Epic Games slams Google for sharing Fortnite Android app exploit info

Google essentially got slapped in the face when Epic Games, the developer of the super popular Fortnite, decided not to make the game available through the Play Store, but via its own app.

Google warned Epic that doing so could potentially put Android users at greater security risk, but the game developer brushed it off, insisting on going it alone for several reasons — including not having to give Google a cut in-app revenue and “embracing open platforms.”

Well, now the worst has happened. Despite having no obligation to do so, Google recently discovered an exploit within the Fortnite installer app that allowed malicious apps installed on one’s Android phone to hijack the download process so that instead of downloading the game from Epic’s server, it could download and install something entirely different, which could potentially leave the device open to attacks.

SEE ALSO: What You Should Know About ‘Fortnite’ Addiction

Here’s a quick run-down of what happened:

Google first discovered the vulnerability inside of the Fortnite installer app on Aug. 15 and immediately notified Epic. Details for the exploit weren’t public yet. Within 48 hours, Epic patched the Fortnite installer and deployed it to all Android users who installed the app. 

Here’s where things get a little ugly. Even though Epic quickly released a patch for the installer app, it asked Google not to disclose the details of the exploit until after 90 days. Not only would there be more time for users to update their installer apps, but hackers also wouldn’t be able to take advantage of the bug.

However, Google’s bug disclosure guidelines explicitly states the following:

“This bug is subject to a 90-day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse or a patch has been made broadly available, the bug report – including any comments and attachments – will become visible to the public.”

Despite Epic’s request for Google to wait the full 90 days before disclosing the exploit, Google abided by its own guidelines and shared the details.

Per Google’s Issue Tracker thread on the bug report:

“…now the patched version of Fortnite Installer has been available for 7 days we will proceed to unrestrict this issue in line with Google’s standard disclosure practices”.

Naturally, the Fortnite developer wasn’t happy about Google’s decision at all. Epic provided Mashable the following comment from CEO Tim Sweeney:

“Epic genuinely appreciated Google’s effort to perform an in-depth security audit of Fortnite immediately following our release on Android, and share the results with Epic so we could speedily issue an update to fix the flaw they discovered.

However, it was irresponsible of Google to publicly disclose the technical details of the flaw so quickly, while many installations had not yet been updated and were still vulnerable.

An Epic security engineer, at my urging, requested Google delay public disclosure for the typical 90 days to allow time for the update to be more widely installed. Google refused. You can read it all at https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/112630336

Google’s security analysis efforts are appreciated and benefit the Android platform, however a company as powerful as Google should practice more responsible disclosure timing than this, and not endanger users in the course of its counter-PR efforts against Epic’s distribution of Fortnite outside of Google Play.”

Ultimately, who’s in the right and who’s in the wrong? Honestly, neither company is. 

Google is right that Epic’s decision to not release Fortnite through the Play Store leaves the app more vulnerable. As my colleague, Mashable tech reporter Matt Binder, previously made clear: Android users need to disable certain Android security permissions in order to install Fortnite and there’s no guarantee they’ll remember to turn them back on after doing so.

Maybe Google really is butt-hurt that it’s not getting any revenue from the massively popular game (apps listed on Google Play pay a share of their sales to Google). However, because of the game’s popularity, the Android gatekeeper still has a responsibility to ensure that users are safe. Otherwise, the entire platform could end up with an even worse reputation because of third-party developers.

That said, Epic is also right because if Google truly cares about protecting its users first and foremost, it should have been more flexible on its bug disclosure deadline so as to not tip off hackers so quickly.

Following Sweeney’s statement, Google had only this to say in response to Mashable’s request for comment: “User security is our top priority, and as part of our proactive monitoring for malware we identified a vulnerability in the Fortnite installer. We immediately notified Epic Games and they fixed the issue.”

The disagreements between Google and Epic should not be overlooked. Google may wish to have nothing to do with Fortnite after being shunned by Epic Games, but their paths will inevitably cross because of the Android platform.

