Two in five Americans say Islam ‘is incompatible with US values’

Washington, DC – A large proportion of non-Muslim Americans think Islam is incompatible with American values, research by the New America foundation and the American Muslim Initiative found.

According to the findings announced on Thursday, 56 percent of Americans believed Islam was compatible with American values and 42 percent said it was not. About 60 percent believed US Muslims were as patriotic as others, while 38 percent they were not.

The study said that although a big majority of Americans – 74 percent – accepted there was “a lot” of bigotry against Muslims existed, 56 percent said they were concerned about extremism spreading within the Muslim community. 

Ex-FBI agent caught teaching police Islamophobic ideas

Researchers found that Republicans were more likely to hold negative perceptions of Muslims and Islam, with 71 percent saying Islam was incompatible with American values. About 56 percent of Republicans also admitted they would be concerned if a mosque was built in their neighbourhood.

A slight majority of Republicans disagreed with the statement that having more than 100 Muslim candidates in the midterm elections was a positive thing.

Robert McKenzie, a senior fellow at the New America foundation and one of the authors of the study, said there were a number of factors that contributed the shaping of anti-Muslim sentiment, and that they were not limited to the political right.

“Hillary Clinton, when talking about violent extremism talked about Muslims being on the frontlines, what does that say about Muslim communities?” He said, adding: “I know she didn’t mean that in a derogatory way but if Muslims are at the frontlines, what does that suggest is happening at the local level in the US?”

The survey also found that just below half of Americans actually knew a Muslim. McKenzie cautioned, however, against correlating knowing a Muslim personally with a more positive perspective on Muslims.

Rising hatred

Rabiah Ahmed, an American Muslim media relations specialist, told Al Jazeera rising Islamophobia had consequences beyond the Muslim community.

“I think Islamophobia is not just a Muslim problem but an American problem, so it needs to be addressed by all sectors of society,” she said.

Ahmed argued that Muslims could not afford to not engage with other communities, and had a duty to “plug information gaps” to dispel negative ideas about the community.

However, she also said politicians, segments of the media, and religious leaders from other communities had played a role in stoking anti-Muslim bigotry.

Islam in America – Rewind

“Fears of Muslims comes from the acts of extremists (and) it comes from the Islamophobia industry, a very well connected, very well funded industry, which makes it their mission to try to marginalise and disenfranchise American Muslims.

“Just as Muslims have a responsibility to lean in, other faith based communities also need to lean in. So when they see their priest preaching divisive rhetoric about Islam, they need to stop that.”

The New America foundation report comes amid a notable rise in anti-Muslim rhetoric in US political discourse and within the media.

Last month, a report by Muslim Advocates found 80 instances of “clear anti-Muslim rhetoric” by candidates running for political office. 

That included unfounded claims that Muslims were plotting to establish Islamic law in the US. 

You have people who are currently in the administration, who are closely connected to the established anti-Muslim hate groups

Zainab Arain, CAIR

US President Donald Trump also used anti-Islam rhetoric in his election campaign, and has introduced executive orders targeting Muslims, such as his infamous ban on Muslims from several predominantly Muslim countries entering the US.

Zainab Arain from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said people with anti-Muslim views were found at the very highest levels of government.

“There are people who were formerly part of the Trump administration, who are well known anti-Muslim bigots,” she said, adding: “You have people who are currently in the administration, who are closely connected to the established anti-Muslim hate groups.”

Rising anti-Muslim bigotry also comes amid a rise in hatred targeting other religious and ethnic minorities. 

Within the last week, there has been a spate of far-right violence in the US, with a foiled pipe bomb campaign targeting anti-Trump politicians and media outlets, a racially motivated shooting of two African-Americans in Kentucky, and the mass killing of 11 Jewish worshippers at a synagogue in Pittsburgh.

Walter Ruby of the Greater Washington Muslim-Jewish Forum said that while anti-Muslim bigotry and anti-Semitism were unique in their characteristics and causes, there were some shared reasons for their recent rise.

“Many people who hate Muslims, hate Jews as well,” he said, adding: “I absolutely think the rhetoric that’s come from President Trump and others has contributed.”

