Muslims crowdfund for victims of Pittsburgh synagogue attack

The Muslim-American community has raised tens of thousands of dollars in a crowdfunding effort to help the victims of the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting that left at least 11 people dead and six wounded.

The campaign, which is hosted by Muslim crowdfunding site LaunchGood, aims to help shooting victims, “whether it is the injured victims or the Jewish families who have lost loved ones”.

It was started by Tark El-Messidi, a Muslim-American speaker and founder of CelebrateMercy, a nonprofit organisation that “teaches about the Prophet Muhammad’s life and character”.

According to an update the campaign’s page, its original goal of $25,000 was raised in “only” six hours. The goal has now been extended to $50,000, with nine days left. At the time of publication on Sunday, the sum had exceeded $43,000.

Muslims, let’s stand with our Jewish cousins against hate, bigotry, & violence. https://t.co/RCl4p4AOGV

— Tarek El-Messidi (@Elmessidi) October 27, 2018

Robert Bowers, 48, has been named as the suspect in Saturday’s mass shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh’s Squirrel Hill neighbourhood.

Bowers has been charged with 29 offenses, including hate crimes. 

Another fundraising campaign was started on GoFundMe by Shay Khatiri, an Iranian who currently lives in Washington, DC, according to his profile on the website.

Khatiri, who appears not to have any direct connection to Pittsburgh, tweeted that his reason for starting the campaign was that he wanted to donate. He said his “donation would be too little to make any change, but I could make a viral campaign” in response to questions about his motivations.

That’s a fair question. I woke up today to my friend telling me what happened. My first reaction was “I’m gonna donate a little money to the synagogue to help them recover.” Then I realized that my donation would be too little to make any change, but I could make a viral campaign

— Shay Khatiri (@ShayKhatiri) October 28, 2018

The GoFundMe campaign has raised over $247,000, well over its original goal of $100,000. It has has extended its goal to $1m.

The Tree of Life synagogue is also accepting donations on its website, according to a post on the GoFundMe page. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2z8xC6p
via IFTTT

Barcelona vs Real Madrid, 2007: Lineups from last Clasico without Messi or Ronaldo – where are they now?


Real Madrid's Robinho takes on Rafael Marquez and Yaya Toure of Barcelona at the Nou Camp in 2007
Real Madrid’s Robinho takes on Rafael Marquez and Yaya Toure of Barcelona at the Nou Camp in 2007

Credit:
AFP

This weekend marks the first meeting between Barcelona and Real Madrid of the season, but there are some obvious absentees. It will be the first time since 2007 that El Clasico will kick off without Lionel Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo on either of the team sheets. 

Though Messi had already scored his first hat-trick in the famous fixture the previous season, he was out with an injury for the December 23 2007 match, and Ronaldo had almost two years yet to play at Manchester United. 

Over the past 11 years both players have been the most prolific figures in La Liga’s highlight of the footballing calendar. Few could have predicted that when Ronaldo was substituted with an injury at half time during the last meeting of the two teams in May (which ended 2-2) it would be his final appearance in the fixture.

With Messi out because of a fracture in his arm and Ronaldo now shirting up for Juventus in Serie A, El Clasico’s two leading goalscorers (Ronaldo is joint second with Madrid’s Alfredo Di Stefano) will likely never play in the fixture together again, and it feels like the end of an era.

2007 was a year that saw Ronaldinho and Wayne Rooney grace FIFA’s cover, Kaka win the Ballon d’Or (the last player other than Messi and Ronaldo to do so), and Manchester City lose 8-1 to Middlesborough. It was inarguably a different time. 

Here we look back on the teams’ starting XIs for Madrid’s 1-0 victory at the Nou Camp in 2007 and ask: where are they now?

Barcelona

Manager, Frank Rijkaard

His five years with Barcelona between 2003 and 2008 paved the way for Pep Guardiola’s great side, and he went on to coach Galatasaray and the Saudi Arabian national team. In 2016 he announced he had retired from coaching. 

Victor Valdes

The goalkeeper spent 12 years playing for Barcelona, before deciding to leave to Manchester United in 2014. He only made two league appearances with United however, and spend time on loan at Standard Liege in Belgium, before spending a season at Middlesbrough where he announced his retirement. He’s now a youth coach at Madrid-based side Moratalaz.

Carles Puyol

The one-club man captained Barcelona for a decade of his 15-year senior career in which he won six La Liga titles and three Champions Leagues. He spent a year as assistant director of football at the club after retirement, until resigning in 2015, and has worked as an agent since then. 

Gabriel Milito

The Argentine ended his Barcelona career in 2011, and would only play for one more season at Independiente before retiring aged 31. He has since coached in Argentinian club football, and now manages Chilean first division side O’Higgins. 

Rafael Marquez

The Mexican played for Barcelona from 2003 until 2010, when he moved to the New York Red Bulls. He ended his club career in April 2018 at Mexican side Atlas, before finally calling time on his playing career after his fifth World Cup with Mexico in June. He is now sporting director at Atlas. 

Eric Abidal

The Clasico 11 years ago was also Frenchman Abidal’s first. During a seven year career at Barcelona, Abidal suffered from liver cancer and underwent a liver transplant. Following his recovery Puyol famously gave Abidal the captain’s armband and let him lift the Champions League trophy in 2011. Abidal played for only a year after leaving Barcelona in 2013, and became director of football at the club in June of this year.

Xavi

Barcelona’s former captain is still heralded as one of the greatest midfielders in their history, and will be remembered for his partnership with Iniesta. The 38-year-old ended his time with the club (which began aged 11) in 2015, and has since played for Al Saad in Qatar.

Xavi

Credit:
GETTY IMAGES

Yaya Toure

Toure’s three years with Barcelona would end with Pep Guardiola effectively replacing him in with with Sergio Busquets in the 2009-10 season. Toure moved to Manchester City, where he would remain for eight years, winning three league titles. The trouble with Guardiola would not end however as, after moving to Olympiacos in May 2018, Toure accused the City manager of “having problems with Africans wherever he goes”. 

Deco

The Brazilian would also end his time with the Catalan giants in the summer of 2008, moving to Chelsea for two seasons before returning to Brazil where he would retired at Fluminese in 2013 – ending a 17 year career which included two Champions League triumphs with Porto and Barcelona. 

Ronaldinho

The 2007-08 season was to be Ronaldinho’s final one with Barcelona, arguably the peak of his career which saw him score 70 goals over five years – the most for any club he played for. He would later say he regretted not spending longer playing with Messi. He first moved to AC Milan, before returning to Brazil. Three years after his final appearance for Brazilian side Fluminense and after a stint playing futsal in India, Ronaldinho confirmed his retirement in January of this year. 