It’s possible Google will discover vulnerabilities in future versions of the Fortnite installerm or even other app installers from other companies that decide to follow in Epic’s footsteps and not offer their apps in the Play Store. Will Google have to monitor and perform security audits on all of those as well in order to protect Android users? Hard to say, but it’s sure gonna be interesting to watch from the sidelines.

If anyone’s laughing at this turn of events, it’s Apple. The company’s closed platform means all apps must be released through the App Store. By not allowing apps to be officially released in any other way, Apple has guarded itself against the issue Google’s now facing. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2o7p36K
via IFTTT

Democrats strip superdelegates of power in picking presidential nominee


Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks to a crowd.

While long a priority of Sen. Bernie Sanders and his supporters, the effort to reduce superdelegates’ clout has been embraced more broadly by party officials desperate to win over young voters. | Jose Luis Magana/AP Photo

Elections

Party officials voted at a meeting to strip the party insiders of much of their influence, a big win for the party’s base.

CHICAGO – Democratic Party officials voted Saturday to strip superdelegates of much of their power in the presidential nominating process, infuriating many traditionalists while handing a victory to the party’s left flank.

The measure’s overwhelming approval – met by cheers in a hotel ballroom here – concluded a tense summer meeting of the Democratic National Committee, which had labored over the issue since 2016. Superdelegates that year largely sided with Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders, enraging Sanders’ supporters.

Story Continued Below

Under the new rule, superdelegates – the members of Congress, DNC members and other top officials who made up about 15 percent of delegates that year – will not be allowed to vote on the first ballot at a contested national convention. The change could dramatically re-shape the calculous of future presidential campaigns, rendering candidates’ connections to superdelegates less significant.

“It’s a big victory for the base of the party,” said Jeff Cohen, co-founder of the online activist group RootsAction.org. “Tom Perez realizes that he’d rather lose 10 dead-enders in the DNC than a couple million activists,” he said of the party chairman.

While long a priority of Sanders and his supporters, the effort to reduce superdelegates’ clout was embraced more broadly in recent months by Democratic Party officials desperate to win over young voters skeptical of centralized party power.

Perez described the change as “historic,” and DNC organizers played a video message from former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean in which the former DNC chairman cast the measure it as an urgent response “to the will of grassroots voters.”

Many young voters, Dean said, “have lost faith in our party’s nominating process, and make no mistake, this is a perception that’s cost us at the ballot box.”

The rule change faced intense opposition from a band of longtime Democratic Party officials who said the measure would disenfranchise party insiders. Their efforts appeared to gain momentum when Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond publicly urged DNC members to oppose the overhaul.

“This vote to strip superdelegates, unpledged delegates, automatic delegates, whatever you want to call us of our voice on the first ballot is inconsistent with our charter,” former DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile said.

While awaiting results of a vote on a related issue, she strolled past media tables, saying, “I’m going to see how they’re counting the votes. I’m gonna make sure it isn’t Chicago style.”

But despite furious lobbying here, the defenders of superdelegates fell short in a procedural vote Saturday, then conceded before the overhaul was approved.

Superdelegates will now be allowed to vote on the first ballot at a national convention only if a candidate earned enough pledged delegates from state primaries and caucuses to win the nomination, anyway.

“What I witnessed was a political murder suicide,” said Bob Mulholland, a super-delegate and DNC member from California who helped organize opposition to the proposal. “What the DNC voted was to take away the votes of governors, Congress members, and take away their own votes, too. Absurd.”

Former DNC Chairman Don Fowler, a Mulholland ally, told committee members before the vote on Saturday that “this attempt to take voting rights away from people whose voting rights are ensured in the charter is not good government.”

He said, “It will be confusing, it will take the leadership out of the presidential nominating process which it has served very well for decades.”

But onlookers in the crowd shouted “Not true!” and “Lies!” when Fowler contended that stripping superdelegate powers would curb representation of African Americans, LGBT people and those with disabilities. And when Fowler stepped away from the lectern, he was treated to a small chorus of boos.

