Ryan McDonough Fired as Suns GM, Replaced by James Jones, Trevor Bukstein

Phoenix Suns general manager Ryan McDonough answers a question as the team introduces its new players after the NBA basketball draft Friday, June 22, 2018, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Ross D. Franklin/Associated Press

The Phoenix Suns fired general manager Ryan McDonough on Monday, eight days before the 2018-19 NBA season begins.

Suns owner Robert Sarver announced vice president of basketball operations James Jones and assistant general manager Trevor Bukstein will handle the GM duties on an interim basis. 

“After much thought and a long evaluation of our basketball operations, I have decided to relieve Ryan McDonough of his duties as general manager of the Phoenix Suns,” Sarver said in a statement

“Our focus in the short term is to prepare for the upcoming NBA season and to continue pursuing opportunities to strengthen our roster. Over the course of the season, we will explore both internal and external options as we look to restructure our basketball front office leadership. On behalf of the entire organization, I want to thank Ryan for his efforts and contributions during his five-plus years with the Suns. We wish him nothing but the best moving forward.”

This article will be updated to provide more information on this story as it becomes available.

Get the best sports content from the web and social in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2QvYPqA
via IFTTT

Erdogan: Saudi officials must prove Khashoggi left consulate

Saudi Arabian officials must prove that journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who has been missing since last week, had left the Istanbul consulate, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said.

“We have to get an outcome from this investigation as soon as possible. The consulate officials cannot save themselves by simply saying ‘he has left’,” Erdogan told a news conference in Budapest on Monday.

Khashoggi disappeared after entering the Saudi consulate on October 2 to sort out paperwork, and Turkish sources told Reuters news agency on Saturday they believed he was killed inside the building in what they described as a “premeditated murder”.

Erdogan, who said he was personally following the case, added that Turkey had no documents or evidence at hand regarding the case.

Turkey has formally requested access to the Saudi consulate for a full forensic search of the premises.

Earlier on Monday, officials in Istanbul told Al Jazeera they “expect [Saudi Arabia’s] full cooperation during the investigation” into the fate of the missing journalist.

On Sunday, Turkish Deputy Minister Sedat Onal summoned the Saudi ambassador to Turkey to the foreign ministry for a second time since Khashoggi’s disappearance, sources at the ministry told Al Jazeera.

An unnamed source inside the consulate was quoted by the official Saudi Press Agency as denying the claims, saying the accusations were “baseless”.

A leading critic of the Saudi government’s reform programme under the stewardship of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Khashoggi had been living in self-imposed exile in the United States for over a year.

Speaking on Al Jazeera’s UpFront earlier this year, Khashoggi said that there was no space for debate in Saudi Arabia with intellectuals and journalists jailed for questioning policies.

“As we speak today, there [are] Saudi intellectuals and journalists jailed. Now, nobody will dare to speak and criticise the reforms [initiated by the crown prince],” he said, adding that “it would be much better for him to allow a breathing space for critics, for Saudi intellectuals, Saudi writers, Saudi media to debate”.

Asked whether Saudi Arabia could ever become democratic under bin Salman, Khashoggi said: “Not on his watch. I haven’t heard him make even the slightest inference that he would open the country for power-sharing, for democracy.”

In his writings for the Washington Post, the Saudi commentator criticised Saudi policies towards Qatar and Canada, the war in Yemen and the crackdown on dissent and the media in the kingdom.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2OdJkXU
via IFTTT

Taylor Swift Broke Her Political Silence With A Powerful New Statement



Matt Winkelmeyer/TAS18/Getty Images for TAS

Though a few of her pop peers vocally campaigned for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election — perhaps most notably Katy Perry and Demi LovatoTaylor Swift remained silent and never made her affiliation or support known. A torrent of takes followed, some of which even linked Swift to white supremacy, as did an inevitable backlash to the backlash.

Over the past year, Swift has been steady about her work, releasing and touring behind her sixth album, Reputation. But on Sunday (October 8), Swift broke her long silence on politics with a lengthy Instagram message where she spoke out against Tennessee representative Marsha Blackburn, a Republican.

Swift, who said she’ll be voting in Tennessee for next month’s midterms, began the post by acknowledging that she’s never weighed in before. “In the past I’ve been reluctant to publicly voice my political opinions, but due to several events in my life and in the world in the past two years, I feel very differently about that now,” she wrote before going on to detail about what informs her voting decisions.

“I believe in the fight for LGBTQ rights, and that any form of discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender is WRONG,” Swift continued. “I believe that the systemic racism we still see in this country towards people of color is terrifying, sickening and prevalent.”

Matt Winkelmeyer/TAS18/Getty Images for TAS

This all leads to Blackburn, a “politically incorrect and proud of it” candidate by her own admission who served as vice chair of President Trump’s transition team. Swift said Blackburn’s voting record “appalls and terrifies” her.

“As much as I have in the past and would like to continue voting for women in office, I cannot support Marsha Blackburn,” she wrote and listed Blackburn’s many unprogressive views before pledging her support to two Democrats, Phil Bredesen for Senate and Jim Cooper for the House.

