How does Sarah Huckabee Sanders sleep at night? ‘SNL’ has the answer.

One avenue that all Donald Trump staffers might want to explore in a post-Trump presidency world: A gig as product spokeperson for whatever drugs or other items they used to keep themselves centered during these hellish years.

Saturday Night Live zeroed in on White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders in a fake TV ad for “HuckaPM,” a “nighttime tranquilizer” sleep aid loaded with ketamine and the active ingredient in roofies. For those nights when you really need to just turn off the world, and your consciousness.

SNL phenom Aidy Bryant steps into the Sanders role once again for this sketch, and she’s her usual great self.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2OmRgkF
via IFTTT

Ariana Grande is cool with all her exes in new song ‘thank u, next’

Image: GC Images

2017%2f10%2f20%2fa0%2fchloebryan11.0b114By Chloe Bryan

PSA: Ariana Grande is not feeling salty about her breakup with Pete Davidson. In fact, she’s feeling grateful.

Ariana released a new song, “thank u, next,” on Saturday night, 35 minutes before Saturday Night Live aired. Despite this seemingly shady timing (Davidson is on the show), the track — which mentions her exes Big Sean, Ricky Alvarez, the late Mac Miller, and Davidson by name — is generous and kind.

SEE ALSO: Ariana Grande’s new video is three glorious minutes of her tiny pet pig

“Even almost got married / And for Pete I’m so thankful,” she sings. “Wish I could say thank you to Malcolm / ‘Cause he was an angel.” (Malcolm is Mac Miller’s legal first name.)

Earlier this week, Ariana tweeted and deleted some more pointed thoughts on Davidson after he joked about their relationship during an SNL promo clip with Maggie Rogers. “for someone who claims to hate relevancy you sure love clinging to it huh,” she wrote. “thank u, next.”

During the Weekend Update segment of Saturday night’s episode (about an hour and a half after “thank u, next” was released), Davidson addressed the breakup himself. “I know some of you are curious about the breakup, but the truth is it’s nobody’s business, and sometimes things just don’t work out and that’s OK,” he said.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2yRH8LL
via IFTTT

NFL Week 9 News

  1. Report: Green Seeing Foot Specialist, Surgery on the Table

    via Bleacher Report

  2. John Harbaugh Reportedly on Hot Seat

    via Bleacher Report

  3. Report: McDaniels Considering HC Jobs Again

    via Bleacher Report

  4. Report: Nick Mullens to Remain 49ers’ Starting QB

    via Bleacher Report

  5. Field Conditions a Major Concern Ahead of Jets vs. Dolphins

    via Bleacher Report

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2OpYcNR
via IFTTT

A brief history of presidents jogging in short-shorts

Our current president takes the back seat in a golf cart instead of walking. He downs monster Big Macs in lieu of salads and guzzles Diet Cokes like they’re water.

But in better(ish!) times, even our most toxically masculine leaders seemed to care about exercise, and did so while rocking teeny-tiny runner’s booty shorts.

SEE ALSO: Jimmy Carter shook everyone’s hands on a flight to Atlanta because that’s his thing

I can’t say I ever longed to see any of my presidents in anything but profoundly boring suits. That being said, I find it soothing to see our leaders go outside to do something in nature that doesn’t involve a golf course or a mediocre Florida resort.

Whatever you think of our pre-Donald Trump presidents, at least they were marginally in touch with reality. Unlike Trump, they understood that the body doesn’t have a “finite amount of energy.”

Presidential jogging actually started with President Carter, who was in power when the form of cardio started gaining popularity in the 1970s.

“Carter is the classic jogger of the 1970s, albeit somewhat older,” Paul Milvy, an assistant professor of community medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, told the Washington Post in 1979.

Not only did Carter stan jogging, he did it while rocking incredible short-shorts. Look at Carter werk that aesthetic while president. He was in the late 50s when he decided to show this much thigh:

White shorts aesthetic

White shorts aesthetic

Image: Bettmann Archive

Here's Jimmy Carter with his trainer in 1979. Again, he's in white shorts.

