‘Crimes of Grindewald’ trailer is bursting with Harry Potter clues: Watch

It may be set decades before Harry Potter was even born, but Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindewald sets the stage for Harry’s epic story. The final trailer for The Crimes of Grindelwald is chock-full of Harry Potter Easter eggs (and those crazy beasts).

SEE ALSO: ‘Fantastic Beasts’ sequel won’t mention Dumbledore’s sexuality

The Crime of Grindelwald finds Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) recruited by his old professor, Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law) to investigate the increasingly powerful dark wizard Grindelwald (Johnny Depp). 

The first jaw-drop Potter moment is Credence (Ezra Miller) addressing Maledictus (Claudia Kim) as she turns into a snake: “Nagini.” (!!!)

We see Grindelwald using the Elder Wand, flashbacks to young Dumbledore and Grindelwald, and some of the best wizard dueling since Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.

The new trailer also features more of Nicholas Flamel (Brontis Jodorowsky), of Leta Lestrange (Zoe Kravitz) and Theseus Scamander (Callum Turner) – and notably, barely any of Fantastic Beasts heroes Jacob (Dan Fogler), Tina (Katherine Waterston), and Queenie (Alison Sudol).

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald premieres Nov. 16.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2pxtit2
via IFTTT

Netflix’s ‘Maniac’: What is it really about?

Maniac looked like it was going to be A Lot. The first trailer for the Netflix original made it seem like a Black Mirror–style technological dreamscape, with dubious medical practice and high fantasy sequences woven together in the kind of narrative that spins off dozens of thinkpieces with headlines like “What Is Even Going On In Maniac” and “The Maniac Finale, Explained.”

It’s not one of those shows at all. 

SEE ALSO: Netflix’s ‘Maniac’ is seriously messing with people’s heads

Yes, technically there is medical malpractice and pseudo-reductive futuristic setting, as well as trippy subplots that take place across a number of time periods and fantastical settings, but to its credit Maniac is 100% not out to blow people’s minds with its weirdness. It wants you to enjoy the weirdness as a means to a very simple end. Maniac wants you to make a friend. 

At the core of Maniac is the idea that living is difficult. The show revolves around a human trial for a three-pill regimen that “cures” humans of mental anguish by guiding them through a process that forces them to identify and confront whatever is holding them back from happiness. The creators of the pills posit that to know oneself is to be truly happy and aim to chemically facilitate the kind of self-knowledge that takes humans years to accomplish, if they ever truly do.

Such a medication is an appealing idea, and even more so in the tilted-sideways version of modernity in which the story takes place. It’s the kind of world where rent-a-friend services are a common and accepted part of life, and grieving widows can buy a man to pretend to be their children’s father in a horrifying service called “Daddy’s Home.” The problem with that world (and, let’s be fair, also this one) is a lack of human connection and an epidemic of loneliness. 

When main characters Owen and Annie sign up to be test subjects for the trial, they are both suffering from what they think are specific problems but are in fact side effects of that loneliness. Owen is potentially schizophrenic and terrified of becoming attached to people in case they aren’t real. Annie is consumed by guilt and grief after the loss of her mother and sister. Neither of them have people in their lives to talk to or friends to help hold them together, and their insistence on dealing with their problems privately contributes to their misery.

Maniac presents loneliness as the most fundamental of human problems and uses the disorienting and fantastic to deliver a clear message about a simple solution: it’s easier with friends.

When an accident caused by the lab’s suicidally depressed artificial intelligence system fuses their trials together, Annie and Owen experience the pills’ promised journey of self-knowledge together and are forced to work through an increasingly elaborate morality tales that reveal their fears and flaws. Even when they don’t remember who and where they are, they take on each story as a team and eventually develop a connection where they need it most — in the real world.

Loneliness is the enemy in Maniac. Even when the show presents GRTA, the aforementioned depressed AI computer, as a villain, it later explores the fact that her bad behavior was an extension of her grief over the death of a doctor she fell in love with. Doctors Mantleray and Fujita, who are running the trial, are also fundamentally lonely — Mantleray is a sex addict who never felt loved by his mother and Fujita hides her human desires in a haze of cigarette smoke and cold ambition. 

Maniac presents loneliness as the most fundamental of human problems and uses the disorienting and fantastic to deliver a clear message about a simple solution: it’s easier with friends. 

The “it” in that truth applies to a number of things in the context of Maniac, some bizarrely specific and some broadly applicable. It’s easier to escape from the psychiatric institution your parents placed you in because you told the truth and got your bullshit brother convicted of a sex crime when you have a friend driving the getaway car. It’s also easier to move on from a death in the family or the loss of your life’s work when you have a shoulder to cry on or a lover to run away with.

For all its dancing around the subject of mental illness and bizarre dance sequences, Maniac’s truth is that there is no pill, whirring wall of buttons, or radioactive headgear that can replace the effect of people coming together in friendship. If that sounds cheesy, it’s because it is. That doesn’t mean it’s not real. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2IdtplV
via IFTTT

UK newsapper industry wants Google and Facebook to pay journalism tax

UK newspaper revenues have plummeted in the last 10 years. Should social media sites pay a tax to prop them up again?
UK newspaper revenues have plummeted in the last 10 years. Should social media sites pay a tax to prop them up again?

Image: Thanasak Wanichpan / Getty images

2016%2f09%2f16%2f6f%2fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymdezlza1.53aeaBy Stan Schroeder

Google, Facebook and other sites that host news content on their platforms should pay an annual tax to fund journalism in the UK. This is the stance of the News Media Association, the British newspaper industry’s trade body which represents most of the UK media. 

The organization’s proposal to the UK government comes as the British newspaper industry shrunk from £6.8 billion ($8.94 billion) to £3.6 billion ($4.73 billion) from 2007 to 2017, the Guardian reported Tuesday

SEE ALSO: Google Search gets a slew of new features on its 20th anniversary

“The primary focus of concern today is the loss of advertising revenues which have previously sustained quality national and local journalism and are now flowing to the global search engines and social media companies who make no meaningful contribution to the cost of producing the original content from which they so richly benefit,” the organization said

Google and Facebook’s platforms are an increasingly significant source of news; according to a 2017 Pew report, two thirds of Americans get some of their news on social media. Research from the Reuters Institute and the University of Oxford showed that, in 2018, social media was a news source for 39% of people in the UK.

But a similar proposal in Spain in 2014 has not gone very well, as Google simply shut down its News service in that country. 

The News Media Association also proposed that Facebook shared its revenue with newspapers when their stories appear in users’ feeds, even if the users don’t click on them. 

