Xi, Putin meet as Russia kicks off biggest ever war games

Russia launched its largest war games since the Cold War on Tuesday with hundreds of thousands of troops, including Chinese soldiers taking part for the first time, in eastern Siberia.

The massive military manoeuvres come as tensions between the West and Russia have intensified to the highest level since the days of the Soviet Union. The drills have been condemned by NATO as a rehearsal for a “large-scale conflict”.

Dubbed Vostok-2018, the war games involve more than 300,000 troops, 36,000 tanks, 1,000 aircraft and 80 warships and support vessels, according to Russia’s defence ministry.

It broadcast images of military trucks being transported on trains, columns of tanks, armoured vehicles and naval vessels on the move, and combat helicopters and fighter aircraft taking off. 

Watched attentively 

The main aim was to check the military’s readiness to move troops large distances, to test how closely infantry and naval forces cooperated, and to perfect command and control procedures, the ministry said. Later stages will involve rehearsals of both defensive and offensive scenarios.

Russia said 24 helicopters and six jets belonging to the Chinese air force had moved to Russian air bases for the exercise.

Beijing has said 3,200 members of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will join in the operations, about 5,000km east of Moscow.

NATO has said it will monitor the exercise closely as will the United States, which has a strong military presence in the Asia-Pacific region. It is likely to be watched attentively by Japan and North and South Korea.

‘Sends a message’

The start of Vostok-2018 coincided with a meeting between Russia‘s President Vladimir Putin who met his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok.

Putin said Moscow has a “trusting relationship” with Beijing “in politics, security and defence”, while Xi said both countries would continue to “make joint efforts to … push the China-Russia relationship up to a new height”.

The three-day meeting in Vladivostok brings together the leaders of Russia, China, Japan and South Korea, as well 5,000 delegates from 60 countries.

It is the two leaders’ third meeting and comes amid an escalating US-China trade war and US-led sanctions against Russia over the conflict in Ukraine.

The Vostok drills involve more than 300,000 troops [Russian defence ministry via AP]

Fyodor Lukyanov, editor of Russia in Global Affairs, said the coming together of Moscow and Beijing was a direct response to moves by the United States.

“Clearly we can see a growing rapprochement between Russia and China because of the very assertive line against both countries by the United States. And in this regard we can say that Donald Trump is the major patron of the Russian-Chinese closer relationship,” said Lukyanov.

Dmitri Trenin, a former Russian army colonel and director of the Carnegie Moscow Center think-tank, agreed.

“With its Vostok 2018 exercise Russia sends a message that it regards the US as a potential enemy and China as a potential ally,” wrote Trenin.

Wednesday will see war games featuring anti-aircraft technology, while the main event will be on Thursday.

The Russian army compared the show of force to the USSR’s 1981 war games that saw between 100,000 and 150,000 Warsaw Pact soldiers take part in Zapad-81 – the largest military exercises of the Soviet era.

But Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu noted these exercises were far larger.

“Imagine 36,000 military vehicles moving at the same time: tanks, armoured personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles – and all of this, of course, in conditions as close to a combat situation as possible,” Shoigu said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2N8M3S1
via IFTTT

Camera catches man perfectly air drumming to Rush during football game

By Marcus Gilmer

Baltimore Ravens fans had plenty to feel good about this weekend as the team steamrolled the Buffalo Bills 47-3 in their NFL season opener. And one fan was really feeling it.

Despite the driving rains, a  member of the Ravens’ marching band, the Marching Ravens, was feeling good enough to celebrate by perfectly air drumming along to Rush’s prog rock classic “Tom Sawyer” during a break in play. 

There’s no other way around it: his air drumming is immaculate. Only the best for one of two NFL marching bands.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2x2G6uR
via IFTTT

Derek Carr Spoils Jon Gruden’s Impressive Coaching Return

OAKLAND, CA - SEPTEMBER 10:  Derek Carr #4 of the Oakland Raiders speaks with head coach Jon Gruden during their NFL game against the Los Angeles Rams at Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum on September 10, 2018 in Oakland, California.  (Photo by Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)

Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images

Maybe, just maybe, Jon Gruden still knows what he’s doing. Instead, a mad genius seemed to emerge during his first game as a head coach since the 2008 campaign, only to be ruined by the play of quarterback Derek Carr. 

The Oakland Raiders are far from perfect. Monday’s 33-13 loss to the Los Angeles Rams at Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum said as much. But Gruden’s squad proved to be far more competitive than expected and didn’t look like a complete disaster. 