Andres Iniesta

Barcelona’s indomitable playmaker and captain, Iniesta played for Barcelona 442 times, winning nine league titles and four Champions League trophies. The 34-year-old ended his 22-year association with the Catalan club last season, making the decision to move to Japanese side Vissel Kobe. 

Samuel Eto’o

With three appearances for Madrid in his early career, Eto’o is one of a handful of players to have featured for both rival sides. However, he only ever played in El Clasico for Barcelona, a side he scored 108 goals for in five seasons. The Cameroonian striker has played for 13 sides over the course of his seemingly evergreen career, and the 37-year-old is currently playing for Qatar SC. 

Real Madrid 

Manager, Bernd Schuster

Less than a year after the December 2007 Madrid win, Schuster would step down as manager after he controversially said his team had no chance of beating Pep Guardiola’s side in the next El Clasico. He has since managed Besiktas, Malaga and currently is head coach of Dalian Yifang in the Chinese Super League. 

Iker Casillas

Madrid’s long-time captain, the goalkeeper’s 502 appearances over 16 years amassed five league titles and three Champions League trophies. His time at his boyhood club ended in 2015 when he was transferred to Porto, where he continues to play. 

Sergio Ramos

The Spain captain has enjoyed a 13 year career with the club. Now captain, the defender is La Liga’s most-carded player ever, with a record 173 cards – 19 of those red – and has often earned his role of villain in El Clasico match-ups. Following Madrid’s terrible run of form, this week Ramos said, “It is in adversity that we show our value more. Now, after a bad start, we are on the right track to get out.”

Pepe

The 2007 fixture was the first of many Clasicos the Portuguese defender featured in during the decade he spent with Madrid. Best known for his diving and aggressive tackles, the defender continues to cause havoc in the Turkish top flight with Besiktas – where he has already picked up his first red card since his free transfer in 2017.

Fabio Cannavaro

Cannavaro moved to Madrid in the summer he captained Italy to World Cup glory, and would play 94 times for the Spanish club before returning to Juventus in 2009. The Neapolitan retired at UAE side Al-Ahli in 2011, and has managed in the UAE, China and Saudi Arabia since. He is currently enjoying a second stint as head coach of Chinese Super League side Guangzhou Evergrande.

In 2015 Cannavaro was sentenced to ten months in prison for breaching court orders that banned him entering his home amid a fraud and tax evasion investigation. Similarly to former teammate Fabinho, the Italian’s sentence has been postponed until the appeal process is over.

Gabriel Heinze

The Argentine left back enjoyed a playing career at a string of top European sides, including PSG, Manchester United, Madrid, Marseille and Roma. He ended his career where he began at Newell’s Old Boy in Argentina in 2014 aged 36, and has been managing top division Argentine team Vélez Sarsfield since 2017. 

Mahamadou Diarra

The former Malian captain played for Madrid for five seasons, before moving to Monaco and then Fulham, where he retired in 2014. He came out of retirement briefly to train with Brentford in 2016-17, making one appearance for the club’s B team. Quite the step down. 

Wesley Sneijder

One of three Dutch players signed by Madrid during the 2007-08 season, the December 2007 fixture was his first Clasico. He would only stay with los blancos until 2009, before making the move to Inter. Holland’s most capped player, with 134 appearances, at 34 years old Sneijder continues to play, signing for Qatari team Al-Gharafa over the summer.

Wesley Sneijder

Credit:
REUTERS

Júlio Baptista

The scorer of the game’s winner, the Brazilian would leave Madrid at the end of the season, and have spells at Roma, Malaga, Cruzeiro in Brazil and Orlando City before moving to his current club, Romanian side CFR Cluj, at the age of 37. He was also named as a La Liga ambassador earlier this month.

Raul

Madrid’s all-time record goal-scorer, with 323 goals during his 16-year legendary career with Los Blancos, he was also the Champions League’s leading scorer until Messi and Ronaldo came around. After leaving Madrid in 2010, the Spaniard went on to play for Schalke, Qatari team Al Saad and the New York Cosmos before retiring in 2015. He returned to Madrid earlier this year to become a coach at the youth academy. 

Robinho

The Brazilian was transferred to Manchester City in 2008 for what was at the time a record Premier League fee of £32.5 million. But after an unsuccessful stint for City, the forward spent five years at AC Milan, with loan stints back in Brazil with Santos, before moving to Chinese team Guangzhou Evergrande and then Brazilian side Atlético Mineiro.

In 2017 he was sentenced to nine years in prison by an Italian court for participating in the 2013 gang rape of a woman during his time at Milan. However, a legal loophole means he will not be required to serve his time until his appeals process is over, and so he is currently playing for Sivasspor in Turkey. 

Ruud van Nistelrooy

Ronaldo’s teammate at Manchester United as well as Madrid (if only sporadically due to injury woes), the striker lined up in the starting XI for only his third El Clasico with Los Blancos – but already with three goals in his previous two appearances in the fixture. After leaving Madrid in 2010 he would play two more seasons (one in Hamburg, and the returning to La Liga for Malaga).

After working as an academy coach and assistant coach with the first team at former club PSV, he is now the under-19 head coach. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2O9ojc1
via IFTTT

Leicester City owner ‘on board when helicopter crashed’

Leicester City football club owner Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha was on board a helicopter that crashed outside the club’s King Power Stadium, the BBC reported on Sunday, quoting a source close to his family.

Another source reportedly told Reuters news agency that five people were on board the helicopter, which belonged to the Thai businessman, including Vichai, one of his daughters, two pilots and another individual whose identity is unknown. 

It is not yet clear if those on board survived or what caused the helicopter, which belonged to the Thai businessman, to crash in a ball of flames in the club’s car park on Saturday, following a Premier League match.

Officials from the club and Vichai’s company, duty-free giant King Power International, declined to comment on whether he was in the helicopter when it crashed. 

According to eye witnesses, the helicopter had just cleared the top of the stadium before spiralling out of control, plummeting to the ground and exploding.

John Butcher, who was near the stadium at the time of the crash, told the BBC his nephew saw the helicopter spiral out of control.

“Within a second it dropped like a stone to the floor … Luckily it did spiral for a little while and everybody sort of ran, sort of scattered,” he said. 

In a statement released late on Saturday, county police said the Air Accident Investigation Branch is leading an investigation to “establish the exact circumstances of the collision”. 

The AAIB is leading an investigation after a helicopter crashed at the King Power Stadium.

