching events in Pittsburgh: “Looks like multiple fatalities. Beware of active shooter. God bless all!”

The tree-lined residential neighbourhood of Squirrel Hill close to the city centre is the hub of Pittsburgh’s Jewish community.

Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf called the shooting an “absolute tragedy”.

“We must all pray and hope for no more loss of life,” Wolf said. “But we have been saying ‘this one is too many’ for far too long. Dangerous weapons are putting our citizens in harm’s way.”

Saturday’s shooting incident is the latest in the United States, where firearms are linked to more than 30,000 deaths annually.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2JlgT4H
via IFTTT

Dodgers Find New Life, Red Sox Miss Their Chance in World Series Game 3 Classic

LOS ANGELES, CA - OCTOBER 26:  Max Muncy #13 of the Los Angeles Dodgers celebrates his eighteenth inning walk-off home run to defeat the the Boston Red Sox 3-2 in Game Three of the 2018 World Series at Dodger Stadium on October 26, 2018 in Los Angeles, California.  (Photo by Harry How/Getty Images)

Harry How/Getty Images

LOS ANGELES — The ball dropped after midnight, and it was a new gear for the Los Angeles Dodgers.

For more than seven hours over 18 innings with the Boston Red Sox, there was no give. There was no take. There was only grunting and swinging, stretching and screaming. There was the longest World Series game ever played, both in innings and time, a duel that started in the late-afternoon sun when the first pitch was thrown at 5:10 p.m. local time and ended, finally, under the cover of darkness at 12:30 a.m.

Then after Walker Buehler’s fire, Nathan Eovaldi’s smoke, Rick Porcello’s tears and Brian Dozier’s bananas, the ball dropped. Bottom of the 18th, full-count, Max Muncy rifled an opposite-field shot that fell just over the left-center field fence and delivered the Dodgers a 3-2 Game 3 win that felt like so much more.

Two jewel franchises with a combined World Series-record $428 million payroll had just authored a classic.

But this also might have been the night the Dodgers flipped the script.

The effects of this hard day’s night likely will reverberate through Games 4 and 5, if not longer. They have to. Two teams cannot play gut-wrenching ball with high leverage on every single pitch over a full seven hours and 20 minutes without repercussions. And when Boston manager Alex Cora summoned his announced Game 4 starter, Eovaldi, out of the bullpen to go for the jugular to start the 12th inning with the score 1-1, it was a bold move.

But 97 pitches later, as Muncy’s game-winner disappeared over the fence, Red Sox pitching suddenly appears in danger of being trapped in a Los Angeles gridlock.

Bleacher Report @BleacherReport

How Max Muncy ended the longest game in #WorldSeries history

(via @FOXSports)
https://t.co/RwXAAUFwZZ

Cora ripped through nine pitchers while attempting to seize a 3-0 series lead, including his Game 2 starter David Price (13 pitches in the ninth) and his closer Craig Kimbrel (28 pitches in the ninth and 10th). Eovaldi has now worked in each of these three World Series games.

Without Eovaldi, Boston’s Game 4 starter Saturday will be?

“How do you spell that, TBA,” Cora said. “TBA.”

The short answer: lefty Drew Pomeranz? He was the only available pitcher on the roster who did not throw in Game 3. Lefty Eduardo Rodriguez? He’s been a swingman, and he only threw six pitches Friday night. Ace Chris Sale on short rest? Come on, after he missed significant time with a sore shoulder in the season’s second half?

There appear to be no other options.

What a night. Fact: You could have been in Los Angeles when this game started and in Boston when it ended. Flying time on a nonstop between the cities is about five-and-a-half hours.

“This game was unbelievable,” said Dodgers ace Clayton Kershaw, who did not pitch. “It was an incredible experience.”

Kershaw pinch-hit—yes, pinch-hit—for reliever Julio Urias in the 17th and banged a hard-hit fly ball to Mookie Betts in right field.

It wasn’t exactly how he envisioned it. No, he thought he’d get a chance in the 16th.

“I had visions in my head before Freezer [David Freese] struck out [in the 16th]. What I saw was Freezer doubling, then them walking [Enrique Hernandez] to get to me, and me with the game-winning hit. But that didn’t work out.”

A lot of stuff didn’t work out—before it finally did for the Dodgers.

Together, the Dodgers and Red Sox combined for 131 plate appearances, 18 pitchers used and 561 total pitches.

The top four spots in the Boston lineup—Betts, Xander Bogaerts, Mitch Moreland and J.D. Martinez—combined to go 0-for-23.

There was a 14th-inning stretch—yes, Dodgers organist Dieter Ruehle played “Take Me Out to the Ballgame” for the second time. The crowd of 53,114—an impressive percentage of whom stuck it out until the end—roared when they displayed “12:00” on the Jumbotron scoreboard in the 17th inning. Then they blasted Wilson Pickett’s classic “In the Midnight Hour” going into the 18th.

“We were all snacking,” Kershaw said. “Tyrone [one of the clubbies] made us some peanut butter-and-banana sandwiches, so we were well-fueled.”

Jae C. Hong/Associated Press

The Dodgers started the night well-fueled thanks to Buehler, who fired seven impressive shutout innings in a game Los Angeles manager Dave Roberts called “must-win.” The kid is 24 years old going on Legend. A year ago, he watched Game 2 of the World Series from an upper-deck seat in the left-field corner of Dodger Stadium. Friday night, he stared hard at his World Series debut…and the World Series blinked.

“Certain people can handle a moment like this and understand what was at stake tonight,” Roberts said of Buehler. “And we needed his best effort. And we needed him to go deeper than their starter, log some innings. Some guys run from it. Some guys can’t answer the bell.”

The bell answered to Buehler. Whenever that day comes when Kershaw is finished in Los Angeles, it will be Buehler who eases the sting for Los Angeles fans.

“You can’t say enough about Walker,” Freese said. “He’s a playoff stud. I don’t know what to say about the guy. He’s just a bulldog. He’s had the ball in some very meaningful games.”

He left with a 1-0 lead, but closer Kenley Jansen surrendered a game-tying home run to Jackie Bradley Jr. with two out in the eighth. Forced to play without a DH in the NL park, Cora opted to bench Andrew Benintendi instead of Bradley, and Bradley rewarded him.

In the moment, it appeared as if that dagger could have been fatal to the Dodgers. No team has ever come back to win a World Series after losing the first three games, and Boston appeared to be gaining momentum.

Also in the moment, nobody could know that they would be playing for, oh, another four hours or so.

“The seventh to ninth innings, I took a nap,” quipped Freese, who, in pinch-hitting for reliever Dylan Floro, became the last position player to enter the game from either team as both Roberts and Cora emptied their benches.

“No,” Freese continued. “I just stayed loose, man.

“This game was wild.”

By the time Freese entered, Eovaldi was well into what should have been a heroic evening. After twice coming back from Tommy John surgery in his career, Eovaldi was acquired by Boston from Tampa Bay on July 25 and will be a free agent this winter. He’s already made himself a lot of money this month by emerging as one of Boston’s most dependable and dominant pitchers, but he outdid himself Friday.

Only three times in his 22 appearances this summer—21 of which were starts—did Eovaldi throw more than the 97 pitches he fired in Game 3. He hit 100 mph when he entered in the 12th and was still clocking in the high 90s five innings later.

“Effort-wise…that was one of the best performances, probably, in World Series history,” Cora said.

Bleacher Report @BleacherReport

WILD.

(via @MLB)
https://t.co/dFyLgZ9uF1

 Eovaldi nearly left with a smile, and much earlier. Boston scored a run in the 13th inning when Brock Holt walked, was wild-pitched to second and then scored from there on Eduardo Nunez’s infield single when pitcher Scott Alexander threw wild to first.

But in the bottom of the inning, with two out and Muncy on second, Yasiel Puig drove a ground ball up the middle that Ian Kinsler ranged over, scooped up…and then threw wild to first, tying the game at 2-2.

