South Korea’s leader: Pyongyang seeks second Trump-Kim summit

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has requested a second summit with US President Donald Trump and also wants US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to visit Pyongyang soon, according to South Korea‘s president.

Speaking at a news conference upon his return to Seoul on Thursday, Moon Jae-in said Kim told him during his three-day summit in Pyongyang that he wanted to hasten the process of denuclearisation.

“Kim Jong-un expressed his wish that he wanted to complete denuclearisation quickly and focus on economic development,” Moon said.

“He said he hoped Mike Pompeo would visit North Korea soon, and also a second summit with Trump would take place in the near future, in order to move the denuclearisation process along quickly.”

He also said he would carry a private message from Kim for Trump when he meets the US president in New York City next week at the UN General Assembly.

Moon will also convey to Trump both his and Kim’s desire to obtain a declaration ending the Korean War by the end of this year, he said.

US concessions

Asked about the specific corresponding US measures demanded by Kim for denuclearisation, Moon said the matter should be discussed between North Korea and the US.

“Pyongyang joint declaration did not include any of those specific measures of North Korea and the corresponding actions of the US. We discussed some of it, but we did not have it written down so I cannot reveal any of the discussed items with you here,” he said.

Al Jazeera’s Rob McBride, reporting from Seoul, said Moon’s speech gave an impression that he knows very well what Kim wants to receive from the US in return for the closure of its main Yongbyon nuclear complex.

“But he is not revealing that at all, saying he has a role of a mediator. The takeaway that we have so far is that [the situation] is very much in line with what we have expected. North Koreans are not going to act unilaterally, unconditionally. They are going to expect at every level some concessions from the US,” he said.

Singapore summit

Kim and Trump held a landmark and high-profile meeting in Singapore in June, where the North’s leader committed to work towards denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula, but no details were agreed.

Washington and Pyongyang have subsequently sparred over what that means and how it will be achieved, with the Trump administration consistently referring to the denuclearisation of North Korea specifically.

The process had become deadlocked until Moon’s trip to Pyongyang, where Kim agreed to permanently dismantle a missile testing site.

Experts were sceptical but the Trump administration immediately welcomed the move, with Pompeo inviting his North Korean counterpart to meet next week on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

Moon said on Thursday that Kim would visit Seoul around November, no later than the end of the year.

He also said Kim agreed to have a meeting between two national assemblies and to facilitate cooperation of the municipal governments.

“I also asked for North Korea to release its restrictions on Kumgangsan facilities in December. I am going to host a cultural event or exhibition with North Korea to celebrate 110th year of Korea,” Moon said.

North Korea’s Kim agrees to ‘dismantle’ key missile test sites

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2DdW4Zm
via IFTTT

Rights group calls Egypt an ‘open-air prison’ for critics

The human rights organisation Amnesty International has called on Egyptian authorities to release people imprisoned for peacefully expressing their opinions and to end legislation that has allowed the state to clamp down on freedom of speech in the country.

In a new campaign launched on Thursday, titled “Egypt, an Open-Air Prison for Critics”, Amnesty said that Egyptians are living in a time of “unprecedented severity” amid a government crackdown on freedom of expression.

Since December 2017, the rights group has documented at least 111 individuals who have been arrested by the National Security Services for criticising Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and the general human rights situation in Egypt.

“It is currently more dangerous to criticise the government in Egypt than at any time in the country’s recent history,” Najia Bounaim, Amnesty’s North Africa Campaigns Director, said in a statement.

“Egyptians living under President Sisi are treated as criminals simply for peacefully expressing their opinions,” she said.

Bounaim called the security services “ruthless” in their suppression of independent political, social or cultural spaces.

“These measures, more extreme than anything seen in former President Hosni Mubarak’s repressive 30-year-rule, have turned Egypt into an open-air prison for critics.”

There was no immediate comment from the Egyptian government on the Amnesty statement, but Cairo authorities have a track record of indignantly dismissing criticism of the country’s human rights record as fabrications.

It routinely accuses advocacy groups like Amnesty or Human Rights Watch of being unprofessional or tools in the hands of Egypt’s enemies.

Egypt, the Arab world’s most populous nation with some 100 million, has launched a massive crackdown on dissent in the five years since the military removal of a freely elected but divisive Islamist president, Mohammed Morsi.

The government has since arrested thousands of his supporters along with secular activists, placed the media under tight control and suppressed freedoms.

Egypt has recently adopted a law that empowers the state’s top media regulatory agency to use the “fake news” label to shut down social media accounts with more than 5,000 followers, without having to obtain a court order. Another new law allows blocking websites with content deemed a threat to national security.

Egyptian measures to silence peaceful voices has prompted hundreds of activists and opposition members to leave the country to avoid arbitrary detention, the rights group said. Journalists, opposition members, artists, comics, and football fans have all been jailed for speaking up under vaguely defined laws.

“Despite these unprecedented challenges to freedom of expression, and despite the fear which has become a part of daily life, many Egyptians continue to peacefully challenge these restrictions, risking their freedom in the process,” Bounaim said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2xpn4zV
via IFTTT

Alabama Loves Sessions, But Not Enough to Stand Up to Trump

Perhaps the most confounding example of divided loyalties in American politics right now is happening in the power corridors of Republican Alabama. From Montgomery to Mobile, the state’s GOP elite has stuck by President Donald Trump with a tenacity almost unmatched in the country. At the same time, those same die-hards have preserved their devotion for a native son the president publicly loathes, a man Trump humiliates with almost weekly jabs about his manhood, his accent, his stature and above all his loyalty. For months now, Trump has pounded on Jeff Sessions like a bass drum at the Auburn-Alabama game. Why, just on Wednesday, the president didn’t just criticize the man whose early endorsement had given his 2016 campaign much needed gravitas, he negated him. “I don’t have an attorney general.”

