Biden caps cash dash with big Florida haul


Joe Biden

Joe Biden’s huge two-day financial haul highlights the still-ample power of big donors in a Democratic primary field that has put more emphasis on digital dollars. | Drew Angerer/Getty Images

2020 elections

Miami and Orlando were the latest stops on the former vice president’s nationwide high-dollar fundraising tour.

Joe Biden collected at least $1.7 million this week from two Florida fundraisers, underscoring the former vice president’s pull with big-dollar Democratic donors and his front-runner status in a crowded presidential primary.

The twin fundraisers in the Miami and Orlando areas capped a month-long coast-to-coast cash dash by Biden, who spent the eve of his campaign announcement fretting about whether he could raise the money to prove he was the real deal. Biden then went on to shatter first-day fundraising records, as his campaign built an online small-dollar fundraising machine to complement his pursuit of traditional donors who can write max-out checks of $2,800 per election.

Story Continued Below

Biden’s huge two-day financial haul in Florida highlights the still-ample power of big donors in a Democratic primary field that has put more emphasis on digital dollars. The fundraising schedule and courting of donors by Biden used to be as common for a presidential campaign as printing mailers, but it now stands out as an increasingly vocal progressive wing and its favored candidates — Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders — have cast Biden’s fundraising in a negative light, which his donors resent.

“It’s sour grapes, like saying they wouldn’t join a club that wouldn’t have them as a member anyway,” said John Morgan, the Orlando-area trial lawyer who hosted a Biden fundraiser at his home on Tuesday and said days before the event that he had $1.3 million in donations already committed to Biden.

“What they [Sanders and Warren] are doing is playing a game to try to block him from taking low-hanging fruit that, in some cases, they can’t get. But in other cases, they haven’t even tried. Joe has,” Morgan said.

Morgan said that donors are turned off by the type of “socialism” that Warren and Sanders espouse and many personally like Biden anyway because “Biden is in the middle, and that’s where the majority of the country is and where the donors are.”

Sanders and Warren’s campaigns didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Before Morgan’s $1.3 million fundraiser on Tuesday, Miami developer and longtime Biden supporter Michael Adler hosted a fundraiser Monday evening in Coral Gables that brought in as much as $400,000, according to two people familiar with the preliminary numbers.

In contrast, in nearby Miami Beach and at the same time as Biden’s Monday fundraiser, Democratic primary rival Pete Buttigieg had a fundraiser that pulled more than $100,000, the campaign confirmed. The campaign said Buttigieg raised another $40,000 at a small-dollar event in Miami that drew hundreds of attendees.

In Hollywood, Biden reportedly raised $700,000 earlier this month. And in his first day as an announced candidate on April 25, $700,000 of the $6.3 million Biden raised in the first 24 hours of launching his campaign came from an event at the Philadelphia home of a Comcast executive, which Warren and Sanders criticized.

“How did Joe Biden raise so much money in one day?” Warren wrote in an email to supporters when the news of Biden’s record-setting one-day haul was reported. “Well, it helps that he hosted a swanky private fund-raiser for wealthy donors at the home of the guy who runs Comcast’s lobbying shop.”

But while Warren bashed “fancy private fundraising events where only big donors are invited,” the Philadelphia Inquirer noted that Warren had raised money in similar settings in Philadelphia from some of the same donors — but for her Senate race.

Sensitive to the criticism that he’s doing the bidding of special interests in secret, Biden made a novel move for a front-running presidential candidate, opening up the fundraisers to the press to ensure a measure of transparency — and free media coverage. The result is that Biden often gives a condensed 15-minute version of his standard stump speech.

“For some people it’s like, ‘What am I paying for?’ Because it’s not like they’re getting anything extra,” said one donor who didn’t want to be identified speaking critically of the campaign. “But most people just want to support the candidate and get their picture taken, so it’s not that big of a deal.”

Biden’s campaign said in a press release Tuesday that his momentum is increasing.

