Hirono: Kavanaugh Is Fudging the Truth

Subscribe to Off Message on Apple Podcasts here. | Subscribe via Stitcher here.

Mazie Hirono thinks Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is not telling the truth about the sexual assault he allegedly committed as a teenager. She thinks he wasn’t telling the truth to the Judiciary Committee when he claimed not to remember any sexual misconduct by a judge he clerked for who was forced to resign last year after allegations from more than a dozen women.

Story Continued Below

And the Hawaii senator says that if she gets to question Kavanaugh in another hearing, she’s going to tell him that the revelations over the weekend—when Christine Blasey Ford came forward to accuse Kavanaugh of attempting to rape her at a high-school party in the early ‘80s—now make her doubt what the nominee said under oath two weeks ago even more.

“It somewhat stretches credulity, let’s put it that way,” said Hirono in an interview for the latest episode of POLITICO’s Off Message podcast. “I think he didn’t want to lie about it, so one way you get through that is saying, ‘I don’t remember.’”

If Kavanaugh’s nomination fizzles and President Donald Trump has to name a replacement, Hirono says he better find someone whom she considers less of a conservative ideologue, or else prepare for Senate Democrats—especially if they win a majority in November’s elections—to keep the court seat vacant until after the 2020 election.

“I think we’ve had those kinds of vacancies before, and we certainly had over a one-year vacancy with Merrick Garland,” said Hirono. “So the world does not come to an end because we don’t fill all of the nominees.”

Hirono is short. She is quiet. She’s not much of a tweeter. She’s not running for president. She doesn’t have an outsize personality in a chamber bursting with them—her hobbies include making her own paper and folding origami cranes. She does pottery, too, but says she lacks the patience to use a wheel.

Yet the unassuming senator has become Democrats’ firmest pillar of resistance on judicial nominations, refusing to vote for cloture for any Trump nominee, and asking every man who appears before her at a committee hearing if he’s engaged in physical or verbal sexual assault as a legal adult. Nominees “can lie,” Hirono said, explaining why she’s made that her standard question, “but they better hope that nobody that they did this to will come forward.”

“Legal adult” is the phrase Hirono used when she asked Kavanaugh the question two weeks ago. She says her wording was carefully chosen because juvenile records often remain sealed. And though Kavanaugh answered no, and the incident is alleged to have happened when he was 17, she’s not ready to write it off.

“Seventeen is not exactly a baby, either. These are serious allegations. She has a very credible story. I believe her. And now we have to do more than say, ‘Well, look at the timing!’ and ‘Well, it’s all politically motivated!’” Hirono said. “This has to be taken seriously.”

Seriously, to Hirono, means another hearing on top of the one now scheduled for Monday, when Kavanaugh and Ford are both expected to testify. In a letter put together to rebut the allegations, 65 women who knew Kavanaugh when he was in high school vouched for his character. “I think we probably need to question 65 people, ‘How well did they know him?’” Hirono said.

President Trump, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Texas Sen. John Cornyn and others who doubt the Kavanaugh allegation and complain about its timing are revealing more about their own “lack of understanding of how difficult it is to come forward with a story like this,”said Hirono.

“She combines a sense of dignity with a sense of badassery,” said Brian Fallon, executive director of We Demand Justice, the outside group formed earlier this year to buttress Democrats on judicial nominations. “At a time when other Democrats have not shown any sense of urgency, she has consistently understood the stakes of what Trump’s takeover the courts will mean.”

On the wall in the center of her office in the Hart Building, Hirono keeps her naturalization certificate (she also points out proudly a printed-out picture of her sitting with Garland two years ago when he came in for the meetings Democrats held in a futile effort to pressure Republicans). She is the only immigrant in the Senate, having left Japan as a child to get away from a father who gambled away their money and beat her mother. She arrived in Hawaii without knowing English and having made the trek in a ship’s steerage. She is the only senator to grow up poor enough to remember what it’s like not to know where the next meal is coming from. She was the first Asian-American woman in the Senate, and is the only Buddhist ever to serve in the chamber.

She says she tells her staff that everything she does now, at 70, sitting on the Senate floor, is because of who she was at 8, arriving on that boat.

“There are people getting screwed in our country every single second, minute, hour of the day. And if by our work, we can decrease that number, we’ll make a difference; we’ll be doing our jobs. And if I didn’t have the kind of background that I had—with a single mother who was just so focused on what she needed to do—I would not be sitting here today,” Hirono said.

She sent herself to law school, got elected to the state Assembly back home in 1980 and started working her way up. She became acquainted with sexual harassment from her male colleagues.

She remembers one fellow state legislator who repeatedly made noises at her. “Finally, I turn around and I said, ‘I don’t respond to that.’ And he said, ‘What do you respond to?’ I said, ‘Try Mazie,’” she said.

Or there was the man who groped her in a stadium once. “I’m just minding my own business and some guy comes and touches me,” she said.