Furthermore, the NMA would like tech companies to give “reasonable notice” when they make changes to their terms of business or algorithms that affect news publishers. Facebook has often been the target of criticism for abrupt changes to its algorithms. 

The NMA also touched on the widely publicized fake news problem. Under their proposal, tech companies would have the same legal responsibility as the publishers whose content they carry, and would be watched over by an independent regulator. 

“This would incentivize the aggregators to promote verified news content over fake news and other harmful content,” NMA claims. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Q2wbgA
via IFTTT

Apple Watch Series 4 review: Sidekick no more

Every product here is independently selected by Mashable journalists. If you buy something featured, we may earn an affiliate commission which helps support our work.

Like a baby learning how to walk and talk, the Apple Watch can finally stand on its own two feet and proudly say “Look world, I’ve arrived!”

In hindsight, it’s clear Apple at first didn’t know what it wanted the Apple Watch to be. Apple CEO Tim Cook announced the smartwatch as “the next chapter in Apple’s story” at the tail end of its iPhone 6 event in 2014, and at first it seemed like the Apple Watch would be a tiny iPhone for your wrist.

Apple boasted about notifications, texting and calling, animated emoji (not to be confused with Animoji), sharing digital heartbeats (weird!), fitness tracking, and insisted apps, much like on iOS, would become the heart of the smartwatch.

The original Apple Watch did all of these things and more, but none of them really well — certainly not to the point where you couldn’t just shrug and live without it.

With each new Apple Watch model, Apple started to key in on what differentiates the smartwatch from an iPhone. Above all else Apple has emphasized fitness and wellness, and with the new Apple Watch Series 4, the company is going even further, positioning it, at least partially, as a medical device that watches your health so you can live a healthier (and hopefully happier) life.

Thanks to bigger screens and more advanced sensors for things like fall detection and ECG readouts, the Apple Watch finally has a real purpose in your life as opposed to being a mere accessory to your iPhone.

Series 4 is the big leap everyone’s been waiting for and it’s truly awesome.

Apple Watch Series 4

$399 (starting for 40mm GPS only) and $429 (starting for 44mm GPS only)

The Good

  • Bigger, higher-resolution displays
  • Compatible with all old Apple Watch bands
  • Increasingly advanced health and fitness tracking
  • Super fast and smooth performance
  • Satisfying haptic feedback in Digital Crown
  • Walkie Talkie app is awesome
  • Excellent battery life

The Bad

  • Lacks sleep tracking, commonplace in other wearables
  • Still no always-on clock
  • Super pricey

The Bottom Line

With larger screens and even more advanced health and fitness tracking, the Apple Watch Series 4 is still the smartwatch to beat.

Cool Factor4

Learning Curve5

Performance5

Bang for the Buck4

But before we get into all of the reasons why the Apple Watch Series 4 is such a great smartwatch — the best there is at the time of this writing — I need to address the elephant in the room: pricing.

The Apple Watch Series 4 isn’t cheap. Compared to Series 3, which started at $329 and $359 for the GPS-only 38mm and 42mm models, respectively, the Series 4 starts at a higher $399 for the 40mm and $429 for the 44mm GPS-only models.

If you spring for the GPS + Cellular versions of the Series 4, it’s gonna cost you at minimum $499 for the 40mm and $529 for the 44mm.

And that’s only for the aluminum versions. The price balloons if you want the nicer stainless steel or Hermès models. Killed off is the Apple Watch Edition, which sported a ceramic case on Series 3. Apple told me it chooses colors and materials based on what’s in style for the season, so there’s no guarantee a particular model will be sold forever, nor are they saying the Edition won’t make return in the future.

Worth noting is the new gold stainless steel model. It’s kinda hot and perfectly matches the gold iPhone XS and XS Max.

Sleeker design and bigger screens

Right off the bat, it’s obvious the Apple Watch Series 4 has changed. The most immediate difference between the new 40mm and 44mm models compared to the Series 3 and earlier versions is the larger displays: They’re over 35 percent and 32 percent larger than the screens on the previous generation 38mm and 42mm devices.

That’s significantly more surface area and more pixels on the OLED screen (394 x 324 on the 40mm and 448 x 368 on the 44mm) to display content, despite being in watch cases that are roughly the same dimensions as the old Apple Watches. Apple crammed a bigger screen into a compact design the same way it did with the iPhone X: It pushed the screen to the edge by shrinking the bezels around it.

A larger screen means larger buttons that are easier to tap.

Lili Sams/Mashable

My feelings on the Apple Watch’s bigger screens haven’t changed since seeing them after Apple’s fall event. This is exactly what the original Apple Watch should have been and no doubt what Jony Ive and the rest of the design team at Apple wanted to achieve but couldn’t because of technology limitations.

Nevertheless, the Apple Watch Series 4 is just gorgeous. I never fancied the aluminum models (the one and only Apple Watch I bought was the original “Series 0” in stainless steel), but the space gray Series 4 paired with the indigo sport loop band is a fire combo.

Not only does the smartwatch look less bulky, but the thinner optical heart rate sensor on the underside, which is now made of ceramic and sapphire crystal for faster readings and better cellular reception, makes it more comfortable to wear. I usually take my watch (smartwatch or mechanical) off before hopping into bed, but I forgot to on a couple of nights and didn’t loathe myself for not remembering to do so. I didn’t even feel the Apple Watch on my wrist during the night.

The Digital Crown now has a less obnoxious red ring and features haptic feedback when rotated.

Dustin Drankoski/Mashable

The speaker on Series 4 is 50 percent louder than on Series 3.

Dustin Drankoski/Mashable

Apple’s also improved virtually every part on the Apple Watch. The Digital Crown has been redesigned with haptic feedback whenever it’s rotated. You feel a very satisfying vibrational “click” whenever your turn it; some people say it’s more like the crown on a mechanical watch, but I disagree. There isn’t as much resistance on the Series 4’s Digital Crown — it’s a much more smoother rotating experience — compared to a regular watch crown.

The speakers are noticeably louder (Apple says up to 50 percent louder), the relocated microphones are better for making calls and using the new Walkie-Talkie feature (more on that later), and the side button is a now elegantly flush with the metal body.

My biggest complaint is: Why not an always-on display to show the time? Most WearOS and Samsung smartwatches have a low-power clock mode so you don’t need to flick your wrist to check the time. I get that it’d reduce battery life, but still… it’ll always be just shy of truly being the world’s “No. 1 watch” (Cook’s claims, not mine) if it doesn’t always show the time. 