As in 2016, an old guard vs. new guard sentiment served as an undercurrent to the debate over superdelegate power Saturday. Karen Carter Peterson, a DNC vice chair and Louisiana state party chair, said she earned privileges as a superdelegate because of her decades of work for the party and suggested the party risked alienating tried and true Democrats.

“Are you telling me that I’m going to go to a convention, after my 30 years of blood sweat and tears for this party, that you’re going to take away my right?” she said, raising her voice. “Are you so worried about building and gaining the trust of one group at the expense of losing the trust of another? Did you hear me? Losing the trust of another.”

But appeals to present the party as less beholden to entrenched interests won over.

Pointing to young Democrats rallying around Beto O’Rourke, the Texas congressman running for U.S. Senate against Ted Cruz, Texas Democratic Party Chairman Gilberto Hinojosa said, “Those same people don’t only want to do the work. They want to have a say in the decision-making process that this party engages in … And they really believe that the current system that we have doesn’t give them the equal voice that they should have.”

“If our party does not grow and get younger,” Hinojosa said, “we’re doomed.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2NnVCbq
via IFTTT

Epic Games slams Google for sharing Fortnite Android app exploit info

Google essentially got slapped in the face when Epic Games, the developer of the super popular Fortnite, decided not to make the game available through the Play Store, but via its own app.

Google warned Epic that doing so could potentially put Android users at greater security risk, but the game developer brushed it off, insisting on going it alone for several reasons — including not having to give Google a cut in-app revenue and “embracing open platforms.”

Well, now the worst has happened. Despite having no obligation to do so, Google recently discovered an exploit within the Fortnite installer app that allowed malicious apps installed on one’s Android phone to hijack the download process so that instead of downloading the game from Epic’s server, it could download and install something entirely different, which could potentially leave the device open to attacks.

SEE ALSO: What You Should Know About ‘Fortnite’ Addiction

Here’s a quick run-down of what happened:

Google first discovered the vulnerability inside of the Fortnite installer app on Aug. 15 and immediately notified Epic. Details for the exploit weren’t public yet. Within 48 hours, Epic patched the Fortnite installer and deployed it to all Android users who installed the app. 

Here’s where things get a little ugly. Even though Epic quickly released a patch for the installer app, it asked Google not to disclose the details of the exploit until after 90 days. Not only would there be more time for users to update their installer apps, but hackers also wouldn’t be able to take advantage of the bug.

However, Google’s bug disclosure guidelines explicitly states the following:

“This bug is subject to a 90-day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse or a patch has been made broadly available, the bug report – including any comments and attachments – will become visible to the public.”

Despite Epic’s request for Google to wait the full 90 days before disclosing the exploit, Google abided by its own guidelines and shared the details.

Per Google’s Issue Tracker thread on the bug report:

“…now the patched version of Fortnite Installer has been available for 7 days we will proceed to unrestrict this issue in line with Google’s standard disclosure practices”.

Naturally, the Fortnite developer wasn’t happy about Google’s decision at all. Epic provided Mashable the following comment from CEO Tim Sweeney:

“Epic genuinely appreciated Google’s effort to perform an in-depth security audit of Fortnite immediately following our release on Android, and share the results with Epic so we could speedily issue an update to fix the flaw they discovered.

However, it was irresponsible of Google to publicly disclose the technical details of the flaw so quickly, while many installations had not yet been updated and were still vulnerable.

An Epic security engineer, at my urging, requested Google delay public disclosure for the typical 90 days to allow time for the update to be more widely installed. Google refused. You can read it all at https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/112630336

Google’s security analysis efforts are appreciated and benefit the Android platform, however a company as powerful as Google should practice more responsible disclosure timing than this, and not endanger users in the course of its counter-PR efforts against Epic’s distribution of Fortnite outside of Google Play.”

Ultimately, who’s in the right and who’s in the wrong? Honestly, neither company is. 