That was then, Hirono said—before #MeToo. That won’t be now, even if the hearings don’t stop Kavanaugh from getting confirmed.

Hirono laughs at the idea that Kavanaugh fits John Roberts’ famous formulation of a judge as a baseball umpire who simply calls balls and strikes.

“Nooooooo,” she said. “He knows where he needs to be, and he gets there.”

Stopping him still seems unlikely, for all the Democratic action, she acknowledged. But that wasn’t the point oftaking an aggressive posture at the Kavanaugh hearings.

“What we accomplish is letting the American people know that I framed this as part of a concerted effort on the part of the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation to pack our courts. And they’ve been doing this for decades now, preparing the way and they now have a willing president who is going to pick names off their list,” Hirono said. “So the American public needs to know that court-packing is going on. … And I hope to enable everybody to connect the dots. That they better be voting at the state legislative level and the governorships for people who are going to provide the kind of protections that maybe they will no longer be able to expect from the Supreme Court.”

Hirono won’t criticize Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top-ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, for sitting on the letter about the Ford allegations for weeks. She won’t criticize other Democrats for taking a more reserved approach that hews to old Senate decorum.

“I don’t bang them over the head about some of the things that I do,” Hirono said. “I figure they have to figure it out for themselves.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Ozx8Nk
via IFTTT

Nigeria’s undercover atheists: In their words

Kaduna, Nigeria – Denouncing God can be a dangerous thing in Nigeria, where religion is the rhythm of life.

Atheism, considered blasphemy by many, is a largely underground movement that’s hard to quantify but increasingly reported among millennials.

Atheists come together in private on WhatsApp groups and use pseudonyms on social media sites to share ideas.

The Nigerian population of nearly 200 million is split almost evenly between Muslims and Christians with sizeable followers of traditional spirituality.

“As a clergyman, this makes me sad that today we have people in Nigeria going in for atheism,” Gideon Obasogie, a Roman Catholic cleric tells A Jazeera. “The effect of this will be terrible. For one who says there is no God, he can do all kinds of horrible things … I feel this will lead to anarchy and chaos.  The rise of atheism in Nigeria is not wonderful news.”

In recent months, Nigerian atheists have registered three pro-secular organisations: Atheist Society of Nigeria, the Northern Nigerian Humanist Association and the Nigerian Secular Society.

“We need these organisations as a space for people to come out,” says Mubarak Bala, who helped to register the groups. 

Bala attracted media attention in 2014 after being admitted to a psychiatric hospital in Kano by his parents when they found out he was atheist. 

He says his father and uncles held him down for 30 minutes and forced him to take medications given by the psychiatrist, who told him “everyone needs God”.

“People began secretly contacting me, telling me that they too, don’t believe in Allah. Even Christians told me they don’t think Jesus is God and they just have questions about the whole religion thing,” Bala said. 

Most keep their beliefs secret.

Bala is the only atheist who allowed Al Jazeera to use his real name.

Al Jazeera travelled to three cities – Kano, Kaduna and Abuja – to meet some “undercover” atheists in their twenties and thirties.

Kenneth: ‘My family told me I am possessed’

“I grew up a rebel. I grew up a black sheep in the family. If I go to church, I go because I am forced to go to church.

I’ve never believed anything, so at a point, the pastor of the church I was attending with my family told me that I am possessed with an evil spirit because I was always questioning God and the Bible.

Kenneth said he’s always been the black sheep of his family, asking controversial questions about religion [Chika Oduah/Al Jazeera]

As an atheist in Nigeria, you will be ostracised. 

Up to today, I have many people who keep their distance from me simply because I ask a lot of critical questions about religion. Many of them don’t even know I’m now an atheist.”

Jiddah: ‘I realised Islam didn’t have my interest as a woman’

“I’ve always had questions, unanswered questions right from childhood. 

It’s not like I was the ideal Muslim girl, because I did a lot of things that Islam did not permit me to do such as wearing men’s clothing – meaning trousers – going clubbing, having premarital sex.

Basically, I realised Islam didn’t really have my interest as a woman. As a child at the Islamic school, I would always ask, ‘Where is God? Why can’t we see him or her?

What I got was a beating, serious flogging because you shouldn’t ask such questions. 

The breakthrough came I guess when I met Mubarak [Bala]. I found him on Facebook and I sent him a friend request.

(Note: Before receiving death threats, Jiddah said she would use the site to criticise Islam and had 8,000 followers. She has now closed her account.)

Then, we began to talk about religion. Mubarak would say, ‘It’s just like me telling you there’s a cat right here and you can’t see it. Why would you believe anything like that?’ 

So gradually, I just rid myself of that belief in God and it’s been liberating. 

But it’s heartbreaking because you really want to talk to your friends about these things and explain to them because you want them to feel what you feel. But you just can’t.”

Shehu: ‘A scholar can declare you an apostate’

“In Islam, I used to see stuff that didn’t correspond with reality. I tried to study Islam but I kept seeing more and more things that I just couldn’t believe I was reading.