It came down in a car park near the stadium shortly after 8.30pm yesterday evening (Saturday 27 October). The force is liaising with Leicester City Football Club as enquiries continue.

— LeicestershirePolice (@leicspolice) October 28, 2018

Vichai is hugely popular with fans of the previously unfancied side from central England who went on to stun the football world by winning the league title in 2016.

According to Forbes magazine, he is the fifth richest person in Thailand with an estimated net worth of $4.9bn.

He pumped millions of pounds into the club, helping to steer them to Premier League victory despite having started the season as 5,000/1 outsiders. Following the win, Vichai gifted 19 players a BMWi8 each.

Leading players in the team, including Jamie Vardy and Harry Maguire, have shared messages of support on Twitter since the crash featuring “praying emojis”.

🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

— Jamie Vardy (@vardy7) October 27, 2018

A growing tribute of flowers and football strips and scarves appeared outside the stadium on Sunday, as people came to show their support.

The incident took place around 20:30 GMT some 40 minutes after Leicester City drew 1-1 in the home match against West Ham United.

Following the crash, a spokesman for the club said it was “assisting Leicestershire Police and the emergency services” and that a more detailed statement would be released once more information is available. 

Fans have been laying flowers and football scarves to show their support [Peter Nicholls/Reuters]

The team is due to play Southampton in the English league on Tuesday, but it has not so far been confirmed whether that match will go ahead. 

A self-made businessman and father of four, Vichai founded King Power in 1989.

The duty-free business got a big boost in 2006 when it was granted an airport monopoly under the government of then Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and continued to prosper even after Thaksin’s ouster in a coup that year.

In 2012, the late King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand bestowed Vichai – originally called Raksriaksorn – with the new surname ‘Srivaddhanaprabha’, meaning ‘light of progressive glory’ in the Thai language, as a royal honour.

An avid polo player in his free time, Vichai’s empire also includes the VR Polo Club in Bangkok. In May 2017, he bought Belgian football club Oud-Heverlee Leuven. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2yGIngR
via IFTTT

The Time a President Stoked a Protest So He Could Play the ‘Law and Order’ Card

The throngs of protesters who stormed Capitol Hill late last month didn’t succeed in keeping Brett Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court. But they did furnish Donald Trump and the Republicans with an election-season message to energize their base. Ever since Americans saw the atria and corridors of the Senate buildings teem with foot soldiers of the resistance, the president and other Republicans have been trying to stoke fears of social chaos with overblown rhetoric comparing Democrats to a mob. “The only way to shut down the Democrats new Mob Rule strategy is to stop them cold at the Ballot Box,” Trump tweeted earlier this month—a warning echoed in GOP political ads across the country. He unveiled a hashtag aimed at Democrats: #JobsNotMobs.

Trump, of course, is far from the first politician to use the fear of the rabble to boost his party’s fortunes. Occasionally Democrats have positioned themselves as the upholders of decorum—a firewall of sanity against the unhinged radicalism of frothing Goldwaterites in 1964 or lunatic Tea Partiers in the Obama years. And this fall, with Trump applauding a congressman who beat up a journalist and pipe bombs targeting Democratic officials, they certainly could position their party as the defender of lawfulness. But overall it’s usually been conservatives who’ve run on law and order, for conservatism at its core prizes stability over change, uniformity over fractiousness, control over expressiveness. Calvin Coolidge, for example, brandished the “law and order” slogan expertly as governor of Massachusetts in the wake of the 1919 Boston police strike, even using it to launch a presidential boomlet.

Story Continued Below

In modern times, the phrase is associated with no one more than Richard Nixon—the president Trump resembles most. Like Trump, Nixon ran for president on a promise to protect the peace-loving public from Democrats who would coddle the libertine and the lawless. Like Trump as well, he dusted it off for the midterm elections that arrived as the opposition was surging—in one instance stoking a liberal protest so that he could capitalize on the backlash, with his speechwriter William Safire, a former public relations man, calling it “the most serious mob attack on a national leader in American history.”

***

America may feel as if it’s unraveling today, but things were worse in 1968. Mass protests against the Vietnam War continued to swell in size and took on an increasingly radical tenor. Revolutionary zeal ran much hotter than it does today. The Weathermen and the Black Panthers make today’s “antifa” gangs look downright toothless. On campuses, student strikes, canceled classes and building takeovers were all but replacing homecoming as an annual ritual. Urban riots, also a rite of summer by 1968, got started early that year, after Martin Luther King’s assassination in April, and continued through the violence at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in August. Throw in a rising crime rate, and it was easy to understand the yearning for a president who would restore calm and safety. (Then, as now, there was right-wing vigilante violence, too—such as at George Wallace rallies, where audience members pummeled protesters, or at the “hard hat” riot of 1970, when pro-Nixon construction workers roughed up antiwar marchers.)

Intuitively understanding this hunger for stability, Nixon promised “law and order” in his campaign speeches that year. Like the best slogans, this one worked on many levels. It resonated with voters who were concerned about the spike in violent crime, scared by the uprisings in inner-city black neighborhoods; resentful toward what they saw as spoiled college kids wasting their parents’ tuition dollars; or put off by opposition to the war. There was also, of course, a none-too-subtle racial element in the appeals.

Nor was law and order just about physical disorder. Broadly, it was about psychic disorder too—a call to beat back the cultural impulses that were bringing radical changes in music and fashion, family dynamics and parenting styles, attitudes toward racial and sexual difference, and so much else. After Nixon’s election, he continued his appeals to aggrieved traditionalists on dozens of issues. Yet none resonated as viscerally as that of lawlessness.

That came in handy in 1970, when Nixon’s approval numbers were falling, anger was mounting over his failure to end the Vietnam War, and the Republicans’ midterm prospects were looking bleak. To rally his voters, Nixon used a trip to San Jose, California, to reinforce his image as the protector of civil order. On Thursday, October 29, just days before the elections, he arrived at San Jose’s municipal auditorium for a speech to find demonstrators massed outside. Inside the arena, even as he and other politicians spoke, the protesters battered the walls from outside, disrupting the speeches inside.. After his speech, Nixon left the building via the rear door, where he was met by a crowd of perhaps 2,000 demonstrators, cordoned off by police barricades, chanting and hoisting signs.