“I had the last out in my glove, and we ended up playing however many innings, 18 innings, 19 innings, whatever,” a dejected Kinsler said. “I had an opportunity to end the game right there, and it didn’t happen.”

Kinsler’s right foot slipped as he turned to make the throw, digging up a large divot in the Dodger Stadium turf. His mistake was in rushing, off-balance, rather than either setting himself to throw or simply deciding to hold the ball, which would have left runners at the corners with two out and Boston still leading.

Bleacher Report @BleacherReport

PUIGGGGGG 👏

(via @MLB)
https://t.co/8VqICyIdUZ

He apologized to Eovaldi afterward, but the pitcher told him not to worry about it, that they are all in this together.

“We’re a team,” Eovaldi told Kinsler. “I know you’ve got my back.”

And, he added, “I’ve got his.”

It was such a gutty, gritty performance that Porcello, who started and surrendered one run and three hits in 4.2 innings, said it left him in tears.

“That was the most incredible pitching performance I’ve ever seen,” Porcello said.

“Everybody definitely had my back…tonight,” Eovaldi said. “That means a lot to me. As a player, that’s pretty much all you can ask for, your teammates to have your back and things like that.”

If not for Muncy, who drove another ball into the seats but foul in the 15th, Boston may well be on deck to sweep this series, and we’d be talking about Eovaldi the rest of the winter.

Instead, Muncy in the 18th whacked the first walk-off World Series home run since…Freese, for St. Louis, in the 11th inning of Game 6 of the 2011 World Series against Texas.

“That’s cool,” said Freese, who didn’t know that until a reporter informed him after the game. “I’m just happy to be part of it.”

Not that he—or any other Dodger—could remember many of the details.

“The 13th?” Kershaw repeated when asked about the clubs trading one run each in that inning to play even deeper into the night. “What happened in the 13th?”

“You know, to be honest, as the game kept going, you look up and see the 18th inning, and you’re like, ‘Holy cow, where did the game go?’” Muncy said. “But those last nine innings or so just kind of blended together.”

As the last several Dodgers batted, Dozier swung three bananas tied together by long shoelaces like a pendulum over the dugout railing in an apparent throwback to Hernandez’s rally banana days from 2015.

It was a bananas night. Long. Wacky. Tense. Surreal.

“Especially when you’re on the outside looking in, kind of like a fan,” Freese said. “Then you get in a handful of hours later….”

As he sat in the dugout waiting to be called, Freese continued to be amazed by what he watched around him, especially as Boston came so close to taking a 3-0 series lead and placing the Dodgers on the endangered species list.

“These guys are so relaxed,” Freese said. “I haven’t been around this group very long … every now and then, they’ll flip helmets or flip words, but man, they do a good job of turning the page.”

“Gut-wrenching game for both sides,” Muncy said. “This is one of those games that whoever came out on top is going to have a lot of momentum going into tomorrow.”

A lot of momentum, but precious little sleep.

“Most people thought it was over when [Boston] scored their second run,” Dodgers outfielder Cody Bellinger said. “I don’t even know what inning that was.”

Scott Miller covers Major League Baseball as a national columnist for Bleacher Report. Follow Scott on Twitter and talk baseball.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2OUGlDQ
via IFTTT

Microsoft Surface Laptop 2 is the best laptop of 2018

Really crisp • bright and responsive touchscreen • Best-in-class keyboard and trackpad • Terrific battery life • Way faster performance compared to old version • Comes in matte black!

Still no USB-C port • Requires proprietary charging connector • Fabric interior can get gross

Microsoft’s Surface Laptop 2 has it all, including a great keyboard, high-res touchscreen, more powerful performance, and battery that’ll last all day.

Oh, how the tides have turned.

For the last 10 years, I’ve always recommended Apple’s MacBooks to anyone who’s asked me which laptop they should buy. Different operating system preferences aside, Apple’s MacBook Air and MacBook Pros — despite the premium cost — always offered a better experience. 

The laptops were built to last, usually had much longer battery life (especially the Air), and made you one of the cool hipsters at the coffee shop.

SEE ALSO: Here’s how to set up a VPN and protect your data

Apple’s latest MacBook Pros are still good, but they’re considerably flawed. Notably, the flat keyboards (even with their quieter, third-generation “butterfly switch” keys) and Touch Bar remain the biggest letdowns.

Apple’s fumbling with its MacBooks, however, is an opportunity for manufacturers on the Windows side to step up. But it’s not your usual Dell, HP, or Asus who are making the best laptops that balance design, performance, and usability. Instead, my two favorite laptops of the year are coming from relative newcomers.

Dollar for dollar, Huawei’s MateBook X Pro remains one of my favorite laptops of the year and one of the best values for a clamshell computer if you’re can splurge $1,500 for the version with a 512GB SSD and discrete NVIDIA graphics.

But if that’s punching a bit above your budget, Microsoft’s Surface Laptop 2, which starts at $999, is my pick for best laptop of the year. 

Hardware-wise, it’s the same great laptop (ports and all, for better or worse) as the original Surface Laptop. The biggest upgrade is internal: stepping up to 8th-generation Intel Core processors means up to 85 percent faster performance, according to Microsoft.

SEE ALSO: How to become the ‘spreadsheet master’ of your office

If you want a $999 MacBook the only option today is the MacBook Air. You can get by on the Air, but its specs are so outdated I can’t in good faith recommend anyone buy it. Especially not when it’s rumored Apple might be close to announcing a new 13-inch MacBook with updated processors and a sharper Retina display.

Do a quick search online and you can find laptops for the same price, but their specs kinda stink compared to the Surface Laptop 2.

Looking at the whole package, the Laptop 2 comes with an Intel 8th-gen Core i5 processor, 8GB of RAM, and 128GB of storage. Other $999 laptops usually come with slower processors, less RAM, or less storage — all of which will feel inadequate further down the road of ownership.

I reviewed a $1,299 model with 256GB of SSD storage and matte black finish. Doubling the internal storage costs an extra $200, but it’s worth doing so since you can’t add more later. It’s also the least expensive way to get the matte black version. 

Microsoft sells other configurations with a faster Core i7 processor, 8GB of RAM, 256GB SSD for $1,599; a Core i7 chip, 16GB of RAM, 512GB SSD for $2,199; and a Core i7, 16GB of RAM, 1TB SSD for $2,699 (oddly enough this top-of-the-line model isn’t available in matte black). 

The sweet spot is the model I tested and the one the one with the best bang for buck. 

Performance for the future

The Surface Laptop has a big, bright 13.5-inch touchscreen.

The Surface Laptop has a big, bright 13.5-inch touchscreen.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

Besides being a fantastic value, the Laptop 2’s most important change is performance. Microsoft says the Laptop 2 is “up to 85 percent faster” than the previous Surface Laptop. And their claims check out.

To test the Laptop 2’s power, I ran Geekbench 4 to benchmark both the CPU and the GPU performance. 

For the CPU test, the Laptop 2 scored 3,872 on the single-core and 13,120 on multi-core. In comparison, last year’s Laptop with the previous-gen Core i5 model and 8GB of RAM configuration scored 3,615 on single-core and 7,492 on multi-core. That makes the Laptop 7.11 percent faster on single-core operations and 75.12 percent faster on multi-core operations.

It’s no surprise the Laptop 2 is faster since its processor has four cores compared to the Laptop’s dual cores. Apps that take advantage of multiple cores, like Photoshop and Adobe Premiere Pro CC, will benefit the most from the extra processing power. 

In certain light, the matte black Laptop 2 looks kinda silver.

In certain light, the matte black Laptop 2 looks kinda silver.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

Graphics performance on the Laptop 2 is also significantly faster compared to the Laptop. Despite having Intel UHD 620 integrated graphics, which is the same integrated graphics as the Intel HD 620 in the Laptop (Intel just rebadged the graphics), my Geekbench 4 GPU test revealed my Laptop 2 was 63.3 percent faster on OpenCL operations (used for tasks like image processing) compared to the Laptop.