“For a lot of us, we may never find a candidate or party with whom we agree 100 [percent] on every issue, but we have to vote anyway,” Swift wrote near the end of the note. “So many intelligent, thoughtful, self-possessed people have turned 18 in the past two years and now have the right and privilege to make their vote count.” Read the entire post right here.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2QC4gEt
via IFTTT

Cowboys News: Jerry Jones Says OT Was Time for Jason Garrett to Take Risks

Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones before an NFL football game against the Houston Texans, Sunday, Oct. 7, 2018, in Houston. (AP Photo/David J. Phillip)

David J. Phillip/Associated Press

The Dallas Cowboys opted to punt from the Houston Texans‘ 42-yard line on fourth-and-1 during Sunday night’s 19-16 overtime loss, and after the game, owner Jerry Jones wasn’t thrilled with the decision.

“We were being outplayed,” he said, per ESPN.com. “It’s time for risks at that particular time.”

He added he wasn’t “second-guessing” head coach Jason Garrett with those comments, though given the Texans drove down the field for a game-winning field goal after the punt, Jones’ comments felt like a critique of Garrett’s decision-making. 

Star running back Ezekiel Elliott also commented on the decision, though he finished short of being critical of Garrett in his remarks. 

“I really don’t remember the field position we were in, but obviously, you would like a chance to go for it on fourth-and-1,” he said, “but I don’t know if that was the best decision right there.”

The punt pinned the Texans on their own 10-yard line, though just eight plays later, Ka’imi Fairbairn hit the game-winning 36-yard field goal for the Texans.

“You know, we had a third-and-2 and we didn’t make much on it and we just felt like at that point in the game, the way our defense was playing, the idea was to pin them down there,” Garrett told reporters after the game.

Quarterback Dak Prescott concurred.

“In that case you don’t question the coach’s decision,” he said, per the team’s website. “The defense had been playing good all night. They kept us in the game for a bunch of the game, from the second quarter. In the fourth quarter they gave us a chance all day long.”

The loss dropped Dallas to 2-3, costing them a chance to move ahead of the Philadelphia Eagles (2-3) in the standings and make up ground against Washington (2-1). They remain ahead of the New York Giants (1-4) in an NFC East that looks wide open at the moment. 

If the Cowboys are going to win their third divisional title in the past five years, however, they’ll need to win games like Sunday’s overtime loss. In turn, it might mean taking a few more calculated risks.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Nx5EXc
via IFTTT

Turkey asks access to search Saudi consulate in Khashoggi case

Turkey has formally requested access to search Saudi Arabia’s consulate in Istanbul as part of what Turkish officials say is a murder investigation into the case of missing Saudi critic Jamal Khashoggi. 

Officials in Istanbul told Al Jazeera they “expect [Saudi Arabia’s] full cooperation during the investigation” into the fate of the missing journalist, amid reports that he may have been killed.

Khashoggi disappeared after entering the Saudi consulate on October 2 to sort out paperwork, and Turkish sources told Reuters news agency on Saturday they believed he was killed inside the building in what they described as a “premeditated murder”.

On Sunday, Turkish Deputy Minister Sedat Onal summoned the Saudi ambassador to Turkey to the foreign ministry for a second time since Khashoggi’s disappearance, sources at the ministry told Al Jazeera.

Onal told the ambassador that Turkey expects Saudi Arabia to cooperate fully during the investigation process.

On Monday, Turkey formally requested to be given access to the Saudi consulate for a full forensic search of the premises. 

Following the disappearance of Khashoggi, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said he is hopeful about the fate of missing Saudi journalist.

Erdogan told reporters on Sunday that authorities were looking into all video surveillance footage of the mission’s entrances and monitoring all inbound and outbound flights since the writer disappeared on Tuesday.

“I am following the [issue] and we will inform the world whatever the outcome [of the official probe]”, Erdogan said.

“God willing, we will not be faced with a situation we do not want. I still am hopeful,” adding that “it is very, very upsetting for us that it happened in our country”.

An unnamed source inside the consulate was quoted by the official Saudi Press Agency as denying the claims, saying the accusations were “baseless”.

A leading critic of the Saudi government’s reform programme under the stewardship of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Khashoggi had been living in self-imposed exile in the United States for over a year. 

Criticism of Saudi Arabia

Khashoggi, a regular contributor to the Washington Post and former editor-in-chief of Al Arab News channel, has been an outspoken critic of the Saudi government.

Speaking on Al Jazeera’s UpFront earlier this year, Khashoggi said that there was no space for debate in Saudi Arabia with intellectuals and journalists jailed for questioning policies.

“As we speak today, there [are] Saudi intellectuals and journalists jailed. Now, nobody will dare to speak and criticise the reforms [initiated by the crown prince],” he said, adding that “it would be much better for him to allow a breathing space for critics, for Saudi intellectuals, Saudi writers, Saudi media to debate”.

Asked whether Saudi Arabia could ever become democratic under bin Salman, Khashoggi said: “Not on his watch. I haven’t heard him make even the slightest inference that he would open the country for power-sharing, for democracy.” 

In his writings for the Washington Post, the Saudi commentator slammed Saudi policies towards Qatar and Canada, the war in Yemen and the crackdown on dissent and the media in the kingdom.

‘Breach of sovereignty’

Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera’s senior political analyst

The incident, if proven true, will be interpreted as a major breach of Turkey’s sovereignty.

Turkish-Saudi relations will worsen, even though it is very hard to imagine how those relations could get any worse.