The mood was ugly. The protesters shouted profanities. Signs compared the president to a Nazi or flaunted obscene images. Nixon, who had in the past baited hecklers to profitable effect, clambered onto the hood of his limousine and thrust out his arms to make the double-V for which he was known. “This is what they hate to see,” he whispered to one of his entourage, as overheard by a reporter. Suddenly, a refrigerator’s worth of projectiles sailed through the air—eggs, tomatoes, vegetables—along with a hail of rocks. Nixon darted into his car as the Secret Service arranged an emergency evacuation. On the staff bus trailing behind, speechwriter Safire watched stones strike the windows, spewing glass. Another car, ferrying aide H.R. Haldeman, was also hit by a rock, then stalled and was rear-ended.

Just as some conservatives last week spread rumors that a Democrat had sent the pipe-bomb packages in order to discredit the right, so in 1970 some of Nixon’s critics began whispering that the administration had engineered the San Jose incident to reflect badly on the left. Some took to calling the episode “the Nixon Hoax,” claiming that Nixon—abetted by a compliant press corps—had magnified, or even concocted the whole episode. Far from a mob riot, they said, it amounted to a run-of-the-mill protest in which no one got hurt. (No one was arrested for rock-throwing, after all, and no one was reported injured by a rock—though of course projectiles of some sort had shattered the window on Safire’s bus and nicked the cars in the presidential caravan.) Some speculated that the White House had even recruited members of the conservative group Young Americans for Freedom or other paid goons to pose as demonstrators in order to provoke the entire incident.

This unfounded conspiracy theory sprang from the fevered imagination of young leftists. But it contained a kernel of truth. Nixon, everyone knew, liked having boisterous crowds at his rallies because they made him look good—especially when he could scold the hecklers. Bill Gulley, a Secret Service agent, claimed that “knowing how the Nixon advance team worked,” he thought it “well within the realm of possibility” that the San Jose incident was “rigged.” Haldeman’s diary, published long afterward, was more precise, noting that while the White House hadn’t set up the incident, Nixon had been keen to provoke a response: “We wanted some confrontation and there were no hecklers in the hall, so we stalled departure a little so they could zero in outside,” he wrote. But when the violence came, it was more than they had bargained for—“rather scary, … as rocks were flying … Bus windows smashed, etc.”

Having escaped unscathed, Haldeman and Nixon and the team saw a payoff. Nixon’s stunt, Haldeman noted, “made a huge incident and we worked hard to crank it up.” He envisioned a “really major story” that “might be effective” on Election Day. After leaving San Jose for his home in San Clemente, in Southern California, Nixon began calling his aide “with ideas about how to push the line.”

Two days later, in Phoenix, Nixon gave another speech. He positioned himself as the bulwark against mob rule as he recounted the incident in San Jose. His language was more composed and deliberate than Trump’s has been this fall, but it similarly played up the peril and prevalence of mob violence from the left. He told his audience:

The crowd inside were exercising their right to peaceable assembly, as you are today. They were listening to political speakers. They were weighing the issues in the campaign of 1970. And outside the hall there was a mob of about 1,000, maybe a few more. We could see the hate in their faces as we drove into the hall, and the obscene signs they waved. We could hear the hate in their voices as they chanted their obscenities. … As we came out of the hall and entered the motorcade, the haters surged past the barricades. They began throwing rocks. These were not small stones; they were large rocks. They were heavy enough to smash windows, windows in the press bus, windows in the staff cars. They weren’t directed at me, though some did hit the presidential car. Most of the rocks hit the buses and the other cars behind.

Nixon encouraged his listeners to identify with the crowd inside the hall—“people like you”—who he said “were repelled by the atmosphere of violence and hatred that marred the event. And they thought to themselves, ‘Is this America?’” The audience cheered. And, as if to rebut his critics in the news media, he insisted, “‘Law and order’ are not code words for racism or repression. ‘Law and order’ are code words for freedom from fear in America.”

The night before the election, the White House paid for television time to rebroadcast the remarks. Ironically, its poor, grainy quality—a local Phoenix station had provided it—made many in the White House fear that it backfired; the Republicans lost many governorships and gave up seats in the House while gaining slightly in the Senate.

But if the effect of the San Jose incident and its aftermath on the elections was hard to discern, there was another, more subtle—and perhaps more important—shift in the political mood that fall. According to Safire, “‘elitism’ and ‘permissiveness,’ which had been sociologists’ terms, became household words. Radical chic, national guilt, self-hate became more suspect. A backlash against demonstrators, part of a general self-identification of Middle America, gained momentum, strengthening Nixon’s hand and presaging his easy domination of [Democratic presidential candidate George] McGovern two years later.”

The political atmosphere of the late 1960s and early 70s, with its suspicion, fearfulness, paranoia, and extremism, is returning. Last time around, the social disorder, hyped by Nixon and his supporters, played into the hands of the right. It is not clear why this time it would be any different.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2O9JeLV
via IFTTT

A former park ranger’s favorite gifts for your outdoorsy friend

One bright summer morning four years ago, two park rangers set off hiking up a dormant Alaskan volcano. 

But like a light switch, the weather changed.

Vicious winds brought frigid, sideways rain. It didn’t relent. Usually dry ditches transformed into swiftly flowing creeks, and the rivers grew higher. 

The rangers found rocky shelter to wait out the storm, but one foolish ranger — ill-equipped with cotton socks that day — experienced both an immeasurably miserable and nearly-harmful journey back to safety: Wet cotton socks don’t insulate.

The lesson: In the outdoors, simple gear matters — a lot.

From a former park ranger, here are eight gifts for the adventurers in your life — some simple, and others essential. 

1. Wool Socks

REI Co-op Midweight Merino Wool Hiking Crew Socks

REI Co-op Midweight Merino Wool Hiking Crew Socks

Image: rei

Going hiking without wool socks — in warm or cold weather — can be an unfortunate proposition.

When inspected up close, wool is composed of uneven, rough fibers, allowing the material to hold more warm air, whereas cotton materials are smooth and more tightly-wound. Additionally, in cooler conditions, wool dries much quicker than cotton — which is notorious for holding in moisture, and staying damp.

These days, wool socks of various persuasions can get pretty expensive, but they needn’t break the bank — like REI’s merino wool socks.

Price: $12.93 – $17.95

2. Hand Sanitizer

Hand Sanitizer Gel with Aloe from up & up™

Hand Sanitizer Gel with Aloe from up & up™

Image: Target

As any medical professional will confirm, the greatest two vectors of disease are your hands. 

And these vectors are amplified in the backcountry, where people often can’t or don’t wash their hands all day.

Do yourself — and others around you — a hygienic  kindness with the gift of hand sanitizer.  

Price: $1.45

3. Solar-Powered Lantern

The MPOWERD Luci solar light

The MPOWERD Luci solar light

Image: MPOWERD Luci

The MPOWERD Luci is truly superb for all sorts of outdoor activity, from backpacking to glamping. 