Google is right that Epic’s decision to not release Fortnite through the Play Store leaves the app more vulnerable. As my colleague, Mashable tech reporter Matt Binder, previously made clear: Android users need to disable certain Android security permissions in order to install Fortnite and there’s no guarantee they’ll remember to turn them back on after doing so.

Maybe Google really is butt-hurt that it’s not getting any revenue from the massively popular game (apps listed on Google Play pay a share of their sales to Google). However, because of the game’s popularity, the Android gatekeeper still has a responsibility to ensure that users are safe. Otherwise, the entire platform could end up with an even worse reputation because of third-party developers.

That said, Epic is also right because if Google truly cares about protecting its users first and foremost, it should have been more flexible on its bug disclosure deadline so as to not tip off hackers so quickly.

Following Sweeney’s statement, Google had only this to say in response to Mashable’s request for comment: “User security is our top priority, and as part of our proactive monitoring for malware we identified a vulnerability in the Fortnite installer. We immediately notified Epic Games and they fixed the issue.”

The disagreements between Google and Epic should not be overlooked. Google may wish to have nothing to do with Fortnite after being shunned by Epic Games, but their paths will inevitably cross because of the Android platform.

It’s possible Google will discover vulnerabilities in future versions of the Fortnite installerm or even other app installers from other companies that decide to follow in Epic’s footsteps and not offer their apps in the Play Store. Will Google have to monitor and perform security audits on all of those as well in order to protect Android users? Hard to say, but it’s sure gonna be interesting to watch from the sidelines.

If anyone’s laughing at this turn of events, it’s Apple. The company’s closed platform means all apps must be released through the App Store. By not allowing apps to be officially released in any other way, Apple has guarded itself against the issue Google’s now facing. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2o7p36K
via IFTTT

Democrats strip superdelegates of power in picking presidential nominee


Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks to a crowd.

While long a priority of Sen. Bernie Sanders and his supporters, the effort to reduce superdelegates’ clout has been embraced more broadly by party officials desperate to win over young voters. | Jose Luis Magana/AP Photo

Elections

Party officials voted at a meeting to strip the party insiders of much of their influence, a big win for the party’s base.

CHICAGO – Democratic Party officials voted Saturday to strip superdelegates of much of their power in the presidential nominating process, infuriating many traditionalists while handing a victory to the party’s left flank.

The measure’s overwhelming approval – met by cheers in a hotel ballroom here – concluded a tense summer meeting of the Democratic National Committee, which had labored over the issue since 2016. Superdelegates that year largely sided with Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders, enraging Sanders’ supporters.

Story Continued Below

Under the new rule, superdelegates – the members of Congress, DNC members and other top officials who made up about 15 percent of delegates that year – will not be allowed to vote on the first ballot at a contested national convention. The change could dramatically re-shape the calculous of future presidential campaigns, rendering candidates’ connections to superdelegates less significant.

“It’s a big victory for the base of the party,” said Jeff Cohen, co-founder of the online activist group RootsAction.org. “Tom Perez realizes that he’d rather lose 10 dead-enders in the DNC than a couple million activists,” he said of the party chairman.

While long a priority of Sanders and his supporters, the effort to reduce superdelegates’ clout was embraced more broadly in recent months by Democratic Party officials desperate to win over young voters skeptical of centralized party power.

Perez described the change as “historic,” and DNC organizers played a video message from former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean in which the former DNC chairman cast the measure it as an urgent response “to the will of grassroots voters.”

Many young voters, Dean said, “have lost faith in our party’s nominating process, and make no mistake, this is a perception that’s cost us at the ballot box.”

The rule change faced intense opposition from a band of longtime Democratic Party officials who said the measure would disenfranchise party insiders. Their efforts appeared to gain momentum when Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond publicly urged DNC members to oppose the overhaul.

“This vote to strip superdelegates, unpledged delegates, automatic delegates, whatever you want to call us of our voice on the first ballot is inconsistent with our charter,” former DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile said.