For at least the past decade, certainly, for the past three years, these relations have deteriorated on nearly all issues relevant to both countries, regionally and internationally.

Washington has huge leverage it could exert over Riyadh if President Donald Trump wants to use it. Unfortunately, he has hesitated since his visit to Saudi Arabia at the outset of his tenure.

In fact, he considers them his best friends and has been giving them his full support.

Saudi authorities barred Khashoggi from writing as a journalist when he was still in Saudi Arabia because he criticised Trump and his discourse towards the Muslim world.

Al Jazeera’s Jamal Elshayyal, reporting from Istanbul, said Turkish authorities are trying to walk a fine line so as not to damage relations between the two countries further. 

“There is an attempt by the Turkish government to try to find a way out of this whereby there isn’t a full collapse of diplomatic relations, at least a temporary freeze between Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

“Because if, indeed, Turkish authorities can prove unequivocally that Saudi agents essentially murdered a journalist inside the consulate in Istanbul, it would require some sort of strong reaction.”

Earlier on Saturday, sources told Al Jazeera that a delegation of 15 Saudi officials arrived in Turkey the day Khashoggi, 59, disappeared.

“The Saudi officials flew into Istanbul on two different flights on Tuesday,” Elshayyal quoted his sources as saying, adding that it was not clear if the Saudi delegation consisted of security or diplomatic officials.

On Friday, Turkey’s foreign ministry summoned Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to Ankara over the issue.

Later that day, the crown prince said Saudi authorities would allow Turkey to search its consulate.

“We will allow them to enter and search and do whatever they want to do … we have nothing to hide,” bin Salman told Bloomberg on Friday.

Saudi Arabia invited a group of journalists into the Istanbul mission on Saturday in an effort to show that Khashoggi was not on the premises.

“I would like to confirm that … Jamal is not at the consulate nor in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the consulate and the embassy are working to search for him,” consul-general Mohammad al-Otaiba told Reuters.

Khashoggi had entered the consulate’s premises at around 1pm (10:00 GMT) on Tuesday to secure paperwork in order to marry his Turkish fiancee, Hatice Cengiz.

Cengiz said she waited outside after Khashoggi entered the Saudi consulate, but he never re-emerged. Following the initial announcement by Turkish sources of Khashoggi’s killing, she tweeted in Arabic her refusal to believe that is the case.

جمال لم يقتل ولا اصدق أنه قد قتل …! #جمال_الخاشقجي #اختطاف_جمال_خاشقجي pic.twitter.com/5SHyIEqqiT

— Hatice Cengiz / خديجة (@mercan_resifi) October 6, 2018

Translation: Jamal was not killed and I do not believe that he has been murdered…!

‘Abysmal new low’

Rights groups have condemned the alleged murder of Khashoggi.

In a press release, Amnesty International said Khashoggi’s death “would set an abysmal new low”.

“Such an assassination within the grounds of the consulate, which is territory under Saudi Arabian jurisdiction, would amount to an extrajudicial execution. This case sends a shockwave among Saudi Arabian human rights defenders and dissidents everywhere, eroding any notion of seeking safe haven abroad,” Amnesty International’s Middle East Research Director Lynn Maalouf said.

“The Gulf Kingdom routinely uses draconian laws to crack down on peaceful dissent at home and has even arrested dissidents abroad in the past. But the enforced disappearance – and now reported assassination – of one of its citizens who had sought asylum abroad should set alarm bells ringing,” Maalouf added.

“If the reports are true, they must immediately launch an independent investigation and those responsible, however high their rank or status, must face justice.”

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said that if Khashoggi was indeed assassinated by Saudi authorities, it would constitute an “absolutely unacceptable assault on press freedom”.

If Turkish reports that @washingtonpost journalist and US resident @jamalkhashoggi was killed in Saudi Arabia’s consulate in Turkey are confirmed, this would constitute a horrific, utterly deplorable, and absolutely unacceptable assault on press freedom https://t.co/FS3HYrHntH

— RSF in English (@RSF_en) October 6, 2018

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) also condemned the news, urging the Saudi authorities to “give a full and credible accounting of what happened to Khashoggi inside its diplomatic mission.”

Khashoggi’s suspected killing may further strain relations between Turkey and Saudi Arabia, who are on opposite sides of the multination blockade of Qatar and other regional crises.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2y7kvmi
via IFTTT

Odell Beckham Jr.: ‘I Don’t Regret Anything That I Said’ About Giants

New York Giants' Odell Beckham (13) catches a pass as Carolina Panthers' James Bradberry (24) defends in the first half of an NFL football game in Charlotte, N.C., Sunday, Oct. 7, 2018. (AP Photo/Mike McCarn)

Mike McCarn/Associated Press

Odell Beckham Jr. has apologized to his teammates for his candid remarks about the New York Giants‘ coaching staff and Eli Manning in an ESPN interview.

He just doesn’t regret them.

“I don’t regret anything,” Beckham told reporters. “I don’t regret anything that I said. If it took that for us to come together as a team like we did [Sunday]. I can take that every single time.”

In an interview with ESPN’s Josina Anderson, Beckham called his use within the offense into question and criticized Manning for not taking more downfield shots. Beckham had his best game of the season Sunday following the controversy, hauling in eight passes for 131 yards and a touchdown while also throwing for a 57-yard score in a 33-31 loss to the Carolina Panthers.