The speedier GPU is great, but don’t expect to do any gaming on the Laptop 2. It’s not equipped for such graphics-intensive tasks. Even on lower graphics settings, Fortnite is unplayable. Get a Razer Blade or Acer Predator with a more powerful discrete GPU for that.

Most people typically replace their laptops every 4-5 years. I feel confident the Laptop 2 will hold up until at least year three or four before it starts to choke up as Windows 10 is updated and perhaps your computing needs become more demanding.

Speaking of Windows 10, the Laptop 2 (thankfully) doesn’t ship with the Windows 10 S mode that the original Laptop did. Out of the box, you get Windows 10 Home and not the locked-down 10 S mode, which only lets you install apps from the Windows Store. 

S mode is useful if you’re maybe a parent and want to have more control over what apps your kids use on their computer, but it’s useless you need to use apps like Chrome or Adobe’s Creative Cloud suite. As clean and speedy as Microsoft’s Edge browser is, as a professional, I need Chrome to do my job. So it’s great to see S mode tossed out for Windows 10 Home.

Same great design, but still no USB-C

Value and performance are really the only two things you need to know about the Laptop 2. Everything else is the same.

The Laptop 2’s design is identical to its predecessor. The wedge-shaped aluminum construction is sturdy and doesn’t flex. If you’ve gone into a Microsoft store and seen the original Laptop, you’ll know exactly what you’re getting.

The keyboard is one the comfiest on a laptop. The felt cover is... alright.

The keyboard is one the comfiest on a laptop. The felt cover is… alright.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

The keyboard is the same, with chiclet-style keys that have a good amount of travel. Typing on them is a comfier than the flatter keys on the new MacBooks for sure. And there’s a proper row of function keys above the number keys. 

Complementing the keyboard is the precision trackpad. In my opinion, it’s the best trackpad on any Windows laptop (and I’ve used way too many premium laptops with crappy ones) with a responsiveness second to a MacBook’s. 

Touchscreens are great on laptops and anyone who says otherwise is wrong.

Touchscreens are great on laptops and anyone who says otherwise is wrong.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

The 13.5-inch touchscreen is also just as gorgeous as the old version. Microsoft says it has an even better 1,500:1 contrast ratio. Having toured their Surface device labs and seen all the machinery they use to stress-test their devices, I’ll take their word for it. To my eyes, the screen’s just really bright and really sharp and I rarely had to crank it to 100 percent brightness (I left it at 75 percent and it was more than visible indoors).

I’m not even too bothered that Microsoft kept the same ports (USB 3.0, Mini DisplayPort, headphone jack, and the Surface connector for charging and connecting to docks), though it would have been nice to see at least one USB-C port.

Microsoft’s Chief Product Officer’s Panos Panay’s explanation for the lack of USB-C on the Laptop 2 (and Surface Pro 6) is honest and direct: “It’s not ready.” And he’s not wrong. Even though it’s been years since USB-C launched, the unfortunate reality is that USB-A (that’s the regular full-size USB port if you’re not versed in your USB alphabet) is still more widely available. That applies to accessories and charging ports in places like airports and trains.

No USB-C port... again.

No USB-C port… again.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

That said, it’s somewhat inexcusable to not include USB-C in the Laptop 2. Apple caught flak for ditching every port on its MacBooks for USB-C, but that act of “courage” if you will, has greatly helped accelerate USB-C’s ubiquity. With Microsoft’s Surface device revenue continuing to grow (it grew 14 percent year-over-year in its fiscal quarter for Q1 2019), the company has a responsibility to help speed up USB-C adoption. The sooner we get past the awkward transitional switching from USB-A to USB-C the sooner we can live in the utopian world where one port rules them all. Not including USB-C only delays the inevitable.

The Microsoft Connect port for charging is versatile for charging and connecting the Microsoft Dock.

The Microsoft Connect port for charging is versatile for charging and connecting the Microsoft Dock.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

I want to also complain about the proprietary Surface Connect port, which could have been replaced with USB-C for charging if Microsoft had included it, but I understand why it’s still on the Laptop 2. One, it’s magnetic and awesome just like MagSafe was (RIP) on MacBooks and so if you trip on the cable you won’t risk dragging it along with you. Two, the Connect port is useful if you want to dock it into a Surface Dock (sold separately). And three, the power brick comes with a USB-A port for you to charge up another device like your phone or tablet. I guess the Connect port isn’t so bad then.

Best laptop of the year

Sorry Apple, but Microsoft now makes the best laptop in this class.

Sorry Apple, but Microsoft now makes the best laptop in this class.

Image: RAYMOND WONG/MASHABLE

I’ve tested a bunch of laptops this year, running the spectrum of 2-in-1s, Chromebooks, MacBooks, gaming laptops, etc. Everyone’s needs are going to be different, which is why there’s no such thing as a one-size-fits-all for laptops.

But enthusiasts laptops aside, I strongly feel the Surface Laptop 2 is the best laptop of the year. And by that I mean the best laptop for most folks’ needs. 

The Surface Laptop 2 is beautiful and really well-built, especially the matte black version. But be warned: Like all colored aluminum, the coating will chip or scratch over time and expose the silver aluminum underneath.

It’s nothing to get overly worried about (my unit already has a few light silver scratches), but if you’re thinking of keeping it pristine, you might want to consider applying a skin to it for a little added protection.

It has a keyboard that doesn’t break if you get cheese doodle dust inside of the keys. And of course it’s a great typing experience with keys that have good travel. The trackpad is also excellent. The touchscreen is brilliant corner to corner. It has a USB-A port! 

It’s got a keyboard that doesn’t break if you get cheese doodle dust inside of the keys.

Battery life is also one of the Laptop 2’s strengths. Microsoft claims up to 14.5 hours of battery life for local video playback just like on the first Laptop, but real battery life on a single charge for mixed usage such having lots of Chrome tabs, streaming Spotify and YouTube videos, and writing a couple of documents (like this review) in Google Docs will get you between 5-7 hours, As always, how long the battery lasts also depends on things like your display brightness setting, whether you’re on WiFi or not, and what kinds of apps you’re running.

And it comes with Windows 10 Home and features faster and smoother performance. The cherry on top is the pricing. It’s a better deal than Apple’s $1,299 MacBook Pro and I like it more than and similarly spec’d Dell XPS 13.

The only laptop I think that also checks off all the boxes in a similarly thin and light form factor is Huawei’s MateBook X Pro, but again, as I said earlier, the best option for that is the $1,500 model.

Last year Microsoft offered the Surface Laptop starting at $999 with a measly 4GB of RAM (an option nobody should even consider in 2018), but with Surface Laptop 2, it’s doubled it, making even the entry-level computer a good machine if you can get by with less storage.

It feels like I’m in Bizarro World that Apple no longer makes the best laptop for most people, but Microsoft does. But hey, that’s what happens when you focus on getting all the core laptop features right instead of chasing thinness and lightness.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2CGnJQR
via IFTTT

How to tell if you’re a ‘Lawnmower Parent’ and what to do about it

Image: vicky leta / mashable

By Sarah Cottrell

Welcome to Small Humans, an ongoing series at Mashable that looks at how to take care of – and deal with – the kids in your life. Because Dr. Spock is nice and all, but it’s 2018 and we have the entire internet to contend with.


Helicopter Parents have reigned supreme in the media these last few years but they’re being replaced by a hyper-concentrated version of themselves with a new moniker: Lawnmower Parents. If you’ve never heard of lawnmower parents, take a seat now because you’re about to have some strong feelings.