Even so, the Series 4 comes with a lot of small tweaks that add up to make it more delightful to use. I’m usually itching to take off my smartwatch as soon as I get home (even if it doesn’t need to be charged up), but I found myself leaving the Apple Watch Series 4 on until right before bedtime or not even removing it at all.

Faster speed and excellent battery life

When I forced myself to use my Apple Watch “Series 0” for a year, I hated how slow it was. I was perpetually looking at spinning wheels as apps took forever to open and load; watchOS stuttered at every corner.

The original Apple Watch had a SiP (system-in-package) chip, but since then Apple’s sped up its wearable tech considerably. Series 1 and 2, which were confusingly released at the same time, used the same dual-core chip — called S1P and S2. Both chips were up to 50 percent faster than the S1, with the only difference between the two being the lack of a GPS on the S1P.

Then with Series 3, Apple cranked the chip’s performance up to 70 percent faster than the S2. The S3 chip was noticeably faster than anything before it, but it still didn’t feel snappy the way Apple’s A-series chips do on iPhones.

However, with Series 4 and the dual-core S4 chip, the Apple Watch finally feels like it’s almost instantaneous. This is largely due to the chip’s jump from 32-bit to 64-bit processing, which Apple says leads to 50 percent faster performance over the S3 chip.

Together with the larger screen, which makes watchOS 5 more enjoyable to tap and swipe at, the software really glides on the Series 4 Apple Watch. Apps open faster, watch face complications open instantly, and scrolling through notifications is silky smooth.

Just like I predicted after my first hands-on with the new Apple Watch, I found myself spending an extra couple of seconds interacting with notifications — I actually used quick replies because they weren’t slow or janky to scroll through — and wanting to open apps because I knew I wouldn’t have to suffer wait times.

The new Infograph Modular watch face has room for up to six complications.

Lili Sams/Mashable

In addition to faster performance (translation: me smiling more smiling and frowning less), there’s improved cellular connectivity for clearer calls and faster messaging — only on the cellular models of the Series 4, of course.

There’s also a new W3 wireless chip with Bluetooth 5.0 support. This is handy if you’ve got Bluetooth 5.0-compatible wireless headphones, speakers, or other devices that can take advantage of features like greater range (about 130 feet versus about 32 feet on Bluetooth 4.2), faster data transfers (setting up my Series 4 and downloading all the apps was much faster than on Series 3), and better power efficiency.

Sadly, if you own AirPods, you won’t be able to benefit from the increased wireless range. That said, the fact the Apple Watch Series 4 supports Bluetooth 5.0 is probably a good sign that the next version of the wireless earbuds will probably support it as well.

I easily got up to two days of battery life with the Series 4, even with cellular turned on.

Lili Sams/Mashable

Battery life was phenomenal in my nearly week of using the new Series 4. Apple advertises up to 18 hours of battery life with a single charge, which is the same as the Series 3, but I got closer to 48 hours!

Like our phones, battery life will vary with different usage. On the Apple Watch, that mostly comes down to how much you use it for working out, streaming music, and receiving notifications.

Streaming music and activating all of the sensors during workouts is going to deplete battery life quicker. And while you may worry about hundreds of notifications draining the battery fast, of all the features, they probably drain the battery the least.

I was a tad too excited after getting the Apple Watch that I forgot to charge it up to 100 percent and note the battery life. No biggie, because the pre-charged device died by the afternoon on the next day and then I really got to work testing.

“Battery life was phenomenal in my nearly week of using the new Series 4.”

As I shared on Twitter, the Apple Watch still had an impressive 52 percent battery life after 22 hours of receiving hundreds notifications for emails, Instagram DMs, and other apps during a complete workday.

I went for two 45-minute runs — one at 28 hours in and then another the next morning at 39 hours in, where I also streamed Apple Music via LTE the entire time. By the time I passed the 42-hour mark since removing the 100-percent-full Apple Watch from its charger, it still had 20 percent juice left.

To be fair, the first 24 hours was a Friday at the office so I got more notifications and didn’t work out, and the second day was a Saturday so I got fewer notifications but did get to run and stream music.

Days three and four with the Apple Watch were more or less the same. Sunday saw fewer notifications and more activity tracking and on Monday the nonstop torrent of notifications continued all day long.

A balance is obviously important to manage battery life on the Apple Watch. Along with my described usage, I also had the display’s brightness set to around 33 percent (there’s only three settings, which works out to low, medium and high brightness) and found it plenty bright. Even with my sunglasses on I could see the screen perfectly while riding the subway or running in the park.

At work and at home, the Apple Watch connected to WiFi, and LTE everywhere else. Manage your settings well and you can get two days of battery like me.

The Series 4 Apple Watch is water-resistant up to 180 feet.

LILI SAMS/MASHABLE

Apple added the ability to stream Apple Music directly to the Apple Watch earlier this year and while that’s really easy to do, I wish they’d let other music services do the same.

There were rumors users would finally be able to stream Spotify, but those whispers never materialized at WWDC or Apple’s fall event. Apple, open up a little will ya? Apple Music is fine, but let people pick the music service they want to stream to their wrist.

Rounding out the Series 4, you should know that every model comes with 16GB of internal storage (not that I ever really worry about storage on a smartwatch TBH), it supports Apple Pay, and it’s water-resistant up to 180 feet deep.

A guardian for your health

To say Apple is obsessed with monitoring your health is an understatement. In the eight years since Tim Cook took over as CEO from Steve Jobs, he’s made his imprint on all of Apple’s products by pushing their health-tracking capabilities. That shouldn’t come as a surprise since Cook is known for being somewhat of a health nut (he reportedly gets up at 3:45 a.m. and then hits the gym by the time 5 a.m. rolls around).

The Apple Watch has always come with a built-in heart-rate sensor, and the company’s marketing over the years has leaned more and more into fitness. Whether that’s being less sedentary and standing up every hour, taking a few minutes to breathe and de-stress, closing your activity rings, or keeping tabs on your heart rate, the Apple Watch has a tool for it. Not to mention Apple’s been bolstering (albeit slowly) its HealthKit platform for a number of years.

Series 4 is Apple taking the kid gloves off and saying, “We’re serious about helping you live a healthier life” at a time when we’re all busier than ever before, paying more attention to what’s happening through our glass phones and tablets and computers, it’s good to have the Apple Watch, which is almost like your mom or dad reminding you to take care of yourself.

“Series 4 is Apple taking the kid gloves off and saying ‘We’re serious about helping you live a healthier life.’”