It crushes down when not in use, making it space efficient. And seven hours of sunlight gives it around 24 hours of luminescence for those dark nights in the backcountry.  

Price: $19.95

4. First Aid Kit

NOLS Med Kit 4.0

NOLS Med Kit 4.0

Image: national outdoor leadership school (NOls)

Simply put, the National Outdoor Leadership School (NOLS) first aid kit, or “Med Kit,” is legit. 

NOLS doesn’t just train wilderness emergency first responders, it offers useful Med Kits — and the 4.0 is brimming with supplies that both the untrained and trained wilderness explorer can use: It includes the requisite supplies for fractures, bleeding, CPR, and gnarly wounds.

Price: $49.99

5. Personal Locator Beacon

SPOT Gen3 Satellite GPS Messenger

SPOT Gen3 Satellite GPS Messenger

Image: SPOT

I have watched this gadget save the lives of two people who flipped their canoe in the deep backcountry — a place with no cell reception, no roads, and in their case, nearly no hope. 

The SPOT personal locator beacon (PLB) sends satellite SOS calls to emergency responders from your location. 

It also allows you to “check-in” so folks know you’re alright — perhaps when you’re on an extended, arduous journey, where chaos can strike.

Price: $149.95

6. Bear Canister

BearVault Bear Resistant Food Canister

BearVault Bear Resistant Food Canister

Image: BearVault

There’s a saying, out in wilderness outposts: “Bears always lose.”

When it comes to bears interacting with people — or more specifically, being drawn to our camping food — it’s true. Bears who learn that the food we carry into the woods is an easy source of snacks, sandwiches, and chocolate, become problem bears. And problem bears that consistently seek out people are typically managed by being killed. 

But most every bear can’t open bear canisters, like the BearVault canister. In some places, like areas in California, Yellowstone National Park, and Alaska, they’re mandatory. 

Keep bears wild — they have other ways to get fat

Price: $63.67 – $79.95 

7. Gravity Water Filters

Katadyn Gravity Camp 6L Water Filter

Katadyn Gravity Camp 6L Water Filter

Image: Katadyn

Filtering water in the backcountry is essential. You never know what might be pooping upstream. 

Pumping water from a stream, however, isn’t the most pleasant pastime — though the pumps can certainly come in handy. But when you stop at camp, filling a handy filtration bag with water, like the Katadyn gravity filter, can efficiently appease the whole group. Hang it from a tree, and the water simply filters through the bottom. 

Gravity rules.

Price: $89.95 

8. Chocolate

Endangered Species Chocolate dark chocolate bar.

Endangered Species Chocolate dark chocolate bar.

Image: Endangered Species Chocolate

Everyone knows that the best trail mix is chocolate.

Especially when 10 percent of Endangered Species Chocolate profits are given to endangered species conservation organizations around the world.

Price: $31.98 (12-pack)

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Pw30Wy
via IFTTT

How to follow the 2018 midterms without losing your sanity

After all the huffing, puffing, canvassing, and hand-wringing, the 2018 midterm elections are nearly here. Now it’s time to hunker down and prep for election night, leaving just one question: how can we make it through our first post-Trump national election without losing our sanity?

SEE ALSO: 10 political podcasts to help you keep your sanity before the midterms

We’re still suffering from New York Times needle-related flashbacks thanks to that tense November night two years ago, and things certainly haven’t calmed down in the time since. (FWIW, the needle will, reportedly, make a comeback this year.)

Still it’s possible to stay on top of midterm election results without your brain melting. Given that we’re constantly bombarded with news via every social platform, it’s naturally going to be a challenge. But, again, it is possible with just a little curation. Here’s who we suggest following:

Five-Thirty Eight

Yes, Nate Silver’s site faced criticism over its forecast of the 2016 election but that criticism was misplaced, exposing a failure to read deeper into its methodology and reporting (in the days before the election, it was noted how Silver actually gave Trump a bigger chance than most of winning). If you take the time to dig into what the site offers, you’ll find sober yet engaging journalism that thoroughly explains its forecast, doesn’t pull punches, and doesn’t favor one side over the other.

If you can keep a level head about you — which I know is asking a lot in a time fraught with political tension — FiveThirtyEight is a vital source of information that uses hard data for its reporting, especially via its traditional live blog on election night. 

PBS NewsHour, NPR, and C-SPAN

Speaking of keeping a level head, the public broadcasting outlets offer invaluable coverage that eschew the breathless talking head panels for balanced reporting and updates. Stripping away the bells and whistles of cable news, both PBS NewsHour and NPR offer straight-forward news without needless distractions (examples include: interactive TV screens! holograms!) Good for keeping your blood pressure low as the night goes on.

C-SPAN will also provide coverage from around the country. It has a deep trove of past debates, interviews, and other clips on candidates and races around the country that are worth diving into in the days ahead of the election.

The Associated Press on Twitter

Okay, so you’ll want to know when the biggest races are called, but you can’t (and shouldn’t) rely on the dreaded Times needle. Same goes for the networks, which tend to have differing tallies. You can save yourself a lot of trouble by following only the Associated Press for called races via their main and politics Twitter accounts. 

If you’re looking to nerd out a little bit about how exactly the AP calls races, the organization lays it all out in a terrific episode of their politics podcast, Ground Game.

Your state’s official tally

Okay, if you want to get OFFICIALLY official, turn off the news, turn up the music, and just refresh either your state’s Secretary of State or Board of Elections website, which offer the official count of voting tallies. They may lag a bit behind what the networks or even the AP say, but it’s the cold, hard numbers with nothing else to muddy the waters. 

Twitter lists

If you’re addicted to Twitter, creating a list is the best way to keep the signal-to-noise ratio at manageable levels. Whether you choose to add candidates, news sources, or elected officials, Twitter lists mean you control the news you see. By shutting out a lot of noise, you can stay focused on the results.

We’ve got a handy list right here of political journalists from dozens of verified organizations that can help you keep track of the breaking news developments.

If elected officials are more your thing, C-SPAN maintains terrific, comprehensive lists of both U.S. Senators and members of the House of Representatives. And they have their own political reporters list if you want even more information. 

Puppies

Finally, if you’re such a nervous wreck on election night that you can’t even turn off the news and just binge Netflix shows instead, maybe search for puppy videos on YouTube.

Zone out and just let the puppies relax you until you absolutely have to tune back in. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Rj8Bg6
via IFTTT

Trump: Pittsburgh synagogue attack ‘evil’ anti-Semitism

President Donald Trump mourned the dead and condemned anti-Semitism after a mass shooting at a Pittsburgh synagogue that left 11 dead.