“Our fundraising has been driven by rapid, massive growth over the last month,” Brandon English, a Biden adviser, said in a written statement. “We’re grateful for the overwhelming grassroots support we’re seeing through our digital outreach, the majority of which comes from donors brand new to our list. We’re continuing to build a robust digital operation that brings new voters to Team Joe and puts our campaign in a position of strength to take on Donald Trump.”

According to the campaign, 97 percent of all donations to Biden are under $200 and almost two-thirds of campaign donors have contributed $25 of less. Biden’s campaign added that its “largest hour of grassroots fundraising since the campaign launch came on Saturday during the Philly kickoff rally, raising more than $1,000 per minute.”

Heading into the race, Biden knew fundraising was a key to his candidacy.

“People think Iowa and New Hampshire are the first test. It’s not. The first 24 hours. That’s the first test,” he said of posting a big fundraising total. “Those [early states] are way down the road. We’ve got to get through this first.”

For Rufus Gifford, finance director for President Obama’s reelection campaign and a former ambassador to Denmark, the Biden campaign has skillfully managed expectations and balanced the need for raising big sums with the knowledge that it might cost him some voters in a primary. But the rewards outweigh the risks, he said.

“One of the biggest issues for Democrats to who can beat Trump, who’s more electable,” Gifford said. “You know what makes you more electable? Money.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2QeIRm0
via IFTTT

Amazon prevails in battle with South American countries for ‘.amazon’ domain name

Amazon, the ecommerce giant, has been embroiled in a 7 year long dispute with countries like Brazil and Peru over the domain name.
Amazon, the ecommerce giant, has been embroiled in a 7 year long dispute with countries like Brazil and Peru over the domain name.

Image: LEON NEAL / AFP / Getty Images 

By Matt Binder

E-commerce giant Amazon has prevailed in its domain name battle with Amazon, the geographic region in South America.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, has approved of Amazon’s proposal to run the top level domain name extension “.amazon” after a 7 year dispute with more than a half dozen countries, according to the Financial Times.

The dispute was backed by the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organisation (ACTO), a group promoting the development of the Amazon Basin. Its member states include Brazil, Peru, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Suriname, and Venezuela.

As part of Amazon’s terms, the company promises not to register any .amazon domain names  with “a primary and well-recognised significance to the culture and heritage of the Amazonia region.” The ecommerce company will also block the use of more than 1,000 domain names that fit that criteria. It would also provide up to nine domain names for ACTO countries to use for non-commercial purposes to “highlight the region’s culture and heritage.”

SEE ALSO: Amazon could replace some of its warehouse workers with robots

Amazon had tried for years to get ACTO to drop their complaint. At one point, the company had even offered $5 million in gift cards to Brazil and Peru, the ACTO member states who originally filed the complaint, to no avail.

Speaking of the current proposal that’s been approved by ICANN, the Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it “does not address important concerns.”

In 2011, ICANN approved of the creation of a multitude of new general top level brand extensions. Basically, for a yearly fee, any brand or organization could run their own “dot whatever.” 

When Amazon applied to run the “.amazon” domain extension, Brazil and Peru filed a formal complaint with ICANN. The complaint stated that giving Amazon the rights to the extension would “prevent use of this domain for purposes of public interest” and argued that “.amazon” should instead serve regions of the Amazon in South America.

According to ICANN, there will now be a 30 day period for public comment. After this period, ICANN may very well finalize its designation of the .amazon domain to Amazon the company.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WYhkrk
via IFTTT

Ben Carson mixed up the real estate term ‘REO’ with Oreo cookies

By Nicole Gallucci

Can you picture a scenario in which Oreo cookies are discussed at a House Financial Services Committee hearing?

No? That’s OK. No need to imagine hypotheticals, because as it turns out, on Tuesday HUD Secretary Ben Carson name-dropped the popular Nabisco sandwich cookie on the stand. He accidentally mixed Oreo cookies up with REO, a common real estate term. Casual!