The new smartwatch includes a couple of new health features. The first is fall detection. Using the improved accelerometer and gyroscope, the watch detects variables such as wrist trajectory, acceleration, and force of a fall to determine if you’ve, well, fallen hard and might need emergency assistance.

If the Apple Watch thinks you’ve fallen and need help after a minute of no response, it’ll call an emergency service and then contact your own emergency contact with a text message that includes your location.

Apple told me it field-tested fall detection on over 1,000 users and determined one minute was a good amount of time before having the Apple Watch contact for help. When I asked why not have the Watch contact your emergency contact first and then call an emergency service, I was told their testing found people usually needed fast medical help first if they’d fallen down.

Fall detection isn’t turned on by default unless you’re 65 or older.

Screenshot: Raymond Wong/Mashable

You probably wanna turn it on.

Screenshot: Raymond Wong/Mashable

Fall Detection also isn’t easily tripped up (no pun intended). As it turns out, most hard falls caused by, say, tripping on the street or falling down the stairs and any other hard impacts create up to 32 g’s of force. The Series 4 looks for the aforementioned variables (acceleration, trajectory, and impact force) to prevent false positives. Series 3 and older Apple Watches can only detect up to 16 g’s, which makes them not accurate enough for fall detection, Apple told me.

With these powerful measurements, all crunched by the S4 chip in real time, the Apple Watch elevates itself beyond just a notification and fitness-tracking wearable.

Fall detection isn’t foolproof. While it takes an actual hard fall for the feature to be triggered (I couldn’t trick it by falling on my bed or even dropping myself onto carpeted floor — yes, I did it for science!), it can’t detect slumps or light falls.

Interestingly enough: Fall detection isn’t turned on by default unless you’ve 65 or over. Apple says younger people are likely to be more active and perform activities that could accidentally trigger the fall detection (I imagine falling off a skateboard over and over probably would) and therefore it’s turned off by default.

If you don’t usually bust your body, you can turn fall detection on in the Watch app on iOS. Make that the first thing you do if you buy a Series 4.

The Apple Watch has an optical heart-rate sensor (underside) and electric heart-rate sensor (in the Digital Crown) for advanced health monitoring.

LILI SAMS/MASHABLE

Apple’s upping the medical data you can get from the Apple Watch’s heart rate sensor. There are new notifications for low heart rate and irregular rhythms (Atrial fibrillation, also called AFib). In addition to the high heart-rate notifications that were added in watchOS 4, there’s now low heart-rate notifications in watchOS 5; you’ll get a notification if your heart rate falls below a certain threshold for at least 10 minutes.

Irregular rhythm notifications are arguably even more valuable. Apple’s touting the feature as a way to detect early signs of AFib, which is the main cause of strokes. Again, like fall detection, it’s not a replacement for going to a doctor, but it will at the very least keep you informed if you notice something irregular.

Apple Watch Series 1, 2, and 3 users will get the low heart-rate notifications if they update to watchOS 5, and the irregular rhythm notifications will come later this year for U.S. users also running watchOS 5.

Coming in an update later this year, the Digital Crown can take an ECG reading in 30 seconds.

Dustin Drankoski/Mashable

By far the one Apple Watch Series 4 feature that has everyone excited the most is its ability to take an electrocardiogram (ECG or EKG). The feature won’t be available until later this year, but Apple’s promising a lot — it’s billed as the first over-the-counter ECG app that’s been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

By just placing your finger on the new Digital Crown for 30 seconds, the Apple Watch can get a readout of your heart’s electrical signals and then compile that info into a graphed waveform PDF document you can then share with your doctor.

My review unit didn’t come with the feature loaded, but I did get to see a real demo of the ECG reader on a Series 4 Apple Watch at a press briefing a week after Apple’s fall event, and it looked promising. I’ll update this review when the feature is available for me to test.

It’s sad the Apple Watch still doesn’t have any sleep-tracking features.

Lili Sams/Mashable

Fantastic and full-featured as the Apple Watch Series 4’s health and fitness capabilities are, it lacks one thing: sleep tracking. Other wearables like Fitbit and Samsung’s Galaxy Watch have built-in sleep tracking.

As a guy who gets terrible sleep and wants to understand the science behind the quality of my Z’s, it’s disappointing to see Apple ignore the feature once again. It’s all the more sad when the Apple Watch (at least the aluminum model I tested) is so comfy to wear to during sleep (something I can’t say the same for the Galaxy Watch or many Fitbits).

WatchOS 5 is compatible with all Apple Watches from Series 1 to Series 4 (the original Series 0 Apple Watch isn’t supported). If you’ve got a Series 1, 2, or 3, you’ll get all of the new workout-tracking features on the Series 4, including the automatic workout detection, yoga and hiking tracking, as well as letting you challenge friends to closing activity rings.

Fitbit owners may cackle at Apple for finally catching up with automatic workout tracking. I’ve used all of Fitbit’s smartwatches and latest fitness trackers that support its SmartTrack technology and only had good things to say about the automatic workout detection.

But Apple gets the last laugh. Whereas it usually takes about 10-15 minutes for Fitbit’s with SmartTrack to auto-detect workouts, the Apple Watch Series 4 only takes a couple of minutes. On the weekend, I was running late to a hair cut appointment and had to sprint to the train station in order to make it in time. It normally takes me about seven minutes to walk from my apartment to the subway station, but with my sprint, it only took half the time and I was impressed to see the auto workout kick in after only about three minutes.

Most people will stick with Apple’s own apps.

LILI SAMS/MASHABLE

WatchOS 5 also allows the Series 1-4 to stream from the Podcast app over LTE, send voice memos using Walkie-Talkie, and raise-to-speak to Siri instead of pressing and holding the Digital Crown.

Raise-to-speak to Siri was a bit of a hit-or-miss for me. Sometimes my Apple Watch would detect my voice and sometimes it wouldn’t. I rarely use Siri on the Apple Watch, so it wasn’t a deal-breaker.

The Walkie-Talkie feature, however, is just so much fun. After inviting friends who have an Apple Watch that’s running watchOS 5, you can press and hold a big yellow button to send a voice message (about 25 seconds — yes, I timed it) and they’ll receive it on their smartwatch as an incoming transmission.

I loved using walkie-talkies as a kid with my sister — remember, we didn’t have the internet back then, and besides it was way more fun to use radio lingo like “Do you copy?” or “10-4” or “Roger that!” — and I had a blast using the Apple Watch version with a few buddies. The downside is anyone without an Apple Watch can’t get in on the two-way fun. I’d love to see a Walkie-Talkie app for iPhone or iPad. It seems like a no-brainer for Apple to expand the feature to its other devices.