It’s not a high bar, one earned after months of mystifying decisions. 

Gruden is the personification of the NFL‘s counterculture after signing a 10-year, $100 million contract to return to the Raiders organization.

At his NFL Scouting Combine press conference, the coach, who left the sidelines nine years earlier to join the Monday Night Football booth, joked about “trying to throw the game back to 1998″ when asked about analytics usage, per the Las Vegas Review-Journal‘s Michael Gehlken

Oakland’s approach to free agency turned the coach’s comments into something more than a joking matter as the franchise undertook a George Allen-esque retooling, making its roster the league’s oldest, according to the Philly Voice’s Jimmy Kempski

These moves became appetizers for the entree: trading the 2016 NFL Defensive Player of the Year, Khalil Mack, to the Chicago Bears. Oakland’s return on the deal is immaterial because it moved an elite performer in his prime at a premium position just nine days before the start of the regular season. 

Oakland Raiders head coach Jon Gruden

Oakland Raiders head coach Jon GrudenBen Margot/Associated Press

Gruden serves as the organization’s shot-caller, and he didn’t help matters when he stated during an ESPN interview aired Monday, “Obviously, Khalil Mack didn’t want to play here.”

All of this built over weeks and pointed toward a coach who lost touch with the modern game. 

Yet, the Raiders came prepared to face one of the NFL’s best teams to open the season. Eventually, the Rams’ talent overwhelmed them, but not without a fight. 

During the first half, Oakland looked like a completely different team from the squad that finished 5-11 a year ago. 

Gruden’s play-calling doesn’t seem to have faded, either. The coach allowed his talented offensive line to take over by implementing a physical, downhill rushing attack that further accentuated Marshawn Lynch, and Beast Mode took over to score the game’s initial touchdown with a Juggernaut-like determination: 

NFL @NFL

HOW?!

BEASTMODE carries the WHOLE defense into the end zone! #LARvsOAK #RaiderNation https://t.co/KF12UVZ9jQ

The Raiders offensive line went toe-to-toe with the Rams defensive front and didn’t blink despite staring at Aaron Donald, Ndamukong Suh and Michael Brockers. Los Angeles managed one sack, and Donald didn’t even register a quarterback hit. 

The game plan worked for the first 30 minutes. Gruden utilized tempo, spread looks and misdirection to complement his traditional West Coast passing attack. Getting the ball into the hands of playmakers served as the primary goal.

In one area, the Raiders were wildly successful. Tight end Jared Cook—one of 15 players on the roster at least 30 years old—set or tied career highs with nine receptions for 180 yards. Cook proved to be too much for the Rams safeties and linebackers to handle. 

Also, the early portions of the game saw Carr get the ball out of his hand quickly and decisively. 

Oakland led 13-10 going into the third quarter before everything started to crumble. The deficiencies still found in the Raiders roster began to show. 

 

Bruce Irvin and Co. generated one sack and another quarterback hit. That’s it. Jared Goff had all night to throw, and the only sack came from the quarterback drifting backward into Irvin after holding the ball too long. The rookie triumvirate of Maurice Hurst, P.J. Hall and Arden Key made little to no impact. The lack of pass rush will likely haunt the Raiders throughout the season. 

Even so, Carr’s disappointing performance is the most disheartening aspect of the loss. Raiders owner Mark Davis made Carr a $125 million quarterback in the 2017 offseason, and his play didn’t come close to reaching his worth. 

Oakland Raiders quarterback Derek Carr

Oakland Raiders quarterback Derek CarrThearon W. Henderson/Getty Images

All three of Carr’s interceptions can be placed directly at the quarterback’s feet. He underthrew Cook near the end zone, and safety John Johnson came down with the ball.

In the second half, Donald collapsed the pocket, Carr threw a lollipop off his back foot with no receiver in sight and linebacker Cory Littleton easily intercepted the pass. Finally, the quarterback made the right read and tried to lead his tight end only to throw the ball into Marcus Peters’ waiting arms, which turned into a pick-six

Carr managed 303 passing yards yet barely acknowledged his weapons at wide receiver. Amari Cooper, Jordy Nelson and Seth Roberts combined to make five catches for 43 yards. 

“We called their numbers,” Gruden said after the game, per the San Jose Mercury NewsMatt Schneidman. “We tried.”