I went to school in Malaysia and learned about intellectualism and what I learned blew my mind. I was learning about science that broke down the myths of religion. Things just became clear.

I came out and told my father, thinking he would understand. It backfired.

Shehu said he was beaten in school by a teacher at the age of 11 for challenging religious doctrines [Chika Oduah/Al Jazeera]

We come from an Islamic royal family in northern Nigeria.

My dad, he went to the NGO I was working at. He was a board member and told them to fire me. So they did. 

Then he brought a woman for me to marry so I could just conform and be normal. 

My dad prevents me from telling anyone about my beliefs. Here in Nigeria, a Mallam – a respected Islamic scholar – can declare you an apostate as an atheist and order you to be killed, just like that. So I’m undercover.”

Peter: ‘Why is it that Christianity had to come through conquest?’

My mother was quite religious. Every Sunday, we’d go to a Catholic church. 

The religion, Christianity itself, came in through several tools. Slavery, colonialism and of course, the subtle colonialism, which is missionary style.

So my question has always been, why is it that something that I need had to come through in such an inhumane way? Why is it that it had to come through conquest?

Peter, an IT professional, was raised by a mother who is a member of the Roman Catholic Church [Chika Oduah/Al Jazeera]

Some people were put to the sword and they had to take it whether they liked it or not. 

For my safety … if folks find out I’m an atheist, I could lose out on work opportunities (Peter is an IT professional). If people here in Nigeria find out I’m atheist, I think that would be the death of my reputation. Religion is a scam.”

Freeman: ‘The killings here over religion do not help’

“The killings that happen so much here in Nigeria over religion do not help. 

I came back home one day from school and I learned that a lot of houses had been brought down by our people, Muslims, just thinking that they did that for God. 

I watched somebody being burned to death on the road. I was coming back from school. I actually had friends, my Muslim friends, who went out to kill Christians and they asked me to join them and they actually believe they were doing it for God.

They said it’s God’s wish. They said that’s what God wants them to do and that it’s also what the Quran says. It really makes me upset.” 

Nasir: ‘My father said I should leave or he’ll kill me’

“I am against Islam entirely. Not just the way it’s practised, but against it fully. 

My parents, they know I don’t believe in God.

My father is an Islamic scholar and one day he called me and my mum, and he asked if it was true, [if] what he was hearing about me being an atheist is true. I said yes.

So, he brought out a knife. He wanted to kill me. I was telling him, ‘Wait let me explain to you.’ 

He said, ‘How can you explain to me?’

Nasir’s father tried to kill him when he found out he no longer believed in God [Chika Oduah/Al Jazeera]

I was scared actually and we were struggling, me and him. Then my mother seized the knife. My father said I should leave the house or he’ll kill me at night. So I left the house and started living at my workplace.

My father sent me away and then a relative talked to him and told him I changed my mind and told him that I’m no longer an atheist. But my father knows that’s not true.

Some of my relatives keep me away from their children because they say I will corrupt them.”

Ayuba: ‘It would break my mother’s heart if she knew’

“My mother will call me and say, ‘Have you been giving your tithes to the church?’ 

Like, if you don’t pay, then you’re stealing from God and God will punish you for that. So, it’s like a way of indoctrinating people, trying to put fear in people.

Ayuba said he always felt different from other people. His mother is an avid church-goer [Chika Oduah/Al Jazeera]

I grew up in ECWA (Evangelical Church Winning All, formerly known as Evangelical Church of West Africa).

The whole story of the Bible and creation, I don’t know. My mother, it would break her heart if she knew I am atheist.”

Abdul: ‘My father started preaching against me’

“I told my father that I don’t believe in prayers any more. He was grooming me to become a mallam, an Islamic scholar, like him. 

He never encouraged me to go to Western schools. Even when I went to university, I just did it on my own.

He started preaching against me a few years ago. 

He’s an Islamic scholar so people listen to him. Him preaching against me, you know, someone could take action to harm me.

Abdul says his life is at risk. His father, a Muslim scholar in northern Nigeria, condemns him in his sermons because he is an atheist [Chika Oduah/Al Jazeera]

In his sermons, he would say, ‘Just imagine, my son went to Western school so now he believes there is no creator. He thinks he is smarter than all of us and he gets his notions from a computer,’ because he used to see me on the computer. 

I see my father and other religious people as victims of their beliefs. I had to stop going to my family house.”

These interviews were edited for clarity and length.

All of the interviewees’ names, aside from those in the introduction, have been changed to protect their safety. They also requested their ages were not published, out of fear of being identified.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2PIQgso
via IFTTT

Hannah Gadsby’s one-minute of Emmys glory stole the show

Hannah Gadsby has got us thinking about jokes again.
Hannah Gadsby has got us thinking about jokes again.