“I don’t want to entirely blame Trump but this movement of hate has coalesced around him, which he certainly helped orchestrate.

“It’s become a very dangerous situation.” 

Head to Head – Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia: Old fears, new threats?

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2JwbLe3
via IFTTT

Facebook hasn’t given up on breaking news

You might not know it, but Facebook’s not done with breaking news.

The company is rolling out its “breaking news” labels to publishers in Australia, France, Germany, Mexico, Spain and the UK, and will start testing the labels in Europe and Asia. The feature was previously only widely-available in the United States and Canada.

The labels allow publishers to append “breaking news” labels to a limited number of stories — about once per week, according to Facebook. 

“We’ve seen that breaking news posts about politics, crime, disaster, and business perform best. We’re using data like this to help publishers understand how to use the label to connect people with the breaking news that they need to see most,” writes Facebook product manager Joey Rhyu.

The social network first began testing the breaking news labels about a year ago. Back then, one of the main questions was whether the breaking news label would affect a particular post’s ranking in the News Feed. At the time, Facebook said it wouldn’t, but acknowledged that could change. 

Now, a Facebook spokesperson tells me that it considers the “breaking news” tag an indication of “timeliness,” which is one factor Facebook considers in determining where any given post should fall in your News Feed.

Facebook's breaking news labels can now include time stamps.

Facebook’s breaking news labels can now include time stamps.

Image: facebook

This shows that Facebook is still trying to find a way to show its users newsworthy information in a timely manner — something that Facebook’s News Feed, which often surfaces days-old posts, has never been great at.  

Facebook has a messy history with breaking news. The company introduced its now infamous “trending” section in 2014, which displayed popular news stories on the platform. Originally, these stories were curated by a group of human editors who selected which articles would appear for any given news story. 

But that effort, which was largely run by contractors employed by Facebook, came under fire in 2016 when Gizmodo reported that the contractors regularly “suppressed” conservatives. The story resulted in a major backlash against Facebook, with conservative politicians saying it was proof the social network was biased against conservatives. 

Much ink has been spilled about the ensuing controversy, which I won’t rehash here, but Facebook promptly got rid of its human editors and opted to let its algorithms determine which topics and stories should appear in the “trending” section. But, even with human editors out of the picture, the trending section was still a bit of a disaster. The section still managed to amplify conspiracy theories and “news” from questionable sources.

So it was a relief to many when Facebook announced earlier this year that it would kill the “trending” section for good, which brings us back to breaking news. 

With the ill-fated “trending” section gone for good, and publishers still wary of Facebook’s commitment in the wake of bigger News Feed shakeups, the “breaking news” labels are a chance for publishers to still get some of their most important stories in front of readers on Facebook.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2zp9tZE
via IFTTT

Brett Brown Wishes Ben Simmons Would Take More Jump Shots

FILE - In this Wednesday, May 9, 2018 file photo,Philadelphia 76ers coach Brett Brown, right, talks with guard Ben Simmons before Game 5 of the team's NBA basketball playoff series against the Boston Celtics in Boston. Philadelphia 76ers coach Brett Brown is expecting more out of guards Ben Simmons and Markelle Fultz this season. The guards failed to hit a 3-pointer last season. Brown says the duo will have to be better from long range this season. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)

Charles Krupa/Associated Press

Philadelphia 76ers head coach Brett Brown doesn’t want point guard Ben Simmons to give up on his jump shot during just his second season of action. 

According to Sixers Insider Jon Johnson, Brown revealed he “wished” the LSU product would take more jumpers. Brown explained Simmons is waiting until he is comfortable to shoot during games to start expanding his offensive arsenal.

Johnson wrote, “The fact Brown spoke to Simmons about jump shot certainly indicates it is of some concern.”

It is a testament to Simmons’ head-turning abilities elsewhere that he was still able to win Rookie of the Year last season despite missing all 11 of the three-pointers he attempted last season. He is yet to take a long-range shot through seven games this season, although he is averaging 13.7 points, 10.4 rebounds and 8.0 assists per game as the primary facilitator in the offense.