This article will be updated to provide more information on this story as it becomes available.

Get the best sports content from the web and social in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2O8MonY
via IFTTT

Why are housing rights activists intimidated in South Africa?

New York, United States – S’bu Zikode, the leader of a shack dwellers’ movement in Durban, South Africa, said he received a tip-off from police in July that he was being targeted and his life was under threat.

Since then, the Abahlali baseMjondolo (AbM) organiser has been living underground, away from his family, between safe-houses.

“I had been receiving threats from a number of local ANC councillors via AbM members and others, warning me not to step into their communities … the ANC have basically created no-go zones,” Zikode told Al Jazeera on the sidelines of an event in New York on September 29 to raise awareness on his story.

ANC is South Africa’s ruling party, led by President Cyril Ramaphosa.

Zikode says AbM members routinely face censorship, intimidation and even murder by local city officials as they attempt to pressure them into providing housing, improving living standards or preventing people in informal settlements from being violently evicted – all charges the city denies.

“The police have confirmed that there is a hit on me and offered me state-witness protection but I had to refuse, because when I asked them for how long, they said until elections [in 2019].

“This means that they will protect me in order to neutralise me from my work ahead of the election … I couldn’t do it,” Zikode said.

On Monday, AbM is holding protests in South African cities and New York against what it terms as state repression, threats and assassinations.

AbM says six of its members have been killed since 2017.

It also alleges that three other members from the Eastern Cape have also gone into hiding, citing mounting threats on their lives. 

AbM says their requests to President Ramaphosa and General Bheki Cele, the minister of police, for a Commission of Inquiry into the killings of AbM members have gone unanswered.

But a spokesperson for Zandile Gumede, the mayor of eThekwini, the metropolitan municipality including Durban, dismissed AbM’s claims. The mayor is the regional chairperson of the ANC.

“This is an old, repeated, fabricated allegation by Abahlali … they must approach relevant security agencies if they have evidence instead of the media,” the spokesperson said. “Making such a serious allegation without going to court will not assist anyone. The failure to report such is counterproductive and equivalent to defeating ends of justice,” Gumede said.

Colonel Thembeka Mbhele, a spokesperson for the South African Police Services (SAPS), confirmed to Al Jazeera police had opened “a case of intimidation” in Durban, raised by the organisation, but said she had no knowledge of Zikode being tipped off by members of the police force.

Bheki Ntuli, the ANC’s regional spokesperson, did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

AbM members have been killed over the years for their work because they do it outside of a political party or electioneering process

Axolile Notywala, general secretary of the Social Justice Coalition

Since its inception in 2005 at the Kennedy Road settlement in Durban, AbM members say they have faced hostility from police and the ruling ANC government, particularly city officials.

This is the fifth time Zikode has gone into hiding since the organisation, which now has 55,000 members, began.

Activists working with poor and marginalised communities in KwaZulu-Natal, the province of which Durban is the capital, say that there is a history of systematic violence against the AbM.

In 2016, two ANC councillors and a hired hitman were found guilty of murdering Thuli Ndlovu, an organiser with AbM. 

Ndlovu was shot dead in front of her daughter by a gunman who had been offered $1,000 and a home for the job. 

In 2017, a court found a police officer guilty of killing 17-year-old AbM member Nqobile Nzuza during a protest in Cato Crest, an informal settlement 7km south of Durban.

“Abahali members have been killed over the years for their work because they do it outside of a political party or electioneering process,” Axolile Notywala, general secretary of the Social Justice Coalition (SJC), told Al Jazeera. 

“They have [direct] experience of corruption and lack of service delivery, therefore speaking out against the ruling party is dangerous,” Notywala said.

AbM focuses on impoverished and working-class communities, traditionally the ANC’s voter base.

“We were not expected to be so vocal and radical and to speak against the ruling party. The ANC behaves like they own the poor. And when we speak, we offend them, because they have always claimed to champion us,” said Zikode, the AbM leader.

Since 2014, at least 100 people have been killed in politically-motivated murders in KwaZulu-Natal, the home province of former president, the ANC’s Jacob Zuma.

“Zuma was like a warlord in KZN,” Zikode says. “We don’t have that much of confidence in President Cyril Ramaphosa to change the economy but he might be able to tackle the violence …  unlike Zuma, he has some fear for international reputation.”

‘AbM keeps politicians on their toes’

With the heartbeat of the economy in urban centres, black South Africans have moved to cities in search of employment and opportunities. 

But the lack of affordable housing has meant millions have resorted to living in informal settlements, often on vacant land on the outskirts.

According to the PEP, a non-profit organisation that supports communities living in informal settlements, around 12 million South Africans live without proper housing.

In April, the World Bank said South Africa was the most unequal country on earth. More than half of the country lives below the poverty line.

Youth unemployment hasalso reached record highs.

Two decades after the end of apartheid, land reform remains one of South Africa’s most divisive issues [File: Mike Hutchings/Reuters]

“As long as there’s still poverty and exclusion, the [AbM] movement is here to stay since it plays a critical role in a political landscape … they keep politicians on their toes,” Baruti Amisi, CEO of KZN Refugee Council, told Al Jazeera.