Here’s Jimmy Carter with his trainer in 1979. Again, he’s in white shorts.

Image: Gamma-Rapho via Getty Images

Bring. Back. Sweatbands.

Bring. Back. Sweatbands.

Image: Bettmann Archive

Clear eyes little shorts can't lose

Clear eyes little shorts can’t lose

Image: Corbis via Getty Images

Whatever you think about his policies, Carter was a short-short jogging icon. Unfortunately, President Ronald Reagan didn’t jog while in office, so it was eight years before his successor President George H.W. Bush could pick up where Carter left off.

Bush was in his mid-sixties when he became president and started jogging regularly in front of the camera.

There were far longer, more fashionable shorts in style at the time. Bush nonetheless chose…this look:

In a collared shirt, no less

In a collared shirt, no less

Image: Bettmann Archive

George H.W. Bush was one step away from a Wigwam sock

George H.W. Bush was one step away from a Wigwam sock

Image: rick maiman/Rick Maiman

George H.W. Bush copping Carter's style in 1980

George H.W. Bush copping Carter’s style in 1980

Image: cynthia johnson/Getty Images

Presidential stretching

Presidential stretching

Image: cynthia johnson/Getty Images

The single-term president showed a lot of of skin for sure. Frankly, however, my favorite photo of the era is this image of Barbara Bush “jogging,” according to the original photo caption. 

The woman is in full-length chino pants and a white polo. She’s not breaking a sweat, she’s not even trotting. She’s got a fresh perm. This, my friends, is how you jog. 

Barbara Bush jogging couture

Barbara Bush jogging couture

Image: mark reinstein/Corbis via Getty Images

Then we had President Bill Clinton, who took the jogging short-short and made it even tinier. The man basically wore bikini underwear in public.

Then Vice President Al Gore tried to sex it down with a map-print T-shirt, but even he couldn’t resist the appeal of the short-short.

Unprecedented upper-thigh transparency

Unprecedented upper-thigh transparency

Image: tim clary/AFP/Getty Images

Clinton rocking fuschia and then  Sen. Joe Lieberman in a UConn Huskies tee.

Clinton rocking fuschia and then  Sen. Joe Lieberman in a UConn Huskies tee.

Image: Robert Giroux/AFP/Getty Images

Put on some pants, Mr. President

Put on some pants, Mr. President

Image: Cynthia johnson/Getty Images

Clinton even occasionally struggled with a classic ’90s athleisure problem: wearing tiny shorts with an oversized shirt (or in his case, sweatshirt,) making it appear as if he’s wearing a mini dress.

The president in a shorty short “dress”

Image: luke frazza/AFP/Getty Images

Tragically for some I guess, Clinton and the short-shorts era came to an end with the election of President George W. Bush. Over time, Bush extended the length of the presidential jogging short to a more traditional, mid-thigh length. 

The era of the radical short-shorts was dead.

Please wear track pants

Please wear track pants

Image: paul buck/AFP/Getty Images

Could use a sweatband

Could use a sweatband

Image: Paul AFP/Getty Images

You might imagine that President Barack Obama was a big jogger. Unfortunately, Obama typically exercised in private (except for that time he and then Vice President Joe Biden jogged in their office attire, which has its own kind of appeal.) 

And President Trump does this.

Trump is technically moving, so there's that

Trump is technically moving, so there’s that

Image: ludovic marin/AFP/Getty Images

Sigh. Let’s not get too nostalgic. I’m not particularly interested in seeing any of these men in short-shorts in the future.

We all, however, should aspire to see something better, like a president who moves, or who at the very least demonstrates knowledge of the U.S. Constitution.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2F4ZO0p
via IFTTT

Report: Cavaliers Veterans Don’t Think Collin Sexton Knows ‘How to Play’

Cleveland Cavaliers' Collin Sexton drives against the Denver Nuggets in the first half of an NBA basketball game, Thursday, Nov. 1, 2018, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)

Tony Dejak/Associated Press

The start of the Cleveland Cavaliers‘ 2018-19 campaign has been tumultuous, to say the least. 