Image: AFP/Getty Images

2016%2f09%2f16%2fe7%2fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymde1lzex.0f9e7By Johnny Lieu

What are jokes anyway?

A delight in an often lacklustre Emmys, Australian comedian Hannah Gadsby pretty much stole the show on Monday with her brilliantly dry, but very funny bit while handing out the Outstanding Director for a Drama Series award.

SEE ALSO: There were a few Emmys bright spots — but it sure wasn’t the hosts

Hosting alone, Gadsby took some time to acknowledge how amazing it was to be there, with her free outfit and everything thanks to the people who didn’t quite get Nanette

“This is not, normal? The world’s gone a bit crazy. I mean, for somebody like me — a nobody from nowhere — gets this sweet gig. Free suit, new boots, just cause I don’t like men?” she said. 

“That’s a joke, of course. Just jokes, fellas, calm down. You know, #NotAllMen, but a lot of ’em. No, it is just jokes, but what are jokes these days? We don’t know. 

“Nobody knows what jokes are. Especially not men. Am I right, fellas? That’s why I’m presenting alone.”

Since the release of her Netflix special, Gadsby said she has been on the receiving end of criticism of men who don’t think she is funny. But hey! She don’t care.

I don’t have an issue with all the angry men telling me that I am not funny. I just wish they would at least try and express their disproportionate feelings about comedy in a more humorous way.

— Hannah Gadsby (@Hannahgadsby) September 13, 2018

People wanted her back on to host the whole damn thing. Maybe next year, folks.

Hannah Gadsby was on the stage for 45 seconds and that segment was better than anything from these hosts. #Emmys

— Lily Herman (@lkherman) September 18, 2018

Er, #Emmys — y’all should have had Hannah Gadsby host. Those 2 mins were the funniest/timeliest of the entire show.

— Nigel M. Smith (@nigelmfs) September 18, 2018

“Nobody knows what jokes are…especially not men. Am I right fellahs?” Hannah Gadsby, providing she is WAY funnier than every SNL alum who presented or did a bit onstage at the #Emmys tonight.

— Eric Deggans at NPR (@Deggans) September 18, 2018

why didn’t hannah gadsby host the emmys why oh why did they choose a warm bowl of oatmeal instead

— Dana Schwartz (@DanaSchwartzzz) September 18, 2018

Emmy Award to Hannah Gadsby for this bit right now.

— Kevin Fallon (@kpfallon) September 18, 2018

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Diyhrt
via IFTTT

Khalil Mack, Not Mitchell Trubisky, Is Driving Force Behind Bears’ Turnaround

CHICAGO, IL - SEPTEMBER 17:  Khalil Mack #52 of the Chicago Bears reacts in the third quarter against the Seattle Seahawks at Soldier Field on September 17, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois.  (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)

Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images

The Chicago Bears‘ identity throughout the franchise’s history has been built around its defense. The story remains the same, even after the additions of quarterback Mitchell Trubisky and offensive-minded head coach Matt Nagy. 

The organization’s latest addition, Khalil Mack, will define its direction throughout the season and into the future. His performances during his first two games with the franchise have been nothing short of spectacular, appearing worthy of every dollar of the $141 million contract the Bears inked him to, while Trubisky continues to provide inconsistent play. 

On the night the Bears honored Brian Urlacher at halftime by presenting his Ring of Excellence after being inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame, Chicago captured a 24-17 victory over the Seattle Seahawks, and Mack showed why he’s on his way to becoming the next well-known Monster of the Midway. 

“He’s a bad dude, man,” Urlacher said, per The Athletic’s Mark Lazerus. “I don’t understand how you give up a guy who’s that good. I’m still baffled how we got him. I’m glad [general manager Ryan Pace] made it happen. He’s a great addition for our team. He fits in perfect with our history here.”

Don’t worry, Brian. No one really understands how the Bears acquired the 2016 NFL Defensive Player of the Year. The Oakland Raiders remain inept after accepting the deal.

“We gotta do something to get more pressure, maybe call more blitzes,” Gruden absentmindedly admitted after Sunday’s 20-19 loss to the Denver Broncos, per The Athletic’s Vic Tafur

The Bears took advantage of another franchise’s discord by building upon the side of the ball already considered their strength. Chicago finished 10th in total defense last season, and Nagy realized Vic Fangio’s retention as defensive coordinator served his best interest.

“He challenges you quietly,” Mack said of Fangio, per The Athletic’s Jon Greenberg. “He has his own little swag about him, that Italian mafia kind of swag to him. But I love it.”

Still, the group lacked a true difference-maker until now. 

Mack is one of the game’s most well-rounded performers. Too often, an effective pass-rusher isn’t good against the run or vice versa. The Bears’ new outside linebacker is dominant in both phases. 