Zikode said people occupy land “so they they can get closer to dignity”.

Twenty-four years since the onset of democracy, most land remains in the hand of white South Africans, who make up less than nine percent of the population.

In December, the ANC resolved to expropriate land without compensation, but Zikode said the ANC is using the issue to win votes.

“They have lost credibility; the question of land has been raised because the ANC wants to restore trust and confidence. After the elections, all of this will be put aside.

“As much as we agree with the concept [of expropriation without compensation] we have a lot of questions. For us, it suggests they will take land from white elites and give it to black elites, and this will not benefit landless, homeless and ordinary people,” Zikode said.

When it comes to the future of AbM, Zikode regrets that in the organisation’s 13 year-history, “we haven’t been able to organise houses for our people”. 

He hopes to build a larger base to push for change. But first, he has more immediate challenges. 

“Reality will hit when I return to South Africa; I return to uncertainty,” he said.

Additional reporting by Lizeka Maduna

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2QvGfPm
via IFTTT

Is Trump Driving Women Away From the GOP for Good?

President Donald Trump has historically low favorability among women, with the Pew Research Center now reporting that 63 percent of women disapprove of how he is doing his job—compared with 30 percent who approve. That might not be surprising, given the range of things that Trump has said and done that might be seen as offensive to women. There’s the famous “Access Hollywood” tape that gave rise to thousands of pussy hats, the 22 women who have publicly accused him of sexual harassment and assault, and the hush money his personal lawyer has admitted to paying to cover up marital indiscretions. There is Trump’s tendency to insult women, from Carly Fiorina to Megyn Kelly to Mika Brzezinski. Most recently, there was his rally in Mississippi, during which the president mocked Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations that Brett Kavanaugh, who has since been confirmed to the Supreme Court, had sexually assaulted her when they were teenagers.

Trump’s election and performance in office have clearly pushed independent and Democratic women into action, resulting in record numbers of women running for office, and surges of women involved in local political organizing for the first time. But what about Republican women? Is it possible that Trump—and the Republican politicians who enable him—are not just alienating left-leaning women, but are permanently damaging the GOP’s female ranks, driving some splintering portion of women away for good?

Story Continued Below

Republican women still overwhelmingly support the president—84 percent of them, according to a POLITICO/Morning Consult poll this week. But that statistic overlooks a broader trend: Fewer and fewer American women identify as Republicans, and that slow migration is speeding up under Trump. My conversations with pollsters, political scientists and a number of women across the country who have recently rejected their lifelong Republicans identities suggested the same—and illuminate why this moment in American politics might prove a breaking point for women in the GOP. According to pollsters on both sides of the aisle, that doesn’t bode well for the Republican Party either in this fall’s midterms—which are likely to bring a record gap between how men and women vote—or for the party’s long-term future.

The gender gap began with white men leaving the Democratic Party in the late 1950s and early 1960s in response to the civil rights and women’s movements, Democratic pollster Anna Greenberg explains. Only more recently did women start actively leaving the GOP. For two decades now, they have been leaking away from the Republican Party, very slowly becoming independents, while independents have been drifting toward the Democrats. In 1994, according to Pew, 42 percent of women identified as or leaned Republican, as did 52 percent of men. By 2017, only 37 percent of women and 48 percent of men still did. In 1994, 48 percent of women and 39 percent of men identified as or leaned toward the Democrats. By 2017, those numbers were 56 percent of women and 44 percent of men.

Trump’s election put this gender shift “on steroids,” Greenberg says. According to Pew, the share of American women voters who identify with or lean toward the Republican Party has dropped 3 percentage points since 2015—from 40 percent to 37 percent—after having been essentially unchanged from 2010 through 2014. By 2017, just 25 percent of American women fully identified as Republicans. That means that when, say, 84 percent of Republican women say they approve of Trump and his actions, or 69 percent of Republican women say they support Kavanaugh, or 64 percent say they, like Trump, don’t find Ford very “credible,” those percentages represent a small and shrinking slice of American women.

These shifts in party allegiance might seem mild, but they matter. As Rutgers political scientist Kelly Dittmar recently wrote, women have voted in higher numbers and at higher rates than men for decades. In 2016, according to Dittmar, 9.9 million more women than men voted, and about 63 percent of eligible females voted, compared with 59 percent of eligible males. If more women than men vote in November, women’s shift toward the Democrats is likely to be over-represented on Election Day—especially in an election like this one, in which women are highly mobilized and motivated. The Cook Political Report’s Amy Walters recently noted: “The most recent NBC/Wall Street Journal survey found that [white college-educated women] support a Democrat for Congress by 22 points—58 percent to 36 percent. In 2014, they preferred a Democratic Congress by just 2 points.”

“If these trends continue,” political scientist Melissa Deckman of Washington College told me, “women’s preference for Democrats will be a big contributor to the midterm results.”

And beyond the midterms, too. “Once you give up that party label, you’re less inclined to easily take it back,” says University of Virginia political scientist Jennifer Lawless. Liam Donovan, a lobbyist and former National Republican Senatorial Committee staffer, notes that the Republican loss of college-educated white women “is not balanced out by a huge spike among white men—on net, that’s a real problem for the Republicans.” Former Trump strategist Steve Bannon, of all people, put it more starkly this summer: “The Republican college-educated woman is done. They’re gone. They were going anyway at some point in time. Trump triggers them.”