After California Congresswoman Katie Porter asked Carson to explain a disparity in REO rates, she took the time to confirm that he actually knew what REO stood for. And it’s a good thing she double checked, because Carson most certainly did not know.

SEE ALSO: Elizabeth Warren has a plan to fix everything, even our sad love lives

“Do you know what an REO is?” Porter asked.

“An Oreo?” Carson replied.

“No, not an Oreo. An REO. R-E-O,” she clarified.

“Real estate…” he guessed.

“What’s the ‘O’ stand for?” Porter pressed.

“Organization?” he ventured.

“Owned. Real estate owned. That’s what happened when a property goes into foreclosure,” Porter explained.

Oy vey.

For those who aren’t fluent in real estate lingo, like Carson it seems, an REO, or “real estate owned,” references a certain property that’s “foreclosed-upon” such as a house, apartment, or piece of land that ends up in a lender portfolio after an unsuccessful sale. The lender, oftentimes a bank, becomes the owner of the property.

According to Porter, who tweeted the exchange later in the afternoon, REO is “a basic term related to foreclosure” that HUD Secretary Carson should have known.

Bottom line: Carson messed up.

After the hearing, Carson tried to recover from the blunder by obtaining a pack of Oreo cookies and offering them, along with a thank you note, to Porter. He even tweeted some photos to charm people.

It was a valid attempt to make amends, but also a royally embarrassing one, especially since the hearing was focused on the foreclosure of homes, which is no laughing matter.

In true brand fashion, the official Oreo Twitter account was quick to get in on the action, tweeting an alternate definition of REO: “Really excellent OREO (cookie).”

𝗥𝗘𝗢 stands for “𝗥eally 𝗘xcellent 𝗢REO (cookie).” Everyone knows that.

— OREO Cookie (@Oreo) May 21, 2019

Ughhhhhhh. Read the room, everyone. And when in doubt, remember, you don’t always have to tweet.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2EnKqJJ
via IFTTT

Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger Admits He ‘Lacked in Leadership’ Last Season

Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger (7) passes in the first quarter of an NFL football game against the Cincinnati Bengals, Sunday, Dec. 30, 2018, in Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

Gene J. Puskar/Associated Press

Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger told reporters Tuesday he failed as a leader during the 2018 season.

“I lacked in leadership,” Roethlisberger said. “Because that’s my job as the leader of this team, to get us to the playoffs. I’m gonna need to focus and refocus my energy and time on, how can I be a better leader to get us back to the playoffs?”

Roethlisberger’s leadership style has taken a hit this offseason due to his falling out with Antonio Brown. The former Steelers wideout has regularly criticized Roethlisberger both before and after his trade to the Oakland Raiders. After Roethlisberger apologized for his criticism of Brown during an interview with KDKA, Brown tweeted “Two face.”

“I’ll start with saying you’re right, AB made me who I am,” Roethlisberger said in the interview. “He was the greatest wide receiver I ever played with. The things that he did in this league and that we did together are among the best of all time.

“And you’re right, there was some great things and then all of a sudden it just kind of, it disappeared, and I’m not sure really where it went. We always worked through it, you know? We always came out the other side smiling and hugged it out and enjoyed it and moved on, and this time, I really don’t know.”

Brown called out the Steelers for giving Roethlisberger preferential treatment, reiterating he had an “owner mentality” on HBO’s The Shop.

“All year dude called me out,” Brown said (via The Score). “We’d lose a game and he’d be like, ‘AB should have ran a better route.’ That’s the type of guy he is. He feels like he’s the owner. Bro, you threw that s–t to the D-line, how the f–k am I running a bad route? You need to give me a better ball.”

Roethlisberger apologized for blaming Brown for the interception he threw late in a loss last season to the Denver Broncos. While the ball was intended for Brown, Roethelisberger’s pass went directly into the hands of Broncos defensive tackle Shelby Harris.