Tyronn Lue was fired as head coach following the team’s 0-6 start, interim head coach Larry Drew has fought the front office over a restructured contract and JR Smith has publicly requested a trade. 

On top of that, first-round pick Collin Sexton has reportedly failed to impress internally.  

According to The Athletic’s Joe Vardon: “It’s becoming increasingly clear that when you hear a Cavs veteran talk about younger players not knowing their role, or knowing how to win, or what to do on the court, they mean Sexton. Throughout the organization, the line on Sexton is that he does not ‘know how to play.’”

Sexton, who was selected eighth overall in June, throttled up draft boards during his freshman season at Alabama thanks to his electric open-floor playmaking capabilities and pick-and-roll prowess. 

However, he’s yet to flash those capabilities with the Cavaliers. 

  1. D-Rose Turned Back the Clock and Put Up 50

  2. Dubs Trolled Fergie So Hard It Became a Challenge

  3. CP3-Rondo Blowup Was a Long Time Coming

  4. NBA Let Players Know They Have to Cover Branded Tattoos

  5. The NBA Is Back and the Soccer World Is Pumped

  6. Boban Is Back to Break It Down for Another Season

  7. Players Battle Campers in Rivalry of the Summer

  8. Happy 30th to KD!

  9. Andrew Bynum Is Making an NBA Comeback

  10. Kobe’s Hottest Kicks 👟

  11. The Kyrie-I.T. Trade Shook the NBA 1 Year Ago Today

  12. Dyckman Courts Are the Red Carpet of Streetball

  13. Giannis’ Youngest Brother Could Be the True ‘Greek Freak’

  14. #JamesGang Got AAU Hoops on Lock 🔒

  15. 11 Years Ago, KG Joined the Celtics

  16. LeBron’s School Opens in Akron 💪

  17. Embiid Putting the World on a Poster This Offseason

  18. Kobe’s ‘Mamba Mentality’ Runs in the Family

  19. Artist Paints Over LeBron’s ‘King of LA’ Mural

Right Arrow Icon

Following Saturday night’s 126-94 loss to the Charlotte Hornets, Sexton is averaging 11.1 points, 2.4 rebounds and 2.2 assists per game on 41.3 percent shooting from the field. 

And that’s not all. 

According to NBA.com’s lineup data, the Cavaliers have been outscored by 14.3 points per 100 possessions and posted a woeful 99.8 offensive rating during Sexton’s 213 minutes on the floor. Conversely, Cleveland has churned out an offensive rating of 109.4 with Sexton on the bench. 

Those inefficiencies have evidently been the source of mounting frustration.

But at 19 years old and with just nine NBA games under his belt, Sexton still has plenty of time to evolve into the difference-maker the Cavs want him to be. 

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2AMnfqW
via IFTTT

Will Caspian deal help ‘barely surviving’ fishermen in Dagestan?

Kraynovka, Russia – After more than 20 years of dispute, five countries – Russia, Iran, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan – have signed an agreement that will resolve the legal status of the Caspian Sea, and devised a formula to divide its resources.

Besides vast oil and gas reserves, the Caspian Sea is enormously rich in fish, with sturgeon being the most valuable.

The average price for caviar – fish roe, specifically from sturgeon – can run up to 25,000 roubles ($380) a kilo on the black market in Russia. 

But fishermen are expected to be the last to benefit with strict measures and fines in place, not only for selling the banned product – it is illegal in Russia to privately harvest or sell black caviar, which comes from the endangered sturgeon fish – but also due to the new sweeping and convoluted laws controlling the sea. 

Kraynovka is a small village on the shore of the Caspian Sea, an hour’s drive along a bumpy road from the nearest city of Kizlyar in northern Dagestan. There are 2,648 people living there currently.

People are barely surviving here. If there were any other jobs, no one would go to sea.

Ruslan Amirov, fisherman

In its booming years, the Soviet ’60s, the village hosted a large fish factory employing most locals and villagers from the surrounding areas. 