Lawnmowers don’t just hover over their kids to make sure that they are safe, they obliterate any whiff of a struggle for their kids by curating every aspect of their childhoods. These parents tend to do extreme things, such as choose their child’s friends, practice “redshirting” to ensure their child’s early academic ease and success, and even jump into arguments on their child’s behalf to prevent their kid from having hurt feelings. 

Thanks to a perfect storm of social and tech evolution, parenting, like so much else, has splintered into “tribes.” Where there was once a community understanding of “it takes a village” there are now strict codes of parenting philosophies. From the Free-Range parents to the Tiger Moms, the Hot Mess Moms, and the Perfect Parents with their sanctimonious status updates on Instagram, all of them feed the idea that kids these days are growing up woefully underprepared for adulthood.

Where keyboard warriors may see arrogance, I see parents who live in pressure cookers

In 2015, a Harris Poll for The JED Foundation, Partnership for Drug-Free Kids and The Jordan Porco Foundation surveyed 1,502 first year college students and found that a staggering 60% of them reported feeling emotionally underprepared for the real world.

“When parents try to remove all obstacles for kids, they are doing them a great disservice,” Samantha Rodman, Ph.D., a clinical psychologist, and author of How to Talk to Your Kids About Your Divorce tells Mashable. “Kids need to learn that they are competent and have agency in the world. If their parents pave the way for them to have an effortless life, then what will they do when an effort is required in adulthood?”

In some ways, I can’t blame parents for feeling compelled to turn to extreme measures. Where keyboard warriors may see arrogance, I see parents who live in pressure cookers to get parenting not just right, but better than everyone else. As a mother of three, I can understand the impulse to create a soft landing for my children when it comes to school, friends, and the world at large, but often that parental impulse blows up in our faces anyway. 

I was reluctant to let my oldest son learn how to use knives to cut his food until the morning he played “for real” Fruit Ninja with an incredibly sharp carving knife. Horrified and impressed at the sight of the bananas he’d whacked into a thousand pieces, I realized that it was clearly time to let go of my fear and teach this kid how to use a knife properly. I temper my instinct to hold my kids back for the sake of safety with the realization that they must learn how to negotiate every kind of perceived danger in order to grow up into resilient and strong people.

“This is all about fear, and worry, and wanting to do our best by our families,” Says KJ Dell’Antonia, author of How to Be a Happier Parent: Raising a Family, Having a Life and Loving (Almost) Every Minute and former lead writer and editor for the Motherlode blog at The New York Times. “I’d never call it vanity. I think we’re just afraid that if we do less than the next person, our kids will end up living under a highway somewhere because all the clear paths we used to see to success have been muddied by change, technology, and the economy. Scary times, scared parents.”

She’s right. At a time when technology is moving at warp speed, the kinds of jobs that my kids will soon be training for don’t even exist yet as I type these words. How can I imagine future stability for my kids when I can’t even comprehend the social or economic demands that will be made on them?

Amy Joyce, editor, and writer for the Washington Post’s On Parenting section tells Mashable that the best way for parents to prevent themselves from becoming lawnmower parents is to get out and connect with their communities.   

“I love to ask parents of older kids or grown kids what they did in whatever situation it is I’m facing at the moment. I seek out advice and find that helps me bond with people,” Joyce tells Mashable. “The best thing my neighbor with three grown kids has told me is that my kids are going to be okay. No matter the issue, they are who they are and we’ll guide them, but we can’t do everything for them. Hearing that and telling myself that allows me to back off a bit.”

Raising children is tough, but it doesn’t have to be a pressure-cooker of stress to get every aspect just right. While I may secretly want my kid to be the strongest, smartest, kindest, best one out there, the fact is that he won’t understand how he fits in this world if I am interfering. So if you need me, I’ll be standing by and wincing with a knot in my stomach while my kids screw up left and right.

Read more great stories from Small Humans:   

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2qf8W84
via IFTTT

Don’t lock them up: Opioid policy shakes up Ohio governor’s race


Richard Cordray

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Richard Cordray is embracing a proposal on the Ohio ballot that would downgrade all drug possession crimes to misdemeanors and prohibit jail time for all but the most frequent offenders. | Angelo Merendino/AP Photo

Health Care

The ballot issue will test how far leftward voters will go in the ‘drug dealer’s playground.’

PORTSMOUTH, Ohio — Two years after Ohio swooned over Donald Trump’s law-and-order presidential campaign, the state is weighing a decidedly un-Trumplike solution to its spiraling opioid epidemic: Stop locking up drug users, and instead use the money to treat them.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Richard Cordray is embracing a proposal on the ballot that would downgrade all drug possession crimes to misdemeanors and prohibit jail time for all but the most frequent offenders, a move that has put him out of step with key state officials and even some in his own party — and sets up a test of how far leftward Ohio’s frustrated voters will go to escape a deepening drug crisis.

Story Continued Below

“You listen to the television commercials and it’s all about fentanyl — how we’ll become some sort of drug dealer’s playground in Ohio if we have any change to the status quo,” Cordray told a Democratic gathering in this once-booming industrial town anchoring a county where the overdose death rate is twice the national average. “Newsflash: We are the drug dealer’s playground in Ohio right now.”

Cordray, who’s running even with Republican Attorney General Mike DeWine in a state that went for Trump in 2016 after twice backing Barack Obama, has made the opioid crisis — and health care more broadly — a fixture of his campaign. The 59-year-old consistently bashes the state GOP for being slow to react to the explosion of super-potent fentanyl throughout Ohio, and has pledged to bring new ideas and energy to the fight.

But the ballot initiative, better known as Issue 1, has prompted concerns from some on the opioid epidemic’s front lines that it may be a bit too novel. While five other states spanning the political spectrum have enacted similar enforcement overhauls of late, none would be as potentially disruptive as Ohio’s.

The wide-ranging proposal would amend the state’s Constitution if it passes by majority vote. Beyond no longer classifying drug possession offenses as felonies, it would also open up new avenues for nonviolent offenders to get out of prison earlier, or get their prior felony drug arrests reclassified to misdemeanors.

Those changes would keep an estimated 10,000 people out of jail per year, the plan’s supporters estimate. The money the state saves — pegged at $100 million in the early years — would be redirected to anti-addiction and support programs.

Early polling shows substantial public support for the initiative, with one October survey finding 48 percent favor the overhaul, versus 30.5 percent who oppose it. It’s a lead that advocates chalk up to the desperation that’s gripped voters across a state where heroin and fentanyl are killing more than 13 people a day — and a growing aversion to jailing drug users as the addiction crisis hits communities closer to home.

“We’re looking at all these things: The prison population, the prison budget and the opioid deaths, which continue to march upward horrifically,” said Stephen JohnsonGrove, deputy director of policy at the Ohio Justice and Policy Center and one of the campaign’s leaders. “It gets very personal when you hear the stories of a mom in Akron whose son is in prison and other son or daughter is dead or addicted to opioids, and then you go to [rural] Columbiana County and hear the exact same story.”

Yet opponents across the state’s political, judicial and health care arenas warn the proposal is an oversimplified response to what is perhaps Ohio’s most complex emergency. Issue 1 would immediately and permanently alter the Ohio constitution, forcing the state government to implement the proposal as it’s written. No massaging the language, no loopholes or carve-outs, no technical fixes to adapt to the situation on the ground.

“The permanency of the constitutional amendment really doesn’t gives us the flexibility that might be needed,” said Lori Criss, CEO of the Ohio Council, the association representing the state’s behavioral health nonprofits.

Such an instant structural shift would throw Ohio’s existing drug enforcement and behavioral health systems into chaos, Issue 1’s critics argue, opening the state up to unintended legal and practical consequences. That includes upending Ohio’s sprawling and successful drug court system — a chief innovation that’s emerged from the opioid crisis — by removing the threat of prison that the state uses to persuade offenders to enter treatment instead.