However, there are also worries about the shooting of Markelle Fultz, especially after the No. 1 pick in the 2017 draft played just 14 games last season and made headlines as he attempted to hone his shooting form following a shoulder injury.

Sam Vecenie of The Athletic highlighted the way the Atlanta Hawks defended Fultz by using his man to roam the floor in half-court sets and help with double-teams and clogging the paint:

Sam Vecenie @Sam_Vecenie

This is how the Hawks are defending Markelle Fultz. Essentially, they’re not guarding him any time he’s outside of 15 feet, and using Kent Bazemore as a center fielder to help off on drivers and double post players. Philly has struggled so far. Interested to see how they adjust. https://t.co/NtDYzmFOaw

Defensive sets like that will be a serious issue for the 76ers if Simmons and Fultz are on the floor together because the former does most of his damage by driving into the lane and either scoring himself or finding teammates. Another defender who is already in the paint will only serve to cut off those driving lanes and allow those defending formidable shooters to remain home and contest those looks. 

The 76ers are off to an uneven 4-4 start this season despite hope they can contend for a spot in the NBA Finals with LeBron James no longer in the Eastern Conference. If Simmons can develop a jumper, it will change the way defenses play against him and his teammates and open up additional options for an offense that is rated just 21st in the league, per NBA.com.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2qkdj1Y
via IFTTT

Trump to further restrict asylum seekers with limits, tent cities

Less than a week before the midterm elections, US President Donald Trump said his administration is finalising a plan that would deny asylum to individuals who cross the US border between official ports of entry. 

Speaking at the White House on Thursday, Trump said the plan is “totally legal”. Legal experts say, however, it is expected to be challenged in court once announced. 

Under US immigration law, any immigrant in the US can apply for asylum regardless of how he or she entered the country. 

Trump said he would be signing an executive order sometime next week regarding immigration. He did not detail the proposal or how it would be implemented. 

The announcement comes as Trump seeks to stoke fear over a caravan of Central American migrants and refugees making its way to the US-Mexico border. The caravan is still more than 1,100km away and is not expected to make it to the US border for weeks. 

Those travelling with the caravan have told Al Jazeera they are fleeing violence, including political persecution, poverty, and poor healthcare. Many have said they plan to apply for asylum at an official port of entry, as other caravans have done in the past. 

One Honduran woman, who witnessed her husband’s murder three years ago, said she joined the caravan to seek opportunities to send money back home to help provide for her son’s expensive medical care. 

Trump also said the US is building “massive” tent cities to house asylum seekers, including children, while their claims are processed. In the past this could take years. 

According to the 1997 Flores settlement, children can only be held in immigration detention for up to 20 days, after which they must either be released to a guardian or placed in a licensed shelter. Trump was forced to end his administration’s practice of separating families at the border earlier this year after public outcry. 

Rocks to be treated like firearms

On Wednesday, Trump said he could send more than 15,000 US military troops to the border. Some 5,200 troops are already making their way down to the border to provide logistical and other support to US border agents.  

When asked on Thursday if troops would use force on migrants and refugees, Trump said if individuals are throwing rocks, they would be treated as if they have firearms.

“I hope there won’t be that,” he said.   

Trump referenced clashes between armed police and caravan participants at Mexico’s border with Guatemala. One Honduran man was killed and more than 100 others were injured on Sunday. 

Trump has been hitting the campaign trail hard this week as he attempts to energise his Republican base ahead of the midterm elections. Democrats are vying to take control of Congress on November 6 in an election viewed as a referendum on the president’s first two years in office. 

Trump was slammed late on Wednesday after he tweeted an anti-immigrant online campaign video blaming Democrats and suggesting, without evidence, that the caravan includes murderers.

During his presidency, he has sought to fulfill a number of anti-immigrant campaign promises, including a wall between the US and Mexico and crackdown on immigration. 

Earlier this year, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said that “generally” domestic violence and gang violence would not longer be grounds for asylum. 