In a state where tribalism is baked into daily life—Auburn or Alabama, but never both—something almost impossible seems to be happening: Republicans are not taking sides in the bitter internecine feud between the president and his top lawman, whom he has openly fantasized about firing. Feud might be too strong a word because it suggests Sessions is punching back, which he has scrupulously avoided with the stoicism of an early Christian. But after initially backing the beloved 20-year senator, whom some call “Dudley Do-Right” and uncompromisingly moral, state Republican officials have stopped defending him. Why, is the question.

Story Continued Below

The answer I got from numerous interviews over the past two weeks as Trump has renewed his shaming campaign is that it’s as much about fear of a Trump backlash as it is love. Conservative Alabama’s politicians love Sessions, who helped lead the state’s rightward shift, but they’re wary of the prickly, shoot-first president more. Who wants to be on the wrong side of Trump’s twitter salvos? And who wants to risk alienating a voting bloc that has remained as loyal to him as any in the nation?

Being on Trump’s wrong side is politically dangerous, and the evidence in Alabama is a fresh memory. Alabama 2nd District congresswoman Martha Roby paid a price for withdrawing her endorsement during the 2016 election over Trump’s “Access Hollywood” tape. Running this year for a fifth term, she was forced into a Republican primary runoff, which she won after receiving Trump’s blessing. During the Republican primaries for lieutenant governor and state attorney general, candidates debated who was a bigger Trump booster.

It’s a different story, however, among rank-and-file voters. Some are indeed upset with Sessions over his recusal and their belief that his Justice Department has not aggressively pursued investigations of Trump’s election rival Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration. But observers on both sides of Alabama’s political spectrum predict Sessions will weather this storm among his home-state voters.

“I can pretty well guarantee that Jeff Sessions’ status has not declined one bit as a result of Trump’s attacks,” said Wayne Flynt, professor emeritus at Auburn University, who has written several books on Southern history, politics and religion.

Rather, Sessions is widely considered a shoo-in if he runs when his old Senate seat is on the ballot in 2020. It’s now held by Doug Jones, who became the only Democrat elected statewide in nearly a decade when he won Alabama’s 2017 special election to complete Sessions’ term.

Even if Trump is impeached by 2020, state Republicans are expected to back Sessions in the primary, and therefore the general election, observers say. “Trump has this unwavering support, but I don’t feel they’re going to fall out with Sessions,” said Steve Flowers, a former state representative and current commentator and columnist on Alabama politics. “Sessions would win the race going away, if he wanted to run for it.”

***

Trump supporters in Alabama don’t always follow the president’s lead when it comes to state politics. In the 2017 Senate special election, not only did Trump endorse Luther Strange, who lost the Republican primary, he also backed GOP nominee Roy Moore in the general election. The timing of Trump’s endorsement — the Friday before the vote — could have been crucial in a tight race with red-state Republicans struggling over accusations that Moore pursued or sexually attacked teenage girls when he was in his 30s. Out of 1.3 million ballots cast, Moore lost to Jones by some 21,000 votes.

“A lot of people who voted for Trump thought, ‘We like the president in general, but we don’t give a damn who he endorses or what he says,’” Flynt said. “There’s a kind of cantankerousness and obstinacy about Alabama voters that makes them remarkably independent.”

Alabama Republicans will stand by Sessions, in part, because they view him as an authentic conservative ideologue, and not a say-anything-to-get-elected, do-anything-once-there politician. Voters here suffer corruption fatigue, after seeing dozens of state and local officials from both parties convicted or removed, Flynt said.

“This is the only state I know of in American history where the chief administrative, legislative and judicial officials were all turned out of office on ethics violations within one year,” the historian said, referring to the ousters of Gov. Robert Bentley, House Speaker Mike Hubbard and Moore (chief justice) in 2016 and 2017. The mindset in Alabama is if you think Washington is a swamp, check out the state capital in Montgomery. “Their general perception of politicians is ‘scumbags,’” Flynt said. “Even the politicians they vote for.”

Voter perception of Sessions is different. He was a Republican leader decades before the state transitioned red, and his old-school conservative principles have only solidified, first as the U.S. attorney in south Alabama and then the state’s top prosecutor and U.S. senator, and now DOJ head.

Even critics note Sessions’ special voter appeal. “If you had to pick a person that Alabamians would say is the most authentic voice for what he believes, it probably would be Jeff Sessions,” said Flynt, who took the attorney general to task in June for misusing scripture to justify his zero-tolerance immigration policy that separated families at the Mexican border. “Completely wrong in my view, but authentic nonetheless.”

Unlike several former members of Trump’s Cabinet, there is no talk about excessive first-class plane travel by Sessions, much less whispers about using sirens to expedite street travel to Washington restaurants or proof of extravagances like having a secure cone-of-silence room installed in his office.

“I’ve never seen anyone as straight an arrow as Jeff Sessions,” says Flowers, who was in the state House of Representatives when Sessions was elected Alabama attorney general and then U.S. senator in the mid-1990s. “He is a true-blue conservative, Eagle Scout, squeaky clean. Dudley Do-Right, just shorter and straighter.”