Ruslan Amirov’s parents moved to Kraynovka when he was five or six years old.

He had already started fishing by the time he was 11. 

“We didn’t use any boats back in the day, you could put a net near the shore, where the water reaches your knees, and catch something,” he reminisces.

Fishermen fill canisters with petrol at the village port [Nikolay Korzhov/Al Jazeera]

There were plenty of fish “back in the day”. Now, the numbers are dwindling, according to statistics from the Federal Agency for Fishery.

This, combined with the ban on fishing sturgeon and strict restrictions by border control, place a heavy burden on fishermen’s shoulders.

Amirov lives in a small apartment that his mother received from the government while working at the factory. Now, half of that two-storey building is abandoned.

The empty window frames used to frighten the village children as they passed by, but they’ve grown used to it. Several houses in the village are this dilapidated. There is no central heating and power outages are frequent.

Ruslan Amirov, who lives in this house, says people are ‘barely surviving’ [Nikolay Korzhov/Al Jazeera]

Amirov has to provide for his small son and pregnant wife by fishing in the Caspian. He worked for two years in Sochi before the 2014 Olympics, making 50,000 to 60,000 roubles ($750 to 900) a month, but decided to return to where he grew up.  

“People are barely surviving here. If there were any other jobs, no one would go to sea,” says Amirov. 

“Now, fishermen have to travel between 200 and 400km [to catch fish]. They are being caught [by border authorities], killed and drowned but they have to feed their families somehow; they have to pay off their debts. There’s no other solution,” says Amirov.

“What’s the point of them looking for other jobs? It’s easier to go to sea once and take the risk, then, they’ll be able to pay off their debts.” 

In December 1992, at a meeting of fishery representatives from Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Russia, a protocol was signed establishing the Interdepartmental Commission on Aquatic Bioresources of the Caspian Sea. This commission has become the only body for joint management of the Caspian’s plentiful wealth.

A fisherman at sea in his boat, or ‘bayda’ [Nikolay Korzhov/Al Jazeera]

The official ban on fishing sturgeon in the Caspian was implemented in 2009 and has been renewed every year since.

Stanislav Pritchin, an analyst at Chatham House and one of the most prominent experts on the Caspian Sea’s legal negotiations, says that “there’s no other way but imposing a ban” as sturgeon is “becoming extinct”.

“The fishing industry is quite a painful topic because poaching is very common in the Caspian Sea. It is a very profitable industry, and sturgeon is a very valuable breed of fish, especially for black caviar. 

“There is an official ban on sturgeon fishing in the Caspian Sea, but in practice, it is very difficult to put such restrictions on fishermen, because for them it is a source of income, a source of profit, sometimes the only one, says Pritchin.

Kraynovka used to be a central hub for fishermen in the booming Soviet ’60s [Nikolay Korzhov/Al Jazeera]

“Therefore, there are strict controls on the fishermen. I believe that this is a justified measure, given that the situation in the Caspian Sea and the environment, in general, is not the best.”

The area around the village and port has turned into a border control zone, so anyone crossing this virtual border without permission – a document can be obtained in Kaspiysk, 18km from the capital, Makhachkala – would be fined.

Fishing hours are strictly regulated: fishermen have to be back at the port before sunset, around 7.30pm, which affects their customary fishing techniques. One example is the mugil, a fish which they can no longer catch as it must be netted at night.

A boat being towed to sea by a specialised tractor [Nikolay Korzhov/Al Jazeera]

According to the Russian Foreign Ministry and Federal Agency for Fishery, the ban needs to be maintained until at least 2027 in order to replenish the sturgeon population.

“Dagestan’s fish industry has been and still is one of the leading sectors of the republic’s economy. Dagestan has significant potential to develop its fishing industry with all its components – from fish and aquaculture production to the processing of aquatic organisms and product sales,” says Russian agriculture deputy minister and head of the federal fishery agency, Ilya Shestakov.

According to the agency, since the start of 2018, there have been 3,009 cases of administrative offences and 47 criminal cases registered in the Caspian. 