Additional reporting by Sandra Cuffe from Tonala, Chiapas, Mexico.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2CWcDY3
via IFTTT

Judgment day arrives for Schumer


Chuck Schumer

Chuck Schumer has taken heat from the left for cutting deals on judges, allowing his members to support some deregulation efforts and freeing them to vote for high-profile nominees, all in service of keeping as many seats as possible. | Andrew Harnik/AP Photo

Elections

Voters will issue a verdict on his strategy of allowing red-state Democrats to break with the party in order to win reelection.

Throughout this year, Chuck Schumer met every few weeks with the five most endangered senators in his caucus. The chatty Democratic leader was mostly in listening mode as he talked them up, according to people familiar with the sessions: What were they seeing back home? Which issues were getting voters excited?

The meetings informed Schumer’s legislative strategy: Give the red-state Democrats as much room as possible to break from the party, if it meant better aligning with their states and improving their shot at winning.

Story Continued Below

Tuesday’s election will offer a verdict on Schumer’s gambit and his first two years as Democratic leader — as well as begin to answer the more fundamental question of whether moderate Democrats can survive in the Trump era.

The quintet of self-proclaimed moderates represents the most powerful bloc of centrists in Congress, as well as the cornerstone of any Democratic Senate majority in future years.

If Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Jon Tester of Montana suffer a wipeout, the number of moderates in the Senate would plummet to its lowest total in recent history, while further polarizing the chamber. A loss by three or four of the five would be a huge setback for the party.

“I hope that we get our vote out and we don’t lose them. I hope that people understand … that blowing the system up can only take you so far,” said Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.). “These are not easy jobs people have from these purple and red states.”

The five senators are taking desperate measures to emphasize their moderate virtues as Republicans call them Trump-hating liberals. Donnelly is expressing openness to limiting birthright citizenship for immigrants and touting his support for President Donald Trump’s border wall. Manchin is playing up his battles with Senate liberals and declaring “both sides are guilty” of uncompromising politics.

And McCaskill has amped up her border security rhetoric to line up with Trump. If she loses, she warned voters, Missouri will “probably get written off as a bright red state” for years.

“I don’t want to be Arkansas, how about you?” she implored voters in Lee’s Summit, Mo., last week.

Yet despite those tacks toward the center, Trump is doing all he can to hurt the staying power of political moderates. Democrats’ opponents are essentially doing nothing to moderate their records other than embrace protections for pre-existing conditions.

Trump has tried to blow up the senators’ careful attempts to straddle both parties: If a lawmaker is for what the president does and says, that person is a conservative. Anything else is viewed by Trump and his supporters as the actions of a “liberal.”

“He’s not a moderate. He’s a liberal. A superliberal,” Donald Trump Jr. said of Tester last week.

Those efforts and the demographics of the states in play have Republicans feeling bullish about knocking off at least two of the five senators. They hope Trump’s final-week sprint through states with close Senate races will put several Republican challengers over the top.

But there are pockets of apprehension. Polls have shown Heitkamp trailing by a wide margin in North Dakota. But Trump is skipping the state this week, reflecting fears among some Republicans of overconfidence.

Heitkamp’s opponent, Rep. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), is “now worried about complacency from some of the polls. That’s really not helpful to him,” said Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.).

The five red-state Democrats have already shown they know how to traverse unforgiving political terrain. All of them won in 2012 in states Mitt Romney carried. Tester and McCaskill won in 2006, too, part of a wave of Democrats elected as a check on President George W. Bush.

The question at the heart of their campaigns this time is whether the five adequately reflect the conservative makeup of their states. They call themselves independents and point to votes where they broke ranks with Schumer and caucus liberals. Republicans say anything but full cooperation with Trump doesn’t cut it.

Donnelly boasts about the number of his bills Trump has signed, often mentions his support for Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and touts voting with Trump more than 50 percent of the time. To his opponent, Republican Mike Braun, though, none of that matters.

“On the important stuff, he’s been with Schumer,” Braun said in a recent interview.

Manchin is the most conservative Democrat in the Senate, occasionally even tilting to the right of a pair of high-profile moderate Republican senators, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. A solid favorite in his race, the anti-abortion Democrat says of liberals: “I look at things very different than they do.”