Sessions was unopposed in the 2014 primary and general election, his last run for Senate, and he garnered roughly 60 percent of the vote in the two prior general elections against competitive opponents. “He’s very popular in this state,” said Terry Lathan, the Alabama Republican Party chairwoman. “He’s been a champion and warrior for the party.”

At the ballot box, Alabamians tend to stick by their own kind. “What it means is, if you’re from someone’s geographical locale—or to use the Southern phrase, ‘their neck of the woods’—they will vote for you because of that,” Flowers said. “If Joe Jones is running for governor from Lee County, folks in Lee and the surrounding counties are going to vote for him come hell or high water. They may realize he’s the biggest drunk in the county, but ‘by God, he’s our drunk.’”

By that yardstick, Alabama’s Dudley Do-Right presents no qualms for state Republicans.

***

Ultimately, getting fired by Trump may even help Sessions politically. Old-line Alabamians love their martyrs. “Historical memory in Alabama is very much associated with people who go into combat outnumbered 2-to-1 thinking they’re probably going to die, and they’re probably going to lose,” Flynt says. “But based on moral principle, you fight anyway. I think Sessions to them is the quintessential moral person.”

Few in Alabama expect Sessions to abandon his noble cause by resigning.

Many would consider it a step down to leave a safe Senate seat for what is by its very definition a temporary appointment. But for Sessions, becoming attorney general was a tangible opportunity to imprint his old-school values and moral principles on an institution he considered too liberal and lenient.

As the byproduct of a state that traditionally enforces homogeneity and resists change, it was Sessions’ way to make his corner of America what he considers great again. “Sessions, in his heart of hearts, wants to take America on a rightward path,” Flowers said.

Sessions’ philosophy also is deeply rooted in his tenure in the tough-on-crime 1980s and early 1990s when he was the U.S. attorney in Alabama’s Southern District, based in the port city of Mobile, during the height of a national cocaine epidemic. His experiences with drug-trade violence and the ongoing role of international drug cartels helped cement his viewpoints on criminal justice and immigration.

“He sees the drug problem as being one of the downfalls of America,” Flowers said. “He has a real penchant for doing away with drugs. That is why he wants to be attorney general.”

People might never realize this from reading presidential tweets, but Sessions is one of Trump’s most effective Cabinet members. He has substantially and comprehensively toughened the DOJ’s approach to immigration, equal protection, and policies on criminal charging and sentencing.

Amid Trump’s tweetstorms, Sessions has mostly kept his head down, getting as much done as he can to implement his agenda in the limited time available. “I suspect that is part of the reason he is willing to sustain this incredible criticism from the president, stuff that would cause most people to leave,” said Joyce Vance, who was U.S. attorney in the Northern District of Alabama during the Obama administration.

Sessions’ 12 years as U.S. attorney also helps explain what the president and his supporters consider his cardinal sin. Donald Trump wanted a loyal button man to kill the probe into his administration, help his friends and punish his enemies. Instead, Dudley Do-Right put Department of Justice policy above kissing his new boss’ ring.

When DOJ employees suspect they have a conflict of interest, they must contact department ethics officials for advice and are expected to follow it. “It’s longstanding DOJ policy,” Vance said. “It applies to attorneys general just like it applies to anybody else.”

Ethically speaking, Sessions had no choice but to cross the boss. That thinking is central to Sessions’ rare public response to Trump in a statement, “While I am Attorney General, the actions of the Department of Justice will not be improperly influenced by political considerations.”

Even if Trump is impeached, Alabama Republicans likely would overlook Sessions’ sins because otherwise he has done pretty much what they want. Lathan, who as state GOP party chair plays a PR game of Twister while she avoids taking sides in the Trump/Sessions imbroglio, cites a long list of Sessions’ policies to control the southern border, fight the Latino gang MS-13 and battle sanctuary cities.

“Those are good things for America,” she said. “And I don’t see President Trump having conflicts or issues with all those things.”

Sessions says he’ll serve as Attorney General as long as the president will have him. And given that Trump’s temper blows hot and cold, it’s possible Sessions might linger after this fall’s midterm elections, the general over/under on when Trump will fire him.

But the president’s temper is unlikely to chill as the heat mounts from Mueller’s probe. For the first time, Sessions’ protectors in the Senate signal they are open to considering a replacement after the midterms.

That could spell the end to Sessions’ 37-year public-service career. Teaching law school or joining a think tank is the most likely private-sector option if he doesn’t retire altogether.

Sessions has the credentials and experience to be a federal judge, but the Trump administration is touting younger candidates for the lifetime appointments.

If Sessions returns to politics, his palatable options are few. After being U.S. senator and attorney general, why would he want either position on a state level? Sessions, who turns 72 on Christmas Eve, is age-barred from joining the Alabama Supreme Court. After November, the next governor’s election is in 2022.

That leaves his old Senate seat. But if he wins, don’t look for Sessions to seek vengeance on his former tormenter-in-chief. “I think the view in Washington is Jeff Sessions with a decisive vote on impeachment is Trump’s worst nightmare,” Flynt said. He disagrees. That’s not Sessions’ style.

The big question is would Sessions even want to return. He never really pursued senatorial trappings and power. He didn’t seek bring-home-the bacon committees like Appropriations, Defense or Agriculture. He was content being the most conservative person on the Senate floor.