“It’s going to upset the whole apple cart,” Donald Capper, a Democrat and judicial candidate in Ohio’s Lawrence County, told POLITICO after pressing Cordray on the initiative during a local party dinner. “I believe jail is a tool, and Issue 1 takes away the tool.”

That’s left Cordray largely on an island in his enthusiasm for Issue 1. He is one of just two statewide Democratic candidates openly backing the drug law overhaul — a position that’s opened up him up to a barrage of GOP attacks down the stretch run of the campaign.

The Republican Party has seized on the initiative as evidence Cordray — who previously ran the Obama administration’s CFPB — is too liberal for Ohio, and derided it as an out-of-state gambit to juice turnout. Issue 1’s campaign is funded largely by two California philanthropies — one run by Mark Zuckerberg, the other by his Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz — and an organization run by liberal billionaire and activist George Soros. None, however, played a role in crafting the proposal.

Polling shows the initiative is appealing in particular to younger voters, minorities and those who list health care as their top issue heading into November — a coalition that Cordray will likely need to carry to win the governorship.

“Cordray and other Democrats support this ill-conceived drug dealer amnesty policy because they want more votes,” Republican National Committee co-Chair Bob Paduchik wrote in an op-ed last week.

DeWine himself has blasted Cordray over Issue 1 so often it’s become a central part of his campaign, often relying on a claim that the new rules would let a drug dealer carry as much as 19 grams of fentanyl — enough to kill roughly 10,000 people — without the worry of jail time.

“The people who wrote this thing just didn’t know what they’re doing, and it’s so wrong, it’s stupid and to me it illustrates a lack of judgment,” he told POLITICO during a recent campaign swing through Troy, Ohio. “I just think it’s crazy.”

A longtime Ohio politician who unseated Cordray as attorney general in 2010, DeWine has fashioned himself the experienced top cop who knows what works best for the state. He won headlines last year for suing five drug companies over the opioid crisis, and has based his own plan for fighting the epidemic on bolstering existing programs and expanding anti-drug education.

“We know what we’re doing,” DeWine said. “We don’t have to go reinvent the wheel.”

Cordray fiercely disputes the “10,000 people” assertion, emphasizing that Issue 1 wouldn’t touch penalties for drug trafficking. He’s said that anybody carrying that much fentanyl is clearly a trafficker who he’d make sure is prosecuted for it.

In an interview, Cordray contended the focus on Issue 1’s shortcomings is more an effort to mask what he calls a failure of the GOP-led legislature to curb an opioid problem that’s metastasized in recent years to a full-blown drug addiction crisis. Overdose deaths in Ohio hit 4,854 last year, the second-highest figure in a nation wracked by rising rates of drug use and an influx of deadly fentanyl.

“People say, oh, it shouldn’t be a state constitutional amendment. I agree. It should be the Legislature, but they’re not doing anything,” he said, adding that he also supports a slate of other legislative proposals for tackling the epidemic in addition to his own five-point plan. “I’m not confident that they will.”

That’s a pessimism that’s shared throughout other parts of the state, even after Trump rolled out a plan to “stop” the opioid epidemic and Congress passed a massive package last month easing access to treatment to much bipartisan fanfare.

A two-year, state-backed effort to rewrite Ohio’s drug laws remains on the shelf. Outgoing Gov. John Kasich’s emphasis on growing the state’s so-called rainy day fund has pressured localities required to pay into it, and anti-addiction support remains scarce in the most drug-troubled communities.

“If this isn’t a rainy day issue for us, what’s the definition of rainy day?” Dale Cahall, the mayor of Georgetown, Ohio, asked one recent morning.

A lifelong resident of the village along Ohio’s southern border, Cahall skews further left than most of his constituents, two-thirds of whom went for Trump in 2016. He remains skeptical of Issue 1, saying he worries about its blanket ban on jail time for certain offenders and isn’t sold on the idea it’d get more people through treatment successfully.

But the damage done by the drug epidemic has no regard for partisan lines in the state, he said. And there’s a similarly broad feeling that the traditional ways of fighting the drug crisis aren’t working anymore.

Surrounding Brown County ranks among the state’s worst for overdose death rates. Georgetown itself has no nearby emergency department after losing its only local hospital — and 300 jobs — to financial difficulties, and it’s struggling now to pay its five part-time emergency responders. The county jail has grown so full at times that it’s turned offenders away.

“I was just talking to my police chief. About 95 percent of all the calls they receive — whether it’s a breaking and entering, or even a speeding ticket — there’s drugs involved,” Cahall said. “We’ve been fighting the war on drugs big time, and we’re not winning.”

Against that backdrop, Issue 1’s proponents say their chief goal is to inject fresh urgency into the state opioid effort by convincing people to try something brand new — and perhaps hit on a better model for the rest of the nation.

Because the proposal would mandate fundamental changes to the core of Ohio’s strategy for combating incarceration and addiction, they argue it would box the state government into taking ownership of a sweeping experiment it might otherwise view as too much of a political gamble to try.

“It’s a risk, but lives are being lost,” said former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland, a Democrat and Issue 1 supporter. “Our criminal justice system is — excuse me, I don’t usually use this word — but f—– up.”

And though the groups behind Issue 1 initially cringed when Cordray endorsed a proposal they’d hoped would remain nonpartisan, JohnsonGrove said the initiative’s fortunes are now effectively tied to his campaign — and the bet that two years after Ohio led the nation’s charge into Trump’s law-and-order era, it’s ready to take another big leap of faith in the other direction.

“If DeWine wins, we’re not going to win. If Cordray wins, we have a shot,” he said. “And even if we don’t, but we get really close, I think we’ll have sent a really solid warning shot that there’s a big appetite in the state for this.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2CGnOnD
via IFTTT

9 of the best celebrity trolls

Cher, master troll.
Cher, master troll.

Image: Isabel Infantes/EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock

It’s Troll Week on Mashable. Join us as we explore the good, the bad, and the ugly of internet trolling.


Here’s something you might not realize: Celebrities are some of the best trolls on the internet.

Just think about it. They’re online constantly, they have millions of people praising and criticizing them daily, and most of them won’t suffer fools. Whether they’re clapping back at insults, or slinging their own, they’re A-list trolls.

SEE ALSO: Ken M and the lost art of ‘do no harm’ trolling

You don’t even have to be a fan of most mega-famous celebrities in order to appreciate their sharp responses and quick-witted lampoons online. For example, I’ve never listened to a full Cher album — I know, I’m sorry — but her Twitter game has turned me into one of her biggest fans.

If you can appreciate a good troll, here are nine expert celebrity experts you need to follow:

1. Rihanna 

Rihanna doesn’t have time for anyone’s bullshit. Not now, not ever. And that’s precisely what her online presence conveys.

Earlier this month, she jokingly shared an Instagram meme to lightly roast her fans who keep asking for new music. 

But Rihanna has been coming for her haters for a long time —  like Piers Morgan, her exes, and just about everyone else. Not to worry though, Riri can handle herself just fine.

2. Chris Evans

Leave it to Captain America to take an active stance against President Donald Trump.

If you follow Chris Evans, then you know he can’t resist taking a shot at Trump whenever he does something particularly despicable, like when he insulted Dr. Christine Blasey Ford after her powerful testimony, discussed Russia’s involvement in the American election, or after his press conference following the deadly Charlottesville protest in 2017. 

Evans’ ongoing political trolls definitely make him one of the best Chrises. Or, the worst. I honestly can’t tell at this point.

Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me with this? What is the purpose of this? Was there no other vitriol you could spew to rile up your base and deepen this country’s divide? You used THIS?? Do you even understand the message you’re sending? Where is your sense of human decency? https://t.co/SdEh7fFLtL

— Chris Evans (@ChrisEvans) October 3, 2018

It’s ‘counsel’, Biff. The word is ‘counsel’.

I was trying to comprehend how in the world a man, even as moronic as you, can misspell a word he probably reads fifty times a day. But then it dawned on me, you probably only HEAR the word.