But his opponent, West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, argues that Manchin’s profile is still at odds with a state that Trump won by 42 points. “A conservative fighter who’s going to help President Trump versus a dishonest Washington liberal,” is how Morrisey sums up the race.

In Missouri, Republican Josh Hawley called McCaskill a “liberal Democrat” at least 10 times during their final debate. In response, she highlights her votes that align with Trump’s positions, and her willingness to work with him.

“Josh Hawley has decided in this campaign that he is going to win or lose by being 100 percent, never wavering from President Trump,” McCaskill said. By contrast, she added, if “I agree with the president, great. If not, I’m not afraid” to oppose him.

For Schumer to ever rise to majority leader, he needs McCaskill’s strategy to resonate with voters in states that Democrats barely contest in presidential elections. He’s taken heat from the left for cutting deals on judges, allowing his members to support some deregulation efforts and freeing them to vote for high-profile nominees, all in service of keeping as many seats as possible.

Democrats have an outside shot on Tuesday to take the chamber and an even better one in 2020. But the task will be exponentially harder if Democrats lose more than one or two seats on Election Day.

It’s a fact not lost on Republicans: Hawley has branded his closing trip around the state as the “Stop Schumer, Fire Claire” tour.

“The choice is between what you voted for in 2016,” Hawley said last week, “and the radical left agenda that Claire McCaskill and her liberal allies like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi want to impose on this country. That’s what’s at stake.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2qmsPtZ
via IFTTT

The Google walkout in Los Angeles was private and restrained

In contrast to the public protests at the company's other offices, Google's LA office staged a gathering in a courtyard.
In contrast to the public protests at the company’s other offices, Google’s LA office staged a gathering in a courtyard.

Image: Rachel kraus / Mashable

2017%2f09%2f19%2ffa%2frakheadshot.f59fbBy Rachel Kraus

Is it really a walk out if you barely… walk out?

Google offices around the world protested sexual harassment and workplace discrimination at the company on Thursday. But in Los Angeles — a center of the #MeToo movement, thanks to Hollywood — Googlers staged a more staid, internal affair than the rabble-rousing actions of their co-workers worldwide. 

SEE ALSO: Report: Google paid Android creator Andy Rubin a ton of cash following sexual misconduct allegations

The protests came in the wake of the New York Times report of Android creator Andy Rubin’s 2014 departure from the company due to a hushed up sexual harassment allegation — and his $90 million settlement package. 

Rumblings of a walkout first began on Monday, October 29. The mostly New York-based organizers announced the walk out in an editorial for New York Magazine, in which they stated their demands.

In New York, thousands of protesters filled a park by the Hudson river, where what Gizmodo described as an “impassioned crowd” chanted and yelled their demands for change. Employees in Dublin and San Francisco flooded the streets with public displays of thousands. 

At the Google offices globally, the message was loud and clear: Googlers are mad as hell, and they’re not gonna take it anymore. 

But in Los Angeles, the message was more restrained, and the walk out consisted of a 50-foot collective crossing of the street, from one enclosed Google courtyard to another.

At 11:10 am, the appointed time for the protest in every timezone, the doorway below the Frank Gehry binoculars of the Google Santa Monica office was empty. What could have been a public, dramatic show of the need for change — below an iconic landmark! — never happened.

Instead of walking out into the streets, employees gathered in an internal courtyard, separated from the press and onlookers by a metal fence and the hammocks and playthings of the Google office.

A crowd of a few hundred gathered in the courtyard. An organizer spoke about why they were there. She invited employees to come up and share their own stories. But from the looks of it, no one answered her call.

After a 30 second chant of “no justice, no peace,” an organizer asked, “are you ready to walk?!” To which people cheered.

Then a stream of hundreds of employees walked out of Google… quietly crossing the street via a crosswalk to another enclosed, apparently Google-owned compound. 

In the new gathering space, employees chanted “Time is up.” Finally, once again supervised by Google security guards, they crossed the street back into their offices. 

The LA office protest was organized and polite, not impassioned. But credit where credit is due: any sort of protest to make change on behalf of women and equality is bold, and admirable. 