While awaiting results of a vote on a related issue, she strolled past media tables, saying, “I’m going to see how they’re counting the votes. I’m gonna make sure it isn’t Chicago style.”

But despite furious lobbying here, the defenders of superdelegates fell short in a procedural vote Saturday, then conceded before the overhaul was approved.

Superdelegates will now be allowed to vote on the first ballot at a national convention only if a candidate earned enough pledged delegates from state primaries and caucuses to win the nomination, anyway.

“What I witnessed was a political murder suicide,” said Bob Mulholland, a super-delegate and DNC member from California who helped organize opposition to the proposal. “What the DNC voted was to take away the votes of governors, Congress members, and take away their own votes, too. Absurd.”

Former DNC Chairman Don Fowler, a Mulholland ally, told committee members before the vote on Saturday that “this attempt to take voting rights away from people whose voting rights are ensured in the charter is not good government.”

He said, “It will be confusing, it will take the leadership out of the presidential nominating process which it has served very well for decades.”

But onlookers in the crowd shouted “Not true!” and “Lies!” when Fowler contended that stripping superdelegate powers would curb representation of African Americans, LGBT people and those with disabilities. And when Fowler stepped away from the lectern, he was treated to a small chorus of boos.

As in 2016, an old guard vs. new guard sentiment served as an undercurrent to the debate over superdelegate power Saturday. Karen Carter Peterson, a DNC vice chair and Louisiana state party chair, said she earned privileges as a superdelegate because of her decades of work for the party and suggested the party risked alienating tried and true Democrats.

“Are you telling me that I’m going to go to a convention, after my 30 years of blood sweat and tears for this party, that you’re going to take away my right?” she said, raising her voice. “Are you so worried about building and gaining the trust of one group at the expense of losing the trust of another? Did you hear me? Losing the trust of another.”

But appeals to present the party as less beholden to entrenched interests won over.

Pointing to young Democrats rallying around Beto O’Rourke, the Texas congressman running for U.S. Senate against Ted Cruz, Texas Democratic Party Chairman Gilberto Hinojosa said, “Those same people don’t only want to do the work. They want to have a say in the decision-making process that this party engages in … And they really believe that the current system that we have doesn’t give them the equal voice that they should have.”

“If our party does not grow and get younger,” Hinojosa said, “we’re doomed.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2NnVCbq
via IFTTT

Walt Disney World will start paying park workers a living wage by 2021

This Magic Kingdom will finally start paying its staff a living wage following an agreement between Walt Disney World and several unions.
This Magic Kingdom will finally start paying its staff a living wage following an agreement between Walt Disney World and several unions.

Image: Marc Rasmus/imageBROKER/REX/Shutterstock

2016%2f06%2f29%2fe7%2fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lzex.c3dabBy Rebecca Ruiz

Walt Disney World might now be a place where the workers’ dreams really do come true. After months of negotiations, the theme park and resort struck a deal with six unions to start paying employees $15 per hour by 2021, according to the Orlando Sentinel

The deal still awaits union members’ approval, but it would slowly increase the hourly minimum wage for Disney World staff from $10 to $15 by October 2021. Nationwide advocates of a $15 hourly wage often refer to that pay as a “living wage.”  

SEE ALSO: Disney hops on the straw ban(dwagon)

UNITE HERE Central Florida, a union that represents staff with Walt Disney World Food & Beverage and Housekeeping, called the raise “historic” in a Facebook post published Friday. In addition, workers will receive a previously scheduled $1,000 bonus that had been put on hold during negotiations. 

The deal will affect 38,000 employees that belong to six different unions. Though Disney World originally wanted concessions on union rights, the agreement doesn’t include those demands. 

“These Union raises will be life-changing for the women and men who welcome millions of tourists to Walt Disney World,” Matt Hollis, president of the Service Trades Council Union, said in a statement. “Now money tourists spend here in Central Florida will stay here, pumping hundreds of millions of dollars into local small businesses.” 

The Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, estimates that full-time, year-round workers who receive $15 an hour will earn $3,500 more a year. It also argues that a single, childless adult will need to earn $15 an hour by 2024 in order to “achieve a modest but adequate standard of living.” 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2MR2hOs
via IFTTT

How to use Shake to Undo on the iPhone

Image: lili sams/mashable

2018%2f05%2f22%2f78%2fimg 2415.d8e2bBy Jake Krol

Mistakes happen. But on the iPhone, they can be undone very easily.

While the Mac has Command-Z, the iPhone has its own unique way of fixing mistakes: Shake to Undo. Shaking your device to go back or undo a mistake has been around since 2009 and iOS 3 (called iPhone OS back then). And it’s one of the most overlooked features on iOS.

Rather than a system-wide button or symbol for undo on iOS, you just shake your phone. For most iPhone users it’s a forgotten feature, but writer John Gruber recently gave it newfound attention with a thoughtful analysis and the revelation that it was actually originally conceived as a joke.

In any case, it’s a useful reminder that the feature exists: When you want to undo something on your iPhone, just shake the darn thing.

SEE ALSO: Apple cleans up Exchange syncing issues with iOS 11.4.1

Shake to Undo is turned on by default. You can turn it off under Settings>General>Accessibility, but be warned: There is no other undo function for iOS. Select apps may have an undo button (usually with a counterclockwise-pointing arrow), but the line stops there. 

In iOS 11 on the iPad, Apple introduced undo and redo arrows for the keyboard but didn’t take it farther or expand it to the iPhone. Last year’s software update also brought native drag and drop, and since then I’ve been using this feature even more. 

Https%3a%2f%2fvdist.aws.mashable.com%2fcms%2f2018%2f8%2f38b2868a fbec 5751%2fthumb%2f00001

With Shake to Undo turned on, iOS users can quickly fix mistakes. Amongst my friends, I have my own unique language that swaps out understandability for laugh-ability. One particularly horrific autocorrect was when iOS changed necklace to “neck ass” — luckily, Shake to Undo was there to fix it.

While I do use Shake to Undo quite a bit, there is always the question of whether I should, as it’s just to easy to slam on the backspace key. You might be someone who gets the undo pop-up by accident on a frequent basis, and that can be a nuisance.

I am a frequent user of Shake to Undo on my iPhone, whether it be for texts, accidentally deleting an email, or moving a photo to the wrong spot. It is a universal way to fix something, something that Windows Phone didn’t have, and Android still doesn’t have. 

So if you forget, just give your iPhone or iPad a shake. It just might make you fall in love with this aging gesture.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2NkGT0X
via IFTTT

Buster Posey to Miss 6-8 Months After Surgery on Hip Injury

San Francisco Giants catcher Buster Posey talks to an umpire before the pitch against the Texas Rangers in the sixth inning of a baseball game in San Francisco, Friday, Aug 24, 2018. (AP Photo/John Hefti)

John Hefti/Associated Press

San Francisco Giants catcher Buster Posey announced Friday he’s set to undergo season-ending surgery on his hip Monday. The procedure comes with a six- to eight-month recovery timetable.

“So if things go smoothly with no hiccups, I’ll be ready to go next Opening Day,” Posey said, via Chris Haft of MLB.com.

The 31-year-old Georgia native missed three of the Giants’ past six games because of the injury.

San Francisco has struggled to remain on the fringe of playoff contention. Its 63-67 record leaves it nine games behind the Arizona Diamondbacks in the National League West and the same amount behind the Milwaukee Brewers for the NL’s second wild-card spot.

“You don’t want to say you’re out of it until you’re out of it,” Posey said. “But unfortunately, where we are, I think it makes the most sense to get this taken care of.”

The Florida State product will finish the 2018 season with a .284/.359/.382 triple-slash line and five home runs across 105 appearances.

Nick Hundley will get a lion’s share of the starts behind the dish for the Giants moving forward.

Posey, who’s resume includes three World Series titles, the 2012 NL MVP Award and six All-Star Game selections, will be in a race against time to get ready for the 2019 campaign.