There’s some other new stuff in watchOS 5 for the Series 4 like a more detailed weather app that shows data for the air quality, UV index, wind direction, and more, but unless you’re maybe a big camper or outdoors person, you probably won’t really be moved by them.

All older Apple Watches that support watchOS 5 get the new Breathe, Fire and Water, Liquid Metal, and Vapor watch faces. But on the Series 4, they use up the entire screen, as opposed to being confined to a circle. As a result, these watch faces are more visually stunning to look at. (Fun fact: Apple actually shot real fire, water, and vapor; they’re not CGI.)

New and exclusive to the Series 4 are the Infograph and Infograph Modular watch faces. Both of these watch faces are designed to cram in more info at glance — Infograph is customizable with up to eight watch complications (AKA shortcuts or widgets) and Infograph Modular with up to six complications.

The new flower watch face fills up the whole screen.

LILI SAMS/MASHABLE

The new Breathe watch face is a good reminder to relax.

LILI SAMS/MASHABLE

Like others who first saw the two watch faces following Apple’s fall event, I initially felt like they crammed too much info into the screen. But as an Apple Watch user, I quickly got used to them. While the colorful complications seem a bit childish at first glance, the multiple colors actually make it easier to glance at more info all at once.

The Mickey Mouse watch face will always be my favorite (how can you not love his arms as clock hands and his tapping foot for the ticking seconds?), but Infograph is the one that makes the best use of the larger screen so it’s the one I stuck with.

After a week of wearing the Apple Watch Series 4, I now understand why Apple’s smartwatch stole the show from the iPhone XS, XS Max, and XR.

With new iPhones, we know what to expect: faster performance, better cameras, and longer battery life. But with the Apple Watch, the future is still a mystery. A smartwatch’s defining features are still for any company to decide.

Apple’s defined its smartwatch better with every new version, pivoting away from a do-it-all mini iPhone on your wrist to a fitness-focused wearable, and now it’s smartly turning it to an “intelligent guardian for your health.”

The Apple Watch Series 4 does all of the things Series 3 does — faster and better — but it’s the smartwatch’s quiet role as a medical device that helps safeguard your health with features like fall detection and an ECG sensor that makes it a compelling device you want to own.

“You can’t do anything without your health and it’s important to take care of it.”

It’s almost as if the Apple Watch is insurance — if something unfortunate were to happen to you in the future, you’ll be glad you have it to call an emergency service or nudge you to go to the doctor because of an irregular heartbeat.

Is having your fitness tracking, notifications, music, and phone and messaging today, plus the small promise of a better-monitored and healthier future worth paying at least $399 for the 40mm (GPS) and $499 for the 44mm (GPS + Cellular) Apple Watch Series 4? I say yes, because as my parents always remind me: You can’t do anything without your health and it’s important to take care of it.

With Apple Watch Series 4, juggling your digital life and your real life with a single device from on your wrist no longer feels like an compromised chore.


  • Senior Tech Corresponent

    Raymond Wong

  • Tech Editor

    Pete Pachal

  • Photography

    Lili Sams and Dustin Drankoski

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2OcUPha
via IFTTT

Palestinian talks: Egypt seeks to regain regional power

Egypt has been mediating talks between rival Palestinian factions, but analysts say Cairo is trying to capitalise on the situation to re-establish itself as a regional powerhouse.

Fatah and Hamas reconciliation talks have been stalled for months over a deadlock that has shown no sign of progress for the 11-year political division.

The Fatah-led Palestinian Authority (PA) wants complete control over the Gaza Strip, including its security, which means the disarmament of Hamas’ armed wing the al-Qassam Brigades – a point that the Hamas movement has made clear it will not concede on.

Last month, Egyptian intelligence acted as a broker between the Gaza-based Hamas movement and Israel in indirect talks, in order to reach a gradual long-term ceasefire and prevent Palestinian discontent from boiling over.

Israeli security establishment is against another war, hoping that a ceasefire will lead to negotiations that will bring back the bodies of two Israeli soldiers that have been missing since the 2014 Gaza offensive.

Gaza Strip governed by Hamas is home to about two million people and has seen mass protests in the past several months against a decade-old Israeli sea and air blockade. More than 170 Palestinians have been killed since March 30 trying to cross the Israeli fence to commemorate the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in 1948.

Cairo also has its own interests in stemming escalation in the besieged Gaza Strip, which it hopes will affect the restive Sinai region that has witnessed deadly attacks on Egyptian army and security personnel over the past few years.

However, the Hamas-Israel talks have raised the ire of PA, which runs government in the occupied West Bank. The PA accused Hamas of not serving national interests by not prioritising reconciliation. It also accused Hamas of aiding Israel’s interests by entrenching the political division.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was incensed that his government should be left out in talks, maintaining that only the PA has the authority to negotiate peace with Israel.

In mid-August, the Palestinian president went as far as refusing to meet the head of Egyptian intelligence who was on a visit to Israel and was supposed to meet PA representatives.

Hamas said on Monday that the indirect ceasefire talks with Israel have halted, citing the PA’s strong opposition.

‘Geo-strategic positioning’

Omar Ashour, associate professor of security studies at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, says Egypt is actively involved in the most contentious issue in the Middle East amid its gradual decline in regional influence.

“Influence over the Palestinians is one of very few remaining ‘assets’ that successive Egyptian regimes attempted to preserve,” he told Al Jazeera.

“This is due to the decline of influence in other spheres, and the desperate need for ‘strategic rents’ -financial aid in exchange for geo-strategic positioning.”

Ashour said that in past decades, Egypt enjoyed regional influence, benefiting from charismatic leadership under President Gamal Abdel Nasser’s ‘progressive republicanism,’ a national or transnational project, and the anti-colonial struggle in the 1950s and 1960s.

“But even that has been notably declining, at the expense of rising regional soft- and hard-powers like Turkey, Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE,” he said.

Ehab Lotayef, the former president of the Egyptian Canadian Coalition for Democracy (ECCD), said that there are other reasons for Egypt’s deep involvement in the quagmire of Palestinian politics.

“One of the gains for Egypt is intelligence,” he told Al Jazeera. “It gets firsthand information about the internal Palestinian differences and [about] the main players on both sides.”

This information, Lotayef continued, can be used as leverage with Israel or be passed to the Israeli government for a price or as a part of other deals.