Additionally, perhaps the LA Google protesters were intimidated by the high expectations, and by the press; media propped cameras and microphones over the fence, and a news helicopter circled above the orange tree-filled Google courtyard, drowning out the mini-megaphone the organizer used to demand change. Plus, the Google Los Angeles office is much smaller than its New York and Bay Area counterparts; these employees did join with their coworkers worldwide, leaving their posts to demand change. 

And as a whole, the Google walkouts represent a potential sea change at Google, and CEO Sundar Pichai is clearly listening. 

Sundar Pichai: “Moments like this show that we didn’t always get it right. We are committed to doing better … I want to acknowledge the women who stood up. …”#dealbook

— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) November 1, 2018

It’s possible that some Googlers view this as an internal affair, not for view by the public. 

But that’s not what a walk out — something that is inherently public — is. 

Los Angeles Google employees didn’t so much “walk out” as “gather within.”

Image: rachel kraus/mashable

The actions of the Google employees in Los Angeles represent a certain hesitance for unrestrained criticism within the tech world. That may be due to the strong company culture that has been deftly critiqued in the press and even by shows like Silicon Valley. 

One man, who was one of very few protesters who was willing to comment, replied to a reporter’s question about why he was protesting, with the answer “because we’re family.” That’s a nice sentiment, even if it’s not actually true; Google, and other tech companies, are multi-million-dollar corporations that, oh, pay their sexually abusing executives to go quietly with a golden parachute.

That reality hasn’t seemed to catch on entirely at Google, yet. 

The restrained LA protest shows that company loyalty, and the impulse to close ranks, remains at Google — even if other protests may indicate otherwise.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2SDWCLS
via IFTTT

Google Chromecast (2018) review: Same as the old Chromecast

Quick and easy setup • Affordable • Casting from phone to TV still dirt-simple

Few upgrades over previous model • Does not automatically pause videos for calls • Amazon video not Cast-compatible

The latest Google Chromecast is still a good buy for anyone looking for a simple, affordable streaming option, but if you already have a second-gen model, you should pass.

The new Google Chromecast was conspicuously absent from the spotlight at Google’s recent hardware event. But there was indeed a new, updated version of Google’s streaming dongle; it’s just the company decided to roll it out quietly. Spend a few minutes with the new Chromecast and you’ll see why the company didn’t brag about the refresh at the event — there’s really nothing new to brag about.

Looking over the specs of this third-generation Chromecast, I thought a fitting tagline would be, “Meet the new Chromecast, almost the same as the old Chromecast.” Now that I’ve spend some serious time with the new model, I regret using “almost.”

SEE ALSO: 8 essential keyboard tips every iPhone owner should know

Don’t get me wrong, the Google Chromecast overall is a fantastic streaming product for $35. It’s cheap, it’s small, it’s cheap, it’s out of the way, and did I mention it’s cheap? Also, I will say that the idea of just throwing content from your phone to your TV screen, aka “casting,” is still really cool if not exactly revolutionary anymore. At the core of what it does, the Google Chromecast works really well. If you don’t have one and you’re looking for an affordable way to stream content to your TV, Chromecast is a really great option.

That being said, I’m someone who already owns the previous model, the second-generation Chromecast. If you’re one of the tens of millions of people who, like me, already own a Chromecast, there’s really not much here for you.

Chromecast evolution

The jump from the first-generation Chromecast released in 2013 to the second-gen model in 2015 was a significant one. It was complete redesign, transforming from a stick to the circular-designed HDMI dongle you’re probably more familiar with.There was also a noticeable change in performance as the older device could be a bit laggy at times. 

The new third-generation Chromecast (left) and second-generation Chromecast (right).

The new third-generation Chromecast (left) and second-generation Chromecast (right).

Image: MATT BINDER/MASHABLE

In contrast, Google’s 2018 Chromecast is practically the same as the previous model. Save for a few more minor performance and appearance upgrades, you likely wouldn’t even tell the difference. The new third-gen Chromecast still comes in round dongle form, albeit there has been a change from a glossy plastic shell to a matte casing. The logo on the device has also changed from the Chrome graphic to Google’s little ‘G’ logo. While it certainly gives the device a nicer, sleeker look, you’ll rarely even see it, as the device will find its home plugged in to the back of your TV screen on most television sets.