***

In recent weeks, I sought out women who had crossed over from Republican to Democrat, to understand what motivated their shift and how permanent they think it will be. The 10 women who ended up talking with me—before the Kavanaugh-Ford hearings, it’s worth noting—were all white college graduates, married or widowed, ages 31 to 80, and living in suburban or exurban areas from California to Kansas to North Carolina. Some had voted straight-ticket Republican all their lives; others had crossed the line occasionally but remained proud Republicans until Trump. Some have converted fully to the Democratic Party; others are hoping the GOP will return to the moderate, small-business party they once loved—but even so, can’t imagine going back to being its unquestioning followers. Each woman’s experiences and motivations were different, but some clear themes emerged about their disillusionment with the Republican Party.

First is their dislike of Trump himself, whom these women see as offensive, impulsive and dangerous to America’s standing in the world. “He is just the most amoral person,” said Jennifer Pate, a recently married 31-year-old devoted churchgoer in San Antonio, raised in that city by what she called “very conservative” parents in a church where women still can’t be pastors. “He is everything—I don’t have kids yet—everything I don’t want my kids to grow up to be. He’s entitled. He’s pompous,” Pate told me.

“His honesty is in question,” said Julie Vann, a 68-year-old in Beavercreek, Ohio. She points to Trump’s company’s multiple bankruptcy filings. “That was just his way of doing business,” she says. “And that’s the same way he thinks now. He doesn’t care who gets hurt as long as he wins.” Vann is still a registered Republican, but she has been supporting Democrat Theresa Gasper against incumbent Republican Mike Turner in Ohio’s 10th Congressional District.

Another born-and-raised Republican, Kansas teacher Janea Lawrence, 54, is dismayed because she believes Trump handed out Cabinet positions to unqualified “friends or people who could buy their way in”—because of wealth or, she assumes, campaign donations. She finds that approach shockingly counter to what she calls her Midwestern ethos of working hard and doing right. While she said she has voted for Democrats sometimes in the past, it wasn’t until Trump’s election that she changed her registration; she is now backing Democrats in both House and gubernatorial races.

Cate Kanellis Zalmat of Plano, Texas, a 61-year-old grocery store manager and grandmother, has been a Republican since she first voted for Ronald Reagan. “I haven’t felt as angry about politics in my life as Trump makes me,” she told me—angry, among other things, at Trump’s instability, at what she sees as the GOP’s pandering to the religious right, at what she described as Republicans’ anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant bias. Zalmat is married to an engineer who was raised a Muslim in Libya.

That brings us to another reason these women are disillusioned: Under Trump, they say, many Republicans are peddling intolerance and exclusion. “It’s become normal to be a racist and a bigot, and those are not normal things,” said Jennifer Hackel Thrift, 43, a corporate headhunter in Austin, Texas. She had never voted for a Democrat until 2016—and now compares Fox News to Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels. When others in her family praise Trump’s handling of the economy, her answer is, “At what price? … We no longer have values as a country—except for ‘me first,’ ‘white is right.’ And that’s not right.”

Karen Winslow, 66, a former Navy nurse who now lives in Austin as well, worked furiously at her consulting business after her first husband died so that her three daughters would be able to get excellent educations and travel widely. Now she is appalled at how Trump slanders Latinos—a group that includes two of her sons-in-law—and how the party treats women. “Having had daughters, I wanted them to have opportunities, which is part of the reason I can’t stand Trump, because he’s such a misogynistic jerk,” she says. “If that’s the Republican Party, I’m not part of it.”

In Charlotte, North Carolina, 58-year-old CPA Beth Monaghan said that in 2016, when her state senator, Dan Bishop, helped sponsor HB2, the North Carolina “bathroom bill,” she took it as an attack on the entire LGBTQ spectrum and was furious that the government was “telling my son he’s less-than because he’s gay.” She was so furious that she ran as a moderate against Bishop in her state Senate district’s Republican primary and lost. When she realized Trump would be the Republicans’ presidential nominee in 2016, she threw herself into Hillary Clinton’s campaign, putting a “huge” banner up at her house in a district that’s two-thirds Republican.

Trump alone didn’t push these women to shed their Republican labels; other GOP politicians’ unquestioning support for Trump did that. Several told me they were angry that an all-Republican government has become the party of fiscal waste, deficits, trade wars and rebates for the wealthy. Zalmat said she is angrier at the “spineless Republicans in the Congress” for “enabling [Trump’s] crazy” than she is at the president himself. “The Republicans that I knew and held beloved really have disappointed me,” Thrift agreed. “They’ve become such sycophants for power. It’s no longer about what’s right for people in my district or my state; it’s about how do I keep my position.” Or as Lawrence, the Kansas teacher, put it, “The Republican Party to me seems like it’s being run by white, upper-class or wealthy businessmen who aren’t paying attention to the rest of us.”

Sentiments like those are telling, says UVA’s Lawless. “If the Republicans had stood up to [Trump], not necessarily on substance, but in terms of style and rhetoric,” she says, the reactions among voters might be, “I’m still a Republican, but I’m not supporting Donald Trump.” Instead, she continues, “because the Republicans have been complicit in a lot of what Trump has done,” many women no longer feel they can consider themselves Republican. And that’s a big step out the door.