Border authorities have seized 1,358kg of sturgeon during this same period.

New restrictions have limited the amount of time fishermen can spend at sea, limiting their income [Nikolay Korzhov/Al Jazeera]

“An important component of the fight against this evil is, of course, the fight against the trafficking of illegally obtained aquatic biological resources.

“We are taking a number of steps to ensure full traceability of the origin of aquatic biological resources in our markets, and we believe that they will be applied together with the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia in the very near future,” Shestakov told Al Jazeera. 

For women, there’s even less work in Kraynovka and few want anything to do with fish.

Zapir Amaradziev and his son. Amaradziev says his wife left because she was exhausted with the challenges fishing brought to the family [Nikolay Korzhov/Al Jazeera]

Zapir Amaradziev raises a 13-year-old son by himself, as his wife left nine years ago. He says that “she got tired of this sort of life.”

“It’s like gambling here. If you go to sea and bring back some fish – you are lucky, otherwise, you drown in debt,” he adds. 

Amaradziev has accrued large debt through buying nets and petrol for the last fishing season.

The ban on fishing sturgeon and strict restrictions by border control place a heavy burden on fishermen’s shoulders [Nikolay Korzhov/Al Jazeera]

In August, he only managed to go to sea five times due to unfavourable conditions. The Caspian is famous for strong winds that fishermen cannot weather in their light, self-made boats, or “baydas”, equipped with fast engines and little else. 

When asked whether his son will follow in his footsteps, Amaradziev says that he desperately doesn’t want him to become a fisherman. 

His son, sitting nearby, exclaims, “Yeah, no way in hell!”

Amaradziev continues: “It’s getting worse and worse here. I would love to sell all this fishing equipment, including the boat, but I wouldn’t know what else to do.”

Fishermen gather with their boats in Kraynovka, a small village on the shore of the Caspian Sea [Nikolay Korzhov/Al Jazeera]

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2F4upv0
via IFTTT

‘SNL’ cold open blasts Fox News and its caravan fear-mongering

By Adam Rosenberg

Saturday Night Live‘s latest episode kicked off with a news package from Fox News featuring Laura Ingraham (Kate McKinnon) and Jeanine Pirro (Cicely Tyson) on the migrant caravan. It’s basically seven minutes of dishonest fear-mongering.

It’s not very funny, but the same goes for the dishonest antics we see every day from Fox News. The best I can say is this segment doesn’t further poison rational discourse. So it’s already got a leg up on Fox on that count.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2F3SEtf
via IFTTT

Egypt security forces kill 19 suspects linked to Coptic attack

Egyptian security forces have killed 19 people linked to a deadly attack on Coptic Christians, according to the interior ministry.

The suspects were killed in a gunfight in the desert of Minya province in central Egypt after security forces pursued them, the ministry said in a statement on Sunday.

“The terrorist elements opened fire on the (security) forces who responded,” the statement said.

Those killed were part of the group that killed seven Coptic Christian pilgrims in the same province on Friday, the ministry said.

ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant), also known as ISIS, claimed responsibility for the attack, although it provided no evidence of its involvement.

Friday’s attack was the latest in a string of assaults against the minority Coptic community.

Armed men opened fire on buses carrying pilgrims to the Monastery of St. Samuel in Minya province, killing seven people and leaving 18 wounded.

On Saturday, hundreds gathered at the Prince Tadros church in Minya, a city some 260km south of the capital, Cairo, to bury six members of the same family who were shot dead in the attack. Among them were a 15-year-old boy and a 12-year-old girl.

The seventh victim, an Anglican bus driver, was buried on Friday evening in a village outside Minya.

On Sunday, Pope Francis said he was pained over the attack on the pilgrims.

“I express my pain after the terrorist attack which two days ago hit the Coptic Orthodox church in Egypt,” Francis said in Saint Peter’s.

“I pray for the victims, pilgrims killed just because they were Christian,” he added.