But faced with another national tragedy, he did not long turn his focus away from the midterm elections or himself.

Nine days from elections that will determine the control of Congress, Trump stuck to his plans to appear at an agricultural convention and a political rally on Saturday.

Throughout the day, he expressed sorrow, called for justice and bemoaned hate, getting regular updates on the shooting. But he also campaigned for candidates, took shots at favourite Democratic targets House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senator Elizabeth Warren and made jokes about his hair.

At a massive rally in southern Illinois for Republican Mike Bost, Trump condemned the shooting as an “evil anti-Semitic attack”. But he said cancelling his appearance would make “sick, demented people important”. He pledged to change his tone for the evening and did cool some of his most fiery rhetoric.

The slaughter at Sabbath services followed a tense week dominated by a mail bomb plot with apparent political motivations and served as another toxic reminder of a divided nation.

It also again underscored Trump’s reluctance to step into the role of national unifier at tense moments as well as his singular focus heading into elections that could dramatically change his presidency.

Trump acknowledged the weight these moments carry, telling reporters that experiencing such events as president, “it’s a level of terribleness and horror that you can’t even believe. It’s hard to believe”.

The White House said Trump was getting regular briefings on the attack. He spoke with the governor of Pennsylvania and the mayor of Pittsburgh. He also spoke with his daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, who are Jewish.

Shortly after returning to Washington late on Saturday, Trump ordered flags at federal buildings throughout the country to be flown at half-staff until October 31 in “solemn respect” for the victims.

Trump sought to energise turnout for Bost, who is fighting to hold on to a seat that was once a Democratic stronghold, but turned out for Trump in 2016.

To bolster his argument for sticking with the rally, Trump argued that the New York Stock Exchange was opened the day after 9/11, though in fact it was re-opened on September 17.

‘Monstrous killing’

Speaking to a massive, cheering crowd at an airport hangar in southern Illinois, Trump said “the hearts of all Americans are filled with grief, following the monstrous killing”.

He told reporters before the rally that he would travel to Pittsburgh, though he did not offer details. He also sought to distance himself from the man arrested in the shooting, calling him “sick” and saying “he was no supporter of mine”.

Although his tone was softer, he still targeted Pelosi and Democrats and the crowd gleefully shouted “lock her up,” in reference to Hillary Clinton, one of the targets of the bomb plot. And he continued to emphasise his hardline immigration rhetoric.

“Republicans want strong borders, no crime, and no caravans,” Trump said.

Trump’s speech to a convention of the Future Farmers of America had all the hallmarks of a Trump rally, as the president riffed on trade, jobs and some of his political enemies.

At one point he also joked about his hair. He said it was ruffled by the rain as he left Washington, adding “I said, ‘maybe I should cancel this arrangement because I have a bad hair day”.

Trump offered an unsparing denunciation of anti-Semitism, which he said was the motive behind the attack, in contrast to remarks after clashes between white supremacists and counterprotesters in Charlottesville last year.

Then, he only inflamed tensions by blaming both sides for the violence.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Pok9Si
via IFTTT

Lawyer calls for independent panel to analyse injury trends in English rugby

Seasons will become longer from 2019-2020


Steven Baylis: ‘The sport has to do all it can to protect players’

Cillian Willis is taking Sale to court over his concussion-related retirement.







Cillian Willis is taking Sale to court over his concussion-related retirement.
Photograph: Jason Cairnduff/Action Images

English rugby should set up an independent medical panel to analyse injury trends in the professional game and suggest ways of minimising risk to players to help insulate clubs, and the Rugby Football Union, from legal action in the future, according to a leading negligence lawyer.

From 2019-20, campaigns will last longer but players will have extra rest periods and have a maximum number of matches and game involvements, which will be closely monitored by a new body, the professional game panel. “Clubs have a duty of care to players,” said Steven Baylis, a partner with Lime Personal Injury. “Injuries do seem to be on the increase: what that is down to is for a medical specialist to answer, not a lawyer, but there needs to be more sharing of medical literature about the prevalence of injuries and trends.

“Clubs will have been put on alert by what has happened in America, in ice hockey as well as American football, over concussion levels. Issues to be looked at include whether overtraining causes weaknesses or too much time lifting heavy weights can predispose players to injuries. Law changes can help, such as tackle height, and the sport has to do all that is practicable to protect players.”

This season has again brought a number of enforced retirements. The former Wales and Lions captain Sam Warburton was the most notable example, forced to give up the game at the age of 29 because of repetitive neck and shoulder injuries. Ulster’s Jean Deysel called time on his career on Wednesday because of a neck problem and early next year the former Sale scrum-half Cillian Willis’s court action against the club and two doctors will start in Manchester. Willis was forced to retire after suffering concussion in an LV Cup match against Saracens in 2013. He alleges he was allowed to play on and then suffered a second blow to the head.

Baylis said: “Unions and clubs need to ensure they have sufficient insurance to cover themselves against future risk. Some form of negligence would need to be shown in any action, not just that a player becomes less mobile in retirement. That puts the onus on teams not to rush players back from injury too early and regularly publish medical data.

“Maybe an independent medical panel should look at this to see if there is a common theme developing and whether they think there is a way of keeping the risk as low as possible. There will always be mishaps and fractures but slight tweaks can be made without spoiling the enjoyment of the game. There needs to be more transparency in sport over medical information and protection of players. With the intensity top players operate at, I think the season is too long.”

Damian Hopley, the chief executive of the RPA, said player welfare was at the heart of the changes to the English game’s structure. “It is always unfortunate when a player has to retire prematurely,” he said. “We have seen a number of high-profile players go that way this year. We are trying to control what we can in the English game, looking at aspects like player load, psychological load, training and game time because they are in our gift, but we only have a voice in law changes. Injuries are an occupational hazard and at this point it is hard to say how we reduce them.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2CLjAv1
via IFTTT

A Moral Debt: The Legacy of Slavery in the USA

Journalist James Gannon has inherited a controversial family legacy – that of a clear descendancy from General Robert E Lee, who led the Confederate Army against the Union during the American Civil war in the mid-19th century.

Gannon grew up in Richmond, Virginia, the former capital of the Confederacy, where an 18-metre high statue of his ancestor dominates the landscape in Monument Avenue, the city’s grandest street.

For over 100 years, Richmond has honoured Lee as one of its greatest heroes. Until recently.

In 2015, 21-year-old white supremacist Dylann Roof shot nine African Americans in a church in Charleston, North Carolina. Photographs of Roof draped in and posing with the Confederate flag emerged on a now defunct white supremacist website.