“He’s a prosecutor at heart,” Flowers said. “I don’t know if he has the fire in his belly to go back to the Senate.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2PRq12L
via IFTTT

Malaysian ex-PM Najib hit with 25 new charges over 1MDB scandal

Malaysia’s former Prime Minister Najib Razak has been hit with 25 new corruption charges linked to the 1MDB scandal.

The new charges include four counts of abuse of power and 21 counts of money laundering over hundreds of millions of dollars of funds received in his personal bank account.

Najib was detained by Malaysia’s anti-corruption agency on Wednesday, for allegedly transferring $681m into his personal bank account, as part of investigations into the 1MDB state investment fund.

The former leader was questioned by police and then appeared in court in the capital, Kuala Lumpur, on Thursday. Najib pleaded not guilty to all charges after they were read out in court.

The money-laundering charges include nine counts of receiving illegal proceeds, five counts of using illegal funds and seven counts of transferring the proceeds to other entities, Deputy National Police Chief Noor Rashid Ibrahim said on Thursday ahead of the court hearing.

The latest charges bring the total number against Najib to 32.

He has previously been charged with money-laundering, criminal breach of trust and abusing his position over claims he pocketed some $10m from SRC International, a subsidiary of 1MDB. Najib has consistently denied any wrongdoing in relation to those charges and his trial is due to start next year.

“These new charges are significant because prosecutors allege the money flowed directly from 1MDB, the state investment fund that Najib had set up,” said Al Jazeera’s Florence Looi, reporting from Kuala Lumpur.

“They will involve a much more complex investigation,” she added. “Investigators believe that front companies as well as foreign offshore entities were used to siphon the money from 1MDB and eventually into Najib’s personal bank account.”

1MDB scandal 

Officially called the 1Malaysia Development Berhad, the 1MDB state fund is the subject of a sweeping international investigation by at least six countries, including the United States, Singapore and Switzerland, over alleged money laundering and corruption by high-level officials.

The 1MDB scandal first became public in 2015 when leaked documents showed that $681m was transferred into Najib’s bank account, leading to massive street rallies calling on him to resign.

The US Department of Justice estimates officials misappropriated $4.5m in total from the fund.

The scandal was a key factor in Najib’s shock defeat in the May elections.

The new government – a coalition of opposition parties headed by Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad – reopened investigations into corruption at 1MBD that were stifled while Najib was in office and set up a special task force.

Najib was released on a 1 million ringgit ($250,000) bail by a Kuala Lumpur court after his first arrest in July.

He and his wife, Rosmah Mansour, who has also been questioned in the scandal but has not been charged, are barred from leaving the country.

Cash, jewellery, luxury handbags and watches worth an estimated 1bn ringgit ($250m) were seized by investigators from multiple Najib-linked private residences in May as part of the probe.

Malaysian police have also issued an arrest warrant for businessman Low Taek Jho, often called Jho Low, in connection with the 1MDB investigation, Al Jazeera’s Looi reported. 

“He is alleged to be a key figure and the mastermind of this complex scheme to defraud the Malaysian government,” she said. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2MNXysP
via IFTTT

US ready to resume N Korea talks, seeks denuclearisation by 2021

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says he wants to restart nuclear talks with North Korea at the “earliest opportunity” in the wake of new agreements reached between the two Koreas at a summit in Pyongyang.

The move comes after North Korean leader Kim Jong-un pledged at the historic summit with South Korean President Moon Jae-in to dismantle its key missile facilities and suggested it would close its main Yongbyon nuclear complex if Washington took unspecified actions.

Pompeo welcomed Wednesday’s agreement between the two Koreas to denuclearise the peninsula.

This will mark the beginning of negotiations to transform US-DPRK relations through the process of rapid denuclearisation of North Korea…

Mike Pompeo, the US secretary of state

“This will mark the beginning of negotiations to transform US-DPRK relations through the process of rapid denuclearisation of North Korea, to be completed by January 2021, as committed by Chairman Kim, and to construct a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula,” Pompeo said in a statement, using the initials of the country’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

The US secretary of state said on Wednesday he had invited North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho to meet in New York City next week on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly to discuss the aim of completing North Korea’s denuclearisation by January 2021.

Pompeo also said Washington invited Pyongyang’s representatives to meet the US special representative for North Korea, Stephen Biegun, in Vienna.

The January 2021 completion date was the most specific deadline set so far in what is expected to be a long process of trying to get the North to end its nuclear programme, which may threaten US allies South Korea and Japan as well as the US mainland.

The sudden revival of diplomacy comes amid doubts expressed by US President Donald Trump’s administration on North Korea’s willingness to negotiate in good faith after a June summit between Trump and Kim yielded few tangible results.

Al Jazeera’s Rosiland Jordan, reporting from Washington, DC, said: “The Trump administration believes that this is an opportunity to try to move ahead and try to improve the relations with the country which it says was not too far off from being at war with the United States.”

She also said it was not clear whether the expected talks in Vienna would be held under the auspices of the United Nations, which typically is involved in similar denuclearisation efforts.

“There is also the question of whether UN Security Council resolutions will have to be reversed in order for closer diplomatic and economic ties to take place between the two countries,” she said.

Reactions

China, North Korea’s closest ally, said it warmly welcomed the agreement reached in Pyongyang and strongly supported it.

“We absolutely cannot let this hard to come by opportunity for peace slip away once again,” the Chinese government’s top diplomat, State Councillor Wang Yi, said in a statement.