The Copts are an Orthodox denomination who make up an estimated 10 to 15 percent of Egypt’s more than 90 million people, although there is no formal religious census to determine an exact number.

They are the Middle East’s largest Christian community and have long complained of persecution and insufficient protection.

In December 2017, a gunman killed 11 people at a church and a Christian-owned shop near Cairo.

More than 100 Copts have been killed in such attacks since 2011, according to The Associated Press news agency.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2D1alXF
via IFTTT

How Brain Science Could Determine the Midterms

We all know liberals and conservatives are different, broadly speaking. They disagree about immigration, global warming and health care. They consume different brands. The stereotypes tell us liberals eat arugula and drive hatchbacks, while conservatives prefer pork rinds and pickup trucks. These two political classes are so dissimilar that people like to joke they are “wired differently.”

But it turns out that might literally be true. Recent brain science suggests there are measurable differences in how liberal and conservative brains process information—distinctions that could have significant impact on what happens on Election Day.

Story Continued Below

First, a little background. The brain divides our thought life into two activities: appreciating what we have and desiring what we need. What we have is experienced through the five senses plus our emotions. The brain uses a cocktail of chemicals to orchestrate these experiences that might be called the “Here & Now” brain chemicals, chemicals like oxytocin, which encourages us focus on intimate relationships, and endorphins, which provide feelings of fulfillment and satisfaction.

By contrast, desiring what we don’t have is the domain of a single chemical in the brain: dopamine. It gives us the drive to pursue new things. You know the feeling of that dopamine “buzz” when you find a package on your doorstep and can’t wait to open it, when you think you might have a shot at a promotion, or when you’re out shopping for a new phone.

Dopamine orients us to the future. It helps us think about possibilities; not what is, but what might be. It drives the ambition of the businessman, the creativity of the artist and the speculation of the scientist. In general, the higher the dopamine level in your brain, the greater the urge you feel to find new things, to create new things—to pursue change.

And we know that dopamine activity isn’t purely situational. Some people are born with genes that naturally make their dopamine circuits more active. These people are more likely than others to pursue creative endeavors. Often, they end up as actors, academics, entrepreneurs and writers.

Consider how this might extend to politics. Progressivism, the pursuit of progress, is, by definition, the pursuit of change, of new things. So, we might expect to see progressive ideology in people with more active dopamine circuits. And that’s just what we do find. Researchers from the University of California discovered that people who inherit particularly active dopamine receptor genes are more likely to subscribe to a liberal ideology. (They also tend to get bored easily and seek novelty, and can be impulsive, exploratory, excitable, quick-tempered and extravagant.) It’s no surprise that so many actors, artists, academics, and writers tend to be liberal: Dopamine may be driving both their creativity and their politics.

Similarly, people with lower levels of dopamine and higher levels of the “Here & Now” brain chemicals are more likely to take their enjoyment from the appreciation of things they already have. They value tradition. They take more satisfaction from the here and now enjoyment of, say, watching a football game with friends rather than the future-focused promises of a presidential debate. Not surprisingly, genes that code for a less active dopamine system have been linked to people who identify as conservative politically, who tend to prize tradition and see safety in the status quo. A study of 1,771 students in Singapore found that conservative attitudes were more common among those who had a receptor gene that was less reactive to dopamine.

This chemical difference can also help explain why liberals tend to be more politically engaged than conservatives. A 2017 study conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute found that liberals were more likely than conservatives to express political opinions on social media, contact elected officials, donate money to a political campaign, and attend a political rally. If a hundred liberals are marching down the street, it’s most likely a protest. With conservatives, it’s probably a parade.

But even though under ordinary circumstances liberals are more engaged in the political process, liberals don’t always have the enthusiasm edge. Why? Because conservative brains, chemically inclined toward preserving the here and now, are more sensitive to threats that might undermine their current way of life. When a group of volunteers were divided by political affiliation, researchers found that, compared to liberals, conservatives had a stronger physiological reaction to frightening images, such as a spider crawling on a man’s face. Also, when presented with a selection of positive and negative images, conservatives spent more time gazing at the negative images—pictures that represented a threat.