***

But will they keep going out the door?

Seth Masket, political science professor at the University of Denver, told me, “All my training tells me that party ID is quite sticky.” Only major world events like war and depressions tend to shake up those allegiances. “You’ll sometimes get some pushback against an unpopular politician, but that does tend to be pretty short-lived. At some point, Trump won’t be president, and these women who’ve been leaning away from the Republican Party may return to that fold.” Democratic strategist Celinda Lake says that if “in 2020 or 2024, [Republicans] nominate a woman, if they start to put women in prominent leadership positions, if they nominate someone like [Ohio Governor John] Kasich who has had strong appeal to women—it could change. But it’ll definitely last through 2020 unless the Democrats blow it, because Trump’s going to be the nominee, and Trump’s style isn’t going to change.”

Donovan, the former NRSC staffer, says he wonders how far women who leave the GOP will actually go. Will they call themselves independents who tend to lean Republican, akin to leaving the team’s clubhouse but staying in its yard? Putative independents who aren’t registered with one party but who tell pollsters that they nonetheless sympathize with one party, Lawless explains, tend to vote for that party’s ticket as reliably as those who embrace the party label. That means the big question is whether, as she puts it, “these women who are saying the Republican Party no longer represents them and are eschewing the party label—will they still lean Republican?”

Among the small sample of women I spoke with, several said they are fundraising, campaigning or otherwise organizing for Democratic state or congressional candidates this fall. Dana Fortier of Michigan, a 51-year-old former paralegal who grew up Republican, is now a paid-up and active member of her state and local Democratic Party clubs, while running two local Democratic women’s campaigns for city council. In fact, she said, every single person she is planning on voting for in November is a Democratic woman: Debbie Stabenow for Senate, Haley Stevens for Congress in Michigan’s 11th District, Gretchen Whitmer for governor and on down the ballot. Similarly, Thrift in Texas is fully outfitted with Beto O’Rourke stickers, buttons, signs and pamphlets that she distributes wherever she can, explaining, “I can’t sit still. I can’t keep my mouth shut. I have to do everything I can to try and stop, or at least neuter, this horrible president.” Monaghan in North Carolina said, “This may be the first time in my life, at 58 years old, that I vote a straight Democratic ticket. That’s how frustrated I am.”

“If they are actively working for Democrats this cycle, they may be true independents,” Lawless says, which suggests “they are not beholden to the party label. I don’t know any research that suggests that they are any more likely to flip back” than they are to keep walking away from the Republican Party.

But, with a few exceptions, most of the women I spoke with said they aren’t fully diving into the Democratic Party. Some continue to be registered Republicans, while others are independents. As Thrift put it to me. “I’m going to choose the best candidates for the job.” Even Fortier does not promise to stay a Democrat. “In five years, in 10 years, there could be a set of Republicans whose ideas and values are very close to me,” she explained, “and I’ll vote for them.”

Of course, a lot rides on what the Republican Party does in the years ahead. Certainly, by saying recently that it’s “a very scary time” to be a young man, Trump has “put the pedal to the metal” on the GOP’s appeal to angry white blue-collar men, Donovan says. But as Masket put it, “There are a lot of young women coming of age in this presidency who will vote for the first time either this year or in 2020, with this very stark view of gender relations between the two parties.” He sees the Ford/Kavanaugh hearings as a powerful influence at such a formative moment for social identity: “Those images aren’t ones that go away very quickly.”

Whether or not their mothers drift away from the Republicans for good, in other words, young women might be signing up for the other team. “If millennials vote three times for the same party, they hold that identification their whole lives,” Lake says. “So, this is a very, very critical erosion. The Republicans could pay the price for decades.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Og6FIj
via IFTTT

Indian schoolgirls beaten up after confronting sexual harassers

Campaigners want India to protect girls in state-run institutions who are at risk of sexual assault and violence after 34 girls were beaten up by a mob for fighting off sexual harassers in Bihar state.

Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya, a residential school for girls in Supaul district, witnessed chaotic scenes on Saturday after some girls objected to sexual advances and lewd messages from a group of boys.

A mob comprising the boys and their parents entered the school later and beat up and injured dozens of girls aged between 12 and 14.

“The girls were playing inside the school compound when some boys came in and tried to sexually harass them. The girls fought them off and there was an altercation. A mob then gathered with the boys’ parents who beat up the girls,” Jagatpati Chaudhury, the District Education Officer in Supaul, told Al Jazeera.

“The girls were injured, shocked, in trauma and were rushed to hospital. These were scenes of havoc as most of the girls are in sixth and seventh grades.”

A video uploaded on social media by a local news website, The Bihar Post, showed a girl from the school after the attack.

Listen to the cries of one of the 40 victim school girls attacked by goons in Kasturba Girl School, Supaul in Bihar… #Bihar pic.twitter.com/4roOA72HpS

— The Bihar Post (@biharpostPatna) October 8, 2018

“They were beating up all the girls. They tore our clothes and took away our dupattas [scarves],” said a young girl who was sobbing at the hospital.

Police say they have arrested two people and detained four in connection with the incident.

District magistrate Baidyanath Yadav said local boys used to write lewd messages on the school walls. Local media reports suggest the girls at the school were routinely harassed. 