The 55-year-old coach is famously tough on his starting quarterback, and Carr described the challenges, or lack thereof, working with his new head coach in July on the Jim Rome Show

“We are so similar. It’s so funny. When he was going to be a coach, the No. 1 question was like, ‘How are you guys going to get along?’ And both of us would just sit there and laugh together. … We love football. We want to win. We love to compete. We love to demand from one another. I demand from him, he demands from me. I’m in his ear every day, ‘What do you have for me today?’ ‘What are you teaching me today?’ And he’s in there pushing me. I can complete in practice—go 30 for 31, we’ll spend an hour talking about that one I missed and how it can be the difference in a game. And that’s exactly how I want it.”

The two are going to have plenty to talk about this week since Carr’s decision-making and overall performance weren’t good enough. 

“Losses with Coach Gruden feel a little bit different than they’ve ever felt before,” Carr said, per Schneidman

Does this mean the Raiders would have won if their quarterback didn’t make as many mental mistakes? Probably not.

However, solid play at the game’s most important position, a roster that can compete and a coach embracing modern offensive elements will make the Raiders a tough out against any opponent. They showed exactly that for two quarters Monday night. 

The Rams are a better team right now. That’s OK, since the Raiders don’t seem to be hopelessly lost with Gruden leading the way. 

Brent Sobleski covers the NFL for Bleacher Report. Follow him on Twitter: @brentsobleski.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2N4Rkd6
via IFTTT

Maisie Williams shares the moment she knew just how big ‘Game of Thrones’ actually was

Game of Thrones is a record breaking, successful show, in terms of viewership and certainly in terms of budget. But the show’s popularity wasn’t always that obvious — not even to the cast.  

SEE ALSO: HBO just aired first ‘Game of Thrones’ Season 8 footage, featuring an unhappy Sansa

Game of Thrones actor Maisie Williams just shared an interview with the podcast The Disruptive Entrepreneur, that it wasn’t until the third season of the show she realised just how huge Game of Thrones actually was. 

The specific moment that made the success of Game of Thrones dawn on her was when she was attending the Season Three premiere in 2013 when she was 15 years old. 

“I remember getting out of the car with my mum and there were just like crowds and crowds of people behind barriers and they were all screaming and they all knew who I was,” Williams said. “It was that moment that I was like ‘oh, this is pretty big.’”

“I looked at my mum and said: ‘My life is never going to be the same again,’” she added.

Williams said she felt that sort of popularity came with a great responsibility not to “ruin” it, which was “terrifying.” 

In the interview she also revealed that her initial contract with the show, which she signed when she was 12, was for six seasons, and not the eight that the show will have in total.

“At the beginning I would have payed them for me to be in it, I was so excited,” she joked. 

At this point, wouldn’t we all pay good money to be in Game of Thrones? 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2oZJxPq
via IFTTT

Redefining what it means to be a model

We meet Halima Aden, Mari Malek, Grace Mahary and Jillian Mercado to find out how fashion and activism can meet.

For designers, models, and fashionistas alike, New York Fashion Week is the pinnacle of the season. It comes with the excitement of seeing new faces strut down the catwalk and witnessing the debut collections of emerging designers.

But, this year, there is substantial buzz beyond the runway, thanks in part to Mari Malek, Grace Mahary, Halima Aden and Jillian Mercado. These three women are redefining what it means to be a fashion model. Malek, Mahary, Aden and Mercado are using their personal brands to bring attention to causes they care passionately about. Particularly, access to education, renewable energy, and disability rights. 

Their ability to move between the modeling and activism worlds is partly due to a shift in the fashion community. Now, more than ever, there is an emphasis on not only creating goods, but doing good. But is this awakening a moment or a movement? Just a trend? We pose that question to Malek, Mahary, Aden and Mercado when they join The Stream to discuss fashion activism. 

On this episode of The Stream, we speak with:​
Grace Mahary @GraceMahary



Fashion model

projecttsehigh.com
Mari Malek @DJStiletto



Fashion model and activist

marimalek.com
Jillian Mercado @jilly_peppa



Fashion model and activist

manufactured1987.com
Halima Aden @Kinglimaa



Model

Read more: 
Is Colin Kaepernick’s Nike deal activism – or just capitalism? – The Guardian 



Does fashion activism actually work? – Fashionista 

What do you think? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

MUST-SEE PROGRAMMES

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2CJtEX2
via IFTTT

Apple’s iPhone XS will be historic, but not for the reason you think

Someone once described the iPhone as a window into our digital lives. Apple’s job, in designing it, is to make that window as large and transparent as possible — preferably to the point where you don’t even know it’s there. The device, in other words, should simply get out of the way.