The 27-year-old finished Monday’s contest with five total tackles, a sack and a tackle for loss. Mack’s stat line doesn’t tell the entire story, because he harassed Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson throughout the night, flushed him from the pocket, demanded double-teams and still couldn’t be stopped in most cases. He worked through three different blockers to earn his only sack of the night: 

Chicago Bears @ChicagoBears

.@52Mack_ is RUTHLESS. 😈 https://t.co/biCXTnOEJt

Mack worked through the tight end before Nick Vannett entered his route, overwhelmed right tackle Germain Ifedi with a bull rush and still got his arm around for the strip sack when right guard J.R. Sweezy attempted to help. 

This type of effort isn’t natural, even for an elite NFL defender, and it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Mack’s presence must be accounted for at all times. Game plans are built around where he lines up. Blocking protections almost always slide to his side. 

So even when Mack isn’t creating pressure, he’s helping the defense. As a unit, Chicago hit or sacked Wilson on 13 different occasions. The Bears currently lead the league with 10 total sacks. If not for a herculean second-half effort from Aaron Rodgers last week, Chicago would be 2-0 as a result. 

Nam Y. Huh/Associated Press

Furthermore, no one sets the edge quite like Mack. He obliterates the point of attack and consistently re-establishes the line of scrimmage. Offensive linemen can’t even enjoy when they have the angle and think they’ve run him past the play, as Pro Football Focus’ Sam Monson noted.

Mack’s athleticism is on par with his power—which makes him nearly impossible to slow down. 

The same can’t be said about the Bears offense, since Trubisky’s play tends to sputter at times. The unit performed at its best the last two weeks within the structure of predetermined play-calling at the beginning of contests. 

Chicago scored touchdowns on both of its opening drives this year. Trubisky is 10-of-11 passing for 154 yards and two total touchdowns in those instances, according to ESPN Stats & Information

Once Nagy’s preplanned approach is complete, last year’s second overall pick doesn’t appear nearly as comfortable in his role, even though the Bears have done everything in their power to make him so. Nagy and offensive coordinator Mark Helfrich instituted many collegiate concepts to expedite Trubisky’s maturation as a starting quarterback. It’s helped to a degree, but the second-year signal-caller continues to struggle with decision-making, overall accuracy and pocket awareness. 

Quarterback play starts with footwork. Trubisky has a bad habit of not driving through the football. His poor technique led to the first of two interceptions when he couldn’t get enough on a deep sideline attempt and underthrew Allen Robinson. Instead, Shaquill Griffin came down with the pass. Griffin struck again later in the second quarter when he snagged a tipped pass out of the air. 

Improper balance occurs when a quarterback isn’t shifting his weight from his back foot onto his plant leg. Trubisky tends to airmail passes when this occurs. 

Also, the quarterback nearly maneuvered his way into a couple sacks and should have thrown a third interception when he bailed from the pocket early despite a lack of pressure. 

CHICAGO, IL - SEPTEMBER 17:  Quarterback Mitchell Trubisky #10 of the Chicago Bears calls out a play in the second quarter against the Seattle Seahawks at Soldier Field on September 17, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois.  (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)

Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images

Of course, it’s a process. The Bears understand this. Trubisky has yet to start a full NFL season. Nagy is encouraged about some of the adjustments his quarterback made from the first to second week. 

“This is going to be fun,” the coach said, per the Chicago Tribune‘s Rich Campbell. “I’m excited for our future together.”

As the Kansas City Chiefs‘ Patrick Mahomes II tears up the league with 10 touchdown passes through two weeks, some disappointment has to set in, since the Bears chose Trubisky eight picks before Mahomes came off the board. The Bears quarterback has nine touchdown passes through 14 contests. 

Right now, it’s rather obvious which side of the ball and which performer is driving the Bears toward an improvement over last year’s 5-11 record, and it’s not the offense nor Trubisky. 

“This defense has some really good football players on it—they can win on defense,” Urlacher said, per Lazerus. “I think that’s very apparent. I think Coach Nagy knows that.”

Brent Sobleski covers the NFL for Bleacher Report. Follow him on Twitter: @brentsobleski.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2NlnGjZ
via IFTTT

Report exposes Maldives ‘orgy of corruption’ before election

An investigation has uncovered new details about Maldives government corruption days before a presidential election and weeks after the European Union moved to sanction its leaders.

Published on Tuesday, the research finds that at least 50 of the nation’s prized tropical island leases were obtained at hugely discounted prices without public tender, and – according to the country’s top auditor – were illegal.

President Abdulla Yameen, who is hoping to secure a second term on Sunday, intervened to help clear at least 24 deals to lease islands to tourism companies, the report says.

The president was also personally involved in direct discussions about at least one of those deals, according to the report.

Leaked chat logs and other documents reportedly show one of Singapore’s richest men, Ong Beng Seng, offering luxury hotel rooms to the president and former vice president.

The hotel tycoon, who runs a number of Maldives resorts, did so at a time when he and his company, Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), were seeking islands in the Maldives.

Shortly afterwards, Ong sealed a deal for two uninhabited islands without public tender, one for $5m and one for free, the report says.