Soon after, the city council in New Orleans voted for their Confederate monuments to be removed. Public consultations over Confederate memorials took place in Virginia, which once had the largest enslaved population in the United States.

When a “Unite the Right” rally to protest against the removal of a Robert E Lee statue in Charlottesville,  Virginia, turned into violent clashes in August 2017, it accelerated the national debate about what to do with the country’s more than 1,500 monuments and publically-installed symbols memorialising the American Civil War.

What happened that weekend in Charlottesville made Gannon consider the true legacy of his slave-owning ancestors.

On a journey into his family’s legacy, Gannon explores why people across the US are so divided on the subject of Confederate monuments and whether the oppression of enslaved people by his ancestors still has an effect on black lives in the US today.

Travelling across Virginia and Maryland to meet key actors in the ongoing moral dilemma the US finds itself in regards to the Civil War and glorification of Confederate monuments, Gannon finds himself face to face with the debate for justice, reparations and the fight to tear these statues down. 


FILMMAKER’S VIEW

By Lynn Ferguson

I’d just finished reading a book entitled: ‘Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People about Race’ when I was asked to take over from the highly-respected Paul Sapin (who was ill) in directing this film.

The book by British author Remi Eddo-Lodge is a brilliant critique of the systematic failure of white people – both collectively and individually – to acknowledge and accept responsibility for race-related inequality and injustice in the UK today. It argues that there’s a huge amount that white people don’t understand – and probably will never ‘get’ – about the reality of being a black person in a white-dominated society, in terms of everyday experiences.

Our hope for this film is that millions of white Americans and Europeans will watch and – in the words of Shan Wallace, not only, ‘listen and take notes’ but become ‘white allies’ in the fight for racial equality.

Lynn Ferguson, filmmaker

This point was driven home to me soon after in a very personal way when my granddaughter came home from school, upset about something a teacher had said during a lesson in ‘black history month’.

In the UK, ‘black’ history is segregated in the school curriculum and relegated to just four weeks of the year. The lesson related to Mary Seacole, a Jamaican-born nurse who tended the wounded in the Crimean war, in the same period as the famous white British nurse, Florence Nightingale.

My granddaughter is of dual heritage – her father’s white and her mother’s of Jamaican descent.

“Nana Lynn”, she asked me, “Why did the teacher say that Mary Seacole is ‘the black Florence Nightingale’? Why does she have to be a black white person? Why can’t she just be herself?”

Good question. The teacher’s description of Mary Seacole arose from a ‘white supremacist’ way of thinking and was potentially hurtful to black children. But the truth is that I would never have realised this, if my granddaughter hadn’t pointed it out. And she’s only nine. I’m as guilty as her teacher of unconscious white prejudice.

It’s white people who need to learn’

Arguably, only black people can truly understand racial inequality. Even so, I didn’t hesitate in accepting the job of directing a film about racial injustice in the US, with a white reporter – for two reasons:

Firstly, I believe that there is merit in the underlying concept for this film – a relatively privileged white person investigating the nature and scale of racial inequality in the US today. Black people already know this stuff. It’s white people who need to learn.

Secondly, reporter James Gannon genuinely wanted to discover the truth about the legacy of his slave-owning ancestors. There was nothing fake, contrived or self-serving about his motives. We both knew, starting out, that we had a lot to learn.

Camera man Victor Tadashi Suarez, co-director Lynn Ferguson and correspondent James Gannon on location, while shooting ‘A Moral Debt: The Legacy of Slavery in the USA’. [Al Jazeera]

In the end, this is a film that we’re proud of, because it succeeds in conveying the two most important truths that our black contributors were keen for white people to understand:

1) The scale of racial inequality and injustice in the US is still vast today. What this means in practice for many black people is poverty, discrimination and lack of equal opportunities.

2) White wealth and privilege and relative black poverty in the US is a direct result of the failure to compensate millions of formerly enslaved black people and their descendants for over 150 years of exploitation and subjugation, followed by deliberate and systematic policies and practices discriminating against black people, that continues up to the present day.

These are immensely important messages because there are many white people who think that racial equality has been achieved in the US following the civil rights movement in the sixties and the election of the first black president. Sadly, this is not the case, either in the US or Europe,

The film also succeeds, in my opinion, because it’s an honest representation of James’ journey. It includes some embarrassing moments of racial insensitivity that have been kept in the film. To James’ credit, he never asked for them to be removed. The film also has ‘heart’. James was deeply and genuinely moved and humbled – as we all were – by the stories of the people we met.

One of the most troubling things we learned is that many black people in the US are made to believe that black lives don’t matter. Despite decades of black people highlighting racial injustice and inequality, it seems that the white majority in the US don’t care and aren’t listening.

In 1968, Martin Luther King Jr. said: “And what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that promises of freedom and justice have not been met.”

Sadly, that is as true today as it was 50 years ago. 150 years after slavery officially ended, Steven Thomas, an African American, told James: “I have never experienced what it truly means to be free”.

Our hope for this film is that millions of white Americans and Europeans will watch and – in the words of Shan Wallace, not only, ‘listen and take notes’ but become ‘white allies’ in the fight for racial equality.

Source: Al Jazeera

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2qgLnvS
via IFTTT

Steve Pearce Heroics Lead Red Sox to 9-6 Game 4 World Series Win over Dodgers

LOS ANGELES, CA - OCTOBER 27:  Steve Pearce #25 of the Boston Red Sox celebrates on his way to second base after hitting a solo home run in the eighth inning of Game Four of the 2018 World Series against pitcher Kenley Jansen #74 of the Los Angeles Dodgers (not in photo) at Dodger Stadium on October 27, 2018 in Los Angeles, California.  (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)

Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

The Boston Red Sox moved to within one win of their ninth World Series championship with a 9-6 victory over the Los Angeles in Game 4 at Dodger Stadium on Saturday night.

Following a record-setting 18-inning battle in Game 3 (a 3-2 Los Angles victory) on Friday night, all eyes were on the starting pitchers. Rich Hill started for the Dodgers and threw 6.1 innings of one-hit, one-run baseball, striking out seven. After recording one out on six pitches in Game 3, Eduardo Rodriguez took the ball for the Red Sox, allowing four runs in 5.2 innings.

Steve Pearce was the star of the night, going 2-for-4 with a walk and four RBI.

Mitch Moreland sparked the Boston offense with a pinch-hit three-run homer in the top of the seventh, with Pearce tying the game with a solo shot in the eighth. Pinch hitter Rafael Devers delivered the go-ahead RBI single in the ninth.