The hardware does this in numerous ways. To name just a few: A fast processor means web pages and apps launch faster, reliable wireless connections mean your AirPods “just work” when you put them in your ears, and the sophisticated touchscreen lets you use simple, natural gestures (like swiping down on a photo to “close” it) to manipulate content.

SEE ALSO: What to expect from Apple’s iPhone XS event on Sept. 12

But the most direct, obvious way of improving the so-called window is to make it bigger. That’s exactly what the iPhone X, with its edge-to-edge display, does. Now Apple is poised to go all-in on that design: The company is widely predicted to unveil three different iPhones, at three different prices, with edge-to-edge screens at its event on Wednesday, spreading design to even more of its customers.

Certainly, the window isn’t yet perfect. (Hello, notch.) But based on Apple’s earnings reports, it’s clear the iPhone X has been a success; even though the company is selling fewer iPhones, it’s generating significantly more revenue from those sales. The iPhone X, which infamously starts at $999, has clearly resonated with customers, validating Apple’s design choices to push the screen outward and discard the home button. Say what you will about the price and the notch — the iPhone X is a better “window” than the previous design.

Cracks in the window

I find it ironic that, just as Apple is coming very close to perfecting that window, the public is in the midst of a larger re-examination of our relationship with technology. The social networks we came to rely on to connect us turned out to be equally adept at dividing and manipulating us. There’s a renewed focus on privacy, which always seems to be in short supply in the digital realm. And there’s been so much scrutiny on the habits our devices have ingrained in us that the companies designing them have been forced to offer tools to mitigate their use.

This isn’t a coincidence. I don’t mean to imply a direct correlation — it’s certainly not Apple’s or the iPhone’s fault that many people are becoming negatively affected by technology — but the iPhone X is the most tangible example of technology’s tendency (in fact its entire justification) to remove friction. Only now has so much friction been removed that the public at large is starting to question the consequences, which are often not good.

Notifications hit us at all times of the day, wrecking our attention spans. Social networks are so habit-forming that they encourage “zombie scrolling,” as anyone who’s walked into a crowded elevator knows. Then there’s the simple psychological toll it takes on anyone to constantly navigate cyberbullying, FOMO, outrage mobs, and just the empty validation-through-likes lifestyle of social networks, all of which has led to well-meaning public exhortations to purge Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram from our phones, if not our lives.

“This is the natural cycle of an sufficiently impactful technology,” says author Nir Eyal, who studies the habits that personal technology creates, “We adopt it wholesale, everybody loves it and then we figure out, wait a minute, there’s some downsides. This is the exact same story that occurred during the Industrial Revolution. There’s always a reckoning with a technology this profound.”

Phones and apps alone didn’t get us here. By letting Alexa, Google Assistant, and Siri into our homes, we’ve begun to question just how much of ourselves we want to reveal to these tech companies. While the convenience they offer is certainly real, the personal data needed to make some experiences seamless is now starkly apparent.

There appears to be some kind of principle at work here akin to robotics’ uncanny valley: As the smartphone experience gets more and more frictionless — the closer we get to that perfect digital window — the stronger the instinct to recoil from that technology.

The first iPhone designed to be used less

Apple and its peers are certainly aware of the problem, and that’s why they’re offering tools like Screen Time, the name for Apple’s suite of tools in iOS 12 to give users insights into how they’re using their iPhones. The feature can show a user how much time they spend in any particular app as well as how many times a day they unlock their phone, which, in the case of the iPhone X and its progeny, is as easy as looking at the device.

“It’s usually hard to sell people something that hurts them,” Eyal says. “This backlash — people saying, ‘I’m using my device too much, I don’t like what it’s doing to me and my enjoyment of life’ — companies have an economic and moral imperative to respond.”

There’s reason to believe Screen Time isn’t just lip service to a serious concern. Apple’s business model isn’t dependent on how much time you spend with its devices; whether you unlock your iPhone once a minute or once a week, Apple made its money when you bought it. Sure, Apple wants to fuel its burgeoning services business as well, but most of its services (like Apple Music) have straightforward subscription models — as opposed to the devil’s bargain of social media where services are cost-free in exchange for data.

This is why Apple stands the best chance of weathering the current tech backlash. Not only do its customers connect with its products in a physical, intimate way, but it’s also the least interested in keeping you constantly engaged with them. If Screen Time makes you use the device less, but generally improves your experience, the company is totally fine with that.