You don’t read shit.

And we all know it. https://t.co/7zZGZRZtkF

— Chris Evans (@ChrisEvans) August 20, 2018

Is anyone else watching this?!? Wow…it’s like watching a train wreck!! ‘Before I make a statement I need the facts’?! Since when??

— Chris Evans (@ChrisEvans) August 15, 2017

3. Billy Eichner

He began as a major troll on the streets of New York City, but comedian Billy Eichner now takes to Twitter to air his grievances, most of which happen to be political these days.

Maybe you remember when he tweeted this message to help distract many of us from reality?

Choosing to believe that the fireworks over the Capitol today were for the Will & Grace reboot.

— billy eichner (@billyeichner) January 20, 2017

Or, perhaps you’re more familiar with one of his more recent tweets slamming Senator Susan Collins.

Susan Collins about to bring out Louis CK for a quick set

— billy eichner (@billyeichner) October 5, 2018

Regardless, Eichner’s roasts and digs will always be hilarious.

Can I play Lindsay Graham in the movie? I’m very good at shouting random nonsense.

— billy eichner (@billyeichner) September 27, 2018

4. Ryan Reynolds

I probably don’t need to tell you that Ryan Reynolds is amazing when it comes to trolling people online, so let’s just take this moment to appreciate his greatest online hits.

Including that time he wished his wife Blake Lively a very happy birthday.

Or, when he wished someone else’s wife a happy anniversary.

Angela. 11 years went by like a lemonade daydream. Words are too clumsy to express what your love means to Jason—which is probably why he had me say it for him. https://t.co/85OuBIC6Zy

— Ryan Reynolds (@VancityReynolds) August 18, 2018

But his best trolling work is done when he comes for the thing he loves the most: his children.

I’d walk through fire for my daughter. Well not FIRE, because it’s dangerous. But a super humid room. But not too humid, because my hair.

— Ryan Reynolds (@VancityReynolds) September 11, 2015

5. Lili Reinhart

Lili Reinhart, has made herself extremely vulnerable online, opening up about issues with break outs, anxiety, and relationships. Naturally, she’s become a target for harsh online criticisms, but she has taken to responding to even the rudest comments with brilliant humor.

When people questioned what happens in Reinhart’s relationship in September, she kindly cleared a few things up.

The actress also wasn’t afraid to clap back at a now-deleted tweet criticizing her weight a year ago. Time goes on, but Reinhart’s wit prevails.

Thank you so much for being concerned about my weight, I’ll respond later after I finish my double cheeseburger 😘 https://t.co/5FVhso3VOl

— Lili Reinhart (@lilireinhart) May 3, 2017

6. Chrissy Teigen

Pretty much everything model, cookbook writer, and social media maven Chrissy Teigen says online is funny. But Teigen is by far her most hilarious self when she’s clapping back at her haters.

Like, that time she criticized Trump, and was told she doesn’t live in the “real world.”

Or, when she pretended she didn’t know where her baby was.

And, when she pointed out the hypocrisy of a person following her if they’re not really a fan.

7. Zendaya

If there’s one person unwilling to sit back and take criticism, it’s Zendaya. The actress has been calling out people on Twitter for years now, and has become known for her smart responses online.

She eloquently called out former E! News host Giuliana Rancic for making a racist comment about her hair in 2015.

Now, the actress mainly serves sarcastic comments to her followers, and has directed most of her energy online into urging people to vote. A more than worthy use of her massive platform.

Have you registered to vote? If not, do that shit!

— Zendaya (@Zendaya) October 7, 2018

8. Dax Shepard and Kristen Bell

There are tons of celebrity couples that love to troll each other online, but none do so as expertly as Dax Shepard and Kristen Bell.

Bell complains about Shepard’s…unique home decorating ideas.

Shepard jokingly tweets about leaving Bell for a booze guzzling motorcycle-queen.

But, even better than when they’re trolling each other is when they’re coming after people who criticize their relationship. For instance, when Shepard blasted Star for attempting to write a story about the possible decline of their marriage.

Bell later took to Instagram to comment, saying that she’d love to comment, but “its hard to talk with this ball gag in!” Classic.

9. Cher

Cher is the absolute master when it comes to singing and acting, but perhaps her greatest gift is her ability roast and toast everyone with the greatest of ease.

The singer and actress routinely criticizes Trump, but beyond political outrage Cher is willing and waiting to take on anyone who dares question her. 

Please just take a look at the cornucopia of delicious trolls that Cher has given us:

little Bo Peep She Lost Her Sheep,

& Doesnt Know Where 2 Find Them.

Little Bro Trump Has Doubled his Rump,& Doesn’t know where 2 Hide it

— Cher (@cher) April 20, 2017

ipad freezing up! Maybe it’s overwhelmed,because it Just realized A Fabulous DIVA Was touching it ! Can’t really Blame it, “SNAP OUT OF IT”

— Cher (@cher) March 7, 2013

Truly a delightful thing to behold.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2z7QBOv
via IFTTT

Young black Portuguese men take police brutality case to court

Eighteen months ago, they were defendants, accused of storming a police station. 

But since that case was overturned last year, Flavio Almada, Celso Lopes, Rui Moniz, Miguel Reis, Paulo Veiga and Bruno Lopes have been testifying not as the accused, but as victims in an unprecedented trial that has put 17 officers of the PSP – Portugal’s public police force – in the dock.

The new case, currently being heard in court, rejects the version of events previously offered by the police officers, and charges them with physical assault, aggravated kidnapping, inhumane treatment and inciting racially-motivated discrimination, hatred and violence – as well as slander, falsifying witness testimonies and falsifying documentation. 

The case dates back to February 2015 and is being accompanied by Amnesty International and SOS Racism, among others.

“We’ve never seen so many police officers on trial facing the same charges,” says Goncalo Gaspar, a lawyer for the defence. 

According to Jose Fernandes, a lawyer from the team representing six of the alleged victims, all of them young, black men, “no police officers have ever been sentenced for anything like this in Portugal – and the very fact that there has been an accusation at all is something of a victory for us.”

Lisbon’s Cova da Moura neighbourhood, where most of the plaintiffs live, is known for its proud, predominantly Cape Verdean community.

But the relationship between the residents and police has been tense, with several outbursts of serious violence in recent years, including the killing of 17-year-old Angelo Semedo at the hands of police in 2001, and the death of a police officer there in 2005. 

“The kind of policing that these mostly black neighbourhoods are subjected to is exceptional,” says Fernandes, the lawyer. “And I know because I grew up in one. They often turn up in armoured trucks and wearing masks … People are very scared of them.”  

Meanwhile, speaking in defence of his police clients, Gaspar says: “It’s a very problematic neighbourhood, where there’s quite a lot of crime and social problems. In this case … a certain amount of force was necessary.”

Several demonstrations have taken place in Lisbon with protesters rallying against racism and police brutality [Ana Naomi de Sousa/Al Jazeera]

The officers maintain that the Alfragide police station was “stormed” following an operation in streets of Cova da Moura earlier that same day. During court proceedings, however, a different account has emerged according to the victims. 

Various witnesses give evidence that they were dragged into the police station or taken forcefully into custody, and held for two days without being charged, during which time they were racially abused and physically assaulted.

The contradictions begin with a police operation in the streets of Cova da Moura, during which police say a stone was thrown at them. During the same operation, Jailza Sousa, Neuza Correia and Celso Lopes, were shot with rubber bullets – none of them apparently intended targets. 

A fourth, Bruno Lopes, told the judges that he was approached by the police in a nearby cafe by officers who asked, “What are you laughing at?”, before hitting him with a truncheon in the face, dragging him bleeding into the police van that took him to the station.

Flavio Almada, 35, a well known community organiser and activist says he was singled out by the police, having gone to the station to find out about Bruno Lopes, who he knew had been arrested. 