Some US officials were deeply sceptical. Speaking before Pompeo’s announcement, two senior US officials involved in US-North Korea policy voiced fears Kim was trying to drive a wedge between Washington and Seoul.

At the summit, the two Koreas agreed on plans to resume economic cooperation, including working to reconnect rail and road links. They agreed as well to restart a joint factory park in the border city of Kaesong and tours to North Korea’s Mount Kumgang resort when conditions are met.

US officials suggested Kim was trying to ease the economic pressure on him to curb his nuclear programmes and to undercut the rationale for US troops being based in South Korea by improving relations with Seoul.

Washington has about 28,500 US troops in South Koreato deter a North Korean attack. Pyongyang has long sought their withdrawal and Trump has questioned their rationale and cost.

North Korea’s Kim agrees to ‘dismantle’ key missile test sites

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2OBnbio
via IFTTT

Kawhi Leonard Rumors: Clippers Still Favorites to Land Raptors SF in Free Agency

SAN ANTONIO, TX - JANUARY 13:  Kawhi Leonard #2 of the San Antonio Spurs handles the ball against the Denver Nuggets on January 13, 2018 at the AT&T Center in San Antonio, Texas. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2018 NBAE (Photos by Mark Sobhani/NBAE via Getty Images)

Mark Sobhani/Getty Images

Toronto Raptors forward Kawhi Leonard could become a free agent after the 2018-19 season, and the Los Angeles Clippers appear to be the favorites to land the talented player, according to Adrian Wojnarowski of ESPN.

The team will have cap space available for two max contracts next season, and it is “emerging as a front-runner” for Leonard.

Minnesota Timberwolves star Jimmy Butler could be the other max player, with Wojnarowski also reporting the guard wants to potentially pursue a future with the Clippers. He reportedly put in a trade request Wednesday and hopes to land with the Clippers, Brooklyn Nets or New York Knicks.

Meanwhile, Leonard was already traded this offseason to the Raptors in a deal that sent DeMar DeRozan to the San Antonio Spurs.

Leonard has a player option after this season worth $21 million, although he can decline it in order to get a larger deal in free agency. There have long been rumors about the two-time All-Star heading west after the season, but that is apparently not a done deal.

“I think he still feels like L.A. might be the destination,” Jabari Young of the San Antonio Express-News said in August on TSN (h/t Colin Ward-Henninger of CBS Sports). “But the same time, he plans to go into this thing with an open mind, giving it every single shot in the world to make it work.”

It seems we won’t know for sure where Leonard will end up until after we see how the experiment in Toronto plays out, but it will be worth watching to see if the Clippers can land the forward in 2019-20.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2NSjlnV
via IFTTT

Russia’s military unintelligence

On September 5, the UK named two agents of the Russian military intelligence (GRU) as the main suspects in the Skripal poisoning case. 

The two are accused of depositing a nerve agent in the Salisbury home of Sergei Skripal, a former Russian double agent, which poisoned him and his daughter in March this year.

The British authorities released the photos, personal details and even the route the two agents allegedly took to accomplish their mission. Russia, of course, has denied everything, but with the amount of evidence uncovered, it will have a hard time convincing the international community of its innocence.

There have been some observers who have expressed their doubt that Moscow is responsible for the Skripal poisoning, arguing that it could not have acted so clumsily, especially after the Litvinenko case. Why would Russia want another such scandal – the argument goes.

They are partially right: Russia really doesn’t need such a scandal right now. Yet, we should not be surprised about its intelligence agencies undertaking such a mission and failing in it. As the popular saying goes: Never attribute to conspiracy that which is adequately explained by incompetence.

For some reason, there is a general perception that unlike other state institutions in Russia, the intelligence agencies are quite professional and capable. Perhaps Hollywood should be blamed for this misconception. To garner interest and sell its films, the US movie industry tends to feature unrealistic depictions of Russian spies as dangerous and highly skilful men and women, who fight it out with their Western counterparts.

But if one is to shoot a realistic film about the GRU, it would probably have to be a comedy. In fact, the last few years of Russian intelligence blunders provide plenty of material for the script.

Poison spies

A lot of people seem surprised about the fact that the attempted Skripal assassination failed and the agents left so many clues behind. But if you look at how Alexander Litvinenko was assassinated in 2006, that should not be surprising.

The two agents, Andrey Lugovoi and Dmitry Kovtun, who were allegedly tasked with killing Litvinenko, had to try twice before succeeding. On October 16, they made their first attempt to poison him in a sushi bar but that night Litvinenko vomited and survived.

Then they tried again two weeks later and managed to slip the poison into Litvinenko’s tea. On both of their trips to London, the two left behind a massive radioactive trace that the police were able to track afterwards. Polonium traces were found in the hotels where they stayed, in the restaurants and cafes they visited, and even on the shisha they smoked.

Traces were also found on the British Airways plane they took back to Moscow after their second mission. The highest concentration of the poison was found in the bathroom plughole of Lugovoi’s hotel room, which made the investigators believe that he poured out the rest of it into the sink.

If the two agents had just stabbed Litvinenko in some dark side street, the murder might have remained unresolved. But polonium leaves behind traces for a long time which exposed Lugovoi and Kovtun. According to the investigators, it is possible the two did not even know what poison they were using and they were actually lucky that they did not get exposed to a deadly dose of radiation.

Is it then surprising that in the Skripal case, the two agents also left behind traces of the chemical agent in their hotel room?