“With iOS 12 with Screen Time, they’re building into these devices a way for you to use the devices less,” explains Eyal. “You might think that doesn’t make any sense, but it does. It’s like seat belts. It wasn’t regulation that first put seat belts in cars — it was consumer demand. And the cars that had seat belts outsold the cars that didn’t have seat belts.”

Apple has spent the last decade polishing its technological window to near perfection, in turn making the digital world on the other side even more attractive. For all the incredible experiences enabled by that progress, the iPhones revealed on Sept. 12 will be the first ones to acknowledge an obvious truth: Sometimes you just want to pull the shade down.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2wXLgZV
via IFTTT

Vet sends owner the most adorable photo of very good dog after his surgery

2017%2f09%2f12%2fd7%2fsambwBy Sam Haysom

Everyone, at some point, has tried to imagine what dogs would say if they could talk.

Maybe one day some beautiful brainiac will invent a piece of technology that makes that distant dream a reality, but in the meantime all we have are our imaginations.

SEE ALSO: This dog’s ear contains another dog and it’s sort of mind-blowing

Well, that and whiteboards:

According to Reddit user u/Emakten, who shared the photo in r/aww on Monday night, Rocco is a nine month-old Yellow Lab/Australian Shepherd cross. He’d been to see the vet to get chipped and neutered.

With 72,000 upvotes in less than 10 hours, Rocco is clearly as much of a popular boy as he is a very good boy.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2O6yUoF
via IFTTT

Redefining what it means to be a model

MUST-SEE PROGRAMMES

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2x1IR0a
via IFTTT

Please enjoy this Shiba Inu dog who can casually speak Japanese

2016%2f09%2f16%2fe7%2fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lzex.0f9e7By Johnny Lieu

When it comes languages, Japanese stands out as one of the more difficult to learn.

It’s not such a problem for Beni the Shiba Inu, who can apparently say the words taberu — that’s “to eat” in Japanese, then hanbagu, which translates to “hamburger steaks.”

SEE ALSO: This dog’s ear contains another dog and it’s sort of mind-blowing

Beni is the star pet of Twitter user @a_t_k123, who SoraNews24 notes has been part of their household for just a little over a year now. 

Anyway, he can probably speak better Japanese than the rest of us rookies, as seen in this video demonstrating his incredible language skills.

Aside from his speaking abilities, Beni is just an all-round great dog. Like when he winks. 

Or pulls off a school uniform.

Or when he’s afraid of the water.

And especially when he has his face smushed.

We love you, Beni.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2x2o7Vd
via IFTTT

Is Pinochet’s shadow over Chile beginning to recede?

The Memory and Human Rights Museum in Santiago, Chile’s capital, was an initiative of former president and newly-appointed UN human rights chief Michelle Bachelet – who herself was a victim of torture under Augusto Pinochet’s rule.

It opened in 2010 and became part of an ongoing debate over the legacy of Chile’s former leader.

Mauricio Rojas, the newly appointed culture minister, was forced to resign after four days in office over comments he had made about the museum in a 2015 book. He had accused the institution of manipulating history and attempting to shock visitors to “prevent them from reasoning”.

The museum features instruments of torture and victim’s testimonies alongside historical documents and drawings by children whose parents were arrested under Pinochet’s rule.

“It’s a shameless and inaccurate use of a national tragedy that touched so many [Chileans] directly,” he said. 

Rojas – who fled Chile following the US-backed coup d’etat that brought Pinochet to power – later said the comments did not reflect his current view and that he had not intended to diminish or justify the “systematic and grave” human rights violations that took place.

On September 11, 1973, Pinochet seized power by overthrowing the democratically-elected Marxist President Salvador Allende, and went on to rule for the next 17 years.

He stepped down in 1990, following a referendum on extending his term.

Under his rule, the Latin American country flourished economically, but the opposition was repressed and thousands of people were executed, disappeared and tortured by state forces.

While Pinochet is vilified as a ruthless dictator on the international stage, the view in his homeland has always been more nuanced, with some still viewing his rule as a positive force.

As the country marks the 45th anniversary of the coup on Tuesday, is Pinochet’s shadow, which has loomed large for decades, beginning to recede?

Portraits of some of the thousands who were murdered, tortured and disappeared [Victor Ruiz Caballero/Reuters]

“There’s a general awareness in Chile that during the dictatorship years, fundamental human rights were violated in a systematic and cruel manner,” said Francisco Javier Estevez, the director of the Museum.