Setting up the Google Chromecast is still quick, easy, and done entirely through the Google Home app on your smartphone. Because your phone is likely already connected to your WiFi network, I didn’t even need to input my WiFi password when setting up the new Chromecast.

While the older Chromecast model streamed at 1080p, one major performance upgrade with this latest version is that it now can stream at 60 frames per second. This fixes the choppiness mentioned in our previous review when it came to watching videogame streams and videos. However, if you’re not typically watching gamer Ninja’s latest Fortnite stream, you really won’t notice a difference. Google also claims the hardware performance of the new Chromecast is 15% faster. It certainly was fast in my testing, but I never really had any issues with my older model running slow. Also, since a Chromecast, by its nature, has no menus to scan through, it’s a fairly unnoticeable upgrade.

The Cast Achilles’ heel

Speaking of the user interface, one of my main issues with Chromecast has long been the fact that you have to use your phone to run the thing. Yes, I know that’s the point, but that means there’s no on-screen user interface at all, which isn’t always the best solution.

Using only your smartphone, you go to whatever video service app you want to watch like Netflix or Hulu and then “cast” the video to your Chromecast-connected TV screen. With other devices like the Apple TV ($149), or — even more analogous to the Chromecast — the Roku Express ($30) or the Amazon Fire Stick ($40), you can pick up the device’s remote and pause what you’re watching, raise and lower the volume, switch to another show or app, whatever! With Chromecast, there’s the extra step of unlocking your phone to change what you want to do on your Chromecast-connected TV set. You control it all from the video player options of the app you’re casting. 

In fact, my biggest pet peeve with Chromecast is that, if you receive a call on your smartphone, it won’t automatically pause what you’re watching. (It supposedly depends on the app, but in my years casting Netflix, HBO, and YouTube with the previous model, I’ve never seen this happen.) Every time, I’ve had to take the call while whatever I was watching awkwardly played in the background until I could bring up the app for whatever video service I was using to pause it. It’s a choice between that or declining the incoming call, pausing the video, and reaching back out to whoever called me. Annoying.

One new feature that could solve the phone call issue is the addition of Google Assistant to control your Chromecast. You can use your voice for some basic controls, like changing what you want to watch on Netflix or YouTube. It’s limited, but it works. The hiccup here is that you need a Google Home speaker or a phone with Google Assistant for this to even work. If you don’t already own one of those devices, you might as well splurge for a full-featured set-top streaming box like the Apple TV instead of getting these other Google Home devices if all you’re going to really use them for is a workaround for Chromecast’s standalone flaws.

An incremental upgrade

All in all, the new Chromecast is just as good as its predecessor. It’s just as bad, too. It can still be a bit clunky using your phone to cast. If you want to browse movies and shows to watch with your family, be prepared to gather around the smartphone screen, because again there’s no Chromecast menu options for your TV set. I guess you could cast your web browser and look at the web version of Netflix (or whatever service you’re using), but that’s an irritating extra step. There’s other little issues like changing the volume on your phone to control your Chromecast-connected TV’s audio, which isn’t always very responsive.

Speaking of sound, multiroom audio support is coming to the Chromecast by the end of the year, but that’s not necessarily a reason to buy this device: it’s supposedly rolling out to second-generation Chromecasts, too.

In my opinion, the Google Chromecast is a worthy secondary TV streaming device. However, if you already have one, there’s not a lot of reason to upgrade to this third-generation model — especially if you have the second-gen Chromecast. 

If you purchased a 4K TV since the older Chromecast model came out, the refreshed device isn’t the streaming option for you either. Google still has 4K streaming reserved solely for it’s more expensive Chromecast device, the now 2-year-old Chromecast Ultra ($69).

However, if you don’t already own a Chromecast and you’re not looking to stream 4K content, it’s certainly among the cheapest options to consider. I wouldn’t use it for my living room set where I watch TV socially with family and friends, but when it’s perfect for the bedroom and just want to put something on since it’s so straightforward.