Roethlisberger said he attempted to mend fences with Brown while he was still a Steeler but never heard back:

“I reached out to him many times, sent him texts, sent him calls—his is all before the season was over. Never heard back. So I could never really find out what was going on. For me, that’s why it was so confusing. I didn’t know where it came from. The week before was the Saints game, right? Unbelievable game. I never really saw any of it coming. I would have loved to have had the chance to talk to him. That’s why I said yesterday, whatever I did to offend him, I apologize for it. I tried to do that in person, talk to him. He wouldn’t allow me to.”

The Steelers and Raiders do not play this season, so odds are Roethlisberger will have to keep waiting for answers. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2WSPNro
via IFTTT

Tesla releases DIY guides for Model 3 maintenance

Image: Tesla

Matthew Humphries

for

PCMag

Uploads%252fcard%252fimage%252f786605%252fd59218b0 cf68 489d 87cc 54720a7fccfd.jpg%252foriginal.jpg?signature=h fnx 1dcutvyyf8oouz9zvl8hs=&source=https%3a%2f%2fblueprint api production.s3.amazonaws

Follow @https://twitter.com/PCMag

PCMag.com is a leading authority on technology, delivering Labs-based, independent reviews of the latest products and services. Our expert industry analysis and practical solutions help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Tesla is embracing the growing demand for consumers to be able to fix stuff themselves by releasing a series of do-it-yourself guides for the Model 3.

The idea here is to allow owners to fix a range of problems without going through the hassle, time, and expense of having to schedule a Service appointment. As the list below reveals, the maintenance you can carry out at home is quite basic, but Tesla should be commended for offering this support.

  • Restarting the Touchscreen

  • Pairing a Bluetooth Phone

  • Connecting to Wi-Fi

  • Programming HomeLinkv

  • Adding and Removing Keys

  • Replacing the Key Fob Battery

  • Installing Phone Charging Cable

  • Installing Front License Plate Bracket

  • Replacing Cabin Filters

  • Checking and Adjusting Tire Pressures

  • Topping Up Windshield Washer Fluid

  • Replacing Wiper Blades

  • Manually Releasing Charge Cable

  • Calibrating Windows

  • Removing and Installing Aero Covers

  • Removing and Installing Lug Nut Covers

All of the above procedures are available to view on a single web page, and where necessary Tesla has supplemented the text with animated GIFs as an aid to the process. For procedures such as replacing the cabin filters, the animation is especially useful and reassuring to watch before you start removing side panels in your vehicle.

For now, these guides cover the most simple of maintenance tasks, but that’s a great start and something Tesla will hopefully build on as well as expanding it to other models in its vehicle range. Other car manufacturers should also take note, because if Tesla continues to offer DIY support it’s quickly going to become another good reason to buy a Tesla.

    This article originally published at PCMag
    here

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2VR5iUm
    via IFTTT

    ‘Stop the bans’: Abortion rights activists rally across the US

    New York City – Thousands of abortion rights activists across the United States took to the streets, town squares and courthouses on Tuesday to protest against a recent wave of anti-abortion laws passed in several states including Alabama, Mississippi, Ohio and Missouri.

    #StopTheBans protests were organised by more than 50 organisations, including National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL) Pro-Choice America and American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

    “We are seeing a new wave of extreme bans on abortion, stripping away reproductive freedom and representing an all-out assault on abortion access,” organisers said in a statement.

    “This is Trump’s anti-abortion extremism and it’s terrifying, particularly for communities of colour and low-income communities who are most affected by these bans.”

    Activists and others gather in major cities across the US, including New York City, Washington, DC, Las Vegas and Philadelphia.

    Dozens of protesters chanted and sang songs outside the Middle Collegiate Church in New York City, holding signs that read, “My body, my choice” and “I am in charge of my body”.

    abortion USA

    Women listen to speeches as they take part in an abortion rights rally in front of the Middle Collegiate Church in the East Village of New York on May 21, 2019 [Timothy Clary/AFP] [Daylife]

    In Washington, DC, hundreds protested outside the Supreme Court building.

    “This nation was built on the backs and grown in the wombs of women, and our rights are not up for debate,” Democratic Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley told the crowd.