“One of them pointed at me and said, ‘Get that one, he thinks he’s so clever,’,” he testified. 

Once inside the police station, Almada says he was racially and physically abused by various officers. 

“They said ‘trash belongs on the floor’, then they threw me down on the floor and carried on kicking me,” he said, also reporting various racial slurs. “Then someone kicked me in the face, I was bleeding a lot and one of my teeth broke. They were kicking and punching me … They seemed to enjoy it.” 

Photographs taken immediately after the release of the alleged victims and submitted to the court show the plaintiffs bloody and bruised.

The physical scars are no longer visible, but while giving his evidence Almada broke down in tears.

“It was like being in hell,” he told the judges.

Flavio Almada, one of the alleged victims, says police officers ‘seemed to enjoy’ physically assaulting him [Ana Naomi de Sousa/Al Jazeera]

Meanwhile, 26-year-old Rui Moniz told judges he was approached by police officers after leaving a shop where he was inquiring about a cable TV service for his mother, close to the Alfragide police station. 

According to Moniz, the officers said: “Look, here comes an amputee”.

Having suffered a stroke as a child, Moniz walks with a limp and has a splint on his arm. 

After officers asked if he had been filming them, Moniz says they knocked his phone out of his hand and punched him in the face, before dragging him into the police station. 

“One of them asked for my ID,” Moniz told the court, “and when he looked at it he said, ‘Hey, this one’s actually Portuguese’, and another officer responded, ‘He’s not Portuguese, he’s Pretoguese’” – preto meaning the colour black, and also a racial slur. 

Moniz went on to describe being made to lie face down on the floor, where police officers walked and wiped their feet on him. 

“A woman came in to clean up the blood on the floor, and she said, ‘This is nothing to do with me, it’s up to my colleagues’,” he told to the court. 

So far, the police officers have denied all of the charges facing them. 

“They are outraged, they feel they have been victimised,” says the defence lawyer, Gaspar Goncalo, “and they’ve suffered both personally and professionally.” 

Some of the defendants told the judges that the case had taken a toll on their psychological well-being, although most remain on active duty in different locations since the judge denied a petition from the prosecution for all of the agents to be suspended from work for the duration of the trial. 

The officers also have backing and legal support from the police trade unions.

At least 15 more cases have been opened against police officers in Amadora [Ana Naomi de Sousa/Al Jazeera]

In Cova da Moura there are mixed feelings about the trial and how it might end. 

For Fernandes, who has been working locally for years, “the general public look at this case from the top down – but the community here is looking at it from the bottom up. People here know that if this goes badly, they’re going to bear the brunt.” 

Nonetheless, Semedo feels the case is of “huge importance – not only because it sends a strong signal that the police cannot do whatever they want with complete impunity, but also because the attitude here has always been that ‘nothing will ever come of this kind of thing’. But now people have started to realise that something could come of it, after all.”

Since it became public, at least 15 more cases have been opened against police officers in the same municipality of Amadora.

The three judges will hear from more than 100 witnesses and the trial is expected to run at least until the end of the year. 

“Personally, I didn’t want to go through all this – of course I didn’t.”, admits Almada, speaking about the trial. “But we have to break the cycle of silence.”

Rui Moniz, left, stands outside the court with lawyers Lucia Gomes, centre, and Jose Semedo Fernandes, right [Ana Naomi de Sousa/Al Jazeera]

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2yAT4lg
via IFTTT

Max Muncy Walk-Off HR Powers Dodgers to Game 3 Marathon Win vs. Red Sox

LOS ANGELES, CA - OCTOBER 26:  Max Muncy #13 of the Los Angeles Dodgers celebrates his thirteenth inning run against the Boston Red Sox in Game Three of the 2018 World Series at Dodger Stadium on October 26, 2018 in Los Angeles, California.  (Photo by Ezra Shaw/Getty Images)

Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

The Los Angeles Dodgers are on the board. 

After dropping the first two games of the 2018 World Series at Fenway Park, the National League champions outlasted the Boston Red Sox for a 3-2 Game 3 win at Dodger Stadium on Friday night behind a walk-off solo home run from Max Muncy in the 18th inning of the longest game in MLB postseason history. 

FOX Sports @FOXSports

IT’S OVER!!!

Max Muncy hits the game-winning homer to end the longest game in World Series history in the 18th inning! https://t.co/MDANs0jNmN

The Red Sox briefly took a 2-1 lead in the top of the 13th inning when Brock Holt scored on an Eduardo Nunez infield single and a Scott Alexander error, but Yasiel Puig responded with an infield single (and Ian Kinsler had an error) that pushed Muncy across home to extend the marathon match: 

MLB @MLB

CAN’T PREDICT BASEBALL. https://t.co/DlbW3xQipu

According to STATS LLC,  the seven-hour, 20-minute epic lasted longer than the entirety of the 1939 World Series between the New York Yankees and Cincinnati Reds. 

Jackie Bradley Jr. Justifies Benintendi Benching with 8th Inning Heroics

The moment the Red Sox qualified for the World Series, armchair managers debated the merits of prospective lineup permutations that would allow the AL champs to thrive in a National League park. 

However, manager Alex Cora never hesitated. 

The Red Sox skipper ditched the possibility of moving Mookie Betts to second base and stuck with the lineup that gave him the most balance. The result: J.D. Martinez in left field, defensive ace Jackie Bradley Jr. in center, Betts in right and Andrew Benintendi pinned to the bench. 

“As far as matchups, for what we have information-wise, there’s no big difference,” Cora said prior to Game 3, per WEEI.com’s John Tomase. “Maybe Beni has the edge. But Jackie’s defense with J.D. in left field, it makes sense for us.”

He wasn’t kidding. 

While a case could have been made for Benintendi considering he entered the night hitting .283 through 11 postseason appearancesincluding a four-hit outing in Game 1Bradley offered the right blend of defensive assurance and clutch hitting. 

And when it came down to it, Bradley came up big—again—as he smashed a game-tying solo home run to right field off Dodgers closer Kenley Jansen in the top of the eighth inning: 

MLB @MLB

Are you serious, JBJ?! 😱😱

#WorldSeries https://t.co/lRaaWgU5zj

Thanks to that blast, Bradley now has 10 RBI with two outs this postseason. 

ESPN Stats & Info @ESPNStatsInfo

Jackie Bradley Jr. is the 4th player in @RedSox history with a game-tying HR in the 8th inning or later of a World Series game (1st since Bernie Carbo in Game 6 of 1975 WS). https://t.co/u5wabEd2Vm

John Fisher @JohnnyPhisher

Jackie Bradley Jr. hits since start of ALCS:
– 3-run double down by 2
– Grand slam in 2-run game
– 2-run HR down by 2
– Single (yawn)
– Game-tying HR with 2 outs in 8th

Sportsnet Stats @SNstats

#RedSox Jackie Bradley Jr. is the 8th player in MLB history to record 10 RBI with 2 outs in a single postseason.

Bradley isn’t as steady as Benintendi on “at-bat to at-bat” basis, to be sure. 

But at this point, he’s earned the right to remain locked into the starting lineup as the Red Sox continue their championship push. 

Buehler Proves He’s Dodgers’ Ace of Future After Dominant Game 3

All season long, the Dodgers have been dogged by questions regarding Clayton Kershaw’s future. 

The southpaw has the ability to opt out of the final two years and $65 million remaining on his contract in search of more long-term security this winter, and he has provided no indications as to whether he’ll extend his stay in Southern California or pursue a potential megadeal on the open market. 

“I have not made a decision,” Kershaw said prior to Game 4 of the National League Championship Series, per ESPN.com’s Alden Gonzalez. “And to my understanding, you get 10 days after the World Series. So, should be a busy 10 days.”

Of course, the Dodgers would welcome back Kershaw with open arms if he decides not to opt out. 

But whether or not he returns, it’s clear L.A. will be in good hands. Specifically, Walker Buehler’s. 