Yasiel Puig and Kike Hernandez each went yard for Los Angeles.

Steve Pearce Showing Off as Boston’s Most Underrated Addition

When Boston acquired Pearce in a deal back in June, it was a move that likely didn’t land on many people’s radar.

However, Pearce is certainly grabbing everyone’s attention now.

The 35-year-old journeyman was solid for the Red Sox down the stretch, hitting .279/.394/.507 with seven home runs, eight doubles and 26 RBI in 50 games following the midseason trade.

Pearce carried that momentum into the postseason, recording hits in six of his first seven appearances, reaching base in all seven. Although he had cooled off as of late, manager Alex Cora stuck with him and penciled him into the 3-hole for Game 4.

That proved to be a brilliant decision.

While it took a pinch-hit home run by Moreland in the seventh to wake up the Red Sox’s bats, Pearce wound up stealing the spotlight. First, there was his game-tying homer in the eighth off All-Star closer Kenley Jansen:

Boston Red Sox @RedSox

Pearce’d! 💥

#DoDamage https://t.co/ANzrDsf1Bn

Then, the first baseman did more damage by breaking the game open with a bases-clearing double an inning later:

Boston Red Sox @RedSox

Steve Pearce, at your service.

#DoDamage https://t.co/Cu2QDk0dHV

That big night resulted in some history, per MLB Stat of the Day:

Not bad for someone who was held hitless through the first three games of the series.

Offseason signing J.D. Martinez certainly played a role in getting Boston to the World Series, but it was Pearce who delivered the biggest performance of the season for the Red Sox.

Rich Hill Justifies Dave Roberts’ Decision to Give Him Game 4 Start

Following the Game 3 marathon on Friday night, Los Angeles skipper Dave Roberts was rethinking who would get the start in Game 4, going as far as calling Saturday’s starter “TBD.”

Roberts had toyed with the idea of an unconventional approach, using an “opener” rather than a traditional starter. However, he decided to give Hill the nod after a conversation with the veteran southpaw.

“We were just kind of just potentially toying with the idea of an opener, and just kind of wanted to leave it open-ended,” Roberts said on Saturday afternoon, according to Matt Vautour of MassLive.com. “And just after more conversation and thought, just feel great about Rich starting and going through his normal routine.”

Well, Hill made his manager look very wise by delivering a gem.

The 38-year-old left-hander, whose injuries have made it tough to rely on him throughout his career, continued to shine on the World Series stage. After allowing just two total runs in two starts (spanning 8.2 innings) against the Houston Astros in last year’s fall classic, Hill was on top of his game from the very start on this night.

Hill took a no-hitter into the fifth inning before finally allowing a single to catcher Christian Vazquez. What makes that feat even more impressive is the fact that he had little room for error, as Rodriguez was matching him pitch for pitch, keeping the Dodgers off the board through the front five.

Even though starter Walker Buehler gave Los Angeles seven innings in Game 3, the bullpen still had to cover 11 innings on Friday night, with four relievers, including Jansen and Pedro Baez, going more than one frame. That type of workload had the potential to impact the game plan in Game 4—but Hill helped make Roberts’ job much easier by delivering 6.1 strong innings.

Not only did he give his team a chance to win Game 4, but eating innings was also key after Game 3. Then again, it appeared he could have gone longer, being yanked while cruising with 91 pitches.

Roberts and the Dodgers needed a good outing from Hill on Saturday, and he delivered more than they could have hoped for. Ultimately, a quick hook may have cost the Dodgers the game…and ultimately a World Series.

Dave Roberts Must Trust Bullpen Beyond Jansen to Win Series

Friday night’s marathon likely affected the way both Cora and Roberts managed Game 4.

It may have been the reason Cora tried to ride Rodriguez, who hadn’t thrown more than 44 pitches in a game since Sept. 20, until the wheels fell off as the result of the bullpen throwing 12.1 innings the night before. That ultimately proved costly, as a scoreless game became a 4-0 Los Angeles lead in the blink of an eye.

For Roberts, his bullpen management the last two games may have contributed to Game 4’s loss.

Saturday marked the second consecutive day in which Roberts turned to Jansen to try to close out a victory by getting the final six outs. It didn’t work in Game 3, and it didn’t work in Game 4. However, the latest blown save could have been impacted by his workload on the previous night.

It’s tough to extend a closer on back-to-back games like this—especially when he’s not used to that kind of workload.

Jansen reached the 30-pitch plateau just once during the regular season and never topped it. He has thrown 30-plus pitches twice in his past five appearances and may have made it three times had he been able to get through the eighth unscathed.

In fact, he never was asked to throw multiple innings on back-to-back days at all this season.

Nobody can blame Roberts for putting games on the arm of his best reliever. After all, this is a pitcher who has 268 career regular-season saves, making three All-Star teams and finishing fifth in Cy Young voting a season ago. But at some point, a manager has to be able to put his trust his setup relievers to bridge the gap.

Let’s not forget the Dodgers bullpen ranked second in all of baseball, first in the NL, with a 3.38 ERA during the regular season. Injuries certainly played a role throughout the season, but as a unit, there weren’t many better.

To be fair, Roberts did show faith in his bullpen in Game 4. He turned to Scott Alexander at the first sign of trouble, even though Hill had thrown “just” 91 pitches in 6.1 innings. That combined with the decision to go with midseason acquisition Ryan Madson one batter later proved costly, as the duo allowed a 4-0 lead to be cut down to just one.

At that point, Roberts called on his No. 1 reliever to try to slam the door shut to even the series. Unfortunately for the Dodgers, Jansen blew his second save in as many nights after blowing just four during the regular season.

Would Los Angeles have won had Roberts used someone other than Jansen in the eighth? That’s impossible to say, especially since all six relievers he called on in the final 2.2 innings allowed at least one run. Perhaps that was the result of Friday’s 18-inning marathon.

Regardless, Roberts can’t be asking Jansen to go multiple innings in high-stress situations on back-to-back days when that’s just something he isn’t used to. After the last two days, it’s not clear what Jansen’s availability for Sunday’s Game 5 will be. And that could loom large if the Dodgers have a lead late in the game.

What’s Next

The Red Sox will have their first opportunity to clinch the 2018 World Series in Game 5 at Dodger Stadium on Sunday night, with first pitch scheduled for 8:15 p.m. ET. The Dodgers must win to keep their season alive and send the series back to Boston.

Probable pitchers: David Price (Boston) vs. Clayton Kershaw (Los Angeles)

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2CMQBqO
via IFTTT