However, if the lack of an onscreen menu doesn’t work for you, there are plenty other similarly priced options nowadays. For example, the Amazon Fire Stick offers all that and is currently only five bucks more than a Chromecast. Oh, right, that’s another thing! Amazon’s video app doesn’t support Google Cast. So, if you really want to stream some Amazon Prime video, Chromecast may not be the option for you.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2zvam2T
via IFTTT

San Francisco Google employees walk out in protest of sexual harassment

Google employees across from the San Francisco Ferry Building.
Google employees across from the San Francisco Ferry Building.

Image: jack morse / mashable

2017%2f09%2f18%2f2b%2fjackbw5.32076By Jack Morse

On an unusually warm Nov. 1 morning in San Francisco, scores of Google employees walked out of their downtown office in protest. 

The staged walkout had come together quickly, and followed the Oct. 25 news that Google execs paid Android creator Andy Rubin $90 million after determining that allegations of sexual misconduct leveled against him by an employee were likely credible.

Those leaving their desks on Thursday in SF were but one part of a global effort by Google employees, all walking out at 11:10 a.m. local time, to demand accountability at the tech giant. According to organizers, who explained their thoughts in The Cut, they seek an “end to the sexual harassment, discrimination, and the systemic racism that fuel this destructive culture.”

Employees carried signs reading “don’t be evil,” and “workers’ rights are women’s rights” as what looked like thousands marched down the San Francisco waterfront to a meeting place across from the Ferry Building.

Once gathered, Google employee Cathay Bi spoke to the crowd through a bullhorn. 

“People don’t change because of laws and policy,” she told the cheering crowd. “Laws and policy change because of people.”

SEE ALSO: The European leg of a global Google staff walkout has kicked off in London and Dublin

Chants of “Not OK, Google” — in a play on the Google Assistant wake phrase — spread through the crowd. 

Https%3a%2f%2fvdist.aws.mashable.com%2fcms%2f2018%2f11%2f3cf9555d e040 5409%2fthumb%2f00001

Bi read aloud stories provided by Google employees, shared anonymously, detailing personal experiences of harassment at the company. She said that she, too, had experienced sexual harassment while at Google, but that she did “not feel safe talking about [it].”

Bi asked the crowd how many of them also had a story that hadn’t been told. Many raised their hands.

When asked about her response to the New York Times report that broke the news of Rubin’s compensation and alleged misconduct, Bi didn’t mince words. 

“Personally, I was not surprised.”

That doesn’t mean that she, and all the other Google employees who walked out today in San Francisco and around the globe, have resigned themselves to the way things are. On the contrary, they’re in it for the long haul. 

“These types of changes,” explained Bi to a group of reporters as the event calmed down, “they don’t happen overnight.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2QaJ0pC
via IFTTT

Everyone is trying to figure out what this new emoji means

Image: mashable

A whole bunch of new emoji were released on Tuesday in iOS 12.1 — 158, to be precise. But there’s one new smiley emoji in particular that people just can’t figure out.

The new emoji’s expression is a mix between a wink, a grimace, and a blush, and as a result people are questioning what emotion or feeling it’s trying to convey.

SEE ALSO: Here’s how to install iOS 12.1 to get new emoji and Group FaceTime

“Can someone please explain this emoji to me,” Twitter user 007dpz asked on Wednesday. A question that is being echoed throughout the platform.

Thanks to the relative vagueness of the emoji’s expression, people have made some pretty humorous guesses at its true meaning, ranging from legit guesses to abstract comparisons.

Others, have just been having fun with the emoji’s goofy expression by inserting it into popular memes, like the one below:

Unicode, the non-profit organization that oversees the global standard for creating new emoji, describes the emoji as a “face-unwell.” 

Some of the keywords associated with the smiley, as listed on unicode’s website are “dizzy,” “intoxicated,” “tipsy,” and “woozy face.” Basically, this emoji is kinda drunk, and it’s not doing awesome. 

I guess that makes sense? Though, it wouldn’t be my first guess. 

Thankfully, there’s still a lot of room for interpretation with this fairly ambiguous smiley —which we look forward to exploiting in our future texts.

[h/t: BuzzFeed]

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2qnEIzX
via IFTTT