The rookie continued his rapid rise in Game 3 as he tossed seven shutout innings while allowing two hits and retiring the final 14 batters he faced. 

Daren Willman @darenw

What a showing by Walker Buehler… If that’s it for him here’s his game breakdown https://t.co/XZAqRNMKCU

Sportsnet Stats @SNstats

100-pitch games this postseason

#Dodgers Walker Buehler: 2
Rest of MLB: 2

FOX Sports: MLB @MLBONFOX

Legends are made in October. Even if they are rookies. https://t.co/LCSlI2uNiq

Those numbers were stellar to begin with. But consider they came against an offense that entered the night hitting .289 on the road in the postseason, and they’re downright spectacular. 

Plus, Buehler has the kind of arm the Dodgers can pin their hopes on. 

Buster Olney @Buster_ESPN

Walker Buehler’s fastball tonight, per @SlangsOnSports: 97.9 MPH was the average four-seamer velo, highest for him this season.

The 24-year-old touched 98 mph on the radar gun when he crossed the 100-pitch threshold, and the gas allowed him to make a statement against American League RBI king J.D. Martinez in the bottom of the seventh inning: 

MLB @MLB

Big-game Buehler. #WorldSeries https://t.co/pxB626o3ce

Kerhsaw will undoubtedly still occupy the No. 1 role in the event he’s back in Dodger blue, but Buehler is the kind of ascendant ace who can confidently slide in as his successor when the time comes. 

Game 3 Marathon Will Test Each Team’s Pitching Plans for Rest of Series

It’s time for Cora and Dave Roberts to get creative. 

Both managers emptied their bullpens out of necessity Friday night, and those decisions figure to have major ramifications moving forward. 

For the Red Sox, their Game 4 plan has been scrapped entirely. 

Eight Boston pitchers hit the hill in Game 3 after Rick Porcello exited after 4.2 innings, including David Price (0.2 IP), Eduardo Rodriguez (0.1 IP) and presumptive Game 4 starter Nathan Eovaldi (6 IP). 

As a result, Cora has been left with a thinned-out group of arms that could force him to embrace a full-scale bullpen game Saturday. 

Now, Rodriguez could always be an option since he only faced one batter. But if he’s not, Drew Pomeranz—who was added to the postseason roster Tuesday in place of Brandon Workman—will be in the mix to start the biggest game of Boston’s season. 

And with a potential Game 5 clash against Clayton Kershaw looming, that’s the last thing the Red Sox need.

The Dodgers admittedly aren’t in as big of a bind. 

Game 4 starter Rich Hill didn’t take the mound Friday, and he could provide Roberts’ side with a major edge if he can stitch together a solid outing that eases the burden on L.A.’s relief corps. 

However, any sort of early slip-up could spell doom for the Dodgers considering they cycled through nine pitchers and asked closer Kenley Jansen to throw 32 pitches across two innings. 

Sportsnet Stats @SNstats

#Dodgers pitchers used

Game 3 of 2018 World Series: 8
Entire 1988 World Series: 7

At this rate, expect chaos. 

What’s Next? 

Game 4 gets underway from Dodger Stadium on Saturday at 8:09 p.m. ET. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2So9Fkb
via IFTTT

Trump: Media uses pipe bomb case to score ‘political points’

President Donald Trump has accused the US news media of using reporting on the suspect in at least 14 bombs sent to some of his prominent critics to score political points against him.

Hours after a Trump supporter, Cesar Sayoc, was arrested in Florida in the bomb case, Trump told a political rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, that political violence must never be tolerated.

“I will do all I can to stop it,” he said.

But any attempt to heal political divisions was quickly set aside as Trump renewed attacks on his usual targets; the news media and his Democratic opponents.

“We have seen an effort by the media in recent hours to use the sinister actions of one individual to score political points against me and the Republican Party,” Trump said.

Trump appeared to be commenting on cable news blanket coverage of the bomb case and how the people targeted are frequently criticised by the president.

Trump was in Charlotte campaigning for Republican candidates ahead of the hotly contested November 6 US congressional elections, with Republicans are trying to hang on to control of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Some in the crowd on Friday quickly chimed in with a cry that is a familiar one at Trump’s political rallies: “CNN sucks.”

Trump paused while the CNN chant continued, then added: “And they do have a major role to play as far as tone. The media’s constant unfair coverage … and negative attacks only serve to drive people apart and to undermine healthy debate.”

When Trump criticised Democrats, the crowd chanted “lock her up,” a refrain from the Republican president’s 2016 campaign when he called Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton “Crooked Hillary.”

Trump again referred to Clinton as “Crooked Hillary” on Friday night when he listed Democrats who supposedly had supported building a wall on the US border with Mexico.

Clinton was the target of one of the bombs sent this week, which was intercepted during a routine off-site mail screening.

“They’re gonna be reporting about you tonight,” Trump told the crowd in North Carolina.

The crowd was chanting messages against media even before Trump landed in North Carolina. 

This is the second “CNN sucks” crowd chant this evening at the Bojangles Coliseum, before President Trump has landed here in Charlotte pic.twitter.com/1Y1sKvQh0B

— Betsy Klein (@betsy_klein) October 26, 2018

Starting with a suspected explosive device sent to the home of liberal billionaire philanthropist and financier George Soros, at least 10 packages containing pipe bombs have been mailed to prominent critics of Trump this week.

Other packages were addressed to former US President Barack Obama, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, US Congresswoman Maxine Waters, actor Robert Deniro and former CIA director John Brennan in care of CNN, among others.

Hateful rhetoric

Later in the rally, Trump also said Republicans did not try to seek political gain over the Democrats when a supporter of democratic socialist Bernie Sanders opened fire on congressional Republicans at a baseball field last year and severely wounded Representative Steve Scalise.

“We did not use that heinous attempt at mass murder for political gain because that would have been wrong … Nor do we blame the Democrat party every time radical leftists seize and destroy public property and unleash violence and mayhem,” he said.

Trump made similar comments on Thursday, blaming the news media for stirring up anger and hateful political rhetoric as two more suspicious packages were discovered.

A very big part of the Anger we see today in our society is caused by the purposely false and inaccurate reporting of the Mainstream Media that I refer to as Fake News. It has gotten so bad and hateful that it is beyond description. Mainstream Media must clean up its act, FAST!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 25, 2018

Trump hinted earlier on Friday in a tweet that the news media’s coverage of the bomb case was taking attention away from the midterm elections at a time when Republicans may be hitting their stride.

“Republicans all over the country, we’re hot,” Trump said in Charlotte. “We’re hot and I don’t think they’re going to cool us off. They try so hard. But I don’t think that’s going to happen.”

Since coming to office, Trump has been widely criticised by rights groups and press freedom organisations for his frequent criticism of the media.

After five press workers were killed by a shotgun-wielding man in Maryland in June, the US became the second most dangerous country for journalists during the first half of 2018, according to the International News Safety Institute. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2zaBh3t
via IFTTT

Here’s a list of things you had time to do during Game 3 of the World Series

What year is this? Where am I?
What year is this? Where am I?

Image: Mark J Terrill/AP/REX/Shutterstock

2017%2f10%2f18%2fe1%2fkeithwagstaff3.786faBy Keith Wagstaff

The Los Angeles Dodgers and Boston Red Sox started Game 3 of the World Series in the year 400 BC, and sweet Jesus it’s still not over. 

Here’s a list of things you could have done so far in the span of this baseball game. 

  • Watch 2/3 of the Lord of the Rings trilogy. 

  • Run an average marathon time. 

  • Get the recommended amount of sleep for an adult.

  • Cook a 20-pound turkey

  • Literally fly from Los Angeles to Boston. 

The game started at 5:09 p.m. PT and right now it’s 12:10 a.m. That’s more than 7 hours. How is this game still tied 2-2? Go Dodgers. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2PoqjBF
via IFTTT