“[Rojas’ comments] generated a very large reaction. The political and cultural worlds said, ‘No, we’re going to defend this museum because it tells the truth and, if we want to contribute to a more just society, we are going to have to get together behind the principles of truth and justice so that [human rights abuses] never happen again’,” he told Al Jazeera.

Despite survivor testimonies, convictions and state acknowledgement, some so-called “negacionistas” – or deniers – believe that the Pinochet leadership was innocent.

“Those who deny that human rights violations were committed [or] try to justify them are a powerful minority,” said Estevez. “They consider the human rights violations to have been inevitable”.

According to an expert on human rights developments in Chile who requested anonymity, Pinochet was able to tailor his legacy by granting amnesty to himself and other figures as one of his final acts before leaving office.

He remained in the public eye, first in his role as head of the military, which he held until 1998, and then as a self-styled “senator for life”.

“The amnesty legislation fully protected Pinochet. It was a bullet-proof protection from any serious attempts to investigate him for atrocities,” he told Al Jazeera.

“Nobody was taking any local investigation against Pinochet seriously, he was a senator for life, he had immunity, so he felt comfortable.”

study published three years ago running from 1987 to 2015 found that almost one in five Chileans still held a positive view of Pinochet.

Supporters of Sebastian Pinera hold a bust of Pinochet aloft following the news of Pinera’s election victory in December 2017 [Pablo Sanhueza/Reuters]

The survey found the Pinochet period was viewed less positively when the right returned to power under Sebastian Pinera in 2010.

The study suggested it was concerns over this return, rather than human rights arguments, that soured views.

In December 2017, Pinera won the presidency once more and appointed two former vocal supporters of Pinochet to his cabinet.

Interior Minister Andres Chadwick and Justice Minister Hernan Larrain had defended the Colonia Dignidad enclave, where a cult-like community operated, led by fugitive former Nazi and paedophile Paul Shafer.

It later emerged that state security officials from the secret police had tortured and murdered prisoners there. 

Chadwick, Larrain and Pinera opposed Pinochet’s arrest and detention in London in 1998. They say their views have now changed.

There are concerns that Pinera won’t pursue convictions for human rights abuses under Pinochet as fervently as Bachelet.

Chile still operates under a 1980 constitution, which was approved in a controversial plebiscite during the Pinochet years. It prevents immediate reelection, so presidents cannot serve consecutive terms.

Over the past 13 years, Chile’s top seat has transferred from Bachelet to Pinera, back to Bachelet and then again to Pinera, creating a certain amount of policy overlap.

For the families, there is no reconciliation.

Alicia Juica Rocco, AFDD

In 2011, during his first term in office, Pinera completed a process started during Bachelet’s first term, raising the number of victims officially recognised by the state to 40,018.

The acknowledgement of these 9,800 additional victims brought the total amount of compensation paid annually by the government to around $123m.

Those officially recognised as survivors of rights abuses receive financial compensation, along with health, housing and education benefits. Families of those the state accepts were killed or “disappeared” also receive compensation.

For many relatives, compensation is not enough.

Alicia Juicia Rocco’s father, Mario Juica Vega, has not been seen since he was arrested in August 1976. 

The 55-year-old, who was 13 when her father was taken, joined the Group of Relatives of the Disappeared and Detained (AFDD) as soon as she was old enough to go out alone.

“The AFDD is a second home. It’s a group of my equals where I can talk about the shame and rage and hopelessness that I feel,” Juica Rocco tells Al Jazeera.

Protests are expected to take place in Santiago on Tuesday, calling on the military to release information on the whereabouts of the remains of those murdered and “disappeared”.

“The process of identifying victims is ongoing but the main work there is done. What we don’t have is information about what happened to the remains of these victims,” said Estevez, director of the Museum. “This information has been denied us”.

The military initially claimed that no such documentation exists, and now maintains these details were recorded, but the paperwork has been destroyed.

The 2015 study found little evidence of a “sincere reconciliation”, with 76 percent saying they had not forgotten the divisions of the past.

“If we take steps forward with more truth and less impunity, then yes, the possible and inevitable consequence is reconciliation,” said Estevez. “But without justice, without truth, a reconciliation with impunity – this is impossible”.  

“For the families, there is no reconciliation,” said Juica Rocco.

“No one can excuse [the disappearance of] a father or son because we are their blood and we have suffered the consequence of their absence in body and soul”.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2NAJCqo
via IFTTT