At the time of publication, neither the billionaire nor the president had responded to the researchers’ request for comment.

Bags of cash

President Yameen has faced corruption allegations since 2016 when Al Jazeera released its award-winning investigation, Stealing Paradise.

Revealing widespread corruption for the first time, it included testimony from men who said they had carried bags of cash to the president, details of an international plot to launder $1.5bn, along with wholesale bribery and embezzlement in the island deals.

Initially, the government did not respond. However, since the investigation’s release, President Yameen has made a qualified concession that he received cash at home.

His presidency has been marked by efforts to crush dissent, imposing a 45-day state of emergency and jailing or forcing into exile many political opponents.

Those actions, plus a crackdown on the political opposition, media and human rights, have led the EU to move towards sanctioning the nation’s leaders.

It has put in place what it calls a “framework” that will allow it to impose travel bans and asset freezes on senior officials if it decides they have undermined democracy and the rule of law or seriously violated human rights.

‘An orgy of corruption’

With a presidential election just days away, specialist corruption and organised crime reporters have released new details of government graft, describing it as “an orgy of corruption”.

The Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) exposes how ministers and officials began a fire sale of the nation’s prized tropical islands to tourism companies,  illegally leasing around 50 of them and embezzling much of the proceeds.

That was a huge increase. Previously, the Maldives had only around 100 resorts that had been slowly constructed over four decades. But after Yameen’s election, at least 50 more were approved in just a few years.

The OCCRP’s work is based upon data obtained by Al Jazeera that formed the basis of the 2016 investigation Stealing Paradise, an exposé that revealed massive government corruption for the first time.

Reporters looked at data obtained from three golden iPhones belonging to former tourism minister and vice president, Ahmed Adeeb.

They analysed the information and cross-referenced it with other leaked paperwork, bank and government records, court documents, and the Paradise Papers leak from offshore services firms in Bermuda and Singapore.

Big business

The research gives a full picture of the pillaging of the Maldives and allows researchers to understand which businessmen secured leases and what has been built on the islands and lagoons.

Former tourism minister and vice president, Ahmed Adeeb, was at the centre of the scandal but has not been able to enjoy his ill-gotten gains.

Arrested in late 2015, he was later convicted of a plot to assassinate President Yameen and of corruption linked to the island lease schemes. He is serving a decades-long sentence.

His friend and co-conspirator, Abdulla Ziyath, was also jailed for his role in the corruption and is serving eight years.

Ziyath was the head of the Maldives Marketing & Public Relations Corporation (MMPRC), an organisation that was set up in 2009 to promote the nation’s tourist industry abroad but which morphed into the central authority on new island leases.

From early 2012, the two men worked closely to lease islands, soliciting bribes and embezzling payments.

Two years into their schemes, they found a lucrative loophole. In order to get around a legal requirement that all leases up to 50 years go through an open bidding process, they instead entered the government into joint ventures with private companies.

In the years afterwards, the government would walk away, leaving the business to do what it wanted without government oversight, having avoided an open tender process.

Starting in mid-2014, interested investors simply approached Adeeb or Ziyath, often via a middleman, negotiated a price, signed a contract, and paid the MMPRC by cheque or bank transfer.

“Those who benefitted were the ones who had a direct line to the minister,” a businessman who acted as a middleman on at least one deal, told OCCRP on the condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisals. “It was all done in the open.”

“Some foreigners flew in just to sign the deals,” the source said. “They must all have known it was all illegal.”

The money paid for the deals was often then transferred to private bank accounts. Some of the cheques were simply rerouted and paid into different accounts using friendly contacts in the banks.

Some of the money was then reportedly handed by bagmen to the president or his allies, as covered in Stealing Paradise.

The president’s orders

Current and former government officials have told OCCRP that President Yameen was central to the operation of the scam.

From prison, Adeeb has claimed he was tasked with running the country while the president “counted the cash.”

A government official with direct knowledge of the deals, who spoke anonymously for fear of retribution, told OCCRP it was the president who ordered Adeeb’s tourism ministry to lease islands without tender via joint ventures run by the MMPRC.

Under Maldives law, uninhabited islands are managed by the Ministry of Fisheries and Agriculture. In order to lease them out for development, Adeeb routinely sought — and received — orders from the president to bring the islands under the Tourism Ministry that Adeeb led, according to the official.

“For 90 percent of the islands, I can say [Adeeb] wrote to the president’s office and requested the president hand those islands over to the tourism ministry,” he said.

“Obviously the president knew.”

According to the OCCRP, messages from Adeeb’s phone show the president knew about at least one MMPRC island deal from its outset. On June 30, 2014, Yameen messaged the tourism minister to ask about Mathiveri Finolhu, an island in the Alif Alif Atoll. Seven minutes later, Adeeb replied: “Today will Hand over sir, sorry for the delay.”

Adeeb’s phone messages also show that Yameen apparently had at least one meeting with Ong Beng Seng, the Singaporean hotelier. Ong’s company received two island leases shortly after.