If he’s ready by the beginning of the timeline, he’d miss only a small portion of spring training, but if it takes the full recovery period, he’d miss the first month of the regular season.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2P5f1yp
via IFTTT

Sia met Donald Trump on ‘SNL,’ and her story comes with a crappy twist

Don't make Sia feel uncomfortable or she'll get crazy diarrhea.
Don’t make Sia feel uncomfortable or she’ll get crazy diarrhea.

Image: Bryan Steffy/Getty Images

2017%2f10%2f24%2f21%2fraymondwong3profile.34d72By Raymond Wong

Way back in 2015, before he was firing everyone from his golden toilet in the White House, Donald Trump just wanted a photo with Sia.

In a Rolling Stone profile published Friday, the singer recalled how Trump politely took it in stride when she declined to take a photo together after they both appeared on Saturday Night Live. But the funniest part? Sia said she had “crazy diarrhea” after the encounter. 

SEE ALSO: Why Trump’s EPA wants to kill the nation’s most ambitious climate change plan

Sia was walking back to her dressing room when Trump, who was hosting that night’s SNL, spotted her and asked for a photo together.

“We’ve got to get a photo!” Sia recalled Trump saying. His daughter Ivanka was reportedly with the future president and ready to snap a pic, but Sia refused his request. 

The singer said she worried about the potential outrage that would come if she was seen with Trump. “Actually, do you mind if we don’t? I have a lot of queer and Mexican fans, and I don’t want them to think that I support your views,” she recalled telling Trump.

Seemingly not offended, Trump brushed it off and didn’t appear angry or upset. “Oh, no problem. Then don’t,” he said in Sia’s account.

“It was as if he viewed me as protecting my brand,” she added. That’s when this story’s twist happened.

“I was like, ‘Thank you so much,’” Sia told Rolling Stone, before adding, “and then I went into my dressing room and had crazy diarrhea.”

While you might be LOLing at the meeting, as the Huffington Post’s follow-up report notes, it’s not the only time the Australian pop star ever took a serious dump after being in stressful situation.

In December 2017, she tweeted to her fans how she suffered from similar symptoms after bad weather conditions screwed up a flight, and then a blown tire during a 13-hour drive “has given me crazy diarrhea.”

I may be five minutes late. We couldn’t catch a plane due to weather, so drove thirteen hours then blew a tire which has given me crazy diarrhea. Bear with me guys. I love you.

— sia (@Sia) December 2, 2017

The question now is, will Trump fire back? Shade her on Twitter? We all know how easily irritated the 45th President of the United States gets whenever anyone says anything remotely bad about him.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2o77SCi
via IFTTT

One year since Myanmar army crackdown, Rohingya seek justice

Rohingya refugees have held protests in Bangladesh to mark one year since Myanmar’s army launched a brutal crackdown of the mainly-Muslim minority, forcing hundreds of thousands to flee across the border. 

More than 15,000 gathered on Saturday at the Kutupalong refugee camp in Bangladesh’s Cox’s Bazar to demand justice for what they called “genocide” committed by Myanmar’s forces.

On August 25, 2017, Myanmar launched a military offensive – termed by the UN as a textbook example of ethnic cleansing – after a Rohingya armed group carried out attacks on border security forces.

The ensuing violent crackdown forced more than 700,000 Rohingya to flee Rakhine state for neighbouring Bangladesh, living in squalid conditions in overcrowded camps. 

“The refugees had to get special permission from the Bangladeshi authorities in order to stage these demonstrations,” said Al Jazeera’s Mohammed Jamjoom, reporting from Cox’s Bazar, which has become home to the world’s largest refugee settlement.  

“We saw men, women, young and old, demanding their rights, demanding justice, pleading to the international community to do more to help them, but also saying that they want to make sure that the perpetrators of this genocide – the Myanmar army – need to be held to account and brought to justice by the International Criminal Court,” he added. 