If you think that the GRU rarely leaves behind so much incriminating evidence, you are wrong. Here are a few more examples.

Hacker spies

For many years, the international cybersecurity community has been hunting for two hacker groups known as Fancy Bear and APT28. Around 2014, experts came to the tentative conclusion that the Russian intelligence agencies could be behind these groups, but had no direct evidence to support it.

Then Fancy Bear hackers started targeting Western political and intuitions and Russian opposition activists and human rights defenders. One of these attacks targeted the email server of French politician Emmanuel Macron’s election campaign. The attack failed to find a “kompromat” in the contents of the server and Macron ended up winning the French presidential elections.

The hackers, however, made the mistake of leaving behind files with metadata that exposed them. Thus, the name of Georgiy Petrovich Roshka came to be known.

The Russian press soon uncovered that a man by this name was a speaker at an IT conference in Russia in 2016. His affiliation was listed in the brochure as Military Unit 26165, which focuses on cryptoanalysis.

Earlier this year, Special Counsel Robert Mueller accused and named 12 GRU hackers of interference in US elections, a good number of them also being part of this unit.

Rocket spies

Another recent journalistic investigation identified Oleg Ivannikov, a GRU officer, as one of the key suspects in the international investigation of the downing of Flight MH17 in 2014.

The Russian authorities declared that he was not on active duty with the military. That would have been believable if an open source investigation hadn’t uncovered that in 2017 Ivannikov had made an order from an online shop to the address of the GRU headquarters in Moscow instead of his own address.

Money spies

On October 16, 2016 – a day before the Montenegrin elections – Prime Minister Milo Djukanovich announced that a coup plot had been foiled. A group of men from Montenegro and Serbia had planned to overthrow the government and hand over power to the Democratic Front, a pro-Russian, anti-NATO party.

During the investigation, two GRU agents who dealt with the financing of the plot were uncovered. One of them, Eduard Shishmakov, used to work under diplomatic cover in Poland from where he was expelled after he tried to recruit a Polish officer.

After this failed mission, Shishmakov got a new passport with a different surname and without making an effort to change his appearance, went to Serbia to recruit locals for a coup plot in Montenegro. He gave cash and later sent money through Western Union from Russia – leaving behind a paper trail the Montenegrin investigators were able to pick up.

It is possible that one of the reasons for such unprofessional behaviour of Russian military intelligence officers is that they do not feel the need to cover up their trail.

The Russian government has always denied any allegations of its agents being involved in special operations abroad, even when the facts were clear. Yet, it very much enjoys all the publicity it gets with each new spy scandal.

After all, if your aim is to scare off other countries, then the more hysteria there is about your special ops abroad, the better, even if they are failed ones.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2OIA1LS
via IFTTT

Jimmy Butler Trade Rumors: Star ‘Most Determined’ to Join Clippers

Minnesota Timberwolves guard Jimmy Butler during the second half of an NBA basketball game Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Kyusung Gong)

Kyusung Gong/Associated Press

Minnesota Timberwolves star Jimmy Butler is “most determined” to try to see the Timberwolves swing a trade with the Los Angeles Clippers, ESPN.com’s Adrian Wojnarowski reported Wednesday.

According to Wojnarowski, Butler likes the fact that the Clippers could potentially have the salary-cap space to sign two max-level free agents.

The Athletic’s Jon Krawczynski reported Wednesday that Butler had requested a trade from the Timberwolves after meeting head coach and president of basketball operations Tom Thibodeau on Tuesday in Los Angeles.

In an earlier report, Wojnarowski listed the Clippers, Brooklyn Nets and New York Knicks as Butler’s preferred destinations.

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the story centered on the Los Angeles Lakers, who didn’t make the cut. Wojnarowski wrote Butler would’ve seriously entertained a move to the Lakers but that “LeBron James’ arrival as the franchise’s cornerstone made it less appealing for Butler in the prime of his career.”

According to Spotrac, the Lakers could have $41.7 million available next summer, which would be more than enough to sign Butler as a free agent—assuming he opts out of his current contract. Financially, they’d be on equal footing with any other team in the Butler sweepstakes.

Part of the attraction to signing James was how he’d open the door for more star players to follow him to Los Angeles, yet Butler isn’t the first star to seemingly balk at the idea of playing alongside the four-time NBA MVP.

Paul George agreed to re-sign with the Oklahoma City Thunder almost immediately after the free-agent moratorium began.

During an appearance on the Back To Back podcast on the Count The Dings network, ESPN.com’s Michael C. Wright reported Kawhi Leonard had also cooled on the idea of becoming a member of the Lakers. Wright said Leonard “doesn’t want to go and be second fiddle to LeBron” and instead saw the Clippers as a better choice.

The Clippers aren’t necessarily in rebuilding mode, but they’re clearly preparing to be serious players next summer and beyond at the expense of contending in the short term. They traded away fan favorite Blake Griffin last season and saw DeAndre Jordan sign with the Dallas Mavericks this offseason.

By signing James, the Lakers were one of the biggest winners of free agency. This time next year, however, the Clippers might actually be on stronger footing if they can successfully land Butler and another All-Star-caliber player.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2DbHuBu
via IFTTT

New York Democrats still waiting for Cuomo’s help


Andrew Cuomo is pictured. | Getty

Andrew Cuomo’s plans sounded uncharacteristically grand for a governor who’d avoided hyper-partisanship during his two terms in office. | Getty Images

Gov. Andrew Cuomo stood last June with Nancy Pelosi and said he would do whatever it took to defeat Republican incumbents in competitive House races across New York.