“It can also use this information to create more internal conflict between Palestinian factions when the need arises, and it gives Egypt the ability to control and manipulate the leadership of both the PA and Hamas,” he said.

Gaza dependency on Egypt

Egypt has long considered Hamas to be an offshoot of the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood movement, despite Hamas leaders denying any formal connection with it.

Hamas’ hold on the Gaza Strip has been beset with an 11-year blockade, three devastating Israeli military offensives, and more recently, punitive PA measures such as refusing to pay for electricity and salaries to its own government employees in the besieged Strip.

The last act, coupled with a rising dissatisfaction among Gaza residents who face unemployment and poverty at an unprecedented level, is aimed at putting more pressure on the Hamas government in a bid to hand over control to the PA.

A World Bank report published on Monday says the Gaza economy is “collapsing” mainly due to the blockade. The report described the economy as being in “free fall”, shrinking by six percent in the first quarter of 2018, and warned of “further deterioration since then”.

While Egypt sees the PA as the sole legitimate government, but at the same time it wants to keep Gaza dependent on it, according to Ramallah-based political analyst Khalil Shaheen.

“Egypt backs the return of the PA to the Gaza Strip in a way that will envelop Hamas into its fold but prevent it from having a political decision-making role,” Shaheen told Al Jazeera.

In the meantime, Egypt wants to make sure it can contain Hamas’ influence and preserve the Strip’s dependency by holding the keys to the southern border, but Shaheen said, fears that the United States‘ Middle East peace plan, touted as the “deal of the century“, would inadvertently contravene its role.

“This plan places Gaza as a priority by seeking to deal with it as solely a humanitarian case, which the US and Israel see as strengthening the private sector in Gaza,” Shaheen said, adding that this scenario does not favour Egypt in the long run.

“Egypt wants to find a solution to the humanitarian situation in Gaza, but does not want the Strip to leave the arena of its control, such as establishing a sea port in Cyprus which reportedly is part of the deal,” he explained.

Egypt’s relationship with Israel

Analysts agree that rather than overseeing the achievement of national reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas, Egypt’s main interests lie in protecting or acting in accordance with Israeli interests, such as a regime change in Gaza.

In addition to that, Ashour said that the current Egyptian government’s mid-to-long term objectives are enhancing influence over the Palestinian factions, and consolidating authority over the northeast Sinai with both Israeli and Palestinian help.

Egypt also seeks to “solidify its relationship with Israel, a critical partner in both the counterinsurgency campaigns in Sinai and on the regional and international stages,” Ashour said.

Lotayef agreed.

“Egypt’s goal is to protect the Israeli interests and security,” he said. “It is clear who the current Egyptian regime has allied itself with.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Q5TfLv
via IFTTT

Belkin’s new wireless dock is almost like AirPower

Disclosure

Every product here is independently selected by Mashable journalists. If you buy something featured, we may earn an affiliate commission which helps support our work.

Almost like the AirPower.
Almost like the AirPower.

Image: Belkin 

2016%2f09%2f16%2f6f%2fhttpsd2mhye01h4nj2n.cloudfront.netmediazgkymdezlza1.53aeaBy Stan Schroeder

Apple’s AirPower — the wireless charging mat that can charge up to three Apple gadgets at once — is a year late and will reportedly be even more late

Luckily, third-party manufacturers are stepping up. Belkin has a new charging dock called Boostup Wireless Charging Dock that can simultaneously charge an iPhone, an Apple Watch and a third device of your choosing. 

SEE ALSO: 7 wireless chargers that will juice up your phone crazy fast

Granted, the Boostup Wireless Charging Dock is not as elegant as AirPower. You can’t just place the gadgets onto it; instead, it has a lean-on surface for the iPhone, a similar surface for the Watch, and a USB-A port that lets you charge one additional gadget. 

All iPhones with wireless charging, as well as all Apple Watch models, are supported.

All iPhones with wireless charging, as well as all Apple Watch models, are supported.

Image: Belkin

But hey, unlike the AirPower, it actually has a price and a launch date: It’ll cost $159.99 when it hits Apple Stores in December. 

Belkin says its new dock has been “enhanced” to work with the iPhone XS, XS Max and Apple Watch Series 4, but it’ll also work with the iPhone X, 8, 8 Plus, and all Apple Watch models. Specs-wise, that means 7.5W of wireless power for the iPhone and 5W of power for the Watch and the USB port. 

If you don’t care about wireless (and want to buy something that can charge more than one gadget right now), the company also has a couple of similar, but cheaper takes on the same concept. The $99 PowerHouse Charge Dock can charge an iPhone and an Apple Watch at the same time, but you need to connect the iPhone to a Lightning connector at the base of the charger. The Valet Charge Dock is a bit more expensive at $129.99, but is essentially the same thing with a slightly different design. 

Both devices are available at Belkin.com.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2px0Wz7
via IFTTT

Gigi and Bella Hadid recreate iconic ‘Beetlejuice’ scene and excuse me while I burst into song

By Rachel Thompson

Ever wondered what a family dinner is like at the Hadid household? ‘Course you have! 

Turns out it’s quite, errr, theatrical, judging by a Vogue video showing the Hadid siblings — Gigi, Bella, and Anwar — having dinner with their mom Yolanda. 

The family recreated a canonical scene from the much-beloved 1988 Tim Burton movie Beetlejuice. For those unfamiliar with the film, there’s a truly wonderful scene in which Catherine O’Hara (Delia Deetz) becomes possessed and starts singing “Day-O”. 

To mark the end of New York Fashion Week, the family donned the “chicest looks” of the week and mimicked the iconic scene.

Tim Burton, here’s your cast for the sequel! 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Ifu7PV
via IFTTT

Ken Starr: Trump’s Defense Team Should Be ‘Very Concerned’

Subscribe to Off Message on Apple Podcasts here. | Subscribe via Stitcher here.

Ken Starr would love to hear from Donald Trump. He thinks he could help.

Story Continued Below

The former independent counsel whose investigation into President Bill Clinton led to Clinton’s impeachment says President Trump has enough to be worried about that he’ll need good lawyers around him as he decides whether to sit down with special counsel Bob Mueller.

“If I’m on his criminal defense team, I would be very concerned,” Starr said in an interview for the latest episode of POLITICO’s Off Message podcast. “I don’t know what President Trump knows, but there have been a number of guilty pleas. Some of those guilty pleas go to false statements, so I would just be cautious” before answering questions from Mueller.

Starr says he’d advise this even while he believes that Trump has a duty to answer investigators’ questions under oath, just as Bill Clinton did 20 years ago. “He is the president of the United States, and I think that carries with it an obligation to cooperate with duly-authorized federal investigations,” Starr said.