This neuroscience suggests that the current confrontational political climate may be helping the conservative cause. News articles that describe public harassment by activists, for example, trigger threat circuits in the brain and can turn the ordinarily complacent conservative into an enthusiastic partisan. Perhaps conservative leaders know this, which is why they frequently emphasize threats. (See the GOP midterm campaign ads accusing Democrats of encouraging “mob rule.”) In response, liberal leaders might reduce conservatives’ motivation to vote by playing down confrontation, and instead emphasizing the commonality all Americans share.

Of course, it’s important to remember that neuroscientists study large groups of people and report on the averages. So, within each group there are plenty who buck the overall trend—call them dopaminergic conservatives and Here & Now liberals. Most scientific study tells us something about groups, but very little about individuals.

But it’s groups that decide elections, so it’s worth exploring how whether differences in levels of brain chemicals could have consequences in the mid-term elections. Biology isn’t destiny, but when you’re playing the odds, it makes sense for both sides to pay attention to the brain.

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Pcbq6b
via IFTTT

Dear white women: Here’s how to step up for women of color

Image: vicky leta / mashable

2018%2f10%2f10%2f8b%2funnamed6.aa10fBy Victoria Rodriguez

Whenever I’m in predominantly white spaces with my Salvadoran grandparents, I’m on high alert because at any second, some racist bigot can harass them for speaking Spanish. I haven’t had to defend them yet, but given the recent rise in hate crimes and related incidents, it’s likely I will one day. 

We’ve seen it happen at restaurants, retail stores, and schools, but a recent incident took place at a grocery store in Colorado, was captured on camera, and went viral. Unlike the other times, a white woman stepped up. Her name is Kamira Trent, and because she called the police, Linda Dwire was arrested and charged for bias-motivated harassment. I’m always ready to protect my grandparents, but if a white woman like Trent is fighting by my side, it will make a great difference.  

SEE ALSO: 6 ways allies still marginalize people of color — and what to do instead

We are two years into the resistance against Trump’s white supremacist agenda, and yet, not nearly enough white women stand up for women of color the way Trent did in everyday life and at the polls. Fifty-two percent of white women elected Trump in the first place, and 63 percent of white women voted for Roy Moore, an accused child molester from Alabama who said America was “great” during slavery. 

“White women are constantly choosing their whiteness over their womanhood, and they’re choosing to vote for people who will help maintain their white supremacy as opposed to what will help maintain the safety of women overall,” activist, writer, and lecturer Rachel Cargle told Mashable. 

“White women are constantly choosing their whiteness over their womanhood.”

The midterm elections are just a few days away, and white women need to vote for candidates who are not racist, which you can determine by researching voting records. They also need to elect progressive women of color, which is now more possible than ever because the number of women of color candidates for Congress has increased 75 percent since 2012. Also, follow the lead of black female voters, who as Cargle points out, have continuously made better choices by voting for progressive candidates that will help, not harm, marginalized communities.

While elections fuel partisanship, it’s important to note that the issue of racism goes beyond party lines. Conservative and liberal white women continue to perpetrate racism and anti-blackness. 

Catrice Jackson, a racial justice educator, speaker, and author, says that when working with white women in her courses and workshops, they often other themselves and make themselves out to be the exceptional white woman, which in turn means they have not addressed their own racism. 

It’s for this reason Jackson echoes Martin Luther King Jr.’s sentiment and says the “most dangerous and threatening” white people in the U.S. are white liberals. Take a moment to consider the white liberal woman who attends the Women’s March but won’t go to a Black Lives Matter rally, or the progressive white mom who puts her kid in a private school to access better resources, contributing to school segregation

“They don’t see themselves as being part of the problem, and so, one of the first things that white women allies need to do is to accept and own their own racism and begin to do their own, personal inner work to continuously uproot those racist behaviors and those implicit biases,” Jackson said. 

So while participating in the midterm elections — or any election — is a great step, it’s just the start to the life-long work required of white women to effectively support women of color in their fight to end racism and create equitable systems in the U.S. Jackson emphasizes that being an ally is not a noun or something you become. 