Many of those Democratic candidates are still waiting for him to show up.

Story Continued Below

Cuomo’s 2017 pronouncement came before he found himself in an unexpectedly heated primary with Cynthia Nixon. In the more than 15 months since he announced the effort to help House Democratic candidates, and with just seven weeks to go until the general election, much of what he promised has yet to materialize. Democrats working on House races this year said they’d forgotten Cuomo had even made the promise.

The governor held a few campaign rallies where he’s taken a noticeably light touch on the incumbents and done little fundraising. When he held a rally Tuesday in New York City with labor unions and argued New York needed to elect a blue Congress to stop President Donald Trump, it was one of only a handful of rallies he’s done for Democrats across the state in the past year.

Back in June of 2017, he suggested he’d be relentless in pursuit of a Democratic House.

“I charge Congressmen [John] Faso and [Chris] Collins with violating their office to represent the people of the state of New York,” the governor said then, referring to two Republican congressmen. “Our message to Leader Pelosi is this: We stand to fight with you and the fight to take back America starts in New York and it starts today.”

Cuomo’s plans sounded uncharacteristically grand for a governor who’d avoided hyper-partisanship during his two terms in office.

“To become hyper-political, I think, violates your oath of office,” he said at the 2016 Democratic National Convention.

But the governor, rumored to be eyeing a 2020 run for the White House, attributed his renewed fervor to the battle against Trump.

He dubbed his initiative “New York Fights Back,” and said it would be run through the state Democratic Party. His aides talked about raising and spending millions of dollars for ads, organizing and personal appearances — all on behalf of Democrats looking to unseat Republicans in some of the nation’s most contested districts.

Yet through the end of July, the most recent date for which federal spending reports are available, the state party, controlled by the governor, hasn’t reported making any direct contributions to any of the Democratic House candidates in this cycle. Its federal committee filings showed no independent expenditures, and no coordinated expenditures.

In addition to Faso and Collins, Cuomo said he would target Reps. Lee Zeldin (NY-1), Elise Stefanik (NY-21), Claudia Tenney (NY-22) and Tom Reed (NY-23) — all Republicans seen as vulnerable in 2018. Now, in a year when Democrats are expected to turn out in huge numbers, other seats are seen as long-shot pickups too: Another district on Long Island, held by Pete King (NY-2), and the seat currently held by Dan Donovan (NY-11) on Staten Island.

“New York is going to be a pivot point for House Democrats, you know, it’s hard to get to 23 seats without picking up a few in New York,” said Steve Israel, the former chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. “There are already a bunch of red to blue districts in New York. When you look at the extraordinary — the nuclear energy that Democrats generated in the primary this past week, it tells you that New York is ready and able to put Democrats over the top.”

But to the extent that the governor has done anything, it’s mostly been small potatoes. In mid-August, Cuomo formed a federal Political Action Committee called “Cuomo NY Take Back the House,” which has so far made a series of $2,700 donations, the maximum individual limit, to a string of House Democratic candidates, including Perry Gershon, Liuba Grechen Shirley, Max Rose, Antonio Delgado, Tedra Cobb, Anthony Brindisi, Tracy Mitrano, Dana Balter, Joe Morelle and Nate McMurray.

Those donations represent a relatively minor financial commitment for a governor known as one of the country’s best fundraisers. Combined, they add up to the amount of money Cuomo spent every 80 minutes in the final weeks of this year’s gubernatorial primary.

One campaign manager for a House Democratic candidate said the campaign had had no contact so far with the state party or the governor’s campaign. A senior campaign official for another campaign told POLITICO the campaign had had minimal contact with state party officials so far, but is hopeful there will be more.

In July, the New York Daily News cited a source saying the state party was working with the DCCC to set up field offices and launch multi-million dollar digital, mail and TV campaigns. As for TV ads, state party officials said they hadn’t made those ad buys yet, but would not rule them out in the future.

“For eight years it’s been a lot of sound and fury and it hasn’t signified very much,” said New York Working Families Party Executive Director Bill Lipton, a frequent Cuomo critic. “It’s been a lot of rallies and press releases, and nothing of real significance.”

State party officials, speaking on background, told POLITICO that the party and Cuomo see every Republican-held seat as a potential pickup, but are focusing their efforts in five key districts, and said they had helped place roughly 25 staff members in the field around the state. They disagreed with the idea that Democrats feel Cuomo has not delivered on his promise, and said the governor’s primary reelection effort, in which his campaign committee and the state party spent millions of dollars, had helped create a massive voter turnout infrastructure that will help the House Democratic candidates in the midterms.

Officials also said the state party has been doing some direct mail and digital advertising on behalf of House candidates and pointed to mailers paid for by the state party that were critical of Tenney and supportive of Brindisi, her Democratic challenger, as well as two mailers that had gone out in support of Delgado and Rose. The officials said a mailer has gone out in support of Gershon, and more would be sent in the coming weeks.

They said these efforts have added up to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

“Unlike others, Gov. Cuomo and the State Party prove our program with results on election day, not bluster,” said Cuomo campaign spokeswoman Abbey Collins in an emailed statement. “The Governor launched an aggressive coordinated campaign over a year ago and has laid a robust infrastructure to take back the House and State Senate to fight back against Donald Trump and Washington Republicans. As we head towards November, we will continue to build on the State Party’s dynamic field, data and mail program and ramp up fundraising and advertising efforts. There is no more urgent task ahead than defeating Trump and Democrats have never been more energized and united to win the day.”