WATCH: Rohingya demand justice a year after fleeing Myanmar (2:46)

Returning home

Rohingya, one of the most persecuted communities in the world, have been denied citizenship and basic human rights by Myanmar’s authorities since 1982.

Bangladesh signed a deal with Myanmar last year to allow the refugees to return, but the repatriation process has been stalled.

But little is know about the deal, and many of the Rohingya say they are afraid of returning only to be forcibly displaced again in the future.

Among their demands are for Myanmar to grant them citizenship, greater inclusivity in government services such as education and workforce, the ensuring of safety and security, as well as reparations for all that they have lost.

“We want to go back home,” said Mohammad Elias, member of the Arakan Rohingya Society for Peace and Human Rights (ARSPH).

“We want to be citizens of our country. We want to live there with safety and security.”

Elias, who fled Rakhine state in August 2017 with his family, believes there is absolutely no excuse for the Rohingya not to be recognised as citizens of Myanmar.

“Our mothers and fathers are from Myanmar,” he told Al Jazeera.

“We were also born there but still they made us suffer. They didn’t let us get an education. They didn’t even let us pray in the mosque.”

Children’s crisis 

The UN’s refugee agency, UNHCR, estimates that children make up 55 percent of the total Rohingya refugee population in Bangladesh.

A family-counting exercise conducted in December 2017 by UNHCR found more than 5,500 families being led by children under 18.

More than half a million Rohingya refugee children are being denied the chance of a proper education, UNICEF said in a report marking one year since the start of the latest influx of Rohingya into Bangladesh.

Children make up 55 percent of the Rohingya refugee population, UNHCR estimates [Sorin Furcoi/Al Jazeera] 

Many arrived at the camps unaccompanied – either separated from their families or orphaned. 

“From the outset, this has truly been a children’s crisis,” said Daphnee Cook, a representative for the UK-based non-profit Save the Children. 

“Many children have seen their parents killed in front of them, they’ve had to endure long, hard journeys where they have arrived here with basically no food and then they’ve had to survive now in these camps for about a year now,” she told Al Jazeera in an interview at Cox’s Bazar.

“It’s horrible,” she added. “It’s not a place where children should be living.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2P6bXSD
via IFTTT

ISIL holding 27 Syrians, including children, hostage: HRW

ISIL has taken a group of at least 27 people hostage in the sparsely populated Sweida desert in southern Syria, according to Human Rights Watch (HRW).

Among those kidnapped, who are mostly of members of the minority Druze community, are at least 16 children aged between seven and 15, the human rights group said on Saturday, citing witnesses and relatives.

Local residents told HRW that ISIL (also known as ISIS) is planning to use the hostages as leverage in negotiations with the Syrian government and Russia, one of Syria’s closest allies.

“For a month now, families of the kidnapped Sweida have been calling for the release of their loved ones,” Lama Fakih, HRW’s deputy Middle East director, said in a statement

“Civilian lives should not be used as bargaining chips, and ISIS should release all the hostages immediately.”

The children were taken during attacks in late July on several villages in the eastern parts of Sweida, HRW said.

Several witnesses told the human rights group that 57 people were killed in the attack, after which 27 were taken by members of ISIL.

Following the attacks, the armed group released videos showing kidnapped women, with one stating that they would be killed if the Syrian government did not stop its assault on Yarmouk, a besieged Palestinian refugee camp held by ISIL in the south of Damascus.

In the weeks following the attacks, local media reported the beheading of 19-year-old Muhannad Abu Ammar at the hands of his ISIL kidnappers.

A woman named Zaya, also taken hostage by ISIL, died of unknown causes several days later.

Sweida province has largely been spared most of the violence that Syrian cities have witnessed in the years since the conflict started in 2011. 

In less than a month, Syrian government forces, backed by Russian air power, have been able to seize control of most of southwestern Deraa province, including the provincial capital of the same name.

Alongside the military offensive, the government has also struck “reconciliation” deals, essentially a negotiated capitulation of a number of villages that have been in rebel hands for years, to restore government control there.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Mu3hJ7
via IFTTT