“You don’t take three workshops, read seven books, and now you’re an ally,” she said. “It is a constant, deliberate, intentional way of being, every single day and every single moment, until you take your last breath.” 

What’s distressing is heading to the hospital to give birth knowing your skin color alone puts you at 4x the risk of maternal mortality. What’s terrifying is that more than half of white women chose their whiteness over their womanhood & put someone like Trump in the White House.

— Rachel E. Cargle (@RachelCargle) November 2, 2018

Although it’s expected of white women to acknowledge their privilege, many feel defensive about the term. Jackson views that type of response as a signal that they are not doing their work. 

“It is a clear, red flag that they do not understand that white supremacy and racism is not just a personal way of being in the world, but it is a systemic set of rules, beliefs, thoughts, behaviors, policies, and laws that are set in place to silence black and brown folks, to keep them marginalized, and to keep them further oppressed,” Jackson said. 

Jackson recognizes that white women did not choose their whiteness, but instead of being paralyzed by fear, shame, or guilt, and causing more harm, she expects them to take daily actions to continue to dismantle racism and support women of color. Those actions could include sharing the work of women of color, buying from black and brown business owners, and connecting women of color to networks and resources. 

“Just like they didn’t choose to be white, we didn’t choose to be black or brown. But every day, black and brown women have to get up and fight the system and deal with racism, whether we want to deal with it or not,” Jackson said. 

“Just like they didn’t choose to be white, we didn’t choose to be black or brown.”

Jackson says that as long as racism exists, white women who want to behave as allies cannot opt out or take a break from fighting racism. She also explains that on a daily basis, black and brown women experience racial battle fatigue, and so it’s important that white women find ways to help nourish black and brown women. Cargle started a fundraiser to help give black women and girls access to therapy sessions and support their mental health, which people can donate to here

When searching for education and ideas about how to be a part of the solution, Jackson says white women should turn to online articles, videos, and other resources. For a more in-depth education, she says white women must turn to women of color who are racial justice educators and buy their books, sign-up for their courses and workshops, and pay women of color for their labor. When learning and engaging with women of color, they need to listen more than they speak. However, white women so often fail to do that, and instead try to lead conversations about race.

📌 so many people respond to my posts with much more anger and outrage at the thought of being called out for their complacency in an oppressive system as opposed to having anger outrage at the system itself.



Via: @QuartneyChante pic.twitter.com/J7WBzzzN9B

— Rachel E. Cargle (@RachelCargle) August 5, 2018

“One of the biggest and most important actions of an ally is to follow the lead of black and brown people, and what we see happening is a lot of ‘so-called’ allies, possibly performative allies, taking up space, taking the platform, hosting the workshops, and leading the discussions,” Jackson said.  

Cargle notes that it’s not enough for white women to want to learn about racism. They need to help end it. The 2017 Women’s March was deemed a setback for the intersectional feminist movement and an example of performative activism by many women of color because it did not address the issues facing women of color. The Women’s March organizers have addressed this criticism, but some women of color have yet to see changes at the leadership level trickle down to the movement itself.

Cargle attended the rally in Washington, D.C., and carried a poster that said, “If you don’t fight for all women, you fight for no women.” There, she says she witnessed a parade for white women, not a protest. 

Although white women like Kamira Trent have stood up for women of color, they should not be hailed as heroes, according to Cargle. “You’re not a hero for being a basic human,” she said. 

If a white woman comes to my aid personally, in the event that my grandparents are harassed for speaking Spanish, I also wouldn’t want her to play the hero. I would want her to intervene because she can and should, because it’s the right thing to do. 

“I think that we need to stop celebrating the base level of humanity, and instead have that as an expectation of the baseline and not some heroic act,” Cargle continued. “We need to start implementing that type of action of protecting the most marginalized as a normalized way of existing in the world.”

Read More

from Daily Trends Hunter https://ift.tt/2Dm8vBI
via IFTTT