    “We are here to say, enough is enough,” said Amy Klobuchar, a Democratic congresswoman who is running in the 2020 presidential election. “We are not going to allow them to move our country backwards,” she said.

    Wave of bans

    In the first quarter of 2019, at least 28 state legislatures introduced some version of an abortion ban, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive health and research and policy organisation. The Guttmacher Institute said that although that number is essentially the same as last year, “the extreme nature of this year’s bills is unprecedented”. 

    Last week, Alabama’s governor signed the strictest abortion law in the United States, making abortion illegal in nearly all cases including rape and incest. Doctors who perform an abortion could face up to 99 years in jail.

    The earliest the law can go into effect is in November, and rights groups have vowed to challenge it in court.

    Several states, including Ohio, Louisiana and Kentucky, have also passed so-called “heartbeat laws” that ban abortion once a fetal heartbeat, which can be as early as six weeks, before many women know they’re pregnant. Rights groups have challenged or plan to challenge the laws in the courts.

    “The health and well-being of women is of little concern to the politicians championing these laws, who come from states with some of the highest maternal and infant mortality rates in the country,” said Jennifer Dalven, the ACLU’s reproductive freedom project director.

    “The ACLU, on behalf of our millions of members, is proud to join today with our partners to fight these bans in court, on the street, and with our votes on Election Day,” she told Al Jazeera.

    Abortion - United States

    August Mulvihill, of Norwalk, Iowa, holds a sign during a rally to protest recent abortion bans at the Statehouse in Des Moines, Iowa [Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo]

    Many anti-abortion rights advocates, expecting the restrictions will be challenged, want the Supreme Court to revisit the 1973 Roe v Wade ruling which legalised abortion. Many feel that with a more conservative court, include two justices nominated by Republican President Donald Trump, they have chance at getting the ruling overturned.

    But #StopTheBan organisers describe the laws as an “unconstitutional attempt to gut Roe and punish those who need access to abortion”.

    Anti-abortion rights activists across the country criticised Tuesday’s protests, saying they were part of “the extreme pro-abortion agenda”.

    “For someone who recognises a precious brother or sister in every unborn child, it’s encouraging to see states passing laws that reflect that reality,” said Eric Sheidler, executive director of the Pro-life Action League.

    “At the same time, it’s deeply troubling to see so many thousands take to the streets this week denouncing the very idea that those unborn lives have any value at all,” he told Al Jazeera.

    Abortion - United States

    A protester holds up her arm with “My Body My Choice” written on it during a protest against recently passed abortion ban bills at the Georgia State Capitol building [Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images/AFP] 

    But many abortion rights activists vowed to continue to protest in the streets

    “The rally ‘ended’ 30 minutes ago, but we’re still here – raising our voices because this is important!” tweeted the Women’s March Minnesota – a state whose legislature is considering restrictions.

    “Abortion is healthcare and healthcare is a right,” protesters chanted.

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2HOBzSi
    via IFTTT

    DOJ renews counteroffer to Schiff over unredacted Mueller report


    Adam Schiff

    House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff got another counteroffer from the Justice Department in response to a request for the full Mueller report. | J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo

    The Justice Department on Tuesday reiterated its counteroffer to the House Intelligence Committee to view an unredacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report in a last-ditch effort to avert an “enforcement action” against the attorney general.

    In a letter to the panel’s chairman Adam Schiff on Tuesday, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd again offered members of the committee to review a “minimally redacted” version of Mueller’s report — tripling the number of lawmakers allowed to view the report from 12 to 34.

    Story Continued Below

    So far, the six Democrats currently allowed to access the report have refused to view it in protest of the restrictions.

    The less-redacted document does not include grand jury material or the requested foreign intelligence and counterintelligence information Mueller’s team gathered as it investigated Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.