The president has previously denied he was fully aware of the corruption.

At the time of publication, OCCRP had not received a response from his office or that of Ong Beng Seng.

Whistle-blower fled

A 2016 audit found that just shy of $80m due to the MMPRC was either never paid, paid in part, or went missing. Some islands were also found to have been given out at clear discounts.

Another audit, submitted two years earlier, had raised the issue of the corrupt scheme for the first time. Then-Auditor General, Niyaz Ibrahim, produced a report detailing how the MMPRC had made millions of dollars in suspicious foreign currency transactions and exposing payments to a company linked to Adeeb.

Niyaz suspected corruption and says he brought his concerns directly to President Yameen, who had him removed from his position.

“I briefed the findings to the president in a one-on-one meeting,” Niyaz told OCCRP. “He accused me of unprofessionalism, and of being biased against his government.”

This is a gross violation of law, these islands have to come back to the state.

Niyaz Ibrahim, Auditor General

Niyaz continued to live in the Maldives until 2016 when Stealing Paradise was broadcast.

It featured an interview with him reacting to the revelation that he had been placed under surveillance by Adeeb, who had instructed special operations police officers to “blast that place” where he had been.

Niyaz says he faced threats and fled to exile in Sri Lanka a day before the documentary was aired.

Of the corrupt deals, he says, “they’ve been doing this for ages, so they know there is no way for the public to hold these criminals accountable. They take Maldives law as a joke.”

He is now calling for the government to seize the islands that were subject to illegal lease agreements.

“This is a gross violation of law, these islands have to come back to the state.”

International hotel brands did not participate directly in the illegal leasing of the islands. Instead, they later signed management or licensing contracts with middlemen and developers and profited from those agreements.

Niyaz believes they should have conducted better due diligence.

“If they are associated with corruption, that will not be good for business,” he said. “There may be no direct legal responsibility, but they have an ethical and social responsibility to the Maldivian public.”

In 2016, the president’s loyalists passed an amendment to the tourism law that removed the requirement for public tenders. Opposition politicians denounced the move as a measure that effectively “legalises corruption“.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2D8nZKp
via IFTTT

Reese Witherspoon gets competitive playing lip sync charades with Zoë and Lenny Kravitz

You’ve never seen charades until you’ve seen Zoë Kravitz try to act out her dad’s song “Fly Away,” to her dad.

Jimmy Fallon invited Reese Witherspoon, Lenny Kravitz and his daughter Zoë onto The Tonight Show for a casual game of charades on Monday. 

But there’s a silly twist — they each have to lip sync popular songs, while their teammate has noise cancelling headphones on.

Witherspoon gets, uh, competitive.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2xmz05e
via IFTTT

Julie Chen leaving ‘The Talk’ following husband Les Moonves’ CBS exit

“She has decided that her main focus needs to be clearing her husband’s name.”

Image: Mike Pont/WireImage

2017%2f09%2f01%2fdc%2f1bw.3febfBy Shannon Connellan

Julie Chen is reportedly leaving CBS’ The Talk, just a week after her husband Les Moonves stepped down as head of the company following multiple sexual harassment and assault allegations.

According to CNN, two sources close to Chen said she will be leaving the panel chat show “effective immediately.” 

SEE ALSO: The CBS sexual harassment exposé is a reminder that this was never just about one bad guy

The panelist, who took time off from the show immediately following the allegations, will make the announcement in a pre-recorded message to air on Tuesday’s episode. 

“She has decided that her main focus needs to be clearing her husband’s name from accusations made 25-30 years ago and tending to her son,” a source told CNN. 

Chen will reportedly continue to host CBS’ Big Brother. The TV host has publicly supported her husband since multiple women came forward to The New Yorker‘s Ronan Farrow with accusations of sexual abuse against Moonves in July and September.

“I have known my husband, Leslie Moonves, since the late ’90s, and I have been married to him for almost 14 years,” she wrote on Twitter in July. 

“Leslie is a good man and a loving father, devoted husband and inspiring corporate leader. He has always been a kind, decent and moral human being. I fully support my husband and stand behind him and his statement.”

Mashable has contacted CBS for further comment.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2PJwlte
via IFTTT

Trump-proof aspects of Manafort deal rankle lawyers


Robert Mueller

“Mr. Mueller … is specifically seeking to impede the ability of the president to exercise his constitutional pardon authority,” said former Justice Department official David Rivkin. | Alex Wong/Getty Images

Mueller Investigation

Robert Mueller seems to have built in safeguards to discourage the president from pardoning Manafort.

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s Friday plea agreement with Paul Manafort took unusual and possibly unprecedented steps to undercut President Donald Trump’s ability to pardon his former campaign chairman.

The plea deal Mueller struck with the former Trump campaign chairman contains several provisions that appear intended to discourage the former Trump aide both from seeking a pardon and to rein in the impact of any pardon Trump might grant.