One Brindisi mailer went out in August, and others were sent in September, a party official said, while declining to give further details about the amount spent on ads for each candidate, or the number of households those mailers had been sent to. But as of the party’s most recent filing, which captured transactions only through July, there had not been many signs of an uptick in party activity. In a report filed last month, the committee reported making $1.2 million in total disbursements this year. That’s not radically different from the $764,000 it reported during the same time period in 2016 or the $1.4 million it reported in 2014.

In each of these years, these totals include a significant share of money that does not appear to have gone entirely toward activities like helping congressional candidates. This year, for example, the spending included $721,000 in operating expenditures that were allocated to non-federal purposes. With that money taken out of the equation, the party only had $504,000 in spending identified as “federal disbursements,” compared to $446,000 at the same point in 2016 and $930,000 in 2014.

It’s not like the candidates couldn’t use the help.

Delgado, the Democrat running for the seat held by Faso, a Republican, in New York’s 19th District, which is often discussed as the likeliest possible pickup for Democrats, has raised roughly $2.8 million for his bid.

So far, outside groups have spent about $321,000 in support of his candidacy. While Faso has raised about $2.3 million, Delgado’s been on the business end of more than $1.8 million in outside spending against him, including a flurry of attack ads from the National Republican Congressional Committee which is running ads highlighting rap songs Delgado wrote.

The same dynamic holds in another seat seen as a possible pickup, in New York’s 22nd congressional district, where Brindisi is challenging Tenney, the incumbent. So far, outside groups have spent $2.3 million against Brindisi, compared to $1.5 million in spending against Tenney. Outside groups have spent just $10 in support of Brindisi’s candidacy.

The Democratic Committee’s relative inactivity in general has caused consternation among the party’s activist wing for years. In the nearly eight years since Cuomo took office, the committee’s federal account has raised only $1.3 million from individual donors. The comparable entity in Massachusetts has raised $5.6 million during that time, and the one in Florida, with a population close to New York’s, raised $6.5 million.

And the state account in New York has rarely spent money on behalf of any Democrats, except for the governor, unless the Democrats transfer it money first.

When Cuomo first announced his congressional push last year, several party committee members were caught by surprise. In response, they drafted a resolution that would force the party’s leadership to submit spending plans to committee members, but this was blocked and did not receive a vote.

State party officials told POLITICO they were actively planning fundraisers for the House Democratic candidates, but so far, Cuomo’s held one, for Anthony Brindisi. He’s held events where he cross-endorsed Rose, the candidate challenging Donovan in New York’s 11th Congressional District, and Grechen Shirley and Gershon, the two Democrats challenging Long Island Republican incumbents King and Zeldin.

But even in backing Shirley, Cuomo’s remarks on King were less than lethal.

“This is more the situation he is in,” Cuomo said of King. “He has a leadership that has sworn allegiance to the president that is anti-New York and I don’t believe situationally he can change it.”

With two months left before the midterm elections, it’s possible Cuomo will pick up the pace. But if he stayed minimally involved in pivotal House races, it wouldn’t be the first time.

When Democrats lost control of the House in 2014, Israel, then DCCC chairman, took Cuomo to task for his non-involvement, in an interview with The New York Times.

“We had conversations several months ago with the governor’s staff about helping to organize and coordinate a campaign and I didn’t see the fruition to those conversations,” he said then.

This time around, though, Israel said Cuomo has been stepping up.

“He’s fundraising, he’s mobilizing, he’s recruiting,” Israel said. “He’s been as engaged and devoted as I’ve ever seen.”

Edward-Isaac Dovere contributed to this report.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2NtiFpF
via IFTTT

Avril Lavigne Makes An Emotionally Charged Comeback With ‘Head Above Water’



Courtesy David Needleman

After a five-year hiatus, Avril Lavigne is back. The 33-year-old singer — who personified teen angst in the mid-aughts — shared the first single from her forthcoming sixth album on Wednesday (September 19), and it sees her returning mightier than ever.

“Head Above Water” is a power ballad about just that: trying to stay afloat and alive. “Yeah my life is what I’m fighting for / Can’t part the sea / Can’t reach the shore / And my voice becomes the driving force / I won’t let this pull me overboard,” she sings over a steady-building instrumental, sounding simultaneously fearful and fierce.

The song’s life-or-death intensity isn’t just metaphorical — it documents a culminating moment in Lavigne’s years-long struggle with Lyme disease, which has prevented her from touring and recording in recent years. In a statement, Lavigne spoke about the night that inspired the song, saying, “I thought I was dying, and I had accepted that I was going to die. My mom laid with me in bed and held me. I felt like I was drowning. Under my breath, I prayed ‘God, please help to keep my head above the water.’ In that moment, the song writing of this album began. It was like I tapped into something. It was a very spiritual experience. Lyrics flooded through me from that point on.”

Given that it’s been so long since we’ve heard from Lavigne, and that the reason for her absence is so personal, it makes sense that she’d choose such an emotional song to return with. It recalls Demi Lovato launching her Unbroken era in 2011 with “Skyscraper,” and Kesha making her 2017 comeback with “Praying.” Both of those (very powerful) songs set the stage for a new beginning following tough chapters in their personal lives, and Lavigne is doing the same thing with “Head Above Water.” It’s good to have her back.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2DbHjGk
via IFTTT