“You’re not above the law. You think you’ve got a time-out based upon your service as president. We respect you, you are occupying the presidency, you have a very important job,” Starr said. “But there’s no time out. You have to respond when you’re summoned to the bar of justice. That’s the way I respond to all this. You have to be a rule of law person if you’re going to occupy a position of trust.”

As he promotes his new memoir, “Contempt,” Starr—who says he probably wouldn’t have written the book if Hillary Clinton had won, reasoning that it would have damaged her presidency unfairly—says “President Trump would be well-advised” to read the book, or at least listen to the audio version and take a lesson from the book: “Facts will come back to haunt you eventually,” said Starr. “The truth ends up coming out, and so you better deal with those facts.”

Twenty years after the Clinton impeachment saga, Starr is amazed at the continued relevance of these issues. And he’s fascinated by the mechanics of how to mount a legal defense of Trump, a man Starr reluctantly voted for in 2016 (he says he cast his ballot not because of a grudge against Hillary Clinton, but due to a commitment to limited government).

If Starr were to join Trump’s legal team, one condition is that the president would have to listen to his legal advice—an achievement that eluded Trump’s former attorneys.“I would not want to take on a representation with it reasonably foreseeable that the advice would not be followed,” Starr said.

One way or the other, Starr thinks that despite the president’s obligation to answer investigators’ queries, it’s a settled legal question that Trump could just fire Mueller and be done with the whole thing—with or without Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on the job. “By my lights—and I don’t think there’s any serious dispute among constitutional lawyers and scholars—he has the raw power to direct his firing,” Starr said.

That’s not the only investigation on Starr’s mind. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was on his team of Whitewater investigators. And with Kavanaugh’s prospects rocked by sexual assault allegations just as Starr was passing through Washington on his book tour, the former independent counsel came prepared to his Off Message interview, with a legal pad page full of preformulated praise for the Supreme Court hopeful.

Does Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Kavanaugh of drunkenly attempting to rape her when she was 15 and he was 17, deserve to have her allegations heard by the Senate? “Of course,” said Starr, who also said the accusation merits a full investigation.

Based on his experiences in the Clinton probe, Starr said that if he were investigating the accusations against Kavanaugh, he would “absolutely pursue relentlessly every possible fact”—just as he did in the Clinton investigation 20 years ago, with the current nominee’s help.

But he was vigorous in his defense of the nominee, and believes that the Ford allegation is, at best, a case of “mistaken identity.”

Starr indicated that he’s inclined to believe Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who accused Bill Clinton of raping her in 1978 and alleged that Hillary Clinton threatened her to stay quiet. Those allegations, said Starr, fit with what he argues was “the metanarrative that I saw there: [The Clintons think] they’re above the law, and they will simply use Saul Alinsky “Rules for Radicals” tactics to take out anyone.”

He sees a different metanarrative for Kavanaugh.

“I believe when Brett Kavanaugh says nothing [happened],” Starr said. “Now, there are these issues of inebriation and so forth, but Brett says it did not happen, and I believe Brett. … Character counts, and you kind of learn pretty quickly what a person’s character is when you’re in the trenches with him, right, day in and day out—and for me, year in and year out.”

There aren’t many people who can have an actual window into what Mueller’s life must be like day to day, but Starr does. He’s been there. He’s lived it. And though he writes and speaks admiringly of Bill Clinton’s political skills—he likes to quote the title of David Maraniss’ Clinton biography, “First in His Class”—he is a man with a sure sense of what’s right, and is just as sure now that he was right as he was then.

Having lived through years of being trashed by a White House spin machine and attacks from the press—peaking in September 1998, when New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd described him as a “helpless victim of his cravings for ecstasy”—Starr understands why Trump and his aides so frequently mock their opponents in personal terms, or attempt to delegitimize them. He just can’t stand it.

“It’s terrible. It’s absolutely terrible,” Starr said. “I definitely disapprove of that kind of behavior on the part of anyone.”

Like many Republicans, Starr says he backs most of what the Trump administration is doing in the policy realm, though he’s dismayed by what Trump himself does day to day. He also wishes Trump would stop the tweets, despite the two approving ones he got after a Fox News appearances in February in which Starr said he didn’t think firing FBI Director James Comey constituted obstruction of justice.

He says it’s too early to say whether he’d vote for Trump again in 2020.

In the meantime, Starr says he takes solace in the recent New York Times op-ed by an anonymous senior Trump administration official, in which the author “vowed to thwart parts of [Trump’s] agenda and his worst inclinations.”

That piece “reminds us that we elect a government. The president presides over the government,” Starr said.

It’s not that he’s comfortable with that set-up, Starr explained. It’s that to him, it’s a better option than electing most Democrats.

“It depends,” Starr said, “on who the Democrat is.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2pz2dFO
via IFTTT

BBC series featuring female Muslim bomber stirs diversity debate

London, England – Representing characters from minority backgrounds as complex, humanised beings has long been a contentious issue within the British arts landscape.

The season finale on Sunday of The Bodyguard, a BBC drama, is the latest television show to be criticised for how it represented characters from ethnic minority backgrounds.

According to the public broadcaster, 11 million people tuned in to the last five minutes of the episode – the highest ratings since 2008, when Brits were hooked on Doctor Who. 

The Bodyguard followed a white, British, male veteran-turned-bodyguard who foils a suicide bomb plot planned by a visibly Muslim woman – to the ire of many Muslim viewers.

The show has reignited the debate over representation of Muslims, with critics arguing they were reduced to stereotypes.

When shows like The Bodyguard perpetuate these negative stories, especially against a backdrop of a rise in Islamophobic hate crimes across Europe and the US, these narratives can have real-life implications.

Shaf Choudry, The Riz Test co-founder

According to The Riz Test, an initiative set up earlier this year to challenge the portrayal of Muslims on British television, The Bodyguard was a failure.

The Riz Test works in a similar way to the Bechdel test, which evaluates the portrayal of women in film and the Duvernay test, which measures racial diversity.

It poses five questions: Have Muslim characters been depicted as hyper-aggressive, a threat to the Western way of life, anti-modern, oppressed if female or misogynistic if male, or perpetrators of terrorism?

“When shows like The Bodyguard perpetuate these negative stories, especially [against] a backdrop of a rise in Islamophobic hate crimes across Europe and the US, these narratives can have real-life implications,” said Shaf Choudry, who founded The Riz Test with Sadia Habib

“Hollywood and the media at large have crucial roles in influencing popular opinions of Muslims.”