Story Continued Below

Legal experts with sweeping views of executive power and attorneys who advocate for broad use of clemency criticized what they call an effort by Mueller’s team to tie the president’s hands.

“What is most concerning to me is that Mr. Mueller, who is a part of the executive branch and is supposed to follow all of DOJ’s policies and procedures, is specifically seeking to impede the ability of the president to exercise his constitutional pardon authority,” said David Rivkin, a Justice Department official under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.

“These waivers are troubling because they have to do with future events we can’t predict,” University of St. Thomas law professor Mark Osler said, referring to provisions in the plea deal. “They did a pretty good job hiding what they did, but as part of these agreements, sometimes the most important things you want to bury it a little.”

The 17-page deal doesn’t explicitly prohibit Manafort from seeking a pardon, but some lawyers said it appears to extract a promise from Manafort not to seek another form of executive clemency that could relieve him of the obligation to turn over tens of millions of property to the government as part of the plea bargain. The agreement also says prosecutors can come after the five identified homes or apartments, three bank accounts and a life insurance policy now or at any point in the future “without regard to the status of his criminal conviction.”

Another part of the deal says that if Manafort’s guilty pleas or convictions are wiped out for any reason, prosecutors immediately have the right to charge him with any other crimes he may have committed previously or confessed to during recent plea negotiations.

Osler said he objects to some of the provisions in the plea deal as going too far to close off legitimate routes a defendant should be able to use to raise potential unfairness.

“It does appear this document was created with clemency in mind,” said Osler. “If this plays out … and later we get a pardon of some kind, we’re going to have a lot of questions of first impression, I think. Then, we’re going to be in the courts on this and it’ll be fascinating.”

The inclusion of a section barring Manafort from filing any “petition of remission” troubled some advocates because it appears to prohibit not just a request to the Justice Department but also directing such a request to the president.

A Justice Department regulation blesses the use of such language in plea deals, but seems aimed solely at the agency’s internal process and not the president’s parallel power.

“It is proper to include in a settlement agreement a provision that expressly leaves open or expressly forecloses the right of any party to file a petition for remission or mitigation,” the regulation says.

A spokesman for Mueller’s office declined to comment on the provisions in the Manafort deal or to say whether they have appeared in other plea deals in the past.

However, some attorneys said they don’t think the language in the plea agreement is far from what the Justice Department has done in other cases where defendants are asked to waive numerous rights.

“it always feels like if they’re not overreaching, they’re heavy handed, but it’s to my sense standard-issue heavy handed,” said Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman.

Legal experts said that ultimately if Trump wants to pardon Manafort he can do so, but to make the pardon effective he may have to word it so broadly that it covers not only the things the former Trump campaign chair was charged with but things he wasn’t.

Trump might also have to make clear what, if any property he’s trying to restore to Manafort.

“The president could make a pardon as sweeping as the president chose to, as long as it doesn’t apply to prospective crimes,” said former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. He also said the plea agreement is replete with indications that prosecutors were gaming out a potential clemency action from Trump.

“I have no doubt that they were thinking about that as they were going through it,” McCarthy said. “If they’re going to do this, they have every reason to do it and justify it, but be honest about it,” he said, adding that he saw several “potential time bombs seeded” into the deal.

The issue of what kinds of waivers are and are not constitutional or appropriate in plea deals have been a subject of heated legal debate for decades. Some important rights can’t be waived, like the right not to be subjected to cruel or unusual punishment. But other rights, like the right to a jury trial, are routinely given up in plea deals as part of the bargain.

In recent years, prosecutors began adding plea deal clauses barring defendants from using the Freedom of Information Act to request information about their cases. Last year, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a 2-1 decision that seemed to reject that practice, questioning what legitimate interest prosecutors had in stymieing such requests. Manafort’s plea deal includes such a waiver, but it only prohibits him from making such requests as long as Mueller’s team is in business.

The Manafort plea agreement doesn’t make any direct mention of the president’s pardon authority. Several lawyers said prosecutors may have wanted to put something directly prohibiting Manafort from seeking a pardon, but Mueller or others may have decided such a move could provoke a backlash from Trump, the judges involved or some in the press.

“It would have created a national debate over that,” Osler said. “We know Mueller doesn’t like to fight battles in public that he doesn’t have to.”

Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz said he believes the main safeguard in the plea deal against a Trump pardon is the fact that Manafort admitted to many state-law crimes that he could be charged with if the federal cases are wiped out.

Dershowitz, who has been sharply critical of the Mueller investigation, said he found “more objectionable” some provisions in the deal about forfeitures because they seem to obscure the connection to the criminal case. However, the Harvard professor called the prosecutors’ stance in the Manafort deal aggressive but not a breach of any rules or standards.

“They’ve gone about as far as they can go without getting up to the red line,” he said. “But I don’t think they’ve crossed any red line.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2xkcTMV
via IFTTT