    Boyd’s latest letter follows a protracted back-and-forth between the House panel and DOJ over the full Mueller report. Schiff and his Republican counterpart, Rep. Devin Nunes of California, asked the Justice Department for the full, unredacted report and its underlying evidence in March. Schiff subpoenaed the Justice Department earlier this month with a deadline of May 15, claiming the department had failed to respond to the panel’s requests.

    Schiff on Tuesday said he’s “not ready to comment yet” on DOJ counteroffer.

    In his letter, Boyd warned Schiff that “in recognition of the committee’s interest in counterintelligence and foreign-intelligence matters,” DOJ is “willing to expedite access” to the prioritized information the panel wants — provided the committee “confirms today that it will not pursue any vote on an ‘enforcement action’” now or in the future.

    The latest offer from DOJ does not appear substantially different from the original offer, which Schiff called “unacceptable” and said “places the department at risk of unlawfully withholding foreign intelligence and counterintelligence information from the committee.”

    After the May 15 deadline came and went with no new documents provided to the committee, Schiff told reporters that he would be consulting with the House Intelligence Committee’s general counsel on some kind of “enforcement action” that the panel may vote on as soon as Wednesday.

    Boyd seemed eager to avoid that, telling Schiff that should the panel avoid a contempt vote on Wednesday, DOJ will “host a meeting with the committee’s senior staff” on May 23 and 24 to update them on the status of its own review of the requested documents. Boyd called it “an extraordinary accommodation” on DOJ’s part.

    Schiff has expressed frustration over what he’s described as an unexplained delay in receiving a briefing from the FBI on the counterintelligence portion of the special counsel probe. He’s also claimed that the intelligence community “is obligated to share” grand-jury information with the House Intelligence committee, citing an exception that allows DOJ “to provide information of a counterintelligence or foreign intelligence nature” to the panel.

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2VZ6p4B
    via IFTTT

    Comcast, a trusted company, wants to monitor you with a smart device

    Such a good idea.
    Such a good idea.

    Image: Joe Raedle / getty 

    By Jack Morse

    It looks like you fell down. Someone will be there between 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. to assist you. 

    Yes, that’s right, everyone’s favorite and definitely trusted company, Comcast, is working on a smart  device of some kind with voice-interactive features to monitor customers’ health. The news, first reported by CNBC, was independently confirmed by Mashable. The tracker will be pilot tested laster this year. 

    Importantly, unlike the Google Home or Amazon Echo, Comcast’s foray into in-home devices won’t search the web or recite the forecast. Instead, it will reportedly track customer bathroom trips, and how much time they spend in bed. The company is also reportedly working on a way to track if customers have fallen down in their homes. 

    It will be able to place emergency phone calls, notes CNBC. 

    Unfortunately, there is still a lot that remains unknown about the specifics of a cable company monitoring your late-night pee breaks. We reached out to Comcast in an attempt to determine the product’s name, official release date, and cost. We were unable to get a statement on the record.  

    A Comcast spokesperson was willing to go into more details about what the company insists is the device’s limited scope, however. 

    “There is no role for this device beyond health,” the spokesperson wrote over email, “and it is purpose-built to be a sensor that detects motion.”

    Imagine sensors that alert a primary caregiver that his or her aging relative, say, hadn’t gotten up from the bed for an extended period of time. This, as opposed to a whimsical Alexa-like voice telling you jokes, is more of what Comcast has in mind. 

    At least initially, the device will be launched in partnership with a health care provider of some kind — likely insurer Independence Health Group. 

    So while clearly not in direct competition with products like the Apple Watch, Comcast’s device will offer some competing services in the personal health market. The Apple Watch, for example, can detect falls and track your sleep.  

    SEE ALSO: Gmail has been tracking your purchases for years

    Whether anyone will feel comfortable sharing this sort of intimate information with their cable company is an open question. Comcast has been criticized for its handling of account security in the past. 

    But hey, we’re sure that Comcast — a company which frequently falls on “America’s most hated companies” lists — has only the best of intentions. 

    Read More

    from Daily Trends Hunter http://bit.ly/2HwTaiI
    via IFTTT