Schools for India’s poorest

The Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya are special schools run by the government and provide residential elementary education to girls belonging to India’s most vulnerable communities: Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, religious minorities and families living below poverty line across India.

Activists point out that the state and the community have failed to protect girls in such schools, which were set up in places where female rural literacy rates are low.

“This case is especially alarming because it happened at a school. It has been an uphill task to get girls from marginalised communities into schools. In rural Bihar, projects to get adolescent girls on self-defence training programmes have worked very well. So this violent attack is a setback,” Prabhat Kumar, head of child protection at the charity Save the Children in India, told Al Jazeera.

“Shockingly, when the boys came back to attack the girls, they were with their parents. Adults not guiding their children and the community not preventing such attacks is shocking and disheartening,” he added.

‘A child abused every 15 minutes’

A child is sexually abused every 15 minutes in India, according to the NGO, Child Rights.

Violence against girls in Bihar has been in the spotlight since more than 30 girls were raped at a children’s shelter in July, in a case that led to national anger over the management of care homes. These girls had told a local court that they were beaten, drugged, raped and scalded with hot water. 

India has enacted strident anti-rape laws in response to nationwide outrage in the wake of a series of child rape cases.

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act has been amended to introduce death penalty for the rape of children below age 12.

Although activists contest the claim that stricter rape laws act as a deterrent, there has been a relentless focus on enabling girls to resist acts of sexual violence.

“Our girls at the school are trained in judo and karate and they gave befitting response to the boys who passed lewd comments. It was only later when the mob arrived that they were beaten up,” said Chaudhury, the government official in Supaul.

According to Child Rights, crime against minors has risen more than 500 percent over the past decade.

In 2016, police in India received 38,947 reports of rape compared with almost 35,000 in 2015, according to data collected by the National Crime Records Bureau.

Campaigners say more needs to be done to protect India’s girl children in far-flung areas. 

“As a country and a society, we have failed these girls. Stricter vigil needs to be kept about the building walls, guards and other security measures at schools like these,” said Save the Children’s Kumar, who has worked extensively in Bihar.

“Reporting rapes since 2012 has increased but rates of convictions or punishments in cases of sexual violence has had no uptick. This reflects the culture of impunity, the feeling that perpetrators will not be punished,” he added.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2y5X0du
via IFTTT

Pakistan: Ex PMs, journalist appear in court on treason charges

Lahore, Pakistan – A Pakistani court has withdrawn arrest warrants issued against a prominent journalist and ordered that travel restrictions on him be removed, as hearings in a treason case against him and two former prime ministers continue.

On Monday, a three-member bench of the Lahore High Court adjourned proceedings in the case against former Prime Ministers Nawaz Sharif and Shahid Khaqan Abbasi as well as journalist Cyril Almeida.

Sharif is accused of committing “treason” for implying that Pakistan’s military and intelligence services allowed attackers involved in the 2008 Mumbai attacks, which killed more than 160 people, to operate with impunity.

“Militant organisations are active. Call them non-state actors, should we allow them to cross the border and kill 150 people in Mumbai? Explain it to me. Why can’t we complete the trial?” Sharif said in the interview with Almeida published in Dawn newspaper in May.

Sharif was dismissed as prime minister on corruption charges last year, and subsequently jailed after being convicted by an anti-corruption court. Last month, Sharif, his daughter Maryam and son-in-law Muhammad Safdar were released on bail in that case as their appeals continue to be heard.

Almeida was named in the petition as having allegedly abetted Sharif. Former PM Abbasi, who succeeded Sharif, is accused of having leaked national security secrets to Sharif.

‘A worrying precedent’

Last month, the court ordered Sharif to appear before it for the hearing, issued arrest warrants for Almeida and placed international travel restrictions on him.

On Monday, the court appeared to take a more lenient view, as Almeida appeared before the bench personally.

“The [restrictions] were only to ensure that he was present,” judge Mazhar Ali Akbar Naqvi told a packed courtroom, where Abbasi and Sharif were also present. 

A look at Nawaz Sharif’s political career

The court ordered the government to provide a formal reply on whether or not it was prepared to move ahead with placing treason charges against the former prime ministers.

Under Pakistani law, the court cannot indict the three accused on treason charges unless the federal government has filed those charges.

“You are not being fair,” said judge Masood Jehangir, accusing the government of dawdling over framing a course of action. It ordered the attorney general to appear at the next hearing to be held on October 22.

The hearing on Monday failed to adjudicate on the maintainability of the petition.

Rights groups have criticised the court for holding hearings in the case, and particularly for summoning Almeida.

After the last hearing, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan said the case was setting a worrying precedent for press freedom in the country.

“The ease with which Mr Almeida’s interview with the former Prime Minister was perceived as an attempt to allegedly defame state institutions, and the pace at which this has spiraled into charges of treason, only serve to further choke press freedom in Pakistan,” HRCP said in a statement.

On Monday, former PM Abbasi said the case against the three accused was baseless.

“There is no case,” he told Al Jazeera in the courtroom, minutes before the hearing got underway. “This is an entirely frivolous petition.”

Asad Hashim is Al Jazeera’s digital correspondent in Pakistan. He tweets @AsadHashim.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2E5Rn4o
via IFTTT