The initiative is named after Riz Ahmed, the British actor who delivered a speech to the House of Commons last year about on-screen diversity, the portrayal of Muslims, and how sincere representation could foil “radicalisation”.

Research by the University of Cambridge in 2016 found that hostile media coverage of Muslims contributed to a heightened climate of Islamophobia and hostility towards Muslims. 

Habib, who has taught at inner-city schools in London and Manchester for seven years, said that proper representation in the arts is important for young people.

“[They] are fascinated by issues surrounding identity and belonging, but often they don’t get the opportunity to explore what it means to belong because of how they’re represented in media, film, and television. They would jump at the chance to explore more about this,” she said.

What has historically happened is that people who commission books are from the same background, they have certain life experiences. And so, when you look at black and ethnic minority representation, they’re fetishised.

Nikesh Shukla, author and editor

In addition to religious diversity, sectors including broadcasting, performance, film and publishing have also been blasted for failing to represent the working class.

A study by Create London published earlier this year on social mobility in the arts found working-class people were hugely under-represented. 

Within publishing, those from working-class backgrounds accounted for only 12.6 percent. In film, TV and radio it was 12.4 percent.

A study by the Centre for Literacy in Primary Education found that children from black and other ethnic minority backgrounds are still under-represented in most mainstream children’s books, with only 4 percent of 9,115 surveyed books in the UK featuring black or ethnic minority characters.

Nikesh Shukla, author and editor of The Good Immigrant anthology of essays on race and identity by ethnic minority authors, said there are gatekeepers in the publishing industry.

“What has historically happened is that people who commission books are from the same background, they have certain life experiences. And so, when you look at [black and ethnic minority] representation, they’re fetishised”, he said.

“You don’t get to hear [black and ethnic minority] writers who are sci-fi writers, who are not writers that are just writing about their oppression or their identity. You only hear about one type of thing that resonates with the people who decide what gets published. 

“We need to look at who decides what gets published and how we can diversify that because the talent is out there, but the talent isn’t actively being looked for by people who know what’s out there and so they just self-perpetuate.”

Films such as Marvel’s Black Panther, featuring mostly black protagonists, became the 10th-highest grossing filmof all time, according to Forbes, and other titles such as Crazy Rich Asians have challenged mainstream narratives.

In 2016, the British Film Institute analysed 1,172 British films and found that most do not feature a single black character and those that did revolved around stereotypical subjects such as crime and slavery.

Theatre, too, continues to be dominated by a privileged, privately educated, white and male majority. Only 18.2 percent of people working in performing and the visual arts are from working-class backgrounds, according to the Create London study.

Common Wealth Theatre, a women-led theatre company, aims for greater diversity.

The cast of its most recent production, Radical Acts, a play celebrating the centenary of women’s suffrage, included Muslim and working-class women from across Bradford. 

“What felt really important is how we brought these women together to think about radical acts that they do every day,” Rhiannon White, co-director of Common Wealth Theatre, told Al Jazeera.”We wanted to celebrate these women, to discover some of this history and share it with the world.” 

Speaking about the importance of including visibly Muslim women like herself on stage, 21-year-old assistant director Jaasra Aslam said: “It means everything … It’s only once you see people like you doing something that you feel accepted and you get the confidence to think, ‘Yeah, I could do that as well.’”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2QUQPjY
via IFTTT

Ted Cruz’s dinner was gatecrashed by protesters against Brett Kavanaugh

Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Ted Cruz shakes hands with Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh in Cruz's office in Washington, DC.
Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Ted Cruz shakes hands with Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh in Cruz’s office in Washington, DC.

Image: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

2017%2f09%2f01%2fdc%2f1bw.3febfBy Shannon Connellan

If Ted Cruz thought his Monday night dinner was going to be quiet, uninterrupted affair, he thought wrong.

The Texas senator was forced to leave a restaurant in Washington D.C., in a scene all too familiar to Department of Homeland Security secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.

SEE ALSO: People across the country stage walk outs in solidarity with sexual assault survivors

Protesters entered Fiola, an upscale Italian restaurant, seemingly opposed to Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and heckled Cruz and his wife.

Apparently an “old friend” of Kavanaugh’s, Cruz sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee who will decide his fate as a Supreme Court nominee. 

Kavanaugh is facing multiple accusations of sexual assault and misconduct, which prompted women’s rights organizations to run a national walkout on Monday in solidarity with survivors.

In a video posted on Monday night by Smash Racism DC, the group of activists can be heard chanting the words, “we believe survivors,” referring to people who have experienced sexual abuse.

BREAKING. Activists just chased @TedCruz out of a fancy Washington DC restaurant, chanting “We Believe Survivors!”

Cruz has been friends with creep Kavanaugh for 20 years. Now Cruz is on judiciary committee hearing his testimony.

Fascists not welcome! #CancelKavanugh pic.twitter.com/7mx6Tc32za

— Smash Racism DC (@SmashRacismDC) September 25, 2018

“While our interruption does not compare in scale to the interruptions his actions as a Senator have had on millions of American lives, we hope that it reminds Cruz and others like him that they are not safe from the people they have hurt,” Smash Racism DC wrote in a tweet.

“This is a message to Ted Cruz, [Brett] Kavanaugh, Donald Trump and the rest of the racist, sexist, transphobic, and homophobic right-wing scum: You are not safe. We will find you. We will expose you. We will take from you the peace you have taken from so many others.”

In another video posted by the same Twitter account, a woman who describes herself as a survivor of sexual assault and a constituent of Cruz’s asks him: “Do you believe in survivors? We believe survivors. Senator, I have a right to know what your position is on Brett Kavanaugh.”

Cruz’s dinner wasn’t the only site of protest, either. NBC affiliate KXAN reported that survivors of sexual assault had protested outside Cruz’s office on Monday, in support of Kavanaugh accusers Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez. 

Kavanaugh’s nomination was originally opposed by Cruz, although many including the Texas Tribune have noted his changing attitude.

Cruz was also the committee member who suggested Ford testify in public.

“These allegations are serious and deserve to be treated with respect,” Cruz said in a statement, published by the Tribune

“Professor Ford should have a full opportunity to tell her story before the Judiciary Committee, and Judge Kavanaugh should have a full opportunity to defend himself. That hearing should be sooner, rather than later, so the committee can make the best assessment possible of the allegations.”

Ford will testify against Kavanaugh in an open hearing on Thursday, CNN reports. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2xWDAXF
via IFTTT